Centennial School District — Transcript
Tuesday, June 23, 2026
2026-2027 Final General Fund Budget Adoption
Special Education Funding and Legal Settlements
Student Academic Growth and Achievement
Operational Efficiency and Vendor Management
Staffing and Administrative Support
Votes (5)
Approval of Proposed 2026-2027 Final General Fund Budget (3.2)
Dissent: Mr. Martin, Mr. Godson, and Mr. Hartline voted against the budget.
Moved by Mr. Saddowski [1:08:18] · Seconded by Unknown [1:08:42]
The discussion highlighted the significant reduction of a forecasted $7 million deficit to $2.8 million through strategic initiatives like zero-based budgeting, scheduling efficiencies, and a retirement incentive. Concerns were raised about the persistent deficit and the implications of unfunded special education mandates. The Board debated the 3.5% tax increase in light of past decisions and current financial strategy.
Compensation Educational Fund Agreement for Student 1-8 (3.5)
Dissent: Mr. Martin voted against the motion.
Moved by Mr. Saddowski [1:11:39] · Seconded by Unknown [1:11:57]
The Board discussed a settlement agreement for a student, including a $35,000 educational fund and up to $20,000 for parent legal fees. There was considerable debate regarding the high cost of legal fees, the district's exposure in due process cases, and the need to improve internal IEP processes to avoid similar future settlements. Administration clarified the settlement was fiscally responsible given a potential $170k+ exposure if the case proceeded to due process.
Teacher on Special Assignment Position and Job Description (3.12)
Dissent: Mr. Martin and Mr. Godson voted against the motion.
Moved by Mr. Saddowski [1:22:42] · Seconded by Unknown [1:22:54]
This item proposed a new, cost-neutral, two-year pilot position at the high school. The goal is to offload low-level administrative tasks from high school administrators, enabling them to focus more on instructional leadership, classroom observations, and providing feedback to teachers to improve student achievement. The discussion revolved around the justification for the position, its impact on existing staff, and how its success would be measured.
Disposal of Vehicles and Trailer (8.2A)
Dissent: Mr. Hartline abstained due to a conflict of interest.
Moved by Mr. Saddowski [1:58:24] · Seconded by Unknown [1:58:36]
The Board considered the approval for the disposal of vehicles as scrap and the sale of a trailer through municipal bid. A board member declared a conflict of interest due to bidders being customers.
Retroactive 25% Reduction of Fees for Archbishop Wood Swim Team (8.2B)
Dissent: None
Moved by Mr. Saddowski [1:59:04] · Seconded by Unknown [1:59:10]
The Board retroactively approved a 25% fee reduction for Archbishop Wood High School's swim team use of the William Tennant High School pool for a past period (November 2025 - March 2026). Discussion included the reasons for the discount (district policy based on in-district student percentage) and the need to ensure future requests for fee reductions are processed and approved proactively, before services are rendered.
Notable Quotes (14)
The overall budget deficit has been reduced from $7 million in the preliminary general fund budget to $2.8 million in this, the final proposed budget, a 60% reduction.
for the first time in what seven years or more, our expenditures are below our revenues and that's very significant and that's something to be proud of.
However, when you look at it, we still have a $2.8 million deficit. So we have some work to do and hopefully as we go through the next year that will be in the back of everybody's mind who wants to go out with new ideas, new projects and whatever.
for the last two years that I was on the board, I asked for full funding and did not get it. And I had three individuals that opposed me routinely on that, even though we consistently asked for full funding. And I voted as a protest this year.
Last year, we have some new board members. Last year, there was no set plan... We made significant improvements this year and that's why we're going through.
That's a pretty poor use of taxpayer funds to pay a lawyer who's essentially taking positions against the school district. So, we're paying somebody to take position against this and the outcome is not great.
In discussing this case with our legal team, we would have been on the hook had this gone through due process for approximately $170,000. And so by offering a settlement of $55,000, we considered that a win.
I don't truly believe that we are knowingly doing harm to a child. I think when I open up paperwork, what I see is errors that are could seem minute to people reading the document, but when you're looking at it from a legal lens are much larger.
The life of a high school administrator is very complex... and one of the issues that we've identified is that we have to clear the deck. We have to find ways to that allow our administrators in an administrative capacity to get into classrooms and observe teaching and learning, observe assessment practices.
I'm reading the job. It says this is a two-year assignment... it's a new position. We were reviewed that we have a $2.8 billion deficit. Where is this person who was going to be added to the administrative staff in the bureaucracy? Where is this person coming from to do this new position?
the improvement in the academic performance of our students in Centennial over the past few years has been great to see... but you know to doing better isn't necessarily good enough given where we were. And I don't know that there is such thing as, you know, quote good enough when it comes to the quality of education that we're offering our kids.
So, we're we're approving it now, but it already happened. Um, does that make sense? I mean, my question is they already did they already pay to use the facility or?
We give them a discount based on our board policy, our district policy depending on the number of in district students that live within the district that are using the say the pool or the track or whatever we we have a set 25% reduction or 50% reduction depending on the percentage of in district students.
I just want to understand like you know if if as an example they're using it chemicals I know where I live the chemicals for our pools have gone up dramatically. So the question is if they're using the pool I mean yes you give them a discount but also are you taking into account any of the increase in costs in terms of running the pool?
Ordinances & Resolutions (13)
The budget under consideration for approval.
Directs the budget process and district's goals.
State-mandated limit for property tax increases without voter approval.
Federal and state mandate impacting the district's special education budget.
District policy governing the enrollment of foreign exchange students.
Memorandum of Understanding for dual credit opportunities for high school students.
District policy governing employment decisions.
Official form for adopting the school district's final budget.
Resolution authorizing the annual property tax collection.
Plan for taxpayers to pay real estate taxes in installments.
Resolution related to property tax relief for homesteads and farmsteads.
Individualized Education Programs for special education students.
Additional Targeted School Improvement plan for the high school.