## City of Blaine ## City Council August 17, 2026 | 7:00 PM ## Blaine City Hall ## 10801 Town Square Drive NE ## Blaine, MN 55449 ## AGENDA 1. Call to Order by the Mayor 2. Pledge of Allegiance ## 3. Roll Call ## 4. Awards - Presentations - Organizational Business ## 5. Open Forum Open Forum is an opportunity for the public to share comments, concerns, or input on other items. While Open Forum is not intended to provide responses or discussion during the meeting, city staff will contact the speaker(s) after the meeting if follow-up is needed. Each speaker is limited to three minutes, with a maximum of 15 minutes set aside for Open Forum. 6. Communications ## 7. Approval of Consent Agenda: All items listed under the "Consent Agenda" are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 7.1. 2026-161 Schedule of Bills Paid ## Sponsors: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director 7.2. 2026-162 Approval of Minutes ## Sponsors: Cathy Sorensen, City Clerk 7.3. RES 26-149 Resolution Granting Final Plat Approval to Subdivide Approximately 10.43 Acres into 4 Lots and 2 Outlots to be Known as Blaine Ventures First Addition at 4131 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE. Blaine Ventures LLC (Newton RES ## LLC) (Case File No. 26-0041/SLK) ## Sponsors: Sheila Sellman, Community Development Director Page 1 of 179 7.4. RES 26-153 Resolution to Declare Cost to be Assessed, Order Preparation and Call for ## Public Hearing on Proposed Assessment for 2024 Southwest Area Street ## Reconstruction Project, Improvement Project No. 24-07 (T2407) ## Sponsors: Daniel Schluender, Director of Engineering 7.5. RES 26-166 Resolution to Approve Joint Powers Agreement No. GR_00815 with Anoka County for the Signalization of CSAH 14 (125th Ave NE) at Zest Street NE, ## Improvement Project No. T2611 and Associated Budget Amendments ## Sponsors: Daniel Schluender, Director of Engineering 7.6. RES 26-167 Resolution to Approve Amended Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) No. ## CCON26-000486-V1 with Anoka County for Intersection Improvements at CSAH 52 (Radisson Road) and CSAH 12 (109th ## Avenue) and Signalization at Mankato Street/Tournament Players ## Pkwy and CSAH 12 (109th Avenue), Improvement Project No. T2518 ## and Associated Budget Amendment ## Sponsors: Daniel Schluender, Director of Engineering 7.7. 2026-163 Motion to Authorize Night Time Paving Operations for the CSAH 52 ## (Radisson Road) and CSAH 12 (109th Avenue) Intersection Improvements ## Project ## Sponsors: Daniel Schluender, Director of Engineering 8. 7:00 PM - Public Hearing and Items Published for a Certain Time 8.1. RES 26-152 Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit to Allow Office, ## Manufacturing, and Warehouse in the Planned Business District (PBD) Zoning District at 3785 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE. MSMWPR-1 LLC (Karl ## Dungs Inc.) (Case File No. 26-0042/SLK) ## Sponsors: Sheila Sellman, Community Development Director 8.2. RES 26-154 Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit for a Sign Plan that Includes Four Wall Signs and One LED Display per Section 117-23 of the Zoning Code, in the 105th Avenue Redevelopment District (RD) Zoning District at 2105 105th Avenue NE. Scheels All Sports Inc. (ISG) (Case File No. 26-0044/SAS) ## Sponsors: Sheila Sellman, Community Development Director ## 8.3. ORD 26-2610 Public Hearing ## An Ordinance Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Connexus ## Energy, a Minnesota Cooperative, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing ## Electric Service Within the City Of Blaine ## Sponsors: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director Page 2 of 179 ## 8.4. ORD 26-2611 Public Hearing An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Circle Pines ## Public Utilities, D/B/A Centennial Utilities, a Minnesota Municipal ## Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas Energy Service ## Within the City of Blaine ## Sponsors: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director ## 8.5. ORD 26-2612 Public Hearing ## An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Centerpoint ## Energy Resources Corp., D/B/A Minnegasco, a Delaware Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas Energy Service Within the City of ## Blaine ## Sponsors: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director ## 8.6. ORD 26-2613 Public Hearing ## An Ordinance Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Northern ## States Power Company, D/B/A Xcel Energy, a Minnesota Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Electric Service Within the City of ## Blaine ## Sponsors: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director ## 8.7. ORD 26-2614 Public Hearing An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Northern States ## Power Company, D/B/A Xcel Energy, a Minnesota Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas Energy Service Within the City of ## Blaine ## Sponsors: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director ## 9. Development Business 10. Administration 10.1. RES 26-162 Revised Resolution Authorizing Submittal of LCCMR Grant Application for ## the Blaine Wetland Sanctuary (BWS) Trail, Improvement Project No. P2405 (25-08) ## Sponsors: Daniel Schluender, Director of Engineering 10.2. RES 26-164 Resolution to Initiate Project and Order Preparation of Feasibility Report for the 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstruction, Improvement Project No. ## 27-04 (T2704) Page 3 of 179 ## Sponsors: Daniel Schluender, Director of Engineering 10.3. 2026-164 Motion to Authorize Mayor and City Manager to Enter into a Contract with Bolton & Menk, Inc. for Professional Engineering Services for the 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstruction Project, Improvement Project No. ## 27-04 (T2704). ## Sponsors: Daniel Schluender, Director of Engineering ## 11. Other Business 12. Adjournment Page 4 of 179 ## CITY OF BLAINE ## SCHEDULE OF BILLS PAID ## APPROVED ON 08/17/2026 FOR PAYMENTS THE WEEK OF 07/16/2026 ## Vendor NameDescription ## Amount ## ABC SIGN & GRAPHIC INCUpdate Site Sign and Address125.00$ ## ACME TOOLSDig Trailer and General Storage Supplies and Tools435.79$ ACME TOOLSTruck Tools for 4603 & 46051,578.37$ ACME TOOLSTruck Tools for 4603 & 4605289.00$ ## AIR MECHANICAL INCFurnace Replacement - Warming House5,394.40$ ## ALEX'S LAWN AND TURF LLCMonthly Mowing; Tom Ryan Park2,219.55$ ## ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGINGName Badge - Building Inspections38.28$ ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGINGKrech bus. cards / envelopes384.75$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESPatrol Equipment - Door stops96.80$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Security wristbands for plain clothes officers working events 18.03$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESElections Supplies (Transfer Box Labels)26.16$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESIce packs for Playnet program56.99$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESCrane Remote Switch9.99$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESEmployee Recognition Gifts (2)55.94$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESGopher Traps / Scissors200.88$ AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESNotebooks, coat hook, phone cases268.32$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESToner19.99$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESSewer Camera/ Poison Ivy Wipes/ Spoons/ Forks205.94$ ## AMCS GROUP INC ## Software Subscription - Dossier August 2026 - November 2026 2,849.40$ ## ANOKA COUNTYRecord Vacation Easement (V26-03)46.00$ ## ANOKA COUNTY2026 County Recordings92.00$ ## ANOKA COUNTY ## Radisson Rd & 109th Traffic Signal JPA CCON26-000486, I/P 25-18 846,936.10$ ## ANOKA COUNTY ## CSAH 32 Watermain Improvements, JPA C0011856, I/P 26-09 81,269.26$ ## ANOKA COUNTY Signal Improvements CSAH 32/CSAH 1 at CSAH 17, I/P 26-10 4,628.62$ ## ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE BUREAUNew Registration - PD #53682,769.80$ ## AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANYWell 14 Bleach Pump Work683.75$ ## AUTOWASH SYSTEMS INCCar Wash Chemicals & Check 6/25/26591.94$ ## AXON ENTERPRISES INCTaser Holsters1,059.82$ ## BANNER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYBanner Life Insurance Premiums36.22$ ## BARNUM COMPANIES INCCH gate maintenance325.00$ ## BARNUM COMPANIES INCGate maintenance Lakeside Commons Park310.00$ ## BLAINE BROTHERS INCEmergency Lighting98.91$ ## BLAINE BROTHERS INCWheel Seals/ Hub Cap Gaskets: Unit 2438 (trailer)56.76$ ## BLAINE BROTHERS INCCredit(3.20)$ ## BLAINE BROTHERS INCWheel Seals/ Hub Cap Gaskets: Unit 2438 (trailer)15.28$ ## BLAINE CUSTOM APPAREL & AWARDSRetirement award102.00$ ## BLAINE CUSTOM APPAREL & AWARDSShirts for Safety Camp1,768.00$ ## BLAINE LOCK & SAFE INCKeys for PD91.50$ ## BLAINE LOCK & SAFE INCKeys for PD5.25$ ## BROWNELLS INCArmory Equipment464.38$ ## BRUSTUEN CHRIS & JESSIKAHome Improvement Grant Reimbursement2,028.00$ ## CAMPION BARROW & ASSOCIATESPre-employment Testing1,470.00$ ## CARLSON LAVINEHydrant Meter Deposit Refund350.00$ ## CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTEDA Loan Program - May 202626,225.00$ Page 5 of 179 ## CENTURYLINK911 Service80.52$ ## CINTAS CORPORATIONCH mats/rugs216.88$ ## CINTAS CORPORATIONMAYC Mats/Rugs42.77$ ## CINTAS CORPORATION2026 Uniform/Rug Towel Rentals494.75$ ## CITY OF ANOKAPD Range Use1,040.00$ ## COMCASTPW Cable TV21.04$ ## COMCASTCable TV for Patrol for FY202636.29$ ## COMCASTInternet for Public Wi-Fi312.89$ ## COMMERS THE WATER COMPANYSalt: PW Car Wash446.00$ ## COMPANION ANIMAL CENTERKennel services for June 2026600.00$ ## COREMARK METALSAngle Iron/ Larson Bin Project1,050.09$ ## CUB FOODS INC - THE VILLAGEParade items and Retirement items23.96$ ## CUB FOODS INC - THE VILLAGEParade items and Retirement items56.93$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 12698 Erskin ST NE7,300.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 12692 Erskin ST NE7,300.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 12672 Fraizer ST NE4,800.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 4440 131st AVE NE4,600.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 4450 131st AVE NE4,700.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 12682 Fraizer ST NE4,800.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 12676 Fraizer ST NE4,800.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 12680 Fraizer ST NE4,700.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 12686 Fraizer ST NE4,800.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 12695 Fraizer ST NE4,900.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 4731 132nd CT NE4,800.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 4708 132nd CT NE4,800.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 13081 Ghia ST NE4,900.00$ ## DISTINCTIVE WINDOW CLEANING COMAYC window cleaning398.00$ ## ECM PUBLISHERS INCPublish PHN Assessments (6/12 & 6/19), I/P 25-05319.00$ ## ECM PUBLISHERS INC ## Publish PHN for Vacation of Scenic Easement (6/19/26), V26-06 88.00$ ## ECM PUBLISHERS INC ## Publish Ad for Bids-2026 Trail Maintenance Project, I/P 26-15 407.00$ ## ELECTRIC PUMP INCLift Station #31 - P2 Rebuild/Repair6,863.48$ ## ETERNITY HOMES LLCEscrow Refund - 4905 130th CT NE7,300.00$ ## ETERNITY HOMES LLCEscrow Refund - 4909 130th CT NE7,400.00$ ## EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INCSpec Mix Motar 641.60$ ## EXPRESS SIGNS INCSign for Sizzling Summer300.00$ ## FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC #1657Well #9 Plumbing Parts3,336.48$ ## FERGUSON ENTERPRISES LLC #3325Private Hydrant Markers4,300.00$ ## FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518Long Sleeve Epox/Dip Wedge1,087.82$ ## FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518PE Comp Coup/ PJ Coup651.10$ ## FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518Water Meter Repair Parts1,142.40$ ## FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518Fire Hydrant Parts2,721.20$ ## FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518Gaskets88.10$ ## FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518Credit(223.38)$ ## FLAGSHIP RECREATIONSeat Strap for Molded Bucket Seats241.00$ ## FLOCK GROUP INCAnnual Fee for 93/65 Falcon Camera3,000.00$ ## FRAULY WILLIAM CHARLESSummer Tae Kwon Do Instructor2,232.00$ ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCService Repair : Unit 5328 (PD)916.11$ ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCOil Pump Replacement : Unit 5280 (PW)4,330.07$ ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCTire Pressure Sensors: Unit 5318 (PD)329.02$ ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCExhaust : Unit 5288 (PD)53.95$ ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCFilter Kit : PD Stock68.63$ Page 6 of 179 ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCTrans Filter : Unit 5341 (PD)78.50$ ## GALLAGHER BENEFIT SERVICES INC Ongoing Consulting416.67$ ## GO PERMITS LLCBuilding Permit Refund - B26-0235880.00$ ## GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY LLCPavement Condition Index Surveys, I/P T26077,375.00$ ## GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC2026 Water & Sewer Locate Fees2,084.40$ ## GREAT RIVER AUTOMATION LLCCH air handler repair1,146.00$ ## GROUP HEALTH NON-PATIENT A/REAP benefits315.90$ ## GUARDIAN FLEET SAFETY LLCUpfit for squad 536322,746.19$ ## HAMDORF RAYMONDHome Improvement Grant Reimbursement3,238.00$ ## HANSON SPORTS LLCSummer Sport Camps1,102.60$ ## HANSON SPORTS LLCSummer Sport Camps5,706.20$ ## HAWKINS INC2026 Water Treatment Chemicals4,158.00$ ## HAYNES SANDRAHome Improvement Grant Reimbursement830.00$ ## HEALTHPARTNERSHealthPartners Dental Claims1,108.95$ ## HEALTHPARTNERSHealthPartners Dental Claims3,598.67$ ## HEALTHPARTNERSHealthPartners Dental Claims3,018.99$ ## HEALTHPARTNERSHealthPartners Dental Claims724.44$ ## HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY GROUPGrass Growth Stunter : Parks140.21$ ## HODGSON JOANAdult Softball Umpire Fees420.00$ ## HOLIDAY COMPANIES2026 Blanket; Car Washes - PD925.00$ ## HOLIDAY COMPANIES2026 Blanket; Car Washes - Fire/Comm Stds35.00$ ## HOSE PROS LLCHydrant valves/ Fittings/ Hoses5,090.60$ ## HOWARD KYLEMileage - MNGFOA Meeting69.89$ ## IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS2026 Utility Billing Invoicing4,549.94$ ## INDELCO PLASTICS CORPORATIONWell #16 Chemical Feed Parts1,035.27$ ## INDELCO PLASTICS CORPORATIONParts for Chem Feed Equip. WTP & Wells663.48$ ## INGINA LLCSummer Tech Camps1,350.00$ ## INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INCAdobe Software Annual Renewal10,965.23$ ## INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INCLaptop for Tom Clements3,078.67$ ## INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH INCWater Sample Testing; 2026 Blanket1,080.00$ ## INTELLIGENCE NEXUS LLCBlaineReserves.Org domain and Event Portal400.00$ ISOM HARLAN GAdult softball umpire fees792.00$ IUOE LOCAL 49 FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS49ers Training Facility Fee; June 2026720.20$ ## JACKSON-HIRSH INCLaminating Materials for Office88.00$ ## JEFF BELZER'S ROSEVILLE AUTO INCTrans Filter : Unit 5283 (PD)204.00$ ## JM ELECTRIC LLCPark Light repair350.00$ ## JM ELECTRIC LLCRemove/Replace fill valve615.00$ ## JOHNSON LITHO GRAPHICSJuly/August 2026 City Newsletter14,838.50$ ## JOLY MELISSAReimbursement - Water Softener Repair, I/P 26-04518.00$ ## KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE COMPANYBulk AW 68; PW Stock847.00$ ## KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE COMPANYBulk DEF; PW Stock585.24$ ## KNOBLAUCH KYLENEAdult Softball Umpire Fees660.00$ ## KNOBLAUCH KYLENEAdult Softball Umpire Fees600.00$ ## KNOBLAUCH KYLENEAdult Softball Umpire Fees660.00$ ## LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERSCommunity Outreach Uniforms135.75$ LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES INC2026 Translation and Interpretation services for the year1,166.99$ ## LAWSON PRODUCTS INCShop Supplies : Cap Plug Assortment75.52$ ## LAWSON PRODUCTS INCBlades/ Grinding Discs/ Couplers/ Screws996.25$ ## LAWSON PRODUCTS INCFlap Band30.54$ ## LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCEWorkers Comp Insurance Claims12,948.42$ LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP2026 State Lobbying Services (Year 3 of 3 Year Agmt)3,166.66$ Page 7 of 179 ## LRS PORTABLES OF MINNESOTA2026 Satellite Rental - Parks9,877.39$ ## MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INCBlades and Belts : Unit 1322 (Sidewalk Trackless)1,105.36$ ## MANAGED SERVICES INCCH Janitorial Services4,948.00$ ## MANAGED SERVICES INCCH Enmotion, TP, soap706.96$ ## MANAGED SERVICES INCMAYC shampoo carpet911.00$ ## MANSFIELD OIL COMPANYFuel Delivery - June 202611,050.15$ ## MANSFIELD OIL COMPANYFuel Delivery - June 202613,532.82$ MARSDEN CENTRAL LLCPW - July 2026 janitorial services2,652.69$ ## MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALSPatching Material for Streets1,616.64$ ## MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALSPatching Material for Streets248.83$ ## MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALSPatching Material for Streets81.41$ ## MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALSPatching Material for Streets1,865.47$ ## MAYER ARTS INCInstruction for Summer Theater Classes2,358.40$ ## MC TOOL & SAFETY SALESPPE Safety gear: New employee428.43$ ## MC TOOL & SAFETY SALESGas Monitor Calibration85.00$ ## MEDPRO WASTE DISPOSAL LLCHazmat disposal invoice 175110569.75$ ## MENARDS - BLAINEDehumidifiers: Well Houses359.52$ MENARDS - BLAINELight bulbs177.86$ METRO FURNITURE SOLUTIONSCH 3rd floor cubical upgrades4,306.70$ ## METROPOLITAN COUNCILMCES Wastewater Services477,884.43$ ## METROPOLITAN COUNCILJune SAC Report73,804.50$ ## METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE MN Paid Leave20,255.20$ MIDWAY FORD COMPANY2026 Capital : Medium Duty Dump Truck w/Plow #466368,761.43$ MIDWAY FORD COMPANY2026 Capital : Medium Duty Dump Truck w/ Plow #466768,934.56$ MIDWAY FORD COMPANY2026 Capital :Light Duty Water Meter Tech Van #467159,830.95$ ## MIDWAY FORD COMPANY2026 Capital :Medium Duty Maintenance Van #467262,113.80$ ## MIDWAY FORD COMPANYBrake Caliper Bolts: Unit 2409 (Truck)17.60$ ## MIDWAY FORD COMPANYHeater Core & EVAP : Unit 1260 (Truck)613.80$ ## MINNEAPOLIS SAW COMPANY INCForestry PPE: Cloggers627.99$ ## MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT - ROGERSCredit(1,296.00)$ ## MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT - ROGERS ## Transmission Overheating Repair/ PTO Cutting out : unit 1276 4,935.85$ ## MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTHPre-employment Testing1,069.00$ ## MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTHPre-employment Testing37.00$ ## MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTHPre-employment Testing680.00$ ## MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTHPre-employment Testing37.00$ ## MINUTE MAKER SECRETARIALMinute Maker Secretarial425.75$ MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRYA/P Only - State Surcharge - June 20267,808.85$ ## MTI DISTRIBUTING INCBlader : Mowers551.12$ ## MTI DISTRIBUTING INCBlader : Mowers314.98$ ## MTI DISTRIBUTING INCDamper : Unit 2454 (Mower)95.98$ ## MUSCO SPORTS LIGHING LLCSports Lighting Yearly Service Fee950.00$ ## NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSNCPERS Group Life Insurance1,024.00$ ## NORTHERN SANITARY SUPPLY CO INCMAYC bags, degreaser, peroxide475.88$ ## NORTHERN SANITARY SUPPLY CO INCSoap for Aquatore Band Shell329.80$ ## NORTHERN SANITARY SUPPLY CO INCMAYC towels, tissues, liners1,418.14$ ## NORTHERN SANITARY SUPPLY CO INCTrash Bags for the Blaine Festival137.76$ ## NR PROPERTIES INCEscrow Refund - 2150 120th LN NE4,900.00$ ## NR PROPERTIES INCFull escrow refund, PC22-0055 Radisson Hills7,500.00$ ## NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENTIgnition Switch : Unit 4622 (Vactor)174.08$ ## NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENTExhaust Pipe: Unit 1269 (Dump Truck)95.94$ ## NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENTWiper Transmission: Unit 1315 (Plow Truck)518.04$ Page 8 of 179 ## NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENTCoolant Hose : Unit 4627 (Dump Truck)135.70$ ## NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENTAirTank : Unit 1269 (Dump Truck)312.57$ ## NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENTFuel Filters : PW Stock656.31$ ## NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENTFittings : Unit 1269 (Dump Truck)74.93$ ## OPTUMOptum HSA/FSA Claims162.80$ ## OPTUMOptum HSA/FSA Claims551.34$ ## OPTUMOptum HSA/FSA Claims1,184.70$ ## O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INCBlower Motor : Unit 5234109.65$ ## O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INCCredit(149.65)$ ## O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INCSolenoid: Unit 2356 (Groomer)26.99$ ## O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC24" Wiper Blades : Unit 4627 (Dump Truck)25.98$ ## O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INCFilters : PW Stock94.35$ ## O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INCR134a Refrigerant: Shop Supplies349.99$ ## O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INCBearings : Unit 4613 (Trailer)45.84$ ## O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INCBearings : Unit 4613 (Trailer)29.88$ ## O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INCWiper Blades/ Filters : PW Stock186.18$ ## O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INCSpark Plugs : Parks7.78$ ## PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC2026 WTP# 1 VOC Testing1,119.00$ PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANYZest Street & Lakes Pkwy Construction, I/P T2504 (25-04)418,675.95$ ## PHASOR ELECTRIC COMPANYDog Park Heater Repair135.00$ ## PLAISTED COMPANIES INCClass 5 / Sand/ Gravel1,369.85$ PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL INCPest Control : Treatment Plants 2 & 4, Tower 4490.50$ ## PRECISE MRM LLC2026 PW GPS Management1,680.00$ ## PRINT CENTRALTom Clements Business Cards39.00$ ## PRINT CENTRALDoor Hangers : Forestry138.19$ ## PRINT CENTRAL5000 Regular & 5000 Window Envelopes1,516.98$ ## PRO-TEC DESIGN INCPro Watch Software server knocked offline321.25$ ## PRO-TEC DESIGN INCSSA-MILESTONE CARE PLUS RENEWAL5,989.95$ PRO-TEC DESIGN INCMilestone tech support software6,078.69$ PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLCEscrow Refund - 12514 Erskin ST NE4,600.00$ PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLCEscrow Refund - 12534 Erskin ST NE4,700.00$ PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLCEscrow Refund - 12649 Fraizer ST NE4,700.00$ PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLCEscrow Refund - 12614 Erskin ST NE5,000.00$ PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLCEscrow Refund - 12604 Erskin ST NE5,000.00$ PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLCEscrow Refund - 12628 Fraizer ST NE4,700.00$ ## RECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES INCBase station scrap from Water Tower20.00$ ## RECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES INCBase station scrap from Water Tower164.25$ ## RECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES INCBase station scrap from Water Tower648.45$ ## REDPATH AND COMPANY LLCCompletion of 2025 Audit31,600.00$ ## ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL2026 Blanket: Disposal of Dead Deer129.00$ ## ROBINSON LANDSCAPING INCRolls of Sod297.00$ ## S & S INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INCDrill Bits204.15$ ## SAM'S CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANKAccount Fees105.91$ ## SAM'S CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANKConcessions LCP424.06$ ## SAM'S CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANKConcessions Lakeside Commons Park153.78$ SAM'S CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANKFood for the bike rodeo270.35$ SAM'S CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANKCandy for City Council Float for Blaine Festival Parade657.96$ ## SAM'S CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANKMembership Dues for 2027230.00$ ## SAXON FLEET SERVICESReplacement Detective Squad Purchase41,901.60$ ## SCHMIDT ROBERTHeat Tape Installation/Replacement MH1,700.00$ ## SCHMIDT ROBERTHeat Tape Installation/Replacement MH1,700.00$ Page 9 of 179 ## SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANYMAYC paint33.94$ ## SMARTSIGHTS LLCScada Alarm Dialer; Water/Sewer4,417.80$ STERICYCLE INCJune 2026 shred156.46$ ## SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INCTires: Unit 5304 (PD)121.61$ ## SUN LIFE FINANCIALLong Term Disability Insurance4,735.40$ ## SUREFITTERSFuel Meter for Truck: Unit 4503 (Truck)231.62$ ## SWANK MOTION PICTURES INCMovie License785.00$ ## TEAMSTER JOINT COUNCIL 32Police Dental Premiums6,603.00$ ## THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ## Life Insurance7,379.50$ ## THOMSEN SYSTEMS INCSummer Tech Camps690.00$ ## T-MOBILE USA INCCell Phone Records for Criminal Investigation50.00$ ## T-MOBILE USA INCCell Tower Dump for Investigation50.00$ ## T-MOBILE USA INCCell Tower Dump for Investigation200.00$ ## TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLYCO2 for Freezing Water98.75$ ## TREVIPAYPressure Washer Wand : Unit 1329 (Patching Truck)233.62$ ## TREVIPAY#4464 Trailer Tools/ Cart / Dollys994.63$ ## TREVIPAYImpact Wrench (2)758.10$ TREVIPAYNorthern Tool - Trimmer and drill bits171.93$ ## TRI-STATE BOBCAT INCFilters : Unit 2377 (Chipper)206.15$ ## TRI-STATE BOBCAT INCWater Tank for Asphalt/Concrete Saw Cart184.99$ ## TUNG PAK HOIMedallion Hunt Finder500.00$ TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVERY INCTow of Explorer from PW to Storage125.00$ ## TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVERY INCTow for Squad 5304125.00$ ULINE5 mesh chairs1,470.63$ ## ULINECredit(495.00)$ ## US BANKFiscal Agent Fees - 2019A575.00$ ## USA BLUEBOOK (#657220)Freeze Plates: Water Dept56.97$ ## USA BLUEBOOK (#657220)Manhole Sleeve Lifter: Sewer793.76$ USA BLUEBOOK (#657220)Tooling up truck : Unit 4667 (Truck)19.07$ ## USA BLUEBOOK (#657220)Dehumidifier3,484.96$ ## USA BLUEBOOK (#657220)Steel Tile Probe: Sewer140.55$ ## VESSCO INCChemical Tank Part - WTP #41,875.00$ ## VESSCO INCChemical Feed Replacement Head920.00$ ## VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICACooks supplemental wage - MAYC June 2026111.56$ ## WSB & ASSOCIATES INCFOG Program Assessment -5/1/26-5/31/262,891.00$ ## XCEL ENERGY4125 109th Ave NE - Signal68.40$ ## ZAHL-PETROLEUM MAINTENANCE COMPANYOil & Hydraulic Reels Leaking : Service975.52$ ## ZIEGLER INCField Service : Unit1294 (Loader)1,409.22$ 2,747,662.70$ Page 10 of 179 ## CITY OF BLAINE ## SUBSET OF PAYMENTS BETWEEN $20,000 AND $50,000 FROM THE SCHEDULE OF BILLS PAID ## APPROVED ON 08/17/2026 FOR PAYMENTS THE WEEK OF 07/16/2026 ## Vendor NameDescriptionAmount ## METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE MN Paid Leave20,255.20$ ## GUARDIAN FLEET SAFETY LLCUpfit for squad 536322,746.19$ ## CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTEDA Loan Program - May 202626,225.00$ ## REDPATH AND COMPANY LLCCompletion of 2025 Audit31,600.00$ ## SAXON FLEET SERVICESReplacement Detective Squad Purchase41,901.60$ Page 11 of 179 ## CITY OF BLAINE ## SCHEDULE OF BILLS PAID ## APPROVED ON 08/17/2026 FOR PAYMENTS THE WEEK OF 07/29/2026 ## Vendor NameDescription ## Amount ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESWater Tank Lid : Unit 4473 (F450)49.58$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESPaint Markers20.89$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESSummer Supplies17.75$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESTool Organizers : Small Tools492.24$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESPlanners : Water , Sheet Protectors : Signs66.93$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESPaint Markers34.10$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Sandbag used during search warrants to secure doors open 21.99$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESPW Summer Supplies70.74$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESPW Summer Supplies53.75$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESLabels for CS food trucks12.95$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESLaptop Stand21.24$ AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESPopcorn & seasoning for movie night67.88$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESPaint Markers24.88$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESFuel Filters : PW Stock25.58$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESCard stock, Mechanical Pencils, Refill Lead62.06$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESSupplies for MAYC268.26$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESDye Injector Kit85.16$ ## AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICESFuel Can Labels219.87$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms209.95$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms325.75$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms59.95$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms514.09$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms110.45$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms482.80$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms123.90$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms91.80$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms374.10$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms110.45$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms126.90$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms2,868.23$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms12.00$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCFire Inspections - Boots164.99$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms64.95$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms64.95$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms17.85$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms418.63$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms329.14$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms123.90$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms154.99$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms1,709.32$ ## ASPEN MILLS INCPatrol Clothing and Uniforms518.05$ ## AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANYWTP#1 Trouble Shooting421.25$ ## AZIMUTH LAND SURVEYINGLS #15 Easement Corners Located1,100.00$ Page 12 of 179 ## BARR ENGINEERING COMPANYWell Interference Response Plan, I/P 23-222,220.50$ ## BAUER BUILT INCTire Repair : Unit 1269 (Dump Truck)64.00$ ## BLAINE BROTHERS INCBrake Parts : Unit 1272 ( Dump Truck)243.80$ ## BLAINE BROTHERS INCReat Brakes : 1272 (Dump Truck)194.98$ ## BLAINE BROTHERS INCCoolant : PW Stock125.94$ ## BLAINE CUSTOM APPAREL & AWARDSShirts for Safety Camp380.00$ ## BLAINE LOCK & SAFE INCDoor Repair at Sunnyside Park Building255.00$ BLAINE LOCK & SAFE INCKeys for PD training sergeant and officer102.00$ ## BLAINE'S BLAZIN' 4TH COMMITTEEBlaine Festival Activities Registration reimbursement11,870.00$ ## BOULDER CONTRACTING LLCFull escrow refund, PC20-0009, Boulder Estates 2nd2,500.00$ ## BOULDER CONTRACTING LLCFull escrow refund, PC20-0009, Boulder Estates 2nd2,500.00$ ## BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION ## Construction Materials Testing, LS13 Force Main-P2, I/P 23-30 2,234.50$ BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATIONCMT - 2026 Quincy Area Street Reconstruction, I/P T2604798.00$ ## CARR'S TREE SERVICE INCStump Grinding : Club West Association2,264.20$ ## CENTERPOINT ENERGYJune 2026 Gas Service472.73$ ## CENTRAL PRO SUPPLYIrrigation Supplies743.00$ CES IMAGINGPaper Rolls for GIS Plotter (42"x150', 2" Core 24lb Coated)132.35$ ## CES IMAGINGCanon MC-30 Maintenance Cartridge for GIS Plotter140.33$ ## CHRONICLES IN HEALTH LLCSenior programs75.00$ ## CINTAS CORPORATIONMAYC Mats/Rugs42.77$ ## CINTAS CORPORATIONCH mats/rugs216.88$ ## CINTAS CORPORATION2026 Uniform/Rug Towel Rentals221.17$ CINTAS CORPORATIONCold storage PD first aid cabinet supplies35.90$ ## CONNEXUS ENERGY-UTILITY PAYMENTSJune 2026 Electric70,427.36$ ## CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENTFuel Cell Install in Unit 44961,928.50$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 13024 Ghia ST NE7,000.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 4500 131st AVE NE4,500.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 4490 131st AVE NE4,600.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 12702 Fraizer ST NE4,800.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 4816 132nd CT NE4,700.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 4713 132nd Ct NE4,900.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 4707 132nd CT NE4,900.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 4702 132nd CT NE4,900.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 4625 132nd LN NE4,900.00$ ## D R HORTON INCEscrow Refund - 4615 132nd CT NE4,800.00$ ## D R HORTON INCRemaining escrow refund, SP21-0008, Harpers Landing31,773.75$ ## ECM PUBLISHERS INC2026 Public Hearing Notices99.00$ ## ECM PUBLISHERS INC2026 Public Hearing Notices82.50$ ## ESCAPE FIRE2025 Annual sprinkler inspection275.00$ ## ESCAPE FIRE2025 Annual sprinkler inspection275.00$ ## ESCAPE FIRE2025 Annual sprinkler inspection275.00$ ## ESCAPE FIRE2025 Annual sprinkler inspection275.00$ ## ETERNITY HOMES LLCEscrow Refund - 4918 130th Ct NE4,900.00$ ## FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518Meters/ Hydrant Markers/ Gaskets369.02$ ## FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518Hydrant Mod Kit and Extension7,316.40$ ## FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518Pump / Compressor4,561.17$ FERGUSON WATERWORKS #251810 Inch Water Main Repair Parts : Territorial Main Repair4,317.52$ ## FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518Fire Hydrant Parts309.52$ ## FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYEyeMed - Vision Insurance753.20$ ## FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYEyeMed - Vision Insurance30.97$ Page 13 of 179 ## FISERVJune 2026 FISERV Payment149.24$ ## FIVE STAR GROUP LLCPartial Escrow Refund, PC17-0025, Deer Pond2,000.00$ ## FJS SERVICESRemaining Escrow Refund, PC17-0025, Deer Pond500.00$ ## FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INCCredit PO 2025-00000210 Hydraulic Hose 25'(329.00)$ ## FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INCBrush control oil: Forestry161.34$ ## FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INCPruning Pole / Blades484.97$ ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCEvaporator/ Seals : Unit 5280 (Tahoe)315.07$ ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCEvaporator/ Seals : Unit 5280 (Tahoe)3.60$ ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCCoil/Wire/ Spark Plug : Unit 5299 (PD)505.30$ ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCCoil/Wire/ Spark Plug : Unit 5299 (PD)501.55$ ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCBelts & Filter : Unit 5331 (PD)120.66$ ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCBelts & Filter : Unit 5331 (PD)76.15$ ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCIgnition Coils : Unit 5299 (PD)322.80$ ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCBelt : Unit 5331 (PD)66.96$ ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCCredit PO 2026-00003330 return parts PD Unit 5299(300.93)$ ## FRIENDLY CHEVROLET INCCredit PO 2026-00003330 return parts PD Unit 5299(501.55)$ ## GALLAGHER BENEFIT SERVICES INCOngoing Consulting416.67$ ## GARY JOHN ANDERSON LANDSCAPING INCRestoration after Sewer Repair:4,403.05$ ## GEMPLER'S INCHangers, Skin Cleanser for Ivy2,143.89$ GRAINGERGFCI outlet144.84$ GRAINGERHVAC controller600.02$ ## GRAINGERVibration Mounts : Unit 2390 ( Groundmaster)53.08$ ## GRAINGERVibration Mounts : Unit 2390 ( Groundmaster)57.76$ ## HANSON SPORTS LLCSummer Sport Camps238.40$ ## HAWKINS INC2026 Water Treatment Chemicals8,992.00$ ## HAWKINS INC2026 Water Treatment Chemicals10,635.40$ ## HAWKINS INC2026 Water Treatment Chemicals460.00$ ## HAWKINS INC2026 Water Treatment Chemicals16,919.80$ ## HELMETS R US INCHelmets for safety camp937.40$ ## HOTSY MINNESOTAPW Pressure washer Hoses521.19$ ## INDELCO PLASTICS CORPORATIONBleach Pump; Water2,080.84$ ## INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INCAdobe license for Engineering intern96.19$ ## JL THEIS INCHydrant Meter Deposit Refund 4,440.00$ ## JM ELECTRIC LLC7/1/26 Troubleshoot 105th / Radisson irrigation box335.00$ ## JOHNSON KEITHAdult Softball Umpire fees363.00$ KRAFT MECHANICAL LLCPW water heater repair443.00$ ## KWIK TRIP STORE ENGINEERINGFull escrow refund, SP18-0005, Kwik Trip14,995.22$ ## LAKES IRRIGATION LLCIrrigation Water Usage - East Lake Parks410.37$ ## LAWSON PRODUCTS INCBrake/Parts Cleaner, Orgelbow, Quickstix975.54$ ## LAWSON PRODUCTS INCBrake/Parts Cleaner, Orgelbow, Quickstix145.86$ ## LAWSON PRODUCTS INCFuel Line : PW Stock531.79$ ## LAWSON PRODUCTS INCWater/Sewer locate paint554.24$ ## LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS INC2026 Annual monitoring325.00$ ## LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS ## 2026 Special Assessment Program & E-Property Site5,965.00$ ## MANSFIELD OIL COMPANYFuel Delivery - June 202614,658.60$ ## MANSFIELD OIL COMPANYFuel Delivery - June 202610,473.10$ ## MANSFIELD OIL COMPANYFuel Delivery - July 2026 6,963.88$ ## MANSFIELD OIL COMPANYFuel Delivery - July 2026 16,043.74$ ## MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALSPatching Material for Streets155.14$ ## MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALSPatching Material for Streets152.83$ Page 14 of 179 ## MC TOOL & SAFETY SALESGloves / Spill Kits1,027.82$ ## MC TOOL & SAFETY SALESGas Monitor Calibration85.00$ ## MEADOWLAND ESTATES LLCFull cash LOC release, PC22-0024 Jefferson Ridge18,000.00$ ## MEDSURETY LLCMedSurety Monthly Fee177.50$ ## MENARDS - BLAINEMeter Parts / Volt Meter55.30$ MENARDS - BLAINERound up / Lopper357.24$ ## MENARDS - BLAINETool for Distro Trailer : Water170.33$ MENARDS - BLAINEHose for gardeners14.99$ MENARDS - BLAINEWipes, valve kit, flapper, fly swatter, filter186.65$ MENARDS - BLAINETraining building supplies292.96$ ## MENARDS - BLAINEGreen Treated 2x6 for Boardwalk384.60$ ## MENARDS - BLAINEDrain Fittings : Well #1754.58$ ## MENARDS - BLAINEGreen Treated / Speed Square : Boardwalk58.62$ ## MENARDS - BLAINEMailbox Post : 11744 Buchannan34.99$ MENARDS - BLAINEBatteries, deadbolts, pliers, file handle168.42$ METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYQ1 & Q2 MN Paid Leave FICA tax service2,614.76$ ## MICKMAN BROTHERS INC2026 Contract: All WTP landscape maintenance1,641.67$ ## MID AMERICA METER LLCDehumidifier Parts263.00$ ## MID AMERICA METER LLCRepair of Prop Meter1,442.94$ ## MID AMERICA METER LLCDehumidifier Parts170.90$ ## MIDWAY FORD COMPANYShifter Cable : Unit 5238 (P&R)101.40$ MIDWAY FORD COMPANYIntake Boot and Clamps : Unit 1244 (Dump Truck)164.67$ ## MIDWEST SECURITY PRODUCTS INCLock and Install for SCACA Computer2,113.90$ ## MILLS FLEET FARMHydrant Meter Deposit Refund206.12$ ## MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ## Construction Materials Testing (Zest Street), I/P 25-04903.49$ MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT - HAM LAKESmall Gas Blowers : Route 6 mowing crew659.98$ ## MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT - HAM LAKECredit PO 2026-00003280 BG Blower(659.98)$ MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT - HAM LAKESmall Gas Blowers : Route 6 mowing crew580.78$ ## MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT - HAM LAKEAuto Cut Saw39.99$ MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT - HAM LAKECredit PO 2026-00003379 auto cut saw(6.00)$ ## MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSOCIATION Safety management program12,808.75$ ## MINNESOTA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION ## Annual State Conference Registration1,365.00$ ## MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LABS #2778Water Testing Lakeside Commons Park76.00$ ## M-R SIGN COMPANY INCDG3 Roll: Supplies610.28$ M-R SIGN COMPANY INCStreet ID Signs : Washington St / 87th Lane1,143.66$ ## MUSKA ELECTRIC COLow Voltage Electrical run to PW SCADA room1,239.91$ ## NEWMARK HOMES ## Remaining escrow refund, PC15-58, Woods at Quail Creek 4th 3,000.00$ ## NORTHERN SANITARY SUPPLY CO INCMAYC towels112.80$ ## NORTHERN SANITARY SUPPLY CO INCCH liners, tissue, towels352.33$ ## NORTHERN SANITARY SUPPLY CO INCCH towels, tissue, bags415.51$ ## NORTHLAND CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FINANCECH leased fitness equipment859.41$ NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENTDeff Filter (x3) : Unit 1272 (Dump Truck)515.65$ ## OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE INCFull escrow refund, SP25-02, Old Dominion14,210.00$ ## OPPORTUNITY SERVICES INCCleaning Services - May 261,549.08$ ## OPTUM FINANCIAL INCAccount fee monthly FSA and HSA550.75$ ## O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INCOil Filters: PW Stock / 5238 (P&R)63.09$ ## O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INCFuel Filters: Unit 2398 (Toolcat)56.25$ ## O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INCAir Fresheners: PD Stock64.44$ ## O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INCActuator Kit : Unit 5252 (PD)91.93$ ## PAFFY'S PEST CONTROL INCPW monthly pest control139.00$ Page 15 of 179 ## PERAOmitted deduction for S Fritz12,147.20$ ## PIONEER MANUFACTURING COMPANYBallfield Paint : Ballfield Lines in grassy areas2,900.00$ ## PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INCService Integrated Plant Mgmt - Monarch Pond1,475.00$ ## PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE INC ## June 2026 Monthly Bed Maint/Weekly Grounds - Various Medians 280.38$ ## PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE INC ## June 2026 Monthly Bed Maint/Weekly Grounds - Various Medians 1,018.34$ PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE INCJune 2026 Add 'l Median Maint: Prune off Curbs78.00$ ## PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE INC ## June 2026 Monthly Bed Maint/Weekly Grounds - Various Medians 1,154.75$ PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE INCJune 2026 Add 'l Median Maint: Prune off Curbs326.44$ ## PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE INC ## June 2026 Monthly Bed Maint/Weekly Grounds - Various Medians 1,204.33$ ## PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE INC ## June 2026 Monthly Bed Maint/Weekly Grounds - Various Medians 812.01$ PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE INCJune 2026 Add 'l Median Maint: Prune off Curbs798.29$ ## PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE INC ## June 2026 Monthly Bed Maint/Weekly Grounds - Various Medians 114.44$ ## PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE INC ## June 2026 Monthly Bed Maint/Weekly Grounds - Various Medians 807.46$ ## PRINT CENTRALBusiness Cards Police39.00$ ## PRINT CENTRALBusiness Cards Police39.00$ RACHEL CONTRACTING INCDemo Escrow full refund - 1308 113th Ave NE2,000.00$ ## RACHEL CONTRACTING INCHydrant Meter Deposit Refund4,950.00$ ## ROTHMEYER TEC, INCFull escrow refund, PC22-54 Vertical Bridge4,984.00$ ## SAFETY SIGNSIrrigation Valve Dig Road Signs1,162.60$ SEALTECH INCFinal Portion of Territorial Park Trail Repair - MS4, Area 120,292.00$ ## SELLMAN SHEILAMileage & Expense Report - Sellman 7/16/2619.31$ ## SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC ## PW Fuel Station Reconstruction Design Services-I/P 25-01 (F2501) 1,698.13$ SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INCFinal Design & Construction Services, I/P 26-06 (T2606)9,251.35$ SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INCNational Street - Phase 2 Prepare Plans & Specs, I/P 25-2223,202.34$ ## TENICITY LLCSummer 2026 Tennis Lessons4,356.00$ ## THOMSEN SYSTEMS INCSummer 2026 Tech Camps1,008.00$ ## TRI-STATE BOBCAT INCBobtach/ Filter : Stock & Unit 2398 (Bobcat)125.23$ ## TRI-STATE BOBCAT INCAC Compressor : Unit 2398 (Toolcat)797.91$ ## TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVERY INCTow for Squad 5241125.00$ ## TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INCHVAC filters592.72$ ## USA BLUEBOOK (#657220)Plant Lab Supplies : All Treatment Plants620.14$ ## USA BLUEBOOK (#657220)Lifting Straps-Lock/Tag out supplies: Sewer147.39$ ## USA BLUEBOOK (#657220)Replacement Transducer cable and Transducer22.49$ ## USA BLUEBOOK (#657220)Replacement Transducer cable and Transducer545.91$ ## USA BLUEBOOK (#657220)Replacement Transducer cable and Transducer463.14$ ## USDA APHISGeese Control1,315.32$ ## VALUE HOMES LLCFull escrow refund, PC21-0048, Laddie Lake Waiver5,000.00$ ## VEHICLE SERVICE GROUP LLC2026 Capital : In Floor Hoist36,502.79$ ## VEHICLE SERVICE GROUP LLCCredit PO # 2026-00003312 CT&T install(9,020.00)$ ## VERTEX UNMANNED SOLUTIONS LLCGPS Geo base and Install / Configuration4,750.00$ ## VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY LLCHVAC fuse294.60$ ## VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY LLCHVAC fuse294.60$ ## VILLEGAS WESLEYTuition Reimbursement517.47$ WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INCWater Main Leak Detection 7/16/26 11818 Monroe Cir480.45$ ## WSB & ASSOCIATES INCPrelim Design & Feasibility Report, I/P 26-051,242.00$ ## ZIEGLER INC2024 Capital : Portable Generator - Sewer87,400.00$ 647,490.19$ Page 16 of 179 ## CITY OF BLAINE ## SUBSET OF PAYMENTS BETWEEN $20,000 AND $50,000 FROM THE SCHEDULE OF BILLS PAID ## APPROVED ON 08/17/2026 FOR PAYMENTS THE WEEK OF 07/29/2026 ## Vendor NameDescription ## Amount SEALTECH INCFinal Portion of Territorial Park Trail Repair - MS4, Area 120,292.00$ SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INCNational Street - Phase 2 Prepare Plans & Specs, I/P 25-2223,202.34$ ## D R HORTON INCRemaining escrow refund, SP21-0008, Harpers Landing31,773.75$ ## VEHICLE SERVICE GROUP LLC2026 Capital : In Floor Hoist36,502.79$ Page 17 of 179 ## DATEVENDORDESCRIPTIONAMOUNT ## 07/02/26VENDOR CHECKSCHECK # 80163$1,196.68 ## 07/02/26EMPLOYEESDIRECT DEPOSITS$829,146.36 ## 07/16/26VENDOR CHECKSCHECK # 80164 - 80170$614,030.94 ## 07/16/26EMPLOYEESDIRECT DEPOSITS$788,062.86 ## 07/30/26VENDOR CHECKSCHECK # NA$0.00 ## 07/30/26EMPLOYEESDIRECT DEPOSITS$892,250.10 ## DATEVENDORDESCRIPTIONAMOUNT ## 07/02/26STATE OF MINNESOTA PAYROLL TAXES$58,542.57 ## 07/02/26IRSPAYROLL TAXES$257,318.87 ## 07/02/26PERARETIREMENT$234,144.58 ## 07/02/26MSRS, GREAT WEST, NATIONWIDEDEFERRED COMP & HSA $91,502.88 ## 07/16/26STATE OF MINNESOTAJUNE 2026 SALES TAX$61,850.00 ## 07/16/2621ST CENTURY BANKCREDIT CARDS$25,672.18 ## 07/16/26STATE OF MINNESOTA PAYROLL TAXES$53,430.78 ## 07/16/26IRSPAYROLL TAXES$236,300.72 ## 07/16/26PERARETIREMENT$220,374.57 ## 07/16/26MSRS, GREAT WEST, NATIONWIDEDEFERRED COMP & HSA $99,536.79 ## 07/30/26STATE OF MINNESOTA PAYROLL TAXES$65,277.33 ## 07/30/26IRSPAYROLL TAXES$274,352.06 ## 07/30/26PERARETIREMENT$278,088.59 ## 07/30/26MSRS, GREAT WEST, NATIONWIDEDEFERRED COMP & HSA $56,126.61 ## PAYROLL CHECKS & WIRE TRANSFERS ## MONTH: JULY 2026 ## PAYROLL CHECKS ## WIRE TRANSFERS Page 18 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## City Council Workshop August 3, 2026 | 5:30 PM ## Blaine City Hall ## 10801 Town Square Drive NE ## Blaine, MN 55449 ## MINUTES ## NOTICE OF WORKSHOP MEETING In accordance with the provisions of Section 3.01 of the Blaine City Charter, a Council Workshop meeting is scheduled for the following purpose: 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Mayor Sanders at 5:30PM. ## 2. Roll Call PRESENT: Mayor Tim Sanders, Councilmembers Terra Fleming, Chris Ford, Leslie Larson, Chris Massoglia, Tom Newland, and Jess Robertson. ABSENT: None. Quorum Present. ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Erik Thorvig; Community Development Director Sheila Sellman; Safety Services Director/Police Chief Brian Podany; Finance Director Jason Zimmerman; Director of Administrative Services Scott Johnson; Director of Engineering Dan Schluender; City Attorneys Jacob Saufley and Lida Banninck; Communications Manager Ben Hayle; and City Clerk Catherine Sorensen. ## 3. New Business 3.1. 2026-152 Closed Session Pursuant to MN Statute 13D.03 Subd. (1)(b) - Labor ## Negotiations Update (30 Minutes) ## Sponsors: Scott Johnson, Director of Administrative Services After a motion and second, the council moved to a closed session meeting pursuant to Minnesota Statute 13D.03 Subd. (1)(b) to receive a labor negotiations update. Page 19 of 179 3.2. 2026-153 Community Engagement with FlashVote (30 Minutes) ## Sponsors: Ben Hayle, Communications Manager Communications Manager Hayle stated one year ago, staff began the onboarding process with FlashVote to provide a new method for community engagement through short issue- based surveys. Through summer and early fall 2025, staff worked alongside FlashVote to build the system and grow the survey panel. The initial goal was to have 300 residents sign up for the survey panel. This would allow for statistically valid data for a city the size of Blaine. By the time the first survey launched in fall 2025, nearly 500 residents had signed up to be on the survey panel. Today we have over 900 residents on the survey panel, and we see growth each time we conduct a survey. Surveys are intended to be conducted quarterly with the option to do two additional surveys each year if a need arises. Surveys are sent by email, text message, or by phone. When signing up, the resident is able to choose how they receive the survey notification. FlashVote surveys are always five questions and are designed to be completed in less than one minute. The survey is open for 48 hours and then the results are delivered to everyone who took the survey. The results can be broken down by council ward, police patrol districts, and other standard demographics. It was noted the city completed surveys on the following topics: ## • Community Satisfaction • Communications • Parks Mr. Hayle shared how information was gathered through the surveys and provided informed decisions and new opportunities to educate and engage, then shared demographics of the survey panel. He said staff appreciated how strong participation was from the survey panel and noted the survey panel was growing after each survey. Further information was provided on the results from the three surveys that have been completed to date. Councilmember Fleming stated she appreciated this tool and how the city was working to better hear the voices of residents. She questioned how FlashVote was being advertised to the public. Mr. Hayle explained FlashVote has been promoted in the city newsletter, on social media and through targeted advertisements before the initial launch. Councilmember Newland asked how confident staff was that the respondents were from Blaine. Mr. Hayle stated respondents have to go through an address verification process in order to sign up for the platform. Councilmember Newland questioned how many times a resident could take a survey. Mr. Hayle reported residents are only allowed to take a survey once. Councilmember Newland inquired how much FlashVote would cost the city going forward. Mr. Hayle indicated FlashVote had an annual cost of $13,000. Councilmember Newland encouraged staff to consider how this tool could be used for economic development. Community Development Director Sellman explained she had Page 20 of 179 spoken with Mr. Hayle about creating targeted questions for the Northtown area. Councilmember Larson recommended a survey be completed on the 105th redevelopment project then asked about the demographics of the survey panel. Mr. Hayle reviewed the demographics for the survey panel. Mayor Sanders suggested a survey on the 105th Avenue project be completed after the city takes the time to explain what would be included in the development. Councilmember Fleming explained she would like to know if the community would value a "coffee with a councilmember" type event, stating she would be wiling to host this type of event with residents. Further discussion ensued regarding the expertise the FlashVote team has added to the city's issue-specific surveys. Councilmember Fleming suggested the city complete a survey regarding a potential community center. Mayor Sanders stated he supported this suggestion, but recommended the survey drill down to the amenities that residents were looking for. Councilmember Robertson suggested the new fire station be considered as a future survey topic as well. Councilmember Massoglia stated he believed FlashVote was a great tool for the city, but noted he was hesitant about allowing the survey results be used to inform decisions. He stated it was very important for the city to consider how the survey questions are phrased. Councilmember Newland inquired if feedback should be pursued regarding the upcoming comprehensive plan update. Mr. Hayle indicated staff had already discussed how this could be a useful way to engage with the public. Mayor Sanders appreciated the data staff was gathering surrounding parks and park maintenance noting this information would be valuable for the council going forward. Council discussed topics and community issues that council would like to explore through future FlashVote surveys, including community and economic development opportunities, the proposed fire station, a community center, the comprehensive plan update, airport, and others topics. ## 4. Other Business City Manager Thorvig provided the council with details on Night to Unite and explained staff would continue to monitor the city's water systems in response to recent cyberattacks on water systems at other cities. Safety Services Director/Police Chief Podany provided the council with an update regarding the Flock camera/license plate reader (LPR) system the city had in place then discussed the real-time crime center the city and county were considering and provided further information on the Page 21 of 179 drone-assisted response program component. He reported if Anoka County were to pursue a real-time crime center, this would be the first county-wide center of its kind. He discussed where the drone-assisted LPRs would be located in order to provide county-wide coverage. He stated the goal would be to get the first four or five drone units in place by the end of the year, with one unit being installed in Blaine. He encouraged the council to bring resident concerns or comments to him regarding Flock cameras or LPRs. Further discussion ensued regarding how the real-time crime center would assist with addressing a stolen vehicle, an active shooter situation or active fire. 5. Adjournment The workshop adjourned at 6:56PM. Page 22 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## City Council August 14, 2026 | 8:00 AM ## Blaine City Hall ## 10801 Town Square Drive NE ## Blaine, MN 55449 ## MINUTES 1. Call to Order by the Mayor The meeting was called to order at 8:06AM by Mayor Sanders followed by Roll Call. ## 2. Roll Call PRESENT: Mayor Tim Sanders, Councilmembers Chris Massoglia, Terra Fleming (remote) and ## Jess Robertson (remote) ## ABSENT: Councilmembers Tom Newland, Leslie Larson, and Chris Ford ## ALSO PRESENT: City Clerk Cathy Sorensen 3. Administration 3.1. 2026-299 Canvass of the 2026 Primary Election ## Sponsors: Cathy Sorensen, City Clerk City Clerk Sorensen presented a summary of the 2026 primary election results for the office of Ward 1 councilmember: Alex Tierney 1,008 37.00% Tom Newland 1,365 50.11% Richard Paul 351 12.89% Total voter turnout for the city was 24.21%. This compares to 12.69% in 2024 and 22.25% in 2020. The city would like to extends its appreciation to all the election judges who served during early voting and on election day. Motion by Mayor Sanders, second by Councilmember Massoglia, to accept and certify the results of the August 11, 2026, city primary election and direct the city clerk to notify all Ward 1 candidates of the results. Motion adopted unanimously. ## 4. Other Business None. 5. Adjournment Page 23 of 179 Mayor Sanders adjourned the special meeting at 8:14AM. Page 24 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## City Council August 3, 2026 | 7:00 PM ## Blaine City Hall ## 10801 Town Square Drive NE ## Blaine, MN 55449 ## MINUTES 1. Call to Order by the Mayor The meeting was called to order at 7:06PM by Mayor Sanders followed by the Pledge of Allegiance and the Roll Call. 2. Pledge of Allegiance ## 3. Roll Call PRESENT: Mayor Tim Sanders, Councilmembers Terra Fleming, Chris Ford, Leslie Larson, Chris Massoglia, Tom Newland, and Jess Robertson. ABSENT: None. Quorum Present. ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Erik Thorvig; Community Development Director Sheila Sellman; Safety Services Director/Police Chief Brian Podany; Finance Director Jason Zimmerman; Director of Administrative Services Scott Johnson; Director of Engineering Dan Schluender; City Attorney Jacob Saufley; Communications Manager Ben Hayle; and City Clerk Catherine Sorensen. ## 4. Awards - Presentations - Organizational Business None. ## 5. Open Forum Open Forum is an opportunity for the public to share comments, concerns, or input on other items. While Open Forum is not intended to provide responses or discussion during the meeting, city staff will contact the speaker(s) after the meeting if follow-up is needed. Each speaker is limited to three minutes, with a maximum of 15 minutes set aside for Open Forum. Mayor Sanders opened the Open Forum at 7:07PM. Page 25 of 179 Claire Walter-Marchetti, 11761 Able Street NE, invited the council to attend a gala event being hosted by the Friends of the Anoka County Libraries on October 15. Bruce Manthei, 4101 99th Avenue NE, shared continued concerns regarding the electrical box location at Lexington and 99th Avenues and asked for responses from council and staff. Scott Coggins, Anoka County Elections Integrity Team, shared comments regarding the validity of the federal certification process of voting tabulator machines used in Anoka County and questioned how the voting tabulator machines were now being certified. Mark Ouellette, 1336 95th Avenue, expressed concerns about the proposed Viridian Sentinel apartment project being constructed in his neighborhood and the potential trash concerns that will result. He asked that the city have plans in place to address trash concerns for construction projects. He commented he was also concerned with how increased traffic levels will impact his neighborhood. He stated it appeared the city did not care about how new projects will impact the current residents of Blaine. Dana Carlson, 287 117th Avenue NE, shared various concerns regarding family and other issues. There being no further input, Mayor Sanders closed the Open Forum at 7:24PM. 6. Communications Councilmember Larson encouraged the residents of Blaine to participate in Night to Unite, which would be held on Tuesday, August 4. ## 7. Approval of Consent Agenda: All items listed under the "Consent Agenda" are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. Councilmember Massoglia requested the removal of consent agenda item 7.4. Moved by Councilmember Newland, seconded by Councilmember Fleming, that the following items on the Consent Agenda be approved. Motion adopted unanimously. 7.1. 2026-154 Schedule of Bills Paid ## Sponsors: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director 7.2. 2026-155 Approval of Minutes ## Sponsors: Cathy Sorensen, City Clerk Page 26 of 179 7.3. RES 26-155 Resolution Approving a Premise Permit for Lawful Gambling Activity for Blaine Youth Football at Bravos Tequila Bar, 11712 Ulysses Lane NE, Suite 200 ## Sponsors: Cathy Sorensen, City Clerk 7.4. RES 26-148 Resolution Granting Final Plat Approval to Subdivide 11.45 acres into 30 Single Family Lots to be Known As Quail Creek 14th Addition Located at 132nd Avenue NE/Bataan Court NE. QC Properties, LLC (Case File No. 26- ## 0038/SLK) ## Sponsors: Sheila Sellman, Community Development Director Councilmember Massoglia asked questions regarding when road connections would be completed for this development. Director of Engineering Schluender explained the developer has been in front of the watershed district and staff anticipated construction would begin yet this fall or early next spring. He noted the rocks and boulders would be removed when the street was ready to drive on. Moved by Councilmember Massoglia, seconded by Councilmember Fleming, to adopt a Resolution Granting Final Plat Approval to Subdivide 11.45 acres into 30 Single Family Lots to be Known As Quail Creek 14th Addition Located at 132nd Avenue NE/Bataan Court NE. Motion adopted unanimously. 8. 7:00 PM - Public Hearing and Items Published for a Certain Time ## 8.1. ORD 26-2610 Public Hearing and First Reading ## An Ordinance Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Connexus ## Energy, A Minnesota Cooperative, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing ## Electric Service Within the City Of Blaine ## Sponsors: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director Finance Director Zimmerman requested the council introduce an ordinance implementing an electric service franchise fee on Connexus Energy, a Minnesota Cooperative, its successors and assigns, for providing electric service within the city of Blaine. Additional information was provided on the proposed franchise fee structure as well as market analysis information for comparable cities. Staff reviewed the proposed model that would be implemented in Blaine, described how the dollars would be utilized and commented on how the proposed rates would impact the median value homeowner. Mayor Sanders opened the public hearing at 7:45PM. There being no public input, Mayor Sanders continued the public hearing to the August 17, 2026, city council meeting. Page 27 of 179 Declared by Mayor Sanders that Ordinance No. 26-2610, “An Ordinance Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Connexus Energy, A Minnesota Cooperative, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Electric Service Within the City Of Blaine,” be introduced and placed on file for second reading at the August 17, 2026, council meeting. ## 8.2. ORD 26-2611 Public Hearing and First Reading An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Circle Pines ## Public Utilities, D/B/A Centennial Utilities, a Minnesota Municipal ## Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas Energy Service ## Within the City of Blaine ## Sponsors: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director Mr. Zimmerman requested the council introduce an ordinance implementing a gas service franchise fee on Circle Pines Public Utilities, D/B/A Centennial Utilities, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, its successors and assigns, for providing gas energy service within the city of Blaine. Mayor Sanders opened the public hearing at 7:46PM. There being no public input, Mayor Sanders continued the public hearing to the August 17, 2026, city council meeting. Declared by Mayor Sanders that Ordinance No. 26-2611, “An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Circle Pines Public Utilities, D/B/A Centennial Utilities, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas Energy Service Within the City of Blaine,” be introduced and placed on file for second reading at the August 17, 2026, council meeting. ## 8.3. ORD 26-2612 Public Hearing and First Reading ## An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Centerpoint ## Energy Resources Corp., D/B/A Minnegasco, a Delaware Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas Energy Service Within the City of ## Blaine ## Sponsors: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director Mr. Zimmerman requested the council introduce an ordinance implementing a gas service franchise fee on Centerpoint Energy Resources Corp., D/B/A Minnegasco, a Delaware Corporation, its successors and assigns, for providing gas energy service within the city of Blaine. Mayor Sanders opened the public hearing at 7:47PM. Page 28 of 179 There being no public input, Mayor Sanders continued the public hearing to the August 17, 2026, city council meeting. Declared by Mayor Sanders that Ordinance No. 26-2612, “An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Centerpoint Energy Resources Corp., D/B/A Minnegasco, a Delaware Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas Energy Service Within the City of Blaine,” be introduced and placed on file for second reading at the August 17, 2026, council meeting. ## 8.4. ORD 26-2613 Public Hearing and First Reading ## An Ordinance Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Northern ## States Power Company, D/B/A Xcel Energy, a Minnesota Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Electric Service Within the City of ## Blaine ## Sponsors: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director Mr. Zimmerman requested the council introduce an ordinance implementing an electric service franchise fee on Northern States Power Company, D/B/A Xcel Energy, a Minnesota Corporation, its successors and assigns, for providing electric service within the city of Blaine. Mayor Sanders opened the public hearing at 7:48PM. There being no public input, Mayor Sanders continued the public hearing to the August 17, 2026, city council meeting. Declared by Mayor Sanders that Ordinance No. 26-2613, “An Ordinance Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Company, D/B/A Xcel Energy, a Minnesota Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Electric Service Within the City of Blaine,” be introduced and placed on file for second reading at the August 17, 2026, council meeting. ## 8.5. ORD 26-2614 Public Hearing and First Reading An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Northern States ## Power Company, D/B/A Xcel Energy, a Minnesota Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas Energy Service Within the City of ## Blaine ## Sponsors: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director Mr. Zimmerman requested the council introduce an ordinance implementing a gas service franchise fee on Northern States Power Company, D/B/A Xcel Energy, a Minnesota Corporation, its successors and assigns, for providing gas energy service within the city of Blaine. Page 29 of 179 Mayor Sanders opened the public hearing at 7:49PM. There being no public input, Mayor Sanders continued the public hearing to the August 17, 2026, city council meeting. Declared by Mayor Sanders that Ordinance No. 26-2614, “An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Company, D/B/A Xcel Energy, a Minnesota Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas Energy Service Within the City of Blaine,” be introduced and placed on file for second reading at the August 17, 2026, council meeting. ## 9. Development Business 9.1. RES 26-144 Resolution Granting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from High Density ## Residential/Planned Industrial/Planned Commercial and Planned ## Industrial/Planned Commercial to High Density Residential 2/Planned Commercial at 9436 and 9422 Ulysses Street NE. Viridian Sentinel (Sentinel ## Management Company) (Case File No. 26-0032/EES) ## Sponsors: Sheila Sellman, Community Development Director Community Development Director Sellman stated the applicant is proposing to subdivide two existing lots into three lots to allow for construction of a new apartment building immediately south of the existing Viridian Apartments and west of the Teamsters headquarters. The project requires a comprehensive plan amendment, a conditional use permit (apartment use and shared access/zero lot line) and a plat. Moved by Councilmember Newland, seconded by Councilmember Ford, to adopt a ## Resolution Granting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from High Density ## Residential/Planned Industrial/Planned Commercial and Planned Industrial/Planned Commercial to High Density Residential 2/Planned Commercial at 9436 and 9422 Ulysses Street NE. Councilmember Massoglia indicated he did not always support apartment buildings but believed this was the proper location for an apartment complex and would be offering his support for this project. Motion adopted unanimously. 9.2. RES 26-145 Resolution Granting Preliminary Plat Approval to Reconfigure Two Existing Lots Totaling Approximately 12 Acres into Three Lots to be Known as Cloverleaf Commons Third Addition at 9436 and 9422 Ulysses Street NE. ## Viridian Sentinel (Sentinel Management Company) (Case File No. 26- ## 0032/EES) ## Sponsors: Sheila Sellman, Community Development Director Page 30 of 179 Ms. Sellman stated the applicant is proposing to subdivide two existing lots into three lots to allow for construction of a new apartment building immediately south of the existing Viridian Apartments and west of the Teamsters headquarters. The project requires a comprehensive plan amendment, a conditional use permit (apartment use and shared access/zero lot line) and a plat. Moved by Councilmember Newland, seconded by Councilmember Ford, to adopt a Resolution Granting Preliminary Plat Approval to Reconfigure Two Existing Lots Totaling Approximately 12 Acres into Three Lots to be Known as Cloverleaf Commons Third Addition at 9436 and 9422 Ulysses Street NE. Motion adopted unanimously. 9.3. RES 26-146 Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit to Allow an 84-Unit Apartment Building in a Planned Business District (PBD) Zoning District with Shared Parking and Shared Access at 9436 and 9422 Ulysses Street NE. Viridian ## Sentinel (Sentinel Management Company) (Case File No. 26-0032/EES) ## Sponsors: Sheila Sellman, Community Development Director Ms. Sellman stated the applicant is proposing to subdivide two existing lots into three lots to allow for construction of a new apartment building immediately south of the existing Viridian Apartments and west of the Teamsters headquarters. The project requires a comprehensive plan amendment, a conditional use permit (apartment use and shared access/zero lot line) and a plat. Moved by Councilmember Newland, seconded by Councilmember Ford, to adopt a Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit to Allow an 84-Unit Apartment Building in a Planned Business District (PBD) Zoning District with Shared Parking and Shared Access at 9436 and 9422 Ulysses Street NE. Councilmember Newland asked questions regarding traffic management and trash or debris control during construction. He requested staff speak with the developer to ensure debris would be controlled during construction. Ms. Sellman reported staff held a meeting with the architect about the site and discussed how the project would be staged, noting there would be no parking on the street. She explained the development agreement would address trash and debris collection for the site. Councilmember Newland suggested a condition be added to the development agreement to ensure trash was cleaned on the site on a daily basis. Ms. Sellman indicated the current language would have inspections conducted on a weekly basis or by complaint. Councilmember Robertson said she understood Mr. Ouellette's concerns about previous construction projects and encouraged the developer to have an open line of communication between Mr. Ouellette in order to ensure all trash and debris concerns are addressed in a timely manner. Page 31 of 179 Motion adopted unanimously. 10. Administration None. ## 11. Other Business None. 12. Adjournment Moved by Councilmember Robertson, seconded by Councilmember Newland, to adjourn the meeting at 8:03PM. Motion adopted unanimously. Page 32 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Staff Report ## File Number: RES 26-149 ## Agenda Date ## Status August 17, 2026 ## In Control ## File Type ## City Council ## Resolution ## Approval of Consent Agenda: - Sheila Sellman, Community Development Director Agenda Item # 7.3 Resolution Granting Final Plat Approval to Subdivide Approximately 10.43 Acres into 4 Lots and 2 Outlots to be Known as Blaine Ventures First Addition at 4131 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE. Blaine Ventures ## LLC (Newton RES LLC) (Case File No. 26-0041/SLK) ## Executive Summary The applicant is proposing a four lot and two outlot plat for the development of three new commercial buildings and outlots for ponding and wetlands. ## Background ## Planning Commission Public Hearing June 9, 2026 ## City Council (Preliminary Plat) July 6, 2026 ## City Council (Final Plat) August 17, 2026 ## Action Deadline September 21, 2026 Staff report prepared by Shawn Kaye, Senior Planner, and Teresa Barnes, Project Engineer. The final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat, Resolution No. 26-126. ## Evaluation of Request ## Planning Analysis ## Zoning The property is zoned Planned Business District (PBD). The PBD zoning allows for some industrial uses, such as warehousing and manufacturing, and commercial uses such as retail and restaurants with a conditional use permit. All uses in the PBD require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). ## Land Use Designation The land use designation is Planned Industrial/Planned Commercial (PI/PC). Page 33 of 179 ## Surrounding Zoning and Uses All surrounding properties are zoned PBD, except Lexi Apartments is Development Flex (DF). Industrial buildings are located to the west and south. Lexi Apartments is located to the north and Lexington Avenue is to the east. ## Existing Conditions The property has an existing building being used for cannabis retail sales, cultivation, and manufacturing. ## History A CUP was approved in September 2025 for a cannabis mezzobusiness. July 6, 2026 approvals: • A preliminary plat creating 4 lots and two outlots. • A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Planned Industrial/Planned Commercial (PI/PC). • A CUP for a credit union/bank, retail, restaurant, medical office, and zero lot line ## Plat Blaine Ventures First Addition consists of four lots. • Lot 1 is approximately 3 acres and an existing cannabis mezzobusiness is located on this parcel. • Lot 2 is approximately .77 acres and a credit union is proposed for this lot. • Lot 3 is approximately .87 acres and restaurant and retail are proposed for this lot. • Lot 4 is approximately 1.91 acres and a medical office, retail, and restaurant are proposed on this parcel. • Outlot A- 1.75 acres—ponding and wetlands • Outlot B- 2.13 acres—wetlands ## Setbacks PBD setbacks will apply. ## Building • Front: 50 feet • Side: 15 feet • Lot 1 will have a zero lot line on the north and east property lines ## Parking • Front: 30 feet • Side: 15 feet • Lot 1 will have a zero lot line on west, east and north property lines • Lot 2 will have a zero lot line on west and north property lines • Lot 3 will have a zero lot line on west, south and north property lines Page 34 of 179 • Lot 4 will have a zero lot line on west and south property lines ## Landscaping All proposed uses will need to meet the landscape requirements of the zoning ordinance through the building permit process. ## Tree Preservation The tree preservation ordinance requirements will need to be met prior to any work on site. ## Park Dedication Park dedication will be required for Lots 2,3, and 4 at the time of building permits. The 2026 PBD zoning district park dedication fee is $7,820 per acre. ## Engineering Analysis ## Grading/Storm Drainage The developer will need to submit construction contract documents that include a mass (rough) grading, erosion protection, sediment control, development, utilities, roadway, and storm drainage plan sheets. Supporting wetland delineation report, geotechnical investigation report, soil boring logs, and hydrology report shall be included in the submittal for city review and approval. The SWPPP may be included in the construction plan sheet(s) or prepared as a separate document and included in the development construction contract specifications. The grading plan shall provide greater detail on protecting existing trees and provide additional information on adjacent property. ## Utilities Utilities will be extended through the proposed development to serve all proposed buildings as necessary. Final locations will be determined during the building permit process. Hydrant locations must be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department. ## Wetlands/Watershed/FEMA The plat will need to provide for a protective buffer strip of natural vegetation at least 15-feet in width (25-feet is preferred) and shall surround all wetlands. This buffer strip shall be placed in an easement. The developer will need to submit the project to the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). Review, approval and permits are required prior to city plan approval and start of site work. ## Access/Street Design/Sidewalks/Trails The development is proposing to gain/provide access from an existing access drive on the north side of Pheasant Ridge Drive and from a proposed access drive connection to the future Austin Street Extension, to be completed by the City in 2027. The proposed development provided an updated Traffic Impact Study. The study did not identify any mitigation measures for the proposed uses. Page 35 of 179 ## Easements/Right-of-way/Permits The developer will need to obtain all required permits to construct the proposed project. A copy of all permits will need to be submitted to the City prior to any site work. Standard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated along all lot lines and over areas of delineated wetlands, wetland mitigation, infiltration trenches, drainage swales, and storm water management ponds. ## Strategic Plan Relationship Not applicable. ## Board/Commission Review The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the preliminary plat. The Planning Commission does not review final plats. ## Financial Impact Not applicable. ## Public Outreach/Input Notifications are not required for final plats. ## Staff Recommendation By motion, adopt the resolution. ## Attachment List 1. Zoning and Map ## 2. Final Plat Page 36 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Signature Copy ## Resolution: RES 26-149 Resolution Granting Final Plat Approval to Subdivide Approximately 10.43 Acres into 4 Lots and 2 Outlots to be Known as Blaine Ventures First Addition at 4131 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE. Blaine ## Ventures LLC (Newton RES LLC) (Case File No. 26-0041/SLK) WHEREAS, an application has been filed by BLAINE VENTURES LLC (Newton RES LLC), Case File No. 26- 0041 for a final plat known as Blaine Ventures First Addition; and WHEREAS, said case involves the division of land in Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 31, Range 23, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying North of the South 780 feet thereof, and lying Easterly of a line drawn 30 feet Easterly from the following described line, as measured perpendicularly and radially thereto: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence along the North line thereof South 89 degrees 27 minutes 45 seconds West, assumed basis of bearings, a distance of 780.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence along non-tangential curve, concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 285.67 feet, a central angle of 53 degrees 10 minutes 40 seconds and a chord of 255.72 feet bearing South 26 degrees 03 minutes 05 seconds West, an arc distance of 265.14 feet to a point of reverse curvature; thence along a tangential curve, concave Easterly and having a radius of 285.67 feet and a central angle of 53 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds, an arc distance of 264.77 feet to a point of tangency; thence South 0 degrees 27 minutes 51 seconds East, 100.00 feet to a point of termination in the North line of said South 780 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, distant 1006.68 feet Westerly of the Northeast corner of said South 780 feet. EXCEPT Parcel 6, Anoka County Right-of-Way Plat No. 61. Anoka County, Minnesota ## Abstract Property WHEREAS, the Blaine City Council granted preliminary plat approval on date, subject to the conditions as ## contained in Blaine City Council Resolution No. 26-126; and WHEREAS, the final plat is in general conformance with the approved preliminary plat. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Blaine that final plat approval for Blaine Ventures First Addition per Section 74-47 of the subdivision regulations is hereby granted subject to the listed conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED The Mayor, City Clerk and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute any and all necessary documents, agreement and releases related to the approval, recording or administration of Blaine Ventures First Addition. Page 37 of 179 1. All development signage by separate review. 2. Any development on the site must meet the City’s tree preservation requirements. 3. Park dedication will be required for Lots 2,3, and 4 at the time of building permits. 4. The developer is responsible for recording the plat mylars with Anoka County. Proof of recording must be provided to the City prior to issuance of building permits. 5. The developer will need to obtain a watershed permit prior to any site work. 6. Site plan approval is required as part of the building permit application. All site improvements to be included in the Site Improvement Performance Agreement and covered by an acceptable financial guarantee. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Blaine this 17th day of August, 2026. Page 38 of 179 ## B-2 ## B-3 ## B-3 ## DF ## DF ## DF ## DF ## DF ## FR ## I-1 ## I-1 ## I-1 ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## POD ## POD ## R-1 ## R-1 ## R-1 ## R-1 ## R-1 ## R-1 ## R-1 ## DF ## B-2 ## DF ## B-2 ## B-2 ## B-3 ## PBD ## DF ## DF ## DF ## PBD ## PBD ## I-1 ## I-1 ## PBD ## I-1 ## I-1 ## R-1 ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## POD ## POD ## POD ## POD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## DF ## DF ## Lochness Park ## Le x ington A ve N ## E ## 108th Ave NE ## Pheasant Ridge Dr NE 109 t h ## A v e ## N ## E ## Ball Rd ## NE ## Fraizer St NE 102nd ## Ave NE ## Austin St NE 1 0 ## 2nd Ln NE ## Iset t a ## S t ## NE ## Ghia St NE ## Hupp St NE ## 103rd Ct NE Interstate 35W Blaine Planning Department / 10801 Town Square Dr NE / Blaine, MN 55449 / (763) 785-6180 ## Case File No. 26-0041 ## Blaine Ventures First Addition ## BlaineMN.gov Scale: 1:7,597 . ## Project ## Location 00.090.170.04Miles ## Zoning ## Blaine Parcels ## City Parks ## Project Location This map is for general reference only. It is not for legal, engineering, or surveying use. Page 39 of 179 ## BLAINE VENTURES FIRST ADDITION ## City of Blaine ## County of Anoka Sec. 23, Twp. 31, Rng. 23 Page 40 of 179 ## S89°23'19"E 891.68 ## N0°36'45"E 99.91 ## C ## H = 2 2 8 . 5 8 ## L = 2 3 6 . 9 7 ## R = 2 5 5 . 6 7 ## Δ = 5 3 ° 0 6 ' 1 6 " ## C ## H ## B = ## S 2 7 ° 0 9 ' 5 3 " ## W ## CH=282.58 ## L=292.98 R=315.67 ## Δ=53°10'40" ## CHB=N27°07'41"E ## S89°27'38"E 683.15 ## N0°29'20"W 83.09 ## N0°46'52"E 455.01 ## N45°41'50"E 28.33 ## N0°32'22"E 194.04 ## S89°29'23"E 289.90 ## S60°52'38"E 130.91 ## S89°29'23"E 347.36 ## S60°52'38"E 88.16 ## S60°52'38"E 89.10 ## S0°38'32"W 220.38 ## S44°56'47"E 161.07 ## S0°38'06"W 23.76 ## S89°13'08"E 189.65 ## S0°30'37"W 181.71 ## S89°13'08"E 189.65 ## N0°36'40"E 28.67 ## S89°23'20"E 32.75 ## S89°29'23"E 33.53 ## N0°46'52"E 29.55 ## CH=21.91 ## L=22.14 R=44.33 ## Δ=28°36'44" ## CHB=S75°11'01"E ## OUTLOT A ## OUTLOT B 1 2 3 4 ## BLOCK 1 ## S0°36'40"W 133.75 ## BLAINE VENTURES FIRST ADDITION ## LEGEND ## City of Blaine ## County of Anoka Sec. 23, Twp. 31, Rng. 23 Page 41 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Staff Report ## File Number: RES 26-153 ## Agenda Date ## Status August 17, 2026 ## In Control ## File Type ## City Council ## Resolution ## Approval of Consent Agenda: - Daniel Schluender, Director of Engineering Agenda Item # 7.4 Resolution to Declare Cost to be Assessed, Order Preparation and Call for Public Hearing on Proposed Assessment for 2024 Southwest Area Street Reconstruction Project, Improvement Project No. 24-07 ## (T2407) ## Executive Summary Improvement Project No. 24-07 was ordered by the City Council on January 17, 2024 with Resolution No. 24-21. A construction contract was awarded to Dresel Contracting, Inc. by the City Council on May 6. 2024 with Resolution No. 24-94 and construction was completed in the spring of 2026. ## Background Improvement Project No. 24-07 included the following project areas: ## Project Area 1 • 89th Avenue (from University Avenue to MN Trunk Highway 65) ## Project Area 2 • 85th Avenue (from dead end west of Lincoln Street to Central Avenue Service Road) • Lincoln Street (from 85th Avenue to 89th Avenue) ## Project Area 3 • 85th Avenue (from Lincoln Street to MN Trunk Highway 65) ## Project Area 4 • Central Avenue Service Road (From 500 feet south of 87th Avenue to the cul-de-sac just south of 89th ## Avenue) The total cost of the project is as follows: Page 42 of 179 ## Construction Costs: $6,390,690.25 ## Engineering Costs: $1,009,154.06 ## Administration, Assessing, ## Other: $617,824.71 ## TOTAL: $8,017,669.02 The total project cost indicated in the Feasibility Report was estimated at $8,525,270.00. The Assessment Roll has been prepared consistent with the Feasibility Report. Of the total cost, the amount to be assessed is $1,062,325.78. The Public Utility Funds will contribute $1,982,817.69 for water, sanitary sewer, and trunk storm sewer improvements, Pavement Management Program funds will contribute $3,222,525.55, and Municipal State Aid funds will contribute $1,750,000.00. ## Strategic Plan Relationship The 2024 Southwest Area Street Reconstruction Project aligns with the City’s strategic plan goal of infrastructure management by providing high-quality street surfaces. ## Board/Commission Review ## N/A ## Financial Impact The 2024 Southwest Area Street Reconstruction Project (T2407) was authorized as part of the 2024- 2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) which was adopted via Resolution No. 23-207 at the December 18, 2023 City Council Meeting. Funding was to be provided by a combination of assessments, Municipal State Aid Funds, bond proceeds placed in the City Pavement Management Program Fund and Public Utility Funds. The 2023 CIP included $113,500 in project funding for consulting, and the 2024 CIP includes $5,760,000 in project funding for consulting, construction, and contingency for a total PMP project budget of $5,873,500. An additional $1,114,000 in stormwater, sanitary sewer and water utility funds for the project were also appropriated in the 2024 CIP bringing the total project budget to $6,987,500. With estimated improvement costs of $8,525,270, the 2024 budget was amended at the May 6, 2024 Council Meeting with Resolution 24-94, appropriating an additional $2,094,600, bringing the total project budget to $9,082,100 which was the total amount authorized within the 2025B bonding for city projects. The actual costs as outlined in the table below are presented at $8,017,669 which is $1,064,431 or 11.7% less than the amended budget and what was bonded for. When a city issues debt, funds are typically placed in a capital project fund and then spent on the acquisition of asset(s). Then user fees, the property tax levy, or other funding sources are then subsequently collected in a separate debt service fund to pay principal and interest associated with the bonding. Typically, when a project is completed and there are remaining funds in the capital projects fund, these funds are transferred to the debt service fund. This is because the bonds were issued to fund the capital project, and the remaining proceeds should be used to pay off those bonds. Page 43 of 179 Assessments will be levied as outlined in the city's assessment policy (15 years for full reconstruction) and will be used to fund repayment of the 2025B bond series. The carrying cost, or interest associated with the variance between the amount of special assessment debt issued and the amount to actually be assessed will need to be funded by additional property tax levies, absent another funding source. ## Funding Source 2023 Adopted ## Budget ## 2024-2028 CIP (12/18/2023) 2024 Amended ## Budget Res 24-94 (5/6/2024) ## Authorized ## Financing/Bondin g ## Actual Costs (08/17/2026) Property Tax Levy Debt (T2407) $113,500 $3,950,500 $4,064,000 $3,222,525 Special Assessment Debt (T2407) - $1,440,000 $1,440,000 $1,062,326 State Aid Municipal Funds (T2407) - $1,750,000 $1,750,000 $1,750,000 Water Utility Funds (U2415) - $1,234,300 $1,234,300 $1,370,930 ## Sanitary Sewer Utility Funds (U2404) - $500,000 $500,000 $508,374 Storm Utility Funds (U2350) - $93,000 $93,000 $103,514 ## TOTAL $113,500 $8,967,800 $9,081,300 $8,017,669 Consistent with historical practice, staff will utilize available PMP Fund appropriations to cover utility budget overruns with project savings for the 2024 Southwest Area Street Reconstruction Project ## (T2407). ## Public Outreach/Input The project itself and the assessment process has complied with all public notification requirements pursuant to MN Statutes, Chapter 429. ## Staff Recommendation By motion, adopt the resolution. ## Attachment List ## 1. 24-07 Project Area Map ## 2. 24-07 Assessed Parcels Map ## 3. 24-07 Proposed Final Assessment Roll Page 44 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Signature Copy ## Resolution: RES 26-153 Resolution to Declare Cost to be Assessed, Order Preparation and Call for Public Hearing on ## Proposed Assessment for 2024 Southwest Area Street Reconstruction Project, Improvement Project No. 24-07 (T2407) WHEREAS, a contract was entered into for reconstructing streets and utilities, including pavement replacement, curb and gutter installation and replacement, storm sewer and waterman improvements, sidewalk installation, and appurtenant construction in the following described areas: ## Project Area 1 • 89th Avenue (from University Avenue to MN Trunk Highway 65) ## Project Area 2 • 85th Avenue (from dead end west of Lincoln Street to Central Avenue Service Road) • Lincoln Street (from 85th Avenue to 89th Avenue) ## Project Area 3 • 85th Avenue (from Lincoln Street to MN Trunk Highway 65) ## Project Area 4 • Central Avenue Service Road (From 500 feet south of 87th Avenue to the cul-de-sac just south of 89th ## Avenue) AND WHEREAS, the construction cost for such improvement is $6,390,690.25, and the expenses incurred in the making of said improvements amounts to be $1,626,978.77 making the total cost $8,017,669.02. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Blaine as follows: 1. The total cost of such improvements is hereby declared to be $8,017,669.02. 2. The amount to be assessed is hereby declared to be $1,062,325.78. The Public Utility Funds will contribute $1,982,817.69 for water, sanitary sewer, and trunk storm sewer improvements, Pavement Management Program Funds will contribute $3,222,525.55, and Municipal State Aid Funds will contribute $1,750,000.00. 3. Assessments shall be payable in annual installments extending over a period of fifteen (15) years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2027, and shall bear interest at the rate of 5.25% per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 4. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to Page 45 of 179 be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land within the district affected without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in their office for public inspection. 5. The City Clerk has notified the City Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in their office for public inspection. 6. A hearing shall be held on the 21st day of September 2026, in the Council Chambers at Blaine City Hall at 7:00PM, or as near that time as possible, to pass upon the proposed assessment at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 7. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed notice of such hearing as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Blaine this 17th day of August, 2026. Page 46 of 179 ## POLK ST NE ## TYLER ST NE ## PIERCE ST NE ## US HIGHWAY 10 ## COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD ## UNIVERSITY AVE NE ## 89TH AVE NE ## 87TH AVE NE ## 85TH AVE NE ## LINCOLN ST ## VAN BUREN ST NE ## JACKSON ST NE ## JEFFERSON ST NE ## TYLER ST NE ## ABLE ST NE ## QUINCY ST NE ## MONROE ST NE ## MADISON ST NE ## JEFFERSON ST NE ## COUNTY ROAD 10 ## UNIVERSITY AVE NE ## TH 47 ## 89TH AVE NE ## 7TH STREET NE ## TH 65 ## CENTRAL AVE SERVICE ROAD (WEST) ## AREA 4 ## (CENTRAL AVENUE SERVICE ROAD) ## AREA 2 ## (LINCOLN ST & 87TH AVE) ## AREA 3 ## (85TH AVE) ## AREA 1 ## (89TH AVE) H:\BLAI\0N1131355\CAD\C3D\FIGR-131355-FIGURE 1_LOCATION MAP.dwg 12/5/2023 6:58:19 AM ## R ## 2024 SW Area Street Reconstruction Project, City Project #24-07 ## Blaine, MN ## Figure 1: Location Map ## LEGEND ## FEETSCALE 0300 600 ## HORZ. ## R ## FULL RECONSTRUCT: ## ADD B418 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER ## AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ## FULL PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT AND ## SPOT CURB AND UTILITY REPAIRS ## FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION AND SPOT ## CURB REPAIRS Page 47 of 179 ## POLK ST NE ## 89TH AVE NE ## US HWY 10 ## COUNTY ROAD 10 ## 7TH ST NE ## 90TH AVE NE ## PIERCE ST NE ## LINCOLN STREET ## TYLER ST NE ## TYLER ST NE ## ABLE ST NE ## VAN BUREN ST NE ## JACKSON ST NE ## QUINCY ST NE ## MONROE ST NE ## MADISON ST NE ## JEFFERSON ST NE ## JEFFERSON ST NE ## 87TH LANE NE ## UNIVERSITY AVE NE ## 89TH AVE NE ## 87TH AVE NE ## 85TH AVE NE ## CENTRAL AVE SERVICE RD 261 1120 285 277 8821 8713 815 821 8810 1355 1054 8821 8614 8720 8823 808 8600 8860 1310 8821 8660 1141 1355 8827 8820 297 293 1100 1150 1152 8727 273 1321 8854 8841 1000 800 1077 8820 8624 101 921 1065 8633 221 8706 8901 309 8712 1331 8734 8729 8815 1240 291 8744 806 8755 8557 8560 8650 8641 707 8866 511 8710 170 1175 1161 8830 255 981 8623 8839 8839 1341 8615 1348 801 8613 1080 1200 1015 1030 8569 8800 8820 8821 1089 8544 1048 1068 1220 1025 269 289 281 305 301 331 1399 8820 1349 8831 1332 1324 8655 941 849 841 231 8550 807 1340 8634 8840 8901 8840 815 1035 1047 1053 1300 8654 1344 8570 8551 1345 8556 1358 1340 173 8806 8575 8564 811 641 1201 8752 8730 8760 8745 1341 1092 265 8536 8502 8500 8943 ## TRUNK HIGHWAY 65 ## VAN BUREN ST NE ## VAN BUREN ST NE ## 89TH LANE NE ## 90TH AVE NE 8722 8732 8744 8754 8800 8822 8844 8852 8860 8812 8634 8620 8628 ## AREA 4 ## (CENTRAL AVENUE SERVICE ROAD) ## AREA 1 (89th Ave) ## AREA 2 ## (LINCOLN ST & 87TH AVE) 8707 ## UNASSIGNED ## AREA 3 ## (85TH AVE) ## H:\BLAI\0N1131355\CAD\C3D\FIGR-131355-FIGURE 2_ASSESSABLE PROPERTIES.dwg ## 12/14/2023 10:22:52 AM ## R ## 2024 SW Area Street Reconstruction Project, Proj. #24-07 ## Blaine, MN ## Figure #2: Assessable Properties ## LEGEND ## SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PER FRONT FOOT ## HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ## SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ## COMMERCIAL Page 48 of 179 ## CONSTRUCTION COSTS*$1,202,035 ## ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS$278,646 ## TOTAL COST$1,480,680 ## RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT RATEx 35%TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE ## ASSESSABLE COST$518,238÷13157.5 LF=$39.39 ## RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT ## RATE PER FRONT FOOT ## ASSESSABLE SINGLE FAMILY ## RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE ## AMOUNT ASSESSED ## ASSESSABLE ## RESIDENTIAL LOT ## UNITS ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## RESIDENTIAL LOT UNIT ## $39.39X5639.2 LF=$222,126.12÷54=$4,113.45 31-31-23-14-00141$4,113.45 31-31-23-14-00151$4,113.45 31-31-23-14-00161$4,113.45 31-31-23-14-00441$4,113.45 31-31-23-14-00721$4,113.45 31-31-23-14-00731$4,113.45 31-31-23-14-00751$4,113.45 31-31-23-23-00051$4,113.45 31-31-23-24-00141$4,113.45 31-31-23-24-00151$4,113.45 31-31-23-24-00161$4,113.45 31-31-23-24-00171$4,113.45 31-31-23-24-00181$4,113.45 31-31-23-24-00191$4,113.45 31-31-23-24-00201$4,113.45 31-31-23-24-00211$4,113.45 31-31-23-24-00221$4,113.45 31-31-23-24-00231$4,113.45 ## 31-31-23-24-00241$4,113.45269 89TH AVE NESVARE, GARY$4,113.45 ## 277 89TH AVE NERUKKE KRISTIAN D & JILL M$4,113.45 ## 273 89TH AVE NEMOORMAN, JEFFREY M$4,113.45 ## 285 89TH AVE NEPHILLIPS, SAMUEL JAY$4,113.45 ## 281 89TH AVE NESCHMELZER HANS$4,113.45 ## 293 89TH AVE NELE, HENRY$4,113.45 ## 289 89TH AVE NE8 MARKET LLC$4,113.45 ## 301 89TH AVE NEZAMARRIPA, LAURA$4,113.45 ## 297 89TH AVE NEPACHECO-AGUILAR, JUAN CARLOS$4,113.45 ## 309 89TH AVE NE5501 FRANCE LLC$4,113.45 ## 305 89TH AVE NELINDQUIST JERILYNN E$4,113.45 ## 801 89TH AVE NEBOCK CHESTER L & MARY L$4,113.45 ## 173 89TH AVE NETUFAA, GEBI$4,113.45 ## 815 89TH AVE NEBEVINS RICHARD D$4,113.45 ## 807 89TH AVE NEKROLL JOHN S & LESLIE A$4,113.45 ## 921 89TH AVE NEMASSEY DOUGLAS$4,113.45 ## 841 89TH AVE NEBRODIE WILLIAM J & CONNIE JEAN$4,113.45 ## 941 89TH AVE NEALBRIGHT BRIAN J$4,113.45 ## ASSESSMENT RATE BREAKDOWN *(CONSTRUCTION COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE SIDEWALK, STREET OVERSIZING, TRUNK STORM SEWER, WATER MAIN, SANITARY SEWER, DRIVEWAY ## REPLACEMENT, LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION REPAIR, AND WATERSHED PERMIT REQUIREMENT COSTS) ## RESIDENTIAL ## ASSESSMENT RATE ## PER FRONT FOOT ## PROPERTY PINPROPERTY ADDRESSPROPERTY OWNER ## ASSESSABLE ## RESIDENTIAL LOT ## UNITS ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## RESIDENTIAL LOT UNIT ## PROPOSED ## ASSESSMENT ## PROJECT 24-07 ## 2024 SOUTHWEST AREA STREET RECONSTRUCTION - AREA 1 ## 89TH AVE (UNIVERSITY AVE TO MN-65) ## CITY OF BLAINE ## EXHIBIT NO. 1A - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ## PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ## 981 89TH AVE NESCHMITT DANIEL R$4,113.45 Page 49 of 179 ## CONSTRUCTION COSTS*$1,202,035 ## ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS$278,646 ## TOTAL COST$1,480,680 ## RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT RATEx 35%TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE ## ASSESSABLE COST$518,238÷13157.5 LF=$39.39 ## RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT ## RATE PER FRONT FOOT ## ASSESSABLE SINGLE FAMILY ## RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE ## AMOUNT ASSESSED ## ASSESSABLE ## RESIDENTIAL LOT ## UNITS ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## RESIDENTIAL LOT UNIT ## $39.39X5639.2 LF=$222,126.12÷54=$4,113.45 ## ASSESSMENT RATE BREAKDOWN *(CONSTRUCTION COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE SIDEWALK, STREET OVERSIZING, TRUNK STORM SEWER, WATER MAIN, SANITARY SEWER, DRIVEWAY ## REPLACEMENT, LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION REPAIR, AND WATERSHED PERMIT REQUIREMENT COSTS) ## RESIDENTIAL ## ASSESSMENT RATE ## PER FRONT FOOT ## PROPERTY PINPROPERTY ADDRESSPROPERTY OWNER ## ASSESSABLE ## RESIDENTIAL LOT ## UNITS ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## RESIDENTIAL LOT UNIT ## PROPOSED ## ASSESSMENT 31-31-23-41-00011$4,113.45 31-31-23-41-00031$4,113.45 31-31-23-41-00051$4,113.45 31-31-23-41-00061$4,113.45 31-31-23-41-00371$4,113.45 31-31-23-41-00601$4,113.45 32-31-23-23-00161$4,113.45 32-31-23-23-00171$4,113.45 32-31-23-23-00191$4,113.45 32-31-23-23-00281$4,113.45 32-31-23-23-00291$4,113.45 32-31-23-23-00851$4,113.45 32-31-23-23-00861$4,113.45 32-31-23-23-00871$4,113.45 32-31-23-24-00071$4,113.45 32-31-23-24-00121$4,113.45 32-31-23-24-00151$4,113.45 32-31-23-31-00161$4,113.45 32-31-23-31-00171$4,113.45 32-31-23-31-00181$4,113.45 32-31-23-31-00481$4,113.45 32-31-23-31-00491$4,113.45 32-31-23-31-00501$4,113.45 32-31-23-31-00511$4,113.45 32-31-23-32-00021$4,113.45 32-31-23-32-00041$4,113.45 32-31-23-32-00131$4,113.45 32-31-23-32-00171$4,113.45 32-31-23-32-00181$4,113.45 ## 32-31-23-32-00191$4,113.451030 89TH AVE NEHUBBARD DANIEL$4,113.45 ## 1054 89TH AVE NESMITH, JENNIFER R$4,113.45 ## 1048 89TH AVE NEHAMACK, LORRAINE M$4,113.45 ## 1200 89TH AVE NEKROELLS, BENJAMIN & LEE MANDY$4,113.45 ## 1100 89TH AVE NEMASSEY, JAMES & JEANNE$4,113.45 ## 1340 89TH AVE NEHEDGERS, MITCHELL T$4,113.45 ## 1150 89TH AVE NELESEWSKI JACOB$4,113.45 ## 8860 LINCOLN ST NEWALDVOGEL THOMAS$4,113.45 ## 1240 89TH AVE NEMOORE, BRIAN$4,113.45 ## 1300 89TH AVE NEWOOD, GLENN$4,113.45 ## 1220 89TH AVE NEPERISH DONALD W & K H$4,113.45 ## 1358 89TH AVE NEERICKSON DALE E & DENISE V$4,113.45 ## 1310 89TH AVE NECHI, CHINDA C$4,113.45 ## 1349 89TH AVE NESPITZER MAXWELL G$4,113.45 ## 1355 89TH AVE NEFISH CATHERINE A$4,113.45 ## 1089 89TH AVE NELUND LARRY LEE JR & RACHEL RAE$4,113.45 ## 1341 89TH AVE NEWILLIAMSON, TYRONE$4,113.45 ## 1065 89TH AVE NESTANGRET BROOKE$4,113.45 ## 1077 89TH AVE NESYDNESS SCOTT M & TAMARA L$4,113.45 ## 1047 89TH AVE NESCHUETT, SALLY$4,113.45 ## 1053 89TH AVE NEMCCARTHY, MARY LOU$4,113.45 ## 1025 89TH AVE NEROEKER, LANE & KIMBERLY$4,113.45 ## 1035 89TH AVE NEKUTH, ROBERT$4,113.45 ## 8840 TYLER ST NEGALLAGHER, KIERAN M$4,113.45 ## 1015 89TH AVE NEJOHNSON, WAYNE ROBERT$4,113.45 ## 815 88 1/2 AVE NE815 BLAINE LLC C/O ERIC DWYER$4,113.45 ## 8840 POLK ST NEDOUGLAS PIERRE$4,113.45 ## 806 89TH AVE NELAW, LUCAS & DANIELLE$4,113.45 ## 808 89TH AVE NEROUNSVILLE, JANET$4,113.45 ## 800 89TH AVE NELA DOUCEUR, JOSEPHINE$4,113.45 Page 50 of 179 ## CONSTRUCTION COSTS*$1,202,035 ## ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS$278,646 ## TOTAL COST$1,480,680 ## RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT RATEx 35%TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE ## ASSESSABLE COST$518,238÷13157.5 LF=$39.39 ## RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT ## RATE PER FRONT FOOT ## ASSESSABLE SINGLE FAMILY ## RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE ## AMOUNT ASSESSED ## ASSESSABLE ## RESIDENTIAL LOT ## UNITS ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## RESIDENTIAL LOT UNIT ## $39.39X5639.2 LF=$222,126.12÷54=$4,113.45 ## ASSESSMENT RATE BREAKDOWN *(CONSTRUCTION COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE SIDEWALK, STREET OVERSIZING, TRUNK STORM SEWER, WATER MAIN, SANITARY SEWER, DRIVEWAY ## REPLACEMENT, LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION REPAIR, AND WATERSHED PERMIT REQUIREMENT COSTS) ## RESIDENTIAL ## ASSESSMENT RATE ## PER FRONT FOOT ## PROPERTY PINPROPERTY ADDRESSPROPERTY OWNER ## ASSESSABLE ## RESIDENTIAL LOT ## UNITS ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## RESIDENTIAL LOT UNIT ## PROPOSED ## ASSESSMENT 32-31-23-32-00211$4,113.45 32-31-23-32-00441$4,113.45 32-31-23-32-00511$4,113.45 32-31-23-32-00531$4,113.45 32-31-23-32-00541$4,113.45 54$222,126.30 ## TOTALS: ## 1080 89TH AVE NEBENEVIDES JOHN$4,113.45 ## 1092 89TH AVE NEORTEGA AMANDA$4,113.45 ## 1068 89TH AVE NETHURSTON, LAURA K$4,113.45 ## 1152 89TH AVE NEMALONE, KAYLA$4,113.45 ## 1000 89TH AVE NELEHMAN, JUSTIN$4,113.45 Page 51 of 179 ## CONSTRUCTION COSTS*$1,202,035 ## ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS$278,646 ## TOTAL COST$1,480,680TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE ## ASSESSABLE COST$1,480,680÷13157.5 LF=$112.53X35%=$39.39 31-31-23-13-0040230** 31-31-23-13-0041915.0 32-31-23-23-008897** 1242.0 ## 1149 89TH AVE NESPRING LAKE PARK FIRE DEPT$39.39$3,820.83 ## TOTALS:$48,922.38 **Denotes 150' corner lot credit given ## 707 89TH AVE NEST TIMOTHY CHURCH OF$39.39$36,041.85 ## SCHOOL/ ## FIRE DEPARTMENT ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## FRONT FOOT ## CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH$39.39$9,059.70 ## PROPOSED ## ASSESSMENT ## 641 89TH AVE NE ## PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ## PROJECT 24-07 ## 2024 SOUTHWEST AREA STREET RECONSTRUCTION - AREA 1 ## 89TH AVE (UNIVERSITY AVE TO MN-65) ## CITY OF BLAINE ## EXHIBIT NO. 1B - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PER FRONT FOOT ## ASSESSMENT RATE BREAKDOWN ## TOTAL COST PER ## FRONT FOOT ## SCHOOL/ ## FIRE DEPARTMENT ## ASSESSMENT ## PERCENTAGE ## PROPERTY PINPROPERTY ADDRESSPROPERTY OWNER ## ASSESSABLE FRONT ## FOOTAGE ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## FRONT FOOT ## *(CONSTRUCTION COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE SIDEWALK, STREET OVERSIZING, ## TRUNK STORM SEWER, WATER MAIN, SANITARY SEWER, DRIVEWAY ## REPLACEMENT, LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION REPAIR, AND WATERSHED PERMIT ## REQUIREMENT COSTS) Page 52 of 179 ## CONSTRUCTION COSTS*$1,392,582 ## ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS$322,817 ## TOTAL COST$1,715,399A ## ASSESSABLE COST$1,715,399÷13157.5 LF=$130.37X50%=$65.19 32-31-23-23-0010124.0 32-31-23-23-0012124.0 32-31-23-32-001467.0 315.00 $65.19$8,083.56 ## 1120 89TH AVE NEACCAP$65.19$4,367.73 ## TOTALS:$20,534.85 ## 1175 89TH AVE NECULLEN DANIEL$65.19$8,083.56 ## ASSESSMENT RATE BREAKDOWN ## HIGH-DENSITY ## RESIDENTIAL ## ASSESSMENT ## PERCENTAGE ## HIGH-DENSITY ## RESIDENTIAL ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## FRONT FOOT ## TOTAL COST PER ## FRONT FOOT ## PROPERTY PINPROPERTY ADDRESSPROPERTY OWNER ## ASSESSABLE FRONT ## FOOTAGE ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## FRONT FOOT ## PROPOSED ## ASSESSMENT ## 1161 89TH AVE NEACCAP ## *(CONSTRUCTION COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE SIDEWALK, STREET ## OVERSIZING, TRUNK STORM SEWER, WATER MAIN, SANITARY SEWER, ## LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION REPAIR, AND WATERSHED PERMIT ## REQUIREMENT COSTS) ## PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ## PROJECT 24-07 ## 2024 SOUTHWEST AREA STREET RECONSTRUCTION - AREA 1 ## 89TH AVE (UNIVERSITY AVE TO MN-65) ## CITY OF BLAINE ## EXHIBIT NO. 1C - MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Page 53 of 179 ## CONSTRUCTION COSTS*$2,767,260 ## ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS$641,483 ## TOTAL COST$3,408,743TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE ## ASSESSABLE COST$3,408,743÷13157.5 LF=$259.07X50%=$129.54 31-31-23-23-0003150.0 31-31-23-23-000450.0 31-31-23-23-0058317.2 31-31-23-31-0022694.2 31-31-23-31-0023189.9** 31-31-23-32-0008488.0** 32-31-23-24-0004550.0 32-31-23-24-0008190.0 32-31-23-24-0014204.0 2833.3 $63,215.52 ## UNASSIGNED405 87TH LLC$129.54$89,926.67 ## 1201 89TH AVE NEHRA OF ANOKA COUNTY C/O FACILITIES MGMT & CONST$129.54$71,247.00 ## 551 87TH LN NEA-1 PROPERTY LLC$129.54$24,599.65 ## 170 89TH AVE NE89 NORTHTOWN LLC$129.54 ## COMMERCIAL/ ## INDUSTRIAL ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## FRONT FOOT ## PROPOSED ## ASSESSMENT ## 1321 89TH AVE NECHEVTAYEVA, INNA$129.54$24,612.60 ## 1399 89TH AVE NEMORGAN VIII LLC$129.54$26,426.16 ## TOTALS:$367,021.80 **Denotes 150' corner lot credit given ## BLAINE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ## 8943 UNIVERSITY AVE NEVICTORIA ESTATES LTD$129.54$41,086.20 ## UNASSIGNEDBLAINE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY$129.54$6,477.00 $129.54$19,431.00 ## *(CONSTRUCTION COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE STREET OVERSIZING, ## TRUNK STORM SEWER, WATER MAIN, SANITARY SEWER, ## LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION REPAIR, AND WATERSHED PERMIT ## REQUIREMENT COSTS) ## UNASSIGNED ## PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ## PROJECT 24-07 ## 2024 SOUTHWEST AREA STREET RECONSTRUCTION - AREA 1 ## 89TH AVE (UNIVERSITY AVE TO MN-65) ## CITY OF BLAINE ## EXHIBIT NO. 1D - COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ## PROPERTY PINPROPERTY ADDRESSPROPERTY OWNER ## ASSESSABLE FRONT ## FOOTAGE ## ASSESSMENT RATE ## PER FRONT FOOT ## ASSESSMENT RATE BREAKDOWN ## TOTAL COST PER ## FRONT FOOT ## COMMERCIAL/ ## INDUSTRIAL ## ASSESSMENT ## PERCENTAGE Page 54 of 179 ## CONSTRUCTION COSTS*$869,511 ## ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS$201,563 ## TOTAL COST$1,071,074 ## RESIDENTIAL RATEx 35%TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE ## $374,876÷6797.6 LF=$55.15 ## RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT ## RATE PER FRONT FOOT ## ASSESSABLE SINGLE ## FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ## FOOTAGE ## AMOUNT ASSESSED ## ASSESSABLE ## RESIDENTIAL LOT ## UNITS ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## RESIDENTIAL LOT UNIT ## $55.15X5914.6 LF=$326,190.19÷56=$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00201$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00221$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00231$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00241$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00251$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00261$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00271$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00281$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00291$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00301$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00311$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00321$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00341$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00351$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00361$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00371$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00381$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00391$5,824.82 ## 8730 LINCOLN ST NEKEENAN JOHN H$5,824.82 ## 8744 LINCOLN ST NEDENNO DAVID N & SANDRA H$5,824.82 ## 8720 LINCOLN ST NEWILKE SCOTT A & ELIZABETH A$5,824.82 ## 8734 LINCOLN ST NEKEENAN, SEAN P$5,824.82 ## 8706 LINCOLN ST NELIU JIAN AN$5,824.82 ## 8712 LINCOLN ST NEDAWSON CLAUDIA L$5,824.82 ## 8713 LINCOLN ST NEXIONG KENG & YANG KONG$5,824.82 ## 8707 LINCOLN ST NECARRIGAN, JAMES R$5,824.82 ## 8727 LINCOLN ST NEFISCHER SANDRA SUE$5,824.82 ## 1331 87TH AVE NELAFRANCE, BRITTANY$5,824.82 ## 8745 LINCOLN ST NEFREEMAN, DEBORAH$5,824.82 ## 8729 LINCOLN ST NEBURCK JOHN P$5,824.82 ## 8815 LINCOLN ST NECRAMPTON, MELANIE JEAN$5,824.82 ## 8755 LINCOLN ST NEPROVOST, MARY ANN$5,824.82 ## 8823 LINCOLN ST NEKAHMANN, JUSTIN$5,824.82 ## PROPOSED ## ASSESSMENT ## 8841 LINCOLN ST NEGREEN PATRICIA$5,824.82 ## 8831 LINCOLN ST NEOLSON, TONY ALAN$5,824.82 ## RESIDENTIAL ## ASSESSMENT RATE ## PER FRONT FOOT ## ASSESSABLE COST ## PROPERTY PINPROPERTY ADDRESSPROPERTY OWNER ## ASSESSABLE ## RESIDENTIAL LOT ## UNITS ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## RESIDENTIAL LOT UNIT ## 8827 LINCOLN ST NEOLIVAR-ARIAN, MARCOS$5,824.82 ## PROJECT 24-07 ## 2024 SOUTHWEST AREA STREET RECONSTRUCTION - AREA 2 ## 87TH AVE (~200' WEST OF LINCOLN ST TO CENTRAL AVE FRONTAGE RD) AND ## LINCOLN ST (85TH AVE TO 89TH AVE) ## CITY OF BLAINE ## EXHIBIT NO. 2A - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ## PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ## ASSESSMENT RATE BREAKDOWN *(CONSTRUCTION COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE WATER MAIN, SANITARY SEWER, DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT, LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION REPAIR, AND ## WATERSHED PERMIT REQUIREMENT COSTS) Page 55 of 179 ## CONSTRUCTION COSTS*$869,511 ## ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS$201,563 ## TOTAL COST$1,071,074 ## RESIDENTIAL RATEx 35%TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE ## $374,876÷6797.6 LF=$55.15 ## RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT ## RATE PER FRONT FOOT ## ASSESSABLE SINGLE ## FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ## FOOTAGE ## AMOUNT ASSESSED ## ASSESSABLE ## RESIDENTIAL LOT ## UNITS ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## RESIDENTIAL LOT UNIT ## $55.15X5914.6 LF=$326,190.19÷56=$5,824.82 ## PROPOSED ## ASSESSMENT ## RESIDENTIAL ## ASSESSMENT RATE ## PER FRONT FOOT ## ASSESSABLE COST ## PROPERTY PINPROPERTY ADDRESSPROPERTY OWNER ## ASSESSABLE ## RESIDENTIAL LOT ## UNITS ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## RESIDENTIAL LOT UNIT ## ASSESSMENT RATE BREAKDOWN *(CONSTRUCTION COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE WATER MAIN, SANITARY SEWER, DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT, LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION REPAIR, AND ## WATERSHED PERMIT REQUIREMENT COSTS) 32-31-23-31-00401$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00411$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00431$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00441$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00451$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00461$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00471$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00531$5,824.82 32-31-23-31-00541$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00201$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00221$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00231$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00241$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00251$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00261$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00271$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00281$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00291$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00301$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00311$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00321$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00331$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00341$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00391$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00401$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00411$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00441$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00461$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00471$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00481$5,824.82 ## 8634 LINCOLN ST NEFRUEN AARON$5,824.82 ## 8650 LINCOLN ST NEMANDT, RENEE GENEVIEVE$5,824.82 ## 8614 LINCOLN ST NESTEWART, SCOTT B$5,824.82 ## 8624 LINCOLN ST NEINIGUEZ, MATTHEW F$5,824.82 ## 8560 LINCOLN ST NENAGEL GREG AARON$5,824.82 ## 8550 LINCOLN ST NEKRAMASZ, PAUL$5,824.82 ## 8557 LINCOLN ST NEGRANANDER DONALD R & J P$5,824.82 ## 8564 LINCOLN ST NEFLATS ON FIFTH LLC$5,824.82 ## 8575 LINCOLN ST NEKIRKS DOUGLAS C & D C$5,824.82 ## 8569 LINCOLN ST NEHENRY KENNETH ALAN$5,824.82 ## 8615 LINCOLN ST NEORNING DANIEL ROSS$5,824.82 ## 8613 LINCOLN ST NEPRIEBE ROBERT S$5,824.82 ## 8633 LINCOLN ST NERISVOLD KARLA L$5,824.82 ## 8623 LINCOLN ST NEROMICK ABBEY J$5,824.82 ## 1340 87TH AVE NESORIA MARISOL HERNANDEZ$5,824.82 ## 8641 LINCOLN ST NEMCCARTHY, JORDYN RICHELLE & MICHAEL$5,824.82 ## 1324 87TH AVE NEWEESE, KIMBERLY M$5,824.82 ## 1332 87TH AVE NEARTHUR, CAROL JO$5,824.82 ## 1348 87TH AVE NEBERIGAN WILLIAM F & LEE ANN$5,824.82 ## 8655 LINCOLN ST NEANCHETA, LEONARD$5,824.82 ## 1345 87TH AVE NESHEPARDSON ALBERT P$5,824.82 ## 1344 87TH AVE NEAK ENTERPRIE LLC$5,824.82 ## 8854 LINCOLN ST NEOHREN CRAIG A & BONNIE S$5,824.82 ## 1341 87TH AVE NEMUELLER, CHAD$5,824.82 ## 8810 LINCOLN ST NEVANG, KHUE$5,824.82 ## 8830 LINCOLN ST NECORRIGAN PATRICK W$5,824.82 ## 8800 LINCOLN ST NEBRIDGE SFR IV BORROWER I LLC$5,824.82 ## 8806 LINCOLN ST NENICKO, DIANNE K$5,824.82 ## 8752 LINCOLN ST NETOLUENE INC$5,824.82 ## 8760 LINCOLN ST NEGENOSKY DAWN$5,824.82 Page 56 of 179 ## CONSTRUCTION COSTS*$869,511 ## ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS$201,563 ## TOTAL COST$1,071,074 ## RESIDENTIAL RATEx 35%TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE ## $374,876÷6797.6 LF=$55.15 ## RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT ## RATE PER FRONT FOOT ## ASSESSABLE SINGLE ## FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ## FOOTAGE ## AMOUNT ASSESSED ## ASSESSABLE ## RESIDENTIAL LOT ## UNITS ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## RESIDENTIAL LOT UNIT ## $55.15X5914.6 LF=$326,190.19÷56=$5,824.82 ## PROPOSED ## ASSESSMENT ## RESIDENTIAL ## ASSESSMENT RATE ## PER FRONT FOOT ## ASSESSABLE COST ## PROPERTY PINPROPERTY ADDRESSPROPERTY OWNER ## ASSESSABLE ## RESIDENTIAL LOT ## UNITS ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## RESIDENTIAL LOT UNIT ## ASSESSMENT RATE BREAKDOWN *(CONSTRUCTION COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE WATER MAIN, SANITARY SEWER, DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT, LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION REPAIR, AND ## WATERSHED PERMIT REQUIREMENT COSTS) 32-31-23-34-00491$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00501$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00511$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00521$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00561$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00581$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00681$5,824.82 32-31-23-34-00671$5,824.82 56$326,189.92 ## TOTALS: ## 8536 LINCOLN ST NELUXURY ON LADDIE LAKE$5,824.82 ## 8544 LINCOLN ST NEKABORE, YOUSSOUF A$5,824.82 ## 8556 LINCOLN ST NEBLUCHER JOHN$5,824.82 ## UNASSIGNEDCONVENIENCE STORE INVESTMENTS$5,824.82 ## 8570 LINCOLN ST NEROESSLER RICHARD C & MEMRY$5,824.82 ## 8551 LINCOLN ST NEDELLY LEONARD A & DEBORA L$5,824.82 ## 8660 LINCOLN ST NEHARACZ TRUSTEE, JAMES F$5,824.82 ## 8600 LINCOLN ST NEMURPHY, KELLY E$5,824.82 Page 57 of 179 ## CONSTRUCTION COSTS*$924,694 ## ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS$214,355 ## TOTAL COST$1,139,049TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE ## ASSESSABLE COST$1,139,049÷6797.6 LF=$167.57X50%=$83.79 32-31-23-31-0001164.0 32-31-23-34-0021152.0 316.0 ## TOTALS:$26,477.64 ## 8710 CENTRAL AVE NEDARUL ARQAM CENTER OF EXCELLENCE$83.79$13,741.56 ## 8654 CENTRAL AVE NESPLK LLC$83.79$12,736.08 ## PROPOSED ## ASSESSMENT ## PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ## ASSESSMENT RATE BREAKDOWN ## TOTAL COST PER ## FRONT FOOT ## COMMERCIAL/ ## INDUSTRIAL ## ASSESSMENT ## PERCENTAGE ## COMMERCIAL/ ## INDUSTRIAL ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## FRONT FOOT ## *(CONSTRUCTION COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE WATER MAIN, SANITARY ## SEWER, LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION REPAIR, AND WATERSHED PERMIT ## REQUIREMENT COSTS) ## PROPERTY PINPROPERTY ADDRESSPROPERTY OWNER ## ASSESSABLE FRONT ## FOOTAGE ## ASSESSMENT RATE ## PER FRONT FOOT ## EXHIBIT NO. 2B - COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ## PROJECT 24-07 ## 2024 SOUTHWEST AREA STREET RECONSTRUCTION - AREA 2 ## 87TH AVE (~200' WEST OF LINCOLN ST TO CENTRAL AVE FRONTAGE RD) AND ## LINCOLN ST (85TH AVE TO 89TH AVE) ## CITY OF BLAINE Page 58 of 179 ## CONSTRUCTION COSTS*$167,303 ## ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS$38,783 ## TOTAL COST$206,086TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE ## ASSESSABLE COST$206,086÷1083.2 LF=$190.26X50%=$95.13 32-31-23-34-0057301.0 301.0 ## PROPOSED ## ASSESSMENT ## 1355 85TH AVE NECONVENIENCE STORE INVESTMENTS$95.13$28,634.13 ## TOTALS:$28,634.13 ## PROPERTY PINPROPERTY ADDRESSPROPERTY OWNER ## ASSESSABLE FRONT ## FOOTAGE ## ASSESSMENT RATE ## PER FRONT FOOT ## ASSESSMENT RATE BREAKDOWN ## TOTAL COST PER ## FRONT FOOT ## COMMERCIAL/ ## INDUSTRIAL ## ASSESSMENT ## PERCENTAGE ## COMMERCIAL/ ## INDUSTRIAL ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## FRONT FOOT ## *(CONSTRUCTION COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE WATER MAIN, SANITARY ## SEWER, LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION REPAIR, AND WATERSHED PERMIT ## REQUIREMENT COSTS) ## PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ## PROJECT 24-07 ## 2024 SOUTHWEST AREA STREET RECONSTRUCTION - AREA 3 ## 85TH AVE (LINCOLN ST TO MN-65) ## CITY OF BLAINE ## EXHIBIT NO. 3A - COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL Page 59 of 179 ## CONSTRUCTION COSTS*$113,861 ## ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS$26,394 ## TOTAL COST$140,255 ## RESIDENTIAL RATEx 35%TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE ## $49,089÷3452.0 LF=$14.22 ## RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT ## RATE PER FRONT FOOT ## AMOUNT ASSESSED ## ASSESSABLE ## RESIDENTIAL LOT ## UNITS ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## RESIDENTIAL LOT UNIT ## $14.22X1076.0 LF=$15,300.72÷11=$1,390.97 32-31-23-31-00101$1,390.97 32-31-23-31-00041$1,390.97 32-31-23-31-00151$1,390.97 32-31-23-31-00521$1,390.97 32-31-23-31-00121$1,390.97 32-31-23-31-00111$1,390.97 32-31-23-31-00071$1,390.97 32-31-23-31-00131$1,390.97 32-31-23-31-00051$1,390.97 32-31-23-31-00061$1,390.97 32-31-23-31-00031$1,390.97 11$15,300.67 ## 8722 CENTRAL AVE NEHANSON, JOSEPH M$1,390.97 ## TOTALS: ## 8744 CENTRAL AVE NEQUINEHAN DARRELL$1,390.97 ## 8754 CENTRAL AVE NEWISHY, FORREST$1,390.97 ## 8800 CENTRAL AVE NEAK ENTERPRISE LLC$1,390.97 ## 8860 CENTRAL AVE NEHOLMBERG, JOHN E$1,390.97 ## 8852 CENTRAL AVE NEHOLMBERG, MARY KAY$1,390.97 ## 8844 CENTRAL AVE NESCARTOZZI, CAROLINE CELESTE$1,390.97 ## 8866 CENTRAL AVE NEHOLMBERG, JOHN E$1,390.97 ## 8812 CENTRAL AVE NESWANSON, LISA L$1,390.97 ## PROPOSED ## ASSESSMENT ## 8822 CENTRAL AVE NEERICKSON, EVAN M$1,390.97 ## 8732 CENTRAL AVE NEHERNANDEZ, KAYLARUBY$1,390.97 ## ASSESSMENT RATE BREAKDOWN *(CONSTRUCTION COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE WATER MAIN, SANITARY SEWER, DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT, LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION REPAIR, ## AND WATERSHED PERMIT REQUIREMENT COSTS) ## RESIDENTIAL ## ASSESSMENT RATE ## PER FRONT FOOT ## ASSESSABLE COST ## ASSESSABLE SINGLE FAMILY ## RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE ## PROPERTY PINPROPERTY ADDRESSPROPERTY OWNER ## ASSESSABLE ## RESIDENTIAL LOT ## UNITS ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## RESIDENTIAL LOT UNIT ## PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ## PROJECT 24-07 ## 2024 SOUTHWEST AREA STREET RECONSTRUCTION - AREA 4 ## CENTRAL AVE FRONTAGE RD (450' SOUTH OF 87TH AVE TO TO CUL-DE-SAC) ## CITY OF BLAINE ## EXHIBIT NO. 4A - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Page 60 of 179 ## CONSTRUCTION COSTS*$113,861 ## ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS$26,394 ## TOTAL COST$140,255TOTAL FRONT FOOTAGE ## ASSESSABLE COST$140,255÷3452.0 LF=$40.63X50%=$20.32 32-31-23-31-000126.0** 32-31-23-34-006983.0 32-31-23-34-0062102.0 32-31-23-34-0070113.3 32-31-23-34-002126.0** 350.3 ## 8654 CENTRAL AVE NESPLK LLC$20.32$528.32 ## TOTALS:$7,118.10 ## 8628 CENTRAL AVE NEURAM SCOTT JAMES$20.32$2,302.26 **Denotes 150' corner lot credit given ## 8620 CENTRAL AVE NEJRSLEA - BLAINE LLC C/O LEON EIDELMAN$20.32$2,072.64 ## UNASSIGNEDURAM SCOTT JAMES$20.32$1,686.56 ## *(CONSTRUCTION COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE WATER MAIN, SANITARY ## SEWER, LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION REPAIR, AND WATERSHED PERMIT ## REQUIREMENT COSTS) ## DARUL ARQAM CENTER OF EXCELLENCE$20.32$528.32 ## PROPOSED ## ASSESSMENT ## 8710 CENTRAL AVE NE ## PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ## PROJECT 24-07 ## 2024 SOUTHWEST AREA STREET RECONSTRUCTION - AREA 4 ## CENTRAL AVE FRONTAGE RD (450' SOUTH OF 87TH AVE TO TO CUL-DE-SAC) ## CITY OF BLAINE ## EXHIBIT NO. 4B - COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ## PROPERTY PINPROPERTY ADDRESSPROPERTY OWNER ## ASSESSABLE FRONT ## FOOTAGE ## ASSESSMENT RATE ## PER FRONT FOOT ## ASSESSMENT RATE BREAKDOWN ## TOTAL COST PER ## FRONT FOOT ## COMMERCIAL/ ## INDUSTRIAL ## ASSESSMENT ## PERCENTAGE ## COMMERCIAL/ ## INDUSTRIAL ## ASSESSMENT RATE PER ## FRONT FOOT Page 61 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Staff Report ## File Number: RES 26-166 ## Agenda Date ## Status August 17, 2026 ## In Control ## File Type ## City Council ## Motion ## Approval of Consent Agenda: - Daniel Schluender, Director of Engineering Agenda Item # 7.5 Resolution to Approve Joint Powers Agreement No. GR_00815 with Anoka County for the Signalization of CSAH 14 (125th Ave NE) at Zest Street NE, Improvement Project No. T2611 and Associated Budget ## Amendments ## Executive Summary The developer of Lexington Crossing has been working with Anoka County to install a traffic control signal system at the intersection of CSAH 14 (125th Ave NE) and Zest Street NE. The signal requires a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) between Anoka County and Blaine. Plans have been prepared and the project can move forward as proposed to construct the traffic control signal system and related road improvements. Construction is scheduled for the summer of 2026. ## Background The county has required the developer of the Lexington Crossing to install a traffic signal system at the intersection of CSAH 14 (125th Ave NE) and Zest Street NE. The county will be supplying the controller cabinet and inspection for the signal system at a cost of $50,000. As the county does not have a way to recover the cost of supplying the cabinet directly or inspection costs from the developer, they have asked to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with the city. In turn, the city will amend the development agreement for the $50,000 to account for the cost of the signal cabinet and payment of the inspection of the signal improvements. Staff worked with Anoka County to prepare a JPA based on the county supplying the control cabinet and inspection at a cost of $50,000. The JPA also indicates the standard future maintenance obligations of the city, which include crosswalk pavement markings on all city streets, street lights, luminaries and EVP systems on traffic signals, and initial and ongoing electrical costs for street lights and traffic signal. ## Strategic Plan Relationship Page 62 of 179 The project aligns with the City’s strategic initiatives for Growth Management and providing a Well- maintained Infrastructure. ## Board/Commission Review ## N/A ## Financial Impact This improvement was not in the 2026 Capital Improvement Program. The estimated cost of the materials furnished by the County to the City is $35,000. The estimated cost for signal construction inspection provided during construction by the County is $15,000. The total estimated cost to the City with County furnished materials and County signal construction inspection is $50,000. Actual costs will be determined once the County furnished cabinet is constructed and fully operational. An updated cost estimate shall be provided to the City at the time of billing. These costs shall be reimbursed to the County by the City. The costs shall then be reimbursed to the City from the developer of the Lexington Crossing development. ## Public Outreach/Input ## N/A ## Staff Recommendation Approve the following resolution. ## Attachment List 1. CP 26-15-14_Blaine JPA_7-29-26 Page 63 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Signature Copy ## Resolution: RES 26-166 Resolution to Approve Joint Powers Agreement No. GR_00815 with Anoka County for the Signalization of CSAH 14 (125th Ave NE) at Zest Street NE, Improvement Project No. T2611 and ## Associated Budget Amendments WHEREAS, the County of Anoka and the City of Blaine desire to jointly construct a signal at the intersection at County State Aid Highway CSAH 14 (125th Ave NE) at Zest Street NE in accordance with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation standards for the benefit of the traveling public; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59 authorizes the County of Anoka to enter into an Agreement with the City of Blaine to provide for the construction of a signal system at CSAH 14 (125th Ave NE) and Zest Street NE for the joint exercise of powers common to each; and WHEREAS, said Agreement details the responsibilities of the County of Anoka and the City of Blaine as to the costs associated with the construction and related activities of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Blaine as follows: 1. Joint Powers Agreement No. GR_00815 between the County of Anoka and the City of Blaine with regard to the construction of a signal system at the intersection of CSAH 14 (125th Ave NE) and Zest Street NE is hereby approved. 2. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Blaine hereby authorizes the following revenue increase(s) to the budget: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Blaine hereby authorizes the following expenditure increase(s) to the budget: ## Fund / Account Project ## Number ## Project Description Amount ## PMP Fund - Developer Payments 503.50.530.533.5309-3806 T2611 Signalization of CSAH 14 (125th ## Ave NE) at Zest Street NE $50,000 ## Fund / Account Project ## Number ## Project Description Amount Page 64 of 179 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Blaine this 17th day of August, 2026. ## PMP Fund - Project Contract Cost 503.50.530.533.5309-4590 T2611 Signalization of CSAH 14 (125th ## Ave NE) at Zest Street NE $50,000 Page 65 of 179 ## Anoka County Contract No. GR_00815 1 ## JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT ## FOR THE SIGNALIZATION OF COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 14 AT ZEST ST NE ## IN THE CITY OF BLAINE, MN ## (CP 26-15-14) THIS AGREEMENT is made by the parties on the last date executed below, by and between the County of Anoka, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, hereinafter referred to as "County", City of Blaine, 10801 Town Square Drive NE, Blaine, MN 55449, hereinafter referred to as "City". ## WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the parties to this agreement agree it is in the best interests of the traveling public to construct a new traffic control signal system on County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 14 (125 th ## Ave NE) ## at Zest St NE and, WHEREAS, the City has prepared design plans for the construction of the traffic signal system at CSAH 14 at Zest St NE in accordance with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation standards; and, WHEREAS, the County has jurisdiction over CSAH 14 and the City has jurisdiction over Zest St NE and, WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 471.59 authorizes governmental units to enter into joint powers agreements for the joint exercise of powers common to each. ## NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY STIPULATED AND AGREED: ## I. PURPOSE The parties have joined together for the purpose of constructing the signal system on CSAH 14 at Zest St NE, as described in the design plans (hereinafter the “Project”). The County and the City project numbers are noted above. The engineering plans for the Project are filed in the office of the Anoka County Highway Department and incorporated herein by reference. The parties to this Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) agree in principle that construction of the Project is in the best interest of the traveling public. It is agreed that the final construction plans have been reviewed and accepted by the parties. ## II. METHOD The City shall cause the construction of the Project. Page 66 of 179 ## Anoka County Contract No. GR_00815 2 ## INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS: As agreed by the parties, improvements to the following intersection have been incorporated into the design plans CSAH 14 at Zest St NE: Construction of a new traffic control signal system, fiber interconnect revisions, and pedestrian curb ramp construction. ## RIGHT OF WAY: No additional ROW acquisition is expected along CSAH 14. ## TRAFFIC SIGNALS: The parties agree that a new traffic control signal system will be constructed at the intersection of CSAH 14 and Zest St NE. The County shall furnish to the City the required traffic signal cabinet and controller along with all related signal control equipment. The County will also furnish to the City EVP detectors, confirmation lights, and EVP controller cabinet phase selector card. All equipment provided by the County, as well as any traffic signal construction inspection services performed by County personnel, shall be subject to reimbursement by the City. Following the construction, the ongoing traffic signal maintenance at the CSAH 14 and Zest St NE intersection will be consistent with Anoka County unwarranted traffic signal maintenance practices. After construction is complete, the ongoing maintenance of the traffic signal at the CSAH 14 and Zest St NE intersection will follow Anoka County’s standard practices for unwarranted signals, with the County fully responsible for all traffic signal maintenance. The City will reimburse the County for 100% of all signal and emergency vehicle preemption (EVP) maintenance costs. Additionally, the City will be responsible for maintaining all luminaires and supplying the electrical power needed for the traffic signal system. ## TRAFFIC CONTROL: The parties agree that CSAH 14 and Zest St NE will be open to through traffic during construction. The parties agree and understand the cost for the traffic control shall be responsibility of the City. ## UTILITIES: The City will be responsible for coordinating the relocation of any utilities within this project area. ## PERMITS: The parties agree that the City will secure all necessary permits for the Project. The County requests that the City inform the County of any ordinances or city regulations that affect construction at the time of the signing of this JPA (e.g. setbacks, tree clearing ordinances, or any other city ordinances). Page 67 of 179 ## Anoka County Contract No. GR_00815 3 ## III. COSTS Except as otherwise provided herein, construction and engineering costs for the Project are the sole responsibility of the City. The estimated cost of the materials furnished by the County to the City described in Part II (Traffic Signals) is $35,000. The estimated cost for signal construction inspection provided during construction by the County is $15,000. The total estimated cost to the City with County furnished materials and County signal construction inspection is $50,000. Actual costs will be determined once the County furnished cabinet is constructed and fully operational. An updated cost estimate shall be provided to the City at the time of billing. These costs shall be reimbursed to the County by the City. ## IV. TERM / TERMINATION This Agreement shall become effective immediately upon execution, and will remain in effect until the Project and all restoration activities are completed, with exception of the ownership and maintenance provisions within this Agreement which shall continue indefinitely. ## V. DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS All funds disbursed by the County or City pursuant to this Agreement shall be disbursed by each entity pursuant to the methods provided by law. ## VI. CONTRACTS AND PURCHASES All contracts let and purchases made pursuant to this Agreement shall be made by the County in conformance with federal, state, and local laws and regulations. ## VII. STRICT ACCOUNTABILITY A strict accounting shall be made of all funds and report of all receipts and shall be made upon request by either party. Prior to City payment to the County, the County shall provide the City a copy of all invoices and cost documentation to assist the City in their application for funding/reimbursement as necessary. ## VIII. SIGNALIZATION POWER The City shall at their sole expense, install and cause the installation of an adequate electrical power source to the service cabinet for all the previously mentioned CSAH 14/Zest St NE traffic control signal system including any necessary extension of power lines. The City shall be the lead agency in this matter. Upon completion of said traffic control signal installations, the ongoing cost of the electrical power to the signal system shall be the sole responsibility of the City. ## IX. MAINTENANCE A. Maintenance of the sidewalk/trail at the intersection of CSAH 14 and Zest St NE shall be the responsibility of the City. The City shall be responsible for general routine maintenance, such as sweeping, clearing, plowing, trash removal and other incidental items. The City shall be responsible for long-term maintenance, such as crack sealing and replacement. Page 68 of 179 ## Anoka County Contract No. GR_00815 4 B. Maintenance of crosswalk pavement markings shall be the responsibility of the County. The County will be responsible for the maintenance of the crosswalk pavement marking for the crossings at the signalized intersection. C. Cost of electrical power to the signal system shall be the obligation of the City. D. Maintenance of the completed traffic control signal and signal equipment at the intersection of CSAH 14 and Zest St NE shall be the sole obligation of the County on a 100% reimbursable basis with the City billed quarterly for 100% of all incurred costs. E. The County shall maintain the said traffic signal controllers, traffic signal and pedestrian indications, loop detectors and associated wiring of the said traffic control signals at the sole obligation of the County on a 100% reimbursable basis with the City billed quarterly for 100% of all incurred costs. F. Maintenance of the galvanized finish on the traffic signal system poles and mast arms shall be the sole obligation of the City. Painting of the traffic signal shall be the sole obligation of the City. G. Timing of the completed traffic control signal shall be determined by the County. H. Only the County shall have access to the controller cabinets. I. The traffic control signals shall be the property of the County. J. The City shall be responsible for maintenance of the luminaries and luminaire relamping. K. All maintenance of the EVP System shall be completed by the County. The City shall be billed by the County on a quarterly basis for all incurred costs. L. EVP Emitter Units may be installed on and used only by Emergency Vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes §169.011, Subdivision 3, and §169.03. The City shall provide a list to the County Engineer, or the County's duly appointed representative, of all such vehicles with emitter units on an annual basis. M. Malfunctions of the EVP System shall be immediately reported to the County. N. All timing of said EVP System shall be determined by the County. O. In the event said EVP System or components are, in the opinion of the County, being misused, or the conditions set forth are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after receipt by the City, written notice thereof from the County, the County shall remove the EVP System. Upon removal of the EVP System pursuant to this paragraph, the field wiring, cabinet wiring, detector receiver, infrared detector heads and indicator lamps and all other components shall become the property of the County. ## X. NOTICE Page 69 of 179 ## Anoka County Contract No. GR_00815 5 For purposes of delivery of any notices herein, the notice shall be effective if delivered to the County Administrator of Anoka County, 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, on behalf of the County, and to the City Administrator of Blaine, 10801 Town Square Drive NE, Blaine, MN 55449, on behalf of the City. ## XI. INDEMNIFICATION The City and County mutually agree to indemnify and hold harmless each other from any claims, losses, costs, expenses or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of the respective officers, agents, or employees relating to activities conducted by either party under this Agreement. ## XII. ENTIRE AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT OF A WRITING It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and all negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter thereof, as well as any previous agreement presently in effect between the parties to the subject matter thereof. Any alterations, variations, or modifications of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing and duly signed by the parties. ## XIII. COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each one of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Page 70 of 179 ## Anoka County Contract No. GR_00815 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of this Agreement have hereunto set their hands on the dates written below: ## COUNTY OF ANOKA ## By: ## Jim Dickinson ## County Administrator ## RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: ## By: Joseph J. MacPherson, P.E. ## Transportation Division Manager ## APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION: ## By: ## Christine V. Carney ## Assistant County Attorney Page 71 of 179 ## Anoka County Contract No. GR_00815 7 ## CITY OF BLAINE ## By: ## Tim Sanders ## Mayor ## Dated: ## By: ## Erik Thorvig ## City Manager ## Dated: Page 72 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Staff Report ## File Number: RES 26-167 ## Agenda Date ## Status August 17, 2026 ## In Control ## File Type ## City Council ## Resolution ## Approval of Consent Agenda: - Daniel Schluender, Director of Engineering Agenda Item # 7.6 Resolution to Approve Amended Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) No. CCON26-000486-V1 with Anoka County for Intersection Improvements at CSAH 52 (Radisson Road) and CSAH 12 (109th Avenue) and Signalization at Mankato Street/Tournament Players Pkwy and CSAH 12 (109th Avenue), Improvement ## Project No. T2518 and Associated Budget Amendment ## Executive Summary The developer of the Scheel's lot has been working with Anoka County to cThe county has agreed to install these improvements a signal system at the intersection of Mankato Street and CSAH 12 (109th Avenue) to move traffic in a efficient and safe manner during the TH 65 proejct. The plan is now prepared, and the project can move forward as proposed to reconstruct and install new traffic control signal systems. Construction is scheduled for Summer of 2026. The county has required the developer of the Scheels site to construct a new right-in/right-out access and associated turn lane to the new store on CSAH 52 (Radisson Road). The county is prepared to add the work to their existing project on Radisson Road at an estimated cost of $156,000. As the county does not have a way to recover these costs directly from the developer, they have asked to amend the existing Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with the city. In turn, the city will amend the development agreement for the $156,000 to account for the cost of these improvements. Staff worked with Anoka County to prepare an amended JPA based on the county providing the improvements at a cost of $156,000. The existing portion of the JPA continues to indicate the standard future maintenance obligations of the city, which include crosswalk pavement markings on all city streets, street lights, luminaries and EVP systems on traffic signals, and initial and ongoing electrical costs for street lights and traffic signal. ## Background Anoka County and the City of Blaine wish to amend JPA dated April 29, 2026 (Anoka County Contract No. CCON26-000486) approved at Blaine City Council on April 20, 2026 with Resolution 26-65. Page 73 of 179 1. The parties agree to amend Section II. Method, to add the following: ## INTERSECTIONS: It is understood and agreed upon by the parties that CSAH 52 at 105th Avenue will involve additional access work for a development project in which the City of Blaine is working directly with the developer. In addition to the improvements addressed in the original Agreement, the parties further agree that certain access modifications will be incorporated into the Project plans, as follows: The improvements to Radisson Road (CSAH 52) will provide a full-length right turn lane for the proposed Scheels access points (one ingress, one egress) tying into the existing Kwik Trip access. The parties agree to extend the existing right turn lane approximately 150’ to provide a full-length deceleration length to the northern Scheels access (the ingress). South of the Kwik Trip access, the County will install a ‘bump out’ to separate the vehicles turning into Scheels and/or Kwik Trip, from those turning onto 105th Avenue. (Improvements are collectively referred to as the “Development Improvements”.) The parties agree there is sufficient distance between the Kwik Trip access and the 105th Avenue intersection to provide for full-length deceleration in the right turn lane, under the assumption that some deceleration (less than 10mph) occurs within the through lane. The parties agree this is acceptable design practice. The County will construct the above-described Development Improvements, which are incorporated by reference into Exhibit A of the original Agreement, and which are depicted in the attached Exhibit entitled “Development ## Improvements - CSAH 52_105th Ave.” 2. The parties agree to amend Section III. Costs, to add the following: ## COSTS. The parties agree that the parties can achieve economy of scale cost savings by constructing the access Development Improvements concurrently with the Project. The City of Blaine shall work with the developer to obtain whatever separate agreements are necessary to address the work and reimbursement of the County’s costs from the developer. For purposes of this Agreement, the City is responsible to reimburse the County for all costs associated with the Development Improvements described above. Estimated Costs. The County’s costs related to the Development Improvements are estimated as follows: $20,000 for design/engineering, $126,000 for construction, and $10,000 related to inspections, for a total cost estimate of $156,000. The parties agree that the County’s reimbursement of Development Improvement costs from the City of Blaine shall be based on actual costs incurred by the County and not the estimated costs. 3. This Amendment is hereby made a part of and shall be amended to the Agreement of the parties. 4. All other terms and conditions of the original Agreement, not in conflict with the above, shall remain in full force and effect. 5. Counterparts: This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each one of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Following the reconstruction and the new signal installation, the ongoing traffic signal maintenance at the intersections of CSAH 12 (109th Avenue) and Mankato Street and CSAH 12 (109th Avenue) at CSAH 52 (Radisson Road) will be consistent with Anoka County warranted traffic signal maintenance practices, with the County 100% responsible for all ongoing traffic signal maintenance, the City reimbursing the County 100% for all ongoing EVP maintenance, the City 100% responsible for all luminare maintenance, and the city 100% responsible for the ongoing supply of electrical power for the traffic signal system. ## Strategic Plan Relationship Page 74 of 179 The project aligns with the City’s strategic initiatives for Growth Management and providing a Well- maintained Infrastructure. ## Board/Commission Review This item has not been reviewed by any boards or commissions. ## Financial Impact The costs for the amendment portion of the JPA, $156,000, will be paid as follows, the County will bill the city and the city will be fully reimbursed by the developer of the Scheels parcel. The remainder of the JPA costs remain the same as the original JPA as depicted below. The estimated construction cost of the total project is $4,647,528.06 The total estimated construction cost to the City is $709,414.90. The estimated cost of the County furnished Signal Cabinets is $70,000.00, with the City’s contribution toward the Signal Cabinets being $26,250.00. The estimated cost of the design for the two temporary signals is $21,424.00. The City participation in construction engineering will be at a rate of eight percent (8%) of their designated construction share of $709,141.90. The estimated cost to the City for construction engineering is $56,731.35. In summary, the total City share of this project is $813,547.25 (includes construction and construction engineering costs). (see summary below). ## Estimated City Cost ## Construction Cost $709,141.90 ## Construction Engineering $56,731.35 County furnished signal cabinet $26,250.00 Design of temporary signals $21,424.00 ## TOTAL $813,547.25 Upon award of the construction contract, the City shall pay to the County, upon written demand by the County, ninety-five percent (95%) of its portion of the cost of the project estimated at $772,869.89. Prior to billing, this estimate will be updated by the County to reflect the actual bid prices as awarded. An updated cost estimate shall be provided to the City at the time of billing. The City's share of the cost of the project shall include only construction and construction engineering expenses and does not include engineering design and administrative expenses incurred by the County. After final completion of the project, the City's share of the construction cost will be based upon actual construction costs. If necessary, adjustments to the initial ninety-five percent (95%) charged will be made in the form of credit or additional charges to the City's share. Also, the remaining five percent (5%) of the City's portion of the construction costs shall be paid. Page 75 of 179 These costs are proposed to be paid for by the city's Municipal State Aid Funds as they are eligible costs. The projects were identified in the City's CIP in years 2023 and 2025. The combined budget is $990,000. Project 2023 ## Budget 2025 ## Budget ## Total CSAH 52/CSAH 12 Traffic Signal (Radisson Rd & 109th Ave) - T2518 $330,000 $660,000 $990,000 To reflect this amended JPA, the attached resolution includes a budget adjustment for the developer's share of the project. ## Public Outreach/Input ## N/A ## Staff Recommendation Approve the following resolution. ## Attachment List 1. Amend No. 1 to Blaine JPA (CSAH 52_105th) C26-0000486 2. Exhibit to JPA Amend No. 1 - Development Improvements - RTL Adjustments Page 76 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Signature Copy ## Resolution: RES 26-167 Resolution to Approve Amended Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) No. CCON26-000486-V1 with Anoka County for Intersection Improvements at CSAH 52 (Radisson Road) and CSAH 12 (109th Avenue) and Signalization at Mankato Street/Tournament Players Pkwy and CSAH 12 (109th Avenue), ## Improvement Project No. T2518 and Associated Budget Amendment WHEREAS, the County of Anoka and the City of Blaine desire to jointly construct the signalization of the intersection at CSAH 12 (109th Avenue) at CSAH 52 (Radisson Road), CSAH 12 (109th Avenue) at Mankato Street NE/Tournament Players Parkway NE and the temporary signal systems on Davenport Street NE at 103rd Avenue NE and at 107th Avenue NE in accordance with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation standards for the benefit of the traveling public; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59 authorizes the County of Anoka to enter into an Agreement with the City of Blaine to provide for the construction of a signal system at CSAH 52 (Radisson Road), CSAH 12 (109th Avenue) at Mankato Street NE/Tournament Players Parkway NE and the temporary signal systems on Davenport Street NE at 103rd Avenue NE and at 107th Avenue NE and CSAH 12 (109th Avenue) for the joint exercise of powers common to each; and WHEREAS, said Agreement details the responsibilities of the County of Anoka and the City of Blaine as to the costs associated with the construction and related activities of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Blaine as follows: 1. Joint Powers Agreement No. CCON26-000486-V1 between the County of Anoka and the City of Blaine with regard to the reconstruction of a signal system at the intersection of CSAH 12 (109th Avenue) at CSAH 52 (Radisson Road), installation of a new signal system at CSAH 12 (109th Avenue) at Mankato Street NE/Tournament Players Parkway NE and the temporary signal systems on Davenport Street NE at 103rd Avenue NE and at 107th Avenue NE is hereby approved. 2. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Blaine hereby authorizes the following revenue increase(s) to the budget: PASSED by the City Council of the City of Blaine this 17th day of August, 2026. ## Fund / Account Project ## Number ## Project Description Amount ## MSA Fund - Developer Payments 406.50.530.533.5309-3806 ## T2518 ## CSAH 52/CSAH 12 Traffic Signal (Radisson Rd & 109th Ave) $156,000 Page 77 of 179 ## Anoka County Contract No. CCON26-000486-V1 ## AMENDMENT NO. 1 ## TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT ## FOR THE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT COUNTY STATE HIGHWAY ## (CSAH) 12 (109 th ## AVENUE) AT CSAH 52 (RADDISON ROAD) THE SIGNALIZATION ## OF CSAH 12 (109 th ## AVENUE) ## AT MANKATO STREET NE/TOURNAMENT PLATERS PARKWAY NE AND ## TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTION ON DAVENPORT STREET IN ## THE CITY OF BLAINE, MN ## ANOKA COUNTY PROJECT NOS. SAP 002-612-015, SAP 002-612-039, SAP 002-652-015 ## CITY OF BLAINE PROJECT NOS. SAP 106-133-002, SAP 106-130-010 THIS AMENDMENT is made by the parties on the last date executed below, by and between the County of Anoka, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, hereinafter referred to as the “County,” and the City of Blaine, 10801 Town Square Drive, Blaine, MN 55449, hereinafter referred to as the “City.” ## WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the JPA dated April 29, 2026, (Anoka County Contract No. CCON26-000486) hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”; and WHEREAS, Section XII of said Agreement provides that any alterations, variations, or modifications of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing and duly signed by the parties. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter stated or contained in the Agreement, the parties do hereby agree as follows: 1. The parties agree to amend Section II. Method, to add the following: ## INTERSECTIONS. It is understood and agreed upon by the parties that CSAH 52 at 105 th Avenue will involve additional access work for a development project in which the City of Blaine is working directly with the developer. In addition to the improvements addressed in the original Agreement, the parties further agree that certain access modifications will be incorporated into the Project plans, as follows: The improvements to Radisson Road (CSAH 52) will provide a full-length right turn lane for the proposed Scheels access points (one ingress, one egress) tying into the existing Kwik Trip access. The parties agree to extend the existing right turn lane approximately 150’ to provide a full-length deceleration length to the northern Scheels access (the ingress). South of the Kwik Trip access, the County will install a ‘bump out’ to separate the vehicles turning into Scheels Page 78 of 179 2 and/or Kwik Trip, from those turning onto 105 th Avenue. (Improvements are collectively referred to as the “Development Improvements”.) The parties agree there is sufficient distance between the Kwik Trip access and the 105 th Avenue intersection to provide for full-length deceleration in the right turn lane, under the assumption that some deceleration (less than 10mph) occurs within the through lane. The parties agree this is acceptable design practice. The County will construct the above-described Development Improvements, which are incorporated by reference into Exhibit A of the original Agreement, and which are depicted in the attached Exhibit entitled “Development Improvements - CSAH 52_105 th ## Ave.” 2. The parties agree to amend Section III. Costs, to add the following: ## COSTS. The parties agree that the parties can achieve economy of scale cost savings by constructing the access Development Improvements concurrently with the Project. The City of Blaine shall work with the developer to obtain whatever separate agreements are necessary to address the work and reimbursement of the County’s costs from the developer. For purposes of this Agreement, the City is responsible to reimburse the County for all costs associated with the Development Improvements described above. Estimated Costs. The County’s costs related to the Development Improvements are estimated as follows: $20,000 for design/engineering, $126,000 for construction, and $10,000 related to inspections, for a total cost estimate of $156,000. The parties agree that the County’s reimbursement of Development Improvement costs from the City of Blaine shall be based on actual costs incurred by the County and not the estimated costs. 3. This Amendment is hereby made a part of and shall be amended to the Agreement of the parties. 4. All other terms and conditions of the original Agreement, not in conflict with the above, shall remain in full force and effect. 5. Counterparts: This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each one of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Page 79 of 179 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Amendment on the dates written below. ## COUNTY OF ANOKA By: ________________________________ ## Jim Dickinson ## Anoka County Administrator Dated: ________________________ By: ________________________________ ## Joe MacPherson, P.E. County Engineer ## Chief Officer, Transportation Division Dated: ________________________ ## APPROVED AS TO FORM By: ________________________________ ## Christine V. Carney ## Assistant County Attorney Dated: __________________________ ## CITY OF BLAINE By: _______________________________ Its: _______________________________ Dated: ________________________ By: _______________________________ Its: _______________________________ Dated: ________________________ Page 80 of 179 ## S ## M ## H ## R ## I ## M = 9 0 8 . 1 8 ## I ## NV = ## I ## N ## V = ## I ## N ## V = ## I ## N ## V = ## I ## N ## V = ## I ## N ## V = ## TNH= 910.76 ## TNH= 910.18 ## 4"BI ## 4"BI 3 ## 4"SP ## 4"SP s ## H ## T ## N ## H = 9 1 1 . 5 2 s s s s Page 81 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Staff Report ## File Number: 2026-163 ## Agenda Date ## Status August 17, 2026 ## In Control ## File Type ## City Council ## Motion ## Approval of Consent Agenda: - Daniel Schluender, Director of Engineering Agenda Item # 7.7 Motion to Authorize Night Time Paving Operations for the CSAH 52 (Radisson Road) and CSAH 12 (109th ## Avenue) Intersection Improvements Project ## Executive Summary The Anoka County Highway Department has requested permission to engage in nighttime/after-hours paving on Radisson Road and 109th Avenue as needed to complete the project safely. ## Background The Anoka County Highway Department (ACHD) approached staff and requested that the city allow the contractor to be able to complete certain portions of the bituminous paving operations for the Radisson Road and 109th Avenue Intersection Improvements Project outside the normal construction hours of 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM. ACHD and the contractor would like to be able to close the entire Radisson Road and 109th Avenue intersection to traffic in order to complete the final lift of paving in a manner that is safest for the traveling public and construction workers, minimizes impacts to traffic and provides for the best final pavement product. In addition, as the project progresses, there may be other not as yet identified areas where a nighttime paving operation would be beneficial for the above-listed reasons. Staff has reviewed and is in support of approving this request. For any nighttime paving requests beyond the currently identified Radisson Road/109th Avenue intersection, staff will review and approve as necessary. ## Strategic Plan Relationship The project aligns with the City’s strategic initiatives for providing a Well-maintained Infrastructure. Page 82 of 179 ## Board/Commission Review This item has not been reviewed by any boards or commissions. ## Financial Impact There is no financial impact to the City of Blaine ## Public Outreach/Input ## Staff Recommendation ## Attachment List ## None Page 83 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Staff Report ## File Number: RES 26-152 ## Agenda Date ## Status August 17, 2026 ## In Control ## File Type ## City Council ## Resolution 7:00 PM - Public Hearing and Items Published for a Certain Time - Sheila Sellman, Community ## Development Director Agenda Item # 8.1 Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit to Allow Office, Manufacturing, and Warehouse in the Planned Business District (PBD) Zoning District at 3785 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE. MSMWPR-1 LLC (Karl ## Dungs Inc.) (Case File No. 26-0042/SLK) ## Executive Summary The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow manufacturing, office, and warehousing in a Heavy Industrial (I-2) zoning district. ## Background ## City Council (Conditional Use Permit) August 17, 2026 ## Action Deadline September 28, 2026 Staff report prepared by Shawn Kaye, Senior Planner, and Teresa Barnes, Project Engineer ## Evaluation of Request ## Planning Analysis The proposed use of the space is for the assembly of products and a small office area. As shown on the submitted site plan and building layout, the small office area is located in the south- west corner of the building and includes office space, a classroom/training room, a break room, and restrooms. The remainder of the building is dedicated to receiving, short-term material storage, assembly operations and shipping. ## Zoning: Page 84 of 179 The property is zoned Planned Business District (PBD). The purpose of the PBD is to allow commercial, multifamily residential and limited light industrial uses serving a local or regional trade area. This district may be located adjacent to residential, commercial, and industrial districts and shall be primarily located on collector or arterial roads. ## Surrounding Zoning and Uses All surrounding properties have a PBD land use. Industrial buildings are located to the south and east. Wetlands are located to the west. ## Existing Conditions The existing multi-tenant building is occupied by Mid-State Metal Works, which occupies approximately 63,000 square feet of the building. ## History In 2008, a CUP was approved to construct a 110,124 square foot office building. However, only an approximately 92,000 sf building was built. ## Site Plan The building is existing, and the proposed use will occupy approximately 29,562 square feet of the building. ## Parking A parking analysis has been provided for the uses occupying the building. The manufacturing uses require 186 parking stalls and there are 386 stalls available onsite. Therefore, all parking requirements are met. ## Landscaping No new landscaping is proposed or required. ## Tree Preservation No trees are being removed. ## Engineering Analysis ## Grading/Storm Drainage The proposed project does not include any alterations to the existing grading or storm water drainage patterns on the property. ## Utilities The proposed development will utilize the existing utilities into the building. No new connections are proposed. ## Wetlands/Watershed/FEMA There are no platted wetland or FEMA flood plain on the existing property. The proposed project does not include any exterior alterations; A Coon Creek Watershed District review is not required. Page 85 of 179 ## Access/Street Design/Sidewalks/Trails The development will utilize the existing access points to the existing parking area. No new access point will be granted. No additional street design, sidewalks or trails will be required. ## Easements/Right-of-way/Permits The developer will need to obtain any and all required permits to construct the proposed project. A copy of all permits will need to be submitted to the City prior to any site work. ## Conditional Use Permit A city exercises “quasi-judicial” authority when considering a CUP application. This means the city’s role is limited to applying the standards in the ordinance to the facts presented by the application. The city acts like a judge in evaluating the facts against the standards. Section 101.04 Criteria for granting conditional use permits: The Blaine City Council shall consider the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the comprehensive plan and upon the health, safety, and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. Among other things, the Council shall consider the following findings where applicable. (Ord. No. 20-2447, 7-20-2020) 1. The use shall not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. o The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools or streets. 2. The use will be located, designed, maintained, and operated to be compatible with adjoining properties and the existing or intended character of the zoning district. o The adjoining properties have a PBD zoning with similar uses of office, manufacturing, and warehousing, and are consistent with the proposed use. 3. The use shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent properties. o The use is going into an existing building. The appearance will not change. 4. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, shall be reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. 5. The use shall be consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. o The purpose of the PBD is to allow commercial, mutifamily residential and limited light industrial uses serving a local or regional trade area. This district may be located adjacent to residential, commercial, and industrial districts and shall be primarily located on collector or arterial roads. The use is consistent with that purpose. 6. The use shall not be in conflict with the comprehensive plan of the City. o The property is guided for PI in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use is consistent with that land use. 7. The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. o The proposed use will not generate any additional traffic hazard or congestion. 8. The use shall have adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities. o The existing structure is served with the required utility services, adequate roadway infrastructure and necessary drainage facilities to service the proposed uses. ## Attachment List: Page 86 of 179 ## Zoning and Location Map ## Site Plan ## Floor Plan ## Parking Analysis ## Narrative Res. 08-170 ## Strategic Plan Relationship Not applicable. ## Board/Commission Review The public hearing is being held at the City Council meeting, therefore no review or recommendation was received from the Planning Commission. Conditional Use Permits for changes in commercial or industrial tenants not neighboring residential areas are often referred directly to the City Council to expedite the review process for the applicant. ## Financial Impact Not applicable ## Public Outreach/Input Notices of a public hearing were: 1. Mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the property boundaries. 2. Published in Blaine/Spring Lake Park/Columbia Heights/Fridley Life. 3. Posted on the City website. ## Staff Recommendation By motion, adopt the resolution. ## Attachment List 1. Attachments Page 87 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Signature Copy ## Resolution: RES 26-152 Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit to Allow Office, Manufacturing, and Warehouse in the Planned Business District (PBD) Zoning District at 3785 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE. MSMWPR-1 ## LLC (Karl Dungs Inc.) (Case File No. 26-0042/SLK) WHEREAS, an application has been filed by MSMWPR-1 LLC as Conditional Use Permit Case File No. 26- 0042 for Karl Dungs Inc.; and WHEREAS, said case involves the property described as follows: Lot 1A, Block 1, CSM Lexington Third Addition. TOGETHER WITH An Easement for road purposes only over the South Thirty-three (33) feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW1/4 of SW1/4), all in Section Twenty-three (23), Township Thirty-one (31), Range twenty-three (23). Subject to drainage and utility easements as shown on the plat, CSM LEXINGTON FIRST ADDITION, recorded as Document No. 478298 on October 7, 2004. Subject to drainage and utility easements as shown on the plat, CSM LEXINGTON SECOND ADDITION, recorded as Document No. 483107.001 on May 27, 2005. Subject to drainage and utility easement as shown on the plat, CSM LEXINGTON THIRD ADDITION, recorded as Document No. 497118.001 on January 20, 2009. ## AND ## Lot 1B, Block 1, CSM Lexington 3rd Addition WHEREAS, the Blaine City Council held a public hearing on August 17, 2026, and recommended approval regarding said Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the Blaine City Council has reviewed said case on August 17, 2026; and WHEREAS, the criteria identified in Section 101-4 for granting a conditional use permit has been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Blaine that a conditional use permit is hereby approved per Sections 101-4 and 117-60 (j)(q) of the Zoning Ordinance to allow office, manufacturing, and warehouse in the Planned Business District (PBD) zoning district with the following condition: 1. Resolution No. 08-170 is null and void with the approval of this conditional use permit resolution. Page 88 of 179 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Blaine this 17th day of August, 2026. Page 89 of 179 ## B-3 ## DF ## I-1 ## I-1 ## I-1 ## I-2 ## I-2 ## I-2 ## I-2A ## I-2A ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## POD ## R-1 ## R-1 ## R-1 ## R-1 ## R-1 ## R-3B ## R-3B ## R-3B ## DF ## B-3 ## PBD ## B-3 ## I-1 ## I-1 ## POD ## I-2A ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## POD ## POD ## POD ## POD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## PBD ## DF ## DF ## R-1 ## R-1 ## R-3B ## R-3B ## Centennial ## Green Park ## A u s t i n ## S t ## N ## E ## Xebec St NE ## W a k e ## S t ## N ## E ## 99th Ave NE ## Naples St NE ## Hamline Ave NE ## 99th Ct NE ## 101st Ave NE ## 99th Ln NE ## W a k e ## C t ## N ## E ## A u s t i n ## S t ## N ## E ## Yalta St NE ## 108th Ave NE ## Pheasant Ridge Dr NE ## C o r d ## S t ## N ## E Interstate 35W Blaine Planning Department / 10801 Town Square Dr NE / Blaine, MN 55449 / (763) 785-6180 ## Case File No. 26-0042 ## Karl Dungs USA ## BlaineMN.gov Scale: 1:7,878 . ## Project ## Location 00.090.180.04Miles ## Zoning ## Blaine Parcels ## City Parks ## Project Location This map is for general reference only. It is not for legal, engineering, or surveying use. Page 90 of 179 Page 91 of 179 39' 9" 6 7 ' 3 5 / 1 6 " 6 1 ' 7 7 / 8 " 8' 5" 4 ' 1 " 4' 11" 1 3 9 ' 1 " 167' 1" 3 2 ' 1 1 / 1 6 " 8' 1" 7 ' 5 " 3' 5" 7 ' 2 " 1 5 ' 5 5 / 1 6 " 3 9 ' 5 1 3 / 1 6 " 1 5 8 ' 5 " 173' 9" 2 ' 5 " 8' 5" 147 1/4" 8 5 3 3 / 8 " 147 1/4" 1 5 ' 8 " 7 ' 9 " 16' 2" 7 ' 7 " 1 5 ' 1 1 3 / 4 " 8 ' 3 / 1 6 " 1 5 ' 2 9 / 1 6 " 1 4 4 " 144" 19' 0" 4 ' 0 " 4 ' 0 " 4 ' 0 " 8' 0" 4 ' 0 " 11x89 ## Non-CAT Crating 34x30 ## Legend ## Inspection / Repack 10x36 ## Shipping 20' x 38' ## 760 SF ## CAT Assembly 65' x 56 ## 3600 SF (20'x40' crane) ## BATH ## BREAK ## KITCH ## Crating 34' x 56' ## 1900 SF 4' FG crate (small) ## Footpath ## OFFICE SPACE 11x89 ## Lift Path ## IT 8' x 8' ## Lift Charge & ## Maintenance 21x27 ## Inbound 20' x 40' ## 800 SF ## Lockers 4' 4' 4' 4' 8'x65 6' 3.5' 4' 4' 6'6' 6'6' 6'6' 6'6x24 10x21 ## MGMT ## BOARD ## Rework / Advanced ## Troubleshooting 5S Tool Crib / ## Consumables / Fixtures ## Today's Schedule / attainment ## KPI TVS ## KPI TVS FG crate (large) Unassembled crate ## Racking ## Empty Kit Cart ## Full Kit Cart Raw crate ## Assembly Workbench ## Empty Workbench ## Crates ## Kits / Benches ## Other ## Crane ## Column 10' x 200 6' ## Quick Put Away 10x36 ## Inspection / Repack 12x31 ## A ## I ## R ## COMP ## Kitting 28x30 8'x30' 6' 6' 6'x30' 6' 6' 2' ## W E ## N ## S 11x89 10' x 48 6' 6' ## Shelving ## Tool Cart 6' Page 92 of 179 ## Parking Analysis Template Page 3 ## Parking Analysis Form ## Site Address: ## Total Spaces Provided ## Building/ ## Unit ## Business Name ## Type of Use ## Area (Square Feet) ## Parking Ratio ## Number of Spaces ## Required ## Total Spaces Required (Rounded Up) ## 3785 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE 100 Karl Dungs Inc. ## Manufacturing 29,609 1:500 59.22 = 60 ## Mid-State Metal Works ## Manufacturing 62,740 1:500 125.48 = 126 186 Page 93 of 179 Karl Dungs Inc. ## 3890 Pheasant Ridge Dr, NE Suite150 ## Blaine, MN 55449 ## Proposed Building Use for Conditional Use Permit The narrative is an explanation of the intended use for the site located at 3785 Pheasant Ridge Dr NE, Suite 100, Blaine, MN 55449. We intend to use the space for office (administrative) and manufacturing (assembly) operations. This will include receiving and shipping of materials intended for assembly at our site. Please refer to the site plan and facility layout to indicate each of the areas noted. The admin area is contained in the SW corner of the building consisting of an office area, classroom, break area and restrooms. The remainder of the building wholly contains, receiving, material storage (short-term), assembly operations, and shipping areas. Please refer to our building layout for a pictorial version of this description. There is no raw material work being done at this facility. All parts received are in their final version and come to us for assembly and testing. Please direct questions concerning this or any of the documents submitted to: ## Konrad Sjoblom ## Project Manager Karl Dungs, Inc. ## 3890 Pheasant Ridge Dr NE, Suite 150 ## Blaine, MN 55449 ## O: 952.495.7155 E: ksjoblom@karldungsusa.com Page 94 of 179 Page 95 of 179 Page 96 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Staff Report ## File Number: RES 26-154 ## Agenda Date ## Status August 17, 2026 ## In Control ## File Type ## City Council ## Resolution 7:00 PM - Public Hearing and Items Published for a Certain Time - Sheila Sellman, Community ## Development Director Agenda Item # 8.2 Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit for a Sign Plan that Includes Four Wall Signs and One LED Display per Section 117-23 of the Zoning Code, in the 105th Avenue Redevelopment District (RD) Zoning District at 2105 105th Avenue NE. Scheels All Sports Inc. (ISG) (Case File No. 26-0044/SAS) ## Executive Summary Scheels is seeking a conditional user permit for signage per Section 117-23 (12) of the zoning code, "any signage not specifically permitted pursuant to section 117-34", which regulates signage for the district. The proposed signage includes four wall signs and one LED sign. ## Background ## City Council (Conditional Use Permit) August 17, 2026 ## Action Deadline September 29, 2026 ## Staff report prepared by Sheila Sellman, Community Development Director ## Evaluation of Request ## Planning Analysis ## Zoning The subject property is zoned 105th Redevelopment District (RD). ## Surrounding Zoning and Uses The subject site is surrounded by properties within the 105th Redevelopment District, with an existing Kwik Trip to the east that is zoned Planned Business District (PBD). ## Existing Conditions The site is currently being graded for Scheels. Page 97 of 179 ## History In 2025 a site plan was approved for Scheels in the proposed location. The proposal meets the site plan that was approved. Signage was not included in the site plan or approved at that time. ## Proposal Scheels is proposing wall signage, canopy signage and a LED screen that wraps around the corner of the building. The RD District has specific signage requirements, which are intended to provide for different types of signage that are unique to this district. The LED-wrapped screen is not defined by ordinance and is unique to the district and to Scheels. Section 117-23 (12) states: "Any signage not specifically permitted pursuant to section 117-34" needs a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The wall signage and LED signage exceed limits and/or are not addressed under section 117-43; therefore, a conditional use permit has been applied for. Section 117-34 allows for 150 square feet of building signage, protecting signage and awning signage. The gross surface area of an awning or canopy sign may not exceed 50 percent of the gross surface area of the smallest face of the awning or canopy to which the sign is affixed. The proposed Scheels building is two stories and approximately 234,000 square feet. Three wall signs, one canopy sign and one LED wrap-around sign are being proposed. The breakdown is as follows: • West elevation (facing parking lot): wall sign measuring 51'10"x6'8" (approximately 307 square feet) • West elevation (facing parking lot) canopy sign measuring 33'x4.2' (approximately 138 square feet) • South elevation (facing 105th Avenue): wall sign measuring 51'10"x6'8" (approximately 307 square feet) • East elevation (facing Radisson Road): wall sign measuring 51'10"x6.8' (approximately 307 square feet) • LED screen integrated into the building facade that wraps around the south and west wall. Section 117-34 allows for wall signage up to 150 square feet, and awning/canopy sign not to exceed 50 percent of the gross surface area of the smallest face or canopy the sign is affixed to. The sign is affixed to the top of the canopy and meets the intent. The wall signage exceeds 150 square feet, which is permitted through approval of this CUP. The scale of signage that is proposed is appropriate for the scale of the building. ## Conditional Use Permit A city exercises “quasi-judicial” authority when considering a CUP application. This means the city’s role is limited to applying the standards in the ordinance to the facts presented by the application. The city acts like a judge in evaluating the facts against the standards. Section 101-4 Criteria for granting conditional use permits: The Blaine City Council shall consider the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the comprehensive plan and upon the health, safety, and general Page 98 of 179 welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. Among other things, the Council shall consider the following findings where applicable. (Ord. No. 20-2447, 7-20-2020) 1. The use shall not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. o The proposed signage does not create an excessive burden. 2. The use will be located, designed, maintained, and operated to be compatible with adjoining properties and the existing or intended character of the zoning district. (Ord. No. 20-2447 , 7-20- 2020) o The RD zoning ordinance was created specifically to facilitate redevelopment within this area. The district is intended to encourage a more creative and innovative approach to development through thoughtful and distinctive design. Ordinance amendments have been made periodically as the vision for the district has evolved. The proposed wrap- around LED sign and canopy sign are consistent with the intended character of the district and support its goal of encouraging innovative design. The signage is also compatible with the surrounding properties, which include vacant land and a Kwik Trip. 3. The use shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent properties. o The site is surrounded by commercial uses and is part of a redevelopment distinct, the proposed signage does not have an adverse effect upon adjacent properties. 4. The use, in the opinion of the city council, shall be reasonably related to the overall needs of the city and to the existing land use. 5. The use shall be consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. o The intent of the RD district is to promote development and redevelopment consistent with the master plan for the 105th Redevelopment area by encouraging residential uses in conjunction with commercial and expanded recreational activities to create an entertainment district and to create greater flexibility in land uses. The proposed signage meets the purpose of the zoning district. 6. The use shall not be in conflict with the comprehensive plan of the city. o The land use designation is High Density Residential/ Planned Commercial (HDR2/PC). The site is proposed to be developed with a Scheels retail store which is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 7. The use will not cause traffic hazard or congestion. o Not applicable. 8. The use shall have adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities. Engineering o Not applicable. ## Strategic Plan Relationship Not applicable. ## Board/Commission Review The public hearing is being held at the City Council meeting, therefore no review or recommendation was received from the Planning Commission. Conditional Use Permits for changes in commercial or Page 99 of 179 industrial tenants not neighboring residential areas are often referred directly to the City Council to expedite the review process for the applicant. ## Financial Impact Not applicable. ## Public Outreach/Input Notices of a public hearing were: 1. Mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the property boundaries. 2. Published in Blaine/Spring Lake Park/Columbia Heights/Fridley Life. 3. Posted on the City website. ## Staff Recommendation By motion, adopt the resolution. ## Attachment List 1. Attachments ## 2. Public Comments Page 100 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Signature Copy ## Resolution: RES 26-154 Resolution Granting a Conditional Use Permit for a Sign Plan that Includes Four Wall Signs and One LED Display per Section 117-23 of the Zoning Code, in the 105th Avenue Redevelopment District (RD) Zoning District at 2105 105th Avenue NE. Scheels All Sports Inc. (ISG) (Case File No. 26- ## 0044/SAS) WHEREAS, an application has been filed by Scheels All Sports Inc (ISG) as Conditional Use Permit Case File No. 26-0044; and WHEREAS, said case involves the property described as follows: ## Lot 5 Block 1 BLAINE TOWN CENTER EAST WHEREAS, the Blaine City Council held a public hearing on August 17, 2026; and, WHEREAS, the Blaine City Council has reviewed said case on August 17, 2026; and WHEREAS, the criteria identified in Section 101-4 for granting a conditional use permit has been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Blaine that a conditional use permit is hereby approved per Sections 117-23 and 101-4 of the zoning ordinance to allow four wall signs, one of which is on top of a canopy, and one LED display (as shown on the attached Exhibit A), in the 105th Avenue Redevelopment District (RD) zoning district with the following conditions: 1. A sign permit is required. 2. Any significant modifications to the square footage or type of signage as shown on Exhibit A will require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Amendment. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Blaine this 17th day of August, 2026. Page 101 of 179 ## AIRPORT ## AIRPORT ## DF ## DF ## DF ## DF ## I-2 ## I-2 ## I-2 ## PBD ## RD ## RD ## RD ## RR ## RR ## RR ## AIRPORT ## I-1 ## I-2RD ## PBD ## RD ## Airport Park ## Radisson Rd NE ## 105th Ave NE 1 0 8 t h ## L n ## N ## E ## 107th Ln NE ## 108th Ave NE ## Mankato St NE ## Nassau St NE 1 0 6 t h ## L n ## N ## E Blaine Planning Department / 10801 Town Square Dr NE / Blaine, MN 55449 / (763) 785-6180 ## Case File No. 26-0044 ## Scheels ## BlaineMN.gov Scale: 1:4,878 . ## Project ## Location 00.060.110.03Miles ## Zoning ## Blaine Parcels ## City Parks ## Project Location This map is for general reference only. It is not for legal, engineering, or surveying use. Page 102 of 179 July 31, 2026 ## City of Blaine ## 10801 Town Square Drive NE Blaine, MN 55449 763-785-6198 ssellman@blainemn.gov ## RE: Blaine Scheels Conditional Use Permit Request ## Ms. Sellman, The applicant/owner is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) from the Blaine City Council to allow additional building signage for a new Scheels retail store located within the 105th Avenue Redevelopment District. The proposed development consists of a new Scheels retail building as part of a larger commercial development currently under construction. As a destination retail tenant, Scheels relies on prominent building identification to provide clear visibility for customers traveling to the site from surrounding roadways and to establish a cohesive architectural identity. The proposed signage includes: • One wall sign measuring 51’ 10” x 6’ 8” on the west wall • One wall sign measuring 33’ x 4.2’ on the canopy located on the west wall • One wall sign measuring 51’ 10” x 6’ 8” on the south wall • One wall sign measuring 51’ 10” x 6.8’ on the east wall • One LED display sign integrated into the building façade wraps around the south and west facades measuring 47' - 1 3/16" x 23' - 6 19/32" on the west and 7' - 10 3/16" x 23' -6 19/32" on the south side The requested signage exceeds the wall sign area otherwise permitted within the 105th Avenue Redevelopment District. Pursuant to Chapter 117-23 of the Blaine City Code, a Conditional Use Permit is required for "any signage not specifically permitted pursuant to Section 117-34." Additionally, Section 117-34 limits the gross surface area of a wall sign to 10 percent of the area of the building wall, including doors and windows, to which the sign is affixed, or 200 square feet, whichever is less. The proposed signage has been designed to complement the scale and architecture of the building while providing effective business identification for a large-format regional retailer. The additional sign area and LED display are intended to improve visibility for customers approaching the development, enhance wayfinding within the larger commercial center, and reinforce the building's role as a primary anchor tenant. The applicant understands that additional tenants within the overall commercial development may also require Conditional Use Permits for signage exceeding the standards established by the redevelopment district. This request is specific to the proposed Scheels building and is intended to facilitate signage that is appropriate for the building's size, function, and prominence within the development. The applicant respectfully requests approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow the proposed wall signage and LED display as shown on the accompanying sign plans. Page 103 of 179 I & S Group, Inc. | 7900 International Drive + Suite 550 + Bloomington, MN 55425 + 952.426.0699 1 ## Sincerely, ## Claire Habel ## Development Services Coordinator ## Claire.Habel@ISGInc.com Page 104 of 179 ## W ## W ## W ## W ## W ## W ## W Xref .\XREF CONSULTANT FILES\250319 Blaine_CAD Background_Site-raddison apartment.dwgXref .\XREF CONSULTANT FILES\250319 Blaine_CAD Background_Site-raddison apartment.dwgXref .\XREF CONSULTANT FILES\250319 Blaine_CAD Background_Site-raddison apartment.dwg ## GEN ## FUTURE BUILDING ## FFE = 909' ## X ## R25' ## R25' ## R25' ## R32' 63' 21' 203' 30' 5' ## PROPOSED BUILDING ## 123,202 SF ## FFE = 909.0 30' 10' 70' ## R75' ## R49' ## R60' 8' 10' ## R70' ## TITLE ## SHEET ## 33366-C3-10 SITE PLAN ## PROJECT NO.FILE NAMEDRAWN BYDESIGNED BYREVIEWED BY ## ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE ## CLIENT PROJECT NO. ## BY ## DESCRIPTION ## REVISION SCHEDULE ## DATE ## PROJECT DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\33000 PROJ\33300-33399\33366 SCHEELS BLAINE TOWN CENTER-BLAINE MN\33366 PRODUCTION FILES\33366 CIVIL 3D\PRODUCTION DWGS\33366-C3-10 SITE PLAN.DWG SAVED BY: ALINA.ELTAMIMI ## SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. ## C3-10 ## SITE PLAN - 05/21/2026 ## C3-10 ## SITE PLAN 300 33366 ## C3-10 25-33366 ## BLAINE ## MINNESOTA 0 ## SCALE IN FEET 30 60 ## MEBKBRKBR ## SCHEELS BLAINE ## TOWN CENTER ## SCHEELS ## THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ## I & S GROUP, ## INC. ## AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED ## WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 ## I & S GROUP, INC. ## LIC. NO. ## DATE ## LIC. NO. ## DATE ## PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE ## STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ## LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ## KRISTOPER B. ROPPE 2026-05-21 60261 ## PROPERTY BOUNDARY ## 60' BUILDING SETBACK ## TRASH COMPACTOR AT DOCK ## PAVEMENT LEGEND ## SYMBOL ## DESCRIPTION ## CONCRETE PAVEMENT ## HEAVY DUTY CONCRETEPAVEMENT ## CONCRETE WALKSYNTHETIC TURF - ## AGGREGATE BASE ## SYNTHETIC TURF - CONCRETE ## BASE ## NATURAL STONE ## OUTCROPPINGS (18"-36" ## DIAMETER STONES - STONE ## TYPE TBD) ## NASSAU STREET NE ## 105TH AVENUE NE ## RADISSON ROAD NE ## BENCHES (TYP) ## (2'x6' EACH, TYPE TBD) ## TRANSFORMER ## GENERATOR ## STOOP - SEE ## STRUCTURAL PLANS (TYP) ## PROPOSED NO-BUILD EASEMENT ## EXISTING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 5' ## CURB BY OTHERS ## CURB (BY OTHERS) ## BITUMINOUS TRAIL ## (BY OTHERS) ## CONCRETE ## DRIVEWAY BY ## OTHERS ## FLAG POLE ## STATUES ## BIKE RACK (TYP 1 OF 3) (REFER DETAIL) ## SYNTHETIC TURF - ## AGGREGATE BASE ## SYNTHETIC TURF - CONCRETE BASE ## BIKE RACK (TYP 1 OF 3) (REFER DETAIL) Page 105 of 179 Page 106 of 179 ## EXTERIOR ELEV. SHEET NOTES • • • • • ## THROUGH-WALL FLASHING TO BE LOCATED ABOVE GRADE. ## PAINT ALL EXPOSED STEEL LINTELS TO MATCH ADJACENT ## FACADE MATERIAL COLOR. ## SEALANT COLORS TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISHED ## SURFACES. ## REFER TO PANEL ELEVATIONS AND ENLARGED ELEVATIONS ## FOR MATERIALS NOT SHOWN ON BUILDING ELEVATIONS ## PJ INDICATES ACM PANEL JOINT ## INDICATES TWO STAGE SEALANT WEEP HOLD OUT ## MAIN FLOOR 100' - 0" ## TO WALL 150' - 0" ## UPPER PARAPET 154' - 0" ## UPPER ROOF 167' - 4" 10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"2' - 4" ## EF8 ## EF10EF10 ## EF10 ## EF7 ## EF7 ## EF8 ## EF7 ## EF11 1 ## A3-12 ________________________________________________ 1 ## A3-12 ________________________________________________ ## PNL C1PNL D2PNL C1PNL A1PNL B2PNL A1PNL B2PNL A1PNL D2PNL D2PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1 ## A2-21 1 ## A2-21 2 ## A2-21 3 ## EF8 ## A2-21 1 ## EF8 ## EF7 ## EF8 ## EF13EF13 ## EF13 ## EF10 ## EF13 ## EF10 ## EF7 ## EF10 ## EF10 ## EF13 ## EF7 ## EF8 ## EF10 ## EF13 ## EF10 ## EF13 ## EF10 ## EF10 ## EF10 ## EF13 ## EF4 ## EQEQ ## EF13 ## REFER TO BID PACK 3 FOR SIGNAGE ## A3-41 11 ## PJPJPJ ## PJPJPJPJPJ ## PJ 23 23 23232323 6 ## A3-73 ________________________________________________ 5 ## A3-73 ________________________________________________ 2 ## A3-73 ________________________________________________ 272727 2727 27 59 ## PJPJPJPJ ## PJPJPJPJPJ - --- ________________________________________________ - --- ________________________________________________ 2 i3-41 ________________________________________________ ## MAIN FLOOR 100' - 0" ## TO WALL 150' - 0" ## UPPER PARAPET 154' - 0" ## UPPER ROOF 167' - 4" ## EF7 ## EF11 3 ## A3-12 ________________________________________________ 3 ## A3-12 ________________________________________________ ## EF11 ## EF11 ## EF8 ## EF7 ## EF7 ## EF7 10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0" PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL B2PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL C1PNL D1PNL B2PNL A1PNL C1PNL D2PNL D1PNL D1PNL D1PNL A1PNL A1PNL D2PNL D2PNL C1 ## A2-21 1 ## A2-21 1 ## A2-21 2 ## A2-21 2 ## A2-21 3 ## EF8 ## EF7 ## EF8 ## EF13EF13 ## EF10EF10 ## EF7 ## EF7 ## EF8 3' - 0" ## REFER TO BID PACK 3 FOR SIGNAGE ## TYP ## A3-41 4 ## PJPJPJ ## PJPJ ## PJ ## PJ ## PJ 2323232323 ## PJPJPJ 23 ## C.O. EMBED 3 1/4" ## B.O. EYBROW 16' - 0" 7 3/8" (+/-) ## VERT ## 8' - 0" O.C. ## HORIZ. ## 6' - 0" O.C. ## EQEQ 3 ## A3-61 ________________________________________________ 7 ## A3-61 ________________________________________________ 4 ## A3-61 ________________________________________________ 1 ## A3-61 ________________________________________________ 5 ## A3-61 ________________________________________________ 272727 2727 28 26 9 ## A3-61 ________________________________________________ ## A3-41 11 142' - 0" 116' - 0" ## B.O. EYEBROW ## T.O. EYEBROW ## EQEQ 6' - 8" ## PJPJ ## PJ 4' - 4"5' - 8" 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 ## WEST ELEVATION - AREA A 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 ## WEST ELEVATION - AREA D 0 1/2" 1" 2" 1/4" ## REFERENCE SCALE 1" = 1" ## SHEET ## PROJECT ## PROJECT NO. ## FILE NAME ## DRAWN BY ## DESIGNED BY ## ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE ## CLIENT PROJECT NO. ## TITLE ## REVIEWED BY ## DATELIC. NO. ## DATELIC. NO. ## I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR ## REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT ## SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ## PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE ## STATE OF MINNESOTA. ## I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR ## REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT ## SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ## ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF ## MINNESOTA. ## THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, ## INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED ## WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. ## © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. ## THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ISG ENGINEERING ## & ARCHITECTURE AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR ## DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. ## © 2024 ISG ENGINEERING & ARCHITECTURE ## 7/30/2026 8:36:23 PM ## A2-12 ## WEST ## ELEVATIONS ## SCHEELS ## BLAINEMINNESOTA ## 33366 Arch R26.rvt ## ANK, JRS, CJH, SKK, KKT ## ANK, JRS, CJH 05/21/2026 ## ANK, JRS, CJH ## KAP ## KAP 25-33366 ## ***AUTO-GENERATED ## – INTERNAL REVIEW ONLY ## – NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION*** ## BLAINE TOWN ## CENTER ## A2-12 WEST ELEVATIONS ## 400 33366 A2-12 ## JESSICA SPAULDING 07/16/2662907 ## EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE ## MARKMATERIAL TYPEMANUFACTURERMODEL / SIZECOLOR ## ADDITIONAL ## INFORMATION ## COMMENTS EF1PRECAST CONCRETE / BRICK INLAYWELLS / ENDICOTT BRICKUTILITY / THIN BRICKMANGANESE IRONSPOT, VELOURRUNNING BOND ## EF2PRECAST CONCRETE / BRICK INLAYWELLS/ ENDICOTT BRICKUTILITY / THIN BRICKVC3 GLAZED GRAY1/3RD BOND ## EF3BRICKENDICOTTUTILITY / FULL BRICKMANGANESE IRONSPOTSTACK BOND ## EF4BRICKENDICOTTUTILITY / FULL BRICKMANGANESE IRONSPOTRUNNING BOND ## EF6PRECAST CONCRETEWELLS-COLOR TO MATCH SAMPLE COLOR ## ID:AA185X ## ACID ETCH FINISH ## EF7METAL PANELALUCOBONDPLUSBLACKDRY REVEAL EF8METAL CAP FLASHINGELEVATE-BLACKAT PRECAST COPING PROVIDE PREFINISHED GALVANIZED SHEET METAL. AT ALL ALUMINUM PANELS ## PROVIDE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM SHEET METAL ## EF10NATURAL STONEVETTER STONE3-HEIGHT RANDOM ASHLAR - HONEDSILVER SHADOW EF11WOOD-LOOK METAL PANELWALL AND SOFFIT PANEL. RECESS PRECAST PANEL AT EF11 LOCATIONS, REFER TO DETAILS ## EF12EXTERIOR PAINTSHERWIN WILLIAMSTRICORN BLACK SW6258EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS AND FRAMES ## EF13PRECAST CONCRETE TRIMWELLSMATCH EF6SEE DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS ## EF14COMPOSITE WOODTREX1" SQUARE EDGEBLACK ## EF15SOFFIT METAL PANELELEVATEUC500ENTRY CANOPY SOFFIT ## KEYNOTE LEGEND ## 23 BRICK RELIEF ANGLE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL ## 26 HIDDEN LINE 'SQUARE' INDICATES EMBED LOCATION. ## 2.5"X12"X3/8" HSS WITH END CAP. GALVANIZED. ## 27 WALL GRAZE UPLIGHT TO BE ISSUED IN BP 2- REFER TO ## ELECTRICAL ## 28 RECESSED PERIMETER GRAZE LIGHT AT EYEBROW - TO BE ## ISSUED IN BP2 ## 59 BUILDING NUMBER WINDOW DECAL, 18" H, ARIAL FONT, WHITE ## REVISION SCHEDULE ## DATEDESCRIPTIONBY ## 06/19/26ADDENDUM 2 ## 07/16/26ADDENDUM 3 51'-10" 4'-2" 33'-0" ## FINAL SIGN DIMENSIONS TO BE ## VERIFIED WITH SIGN SHOP DRAWINGS Page 107 of 179 ## EXTERIOR ELEV. SHEET NOTES • • • • • ## THROUGH-WALL FLASHING TO BE LOCATED ABOVE GRADE. ## PAINT ALL EXPOSED STEEL LINTELS TO MATCH ADJACENT ## FACADE MATERIAL COLOR. ## SEALANT COLORS TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISHED ## SURFACES. ## REFER TO PANEL ELEVATIONS AND ENLARGED ELEVATIONS ## FOR MATERIALS NOT SHOWN ON BUILDING ELEVATIONS ## PJ INDICATES ACM PANEL JOINT ## INDICATES TWO STAGE SEALANT WEEP HOLD OUT ## MAIN FLOOR 100' - 0" ## TO WALL 150' - 0" ## UPPER PARAPET 154' - 0" ## UPPER ROOF 167' - 4" 3 ## A3-11 ________________________________________________ 3 ## A3-11 ________________________________________________ 4' - 5"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0" ## EF8 ## EF7 ## EF10 ## EF11 ## EF7 ## EF7 ## EF7 ## EF10 1 ## A3-11 ________________________________________________ 1 ## A3-11 ________________________________________________ ## PNL A1PNL B2PNL A1PNL C1PNL D1PNL D1PNL D1PNL D1PNL D1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1 ## EF8 ## EF13 ## EF10 ## EF13 ## EF8 ## EF13 ## EF13 ## EF11 ## EF7 ## EF8 ## EF8 ## A2-21 2 ## A2-21 1 ## EQ 4 ## A3-71 ________________________________________________ ## TYP ## A3-41 4 ## PJ 23 ## EF7EF7 ## HORIZ ## 6' - 0" O.C. ## VERT. ## 8' - 0" O.C. 28 26 25 ## B.O. EYEBROW 16' - 0" 26' - 0" 3 ## A3-61 ________________________________________________ 1 ## A3-61 ________________________________________________ 7 ## A3-61 ________________________________________________ ## SIM 4 ## A3-61 ________________________________________________ 9 ## A3-61 ________________________________________________ 27 ## EF7 ## EPDM 142' - 0" ## T.O. EYEBROW 116' - 0" ## B.O. EYEBROW - --- ________________________________________________ - --- ________________________________________________ ## PJPJPJPJPJPJPJPJPJPJ - --- ________________________________________________ - --- ________________________________________________ 5 i5-15i ________________________________________________ ## MAIN FLOOR 100' - 0" ## TO WALL 150' - 0" ## UPPER ROOF 167' - 4" 10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"3' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0" ## EF7 ## EF8 1 ## A3-11 ________________________________________________ 1 ## A3-11 ________________________________________________ PNL B2PNL A1PNL B2PNL A1PNL B2PNL A1PNL B2PNL A1PNL A1PNL B1PNL A1PNL B1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1 ## A2-21 1 ## A2-21 1 ## A2-21 1 ## A2-21 1 ## EF8 4 ## A3-11 ________________________________________________ 4 ## A3-11 ________________________________________________ 2 ## A3-11 ________________________________________________ 2 ## A3-11 ________________________________________________ 8' - 0"4' - 7" ## REFER TO BID PACK 3 FOR SIGNAGE ## EF13 ## EF13 ## EF1 ## BO SOFFIT 131' - 0" ## TYP ## A3-41 4 ## PJ 23232323 24 10 ## A3-61 ________________________________________________ 8 ## A3-61 ________________________________________________ ## A3-41 10 ## PNL E1 27' - 0" ## PNL E1 27' - 0" 108' - 8" ## T.O. WALL ## EQEQ 37 37 ## PJPJ ## PJPJ - --- ________________________________________________ 3' - 6"6' - 6" - --- ________________________________________________ 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 ## SOUTH ELEVATION - AREA D 0 1/2" 1" 2" 1/4" ## REFERENCE SCALE 1" = 1" ## SHEET ## PROJECT ## PROJECT NO. ## FILE NAME ## DRAWN BY ## DESIGNED BY ## ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE ## CLIENT PROJECT NO. ## TITLE ## REVIEWED BY ## DATELIC. NO. ## DATELIC. NO. ## I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR ## REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT ## SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ## PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE ## STATE OF MINNESOTA. ## I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR ## REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT ## SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ## ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF ## MINNESOTA. ## THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, ## INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED ## WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. ## © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. ## THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ISG ENGINEERING ## & ARCHITECTURE AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR ## DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. ## © 2024 ISG ENGINEERING & ARCHITECTURE ## 7/30/2026 8:36:54 PM ## A2-13 ## SOUTH ## ELEVATIONS ## SCHEELS ## BLAINEMINNESOTA ## 33366 Arch R26.rvt ## ANK, JRS, CJH, SKK, KKT ## ANK, JRS, CJH 05/21/2026 ## ANK, JRS, CJH ## KAP ## KAP 25-33366 ## ***AUTO-GENERATED ## – INTERNAL REVIEW ONLY ## – NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION*** ## BLAINE TOWN ## CENTER ## A2-13 SOUTH ELEVATIONS ## 400 33366 A2-13 ## JESSICA SPAULDING 07/16/2662907 ## EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE ## MARKMATERIAL TYPEMANUFACTURERMODEL / SIZECOLOR ## ADDITIONAL ## INFORMATION ## COMMENTS EF1PRECAST CONCRETE / BRICK INLAYWELLS / ENDICOTT BRICKUTILITY / THIN BRICKMANGANESE IRONSPOT, VELOURRUNNING BOND ## EF2PRECAST CONCRETE / BRICK INLAYWELLS/ ENDICOTT BRICKUTILITY / THIN BRICKVC3 GLAZED GRAY1/3RD BOND ## EF3BRICKENDICOTTUTILITY / FULL BRICKMANGANESE IRONSPOTSTACK BOND ## EF4BRICKENDICOTTUTILITY / FULL BRICKMANGANESE IRONSPOTRUNNING BOND ## EF6PRECAST CONCRETEWELLS-COLOR TO MATCH SAMPLE COLOR ## ID:AA185X ## ACID ETCH FINISH ## EF7METAL PANELALUCOBONDPLUSBLACKDRY REVEAL EF8METAL CAP FLASHINGELEVATE-BLACKAT PRECAST COPING PROVIDE PREFINISHED GALVANIZED SHEET METAL. AT ALL ALUMINUM PANELS ## PROVIDE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM SHEET METAL ## EF10NATURAL STONEVETTER STONE3-HEIGHT RANDOM ASHLAR - HONEDSILVER SHADOW EF11WOOD-LOOK METAL PANELWALL AND SOFFIT PANEL. RECESS PRECAST PANEL AT EF11 LOCATIONS, REFER TO DETAILS ## EF12EXTERIOR PAINTSHERWIN WILLIAMSTRICORN BLACK SW6258EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS AND FRAMES ## EF13PRECAST CONCRETE TRIMWELLSMATCH EF6SEE DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS ## EF14COMPOSITE WOODTREX1" SQUARE EDGEBLACK ## EF15SOFFIT METAL PANELELEVATEUC500ENTRY CANOPY SOFFIT 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 ## SOUTH ELEVATION - AREA C & E ## KEYNOTE LEGEND ## 23 BRICK RELIEF ANGLE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL ## 24 PAINT GAS PIPE TO MATCH ADJACENT BRICK FINISH ## 25 LARGE FORMAT, CORNER WRAP L.E.D. SCREEN - IN FUTURE ## BID PACKAGE ## 26 HIDDEN LINE 'SQUARE' INDICATES EMBED LOCATION. ## 2.5"X12"X3/8" HSS WITH END CAP. GALVANIZED. ## 27 WALL GRAZE UPLIGHT TO BE ISSUED IN BP 2- REFER TO ## ELECTRICAL ## 28 RECESSED PERIMETER GRAZE LIGHT AT EYEBROW - TO BE ## ISSUED IN BP2 ## 37 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, REFER TO MECHANICAL ## DOCUMENTS ## REVISION SCHEDULE ## DATEDESCRIPTIONBY ## 06/19/26ADDENDUM 2 ## 07/16/26ADDENDUM 3 ## FINAL SIGN DIMENSIONS TO BE ## VERIFIED WITH SIGN SHOP DRAWINGS 6' - 8" 51' - 10" Page 108 of 179 ## EXTERIOR ELEV. SHEET NOTES ## • THROUGH-WALL FLASHING TO BE LOCATED ABOVE GRADE. ## • PAINT ALL EXPOSED STEEL LINTELS TO MATCH ADJACENT ## FACADE MATERIAL COLOR. ## • SEALANT COLORS TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISHED ## SURFACES. ## • REFER TO PANEL ELEVATIONS AND ENLARGED ELEVATIONS ## FOR MATERIALS NOT SHOWN ON BUILDING ELEVATIONS ## • PJ INDICATES ACM PANEL JOINT ## INDICATES TWO STAGE SEALANT WEEP HOLD OUT ## MAIN FLOOR 100' -0" ## TO WALL 150' -0" ## UPPER ROOF 167' -4" 10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0" 3 ## A3-12 ________________________________________________ 3 ## A3-12 ________________________________________________ ## EF7 ## EF8 PNL A1PNL B1PNL A1PNL B1PNL A1PNL B1PNL A1PNL A1PNL B1PNL B1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1 ## EF8 6' - 0" 10 ## A7-24 ________________________________________________ ## A3-41 4 ## TYP ## A3-41 11 ## A3-41 11 ## EQ 3 i3-41 ________________________________________________ ## MAIN FLOOR 100' -0" ## TO WALL 150' -0" ## UPPER ROOF 167' -4" 10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"5' - 0"8' - 0"5' - 0"8' - 0"10' - 0"6' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0" 2 ## A3-12 ________________________________________________ 2 ## A3-12 ________________________________________________ 1 ## A3-12 ________________________________________________ 1 ## A3-12 ________________________________________________ ## EF8 ## EF7 ## EF8 PNL A1PNL B1PNL A1PNL B1PNL A1PNL B1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1PNL A1 4' - 0" ## PNL A1 ## EQEQ ## EQEQ ## EQEQ ## EF14 ## EF1 ## EF13 ## EF13 ## EF13 ## EF1 ## EF13 ## A3-81 1 ## TYP ## A3-41 4 24 ## PJPJPJ ## EPDM 10 ## A3-61 ________________________________________________ ## TYP 39 39 37 37 40 41414141 1 i3-41 ________________________________________________ 5 i3-41 ________________________________________________ 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 ## EAST ELEVATION - AREA C 0 1/2" 1" 2"1/4" ## REFERENCE SCALE 1" = 1" ## SHEET ## PROJECT ## PROJECT NO. ## FILE NAME ## DRAWN BY ## DESIGNED BY ## ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE ## CLIENT PROJECT NO. ## TITLE ## REVIEWED BY ## DATELIC. NO. ## DATELIC. NO. ## I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR ## REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT ## SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ## PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE ## STATE OF MINNESOTA. ## I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR ## REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT ## SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ## ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF ## MINNESOTA. ## THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, ## INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED ## WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. ## © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. ## THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ISG ENGINEERING ## & ARCHITECTURE AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR ## DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. ## © 2024 ISG ENGINEERING & ARCHITECTURE ## 7/31/2026 11:04:48 AM ## A2-14 ## EAST ## ELEVATIONS ## SCHEELS ## BLAINEMINNESOTA ## 33366 Arch R26.rvt ## ANK, JRS, CJH, SKK, KKT ## ANK, JRS, CJH 05/21/2026 ## ANK, JRS, CJH ## KAP 25-33366 ## PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR ## CONSTRUCTION ## BLAINE TOWN ## CENTER ## A2-14 EAST ELEVATIONS ## 400 33366 A2-14 ## JESSICA SPAULDING 06/19/2662907 ## EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE ## MARKMATERIAL TYPEMANUFACTURERMODEL / SIZECOLOR ## ADDITIONAL ## INFORMATION ## COMMENTS EF1PRECAST CONCRETE / BRICK INLAY WELLS / ENDICOTT BRICKUTILITY / THIN BRICKMANGANESE IRONSPOT, VELOURRUNNING BOND EF2PRECAST CONCRETE / BRICK INLAY WELLS/ ENDICOTT BRICKUTILITY / THIN BRICKVC3 GLAZED GRAY1/3RD BOND ## EF3BRICKENDICOTTUTILITY / FULL BRICKMANGANESE IRONSPOTSTACK BOND ## EF4BRICKENDICOTTUTILITY / FULL BRICKMANGANESE IRONSPOTRUNNING BOND ## EF6PRECAST CONCRETEWELLS-COLOR TO MATCH SAMPLE COLOR ## ID:AA185X ## ACID ETCH FINISH ## EF7METAL PANELALUCOBONDPLUSBLACKDRY REVEAL EF8METAL CAP FLASHINGELEVATE-BLACKAT PRECAST COPING PROVIDE PREFINISHED GALVANIZED SHEET METAL. AT ALL ALUMINUM PANELS ## PROVIDE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM SHEET METAL ## EF10NATURAL STONEVETTER STONE3-HEIGHT RANDOM ASHLAR - HONEDSILVER SHADOW EF11WOOD-LOOK METAL PANELWALL AND SOFFIT PANEL. RECESS PRECAST PANEL AT EF11 LOCATIONS, REFER TO DETAILS ## EF12EXTERIOR PAINTSHERWIN WILLIAMSTRICORN BLACK SW6258EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS AND FRAMES ## EF13PRECAST CONCRETE TRIMWELLSMATCH EF6SEE DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS ## EF14COMPOSITE WOODTREX1" SQUARE EDGEBLACK ## EF15SOFFIT METAL PANELELEVATEUC500ENTRY CANOPY SOFFIT 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 ## EAST ELEVATION - AREA B ## KEYNOTE LEGEND ## 24 PAINT GAS PIPE TO MATCH ADJACENT BRICK FINISH ## 37 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, REFER TO MECHANICAL ## DOCUMENTS ## 39 BRICK RETURN AT WALL END ## 40 STEP BASE OF PRECAST UP FOR FOUNDATION STEP, REFER ## TO STRUCTURAL FOR FOUNDATION INSULATION. ## 41 HOLD BOTTOM OF PRECAST PANEL UP 1' - 0" FOR ## FOUNDATION STEP, REFER TO STRUCTURAL FOR ADDITIONAL ## FOUNDATION INFORMATION. ## REVISION SCHEDULE ## DATEDESCRIPTIONBY ## 06/19/26 ADDENDUM 2 6' - 8" 51' - 10" ## FINAL SIGN DIMENSIONS TO BE ## VERIFIED WITH SIGN SHOP DRAWINGS Page 109 of 179 Page 110 of 179 1 ## Pat Robinson ## From:Blake Nygaard <sa205703@atsu.edu> Sent:Sunday, August 16, 2026 10:45 AM ## To:Planning ## Subject:Scheels Sign Request To whom it may concern, I’m writing to provide public comment regarding the conditional use permit Scheels is requesting for signage. I’m a loyal customer at Scooter’s and are aware of the lack of signage they’ve had since opening. I drove by countless times before a coworker of mine informed me there was a Scooter’s in the new building. It’s my understanding the City Council was unwilling to approve more than 200sq. foot of signage for the entire building and they won’t allow a monument sign with Scooter’s, the PARC, Protein House and other tenants listed on it. Each business is doing their best to drive awareness and traffic to their stores but limited signage is not helpful. Please remember these restrictions you put on Scooters and the other tenants in that building when you vote on how much signage Scheels should be allowed. Thank you for your consideration. ## Blake Allen Page 111 of 179 1 ## Pat Robinson ## From:Stacey Hanlin <staceyalarsen@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, August 17, 2026 9:05 AM ## To:Planning ## Subject:Scheels Conditional Use Permit ## Dear Mayor and City Council, I am writing to express my concern with the amount of signage Scheels is requesting in their CUP, including an LED sign. Other buildings within the 105th redevelopment district were allowed minimal signage. I am requesting that you treat all tenants the same. ## Sincerely, ## Stacey Larsen Page 112 of 179 1 ## Pat Robinson ## From:susan@scootersnsv.com Sent:Monday, August 17, 2026 10:35 AM ## To:Planning Subject:Scheels signage public comment ## Mr. Mayor and City Councilmembers, Signage can make or break a business. Tenants in building B of the National Sports Center have been undersigned for nearly two years and business has been negatively aƯected. We’re excited to have Scheels and all the rest of the 105 th redevelopment district join the Blaine community, however equality and fairness need to be considered. You say you want to make sure businesses in Blaine are thriving, but your actions don’t always match. We’ve never asked for anything flamboyant but, in my opinion, Scheels is. Council member Robertson said on 1-22-25 – ‘we want everybody that comes into and does business with the city to succeed.’ Great words and intention but lack of signage you’ve allowed currently open businesses in the 105 th redevelopment district has only hurt business by restricting visibility and awareness. We’re following along and look forward to seeing how the Mayor and City Council carefully consider their decisions as we know past decisions made by this group, i.e. only allowing the NSV Building B 200 square foot of signage compared to 225 or even 300 sq. foot, has had negative impact on Blaine businesses. Thank you, ## Susan Nygaard ## Scooter’s CoƯee Franchise Owner Page 113 of 179 1 ## Pat Robinson ## From:Tracie Shroyer <tracie.a.shroyer@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, August 17, 2026 10:39 AM ## To:Planning Subject:Public Hearing on 26-0044 ## Dear Mayor and Members of the Blaine City Council, I am writing regarding Case 26-0044 and the proposed conditional use permit for the Scheels sign plan. I’ve lived in this area my entire life, and I care a great deal about seeing Blaine support both large developments and the smaller local businesses that have invested in this community. I am concerned about the consistency with which the City is applying its signage standards. I understand that requests for additional or expanded signage by businesses within National Sports Village, including Pizza Pub Prime, The PARC, Protein House, and Scooter's Coffee, have previously been denied or restricted. These are local businesses for whom visibility and signage can make a real difference in attracting customers. Scheels, by comparison, is an enormous, nationally recognized retailer occupying a very large, highly visible building that will serve as an anchor for the redevelopment district. Scheels size, location, and brand recognition would seem to make additional signage less necessary, not more. My concern is not simply whether Scheels should be allowed four wall signs and an LED display. It is whether the City is applying the same standards and considerations to every business. If the Council determines that the Scheels proposal warrants an exception through a conditional use permit, I would ask the Council to also consider what precedent that decision establishes for other businesses in the immediate area. In particular, I believe the signage requests made by businesses at National Sports Village should be revisited using the same reasoning and standards being applied to Scheels. Small, locally owned businesses should not face a more restrictive standard simply because they do not have the size, resources, or name recognition of a company like Scheels. If additional signage is considered reasonable and appropriate for Scheels in this area, the City should be willing to extend that same flexibility to its smaller neighboring businesses. I ask that you either deny Case 26-0044 or, if it is approved, reconsider comparable signage requests from the National Sports Village businesses so that the City’s policies are applied fairly and consistently. Thank you for considering my comments. ## Tracie Shroyer Page 114 of 179 1 ## Pat Robinson ## From:susanbrent@comcast.net Sent:Monday, August 17, 2026 11:53 AM ## To:Planning ## Subject:Scheels Signage Public Comment ## Mr. Mayor and City Council Members, My wife and I own, the Scooter’s CoƯee in the 105 th Redevelopment District in Blaine where Scheels is in the process of being built. We look forward to Scheels and think they will be a great addition to the district. With that said I have some concerns with Scheels requested signage allotment and the way decisions were made for signage allocation for the National Sports Village. We attended the January 22, 2025 City Council meeting. We were the first business to open in the 105 th Redevelopment District. At that point we were 4 months into our new business and along with the landlord, requesting the Council to increase signage for Building B, from 150 to 300 square foot. The problem was and continues to be lack of signage and visibility for open businesses. Well next month marks 2 years we’ve been open for business and the building is still lacking signage as well as a monument sign showing the various tenant names. I want to share a few statements made at the Jan. 22, 2025 meeting which you as the Mayor and City Council members discussed our landlords request to increase the signage square foot for the entire NSV building B, which now houses Scooter’s CoƯee, the PARC and Protein House from 150 square feet to 300 square feet, but the council only increased it to 200 square feet and declined the request to have a monument sign listing all tenants names on it. ## Tom Newland said: I think that we have done our share. Signage does not make or break a building. So, signage is not the answer. Signage is a part of how things work, but as I've said in the workshop discussion, Businesses want as much signage is possible. There's no such thing as too much, but there is, and what we have here is too much. So, I am not supportive of this and will absolutely vote no. (regarding increasing signage for the NSV to 300 sq. foot) ## Jess Robertson said: I think sometimes what gets lost on some of my colleagues is a precedent we set when we do these things, because if I go in and change the zoning for one zoning area signs, we just had like a fairly long, workshop on signage. All the people that are violating the current sign ordinances, all the ways that people hate the sign ordinances, all the ways that it compares to us not being even close to this remotely strict as Maple Grove and other communities. My issue isn't wanting to, I don't I don't want them to fail. I don't want you to fail. I think there's a way that the city can step in and do something. But I don't think that changing the zoning for this district is what it is as it relates to the sign. Page 115 of 179 2 We want you to succeed, but I don't think amending the zoning for this district is the way to do it because as I promise you, they will come every time we do something and we say, oh, precedent and we all put it in the back of our. But it comes back every single time, and I just don't want that here. We have to be consistent, and I think there's a way to get you what you want without amending the zoning code. Massoglia said: We did have a vision for this whole district to have less signage, to be a little less flashy, a little less in your face. ## Jess Robertson said: I don't want it to look like the village where Target is or, you know, the gas station with little tenants that has a monument sign. There was intention behind creating the district. Now, listen, I am happy to accommodate your need for a sign, but I'm not going to go in here and be like we're adding more walls and bigger monument signs. That I'm not going to do. So, after seeing some of the comments from January 22 nd 2025, I’ll have to say this council should reflect on how signage decisions were made for the National Sports Village and how you’re making decisions for Scheels and other upcoming businesses, which are all part of the 105 th Redevelopment District. Fast forward to today with Scheels coming into our same 105 th Redevelopment/district you are considering approving over 1000 square feet of signage on 4 sides of the building for one tenant along with a giant LED billboard that will be flashing all kinds of images, advertisements, etc. What happened to not wanting it to look like the retail over by Target (which isn’t close to this level of signage)? That signs don’t make the building. What happened to all your meetings and conversations of how this was going to be diƯerent. You said, we don’t need signage and people will just figure it out. You’ve really put us through a lot of strain and hardship trying to work with what you felt was a good idea that failed miserably. The current NSV monument sign is useless and says nothing about tenants as other complexes have which you struck down on that same day (1-22-25) when the landlord asked it to be increased 15 sq foot to 45 sq foot to accommodate tenant names. Again, this isn’t about Scheels but the way you had a vision for a redevelopment district that looks reserved and not flamboyant and now you’re considering signage that will allow just that. ## Regards, ## Brent Nygaard (Scooter’s CoƯee Franchise Owner) Page 116 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Staff Report ## File Number: ORD 26-2610 ## Agenda Date ## Status August 17, 2026 ## In Control ## File Type ## City Council ## Ordinance 7:00 PM - Public Hearing and Items Published for a Certain Time - Jason Zimmerman, Finance ## Director Agenda Item # 8.3 ## Public Hearing An Ordinance Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Connexus Energy, a Minnesota Cooperative, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Electric Service Within the City Of Blaine ## Executive Summary An Ordinance Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Connexus Energy, A Minnesota Cooperative, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Electric Service Within the City Of Blaine. ## Background As noted by City Council members throughout the 2025 budget process, among peer communities in Minnesota, Blaine is the only city that continues to rely predominantly on property taxes to fund general government functions, including police and fire services. With rapidly increasing demands for services and infrastructure amidst constraints on traditional revenue sources, identifying and implementing alternative revenue mechanisms can help diversify the city's income portfolio and address funding gaps. Alternative revenue streams can help diversify the city's income, reduce overreliance on the existing property tax levy, and provide dedicated resources for critical projects. These approaches not only enhance fiscal resilience but may also be structured to allow for more equitable contributions from residents, businesses, and visitors who benefit from local services. In early 2025, the city council was presented with information on alternative revenue sources to reduce the burden on property taxpayers in the city of Blaine. One of the options discussed was utility franchise fees. The council directed staff to explore franchise fees further. City staff then began the process of meeting with all gas and electric utility providers in Blaine. They include CenterPoint Energy (gas), Xcel Energy (gas and electric), Connexus (electric) and Centennial Utilities (gas). The purpose of the Page 117 of 179 meetings was to inform the utility companies about Blaine's potential desire to establish franchise fees, discuss the process for establishing said fee, and obtain data from the utility companies.Utility providers, like those for gas and electricity, are required by Minnesota law to deliver services that are safe, adequate, and efficient. To do this, they often need to use public areas like roads and sidewalks, which are known as public rights-of-way. Because cities are responsible for managing these rights-of-way, they often create franchise agreements with utility companies. A franchise agreement is a contract that gives a utility company the right to install, maintain, and repair its equipment within a city's public grounds or rights-of-way. In Minnesota, cities have broad authority under state law to negotiate these agreements, which are formalized as ordinances. Per Minnesota Statute 216B.36, a city may impose a franchise fee on a gas or electric utility for the use of the public right-of-way by adopting an ordinance that establishes fee terms, including structure, collection, schedule and effective dates. Cities have the option of imposing a flat fee or a percentage fee based on utility usage. These fees can vary between residential customers and various commercial customer types. While a flat fee is constant from month-to-month, a percentage-based fee varies seasonally. The table below provides a comparison of how several similar sized cities utilize utility franchise fees: ## City Electric Franchise Fee Gas Franchise Fee ## Apple Valley Yes Yes ## Bloomington Yes Yes ## Brooklyn Park Yes Yes ## Burnsville Yes Yes ## Coon Rapids Yes Yes ## Eagan Yes Yes ## Eden Prarie Yes Yes ## Edina Yes Yes ## Lakeville Yes Yes ## Maple Grove No No ## Minnetonka Yes Yes ## Plymouth Yes Yes ## St. Louis Park Yes Yes ## Woodbury Yes Yes Page 118 of 179 When comparing franchise fees as a revenue source to property taxes, advantages include: • Local control of processes and fee structure. • Wider base than property taxes. • Inclusion of tax-exempt properties. • Diversification of the city’s revenue sources. • Reliable source of revenue. • New construction would contribute immediately (market value / tax delay under state law) Some disadvantages of franchise fees include: • Unlike cable franchise fees paid only by subscribers, everyone must pay since gas and electricity are essential services. • Significant administrative time is required to establish franchise fees and implement them concurrently. • Potential resistance from utility providers to implement fees proposed by the city. Franchise fee revenues can be utilized to support a variety of community needs and capital improvements. Common applications include investments in street and trail systems, such as mill and overlay projects and full street reconstructions. Some cities choose to allocate these funds toward the maintenance and enhancement of trails and sidewalks. In addition to transportation related projects, communities have directed franchise fee funds toward broader infrastructure improvements, including the construction or renovation of public facilities such as police stations, fire halls, and city hall buildings. While less common, franchise fees have also supported climate and sustainability initiatives, including implementation of climate action plans and other efforts aimed at improving environmental sustainability and community resilience. Based on the comparison of electric and gas franchise riders from various cities, the City of Lakeville was selected as the most suitable model to meet Blaine's current financial needs. Lakeville’s rates were recently adopted and reflect existing market conditions, potentially leading to a more expedient approval path with regulatory authorities. As a community similar in size and characteristics, it also provides a relevant and reliable benchmark for analysis. Using Lakeville’s rates as a reference, the estimated annual revenue is approximately $5.7 million, an amount that aligns closely with Blaine’s planned annual debt/levy portion of pavement management programming as outlined in the preliminary 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Plan. The flat-rate model does not fluctuate from year to year, unlike taxes which are based on property values that change every year. It would provide a consistent rate that residential, commercial and industrial property owners can rely on. It would be equally spread across all gas and electric users, including tax-exempt properties such as schools, churches and nonprofits that also benefit from city services. The flat-rate model also offers a stable and predictable fee structure, creating a consistent revenue stream to support the city’s annual budget. Albeit the allocation of franchise fees is an annual election of the City Council through the budgeting process, dialog has focused on directing these revenues toward infrastructure investments in lieu of additional debt, thereby achieving meaningful long-term savings through the elimination of interest and issuance expenses. Page 119 of 179 While the modeled fee arrangement may not benefit all properties equally, franchise fees typically represent a less significant financial burden compared to taxation. Per the table below, which is based on the current 2026 tax levy, the median valued residential property, average valued residential property, a small commercial user with a $1 million property, and a large commercial user with a $4 million property are all better off financially from the implementation of franchise fees rather than increasing the tax levy. This shows equity in implementation and doesn't create an undue burden on any one property classification. Under the franchise rates and customer projections noted above, it is estimated that the majority of residents and businesses would experience a reduced financial burden relative to ongoing borrowing for capital projects, which would otherwise increase pressure on the property tax levy. On April 13, the City Council met to review the procedural framework and necessary timelines for establishing new franchise and fee ordinances. Because the Council reached a consensus to move forward with the process as drafted, a mandatory 60-day notice period for utilities was scheduled to begin on July 1. These fee ordinances are tentatively slated for a continuation of the public hearing and second reading on August 17 and adoption on September 9. ## Utility Franchise Fee to Levy Comparison ## Franchise Fees ## Property/Customer Type ## Monthly Fee — ## Electric ## Monthly Fee — Gas ## Monthly ## Total ## Annual Total ## Annual ## Levy ## Additional ## Cost if Levied ## - No Franchise ## Fee $346K Residential - ## Median $6.00 $6.00 $12.00 $144.00 $157.11 $13.11 $380K Residential - ## Average $6.00 $6.00 $12.00 $144.00 $174.73 $30.73 Small Commercial - $1 ## Million $35.00 $35.00 $70.00 $840.00 $914.79 $74.79 Large Commercial - $4 ## Million $120.00 $120.00 $240.00 $2,880.00 $3,766.10 $886.10 ## Proposed Utility Franchise Fees ## Electric Gas ## Classification Monthly Rate Classification Monthly Rate ## Residential $6.00 Residential/Firm A $6.00 ## Small C&I Non-Demand $16.00 Firm B $35.00 ## Small C&I Demand $35.00 Firm C $120.00 ## Large C&I $120.00 Small Volume Dual Fuel A $120.00 ## Public Street Lighting $- Small Volume Dual Fuel B $120.00 ## Municipal Pumping Non-Demand $- Large Volume Dual Fuel $120.00 ## Municipal Pumping Demand $- Large Volume Firm $120.00 Page 120 of 179 ## Strategic Plan Relationship Utility franchise fees will provide increased non-tax revenues. ## Board/Commission Review ## None ## Financial Impact Franchise fees provide a stable source of funding that will be used to help the city maintain streets and other community assets without sole reliance on the property tax levy. These funds will be used to supplant the need for costly long-term bonding to support critical infrastructure improvements and will not be earmarked for new spending or the expansion of city services. ## Public Outreach/Input Notice of this public hearing was published in the Blaine Spring Lake Park Life in its July 3 and July 10 editions. On July 1, a pre-notice cover letter was sent via certified mail to the utility provider. Public workshops were held on the following dates to discuss the potential implementation of gas and electric franchise fees: • January 13, 2025 • September 8, 2025 • November 17, 2025 • January 23, 2026 • April 13, 2026 • May 18, 2026 The public hearing for this proposed ordinance began on August 3 with no public comments and was continued to the August 17 City Council meeting. ## Staff Recommendation Reconvene the public hearing, receive comments, then close. The second reading of the ordinance will be considered at the September 9, 2026 regular meeting. ## Attachment List ## 1. Public Comments Page 121 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Signature Copy ## Ordinance: ORD 26-2610 ## Public Hearing An Ordinance Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Connexus Energy, a Minnesota Cooperative, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Electric Service Within ## the City Of Blaine ## THE CITY OF BLAINE DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Purpose. The Blaine City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide electric services within the City of Blaine (the “City”). Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 26-2607, a Franchise Agreement between the City and Connexus Energy, a Minnesota cooperative, its successors and assigns, (“Company”) the City has the right to impose a franchise fee on the Company. Section 2. Terms. A franchise fee is hereby imposed on the Company under its electric franchise in accordance with the Franchise Agreement amount and fee design set forth in the fee schedule attached as Exhibit A to this Ordinance commencing with the Company's January 2027 billing month. This fee is a monthly account-based fee on each premise and not a meter-based fee, as established in Section 8.2 of the Franchise Agreement. In the event that an entity covered by this ordinance has more than one meter at a single premise, but only one account, only one fee shall be assessed to that account. If a premise has two or more meters being billed at different rates, the Company may have an account for each rate classification, which will result in more than one franchise fee assessment for electric service to that premise. If the Company combines the rate classifications into a single account, the franchise fee assessed to the account will be the largest franchise fee applicable to a single rate classification for energy delivered to that premise. In the event any entities covered by this ordinance have more than one premise (address), each premise shall be subject to a separate franchise fee appropriate for the premise. In the event a question arises as to the proper fee amount for any premise, the Company's manner of billing for energy used at all similar premises in the City will control. Section 3. Payment and Fee Modification. The franchise fee shall be payable to the City quarterly and shall be based on the amount collected by Company during the complete billing month during the period for which payment is to be made. The payment shall be due the last business day of the month following the period for which the payment is made. Such franchise fee shall not exceed any amount that the Company may legally charge to its customers prior to payment to the City by imposing a surcharge equivalent to such franchise fee in its rates for electric service. The franchise fee may be increased or decreased by ordinance from time to time, however any such change may not occur more often than annually. Company may pay the City the fee based upon the surcharge billed subject to subsequent reductions to account for uncollectibles, refunds, and correction of erroneous billings that are not Page 122 of 179 received by or credited to the Company. Section 4. Surcharge. The City recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission may allow the Company to add a surcharge to customer rates of City residents to reimburse the Company for the cost of the fee. The Company agrees that it is prohibited from adding an administrative fee of any kind upon or relating to the franchise fee. Section 5. Enforcement. Any dispute, including enforcement of a default regarding this ordinance will be resolved in accordance with Section 2.5 of the Franchise Agreement. Section 6. Effective Date of Franchise Fee. The effective date of fee collection shall be January 1, 2027 or sixty (60) days after the City sends written notice enclosing a copy of this adopted Ordinance to the Company by certified mail, whichever date is later. Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. INTRODUCED and read in full the 3rd day of August, 2026. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Blaine, Minnesota this ___ day of ___________, 2026. Page 123 of 179 ## From: Sam Villella <sdvillella@gmail.com> ## Sent: Monday, August 3, 2026 6:31 PM ## To: Tim Sanders <tsanders@blainemn.gov>; Chris Ford <cford@blainemn.gov>; Tom Newland ## <tnewland@blainemn.gov>; Jess Robertson <jrobertson@blainemn.gov>; Leslie Larson ## <leslielarson@blainemn.gov>; Terra Fleming <tfleming@blainemn.gov>; Chris Massoglia ## <cmassoglia@blainemn.gov>; Erik Thorvig <ethorvig@blainemn.gov>; Franchise Fees <franchisefees@blainemn.gov> ## Subject: Utility Franchise Fees ## Sam Villella ## 10534 Alamo Street NE ## Blaine, MN 55449 August 2nd, 2026 ## Re: Utility Franchise Fees ## Mayor Sanders & Councilmembers- I wanted to express my personal objection to the use of utility franchise fees to increase city revenue and fill budget gaps. My views are independent, from the perspective of a resident and taxpayer. They do not represent Connexus Energy or the Spring Lake Park School District. Until now, Blaine has always been committed to a transparent tax environment without the use of such fees. I was able to sit down with staff to understand the rationale. From a staff perspective, I am sympathetic and can understand their recommendation. Nevertheless, I want to lay out why I believe this is the wrong tool for Blaine to utilize, even understanding the budget pressures driving it: It is a STEALTH TAX, not a transparent one. A franchise fee is collected by the utility and folded into a monthly bill as a line item most residents never scrutinize. Unlike a property tax levy, it does not go through Truth-in-Taxation notices, public levy hearings, or the same level of scrutiny residents expect before their tax burden changes. Replacing a transparent mechanism with an opaque one is a mistake. It is regressive. The franchise fees will be a flat rate monthly add on income or ability to pay. A fixed-income senior and a high-earning household pay the same monthly fee regardless of the disparity of usage. That falls hardest on residents who can least absorb it, at a time when energy costs are already a real burden for many families. It is disconnected from the cost of the service it funds. Unlike a special assessment tied to a specific improvement, franchise fee revenue typically flows into the general fund and is spent on unrelated priorities such as the indicated use of resurfacing roads. Residents paying more on their electric and gas bills have no clear line of sight to what they are actually funding. It compounds on top of already rising utility costs. Electric and gas rates have been climbing independent of anything the city does. Layering a new fee onto bills that are already increasing compounds the burden on households and small businesses at the worst possible time due to recent inflation. It sets a precedent that is easy to expand and hard to reverse. Once a franchise fee is in place, it becomes a low- visibility lever for future councils to raise without the same public accountability a levy increase requires. Fees adopted as "modest" or "temporary" have a well- documented tendency to grow over time precisely because they draw so little scrutiny. Finally, it undermines trust in the city. Blaine's reputation for straightforward, transparent taxation is an asset. Introducing a fee that functions as a workaround to the normal levy process risks eroding resident trust in how Page 124 of 179 budget decisions are made and communicated. There are more transparent alternatives. A modest, clearly justified levy increase debated openly, subject to Truth- in-Taxation hearings, and visible on the property tax statement is a more honest way to ask residents to fund city priorities than routing the increase through a utility bill. I recognize staff are working with real constraints, and I don't take that lightly. But I'd strongly encourage the Council to pursue revenue solutions that keep Blaine's commitment to transparency intact, rather than one that shifts costs onto residents in a way that is harder to see and harder to hold anyone accountable for. Thank you for your time and consideration. ## Respectfully- ## Sam Villella 763-226-0406 Page 125 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Staff Report ## File Number: ORD 26-2611 ## Agenda Date ## Status August 17, 2026 ## In Control ## File Type ## City Council ## Ordinance 7:00 PM - Public Hearing and Items Published for a Certain Time - Jason Zimmerman, Finance ## Director Agenda Item # 8.4 ## Public Hearing An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Circle Pines Public Utilities, D/B/A Centennial Utilities, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas ## Energy Service Within the City of Blaine ## Executive Summary An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Circle Pines Public Utilities, D/B/A Centennial Utilities, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas Energy Service Within the City of Blaine. ## Background As noted by City Council members throughout the 2025 budget process, among peer communities in Minnesota, Blaine is the only city that continues to rely predominantly on property taxes to fund general government functions, including police and fire services. With rapidly increasing demands for services and infrastructure amidst constraints on traditional revenue sources, identifying and implementing alternative revenue mechanisms can help diversify the city's income portfolio and address funding gaps. Alternative revenue streams can help diversify the city's income, reduce overreliance on the existing property tax levy, and provide dedicated resources for critical projects. These approaches not only enhance fiscal resilience but may also be structured to allow for more equitable contributions from residents, businesses, and visitors who benefit from local services. In early 2025, the city council was presented with information on alternative revenue sources to reduce the burden on property taxpayers in the city of Blaine. One of the options discussed was utility franchise fees. The council directed staff to explore franchise fees further. City staff then began the Page 126 of 179 process of meeting with all gas and electric utility providers in Blaine. They include CenterPoint Energy (gas), Xcel Energy (gas and electric), Connexus (electric) and Centennial Utilities (gas). The purpose of the meetings was to inform the utility companies about Blaine's potential desire to establish franchise fees, discuss the process for establishing said fee, and obtain data from the utility companies.Utility providers, like those for gas and electricity, are required by Minnesota law to deliver services that are safe, adequate, and efficient. To do this, they often need to use public areas like roads and sidewalks, which are known as public rights-of-way. Because cities are responsible for managing these rights-of-way, they often create franchise agreements with utility companies. A franchise agreement is a contract that gives a utility company the right to install, maintain, and repair its equipment within a city's public grounds or rights-of-way. In Minnesota, cities have broad authority under state law to negotiate these agreements, which are formalized as ordinances. Per Minnesota Statute 216B.36, a city may impose a franchise fee on a gas or electric utility for the use of the public right-of-way by adopting an ordinance that establishes fee terms, including structure, collection, schedule and effective dates. Cities have the option of imposing a flat fee or a percentage fee based on utility usage. These fees can vary between residential customers and various commercial customer types. While a flat fee is constant from month-to-month, a percentage-based fee varies seasonally. The table below provides a comparison of how several similar sized cities utilize utility franchise fees: ## City Electric Franchise Fee Gas Franchise Fee ## Apple Valley Yes Yes ## Bloomington Yes Yes ## Brooklyn Park Yes Yes ## Burnsville Yes Yes ## Coon Rapids Yes Yes ## Eagan Yes Yes ## Eden Prarie Yes Yes ## Edina Yes Yes ## Lakeville Yes Yes ## Maple Grove No No ## Minnetonka Yes Yes ## Plymouth Yes Yes ## St. Louis Park Yes Yes ## Woodbury Yes Yes Page 127 of 179 When comparing franchise fees as a revenue source to property taxes, advantages include: • Local control of processes and fee structure. • Wider base than property taxes. • Inclusion of tax-exempt properties. • Diversification of the city’s revenue sources. • Reliable source of revenue. • New construction would contribute immediately (market value / tax delay under state law) Some disadvantages of franchise fees include: • Unlike cable franchise fees paid only by subscribers, everyone must pay since gas and electricity are essential services. • Significant administrative time is required to establish franchise fees and implement them concurrently. • Potential resistance from utility providers to implement fees proposed by the city. Franchise fee revenues can be utilized to support a variety of community needs and capital improvements. Common applications include investments in street and trail systems, such as mill and overlay projects and full street reconstructions. Some cities choose to allocate these funds toward the maintenance and enhancement of trails and sidewalks. In addition to transportation related projects, communities have directed franchise fee funds toward broader infrastructure improvements, including the construction or renovation of public facilities such as police stations, fire halls, and city hall buildings. While less common, franchise fees have also supported climate and sustainability initiatives, including implementation of climate action plans and other efforts aimed at improving environmental sustainability and community resilience. Based on the comparison of electric and gas franchise riders from various cities, the City of Lakeville was selected as the most suitable model to meet Blaine's current financial needs. Lakeville’s rates were recently adopted and reflect existing market conditions, potentially leading to a more expedient approval path with regulatory authorities. As a community similar in size and characteristics, it also provides a relevant and reliable benchmark for analysis. Using Lakeville’s rates as a reference, the estimated annual revenue is approximately $5.7 million, an amount that aligns closely with Blaine’s planned annual debt/levy portion of pavement management programming as outlined in the preliminary 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Plan. The flat-rate model does not fluctuate from year to year, unlike taxes which are based on property values that change every year. It would provide a consistent rate that residential, commercial and industrial property owners can rely on. It would be equally spread across all gas and electric users, including tax-exempt properties such as schools, churches and nonprofits that also benefit from city services. The flat-rate model also offers a stable and predictable fee structure, creating a consistent revenue stream to support the city’s annual budget. Albeit the allocation of franchise fees is an annual election of the City Council through the budgeting process, dialog has focused on directing these revenues toward infrastructure investments in lieu of additional debt, thereby achieving meaningful long-term savings through the elimination of interest and issuance expenses. Page 128 of 179 While the modeled fee arrangement may not benefit all properties equally, franchise fees typically represent a less significant financial burden compared to taxation. Per the table below, which is based on the current 2026 tax levy, the median valued residential property, average valued residential property, a small commercial user with a $1 million property, and a large commercial user with a $4 million property are all better off financially from the implementation of franchise fees rather than increasing the tax levy. This shows equity in implementation and doesn't create an undue burden on any one property classification. Under the franchise rates and customer projections noted above, it is estimated that the majority of residents and businesses would experience a reduced financial burden relative to ongoing borrowing for capital projects, which would otherwise increase pressure on the property tax levy. On April 13, the City Council met to review the procedural framework and necessary timelines for establishing new franchise and fee ordinances. Because the Council reached a consensus to move forward with the process as drafted, a mandatory 60-day notice period for utilities was scheduled to begin on July 1. These fee ordinances are tentatively slated for a continuation of the public hearing and second reading on August 17 and adoption on September 9. ## Utility Franchise Fee to Levy Comparison ## Franchise Fees ## Property/Customer Type ## Monthly Fee — ## Electric ## Monthly Fee — Gas ## Monthly ## Total ## Annual Total ## Annual ## Levy ## Additional ## Cost if Levied ## - No Franchise ## Fee $346K Residential - ## Median $6.00 $6.00 $12.00 $144.00 $157.11 $13.11 $380K Residential - ## Average $6.00 $6.00 $12.00 $144.00 $174.73 $30.73 Small Commercial - $1 ## Million $35.00 $35.00 $70.00 $840.00 $914.79 $74.79 Large Commercial - $4 ## Million $120.00 $120.00 $240.00 $2,880.00 $3,766.10 $886.10 ## Proposed Utility Franchise Fees ## Electric Gas ## Classification Monthly Rate Classification Monthly Rate ## Residential $6.00 Residential/Firm A $6.00 ## Small C&I Non-Demand $16.00 Firm B $35.00 ## Small C&I Demand $35.00 Firm C $120.00 ## Large C&I $120.00 Small Volume Dual Fuel A $120.00 ## Public Street Lighting $- Small Volume Dual Fuel B $120.00 ## Municipal Pumping Non-Demand $- Large Volume Dual Fuel $120.00 ## Municipal Pumping Demand $- Large Volume Firm $120.00 Page 129 of 179 ## Strategic Plan Relationship Utility franchise fees will provide increased non-tax revenues. ## Board/Commission Review ## None ## Financial Impact Franchise fees provide a stable source of funding that will be used to help the city maintain streets and other community assets without sole reliance on the property tax levy. These funds will be used to supplant the need for costly long-term bonding to support critical infrastructure improvements and will not be earmarked for new spending or the expansion of city services. ## Public Outreach/Input Notice of this public hearing was published in the Blaine Spring Lake Park Life in its July 3 and July 10 editions. On July 1, a pre-notice cover letter was sent via certified mail to the utility provider. Public workshops were held on the following dates to discuss the potential implementation of gas and electric franchise fees: • January 13, 2025 • September 8, 2025 • November 17, 2025 • January 23, 2026 • April 13, 2026 • May 18, 2026 The public hearing for this proposed ordinance began on August 3 with no public comments and was continued to the August 17 City Council meeting. ## Staff Recommendation Reconvene the public hearing, receive comments, then close. The second reading of the ordinance will be considered at the September 9, 2026 regular meeting. ## Attachment List ## 1. Franchise Comments Page 130 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Signature Copy ## Ordinance: ORD 26-2611 ## Public Hearing An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Circle Pines Public Utilities, ## D/B/A Centennial Utilities, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas Energy Service Within the City of Blaine ## THE CITY OF BLAINE DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Purpose. The Blaine City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide gas services within the City of Blaine (the “City”). Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 18-2401, a Franchise Agreement between the City and Circle Pines Public Utilities, D/B/A Centennial Utilities, a Minnesota municipal corporation, its successors and assigns, (“Company”) the City has the right to impose a franchise fee on the Company. Section 2. Terms. A franchise fee is hereby imposed on the Company under its gas franchise in accordance with the Franchise Agreement amount and fee design set forth in the fee schedule attached as Exhibit A to this Ordinance commencing with the Company's January 2027 billing month. This fee is a monthly account-based fee on each premise, and not a meter-based fee, as established in Section 8.2 of the Franchise Agreement. In the event that an entity covered by this ordinance has more than one meter at a single premise, but only one account, only one fee shall be assessed to that account. If a premise has two or more meters being billed at different rates, the Company may have an account for each rate classification, which will result in more than one franchise fee assessment for gas service to that premise. If the Company combines the rate classifications into a single account, the franchise fee assessed to the account will be the largest franchise fee applicable to a single rate classification for energy delivered to that premise. In the event any entities covered by this ordinance have more than one premise (address), each premise shall be subject to a separate franchise fee appropriate for the premise. In the event a question arises as to the proper fee amount for any premise, the Company's manner of billing for energy used at all similar premises in the City will control. Section 3. Payment and Fee Modification. The franchise fee shall be payable to the City quarterly and shall be based on the amount collected by Company during the complete billing month during the period for which payment is to be made. The payment shall be due the last business day of the month following the period for which the payment is made. Such franchise fee shall not exceed any amount that the Company may legally charge to its customers prior to payment to the City by imposing a surcharge equivalent to such franchise fee in its rates for gas service. The franchise fee may be increased or decreased by ordinance from time to time, however any such change may not occur more often than annually. Company may pay the City the fee based upon the surcharge billed subject to subsequent reductions to account for uncollectibles, refunds, and correction of erroneous billings that are not Page 131 of 179 received by or credited to the Company. Section 4. Surcharge. The City recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission may allow the Company to add a surcharge to customer rates of City residents to reimburse the Company for the cost of the fee. The Company agrees that it is prohibited from adding an administrative fee of any kind upon or relating to the franchise fee. Section 5. Enforcement. Any dispute, including enforcement of a default regarding this ordinance will be resolved in accordance with Section 2.5 of the Franchise Agreement. Section 6. Effective Date of Franchise Fee. The effective date of fee collection shall be January 1, 2027 or sixty (60) days after the City sends written notice enclosing a copy of this adopted Ordinance to the Company by certified mail, whichever date is later. Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. INTRODUCED and read in full the 3rd day of August, 2026. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Blaine, Minnesota this ___ day of __________, 2026. Page 132 of 179 ## From: Sam Villella <sdvillella@gmail.com> ## Sent: Monday, August 3, 2026 6:31 PM ## To: Tim Sanders <tsanders@blainemn.gov>; Chris Ford <cford@blainemn.gov>; Tom Newland ## <tnewland@blainemn.gov>; Jess Robertson <jrobertson@blainemn.gov>; Leslie Larson ## <leslielarson@blainemn.gov>; Terra Fleming <tfleming@blainemn.gov>; Chris Massoglia ## <cmassoglia@blainemn.gov>; Erik Thorvig <ethorvig@blainemn.gov>; Franchise Fees <franchisefees@blainemn.gov> ## Subject: Utility Franchise Fees ## Sam Villella ## 10534 Alamo Street NE ## Blaine, MN 55449 August 2nd, 2026 ## Re: Utility Franchise Fees ## Mayor Sanders & Councilmembers- I wanted to express my personal objection to the use of utility franchise fees to increase city revenue and fill budget gaps. My views are independent, from the perspective of a resident and taxpayer. They do not represent Connexus Energy or the Spring Lake Park School District. Until now, Blaine has always been committed to a transparent tax environment without the use of such fees. I was able to sit down with staff to understand the rationale. From a staff perspective, I am sympathetic and can understand their recommendation. Nevertheless, I want to lay out why I believe this is the wrong tool for Blaine to utilize, even understanding the budget pressures driving it: It is a STEALTH TAX, not a transparent one. A franchise fee is collected by the utility and folded into a monthly bill as a line item most residents never scrutinize. Unlike a property tax levy, it does not go through Truth-in-Taxation notices, public levy hearings, or the same level of scrutiny residents expect before their tax burden changes. Replacing a transparent mechanism with an opaque one is a mistake. It is regressive. The franchise fees will be a flat rate monthly add on income or ability to pay. A fixed-income senior and a high-earning household pay the same monthly fee regardless of the disparity of usage. That falls hardest on residents who can least absorb it, at a time when energy costs are already a real burden for many families. It is disconnected from the cost of the service it funds. Unlike a special assessment tied to a specific improvement, franchise fee revenue typically flows into the general fund and is spent on unrelated priorities such as the indicated use of resurfacing roads. Residents paying more on their electric and gas bills have no clear line of sight to what they are actually funding. It compounds on top of already rising utility costs. Electric and gas rates have been climbing independent of anything the city does. Layering a new fee onto bills that are already increasing compounds the burden on households and small businesses at the worst possible time due to recent inflation. It sets a precedent that is easy to expand and hard to reverse. Once a franchise fee is in place, it becomes a low- visibility lever for future councils to raise without the same public accountability a levy increase requires. Fees adopted as "modest" or "temporary" have a well- documented tendency to grow over time precisely because they draw so little scrutiny. Finally, it undermines trust in the city. Blaine's reputation for straightforward, transparent taxation is an asset. Introducing a fee that functions as a workaround to the normal levy process risks eroding resident trust in how Page 133 of 179 budget decisions are made and communicated. There are more transparent alternatives. A modest, clearly justified levy increase debated openly, subject to Truth- in-Taxation hearings, and visible on the property tax statement is a more honest way to ask residents to fund city priorities than routing the increase through a utility bill. I recognize staff are working with real constraints, and I don't take that lightly. But I'd strongly encourage the Council to pursue revenue solutions that keep Blaine's commitment to transparency intact, rather than one that shifts costs onto residents in a way that is harder to see and harder to hold anyone accountable for. Thank you for your time and consideration. ## Respectfully- ## Sam Villella 763-226-0406 Page 134 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Staff Report ## File Number: ORD 26-2612 ## Agenda Date ## Status August 17, 2026 ## In Control ## File Type ## City Council ## Ordinance 7:00 PM - Public Hearing and Items Published for a Certain Time - Jason Zimmerman, Finance ## Director Agenda Item # 8.5 ## Public Hearing An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Centerpoint Energy Resources Corp., D/B/A Minnegasco, a Delaware Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas Energy Service ## Within the City of Blaine ## Executive Summary An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Centerpoint Energy Resources Corp., D/B/A Minnegasco, a Delaware Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas Energy Service Within the City of Blaine. ## Background As noted by City Council members throughout the 2025 budget process, among peer communities in Minnesota, Blaine is the only city that continues to rely predominantly on property taxes to fund general government functions, including police and fire services. With rapidly increasing demands for services and infrastructure amidst constraints on traditional revenue sources, identifying and implementing alternative revenue mechanisms can help diversify the city's income portfolio and address funding gaps. Alternative revenue streams can help diversify the city's income, reduce overreliance on the existing property tax levy, and provide dedicated resources for critical projects. These approaches not only enhance fiscal resilience but may also be structured to allow for more equitable contributions from residents, businesses, and visitors who benefit from local services. In early 2025, the city council was presented with information on alternative revenue sources to reduce the burden on property taxpayers in the city of Blaine. One of the options discussed was utility franchise fees. The council directed staff to explore franchise fees further. City staff then began the Page 135 of 179 process of meeting with all gas and electric utility providers in Blaine. They include CenterPoint Energy (gas), Xcel Energy (gas and electric), Connexus (electric) and Centennial Utilities (gas). The purpose of the meetings was to inform the utility companies about Blaine's potential desire to establish franchise fees, discuss the process for establishing said fee, and obtain data from the utility companies.Utility providers, like those for gas and electricity, are required by Minnesota law to deliver services that are safe, adequate, and efficient. To do this, they often need to use public areas like roads and sidewalks, which are known as public rights-of-way. Because cities are responsible for managing these rights-of-way, they often create franchise agreements with utility companies. A franchise agreement is a contract that gives a utility company the right to install, maintain, and repair its equipment within a city's public grounds or rights-of-way. In Minnesota, cities have broad authority under state law to negotiate these agreements, which are formalized as ordinances. Per Minnesota Statute 216B.36, a city may impose a franchise fee on a gas or electric utility for the use of the public right-of-way by adopting an ordinance that establishes fee terms, including structure, collection, schedule and effective dates. Cities have the option of imposing a flat fee or a percentage fee based on utility usage. These fees can vary between residential customers and various commercial customer types. While a flat fee is constant from month-to-month, a percentage-based fee varies seasonally. The table below provides a comparison of how several similar sized cities utilize utility franchise fees: ## City Electric Franchise Fee Gas Franchise Fee ## Apple Valley Yes Yes ## Bloomington Yes Yes ## Brooklyn Park Yes Yes ## Burnsville Yes Yes ## Coon Rapids Yes Yes ## Eagan Yes Yes ## Eden Prarie Yes Yes ## Edina Yes Yes ## Lakeville Yes Yes ## Maple Grove No No ## Minnetonka Yes Yes ## Plymouth Yes Yes ## St. Louis Park Yes Yes ## Woodbury Yes Yes Page 136 of 179 When comparing franchise fees as a revenue source to property taxes, advantages include: • Local control of processes and fee structure. • Wider base than property taxes. • Inclusion of tax-exempt properties. • Diversification of the city’s revenue sources. • Reliable source of revenue. • New construction would contribute immediately (market value / tax delay under state law) Some disadvantages of franchise fees include: • Unlike cable franchise fees paid only by subscribers, everyone must pay since gas and electricity are essential services. • Significant administrative time is required to establish franchise fees and implement them concurrently. • Potential resistance from utility providers to implement fees proposed by the city. Franchise fee revenues can be utilized to support a variety of community needs and capital improvements. Common applications include investments in street and trail systems, such as mill and overlay projects and full street reconstructions. Some cities choose to allocate these funds toward the maintenance and enhancement of trails and sidewalks. In addition to transportation related projects, communities have directed franchise fee funds toward broader infrastructure improvements, including the construction or renovation of public facilities such as police stations, fire halls, and city hall buildings. While less common, franchise fees have also supported climate and sustainability initiatives, including implementation of climate action plans and other efforts aimed at improving environmental sustainability and community resilience. Based on the comparison of electric and gas franchise riders from various cities, the City of Lakeville was selected as the most suitable model to meet Blaine's current financial needs. Lakeville’s rates were recently adopted and reflect existing market conditions, potentially leading to a more expedient approval path with regulatory authorities. As a community similar in size and characteristics, it also provides a relevant and reliable benchmark for analysis. Using Lakeville’s rates as a reference, the estimated annual revenue is approximately $5.7 million, an amount that aligns closely with Blaine’s planned annual debt/levy portion of pavement management programming as outlined in the preliminary 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Plan. The flat-rate model does not fluctuate from year to year, unlike taxes which are based on property values that change every year. It would provide a consistent rate that residential, commercial and industrial property owners can rely on. It would be equally spread across all gas and electric users, including tax-exempt properties such as schools, churches and nonprofits that also benefit from city services. The flat-rate model also offers a stable and predictable fee structure, creating a consistent revenue stream to support the city’s annual budget. Albeit the allocation of franchise fees is an annual election of the City Council through the budgeting process, dialog has focused on directing these revenues toward infrastructure investments in lieu of additional debt, thereby achieving meaningful long-term savings through the elimination of interest and issuance expenses. Page 137 of 179 While the modeled fee arrangement may not benefit all properties equally, franchise fees typically represent a less significant financial burden compared to taxation. Per the table below, which is based on the current 2026 tax levy, the median valued residential property, average valued residential property, a small commercial user with a $1 million property, and a large commercial user with a $4 million property are all better off financially from the implementation of franchise fees rather than increasing the tax levy. This shows equity in implementation and doesn't create an undue burden on any one property classification. Under the franchise rates and customer projections noted above, it is estimated that the majority of residents and businesses would experience a reduced financial burden relative to ongoing borrowing for capital projects, which would otherwise increase pressure on the property tax levy. On April 13, the City Council met to review the procedural framework and necessary timelines for establishing new franchise and fee ordinances. Because the Council reached a consensus to move forward with the process as drafted, a mandatory 60-day notice period for utilities was scheduled to begin on July 1. These fee ordinances are tentatively slated for a continuation of the public hearing and second reading on August 17 and adoption on September 9. ## Utility Franchise Fee to Levy Comparison ## Franchise Fees ## Property/Customer Type ## Monthly Fee — ## Electric ## Monthly Fee — Gas ## Monthly ## Total ## Annual Total ## Annual ## Levy ## Additional ## Cost if Levied ## - No Franchise ## Fee $346K Residential - ## Median $6.00 $6.00 $12.00 $144.00 $157.11 $13.11 $380K Residential - ## Average $6.00 $6.00 $12.00 $144.00 $174.73 $30.73 Small Commercial - $1 ## Million $35.00 $35.00 $70.00 $840.00 $914.79 $74.79 Large Commercial - $4 ## Million $120.00 $120.00 $240.00 $2,880.00 $3,766.10 $886.10 ## Proposed Utility Franchise Fees ## Electric Gas ## Classification Monthly Rate Classification Monthly Rate ## Residential $6.00 Residential/Firm A $6.00 ## Small C&I Non-Demand $16.00 Firm B $35.00 ## Small C&I Demand $35.00 Firm C $120.00 ## Large C&I $120.00 Small Volume Dual Fuel A $120.00 ## Public Street Lighting $- Small Volume Dual Fuel B $120.00 ## Municipal Pumping Non-Demand $- Large Volume Dual Fuel $120.00 ## Municipal Pumping Demand $- Large Volume Firm $120.00 Page 138 of 179 ## Strategic Plan Relationship Utility franchise fees will provide increased non-tax revenues. ## Board/Commission Review ## None ## Financial Impact Franchise fees provide a stable source of funding that will be used to help the city maintain streets and other community assets without sole reliance on the property tax levy. These funds will be used to supplant the need for costly long-term bonding to support critical infrastructure improvements and will not be earmarked for new spending or the expansion of city services. ## Public Outreach/Input Notice of this public hearing was published in the Blaine Spring Lake Park Life in its July 3 and July 10 editions. On July 1, a pre-notice cover letter was sent via certified mail to the utility provider. Public workshops were held on the following dates to discuss the potential implementation of gas and electric franchise fees: • January 13, 2025 • September 8, 2025 • November 17, 2025 • January 23, 2026 • April 13, 2026 • May 18, 2026 The public hearing for this proposed ordinance began on August 3 with no public comments and was continued to the August 17 City Council meeting. ## Staff Recommendation Reconvene the public hearing, receive comments, then close. The second reading of the ordinance will be considered at the September 9, 2026 regular meeting. ## Attachment List ## 1. Franchise Comments Page 139 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Signature Copy ## Ordinance: ORD 26-2612 ## Public Hearing An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Centerpoint Energy Resources Corp., D/B/A Minnegasco, a Delaware Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for ## Providing Gas Energy Service Within the City of Blaine ## THE CITY OF BLAINE DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Purpose. The Blaine City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide gas services within the City of Blaine (the “City”). Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 21-2478, a Franchise Agreement between the City and Centerpoint Energy Resources Corp., D/B/A Minnegasco, a Delaware Corporation, its successors and assigns, (“Company”) the City has the right to impose a franchise fee on the Company. Section 2. Terms. A franchise fee is hereby imposed on the Company under its gas franchise in accordance with the Franchise Agreement amount and fee design set forth in the fee schedule attached as Exhibit A to this Ordinance commencing with the Company's January 2027 billing month. This fee is a monthly account-based fee on each premise and not a meter-based fee, as established in Section 8.2 of the Franchise Agreement. In the event that an entity covered by this ordinance has more than one meter at a single premise, but only one account, only one fee shall be assessed to that account. If a premise has two or more meters being billed at different rates, the Company may have an account for each rate classification, which will result in more than one franchise fee assessment for gas service to that premise. If the Company combines the rate classifications into a single account, the franchise fee assessed to the account will be the largest franchise fee applicable to a single rate classification for energy delivered to that premise. In the event any entities covered by this ordinance have more than one premise (address), each premise shall be subject to a separate franchise fee appropriate for the premise. In the event a question arises as to the proper fee amount for any premise, the Company's manner of billing for energy used at all similar premises in the City will control. Section 3. Payment and Fee Modification. The franchise fee shall be payable to the City quarterly and shall be based on the amount collected by Company during the complete billing month during the period for which payment is to be made. The payment shall be due the last business day of the month following the period for which the payment is made. Such franchise fee shall not exceed any amount that the Company may legally charge to its customers prior to payment to the City by imposing a surcharge equivalent to such franchise fee in its rates for gas service. The franchise fee may be increased or decreased by ordinance from time to time, however any such change may not occur more often than annually. Company may pay the City the fee based upon the surcharge billed subject to subsequent reductions to account for uncollectibles, refunds, and correction of erroneous billings that are not Page 140 of 179 received by or credited to the Company. Section 4. Surcharge. The City recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission may allow the Company to add a surcharge to customer rates of City residents to reimburse the Company for the cost of the fee. The Company agrees that it is prohibited from adding an administrative fee of any kind upon or relating to the franchise fee. Section 5. Enforcement. Any dispute, including enforcement of a default regarding this ordinance will be resolved in accordance with Section 2.5 of the Franchise Agreement. Section 6. Effective Date of Franchise Fee. The effective date of fee collection shall be January 1, 2027 or ninety (90) days after the City sends written notice enclosing a copy of this adopted Ordinance to the Company by certified mail, whichever date is later. Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. INTRODUCED and read in full the 3rd day of August, 2026. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Blaine, Minnesota this ___ day of _________, 2026. Page 141 of 179 ## From: Sam Villella <sdvillella@gmail.com> ## Sent: Monday, August 3, 2026 6:31 PM ## To: Tim Sanders <tsanders@blainemn.gov>; Chris Ford <cford@blainemn.gov>; Tom Newland ## <tnewland@blainemn.gov>; Jess Robertson <jrobertson@blainemn.gov>; Leslie Larson ## <leslielarson@blainemn.gov>; Terra Fleming <tfleming@blainemn.gov>; Chris Massoglia ## <cmassoglia@blainemn.gov>; Erik Thorvig <ethorvig@blainemn.gov>; Franchise Fees <franchisefees@blainemn.gov> ## Subject: Utility Franchise Fees ## Sam Villella ## 10534 Alamo Street NE ## Blaine, MN 55449 August 2nd, 2026 ## Re: Utility Franchise Fees ## Mayor Sanders & Councilmembers- I wanted to express my personal objection to the use of utility franchise fees to increase city revenue and fill budget gaps. My views are independent, from the perspective of a resident and taxpayer. They do not represent Connexus Energy or the Spring Lake Park School District. Until now, Blaine has always been committed to a transparent tax environment without the use of such fees. I was able to sit down with staff to understand the rationale. From a staff perspective, I am sympathetic and can understand their recommendation. Nevertheless, I want to lay out why I believe this is the wrong tool for Blaine to utilize, even understanding the budget pressures driving it: It is a STEALTH TAX, not a transparent one. A franchise fee is collected by the utility and folded into a monthly bill as a line item most residents never scrutinize. Unlike a property tax levy, it does not go through Truth-in-Taxation notices, public levy hearings, or the same level of scrutiny residents expect before their tax burden changes. Replacing a transparent mechanism with an opaque one is a mistake. It is regressive. The franchise fees will be a flat rate monthly add on income or ability to pay. A fixed-income senior and a high-earning household pay the same monthly fee regardless of the disparity of usage. That falls hardest on residents who can least absorb it, at a time when energy costs are already a real burden for many families. It is disconnected from the cost of the service it funds. Unlike a special assessment tied to a specific improvement, franchise fee revenue typically flows into the general fund and is spent on unrelated priorities such as the indicated use of resurfacing roads. Residents paying more on their electric and gas bills have no clear line of sight to what they are actually funding. It compounds on top of already rising utility costs. Electric and gas rates have been climbing independent of anything the city does. Layering a new fee onto bills that are already increasing compounds the burden on households and small businesses at the worst possible time due to recent inflation. It sets a precedent that is easy to expand and hard to reverse. Once a franchise fee is in place, it becomes a low- visibility lever for future councils to raise without the same public accountability a levy increase requires. Fees adopted as "modest" or "temporary" have a well- documented tendency to grow over time precisely because they draw so little scrutiny. Finally, it undermines trust in the city. Blaine's reputation for straightforward, transparent taxation is an asset. Introducing a fee that functions as a workaround to the normal levy process risks eroding resident trust in how Page 142 of 179 budget decisions are made and communicated. There are more transparent alternatives. A modest, clearly justified levy increase debated openly, subject to Truth- in-Taxation hearings, and visible on the property tax statement is a more honest way to ask residents to fund city priorities than routing the increase through a utility bill. I recognize staff are working with real constraints, and I don't take that lightly. But I'd strongly encourage the Council to pursue revenue solutions that keep Blaine's commitment to transparency intact, rather than one that shifts costs onto residents in a way that is harder to see and harder to hold anyone accountable for. Thank you for your time and consideration. ## Respectfully- ## Sam Villella 763-226-0406 Page 143 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Staff Report ## File Number: ORD 26-2613 ## Agenda Date ## Status August 17, 2026 ## In Control ## File Type ## City Council ## Ordinance 7:00 PM - Public Hearing and Items Published for a Certain Time - Jason Zimmerman, Finance ## Director Agenda Item # 8.6 ## Public Hearing An Ordinance Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Company, D/B/A Xcel Energy, a Minnesota Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Electric Service ## Within the City of Blaine ## Executive Summary An Ordinance Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Company, D/B/A Xcel Energy, a Minnesota Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Electric Service Within the City of Blaine. ## Background As noted by City Council members throughout the 2025 budget process, among peer communities in Minnesota, Blaine is the only city that continues to rely predominantly on property taxes to fund general government functions, including police and fire services. With rapidly increasing demands for services and infrastructure amidst constraints on traditional revenue sources, identifying and implementing alternative revenue mechanisms can help diversify the city's income portfolio and address funding gaps. Alternative revenue streams can help diversify the city's income, reduce overreliance on the existing property tax levy, and provide dedicated resources for critical projects. These approaches not only enhance fiscal resilience but may also be structured to allow for more equitable contributions from residents, businesses, and visitors who benefit from local services. In early 2025, the city council was presented with information on alternative revenue sources to reduce the burden on property taxpayers in the city of Blaine. One of the options discussed was utility franchise fees. The council directed staff to explore franchise fees further. City staff then began the Page 144 of 179 process of meeting with all gas and electric utility providers in Blaine. They include CenterPoint Energy (gas), Xcel Energy (gas and electric), Connexus (electric) and Centennial Utilities (gas). The purpose of the meetings was to inform the utility companies about Blaine's potential desire to establish franchise fees, discuss the process for establishing said fee, and obtain data from the utility companies.Utility providers, like those for gas and electricity, are required by Minnesota law to deliver services that are safe, adequate, and efficient. To do this, they often need to use public areas like roads and sidewalks, which are known as public rights-of-way. Because cities are responsible for managing these rights-of-way, they often create franchise agreements with utility companies. A franchise agreement is a contract that gives a utility company the right to install, maintain, and repair its equipment within a city's public grounds or rights-of-way. In Minnesota, cities have broad authority under state law to negotiate these agreements, which are formalized as ordinances. Per Minnesota Statute 216B.36, a city may impose a franchise fee on a gas or electric utility for the use of the public right-of-way by adopting an ordinance that establishes fee terms, including structure, collection, schedule and effective dates. Cities have the option of imposing a flat fee or a percentage fee based on utility usage. These fees can vary between residential customers and various commercial customer types. While a flat fee is constant from month-to-month, a percentage-based fee varies seasonally. The table below provides a comparison of how several similar sized cities utilize utility franchise fees: ## City Electric Franchise Fee Gas Franchise Fee ## Apple Valley Yes Yes ## Bloomington Yes Yes ## Brooklyn Park Yes Yes ## Burnsville Yes Yes ## Coon Rapids Yes Yes ## Eagan Yes Yes ## Eden Prarie Yes Yes ## Edina Yes Yes ## Lakeville Yes Yes ## Maple Grove No No ## Minnetonka Yes Yes ## Plymouth Yes Yes ## St. Louis Park Yes Yes ## Woodbury Yes Yes Page 145 of 179 When comparing franchise fees as a revenue source to property taxes, advantages include: • Local control of processes and fee structure. • Wider base than property taxes. • Inclusion of tax-exempt properties. • Diversification of the city’s revenue sources. • Reliable source of revenue. • New construction would contribute immediately (market value / tax delay under state law) Some disadvantages of franchise fees include: • Unlike cable franchise fees paid only by subscribers, everyone must pay since gas and electricity are essential services. • Significant administrative time is required to establish franchise fees and implement them concurrently. • Potential resistance from utility providers to implement fees proposed by the city. Franchise fee revenues can be utilized to support a variety of community needs and capital improvements. Common applications include investments in street and trail systems, such as mill and overlay projects and full street reconstructions. Some cities choose to allocate these funds toward the maintenance and enhancement of trails and sidewalks. In addition to transportation related projects, communities have directed franchise fee funds toward broader infrastructure improvements, including the construction or renovation of public facilities such as police stations, fire halls, and city hall buildings. While less common, franchise fees have also supported climate and sustainability initiatives, including implementation of climate action plans and other efforts aimed at improving environmental sustainability and community resilience. Based on the comparison of electric and gas franchise riders from various cities, the City of Lakeville was selected as the most suitable model to meet Blaine's current financial needs. Lakeville’s rates were recently adopted and reflect existing market conditions, potentially leading to a more expedient approval path with regulatory authorities. As a community similar in size and characteristics, it also provides a relevant and reliable benchmark for analysis. Using Lakeville’s rates as a reference, the estimated annual revenue is approximately $5.7 million, an amount that aligns closely with Blaine’s planned annual debt/levy portion of pavement management programming as outlined in the preliminary 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Plan. The flat-rate model does not fluctuate from year to year, unlike taxes which are based on property values that change every year. It would provide a consistent rate that residential, commercial and industrial property owners can rely on. It would be equally spread across all gas and electric users, including tax-exempt properties such as schools, churches and nonprofits that also benefit from city services. The flat-rate model also offers a stable and predictable fee structure, creating a consistent revenue stream to support the city’s annual budget. Albeit the allocation of franchise fees is an annual election of the City Council through the budgeting process, dialog has focused on directing these revenues toward infrastructure investments in lieu of additional debt, thereby achieving meaningful long-term savings through the elimination of interest and issuance expenses. Page 146 of 179 While the modeled fee arrangement may not benefit all properties equally, franchise fees typically represent a less significant financial burden compared to taxation. Per the table below, which is based on the current 2026 tax levy, the median valued residential property, average valued residential property, a small commercial user with a $1 million property, and a large commercial user with a $4 million property are all better off financially from the implementation of franchise fees rather than increasing the tax levy. This shows equity in implementation and doesn't create an undue burden on any one property classification. Under the franchise rates and customer projections noted above, it is estimated that the majority of residents and businesses would experience a reduced financial burden relative to ongoing borrowing for capital projects, which would otherwise increase pressure on the property tax levy. On April 13, the City Council met to review the procedural framework and necessary timelines for establishing new franchise and fee ordinances. Because the Council reached a consensus to move forward with the process as drafted, a mandatory 60-day notice period for utilities was scheduled to begin on July 1. These fee ordinances are tentatively slated for a continuation of the public hearing and second reading on August 17 and adoption on September 9. ## Utility Franchise Fee to Levy Comparison ## Franchise Fees ## Property/Customer Type ## Monthly Fee — ## Electric ## Monthly Fee — Gas ## Monthly ## Total ## Annual Total ## Annual ## Levy ## Additional ## Cost if Levied ## - No Franchise ## Fee $346K Residential - ## Median $6.00 $6.00 $12.00 $144.00 $157.11 $13.11 $380K Residential - ## Average $6.00 $6.00 $12.00 $144.00 $174.73 $30.73 Small Commercial - $1 ## Million $35.00 $35.00 $70.00 $840.00 $914.79 $74.79 Large Commercial - $4 ## Million $120.00 $120.00 $240.00 $2,880.00 $3,766.10 $886.10 ## Proposed Utility Franchise Fees ## Electric Gas ## Classification Monthly Rate Classification Monthly Rate ## Residential $6.00 Residential/Firm A $6.00 ## Small C&I Non-Demand $16.00 Firm B $35.00 ## Small C&I Demand $35.00 Firm C $120.00 ## Large C&I $120.00 Small Volume Dual Fuel A $120.00 ## Public Street Lighting $- Small Volume Dual Fuel B $120.00 ## Municipal Pumping Non-Demand $- Large Volume Dual Fuel $120.00 ## Municipal Pumping Demand $- Large Volume Firm $120.00 Page 147 of 179 ## Strategic Plan Relationship Utility franchise fees will provide increased non-tax revenues. ## Board/Commission Review ## None ## Financial Impact Franchise fees provide a stable source of funding that will be used to help the city maintain streets and other community assets without sole reliance on the property tax levy. These funds will be used to supplant the need for costly long-term bonding to support critical infrastructure improvements and will not be earmarked for new spending or the expansion of city services. ## Public Outreach/Input Notice of this public hearing was published in the Blaine Spring Lake Park Life in its July 3 and July 10 editions. On July 1, a pre-notice cover letter was sent via certified mail to the utility provider. Public workshops were held on the following dates to discuss the potential implementation of gas and electric franchise fees: • January 13, 2025 • September 8, 2025 • November 17, 2025 • January 23, 2026 • April 13, 2026 • May 18, 2026 The public hearing for this proposed ordinance began on August 3 with no public comments and was continued to the August 17 City Council meeting. ## Staff Recommendation Reconvene the public hearing, receive comments, then close. The second reading of the ordinance will be considered at the September 9, 2026 regular meeting. ## Attachment List ## 1. Franchise Comments Page 148 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Signature Copy ## Ordinance: ORD 26-2613 ## Public Hearing An Ordinance Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Company, D/B/A Xcel Energy, a Minnesota Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for ## Providing Electric Service Within the City of Blaine ## THE CITY OF BLAINE DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Purpose. The Blaine City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide electric services within the City of Blaine (the “City”). Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 26-2608, a Franchise Agreement between the City and Northern States Power Company, d/b/a Xcel Energy, a Minnesota corporation, its successors and assigns, (“Company”) the City has the right to impose a franchise fee on the Company. Section 2. Terms. A franchise fee is hereby imposed on the Company under its electric franchise in accordance with the Franchise Agreement amount and fee design set forth in the fee schedule attached as Exhibit A to this Ordinance commencing with the Company's January 2027 billing month. This fee is a monthly account-based fee on each premise and not a meter-based fee, as established in Section 8.2 of the Franchise Agreement. In the event that an entity covered by this ordinance has more than one meter at a single premise, but only one account, only one fee shall be assessed to that account. If a premise has two or more meters being billed at different rates, the Company may have an account for each rate classification, which will result in more than one franchise fee assessment for electric service to that premise. If the Company combines the rate classifications into a single account, the franchise fee assessed to the account will be the largest franchise fee applicable to a single rate classification for energy delivered to that premise. In the event any entity covered by this ordinance have more than one premise (address), each premise shall be subject to a separate franchise fee appropriate for the premise. In the event a question arises as to the proper fee amount for any premise, the Company's manner of billing for energy used at all similar premises in the City will control. Section 3. Payment and Fee Modification. The franchise fee shall be payable to the City quarterly and shall be based on the amount collected by Company during the complete billing month during the period for which payment is to be made. The payment shall be due the last business day of the month following the period for which the payment is made. Such franchise fee shall not exceed any amount that the Company may legally charge to its customers prior to payment to the City by imposing a surcharge equivalent to such franchise fee in its rates for electric service. The franchise fee may be increased or decreased by ordinance from time to time, however any such change may not occur more often than annually. Company may pay the City the fee based upon the surcharge billed subject to subsequent reductions to account for uncollectibles, refunds, and correction of erroneous billings that are not Page 149 of 179 received by or credited to the Company. Section 4. Surcharge. The City recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission may allow the Company to add a surcharge to customer rates of City residents to reimburse the Company for the cost of the fee. The Company agrees that it is prohibited from adding an administrative fee of any kind upon or relating to the franchise fee. Section 5. Enforcement. Any dispute, including enforcement of a default regarding this ordinance will be resolved in accordance with Section 2.5 of the Franchise Agreement. Section 6. Effective Date of Franchise Fee. The effective date of fee collection shall be January 1, 2027 or sixty (60) days after the City sends written notice enclosing a copy of this adopted Ordinance to the Company by certified mail, whichever date is later. Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. INTRODUCED and read in full the 3rd day of August, 2026. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Blaine, Minnesota this ___ day of __________, 2026. Page 150 of 179 ## From: Sam Villella <sdvillella@gmail.com> ## Sent: Monday, August 3, 2026 6:31 PM ## To: Tim Sanders <tsanders@blainemn.gov>; Chris Ford <cford@blainemn.gov>; Tom Newland ## <tnewland@blainemn.gov>; Jess Robertson <jrobertson@blainemn.gov>; Leslie Larson ## <leslielarson@blainemn.gov>; Terra Fleming <tfleming@blainemn.gov>; Chris Massoglia ## <cmassoglia@blainemn.gov>; Erik Thorvig <ethorvig@blainemn.gov>; Franchise Fees <franchisefees@blainemn.gov> ## Subject: Utility Franchise Fees ## Sam Villella ## 10534 Alamo Street NE ## Blaine, MN 55449 August 2nd, 2026 ## Re: Utility Franchise Fees ## Mayor Sanders & Councilmembers- I wanted to express my personal objection to the use of utility franchise fees to increase city revenue and fill budget gaps. My views are independent, from the perspective of a resident and taxpayer. They do not represent Connexus Energy or the Spring Lake Park School District. Until now, Blaine has always been committed to a transparent tax environment without the use of such fees. I was able to sit down with staff to understand the rationale. From a staff perspective, I am sympathetic and can understand their recommendation. Nevertheless, I want to lay out why I believe this is the wrong tool for Blaine to utilize, even understanding the budget pressures driving it: It is a STEALTH TAX, not a transparent one. A franchise fee is collected by the utility and folded into a monthly bill as a line item most residents never scrutinize. Unlike a property tax levy, it does not go through Truth-in-Taxation notices, public levy hearings, or the same level of scrutiny residents expect before their tax burden changes. Replacing a transparent mechanism with an opaque one is a mistake. It is regressive. The franchise fees will be a flat rate monthly add on income or ability to pay. A fixed-income senior and a high-earning household pay the same monthly fee regardless of the disparity of usage. That falls hardest on residents who can least absorb it, at a time when energy costs are already a real burden for many families. It is disconnected from the cost of the service it funds. Unlike a special assessment tied to a specific improvement, franchise fee revenue typically flows into the general fund and is spent on unrelated priorities such as the indicated use of resurfacing roads. Residents paying more on their electric and gas bills have no clear line of sight to what they are actually funding. It compounds on top of already rising utility costs. Electric and gas rates have been climbing independent of anything the city does. Layering a new fee onto bills that are already increasing compounds the burden on households and small businesses at the worst possible time due to recent inflation. It sets a precedent that is easy to expand and hard to reverse. Once a franchise fee is in place, it becomes a low- visibility lever for future councils to raise without the same public accountability a levy increase requires. Fees adopted as "modest" or "temporary" have a well- documented tendency to grow over time precisely because they draw so little scrutiny. Finally, it undermines trust in the city. Blaine's reputation for straightforward, transparent taxation is an asset. Introducing a fee that functions as a workaround to the normal levy process risks eroding resident trust in how Page 151 of 179 budget decisions are made and communicated. There are more transparent alternatives. A modest, clearly justified levy increase debated openly, subject to Truth- in-Taxation hearings, and visible on the property tax statement is a more honest way to ask residents to fund city priorities than routing the increase through a utility bill. I recognize staff are working with real constraints, and I don't take that lightly. But I'd strongly encourage the Council to pursue revenue solutions that keep Blaine's commitment to transparency intact, rather than one that shifts costs onto residents in a way that is harder to see and harder to hold anyone accountable for. Thank you for your time and consideration. ## Respectfully- ## Sam Villella 763-226-0406 Page 152 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Staff Report ## File Number: ORD 26-2614 ## Agenda Date ## Status August 17, 2026 ## In Control ## File Type ## City Council ## Ordinance 7:00 PM - Public Hearing and Items Published for a Certain Time - Jason Zimmerman, Finance ## Director Agenda Item # 8.7 ## Public Hearing An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Company, D/B/A Xcel Energy, a Minnesota Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas Energy Service ## Within the City of Blaine ## Executive Summary An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Company, D/B/A Xcel Energy, a Minnesota Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Gas Energy Service Within the City of Blaine. ## Background As noted by City Council members throughout the 2025 budget process, among peer communities in Minnesota, Blaine is the only city that continues to rely predominantly on property taxes to fund general government functions, including police and fire services. With rapidly increasing demands for services and infrastructure amidst constraints on traditional revenue sources, identifying and implementing alternative revenue mechanisms can help diversify the city's income portfolio and address funding gaps. Alternative revenue streams can help diversify the city's income, reduce overreliance on the existing property tax levy, and provide dedicated resources for critical projects. These approaches not only enhance fiscal resilience but may also be structured to allow for more equitable contributions from residents, businesses, and visitors who benefit from local services. In early 2025, the city council was presented with information on alternative revenue sources to reduce the burden on property taxpayers in the city of Blaine. One of the options discussed was utility franchise fees. The council directed staff to explore franchise fees further. City staff then began the Page 153 of 179 process of meeting with all gas and electric utility providers in Blaine. They include CenterPoint Energy (gas), Xcel Energy (gas and electric), Connexus (electric) and Centennial Utilities (gas). The purpose of the meetings was to inform the utility companies about Blaine's potential desire to establish franchise fees, discuss the process for establishing said fee, and obtain data from the utility companies.Utility providers, like those for gas and electricity, are required by Minnesota law to deliver services that are safe, adequate, and efficient. To do this, they often need to use public areas like roads and sidewalks, which are known as public rights-of-way. Because cities are responsible for managing these rights-of-way, they often create franchise agreements with utility companies. A franchise agreement is a contract that gives a utility company the right to install, maintain, and repair its equipment within a city's public grounds or rights-of-way. In Minnesota, cities have broad authority under state law to negotiate these agreements, which are formalized as ordinances. Per Minnesota Statute 216B.36, a city may impose a franchise fee on a gas or electric utility for the use of the public right-of-way by adopting an ordinance that establishes fee terms, including structure, collection, schedule and effective dates. Cities have the option of imposing a flat fee or a percentage fee based on utility usage. These fees can vary between residential customers and various commercial customer types. While a flat fee is constant from month-to-month, a percentage-based fee varies seasonally. The table below provides a comparison of how several similar sized cities utilize utility franchise fees: ## City Electric Franchise Fee Gas Franchise Fee ## Apple Valley Yes Yes ## Bloomington Yes Yes ## Brooklyn Park Yes Yes ## Burnsville Yes Yes ## Coon Rapids Yes Yes ## Eagan Yes Yes ## Eden Prarie Yes Yes ## Edina Yes Yes ## Lakeville Yes Yes ## Maple Grove No No ## Minnetonka Yes Yes ## Plymouth Yes Yes ## St. Louis Park Yes Yes ## Woodbury Yes Yes Page 154 of 179 When comparing franchise fees as a revenue source to property taxes, advantages include: • Local control of processes and fee structure. • Wider base than property taxes. • Inclusion of tax-exempt properties. • Diversification of the city’s revenue sources. • Reliable source of revenue. • New construction would contribute immediately (market value / tax delay under state law) Some disadvantages of franchise fees include: • Unlike cable franchise fees paid only by subscribers, everyone must pay since gas and electricity are essential services. • Significant administrative time is required to establish franchise fees and implement them concurrently. • Potential resistance from utility providers to implement fees proposed by the city. Franchise fee revenues can be utilized to support a variety of community needs and capital improvements. Common applications include investments in street and trail systems, such as mill and overlay projects and full street reconstructions. Some cities choose to allocate these funds toward the maintenance and enhancement of trails and sidewalks. In addition to transportation related projects, communities have directed franchise fee funds toward broader infrastructure improvements, including the construction or renovation of public facilities such as police stations, fire halls, and city hall buildings. While less common, franchise fees have also supported climate and sustainability initiatives, including implementation of climate action plans and other efforts aimed at improving environmental sustainability and community resilience. Based on the comparison of electric and gas franchise riders from various cities, the City of Lakeville was selected as the most suitable model to meet Blaine's current financial needs. Lakeville’s rates were recently adopted and reflect existing market conditions, potentially leading to a more expedient approval path with regulatory authorities. As a community similar in size and characteristics, it also provides a relevant and reliable benchmark for analysis. Using Lakeville’s rates as a reference, the estimated annual revenue is approximately $5.7 million, an amount that aligns closely with Blaine’s planned annual debt/levy portion of pavement management programming as outlined in the preliminary 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Plan. The flat-rate model does not fluctuate from year to year, unlike taxes which are based on property values that change every year. It would provide a consistent rate that residential, commercial and industrial property owners can rely on. It would be equally spread across all gas and electric users, including tax-exempt properties such as schools, churches and nonprofits that also benefit from city services. The flat-rate model also offers a stable and predictable fee structure, creating a consistent revenue stream to support the city’s annual budget. Albeit the allocation of franchise fees is an annual election of the City Council through the budgeting process, dialog has focused on directing these revenues toward infrastructure investments in lieu of additional debt, thereby achieving meaningful long-term savings through the elimination of interest and issuance expenses. Page 155 of 179 While the modeled fee arrangement may not benefit all properties equally, franchise fees typically represent a less significant financial burden compared to taxation. Per the table below, which is based on the current 2026 tax levy, the median valued residential property, average valued residential property, a small commercial user with a $1 million property, and a large commercial user with a $4 million property are all better off financially from the implementation of franchise fees rather than increasing the tax levy. This shows equity in implementation and doesn't create an undue burden on any one property classification. Under the franchise rates and customer projections noted above, it is estimated that the majority of residents and businesses would experience a reduced financial burden relative to ongoing borrowing for capital projects, which would otherwise increase pressure on the property tax levy. On April 13, the City Council met to review the procedural framework and necessary timelines for establishing new franchise and fee ordinances. Because the Council reached a consensus to move forward with the process as drafted, a mandatory 60-day notice period for utilities was scheduled to begin on July 1. These fee ordinances are tentatively slated for a continuation of the public hearing and second reading on August 17 and adoption on September 9. ## Utility Franchise Fee to Levy Comparison ## Franchise Fees ## Property/Customer Type ## Monthly Fee — ## Electric ## Monthly Fee — Gas ## Monthly ## Total ## Annual Total ## Annual ## Levy ## Additional ## Cost if Levied ## - No Franchise ## Fee $346K Residential - ## Median $6.00 $6.00 $12.00 $144.00 $157.11 $13.11 $380K Residential - ## Average $6.00 $6.00 $12.00 $144.00 $174.73 $30.73 Small Commercial - $1 ## Million $35.00 $35.00 $70.00 $840.00 $914.79 $74.79 Large Commercial - $4 ## Million $120.00 $120.00 $240.00 $2,880.00 $3,766.10 $886.10 ## Proposed Utility Franchise Fees ## Electric Gas ## Classification Monthly Rate Classification Monthly Rate ## Residential $6.00 Residential/Firm A $6.00 ## Small C&I Non-Demand $16.00 Firm B $35.00 ## Small C&I Demand $35.00 Firm C $120.00 ## Large C&I $120.00 Small Volume Dual Fuel A $120.00 ## Public Street Lighting $- Small Volume Dual Fuel B $120.00 ## Municipal Pumping Non-Demand $- Large Volume Dual Fuel $120.00 ## Municipal Pumping Demand $- Large Volume Firm $120.00 Page 156 of 179 ## Strategic Plan Relationship Utility franchise fees will provide increased non-tax revenues. ## Board/Commission Review ## None ## Financial Impact Franchise fees provide a stable source of funding that will be used to help the city maintain streets and other community assets without sole reliance on the property tax levy. These funds will be used to supplant the need for costly long-term bonding to support critical infrastructure improvements and will not be earmarked for new spending or the expansion of city services. ## Public Outreach/Input Notice of this public hearing was published in the Blaine Spring Lake Park Life in its July 3 and July 10 editions. On July 1, a pre-notice cover letter was sent via certified mail to the utility provider. Public workshops were held on the following dates to discuss the potential implementation of gas and electric franchise fees: • January 13, 2025 • September 8, 2025 • November 17, 2025 • January 23, 2026 • April 13, 2026 • May 18, 2026 The public hearing for this proposed ordinance began on August 3 with no public comments and was continued to the August 17 City Council meeting. ## Staff Recommendation Reconvene the public hearing, receive comments, then close. The second reading of the ordinance will be considered at the September 9, 2026 regular meeting. ## Attachment List ## 1. Franchise Comments Page 157 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Signature Copy ## Ordinance: ORD 26-2614 ## Public Hearing An Ordinance Implementing a Gas Service Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Company, D/B/A Xcel Energy, a Minnesota Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, for ## Providing Gas Energy Service Within the City of Blaine ## THE CITY OF BLAINE DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Purpose. The Blaine City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide gas services within the City of Blaine (the “City”). Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 26-2609, a Franchise Agreement between the City and Northern States Power Company, d/b/a Xcel Energy, a Minnesota corporation, its successors and assigns, (“Company”) the City has the right to impose a franchise fee on the Company. Section 2. Terms. A franchise fee is hereby imposed on the Company under its gas franchise in accordance with the Franchise Agreement amount and fee design set forth in the fee schedule attached as Exhibit A to this Ordinance commencing with the Company's January 2027 billing month. This fee is a monthly account-based fee on each premise and not a meter-based fee, as established in Section 8.2 of the Franchise Agreement. In the event that an entity covered by this ordinance has more than one meter at a single premise, but only one account, only one fee shall be assessed to that account. If a premise has two or more meters being billed at different rates, the Company may have an account for each rate classification, which will result in more than one franchise fee assessment for gas service to that premise. If the Company combines the rate classifications into a single account, the franchise fee assessed to the account will be the largest franchise fee applicable to a single rate classification for energy delivered to that premise. In the event any entities covered by this ordinance have more than one premise (address), each premise shall be subject to a separate franchise fee appropriate for the premise. In the event a question arises as to the proper fee amount for any premise, the Company's manner of billing for energy used at all similar premises in the City will control. Section 3. Payment and Fee Modification. The franchise fee shall be payable to the City quarterly and shall be based on the amount collected by Company during the complete billing month during the period for which payment is to be made. The payment shall be due the last business day of the month following the period for which the payment is made. Such franchise fee shall not exceed any amount that the Company may legally charge to its customers prior to payment to the City by imposing a surcharge equivalent to such franchise fee in its rates for gas service. The franchise fee may be increased or decreased by ordinance from time to time, however any such change may not occur more often than annually. Company may pay the City the fee based upon the surcharge billed subject to subsequent reductions to account for uncollectibles, refunds, and correction of erroneous billings that are not Page 158 of 179 received by or credited to the Company. Section 4. Surcharge. The City recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission may allow the Company to add a surcharge to customer rates of City residents to reimburse the Company for the cost of the fee. The Company agrees that it is prohibited from adding an administrative fee of any kind upon or relating to the franchise fee. Section 5. Enforcement. Any dispute, including enforcement of a default regarding this ordinance will be resolved in accordance with Section 2.5 of the Franchise Agreement. Section 6. Effective Date of Franchise Fee. The effective date of fee collection shall be January 1, 2027 or sixty (60) days after the City sends written notice enclosing a copy of this adopted Ordinance to the Company by certified mail, whichever date is later. Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. INTRODUCED and read in full the 3rd day of August, 2026. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Blaine, Minnesota this _____ day of __________, 2026. Page 159 of 179 ## From: Sam Villella <sdvillella@gmail.com> ## Sent: Monday, August 3, 2026 6:31 PM ## To: Tim Sanders <tsanders@blainemn.gov>; Chris Ford <cford@blainemn.gov>; Tom Newland ## <tnewland@blainemn.gov>; Jess Robertson <jrobertson@blainemn.gov>; Leslie Larson ## <leslielarson@blainemn.gov>; Terra Fleming <tfleming@blainemn.gov>; Chris Massoglia ## <cmassoglia@blainemn.gov>; Erik Thorvig <ethorvig@blainemn.gov>; Franchise Fees <franchisefees@blainemn.gov> ## Subject: Utility Franchise Fees ## Sam Villella ## 10534 Alamo Street NE ## Blaine, MN 55449 August 2nd, 2026 ## Re: Utility Franchise Fees ## Mayor Sanders & Councilmembers- I wanted to express my personal objection to the use of utility franchise fees to increase city revenue and fill budget gaps. My views are independent, from the perspective of a resident and taxpayer. They do not represent Connexus Energy or the Spring Lake Park School District. Until now, Blaine has always been committed to a transparent tax environment without the use of such fees. I was able to sit down with staff to understand the rationale. From a staff perspective, I am sympathetic and can understand their recommendation. Nevertheless, I want to lay out why I believe this is the wrong tool for Blaine to utilize, even understanding the budget pressures driving it: It is a STEALTH TAX, not a transparent one. A franchise fee is collected by the utility and folded into a monthly bill as a line item most residents never scrutinize. Unlike a property tax levy, it does not go through Truth-in-Taxation notices, public levy hearings, or the same level of scrutiny residents expect before their tax burden changes. Replacing a transparent mechanism with an opaque one is a mistake. It is regressive. The franchise fees will be a flat rate monthly add on income or ability to pay. A fixed-income senior and a high-earning household pay the same monthly fee regardless of the disparity of usage. That falls hardest on residents who can least absorb it, at a time when energy costs are already a real burden for many families. It is disconnected from the cost of the service it funds. Unlike a special assessment tied to a specific improvement, franchise fee revenue typically flows into the general fund and is spent on unrelated priorities such as the indicated use of resurfacing roads. Residents paying more on their electric and gas bills have no clear line of sight to what they are actually funding. It compounds on top of already rising utility costs. Electric and gas rates have been climbing independent of anything the city does. Layering a new fee onto bills that are already increasing compounds the burden on households and small businesses at the worst possible time due to recent inflation. It sets a precedent that is easy to expand and hard to reverse. Once a franchise fee is in place, it becomes a low- visibility lever for future councils to raise without the same public accountability a levy increase requires. Fees adopted as "modest" or "temporary" have a well- documented tendency to grow over time precisely because they draw so little scrutiny. Finally, it undermines trust in the city. Blaine's reputation for straightforward, transparent taxation is an asset. Introducing a fee that functions as a workaround to the normal levy process risks eroding resident trust in how Page 160 of 179 budget decisions are made and communicated. There are more transparent alternatives. A modest, clearly justified levy increase debated openly, subject to Truth- in-Taxation hearings, and visible on the property tax statement is a more honest way to ask residents to fund city priorities than routing the increase through a utility bill. I recognize staff are working with real constraints, and I don't take that lightly. But I'd strongly encourage the Council to pursue revenue solutions that keep Blaine's commitment to transparency intact, rather than one that shifts costs onto residents in a way that is harder to see and harder to hold anyone accountable for. Thank you for your time and consideration. ## Respectfully- ## Sam Villella 763-226-0406 Page 161 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Staff Report ## File Number: RES 26-162 ## Agenda Date ## Status August 17, 2026 ## In Control ## File Type ## City Council ## Resolution ## Administration - Daniel Schluender, Director of Engineering Agenda Item # 10.1 Revised Resolution Authorizing Submittal of LCCMR Grant Application for the Blaine Wetland Sanctuary ## (BWS) Trail, Improvement Project No. P2405 (25-08) ## Executive Summary Council is requested to approve a revised resolution authorizing the submittal of the LCCMR - ENRTF Grant application for the Blaine Wetland Sanctuary (BWS) Trail Development, Improvement Project No. ## P2405 (25-08). ## Background The Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR) is recommending $2,167,000 in funding from lottery proceeds for the construction of the southern Blaine Wetland Sanctuary boardwalk and trail. As part of this grant process the LCCMR has requested additional documentation to be completed at this time. Part of the documentation requested is a revised resolution with the following language added to the operative clause of the resolution: "That the City of Blaine has the financial capability to ensure adequate operation and maintenance of the project once completed." Council passed the original resolution 26-41 on March 2nd, 2026 authorizing the submittal of the LCCMR grant application for this project. The grant application was submitted requesting $2,350,000 in funding ($2,167,000 is recommended for award), for construction costs only, for the first two phases of the trail (southern trail segments). The total estimated construction costs for the first two phases is approximately $5,871,000. The grant funds will help close the gap between the funding allocated in the capital improvement plan and expected construction costs for the two proposed phases of the trail. The proposal was one of the highest ranked among the 434 proposals submitted and was a joint effort of the engineering and planning departments and was awarded nearly the full amount requested. The final awards must be approved Page 162 of 179 by the legislature and governor during the 2027 session, which will happen sometime between January and May 2027, at which point the City will publicize the award. Construction could begin as early as fall 2027. The current capital parks budget identifies this project for 2031 and discussions with council and modifications to the capital plan would need to occur if construction were to occur sooner. ## Strategic Plan Relationship The project aligns with the City’s strategic initiatives for providing a Well-maintained Infrastructure and increasing non-tax revenue sources. ## Board/Commission Review Not required. ## Financial Impact This project was previously identified in the 2024-2028 Capital Improvement Program as "Blaine Wetland Sanctuary Trail Development", which was adopted by the City Council via resolution 23-207 on December 18, 2023. The 2024 CIP includes $1,000,000 for consulting services and for Phase 1 construction. The consulting contract with Stantec for preliminary and final design was previously approved. All work under the preliminary phase of that contract has been completed at this time. Permitting, plans and specifications are at approximately 90% complete with the project nearly ready for bidding. As a result of the LCCMR Grant award, the project will need to complete some additional environmental studies and documentation as well as possibly some additional design requirements. Staff is waiting for direction by the grant committee on additional requirements. Once these requirements are received, an expansion to the current consulting contract with Stantec will be necessary. The city is not seeking any reimbursement for the prior completed engineering and design costs for the project as this work was started and completed before the grant approval was received. The final project plans have broken the entire project into several segments to allow for effective phasing of the project for cost and constructibility and will be bid with a base design (5000 lb capacity) and an alternate design (2500 lb capacity). The following are current cost estimates with Grant funding accounted for: 5000 lbs design (this would likely consist of concrete with helical piers or possibly wood/composite with helical piers) Estimated Cost for segments 1 and 2 = $5,875,000 for construction + $120,000 for engineering design + $30,000 for additional environmental documentation/permits due to grant requirements. Estimated Project Total = $6,025,000 - $2,167,000 grand funds = $3,858,000 City Funds needed 2500 lb design (this would probably exclusively be wood or composite with pan footings) Estimated Cost for segments 1 and 2 = $5,350,000 for construction + $120,000 for engineering design + $30,000 for additional environmental documentation/permits due to grant requirements. Page 163 of 179 Estimated Project Total = $5,500,000 - $2,167,000 grand funds = $3,333,000 City Funds needed If the grant is awarded, Phase 1 & 2 construction costs will then be identified in 2027 once the project has received grant approval and has been competitively bid. ## Public Outreach/Input The grant award will be publicized after legislation allocating the funds is adopted. Aveda supported the grant application with a commitment to fund interpretive signage and other communication efforts about the rare plants found in BWS. ## Staff Recommendation By motion, approve the revised resolution Authorizing Submittal of LCCMR Grant application for the BWS Trail Project. ## Attachment List ## 1. 2025 BWS Master Plan Trail 11-12-25 Page 164 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Signature Copy ## Resolution: RES 26-162 Revised Resolution Authorizing Submittal of LCCMR Grant Application for the Blaine Wetland ## Sanctuary (BWS) Trail, Improvement Project No. P2405 (25-08) WHEREAS, the City of Blaine seeks up to $2,167,000 for Blaine Wetland Sanctuary Trail Development project to construct boardwalk/trails connecting pedestrians, bikers and neighborhoods to other trails, recreational and environmental resources throughout the community; and WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Plan sets aside $3,850,000 of Open Space Development funds for the construction of boardwalk, which is insufficient to complete the project; and WHEREAS, the Authorized Representatives for the City of Blaine are Brent Larson, Staff Engineer and Elizabeth Showalter, Housing Program Coordinator, or their successors are responsible for submitting the necessary documentation for said project's funding requirements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Blaine does hereby, 1. Support the above referenced project and authorize the submittal of a proposal for funding of this project by the Authorized Representatives on behalf of the City of Blaine to the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR) in response to the ML 2027 Environmental and Natural ## Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) Request for Proposal; and 2. That, if funding is awarded, the City of Blaine agrees to accept the award and may enter into an agreement with the state of Minnesota for the above referenced project. The City of Blaine will comply with all applicable laws, environmental requirements, and regulations and any additional conditions stated in the grant agreement and the approved LCCMR work plan; and 3. That City of Blaine understands that grants from the ENRTF are generally paid out on a reimbursement basis. The City of Blaine has the financial capability to pay for project expenses prior to seeking reimbursement; and 4. That the City of Blaine certifies that none of the current principals of the City of Blaine have been convicted of a felony financial crime in the last ten years. For this purpose, a principal is defined as a public official, a board member, or staff that would have the authority to access or determine the use of ENRTF funds, if awarded; and 5. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute such agreements; and 6. That the Authorized Representatives are hereby authorized to execute work plans as necessary, and implement the project on behalf of the City of Blaine; and Page 165 of 179 7. That the City of Blaine has the financial capability to ensure adequate operation and maintenance of the project once completed. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Blaine this 17th day of August, 2026. Page 166 of 179 10/30/2025 | Project #190300236 ## BLAINE WETLAND SANCTUARY PROPOSED TRAIL SYSTEMMASTER PLAN LEGENDExisting TrailsExisting BoardwalkParcelsExisting City ParkSanctuary BoundarySite 7/Branch 3 BoundaryProposed TrailProposed BoardwalkDitchBridge/Culvert CrossingDelineated Wetland Upland TransitionPublic RestroomsParking LotWildlife ViewingRare Plant AreaCrane Nesting AreaHawk Nesting Area ## P 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 ## P ## P ## SITE 7 - USE PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED DELINEATIONBRANCH 3 - USE PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED DELINEATION ## ALL AREA SOUTH OF BRANCH 3PERFORM 2025 DELINEATIONS ## LEXINGTON ## ATHLETIC ## COMPLEX ## 109th Ave NE ## NORTH ## OAKS WEST ## PARK ## SOUTH ## LAKE ## PARK ## EAST LAKE ## PARK ## LAKESIDE ## COMMONS ## PARK ## Lexington Ave NE ## SANCTUARY ## PRESERVE ## PARK ## LOCHNESS ## PARK ## BARN ## PARK ## BLAINE WETLAND SANCTUARY ## TRAILHEAD ## SITE 7 ## RENDOVA ## PARK ## OAK SAVANNAH ## PARK ## BLAINE WETLAND SANCTUARY ## TRAILHEAD ## BRANCH 3 ## N 0 500 1,000ft Page 167 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Staff Report ## File Number: RES 26-164 ## Agenda Date ## Status August 17, 2026 ## In Control ## File Type ## City Council ## Resolution ## Administration - Daniel Schluender, Director of Engineering Agenda Item # 10.2 Resolution to Initiate Project and Order Preparation of Feasibility Report for the 2027 Laddie Lake Area ## Street Reconstruction, Improvement Project No. 27-04 (T2704) ## Executive Summary Council is being asked to initiate a 2027 Pavement Management Program project for the 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstructions, Improvement Project No. 27-04. ## Background The five-year Capital Improvement Plan for the Pavement Management Program (PMP) was updated by staff and presented to Council at the July 13, 2026 workshop. The 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstruction project, Improvement Project No. 27-04, can be seen on the attached map and consists of reconstructing the following streets: ## Project Area 1: ## • 86th Avenue from Tyler Street to Polk Street • 87th Avenue from Able Street to 30’ east of Taylor Court ## • 87th Lane from Able Street to Polk Street • Tyler Street from 170’ north of County Highway 10 Frontage Road to 89th Avenue • Polk Street from south dead-end to 89th Avenue • Cottagewood Terrace from 630’ north of County Highway 10 to Polk Street ## Project Area 2: • Taylor Court from 87th Avenue to north cul-de-sac Project Area 1 consists of city streets with rural sections and no curb and gutter. The method of Page 168 of 179 reconstruction for Project Area 1 will be a full reconstruction to the city standard residential street with concrete curb and gutter. Project Area 2 consists of city streets with concrete curb and gutter. The method of reconstruction for Project Area 2 will be full depth replacement of bituminous pavement and spot replacement of damaged concrete curb and gutter. If approved, this Resolution initiates the proposed 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstruction project and orders the preparation of a feasibility report. ## Strategic Plan Relationship The project aligns with the City’s strategic initiatives for Growth Management and providing a well- maintained Infrastructure. ## Board/Commission Review Not required. ## Financial Impact The project will be funded by a combination of assessments, bond proceeds placed in the City Pavement Management Program fund, and Public Utility Funds. ## Public Outreach/Input The project will follow the public outreach guidelines set forth in MN Chapter 429 Statues. ## Staff Recommendation By motion, approve the Resolution. ## Attachment List 1. 27-04 Location Map Page 169 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Signature Copy ## Resolution: RES 26-164 Resolution to Initiate Project and Order Preparation of Feasibility Report for the 2027 Laddie Lake ## Area Street Reconstruction, Improvement Project No. 27-04 (T2704) WHEREAS, the City Council is aware of the need to maintain City streets in a condition that provides for functional, safe and efficient travel; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the public interest to implement a Pavement Management Program to maintain City streets in a logical and cost-efficient manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Pavement Management Policy by Resolution No. 10-87 on October 7, 2010 to serve as the framework for implementing a Pavement Management Program; and WHEREAS, the Blaine City Council proposes to initiate a street improvement project for the 2027 Laddie ## Lake Area Street Reconstruction; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the costs of the improvements, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Blaine that the proposed improvements are hereby referred to the City Engineer to provide the Council with a Feasibility Report and to advise the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvements are necessary, cost-effective, and feasible, and the estimated cost of the improvements as recommended. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Blaine this 17th day of August, 2026. Page 170 of 179 ## ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ## 10801 Town Square Drive, Blaine, Minnesota 55449 Phone (763) 785-6172 ## CITY OF BLAINE ## 2027 LADDIE LAKE AREA ## PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ## STREET RECONSTRUCTION ## 86TH AVENUE87TH AVENUE87TH LANE ## TYLER STREET ## POLK STREET ## COTTAGEWOOD TERRACE ## TAYLOR COURT Page 171 of 179 ## City of Blaine ## Staff Report ## File Number: 2026-164 ## Agenda Date ## Status August 17, 2026 ## In Control ## File Type ## City Council ## Motion ## Administration - Daniel Schluender, Director of Engineering Agenda Item # 10.3 Motion to Authorize Mayor and City Manager to Enter into a Contract with Bolton & Menk, Inc. for Professional Engineering Services for the 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstruction Project, Improvement Project No. 27-04 (T2704). ## Executive Summary Council is requested to approve a contract from Bolton & Menk for professional services for preliminary design and preparation of a feasibility report for the 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstruction Project, Improvement Project No. 27-04 in the amount of $103,042. ## Background The Engineering Department has identified three separate street improvement projects for the 2027 pavement management program. For each of these projects, staff requested a letter of proposal from an engineering firm that is in the consultant pool that the City Council adopted on August 2, 2021 with Motion 21-114. The 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstruction Project, Improvement Project No. 27-04, includes the following streets: ## Project Area 1: ## • 86th Avenue from Tyler Street to Polk Street • 87th Avenue from Able Street to 30’ east of Taylor Court ## • 87th Lane from Able Street to Polk Street • Tyler Street from 170’ north of County Highway 10 Frontage Road to 89th Avenue • Polk Street from south dead-end to 89th Avenue • Cottagewood Terrace from 630’ north of County Highway 10 to Polk Street Page 172 of 179 ## Project Area 2: • Taylor Court from 87th Avenue to north cul-de-sac Bolton & Menk has provided the requested letter of proposal for the 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstruction Project, Improvement Project No. 27-04. The proposal, in the amount of $103,042, is for preliminary design and preparation of a feasibility report for the project. Staff reviewed the proposal, compared it with previous proposals for similar projects, and determined that the fees are justified and reasonable. After completion of the feasibility report and upon ordering the improvements, a contract for final design and construction services would be negotiated with Bolton & Menk. This project will be funded through proposed project assessments, Pavement Management Program funds, and Public Utility funds. ## Strategic Plan Relationship This project aligns with the City’s strategic plan goal of well-maintained infrastructure by providing high quality city streets. ## Board/Commission Review Not required. ## Financial Impact This project was identified in the 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which was adopted by the City Council via resolution 25-191 on December 15, 2025. The 2026 project budget includes $785,200 for preliminary consulting services, which would be used to cover the proposed engineering contract. Consistent with the 2027-2031 transportation capital plan that was presented at the July 13, 2026 City Council Workshop, additional funds will be formally requested within the 2027 CIP to provide for construction and contingency expenditures related to the project. ## 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstruction Project ## Sources and Uses ## 2026 CIP ## Approved ## 2027 CIP ## Anticipated ## Total ## Anticipated ## Appropriation ## Funding Sources ## Property Tax Levy Supported Bonds (PMP) $785,200 $3,055,000 $3,840,200 Special Assessment Bonds - $871,000 $871,000 ## Water Utility - $500,000 $500,000 Page 173 of 179 ## Sewer Utility - $52,000 $52,000 Total Funding Sources $785,200 $4,478,000 $5,263,200 ## Expenditures Consulting $785,200 - $785,200 Construction - $4,121,000 $4,121,000 Contingency - $357,000 $357,000 Total Expenditures $980,000 $4,478,000 $5,263,200 ## Public Outreach/Input The project will follow the public outreach guidelines set forth in MN Chapter 429 Statues. ## Staff Recommendation By motion, authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a contract with Bolton & Menk in the amount of $103,042 for preliminary design and preparation of a feasibility report for the 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstruction Project, Improvement Project No. 27-04. In addition, authorize a 10% contingency to bring the total project budget to $113,346 and authorize the City Manager or their designee to sign all change orders up to the authorized project budget amount. ## Attachment List ## 1. 27-04 BMI Feasibility Proposal 2. 27-04 Location Map Page 174 of 179 ## H:\BLAI\_Proposals\2027 Laddie Lake Area RFP\Proposal_2027 Laddie Lake Area Reconstruct.docx August 6, 2026 Cody Sylvester, P.E. ## Project Engineer ## City of Blaine ## 10801 Town Square Drive NE ## Blaine, MN 55449 RE: Proposal for 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstruction Project ## City of Blaine, MN ## City Project No. 27-04 ## Mr. Sylvester: The project scope and proposed fees have been prepared as requested to complete the reconstruction of the following streets in the City of Blaine: Area 1 • 86 th ## Avenue from Tyler Street to Polk Street • 87 th Avenue from Able Street to 30’ east of Taylor Court • 87 th ## Lane from Able Street to Polk Street • Tyler Street from 170’ north of County Highway 10 Frontage Road to 89 th ## Avenue • Polk Stret from south dead-end to 89 th ## Avenue • Cottagewood Terrace from 630’ north of County Highway 10 to Polk Street All streets within Area 1 will be reconstructed to the city’s standard residential street typical section, including concrete curb and gutter. Existing storm sewer will be supplemented with new storm sewer as needed, and block structures will be replaced with new pre-cast structures. Replacement of water main is proposed on 87 th Avenue from Able Street to Tyler Street. Other water main improvements will consist of replacement of old-style hydrants (approximately 12 each) and gate valves (approximately 20 each). No sanitary sewer improvements are anticipated. Additional details of the project scope, fee and schedule are provided below. Area 2 • Taylor Court from 87 th Avenue to north cul-de-sac. Work includes replacement of bituminous pavement, spot replacement of curb and gutter, and replacement of old-style hydrant and gate valves (approximately 2 each). Page 175 of 179 ## 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstruction Project ## H:\BLAI\_Proposals\2027 Laddie Lake Area RFP\Proposal_2027 Laddie Lake Area Reconstruct.docx ## Project Scope ## Task 1 – Preliminary Survey As part of Task 1, we will: 1. hold a kick-off meeting with city staff, 2. perform a pre-inspection of the streets, including a thorough inspection of the existing storm sewer structures, including 360-degree photos, 3. perform a topographic survey of all streets, including private utilities, 4. determine ROW and/or easements needed, and 5. coordinate a geotechnical investigation of the project areas. Geotechnical investigation to be performed by a sub-consultant. ## Task 2 – Preliminary Design/Feasibility Report As part of Task 2, we will perform preliminary design services and prepare a feasibility report that includes preliminary cost estimates and assessments based on the City of Blaine Assessment Policy. We assume the city will provide the property owner information (i.e. names, addresses, PIDs, etc.) to include in the feasibility report. Finally, we will prepare for and attend one neighborhood open house to review the findings in the feasibility report. ## Proposed Fee The following table summarizes the cost breakdown for each task. A detailed summary of our estimated hours and hourly rates is attached to this proposal. ## Estimated Fees ## Task Description Amount 1 Preliminary Survey $48,396 ## 2 Preliminary Design/Feasibility Report $54,646 ## Total Estimated Fee $103,042 Tasks 1 and 2 shall be Hourly Not to Exceed, subject only to adjustments for a change in scope of services performed agreed upon in writing by the City and the Consultant. As stated in the request for proposal, the City anticipates entering into a JPA with Spring Lake Park to reconstruct the south ends of Cottagewood Terrace and Tyler Street. If executed, any additional work as a result of the JPA will be addressed with a change order. A separate proposal will be submitted for final design and construction services costs following completion of the feasibility report. Sub-consultant costs for the geotechnical investigation in Task 1 will be forwarded to the city for payment directly from the sub-consultant and are not included in the above costs. Costs for the investigation are estimated to be $10,000 - $15,000. Page 176 of 179 ## 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstruction Project ## H:\BLAI\_Proposals\2027 Laddie Lake Area RFP\Proposal_2027 Laddie Lake Area Reconstruct.docx ## Proposed Project Schedule Design of the project would occur in 2026/2027, and the project would be constructed during the summer of 2027. Therefore, the following schedule allows for construction to be completed during the 2027 construction season: ## Proposed Project Schedule Council approves consultant contract, orders feasibility report August 17, 2026 Perform prelim survey September to October 2026 Prepare feasibility report October to November 2026 City Staff receives final feasibility report November 20, 2026 Council receives feasibility report and orders public hearing December 7, 2026 Open house meeting Week of Dec 14, 2026 Public improvement hearing, council orders project, authorizes plans/specs January 4, 2026 Prepare plans/specifications Jan 2027 – March 2027 Council approves plans/specifications, sets bid date March 2027 ## Open Bids/Award Contract April 2027 ## Construction May - October 2027 Assessment hearing Spring 2028 ## Acceptance Please indicate your acceptance of this proposal by signing on the signature block below and returning a copy to us. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact me at 651-728-3172. Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Blaine ## Michael Warner, P.E. By: ## Principal Engineer ## Printed Name: Tim Sanders ## Title: Mayor ## Date: ## By: ## Printed Name: Erik Thorvig ## Title: City Manager ## Date: Page 177 of 179 ## Task No. ## Work Task Description ## Principal Engineer/ ## Project Manager ## Design Engineer ## Engineering ## Technician ## Water Resources ## Project Engineer ## Construction ## Manager ## Survey Project ## Manager ## Survey Technician ## Surveyor ## Geotechnical ## Total ## Hours ## Total ## Cost ## 1.1 Street and Structure Inspections 2 20 20 42 $7,246 ## 1.2 Kick-off Meeting 2 4 6 $1,146 ## 1.3 Topographic Survey 8 12 12 160 192 $38,548 ## 1.4 Review ROW/Easement Needs 1 1 2 4 $686 ## 1.5 Coordinate Geotechnical Review 1 2 1 4 $770 $48,396 ## 2.1 Preliminary Watershed Meeting 2 2 4 $754 ## 2.2 Preliminary Design and Cost Estimates 40 96 48 24 208 $38,208 ## 2.3 Prepare Report, Including Assessments 24 50 74 $14,1 12 ## 2.4 Prepare for and Attend One Open House 4 4 8 $1,572 $54,646 ## Total Hours 73 187 48 27 20 13 14 160 538 ## Hourly Rate $213.00 $180.00 $160.00 $197.00 $161.00 $212.00 $147.00 $2 05.00 ## TOTAL COST $15,549 $33,660 $7,680 $5,319 $3,220 $2,756 $2,058 $32,800 $0 $103,042 ## Sub-Total Task 2 ## Task 2 - Feasibility Report Services ## Fee Schedule - 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstruction Pro ject ## Task 1 - Pre-feasibility Report Survey Services ## Sub-Total Task 1 ## 2027 Laddie Lake Area Street Reconstruction ProjectCity of Blaine, Minnesota Page 178 of 179 ## ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ## 10801 Town Square Drive, Blaine, Minnesota 55449 Phone (763) 785-6172 ## CITY OF BLAINE ## 2027 LADDIE LAKE AREA ## PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ## STREET RECONSTRUCTION ## 86TH AVENUE87TH AVENUE87TH LANE ## TYLER STREET ## POLK STREET ## COTTAGEWOOD TERRACE ## TAYLOR COURT Page 179 of 179