See, I want to I want to table these minutes. I'll meet with staff and go over it. I think there's needs to be a lot added to it.

It seems like there's a lot more people. we are hiring is maybe I'm incorrect but um is this a lot more than what we usually have back there because I thought we only had like three or four and this is six or so.

They they don't necessarily all work at the same time. We're just trying to fill the schedule, make sure that we have someone to staff.

Ultimately that lists all the responsibilities of both the developer and the city but fundamentally rely on the developer to install the road, provide the utility extensions pay for all the design, the engineering, oversight of the project by the city engineer, installing all the storm water and drainage improvements, securing all the easements.

There is a provision under item 12.7. It's a short provision that basically requires the developer in the city to enter into a pilot understanding or payment in le of taxes.

So, why are we approving it without all of the um final review and approval by the engineer and administrator? That just seems like we should see those documents before we approve it.

Two weeks in construction season right now doesn't make a big difference. is the critical mass. But to the city attorney's point, um I don't know if there's anything in the final engineering that, no offense to any of us, that we might know what we're looking at with great detail to say something is wrong. We're not engineers.

Currently right now on average we make about $30 a year on notary services. So it's insignificant. Um and if it was 300,000 you might assume the risk but at $30 you probably don't want to assume the risk.

what's not identified in here essentially we are we are not going to be be providing those services to the public as a service that somebody can come in and and have a not find a notary.

I think in situations such as this, we kind of know that well, you're not sighting in a gun. you're not, you know, necessarily using it for hunting or something of that nature, but when you're when you're intentionally trying to cause a disturbance like this. Um that our firearms ordinance should somewhat identify disorderly conduct or at least give the opportunity for the city to contact the individual and say, 'This is our ordinance. You're kind of out of line.'

I think the penalty needs to say and before I even say this, I want to say I am not pro taking away anybody's constitutional rights, but I think that the police need to get involved and be we need to give the police permission to temporarily confiscate that gun.

A firearm used in the commission of a crime can be confiscated by law enforcement. This is defining the discharge of in a manner that is otherwise a nuisance or or harassment of other people. So therefore, the officer on scene determines that that crime has been committed and they have the ability to obtain that firing.

So, so I would like to incorporate your language, but I also want to get this passed right away and then just have it come back.

As appointed members, there really isn't that option out there right now. And so this document here kind of gives a uh just a bullet point type of a this is what you need to be aware of what we our expectations are.

elected officials have I think a different um you know threshold and that that's being that they're elected and you are responsible to the the members of the public. Your your conduct is evaluated every time you run for election.

I would also like to add some links to the league website. Okay. uh because we're part of this was uh educational and just a quick search that uh I did on the league website they have planning commission guide learn ways the city may create change or discontinue a city planning commission provides information on appointments of members commission powers and duties and meeting rules.