St. Francis City Council — Transcript
Monday, November 2, 2026
City Operations and Staffing Updates
Public Works Department Report and Policy Discussions
Police Department Activities and Community Engagement
Rum River Fire District Performance and Resource Utilization
Council Member and Community Engagement Updates
Votes (5)
Consent Agenda Discussion (Ice Rink Management)
Dissent: None
Moved by Council Member Fonis [~6:19 PM] · Seconded by Council Member Robinson [~6:19 PM]
A question was raised regarding the 'C ring management' item on the consent agenda, which was temporarily pulled. The discussion centered on the baseball club's long-standing use of the ice rink for fundraising, the city's cost savings by engaging a non-profit, and the associated responsibilities and liabilities of the contract. Council members inquired about opportunities for other groups to participate in similar fundraising activities.
Public Hearing for Miscellaneous Special Assessments
Dissent: None
Moved by Council Member Fonis [~6:33 PM] · Seconded by Council Member Malbower [~6:33 PM]
The annual certification of delinquent accounts (past due utility bills, administrative citations, and fees) for collection through 2027 property taxes was presented. The process includes a 10% administrative fee. Council members questioned specific high-value utility bills, the accumulation period, and the city's recovery process. A tree removal assessment from a specific agreement was also discussed. Concerns were raised about the fairness to paying residents, the adequacy of the 10% fee to cover city costs, and the potential policy of cutting off services for delinquent accounts. Public comments included frustration over watering restrictions while others don't pay bills, and suggestions for proactive communication or payment plans for residents with delinquent accounts. Future policy discussions on water/sewer shut-offs are planned.
St. Francis Warming House Improvement Project
Dissent: None
Moved by Council Member Udvig [~6:44 PM] · Seconded by Council Member Robinson [~6:44 PM]
The council reviewed the St. Francis warming house improvement project, which began in March 2025 and is now ready for bids. The schedule anticipates bid opening in early December and council approval soon after, with construction starting early spring 2027, allowing the rink to be open this winter. Discussions covered safety decisions regarding parking and rink layout, the estimated budget, public works' role as caretaker, ADA compliance in the renovation, and the use of earmarked funds (from the sale of the old city hall) without bonding. Council expressed excitement for the project's maintenance and improvement of existing facilities.
St. Francis High School Preliminary and Final Plat
Dissent: None
Moved by Council Member Fonis [~6:52 PM] · Seconded by Council Member Robinson [~6:52 PM]
The council considered preliminary and final plat requests to combine three existing parcels (94 acres) of the St. Francis High School property into one 93-acre lot, dedicating one acre for right-of-way. This action aims to clean up legal descriptions and lot lines without proposing physical changes to the site. The property's use is consistent with the city's 2040 Comprehensive Plan, with a small portion to be re-guided in the 2050 update. Discussion focused on the future implications for the busy Rum River Boulevard and 235th Avenue intersection, and the potential need for a roundabout, even though the county did not request additional right-of-way at this time.
Shade Tree Cove of St. Francis Concept Plan
Dissent: None
The council reviewed a concept plan for a 13-acre property proposing five rural residential lots, which would require a comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning for higher density than currently allowed (1 unit per 2.65 acres vs. 1 per 5 acres). Staff presented two options for addressing the density issue: adjusting the maximum allowable density for all rural residential areas (Option 1) or creating a new land use category (Option 2, preferred by Planning Commission). Concerns were raised about Metropolitan Council regional policy on sprawl and sewer expansion. The need for a public benefit if pursuing a Planned Unit Development (PUD) was also discussed. Council members generally supported the idea of mid-size lots to address a perceived gap in housing options within the city, acknowledging it would need to align with the ongoing 2050 Comprehensive Plan update.
Notable Quotes (16)
And the the idea behind it is that the city would have to pay somebody to sit there. So instead of paying someone to a temporary person to do that, we take whatever that x number of dollars and give it to a nonprofit and they then sit there and man the hours and everything and is that is that how that works?
it saves the city a substantial amount of money because these are all nights and weekends that that is open after three during the week and then all day on the weekends and if the city were to staff that it would be a huge burden.
The accounts included in this certification consist of past due utility bills, administrative citations, and other outstanding fees for services or costs already incurred by the city. If approved, these delinquent balances will be certified as a special assessment against the applicable properties and added to the 2027 property taxes. Each assessment will be a one-year assessment payable in 2027 and will include a 10% administrative fee to cover the costs associated with the certification process.
I just don't think it's fair to the public that we've got over $200,000 that we're fronting to to residents and the 10% is is not it's not penalizing them. We're just recouping the expense we got into it. So, it's not like it's a penalty. It's ju it's just covering our expense to do it.
We do know that this is an issue that some house household holds use just to pay their bill. They they know they don't have to. They intentionally do this year after year. So, some of these names are repeat from years past, too. So, it's it's really how do we address that? How do we educate, right?
I'm kind of appalled that I get a notice every now and then that uh I'm not allowed to water my lawn yet I pay my bill every month and all these people here are uh not paying their bill. I just kind of find that ironic that uh you're sending me notices to quit watering my lawn on my non-watering days even though I watered my damn lawn.
We need to stay a small community and actually work with our community.
Instead of walking across ice to get to the ice without ice skates on, I chose to be able to park up to the ice rink, then everyone could move into the warming house, put their skates on, and then go on to the ice. That's why I switched that. That was me last year.
When when mayor and council when this project in a little over a year and a half ago when we first started it, they had it set around $800,000. So, I'm hoping it doesn't go I'm hoping it's 10% or less above that at this point.
This is about maintaining what we have. This really isn't so much about expanding into other things. This just lends itself to the opportunity to improve it and bring things up to code, but it's not like some big going out there buying another whole 40 acres and creating a whole new park.
The applicant's not proposing any physical changes to the site. This is really just to clean up um clean up the legal description and clean up the the lot lines so that you don't have lot lines kind of bicting that property.
So, do these rightways allow enough space to it? I hate to say it. I I personally don't mind them, but I it's screaming for a roundabout at some point in time.
The reason that that policy is in place primarily uh is to prevent overall sprawl uh within the region uh and then to preserve the opportunities for future regional sewer and water expansion.
One challenge we face with responsible growth, I think, um, as many residents have put it forth, is that we don't have any mid-grade lots. We have city lots and we have big lots and we don't have any surrounding areas are starting to do that.
I know this parcel and the what they're thinking about here would fit in there very nicely. The gentleman PNZ also said they were going to be between 650 and $800,000 homes. So very nice for the tax base for sure.
The amount of people you see when we have a development come forward is what Jod and I are telling a family member they can't split their lot for a family member constantly. So, it is a request that even our current residents try to split two two and a half acres off for a child or a family member and we can't allow it.
Ordinances & Resolutions (8)
Authorizing the certification of delinquent accounts to 2027 property taxes.
Approving plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids for the St. Francis Warming House Improvement Project.
Approving the St. Francis High School preliminary plat and final plat with conditions and findings of fact.
City's current long-range planning document, guiding land use and development.
Ongoing update to the city's comprehensive plan, evaluating future land use categories and density.
Urban low-density detached residential zoning district.
Zoning mechanism providing flexibility from standard code in exchange for a public benefit.
Zoning district allowing single-family homes with minimum 2.5 acre lot sizes.