Show document text
---
## title: Permanent School Fund Detail
---
## SCHOOL DISTRICT 197 · School Board
## Referendum Review
With a closer look at the Permanent School Fund amendment
Peter Olson-Skog, Superintendent | August 24, 2026
The district provides information. Voters make the decision.
## TONIGHT
Three parts
The detail we committed to sharing on the Permanent School Fund in the larger context of the local
referendum.
01
Where we are
The gap, what we have already cut, and what is left. A short review — most of this the board has seen.
02
## The Permanent School Fund
What the fund is, what the amendment would actually change, and what it would mean here.
03
Two questions, one ballot
How they differ, why residents are conflating them, and how we answer that accurately.
## PART ONE
Where we are
A short review of the budget picture and reductions to date.
## THE PROBLEM
Costs climb faster than revenue. Every year.
State funding has not kept pace with inflation for two decades. Had the general education formula simply
tracked inflation, District 197 would have received about $7.7 million more last year alone.
~3%
## ANNUAL COST GROWTH
What it costs to run our schools,
year over year.
~1%
## ANNUAL REVENUE GROWTH
What the state formula and local
sources typically deliver.
## $2M
## THE GAP, EVERY YEAR
And it accumulates. Skip a year
of reductions and the hole is $4
million.
The gap is structural, not a one-year event. That is why one-time tools do not close it.
## WHAT IS DRIVING IT
Health insurance is the clearest example
~44%
More than we paid four years ago
Four straight renewals of 8%, 8%, 14% and 8%. Compounded,
our cost today is about 44% higher than it was four years ago.
Not ours to control
Health insurance, special education, transportation and
utilities are obligations, not preferences.
Our employees pay it too
The employee share rose by the same percentages. Staff
are absorbing these increases alongside everyone else.
Familiar to every household
This is the one line in our budget that residents
experience directly in their own lives.
## BEFORE ASKING
We started with our own budget
$3.2 million reduced over two years before bringing any question to voters. Nearly all of it permanent
structural change rather than one-time patches.
## $3.2M
## CUT OVER TWO YEARS
Reductions made before any
levy question went to the ballot.
## $2.55M
## FOR 2026–27 ALONE
$1.73M from positions; $825,000
from everything else.
One-third less
## THAN STATE AVERAGE SPENT ON ADMIN
Per MDE’s FY25 report as a
percentage of budget
The MDE report predates nearly all of these reductions — the next one should show us
further below average, not closer to it.
## WHAT IS LEFT
Everything left will be felt in classrooms
The reductions we could make away from the classroom are largely behind us. If the levy
does not pass, another $2 to $4 million comes out for the following year — and that is just to
hold the fund balance where it is. Rebuilding to the board’s target would requir…