Farmington City Council — Transcript
Thursday, September 24, 2026
Candidate Introductions and Vision for Farmington
Infrastructure Needs and Funding
Attracting and Retaining Businesses
Data Center Project and Environmental Review
Data Center Moratorium
Unaddressed Issues in Farmington
Notable Quotes (31)
My campaign is centered on three principles: thoughtful growth, responsible spending, and transparent leadership. On thoughtful growth, I want to be clear about my position on the proposed data center technology park. I oppose it. And if elected, I will vote no at every lawful opportunity that I have to advance the project.
I'm not a politician. I'm a local mom of four, a volunteer, an advocate, organizer, and community builder. I believe in Farmington's future, and a vote for me is a vote for authenticity, indomitable will, and audacious hope.
More than two years ago, a decision was made that I believe sacrificed an entire section of our town for tax revenue... The hypocrisy, that poor decision is what got me off the bench and in the game.
My goal as a council member is simple. It's to listen, to learn, and represent our community with honesty, transparency, and dedication. All while doing that with my heart.
I'd come to the city council looking at it with a fresh set of eyes at return on your investment. What's the dollars doing? Where is it the best used for? And how can we make sure we're maximizing what we have?
my profession has given me the opportunity to work with every facet of a community that you could possibly think of... you need to be able to talk to people where they're at and not just not just look at them and hear them, but to listen to them.
with my professional career, I've also built relationships with many people. Um whether that's people I've dealt with on calls for service or building relationships within city hall that have also helped me outside of work as a council member.
I want a a vibrant downtown. I want to support the small businesses that are here and encourage more businesses to come in, especially more small businesses. Um, you know, even right now we kind of are trying to I can't remember the actual quote, but it's something like work, sleep, shop here. And I think that that's a great vision to have.
My vision for Farmington is to see small business growth, not at the expense of large businesses. And then also, uh, making sure that families have a good opportunity to live within peace within the city. And then also to to mix our tax base appropriately.
I actually want to make a different than our country. I'm tired of the politics. I just want people who want to come together and do the best we possibly can with the information that we have.
One of the major projects right now is the city maintenance building has a roof that's leaking sandbags on top of it. That is a deferred maintenance that's went down the road and now we're here and now we need to fix it. Um the other big uh infrastructure that needs the most attention right now is the police department.
I think it's the right project, but at the wrong time. Um, at a time when we have 11.3% uh property tax increase. The county is looking at double digit increases as well. Um, you know, the fact that we're looking at funding it by a utility fee, um, which is actually a franchise fee, kind of sneak in there a little bit. and don't add it to our property tax line.
My thought process would be if a company's coming in and getting a $500 fine a day for going over the noise volume and then it's $5 $500 the next day, that's not going to do anybody any good.
When we look at attracting new business, it's not just about asking the business. It's going to them and saying, 'What do you need from us?' I'm going probably say an uncommon and unpopular opinion, but does that mean we get rid of the Farmington liquor store? Is that's what holding back a grocery store from coming here?
as a business owner, businesses want certainty and even before I get into that, we want to attract businesses that are going to succeed. So, having a grocery store only for them to go belly up in a couple years because the margins aren't there or the foot traffic isn't there doesn't help anybody. What we need is to allow businesses to come to Farmington that want to come to Farmington.
One of the big key programs that we're operating and and that's in the budget right now is the micro grants. These are grants given to local businesses that are already established that need help, whether it's a roof, refrigeration equipment, um any services that could improve their business.
I am a person that likes to see what the process brings. And just because a process is brought up and step one and two of 347 have been taken, that doesn't mean that we're going to make it all the way to the end.
There are no protections with that site for any of the secondary generators. Uh GE Verova uh turbine generators run at 170 dB startup sound at 155 dB require full constant uh natural gas to supply them. Imagine that next to your home... And so why these protections were not put in place to start with. This is something that that absolutely should have been brought up. The process should have been slowed down. And frankly, those who voted for it need to get unelected.
The residents that bought in executive estates and surrounding communities that could go out to a mile didn't buy next to industrial, they bought next to residential, what kind of protections and safeguards do they have like that metropolitan and airport commission did for the surrounding neighbors of the airport.
I would support instituting a data center moratorum. Uh a mortorium would give us time to think things through a little bit further. Uh Inenver Grove Heights went through this a little bit and faced some litigation and that's something we as a community need to need to weigh. Um if we do that, are we inviting that?
I am not, you know, really wellversed in how this decision was made, and I trust a lot of people who are seated right now. I know them personally, um, and their heart and that they care about Farmington. So, I can only imagine that there are things that I'm not seeing.
Probably one of the easiest questions for me to answer is yes, moratorum on any new project for sure. Can we retroactively put a moratorum on there? I'm not a lawyer. I'd consult with our legal team on that one to go back like Ben said, is there a possibility that we could invite um litigation for putting a mortorium and going um retroactive on it and going back to this specific project?
For how long? I think a year. One year I think we should be able to accomplish uh the necessary goal in mind. uh by you know with the data that we do get the professionals we talk to the residents that we talk to um as far as the data center goes um currently I don't think uh I would support a moratorum
Everybody keeps saying we're running a lean city. Um, I do believe we constantly hire consultants to help our experts and our staff do their job because they say they quote unquote go to the experts for the answers. What are we paying the city staff for then? If we're constantly going to experts to get their input or to get their support or get their help.
I'm going to use this question to talk about Sasha Belladin, a 13-year-old boy who lost his life in Farmington this summer...that's Highway 50 right now. It needs to be immediate action...there's no safe sidewalk for bikers at McDonald's, which is where all of our teens hang out.
we haven't I don't think we've had real public honest debate about the spending side of the equation on city finances as long as I've lived here...residents are they're sick of constantly paying more and getting less services. You know we lost the pool, we lost uh well we had went garbage. I mean there there's so many things that have gone back from from where they were before um that I feel like residents aren't getting really the best deal.
I think one of the uh most important things probably not getting enough attention right now is overall the amenities for people that live in town and especially families. Um, you know, we don't have a pool. We don't have a splash pad. We don't have a sports complex that involves all sports... We don't have a dog park.
At no time on my service on the planning commission or currently on the city council have I ever signed an NDA. I want that out there so everybody's aware...I believe decisions should be thoughtful, responsible, and driven by data, not simply by what is most popular in the moment.
I'm not promising that I'll agree with everyone. I won't. I'm not promising that every decision will be easy. It won't. What I can promise is that the questions I will ask are going to be the tough ones. I'll do my homework. I'll make the distance, travel the distance that needs to go. I'll listen to residents and treat their opinions with respect and dignity and not sit up here with a stone face and be have a smug attitude.
My personal phone number is 651-703-7053. you can call me at any reasonable hour and I'll get back to you as soon as possible. Um, and I mean that and uh I think that that's uh it's important for our community members to be able to reach us when there's something that's important and they need to talk to the people that represent them.
You know, we need growth, but I don't believe growth should come at the expense of our small businesses or the people who already call Farmington home. I want an environment where small businesses can grow alongside larger employers while maintaining the character of our community.
Ordinances & Resolutions (7)
A guiding document for the city's future development and zoning, referenced by several candidates.
Specific comprehensive plan guiding growth and development into the future.
Rules and regulations of the city government, mentioned in the context of city governance and business permitting.
Agreements mentioned in the context of Philip Winshiddle's police officer experience.
Grants provided by the city's Economic Development Authority to local businesses for improvements.
The environmental review process for the data center project, debated as to its adequacy.
Mentioned as a concern for lack of transparency regarding the data center project.