Farmington City Council — Transcript
Monday, September 21, 2026
Police Department Remodel and Expansion Project (Construction Manager at Risk Services)
Zoning Ordinance Amendments and Zoning District Map Update
Preliminary 2027 General Fund Budget and Tax Levy
Citizen Comments on City Projects and Policy
Votes (3)
Contract with Krauss Anderson Construction for construction manager at risk services
Moved by Council member Phil [0h14m57s] · Seconded by Council member Holly [0h14m58s]
Mr. Chansky presented the proposed AIA Owner Construction Manager as Constructor Agreement with Krauss Anderson Construction for the Police Department remodel and expansion. He detailed the two-phase approach (pre-construction and construction) and highlighted the benefits of a Construction Manager at Risk, including developing a guaranteed maximum price, providing a dedicated site superintendent, and ensuring quality control. Council members expressed strong support for leveraging expert services for such a complex project.
Adopting ordinances 2026 tax 007 and 2026-8 amending title 10 of the Farmington City Code as they relate to the zoning ordinance and adopting a new zoning district map
Dissent: Council member Wilson voted 'No' on Ordinance 2026 TAC 007. Council member Wilson voted 'No' on Ordinance 2026 TAC 008.
Moved by Council member Holly [0h41m32s] · Seconded by Council member Jake [0h41m33s]
Planning staff and consultant Beth Richmond presented two ordinances: one amending the zoning ordinance and another adopting a new zoning map. Key changes included restructuring downtown districts (renaming B2 to DC, RD to DR, and creating a new DE district), incorporating overlay design standards into a general chapter, and technical updates. A correction was noted regarding the accidental inclusion of data centers as a permitted use in the MUCR district, which was removed. Council members largely supported the efforts to modernize the code and align it with future growth, but Council member Winshettle expressed strong concern about the Downtown Expansion district and its potential unintended consequences, particularly regarding conditional uses like fast-food restaurants adjacent to residential areas, and questioned the timing of the update before the 2050 comprehensive plan.
The preliminary 2027 general fund budget and tax levy
Dissent: Council member Winshidel voted 'No' on Resolution 2026 TAC 076.
Moved by Council member Steve [1h3m50s] · Seconded by Council member Jake [1h3m51s]
Lynn and Kim presented the preliminary 2027 budget and tax levy, emphasizing the comprehensive process, strategic pillars, and data-driven decisions. They detailed key investments in public safety (additional fire staff, police sergeant, PD expansion), facilities, and infrastructure. The proposed 11.3% levy increase was explained in the context of operational cost pressures and capital reinvestment needs. Kim illustrated how individual property tax increases may differ from the levy percentage due to changes in tax base, valuation, and classification. The average homeowner is projected to see a 3.5% increase. Council members acknowledged the challenging economic conditions but supported the budget as necessary for maintaining services and investing in critical infrastructure, while also seeking further refinements.
Notable Quotes (13)
The purpose of a construction manager is really to be the city's representative when we get into construction for a project. Specifically, in this situation, it is the police department remodel and expansion project.
I appreciate the work that we did for the construction manager at risk shifting the responsibility of construction away from the city to know uh as an expert in that field what we're doing and putting it on an actual expert in the field. So, I think it's a good move.
One thing I do want to mention with the zoning code amendments, uh, with the piece that was brought to the planning commission, uh, there was an error that had been identified in that. Um, it actually had data centers as a permitted use within the MUCR. And that was that happened by accident when the MUCR district was to take the place of the Spruce Street master plan area, which did allow for data centers in the current code. So, it was just a carryover that got missed. uh we did remove that because that was never the intent to include data centers within the MUCR district.
So, one of those is related to the structure of the zoning districts themselves. Making sure that the zoning districts that you have in the code are supporting what the vision uh of the community is. One of the other changes is just looking at the the structure and organization of the code overall uh and doing some reorganization to make sure that the code is as logical and as easy to use as we can make it.
Most of the effort here was focused on downtown core downtown expansion. So it's not work that's being done for future land use. It's work that um over the course of the next 20 or so years as things naturally shift and adjust. It gives options to residents. It's not forcing them to do anything.
I just have not reached the comfortability with this downtown expansion at all. And here's what I worry about as a council member. You know, I think this is just how I look at it. So, I'm not trying to project what anyone else would how they anybody else would look at it. I really have to take a long-term view of the community and you know what is 2050 2060 you know when my kids are coming to visit me at the cemetery.
Fast food restaurants are permitted as a conditional use in in this expansion area. Correct. So, I can think of a couple and so this is the type of unintended consequence that I worry about.
Every priority and department request that comes forward is taken seriously. At the same time, we recognize that every dollar we spend ultimately comes from taxpayers. whether through traditional property taxes or other sources of revenue. That responsibility is sometimes is something that we do not take lightly.
The amount adopted tonight will appear on the proposed tax statements mailed in November. The key point to emphasize, the final levy adopted in December cannot exceed the preliminary levy. So tonight, we are establishing the maximum levy while still giving us the upcoming months to refine the budget based on updated information.
Do I get excited about 11% tax increase preliminarily? No, I don't. But do I think it is um a justifiable use of taxpayer money for what they are going to be getting the deliverables from the city? I absolutely do.
It's kind of what we need to do at this point. Anything less would be not good moving forward.
As far as the budget goes, um, and preliminary, I'm not uh impressed with the increase. I don't want an increase. Um I 100% fully support public safety, fire, um that type of things. I just think there's other ways that we can try to get the budget to where it needs to be u by like somebody said finetuning that pencil and making it sharper.
You look at the chart of the bullet points you have on there, that is in the kindest way, that is the most boring list I could possibly imagine of things to spend money on in this city, right? Which is exactly how we kind of wanted around here. We are a very lean city.
Ordinances & Resolutions (8)
Contract for construction manager at risk services with Krauss Anderson Construction.
Amending Title 10 of the Farmington City Code, the zoning ordinance.
Amending Title 10 of the Farmington City Code, the Farmington zoning ordinance adopting a new official zoning map.
Upcoming plan update that will influence future zoning code and map changes.
Adopting the preliminary 2027 budget and setting the preliminary tax levy collectible in 2027.
City's annual operating budget.
The total amount of property tax revenue the city plans to collect.
Long-term plan for facilities, infrastructure, and equipment needs.