Lakeville Area Public Schools — Transcript
Tuesday, December 2, 2025
Polling Location Consolidation
Academic Achievement Quarterly Business Review (QBR)
Facilities Vision 2035 and Middle School Capacity
Votes (3)
Discussion on Combining Polling Locations
Dissent: Discussion included differing views on the extent of consolidation and its potential impact on voter access.
The board discussed a district recommendation to consolidate special election polling locations to reduce costs and administrative complexity. Key points included the unique situation with Scott County's incompatible election equipment, necessitating special arrangements, and the observation that Lakeville is the only district in Dakota County not combining polling places. Concerns were raised about potential impacts on voter turnout in rural areas versus the benefits of efficiency and cost savings. No decision was made, but a deadline of December 31st was noted for setting conditions for future elections.
Academic Achievement Quarterly Business Review (QBR)
The Teaching & Learning team presented the inaugural academic QBR, outlining baselines and current quarterly data for student achievement metrics like FastBridge scores and rates of failing classes. A significant portion of the discussion centered on the impact of removing the 'least harmful F' policy, leading to increased failure rates, and the identified resource gap in Tier 2 and Tier 3 student interventions. Science MCA scores were noted as lower due to new state standards and curriculum alignment issues, with elementary outperforming secondary. The board also discussed the future of college credit offerings (AP vs. concurrent enrollment) and the critical need for an integrated, long-range vision for teaching and learning.
Facilities Vision 2035 and Middle School Capacity
Dissent: Board members expressed varied opinions on the scope, timing, and components of a potential bond referendum, weighing immediate needs against a comprehensive long-term vision and community tax tolerance.
The Superintendent outlined the district's urgent need for middle school capacity due to anticipated student growth, recommending a focused bond levy for additions to existing middle schools as the most practical immediate solution. He stressed the importance of developing a comprehensive long-range vision for teaching and learning to inform future facilities planning, acknowledging current constraints. The board debated the merits of a 'short-term fix' versus a larger, integrated approach that addresses high school capacity, career centers, and pre-K facilities simultaneously, considering the community's tax tolerance and the strategic timing of referendums.
Notable Quotes (18)
one of the biggest challenges uh with elections is the heavy amount of administration associated with it.
Lakeville itself doesn't bother me for condensing uh, voting areas. it. You know, driving five miles should be nothing, honestly. But the thing that I do have a little bit of pause on is going down into Scott County and those southern areas...
So every school district in Dakota County combines their polling places. Um, Lakeville is the only school district that does not.
if all these other school like I feel like this is a repeat conversation. You name the topic like Lakeville just is not in line with our peers on on many things it feels like and so if we is doing this and why school district is ginormous too right and they have one polling location I I don't see the argument why we would spend more money spend more staff time when this is a model that our peers are using for special elections.
Scott County doesn't have an elections department like Dakota County does. Scott County turns over all of the absentee ballots. All of the work of the elections comes to us to do where Dakota County does the absentee processing for us. They also do all of the equipment programming...
at the beginning of the document, we have our baselines spring data. And so, you'll see all of the areas under student achievement that align to the executive dashboard... at the bottom uh there are two areas that we are sharing for a uh quarterly um review and as as Dr. McDonald said those are areas that we have new data for since the spring data that we shared earlier.
The second thing that caught my eye was the um failing one or more classes. And and I I know you're probably not uh enthralled with these numbers either, but when I when I looked at the kids in middle school, uh 6 and a half% of them are failing one or more classes. And then in high school, just a hair over 18%.
We have a gap. We have a gap.
I feel like that's a failure at like the teacher level, the department chair level, the principal level, teaching and learning, all the way to the top, right? like at all these levels, no one thought, wow, we're not teaching what the test is asking.
what we see from the MCAs is a systems level problem. It's not the teacher problem. Um it's the system. we didn't have the system set up for those teachers to be successful to get the professional development that they needed to best teach our students.
And so I think we're in a space now too where it's time to look at like where we are with AP and where we are with concurrent enrollment and is it some sort of a yes and which is usually what it is to meet the needs of your your students and then how do we resource and support that from a from a budget standpoint.
our most pressing situation or need is to have space for our middle schools. Um, the bigger question and the bigger longer range plan uh obviously needs to be predicated on a TNL vision.
it it's not how many students we need to fit in school, but what kinds of learning do we want to make possible?
I don't feel like there's this collaboration amongst the departments to figure out how to all bring that vision together because if we go to a le for a levy for buildings and we go for a levy later for teaching and learning one might pass and one might not and instead how do we create a vision for our community where we are bringing these things together that everyone can buy into and support both of those things.
My thought around it was I I do feel like the middle schools obviously there's there's an issue there and we need to figure out how we're going to address that. But my my thought was could we access the land that's by south and have a career center and a middle and add on the middle schools at the same time, right?
That's what I'm thinking.
There are there are no no wants in that list.
A tennis court, you know, a big a big new performing arts center. I I guess that's just not part of my priority list, especially when I have like the ALC students that are in a locker room learning without any windows, without any cafeteria access, without any gym access. The tennis courts are kind of down here for me.
Ordinances & Resolutions (16)
Website for voters to check polling place information.
District's overarching plan to which objectives and action items are aligned.
Data dashboard that student achievement areas align to.
System used for notifying families and students about grades.
Data dashboard used by administrators to identify students at risk of failing.
Ninth-grade program for teacher-student meetings to support grades and assignments.
Dedicated time for teachers to provide additional support to students.
Framework for providing academic and behavioral support to students, with identified gaps in Tier 2 and Tier 3 resources.
Process for continuous improvement at the classroom level, key for curriculum alignment.
State collaborative related to graduation rates.
Data visualization platform used by the district.
Platform where student data is available for staff.
State assessments, specifically discussed for science and ELA scores.
Assessment tool used for reading and math proficiency and growth data.
Document outlining course offerings, under review for new courses.
Survey whose results are pending, intended to confirm community tax tolerance and priorities for facilities.