Bloomington City Council — Transcript
Thursday, August 6, 2026
Development Review Process
Annual Review of Rules and Procedures
Election of Officers
Policy and Issues Update
Votes (6)
Swearing-in of Commissioner Madeline Summers
The meeting began with the formal swearing-in ceremony for newly appointed Planning Commissioner Madeline Summers. She affirmed her oath to uphold the Constitutions and faithfully discharge her duties for a three-year term.
Development Review 101 Study Item
Planning Manager Nick Johnson delivered an educational presentation on the city's four-phase development review process: pre-application, formal application, permitting, and construction. He outlined the rationale for planning and zoning (public infrastructure, future vision), the objectives of effective review (compliance, adequate infrastructure, transparency, efficiency), and the roles of various review entities (staff, DRC, Planning Commission, City Council, and external agencies). The presentation also covered legal frameworks (Minnesota Statute, agency action deadlines), public notice requirements, and the significant costs incurred by developers. Ideas for improving accessibility and transparency were discussed, including website overhaul and ADA compliance. Commissioners asked about project expiration and AI's impact on applications.
Annual Review of Rules and Procedures
Moved by Commissioner Munster [1:05:43] · Seconded by Unknown [1:05:45]
Planning Manager Nick Johnson presented the annual review of the Planning Commission's Rules of Procedure. Key discussions focused on ex parte contacts and conflicts of interest, with City Attorney Kevin Toskey providing advice on early disclosure of potential conflicts. Commissioner Cunningham proposed an amendment to establish a 'no less than 3 minute' time limit for public testimony, prompting discussion among commissioners about balancing clarity for the public with managing meeting efficiency and unforeseen circumstances. Ultimately, the proposed amendment was withdrawn, and the Rules of Procedure were adopted as presented.
Planning Commission Election of Officers
The Planning Commission elected its officers for the 2026-2027 calendar year. Acting Chair Kevin Cunningham, Commissioner Abdi Isse, and Commissioner Shonte Brown were selected as Chair, Vice Chair, and Secretary, respectively. Prior to voting, commissioners had the opportunity to express their interest or unwillingness to serve in each role, clarifying that formal nominations were not required.
Approval of July 9th Planning Commission Meeting Synopsis
Moved by Unknown [1:13:58] · Seconded by Unknown [1:14:04]
The Planning Commission reviewed the draft synopsis of its July 9th meeting. After a motion and second, the synopsis was approved with abstentions, indicating a procedural review of past meeting records.
Regular Policy and Issues Update
Planning Manager Johnson updated the Commission on upcoming public hearings for August 20th (cannabis manufacturing/cultivation facility, James Avenue detached townhomes) and September 3rd (city code amendment for sports training facilities, annual miscellaneous issues ordinance cleanup). Commissioner Coleman inquired about the City Council's recent action on the previously recommended townhomes, to which Johnson clarified that the Council postponed the decision for applicant consideration of design changes, without explicitly deeming the R3 zoning inappropriate. The discussion concluded with a note on the Minnesota State Planning Conference in October.
Notable Quotes (13)
I, Madeline Summers, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States, and of the state of Minnesota, and faithfully discharge the duties of the off- and faithfully discharge the duties of the office of the Planning Commission, of the city of Bloomington in the county of Hennepin and the state of Minnesota to the best of my judgement and ability.
Our capital with the public is trust, right? And so, in order to, uh, make them feel, uh, maybe that they're listened to or that they're actually getting a true audience and that, um, its representatives are representing them effectively and working on their behalf...
The range that they all and I I talked to them independently... uh the range that uh they consistently reported on is that it cost somewhere between two and three hundred thousand dollars um to get to the stage of a formal development application for a large-scale development...
I was wondering about after a after something is say approved by the City Council, how long in general do they have to like for example begin construction uh before they would have to come back and reapply?
Yes, I have. We have. And um it's more common in the written narratives or written documents that we see, although we have seen some architectural plans um that are kind of stock or uh AI-generated plans. And the way that we would catch it is that it's not like the scale, um the dimensions of the buildings are not matching up with what we're seeing on our civil plans, right?
just come to us early if you think you have an issue with any financial or other conflict of interest. Um, it's always easy to talk them out on the front end, just have a short quick discussion.
I would propose to put in a no less than 3 minute. Uh and that sense with no less than 3 minutes, just so that folks that are preparing at home to testify publicly have a guardrail of how long the chair will give them to speak.
I have mixed feelings about it. I I appreciate the intent behind both suggestions from Commissioner Monstern and from yourself about offering clarity for the um the audience. I do have just concerns about the unknown and needing to manage our time efficiently and make sure that the maximum number of voices are heard.
I'm fine being chair. Uh I it's not something I need to do or strive to be. Um as you guys can see I had do it a little differently than Chair Cook did or Chair Albrecht who was before him. Uh I also travel for work. So, I am I do meet make the requirements to be here as much as possible. I I I try to be at every meeting. Um but I I can't have a perfect attendance like Phil did even when he was in Detroit. I mean, he he called in.
Uh yeah, thank you Chair Cunningham. Uh yeah, I am interested in uh be becoming vice chair, so. Thank you.
Planning Manager Johnson, could you, uh, share what, uh, the uh, the City Council action on the, uh, townhomes that we, uh, recommended approval at the last meeting of the Planning Commission?
So, there was a fair amount of, uh, discussion at the Council level about that case. And there were some discussion around making some, uh, some design changes to that project. So, the applicant has taken that direction. They did formally postpone, uh, consideration of that application until the August 31st, um, uh, City Council meeting. They did hold the public hearing and close the hearing.
I mean, I do want to mention that in our rules of procedure, it says that we can that the chair can make a written or in-person statement to the council attached to that. Um I wonder if this if the commission would be interested in doing that if we cuz I think that I I felt pretty strongly at the last meeting about R3 being an appropriate use of that site.
Ordinances & Resolutions (18)
Long-range planning document informing the city's future vision and regulatory mechanisms.
State law granting municipalities the right to plan and enact zoning, and outlining baseline public hearing requirements and agency action deadlines.
Local regulations outlining development review procedures (e.g., section 21.502.01) and public hearing requirements. Everything in City Code must meet or exceed State Law.
Formal permitting software used by city staff for electronic plan review and application management.
Legal right to occupy a building after all inspections are complete and conditions are met.
Document outlining how the Planning Commission conducts its meetings, including conduct for public hearings, ex parte contacts, and conflicts of interest. Requires annual review and City Council approval for amendments.
An application type requiring a public hearing, changing the zoning classification of a property.
Detailed plans required for development approval, subject to staff review and compliance.
A specific type of platting for lot development, mentioned for the James Avenue townhomes.
A change to the city's regulatory code, e.g., to allow sports training facilities in a specific zoning district.
An annual ordinance addressing various cleanup and minor policy items.
A specific zoning classification discussed in the context of the James Avenue townhomes project and City Council feedback.
Online interactive map providing public access to information about projects under review, approved, under construction, and completed.
Permit type requiring a public hearing, discussed for a cannabis facility.
Permit type requiring a public hearing, allowing a deviation from zoning code requirements under specific conditions.
Required for construction, must be obtained within 2 years of development approval (with possible extensions).
A sub-permit allowing site grading prior to a full building permit.
A sub-permit allowing the installation of utilities.