CompletedJanuary 30, 2025 Bloomington Planning Commission Meeting

January 30, 2025 Bloomington Planning Commission Meeting

Date: Friday, January 31, 2025 at 3:32 PMActual: Friday, January 31, 2025 at 3:32 PM

January 30, 2025 Bloomington Minnesota Planning Commission Meeting 00:04:20 ITEM 1 PL2025-01 (public hearing) ALPHA GROUP LLC (user) Akmed Muhumud (owner) 9000 Old Cedar Avenue, Bloomington, MN 55438 Conditional use permit for an adult day care center 00:12:14 ITEM 2 PL2024-211 (public hearing) City of Bloomington City Code Amendment - RS-1 and R-1A Zoning Districts 00:37:55 ITEM 3 PL2024-224 (study item) City of Bloomington Sign Code One-Year Look Back Amendments 01:43:14 ITEM 4 City of Bloomington (study item) The Heights – TIF Review 02:49:03 ITEM 5 City of Bloomington (study item) Consider approval of draft 12/19/24 Planning Commission meeting synopsis 02:49:49 ITEM 6 City of Bloomington (study item) Planning Commission Policy and Issues Update

Documents (1)

TranscriptAnalysis ready

Published Friday, January 31, 2025

Show document text
" HELLO AND Evening Welcome To The January 2025 Meeting Of The Bloomington Planning Commission For An Overview For The Audience And Also A Focus On Tv The Planning Commission Is Made Up Of Seven Members We Have Five And Almost Six This Evening And Maybe A Seventh Will Be Joining Us Virtually Each Member Volunteers Their Time And Is A Bloomington Resident Members Are Appointed By The City Council The Planning Commission Advisory To The City Council For Most Items The Commission Makes Recommendations And The City Council Has The Final Decision Making Authority There Are Certain Applications That The Planning Commission Can Approve Or Deny On Its Own Subject To The Appeal Of The City Council We Have One Of Those Items This Evening For Each Item There Will Be A Staff Report Then A Chance For The Applicant To Present Then A Chance For Any Member Of The Public To Provide Testimony And Then The Will Close The Public Hearing And Discuss The Item Before Any Action Is Taken. Our First Order Of Business Tonight Is The Pledge Of Allegiance. Please Stand If You Are Able To The Flag Of The United States Of America And To The Republic For Which Stands One Nation Under God Indivisible With And Justice For All . All Right. Our First Item This Evening Is Does Have A Public Hearing. It'S A Conditional Use Permit For An Adult Daycare Center At 9000 Old Cedar Avenue And Planner Has You Have The Staff Report Thank You. Good Evening Chair And Commissioners Yes So Tonight This Item Is A Conditional Use Permit For An Adult Daycare And It Is Located At 9000 Old Cedar Avenue Which Is This Property Outlined In Red. This Property Is In The Art For Zoning District And It'S At The Corner Of Old Cedar Avenue South East 90Th Street Surrounding Uses Multifamily Housing And Some Commercial Across The Street. So This Is A Floor Plan. The Building Is 2800 Square Feet. The Adult Daycare Will Have A Maximum 50 Participants And Maximum Of Six Caregivers On Any Given Shift Participants Will Usually Spend Less Than 6 Hours Per Day At The Daycare And Most Will Be Transported Not Driving. There Are No Proposed Exterior Changes Than Complying With Ada Standards For Parking And Entrances Exits As Far As Code Requirements Go Parking Parking Is In Compliance 12 Spots Are Required Where 13 Are Existing Landscaping And Lighting Are Not Compliance. These Are Conditions Listed Attached To The Staff Report And Then As I Sent Out Earlier Via Email And Should Be At Your Chairs As Well We Did Receive A Piece Of Correspondence Related To Traffic In This Area. This Is Not A Concern According To Our Staff As I Site Is Served By Two Major Collector Roadways Of Of Adequate Capacity And Then The Pick Up And Drop Off Must Occur On Site And Then Additionally The Site Will Be Required To Be Fully Sprinkler Protected Because Of This Square Footage And So With That Staff Recommending Approval And The Applicant Is Here Tonight If You Have Questions For Them Or Me. Thank You. Any Questions For Staff Not Oh Okay. A…

Stories from this meeting (1)

Document Analysis

No minutes document found yet. Refresh ingestion to check for newly published minutes, or analyze the agenda packet alone.

Topics Discussed (4)

Conditional Use Permit for Adult Daycare Center

City Code Amendment for RS One and R1A Zoning Districts

Sign Code One Year Look Back Amendments

Review of The Heights Housing Improvement Area (HRA) and Tiff District

Full Document Analysis
Motion Carries (Approved)
Motion Passes (Approved)
No formal vote, discussion to inform future ordinance drafting
No formal vote, discussion to inform future HRA and City Council action

This is a building that has formerly served or is being used as an office building. We've owned it for I think about two years now and we're trying to put it and a useful use of it and reinvigorate that corner and we pleased that the department or the service are recommending approval and Um if there's any questions I'll be happy to answer.

Mohammed [Timestamp]Conditional Use Permit for an Adult Daycare Center at 9000 Old Cedar Avenue

I mean it sounds like there really isn't much of any traffic through the building on a daily basis. So although it sounds like the somebody gets a ton of traffic on the road which maybe something that we should look at at some point you understand what's going on there but I don't think this will have really I mean if there's any impact it's going to be super minimal. So I don't have any issues with it.

Tricia Curry [Timestamp]Conditional Use Permit for an Adult Daycare Center at 9000 Old Cedar Avenue

The broad scope or the broad intention of these changes was to increase opportunities for housing creation through infill development and other reasons kind of informing some of those changes.

Planning Supervisor Johnson [Timestamp]City Code Amendment for RS One and R1A Zoning Districts

I would agree. Thank you Madam Chair that it seem like a disproportionate amount of time spent for a very small portion of of the city here I don't have strong feelings on it it seems reasonable I don't mind that we have a couple of neighborhoods with larger lots it doesn't bother me. You know we talk about serving the entire market so I guess we'll serve the higher end of the market in this neighborhood and that's just fine and I'm I'm okay approving this this evening.

Commissioner Cooked It [Timestamp]City Code Amendment for RS One and R1A Zoning Districts

One commitment we made both to the business community but also the Planning Commission and Council because it was such a substantial departure from the previous ordinance we committed to doing a one year look back basically evaluation of the code as it was out on on the ground or in the wild if you will for that full first full year.

Planning Supervisor Johnson [Timestamp]Sign Code One Year Look Back Amendments (Study Item)

I'm supportive of this so long as we can't do billboards which is the understanding here I don't know you around South Loop and there's lots of different types of signage and what I've learned over time is we shouldn't be scared of it all has these giant signs and they look great. The Ac Hotel looks fine. You wouldn't even think it stands out at all if you didn't realize what we did. So I don't know. I want us to be a dynamic city that allows us to do creative things and be different than all these other suburbs. So I'm in favor of this.

Commissioner Hooten [Timestamp]Sign Code One Year Look Back Amendments (Study Item)

I also prefer to stay with one. I think it's visual clutter and I think one's enough and I believe me I appreciate that there's a struggling office out there but eventually that's going to correct itself whether people come back to the office a little bit or it's just the expansion of business and these buildings will fill up eventually and then we've made a decision that there's two sides on every building and 15 years from now when all these office buildings are full again or ten years from now whatever and we've stuck ourselves with two sides on every facade. And so like this Dairy Queen Building on the front like okay sure there's only one on this large broad side here but that short skinny side that's on 90 degrees where we're good with two on that side there probably we've stagnant like I just think it's visual clutter and I'm unsupportive of it. One is enough for me.

Commissioner Cookson [Timestamp]Sign Code One Year Look Back Amendments (Study Item)

This is a highly affordable community in the city and so we have really made a lot of efforts to come up with a financing package that will keep this affordable the residents who are living there and then affordable homeownership of course is also a goal of the plan and this proposal satisfies that goal as well.

HRA Administrator Abe [Timestamp]Review of The Heights Housing Improvement Area (HRA) and Tiff District (Study Item)

I hate to use the word bailout because really infers some things I don't mean to infer but are we the comprehensive plan suggests we should be bailing out condo buildings and like the other thing too is an ownership perspective... when you sign your name on the dotted line you're taking ownership of that and you have a to do your due diligence... and unfortunately that's the situation these residents have put them in.

Commissioner Cookson [Timestamp]Review of The Heights Housing Improvement Area (HRA) and Tiff District (Study Item)

I'm that there are ways for properties this to get assistance I think that's important I don't think people are born knowing how to own and manage property. I think that people make mistakes and the fact that there are ways for people to get help and to learn is good. I think that there are very valid reasons to be concerned about the perception this can create and the public that is not just a perception but that is reality that you know we are for all intents and purposes bailing out a private property that didn't do a good job of managing itself. But I think it's more to the story than that and I hope that we can be very clear when we when we tell this story, when we talk about this project that the whole story told and that it's not just the short, easy way of describing it.

Commissioner White [Timestamp]Review of The Heights Housing Improvement Area (HRA) and Tiff District (Study Item)

The way it's defined is that redevelopment is about addressing blight and so it may not necessarily be that it is construction of a building. It could be addressing that blight which is why you're hearing this being brought before you today.

Attorney Task [Timestamp]Review of The Heights Housing Improvement Area (HRA) and Tiff District (Study Item)

Watch the Meeting