Robbinsdale Area Schools — Transcript
Monday, May 4, 2026
School-Based Mental Health Services
Employee Contract Negotiations
District Financial Planning and Facilities Maintenance
Educational Strategic Planning and Equity Initiatives
Votes (9)
School-Based Mental Health Partnerships Update
Tony Boyden, Director of Student Services, presented on the district's 25-year history of school-based mental health services, emphasizing its pioneering role and current partnerships with People Incorporated, VEMA, and Vona. The program is largely funded by the DHS School Linked Behavioral Health Grant. Key services include identification of mental health needs, increased accessibility by removing barriers, and coordination of care. Current data indicates 459 students served with 496 referrals this year. Discussion included grant funding, the cost per therapist, and legislative efforts to increase grant funding, particularly in light of an anticipated funding 'cliff'.
Consent Agenda Approval (excluding pulled items)
Dissent: Director Long voted No. Director Bassett voted Yes for specific items only, explicitly excluding the pulled items.
Moved by Director Wotow [15:20] · Seconded by Director Hillenbrand [15:22]
Director Bassett requested to pull tentative agreements for Equity Allies, Program Assistants, Program Directors, and Cabinet from the consent agenda for separate discussion. The remaining items on the consent agenda, including property and liability insurance renewal, the dairy bid award, financial reports, and personnel reports, were then voted upon.
Tentative Agreements for Robbinsdale Equity Allies, Program Assistants, Program Directors, and Cabinet
Dissent: Director Long voted No. Director Bassett abstained.
Moved by Director Hillenbrand [24:26] · Seconded by Director Bowman [24:28]
Director Bassett and Director Long raised significant concerns about approving these contracts without a prior closed session for contract negotiation discussions, arguing that parameters were not adequately set or discussed, and prioritizing the larger teacher contract negotiations. Chair Evans Becker asserted that negotiation parameters were established in closed sessions in July last year, and the current agreements fell within those parameters. Director Long specifically voiced strong opposition to the Cabinet agreement. Debate also touched on board transparency and process.
Intermediate District 287 Long-Term Facilities Maintenance Approval
Moved by Director Bowman [26:17] · Seconded by Director Brenneman [26:19]
CFO Holsen presented this as an action item with no outstanding questions following prior presentations. The item proceeded directly to a vote.
Robbinsdale Public Schools District 281 Fiscal Year 25 SOD Notification Approval
CFO Weisel notified the board that the Department of Education approved the district's Fiscal Year 25 Strategic Operating Decisions (SOD) plan on April 23rd. Director Bassett sought clarification on whether the plan's approval was predicated on specific elementary school closures (six or seven), to which CFO Weisel confirmed the plan acknowledges likely building reductions but does not specify a precise number.
Reimage ARD Vision 2030 Phase 1/2 Update (Facility Planning and Funding)
Dissent: Director Long expressed general concern about any tax increases.
Michael Hart presented financial models for the district's facility plan, including voter-approved bonds (projected $450-$515 million) and board-approved Long-Term Facilities Maintenance (LTFM) funding. He detailed tax impacts for an average home ($24-30/month for referendum, $12-21/month for LTFM-only scenarios, with a recommended 'paygo' LTFM option at $16/month). Key assumptions included a November 2026 referendum, interest rates with a 0.75% cushion, and a 20-year payment schedule. Discussion focused on bond rating's reliance on fund balance, the transparency of tax impact projections, and the timeline for submitting plans. The CFO sought and received board direction to proceed with LTFM planning based on the recommended flexible option.
Robbinsdale Area Schools Portrait of our Learners Adoption
Moved by Director Bowman [36:31] · Seconded by Director Bassett [36:32]
The 'Portrait of our Learners' document, which had been presented at previous meetings, was brought forward for adoption. There were no changes made to the document since its last discussion.
Resolution Accepting Donations
Moved by Director Bassett [37:25] · Seconded by Director Hillenbrand [37:27]
The board considered a resolution to accept donations totaling $13,891.40 for the month.
Achievement and Integration Three-Year Plan Presentation (FY 27-29)
Beth Tepper and Tony Patterson presented the Achievement and Integration plan, mandated by Minnesota statute. The plan aims to increase racial and economic integration, reduce academic disparities, and enhance access to diverse teachers. It outlined definitions for 'protected class,' 'racially isolated district' (which Robbinsdale is), and 'racially identifiable schools' (Meadow Lake and Northport Elementaries). Specific goals for K-5 and 6-8 literacy growth, 4-year graduation rates for protected classes, and a 1% annual increase in licensed staff of color were detailed, along with strategies like Science of Reading, AVID, and 'Grow Your Own' programs. Discussion included the implementation of restorative practices and the use of the Dream Catchers project to inform cultural inventory tools.
Notable Quotes (14)
This is a 25 year partnership if not longer. And we were one of the founding people to incorporate therapists into our schools um into our schools in Minnesota.
So, approximately within the Robbinsdale District for every therapist we have, it's about $36,000 that's covered um per the cost of having a therapist embedded in the school sites.
But if you if that goes down, what will that mean to local districts? And if a redesign is helping to fund that, and I happen to sit on the redesign board for this board, and so our local family services collaborative, who funds the other part of this, and so if that means there might be some changes in that funding, it would be good for that board to know.
I am concerned about settling any contracts prior to us having another closed session to discuss the the contracts themselves. ... I don't want to would not like to see the board approve any other contracts until we we contract with our teachers. I think that's the top priority now and to move all these contracts along and we don't know the impact of them.
I would like to remind everybody on the board that July 7th and July 21st of last year, we met in closed session and decided the parameters for each of these bargaining units. ... In good faith, the negotiation teams from each of the groups met and these groups have all settled within the parameters that the board set.
So, personally, against the other bargaining units, I'm going to have to vote no, and it's not about your other bargaining units. I 100% support you guys. I think uh some of you guys should probably gotten more than what you've gotten in there. Um but there's one that I cannot support, so I will be voting no this evening, and I'm I apologize to the other bargaining bargaining units.
The bulk of which would be required to be approved by voters at a referendum. And then there's about 80 to 90 million of it which is LTFM funding. That component within the LTFM funding program is a board action.
The by far the most important metric for your bond rating is your the school district's fund balance. The fund balance is not in a good position right now. You will need to have an audited financials with a significantly improved fund balance in order to increase the rating.
So the really the difference is 16 to 30. ... It's a $14 difference, right? Like at the end of the day we're going like referendum or not we're going to go ask for the $16 one way or the other cuz the buildings need $140 million.
If we wanted to do something new in all of our elementary buildings. Now, I I believe some of that visioning has been done, but I'm not sure how much. And I'm not sure which I'm not sure about what that means cuz I don't have a clear understanding of that.
Yeah, I guess I'm just really concerned about any tax increase even if we go for whatever the pay go levy one especially with all the cities having increased their uh property taxes too. So I'm you know, we've had people come here and speak about how they are struggling financially and I'm sorry even $30 $15 $16 a month that can impact some families based on where they are financially.
protected class students means students who self-report as being um in one of the race and ethnicity categories used by school districts and MDE to track student enrollment. And so, these categories are African Black American, Asian Pacific Americans, Chicano Latino Americans, American Indian Alaskan native and multiracial.
Our goal is the percentage of licensed staff of color working in Robbinsdale Area Schools will increase by 1% each year from fiscal year 26 to fiscal year 29.
And because this particular funding unlike other funding, is targeted toward our students of color by statute, by law um, it would be helpful to understand you know, I love one-pagers and matrixes. It would be helpful to understand how many students across the district that we're actually capturing in this. Where are you see growth and proficiency?
Ordinances & Resolutions (10)
Grant funding school-based mental health partnerships
Mission statement reviewed at the meeting
Approval of the plan for long-term facilities maintenance for the intermediate district
Approval notification of the Strategic Operating Decisions plan by the Department of Education
Update on financial planning for the district's long-term facility vision
District document outlining educational goals for students
Official resolution to accept financial donations to the district
District plan addressing racial and economic integration and student achievement disparities
State statute governing Achievement and Integration for Minnesota programs
State-required long-term strategic plan goals for districts