I mean, she she's saving the city, is it about $75,000 on this contract. So, I just think it's a night a nice thing to do for taxpayers. So, thank you for saving money instead of spending money.

I'm struggling specifically with two items on there. Um one of them is that um currently we have the sobatical pay that is um one of the benefits that our uh union officers receive... but there's an 8% extra pay increase to someone who who is now going to have to cover that role... The other piece that I have um some difficulty supporting is the longevity pay.

I support providing our non-UN police supervisors with substantially the same police specific benefits that are available to our union represented officers... Police work is unique. It involves risk, responsibilities, and liabilities that do not exist in most other city positions.

What problem are we trying to solve? How widely used is AI or how widely is AI currently being used within uh the city and has legal council reviewed the policy for data practices and records retention compliance?

I was absolutely against AI and in my annual review, you made me do professional development training this year. I didn't want to. I did it. And then what I learned was uh there's a lot for us to leverage here that is going to address some of the concerns that council has in terms of being efficient and effective with the tools that we have that can save money, help us better serve and and come up frankly with with better solutions than we can on our own.

It's simply not physically possible to fit a trailer of that size and height between our trees... I don't see how any equipment required to construct a shop needed, a backhoe, a bulldo dozer, or a cement truck could fit. You just can't put a square peg in a round hole.

This shop, the only use is for John for his company is to send invoices and use that office for office work. There is not going to be any construction material there. Nothing... We just want to have a a great life in Corkran and that's all we're asking.

I make a motion to amend number six in resolution 2026-35 to add the word double prior to the word row when referring to landscaping and to strike the words and deciduous from that sentence and to modify point four to add language limiting usage of the property to what was outlined to staff on date that will turn.

Number one, the city needs to retain ownership of all data, recordings, metadata, and evidence collected through this system. Number two, the city must be able to export and migrate its data if we decide in the future to change platforms. We don't want to find ourselves in a situation where our data is locked into a particular vendor. And third, I would like to better understand the life cycle cost of evidence storage, software licensing, hardware replacement, and any AI capabilities that may be included in the vendor's proposal.

The cost will be painful, but not as painful as one critical incident and we don't have good footage. It's blurry. It It was dark out and now we can't see what actually happened. It's going to cost a whole lot more and we're going to be wishing we had we had gotten this.

The present structure is stressed and so we probably should look at some different ways to do things. It might be technology, it might be uh different roles... but but getting a recommendation.

What I struggle uh with is identifying the specific problem that we're trying to solve with this study. The report references population growth, increased responsibilities, recruitment challenges, retention challenges... but I've not seen objective evidence that our current structure is failing.

We did a damn good job in my professional. We are maxed out. That same model that we took from over the last 10 years will disintegrate or the spokes will come off whatever adjective you want will not work the next 10 years.