And again, our interest, or the only interest I would have is it would sure would be nice if we didn't just add turn lanes and stuff. It'd be nice if, uh, they could engage somewhat with the property owners along that property of those of that that stretch. It's just a mile over road. And they just add turn lanes for very shortly thereafter to all of a sudden tear it all up and redo it. It sure would be nice if, uh, if they could acknowledge something and talk about it instead of just doing it halfway.

One concern I remember expressing when the concept came before council last time is a desire to see a concrete plan for how the commercial portion of the site would develop. And for for me that was important because we know we have a desire to expand the tax base. And I felt there was risk if we allow a development to proceed with only a residential component when a commercial was also required by the zoning, that we may find ourselves holding a bag where that land never develops in the way that we had originally planned it to develop, and we get a request 5 or 10 years down the road to convert it to more residential.

So, essentially what we have right now, if we don't receive um an additional extension from the applicant, the application would have to move forward no matter what in October unless it's withdrawn or extended. Um and at that point with the information we have, it's possible that it might be with a staff recommendation to deny it at this time.

For transportation corridors, no. Recapture agreements exist for the utility infrastructure like you talked about, but until the legislature changes the law, we don't really have a mechanism to recoup that related to transportation corridors.

I wouldn't advocate changing our overall position. I think TIFs and other similar mechanisms of deferring revenue growth really serve to counter our policy objective. Uh I would be willing to think about are there certain requirements that we could defer until the commercial develops like portions of the road connections or things like that.

The county has recent more recently gone to like a 5-year CIP plan where they identify projects and they start funding them and committing to them. And so, you know, once you're on that list it's you start funding you probably have a realistic project within 5 years... but even if it were adopted say in 9 months it will probably take 5 years to actually start a construction project.

We're here to say that we we cannot bear the burden of a roundabout. It's easily $6 million. So, again, we had budgeted... we can't continue. There's no way for us to bear that burden with with the number of units that we have here or other participants immediately.

So, I mean, short short of funding from the city if they want development here or some participation, the there's no solution that we can offer on our own accord.

I feel like if we have something that is a plausible possibility of something that can come in to help with our tax base, we should definitely be looking at it versus making it more difficult.