The candidates were divided on whether Maple Grove should shift from its current at-large city council system—where all council members represent the entire city—to a ward or district system. Supporters of wards argued the growing, increasingly diverse city needs representatives focused on specific neighborhoods to better address local concerns. Opponents countered that at-large representation encourages council members to think about the whole community, though some indicated openness to exploring a hybrid model in the future.

Housing affordability emerged as another key battleground. Candidates discussed the need for a balanced mix of rental and single-family homes to serve residents at different life stages, from young renters to seniors. Some emphasized the importance of keeping single-family homes affordable so young families and long-term residents aren't priced out, citing high land costs and the city's comprehensive development plan as factors influencing current trends.

Candidates also sparred over data center development and water treatment investments. Those opposing data centers cited environmental concerns about heavy water and electricity usage straining city infrastructure, while supporters highlighted potential job creation and economic benefits. On water quality, some candidates backed a costly reverse osmosis system to address hardness and PFAS contamination, while others questioned the investment given that many residents already use home filtration systems.

Surveillance technology proved contentious. Candidates debated the use of license plate readers and cameras, with some citing crime reduction benefits and others expressing civil liberties concerns. The city clarified it uses the Axon system linked to body cameras rather than Flock cameras, suggesting greater data security.

Other priorities discussed included establishing a Human Rights Commission—supported by some as overdue for a diverse city but opposed by others who questioned whether it duplicated existing state resources—and improving city communication through social media, newsletters, and community events. Candidates also outlined first priorities if elected, including financial stewardship, public safety, infrastructure development like the Fish Lake Interchange, and workforce development.