I mean that road is the main entrance. It's our only exit and entrance off from 94. I mean, the vision of the city is that that's going to be the the main hub to come in and out of Dayton and for us to to relinquish the right to an intersection that I think would be inherently dangerous.

I can say with confidence that will be written in there that when the ownership of that road transfers the agreement will no longer exist.

The contingency for us is that it's going to go down Dave Parkway and go around the roundabout in 114th at that point. So, I think that alternative has has already been considered. As I said, the equipment leaves via that that routing today.

U you haven't built the building yet, but you're asking for a variance and and there there has to be some reason why other than we just want the space in my opinion for a city to grant a variance.

I think it is worth noting that from the existing property line there we're more than exceeding what would be needed for a variance... it's only needed because we're granting the rightway to build the new public street.

I'm just wondering what the threshold is um that staff is comfortable with as far as approving a site plan that still needs more than five or six revisions before it becomes to code. Right? I understand you're working with the applicant, but you're essentially asking the planning commission to look at an incomplete uh site plan.

The changes that were made from the pre previous iteration was the truck court proximity to the neighbors...By flipping the building and purchasing the northeast parcel, we are able to keep all those same features while also moving the truck court nearly 500 ft from the mobile park residence.

I'm maintaining that behind my home and it's not even my lot or my property...accountability on maintenance and and and caring for the property is going to be a major issue because it's not happening with uh, the logistics company right behind me because I'm cutting that grass.

I think having the fence on the on the property line, I think that kind of defeats that because you're just you're basically walling all those folks in at the end of their property and and now they're they look out and they're sit in their backyards and they see this, you know, this nice little woods back there and and that beautiful view out their backyard and probably the worst thing you could do is stick a fence right at the property line, right?

what you've done from when we looked at it the first time in listening to the residents and their concerns about the parking lot being next to the back of their property...I think you've done a really good job trying to address the concerns that the commission and the and that the citizens in the area have brought forth, and I commend you for that.