Dayton City Council — Transcript
Tuesday, July 28, 2026
Agenda Amendments and Removals
Metromobility Implementation
Flock Cameras and Government Transparency
Public Safety (Stop Signs)
Council Member Conduct on Social Media
Hazardous Buildings and Conditions
LC Stevens Park Phase 3 Design
Votes (4)
Dayton Parkway Neighborhood Utilities & Roadway Project Bid Award
Dissent: None
Moved by Council Member (Stephanie Henderson) [01:04:47] · Seconded by Council Member (Scott Salonic) [01:04:50]
The council considered awarding a bid for the Dayton Parkway neighborhood utilities and roadway project. The project aims to connect properties to a public roadway with sewer and water utilities. Twelve bids were received, with the lowest at $1.711 million, which was under the estimated project cost. The total project cost, including wetland mitigation credits, is expected to be about $300,000 under budget. Construction is slated for early September, with an interim completion by November 15th (utilities and one pavement layer) and final completion by Spring 2027 after a freeze-thaw cycle. The project is planned to be financed through tax abatement bonds, contingent on 150 units in development, and the bid contract includes an option to cancel without penalty.
Approval of Travel and Meal Food Policy
Dissent: None
Moved by Council Member (Stephanie Henderson) [01:07:34] · Seconded by Council Member (Scott Salonic) [01:07:37]
The council reviewed a proposed Travel and Meal Food Policy, developed by the City Administrator from various community policies. Council members noted the policy felt somewhat disjointed due to combining travel and in-city meal purchases, but acknowledged the difficulty in crafting a single, perfect policy. The consensus was to approve the policy as written, with an understanding that it might be revisited after a year of implementation to assess its practical effectiveness and address any administrative challenges.
Amending City Code Regarding Uses of Tables (Ordinance 2026-13)
Dissent: Council Member (Sarah Van Ness)
Moved by Council Member (David) [01:20:00] · Seconded by Council Member (Scott Salonic) [01:20:06]
The council addressed a long-standing typo in the zoning code concerning accessory buildings in the Public Recreational (PR) district, debating whether they should be a permitted or conditional use. The Planning Commission recommended Conditional Use Permits (CUPs). Staff recommended permitted use, or if CUP, an exception for structures under 1,000 square feet to avoid excessive administrative burden for small items like picnic shelters. Council decided to require CUPs for accessory buildings larger than 1,000 square feet in PR districts. Additionally, a clarification was made to the Village Mixed-Use (VM) district table of uses, changing both light and medium industrial uses to conditional uses, as the previous categorization was deemed illogical.
Approval of Claims Made
Dissent: None
Moved by Council Member (Stephanie Henderson) [00:55:43] · Seconded by Council Member (Scott Salonic) [00:55:45]
The council reviewed and approved the payment of claims. Discussions included a police department expenditure of $3,500 for a wellness room (offset by a $6,000 donation from West Metro Fire), the purchase of $7,800 dehumidifiers for the wellhead treatment plant to address tank sweating, and concrete testing costs for a road overlay project. A notable point of discussion was the in-house replacement of front brakes and rotors for the chief's vehicle by the assistant chief, leading to a query about coordinating such maintenance with the Public Works department for efficiency.
Notable Quotes (7)
Nothing has changed since that process. The numbers have changed now. Now we have solid numbers to go off of but nothing has changed in that aspect of things.
In the bid process through the contract we noted that we could cancel for any reason without any penalty.
I'm okay adopting it as is and like letting it ride for a year and seeing how it actually plays out in real life. Like how did this actually work?
I'm kind of leaning towards conditional use, particularly because the code does say as a conditional use. It's literally what the code says. Um, and so why is that a snag for you?
I do support the cup use. I'm a little skeptical or the change to the cup. I'm a little um I have some concerns about the 1,000 square ft um condition. I I believe that could be a condition that could be determined when it's going through the CUP process.
Um in the VM district on the table, industrial light is conditional use, but industrial medium is permitted. That doesn't make sense to me. ...They should either both be conditional or flip-flopped.
So on page 76, we um paid for front brakes and rotors for the chief's vehicle. Is that something we could be doing in house? ...just wondering if maybe that's something that we could coordinate with um Marty.
Ordinances & Resolutions (8)
Proposed moratorium or interim ordinance for site plan review
Legal framework for cities to address hazardous buildings and conditions
Meeting where Flock camera recommendations were made and questions raised
Document shared by the Elm Creek Watershed, being piloted by other cities
DNR grant program for Emerald Ash Borer impact mitigation
New policy to regulate city employee travel and meal expenses
Amending city code related to uses of tables, specifically for accessory buildings in the Public Recreational district and industrial uses in the Village Mixed-Use district
Development approval for Sundance Greens, discussed in relation to a maintenance building