Dayton City Council — Transcript
Tuesday, July 14, 2026
Consent Agenda Items
Open Forum - Anoka Alliance Permit and McNeel Park Water Tower
Staff and Council Updates
Community Survey Results Review
Votes (6)
Consent Agenda Approval
Dissent: None
Moved by Unknown [00:01:52] · Seconded by Council Member Scott [00:01:52]
Discussion included correcting a typo for 'Anoka Lions' to 'Anola Lions' in Item C, clarifying the status of McNeel Park and community center needs (sound system, heater) that were part of previous requests. A significant point of discussion was the policy for waiving fees for city events, with clarification that the city now tracks the dollar value of these waivers, a practice established during the 2025 budget discussions. Council Member David questioned the math on the 'LC canoe launch' pay app spreadsheet, which staff committed to reviewing. Clarifications were also provided on bank fees (insufficient funds, remote deposit, check imaging) and semi-annual bond payments to Ellers.
City Vehicle Use Policy (Item L)
Dissent: None, but significant debate led to a compromise.
Moved by Unknown [00:43:55] · Seconded by Unknown [00:44:00]
The proposed policy aimed to formalize city vehicle use guidelines, including take-home vehicles and GPS tracking. Council Member Henderson questioned the policy's potential for personal use and suggested adding language about mileage reimbursement for personal use, and also inquired about potential insurance discounts from tracking. A significant debate arose over the city administrator's authority to assign take-home vehicles, particularly for extended temporary periods, with council members expressing concern about lack of oversight and potential for temporary assignments to become de facto permanent benefits, weakening future contract negotiations. A compromise was reached to limit the city administrator's temporary assignment authority to seven days, with longer periods requiring council notification.
Resolution 292026 Amending Employee Recognition Program (Item M)
Dissent: None
Moved by Council Member Scott [00:54:19] · Seconded by Unknown [00:54:20]
The resolution aimed to formalize the employee recognition program, including an annual employee breakfast/lunch/outing, and establish a cap of $25 per employee for department camaraderie events. Discussion centered on the $25 cap, total budget ($8,000), and compliance with State Auditor's Office (OSA) guidelines, specifically regarding the exclusion of spouses/third-party contractors and alcohol from city-funded events. Council members emphasized the need for explicit language in the policy to reflect these OSA requirements and ensure transparency, despite some expressing that staff were generally aware of alcohol restrictions. The math of the budget allocation for various events and department-specific activities was also clarified.
Approve Purchase Agreement and Public Infrastructure Development Agreement (Item Q)
Dissent: None
Moved by Unknown [00:56:56] · Seconded by Council Member David [00:56:56]
No public discussion was recorded for this item.
Accept Resignation of Police Officer and Post for Police Officer and CSO Positions (Item R)
Dissent: None
Moved by Council Member Scott [00:57:43] · Seconded by Council Member Stephanie [00:57:43]
This item was amended to include both accepting the police officer's resignation and posting for both a police officer and CSO position.
Accept Resignation of Firefighter (Item S)
Dissent: None, but a strong dissenting statement was made prior to the vote.
Moved by Unknown [00:58:36] · Seconded by Unknown [00:58:37]
Prior to discussion, the City Administrator reminded the council that the unredacted version of the resignation, considered private data, should not be discussed. Council Member Henderson made a strong statement expressing disappointment and frustration with the process, alleging discrimination, and stating that the individual was not set up for success due to dropped balls and poor communication. She expressed hope that the city would learn from the experience.
Notable Quotes (11)
It's an NA, but it is a Noa and not the Dayton lions.
I think the there was a price in there of an estimate of what those services would cost to give you an idea of what you're waving.
And my understanding was in the past we didn't necessarily track the dollar value. It just and now the change is not that we're not approving it. The change is that we're actually tracking how much it's costing us.
If you're using a city vehicle, you got the other way. Yeah. Correct. Um and it is that's what I understand to be and it is there in the because there is something about that in the take-home one about mileage.
So we could say maybe there's an investigation going on and the investigators need to take a take-home vehicle home. So they need to be assigned a take-home vehicle during a process and that might be over a month.
I have an issue with the giving free power to say um that we're going to issue a take-home vehicle when we've been very specific about not having any more take-home vehicles than we absolutely have to have required by the union contract.
This limits city staff for how many dollars are available for this program. with all approval having to go through me for any of the use of the dollars and it defines more clearly when plaques will be provided for employees who retire from the city.
We cannot pay for spouses and we cannot buy alcohol. Um, and those are two things in here that in my mind I felt that maybe we needed to specify because those are not common knowledge things and I think that once you know something you know it and I don't know that everybody knows that.
Would it be fair to say that there is the all city recognition program, which is the outings, the lunch, the breakfast, the outings, but then individual departments. So, Marty's public works guys can have their thing. That's capped to $25 per person for that thing.
Um, if you have questions that are for the city attorney and or for me or whatnot, please reach out in whatever way we you want to or can. Um, but the city attorney did that's for what her note was is to say that the unreacted version that was sent to the council is private council and private data. Yeah. Protected by law. Correct.
Um, this entire process has been extremely disappointing and frustrating and I think it sets a precedent for moving forward and um, unfortunately I don't feel that we set this individual up for success. I think that's on our side and I cannot trying to be careful. Um, I just I'm sorry to him for the process, for the way it was handled, for the communication, for all the balls that were dropped, for what I feel is discrimination, and I wish him the best of luck somewhere else. Um, and I just hope we learned something from this entire thing, which um seems to not be our MO, but I'm really really hoping that we learned something.
Ordinances & Resolutions (13)
City Council meeting agenda, with an item S added.
LC canoe launch pay app details, with a math discrepancy.
Discussion item on resident opinions about city services, taxes, and amenities.
Upcoming plan for review by Planning Commission with a tight deadline.
Previous discussion related to city facilities.
Proposed policy for safe and effective use of city vehicles, including take-home provisions and tracking.
Amending the employee recognition program.
Program detailing employee appreciation events, budget, and guidelines.
Cited for closed session regarding real property purchase/sale.
Cited for closed session regarding allegations against an individual.
Agreement for real property PI 31-120-22-33-00009.
Agreement related to public infrastructure development.
Specific real property parcel ID.