Minnetonka Public Schools — Transcript
Thursday, April 23, 2026
Story
Minnetonka Schools explores fee increases, new endowment fund
Student School Board Advisory Program Evaluation
Middle School Program Update and Adjustments
Long-Term Facilities Maintenance 10-Year Plan Review
Endowment Fund Concept Discussion
Votes (5)
Review of Fees
Dissent: N/A
Moved by N/A · Seconded by N/A
Superintendent Law and Executive Director of Finance and Operations Paul Bourgeois presented proposed fee adjustments for the upcoming fiscal year. The changes aim to align fees with the cost of services and contribute to the district’s long-term financial stability. Proposed increases included $2 for the middle school Family Consumer Science fashion design class, a $7 increase in the participation fee for high school activities, a $30 across-the-board increase for co-curricular specific activity fees, an additional $50 for cheerleading uniforms, and a new $50 fee for Youth and Government. These adjustments are primarily driven by rising transportation costs, officials' pay, and general inflation (e.g., Tonka Dome fees). Board members inquired about fee waivers or scholarships to ensure continued student participation, and it was confirmed that Activities Director Schultz has the authority to waive fees. The district's fee structure remains competitive within the Lake Conference, even with the proposed increases.
Student Board Advisory Representative Presentation
Dissent: N/A
Moved by N/A · Seconded by N/A
Ana Samir, Ally Stockman, and Austin Harrison, the student board representatives, presented their year-one review of the pilot student school board advisory model. They shared positive experiences, emphasizing that the program provided a unique opportunity to be heard, gained them understanding of district decisions, and boosted their confidence in engaging with adults. Students also learned about complex topics and different board member perspectives. For next year, they proposed several improvements to gather broader student input, including anonymous student surveys, morning show updates to share meeting information, and open forums. They also suggested a balanced selection process for future representatives to ensure a mix of new and experienced voices. Board members commended the students for their contributions and welcomed their ideas for enhancing student engagement.
Middle School Program Update
Dissent: N/A
Moved by N/A · Seconded by N/A
Dr. Amy Leoo, Pete Dimit (Principal), and Principal Shermacher provided an update on the first year of the new middle school program, implemented in Fall 2025. Key priorities included a flexible block schedule to untether advisory, increased elective options (23 new electives, with Forensics and Financial Literacy being popular), and responsive academic/social-emotional support. They discussed the shift to foundational skills intervention, tier 2 SEAL intervention, and the 'Crew Academy' for proactive life skill development, including digital citizenship and preparing for AI. The mixed-grade advisory model aims to foster long-term relationships and belonging. Challenges included a significant shift for staff and adapting curriculum for middle schoolers' engagement. Adjustments planned for year two include tweaking the schedule for transitions, additional flex time options, refining Crew Academy content differentiation, and improving the complex scheduling process. Board members raised questions about science instruction minutes, the integration of advanced learning (HP) into Crew Academy, and student discretion during flex time. The presenters affirmed that essential science learnings are prioritized through curriculum modifications and block schedule efficiencies, and that the Hub software manages student flex time, allowing teachers to request students for support or offer enrichment activities.
Review of Long-Term Facilities Maintenance 10-Year Plan
Dissent: N/A
Moved by N/A · Seconded by N/A
Executive Director of Finance and Operations Paul Bourgeois presented the annual review of the district's Long-Term Facilities Maintenance (LTFM) 10-year plan, covering FY27 through FY36. The plan outlines approximately $66 million in projected maintenance needs, focusing on preserving existing infrastructure rather than new construction. The district manages 1.871 million square feet, with 58% of its buildings being 59 years or older. Historical strategies include bonding to spread costs, eliminating deferred maintenance, and maintaining a relatively flat tax levy. Past successes mentioned include 100% LED lighting by 2013 and district-wide HVAC climate control. For Summer 2027, $14.3 million in projects are planned, including elementary cabinet and hallway resurfacing, HVAC at Deephaven and Excelsior, MMW boiler room work, roofing, and paving. Future significant projects include multiple turf field replacements, stucco and tuck pointing, Minnetonka High School window replacements (some dating to 1952), and a $1.5 million replacement of the Pagel ice system, currently using an R22 refrigerant system acquired with a proactive stock of R22. The presentation emphasized coordinated efforts with building bond projects for cost efficiency and the long-term benefit of maintaining facilities for future generations.
Discussion on the Endowment Fund Concept
Dissent: N/A
Moved by N/A · Seconded by N/A
Superintendent Law and Paul Bourgeois presented the concept of a 'Pay It Forward Perpetual Endowment Trust Fund' to foster long-term financial sustainability for the district's unique educational programs. This initiative aims to leverage the community's strong pride and history of donations, moving beyond traditional funding models. The proposed trust fund would operate like a university endowment, with legacy gifts (e.g., from wills, entrepreneurs) forming a corpus that is never spent. Instead, only a percentage of the annual investment earnings would be withdrawn as dividends to support programs, allowing the principal to grow perpetually. Investment strategies would adhere to Minnesota statutes and district Policy 705. Proposed steps include developing an irrevocable trust document, board approval, establishing an advisory committee, and creating policies for fund growth and dividend withdrawals. The objective is to secure millions of dollars in annual earnings over several decades, ensuring the continued excellence and distinctiveness of Minnetonka Public Schools amidst potential state funding limitations and the need to preserve programs that make the district special.
Notable Quotes (27)
on an annual basis, our district runs an audit of all the different fees that we charge and aligns those fees to the cost of the services that they're connected with. And then as appropriate, they're adjusted to make sure that we're, you know, our board goal of long-term financial stability.
If these fee changes are actually approved, comparing ourselves to our, uh, Lake Conference, uh, co-chools or co-dists, uh, we currently have the lowest average fee structure in the conference. We would be the second lowest, about $5 above what Buffalo is at compared to the other schools in the conference.
if a student can't afford this, is there some some way that, you know, we want students to be able to participate? Are there scholarships or what would a family do if, you know, this becomes prohibitive in some activity or
activities? Director Schultz has the ability to uh look at situations in in wave fees.
actually activities director shows says that that uh had had produced some information for superintendent law and myself that these changes would allow them basically to keep operating on a break even level with all the costs that they have to run.
The board decided to pilot a new model for student school board representation. And that model was actually presented by students from our vantage program.
It was a unique and amazing opportunity to be heard. We got direct input into real district decisions and it was overall very positive and a great experience for everyone who was involved.
the core goal was to include authentic student voice. That was the number one priority for this and that's what we succeeded at.
One of them being the student survey. Um, we think this would be a way for students to feel more comfortable sharing their voices just because not everyone's comfortable going up to a representative or something.
I will tell you when I was a freshman or sophomore in high school, there is a 0% chance that you would have gotten me to come and speak to a room full of adults while being live streamed. So, I commend you for that.
Our last middle school program review was in 2006. A lot has changed. It's time for us to revisit this.
We structured this master schedule, we did it in a way that uh created continuity for math and language arts because um you know on a four period AB schedule, you know, one option is you could just have math be one period on A day and uh language arts be one period on B day. Um and we were really concerned about the the lack of continuity for that.
one of the biggest challenges in working with middle schoolers is um we know that they need support and seal and executive functioning, but uh very few middle schoolers believe that they need support and seal and executive functioning.
And you can see in seventh grade uh the forensics course new course has been overwhelmingly popular. uh the financial literacy which you know I would have we were always curious about whether you know mom and dad were going to win that one or if the kids were going to win that one. Um and as it turns out mom and dad won that one a lot and um and it's been very popular.
in this new model, we lost minutes in science instruction. And I understand that when we're doing a science lesson that we don't have the setup and the take, you know, I mean, that that can be beneficial, right? But I I would like to know like what is our plan to monitor our students and make sure that I mean that that's working the way we wanted it to because I I do believe we lost some significant chunk of time there.
And when you go to the block, you reduce the minutes you're losing in transition. Teachers also have done extensive work uh making some modifications within the curriculum in terms of how they're designing their lessons, their units. Um so that the essential learnings are all still being prioritized within their curriculum.
the tone around the change like the beginning of the year compared to the middle of the year compared to the end. It like there was a dramatic shift and hearing them talk about the way the classes were structured especially after that midyear PD day where they talked a lot about how to effectively use a block period. It seems like students felt that whe I mean they didn't articulate it in that way but there was less time being kind of not used efficiently or they weren't being asked to sit for a huge chunk of time alto together.
The language in statute for this is like for a like. Like, you don't use long-term facility maintenance to build a pool where there is no pool or to add to a building. But if you're replacing current with better because it of the need for maintenance, these funds can be used for that.
We're one of the first districts in the state to be 100% LED lighting. We went in big time on those and and uh, basically we were all LED by about 2013.
if you want to be a district of excellence, you have to exceed excellence in every every facet. Our uh cafeteria HV replace HVAC replacements at Dpave and Excelsure.
our 1,871,000 square feet would take about $479 per square foot at current construction costs. And it's about $900 million to rebuild our buildings.
we bought about $60,000 worth at that time of additional R22 which you while you still could buy it and we have it stored at our our mechanical uh shop that that's our contract mechanical repair people for the uh ice rink and uh there's enough there to replace four complete failures of the ice rink.
One of those things is this concept that Mr. as well. We'll share tonight that um in 2027 or 2028 won't generate millions of dollars, but um could be the start of something really incredible.
we talk about Minnitonka public schools in some respects in a manner that most of people talk about their college, you know, where they graduate from university, their college elma mater. So just a strong community pride and support and it's evidenced by support for various referendum.
So what this idea is is to do a trust but just kind of give it a little more oomph in terms of having specific documents and um uh and and and a little bit more structure around it that would give people the opportunity to do what I call legacy giving.
we make we make the promise in our in our trust documents that we will never touch that $5,000. We'll utilize the earnings on it. And, uh, so we'd then be able eventually over time, we'd be able to make annual dividend withdrawals from the investment earnings only.
I mean, you're talking about it's hundreds of millions of dollars and you're pulling millions of dollars out in earnings you know so this is a long-term play
Ordinances & Resolutions (6)
State legislative act influencing intervention focus in the middle school program.
Annual plan reviewed by the board and state for future facility maintenance needs.
Statutes governing allowable investment options for school districts, referenced in Policy 705.
District policy tying to state statutes regarding investment options for district funds.
Existing trust fund mentioned as a template for the proposed perpetual endowment fund.
An example of an existing trust fund for specific-purpose donations.