Edina Public Schools — Transcript
Monday, January 8, 2024
Story
Edina Schools faces $2 million budget deficit in 2025
Community Comment Period and Conduct Standards
Student Suspensions and Free Speech Debate
Legislative Action Committee Platform Approval
Social Studies Curriculum Guiding Change Document
International Travel Recommendations
Fiscal Year 2025 Cost Containment and Budget Deficit
Policy 406: Public and Private Personnel Data
Policy 506: Student Conduct and Discipline
Policy 514: Bullying Prohibition
Policy 526: Student Hazing Prohibition
Policy 665: Library Materials Selection and Reconsideration
Policy 715: Food and Nutrition Services Program
Policy 807: Closing of Facilities Due to Hazardous Weather or Emergency
Policy 810: Safety and Security of Students, Employees, Visitors, and Buildings
Policy 902: Use of School District Facilities and Equipment
Secondary Course Recommendations for 2024-2025
Votes (18)
Approval of Meeting Agenda
Dissent: None
Moved by Unknown [11:12] · Seconded by Unknown [11:17]
The board approved the agenda with removal of a presentation from Intermediate District 287 due to illness of the presenter (Marc D). The agenda was streamlined to focus on consent items, legislative action committee platform, curriculum discussions, fiscal planning, and policy reviews.
Recognition of Outgoing Board Members
Dissent: None
Moved by N/A - Recognition item · Seconded by N/A - Recognition item
The board formally recognized Julie Green (2012-2023), Regina Neville (2010-2017, 2022-2023), and Janie Shaw (2020-2023) for their service. Julie Green was commended for leadership of the Legislative Action Committee and advocacy for funding and policies; Regina Neville was recognized for 13 years of service and integration of equity work into district policies; Janie Shaw was praised for her role as Board Treasurer and Clerk and commitment to student excellence. Each received a plaque.
Community Comment Period
Dissent: Significant community division on student suspensions; no board vote or formal response during meeting
Moved by N/A - Public comment period · Seconded by N/A - Public comment period
The board heard extensive public comment on multiple topics, with particular focus on student suspensions related to the chant 'From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free.' Speakers presented sharply divided perspectives: some argued the chant is anti-Semitic and the suspensions were justified; others contended the chant represents a call for equal rights and that suspensions violate First Amendment protections. Additional speakers praised the board's work and urged respectful dialogue. The board chair repeatedly reminded speakers of the three-minute limit and audience conduct expectations.
Legislative Action Committee Platform Approval
Dissent: None
Moved by Unknown [1:17:07] · Seconded by Unknown [1:17:07]
Director Dan Arum presented the 2024 Legislative Action Committee platform, developed in collaboration with the Metropolitan Association of Metropolitan School Districts and Minnesota School Board Association. The platform includes six priorities: (1) increasing mental health support for staff and students, (2) strengthening and supporting special education programs, (3) stabilizing education funding (including discussion of local optional revenue), (4) ensuring safe and modern school facilities, (5) increasing and diversifying the workforce, and (6) prioritizing student-centered learning with enhanced local decision-making. Board members asked clarifying questions about local optional revenue ($724 per pupil unit, unchanged since inception, now worth ~$850 adjusted for inflation) and the decision to focus on federal rather than state special education funding. The board noted that special education funding improvements from the state (increasing cross-subsidy aid from 6.43% to 44%) still do not fully cover the district's cross-subsidy costs.
Social Studies Guiding Change Document Discussion
Dissent: None
Moved by N/A - Discussion item only · Seconded by N/A - Discussion item only
Director of Teaching and Learning Jody D. St. Hubert and Assistant Director Bethany van Ozel presented the Social Studies Guiding Change document, prepared in anticipation of new state social studies standards releasing in 2026-27. The document aligns with district values, mission, and vision. A board member asked whether the new ethnic studies statutory requirement would impact the work; the response was that ethnic studies will be integrated into social studies curriculum in alignment with the guiding change. The board praised the document's focus on literacy integration and informed consumer skills. The implementation timeline follows the state standards release, with full understanding of current resources and instruction to be completed by year-end, followed by curriculum changes for 2026-27 implementation.
International Travel Recommendations
Dissent: None
Moved by N/A - Discussion item only · Seconded by N/A - Discussion item only
Assistant Principal Carter presented international travel proposals for 2024-25, marking the first full year of international travel resumption post-COVID. Six proposals from Edina High School and one from Normandale Elementary were presented. Notable proposals included: (1) a rescheduled Portugal science experience for students previously affected by two cancellations, (2) two science experiences to address the Portugal cancellation, and (3) a Zimbabwe service-learning partnership with Rotary involving student observation of Rotary-funded projects. The board discussed equity, access, and the educational value of extended travel. The Rotary partnership was clarified: Rotary is not chaperoning or sponsoring; Edina staff will provide supervision while students participate in service-learning projects.
Fiscal Year 2025 Cost Containment Recommendation
Dissent: None during discussion; board member raised question about whether facility use fees should be reconsidered as part of BURG process
Moved by N/A - Discussion item; formal approval scheduled for February · Seconded by N/A - Discussion item; formal approval scheduled for February
Director of Finance Woodard presented a comprehensive fiscal analysis showing the district will end FY2024 with an unassigned fund balance of 5.7% (below the 6% board minimum policy) and face a $2 million deficit in FY2025. The administration recommended a $3.6 million cost containment target to bring the fund balance to 6.9% by end of FY2025. Alternative options considered were $2.56 million (bringing fund balance to exactly 6% but requiring significant cuts in FY2026) and $4.4 million (providing two years of stability at 7.45% fund balance). The board will formally approve the $3.6 million recommendation in February, with preliminary reduction items to follow and final approval in March. The district will conduct community engagement through virtual and in-person Budget Reduction (BURG) meetings starting January 25, with electronic surveys also available. Board members noted that despite state funding increases, the district still covers only 50% of special education costs and faces rising energy and salary expenses that outpace state funding.
Policy 406: Public and Private Personnel Data Discussion
Dissent: None
Moved by N/A - Discussion item only · Seconded by N/A - Discussion item only
Director of Human Resources Sonia Sa presented updates to Policy 406, which governs employee and applicant data privacy. The policy clarifies that only superintendent finalists become public (as the board is the only appointing authority for that position), and that employee salary, benefits, work experience, training, and education are public information. The policy was updated to reflect new statutory requirements regarding union notification of new hires within a specified timeframe. A board member raised concerns about the clarity of Section 4D regarding 'applicants for appointment to a public body,' noting that the term 'public body' is defined elsewhere in the policy but the reference is unclear. The board requested that the policy committee consider adding parenthetical clarification or improving the definition section to enhance readability.
Policy 506: Student Conduct and Discipline Discussion
Dissent: Board member requested clarification before approval
Moved by N/A - Discussion item only · Seconded by N/A - Discussion item only
Assistant Superintendent Randy Smle presented minor updates to Policy 506, including clarification that suspension does not apply to discipline lasting less than one day (per new statutory language) and updated language on carpool driving infractions. The updated carpool language applies infractions to the entire carpool permit rather than just the driver, based on administrator feedback that the previous language was not working effectively. Board members raised concerns about holding entire carpools accountable when not all members were present at the time of the infraction. The board requested that administration provide clarification on how the policy has been applied in practice and whether students not present in the vehicle should be penalized. The board also noted that the policy should be clearly communicated to students and families, as the change may surprise many people. The policy is reviewed annually.
Policy 514: Bullying Prohibition Discussion
Dissent: None
Moved by N/A - Discussion item only · Seconded by N/A - Discussion item only
Assistant Superintendent Randy Smle presented updates to Policy 514, which now includes clearer definitions of malicious and sadistic conduct, cyber-bullying, and building report-taker roles. The policy streamlines the purpose section and adds online reporting forms accessible to students, families, and staff. The policy emphasizes restorative practices to help students understand the impact of their actions and repair harm. A board member asked whether the district provides student education on bullying and appropriate behavior; the response was that such education occurs through advisory at the elementary level, homeroom at the middle level, and through incident-specific education when infractions occur. The policy will be updated to align the bullying and hazing reporting forms (Policy 526) for consistency.
Policy 526: Student Hazing Prohibition Discussion
Dissent: None
Moved by N/A - Discussion item only · Seconded by N/A - Discussion item only
Assistant Superintendent Randy Smle presented updates to Policy 526, which now includes language on restorative practices and aligns the hazing reporting form with the bullying reporting form (Policy 514) for consistency across the district. The policy defines hazing as acts creating substantial risk of harm for student organization initiation or school-related purposes. The electronic reporting form will mirror the paper form in the policy appendix.
Policy 665: Library Materials Selection and Reconsideration Discussion (New Policy)
Dissent: None
Moved by N/A - Discussion item only · Seconded by N/A - Discussion item only
Director of Media and Technology Monos Sty presented a new policy (665) establishing consistent procedures for library material selection and reconsideration across all district buildings. The policy was developed by media specialists in collaboration with the Minnesota Library Association, American Library Association, and neighboring districts. Currently, the district has no formal policy; objections are handled informally by media specialists and building principals. The new policy establishes a three-step process: (1) informal review with the media specialist, (2) formal committee review if needed, and (3) appeal to the superintendent and ultimately the board. The policy specifies selection criteria and the reconsideration process. A board member requested that the policy committee add clear language specifying how committee members will be selected to ensure transparency and avoid bias, particularly given the potentially contentious nature of material challenges. The board praised the comprehensive work on the policy.
Policy 715: Food and Nutrition Services Program Discussion
Dissent: None
Moved by N/A - Discussion item only · Seconded by N/A - Discussion item only
Director of Finance Woodard presented updates to Policy 715 to bring the district into compliance with state and federal law. The policy now defines procedures for deeming meal debts uncollectible and requires that all students qualifying for free or reduced meals receive at least one free breakfast and one free lunch per school day. The policy also prohibits forcible removal of meal trays once a student has placed a meal on their tray. The board noted that while all Minnesota students currently receive free breakfast and lunch, the policy memorializes the district's moral commitment to providing nutritious meals for all students, which may be important if the state program changes in the future.
Policy 807: Closing of Facilities Due to Hazardous Weather or Emergency Discussion
Dissent: None
Moved by N/A - Discussion item only · Seconded by N/A - Discussion item only
Superintendent Stanley presented minimal updates to Policy 807, primarily involving wording clarifications and updates to protocols. The policy appendix was updated to include Community Education programs and to reflect protocols developed over the past two years for facility closure decisions.
Policy 810: Safety and Security of Students, Employees, Visitors, and Buildings Discussion
Dissent: None
Moved by N/A - Discussion item only · Seconded by N/A - Discussion item only
Director of Media and Technology Monos Sty presented updates to Policy 810, primarily reflecting organizational changes (director oversight transferred from Buildings and Grounds to Media and Technology) and alignment with Policy 806 (Emergency Management). The policy now references Building Emergency Response Teams (BERT) and District Emergency Response Team (DIRT) instead of a separate Safety and Security Committee. A board member requested that acronyms be spelled out on first use in the policy and recommended adding this to the policy checklist to ensure consistency across all policies.
Policy 902: Use of School District Facilities and Equipment Discussion
Dissent: Board member raised question about reconsidering fees as part of BURG process
Moved by N/A - Discussion item only · Seconded by N/A - Discussion item only
Director of Community Education Dr. Anarie Leland presented updates to Policy 902, including minor changes to scheduling and cancellation language and a 3.5% overall fee increase (approved at the previous month's board meeting). The fee increase applies to facility rental rates effective July 1. A board member raised concerns about whether facility use fees should be reconsidered as part of the ongoing Budget Reduction (BURG) process, given the district's fiscal challenges. Administration indicated that the policy would move forward with current rates, but noted that if the BURG process recommends changes to fees, the policy could be updated accordingly without requiring a full re-approval. The board confirmed that the fee structure is part of Fund 1 (general fund) and that rates are competitive with contiguous districts.
Approval of Legislative Action Committee Platform
Dissent: None
Moved by Unknown [1:17:07] · Seconded by Unknown [1:17:07]
The board voted to approve the 2024 Legislative Action Committee platform, which includes six advocacy priorities developed in collaboration with the Metropolitan Association of Metropolitan School Districts and Minnesota School Board Association.
Approval of 2024-2025 Secondary Course Recommendations
Dissent: None
Moved by Unknown [1:17:46] · Seconded by Unknown [1:17:46]
The board approved new secondary course proposals organized into three categories: (1) general course changes (primarily at Edina High School, including Edina Virtual pathway courses), (2) English Language Arts curriculum redesign (Phase 1), and (3) Social Studies curriculum updates. The ELA redesign, led by teacher Tess Berman with support from Heidi Diner and Sarah Bridges, emphasizes equity, student choice, on-ramps, scaffolds, acceleration, enrichment, and college transcript options. The board praised the teachers' work and the intentionality of the curriculum design in supporting the district's strategic plan of ensuring each student sees themselves in the curriculum. The board had previously reviewed these proposals in a December work session.
Notable Quotes (37)
You came in in a really tough time just before the pandemic started and you have worked tirelessly for the community around advocacy for funding around advocacy around policies that better serve our district so we are just um very proud very sad to lose you but we're very proud of you.
Because of your leadership we have integrated um the work around equity into our policies at a level that has never been integrated before we are just grateful for all of your work on 287 to really recognize our students who are served in 287.
You too started at the onset of the pandemic and I just appreciate you truly striving for excellence for each and every student and pushing us to think differently really pushing us on strategy with academics to make sure that we are meeting the needs of all students.
I completely support free speech I think that everyone has a right to speak their mind um I know that there is a lot of passion in the room um and I know there was a lot of passion in the room there however things were out of hand um we were not able to continue the meeting you as board members weren't able to do the important work that you do the distraction and the chaos that ensued at this meeting hurts my children and it hurts all of our children.
As a Jewish woman and mother of two Jewish students in the school in Edina the schools um before October 7th occurred I mean more of my son who's the older one he anti-Semitism is the never ending it's never ending it's existed from time immemorial and um it's just part of the fabric of some people's lives.
I'm here to express mine and my fellow MPS students full and unwavering solidarity with the three Edina or four Edina students were recently suspended over the chant from The River To The Sea we also condemn in the strongest terms this act of outright censorship it is disturbing that this District chose to take punitive action against students who are protesting a genocide.
I was at the school board meeting um in December uh I was it was something I have never experienced before um the room here was taken over by Pro Palestine protesters um and for a while the meeting was at recess uh in which point I would say that the environment was both chaotic and frightening we had speakers uh slamming their hands on the table people were chanting um running up and down here.
You cannot suspend students because you think a chant means something without finding out what it really means from The River To The Sea Palestine will be free simply means that all people in that land that's Jews Christians Muslims deserve equal rights.
The conflation of anti-zionism and anti-Semitism is so dangerous this conflation is exactly what happened to the legacy of from The River To The Sea Palestine will be free the slogan has roots in a Palestinian call for a secular Democratic State a state in which Palestinians Jewish Israelis and all citizens would live in political equality.
I'm a former Civics and history teacher and I fully Embrace Free Speech everybody has the right to express their opinion uh we have the right to freedom of assembly but we do not have the right to threaten harass um and so I do support the school's decision to Suspend those students uh the the the phrase uh from The River To The Sea I view as very anti-semitic and a call for the uh annihilation of the Jewish people.
I'm going to say for the first time in my life I don't care and the the example I'm going to give is in 2016 during the rise of Donald Trump there was an empirical statistical rise and hate crimes against Muslims that were associated with his rhetoric with rhetoric like make America great again there were kids in school that were wearing Maga hats I felt extremely disgusted uncomfortable horrified by these slogans but what did I do I protested I spoke out I debated I put up signs but the one thing I did not do despite the fact that these slogans were directly and statistically related to incendiary and uh uh provocative actions being taken against my people what did I what did I not do I did not call for students to throw water bottles at kids wearing Maga hats.
You have a right to be here you have a right to gather you have a right to deliberate you have a right to decide in peace do not succumb to the mob's mentality from last month do not be intimidated by it make your decisions for or against them apart from Mob intimidation.
The children that have been here are from this families called us and told us they need help and there are students there are families that go here and they are the families that we put when we have school statements we build the DEI and all you know their first city on their pictures on the front pages of our schools system in our education system so I want to make sure if you go to any school uh page right now you have a Somali student you have a Muslim student.
The advocacy efforts and the goals are kind of consistent with the years past where we're talking about advocacy efforts related to the priorities um regarding the legislative session um building relationships with the legislative representation and then advocacy efforts of the student voice to be Amplified.
The local optional Revenue refers to the $724 per pupil unit that each Public School District in the state of Minnesota that has a tax base um has the board can approve that um without any voter approval that $724 has been fixed at 724 since Inception and like the basic education formula has lost ground to inflation in the ensuing years um were that to be adjusted to inflation it'd be upwards of $850 per per adjusted pupil unit.
As we look ahead to the steps that we want to take to get ready for the release of those standards in 2026 27 we are um starting the process with our guiding change so that we can move forward with our committee in a way that that supports our um values mission and vision and Edina.
I really appreciate the um addition and the real focus on the literacy making sure that we're dovetailing our literacy work with our social studies work and um that important aspect of of being an informed consumer of information because I think that's a really important um uh skill that our students need.
At the same time that we're having conversations just around purpose and equity and access we want to make sure that we keep the process going for our students to experience the current opportunities that are in place.
The school district believes that it will end fiscal year 2024 with an unassigned fund balance of about 5.7% or a decline of $789,000 um that is a deviation from the more than $5 million that we plan to add um in this fiscal year in fiscal year 25 we expect a further deficit spending in the unassigned portion of fund balance to the tune of 2 million and a further decline to the unassigned fund balance to 3.9%.
I would highly recommend looking in detail at the document M put together which does a great job of explaining um exceptionally grateful for the money that we did get from our state it still does not cover the cost of doing business um as it was alluded to earlier still covering only 50% of our special education costs um the document goes over the price of things like energy and salaries um none of these things are commiserate with the amount of money that we're getting from the state.
This policy informs employees and others of what type of information is public about them if they're hired as a Public Employee um and of course also what information could be public about them if they apply for employment um with a public entity as well.
I was confused about the verbiage used in section 4 d and it states data about applicants for appointment to a public body collected by the District as a results of the applicants application for appointment so who would be a person that gets appointed to a public body like who what individuals are we talking about that already applied for employment a school board a member I was wondering if that was the school board I was like are these people that apply to committees I mean kind of an interesting way that comes directly from statute of course but it's interesting way of saying they've applied to run for school board right.
The infraction applies to that particular permit which applies to the car pool um it's always difficult to know exactly who is driving in those situations we expect students to uh be responsible for the particular permit as a carpool group of students and so they have a responsibility to each other to be um to be responsible for that particular permit for that car.
I can understand it applying to individuals in in the car at the time but there's so many instances at the high school that the chances of the entire carpool being in the car every single time that car leaves um and I could see quite often students not even being in a car if something Reckless happens and just because they happen to be part of a carpool I would hate for students um to get punished um for not even if they weren't even in a car.
Our um High School administrators came came to us and and they did share that um often times there is push back most times it's really when kids are in the car all of the kids have been in the car so I appreciate Randy saying that excuse me that he is um going to seek out additional information and there is that sense of accountability that students have to have for one another um especially in the high school context.
The addition of language around restorative practices which typically unpack the incident try to help students understand the impact that was had so that that harm can be restored and relationships can be restored the harm can be address and relationships can be uh restored as a tool to resolve conflicts between individuals.
I was kind of interested in the training and education component which is in section s and this is more just a a general question not so much the train education of our team or personnel with the district but have we ever thought about or is it ever a practice to where we try to train and educate students on bullying and appropriateness and so on so forth.
Language was incorporated into the reporting section to reference the reporting form at the back of the policy in appendix and online cross references to policy 506 were updated a penex one was revised so that the re reporting form again in policies 514 526 are identical and consistent.
Last summer our media Specialists realized that we don't really have a policy around our media spaces and the materials that are in there be the electronic uh text or not textbooks regular books um magazines any sort of subscription that we have um and given the climate of the country over the past uh year or so um they took some time to develop a 66.5 which would speak to the language of um instruction or the materials in our library spaces.
I would like the policy committee But ultimately it would be Administration to consider putting in the appendic how the committee will be formed um because when you say how as opposed to who because you have who right um but I'm concerned that if something like this does happen and gets to the point that it does have to come to a committee it's obviously going to be a contentious issue and I would hate for at that point to not there're already have been in place very clear understanding of the process for example like how will members of the community be chosen for this committee.
At the end of the day everything rests with the Schoolboard so that is still the ultimate decision but there's a process that's put into place and so essentially what would happen is that a person that would like to object or um request reconsideration of Library materials would first speak with the media specialist who would then be able to talk through the selection criteria and how it was put into place and why.
State and federal law requires our school policy or procedure um should we choose to leave it at that level um to Define how we deem um bad meal debts uncollectible um what we would do once they are deemed uncollectible um we must have language in our policy ensuring that all students who qualify for free or reduced lunches receive at least one free breakfast and one free lunch per school day and we must also ensure that once a student student or participant in our school service um school lunch service program places a meal on their tray that that tray cannot be forcibly removed by a member of the school district.
I would recommend that we put spell it out because we don't necessarily know if someone's looking at in conjunction with policy 806 and I also wanted to recommend I do I don't know if this is actually part of our checklist for policies but that maybe we add to our checklist that to make sure that the first time any acronym is in a policy that we have spelled out what it is.
Some of the changes there were very few changes to this policy and um some of them were around the scheduling and cancellation um changes we updated some language uh per some direction from some policy committee members and then we also as um as approved by sorry I'm just a little tired approved by last month board meeting um there's a 3 and a half% overall fee increase.
I appreciate the rate increases I was wondering if since we're entering into our Berg process if there's any chance that these rates will be reconsidered again as part of the burd process now that we know the um amount that we are dealing with from a deficit perspective.
Tess Bman has been the content lead in this project and she's been working alongside Heidi dner and Sarah Bridges for the last three years I've been meeting with them regularly have they've been working through this process to really instill change in the ELA Department um we have always defined Excellence Ina and I want to say that their goals and their um commitment to opening doors for students students has been nothing short of astounding and they've worked tirelessly to create the plan that you guys have had a chance to review.
The board was really excited about the work that these the English language arts department had done um and the intentionality the choice um and really making sure that we're living out our strategic plan of each and every student seeing themsel in this plan.
Ordinances & Resolutions (15)
Community Comment Guidelines; establishes three-minute speaker limit, prohibits personal attacks and disruptions, and outlines expectations for public participation at board meetings.
Public and Private Personnel Data; governs employee and applicant data privacy, specifying what information is public (salary, benefits, work experience) and procedures for union notification.
Student Conduct and Discipline; establishes disciplinary procedures and infractions, including carpool driving violations; reviewed annually.
Bullying Prohibition; defines bullying, malicious and sadistic conduct, and cyber-bullying; establishes reporting procedures and restorative practices.
Student Hazing Prohibition; defines hazing and establishes reporting and response procedures aligned with Policy 514.
Library Materials Selection and Reconsideration; new policy establishing consistent procedures for material selection, informal review, formal committee review, and appeal to superintendent and board.
Food and Nutrition Services Program; updated to comply with state and federal law regarding meal debt and free meal eligibility; prohibits forcible removal of meal trays.
Emergency Management; referenced in Policy 810 updates; establishes Building Emergency Response Teams (BERT) and District Emergency Response Team (DIRT).
Closing of Facilities Due to Hazardous Weather or Emergency; updated to clarify protocols and include Community Education programs.
Safety and Security of Students, Employees, Visitors, and Buildings; updated to reflect organizational changes and align with Policy 806 regarding emergency response teams.
Use of School District Facilities and Equipment; establishes facility rental procedures and fee structure; updated with 3.5% fee increase effective July 1.
Six-point advocacy platform developed in collaboration with Metropolitan Association of Metropolitan School Districts and Minnesota School Board Association; priorities include mental health support, special education funding, education funding stabilization, facility safety, workforce diversity, and student-centered learning.
Curriculum framework prepared for new state social studies standards releasing in 2026-27; emphasizes literacy integration and informed consumer skills; implementation timeline extends through 2026-27.
Administration recommends $3.6 million in budget reductions to address $2 million deficit in FY2025 and maintain 6% minimum fund balance policy; formal approval scheduled for February with preliminary reduction items and final approval in March.
Three-phase ELA curriculum redesign led by teacher Tess Berman; Phase 1 courses approved for 2024-25; emphasizes equity, student choice, on-ramps, scaffolds, acceleration, enrichment, and college transcript options.