## Planning Commission Meeting Agenda August 12, 2026, 7:00 PM Edina City Hall, Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St. Participate in the meeting: Watch the meeting on cable TV or YouTube.com/EdinaTV. Provide feedback during Community Comment by calling 312-535-8110. Enter access code 2866 746 3092 . Password is 5454. Press *3 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A staff member will unmute you when it is your turn to speak. ## Accessibility Support: The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. 1. Call to Order ## 2. Roll Call ## 3. Approval of Meeting Agenda ## 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes 4.1. Minutes, July 15, 2026 ## 5. Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. ## 6. Public Hearing During "Public Hearings," the Commission chair will ask for public testimony after staff and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an efficient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Chair may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. Page 1 of 67 6.1. Variance request Cavalry Church 5300 France Ave. So. 6.2. Variance request 5620 Woodcrest Drive 7. Reports/Recommendations ## 8. Chair and Member Comments ## 9. Staff Comments 10. Adjournment Page 2 of 67 ## Draft Minutes☒ ## Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2026 Page 1 of 6 ## Minutes ## City Of Edina, Minnesota ## Planning Commission ## Edina City Hall Council Chambers July 15, 2026 ## I. Call To Order Chair Alkire called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ## II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Bennett, Brennan, Felt, Hahneman, Nelson, Smith, and Chair Alkire. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director; Kris Aaker, Assistant ## Planner; Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator; and Miriam Laredo-Fuentes, Administrative Support Specialist. Absent from the roll call: Commissioner Daye, Padilla, Ja, and Just. ## III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Nelson moved to approve the July 15, 2026, agenda. Commissioner Felt seconded the motion. A roll call vote was performed: ## Commissioner Bennett aye ## Commissioner Brennan aye ## Commissioner Felt aye ## Commissioner Hahneman aye ## Commissioner Nelson aye ## Commissioner Smith aye ## Chair Alkire aye Motion carried. ## IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes ## A. Minutes: Planning Commission, June 24, 2026 Commissioner Smith moved to approve the June 24, 2026, meeting minutes. Commissioner Hahneman seconded the motion. A roll call vote was performed: Page 3 of 67 ## Draft Minutes☒ ## Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2026 Page 2 of 6 ## Commissioner Bennett aye ## Commissioner Brennan aye ## Commissioner Felt aye ## Commissioner Hahneman aye ## Commissioner Nelson aye ## Commissioner Smith aye ## Chair Alkire aye Motion carried. ## V. Community Comment None. ## VI. Public Hearings ## A. Variance Request – 5401 Londonderry Road Director Lewis presented the request for a Variance at 5401 Londonderry Road. Staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested, subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Appearing for the Applicant The applicant was in the audience but did not come to the podium to address the Commission. Staff answered Commission questions. ## Public Hearing The property owner at 5405 Londonderry Road, expressed concerns about the visual impact of the remodel, removal of mature trees, and the appearance of a new window well near the shared property line. She requested additional landscaping to restore the natural buffer that previously existed between the two homes. The builder responded that an arborist and City Forester had reviewed the tree removals, that all permits had been obtained. That revised landscape plans, including additional shrubbery, had already been shared with the neighbors. Commissioner Bennett moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Brennan seconded the motion. A roll call vote was performed: ## Commissioner Bennett aye ## Commissioner Brennan aye ## Commissioner Felt aye ## Commissioner Hahneman aye ## Commissioner Nelson aye ## Commissioner Smith aye Page 4 of 67 ## Draft Minutes☒ ## Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2026 Page 3 of 6 ## Chair Alkire aye Motion carried. The Commission discussed the variance request, acknowledged the neighbor's concerns regarding landscaping, and encouraged both parties to continue working together to improve screening between the properties, even though the proposal complied with City requirements. Finding the request reasonable and consistent with previous approvals involving unique lot conditions, the Commission unanimously approved the variance. ## Motion Commissioner Nelson moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the variance request to the City Council, as outlined in the staff memo, subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Hahneman seconded the motion. A roll call vote was performed: ## Commissioner Bennett aye ## Commissioner Brennan aye ## Commissioner Felt aye ## Commissioner Hahneman aye ## Commissioner Nelson aye ## Commissioner Smith aye ## Chair Alkire aye Motion carried. ## B. Variance Request – 6520 Gleason Court Assistant City Planner Aaker presented the request of 6520 Gleason Court for a variance. Staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested, subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Tom Gardner, the homeowner. The project developer, Mr. Aaron Virtue of Fox Homes, and Mr. Nick Shuman, the coordinator at Fox Homes, were available for comment. Staff answered the Commissioners' questions. ## Public Hearing No one wished to address the Commission. Commissioner Felt moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Page 5 of 67 ## Draft Minutes☒ ## Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2026 Page 4 of 6 A roll call vote was performed: ## Commissioner Bennett aye ## Commissioner Brennan aye ## Commissioner Felt aye ## Commissioner Hahneman aye ## Commissioner Nelson aye ## Commissioner Smith aye ## Chair Alkire aye Motion carried. The Commission spent considerable time discussing the consistency with which residential variances should be evaluated. Several Commissioners reflected on previous applications that had been denied because homeowners had alternative design options. Others questioned whether this proposal represented a genuine hardship or simply a preference for a larger bedroom. Many Commissioners concluded the requested encroachment was modest and would have virtually no impact on neighboring properties. They noted the addition would remain behind the house, preserve the streetscape, and allow the homeowners to improve the livability of their existing home without requiring a larger reconstruction project. Several Commissioners emphasized that Edina should encourage residents to remain in their homes as their needs change, provided additions remain compatible with surrounding neighborhoods. Others stressed that each variance must still be evaluated individually because no two properties present identical circumstances. ## Motion Commissioner Bennett moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the variance request to the City Council, as outlined in the staff memo, subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Hahneman seconded the motion. A roll call vote was performed: ## Commissioner Bennett aye ## Commissioner Brennan aye ## Commissioner Felt aye ## Commissioner Hahneman aye ## Commissioner Nelson aye ## Commissioner Smith aye ## Chair Alkire aye Motion carried. C. Variance Request – Saint Stephen’s Church – 4439 West 50 th ## Street Assistant City Planner Aaker presented the request of Saint Stephen’s Church for a variance. Page 6 of 67 ## Draft Minutes☒ ## Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2026 Page 5 of 6 Appearing for the Applicant Ms. Mary Sue Vorbrick, Lay Leader for Saint Stephen’s Church, addressed the Commission. The applicant and staff answered the Commission’s questions. ## Public Hearing Name, Company, introduced himself and explained ?? Commissioner Hahneman moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Nelson seconded the motion. A roll call vote was performed: ## Commissioner Bennett aye ## Commissioner Brennan aye ## Commissioner Felt aye ## Commissioner Hahneman aye ## Commissioner Nelson aye ## Commissioner Smith aye ## Chair Alkire aye Motion carried. The Commission discussed the variance request and, finding that it satisfied the required variance findings, recommended approval. ## Motion Commissioner Hahneman moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the variance request to the City Council, as outlined in the staff memo, subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Nelson seconded the motion. A roll call vote was performed: ## Commissioner Bennett aye ## Commissioner Brennan aye ## Commissioner Felt aye ## Commissioner Hahneman aye ## Commissioner Nelson aye ## Commissioner Smith aye ## Chair Alkire aye Motion carried. ## VII. Reports/Recommendations ## A. Sketch Plan Review – 7600 France Avenue Page 7 of 67 ## Draft Minutes☒ ## Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2026 Page 6 of 6 Director Teague presented the request for a sketch plan review. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Michael Magulies, Project Manager at Newton Res LLC, addressed the Commission. The Commission asked questions of the applicant and staff. The Commission reviewed the sketch plan and offered comments, which can be viewed in the official meeting video. B. Sketch Plan Review – Macy’s Furniture Store Site, Northwest Lot (7235 France ## Avenue) Director Teague presented the request for a sketch plan review for Macy’s Furniture Store. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Evan Doran, CEO of Doran Group, addressed the Commission. The Commission asked the applicant and staff questions. The Commission reviewed the sketch plan and offered comments, which can be viewed in the official meeting video. ## VIII. Chair and Member Comments Received. ## IX. Staff Comments Received. ## X. Adjournment Chair Alkire adjourned the meeting at 10:05 p.m. Page 8 of 67 ## Item Report August 12, 2026 ## Planning Commission ## Item Number: 6.1 Department: Community Development ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner Item Title: Variance request Cavalry Church 5300 France Ave. So. ## Action Requested: Approve the variance as requested based on the findings and subject to the conditions as listed in the staff report. ## Information/Background: The representative for Cavalry Church, located at 5300 France Ave., is requesting a 38-foot north setback variance from the required 50-foot requirement per Section 36-438 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance to allow a 12-foot setback from the north lot line. The variance is to allow Calvary to build a storage building 12 feet from the north property line upon the removal of a much larger double dwelling unit on the property that has fallen into disrepair. The storage building will meet all other setback requirements and Edina codes. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## 1. Staff Report ## 2. Variance Memo - Engineering ## 3. Staff Presentation 4. Applicant narrative 5. Applicant submittal Page 9 of 67 ## Staff Report Date: 08/12/26 ## To: Planning Commission ## From: Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner ## Subject: Variance request Staff Recommendation: Motion to approve a 38-foot setback variance from a north lot line for a religious institution to build a storage building 12 feet from the north lot line at 5300 France Ave. subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. ## Information/Background: The subject property, 5300 France Ave., is approximately 5.48 acres and is located south of West 52 nd Street and west of France Ave., consisting of a church building, parking lot and a double dwelling unit. Cavalry Church is requesting a 38-foot north setback variance from the required 50-foot requirement per Section 36- 438 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance to allow a 12-foot setback from the north lot line. The variance is to allow Calvary to build an 864 sq ft storage building, 12 ft. from the north property line upon the removal of the much larger double dwelling unit, (4,044 sq ft), on the property north of the church that has fallen into disrepair. Removal of the dwelling and addition of the storage building will increase landscape area by 3,180 sq ft. The double dwelling unit was acquired by the church with the lot combined into the remainder of the church property through Hennepin County. There are no proposed exterior changes to the church building. The storage building will meet all other requirements of Edina codes. ## Surrounding Land Uses: Northerly: Single Unit residential home; zoned R-1 Single Dwelling Unit and guided low-density residential. Easterly: Residential homes; City of Minneapolis. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 Single Dwelling Unit and guided low-density residential. ## Existing Site Features: The subject property is a 5.48-acre lot; lot located on the west side of France Ave., very near the 50 th and France Commercial node. The property consists of an existing church building, a sizable parking lot, and a double dwelling unit residential building. Page 10 of 67 ## Staff Report ## Planning: ## Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential ## Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District ## Compliance Table: ## City Standard ## Proposed Accessory building less than 1,000 sq ft on a church property/north side setback 50 feet Existing building Nonconforming *4.5 feet **12 feet +7.5 feet Accessory building east front street setback 50 feet 98.07 feet Accessory building height 3 stories or 40 feet whichever is less One story 14 feet Hard surface area 50% Existing nonconforming *74% Proposed 72.6% -1.4% reduction * Existing nonconforming **Requires variance ## PIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMMENDATION ## Primary Issues Is the proposed variance justified? Yes, staff believe the requested variance is justified. Minnesota Statutes and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that a variance shall not be granted unless the following findings are made: 1. The variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. Staff believe the variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The purpose of setback requirement is to maintain a general consistency in setback on church proprties. The proposed storage building will increase setback by 7.5 feet from the 4.5 foot setback of the dwelling unit to provide a 12 foot setback from the north lot line. The storage building will more than doubleexisting setback, and will be 3,180 sq ft smaller than the current 4,044 sq ft double dwelling. The proposal moves the property towards a more conforming condition on the church property than currently exists on site. It should be noted that double dwelling unit properties allow detached accessory structures with minimum 3 ft side and rear yard Page 11 of 67 ## Staff Report setbacks. A much closer setback is permitted on a single and double dwelling unit lot for the same structure. The proposed building is a passive accessory storage building and will not be used for active church functions. 2. The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff believe the variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan guides the proprety for Low Density Residential use and use of the property and will remain a church. The variance would allow for a project that is a compatible use adjacent to the single dwelling unit to the north and with other homes near by. 3. There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: i. The propery owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. The property owner is proposing an accessory storage building on a property that previously functioned with two dwelling units. The applicant will increase setbacks to the north and east lot lines from the existing double dwelling unit setbacks. Staff believe the proposed use of the property is reasonable. The accessory structure is smaller, lower in height and farther from property lines than current conditions which will increase green space on the church property. ii. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The double dwelling unit presumably complied with the setback requirements at the time it was constructed, which allowed a much closer setback to the side for the double than proposed by the storage building. The same storge building would not require a variance for setback if the property had remained a separate R-2 lot. The required 50 ft setback renders that portion of the property mostly unbuildable without the benefit of a variance. iii. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Staff do not believe the variance will alter the essential character of the locality. The overall setbacks of the proposed structure improves upon existing setbacks and will result in less building and hard surface coverage on the property. Very little of the accessory structure will be visible from the street given higher grade elevations along France Ave, and a new solid wall fence and landscaping will be installed along the north lot line to buffer the adjacent residendence. Page 12 of 67 ## Staff Report ## Staff Recommendation Staff recommend approval of the requested variance. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The purpose of the setback requirement is to maintain general consistency in setback and provide an adequate distanceof buildings to property lines. 2. The variance allows for a much smaller storage building to replace a double dwelling unit and will improve upon the existing north and east setbacks and will increase spacing to the north. 3. The church proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. The church is proposing a replacement of the existing 2-unit home, with a passive storage building, with a much smaller footprint, lower ridge height and located farther from lot lines and the closest neighbor. The storage building will maintain the required setback from the East/France Ave. lot line. 4. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The same storge building would not require a variance for setback if the property had remained a separate R-2 lot. 5. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The overall setbacks of the proposed structure improves upon existing setbacks and will result in less building and hard surface coverage on the property. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Plans submitted at the time of building permit shall be consistent with the plans included in the August 12, 2026 Planning Commission packet. 2. Conformance with the tree ordinance at building permit. 3. Conformance with comments from Engineering at building permit. Page 13 of 67 ## DATE: 8/3/2026 ## TO: Cary Teague – Planning Director ## FROM: Andrew Reinisch – Engineering Technician RE: 5300 France Ave S – Calvary Church Garage The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, stormwater, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed are dated 07-01-2026. ## Summary of Work The applicant proposes to demolish an existing twin home located north of the church and construct a new structure to act as a detached garage. ## Easements No easements are recorded or relevant to the scope of this project. ## Grading and Drainage The grading and drainage pattern will remain consistent from existing to proposed. The overall impervious coverage will be reduced significantly and more greenspace will be provided. ## Stormwater Mitigation No stormwater mitigation is shown or required due to the reduction of impervious coverages from the existing condition. ## Floodplain Development There are no relevant local floodplain issues with the proposed scope of this project. No FEMA or local floodplain issues. ## Erosion and Sediment Control An erosion and sediment control plan was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-002. ## Street and Driveway Entrance No impacts to the street or driveway entrance apron are proposed. ## Public Utilities No proposed modifications to the existing utility services. ## Miscellaneous A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit will need to be obtained prior to city approval. Page 14 of 67 ## EdinaMN.gov Variance at 5300 France Ave. ## Cavalry Church August 12, 2026 Page 15 of 67 ## Project Location – Cavalry Church 5300 France Page 16 of 67 ## Existing Property Location Page 17 of 67 ## Front Street Photo of subject and Neighbor Page 18 of 67 ## Front Street View Page 19 of 67 ## Existing Site Page 20 of 67 ## Existing Site ## Features Page 21 of 67 ## Proposed Plans3 Page 22 of 67 ## Building Elevations Page 23 of 67 ## Building Elevation renderings Page 24 of 67 ## Site with Building Elevations Page 25 of 67 ## Variance Criteria 1.The variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. 2.The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3.There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: i.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. ii.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. iii.The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Page 26 of 67 ## Staff Recommendation Motion to approve the variance request based on the findings and subject to the conditions in the staff report. Deadline for a City decision: September 6, 2026 Page 27 of 67 Letter to Edina Planning Commission - Providing Additional Information re. Calvary's Request for a Variance from the 50 ft. setback. Calvary Christian Reformed Church (Calvary), located at 5300 France Avenue South in Edina, MN, wishes to remove the Duplex located on our property (formerly 5236 & 5238 France Ave), regrade and landscape that area, providing 3180 sq. ft. of additional green space, and build a modest storage building on the lot. The storage building we wish to build will be further from our neighbor's property line than the current Duplex is. However, we need to request a variance from the 50 ft. setback for the proposed location of the new storage building. Locating the storage building anywhere else on Calvary's property, and meeting the 50 ft. set back requirement, would place the storage building somewhere near the middle of our parking lot which would be much more visible and unappealing to all our neighbors (see the red outline on the sketch on the last page of this application). The storage building location proposed on the attached drawings is the most discreet location, will be shielded by trees, bushes, a fence, and a hill to the east. It is the best location to meld into the neighborhood. It requires Edina's approval for a 12 ft. setback variance from our north property line, rather than a 50 ft. setback. It meets all other Edina setback and code requirements. The renderings on the next page and on L1 of the drawing set, show what the storage building and landscaping will look like from France Ave. and from our neighbor's house to the north. Calvary is convinced the Duplex must be removed and that removing it will benefit the neighborhood and will increase our green space by 3180 sq. ft. Calvary wishes to turn the east side of the lot (France Ave side) into green space which will benefit our neighbors to the east and north and anyone driving along France Ave. Calvary currently uses the Duplex for storage of our lawn equipment, snow blowers, and other outdoor maintenance equipment. Calvary has investigated updating the Duplex and renting it at below market value to people in need of housing. Contractors have informed us that is not practical. The Duplex has many issues, does not meet current codes in many areas, and would be unreasonably expensive to rehabilitate. Calvary has concluded we must remove the Duplex for the benefit of all. When we remove the Duplex, we also need to build a modest, )11, architecturally pleasing, storage building near the west side of the lot. We need to retain outdoor storage areas for lawn mowers, snow blowers, and other outdoor equipment. ## 'I_ 0 7 2026 ## The Proposed Variance will: Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and is the use reasonable. Yes. Locating the storage building anywhere else on our property that complies with the 50 ft. setback requirement would place the storage building somewhere near the middle of our parking lot which would be much less appealing to our neighbors and to Calvary. The proposed location is more discreet than any other potential location on our property. The hill to the east blocks the view of the storage building from France Ave. and a fence, trees, and bushes will soften the view of the building from the north. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. Yes. Our property is unique in that the contour of our property in the area where we are proposing locating the storage building provides a natural berm or hill to the east, almost completely blocking the view of the storage building from France Ave. and our neighbors to the east. Locating the storage building anywhere else on our property would be much more visible to our neighbors and be much more difficult to screen will berms, trees, bushes, and fences. 6 Page 28 of 67 rE. ## NEM STORAV - ftADNG ## CH ## i232 FR•UiCE A Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. Yes. The requested variance allows Calvary to remove an outdated and degraded duplex that we currently use for storage, turn much of that area into green space with trees and bushes, increase our permeable soil area by 3180 sq. ft., and build a modest storage building that is almost invisible to France Ave. traffic and is surrounded by trees, bushes, and a fence. Not alter the essential Character of the neighborhood. Yes. Approving the variance will not alter the essential Character of the neighborhood and in fact will improve the neighborhood with additional green space, trees, bushes and an additional 3180 sq. ft. of permeable soil. ## VIEW LOOKING WEST FROM FRANCE AVENUE ## AEW ## STCRACC ## Sul6 W, ## VIEW LOOKING SOUTH FROM 5232 FRANCE AVENUE ;1• 1 y ## JUL 0 7 2026 7 Page 29 of 67 Without a variance on the 50 ft. setback requirement, Calvary would be required to locate the Storage Building somewhere inside the area indicated by the red outline in the adjacent sketch. As stated earlier in this ## Variance Application, Calvary believes locating the Storage Building anywhere within the indicated red borders would be unpleasing to our neighbors and many areas within the red boundaries would block off our parking lot. ## JUL 0 7 2026 8 Page 30 of 67 ## I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ## OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY ## DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY ## LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE ## LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ## PRINTED NAME: NAME: MICHAEL GERBER ## DATE: 09-25-2025 LICENSE R: 56653 ## THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS ## THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS ## WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ## ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS ## PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ## DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF ## THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ## ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED ## STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO ## LEGAL PROSECUTION. ## COPYRIGHT @ 2025 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING ## DRAWN BY: NPK ## CHECKED BY: AUG ## PROJECT NO.: 14025002 ## DESCRIPTION ## ADDRESS UPDATE ## COVER SHEET ## NO. 07/01/2026 ## DATE ## CITY OF EDINA ## JUL 0 7 2026 ## 5236 FRANCE AVE S. ## EDINA, MN, 55410 - ## SHERBURNE SLATER \ 14025 002- ## CALVAR ## Y ## CHURCH ## GARA ## GK ## IVRA ## CAD \ 1 4025002- ## C- ## DETAILS. ## CALVARY CHURCH GARAGE ## INDEX OF SHEETS: ## C001 ## COVER SHEET ## C101 ## EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS ## C102 ## REMOVALS PLAN ## C201 ## SITE PLAN ## 001 GRADING PLAN ## C401 ## EROSION CONTROL PLAN ## C501 ## CIVIL DETAILS ## C502 ## CIVIL DETAILS ## GENERAL NOTES: 1. ## TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, INCLUDING PROPERTY LINES, LEGAL DESCRIPTION, EXISTING UTILITIES, ## TOPOGRAPHY WITH SPOT ELEVATIONS AND PHYSICAL FEATURES WAS PROVIDED BY: ## DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING ## 120 17TH AVENUE WEST ## ALEXANDRIA, MN 56308 2. ## CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ## ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT ## PROJECT CONTACTS ## CIVIL ENGINEER ## LAND SURVEYOR ## DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING AND ## DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING & LAND ## LAND SURVEYING ## SURVEYING ## JEREMY E. ANDERSON ## JON SCHUETTE ## 120 17TH AVENUE WEST ## 120 17TH AVENUE W ## ALEXANDRIA, MN 56308 ## ALEXANDRIA,MN, 56308 ## TEL:320-460-7104 ## TEL:320-460-7110 ## EMAIL:jea@dte-ls.com ## EMAIL:jds@dte-ls.com ## NORTH ## DESIGN 4-TREE engineering -I land surveying ## Corporate Office: ## 120 17th Ave W Alexandria, MN 56308 ## 88B-216-1916 ## DRAWING NO. ## C001 Page 31 of 67 ## MAIM 4 141,0144 84 871'/L,Ft12,2 2242 ## RIM B96 OS ## INV MANS 494 511' ## SUM:NM BB 7 ## RIM 89621 =19f67-1 ## SUMP BM) ## X87 ## BT 71- ## CO • / ## INV N ## 4L. ## INV S 82030 ## I ## RIM OBI 92 ## INV CRACKED LID ## UNABLE 'CORER ## !INN /120 15 — ## A ## P ••••••.1 519 892 42 ## INV 412141.0 LID ## UNABLE TO MEN ## BENCHMARK ## - TOP NUT Or ## 4 HYDRANT ## ELM/ 8943 42 / / / 80 i / / / / / / / / / / —h.-4.. / ## T ,, , ),c , , ## SCRIBED .X.114 LIGHT PC. / ## I I / n"'") i / i / _ „ , _ , / , 4,11 4 1 11 it al) ,,/ // , ## HIL M ---/- 11, 1•••• /353 / / / 0 1 , 0 5 # 9? 'g' ,r, go' ' ‘ 73 2 * -1934. I/ I/ 1/ LI il 1 /I I I/ 1 / I i 7' ...x.... _ SYS-..... "s. -88 ## s,1TY OF EDIN .i ## JUL 07 2026 ## PARCEL CURVE DATA ## CURVE NO. ARC LENGTH ## RADIUS DELTA CH. BEARING I CH. LENGTH, Cl 2E45 38.42 03912E361 579145'57E 25.93 r / 09- / / / / / //7 e,9"C / / / / 8 /1/1 1 ,a/ / / 42291' ## I ## I / / ( ## THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS ## THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS ## WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ## ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS ## PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ## DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF ## THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ## ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED ## STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO ## LEGAL PROSECUTION. ## COPYRIGHT (D 2025 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING ## DRAWN BY: NPK ## CHECKED BY: PUG ## PROJECT NO.: 14025002 ## DATE DESCRIPTION ## NO. ## 07/01/2026 ADDRESS UPDATE ## I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ## OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY ## DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IAM A DULY ## LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE ## LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ## A laritm/ „._ ## PRINTED NAME: MICHAEL J. GERBER ## DATE: 09-25-2025 LICENSE S: 56653 ## DESIGN‘TREE engineering + land surveying ## Corporate Office: ## 12017th Ave W Alexandria. MN 56308 888-216-1916 ## EXISTING ## CONDITIONS ## DRAWING NO. 0101 ## NOTES: 1. ## EXISTING CONDITIONS & TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: ## DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING ## 120 17TH AVENUE W ## ALEXANDRIA, MN 56308 2. ## CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND ## REMOVAL LIMITS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. ## 3. THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ## HEREIN ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM ## AVAILABLE SURVEYS AND/ OR RECORDS. THE CONTRACTOR IS ## RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING LOCATION AND ELEVATION TO ## ENSURE THAT ANY EXISTING UTILITIES (SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN) ARE ## NOT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ## 4. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL DAMAGE PREVENTION SYSTEM FOR BURIED ## UTILITIES. 1-800-252-1166. CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE A PRIVATE ## UTILITY LOCATOR TO ASSIST WITH PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATES. ## LEGEND 0 ## Oo ## HYDRANT ## SANITARY MANHOLE ## GATE VALVE ## POWER POLE ## LIGHT POLE ## CATCH BASIN ## SIGN ## DECIDUOUS TREE ## CONIFEROUS TREE ## C) SHRUB ## (8) PEDESTAL ## < GUY WIRE ea BOLLARD ## Ln ## POWER BOX ## O ELECTRIC METER ## O ## MONITORING WELL g, ## SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT ## o WOOD FENCE ## O ## CHAINLINK FENCE ## WIRE FENCE ## STORM SEWER LINE ## SANITARY SEWER LINE ## WATERMAIN - ## OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ## UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE ## UNDERGROUND FIBER ## B. ## UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ## UNDERGROUND GAS LINE ## CONCRETE PAVEMENT ## BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ## AGGREGATE SURFACING ## LANDSCAPING "'"""• ## BUILDING 0' 50 100' Page 32 of 67 ## I ## I ## I ## -I ## I ## I i b. 0 4 4 *4, b. 4 0 . 0 . 4 .. . } 4 4 n b 4 ## P . "... ..., . ## FRANCE AVENUE -__ - ,.... - - - - - - - ## /!L .° a 0 4 ## NOTES: engineering + land surveying ## Corporate Office: 120 17th Ave w Alexandria, MN 56309 888-216-1916 ## I / i 1 / ## I / / ## I / ## I ## I // ## I ## I / / / ## I / ## I ## I / ## I / ## I / ## I ## I 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 ## I ## I 1 ## I ## I ## * I ## I ## I 1 ## I I \ ## I ## I , k. ## I 1 3r. \ \ \ / \ \ / c / / / ## I 1 ## I ## I ## I \ * 1 \ \\ c / ## DESIGNeTREE 1. ## EXISTING CONDITIONS & TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: ## DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING ## 120 17TH AVENUE W ## ALEXANDRIA, MN 56308 2. ## CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND ## REMOVAL LIMITS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. ## 3. SAWCUT CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK, OR REMOVE AT NEAREST ## EXPANSION JOINTS. ## 4. SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH AT ALL TIE-IN LOCATIONS. ## 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL ## MEASURES REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SITE STABILITY PRIOR TO ## EXECUTING ANY SITE REMOVALS. ## 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH ## UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING ## UTILITIES AFFECTED BY SITE DEVELOPMENT. ALL PERMITS, ## APPLICATIONS, AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ## CONTRACTOR. ## 7. ALL EXCESS OR WASTE MATERIAL GENERATED AS PART OF ## CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF ## IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. ## 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES ## DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO ## AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ## 9. THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ## HEREIN ARE APPROXIMATE. 111EY HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM ## AVAILABLE SURVEYS AND/ OR RECORDS. THE CONTRACTOR IS ## RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING LOCATION AND ELEVATION TO ## ENSURE THAT ANY EXISTING UTILTRES (SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN) ARE ## NOT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10. ## GOPHER STATE ONE CALL DAMAGE PREVENTION SYSTEM FOR BURIED ## UTILITIES. ## 1-800-252-1166. CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE A PRIVATE ## UTILITY LOCATOR TO ASSIST WITH PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATES. ## REMOVALS LEGEND ## I \ \ \ \ /.... \ / / / 0 / ## I \ \ \ \ \ / z / ## I \ \ \ \ 1 / 4.' / \ \ \ \ / 0 / /- e/. / ## I \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ / ## I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ## OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY ## DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY ## LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE ## LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. /140/Witfrriff / / \ ....- \ \ r -- / \ \ / ....- \- \ / / / ## I ## + -I- / ( \ + + / + + + +\ + \ ## I + + + + \ + + / / / - -- -- \ ' -- -' \ \ ## I - --=. + + + ., + \ + + + , .. + + \ + + -.4 + + + / ## I \ \ e, + + /+ + + + + i + + + + + + + 1+ + + + + c + + + +, + + + + i _ \ ## I a 2 <, 4 '- \ \ \ ## I ## PRINTED NAME: MICHAEL J. GERBER ## DATE: 09-25-2025 ## LICENSE ## A: 56653 '+ + + + + i f + + + + ## + I + + + + el + + + + ## + + + IF + + + + + a ' o / / ''----77 ' `-‘. a ## CALVARY CHURCH ## GARAGE "--k.• /N, ("i— 6C / \/ 0 ‘) 4 ## <ZI K r 9 ..., ## ,A ## ,Z---- -- ----- ## 5300 FRANCE AVE ## EDINA, MN 55410 ## + + + + 1 + + + + I+ . ## . A / ## + + + + +I + + + + + ## + + + + + + + + -I- - // , ,L. 1 -s-_. _, -- ## I 1 ## I 1 + + + 1-1 + + + i + + + + + if + + 4 to + + + + + + 1, + + + . + ? + + + + +if + + + + + + + + + + + + 1-1- + / A a a 4 ## A . . a a . a ## EXISTING BUILDING / / // 1- + + \ ## + + + + + 1+ + + +I + ## I . / // 1- ' ,sI- \ ## I 1 + + + + +1 + + + + + + ## + + + + I + + + + + + + +, + + + + -1- ____ ..... t/ + + 1 ## I \ + +`+ + + 4- + ' + °+ a a , 0 4 4 ## I * ++++\+++'"+, ## I + + \+ a __4,-_____ — ---.. -- \ + // 1 / el a + \+ + + \i- + + + + \ + -, \ , ## = RETAINING WALL REMOVAL 1 / 0 d 4144 ## I a ? i' a LI .. / ., 7 ## 4'S N ,i2;;) ,?i , %, ## = BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVAL ( q 0 ## O ## PROPERTY LINE 4 / / ## I v I . 0 1 _. 0 4.,„ 44.444.4..y, . et...m.. 4.4...m...t44._44. 40,0,4.4•440,4,4.40,+irt4...A....t...t.t...v.....m.....fae..m_ gamtim . CONCRETE REMOVAL ## I •• i 0 *41.40740 + + + +, +V El tgetlegt+Zi e .4.V.. 7/.4117,44 Or wo ## „.,, \ „ \ , \ A . , . ## REMOVAL ITEM ## X ## =REMOVAL ITEM ## KEY NOTES: 1 c '4:e, +1 4 ;4'.? + 0 ,....-1,58. + 4-43r 4r-v/ -4r7,re- ## "FA 1 1 t..6 / r ## Migtfe.Ki. AlitAte ..ieteASAt -,‘*$ + + + ## At' • • e_ii:,•',$)4 - - -7 - -- - 1 '64' ( 0 ' • _ . , / 7 - 41 Ilr• drW/Vr 4VvIrl 04/.4' , _ ..... + \ + + + + ## + -I , .* ## F +- -, - , -, - 9m _45, 0140, #, r- \\ \ 0;• \ i'04I4ITil• \ arw/vaWavIvIv , ## Fit , 41:1`;', 44044.-44# . . . \ \ ## I 0 ## I ## I 1 • • . *404./irt. 14;;4 :V div 4.4... 4*, :,,' 4.",+#44 4ctleistee+4.44 d•-,,,Aipi ## 1,40 I ## I 0'40 04•• 4 1 4.4.# 4,4 4*/ 4.# ## I , i•I 44 ## K* ,, 04 ## AI+ ## No + 4- 1 -,- \ \ \ ## I ## I ## I 0 ## SAWCUT EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ## 0 REMOVE DUSTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ## 0 REMOVE STUMP 0 ## REMOVE FENCE 0 ## REMOVE EXISTING STAIRS ## 0 REMOVE EXISTING RETAINING WALL ## 0 REMOVE EXISTING BUIWING 0 ## SAWCUT EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT ## 0 REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT ## 0 REMOVE SHRUB ## OVERHEAD ELECTRIC REMOVAL (COORIDNATE W/ELECTRICAL COMPANY) e ## REMOVE EXISTING BLACK LOCUST TREE \ (.• 411.1) 10. 20 , .1 0.4e ..°46 4.4 7-44 , re. ## EXISTING BUILDING 6, ---------- \ • 41 • _ 6 a 4 - - , a __, / / / / tx, re4.,, ## Pr ## VA r4 11 + 0 7 ## I c ## I 1 ## THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS ## THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS ## WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ## ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS ## PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ## DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## REPRODUCTION OF ## THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ## ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED ## STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO ## LEGAL PROSECUTION. ## COPYRIGHT @ 2025 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING ## I / ## I ## I 04 / 1: / 1 0.0 j1 + / \ ## I \ \ l; ## I ## ULCH \ I a 4 // i ## P / \ / \ 1,i; 7 \ 44 * ,.4b A&A. -JA4o 0444•0.4' # :*, ' 4*# e• • ## AC. • ,,A \ \ \ — \ \ \ a \ / - \ l, $.1 2,t,-,.. ../..a...k ient . • • ia ## A•4 Wiare,t 44$0t: ## I + + — — —• -1', ## I__ . ,,, ,b *e.A..4A • \ a ..g (/ __ _._ ___....-__ _ ,k ## N - - "" - -0 ## I "61 -.— ## A.Ati.,...,Atl ## IL,' - -*....,,- --- .1,''-- ' 0,41 • ## -L.. ± ) / 890-- ## ,II, ## III • . + + • 40,1'.1 _ 0 + + + + + 7 ## I a ,, f- -1.- . / . + + .1.1.41 / + w + . 7 ## I ## V ## ,- -.I- • + + a ° I a t..5' ..,---a ^3 • ## DRAWN BY: NPK ## I 7 1 ## I ' - fi _ ...- --892 - ,..„ --80- 1- 4 ## \ P ----- ## CHECKED BY: MJG / a / / // / //- / / or -a // ## PROJECT NO.: 14025002 f-,ITY OF JUL 0"i ## EXISTING BUILDING ## EXISTING BUTDING / / / / ## ED1NP 2026 , it ## Iit ## I 41 ## I c, + ## I ', \ \ . . . . \ ## N01. ## OD6A/TE 18/2026 ## DESCRIPTION ## TREE T REVISION 2 07/01/2026 ## ADDRESS UPDATE ## REMOVALS PLAN ## 1-\NN'13, ## I / ## AN1 r ## I+ ## 1I+ 1 c,; o0 ## + IJ rr- t ## /4:1I+ tE \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ ## C \ / ## I ## I ## I ## I 1 ## I ## I ## II - il // / / // / ## DRAWING NO ## C201 1--1 Page 33 of 67 ## SITE PLAN ## NOTES: 1. ## ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO ROW LINE, CENTERLINE OF FENCE, ## EDGE OF PAVEMENT, OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING, UNLESS ## OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ## CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS PRIOR ## TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. ## ALL CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR. 4. ## ALL INTERIOR PARKING STALL STRIPING SHALL BE 4" AND YELLOW IN ## COLOR. ## 5. ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL STRIPING, ACCESS AISLE, SYMBOL, AND ## SIGNAGE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL AUTHORITY ## REQUIREMENTS. ## 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES ## DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO ## AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ## 7. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ## RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. ## 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE ## PLAN FOR ANY WORK PERFORMED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. ## 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN ## FOR ANY WORK PERFORMED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. ## 10. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL DAMAGE PREVENTION SYSTEM FOR BURIED ## UTILITIES. 1-800-252-1166. CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE A PRIVATE ## UTILITY LOCATOR TO ASSIST WITH PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATES. ## SITE LEGEND ## CONCRETE PAVEMENT ## RETAINING WALL ## • PROPOSED BUILDING ## —1:1— PROPOSED WOOD FENCE ## PROPERTY INFORMATION ## TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 5.48 AC ## DISTURBED AREA 0.17 AC ## EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 4.052 AC ## PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.979 AC 44) 50' 100' ## I I ## U ## 50' BUILD 711 ## ING S ## Li LI ## ETBACK ## I — ## Ill 1 ## L.._.._.._.._.._... _ . _ . _ _ _ ## VIMICIC-4,V4 1111111 ## IMI ## I ## 50' BUILDING SETBACK ## _J ## PROPERTY LINE ## PROPOSED ## BUILDING ## FFE: 885.25 98.0758171 ## 50' BUILDITIG ## SETBACK ## PARCEL CURVE DATA ## CURVE NO. ARC LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CH. BEARING I CH. LENGTH, ## Cl 26.45 30.42 039'2036" ## 579.4952E , 25 93 j . ## CITY OF EDINk ## JUL 0 7 2026 ## PLANNING L ## I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ## OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY ## DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY ## LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE ## LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ## PRINTED NAME: MICHAEL 3. GERBER ## DATE: 09-25-2025 ## LICENSE A: 56653 ## DESIGN‘TREE engineering + land surveying ## Corporate Office: ## 12017th Ave W Alexandria, MN 56308 888-216-1916 ## THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS ## THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS ## WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ## ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS ## PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ## DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF ## THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ## ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED ## STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO ## LEGAL PROSECUTION. ## COPYRIGHT 0 2025 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING ## DRAWN BY: NPK ## CHECKED BY: MIG ## PROJECT NO.: 14025002 ## NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 07/01/2026 ## ADDRESS UPDATE ## DRAWING NO. ## C301 Page 34 of 67 i ## I ## I ## I ) ## I ## II ## I ## I 1 ## I o 4 2 1 ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I / ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I / i i ## I 1 lail ## D ## Z ## LLI > < ## LLI u ## Z ## U- / , / / / / / / / / / / 1 / / 1 1 / / 1 \ \ \ \ \\ 1 \ ## I 1 ## I ## \ NOTES: ## DESIGN*TREE engineering + land surveying ## Corporate Office: ## 120 170: Ave W Alexandria, MN 56308 888-216-1916 1 ## I ## I 1 / ## I / / , / ## I ## I / , / ## I ## I / ## I / / ## I ## I / ## I / ## I ## I / ## I / ## I ## I ## I 1 ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I 1 ## I I _x,-- ' ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I 1 ## I \ 1 ## I 1 \ * \ \ \ 1 / \ 1 / \ \ \ / / z z / ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I \* ## I \ \ \ 1 , 1. THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF THE DaSTING UTILITIES SHOWN ## HEREIN ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM AVAILABLE ## SURVEYS AND/ OR RECORDS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ## FIELD VERIFYING LOCATION AND ELEVATION TO ENSURE THAT ANY ## EXISTING UTILITIES (SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN) ARE NOT DAMAGED DURING ## CONSTRUCTION. 2. ## SIDEWALKS SHALL MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS, AND SHALL NOT EXCEED ## 2.00% CROSS SLOPE, OR 5.00% LONGITUDINAL SLOPE. 3. ## CONCRETE ENTRANCES AND APPROACHES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.00% ## CROSS SLOPE IN SIDEWALK AREAS. ## 4. ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS SHALL MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS, AND ## SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.00% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. ## 5. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS.. ## 6. ALL EXCESS OR WASTE MATERIAL GENERATED AS PART OF CONSTRUCTION ## SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE ## WITH STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. ## 7. ALL ## EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT ## EDITION ## OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND ## BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ## ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 8. ## ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ## RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 9. ## SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS & ## GUTTER FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ## ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. 10. ## GOPHER STATE ONE CALL DAMAGE PREVENTION SYSTEM FOR BURIED ## UTILITIES. ## 1-800-252-1166. CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE A PRIVATE UTILITY ## LOCATOR TO ASSIST WITH PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATES. ## GRADING LEGEND / \ -, 1 \ \ / \ / / • . , t„ / '6.-- • %/ / \ \ ## I \ \ \ \ \ / \ ## I \ \ \ ## I \ \ \ \\ / z / 0 \ el / - -- \ / \ 1 \ \ \ \ ,,„ ## I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ## OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY ## DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT ## I AM A DULY ## LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE ## LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. $(4/11/1tPrit / / / _ ... / ..-- Ns. \ _ \ \ \ \ ## I / „,.. \ / / / . .......„.., + c -1- / + \ . + + \ + \ ## I ..... ## + +\ -I- -' 7/1 / - - - - \ I't - --- \ ## I \ ## I - ----..., , + 4, 4 + \ 1 \ - - + ±-, / ••+ + + ## I \ ## I \ \ + + /+ + + + 11 + + + ## I + + + + + + a ## A' . \ 1 \ 1 ## PRINTED NAME: MICHAEL J. GERBER ## DATE: 09-25-2025 LICENSE it: 56653 + +, + + + t + .-- ///>/// + + + + + + + + ## + I + + + + + + 8- + + + z 4 /// a o scr ## I ## CALVARY CHURCH ## GARAG- ## A. • It- 6 <> 0 \) k/ 4 < <2- K c o 'cZ 0 (.•,(3 ..... ## 5300 FRANCE AVE ## EDINA, MN 55410 ## + + + I + + + + L*.=- _,N j + + + t + + + + ++ 4, + + + %// ## I 5, 1 \ + + + t+ + ## + + -FT + + + + + il- + + + + + + + + ; + + + ## A ## VS p 7' a a a 4 a a ‹ .:, , ## EXISTING BUILDING //sl, / 1 1 & ## I • ++++++1++++++++ i + , ## I + + + + + + I elk ## I /' , 2 / ,.... 40 a ## A 1 , + + ,1- + + \ +,t---t ° 1 4 ## + \+ + + N- + "4- ,/ - , -.6___ / 0 , 1 + \ + + + \+ + 1 ' + + 4 -, 1 \ 1 1 „,/7" .:, , 2 0 1 a 1 1 ## 4 I ## ?P' 1 i' ' 44 ' / d a 4 4 ## I a ## I ## T ° 4 "e'v 2 4 ## I ## ( EXISTING WOODEN FENCE / ## PROPERTY .... ## LINE a 4 ## I / ## I ° ## I _ 0 _ ..._.- \ - i _,, 1 ## I ## I ,, 885- - - - 885.17 1 - \ „_, -- ___ _ __,_,.. _ (....-;-.4 .,./_ _ _ --) - - _ 886 --, ## -4351 --•••••••/- SCWENTEALERLINE ## - - - - - - = EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR ## = EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR -100 ## - DaSTING CONTOUR LABEL ## - PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR ## I 4 0 ‘- ;883.44 884 / " -- ## I es (883.8 -.. 885.21 / / 884.71 05 •(- 885.80 , \ ),..- 885.36 / \ ## I ## I 4' 1 •t?' 1 , 0 ## I ## I 883.77 -- ## I ' ## • I ' , ' L(a. ... i 1 . 4 ' s ## : . I 884.10 11 ## • I , I \ ## El ## II 1: ## PROPOSED BUILDING 885.80` 885.59 :: ## FFE: 885.25 ., ## II 1 ## 889.25 (EOM 886.26 ## .(T 4 ) / i° ## 24 LF. MODULAR ## ' O-9 - ## ".II ## ,- I r - -, _ i N ## I 2 ## Cn 2 \ \ ,. \ \ \ ## I 1 ## PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR - 100 ## = PROPOSED CONTOUR LABEL .,,,, . ## EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION* ,,,,,- xxxxx ## =PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION* ## SURFACE FLOW -.4.••••• ## LL ••• ## - PROPOSED ## BOCK RETAINING .\,.., ,, , --$883(9fv . _1313, - 8:84.40 . i • . 884.4 . 0 di • ----- ## WALL ## I 89 -------____________} 1' 1 / 2 ## /I 4 0 \ i ,&, 891 k 885.37 1 1 a 884 04 'It 884.71 885.80 J ## X884.69 885.21 892 /..• ## I ## THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS ## THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS ## WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ## ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS ## PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ## DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF ## THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ## ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED ## STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO ## LEGAL PROSECUTION. ## COPYRIGHT &i1 2025 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING ## DIRECTION ## *SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG CURB & GUTTER AND OTHER ## REVEALS ARE TO FLOWLINE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ## KEY NOTES: a z1 R ags *r ' 884.36 r 884.42 ## SWALE / ' / \ ## I \ \ 2 a 88424 1 4a, ## 894.19 OW) 893 -----...,,,,, i _ 85 ## I _________ ## CENTERLINE . 7 \ \ a -• 884791 , rr I f I / 881 i). / ' 7 \ 885.03 -7--- ## 885.69 (ERN) ,/ / 0, -, 894 ## _ J •• 886 '71 4 / 6298 \ 0 , _ 4/ r //, / 7.',- /- ---1 ## N - - - - ## I 89 0, \ x _ • ei/fif - -...- -- - -__ •---,.. .._ ..- - 887 ## I ## I ) 0 ## MATCH INTO EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ## 0 CONCRETE PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) (13 ## FENCE GATE . '.... (4 dbl. 10' 20' ## J I ## 889.12 (TW). 4 ----Ng' 8-91.°°("70 - / g0e I "I - - - .. ' • • ## 17 L.F. MODULAR ...-- -- ..... ## BOCK RETAINING • - -891- - ## --- V ## WALL ## EXISTING RETAIN WALL ## AP' - - ## I / a a I a I,:5' ..,----.6 - - d ## I 1 _ _ . _ .. -9P - - - - t o -a- ## DRAWN BY: NPK ## CHECKED BY: MJG r/ / /// , a- r // / / /// ## PROJECT NO.: 14025002 ## NO. ## DATE DESCRIPTION 1 //17,.., //// //- // - /7 / / ///, ## EXISTING BUILDING ## EXISTING BUTDING ## CITY OF EDINA ' + + 1 1 1 ,!, 11 1 ## I ## 1 CI `,.. , 0, \ \ \ 1 ## 07/01/2026 ADDRESS UPDATE ## GRADING ## PLAN F. f JUL 0 i 2026 / ## I / . , .±1-, +1 ti- ## It/ + 1, tr , t , ,...44. 4-1 ## If \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , , / ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I o . , 1,' , // - , / / / // / ## DRAWING ## C401 ## NO. ## I I--1 Page 35 of 67 i I i 1 1 a ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I 4 ## A ## A -- ## I i 1 1 1 ## I / 1 ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I i ## I i i / / / / 1 / / / / / / 4-> // ## I 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ ## I \ ## I ## NOTES: ## DESIGN‘TREE engineering + land surveying ## Corporate Office: ## 120 17th Ave W Alexandria, MN 56308 888-216-1916 ## I / 1 i / ## I / ## I ## I 1 / ## I ## I ## I / i // ## I ## I / ## I ## I / ## I . ## I i ## I i 1 , 1 1 ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I # ## I 1 ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I \ ## I ## „,„/„. I \ * \ \ \ ## I \ / ( \ \ \ ## I I ## I 1 1 / r „ / / 1 ## I 1 ## I ## I ## I \ * ## I \ ## I \ 1. ## ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE FINAL GRADED AND PERMANENTLY ## STABILIZED WITH THE SEED MD( IDENTIFIED ON PLANS. ## 2. THE SITE MUST BE STABILIZED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPGA, ## NPDES PERMIT, MNDOT, AND THE CITY. 3. ## INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL CATCH BASINS AND ## INLETS DOWN GRADIENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. ## 4. PROVIDE SILT FENCE PERIMETER CONTROL DOWN GRADIENT OF ALL ## CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND TEMPORARY STOCKPILES. ## 5. TEMPORARY STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITS SHALL BE INSTALLED ## AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. ## 6. NO OFFSITE VEHICLE TRACKING IS PERMITTED. STREETS SHALL BE ## CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS ## AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. ## 7. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL DAMAGE PREVENTION SYSTEM FOR BURIED ## UTILITIES. 1-800-252-1166. CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE A PRIVATE ## UTILITY LOCATOR TO ASSIST WITH PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATES. ## EROSION CONTROL LEGEND & QUANTITIES: ## A 4 / - \ •-,\ ## I \ \ \ \ i / / 0 / / 2,.:>, / / / \ \ \ \ 0 \ ## I \ \ \ ## I ## I \ \ \ \ / / 0 / \ / ## I \ \ \ \ \ \ ## I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ## OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY ## DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY ## LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE ## LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. / / -- ',. / --- i ,...- \ \ \ \ ( / / / \ \ c + + / + \ + \ / • + +\ + \ ## I + + \ + /// / \ r'l -- .-- \ •••••. + + -k -i \ + + . , • + \ ## I \ ## + + II + + + + 1+ + + + ## I J o . \ ## PRINTED NAME: MICHAEL J. GERBER ## DATE: 09-25-2025 ## LICENSE #: 56653 4-, + + + + .-1- + + -1- + + \ + + + + +++++++ + + ++ ++ ++ +++ + ## I ## A 4 --\ / 'Yr f ## I ## CALVARY CHURCH ## GARAG 4** Iv, „,, .! 1....\ ‘.../ ‘Oib• 1 ## 6 •Y 6%., i.1.) <21C/ K‘ e,C— q 0 (,...0 vv.- ## QI ## 5300 FRANCE AVE ## EDINA, MN 55410 0 0 4 v A_ ___, .,_, 41 .. 1 1 q + + + + + + + + +4+ + + ii- +T + + + le + + + ri- + + +, + + 4 ± ± ++ + ±± ± i± ++ / ..1 ## A <, ## I a a a ## A a < a //„,-- / s / ///:.,9-, + \ 4 + +1 + + + ,+ + ## I a / ± \ 1 & ## I ## I ## A + ,+ + + +\ + * + + + + + + + + ' + + + + + + + +++-9 + + + 1 ## I ## I 1: .:, . a ,,,, ,,, / 1+ + 1 + + + +...,\ + ‘v1- + -0, / d -El + -k + -'4-. \ +.0 + + , + + ,t- + + \ +, ,i----+ _ ## A ## I ' + + \+ + + s+ + --+ , + - - < - __v__ — _ _ _ ..... i 6 \ z // / ## 0 4 SILT ## A 0 4 A a ## IP' ., d ,,,, ,4 0. ## FENCE 1 a 4°4' a ## I ## I a ## I 7 , A z ( ## PROPERTY LINE / ‹ I i, 1 ## I _ * *..... ......., = --r_i_r__... .,-_._ •_1_._"_. _..1...-...., • '7. .k. ,--. . . . . ## I . . . ## *I''I-:- ' *--`-: '-;• / . 8 - . ••• ## IA . - . - . '_.....— -,,-. ,, __._ * _..... :.s. 886 - ...% . . . . i _ — e.. .- -. 1 ## STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION BUT ## (1 EA) ## = •SILT FENCE ## (153 LF) ## I 4, % --' ;,-- . - . - . ' * fiB!` • . • . - . ## C --. ' ## I el' ## I / - . . ./ . . . 885 . . . . . ..t _ • v • • • • • • • • • • • • . • . . • a 1: • : - : ## _ J ## MNDOT SEED MIX 25-151 ## (0.13 AC) :•:4•:0:4 ## CATEGORY 20 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION PRODUCT ## (71 SY) "....• • ## NOTE QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE FOR SWPPP PLAN, AND ARE NOT FOR BIDDING ## PUFtPOSES, • (114 10' 20 ‘" s . _ _., - - - - - - \ "A{ci\N \ \ , ‹ ... \ ## N. \ \ ## Rib • ## STABILIZED ## CONSTRUCTION EXIT a ..... ## . I ## E 1 1 i - \ \.. ,‘\. : ## I ••••••• ## II \ ## II ## I ## II PROPOSED BUILDING , ## FFE: 885.25 • , . . • . . . ## Si* . 4,,, . • . • . . • • . ••• c• . . . / . . . . . . * * ## MNDOTSEET MIX 25-151 \ . .• ## N. \ \ \ \ ## I 1• 1 ## / I . ## I o , — ..,.. _ ...., , \ o _ 1354-- —t1/4, , ,,, 1. , /• .' ; ..4\ o • , _— Li \\\\\ . - - • • • • .. +1'.:•.• ••r • •• • • •••• ."-... •••••••••• ..... 44....:•4•:•:•:•:•:•:••••-. , • • • • ••••%••!..m.t•••••••• ••• •• • .. ## • CATEGORY 20 • ## :. ROLLED EROSION :•:4.: .f. , • -. ## R 7 ## I i ## I ## THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS ## THE PROPERTY ## OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS ## WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ## INC IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS ## PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ## DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF ## THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ## ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING ## INC. ## VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED ## STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO ## LEGAL PROSECUTION. ## COPYRIGHT @ 2025 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING / / ## I 0 ## I ## I 4 a A ## SILT FENCE * / * ## I . / . . , ... /. . • ..---....- ./. ## I., . . . . .4'.• ,,,..... . . . • . • . . . • . • • • • 7'.° • • • • , . . . . . . . . . - .,. ...7---,..- ---....._-. ----- • :. . 4 ## PREVENTION ## PRODUCT • • • • • / •• ## I. . • .... • • .. •• . . ## I \ \ \ \ 7:::.'.... -... ## / I / ' ## A ad 1 ## I 1 ## A ' 14 [ ## I 1 , ## ULCH \ ## 0 I / - . . 885 • •• v© ## ENGINEERING ## \ I - \ o < .„, ___. seff-- -r ..- 7 --.- ."--, • 661- --". • . . . . ,. \ N ty . . 88. . //) ## N ..: .—. —•-• - 7 .---•• __. s-- —.... / • •,• 4 • ./ . . . . -.— ..—*/—.- -.— .—. —.- -.-- .^. 895— . . rn \ \ •at . ..,_,... . - 887 _," - \ .. i * - ## F ) * ## ) I° !_._-1390"."; . ....- .- . / / ... ,- - -- _ • . . . 896 , . . / (° ## I / 1 ## I ..- / 1 . ## ''' I ## I . --- - • . . --. - *est*' . • ..;,....' • • • . .„, ...", • ..#7" . . . . . _.....! . - , 692- 2 .: .' . * . * . * . * . * .,;, --•••. .. . + . _ to, . / ## I ## I 0 0 ## A a -,, ' '>''' a ,.. _ .-___v •,, , __..g, -- ## DRAWN BY: NPK ## CHECKED BY: NIG / / ' ////?///7 77 ir / / ## PROJECT NO.: 14025002 //////// / / • ## CITY OF EDINA r# ## ' I 4 4 t ## I 4 ## 1 41J 4 ## I ## It + , i 4 1 \ \ \ . . '‘ \ , ## NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1 07/01/2026 ## ADDRESS UPDATE ## EROSION ## CONTROL PLAN ## JUL 0 2026 ## ,—NIENT ## A I+ +1 + ## If ±1 + -41 el 4 ## I+/ ## +I/ 4 (1+ ±, t , „ t \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ ## I 1 , , \° ## I ## I ## I ..:, 1 / ////// , / ## DRAWING ## C501 ## NO ## I--1 Page 36 of 67 ## CONCRETE ## CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE ## CAL ## VAR ## Y ## CHURCH ## GARAGE \ ## CIVI ## C ## CIVIL DETAILS ## NOTES: ## 1. USE V NON-REINFORCED POURED CONCRETE ON 6" AGGREGATE BASE FOR APPROACHES ## CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION ## 50.41.T.S. ## SEGMENTAL WALL U ## RANULAR BACKFILL ## " PERFORATED PVC DRAIN PIPING ## NOTES: ## 1. THIS DETAIL IS PROVIDED AS A GUIDE ONLY. FINAL DESIGN TO BE ## PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR'S WALL ENGINEER AND INSTALLED PER ## MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROJECT ## SPECIFICATIONS. ## SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL DETAIL ## SCME*rs ## SPACE INENTALLY LEFT BLANK ## I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ## OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY ## DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY ## LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE ## LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ## PRINTED NAME: MICHAEL 3. GERBER DATE: 09-25-2025 LICENSE it: 56653 ## DESIGN‘TREE engineering + land surveying ## Corporate Office: ## 120 17th Ave W Alexandria, MN 56308 888-216-1916 ## THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS ## THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS ## WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ## ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS ## PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ## DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF ## THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ## ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED ## STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO ## LEGAL PROSECUTION. ## COPYRIGHT @ 2025 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING ## DRAWN BY: NPK ## CHECKED BY: MJG ## PROJECT NO.: 14025002 ## NO. ## DATE DESCRIPTION 07/01/2026 ## ADDRESS UPDATE ## DRAWING NO. ## C601 Page 37 of 67 07/01/2026 ## ADDRESS UPDATE ## INPLACE ## GROUND ## RUMBLE PAD ## 6" MIN. DEPTH OF 1" TO ## 2" CRUSHED ROCK ## OR SLASH MULCH ## SECTION A-A ## P:\ 1 40- ## SHERBURNE 5 ti tt 8 ## EROSION ## CONTROL DETAILS ## IMPERMEABLE ## SHEETING ## 7. WOOD POSTS MAY BE SPACED UP TO 4 FEET APART IF WIRE MESH IS NOT ## USED TO SUPPORT THE FABRIC. IF WIRE MESH IS USED TO SUPPORT THE FABRIC ## STEEL POSTS MAY BE SPACED UP TO 8 FEET APART. ## STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT DETAILS ## CONCRETE WASHOUT DETAILS 501.11.7.5. ## DIRECTION OF RUNOFF FLOW z ## NOTES: ## 1. TYPE OF FENCING TO BE USED SHALL COMPLY WITH MNDOT 3886.1 ## UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON PLANS. 2. DIG A V x 6" TRENCH ALONG THE INTENDED FENCE LINE. ## 3. DRIVE ALL POSTS INTO THE GROUND AT THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF TRENCH. ## 4. WIRE FENCING PER MNDOT SPEC. 3886. WIRE MESH MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 2" ## INTO THE GROUND AND NO MORE THAN 36" ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. ## 5. FILTER FABRIC PER MNDOT SPEC. 3886. FABRIC APPARENT OPENING SIZE (AOS) ## SHALL BE 30 TO 80 IN AREAS OF COARSE GRAINED SOILS, AND 50 TO 80 IN AREAS ## OF FINE GRAINED SOILS. ## 6. LAY OUT SILT FENCE ON THE UPHILL SIDE ALONG THE FENCE UNE, AND BACK FILL. ## BINDING WIRE, ## STRAW BALE ## (TYP.) ## SLASH MULCH, CRUSHED ROCK, OR SHEET ## PAD CONSTRUCTION EXI- ## RD® ## RUMBLE PAD ## CONSTRUCTION EXIT® ® ## SECTION B-B ## HIGH STRENGTH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ## (TWO LAYERS SEWN TOGETHER TO ## FORM POCKETS) ## TRAFFIC FLOW ## CORRUGATED STEEL PANELS ## GEOTDMLE FABRIC ## CROSS SLOPE 3% OR FLATTER 0,p ## NOTES: ## SEE SPECS. 2573 & 3882. 0 MINIMUM LENGTH SHALL BE THE GREATER OF 50 FEET OR A LENGTH SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW A MINIMUM OF 5 TIRE ## ROTATIONS ON THE PROVIDED PAD. MINIMUM LENGTH SHALL BE CALCULATED USING THE LARGEST TIRE WHICH ## TAPER EDGES WILL BE USED IN TYPICAL OPERATIONS. ## AT 1:1 ## 0 PROVIDE RADIUS OR WIDEN PAD SUFFICIENTLY TO PREVENT VEHICLE TIRES FROM TRACKING OFF OF PAD WHEN ## LEAVING SITE. ## 0 IF RUNOFF FROM DISTURBED AREAS FLOWS TOWARD CONSTRUCTION EXITS, PREVENT RUNOFF FROM DRAINING ## DIRECTLY TO PUBLIC ROAD OVER CONSTRUCTION EXIT BY CROWNING THE EXIT OR SLOPING TO ONE SIDE. IF ## SURFACE GRADING IS INSUFFICIENT, PROVIDE OTHER MEANS OF INTERCEPTING RUNOFF. ## 0 IF RUNOFF FROM CONSTRUCTION EXITS WILL DRAIN OFF OF PROJECT SITE, PROVIDE SEDIMENT TRAP WITH ## STABILIZED OVERFLOW. ## 0 IF A TIRE WASH OFF IS REQUIRED THE CONSTRUCTION EXITS SHALL BE GRADED TO DRAIN THE WASH WATER ## TO A SEDIMENT TRAP. ## 0 MINIMUM LENGTH OF RUMBLE PAD SHALL BE 20 FEET, OR AS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM TIRES. IF ## SIGNIFICANT SEDIMENT IS TRACKED FROM THE SITE, THE RUMBLE PAD SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR THE DESIGN MODIFIED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL VIBRATION. WASH-OFF LENGTH SHALL BE AS REQUIRED TO EFFECTIVELY REMOVE ## CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT FROM VEHICLE TIRES. ## 0 MAINTENANCE OF CONSTRUCTION EXITS SHALL OCCUR WHEN THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SEDIMENT REMOVAL HAS ## BEEN REDUCED. MAINTENANCE SHALL CONSIST OF REMOVING SEDIMENT AND CLEANING THE MATERIALS OR ## PLACING ADDITIONAL MATERIAL (SLASH MULCH OR CRUSHED ROCK) OVER SEDIMENT FILLED MATERIAL TO ## RESTORE EFFECTIVENESS. ## SILT FENCE DETAIL Wit-I. ## NOTE: ## CAN BE TWO STACKED BALES OR PARTIALLY EXCAVATED TO REACH 3 FT DEPTH ## WASHOUT STRUCTURE WITH STRAW BALES ## SANDBAG ) ) ## MIN. 2" DIA. HIGH TENS ## REINFORCED RIBS ## TAPER EDGES ## AT 1:1 ## IMPERMEABLE SHEETING ## SANDBAG ## IMPERMEABLE OR EQUNALE ## SHEETING ## 3' TYP. ## 1:1 OR FLATTER ## SIDE SLOPE ## SLASH MULCH, ## CRUSHED ROCK, ## SHEET PAD, OR ## OTHER PER ## SPECIFICATION ## RUMBLE PAD ## ENTRANCE WIDTH ## AS REQUIRED ## PUBLIC ROAD ## PUBLIC ROAD ## RADIUS ASi;-, ## REQUIREDW ## SEDI ## TRAP ## MENt) KE . ## TENTO ## TR ## AP ## SURFACE FLOW ## SLASH MULCH, ## CRUSHED ROCK, ## SHEET PAD, OR ## OTHER PER ## SPECIFICATION ## E 9 „ ## ENTRANCE WIDTH ## AS REQUIRED 10' 3' ## PLAN ## MPERMEABLE ## SHEETING ## SECTION B-B ## IMPERMEABLE ## SHEETING WOOD FRAME SECURELY ## FASTENED AROUND ## ENTIRE PERIMETER WIT ## TWO STAKES ## 10, TYP. ## WASHOUT STRUCTURE WITH WOOD PLANKS ## 1/8" DIA. ## STEEL WIRE ## STAPLE DETAIL ## STAPLES ## (2 PER BALE) ## WOOD OR ## METAL STAKE ## (2 PER BALE) ## 6" MIN. .--, ## IYP. .../ ## A ## L 10' ## PLAN ## EXCAVATED WASHOUT STRUCTURE ## CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1. LOCATE WASHOUT STRUCTURE A MINIMUM OF 50 FEET AWAY FROM OPEN CHANNELS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, SENSITIVE AREAS, ## WETLANDS, BUFFERS AND WATER COURSES AND AWAY FROM CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC. 2. SIZE WASHOUT STRUCTURE FOR VOLUME NECESSARY TO CONTAIN WASH WATER AND SOLIDS AND MAINTAIN AT LEAST 4 INCHES ## OF FREEBOARD. TYPICAL DIMENSIONS ARE 10 FEET X 10 FEET X 3 FEET DEEP. 3. PREPARE SOIL BASE FREE OF ROCKS OR OTHER DEBRIS THAT MAY CAUSE TEARS OR HOLES IN THE LINER. FOR LINER, USE 10 MIL OR THICKER UV RESISTANT, IMPERMEABLE SHEETING, FREE OF HOLES AND TEARS OR OTHER DEFECTS THAT COMPROMISE ## IMPERMEABILITY OF THE MATERIAL. 4. ## PROVIDE A SIGN FOR THE WASHOUT IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE FACILITY. 5. KEEP CONCRETE WASHOUT STRUCTURE WATER TIGHT. REPLACE IMPERMEABLE LINER IF DAMAGED (E.G., RIPPED OR PUNCTURED). EMPTY OR REPLACE WASHOUT STRUCTURE THAT IS 75 PERCENT FULL, AND DISPOSE OF ACCUMULATED MATERIAL PROPERLY. DO NOT REUSE PLASTIC LINER. WET-VACUUM STORED LIQUIDS THAT HAVE NOT EVAPORATED AND DISPOSE OF IN AN APPROVED MANNER. PRIOR TO FORECASTED RAINSTORMS, REMOVE LIQUIDS OR COVER STRUCTURE TO PREVENT OVERFLOWS. REMOVE HARDENED SOLIDS, WHOLE OR BROKEN UP, FOR DISPOSAL OR RECYCLING. MAINTAIN RUNOFF DIVERSION AROUND EXCAVATED ## WASHOUT STRUCTURE UNTIL STRUCTURE IS REMOVED. ## SHEET PAD ## 6" MIN. DEPTH OF 1" TO 2" ## CRUSHED ROCK OR SLASH MUL ## GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ## SLASH MULCH OR CRUSHED ROCK 1,4 ## POST (METAL OR WOOD) (2' x 2') ## WIRE MESH (14-1/2 MIN. GA .) ## FILTER FABRIC (36" MAX. HT .) ## I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ## OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY ## DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY ## LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE ## LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ## PRINTED NAME: MICHAEL J. GERBER ## DATE: 09-25-2025 ## LICENSE 8: 56653 ## DESIGNALTREE engineering + land surveying ## Corporate Office: ## 120 17th Ave W Alexandria. MN 86308 888-216-1916 ## THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS ## THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## USE BY THE HOWER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS ## WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ## ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS ## PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ## DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF ## THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ## ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. ## VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED ## STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO ## LEGAL PROSECUTION. ## COPYRIGHT 0 ## 2025 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING ## DRAWN BY: NPK ## CHECKED BY: NIG ## PROJECT NO.: 14025002 ## DATE DESCRIPTION NO. ## DRAWING NO. ## C602 Page 38 of 67 ## LP SMART SIDE ## 6" TRIM BOARD TYP ## WITH CEDAR TEXURE ## LP SMART SIDE ## 6" LAP SIDING ## WITH CEDAR TEXURE ## AVERAGE EXISTING GRADE ## EL. = 886.50 ## FINISHED FLOOR . = 885.25 ## ASPHALT SHINGLES ## LP SMART SIDE ## 4- TRIM BOARD TYP ## WITH CEDAR TEXURE 111 4 1 111111 111 111.,_ 11~ 11111111111111111 n \.. t4111 11 1 ## A ## I ## C 1 ## EItui ## II II . 1 ,. 1 i, 1 - ## 1111111111111111111111111MIIIIIIIIIMIN111111111111111111M111111111 ## 6 I TSP ## OVERHANG ## 206 WOOD STUDS ## AT 16" O.C. 12 ## ASPHALT SHINGLES ## 151 FELT PAPER ## 1/2" NOM. ## PLYWOOD OR ## OSB SHEATHING ## TRUSS BEARING ## EL. = 109 ## SOFFIT'\ ## PANELS ## TRIM ## BOARD ## PRE ENGINEERED ## WOOD TRUSSES ## AT 24" 0.C. ## TRIM BOARD ## LAP SIDING ## HOUSEWRAP ## 8" CONCRETE ## BLOCK ## FINISHED FLOOR to ## EL. = 100 —0 ## 4" CONCRETE ## SLAB ON GRADE ## 1/2" NOM. ## PLYWOOD OR ## OSB SHEATHING ## TREATED 2X6 ## WOOD PLATE ## 6" COMPACTED ## GRANULAR FILL ## LP SMART SIDE ## SHAKES ## WITH CEDAR TEXURE " " ## TYPICAL SECTION ## SCALE: 3/4" = 1.-0" 0 ## D.Ht x ## O ## Ip b 1 ## —I g, ileik ## Mir ## H ## 14.X7' ## _I 0 ## Nd ' ## L ## __I ## NORTH ## FLOOR PLAN ## SCALE: 1/4" = 1 .-0" el ## SOUTH ELEVATION ## SCALE: 1/4" - 1 .-0" ## EAST ELEVATION ## SCALE: 1/4 " = 1'-0" 1 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 ## I 11 r 1 m 1 `illi r 1 1 1 ## 1I1 m 1 ## H ## J 1 ## III i 1 ## H i ## L 1 1 i , ## I1 i 1 ## H 1 m ## H ## 1 1I 1HI m ## I 1I 1 1 ## H i 1 - 1 1 1 ## I 1 1 ## 1H 1 1 11 1 1 ## I1 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 ## 1111I 1 1 1 ## I 1 1 1 1 1 ## 1 H1H 1 1l i t 11 l 1 l 11 111 1 111111111 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ## H 11 1 1 11 ## 11H 11 1 1 ## 1H 1 1 1 1 1 ## H 11 1 ## I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ## H i 1 m ## H1r u 4 i 1 m 111 i 1 i 1 i 11 m 11 m 111 i 1 l 1 l 1 i 1 m 111 i 1 r 1 ## L 1 i 11 m 11 il 1 l 1 i 1 i 1 m 1 11 il 1 l 1 [ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ## H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I III1111111111111111 1 1 111111J1Ilit111J11 j 111111111 ## J 11111111111[11 / 111111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 ## H 1 ## I 1[ ## P 1 ## I 1 ## H 11 ## I 1 ## H 11 ## I 1 ## H 11 ## I 1 ## H 11 ## I 1 ## H 11 ## I 11 ## H 1 ## I 11 ## H 1 ## I [1 ## H 1 ## I 1 ## H 1 ## I 11 ## H 1 ## I 1 [ 1 1 1 1 1 1,1 1 1 1 ## H 11 ## I 1 ## H 11 ## I 1 ## H 11 ## I 11 ## H 1 ## I 1 ## H 11 ## I 11 ## H 1 r 1 h 1 1 1 ## H 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ## 11H1H1 I[ ## H 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 ## I 1 ## H ## H1 11 ## H 1 1 [1 ## H 11 l ## [H 1I1H11I1 ## H 11 ## IH ## 4I H11H11I1[ ## H1 11l1H11 1 1 1'1 ## I 1 ## I 1 ## I 11 ## H 1 ## I 11 ## H 1 ## I 1 ## H 1[1 ## H 11 ## I 1 ## H 11 ## I 1 ## H 11 ## I 1 ## I 1 ## H 11 i 1 l 1 t 1 t 1 l 1 i ## I t ## I 1 1 1 1 1 [ cill 1 1 1 r 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 11 ## I 1 ## I 11 1 1 ## I 1 ## I p 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 1 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 11 l ## J t 1 ## I 1 1 _ 1 1 1 ## I 1 1 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 t 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 ## I 1 1. 1 1 1 ## O rc va rc 5 0 0 17, § ## Ordignighh ,m41111111111momnomal... ## ~BI ## IIWBVhI ,m1MITATIMINUNIVEINUMNME6w. .411111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111h. .411111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111114. 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111011111111111111111/111111111111111111111,. 1111111M11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ## JUL 0 7 2026 ## LP SMART SIDE ## FASCIA ## LP SMART SIDE ## SOFFIT ## WEST ELEVATION ## SCALE: 1/4 " = 1.-0" ## II1111111111- 111111111111IHIHI!IIIIIHIIIIHHHHIHIH1H11r1HHIHIIIIIH ## 1111111111H1HIHIHIHIHIIIH ## I ## HIH11111_11 1 1 111111111111111111111 1111 1 ll llllllll lll lllllllll llllll ll lll ## HHHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIH1H1HIHIHIHIHIHIH ## 1 4,1,111,INAMMIAIMIAINAIMINAIMIMIAIMIAIAINPAY I IP ## NORTH ELEVATION ## SCALE: 1/4" 1'-0" ## LAMPERT ## ARCHITECTS ## 420 Summit Avenue ## St. Paul, MN 55102 1.1 Phone:763.755.1211 60,0763.757.26149 lampertOtarnperl—orch.cont ## ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION: ## I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, ## SPECNICADON DR REPORT WAS ## PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT ## SUPERVISION AND THATI AllfULY ## LICENSED ARCHITECT ## LAWS OF THE 51% ## AIIAPE ## T ## TA. itt , itt ## W E etc . ## Olt cl 04 13669 14.- cs .i 9.1./ 0 fEli 441111111111MikNE 1-!, ## 6550 York Ave S, Suite 202 ## Edina, MN 55435 Ph: 612-655-7450 ## I U z ## U ›- cc ## U CopyrIghl 2025 Leonard Lampert Architects Inc. ## Project Designer: JAMES B ## Drawn By. JRB ## Checked By. LL ## Revisions ## 6/30/26 PRELIMINARY ## FLOOR PLAN ## Sheet Number ## Al ## STORAGE 53 00 ## France ## Avenue ## S, ## E dina, ## M inneso ta ## Project No. 250207-3 Page 39 of 67 11111 111111 111111 1111111111111111101111111h. ## 1 I 1 ## I 11 1 1 ## 11 I ## 1 I ## LP SMART SDE TRIM ## PAINT SW 7716 ## CROISSANT ## LP SMART SCE TRIM ## PAINT SW 7716 ## CROISSANT ## LP SMART SDE LAP SONG ## PANT SW 2823 ## ROCKWOOD CLAY ## METAL DOORS ## PAM SW 2808 ## ROCKWOOD DARK BROWN 0 ## LI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 ## H rIijIP II ## 111J11111111111111I1J1111111 ## L1111111LirIll 11111111111111 t11 11111111111111111111111111111111111f.H11111111 1111111111 1111111111- 11t'hh'1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 [1 1 11111111 1,1,111,111 1,11 1,1,11 1,1,1,111,1111,1,1,1,1,1,4,1,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,111,111,11],1,11,1,1111 41, 4,111,1111 irate /1111111111111 111111\ „indin1111111111111121116... 11111111111111111111111011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111... ## ../11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111X11111111111111111111111111111116... ..0111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111113111111111111111111111111111111511111B11111116.. 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.11111111111110111110111111111111111111111111111111111114. 9 ## WEST ELEVATION ## NORTH ELEVATION ## SOUTH ELEVATION ## EAST ELEVATION ## CALVARY CHURCH STORAGE BUILDING ## 5300 France Avenue S, Edina, Minnesota ## NOT. N DRAWING IS FOR ## ILLUSTRAD ## IS ## VE PURPOSES ONLY. ## ACTLIAL CCUIRS NEED TO BE ## FIELO VERIFIED. Page 40 of 67 ## PLAN TING SCHEDULE ## QTY. KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE MTHD REMARKS ## 1 CT ## COFFEE TREE ## GYMNOCLADUS DIOICUS 2.5" CAL. BB ## 3 BP ## BIRCH PARKLAND PILLAR BETULA PLATYPHILLA .JEFPARIC ## 1.5" CAL. ## BB ## 2 BH ## ImEHILLS ## PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA 6' TALL BB ## I ANDSCAPE NOTES: ## 1. SEED/SOD AREAS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. ## 2. WOOD MULCH BED TO BE SEPARATED FROM ## TURF AREAS BY BLACK VINYL EDGER. ## 3. SEE PLAN FOR EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED ## LAMPERT ## ARCHITECTS ## 420 Summit Avenue St. ## Paul, MN 55102 1111 ## Phonot753.755.1211 r00763.757.2849 lomporlelompori—arch.com ## NEW STORAGE ## BUILDING NEW STORAGE ## BUILDING ## FRANCE AVE ## 5232 FRANCE AVE ## -1,9(4,44114MIEM"4.11 -12118.,..8111.2(08,..HEL.1116.911.1611001111.§....., *Sm.. 11111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111.1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ## CHURCH ## SHERBURNESL AT ## E R ## CONSTRUCTION ## 6550 York Ave S, Suite 202 ## Edina, MN 55435 Ph: 612-655-7450 ## PARKING LOT ## VIEW FROM FRANCE AVENUE ## VIEW FROM NORTH ## SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" ## SCALE: 1" = 10.-0" ## c;ITY OF EDINA ## JUL 0 7 2026 ## EXISTING HOUSE ## 5232 FRANCE AVE 9- 2;//// 53 00 ## Fra nce ## Avenue ## S, ## E dina, ## Minne so ta ## EXISTING OVERSTORY ## TYPICAL ## EXISTING EVERGREEN 0 ## TYPICAL Copyright 2025 Loonord Leong. ...Nets Inc. ## EXISTING SCREEN FENCE ## TO REMAIN ## Project Designer: JAMES B ## RETAIN TREES NATURAL FORM. ## REMOVE ONLY DEAD OR ## DAMAGED BRANCHES ## DO NOT CUT LEADERS ## Drown By. JRB ## Checked By. LL ## Revisions ..... — ## NEW FENCE ## 9/8/25 PRELIMINARY ## ROOT COLLAR 1-2" ## ABOVE GRADE ## CONNECT NEW ## FENCE TO ## EXISTING FENCE ## (MATCH EXISTING) ## WOOD CHIP MULCH ## REMOVE WIRE BASKETS AND ## POLY TIES. CUT BURLAP FROM ## UPPER 1/2 OF BALL ## —7 \-WOOD ## MULCH BED ## PROPOSED ## STORAGE ## BUILDING ## MNDOT SEED MIX ## 25-151 AT ALL ## DISTURBED TURF ## AREAS ## FENCE ## AND GATE ## EXISTING GRADE ## EXISTING PLAY AREA ## GROUND COVER ## OR MULCH AS SPEC. ## TURN BACK BURLAP ## REMOVE POLY AND WIRE ## EXTEND RETAINING ## WALL AS REQUIRED ## EXTEND RETAINING ## SET BALL ON I ## WALL AS REQUIRED ## UNDISTURBED GROUND ## BACKFILL WITH EXISTING ## SOIL. ## WATER THOROUGHLY TO ## ELIMINATE AIR POCKETS ## FRANC ## E ## AVE ## NUE ## N 11 ll ## =IIIE ' ## LANDSCAPE PLAN \ .1 ll I=III ## E,HEL ivii+.•akAWF4 ## H 11 rrt-i _ ## T oluiwil 1 =-771Tcww ## BACKFILL WITH ## EXISTING SOIL EXISTING CHURCH ## 5300 FRANCE AVE ## Sheet Number ## 3x ROOTBALL DIAMETER ## BREAK DOWN SIDES OF HOLE ## UNDISTURBED SOIL ## BENEATH BALL ## Ll ## File na me: ## C ## ALV ## ARY ## CHU ## RCH S ## TO ## RAGE ## BUIL ## DING \ ## C ## ALV ## ARY ## CHU ## RC ## H S ## TO ## RAGE B ## UILD ## ING— ## L i ## NORTH ## LANDSCAPE PLAN ## SCALE: 1" = 20.-cr ## TREE PLANTING DETAIL ## SCALE: NOT TO SCALE ## SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL ## SCALE: NOT TO SCALE ## Project No. 250207-3 Page 41 of 67 ## Item Report August 12, 2026 ## Planning Commission ## Item Number: 6.2 Department: Community Development ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner ## Item Title: Variance request 5620 Woodcrest Drive ## Action Requested: Staff recommends denial of the variance request. ## Information/Background: The current property is nonconforming regarding setback closer than allowed to a pond and is over on building coverage based on Section 36-4638 of the city’s zoning ordinance. The property owners at 5620 Woodcrest Drive are requesting a 37.9-foot setback variance for construction of a porch and deck to allow a 12.1-foot setback from where a 50-foot setback is required to a pond. The project also requires a 196-square foot building coverage variance from the maximum allowed limit of 2,250 square feet. The requested variances reduce the existing nonconforming setback to the water body encroaching closer to the pond edge and increases the existing nonconforming coverage overage of 177-square feet by 196-square feet for a total of 373-square feet of coverage over the allowable 2,250- square foot limit. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## 1. Staff Report 2. Presentation 3. Narrative 4. Survey 5. Applicant submittal Page 42 of 67 ## Staff Report Date: 8/12/26 ## To: Planning Commission ## From: Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner ## Subject: Variance request Staff Recommendation: Motion to deny a 37.9-foot setback variance from the 50-foot setback requirement and a 196 sq ft building coverage variance at 5620 Woodcrest Drive based on the findings in the staff report. ## Information/Background: The property at 5620 Woodcrest Drive backs up to a pond and contains a one-story rambler with an attached two car garage built in 1974. The property owners are hoping to add a 14’ x 14’, 196 sq ft, four season porch and a, 8’ x 8’.5”, 66 sq ft deck, (excluding steps), to the back of their home. The existing home is 26.1 feet from the pond edge. The improvements will reduce the existing nonconforming setback by 14 ft to be within 12.1 feet of the pond therefore; the owners are requesting a 37.9-foot setback variance from the 50-foot pond setback. The requested variances reduce the existing nonconforming setback of the home to the water body, encroaching closer to the pond edge. The project also requires a 196-square foot-building coverage variance from the maximum limit of 2,250 square feet increasing the existing nonconforming building coverage of 177-square feet for a total of 373-square feet of coverage over the allowable 2,250-square foot limit (32.92%). ## Surrounding Land Uses ## Northerly: Single-Family; zoned R-1; guided Low Density Residential ## Easterly: Single-Family; zoned R-1; guided Low Density Residential/Pond ## Southerly: Single-Family; zoned R-1; guided Low Density Residential ## Westerly: Single-Family; Water; zoned R-1; guided Low Density Residential ## Existing Site Features The property contains a one-story home with attached garage built in 1974. The property is 7,967 square feet in area and backs up to a pond. There is a 50-foot setback required from the pond located in the rear yard. The existing home Page 43 of 67 ## Staff Report is nonconforming with respect to front yard, side yards, and pond setbacks and currently exceeds the maximum allowed building coverage by 177 sq ft. ## Planning ## Guide Plan designation: Low Density Residential ## Zoning: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District ## Grading & Drainage The Engineering Department has reviewed the application. Full review of the grading and drainage plans will be reviewed at the time of building permit. ## Compliance Table ## City Standard Proposed West (water) – East Side (Front) - ## North Side– ## South Side- 50 feet OHWE 30.8 feet 10 feet 10 feet **12.1 feet *30 feet no change *9.6 feet no change *9.7 feet no change ## Building Coverage ## Hard Cover 30% but not to exceed 2,250 sq ft 50% *2,247 sq ft existing/177 sq ft over ** +196 sq ft = 2,263 sq ft (total: 373 sq ft over existing + proposed) = 32.92% 46.8% Building Height 35 feet No change * Existing nonconforming **Requires variance ## PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMMENDATION Page 44 of 67 ## Staff Report ## Primary Issues Is the proposed variance justified? No, staff does not believe the requested variance is justified. Minnesota Statutes and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that a variance shall not be granted unless the following findings are made: 1. The variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The variance will not be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The primary purpose and intent of the water body setback ordinance is to maintain an adequate distance from a water body to provide a proper buffer area between structures and the water’s edge. Prior to 1990, a 25-foot setback was required from water bodies. Many of the original surveys of homes backing up to the pond indicate setbacks ranging between 25-28 feet from the pond edge. The homes were built in conformance with pond setbacks required in the mid-1970’s with a DNR mandated ordinance change in 1990 to a minimum 50 ft setback causing properties to become nonconforming. In 1974, even with a required 25 ft setback, most of the homes surrounding the pond were built with little opportunity to expand closer to the water body. The primary purpose and intent of the maximum building coverage ordinance is to maintain a consistent maximum amount of building area per lot regardless of size or configuration of a lot. Beyond the maximum is considered over-building on a lot. It is not the intent of establishing maximum building coverage to allow more building area, which potentially opens expectations of neighbors believing there may be opportunities for similar coverage variances. This property is currently over the maximum allowed coverage of 2,250 sq ft by 177 sq ft. The property is already benefitted from exceeding the building coverage cap. 2. The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan guides the property for Low Density Residential use. Use of the property will remain a single-family home. The request could be viewed as consistent with the following goal and policy from the Housing Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan: Housing Quality and Design Goal 3: Continue to support high-quality design of residences and residential neighborhoods in a way that furthers sustainability, character, and livability, and maintains long term investment. 1. Provide an attractive living environment and promote housing that is compatible in quality, design, and intensity within neighborhoods to ensure the vitality and health of single family and multifamily/mixed-use neighborhoods. Page 45 of 67 ## Staff Report 3. There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: i. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. The property owner is not proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner The applicant is proposing to add more building area to a structure that currently exceeds the allowable building coverage. Staff are unable to identify a unique circumstance specific to the property that could not be replicated by other properties in the vicinity to also exceed coverage and allow reduced setbacks from the pond that would require similar variance requests. ii. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The plight of the landowner is due to the desire to expand the main floor to gain a 4-season porch and small deck on a nonconforming property that is currently “over-built” given the amount of building coverage. The new home addition and deck are proposed to be closer to a water body than the existing home. Conditions around the pond are similar for neighboring properties who share similar circumstances of proximity and coverage. iii. The variance, if granted, may alter the essential character of the locality. The variance may alter the essential character of the locality. The applicant is proposing improvements that may motivate similar variance requests from setback and coverage. Building coverage and setback changes may alter the existing character of the neighborhood. ## Staff Recommendation Staff recommend denial of the requested variance. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The variance is not in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The primary purpose and intent of the ordinance is to maintain an adequate buffer and distance from water bodies and not over build on a lot. The proposal will reduce the already nonconforming setback from the pond and increase building area and intensify the already nonconforming building coverage. 2. Staff agree the variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The use of the property will remain a single- family home and the variance is consistent with the city’s goals of providing an attractive living environment and promoting housing that is compatible in quality, design, and intensity within neighborhoods. Page 46 of 67 ## Staff Report 3. The property owner proposes to use the property in a manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to reduce setback to the pond while intensifying existing building coverage over the maximum allowed. 4. The plight of the landowner is not due to circumstances unique to the property but are instead created by the landowner. The buildable area on this property is consistent with other properties in the vicinity. 5. The variance may alter the essential character of the locality. The applicant is proposing to exceed zoning ordinances on a nonconforming property in a neighborhood of similar properties with similar nonconformities, and with no specific property-based characteristics unique enough to grant exceptions. Page 47 of 67 ## EdinaMN.gov Variance at 5620 Woodcrest August 12, 2026 Page 48 of 67 ## Project Location – 5620 Woodcrest Page 49 of 67 ## Existing Page 50 of 67 ## Proposed Plans1 Page 51 of 67 ## Building Floor Plans Page 52 of 67 ## Building ## Elevations Page 53 of 67 ## Building Sections and Roof Plan Page 54 of 67 ## Variance Criteria 1.The variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. 2.The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3.There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: i.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. ii.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. iii.The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Page 55 of 67 ## Staff Recommendation Motion to deny the variance request based on the findings and subject to the conditions in the staff report. Deadline for a City decision: August 21, 2026 Page 56 of 67 ## Request: We are requesting a 37.9' set-back variance. Due to the nature of offsetting the meandering and curving OHW line for the 50' setback and measuring to it at right angles, we will end up at 37.9' into the setback. In addition, we are allowed up to 30% building coverage on lots under 9,000 sf, but with a caveat that the building does not exceed 2,250 sf. With the addition of the 4-season porch, our building will total 2,623 sf. We are requesting a variance for 2.9% over the maximum allowable building coverage and 373 sf over the allowable building square footage. ## PROPOSED LOT AREA CALCULATION: ## )111)1N , ## Lot Area to O.H.W. = 7,967 SF ## PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE: ,11) 10 ?On House = 2,427 SF Proposed 4-Seasons Porch = 196 SF Deck 82 SF (Less 150 SF) = 0 SF Total = 2,623 SF ## Proposed Building Coverage = ## (30% Maximum Allowable Building Coverage - Buildings not to exceed 2,250 SF) Requesting a 2.9% variance. ## PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: (No variance needed) House = 2,427 SF Proposed 4-Seasons Porch = 196 SF Deck & Stairs = 112 SF ## Concrete Driveway, Stoop, Steps & Pads = 874 SF Walls = 66 SF ## Brick Driveway Edging = 53 SF Total = 3,728 SF ## Proposed Impervious Surface = 46.8% (50% Maximum Allowable Impervious ## Surface) ## Note: In addition, when reviewing the previous survey, you will see we are not increasing impervious enough to require cat 2 stormwater mgmt. plan. 1 Page 57 of 67 Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. Please fully explain your ## L ' " answers using additional sheets of paper as necessary. JULsi10 ?1i25 The variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. ## YES The ordinance states that "lifecycle housing" a long-term goal of the city. Ensuring that there is a full range of housing options for all stages of life from starter homes through continuum of care, so people can live their whole lives in Edina, as they choose. We are 53 years old and have been Edina residents for more than 22 years. We wanted to stay in Edina, but in a smaller home that still fit our family but was able to work with us as we age. The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. ## YES The community must balance the needs of families with an aging population that desires to "age in place." (4-17) We are part of the aging population that wants to age in place. Therefore, we purchased a smaller home, in a walkable neighborhood that fit our needs, but with the expectation that we would be able to convert an existing deck to a 4-season porch. As of now, we can't access our backyard from the house as it is up a 1/2 story. 2 Page 58 of 67 This addition will have no direct impact on the pond itself or our neighbors (not impeding any views, etc.) Therefore, we believe this makes it consistent with the comprehensive plan. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the ordinance. ## YES The Ordinance states that all living space must be set-back 50 feet from the OHWE. However, more than 50% of our property is below the OHWE, therefore giving this home an unfair strike with current setback laws. We currently have no access to our backyard from the home (there was a deck previously in place but was dilapidated and unsafe and therefore had to be removed). We would like to replace the former deck with a four-season porch and smaller deck space to access the yard. Very minimal impact on the yard as the footings are already in place. The scale of the new spaces are appropriate for the home's existing square footage and will not "over-power" the space by keeping them to scale for a house this size. Important to note, the spaces are above ground, on footings and only increases our interior square footage by less than 200 square feet. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. ## YES JUL 0 ?On 3 Page 59 of 67 The foundation of house as it stands today is exactly how it was built in 1974. As you can see from our survey, the house was built much closer to the water than any setback rule. The pond is actually a man-made drainage easement from Minnehaha Creek. A true 50-foot set-back from the pond is actually in the middle of our living room. Therefore, making this lot almost impossible to re-build to meet current requirements. In addition, we seem to have a smaller land to water ratio due to less of our property being above the OHWE vs. other k-oiNp properties on the pond. Hi! 10 2026 No one has occupied the home for more than 15 years (possibly longer). There was a deck off the back of the house that was very decayed, unstable and therefore unusable, that we tore down as part of the demolition process. Since it had to be taken down for safety reasons, our intent was to use the existing footings and enclose the area to make it a more functional living space (so it usable year-round) by making it a 4-seson porch and much smaller deck area. Our intent was the keep the home in its original architecture but simply add and update the backyard space. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. ## YFS By adding less than 200 square feet, this maintains Edina's lower square footage housing stock that will attract new residents and retain existing residents and provide affordable housing. In addition, we took a house that was an eye-sore in a beautiful neighborhood and brought it to life with quality updates and additions 4 Page 60 of 67 of 5 trees (there was previously none on the property) and beautiful perennial gardens that complement the pond and its surrounding areas. In addition, we are requesting to repurpose the space that was already there (formerly as the deck) and make it more functional for our family and future homeowners, as well. This will allow us to use the proposed space in a reasonable manner. We would ask to have the space "grandfathered in" as it previously had a structure in this place. In addition, we would add a small deck that would be adjacent to the porch space and would simply serve as a vehicle to access our back yard from the house. As previously stated, the circumstances unique to this property were not created by our own doing. It simply is as the laws and ordinances have changed, the home has not been able to keep up to be compliant. We are the only property on the pond without a walk-out basement and currently have no access to the backyard through the house. We do have a dog and accessing the backyard is imperative for her. It is important to note, most of the houses on this pond have similar 3- and 4-season porches which is why we didn't initially consider this to be an issue. Our new home lot is unique. It is, by far, the closest to the pond, doesn't have access to the backyard and at 2,600 sqft, is smaller than most of the houses around us. However, it suits the area, and it suits us. The porch and deck additions will not alter the essential character of the locality. Still keeping the home to scale (if still not smaller) than most homes in the area. We were happy to update a home in a beautiful area of the city. In addition, we did timeless, quality updates that will hold their value, but we didn't overbuild for the area. One of the city inspectors even commented that it was one of the nicest remodels he had seen in a long-time. ## I '( 01- - ri ## JUL 1 0 2026 5 Page 61 of 67 We purposely bought this home for its size and location. We are looking forward to being able to stay here as we age (we are currently 53) as this home affords main-level living and all the amenities we would need for the future. We thought carefully about updates ensuring this house would appeal to other empty-nesters or ever smaller families in the future. This all lends itself to making small adjustments to the home (as we added no additional foundation to the existing 1974 property) and adding a small amount of square-footage to access the backyard and offer year-round living space. Final notes: As I mentioned, we have been Edina residents for more than 22 years. We are wanting to stay in our new home for at least 22 more and beyond. Not being able to access the backyard from the home is not conducive to that plan. We are a family that will continue to grow and addition of extra main floor gathering space is imperative to us staying here. We love this area, this community and this city. We did everything we could to keep the integrity of the house and its original renderings. We are asking the Planning Commission to please consider the variance for the small amount of square footage we are asking to add, as well as less than 3% in maximum allowable building coverage. We are almost 2,000 square-feet less than most houses on this pond (and in the surrounding area) and have the most water coverage on our lot. Our intent is not to "over-build" or make the house stand out. We will not be impeding on the pond any more than the existing footings are already doing. We are keeping the deck under 150 square feet simply to set a grill and two chairs for fresh air. 6 Page 62 of 67 We are hopeful that the Commission will understand that our requests are personal, not for profit. When we bought the house (with the deck off the back), the plan was to convert the space, unaware that it was not in compliance to current setback restrictions. This home and lot are very unique in that the lot is not conducive to rebuilding since it is so close to the OWHE. We are asking that an exception be made for this home to keep it useful and livable for many generations to come. 7 Page 63 of 67 Page 64 of 67 1 3 12 ## LEFT ELEVATION 1 / 5" = 1i-0" ## RIGHT ELEVATION 1/E3" = 11 -0" 12 6 ## V ## I o EDIN/:, ## JUL 10 2026 ## Designed to ## Build Inc ## SEAN AUSLAND naaa ## NOLT COURT ## LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 ## PI-1, (612) 251-1115 5-11-26 ## 1" EXPOSURE ## 4" TRIM ## LP SIDING -1 ## REAR ELEVATION 1/4" = 11 -0" Copyright for these drawings is owned by Designed to Build Inc Upon payment of all fees due to Designed to Build Inc, a limited license is granted to use these plans to build one structure. Designed to Build Inc reserves all rights. These plans may not be re-used for any additional structures, ## BALL DOOR 4 WINDOW HEADERS may not be assigned or copied, and may not be modified or used in any redesign without the prior ## TO BE S.P.F. *2 OR !BETTER written consent of Designed to Build Inc ## © Designed to Build Inc 2026 ## *D26-006 Page 65 of 67 ## EX. UJDUJS. 2/6x3/6-2 CSMT ## FAMILY ROOM • ## EXISTING ## FOUNDATION PLAN 1/4" = 11 -0" ## TRT. 6)(6 POST ON 18"x42" CONC. ## TUBE FTG. ## EX. WDW. 2/8x3/6 CSMT ## O kr ## EX. WDW, 2/6x3/6 CSMT ## BEDROOM *3 • ## EXISTING ## O 0 ## O 0 ## O 0 CANT. BM. 24" -Th ## T-0' ## 4 SEASON PORCH ## •WOOD ## *10. CLG, ## *196 SQ. FT, / ## TRUSSES ## 24" O.C. ## EXISTING I-1DR, ## 6068 C.O. 2-2x10 CONT. 3/0x2/0-3 FX 3/0x5/6-3 CSMT ## TOF ## CANT. BM. 24" 9 d) X ## U u_ ## DECK iV ## TRT. 6x6 POST ON 24"x42" CONG. ## TUBE FTG, / TRT. 6x6 POST ## I— 24" CANT. ## ON 24"x42" CONC, ## TUBE FTG. ## L 2-2x10 DROP4- rD ## T. 2-2x10 DROPP ## TRT, 6x6 POST 111 ## I ## I ON 1S"x42" GONG, lr —- i ## TUBE FTG, 11r — — — —, ri) 3111-----q rm w ,i ill 0 ## THIRT ## IT.-, 4 6;, ## I- :,.? i ## I ## I ## I ## I ## IFLusw ## I' 1 x f- ## W % ## TRT. 6x6 POST ## III ON 18"x42" CONC. ## III ## TUBE FTG, ## IlL,irRT. 3-2x10 FLUSH ## I IIP ## III ## LL ## II 0 .7,11 o ## C411 .9 i= II ## BO in I x ## 1Y- ## — — H ## — — — — H — — — — _e - 8'-0 ## EXISTING LUDWS. o4 ## /ND ## Z 0 0 0 © Designed to Build Inc 2026 14-0 12' 0' ## FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 11 -0" ## NEW WALLS ## EXISTING WALLS 2/6x5/6 5/0x5/6 ## CSMT ## FIXED 2/6xS/6 ## CSMT ## DINING ## *EXISTING 2 ## *D2&-006 3 ## EXISTING WDWS. 2/6)(5/6 5/0x5/6 2/6x5/6 ## GSMT FIXED GSMT ## EXISTING WOWS. 2/6x5/6 4/0x5/6 2/6x5/6 ## CSMT FIXED CSMT ## MASTER BEDROOM ## *EXISTING Page 66 of 67 4'-0 ## 3/4" T ## 4 G FLOOR ## 5/S" GYP. BD. ## WI V.B. ## SHINGLES ## 15* FELT I/2" Sl4TG. ## ROOF VENTS I/300 ## ATTIC ## 50% ROOF 5D% SOFFIT ## EXTERIOR WALL ## EXISTING ## 4S INSUL. 12 ## F ## TRUSSES * 24" 0.0, ## (DESIGNED BY MFR) ## ENERGY HEEL ## 2X6- IS" O.G. ## R-2I INSUL. ## VB ve GYP. BD. ## ALUM. ## FASCIA ## ALUM. ## VENTED ## SOFFIT ## R-2I SPRAY FOAM ## MIN. R-30 ## SPRAY FOAM EXISTING 2xI2 JTS. ## TRT. 6x6 POST ## GRADE 1 ## F 24"x42" GONG, ## TUBE FTG. ## I 1 1 ## CROSS SECTION 3/8" = 11-0" ## FOUNDATION WALL ## EXISTING TRT, 2x12 JTS, 6, 16" 0.0, TRT, 2-2x10 2-0 ## ROOF PLAN 1 /5 " = 11 -011 12 6 12 ## 6 VERIFY ## EXISTING 12 ## 6 VERIFY ## EXISTING ## I- 12 ## 6 I ## TRUSS MFR. TO VERIFY ## ALL ROOF PITCHES, ## OVERHANGS, 4 ENERGY HEELS © Designed to Build Inc 2026 ## *D2&-00& 3 0 3 Page 67 of 67