## City Council Meeting Agenda April 21, 2026, 7:00 PM Edina City Hall, Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St. Participate in the meeting: Watch the meeting on cable TV or YouTube.com/EdinaTV. Provide feedback during Community Comment by calling 312-535-8110. Enter access code 2863 586 7069. Password is 5454. Press *3 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A staff member will unmute you when it is your turn to speak. ## Accessibility Support: The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. 1. Call to Order ## 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance ## 4. Approval of Meeting Agenda ## 5. Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Mayor will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. The City Manager will respond to questions raised during Community Comments at the next meeting. ## 5.1. City Manager's Response to Community Comments ## 6. Adoption of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless requested to be removed by a Council Member. If removed the item will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable roll call vote of majority of Council Members present to approve, unless otherwise noted in consent item.) ## 6.1. Minutes: Work Session and Regular, April 7, 2026 Page 1 of 160 6.2. Payment of Claims 6.3. Traffic Safety Report of February 24, 2026 ## 6.4. Purchase Request: Ouster LiDAR Vehicle Detection System ## 6.5. Purchase Request: Natural Areas Long-Term Maintenance for 2026-2028 ## 6.6. Purchase Request: 2026 Commodity Quotes 6.7. Purchase Request: Edinborough Park Emergency Repairs for Fire Alarm and Smoke ## Evacuation System 6.8. Purchase Request: Prospect Knolls A/C/D & Parklawn Ct Neighborhood Roadway ## Reconstruction Materials Testing ## 6.9. Purchase Request: France Ave Sidewalk Phase 4 Construction ## 6.10. Purchase Request: France Ave Sidewalk Phase 4 Construction Services ## 6.11. Purchase Request: Parks & Recreation Annual Software Renewal ## 6.12. Purchase Request: Cleaning Services for Edina Aquatic Center 6.13. Purchase Request: Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment for Edina Aquatic Center ## 6.14. Waive Permit Fees: Fred Richards Park Master Plan Implementation ## 6.15. Purchase Request: Helpdesk Software Subscription 6.16. On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License: Cielito Lindo Southdale LLP dba Cielito Lindo ## 7. Special Recognitions and Presentations ## 7.1. Introduce Human Resources Director, Jessica Nikunen ## 7.2. Proclamation: Building Safety Month — May 2026 7.3. Proclamation: Arbor Day — April 24, 2026 ## 7.4. I-494 Corridor Update Page 2 of 160 8. Reports/Recommendations ## 8.1. Resolution 2026-20: Accepting Donations ## 8.2. Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Bid Results 8.3. Purchase Request: Professional Services for Preliminary Engineering of France Avenue ## Pedestrian Underpass ## 8.4. Sketch Plan Review - 7600 Parklawn (Senior Housing) ## 9. Manager's Comments ## 10. Mayor and Council Comments 11. Adjournment Page 3 of 160 ## Item Report April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 5.1 Department: Administration ## Item Activity: Information Prepared By: Scott Neal, City Manager ## Item Title: City Manager's Response to Community Comments ## Action Requested: None, information only. ## Information/Background: Responses to questions posed during Community Comment at the last meeting were posted on the City's website (URL). City Manager Neal will provide summaries of those responses during the meeting. ## Supporting Documentation: ## None Page 4 of 160 ## Item Report April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.1 Department: Administration ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Sharon Allison, City Clerk ## Item Title: Minutes: Work Session and Regular, April 7, 2026 ## Action Requested: Approve minutes as presented. ## Information/Background: ## Supporting Documentation: ## 1. Minutes: Work Session, Apr. 7, 2026 2. Minutes: Regular, Apr. 7, 2026 Page 5 of 160 ## MINUTES ## OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL ## WORK SESSION ## COMMUNITY ROOM, CITY HALL ## TUESDAY, APRIL 7, 2026 ## 5:30 P.M. ## 1.0 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:33 p.m. ## 2.0 ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Agnew, Jackson, Risser, and Mayor Hovland. Pierce arrived at 5:36 p.m. Staff in attendance: Scott Neal, City Manager; Ari Lenz, Assistant City Manager; Addison Lewis, ## Community Development Coordinator; Cary Teague, Community Development Director; Chad ## Millner, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Manager; Jesse Meyer-Ruude, I.T. Supervisor; and Sharon Allison, City Clerk. Also present: Michael Stein, ZoneCo, City’s consulting partner (virtual), David Alkire, Chair of Planning Commission to give PC’s feedback. ## 3.0 MEETING TOPICS ## 3.1 ZONING AND SUBDIVISON ORDINANCE UPDATE – R-1 ANALYSIS Manager Neal introduced the topic and shared that it was presented to the Planning Commission (PC) and Chair Alkire was present to share the PC’s feedback. Neal said staff were asking for feedback, no decision. Planning Coordinator Lewis shared the current zoning ordinance was adopted in 1970 and that the vision, housing market and development in the R-1 zoning districts were different today. He said in the last 5-10 years, the issue was amplified and an audit was done in 2024 in preparation for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Key findings were the need for approval for simple development projects, overly specific allowed uses and standards, and front yard setback standards that created barriers and are burdensome. In addition to aligning with the Comp Plan, he said this was an opportune or an ordinance that was simply and efficient as possible, easy to understand, administer and amend, and uses plain language that reduces the potential for erroneous or controversial interpretations. In addition to simplifying, other goals are updating or creating new zoning districts, add development incentives, update permitted, conditional and accessory uses, definitions, etc. Council asked about timing, and staff indicated recommendations are anticipated later this year or early next year. Council expressed interest in establishing clear guiding principles to inform zoning decisions, including considerations such as sustainability, tree canopy, and neighborhood character. Council noted that shared principles would provide consistency and help guide decision-making when disagreements arise. There was also discussion about differences across neighborhoods, including lot configurations, sidewalk presence, and tree canopy, and the need to apply standards equitably while recognizing these variations. Council asked about impervious Page 6 of 160 surfaces and environmental impacts, with staff noting that additional analysis may be addressed in future phases of the work. Consultant Michael Stein introduced a proposal to create R-1 subareas based on existing neighborhood characteristics such as lot size, width, and depth. The intent is to better align standards with existing conditions, simplify administration, and improve predictability for residents. Front yard setbacks and nonconformities were identified as key issues, with significant variation across neighborhoods often resulting in the need for variances. Examples were discussed illustrating the current cost and complexity of subdivision and variance processes, with staff noting that the proposed changes aim to reduce financial burdens and increase predictability for property owners. Staff described proposed adjustments to reduce setback creep and minimize the frequency of variances while maintaining neighborhood character. Feedback from the Planning Commission was noted as positive, particularly regarding improved clarity and reduced costs for residents navigating the zoning process. Questions were raised about infrastructure capacity, such as sewer systems, with staff confirming these factors are evaluated during subdivision review. Council expressed general support for the direction of the work. ## 4. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:36 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ## Sharon Allison, City Clerk ## James B. Hovland, Mayor Minutes approved by Edina City Council, April 21, 2026. Audio copy of the work session available. Page 7 of 160 Page 1 ## MINUTES ## OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ## EDINA CITY COUNCIL ## HELD AT CITY HALL ## APRIL 7, 2026 ## 7:00 P.M. ## I.0 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. ## 2.0 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, and Hovland. ## 3.0 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ## 4.0 MEETING AGENDA – APPROVED Member Pierce made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. ## 5.0 COMMUNITY COMMENT Ralph Zickert discussed comments made by Mayor Hovland regarding the 2026 budget and City Manager Neal at the March 3, 2026, City Council meeting and stated that they were disrespectful. Rick Vining stated that the 91 trees being proposed on the shoreline of Lake Cornelia would impact the community negatively and would hinder residents from being able to enjoy the area. Pieter Friedrich stated that the City should understand what the resolution going through the State legislature contains. Mr. Friedrich discussed the Kona leadership and Hindu Nationalism associated with the resolution. Marillene Allen stated her support for a crosswalk on Coopers Avenue on Interlachen Boulevard. Mrs. Allen read in full a statement from her grandson regarding an incident where he and his dog were struck by a vehicle that failed to stop. Mrs. Allen noted that they need a crosswalk to make it safer for residents to cross Interlachen Boulevard. ## 5.1. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS City Manager Neal responded to Community Comments from current and past meetings. ## 6.0 CONSENT AGENDA – ADOPTED Member Pierce made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, approving the consent agenda as follows: 6.1. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of March 17, 2026 6.2. Approve Claims for Payment for Check Register Pre-List Dated March 13, 2026, totaling $2,069,662.17, Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated March 20, 2026, totaling $962,868.14, and Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated March 27, 2026, totaling $2,125,925.49 6.3. Sustainable Building Policy Partial Waiver for Braemar Arena Expansion ## Project 6.4. Request for Purchase, Lake Herbicide Treatments for Algae, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Lake Management Inc., at $20,594 6.5. Request for Purchase, Stormwater Assets Inspection 2026, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Barr Engineering at $127,000.00 Page 8 of 160 Page 2 6.6. Request for Purchase, Sanitary and Storm Sewer Manhole Lining, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Underground Utility Specialists at $75,000.00 6.7. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-18, Authorizing Community Tree Planting Grant ## Agreement 6.8. Request for Purchase, York Pond Storm Water Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Boulder Creek Inc., at $832,865 6.9. Request for Purchase, Prospect Knolls A, C & D and Parklawn Court Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, McNamara Contracting at $9,999,999.25 6.10. Request for Purchase, Fred Richards Park Preconstruction Tree Removals, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Hoffman Unhorn Construction at $162,076.00 6.11. Request for Purchase, Fred Richards Park Design and Engineering Construction Administration, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Confluence, at $346,000 6.12. Request for Purchase, Network Storage Replacement, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, LOGIS at $313,917.17 6.13. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-17, authorizing application for the Livable ## Communities Grant Program ## 6.14. Parks & Recreation Commission Appointment 6.15. Request for Purchase, July 4th Fireworks, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, J&M Displays, Inc., at $20,500 ## 6.16. Digital Accessibility Policy Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. ## 7.0 SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ## 7.1. PROCLAMATION: DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE – PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in full the proclamation declaring April 13-20, 2026, as Days of Remembrance in Edina. Ian Nemerov, Days of Remembrance Event Organizer, accepted the proclamation and thanked the City for how they honor the Days of Remembrance in the City. Mr. Nemerov noted that the event will take place on April 14th, 2026, at Fire Station #2. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, approving the proclamation declaring Days of Remembrance on April 13-20, 2026, in the City of Edina. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. Asad Masood, new City Management Fellow, was introduced to the Council. ## 7.2. PROCLAMATION: NATIONAL 911 PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATOR ## WEEK – PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in full the proclamation declaring April 12-18, 2026, as National 911 Public Safety Telecommunicator Week in Edina. Janelle Harris, Dispatch Supervisor, accepted the proclamation and thanked the Council for their recognition of the hard work and critical duties the 911 dispatchers have. Member Pierce made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, approving the ## proclamation declaring National 911 Public Safety Telecommunicator Week as April 12-18, 2026, in the City of Edina. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. Page 9 of 160 Page 3 ## 7.3. PROCLAMATION: EARTH DAY – PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in full the proclamation declaring April 22, 2026, as Earth Day in Edina. Sustainability Manager Bayer thanked the Council for the proclamation and discussed events the City will be holding to celebrate Earth Day this year. Paul Thompson discussed the Earth Day Festival that will be taking place on April 26, 2026. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, approving the proclamation declaring Earth Day as April 22, 2026, in the City of Edina. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. ## 7.4. ANNUAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE ACTION UPDATE – ## PRESENTED Sustainability Manager Bayer presented the annual sustainability update, including information regarding the Climate Action Plan, progress towards goals, Conservation & Sustainability Fund, 2025 Grant & Tax Credit Funding for CAP Implementation, future of sustainability funding, accomplishments, programs, capital investments, policies, Extreme Heat in Edina report, and looking ahead. The Council asked questions regarding soy-diesel conversion, additional data points from the single- use bag ordinance, use of the land behind Fire Station #2, and bag fees. Sustainability Manager Bayer stated that the soy-diesel project received a lot of State and Federal funding, and they have installed the tank and updated all the trucks, and they will know in a few weeks if everything is running well and shared that her goal is to ensure a sustainability element is put into the land behind Fire Station #2. The Council discussed the importance of comparative data to see how their goals are being met and are creating an impact. ## 8.0 REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS ## 8.1. ORDINANCE NO. 2026-02, AMENDING SECTION 4-9-9; REPEALING AND ## REPLACING CHAPTER 6 ARTICLE III LAWFUL GAMBLING OF THE EDINA ## CITY CODE – ADOPTED City Manager Neal noted they are advocating to develop a clean, easy system for lawful gambling in the City. City Clerk Allison gave a brief overview of what was discussed and approved at the February 17, 2026, City Council meeting. The Council recommended limiting the ordinance to Edina-based nonprofits and removing the 10% contribution to the City to not take funds from a good cause. City Manager Neal noted that if the percentage is not established now, it will be hard to do so later. Member Jackson made a motion to amend the definition in Section 6.63, licensed organization, to include nonprofits located in Edina. Member Pierce seconded the motion. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. Member Jackson made a motion to eliminate Section 6.70, 10% contribution of net profits to fund administered by the City. Member Pierce seconded the motion. Ayes: Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Nay: Agnew. Motion carried. Member Jackson made a motion to adopt the amended Ordinance No. 2026-02, Amending Section 4-9-9; Repealing and Replacing Chapter 6, Article III, Lawful Page 10 of 160 Page 4 Gambling of the Edina City Code, and waive Second Reading if applicable. Member Pierce seconded the motion. Ayes: Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Nay: Agnew. Motion carried. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to approve summary publication of Ordinance No. 2026-02. Ayes: Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Nay: Agnew. Motion carried. ## 9.0 COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE (MINUTES AND ADVISORY ## COMMUNICATION) – Received ## 9.1. ADVISORY COMMUNICATION: E-BIKE REGULATION ## 9.2. ADVISORY COMMUNICATION: SUPPORT MITIGATION AND ## ADAPTATION SOLUTIONS LISTED IN EDINA’S EXTREME HEAT REPORT ## 10.0 MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received ## 11.0 MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received ## 12.0 ADJOURNMENT Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to adjourn the meeting at 9:18 p.m. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, ## Sharon Allison, City Clerk ## James B. Hovland, Mayor Minutes approved by Edina City Council, April 21, 2026. Video Copy of April 7, 2026, meeting available. Page 11 of 160 ## Item Report April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.2 Department: Finance ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Pa Thao, Finance Director ## Item Title: Payment of Claims ## Action Requested: Approve claims for payment ## Information/Background: For security purposes and to meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL), the detailed claims reports are not included in the public packet but they are available to City Council through a secure Board Portal. To request the claims reports, please submit a data request (URL). ## List of Payment Claims: ## 1. Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 03.31.2026 Total $95,236.47 ## 2. Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 03.31.2026 Total $66.62 ## 3. Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 04.02.2026 Total $1,906,002.34 ## 4. Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 04.10.2026 Total $1,999,375.38 Page 12 of 160 ## Item Report April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.3 Department: Public Works Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Andrew ## Scipioni, Transportation Planner ## Item Title: Traffic Safety Report of February 24, 2026 ## Action Requested: Approve the recommendations of the Traffic Safety Committee. ## Information/Background: The Traffic Safety Committee recommends action on two items and no action on two items. The Transportation Commission reviewed the report at their March 26 regular meeting and had no additional recommendations. ## Traffic Safety Committee Recommendations: ## Section A Action Recommended ## A1. Request for crosswalk over Interlachen Blvd at Cooper Ave Description Concern about lack of gaps to cross and only one marked ## crossing over Interlachen Blvd at Vandervork Ave AADT 7,260 vehicles per day (2024) Crashes Two in last 10 years, one involving a pedestrian Ped/Bike Crosses 90 crosses from September 2025 study Peak hour of 24 crosses at 1:30-230 PM ## Lane ## Configuration Two travel lanes with standard bike lanes ## Previous Work Interlachen Blvd overlaid in 2019 ## Unique ## Circumstances Permanent dynamic display speed signs approx. 700' east Proposed reconstruction of Interlachen Blvd in 2027 (Blake Rd to ## Mirror Lakes Dr) TSC recommends a crosswalk over Interlachen Blvd at Cooper Ave per City's Pedestrian Crossing Policy. A2. Request for crosswalk over Concord Ave at W 60th St Page 13 of 160 Description Concord for children crossing to go to Concord Elementary School AADT 1,541 vehicles per day (2025) Crashes Six in last 10 years Ped/Bike Crosses 88 total in one day Peak hour of 19 crosses at 9:00-1:00 AM ## Lane ## Configuration Two travel lanes ## Previous Work Concord Ave reconstructed in 2008 ## Unique ## Circumstances Sidewalks on north, south and west intersection approaches Proposed sidewalk on W 60th St east of Concord Ave TSC recommends a crosswalk over Concord Ave at W 60th St per City's Pedestrian Crossing Policy. ## Section B No Action Recommended B1. Request for crosswalk over Interlachen Blvd at Mirror Lakes Dr Description Concern about lack of gaps to cross and only one marked ## crosswalk over Interlachen Blvd at Vandervork Ave AADT 7,260 vehicles per day (2024) Crashes None in last 10 years Ped/Bike Crosses 27 crosses in September 2025 study Peak hour of 9 crosses at 8:45-9:45 AM ## Lane ## Configuration Two travel lanes with standard bike lanes ## Previous Work Interlachen Blvd overlaid in 2019 ## Unique ## Circumstances ## Sidewalk on Interlachen Blvd east of Mirror Lakes Dr Proposed reconstruction of Interlachen Blvd in 2027 (Blake Rd to ## Mirror Lakes Dr) TSC recommends no action per City's Pedestrian Crossing Policy. B2. Request for increase crosswalk treatment over Valley View Rd at Cheyenne Trl Description Concern about pedestrian safety AADT 3,913 vehicles per day (2023) Page 14 of 160 Crashes None in last 10 years ## Ped/Bike ## Crosses 42 crosses in September 2025 study Peak hour of 14 crosses at 5:15-6:15 PM ## Lane ## Configuration Two travel lanes with parking lane and striped shoulder ## Previous Work Sidewalk on east side of Valley View Rd Crosswalk installed in 2024 TSC recommends no action per City's Pedestrian Crossing Policy. ## Section C Further Study Recommended ## Section D Requests Handled by Staff D1. Complaint about vegetation blocking stop sign at W 42nd St and France Ave; staff trimmed adjacent vegetation. D2. Report of inoperable pedestrian crossing sign at W 70th St and northbound Normandale Rd; referred to MnDOT staff. D3. Report of downed tree branch near Wilryan Ave and W 66th St; staff cleared the obstruction. ## Section E Enforcement Referral ## Resources/Financial Impacts: Traffic control signage and pavement markings within the public right-of-way are owned and maintained by the Public Works Department. Changes or additions to signage or markings will be funded through the Streets Division operating budget or the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund. ## Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: The recommendations in these reports support the goal in the Transportation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan to "manage, maintain and operate roadways to maximize, wherever possible, the safety and mobility of all users and all modes." ## Reliable Service Livable City ## Values Impact: ## Engagement Members of the public are given opportunities to provide additional information to the Transportation Commission and City Council. ## Equity The Traffic Safety Committee's recommendations are guided by the ## Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD) and the City's local traffic policies. Staff strives to apply this guidance equitably to all areas of the City. Page 15 of 160 ## Health The Traffic Safety Committee recommendations promote the physical well-being of all people who live, work or visit Edina. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## None Page 16 of 160 ## Purchase Request April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.4 Department: Public Works ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Noah Silver, Electrical Supervisor ## Item Title: Purchase Request: Ouster LiDAR Vehicle Detection System ## Action Requested: Approve Purchase Request for Ouster LiDAR Vehicle Detection System from Traffic Control Corporation for $41,750. ## Requisition Number: 12600111 ## Vendor: Traffic Control Corporation ## Equipment Status: Replacement ## Funding Source: Traffic Signal Repairs and Maintenance budget Cost: $41,750 ## Information/Background: The existing video detection system for the 66th and Valley View Rd. traffic signal has exceeded its service life. The new Ouster LiDAR Vehicle Detection System will ensure reliable vehicle detection for this traffic signal and will be installed and maintained by City electricians. ## Resources/Financial Impacts: This replacement is within the traffic signal operations budget and part of the City's traffic signal upgrade and repair plan. The City of Edina will operate and maintain the new vehicle detection system. ## Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: This aligns with the Comprehensive Plan and the City's traffic signal upgrade and repair plan. ## Strong Foundation Reliable Service Livable City Better Together ## Values Impact: ## Stewardship Capital assets and infrastructure systems are managed to minimize risk and sustain service levels to be safe and reliable. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## None Page 17 of 160 ## Purchase Request April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.5 Department: Public Works ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, Water Resources ## Coordinator ## Item Title: Purchase Request: Natural Areas Long-Term Maintenance for 2026-2028 ## Action Requested: Approve purchase request for ENG 26-5 Natural Areas Long-Term Maintenance for 2026-2028 with Landbridge Ecological for $634,694.86. ## Requisition Number: 12600112 ## Vendor: Landbridge Ecological ## Equipment Status: N/A ## Funding Source: Stormwater Utility Fund Cost: $634,694.86 ## Information/Background: The project consists of site preparation; furnishing, transporting, and installing all seeds, plant materials, and other materials as required for the restoration and establishment of native plant communities; and management of planting areas across 12 project areas. The project includes three years of maintenance; final completion date is December 31, 2028. ## Resources/Financial Impacts: ## Stormwater Utility Fund - Natural Areas Maintenance Budget ## Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: ## Climate Action Plan and Water Resources Management Plan ## Livable City ## Values Impact: ## Sustainability Natural areas restoration supports clean water and a healthy ecosystem. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## None Page 18 of 160 ## Purchase Request April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.6 Department: Public Works ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Dave Goergen, Assistant Director ## Item Title: Purchase Request: 2026 Commodity Quotes ## Action Requested: Approve Purchase Request for 2026 Public Works Commodities. ## Requisition Number: 12600120 ## Vendor: Various ## Equipment Status: New and Replacement ## Funding Source: Public Works Operating Budget Cost: $3,844.03 ## Information/Background: The following is a summary of commodities that may be used, depending on need, in 2026. This is an annual contract with multiple vendors and commodities which will exceed a $20,000 purchase and by approving this, the below pricing is locked in for the year. Martin Marietta - Ready mix bituminous materials SPNWB330B $48.90, Ready mix bituminous materials SPWEA340B $51.65, Ready mix bituminous materials SPWEB340B $50.70. AVR - Concrete 200 cu yd $205.00, Concrete 400 cu yd $179.00. Hawkins Inc - Hydrofluosilicic Acid $.56/lb, Liquid Chlorine $1.44/lb, Ortho-Polyphosphate 50/50 blend $11.77/ Gal, Tonkazorb 3% $15.32/Gal, Ammonium Sulfate $10.69/ Gal. ESS Brothers and Sons - San Sewer R1733 complete casting and lid $441, San Sewer R1733 casting only $224, San Sewer R1733 lid only $217, St Sewer R2390 complete casting and lid $497, San Sewer R2390 casting only $224, St Sewer R2390 lid only $273, St Sewer 3067V complete casting and lid $635, St Sewer 3067V casting only $248, St Sewer 3067V lid only $213, curb box $174. ## Crow Hassan Nursery - Weed Mowing $10.00/SF All Around Concrete - Retaining Wall Repair $31.50, Concrete removal and replacement curb and gutter $42.00, Concrete removal and replacement flatwork 4" $12.00, Concrete removal and replacement flatwork 6" $13.25, ADA Ramp $14.25. ## Resources/Financial Impacts: Funding for these commodities comes from various utility funds and Public Works operating budgets, depending on what commodities are needed during the year. Page 19 of 160 ## Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: ## Strong Foundation Reliable Service ## Values Impact: ## Health Sound water and sanitary infrastructure is paramount to community health. ## Stewardship Re-investment in City infrastructure to ensure consistent customer service. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## None Page 20 of 160 ## Purchase Request April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.7 Department: Public Works ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Noah Silver, Electrical Supervisor Item Title: Purchase Request: Edinborough Park Emergency Repairs for Fire Alarm and Smoke ## Evacuation System ## Action Requested: Approve purchase request for change order #4 of contract #300151 for Edinborough Park emergency repairs for fire alarm and smoke evacuation system from LVC Companies and Corporate Mechanical for $60,630.00. ## Requisition Number: 300151 CO#4 ## Vendor: LVC Companies and Corporate Mechanical ## Equipment Status: Repairs Needed ## Funding Source: Asset Prevention Fund Cost: $60,630 ## Information/Background: The fire alarm and smoke evacuation system for Edinborough Park requires urgent repairs to ensure the park remains open to the public and safe for all occupants. ## Resources/Financial Impacts: Asset preservation will fund this repair. This change order will increase the total contract amount to $289,663. ## Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: This aligns with the Comprehensive Plan. ## Strong Foundation Reliable Service Livable City ## Values Impact: ## Health The smoke evacuation system ensures the safety of all building occupants. ## Stewardship Maintaining life safety systems for the building will provide safe occupancy for the community well into the future. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). Page 21 of 160 ## None Page 22 of 160 ## Purchase Request April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.8 Department: Public Works ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer Item Title: Purchase Request: Prospect Knolls A/C/D & Parklawn Ct Neighborhood Roadway ## Reconstruction Materials Testing ## Action Requested: Approve purchase request for ENG 26-2, Prospect Knolls A, C & D and Parklawn Court Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Materials Testing, with Braun Intertec for $71,697.00. ## Requisition Number: 12600127 ## Vendor: Braun Intertec ## Equipment Status: N/A Funding Source: The improvements will be funded by special assessments, property taxes, storm sewer utility, and the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund Cost: $71,697.00 ## Information/Background: The project involves reconstruction of 3.25 miles of local streets, the replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter, replacement of asphalt and concrete streets with asphalt, construction of new concrete sidewalk on Parklawn Court, and localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood. The project area includes West 70th Street, Antrim Court, Antrim Road, Antrim Terrace, Down Road, Dublin Circle, Dublin Road, Fleetwood Drive, Kemrich Drive, Kerry Road, Lanham Lane, Lee Valley Circle, Lee Valley Road, Parklawn Court, Shannon Drive, Tara Road, Tralee Drive, Village Drive, Weston Circle and Wexford Road. This contract will provide the necessary material testing to ensure the project is built according to the specifications. ## Resources/Financial Impacts: The improvements are listed in the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) under CIP numbers CIP 19-308, CIP 19-309, ENG23001, ENG25074. The improvements will be funded by special assessments, property taxes, water utility, sanitary sewer utility, storm sewer utility, and the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund. Public Works will maintain the infrastructure following the warranty period. Page 23 of 160 ## Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: This project aligns with the Comprehensive Plan, Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan, Water Resources Management Plan and Climate Action Plan and is included in the Capital Improvement Plan. ## Strong Foundation Reliable Service Livable City Better Together ## Values Impact: Engagement Residents have voiced concerns about the condition of the streets. ## Health Well-maintained water, storm, and sanitary infrastructure is key to a healthy community. ## Stewardship Replacing aging infrastructure at the appropriate time is sound asset management practice. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## None Page 24 of 160 ## Purchase Request April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.9 Department: Public Works ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Ben Jore, Senior Project Engineer ## Item Title: Purchase Request: France Ave Sidewalk Phase 4 Construction ## Action Requested: Approve Purchase Request for France Ave Phase 4 Sidewalk Construction Services with New Look Contracting for $528,729.75. ## Requisition Number: 12600124 ## Vendor: New Look Contracting ## Equipment Status: N/A Funding Source: Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety, Watermain, Storm Sewer, and Sanitary Sewer Cost: $528,729.75 ## Information/Background: The project includes the installation of a sidewalk along the east side of France Avenue from 62nd Street to Highway 62. It will be a 5-ft boulevard with a 5-ft sidewalk for the majority of the length. Hennepin County has design requirements that the project was able to meet with the existing right- of-way. Staff have worked directly with the property owners on specific impacts to each property, such as trees, landscaping, fences, and driveway adjustments. ## Resources/Financial Impacts: The improvements are funded by the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund (PACS). The City will implement, own, and operate, including snow removal. ## Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: This project aligns with the Comprehensive, Pedestrian & Bicycle Master and Climate Action Plans. ## Strong Foundation Livable City ## Values Impact: Stewardship Sound infrastructure is good asset management practice. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## None Page 25 of 160 ## Purchase Request April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.10 Department: Public Works ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Ben Jore, Senior Project Engineer Item Title: Purchase Request: France Ave Sidewalk Phase 4 Construction Services ## Action Requested: Approve Purchase Request for France Ave Phase 4 Sidewalk Construction Services with Bolton and Menk for $97,500.00. ## Requisition Number: 12600119 ## Vendor: Bolton and Menk ## Equipment Status: N/A ## Funding Source: Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Cost: $97,500 ## Information/Background: The project includes the installation of a sidewalk along the east side of France Avenue from 62nd Street to Highway 62. It will be a 5-ft boulevard with a 5-ft sidewalk for the majority of the length. Hennepin County has design requirements that the project was able to meet with the existing right- of-way. Staff have worked directly with the property owners on specific impacts to each property, such as trees, landscaping, fences, and driveway adjustments. ## Resources/Financial Impacts: The improvements are funded by the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund (PACS). The City will implement, own, and operate, including snow removal. ## Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: This project aligns with the Comprehensive, Pedestrian & Bicycle Master and Climate Action Plans. ## Strong Foundation Livable City ## Values Impact: Stewardship Sound infrastructure is good asset management practice. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## None Page 26 of 160 ## Purchase Request April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.11 Department: Parks & Recreation Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Tracy Petersen, Assistant Director Parks & ## Recreation ## Item Title: Purchase Request: Parks & Recreation Annual Software Renewal ## Action Requested: Approve purchase request for Parks & Recreation software renewal with CivicPlus, LLC for $47,821.05. ## Requisition Number: 12600118 ## Vendor: Civic Plus, LLC ## Equipment Status: N/A ## Funding Source: Parks & Recreation Administrative Operating Budget Cost: $47,821.05 ## Information/Background: This is the annual payment for the Parks & Recreation Department's recreation management software system, Civic Rec. This system provides user-friendly and accessible registration for programs, events, point-of-sale facility transactions and facility rentals offered through the department. ## Resources/Financial Impacts: This system is budgeted in the Parks & Recreation Administrative Operating Budget. The amount for 2026 is a 3% increase from our renewal rate in 2025. ## Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: This registration system aligns with the Parks & Recreation Strategic Plan to provide community health and wellness by engaging all residents in our parks, programs, recreation facilities and services. ## Reliable Service Better Together ## Values Impact: ## Equity Provides an accessible registration format for all to access programs and facilities. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## None Page 27 of 160 ## Purchase Request April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.12 Department: Parks & Recreation ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Nate Morrison, Maintenance Supervisor ## Item Title: Purchase Request: Cleaning Services for Edina Aquatic Center ## Action Requested: Approve purchase request for cleaning services at Edina Aquatic Center with Covas Cleaning Services, LLC for $36,500. ## Requisition Number: 12600122 ## Vendor: Covas Cleaning Services LLC ## Equipment Status: N/A ## Funding Source: Edina Aquatic Center Operating Budget Cost: $36,500 ## Information/Background: This purchase is for pre-season deep cleaning, daytime and overnight cleaning services at the Edina Aquatic Center for the 2026 season, June 4- August 23. These services provide a clean and safe facility during all hours of operation for the 1,000-2,000 daily visitors in attendance. ## Resources/Financial Impacts: This service is budgeted for within the Edina Aquatic Center operating budget. ## Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: ## Strong Foundation Reliable Service ## Values Impact: ## Health This service provides a clean and welcoming environment for all users of the facility ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## None Page 28 of 160 ## Purchase Request April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.13 Department: Parks & Recreation ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Nate Morrison, Maintenance Supervisor Item Title: Purchase Request: Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment for Edina Aquatic Center ## Action Requested: Approve purchase request for furniture, fixtures, and equipment for Edina Aquatic Center with Henricksen for $196,809.60. ## Requisition Number: 12600131 ## Vendor: Henricksen ## Equipment Status: New ## Funding Source: Edina Aquatic Center Bonding Cost: $196,809.60 ## Information/Background: This purchase is for furniture, fixtures and equipment to service new amenities and enhance the overall guest experience at the Edina Aquatic Center. The filter room construction project includes replacing the existing shade structure and the addition of cabanas to increase the availability of shaded spaces. The majority of the filter room project is not usable by Aquatic Center guests. However, the new shade structure and cabanas provide a fresh, functional and modern aesthetic improvement to the facility. The furnishings include comfortable, multi-functional pieces for families and groups to gather and ADA-compliant seating for use throughout the facility. The proposed furniture will also support new additional services, including cabana rentals, birthday parties and an expanded food & beverage operation in those areas. ## Resources/Financial Impacts: This equipment was budgeted for within the construction project bonding and is under OMNIA public sector state contract pricing. ## Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: ## Strong Foundation Reliable Service Better Together ## Values Impact: ## Engagement Creating comfortable and welcoming open spaces for the community to connect. ## Equity Adding much-needed ADA-compliant chairs for ease of use and comfort for guests with limited ability to use existing furniture options. Page 29 of 160 ## Health The Edina Aquatic Center creates a space where 70,000 people of all ages gain physical health; providing updated furniture creates welcoming/relaxing spaces for improved mental health and social environment. ## Stewardship Taking advantage of bulk purchasing power to replace existing assets at a lower cost, and provide safer/updated furniture and greater value to future generations of customers. ## Sustainability All items were chosen based on being manufactured from recyclable materials and/or have a long expected useful life. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## None Page 30 of 160 ## Item Report April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.14 Department: Parks & Recreation ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Rachel DeVries, Park Planner Item Title: Waive Permit Fees: Fred Richards Park Master Plan Implementation ## Action Requested: Waive Permit fees for Fred Richards Park Master Plan Implementation's construction activities, inclusive of all city permitting in the amount of $124,238.40. ## Information/Background: The City has the authority to waive building fee permits for municipal building projects. By doing so, the City is able to set aside the amount that would have been spent on the fees to instead add value to the overall project, cover potential future change orders, or make the project more affordable by reducing the total project cost. The total estimated building permit fees for this portion of the project is $124,238.40. ## Building Permit Fee $75,296.00 ## Plan Review Fee $48,942.40 Total $124,238.40 Permit fees are inclusive of the following scope of work: Demolition, Grading, Building Construction, Building Renovation, Mechanical and Plumbing, Signage and all other project components for construction of park and facilities at and on City Property, Fred Richards Park. ## Resources/Financial Impacts: Project funded by Local Option Sales Tax. ## Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: ## Strong Foundation Reliable Service Livable City Better Together ## Values Impact: ## Engagement The project was engaged in 2016 to identify community needs through outreach. Concepts were presented in 2024 for comments and feedback. ## Equity The project will examine accessibility and needs of regional users as well as community surrounding the site. Barriers will be removed to create a welcoming and high functioning space for all to enjoy. Architectural design will be people-centered and reflect the needs of all users ## Health Designs and layouts will promote physical and mental health. Accessible connections to nature will be incorporated. Page 31 of 160 ## Stewardship Designs will reflect city standards and needs for long term sustainability and support. Strategic renovation and re-purposing will allow for budget maximization as well as impact. ## Sustainability Facilities will be designed to reflect the Park goals and support City's sustainability goals. SITES and LEED will be pursued with this project. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## None Page 32 of 160 ## Purchase Request April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.15 Department: IT ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Ryan Browning, IT Director ## Item Title: Purchase Request: Helpdesk Software Subscription ## Action Requested: Approve purchase request for the annual helpdesk software subscription from HappyFox for $31,609.20. ## Requisition Number: 12600129 ## Vendor: HappyFox ## Equipment Status: Renewal ## Funding Source: IT Budget Cost: $31,609.20 ## Information/Background: This request is for a one-year renewal of the HappyFox help desk software, used by departments to track, manage, and respond to work requests. The system supports unlimited agents and ticket requesters, making it a cost-effective solution to extend structured service tracking and improve visibility across a larger number of staff. ## Resources/Financial Impacts: This request is within budget and will be paid for out of the I.T. budget. I.T. also provides support for this system. ## Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: This software enables more efficient support by tracking work for multiple City departments. ## Reliable Service ## Values Impact: Stewardship Streamlines support for I.T., Communications, and Facilities. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## None Page 33 of 160 ## Item Report April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 6.16 Department: Administration ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Kari Sinning, Deputy City Clerk Item Title: On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License: Cielito Lindo Southdale LLP dba Cielito Lindo ## Action Requested: Approve On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale liquor licenses for Cielito Lindo Southdale LLP dba Cielito Lindo. ## Information/Background: Cielito Lindo, located at 10 Southdale Center Suite 2290, has applied for On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale liquor licenses. Staff reviewed the application and found that it complies with city code requirements and a background investigation was completed by the Police Department. Staff recommends approval of the liquor license. ## Supporting Documentation: ## None Page 34 of 160 ## Item Report April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 7.1 Department: Administration ## Item Activity: Information Prepared By: Scott Neal, City Manager ## Item Title: Introduce Human Resources Director, Jessica Nikunen ## Action Requested: None, information only. ## Information/Background: Jessica Nikunen will attend and introduce herself. ## Supporting Documentation: ## None Page 35 of 160 ## Item Report April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 7.2 Department: Fire ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Nate Borwege, Chief Building Official ## Item Title: Proclamation: Building Safety Month — May 2026 ## Action Requested: Adopt proclamation declaring May 2026 as Building Safety Month. ## Information/Background: Throughout May, the City of Edina will participate in the 46th annual Building Safety Month, a worldwide campaign presented by the International Code Council, its members, and partners to promote building safety. This year’s campaign, “Built to Last,” encourages people to get involved in all aspects of building safety. The campaign also makes the connection between building codes and personal safety, as well as the important work done by building safety professionals in our communities. This year’s campaign addresses how building safety impacts everyone at the personal, local, and global levels. • Week 1: Safe Homes, Strong Communities (May 1–10) focuses on simple actions homeowners can take to improve safety at home. • Week 2: Voices of the Built Environment (May 11–17) spotlights building safety professionals and the roles they play in keeping communities safe. • Week 3: Prepared to Protect (May 18–24) encourages community preparedness and highlights how disaster-resilient building codes protect people and property. • Week 4: Communities Without Limits (May 25–31) showcases the importance of accessibility in building construction and design. Our department is using Building Safety Month to educate the community. It is an opportunity to increase public awareness of the role building safety and fire prevention officials, local and state building departments, and federal agencies play to protect lives and property. They are the “silent defenders” who are seldom seen but work daily to ensure safety in the built environment. ## Supporting Documentation: ## None Page 36 of 160 ## Proclamation: Building Safety Month — May 2026 Whereas, our City of Edina is committed to recognizing that our growth and strength depends on the safety and essential role our homes, buildings and infrastructure play, both in everyday life and in times of natural disaster, and; Whereas, our confidence in the structural integrity of these buildings that make up our community is achieved through the devotion of vigilant guardians––such as building safety and fire prevention officials and others in the construction industry––who work year-round to ensure the safe construction of buildings, and; Whereas, these guardians are dedicated members of the International Code Council (ICC), who are experts in the built environment to create and implement the highest-quality codes to protect us in the buildings where we live, learn, work, play, and; Whereas, these modern building codes and standards include safeguards to protect the public from natural disasters such as hurricanes, snowstorms, tornadoes, wild land fires, floods and earthquakes, and; Whereas, Building Safety Month is sponsored by the ICC to remind the public about the critical role of our communities’ largely unknown protectors of public safety––our local code officials–– who assure us of safe, sustainable and affordable buildings that are essential to our prosperity, and; Whereas “Built to Last,” the theme for Building Safety Month 2026, encourages us all to raise awareness about building safety on a personal, local and global scale, and; Whereas, each year, in observance of Building Safety Month, people all over the world are asked to consider the commitment to improve building safety and to acknowledge the essential service provided to all of us by local, state, tribal, territorial, and federal building safety and fire prevention departments, in protecting lives and property. Now, therefore, the City Council of the City of Edina, MN, hereby proclaims the month of May 2026, as ## Building Safety Month In the City of Edina, MN, accordingly, I encourage our citizens to join with their communities in participating in Building Safety Month. Dated April 21, 2026 Page 37 of 160 ## Item Report April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 7.3 Department: Parks & Recreation ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Luther Overholt, City Forester ## Item Title: Proclamation: Arbor Day — April 24, 2026 ## Action Requested: Adopt proclamation declaring April 24, 2026 as Arbor Day. ## Information/Background: Arbor Day is a holiday that originated in Nebraska City, Nebraska by J. Sterling Morton, to encourage the planting and caring for trees. The first Arbor Day was held on April 10, 1872, and an estimated one million trees were planted that day. Many countries now observe a similar holiday. Though usually observed in the Spring, the date varies, depending on climate and suitable planting season. This will be the City of Edina’s 28 th year as a Tree City USA city and our 6 th year as a Tree City of the World. Recognition is received annually as a Tree City for meeting their 4 core standards: Maintaining a tree board or department, having a community tree ordinance, spending at least $2 per capita on urban forestry, and celebrating Arbor Day. Edina has been a Tree City of the World since the program’s inception 6 years ago. Tree Cities of the World must successfully meet 5 core standards: Identify who is responsible for city trees, have an official law or policy that governs the management of forests and trees, have access to a recent inventory, survey, or canopy assessment, have a city budget for tree planting, maintenance, and removal, host at least one or more public events celebrating trees and the workers who plant and maintain them. Edina and Minneapolis are the only two cities in the state of Minnesota to hold this designation. Worldwide there are 200 recognized cities in 22 different countries. The increased benefits include but are not limited to: clean water, clean air, stormwater management, lower urban temperatures, better mental health, and crime reduction. City Forester, Luther Overholt, will recognize the Edina Arbor Day celebration on Friday, April 24, 2026, from 10 a.m.-2 p.m. at Creek Valley School Park. Staff will be planting over 50 new trees throughout the park and will have free tree seedlings available. To assist with planning the event those interested in volunteering to help plant trees are asked to RSVP by searching “Arbor Day” on the City of Edina website. ## Supporting Documentation: ## None Page 38 of 160 ## Proclamation: Arbor Day — April 24, 2026 Whereas, in 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees, and Whereas, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska, and Whereas, forest soils prevent flooding and reduce storm water by capturing and storing rainwater and snowmelt, which is then slowly released to our lakes, streams and groundwater; and Whereas, trees and forests improve our physical health by cleaning the air, reducing exposure to the sun’s UV rays and decreasing temperatures during the summertime; and Whereas, One tree provides $62,000 worth of pollution control over a period of 50 years; and Whereas, trees can reduce the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cut heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce life-giving oxygen, and provide habitat for wildlife, and Whereas, forests create high-quality drinking water by acting as a natural filter; and Whereas, Edina is proud of the beautiful shade trees which grace our homes and public places; Now, therefore, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, MN, hereby proclaims April 24, 2026, as ## Arbor Day in the City of Edina, MN, and call upon the spirited and foresighted citizens of Edina to plant trees now for our pleasure and that of future generations. Dated: April 21, 2026 Page 39 of 160 ## Item Report April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 7.4 Department: Administration ## Item Activity: Information Prepared By: Scott Neal, City Manager ## Item Title: I-494 Corridor Update ## Action Requested: None, information only. ## Information/Background: I-494 Corridor Commission Executive Director, Melissa Madison, will give a brief presentation regarding membership and services of the I-494 Corridor Commission. ## Supporting Documentation: ## 1. I-494 Corridor Presentation Page 40 of 160 ## Edina’s Return on Investment in the I-494 Corridor Commission and ## Commuter Services Page 41 of 160 ## Working Jointly on Transportation Improvements ## The I-494 Corridor Commission is a joint powers organization established in 1986 to address concerns about increasing traffic congestion along the I-494 corridor ## Member cities include Edina, Richfield, ## Bloomington, Eden Prairie, and ## Minnetonka Member cities pay $0.60 per resident per city to the Corridor Commission The City of Edina’s membership dues are 4% of our overall budget, so we are able to provide Edina a great return on investment Page 42 of 160 ## The I-494 Corridor Commission Takes a Supply Side ## and Demand Side Approach ## to Slowing Traffic Congestion Page 43 of 160 ## Reduced Trips Are Not As Visible As A New Road Page 44 of 160 95% of the Corridor Commission’s Budget is Spent on ## Demand Management, and 5% is Spent on Supply Side Projects Page 45 of 160 ## Commuter Services Staff ## In 2001 the I-494 Corridor Commission hired staff to work with employers to reach employees with resources to shift drive alone commuters into a sustainable mode ## Edina receives Commuter Services as part of your membership in the ## Corridor Commission Page 46 of 160 ## I-494 Corridor •Over 340,272jobs near the I-494 corridor in our five member cities compared with 216,000jobs in downtown Minneapolis 45,881jobs in downtown St. Paul Most of the major interstates have a Corridor Coalition to look out for the interests of the communities along it Page 47 of 160 ## I-494 Corridor •People from 85 out of 87 counties in Minnesota use this section of I-494 on a daily basis Page 48 of 160 Commuter Services was created to influence employers and commuters toward sustainable commute options to slow the growth of traffic congestion and reduce demand for roads Page 49 of 160 ## We Hold Over 100 Onsite Commuter Fairs ## Annually Page 50 of 160 ## Strategies and Resources for Employers Displays: with transit routes serving that employer, bicycle commuting tips, carpool and Guaranteed ## Ride Home information Preferential carpool parking: management of carpool parking Commuter Fairs: on-site, interactive events Lunch & Learns: construction projects, how to bike in traffic, updates on transit projects Customized communications: written content to promote sustainable commute options Transit pass program enrollment assistance Telework/Hybrid resources Road construction updates Page 51 of 160 ## Commuter Services created Twin Cities Telework ## Twin Cities Telework Website www.tctelework.com Webinars Ask an Expert Newsletter Free Consulting Page 52 of 160 ## Employers Have Requested ## Telework and Hybrid Resources •Guidance on How to Create ## Connection on a Hybrid Team ## •Effective Communication Tips •Ensuring equal opportunity for participation from off-site employees •Scheduling issues for gathering together on-site ## •Ergonomic and Home Office Safety recommendations •Help with lack of consistent company hybrid policies between departments Page 53 of 160 ## Edina Employer Outreach 50 th ## & France Business Association ## 7700 France Avenue ## Abdo ## Advent Talent Group ## Aurora on France ## BI Worldwide ## Braemar Office Park ## Caribou Coffee ## Casa de Corazon ## CBRE ## Centennial Lakes Office Park ## Cetera ## Children’s Hospitals and Clinics ## City of Edina ## Cool Planet ## Cub Foods ## Doherty Staffing Solutions ## DuPont Water Solutions (Dow/Filmtec) ## Edina Chamber of Commerce ## Edina Coffee Roasters ## Edina Library ## Edina Public Schools ## Edina Realty ## Edinborough Corporate Center ## English Rose Suites ## Fairview Ebenezer ## Fairview Health Services ## Frauenshuh ## Hellmuth & Johnson ## Homewood Suites by Hilton Edina ## Jerry’s Foods ## Katun Corporation ## Kowalski’s ## Lunds & Byerly’s ## M Health Fairview Southdale Hospital ## Microsoft Corporation ## MMIC Group ## Newbridge Health & Wellness ## Panera Bread ## Pentagon Park ## PGC ## Puttshack ## Royal Credit Union ## Seagate ## Southdale Center ## Southdale Library ## Southdale Office Center ## Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ## SpartanNash ## Sunrise Senior Living Ta rg e t ## The Nerdery ## Westin Hotel Page 54 of 160 ## Quote from Joanne Mallon from Centennial Lakes Office Park “Commuter Services is a wonderful resource for our tenants. They make daily travel easier and more affordable while supporting a more sustainable community. Their guidance, tools and programs help commuters find smart, stress reducing commuting options.” Page 55 of 160 ## Quote from Mary Younggren, CEO of Advent Talent Group “Commuter Services has been a go- to resource we share with employees. Whether they are mapping a transit route, exploring carpool options or taking advantage ## of the Guaranteed Ride Home program, the tools at www.commuter.org make commuting easier and less stressful. Their telework resources have been genuinely valuable!” Page 56 of 160 ## Individualized Commute Assistance Ridematching: Individuals with a similar commute who are interested in sharing the ride for carpooling or vanpooling Customized transit information: Personalized trip itinerary, schedules for bus or train, two free passes to try it Bike commuting resources: Hennepin County bike trails map, tips on biking in traffic, bike apps and the MN bike laws Guaranteed Ride Home: $100 free taxi, Uber or Lyft rides per year as a safety net for people who use an alternative to driving alone to work Telework/Hybrid resources: Deep set of resources for teleworkers and hybrid workers, telework trends newsletter, ## Ask An Expert, webinars Resources in multiple languages: We carry several of our most- used resources in Spanish and Somali, but can translate to other languages as requested Page 57 of 160 ## 884 Edina Residents and Commuters ## Requested Sustainable Commuting Resources Page 58 of 160 ## After We Assist People with Customized Commute ## Resources We Survey to Determine Mode Shift 91% of drive-alone commuters report they tried the mode we helped them with Page 59 of 160 ## We Ask: How Frequently Are You Using Your New Mode Now? ## Once Per Week = 37% ## Twice Per Week = 19% ## Three Days Per Week = 11% ## Four Days Per Week = 9% ## Five Days Per Week = 19% ## Do Not Use New Mode = 5% Page 60 of 160 ## Quote from Michelle O’Kelley, Edina Commuter from ## Advent Talent Group “I have personally used ## Commuter Services to evaluate and plan viable transportation options, including public transit, biking and carpooling. The assistance I received was individualized, practical and not one-size fits all.” Page 61 of 160 ## Quote from Will Madry, Edina Commuter from ## BI Worldwide “I love incorporating biking into my commute. Having time outside and starting the day with exercise is amazing. I bike to lower my carbon emissions and cut out pollution as much as I can. It makes me feel way more productive when I haven’t had to navigate a snarl of traffic to get to ## Edina.” Page 62 of 160 Outreach in the Community Community events provide an excellent way to reach residents. In 2025 and 2026, Commuter Services has participated in: EdinaRides ## Edina Clothing Swap ## Edina Jewelry Swap ## Edina Toy Swap ## Edina Earth Day ## Edina Farmers Markets Edina State of the City ## Metro South Adult Basic Education ## Edina Senior Center Health Fair ## Southdale YMCA Senior Health Fair ## Edina Fall Into the Arts ## City of Edina Fire Station 2 Open House Page 63 of 160 ## Working with the Joint Community Police Partnership ## Fourty-Fourty Flats The Sound on 76th ## Metro South Adult Basic Education And more are planned... Page 64 of 160 ## Residential Outreach ## Commuter Services Residential Outreach program builds relationships with multifamily property managers who, in turn, pass along our free transportation resources to their residents Free displays, transit maps, transit route schedules, bike maps Information about the Transit Assistance Program for low- and fixed income residents Tabling at resident events to share resources; all residents get free bus tokens to try transit Provide construction updates through direct emails Commuter Services currently shares resources with 28 Edina Multi-Unit residential properties Page 65 of 160 ## Edina Residential Properties We Work With 51 France 71 France Cedars of Edina Durham Edina Ebenezer ## Edina Highland Villa Edina Park Ewing Place Forty-Forty Flats Highland Management Interlachen Court Maison Green Millennium Nolan Mains Oaks Braemar Oaks Lincoln Oaks Vernon ## One Southdale Place Onyx Parklawn Estates The Bower, The Eddi, Edina Towers, The Sound, York Place, York Plaza, ## Willows on France Page 66 of 160 ## We Hosted a Metro E Line Webinar for Edina ## Residents, Employers and Commuters Watched by 192 people Page 67 of 160 ## The Webinar is Available to Watch Any Time on Our ## YouTube Channel: www.youtube.com/@commuterservices494 Page 68 of 160 ## Commuter Services ## Annual Results by Mode 1,887 new transit riders 1,635 new carpoolers 1,254 new bicycle commuters 937 new teleworkers 43 new vanpoolers in 15 vanpools 5,756 Drive alone commuters switch to using a sustainable commute mode (three or more days per week) after receiving customized assistance from Commuter Service Page 69 of 160 Resulting in an estimated 56 million vehicle miles avoided annually as a direct result of Commuter Services outreach Page 70 of 160 ## Annual Report Summary 56 million vehicle miles avoided is 23,234 metric tons of CO2 emissions saved Page 71 of 160 Making a difference It takes 1,161,692 million mature trees to reduce the same amount of CO2 emissions Page 72 of 160 ## We Are Helping the City of Edina Reach Your ## Climate Action Goals Page 73 of 160 Thank You! For information, please contact: ## Melissa Madison ## Executive Director ## Commuter Services 612-749-4494 melissa@494corridor.org www.commuter.org Page 74 of 160 ## Item Report April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 8.1 Department: Administration ## Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Kari Sinning, Deputy City Clerk ## Item Title: Resolution 2026-20: Accepting Donations ## Action Requested: Approve resolution 2026-20 accepting donations. ## Information/Background: To comply with State Statute, all donations to the City must be accepted by resolution and approved by two-thirds majority of the Council. ## Supporting Documentation: ## None Page 75 of 160 ## Resolution 2026-20: Accepting Donations Whereas Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens and; Whereas said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two-thirds majority of its members. Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. ## Edina Senior Center ## Friends of the Edina Library $5,000.00 General Use ## Edina Parks & Recreation ## Edina Girls Athletic Association $3,200.00 Bench Donation ## Jennifer and Scott Gill $700.00 Two Trees ## Suzanne and Kip Knelman $350.00 One Tree ## Edina Police Department ## Kowalskis Edina Market $150.00 Cops on the Court Donation ## Jerry's Foods Edina $200.00 Cops on the Court Donation ## Chick Fil A Bloomington $543.00 Cops on the Court Donation ## Starling $500.00 Cops on the Court Donation ## Chick Fil A Bloomington $1,098.00 Dia del Nino Donation ## Zensai Spa $420.00 Mothering Series Donation ## Starling $500.00 Mothering Series Donation Dated: April 21, 2026 Page 76 of 160 ## Item Report April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 8.2 Department: Public Works Item Activity: Discussion Prepared By: Chad Millner, Director of Public Works and City ## Engineer ## Item Title: Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Bid Results ## Action Requested: None, discussion only. ## Information/Background: The Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge is a piece of critical transportation infrastructure that must be replaced. The bridge connects the north and south communities by providing a safe overpass bridge above Minnesota Highway 62. It is a critical connection for pedestrians from northern Edina to safely access Rosland Park and its amenities, including the Edina Aquatic Center. The current pedestrian bridge is owned and managed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). It was built in the 1960s. The bridge does not meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards and was substantially damaged when it was struck twice in 2022 by vehicles traveling on Minnesota Highway 62. The damage resulted in the closure of the bridge for most of 2022, until expensive temporary repairs were made in January 2023. Project goals • Improve safety and mobility for all users • Create ADA compliant pedestrian and bike route • Improve connectivity between the residential neighborhoods and Rosland Park • Limit impacts on residential and park properties, trees, and road operations with an eye on long term operations and maintenance ## Engagement • April 12, 2023, Resident Meeting • Nov. 8, 2023, Resident Meeting • Nov. 21, 2023, City Council Meeting – Council directed for more community feedback ## • Nov. 22, 2023, Created BTE Website • Dec. 14, 2023, Community Meeting - 3 Councilmembers in attendance ## • Dec. 19, 2023, City Council Meeting • Jan. 11, 2024, Resident Meeting ## • Feb. 22, 2024, BTE Updated Concepts and Matrix ## • March 1, 2024, BTE Graphical Renderings • March 5, 2024, BTE additional Graphical Renderings • March 19, 2024 City Council Meeting – Location and Alignment Decision ## • June 18, 2024 City Council Meeting – Architect Selected Page 77 of 160 ## • January 21, 2025 City Council Meeting – Project Update • March 18, 2025 City Council Meeting – Bridge Fabricator Contract Awarded ## • June 3, 2025 City Council Meeting – Project Update ## • September 16, 2025 City Council Meeting – Project Update • April 13, 2026 Open Bids • April 21, 2026 – City Council Meeting – Review Bids • May / June 2026 - City Council Meeting – Award Contract • 2026 / 2027 Construction TBD All the required user groups at MnDOT have signed off on the final plans. This included an ADA review. Staff bid the project with 3 build options with 2 schedules. This was done to create options for the contract award that best meets budget and construction timing. Build options were no cladding, partial cladding ( bridge only), and full cladding (bridge & ramps). 4 contractors bid on the project. Two completion dates were bid, December 1, 2026 and June 1, 2027. The December 1, 2026 completion date was approximately $1.1 million more expense and the June 1, 2027 completion date. Staff would recommend the June 1, 2027 completion date. Lunda Construction was the lower bidder for all three- build options using the June 1, 2027 completion date. Using the low bids and adding total project costs such as the steel truss and engineering, the following are the total project costs. 1. $7.6M No Cladding ## 2. $8.0M Partial Cladding - Bridge Only 3. $8.4M Full Cladding – Bridge and Ramps Budget: Recall we secured $6.2M in various state funds for this project. A funding gap exists ranging from $1.4 (No Cladding) to $2.2M (Full Cladding). Staff is willing to use a combination of Municipal State Aid (MSA) and Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) funds to cover the no cladding gap. Using these funds will delay a sidewalk along Olinger Boulevard and delay a few smaller MSA maintenance type projects. It will also use PACS funds dedicated to the Prospect Knolls Project. If council requires the full cladding option, closing the funding gap becomes much more impactful to infrastructure due for maintenance. We would have to delay the Wooddale Avenue Bridge Replacement Project from 2029 to 2030, delay two bridge beam painting projects on the Benton Avenue and Valley View Road bridges over CPKC Rail from 2030 to 2031, and delay Hillary Lane Reconstruction from 2031 to 2032. The delays to MSA projects will continue in out years. Staff would recommend a June 1, 2027 completion date with no cladding. ## Resources/Financial Impacts: TBD based on the review of the bid results. ## Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: This project aligns with the Comprehensive Plan, Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan and Climate Action Plan and is included in the Capital Improvement Plan. ## Strong Foundation Reliable Service Livable City Better Together Page 78 of 160 ## Values Impact: ## Engagement Residents have voiced many concerns about the lack of an ADA compliant bridge over Highway 62 at Rosland Park. ## Equity Improving multimodal transportation options in Edina ensures that residents who do not have a car — whether that be because they are low-income, seniors who no longer drive, or children — are able to live their daily lives and experience all that Edina has to offer ## Health Many of the non-car transportation options this project will promote inherently improve residents' health by giving them more opportunities to walk and bike. ## Stewardship Replacing aging infrastructure at the appropriate time is sound asset management practice. ## Sustainability Providing pedestrian and bicycle transportation options should reduce vehicle miles traveled. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## 1. Staff Presentation Page 79 of 160 ## EdinaMN.gov ## Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge ## Bid Results ## April 21, 2026City Council Meeting ## Chad Millner, Public Works Director / City Engineer Page 80 of 160 ## Project Team, Engagement, Approvals ## •Bolton Menk, Snow Kreilich Architects, and Anderson Bridges •13 th public meeting this project has been discussed. •Meetings started April 2023. •MnDOT Bridge and all MnDOT user groups have approved the project. This included an ADA review. Page 81 of 160 ## Construction Completion Dates •Schedule #1 December 1, 2026Completion Date •Schedule #2 June 1, 2027Completion Date was $1.1 million less. •All Project Costs will be using Schedule #2 with a completion date of June 1, 2027. Page 82 of 160 ## Cladding Options •No Cladding •Partial Cladding –Bridge Only •Full Cladding – Bridge and Ramps Page 83 of 160 ## NoCladding Page 84 of 160 ## Partial Cladding Bridge Only Page 85 of 160 ## Full Cladding Bridge and Ramps Page 86 of 160 ## No Cladding Page 87 of 160 ## Partial Cladding Bridge Only Page 88 of 160 ## Full Cladding Bridge and Ramps Page 89 of 160 ## Bid Results and Funding •$7.6 million No Cladding ## •$8.0 million Partial Cladding – Bridge Only •$8.4 million Full Cladding – Bridge and Ramps •Recall, $6.2 million secured in state funds. •Funding gap of $1.4 million (no cladding) up to $2.2 million (full cladding). Page 90 of 160 ## FundingImpacts •Recommend no cladding and delay Olinger Sidewalk Project, use PACS funds from Prospect Knolls Neighborhood Project, and delay miscellaneous municipal state aid maintenance projects. •If Council requires full cladding, very impactful to infrastructure due for maintenance. •Delay Wooddale Avenue Bridge Replacement from 2029 to 2030. •Delay 2 bridge beam painting projects from 2030 to 2031. •Delay Hillary Lane Reconstruction from 2032 to 2033. •Delay all future MSA projects. Page 91 of 160 ## Discussion •Not asking to award a contract tonight. •We need to understandwhat to award tonight.Wewould bring back a contract after MnDOT completes their bid review. Page 92 of 160 ## Purchase Request April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 8.3 Department: Public Works Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Chad Millner, Director of Public Works and City ## Engineer, Bill Neuendorf, Economic Dev Mgr Item Title: Purchase Request: Professional Services for Preliminary Engineering of France Avenue ## Pedestrian Underpass ## Action Requested: Approve or Deny a purchase request for Professional Services for preliminary engineering for the ## proposed France Avenue Pedestrian Underpass with LHB for $387,527.00 ## Requisition Number: 12600116 ## Vendor: LHB ## Equipment Status: NA ## Funding Source: Centennial Lakes TIF Cost: $387,527.00 ## Information/Background: ## Bid Summary In Fall 2025, the City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for preliminary architectural and engineering services for 30% design of a proposed France Avenue Pedestrian Crossing / Underpass. Four teams responded by the November 2025 deadline. The lead organization and proposed costs are summarized below: • Bolton & Menk $392,501 • Kimley Horn $395,960 ## • LHB $387,527 ## • TKDA $414,800 A review team consisting of staff from multiple City Departments and Hennepin County reviewed and discussed each proposal in November 2025. The review team noted that each of the four proposals were submitted by qualified and experienced companies with teams in the Twin Cities. The review team agreed that the proposal from LHB noted the strong understanding of the project goals, was responsive to the RFP and offered services at the lowest cost. These combinations of factors lead the review team to conclude that the LHB proposal offered the best value to the City. ## About the LHB Team LHB is a multi-disciplinary professional service firm with a staff of 225, with offices in Minneapolis, Cambridge, Duluth, and Superior, WI. LHB is known for design leadership and loyalty to clients. The firm’s background is deeply rooted in road and bridge work. They have worked extensively in all phases of municipal project delivery including scoping, preliminary and final design, and construction Page 93 of 160 inspection and administration. For the proposed France Avenue project, LHB intends to provide project management, public engagement, roadway and ADA design, survey, bridge and wall design, staging, and plan development. LHB's proposal noted relevant experience including previous work for: City of Edina, Dakota County, City of Minneapolis, Washington County, City of Wayzata, City of Duluth, Olmsted County, City of Grant ## and Three Rivers Community Action LHB's team is anticipated to be lead by Brad Reifsteck, PE (Project Manager) and Matt Settergren, PE (Project Principal / Quality Manager).The LHB's internal team of engineers, architects and planners is supplemented by additional experts at SEH and Confluence. ## Contract Execution to Satisfy City Objectives Per the terms of the RFP, proposal and contract, the LHB Team will work closely with staff of City of Edina, Hennepin County, and adjacent property owners to begin design of a pedestrian-focused underpass that extends below France Avenue between Gallagher Drive and 72 nd Street. This level of design is sufficient to refine the design in a manner that will be acceptable to Hennepin County, enable the City to pursue funding from external programs and refine the estimated construction costs for the project. This proposed underpass would be incorporated into the design of the westerly Promenade that extends through the redevelopment sites on both sides of France Avenue. The intention of the proposed underpass is to establish a dedicated route for pedestrians and bicyclists that is separated from the nine (9) lanes of vehicle traffic on France Avenue / County Road 17. The LHB team is aware of the City's intention to incorporate a "people-first" design so that this underpass is not only functional, but safe and inviting to users. The completion of this contract is anticipated to take 11-12 months. The design character of the proposed underpass is heavily influenced by the human experience of traveling to and through the underpass to reach their ultimate destination. Personal safety, both actual and perceived, is essential for the design. Keeping the underpass as short as possible with direct views through to activity on the other side is important. Bringing natural light in during the day and allowing light from inside the underpass to shine up at night is also important to make the inside/outside connection. Lighting, interior surface materials and colors, artwork, and shapes of walls and ceilings will all influence the feeling of safety. ## About the Proposed Promenade Extension / Underpass Project The redevelopment of the parcels at 7200/7250 and 7235 France Avenue presents an opportunity to extend the Edina Promenade in the westerly direction to connect the South Cornelia and Parklawn neighborhoods. The approved site plans include new public sidewalks, public trails and public plazas that collectively serve to extend the Edina Promenade so that the general public has permanent rights to travel through these spaces. The redevelopment of these sites also creates an opportunity to improve the pedestrian and bicycle crossing of France Avenue. There have been multiple studies over the past two decades which noted Page 94 of 160 the desire for a grade separated crossing of France Avenue. The width and traffic volumes of this County Road create a barrier to pedestrian movements. This barrier has existed for many decades. Challenges for implementation include right-of-way, roadway geometry, traffic volumes and funding. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail crosses France Avenue at Gallagher Drive. This proposed underpass project would not remove this crossing nor replace the current alignment. Users of the trail would have a choice on how to cross France Avenue. Trail use was measured near 7235 France Avenue at an average of 300 users per day for a week on September 2024. The City of Edina has explored various methods and locations for a pedestrian crossing, finding the current proposal for a pedestrian underpass most viable due to favorable grades and the concurrent redevelopment of adjacent properties. In 2025, a 5-minute video was created to illustrate one example of how this proposed underpass could be designed to create new pedestrian improvements. The project's goals include ensuring a safe and comfortable crossing, maintaining current traffic conditions, adhering to Hennepin County's roadway standards, integrating with ongoing redevelopment, extending the character of Centennial Lakes Park and The Promenade, and aligning with the Greater Southdale Area Plan and other city plans. The proposed pedestrian underpass would connect the neighborhoods west of France Avenue to the Centennial Lakes/Promenade neighborhoods east of France Avenue, enhancing pedestrian and bicyclist access. It should integrate seamlessly with the character of Centennial Lakes and The Promenade, reflecting their design and investment, while influencing private developments to ensure a cohesive and engaging experience for users. ## Summary of Public Engagement City staff has engaged the adjacent property owners, neighbors and general public on multiple occasions since this current study began in 2023. Initially, a "scrapbook of ideas" was compiled to identify and understand realistic options to extend the Edina Promenade and improve connections across France Avenue. The Better-Together-Edina website was used as the primary method to collect ideas and comments. A large neighborhood meeting was held in 2025 and a public open house was held earlier this month. The website was well used and the in-person meetings were well attended. Opinions and support for this proposed project are varied. In general, the following types of comments have been heard consistently since this pedestrian crossing began to be studied: • Younger people tend to support this project due to the functional and quality of life benefits it could deliver • Older people tend to oppose this project because they do not intend to walk or bicycle in this area and are concerned with City spending and property taxes • Good design is essential to minimize personal safety risks including potential conflicts between bicyclists and slower moving pedestrians • Support tends to decline if the construction or maintenance costs of this project results in a significant increase in property taxes paid by residents Page 95 of 160 ## Contract Financing This contract is funded by existing monies held in the Centennial Lakes TIF Fund. These funds can be used for design and construction of public infrastructure improvements such as roads, bridges, sidewalks and trails. ## Overall Project Financing If the City Council chooses to fund construction of this proposed underpass in the future, multiple funding sources will be pursued. The City's general tax levy is not expected to be a source for construction funding. The primary funding will come from the new property taxes paid by the commercial properties at 7200, 7250 and 7235 France Avenue. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Districts have previously been established at these properties. While existing taxes from these properties will continue to be distributed to City, County, Schools and State, the new taxes will be dedicated to financial obligations incurred in this immediate area. There are multiple grant opportunities and transportation programs available to supplement the City's funding. If City Council approves this contract, staff will also start applying for grant funding opportunities. ## Direction Needed This concept has been discussed since 2007. Most recently, this underpass has been explored (on and off) for nearly 3 years. The purchase request has been delayed until both properties are clearly on the path to redevelopment. The properties on the west side of the street are under construction with completion expected in late 2026 and early 2027. The 7235 property on the east side of France Avenue was recently acquired by the real estate developer with site preparation and ground breaking for the first phase of new construction anticipated in 2026. Today, staff is seeking direction from City Council to proceed with 30% engineering design and grant funding applications, or to pause the project for future consideration, or to end study of this potential project now. ## Resources/Financial Impacts: This contract is funded by Centennial Lakes TIF Fund. If approved, staff will start submitting applications for grant funding to assist with funding this project. Maintenance funding and responsibilities will be determined once the actual project elements are finalized. ## Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: This proposed project aligns with the Comprehensive Plan, Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan and Climate Action Plan and is included in the Capital Improvement Plan. This project could improve non-motorized connections between neighborhoods that are separated by a wide and busy county road. Improvements like this contribute to a more livable city by creating new options that are not currently available and improve the overall quality of life for residents, employees and visitors. ## Livable City Page 96 of 160 ## Values Impact: ## Engagement A wide range of feedback—both supportive and critical—has been gathered about this project. ## Equity This project provides new travel options for pedestrian and bicyclists while retaining existing routes for drivers. This project is located at the boundary of Edina's two most populous census tracts. Compared to Edina as a whole, residents in these census tracts tend to be older in age, lower in household income, with higher percentages of disabilities. Improving multimodal transportation options in Edina ensures that residents who do not have a car — whether that be because they are low-income, seniors who no longer drive, or children — are able to live their daily lives and experience all that Edina has to offer. ## Health This project provides an alternative to driving. It enables pedestrian and bicycle access whether for leisure, fitness or commuting to work or errands. New non-motorized routes inherently improve residents' health by giving them more opportunities to walk and bike. ## Stewardship This type of project transforms mobility in the most densely populated area of Edina and will serve nearby residents and visitors for generations. ## Sustainability This project improves mobility for vehicles and modes that have a dramatically smaller carbon footprint compared to typical motorized vehicles.Providing pedestrian and bicycle transportation options may also reduce vehicle miles traveled, especially short trips. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## 1. Staff Presentation ## 2. Community Comments April 2026 Page 97 of 160 ## Extending the Edina Promenade ## France Avenue Pedestrian Crossing ## City Council April 21, 2026 ## For Discussion Page 98 of 160 2 ## Overview •Background •Alternatives Considered •Proposed Concept •Cost & Financing •Community Outreach •Next Steps Page 99 of 160 3 ## Discussion Needed HRA provided direction in 2023. 2024 Feasibility Report unable to identify any red flags that would prevent construction. Developers are moving forward. HRA & City should soon decide how they will proceed (if at all) • Option 1a – Proceed with intention to construct in phases in the near future • Option 1b –Proceed with preliminary design and budget preparation and delay decision-making whether or not to proceed to the future • Option 2 –Do not study this concept further Page 100 of 160 4 ## Background and Existing Conditions Page 101 of 160 5 Background; 2007 URS Study identified several needed improvements Page 102 of 160 6 Approved site plans -privately led development with public easements Page 103 of 160 7 Alternatives Considered, 2007 alignment and early modification 2007 Study by URS shows bridge at 72 nd ## St 2023 Sketch by CSG shows bridge or tunnel between 72 nd ## St and Gallagher Dr Page 104 of 160 8 Alternates Considered; traffic calming - local & through separation Page 105 of 160 9 Alternatives Considered; traditional tunnel Page 106 of 160 10 Alternatives Considered; tunnel leading to outdoor plaza Shakopee pedestrian tunnel terminates in outdoor plaza ## John Hancock Plaza in Chicago is appealing to pedestrians Page 107 of 160 11 Alternatives Considered; examples of bridge with ramps & steps Page 108 of 160 12 Alternatives Considered; modernbridge with ramps Page 109 of 160 13 ## Alternatives Considered; bridge along Nine Mile Creek bike trail Page 110 of 160 14 Alternatives Considered; bridge with steps and elevator Page 111 of 160 15 Alternates Considered; iconic bridge and land bridge Page 112 of 160 16 Alternatives Considered; underpasses in near vicinity Page 113 of 160 17 Concept Layout; Aerial view showing pedestrian and vehicle routes Page 114 of 160 18 ## Estimated Project Cost •$ 0 M -Land •$ 4.2 M -Bridging structures & retaining walls •$ 1.5 M -Architectural elements •$ 660 k -Water & sewer •$ 500 k -Private utility •$ 1.2 M -Street and sidewalks •$ 3.0 M -Landscape & streetscape •$ 1.0 M - Traffic control and phasing •$12.085 M – Estimated sub-total •$ 2.4 M -Add 20% contingency •$ 5.1 M - Add 35% financing, design, legal, construction admin ## •$19.6 M – Estimated Total Cost ## Source: Appendix A-10, 2024 Feasibility Report Page 115 of 160 19 ## Anticipated Project Financing •$ 0General (residential) property taxes •$ 500 kSite work by commercial properties •$ 0Federal (unlikely) •$ 3 MState (estimated) •$ 3 MCounty & Met Council (estimated) •$12.1 MIncremental (new) taxes from adjacent properties ## •$19.6 M •These are estimates only; intended to illustrate the overall strategy. Page 116 of 160 20 Community Outreach –2023 to present •Hennepin County ## •Three Rivers Park District ## •Adjacent Property Owners •Neighborhood groups •Better Together Edina website ## •2025 Quality of Life Survey ## •Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority •Edina Commissions •Spring 2026 Open House Page 117 of 160 21 ## Summary of Community Input •2025 Quality of Life survey included a general question about pedestrian improvements in this location. 70 percent strongly or somewhat support ## Comments received at Open House similar to those previously collected. •Most people express support safe pedestrian routes •Concern for City spending and reasonable taxes •Younger families tend to support, older people tend to oppose •Concerns about cost control and financing •Concerns about personal safety (including security, vandalism and bicycle/pedestrian conflicts) •Concerns about maintenance costs Page 118 of 160 22 ## Discussion Staff is available to answer questions as you discuss this proposed project • Option 1a – Proceed with intention to construct in phases in the near future • Option 1b – Proceed with preliminary design and budget preparation and delay decision-making whether or not to proceed to the future • Option 2 – Do not study this concept further Page 119 of 160 ## April 6, 2026 Open House Comments Page 1 ## Promenade Extension West / France Ave Pedestrian ## Crossing ## April 6, 2026 Open House ## Summary of Comments Received ## ABOUT THE OPEN HOUSE Doors open at 6 pm. Seven poster boards were scattered around the perimeter of the room. Each board was staffed to answer questions about the proposed project. The 5-minute video ran in a loop during most of the meeting. Staff presented 25-minute overview at 6:15 and repeated at 7:15. Doors closed at 8 pm. Staff continued Questions/Answers sessions with residents until 8:20 pm. Event was staffed by 3 City of Edina staff and 2 consultants from Confluence Design who created the video depicting the hypothetical project. Event was advertised to general public with additional outreach to neighbors in South Cornelia, Parklawn Centennial Lakes and Promenade neighborhood. Approximately 200 people attended the Open House during the 2+hour time period. Attendees ranged in age from school-age to senior citizens. ## QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS OFFERED VERBALLY Staff Note: The five people that presented and staffed the poster stations debriefed after the event and compiled these frequently heard concerns, questions and suggestions. 1) City spending and project financing a. Large cost for single project b. Initially concerned about high cost but support the funding strategy presented c. How likely is Edina to receive grants? d. Will taxes from adjacent commercial sites (TIF) be adequate? e. Can $20 M be spent in a way that benefits more people? f. Can $20 M be spent on different projects around the City related to core services? g. Will taxpayers be stuck with higher tax bills due to this project? Page 22 of 68 Page 120 of 160 ## April 6, 2026 Open House Comments Page 2 h. Support the project if typical taxpayer is not impacted 2) General comments about government a. Concerned that project will be mismanaged, with delays and unbudgeted expenses b. Accusations that decision is already made and meetings are just for show c. Anger at government spending and taxes, in general 3) Are pedestrian improvement such as this a “need” or a “want”? a. Any documented safety problems? b. How many people will use this new route on a daily, weekly, annual basis c. Project does not fully address safety and accessibility issues on entire France Ave corridor d. Good idea to extend the Edina Promenade to serve nearby neighborhoods 4) Personal safety and security a. Concerned an underpass would be unsafe and create a nuisance b. Many participants said they would feel comfortable using underpass if well- designed, other participants said they feel unsafe regardless of design c. Suggest separating bicyclists from walkers to avoid conflicts 5) Many people support the project a. Younger participants tend to support this proposed project b. Benefits families, neighbors, kids c. Provides better access for South Cornelia and Parklawn neighborhoods d. Creates new travel options for people of all ages and all abilities e. Improves pedestrian / bicyclist safety by separating from fast-moving vehicles 6) Some people oppose the project a. Older participants tend to oppose this proposed project b. Alleged boondoogle and political legacy c. Doesn’t improve poor walking conditions on France Ave near Southdale Center d. This doesn’t directly benefit residents who live west of Hwy 100 Page 23 of 68 Page 121 of 160 ## April 6, 2026 Open House Comments Page 3 e. Not worth the expense f. I won’t use this and neither will anyone else 7) Other concerns related to France Avenue in Greater Southdale Area a. Some prefer that the City continue urging the County to apply a ‘road diet’ to France Avenue and reduce the number of vehicle lanes to better suit the demand and to deter speeding vehicles b. Will the City consider crossing improvements elsewhere on France Ave to be convenient for other neighborhoods? 8) Construction impacts a. How many months/years of road detours? b. Any economic impact on nearby businesses? 9) Repair and Maintenance a. Concerned about day-to-day cleaning b. Would like to see estimate of long-term maintenance costs and who pays for that ## WRITTEN COMMENTS SUBMITTED DURING THE OPEN HOUSE Staff Note: Individual comments are transcribed. Zip codes of participants shown, when included on comment card. 1. This seems very expensive and the City of Edina needs to stop giving developers a tax break with TIF financing. Time for new city council members if this continues. 55436 2. Has there been any discussion with the Edina superintendent and principal at Cornelia elementary to give opportunity for their concerns? 3. All for it. Please proceed. I appreciate the Park like feel on both sides. I’m all for separating pedestrians and cars. Please make sure bike lane is separated from pedestrians or make 10 mph maximum speed. 55416 4. Separate bikes from pedestrians. Understanding that no pedestrian crossing on street level so France traffic doesn’t stop for them and only car cross traffic. Love the concept. Page 24 of 68 Page 122 of 160 ## April 6, 2026 Open House Comments Page 4 Keep tall buildings way back from Promenade, don’t destroy it. New construction contractors should pay more of the cost. 55435 5. Love how pedestrian friendly the proposed underpass looks. The simulated drone video was a fabulous way to show the paths stairs and elevated walkways and the surrounding buildings and parkways! 55435 6. Good presentation, planning shows. Is the reason for the tunnel rather than a bridge due to aesthetics and ADA compliance? Why was the elevator idea used in Colorado rejected? What is the cost difference between a bridge and a tunnel? Have security issues been addressed? Why aren’t developers contributing to the payment since this will certainly enhance the value of their property. 55435 7. Concerns: cost cost cost. No info on a risk assessment of cost. Interference with France Avenue traffic. 55435 8. Too much money for not year-round use. For the small percentage of people crossing, concern for safety, graffiti opportunities and homelessness. Much safer and practical to build a pedestrian and biking bridge across France. Design the bridge so it becomes a beautiful Edina Landmark. 55435 9. On behalf of our 1000+ community at Cedars of Edina we are 100% for this tunnel! Thank you! 55435 10. Please build this project! I live nearby and the number of bikes and peds crossing is tremendous. Cars are all having to stop. The regional trail should not cross seven lanes of traffic at grade. It is dangerous. 55435 11. I’m an avid biker, but this isn’t necessary! I commute on my bike in the summer on the Nine Mile Trail. The current crossing works. It’s not great but it works. 55424 12. For all the years, do you have current data on how many people try to walk/ bike across France every day? Share it if you do. If not, you should get some. Otherwise it is a very much of a wish not a need. I have crossed there and have never seen anyone else crossing the road. It’s a lot of money. You haven’t accounted for upkeep of the space if you do it. Don’t you need to? 13. This is a hard NO. This plan does not seem to be an appropriate answer to the problem of how to address pedestrian traffic and bikers crossing France Avenue. Number one it fails on a cost benefit standpoint. Just too expensive both to build, maintain, and replace. Just not enough people on the west side wanting to go east or vice versa. Number two it is too long of a tunnel for people to feel safe to be in there. Actually could cause more problems than it solves. Tunnels attract graffiti artists in all cities I’ve ever lived. They attract Page 25 of 68 Page 123 of 160 ## April 6, 2026 Open House Comments Page 5 unhoused people and smell like sewers. Other municipalities have closed their tunnels. Not a good idea! Number three use the TIF money for more important things. Why not use the money to help support Centennial Lakes Park for the next 30 years? Or affordable housing? Number four not safe for bike bikes. 90° angles posts, etc.’s can’t link to promenade because bikes are not allowed there. 14. There are too many unknowns in the plan. The project could take years to complete making travel on France impossible. Cost overruns even with a 20% contingency. Your bridge concepts are not realistic. You have no data on the number of people who would utilize the tunnel. The funding does not compute. 55424 15. I’m very disappointed that we could not ask questions in a group setting. This fire department doubled in cost during the build. What is preventing this project from going from $20 M to $40 M? We have school funding needs that should take priority. Why can’t we implement a better crosswalk? I believe this is a want versus a need. I don’t think this meeting indicated any interest in finding a less expensive or less disruptive option. 55435 16. First nice presentation. But I don’t need the tunnel and I will never use it. I live in the South Cornelia neighborhood. Second with the advisors you are using is there a conflict of interest? I think so. Third construction time is a problem. Also, the disruption along France Avenue could be a killer for businesses. Fourth cost to maintain. 55435 17. First, I would really like to see an annual budget estimate of maintenance costs before approval so we can make appropriate long range planning. Second on slide 3.2 it was said that this [custom crosswalk design with 8 lanes of traffic] isn’t any better and it wasn’t clear what was meant by that statement. A wider more visible at grade crossing would certainly be cheaper and could be something to start with and see if it meets the need. Third what exactly is wrong with a really long bridge? We have one like this already on France Avenue that works well by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. 55424 18. Do not do any further work on this concept. It’s too expensive and there are too many unknowns. What are the risks associated with this project? A risk assessment is a basic staff function. Where is it? The cost of $20 M doesn’t include the long-term costs associated with maintaining the tunnel. These costs could exceed the cost of building it. What is the expected life cycle of the tunnel? 10 years? 20 years? Where is the traffic analysis that shows building the tunnel at this location is warranted? Will there be a public hearing given the large expenditure of funds? Not enough information was presented to fully comment on this concept. 19. This is the poorest area of Edina with the most diversity. This area needs investment like the tunnel and public spaces to encourage racial equity! 55435 Page 26 of 68 Page 124 of 160 ## April 6, 2026 Open House Comments Page 6 20. I believe it would be helpful to provide a bigger picture context in two ways. Show how this tunnel ties into the biking and walking infrastructure envision for this whole southeast quadrant. Include the Nine Mile Creek Trail, west Promenade, current Promenade, etc. Second show how much the completion of the Nine Mile Creek Trail increased bike traffic on the trail. This is a “if you build it, they will come” type of argument. I like and support this project. 21. No tunnel. Get rid of TIF money you’re giving away to prime real estate. 22. I would be against your tunnel 100%. 23. I am completely in favor of the proposed tunnel. It would make the area more walkable and safer. Too many cars speed, and or go through red lights making crossing a difficult endeavor. 55435 24. The clocks in this room are off by one hour. 25. We very strongly oppose this project. I haven’t found any estimate of the number of users per month, per season, per year. Is it $5 per crossing? $10 per crossing? Also, please do not use TIF to make the residents pay. 55424 26. Do not proceed with this idea. Estimated costs are from 1-1/2 years ago. West side of the tunnel is on private property. How does it get maintained for walkways bikeways. West side also has two steep slopes up to Gallagher for ADA compliance. Is this another DOJ investigation? How do Nine Mile Creek path users get to the trail if westbound? Cut across the street? Dangerous. The video widens and flattens perspective. 55424 27. I have grave concerns about the cost because of the war in Iran’s impact on all goods within the next six months. That the burden of Cost will fall on all residents for the benefit of primarily the new development owners. The ethics of using TIF to fund what amounts to a vast return of benefit again to the developers. Underestimating the structure of the roadway in the animation; it is unrealistically thin. 55435 28. What are maintenance costs for snow plowing, changing lightbulbs, removing graffiti, trash removal? These need to be identified before the project is approved. Then the City assets found and the budget needs to include this. 29. Where is the pedestrian safety risk assessment? Pedestrian tunnels are not safe. The city of Birmingham in the UK developed a tunnel system for pedestrians and later spent much money in reducing it. Is the proposal fully ADA compliant? 55424 30. What is the data on usage of the pedestrian tunnel between York to the YMCA correlated with weather? Are propose 7235 buildings (ABCD) definite or speculative? What is the Page 27 of 68 Page 125 of 160 ## April 6, 2026 Open House Comments Page 7 number of residential units? What is the cost of yearly maintenance? What will drive two- way pedestrian traffic east and west and west and east? 7235 buildings = no tax base for finance. 55439 31. This tunnel will not serve enough of the residents to justify costs. It will not be usable in winter due to ice unless you install heating. The paths at Centennial Lakes are consistently icy in winter due to thawing and dripping water that collects under there. The tunnel under 70th St. is impassible between November and March due to ice buildup. This Minnesota climate does not support such a huge cost for six months usage out of the year. I don’t believe the project will be useful for cyclists - too indirect and filled with obstacles like food trucks. Bicycles have already been restricted from circling Centennial Lakes. 55435 32. I am opposed to the tunnel. Our taxes are increasing immensely. We need to cut back. I watch traffic on the intersection of France and 66th every day. Everything seems to be working well. If you did something similar, you would save lots of money and not have disruption of traffic for a long time. Also concerned about the safety at night time in the tunnel. 33. Minneapolis has not used any TIF financing on their side of France Avenue. Developers should pay for this project themselves. TIF financing is not free money. Spending here takes $20 M away from your residents for better projects and improvements. 34. Misleading community interest inquiry in this project. Voters remember and I know I will. Irresponsible expenditure! 35. This is an ill advised use of funds. Unnecessary and expensive. Please take a poll of residents to see what they think. Or are you worried about the results? Also, Edina has too much TIF debt. I wonder if the tunnel fits in the T:IF definition“but for” requirement? How long will France Avenue be closed? Will the County approve that? 55424 36. I am not a fan of this concept. I am concerned about the negative impact this project will have on existing business. During two years of construction. Local resident will not walk miles to access this tunnel. This $20 M budget will balloon into a higher number probably closer to $30 M. 55439 37. I am strongly opposed to this project. We as a city do not have the money and this is not a need. 55424 38. The Cities track record of estimating costs versus actual costs (Cornelia pool) or completion dates (50th and Highway 100 bridge construction) is not good. What guarantees are there? This is another boondoggle. You don’t have credibility. 55424 Page 28 of 68 Page 126 of 160 ## April 6, 2026 Open House Comments Page 8 39. I believe the properties have been financed by tax increment financing (TIF). Does that mean any tax increases to help fund the tunnel won’t be available for about 25 years? Construction of tunnel of France will impact north and south flow of traffic. Talk to the County to get the timing of lights extended to make crossing France safer. 55424. 40. There are many other projects that are much higher priority for Edina than this pedestrian tunnel. Total waste for the community at large. Let developers pay for this project. 100% opposed. This is 99% useless to 98% or more of Edina residents. 55424 41. First a risk reward analysis is really needed. Secondly TIF. Does the proposed use of TIF consider TIF is already approved for 7200-7250 projects? Third who will actually use this tunnel? Doesn’t the neighborhood have a large senior population? Finally, you are trying to sell us a project we just don’t need and cannot afford. 55435 42. Do we need to construct additional green space to solve a road crossing problem. This is a pie in the sky project that has been going on for 10 years. 55424 43. Looks very nice and functional. I am looking for more information before I decide whether I am for the project or not. Need revised estimate for 2026 including current costs for time materials and consideration of tariffs oil and gas prices and inflation $19.6 million is not realistic in 2026. Also a rendering showing accessibility and compliance with ADA requirements. Minnesota is aging (see Project 2030 from Minnesota DHS). Thank you 55424 44. How long will it take? Will it be safe? What popular stores are there going to be? Is there going to be any stores in the tunnel? Is there going to be a sweet science ice cream? Signed kids of Edina! 45. No! 46. How accurate is the financial estimate in 2026 based on the 2024 date of the last study? If this project moves forward benches are needed along the tunnel also chairs with arms ADA height and backs. 55435 47. Very common sense proposal to accommodate anticipated development. 55435 48. The economics of the issue are confusing. Explain how taxpayers are not contributing to costs when they pay higher taxes for TIF districts. 49. A better use would be to hire crossing guards to help escort pedestrians. The 2024 budget numbers are based on outdated values and costs which are certainly low compared to the actual future costs. Glad the city is trying to improve pedestrian access. This is just not the right approach. Thanks. 55439 Page 29 of 68 Page 127 of 160 ## April 6, 2026 Open House Comments Page 9 50. How long will construction disrupt traffic on France? 51. This is a great plan. Very safe and seems like the most viable option. I’m referring to the underpass. 55416 52. I saw the breakdown of how the project will be funded. But how much money does the average taxpayer (like me) will come out of my purse? It’s a beautiful idea but as a senior, I can’t afford it. And more disruption on France Avenue. 55435 53. The presentation made it sound like Edina taxpayers will not be paying anything for the underpass. This defies credibility. Also, if Hennepin County thinks crosswalks are a problem why are there so many of them on France Avenue. 55435 54. I applaud your efforts to find a solution to pedestrian and bike safety crossing France Avenue. Some concerns include; Cost. Wow! Better places to use the money, safety and security or crime and maintenance. I have lived in three cities where pedestrian underpasses are known as places to urinate or to get mugged. For this reason, most people avoid them even in well traveled areas. What about shrinking France Avenue instead? It is overbuilt with too many lanes that are never full. Take away two lanes and it would be easier to cross. 55436 55. Yes. Build it. Crossing France Avenue as a pedestrian or bicyclist is deadly. A pedestrian crossing is needed. Concerned that it may be dark have been addressed. If it doesn’t get built, it’ll be even darker. 55436 56. Please make this happen. 55436 57. I walk the neighborhood often and frequently walked to Centennial Lakes Park. I would truly welcome not having to interact with traffic on France Avenue! This looks like a good option if it is well lit, safe and well maintained. Thank you. 55435 58. Southdale and Cornelia areas have the most crime. Tunnel would not be safe! And the maintenance would be very expensive! Pumping water would be an issue and ice in the winter. Too expensive! 59. I moved from downtown Minneapolis to this area for the walk ability and bike trails. As you add new developments, it is imperative to add amenities like this tunnel and paths to accommodate all the new users, otherwise Centennial Lakes will be overcrowded. So yes. Yes. Yes. 55435. 60. Please, please please do not abandon this project! Make walk ability in the most dense area of Edina safe and accessible. Enough with enabling more cars! This is the future. I Page 30 of 68 Page 128 of 160 ## April 6, 2026 Open House Comments Page 10 would use this bridge daily with my young family. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity. 55435 61. Too expensive. I don’t understand why this needs a $19 million tunnel but other parts of France can be crossed with a crosswalk. 62. Pedestrian and bike paths need to be clearly marked and separated. Areas of potential bike and pedestrian traffic need to be designated with directions for a smooth flow. My wife and I are in support of this project since we live in the area, walk to many amenities and bike regularly. 55435 63. I’d like to see improvements at Street level before spending this kind of money. 64. This is a very expensive project serving a small niche need. I’m skeptical that people crossing France Avenue just a few blocks north or south of the tunnel will bother to detour. Please find a better use for all of this money. And I live close by so I might even use it. 55435 65. As a future resident of Centennial Lakes neighborhood, I fully support this project. The walk ability of this neighborhood will only be enhanced with this project, especially given the increased density of the new housing projects. Take advantage of the tax increment financing. Centennial Lakes took us in similar direction to this. 55435 66. Add a dog park too! 67. I used pedestrian tunnels in other places and in general, I don’t feel comfortable in them in terms of feeling safe and the number of people in them. There are lots of intersections on France. I don’t think people will go out of their way to use this tunnel. This tunnel is super expensive for only one crossing point on all of France. Very expensive exclamation! 55435 68. Is this public land? I don’t think it is. 55416 69. My concern is crime. Will it be monitored if it’s an underpass? Crime has escalated - not to all of the new residence. When will the construction is done. I live on Centennial Lakes. 55435 70. not on private land. 55435 71. Do you have buy in from the police? Who will take ownership if there is crime or homelessness in the space? We appreciate all the considerations and designs that went into this concept with all the new apartments coming the future France Avenue needs a safe pedestrian crossing. Gathering facts on the number of accidents on France Avenue could be helpful in supporting the need for this. I know there have been many close calls! Page 31 of 68 Page 129 of 160 ## April 6, 2026 Open House Comments Page 11 We like it! And while we would have rather have less apartments and less need for this, the apartments are coming. France Avenue will get busier. This will be needed in the future. 55435 72. I like the plans. But I would like to have bike lanes separated from pedestrian lanes. 73. Better look to it than I thought. If you can really see through to the other side that makes a difference. Funding is still a concern, especially with the introduction of the Trump 2026 through 2027 fiscal year budget. 55436 74. I’m concerned about what seems to be continuous disruption of traffic on France Avenue. The extent of this project looks like it would take a long time! 55410 75. $20 million? I’ll take the over! 76. I think it’s lovely. Smiley face. 77. We think this is a good thing safety wise. 55424 78. This is great. France Avenue is a disgrace. I encourage city council to support. 79. Bicycles and pedestrians must have separate lanes. Improve safety on France to gain access to the tunnel. There must be a solution to drainage and ice! 55435 80. Who will maintain the underpass and adjacent areas leading up to it in the winter to keep it usable; plowing, sweeping up leaves, etc. in the fall. 55435 81. I think this project is a great idea and the fact that it’s been studied multiple times really proves why it is needed. I commute along the Nine Mile Creek bike trail to a job in Richfield and cross France Ave via bicycle six times a week. I’ve had close calls crossing at the existing crossing and would love the option to go under! 55408 82. Generally positive. I walk this area frequently and the lack of a good crossing at 72nd St. is a problem. The concept of extending the Promenade is excellent. The cost doesn’t seem unreasonable. 55435 83. What is the anticipated volume of traffic using the new improvements? 55435 84. Great planning! Love the underpass idea! Just do it! 55424 85. City staff is very impressive! The research and preliminary design is very attractive. This underpass is needed for increasing the desirability and financial viability of the community and Edina as a whole. Crossing France is not particularly safe in a car at a Page 32 of 68 Page 130 of 160 ## April 6, 2026 Open House Comments Page 12 crossing with a light let alone crossing on foot. Public restrooms? Would it be possible to partner with apartments or businesses along the route to include them? 55435 86. Need to stop the TIF financing 87. You haven’t explained why it is necessary to fix the crosswalk, much less spend $20 million. 55424 88. This tunnel is a bad idea! We do not have the money first. Do not tax us anymore. Additionally, it’s dangerous! And a flood risk. Stop this madness. 55424 89. No tunnel! 55439 90. I’ve been wanting a safer crossing at France since moving to South Cornelia in 2018. Thrilled THAT it could finally be happening and think the tunnel is an elegant and safe solution. 55435 91. Should have Q&A when here! 92. Was not contacted and two blocks away. Village Homes of Centennial Lakes over 250 owners 7400. 40 mph speed on France = walkers do not like. What will it take to stop the project? How much has already been spent? 55435 93. Please consider a shuttle service to facilitate ped access across France Avenue. Flexibility of pick up and drop off times. Enhanced access for peds with less stamina for long walks. 55435 94. Disappointing that Hennepin County won’t help with a more cost efficient solution but it is what it is. I love the idea, but I just can’t be confident in the value of this project versus other potential uses for $20 million. This is really great, but what other opportunities are there? I know there’s some leverage and TIF (unique to this opportunity). I worry that we don’t adequately consider maintenance costs. What’s the capitalized 2026 cost of 20 years of maintenance? 55424 95. City does not need this under France! This is a safety issue! Quiet living like it’s 1950! Crime is rampant in Southdale area. 96. A project of this magnitude should be taken to a vote. Not enough taxpayers are engaged in meetings and Better Together. Ask as many people as possible putting it on a ballot in November. The City is already challenged with a maintenance backlog. We are not good at keeping up with maintenance - see emergency aquatic center repairs. Is there a long- term plan for maintenance? Chad thought it may need to be an additional tax levy so this is not a project without increased taxes. Shouldn’t other solutions be explored before a large project like this is approved? Please no more TIF. 55439. Page 33 of 68 Page 131 of 160 ## April 6, 2026 Open House Comments Page 13 97. This underpass is a good idea. Bikes and pedestrians need safe safer ways to cross France Avenue. Make sure the west end leads to desirable destinations. 55435. 98. What is the problem we are trying to solve? This does make a bike connection to Nine Mile Creek Trail but not to the 70 th Street bike lane. For pedestrians and access for those living in the area (many seniors) this does not solve the challenge of getting across France in multiple locations. This tunnel is too out of the way for many residents to use. Improved crosswalks at grade and reducing speed on France would be a better use of money to assist more people. Are new taxes from these new properties really additional from what was collected from previous properties? What is our opportunity cost with that money? How else could we use it as a city? 55416 99. Very full room. Only one bicycle parked outside. Are we solving a problem that doesn’t exist? Do bikes pay a user fee? Mention of a food truck plaza. Does Edina allow food trucks? I pay over $1000 annually in property taxes enough! 55436 100. No more TIF. TIF isn’t free. No don’t do it. The city is broke! County has already said they will give no money. The state has no money. This is a want and not a need. 101. This is useless to most Edina residence. I take issue with his proposal on several fronts. Wildly expensive even with TIF financing. Let’s not forget we the taxpayers will pay for this. Has a request for extended crossing times at grade been made? Misleading inquiry into community interest – a $20+ million tunnel was not a part of that inquiry. Tunnels are well documented to be unsafe. This is obviously a “dream scenario” for the developers involved. No one wants to go walk amongst apartment and condo developments with no draw. The placement of this proposed tunnel serves only developers interests. If you want to serve Edina community in the Southdale area, far more compelling to address easier pedestrian access from Southdale to Galleria to Target etc at street level. There is no need for this extravagant plan. Act with greater fiduciary responsibility. I did not see a line item on the budget for what I presume would be a significant expense to redo the France Ave., road and reroute traffic! 55424 102. My comments first will it be open at night? Who will repaint graffiti? Will it become a homeless shelter, especially in winter? Will it become a public latrine? Who will provide security? How much will it cost (see #6). Hire two school crossing guards with stop signs. Install flashing yellow lights as at schools and parks and other pedestrian crossings. $20 million somebody or other taxes pay 55435 103. No tunnel! Dangerous. Adds crime. $$$ 55439 104. Concerned about; this doesn’t connect publicly owned property. And feasibility of the ADA plans. Page 34 of 68 Page 132 of 160 ## April 6, 2026 Open House Comments Page 14 105. Please vote to proceed with this wonderful plan! I’ve been concerned about safety for years. I’m dropping emails I sent in 2019 into the comment box for reference. This investment will provide wonderful returns for our community. Thank you for your hard work! Attached email dated May 27, 2019 emailed to KStaunton@edinamn.gov. I’m writing because I am concerned about the safety of the intersection at Park lawn Avenue in France Avenue (right at the corner by Whole Foods). This intersection is heavily used by pedestrians and bikers and yet there is no crosswalk painted on the road. It’s the perfect location for pedestrians and bikers because it connects beautiful new biking and walking trails with Centennial Lakes Park. Yet to cross the street people need to cross up to EIGHT lanes of traffic. I’ve included some pictures from last summer when my daughter and I attended the art fair. It’s terrifying to think of all the people trying to cross there without any protective measures in place. I’m hoping you can share some ideas with me about what Edina can do to remedy this dangerous situation. Thank you. 55435 106. comment card includes notes referencing York Avenue tunnel at the YMCA, the low spot of the roadway in France Avenue, the 2007 study, the Nine Mile Creek Trail, local existing underpasses in Chaska, Chanhassen and Golden Valley. Possible alternatives include shuttle? 107. Interesting idea. I don’t agree that this is a need. It is amazing that you don’t think this will raise taxes but I think $20 million of tax revenue could be better spent. I also don’t have faith that this area would be well kept. France Avenue in general looks terrible all summer. The weeds are left growing out of control and the planting beds along France and various intersections look terrible. What are the maintenance costs yearly for the project and who pays for it? Year after year? I suspect it will be paid for by city taxes and that is not good! While a nice idea, this seems like a solution looking for a problem. 108. Fully support this project. Don’t listen to the negative baby boomers. ## END Page 35 of 68 Page 133 of 160 ## Item Report April 21, 2026 ## City Council ## Item Number: 8.4 Department: Community Development ## Item Activity: Discussion Prepared By: Cary Teague, Community Development Director ## Item Title: Sketch Plan Review - 7600 Parklawn (Senior Housing) ## Action Requested: Provide the applicant non-binding feedback on a potential future land use application. ## Information/Background: The City Council is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to tear down the existing office building and build two 125–150-unit senior apartment buildings. Two different development proposals with varying heights are provided for consideration. The site is zoned MDD-6, Mixed Development District 6. To accommodate this request, the following would be required: • Site Plan Review. • Multiple Variances: Building height, lot area per dwelling unit, and usable lot area. As with all sketch plan reviews, the Planning Commission is asked to provide non-binding comments and direction on a potential future development request. Areas of focus should be on the scale of the proposed use, given the number of variances necessary regarding building height and density using the existing MDD-6 Zoning District, or should PUD zoning be required. ## Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). ## 1. Planning Commission Staff Memo from April 15, 2026 ## 2. Staff Presentation at Planning Commission ## 3. Site Location, Zoning, Comp. Plan, Proposed Plans ## 4. Applicant Narrative ## 5. Proposed Plans (Board Portal) ## 6. Applicant Presentation at Planning Commission (Board Portal) Page 134 of 160 ## Staff Report Date: April 15, 2026 ## To: Planning Commission ## From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director ## Subject: Sketch Plan Review – 7600 Parklawn (Senior Housing) Staff Recommendation: No recommendation. The Planning Commission is asked to provide non- binding comment and direction on a potential future development request. ## Information/Background: The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to tear down the existing office building and build two 125–150-unit senior apartment buildings. Two different development proposals with varying heights are provided for consideration. The site is zoned MDD-6, Mixed Development District 6. To accommodate this request, the following would be required: ➢ Site Plan Review. ➢ Multiple Variances: Building height, lot area per dwelling unit, and usable lot area. (See Compliance Table on page 3 of this staff report.) As with all sketch plan reviews, the Planning Commission is asked to provide non-binding comments and direction on a potential future development request. Areas of focus should be on the scale of the proposed use given the number of variances necessary regarding building height and density using the existing MDD-6 Zoning District, or should PUD zoning be required. The potential variances are listed on the last page of this report. ## Issues/Considerations: Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided OR, Office Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. Below is the land use category and description. The proposed density is 48-58 units per acre. ## Categories Description, Land Uses Development Character and ## Guidelines Density and ## Intensity ## OR ## Office ## Residential Transitional areas along major thoroughfares or between higher intensity districts and residential districts. Many existing highway- oriented commercial areas are anticipated to transition to this more mixed-use character. Primary Uses are offices, attached or multifamily uses. Secondary uses are retail and service. Upgrade existing streetscape and building appearance, improve pedestrian and transit environment. Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment. 20-75 residential dwelling units/acre Page 135 of 160 Density. The proposed density is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; however, it far exceeds the current zoning regulations for the site, which would only allow a maximum of 125 units on the site. A variance would be required as the applicant is proposing 250-300 units in the development. This discrepancy is one of the reasons that the current Zoning Ordinance is being revised, rather than using PUD Zoning to consider increases in density. Proposed heights. The proposed height of 7-12 stories exceeds the code required 4-story maximum. As a comparison the Fred and Finch new housing developments to the west are 5-7 stories in height. Variances would also be required for the proposed heights. Using the Existing MDD-6 Zoning District rather than PUD. The previously mentioned Fred and Finch project requested rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Using PUD zoning, flexibility in relaxing the above- mentioned density and height requirements was used in exchange for meeting the City’s affordable housing and sustainable buildings policies. Using existing zoning, these cannot be required. Rather the variances requested would be considered using the standard variance criteria. Pedestrian Connection to Fred Richards Park. Final development plans should include connections to Fred Richards Park. Sidewalks. A boulevard style sidewalk would be required to be installed along Parklawn Avenue per the City’s Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan. Traffic and Parking Study. Will be done as part of a formal application. Signage. Signage is not specifically proposed yet. Below are the Code requirements for signage in the ## PCD-4 Zoning District: ➢ One sign per development for each frontage. ➢ Sign area: Maximum area of first sign: 100 square feet. Maximum area of additional signs: 70 square feet. ➢ Sign height: 8 feet tall ➢ Building identification signs: residential. One freestanding sign not to exceed 24 square feet for each building with ten or more dwelling units. One wall sign not to exceed six square feet for each building. Maximum height: eight feet. Page 136 of 160 ## Compliance Table ## City Standard (MDD-6) ## Proposed ## Building Setbacks ## Front – Parklawn ## Rear – Fred Richards Park ## Side – North ## Side – South 35 feet 35 feet 20 feet 20 feet 35 feet 35 feet 25 feet 50+ feet Building Height 4 stories and 48 feet 7 & 12 stories* Lot Area Required 1,800 s.f. per unit (24 units per acre – 125 units maximum for this site) 250-300 units* Density Per the Comp. Plan 20-75 units per acre 48-58 units per acre ## Building Coverage 30% 23-30% ## Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.0 .96 Usable Lot area 200 s.f. per dwelling = 50,000-60,000 s.f. 34,000-51,600 s.f.* Parking Stalls .75 spaces per unit = 188-225 stalls required 476 stalls *Variance Required Page 137 of 160 ## EdinaMN.gov ## Sketch Plan Review – 7600 Parklawn Avenue ## (Senior Housing)e Page Style Page 138 of 160 ## Zoning Map & Site ## Location ## Site ## Location Page 139 of 160 ## Land Use Map ## & Site Location ## Site ## Location Page 140 of 160 ## Building Massing – Option 1 Page 141 of 160 ## Building Massing – Option 2 Page 142 of 160 ## Site Plan – Option 1 Page 143 of 160 ## Site Plan – Option 2 Page 144 of 160 ## Zoning Compliance – MDD-6 District Page 145 of 160 ## Areas of Focus for the Planning Commission ØThe scale of the proposed use, given the number of variances necessary regarding building height and density using the existing ## MDD-6 Zoning District; or ØShould PUD zoning be encouraged. Page 146 of 160 ## Zoning Map & Site ## Location ## Site ## Location Page 147 of 160 ## Land Use Map ## & Site Location ## Site ## Location Page 148 of 160 ## Land Use Description for Office Residential Page 149 of 160 ## Proposed Site Plan Page 150 of 160 ## Site Plan Page 151 of 160 ## Building Massing – Option 1 Page 152 of 160 ## Building Massing – Option 2 Page 153 of 160 ## Site Plan – Option 1 Page 154 of 160 ## Site Plan – Option 2 Page 155 of 160 ## Zoning Compliance – MDD-6 District Page 156 of 160 ## Areas of Focus for the Planning Commission ØThe scale of the proposed use, given the number of variances necessary regarding building height and density using the existing ## MDD-6 Zoning District; or ØShould PUD zoning be encouraged. Page 157 of 160 ## Cary Teague ## Community Development Director ## City of Edina 4801 w. 50 th ## St ## Edina, MN 55424 March 16, 2026 ## Re: 7600 Parklawn Avenue Sketch Plan Project Narrative ## Dear Cary- Please see below the written narrative for the proposed project at 7600 Parklawn Avenue. Intended Use: The proposed project is a two-phase redevelopment replacing an existing office building located at 7600 Parklawn Avenue in Edina. The proposed redevelopment would transition the existing office building into residential uses, age restricted for 55+ occupants, bringing forward approximately 125-150 units in each phase or approximately 250-300 units in total. Once completed the newly developed community would offer first class living, lifestyle amenities, concierge level service, and direct access to the reenvisioned Fred Richards Park. The property will be developed and operated by Greco, a Twin Cities-based development firm with over 25 years of experience in the multifamily space. Once fully developed the properties are projected to employ a total of 7-8 full-time personnel. ## Site Plan Considerations The development team is evaluating the feasibility of two different conceptual site plans for the Phase I project and we have included both building footprints in the package for consideration and feedback. ## Key Project Features • 250-300 units in total, 125-150 units per phase • Underground Parking of 1 per bedroom • Approximately 54 surface stalls for guests and vendors • Two 7 story concepts (Option 1) and a 12 and 7 story concept (Option 2) • Walk-up units • Elevated amenity courtyards and ground level walking paths Page 158 of 160 • Outdoor pools and spas • Gardening areas • Dog runs • Screened in porches • Outdoor firepits and kitchens • Premium interior and exterior finishes and fixtures • Interior amenities o Private dining rooms o \ndoorgoli￿unge o Wellness center o Library/reading rooms o Hobby lounge o Arts rooms o Work from home/office suites ## o Resident Bistro Site Zoning and Proposed: The site is currently zoned MDD-6 witha land use of Office. Below is chart outlining the early identification of zoning compliance/exceptions tor the proposed redevelopment. As the project progresses, we anticipate further discussion and refinement on proposed exceptions. Page 159 of 160 ## ELEMENT ## Current Zoning ## Proposed ## Site Data Total Site Area (SF) 228,402 228,402 ## Total Site Area (acres) 5.24 5.24 ## District MDD-6 Mixed Development MDD-6 Mixed Development Total Units 105 to 393 125-150 each phase (250-300 total) - assume 270 units Units /Acre 20 to 75 units/acre - Office/Resi 48-58 units/acre ## Height HOD-4 - 4-stories 48' 144 feet (12 Stories)-directly across street (85'-0" Max -7 Levels) ## Lot Area Required Req'd 3,300 sf/ unit = 891,000 Max Allowance 1,500 = 405,000 914 sf to 762 sf/ unit base - not including potential allowances ## Lot Coverage max lot coverage 30% 200 sf of useable lot area req'd per unit 200 sf x 270 units= 54,000sf. Actual= 54,775 sf ## F.A.R. Residential Uses shall not exceed 0.5 0.96 ## Setbacks Afronting a Street/Front 35 feet Miniumum 35 feet Side Street (ft) 35 feet ## NA ## Interior Side Yard (ft) 20 feet Minimum 20 feet Rear Yard (ft) 35 feet Miniumum 35 feet ## Parking Setback >20' from public street ROW or >1O' from interior side lot line Minimum 20 feet from public ROW, 1O feet from interior lot line ## Total Impervious Surface ## Current Site approx 90% Impervious Proposed potential 65% Impervious ## Required Parking (1 per bedroom) 540 Required 530 including visitor ## Visitor Parking based on exposed spaces? see above Standard 90 degree ## Parking 8'-6" x 18 ' - 24' drive aisles 8'-6" x 18 ' - 22' drive aisles Compact 90 degree ## Parking 7'-6" x 18 ' - 24' drive aisles 7'-6" x 18 ' - 22' drive aisles ## Accessilble Parking State Accessibilty Code State Accessibilty Code ## Bike Parking 1 per every 14 units Minimum 18 to 22 depending on final unit count We look forward to further discussions regarding the proposed redevelopment. While we understand this is the very beginning stage of the project, we are excited to further the conversation on what we believe to be a compliment of the guiding principles outlined in the Edina Comprehensive Plan, specifically those directed towards the Greater Southdale ## Plan..,,..., Page 160 of 160