Edina School Board Proposes 5.26% Property Tax Increase for 2024
The Edina Public Schools Board held its required Truth in Taxation hearing on December 11, presenting a proposed $3.6 million increase in property taxes for the coming year while citing a growing gap between state funding and actual costs.
District officials told residents that property taxes would rise 5.26% under the proposed 2024 levy, driven largely by state education funding that has failed to keep pace with inflation. Director of Business Services Mat Woodard explained that over the past two decades, state appropriations have fallen approximately $1,400 per student behind actual inflation costs.
The district relies on local property taxes for about 35% of its budget — a higher proportion than many other school districts. Staff compensation accounts for roughly 79% of all district spending, Woodard noted, adding that "any changes to this category would obviously have a significant impact on the school district's financial outlook." Officials said growth in the local tax base has helped soften the impact on individual taxpayers.
The meeting began with the board voting to limit public comment to 30 minutes, a move proposed by Director Green under the district's Policy 206. The restriction was designed to accommodate a packed agenda that included both the tax hearing and a review of the fiscal year 2023 audit. Green said the time limit would still allow at least nine community members to speak under the standard three-minute rule.
The public hearing was briefly interrupted when resident Eva Hajan attempted to address topics unrelated to taxation and was ruled out of order by Chair Allenberg, prompting a short recess. No formal dissent was recorded on the motion to limit comments, though at least one audience member later objected to the restriction.
The board also reviewed audit results from the recently completed fiscal year. The meeting touched on the district's strategic plan, which emphasizes civil discourse and considering multiple perspectives during public engagement.
Our proprietary artificial intelligence agent analyzed publicly available documents including meeting agendas, minutes, and transcripts to write this story to help inform local residents. Feedback helps us improve, so please consider rating how we did with the thumbs up or down below.
Go deeper on this topic
Research related meeting documents and build a brief — without rewriting the story.
Full analysis
Votes (2)
Motion to Limit Community Comment
Dissent: None recorded during the vote, though a member of the public later objected to the restriction.
Moved by Director Green [2:32] · Seconded by Unknown [2:39]
Director Green proposed limiting community comment to 30 minutes to manage a dense agenda including the audit review and taxation hearing. The motion aimed to ensure at least nine speakers could participate under the three-minute rule.
Truth in Taxation Hearing
Dissent: Eva Hajan [22:04] attempted to speak on non-tax issues and was ruled out of order, leading to a meeting recess.
Moved by Chair Allenberg [4:54] · Seconded by N/A
Director Mat Woodard presented the financial status of the district. Key points included a $3.6 million increase in the property tax levy (5.26%), the impact of state funding lagging behind inflation by $1,400 per pupil, and the growth of the local tax base mitigating taxpayer impact.
Notable Quotes (3)
I propose that we limit the community comment to 30 minutes pursuant with policy 206... so we will be able to have nine speakers.
There you can see the gap between what the state has appropriated over the last 20 years and what actual inflation has been. The difference is about $1,400 per pupil unit.
Staff compensation actually makes up about 79% of all of our expenditures... any changes to this category would obviously have a significant impact on the school district's Financial Outlook.
Ordinances & Resolutions (4)
Board policy regarding community comment and public participation at meetings.
Financial audit results presented to the board for review.
The proposed property tax levy certification for the subsequent fiscal year.
District plan emphasizing civil discourse, empathy, and multiple perspectives.
Source document
Was this story helpful?
Other Topics from This Document
Community Comment Policy and Meeting Management
School District Financial Audit and Budgeting
Want to know when new stories arrive?
Enter your email to receive updates.
We will not use your email for any other purpose. You can unsubscribe at any time.