Edina Council Reviews Townhome Proposal, Adopts Budget Changes
The Edina City Council reviewed a sketch plan for four townhomes at 5516 Vernon Avenue during their February 4 meeting, while also adopting budget amendments and the 2025-2030 capital improvement plan.
Abundance Properties presented plans to demolish an existing single-family home and construct four townhomes on the 38,000-square-foot property. The proposal would require a comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning to accommodate the development. Council members provided feedback on design elements, suggesting consideration of tree preservation and reduced impervious surfaces.
The council approved a 1% budget reduction totaling $545,000, including $192,000 from police department vacancy management and $25,000 from eliminated election costs. City Manager Scott Neil explained the reductions came from department recommendations and would not materially impact staffing levels.
Council members also adopted the 2025-2030 capital improvement plan, despite concerns from Council Member Risser about the $16 million France Avenue Crossing project. The plan increased from $300 million to $547 million over the six-year period.
Police Chief Milburn outlined the department's immigration policy, clarifying that officers do not ask about immigration status during routine stops and do not participate in federal immigration enforcement activities. The policy will be published on the city website for transparency.
This story was created by artificial intelligence (a large language model) based on the proceedings captured in the video below.
Go deeper on this topic
Research related meeting documents and build a brief — without rewriting the story.
Rate this story
▸Meeting Analysis
The Edina City Council held their February 4, 2025 meeting, starting with a slight delay due to preliminary budget work with Police and Fire Chiefs. Key items included budget amendments, capital improvement plan adoption, and a sketch plan review for townhomes at 5516 Vernon Avenue. The council also discussed community comment procedures, federal funding impacts, and various operational updates.
▸Source Document
[0:13] February 4th 2025 our apologies for the slight delay and getting started here at
[0:18] 7:10 we were doing some preliminary work on budgeting for the years ahead uh
[0:24] upstairs in our work session and um meeting with our Police and Fire Chiefs and uh talking about their operations so
[0:31] uh again my apologies for the slightly delayed start to the meeting um as
[0:36] director benro said we're continuing to do these meetings in a hybrid sort of way uh we've been we did it all the way
[0:42] through covid pandemic post pandemic now we're continuing that same process
[0:47] sometimes we have a public hearing and there's always public comment opportunity for Community comment uh no
[0:53] public hearing this evening as director benat indicated uh but there will be an opportunity for Community comment if
[0:59] someone wants to speak to the council about a matter that's not on the agenda this evening or scheduled for a future
[1:04] public hearing you're welcome to come forward if you're in the uh audience you'll have three minutes you'll get a
[1:09] yellow light the warning light to come on when you got 30 seconds left should be thinking about wrapping up your comments so we can treat everybody the
[1:15] same from a time stpoint uh and then we'll do the uh folks that might be turning in uh tuning in virtually after
[1:22] that so uh having provided that information let me now ask our clerk Sharon Allison to call the role cleris
[1:29] Council member agnu here council member Jackson is absent council member Pierce here council member Risser here mayor
[1:35] hubin here uh next is Pledge of
[1:41] Allegiance allegiance to the flag United United States of America and to the
[1:46] Republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with libery and
[1:52] justice for all thanks everyone uh and now we have a uh form of
[2:00] meeting agenda in front of us this evening is there anyone who wishes to
[2:06] modify the agenda on the council from or from a staff standpoint is there a motion to approve the meeting agenda is
[2:11] published so move second we got a motion by member Pier second by member rard to adopt the
[2:18] meeting agenda as published any further conversation on that issue all those in favor of adopting the meeting agenda say
[2:24] I I I oppos carried uh before we go to community comment I I don't know if
[2:29] anyone in the AUD audiences here with regard to item um 7.2 which um was
[2:35] intended to be a second reading on um uh possibly adding to the code the language
[2:42] uh dealing with the sale of inhumanely bred animals the sale of inhumanely bred
[2:48] animals and uh council member agu has been working on this matter and she's had some conversations I think with
[2:54] folks whose input we would like and she would appreciate and I'm going to turn to her now uh and uh I think we're going
[3:01] to be tabling this matter but I'll let member U take it from here yeah absolutely thank you um so I had uh
[3:06] members of The Humane Society reach out and one they're really excited that we're looking at this as a council but
[3:13] they also um had some suggestions on incorporating it back but they just got
[3:18] back to me today on um some of those suggestions so I just wanted to give us proper time to integrate those consider
[3:25] um the feedback and the impacts that it would have to the ordinance and hoping to address table this until March 4th
[3:32] okay so you would you would move that the uh 7.2 the second reading of ordinance 22501 be tabled to the March
[3:40] 4th 2025 city council meeting for further discussion yes all right yes is there a second to that a second all
[3:47] right we got a motion a second to uh table uh item 7.2 which is ordinance
[3:53] 20251 which would amend chapter 8 concerning the sale of inhumanely bred animals to the March 4 25 meeting any
[4:00] further discussion on that matter all those in favor of tbling the matter stated to March 4 2025 meeting say I I I
[4:08] oppos carried all right thanks member U for that update uh now we're going to go back to um Community comment and um
[4:16] we'll take folks I see a few of our residents fellow residents in the audience uh who may want to uh come up
[4:22] and address the Council on a matter of concern to them that's not on the agenda uh or scheduled for a future public
[4:29] hearing so if you feel feel welcome to come
[4:34] forward hello danie Weston 6136 Brookview Avenue I'm back um at the last
[4:41] city council meeting two weeks ago um on the agenda was the um item of
[4:49] an a um so-called conservation easement
[4:54] uh that was discussed and what came up in that regard was the process and that
[5:01] the city does not have a set process um or guidelines of how to do that sort of
[5:08] a thing um one thing that made me um sit up a little little bit more in
[5:16] my chair in the remarks toward the end of all of that discussion before the vote or maybe it was after the vote
[5:22] whichever um mayor holand said we used a process that was kind of customized to
[5:29] the situation we had a unique process we used then a little further into that
[5:35] same minute he referred to a conversation he'd had with a retired
[5:41] County engineer that told him and I'm quoting exactly as it was in the
[5:47] recording Jim don't let that concern about process cause you to kill a good
[5:53] project don't ever let process kill a good project
[6:00] and I have an issue with that because process is
[6:07] something that gives us fairness it gives us set
[6:15] guidelines and when you do not have a process and you do not
[6:20] follow a process even when one is established what can happen is the city
[6:29] can be responsible for code violations violations of what state
[6:34] statute says you are to do and it can cause
[6:40] favoritism and I have seen this happen personally with a house that was built
[6:46] starting in 2008 two doors down from me the city code was not followed it was
[6:54] allowed to be placed where it should not have been placed by almost 8 ft
[7:00] and there were many violations of our city code as far as building procedures
[7:06] process inspections it ended up with the house having a stop work order finally put
[7:13] onto it a month after the first complaints and the city was sued this
[7:21] causes the taxpayers money lawyer time and this is not okay because
[7:29] process code was not followed we need to make sure that this
[7:37] is that we do not do things as they may have been done in the 60s 7s when ah I
[7:44] know you you're good it's fine you can pass but that's not okay anymore process
[7:52] and following what the city code and statutes State statutes say you are
[7:57] supposed to do is extremely important when those are not
[8:03] done it becomes a very shaky dangerous situation and our federal government
[8:10] right now is seeing huge issues because of that very thing happening so I don't
[8:17] want to see this done at a local level if we've got the rules follow
[8:23] them thank you yeah thanks M Wesson I appreciate your perspective on it I'll address it in the few minutes
[8:31] here context um anyone
[8:51] else good evening mayor H and council members my name is Steve Brown I live at
[8:57] 5528 Halifax Lane I want to comment in support of
[9:03] your use of Tiff for redevelopment projects one reason for my support is
[9:09] that I believe that Tiff is good for taxpayers how our taxes are calculated
[9:14] is incredibly complex but this chart illustrates one very simple
[9:24] concept this was brought to my attention by a presentation made in 2019 by by
[9:29] then council member Mike fiser council member Fischer said that
[9:34] we can think of the city's tax capacity as a pie that big green circle that you see there each resident share of the pie
[9:42] is represented by the small orange slice this slice here and then if you think
[9:48] about a typical Tiff project it typically will involve a large piece of project and so it's represented here is
[9:54] this large yellow slice the yellow
[10:00] when property under goes Redevelopment the property increases in value typically and its share of tax capacity
[10:07] increases so that yellow slice gets bigger when that happens the share of
[10:14] tax capacity for the resident decreases because the pi is not changing
[10:20] all that much in total size and they pay less taxes they would
[10:26] than they would have paid if the project hadn't happened so so one key question is have Tiff projects increased in value
[10:32] over time and Mike answered that question with a example from Grand View
[10:38] Square
[10:44] project and this was a project that took place between 1984 and
[10:49] 2010 and it involved the new library that was built into din at that time and
[10:55] what Mike did was had the city resources put together this chart which showed
[11:01] that over the time period for that project the slice of that that yellow
[11:07] slice of P grew by 830 per. that was almost eight times faster
[11:14] than the overall tax capacity of the city so the city grew but that
[11:19] particular project grew a lot faster and that meant that every single residents
[11:25] share decreased a little bit that's a good thing for
[11:30] taxpayers so the second question is how have other Tiff projects performed over
[11:36] time so in the recent H year in review they published this chart and you don't
[11:43] have to read the numbers on this chart you just have to recognize that there are a lot of numbers on the chart and
[11:50] the fact that there are numbers on the chart says that all of those projects that are listed there the ones that have
[11:57] completed Construction are actually paying incremental taxes that's a good thing that's like
[12:04] paying interest on a bank account if you were to invest in a bank and it didn't
[12:10] pay interest you wouldn't be happy if you're getting the interest you're happy
[12:16] in this case all the projects are paying interest and so far in the last six years we've had about 28 million do in
[12:24] incremental taxes generated by the projects in which the city invested Tiff
[12:30] thanks Mr Brown I need to have you wrap up your comments so I am done okay I don't want to overstate the importance
[12:37] of Tiff Tiff is only 1.5% of total tax capacity but I think it's important that
[12:43] we all recognize that it's been official to us as taxpayers thank you thank you Mr
[12:50] Brown anyone else in the
[12:56] audience he let's turn to the virtual world we'll see if we have anybody tuning
[13:04] in I do have a caller um I'm going to unmute your line caller and um please
[13:10] Begin by stating your full name and record your full name and record your full name and address for the record
[13:17] please go ahead caller thank you uh This is Connie
[13:22] Corino 4509 Garrison Lane so um
[13:29] let's see first I I want to thank you for keeping Community comment on tonight's agenda and I urge you to
[13:36] continue to make this important communication tool a part of the community engagement and the public
[13:43] input process and just a few moments ago for example there were two residents who
[13:49] presented uh issues that um are of community interest and not and and
[13:56] Beyond just presenting to five council members in a close door session so I think it's really important that we keep
[14:01] Community comment available and my second point it was actually through
[14:08] looking for an update on that proposal um to remove Community comment
[14:14] from the council agenda that lends me to this next point and it certainly is
[14:20] easier and more direct to provide this note via either in person or in this
[14:25] virtual uh format then a closed door session just with Council um what I was
[14:31] looking for the item I'm looking for um I won't mention it so that I comply with
[14:37] your guidelines and rules but I found the new format to view Council agendas online very
[14:44] cumbersome um for for instance the item I was looking for it was really
[14:49] difficult to find the attachments they were rather buried and I wanted to learn more so I would would encourage you to
[14:58] find an easy I uh way to make all of the agenda items with the attachments for
[15:04] everything from the consent agenda all the way through the reports easier to access thank you thank you m
[15:14] Kino okay all right um yeah thanks Mr Brown thanks M Kino
[15:22] and Miss Weston I was probably a little bit too glib when I was commenting on what the county attorney told me uh and
[15:29] I could see where you would come up with some concerns about that uh it was in the context of um where you otherwise
[15:37] had an adequate and appropriate sort of process that you don't want to
[15:42] let the um uh some concerns about the adequacy of that
[15:48] process uh you know otherwise kill a project that was worthwhile doing and uh
[15:53] that's not even the most articulate way to express it but the concerns that you've expressed uh really don't go so
[16:00] much to process as they do to enforcement in my opinion so um but nonetheless I thought your point was
[16:06] well taken and um certainly am a believer over the years I've been doing this that the process you employ is is
[16:13] very important to follow uh as well now whether we should have a set process for
[16:19] dealing with proposed conservation easements um because of the varied
[16:24] nature of those things over time um I think that's why they have tended to get kind of customized whether it's 50 I'll
[16:32] use an example of a 50 foot conservation easement along one of our lakes or uh
[16:38] the one like we discussed at the recent meeting and um but there certainly something we could take a look at have
[16:43] our City attorney and staff look at to see if they think that has Merit to create some kind of a process around
[16:49] conservation easement so and U manager Neil is nodding his head affirmatively so I I think we said that at the at the
[16:55] council meeting too yeah so we are going to work on that all right very good and I don't know if you stuck around to hear
[17:02] that but at the last meeting we were going to take a look at that so uh thanks for coming tonight and thanks for
[17:07] your observations okay um now we're going to
[17:13] move on from Community comment uh into our city manager response to community comments that were made at the last meeting and manager Neil have you got
[17:19] anything you wanted to comment on thank you honor members of council uh at our Fe at our January 21st meeting we had
[17:26] three speakers under Community comment no question uh we had some folks talking from
[17:31] Project the project Earth group from the high school uh we had two representatives from Hindus of North
[17:36] America that talked a little bit about some uh uh collaboration they were doing with the police department and uh Miss
[17:43] Weston talked about u a public forum Community comment um but offered no
[17:50] questions okay all right uh thanks for that now
[17:55] we're going to move on to the uh consent agenda and I I know that member rer wanted us to pull items 6.4 and 6.5 do
[18:03] any other council members wish to have an item pulled off to consent agenda is there a motion to adopt the items on the
[18:09] consent agenda with the exception of items 6.4 and 6.5 so second got a motion second to
[18:16] adopt the items on the consent agenda in a single motion member Pierce moves member U seconds the adoption of those
[18:23] items on the consent agenda a single motion with the exception of items 6.4 and 6.5 uh uh with respect to the motion as
[18:31] stated uh is there any further discussion all those in favor of adopting the items on the consent agenda
[18:36] with the exception to items 6.4 and 6.5 which will take up individually say I I
[18:41] I opposed carried items on the consent agenda adopted with uh except with
[18:47] respect to items 6.4 and 6.5 and 6.4 involves a proposed
[18:53] resolution amending the 2025 budget that's embodied in resolution 20254 14
[18:59] I'm now going to turn to member Risser to hear what her concerns are with regard to that matter member rer um I
[19:05] was specifically interested in knowing more about the 1% reductions and when I
[19:11] look at the table the top item uh and this was to reduce the budget by 1%
[19:18] which was agreed upon and we voted and approved that uh but seeing the
[19:24] $192,000 reduction from the police department caught my attention and so I thought maybe we could learn a little
[19:30] bit more about that and the other items as well sure thank you member rer member of
[19:38] council members of council um I think the process uh that that we used uh to
[19:44] come up with the these savings is important to understand we went to the executive leader assistant city manager
[19:50] lens and I went to the assist went to the members of the executive leadership team we discussed uh the challenge that
[19:57] we got from the council and how to meet it um we received back from all of those
[20:03] different groups uh potential reductions in their budgets and we used U quite a
[20:09] number of them to get to this $545,000 reduction the vacancy placement
[20:15] uh uh item in the police department is one that came from them uh it and I
[20:21] think the chief discussed it in the works uh work session a little bit ago just the challenges of of moving people
[20:28] from civilian to Cadet to police officer and so when they took a look at their
[20:33] budget and took a look at what they could possibly uh bring on this year this this amount was something that they
[20:40] thought they could uh uh use as part of the reduction and not have a a material
[20:47] impact on their Staffing levels thank you um with the elections
[20:54] um and administration it sounds like this is a cost that we would not occur
[20:59] incur anyway am I reading that incorrectly right that's that's a good one because that's a number that we
[21:05] included in that budget um and then when we went back to look at it uh for 2025
[21:10] this will be the first year in I think four years Miss Allison that we won't
[21:16] have an election uh this year so that money is not won't be spent because we won't have an
[21:22] election so is that a budget reduction or is that just not a cost that we're going to have that's a reduction we're
[21:28] reducing that that item in the expense budget in that department okay thank you
[21:35] right member rer having uh received that information do you care to move the adoption of resolution
[21:43] 20254 so moved second member rer moves the adoption of the amended 2020 2025
[21:51] budget reflecting the 1% service reduction in those different categories embodied in resolution
[21:57] 2025-the motion by m member rer as I stated and the second by member Pierce
[22:02] any further discussion all those in favor of uh adoption of resolution
[22:08] 20254 14 amending the 2025 budget say I I I opposed
[22:14] carried uh resolution 2025-the you had as well uh that was
[22:23] with respect to the potential adoption of the 2025 through 2030 capital
[22:28] Improvement plan go ahead correct um and I did not vote for this and so this is
[22:33] again pulling an item um that I previously did not support and being consistent with that I still have
[22:40] concerns about the CIP particularly in the introduction um where it's noted
[22:46] that there is a significant increase um going from 547 million um that's what it
[22:53] is uh from a $300 million plan and listed in that is 16 million for the
[22:59] France Avenue Crossing at Gallagher in 72nd and I do still have concerns about that so it's procedural I want to be
[23:06] consistent with my vote um sure thank you for that uh this might be a good opportunity for manager Neil to express
[23:15] um uh what we do from a process standpoint with respect to Capital Improvement and uh how that that
[23:21] fiveyear Capital Improvement plan works regardless of the sequence of years that we're in so so thank you uh mayor
[23:28] members of Council the first thing that we do is we take the existing 5-year plan and we try to make try to build
[23:34] some consistency in whatever that CIP has into the future CIP it's important
[23:40] that if we have a project that has uh Council support uh that we include the
[23:46] project even if it isn't fully funded uh so that when we as we March out towards those out years towards 27 28 29 uh we
[23:55] we are constantly reminding ourselves that we have a project there that a council or a previous Council wanted to
[24:02] do and we need to build funding for it so we will build if this is if this item
[24:07] stays in the CIP and it stays in the next CIP as we get closer to it it gets more serious and that gives that gives
[24:14] the council the city and the city staff uh the The Authority they need to go
[24:20] forward and make plans so year one ends up being uh in the capital Improvement plan ends up
[24:26] being something as part of the budget for the but even in that situation like our last
[24:32] budget we removed some items from the capital Improvement plan uh to uh to get
[24:38] the budget reductions that we wanted to see as a council overall so just because some an item is in the CIP doesn't give
[24:45] staff 100% uh discretion to just go build it right um in most cases those
[24:52] projects exceed the $20,000 level so it does give us the authority to plan it and to uh maybe
[25:00] acquire Professional Services to work on architecture or engineering um but we still come back to the council to
[25:07] approve a project and to award a contract any other comments questions member
[25:13] rer um briefly with this one it's a project that has not had gone before the
[25:19] public for an event and we've talked about you know possibly having something like that but I I really do have issues
[25:25] with it and continue to have issues with that um so thank you I want to ask you
[25:31] if you'll move the matter then thank you is there a motion to um adopt uh
[25:38] resolution 2025 or excuse me adopt the capital Improvement plan for the years 2025 through 2030 as suggested by staff
[25:46] so moved second ra moves member Pierce uh seconds the uh adoption of the 2025
[25:53] through 2020 2030 Capital Improvement plan any further discussion all those in
[25:58] favor of adoption of the capital Improvement plan for the years 2025 through 2030 say I I I opposed n carried
[26:08] uh the 2025 through 2030 Capital Improvement plan is adopted all right
[26:14] that completes our work in the consent portion of the agenda uh we're going to now move on to the reports and
[26:20] recommendations portion of the agenda and we have um one matter remaining in
[26:25] that portion of the uh agenda this evening and that's a plan review by some enterprising young
[26:32] gentlemen who uh would like to get some Council
[26:37] feedback on a proposed project uh they're thinking about on 5 at 5516
[26:42] Vernon Avenue and cry tar community development director has the matter and then we'll ask the uh applicants to come
[26:48] up and uh present their version of the project and we'll have a conversation about it so director CH yes thank you
[26:55] mayor members of council I'll just quickly Tee It Up and then turn it over to the potential applicants so this site
[27:02] is located west of Grand View the Grand View area it's located on
[27:08] Vernon property zoned R1 single dwelling unit district it's guided in our
[27:14] comprehensive plan for low density residential which is our single family uh residential area here's an area look
[27:22] at the site it's about 38,000 Square ft so it's a large property located south
[27:29] of Highland School there's another very large property to the east
[27:36] 5508 little subdivision culdesac off of Vernon to the west and Vernon Avenue to
[27:42] the South here's a look at the site this is the site we're looking at and then
[27:48] the adjacent single family home you can see it's um there's a row of trees that
[27:54] kind of separate that that little culdesac to the West The Proposal is to tear down that single
[28:01] family home and build two town home or duplexes they would be two story
[28:06] structures about 3,000 square ft in size a formal application would require an
[28:12] amendment to the comprehensive plan to low density attached residential that
[28:18] would allow those two dwelling unit or town homes on the site a rezoning to
[28:24] prd2 and a site plan review just quick quickly looking at the
[28:29] prd2 zoning standards this project would be in compliance with
[28:34] those if you tuned in the Planning Commission I mentioned a potential varia
[28:39] regarding usable lot area we've recalculated that looking at the definition and actually this project
[28:46] would comply we um the code only excludes
[28:52] Front Street setbacks and side street setbacks so the the area that I
[28:59] demonstrated at Planning Commission the required setback areas are included in
[29:05] that that usable lot area so there would be no variance there issues and
[29:10] considerations these two sites kind of sit on their the uh somewhat isolated from
[29:17] adjacent properties when you look at the two sites together there's that Wetland
[29:22] to the East Highland School to the North and the single family uh homes to the
[29:27] West so the amendment to the comprehensive plan staff would suggest that both those
[29:33] lots be included to rezone to low density attached the existing single
[29:38] family home to the east could remain under the low density attached
[29:44] designation in their comprehensive PL a single family home would be allowed also want to touch on a somewhat
[29:52] similar situation to the West it's the old Vernon development
[29:58] here's the site we're looking at so it's just to the West this was a site that
[30:04] was rezoned from R1 to uh to the prd2 that we're looking
[30:11] at this evening it was it was the difference however is that it was guided
[30:16] in the comprehensive plan for low density attached residential that took place in
[30:23] 1997 another thing just wanted to mention this would be considered missing middle not necessarily affordable
[30:29] housing but in the the construct of the development itself they're looking at about $7 to
[30:35] $800,000 uh for values of each you go back to Old Vernon for just a moment sure yeah and so that was zoned low
[30:43] density attached it was zoned R1 zoned R1 okay but it was guided in the
[30:50] comprehensive plan for low density attached residential okay and what did
[30:55] it end up getting reson to to prd2 okay so uh it doesn't necessarily
[31:03] mean that you have to have buildings attached because those aren't attached to each other correct they're on zero
[31:09] lot lines they are but that you have that flexibility too under this code
[31:15] designation attached correct okay okay thank you
[31:28] anything else I will turn it over to the applicants okay let's check to see if anybody has any questions for you first
[31:33] before we let you sit back down uh council members questions for director te member Risser can you go back to the
[31:44] Chart so with the proposed um rezoning it's not prd2 but
[31:51] it is um going to result in a potential of
[31:56] five units per per acre not six per acre I only asked because I believe when
[32:03] I watched the Planning Commission there was suggestions that they bump it up from 4 to 6 and I kind of thought does
[32:10] that really work with what is being requested yeah if if that were to happen
[32:16] it it could bump it up into a medium density right okay designation yes thank
[32:21] you okay other questions from Council Members for director Teague all right
[32:27] let's uh bring our applicants up here and um gentlemen if you could introduce
[32:32] yourselves as you come up um so that we know I see three names in the agenda
[32:38] here and I'll let you uh tell us Who's Who and then we'll hear about what you'd
[32:45] like to do over there at this particular location in on Vernon Avenue good evening good evening good evening thank
[32:51] you all for having us uh we're excited to be here um and then am I pressing
[32:58] just the the arrows good okay cool cool uh my name is Jordan Crockett uh with
[33:04] abundance properties um today we're going to walk through Mr Crockett would you give us your business address too
[33:10] please U for the record off the top of my head 6417 pin Avenue uh South
[33:17] Minneapolis yeah thank you um but we'll talk a little little bit about us uh the
[33:23] proposal the plan uh and then we'll walk through some questions uh as well here
[33:29] very good so uh again my name is Jordan Crockett I'm the uh operations project
[33:35] manager here at abundance good evening everybody sorry it's a little loud want
[33:40] to make sure I'm channeling my inner Rockstar like Jennifer said I'm Rashad Kennedy co-founder of abundance
[33:46] properties along with Jordan and Daran I also own and operate a separate entity keny property development uh specializ
[33:52] in new developments uh remodels mixed use multif family
[33:58] um you you name it we've done it uh we I believe you guys have a a packet that
[34:04] shows some our track record so that's a little bit about KY proper vment as well and I'm Daren Fletcher and uh we
[34:12] make abundance properties and uh at abundance properties our mission is to create abundance through rehab and
[34:19] development of communities while empowering and educating others to do the same so there is a project actually
[34:25] that we' love to highlight that we worked with with a nonprofit out of South Minneapolis PPL and we have a
[34:31] video that really shows what that project meant to us as an organization but more importantly the
[34:41] community what's up y'all it's chy holworth with abundance properties y'all
[34:47] it's cold out [Music] here it's cold out here when we first
[34:53] started this project it was warm out the sun was out we had drone shots none of
[34:59] that's happening now it's cold but we still got work to do we've already done Roofing siding Plumbing electrical
[35:07] whatever you can think of we've done it on this rece project and the last part of this is the windows and that's what's
[35:13] happening right now we're doing Chicago Avenue and Portland Avenue windows and uh we getting it done the crew has been
[35:18] amazing and this has been a fun project um that we've been doing with PP so what I'm most excited about with the receip
[35:24] program is how it's allowing emerging developers to add to their portfolio but
[35:31] not have to take on so much risk with grabbing properties that need a ton of work steel so this is a great
[35:37] opportunity for people within the community to now be able to continue to invest back into their community and not
[35:44] take on as much
[35:51] risk our team here at abundance properties have been excited doing this project with PPL because it's bringing
[35:58] forth Equitable transformation here in South Minneapolis the time is now and
[36:04] Legacy starts [Music]
[36:11] here all right and that that was uh our our partner chony who's not currently
[36:16] here um but that's just kind of emulates our team and and what we've done so it's
[36:22] excit I'm sure that was a nice partnership for you with PPL it's it's a great organization yeah absolutely
[36:29] absolutely um well sweet so while we're here today is uh 5516 Vernon uh Avenue
[36:35] which we're proposing town homes and a rezone all right so here's the meat meat
[36:42] and potatoes for y'all um why does it work right so uh the uh visual that
[36:49] you're seeing is actually from you guys's uh or a third party U ofm study that was done uh recently believe 2024
[36:57] but um it shows essentially the recommended areas where density and
[37:04] rezoning uh should occur um and as you can see our site is right there in those
[37:14] zones uh which are recommended to be uh increased in
[37:20] density uh and then that U ofm study that was done um when it kind of comes
[37:27] down to it it breaks down just the value of density uh and what's recommended in
[37:33] or the purpose essentially which you know more density uh allows for more
[37:39] residents to work the jobs in e um which then decreases the vehicle
[37:45] miles traveled uh which therefore uh decreases the greenhouse gases and
[37:53] everything as well and uh overall more usage of the transit system system in
[37:58] Idina which uh is is very clear uh that you guys have noted that you have a goal
[38:04] in 2030 to uh increase uh by double uh
[38:10] the usage of the transit system so this is all all in the line in in in a circle
[38:16] with that um as far as the land use efficiency right so if if the question
[38:22] is you know if somebody would give you an acre and you have the the city in
[38:28] you know as a single family what you would decide to put there right so that's kind of the question there
[38:36] um and the last kind of piece is is our team uh we're a very Dynamic team we
[38:43] have a track record of success uh and we are extremely capable uh we also are
[38:49] invested in the we own the lot so we're here to partner with you guys and really do something special here
[39:01] all right so four units as we can see on the site plan 3,000 sare ft each three
[39:06] beds three baths now I want to touch uh talk a little bit about some of the materials that we're going to be using
[39:13] so I'm going to start with the lp Smart Siding lap shakes board and batting low
[39:18] emission manufacturing process with renewable materials and then resistance to moisture rot and insects reducing
[39:24] maintenance and waste aluminum s in fascia 100% recyclable make it one of
[39:29] the most sustainable materials requires little maintenance eliminating eliminating the need for a frequent
[39:37] repainting windows and doors Anderson 100 series made from fibrex composite
[39:43] 40% reclaimed wood fiber stronger than vinyl low eass Coatings reduce UV and
[39:49] infrared light penetration and then energy efficient exterior doors insulated core reduces heat transfer and
[39:56] then low E glass prevents excessive heat gain low vocc interior and exterior
[40:03] paint improves indoor air quality by reducing harmful emissions eco-friendly with Fe pollutants contributing to
[40:10] sustainability and then some of the Mechanicals I want to touch based on high efficiency Heating and Cooling 97%
[40:16] high efficiency furnace uh gas tankless water heaters reduces standby heat loss improving
[40:22] efficiency by up to 30% and then some of the electrical and
[40:27] Smart Energy features LED lighting uses 70% 75% less energy lasts 25 times
[40:34] longer than regular light bulbs smart thermostats remote control of heating cooling to minimize energy waste energy
[40:42] star appliances reduces overall household energy consumption high efficiency exhaust fans
[40:48] reduces humidity while using less power and then pre-wiring the garages for Ev chargers for um electric
[40:55] vehicles and then with all that to say we have carefully chosen materials that prioritize sustainability Energy
[41:01] Efficiency and durability our focus is on reducing energy consumption and waste
[41:06] while enhancing long-term value for homeowners in the community and then the goal for the end would be um owner
[41:14] occupants and then each townhouse would also be plotted uh for ownership uh by
[41:22] surveyor in the county thanks Mr Kennedy
[41:28] all right so when it when it comes down to it um you D's comprehensive plan the
[41:35] climate action plan the transit plan everything leads to this goal of
[41:40] increasing density in targeted areas um
[41:45] the location and the size you know the stars are aligned here where we own the property we're ready to partner um in an
[41:54] area that is a busy cour Corridor uh where there is going to be a
[42:00] lot more Transit and as well as the size of the lot we can really do something
[42:05] special with um and the last piece uh it's super exciting what we're doing
[42:11] here um not just with the intention of this project but a lot of the other projects we're doing um you know we have
[42:18] the experience the capabilities to really like overd deliver so we'd love to share too um Rashad can uh give a
[42:25] little bit more context to some of the products we we've done uh you know even some of the other stuff that uh he's
[42:31] done in udina as well so thank you guys yeah thank you uh I think good place to
[42:37] start might be if you scroll back on your presentation to that uh site plan
[42:42] there you go just go back there you go maybe that might be a good place to start I'm going to turn to my colleagues
[42:48] here and see uh who has uh any comments they want to make or questions they have
[42:54] member Risser um first I want to thank you for bringing a sketch plan that really
[43:01] reflects the um resoning that you are requesting okay and I know that during
[43:08] the Planning Commission meeting there was a lot about another project that did not get approved that was going for a
[43:14] comprehensive plan Amendment and the difference between what you are
[43:19] presenting and what was presented for that it's just very extremely different
[43:26] okay and the ask that you're making is one that is like a a little
[43:33] step not a huge leap and so I just wanted to get that out there now my
[43:40] understanding is this is going to be architecture slab built how am on okay the one question I
[43:47] have is can you talk about you know you got severe weather um I've heard some slab homes
[43:54] have sort of a a safe space in case that they're 's you know a big storm that comes up
[44:00] um I did actually experience when I was growing up a slab house that had a
[44:07] Sellar that you could access through the garage and I'm just wondering what what kind of space can somebody go to when
[44:14] that tornado warning happens yeah I appreciate that question so when you walk in the front door to the right
[44:20] there's a door into the garage and then to your left there' be the staircase that goes up underneath that staircase
[44:27] there's an area right there as well as like the mechanical room so as far as like tornado or extreme weather out of
[44:34] the that space I feel like that would be the best location underneath that staircase um next to the utility
[44:41] room thank you yes thank you uh member EGU thank you and thank you for a great
[44:47] presentation I also love the video that was was great um so when I'm looking at
[44:52] this obviously it's it's just showing the unit you mentioned a garage and you just re iterated a garage here um can
[44:59] you just give me maybe a little bit more insight into what the makeup is visually
[45:05] of that cuz I'm trying to imagine like driving in um seeing kind of garage
[45:11] after garage and then there's also this parking area slab um so just walk me
[45:16] through a little bit more of um the vehicular experience of the site for
[45:22] sure so facing the let's say unit four and unit three let's say you're facing
[45:27] that so the garage is on the main level I'm going to call it the main level uh for both we all four units to the left
[45:34] is your entrance you need to walk up the stairs to get to I'm going to call it the second floor then that's your
[45:40] kitchen that's your gray room there's a powder room right there with a toilet vanity um Pantry on that main level so
[45:47] as far as the parking it's on on the first level I should say on as far as the parking it's on that main level um
[45:53] underneath the kitchen great room and the powder B bathroom so it takes up the
[45:59] bulk of that space correct yes okay that's helpful in that garage is the utility room and along with the space
[46:04] that I Hadad mentioned as far as um potential um seeking safe place if needed okay and then is there also a
[46:12] driveway element here or or not like I'm thinking of a driveway in the sense of
[46:19] parked cars in front of a garage or does it kind of taper off pretty quickly and
[46:24] there's not that space for it so you would have two spots right there in front of the
[46:29] garage okay so they have two spots within the garage and then
[46:35] two guest spots or however you want to think of it in front of their garage um then speak to me about the idea of
[46:42] having than that additional parking and vehicular slab
[46:47] and kind of like where my mind always goes is um you know I do there is quite
[46:52] a bit of yard especially with units one and two in the backyard area but wanting to really focus on where are the kids
[46:59] going to play how can we reduce the impervious surface I think I said that the correct way um so yeah talk to me
[47:07] about the the thought process there please yeah so a little bit about the thought process it's really just having the opportunity for guest parking as far
[47:13] as like the street parking is limited being that's that busy road so really just keeping guests in mind and then
[47:20] people that may have more vehicles um you know being that it's going to be a um common interest Community we would
[47:26] put something in in the Declaration um giv rules and guidelines as far as you
[47:32] know who has what space just so that you know unit tools not filling up all four
[47:37] spaces all the time um but that's kind of our thought process just more parking for guests as well as not really having
[47:43] options for street parking okay that's helpful thank you um
[47:51] what does it feel like then and all of this would obviously come out in like a actual proposal um from like a visual
[47:59] standpoint um but on Vernon unit 4 does
[48:04] that feel like it's the front of that home or what does it look like from the street view yeah so that's the side of
[48:10] the house okay so yeah so the staircase is on your facing it be on the left side
[48:15] and then there'd be a few windows on that side okay cuz I always think about
[48:20] like what's the experience with those homes on the street view as well um and
[48:27] I I live in a house that there's only one way and you have your driveway and so the bulk of your house is the front
[48:33] of your house is just the garage right um I've dreamed of a corner unit where you can have like the front of the house
[48:40] be welcoming and then like the vehicular component is on the side or on the back
[48:45] and so I think that this could be an opportunity here to kind of at least with unit four move in some way the
[48:54] front of the house to be on Vernon um just when you think about kind
[49:00] of an inviting look and feel um and I understand that there's multiple other units and that might not be as easy but
[49:08] by having that garage kind of tuck in then to the side and have it still be kind of a statement front piece I think
[49:14] it could be really beautiful and inviting um I don't think I have any other
[49:21] questions at this point should I also be giving General other feedback I know I kind of embedded some feedback okay um
[49:29] overall I I do I like it I like incrementally increasing um I love having a a
[49:36] statement of support as well from our affordability um housing managers is
[49:42] really supportive of this as well it seems like um so the the feedback that I
[49:48] have is more of like how can we continue to make it jive with the
[49:53] neighborhood um and so when I see like four parking stalls in addition to I
[50:00] would at least in my kind of understanding of this neighborhood there's probably no other sites where
[50:05] you're going to have additional parking in that sense um so I just think of like okay what's what's the use case for that
[50:12] um thinking even into my own neighborhood like yes I do have street parking for when I have holiday parties
[50:18] or whatever um so I understand that balance um but I also want it to still feel like a home
[50:27] um and so I know that's kind of hard feedback to see sift through um I would
[50:32] like to get rid of it from a character and an appeal a visual
[50:38] appeal perspective as well as optimizing and focusing on the Green Space um but I
[50:44] also understand there are other constraints that you're working with and you probably know your target market more so that's kind of how what I'm
[50:50] weighing in my head right now I thank you for member Pierce uh thanks Mr mayor
[50:58] um so this this uh location is around
[51:04] the block from where I live so when I walk past there I've often looked at
[51:10] that house off in the distance thinking why it would be really neat if somebody
[51:16] would buy that and redevelop that for medium density um and so I I applaud you
[51:25] for the uh creativity and the use of the space
[51:32] um I I had a similar question in terms of when you're walking by there it's
[51:38] actually in a unique spot where the houses aren't
[51:45] traditional uh where they face the front Road like a typical neighborhood would be like there's one in the back there's
[51:53] another one that's kind of tucked away so it's a little unique in that way um and so I thought
[52:01] um it was very creative um actually to
[52:06] have some parking within the the lot uh for that reason um I totally get where
[52:13] member Anu was going um but I did like the way you you kind of thought through
[52:18] that um I like that its owner occupied I think it's a really well
[52:25] fought out it's really well thought out and planned the the way you um have have the design so far um I wouldn't increase
[52:33] it to five or six I would stick to four
[52:39] um and actually for the same reason that remember AGN Gabe I think you know five
[52:45] or six starts to not in my opinion kind of fit in with uh the neighborhood I
[52:51] think four Town Homes to me feels like it would would fit better
[52:57] um I do want to see more of the interior
[53:04] and then I got a question for you um and it may sound odd but how much money have
[53:10] you put into getting to this point yeah so um great question we like
[53:18] Jordan said we are committed um we bought the land I had a vision for it from the beginning before we closed on
[53:24] it and um you know so we've had engag with our draftsman our our our architect
[53:31] um civil engineer um they had to work together um as well as surveyor to do
[53:36] our to get the certificate of survey the topography all that um so we're at least
[53:41] a few thousand in okay and it would be more if I didn't have those relationships already if I was engaging
[53:47] with um people that I haven't worked for 9 plus years um we could have been 10 15,000 in just to yeah get to this point
[53:55] and so excluding the cost of the land I I could have said it that way that's what that's what that's where I was
[54:02] going because I I felt like what you presented and it's kind of the member
[54:08] risser's Point earlier it felt like to me what I think a sketch plan should be like you had
[54:17] three slides four slides one slide that really talked
[54:22] about the project and then you spoke to it to get feedback and then what I think you will need to
[54:29] do then is take that feedback and then go to the next step um and so it it feels like it's the right balance to me
[54:37] for um a sketch plan so that was why I asked that question um and then the last
[54:42] thing I'll add when we talked about affordable housing uh I'm going to say last year I
[54:49] was doing work with uh um Stephanie Hawkins and we talked about are there
[54:55] ways to to get other developers into udina to do smaller projects like this
[55:02] we talked about emerging developers um and um like that's what
[55:09] that's what this is to me bring being able to find a developer that can come in have some expertise smaller scale
[55:18] that can Now understand what we want as a community and then figure out how to
[55:23] make that happen um so I like this the
[55:29] last piece of feedback I give you you're going to get a lot of feedback um I think
[55:36] it's it it there is TP there's a danger and this this is also going to sound
[55:42] weird into listening to all of us for all the things that we want and then taking that as we have to
[55:52] go do this and that's not what we're looking for so if there are things that you're hearing we would
[55:58] encourage to dialogue right um just as you did for the the parking um so don't
[56:04] shy away from um giving the DI engaging in the dialogue and giving us uh um
[56:11] hearing our feedback and then asking questions to really understand uh what we're looking for but I I like it and I
[56:18] would encourage you to keep going to the next steps member rer this dialogue has
[56:24] caused member rer to think of something else she wanted to talk to you about um people do care a lot about trees
[56:31] especially oak trees mature ones and my understanding is there's three clusters of Oaks on this site um I haven't
[56:39] actually gone out to see it but um when you come back if you could have those
[56:45] trees and if there's a way even if you have to shift a little bit so that you can preserve some of those the other
[56:51] thing is just you know having pounded the pavement running for office going down Kellog in the summer you feel it
[56:59] when you're in front of all the new houses that don't have a mature tree and then you get to the older part and it
[57:06] just physically it felt so great and then there's also the value of if you
[57:12] can preserve some of those Oaks it lends an air of you know this kind of idea
[57:19] that the place has been there for a long time and I think that would add value and just the temperature differential
[57:25] during the summer if you can sit under a tree instead of not having a tree but I did and to member U's Point anything
[57:34] that you can do to reduce the amount of impervious surface would be fantastic and you know I don't know if
[57:41] some of that could be the surface material you use for the driveways and the parking areas or something like that
[57:47] I have no idea but um that could be a really good thing and then I did just do
[57:56] a drop down on Vernon Avenue with Google Maps and a lot of the houses that are along Vernon it's the side view not the
[58:03] front view and so I I kind of feel like I see where member U is coming from but
[58:10] I think that would be a really big ask to you know turn and put the front of
[58:15] that first house facing Vernon I think that would be kind of a a tall order so
[58:23] there's that and then just also to member Pierce's point the last um project that was mentioned
[58:29] many times at the Planning Commission um when it came back for final review it had tandem parking near the entrance
[58:38] between the dumpster and the entryway because of all of the suggestions that
[58:44] had been made okay you have to reject you can't I mean and and I
[58:52] really do think the four units work beautifully they fit really well we also
[58:58] have an Adu ordinance and I don't know with the amount of space that you have
[59:04] and I haven't looked at the regulations for that but you know potentially somebody who purchased one of these
[59:10] could also pop in an Adu um so I I think what you have here Works incredibly well
[59:18] and I just want to emphasize that thank you member rer could you get that site
[59:24] plan back up there again please I don't know what happened to it there you go thank you um yeah so you're going to
[59:32] hear us say some of the same things different ways and uh some may resonate
[59:37] and some may not uh but I thought a remember eggner idea was an interesting one on unit number
[59:43] four uh you know and at least have your architect look at it uh I get what she's talking about in terms of facing Vernon
[59:50] and I understand member rer Point as well but it wouldn't hurt to at least ask the architect if we if you're
[59:56] rotated that unit number four 90° uh that's still your common wall on
[1:00:01] the North side right and there's no there's no windows there's there that's a common wall so there there's nothing
[1:00:09] on that wall anyway so uh and that's a good wall to have nothing on facing north uh anyway take a look at that
[1:00:15] issue uh in terms of the member U's issue about the uh or not issue but the
[1:00:23] uh comment she raised about the guest parking those four stalls and making it
[1:00:29] feel like there's a residential uh transition that's that's real soft and
[1:00:34] gentle from a single family neighborhood to let's say four units and I think we're all in accordance that four fits
[1:00:41] nicely on the site me we you got guided very well by our planning department who
[1:00:46] helped you look at prd2 and land on prd2 and total compliance with prd2 that's a
[1:00:52] really good thing so um you could look at uh where those guest
[1:00:58] spots are I think a look at the prvious pavers where the grass grows up through
[1:01:03] the pavers so it feels a bit more like yard but it still accomplishes the same purpose of providing a place for people
[1:01:09] to park just a suggestion or idea you can look at um uh the trees was top of
[1:01:15] my list member rer went back to that in her second comments so I think you know to the extent that there are uh fully
[1:01:23] mature trees along that West lot line you should try to preserve as many of those as possible for the reason she
[1:01:29] expressed and if you haven't looked at our tree ordinance that will give you encouragement to preserve as many as you
[1:01:36] can I've seen it and some of it you know in terms of the building pads you're you're going to
[1:01:43] get some forbearance there you know on what's required uh and we see that some
[1:01:48] of these things are inevitable that you're going to to take some of those trees down but I'd say the extent that
[1:01:53] you even had to move things a little bit further east to accommodate trees on the west uh don't be afraid to think about
[1:01:59] that either and we're just giving you ideas to think about uh remember Pierce asked about the interiors and there's
[1:02:06] one one of your first slides I think had a beautiful photo of an interior and I
[1:02:11] don't know if that was kind of what you're striving for or right there if that's if that's a level of finish
[1:02:17] you're striving for it looks beautiful you know and uh I know the next go around that we'll see more detail around
[1:02:23] all of that uh uh and um but that's you know that what
[1:02:29] you chose there to show us is really quite striking quite beautiful
[1:02:35] um and then as mentioned unit count interior uh pricing range any
[1:02:41] expectation yet on what kind of range you'll be in price-wise per unit yeah so the as far as the range it
[1:02:48] is closer to and and you know a lot depends on construction but it is around
[1:02:53] that you know 750 to 950 okay range yeah we I mean we've we
[1:02:59] understand that I mean we had you know if you saw the ones further up Vernon behind Wells Fargo Bank we thought we
[1:03:05] were going to get the missing middle there and the missing middle for us we all had a different definition than the new missing middle but there in that you
[1:03:12] know that's they're may be a little bit more expensive than that but in that same range so we we kind of understand
[1:03:17] that we wish they were lower priced but uh we we get it you know land labor Lumber it's a it's a different world out
[1:03:25] there now so uh I think that me I think the level
[1:03:30] of finish that you put on them is is going to be important if you're at that price point so people are going to
[1:03:35] people are going to be expecting a high level of finish exterior and interior and and I take it it's a um double
[1:03:42] garage correct okay not not tandem but just side by side corre D conventional
[1:03:48] double garage okay uh that's about all I had um so I
[1:03:55] think think you probably between the Planning Commission and the city council you've you've gotten enough food for thought and U you guys L to make the
[1:04:03] decision sounds like you B the land so you're going forward you got it yeah okay well we'll
[1:04:10] wait to see on the next goore round all right thank you gentlemen thank
[1:04:19] Youk all right we're going to um thank you handled member egg news matter uh
[1:04:25] the beginning of the meeting I don't think there's been any new correspondence that's come in during
[1:04:31] the course of the meeting I'm going to turn now to manager comments uh thank you your honor I
[1:04:38] wanted to give the council an update on a couple of things uh first our tactical
[1:04:44] Training Center project out at the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility uh during the uh early stages of that
[1:04:51] project that all early stage projects involved digging a hole in the ground um
[1:04:57] we encountered some obstacles that they weren't expecting in in that process so that project has kind stalled for the
[1:05:04] moment um they are going to resume the the uh grading and the construction of
[1:05:10] the project and do still believe they can make a a summer a June July um 2025
[1:05:17] deadline for the construction of the of the site when we do have a site ready for for occupancy uh we'll do some kind
[1:05:24] of an event and council members out there so you can see what it is uh State Legislative activities even
[1:05:31] though the the house is not uh seated uh we are still we are still having
[1:05:38] meetings with uh members of the house and members of the Senate with regards to our uh legislative platform uh we've
[1:05:46] already had a discussion with uh house leaders on the bonding Bill side talked a lot about our we had a discussion to
[1:05:53] talk about our Bridge Project and the pool uh Aquatic Center project we spent
[1:05:59] the entire time talking about the The Bridge Project and mindat did not get to
[1:06:04] talk uh about our pool project so we will uh be talking to Senate uh leaders
[1:06:10] about those projects and about the extensions that we're requesting for um
[1:06:15] two Tiff districts sometime next week and have the first discussions around
[1:06:21] that uh also wanted to give you an update on where we are with regards to kind of uh monitoring our federal funds
[1:06:28] um we as a our city government does not receive much in the way of federal funds
[1:06:34] if you look at our our total spend for proposed uh 2025 or approved 2025 it was
[1:06:41] right around $211 million that that's all the dollars we spend on people
[1:06:46] Commodities Professional Services Street conu uh construction projects of all
[1:06:52] kinds Etc of that total uh about 595,000 of it comes from uh Federal sources
[1:06:59] that's just that's about a quarter of 1% so it's not very much um of that total
[1:07:06] 595,000 425,000 of it is in the general fund and
[1:07:12] and about 170,000 is is um cdbg Community Development block grant so
[1:07:17] again uh small percentages we are monitoring it's not insignificant money
[1:07:23] uh we have somewhere around 2 million ion dollar um in Grants in addition to
[1:07:28] those operating funds that we're looking at here um some of our funding that is
[1:07:33] uh money that's obligated but no contract available to sign so that's money at risk is a US doe Energy
[1:07:40] Efficiency and conservation block grant $119,000 but we have a number of other
[1:07:45] uh grants that are that are uh that have been funded and have been and we have signed contracts for we expect those con
[1:07:53] those contracts to be fulfilled and we're also looking we're also working with League of Minnesota cities
[1:08:00] and also the US Conference of Mayors they both have set up uh resources for cities and and elected officials alike
[1:08:07] City staff and elected officials if you'd like to go on and see this kind of information they've on both their
[1:08:12] websites they're pretty easy to find and I uh Jen can we turn on
[1:08:18] the so part of what I I wanted to do I I think I said this at our last uh council
[1:08:23] meeting is sometimes uh when you're considering a policy change it's good to have something to
[1:08:29] look at and and pick apart um I I've drafted a proposed uh change to
[1:08:36] community comment based on some of the comments that I've heard from Council Members previous to tonight again this
[1:08:43] is this is something that will look a lot like what we already do work sessions would start at 5:30 and would
[1:08:50] be completed at 6:30 that we'd take you know a few minutes to come down and get settled and get in front of get on the
[1:08:57] dis uh Start Community comments at 6:40 and no later than 7 because council
[1:09:02] meeting would start at 7 Community comment would be conducted in the city council chambers and per the same kind
[1:09:09] of rules of procedure that already apply about what's what's eligible to be commented on what's not eligible uh
[1:09:16] there's no back room or closed door any more than there there is today um all
[1:09:23] current rules still apply community comment isn't televised or recorded in this in this scenario and I would give
[1:09:30] you a recap on the previous meetings Community comment just like we use today
[1:09:35] so uh there's there's a thousand ways to do this this is one way to do it if it's
[1:09:40] if you want further discussion on this as a group this is your first time you're seeing this uh I wanted to share
[1:09:45] it with you in this format if there's a if there's interest in pursuing it we can pursue it at another
[1:09:51] meeting I think uh in furnace to council member Jackson who had to be uh in De
[1:09:58] Moine for a family medical situation I'd like to have her input on sure this and so I think giving us kind of a sneak
[1:10:05] preview of what your thoughts are uh based on the input that you've gotten both from the council and from for some
[1:10:11] council members and and uh and the public um I think we should take this up
[1:10:17] another time when she's present so that we can have her uh input as well I had no expectation of action tonight I just
[1:10:24] wanted to give you as you said a a preview of it so that you could be ready to have some discussion about it and
[1:10:29] maybe have some questions about how it could work even if we decided we wanted to stay Just The Way We Were I think
[1:10:35] still we need council member Jackson here okay yeah member U thank you um and
[1:10:42] maybe even prior to that or if we build it into a broader conversation I think
[1:10:48] in addition to the slide that you had on there having something that and it can
[1:10:54] be a part of our convers ation focuses in on the goals like what are we hoping
[1:10:59] to achieve by doing this I think would be a really good way to root the conversation um so whether you we
[1:11:06] collect that ahead of time and have a a visual to denote that or whether it becomes the focus as we initiate that
[1:11:14] conversation when we have it I think that will be important to carry
[1:11:19] through thank you uh member rer this is a topic and I have received a lot of
[1:11:26] email about it and I know residents are concerned a lot of I think pretty much
[1:11:32] everyone who has written to me has said that they want to keep it the same format and what's frustrating is I heard
[1:11:39] a lot of people say I'm looking at the agenda I don't see it I heard at the last meeting that we were going to talk
[1:11:45] about Community comment at the February 4th meeting that it was announced and I don't see it on the agenda there's
[1:11:51] nothing there and do you know what happened and I could couldn't respond cuz I didn't know what happened and now
[1:11:59] I see on my screen um item 9.1 is community comment
[1:12:05] proposal that's not on my agenda that I have before me it's not something that the public was able to see and so I I
[1:12:13] think on this one we have to do better when it comes to transparency and you know we can talk
[1:12:18] about waiting until member Jackson is here and I do think that's important um
[1:12:24] but it's also important to let the public know when we're going to talk about it so if we're going to talk about
[1:12:29] it at a future meeting I think what we're going to talk about needs to be on
[1:12:35] the agenda I think item 9.1 needs to be added to the packet that is available
[1:12:40] online and the slide that we just saw needs to be added to that as well so the public can see that um I think that's
[1:12:48] really important thank you maner Neil I think this has been entirely transparent um
[1:12:55] I've sh I'm sharing it with you in this format is an act of transparency if you choose not to advance it that's that's
[1:13:03] okay um but I just wanted to give you something uh to start with and nine the
[1:13:09] nine items are just the items that are under my comment and sometimes I'm developing that list um right up until
[1:13:16] the council meeting the day of the council meeting so that's where that comes from yeah okay I think Aon in a
[1:13:24] situation that I is the fact that it wasn't on the agenda allowed the person that called in to talk about it which
[1:13:30] was would otherwise been inappropriate so uh nonetheless a point taken member
[1:13:36] Risser and um I think when we do get to the point where we want to have a a broader conversation about it uh we can
[1:13:43] you know it'll be I'm sure if you've got some slides put together they'll be part of the part of the agenda
[1:13:51] deck um any other comments you wanted to cover manager NE Neil that's all okay uh
[1:13:56] going to go down to member U who I've ignored for starting for a couple weeks or a couple meetings I think I feel like
[1:14:03] I'm always first but oh well no I maybe it's just personal bias um I
[1:14:12] so I didn't put together like a a ton of thoughts on this necessarily
[1:14:18] but there have been a lot of things happening at the national level
[1:14:25] um within our community and I know that we're starting to think about an experience ways that it's impacting us
[1:14:32] locally as well um you know personally um my daughters three and five go to
[1:14:40] Spanish Immersion daycare here in Indina um we absolutely love it it's been an amazing experience for them but we got
[1:14:47] an email this week that talked about the impact of changes to immigration um and what that might mean
[1:14:56] for Staffing levels and being able to provide the same level of um care and so
[1:15:03] I think that that caused me to have a conversation with Scott Neil and just think about um what are some of the
[1:15:09] other ways that we're starting starting to feel this within our
[1:15:14] community um and I guess I even have a question I don't know putting you on the spot of what what does some what do some
[1:15:23] of these changes mean and I'm kind of looking over um at Chief Milburn here um cuz I don't know if you can even reflect
[1:15:29] on if there's any impacts to our police department and the ways that we're doing policing within the community um but
[1:15:36] before I hand it over like that's just something that is top of mine for me um and I like I said I didn't have a ton
[1:15:42] more to say about it but I I think we are starting to feel some local impacts if you hold that thought I was going to
[1:15:49] bring up the Polar Plunge that you're participating in which is ice of one type and then we can go to member 's ice
[1:15:55] uh discussion as well so hold that thought till we get a little deeper here remember
[1:16:02] Pierce nothing from me tonight okay thank you um so well let me talk about the Polar
[1:16:09] Plunge I did a mayor's minute on it tonight and that is uh at Lake Nomas on
[1:16:14] February 28th it is a fundraiser for Special Olympics Minnesota and our
[1:16:21] police department has a team um and we're trying to raise or they're going to try to raise $22,000 that's their
[1:16:28] goal and there's a website that you can go to to donate to the cause and that is
[1:16:35] reg r. plungemn.org
[1:16:40] team SL Edina Police Department oh no one will ever forget
[1:16:46] that URL so just but just in case I read it again rig. plungemn.org teamed
[1:16:55] police department and those participating in the February 28th event for the city of Vian police department
[1:17:00] at Lake Nomas will be the chief uh lieutenants Jake Hecker and Ryan Schultz Community engagement
[1:17:07] Officer Nick Donahue officers Evan Miller and Nick Nas Cadet Mar Kaya Riley
[1:17:13] and Reserve officer Steve kanig so uh council members too keep in mind if you
[1:17:19] want to help support uh our team and uh competing against other police departments and special
[1:17:25] Minnesota uh you know think about uh getting on that website and making a contribution or maybe you can do it
[1:17:31] right through the PD special you have to go on the website mayor yep we will for sure have a link
[1:17:40] the video this this is important to follow the process here y yeah well I was thinking it would the check could be written to Special Olympics Minnesota
[1:17:46] not to the adop PD but nonetheless okay we'll follow the process
[1:17:52] um and then um the to the federal issues that member U
[1:17:58] alluded to generally I I sent to uh I don't know if she's got these out to you or not I got a document from the US
[1:18:04] Conference of Mayors and if you if you click on the various categories of immigration energy and environment
[1:18:10] Transportation Health Technology Innovation you'll see what the potential impact is on cities in some of those
[1:18:17] areas uh and then with respect to uh immigration um I
[1:18:22] think did everybody get an email from some reporter looking to talk to somebody about how we would act compared
[1:18:28] to the City of Minneapolis and I thought well that's a good topic as you sort of instinctually thought member U let's ask
[1:18:35] the chief about what our position has been from RPD uh first of all thanks for doing the
[1:18:42] polar plunge and then we'll move on to the ice in a different way sure yeah thank you mayor yeah it's it's cold I
[1:18:49] did this last year and so uh I'll do it again this year it's fun for it's for a good cause I'm looking forward to that
[1:18:55] uh as it relates to immigration uh I've been through this before about eight years ago and so everyone knows I used to work in Brooklyn Park and back there
[1:19:01] we got a lot of questions about same similar topics that we're going on um
[1:19:06] that experience prompted me here internally about a month ago to start working on a policy that we have just to
[1:19:12] kind of reinforce a practice that's been in play now for a number of years and that practice is ice people need to look
[1:19:18] at ice it's different than local authorities and so they operate in a different space than we do so in other words we get a lot of questions about
[1:19:24] during traffic stops do we ask about immigration status we do not that's not the focus of our work we look we look at
[1:19:30] local and focus on local issues enforcing State Statute ordinances and things like that and that's a different
[1:19:36] threshold than what ice operates under uh we get questions about sweeps if there are sweeps going on do we
[1:19:41] participate in in that and we do not ice uh has a civil process with detainers
[1:19:47] and holds and there was some work that was done with the H County Jail several years ago and they spelled out that they do not participate in that either so as
[1:19:54] ice goes in the federal um thresholds and the things that they look at they have information on the back end right
[1:20:00] so if somebody's booked and processed they have access to that data understand that somebody was booked or arrested for
[1:20:06] any particular crime and they can do their followup accordingly but they don't ask us and we don't participate in that so there's just these differences
[1:20:12] that are in practice the policy that we put together really just spells that out so it's really clear for Community it's also clear for our staff on what what
[1:20:19] those guard rails are we ran that through our Mac Group which is our Multicultural advisory committee and we showed that to them about 3 weeks ago
[1:20:25] and they were really appreciative of it and gave us good feedback out this this meets what our expectations would be for the local authorties as well so we're
[1:20:32] just uh on the very back end of that policy um completing that and we'll post it to our website all of our policies
[1:20:38] are on our website and we'll publish that so everyone can see exactly what our roles and responsibilities are in
[1:20:43] this matter the only difference is if we're working and looking at a local crime so if we have a local assault for
[1:20:49] example and there's some kind of an immigration tie to that that ice might be looking at as well there could be a
[1:20:55] connection that way but we have to operate under uh a warrant that might be issued for anybody or an active local
[1:21:00] criminal investigation those are the only connections that we would have a focus on or any kind of interactiveness with this topic uh moving forward so
[1:21:08] I'll stand for any questions on that though y questions for the chief or follow on for information no oh yeah
[1:21:15] thanks for that could I add one thing too a lot of communities are going through this and so we at the henip county Chiefs level put together a
[1:21:21] statement and that was released about 2 3 days ago uh to all local media just to kind of explain her position and and all
[1:21:27] the police departments in hen County U that I've talked to and know are all operating under the same threshold as
[1:21:34] well good thanks for that I only had one other item and it was I've had a personal experience on this and then uh
[1:21:40] people calling me on the bag fee and I was in Walgreens and the guy
[1:21:46] said well that'll be a dime I said well I thought it was a nickel uh and he said well we we rais it to a dime and then
[1:21:52] today I got a call from a resident who said uh he was at some grocery store and they said uh it was going to be a dime
[1:21:59] or 15 cents and so I asked manager Neil and U about this issue I thought that we had
[1:22:06] set the fee uh on what it was going to be at a nickel uh but apparently the ordinance
[1:22:13] is crafted in a way uh Mr Kendall will no this as well that they could they can
[1:22:19] charge more for the bag if they want so it kind of beg the question for
[1:22:26] me of uh did we did we head in a good direction I know I was the only one that
[1:22:31] didn't like the idea of it initially but uh with the merchants now raising
[1:22:38] the fee for bags we're the ones that are being looked at as being responsible for
[1:22:44] whether it's 10 cents 5 cents 10 cents 15 cents whatever the price of the bag is they think that we're the ones that
[1:22:50] caused that and maybe we maybe we were with the or but um just a little food
[1:22:57] for thought and uh I'd like to look at look at it in a little bit more depth I don't know quite how to go about it if
[1:23:03] we should have the energy environment commission look at it again or what would be the appropriate
[1:23:08] mechanism if the council wanted us to look at it again I think that's probably the threshold question not not just me
[1:23:14] it would be yeah we would want some kind of council Direction decided on a majority basis whether or not they
[1:23:20] wanted to revisit the bag fee issue you know we could we could certainly do
[1:23:26] some some analysis after defined length of time maybe it's a year maybe it's something else to give you a sense of
[1:23:33] what what's been the impact of this but um our ordinance just set a floor you
[1:23:40] know a five cents and if people want to if merchants or retailers want to charge more than them that's it's just like any
[1:23:46] other product in their store they set the price of it and one of the eries of it is I had a
[1:23:53] young woman s me I was over at Jerry's and I was in line and she came up and she had a plastic bag full of asparagus
[1:24:00] and she said this isn't costing me a nickel but the bag they put it into is going to cost me a nickel you know and
[1:24:08] the meat I just bought in the plastic container that doesn't cost me a nickel you know so there's this
[1:24:14] um I don't know if you'd call it inconsistency but uh it's it's a mixed
[1:24:20] message you know I think but um so anyway when member Jackson gets back
[1:24:26] here maybe we can talk about the issue a little bit more and decide in one of these little more formal conversations
[1:24:33] at the end of the meeting if we want to send it back to uh hrrc to look at it a little bit more in
[1:24:40] depth I do think and I actually remember member Pierce really pushing on this of
[1:24:48] coming back with the data and I know that that was a large part of the discussion that we had of being able to
[1:24:53] see is this having the impact that we want it to um working with retailers to
[1:24:59] understand kind of pre and post numbers of bags being used and are we decreasing
[1:25:04] that number um and if I recall we did expect a year of data and I think it
[1:25:10] took effect in July so my recommendation would be we still talk about it this
[1:25:16] year but we wait for that year mark to hit and get the data compile the data um
[1:25:23] and then bring it up maybe later in the summer early in the fall for
[1:25:30] discussion so we're at a year and a half so Marissa is trying to collect data right now she's collecting and
[1:25:37] requesting the information right now that's correct but the it went into place in July so we are we've sent out
[1:25:45] letters to all of the businesses and we've issued press releases and other Communications with the requirement that
[1:25:52] they report by the end of March for their experience from July through the end of
[1:25:58] 2024 m is about seven months on the topic of plastic bags my thing is that I
[1:26:05] have taken the plastic free challenge and on Sunday I did go to the Grand View library and we had a really amazing
[1:26:13] presentation from Gabriella Roso who is the green core person for Ein and she
[1:26:18] did just a fabulous job and so I did for the first time bring my own
[1:26:25] durable plastic containers to the co-op to get refills on oatmeal and all that
[1:26:30] and it wasn't that hard but I had never done it before so anyway there are things you can do to re reduce the
[1:26:37] amount of plastic bags um that you're using or just try to step away from
[1:26:42] plastic and I am really trying to be dedicated about capturing the plastic
[1:26:47] that flows through my life including the little plastic ball that was in my non-alcoholic Guinness can
[1:26:55] which is really weird but it's there so it's there everywhere and that is all I
[1:27:01] have right I thought you that's a good suggestion remember let's wait get the data after a year and take a look at it
[1:27:08] yeah especially with it being right around the corner yeah mayor just one more comment on
[1:27:15] that I think the city can be clear that the ordinance requires the 5cent charge
[1:27:20] it doesn't require anything more than that if if Merchants want to charge more than that they're free to do that I
[1:27:26] don't think the city could probably stop them from doing that but the ordinance only requires the 5cent
[1:27:35] charge appear that at least one argument would be that we gave him a pretty good
[1:27:42] idea um but M A has raised a great point and that is let's see what the impact has
[1:27:49] been and and then we can look at absolutely we can we by we'll have more feedback from I think our residents too
[1:27:56] about the experiences they're having on increased bag fees so okay that's all I had manager Neil I
[1:28:05] had one more one I'm sorry one final thing that I had on my uh list here but didn't get to that is uh last week uh we
[1:28:13] were able to honor our own Chad Milner who was selected as city engineer of the
[1:28:18] Year from Minnesota City Engineers Association all right
[1:28:27] just for this one year though that's all and then somebody else gets it after that well maybe he'll get it again but
[1:28:32] he got it at least this year we're very proud of it in the world of being honored it then has caused me to remember that while I was out of town
[1:28:38] last Friday they had the funeral for Willard aola and I'm sure that was quite a great celebratory event so our our
[1:28:46] best thoughts to his family and all of his friends that cared so deeply about him all those students that he had all
[1:28:53] those lives he influenced is just uh was he was an incredible human being so um
[1:29:00] that's it for the evening of February 4th 2025 is there a motion to adjourn so
[1:29:05] move I second pece moves member U seconds a motion to adjourn the city council meeting for the city of udina
[1:29:11] this Tuesday February 4th 2025 at 838
[1:29:17] p.m. all right any further discussion those in favor of adjournment say I I I oppos carried City Council
This story was created by artificial intelligence (a large language model) based on the proceedings captured in the video below.
Want to know when new stories arrive?
Enter your email to receive updates.
We will not use your email for any other purpose. You can unsubscribe at any time.