Minneapolis City Council — Transcript
Tuesday, October 13, 2026
Committee Reports and Upcoming Agenda Items
City of Minneapolis Business Regulatory Environment
Minneapolis Public Schools Transformation Plan and School Closures
City Council Subpoena Authority
Minneapolis Police Department Gift Acceptance
Votes (5)
LRO Presentation: City of Minneapolis Business Regulatory Environment
Dissent: No vote taken, as it was a 'receive and file' item.
Moved by Not applicable · Seconded by Not applicable
Ashley Juk from LRO presented a landscape analysis of municipal efforts to improve the regulatory environment for businesses. The report identified Minneapolis's environment as complex and burdensome, highlighting three key areas for improvement: reviewing/reducing regulations, enhancing one-on-one business assistance (concierge services), and modernizing technology through online portals. Examples from other cities were provided. Council members raised concerns about streamlining, cost savings, literacy barriers, the city's reputation among businesses, and communication issues with city departments. The presentation also touched upon the City Auditor's challenges in obtaining information, linking it to broader transparency and accountability issues within the administration.
Setting Public Hearing for Government Structure Ordinance
Dissent: None
Moved by Chair Chowry [00:46:00] · Seconded by Not explicitly stated
This item set a public hearing for an ordinance concerning the city's government structure. Council members discussed the context, noting the 2022 government structure was a 'try before you buy' pilot. Key proposed changes include eliminating the Office of Community Safety (OCS) and reassigning its responsibilities to the Neighborhood Safety Department, and realigning the Department of Racial Equity Inclusion and Belonging (REIB) under Neighborhood Community Relations. Discussions also touched upon the need for greater accountability and transparency, the relationship between this ordinance and the upcoming budget process, and the potential for a mayoral veto. The City Attorney's office was asked to provide a memo on the implications of a budget veto.
Additional Gift Acceptance for Minneapolis Police Department Conferences
Dissent: None
Moved by Chair Chowry [00:49:00] · Seconded by Council President Payne [00:49:10]
Commander Chris Brown presented a walk-on item for accepting an additional gift from the Minneapolis Police Foundation to fully cover the costs of police chiefs attending conferences in Florida. This action was a direct result of a prior council recommendation to seek full external funding for these events, ensuring no city budget overruns. Council members expressed appreciation for the Police Department's responsiveness in securing the additional funds.
Resolution on Minneapolis Public Schools School Closures and Transformation Plan
Dissent: None, though diverse opinions on the *topic* were expressed.
Moved by Council Member Chavez [00:54:30] · Seconded by Chair Chowry [00:54:35]
Council members discussed a resolution addressing the Minneapolis Public Schools' (MPS) transformation plan, particularly focusing on proposed school closures and mergers. The primary author, Council Member Vita, indicated potential withdrawal of the resolution at a later date, contingent on an announcement from the school board regarding delays in the closure plan. Several council members expressed deep concern from their communities about the closures, highlighting the historical significance of affected schools, the negative impact on neighborhood hubs, and the lack of community consultation. Some advocated for a full abandonment of closure discussions, citing national evidence that school closures do not improve enrollment or fiscal stability, while others urged the school board to engage honestly in systemic change, emphasizing the need to improve student experience and drive enrollment rather than reduce physical footprint.
Staff Direction: City Council Subpoena Authority
Dissent: Council Member Schaefer
Moved by Council Member Wansley [01:13:00] · Seconded by Not explicitly stated
Council leaders initiated a staff direction requesting the City Attorney's office to provide a legal analysis of the City Council's subpoena authority. This action was prompted by concerns over the mayor's letter restricting staff time to committees and a perceived lack of transparency and consistent information flow from the administration. Proponents argued that such authority is a necessary oversight tool, citing examples of other Minnesota cities with similar powers and past instances where the City Auditor faced challenges obtaining information. Opponents criticized the request as 'ridiculous' and a waste of legal resources, suggesting that inter-governmental differences should be resolved through professional dialogue rather than legal compulsion.
Notable Quotes (20)
The Minneapolis business regulatory environment was consistently described as complex, hard to navigate, and administratively burdensome for the business community by staff from the Minneapolis downtown Council, Minneapolis Regional Chamber, Meet Minneapolis, and Elevate Henipin. Whether accurate or not, there is a perception that Minneapolis is hard to do business in.
I have a person in my ward right now who is has been trying to apply for a business license well over a year and language is a barrier, but also um literacy is a barrier. And so, you know, there's shame associated with that. People don't want to walk into an already intimidating place and say to people who they see as professionals that I can't read and write...
I see this as a call to action. I believe that it is time now for us to change this dialogue by having a more predictable, friendly, easy to use user experience for everyone who wants to bring their business to Minneapolis.
I think that is actually enlightening because one of the first recommendations that you put in your presentation and that actually was kind of concerning to me was the reducing of regulations piece. So, I at least wanted to get a little bit more clarity because throughout the report, it it actually names like...the small business team says that they primarily do not get complaints about regulatory issues, but that is such a major highlight in this report.
the lack of communication um that happens between um the staff and also the the business owners are very difficult. It's not it's not um easy navigating around that. Um people call 311 and then you know those those communication is um never get to the right person...
But when we brought this ordinance forward um in 2022, we also heard that it was framed as a a try before you buy it. Like this was our pilot. Um meaning that after a few years of experiencing it and its proposed iteration, council and the public could then look back um at it and use now new years of data to truly make adjustments.
I do think that it's really important that this time that we take the opportunity for the residents of Minneapolis to really demonstrate a collaborative spirit about trying to work together on our differences of opinion so that we do not end up with a veto and an upheld veto.
I'll just add the comment, a veto is not a choice of this body. That's the choice of the mayor. And I hope that that's one that will not happen given the financial circumstance of the city budget.
So this particular item uh was uh is kind of a part two uh from the original which is a a gift acceptance for um members of the Minneapolis Police Department to attend the International Association of Chiefs of Police. Um... some very generous donors did exactly that. So, um, thank you to them and thank you for the recommendation from the council.
I just appreciate the Minneapolis Police Department asking for additional gift money, so we didn't contribute to further overspending the budget. Um, I think it made a lot of sense in our last resolution out of council to ask for that. Um, and I'm glad to see that it was completely possible and glad that that work happened.
I wanted to to continue moving it forward, but also with the possibility that um I also may be withdrawing it at a later date if uh things go a certain way tonight at the meeting. Thank you to all my colleagues for helping with this. It's it's very important that we support our families um during this time.
Field has a a rich history um in W 8. It's a cornerstone of the Southside African-American community and was one of the first schools in Minneapolis to participate in the desegregation programs in in 1971. Um, so the seeing that school closed in all of the of the options given was really alarming to to my community.
I will name I would like to see a full abandonment of any discussion about school closures. And I say that as someone who um lived through Chicago's quote unquote uh Renaissance 2010. Basically, that was their transformation plan. And it closed between 80 to 100 uh public schools mostly located in black, brown, and um Latino communities all over uh Chicago.
I trust the hard work that Dr. sales Adams and her deputies have put into this response, this request for information, and I've been deeply disappointed at the way that they've been received and this information has been weaponized against the narrative. I get passion in parents. I myself am particularly passionate about my kids' education, too. But we need to engage honestly in this conversation.
The conversation to be had overall is 50% of North Side students go outside of the district. And so my call is to get the 2,000 students back into MPS that we need. And so that's what I want to work with the school and the administration on is not it's not about giving up on our students. It's about welcoming our students back in to Minneapolis public schools.
I met with the mayor and he stood by his letter. So um we really can't control what the administration does. we can only control what we can do on our side of the government structure. And uh with some initial research, there are some local jurisdictions in the state of Minnesota that do have the ability to compel uh city officials uh to present.
Transparency and access to information should not depend on who occupies the mayor's office or who serves on the city council or even the willingness of any particular administration to cooperate. These are essentially foundational and fundamental principles of good governance and they must be institutionalized...
I think any relationship is really based on trust and I understand if over years there's problems with information received or trust has been broken etc etc. Um, but I also know that city staff and the mayor have never willingly stated that they would never provide information to us as a council...To bring forward a whole arena of trying to have the action of taking a subpoena against our own city seems ridiculous.
administration is not perfect. No administration will be perfect. This one or the next one. and we were elected to be the oversight and having more information. I don't see how that's a bad thing um for um treating as the administration they all you know good and they're going to tell us everything true. It's it's just not the way of we have seen um things that have that you're not happy with...
We requested but were unable to obtain a comprehensive list of data sharing agreements or memorandum of understanding with federal law enforcement agencies. And I'll repeat that part. We requested but were unable to obtain. This action is a very easy vote for me because if there's a request and information is not being provided, then council has a responsibility to get that information themselves.
Ordinances & Resolutions (26)
Reported on by the Budget Committee, with presentations received from various departments.
Authorization for a contract related to the project.
Decision to rescind operating conditions for the business.
Recommendations and conditions for the business license, sent without recommendation.
Authorization for applications.
Resolution for adopting 2027 assessment rates.
Resolution for adopting 2027 assessment rates.
Resolution for adopting 2027 services and service charges.
Resolution to cancel incorrect assessments.
Approval of a letter of agreement.
Approval of a legal settlement.
Contract amendment for architectural and engineering design services.
Acceptance for purchasing Meridian vehicle intrusion mitigation barricades and authorizing a contract.
Acceptance for firefighter positions.
Approval of the committee's work plan.
Request for city auditor to undertake an independent review.
Approval of a legislative directive.
Approval of a legislative directive.
Request for city auditor to conduct an independent audit.
Presentation from LRO on municipal efforts to improve the business environment.
Proposed ordinance to restructure city government, setting a public hearing for consideration.
Resolution by council members addressing the MPS transformation plan and proposed school closures.
Request to the City Attorney's office for analysis of subpoena power.
Previous ordinance adopting the current government structure, referred to in the context of the new proposed ordinance.
Referenced by Council Member Wansley and Payne regarding challenges in obtaining information from the administration.
Referenced by Council Member Chavez, highlighting the auditor's inability to obtain comprehensive data sharing agreements.