Minneapolis City Council — Transcript
Monday, August 10, 2026
Emergency Shelter Conditional Use Permit (2011 Pillsbury Avenue)
Zoning Code Text Amendment: Fence Regulations
Votes (2)
Conditional Use Permit for Emergency Shelter at 2011 Pillsbury Avenue
Dissent: Jeff Jones, Chris Broberg, and Rhonda Broberg voiced strong opposition during the public hearing due to concerns about neighborhood density and potential negative impacts.
Moved by Commissioner Choudry [00:29:56] · Seconded by Commissioner Johnston [00:30:00]
Staff recommended approval for an emergency shelter with 65 beds, citing its alignment with comprehensive plan goals and the building's historical use as a rooming house. The applicant, Steps to Strategy, detailed their family-focused model, on-site services (mental health, tutoring), 24-hour staff, and partnership with Hennepin County for referrals. Several individuals who had benefited from Steps to Strategy's services provided supportive testimony. Opposing neighbors and a property owner's attorney raised concerns about the increase in density (65 beds vs. a previous 27-bed shelter's failure at the location), potential for disruption in a residential neighborhood, and overall targeting of the area. Commissioners lauded the applicant's thorough approach, the critical need for family shelters, and the project's consistency with city zoning and planning objectives, emphasizing the long-term stability offered by the program.
Zoning Code Text Amendment: Fence Regulations
Dissent: None
Moved by President Meyer [00:43:08] · Seconded by Commissioner Choudry [00:43:10]
Staff presented a zoning code text amendment focusing on three changes to fence regulations: greater flexibility for 6-ft open/decorative fences in corner side yards up to the front wall, reintroduction of 3-ft opaque fences in front yards, and a life safety provision ensuring fences do not block existing side doors. The changes aim to reduce the need for variances, lower project costs, and increase flexibility, particularly addressing issues that arose from a 2023 Land Use Zoning Study. The public hearing concluded without any speakers.
Notable Quotes (8)
The item before you is for an emergency shelter located at 2011 Pillsbury Avenue. Again, that request is a congregate living use emergency shelter with 65 beds. And this requires a conditional use permit to allow that in the UN3 urban neighborhood district.
This is going to be a much different model. It's going to focus on the family. We are bringing in group style counseling that will help the families from what they've been through while addressing some of the needs of the children, because it's much bigger than we just find a way to get them into their next place to start over.
I'm living proof that it does work. It It is a program that works. I mean, I'm grateful to be there. I mean, I don't know what I do without Steps of Strategy. It's a really good place to But it's uh I am getting housed through them here within a month. I'm going to the Helix program. Um I've been approved, so it is a good program. Thank you.
I would actually contend that this CUP application doesn't satisfy any of the six requirements. I will note I support their cause um and I support the goals, but it seems like this particular neighborhood is being targeted in the sense that a shelter just went in from Alliance, who is the previous owner of this property, and shut it down in 2025 because they did not have adequate plans for uh policing to deal with the drug usage and at that time they only had 27 beds.
I think for me, the thing that feels really pressing in this moment is the fact that we have uh shelter all family system, and it is consistently over capacity. And that is just dangerous for community members that are trying to build their family, right?
I want to highlight um the description um from the staff that the structure was constructed in 1906 as a rooming house with 24 rooms. Extensive permit history demonstrates this structure has been utilized as single room occupancy, boarding lodging, and similar uses since it was originally constructed.
So, for the first proposed change, we are proposing to allow 6-ft tall fences to be constructed up to the front wall of the home. Um so, currently, what you are allowed to build in a corner side yard um and so, to clarify, the the corner side yard is when you have a property that's along a corner, you have the front of your house facing a street, and then you have the side of your house also facing a street.
And then the final change is the request adjacent to a life safety concern for changes to fences in interior side yards. So this would be the property line that's between two homes. Currently we allow 4-ft fences along that interior side yard unless the adjacent home is over 5-ft from the property line.
Ordinances & Resolutions (14)
Required for the emergency shelter at 2011 Pillsbury Avenue.
Zoning district where the emergency shelter is proposed.
A goal supported by the emergency shelter proposal.
A goal supported by the emergency shelter proposal.
A goal supported by the emergency shelter proposal.
A policy aligned with the emergency shelter proposal.
A policy aligned with the emergency shelter proposal, specifically point C on enhancing shelter safety methods.
A policy aligned with the emergency shelter proposal.
Mentioned by President Meyer regarding consistency with the emergency shelter proposal.
Proposed changes to fence regulations.
Previous study that removed provision for opaque fences in front yards.
Future plan for which commissioners will discuss ideas at Committee of the Whole.
Upcoming public hearing on October 13th with a 60-day public comment period opening August 17th.
Appeal process concluded with denial and added conditions related to parking.