Minneapolis City Council — Transcript
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
Consent Agenda Approvals and Key Discussions
Police Chief Nomination
Police Training Facility Contract
Sponsor Kennel Program for Animal Care and Control
Legislative Directive on MPD-Federal Government Collaboration
Oversight of McAterry-Lucero After-Action Reviews
Implementation of Rental License Ordinance
Public Testimony on Davis McAterry Shooting
Drones as a First Responder Pilot Program
Votes (8)
Consent Agenda (Items 1-15)
Dissent: None
Moved by Chair Chavez [12:57] · Seconded by Unknown [12:58]
The consent agenda included various contracts, grant applications/acceptances, a joint powers agreement, and a rental dwelling license reinstatement. Item 1 (Forest Lake Sportsman's Club contract for police training) was pulled for discussion, with Council Member Wansley advocating for its cost-effectiveness as an alternative to a new 'Cop City'. Item 15 (Public hearing for Brian O'Hara's police chief nomination) generated discussion regarding aligning the hearing and final vote with the release of the crucial Elifa report on settlement agreement implementation.
Discussion Item: Sponsor Kennel Program for Animal Care and Control
Dissent: None
Moved by Chair Chavez [20:53] · Seconded by Unknown [20:53]
Director Tony Schendel presented a new 'sponsor kennel program' in collaboration with MAC PAC (a 501c3 nonprofit) to raise donations for animal care. The program aims to offset rising costs, provide enrichment, and maintain the facility's 'no-kill status' without using city resources or impacting the city budget. Council members expressed enthusiastic support for the innovative community partnership.
Item 17: Legislative Directive Related to MPD and Federal Government Collaboration on Homeland Security Task Force
Dissent: None
Moved by Chair Chavez [29:50] · Seconded by Unknown [29:51]
This directive was introduced to investigate MPD's participation in a Homeland Security Task Force, citing concerns revealed by open record requests. Discussions focused on potential violations of human rights, city separation laws, and lack of transparency when local law enforcement is deputized by federal agencies. Members referenced past incidents involving ICE and called for robust protocols, accountability, and clarity on data sharing with federal entities.
Item 18: Receiving a Report Regarding the Internal Review of the Shooting of Davis McAterry
Dissent: None
Moved by Chair Chavez [30:57] · Seconded by Not Applicable
This item involved receiving the internal review report on the shooting of Davis McAterry. The committee 'received and filed' the report. No direct discussion or questions were held on the report itself during this session; however, this item provided the context for subsequent public testimony by Mr. Maturi.
Public Testimony on Davis McAterry Shooting Internal Review
Dissent: None
Moved by Not Applicable · Seconded by Not Applicable
Mr. Davis Maturi, the victim of the shooting, addressed the committee, sharing his traumatic experience with constant terror from his neighbor, repeated police inaction despite dozens of 911 calls, and the profound personal toll. He characterized the incident as a hate crime and expressed deep disappointment in the lack of accountability from the police department, its leadership, and the mayor, calling for specific actions like the police chief not being reappointed and a public apology from the mayor. Council members acknowledged his pain, emphasized the hate crime aspect, and affirmed commitment to accountability.
Item 19: Approving a Legislative Directive Related to the McAterry-Lucero After-Action Review's Quarterly Updates
Dissent: None
Moved by Chair Chavez [32:29] · Seconded by Unknown [32:29]
This legislative directive, co-authored by Chair Chavez, Vice Chair Stevenson, and Council Member Wansley, was presented to ensure consistent oversight and tracking of recommendations from the Davis McAterry and Allison Lucius after-action reviews. The aim is to monitor implementation of proposed changes to policies, procedures, training, staffing, and 911 response protocols to address identified concerns and ensure accountability.
Item 20: Receiving the First Report on the Implementation of the Rental License Ordinance
Dissent: None
Moved by Chair Chavez [41:20] · Seconded by Not Applicable
Director April Bogard presented on the implementation of the new rental license ordinance, detailing the three-tier system for properties and the factors determining tier level. Challenges in the current tiering system were noted, particularly that it doesn't always reflect current conditions or sufficiently weight renter-impactful issues, resulting in a lower-than-expected number of Tier 3 properties. Staff noted the need for technical amendments to the ordinance and acknowledged staff capacity as a challenge.
Item 21: Receiving a Report Responding to a Legislative Directive About Drones as a First Responder Pilot Program
Dissent: None
Moved by Chair Chavez [2:01:40] · Seconded by Not Applicable
The Office of Community Safety and MPD presented a proposal for a 75-day Drones as First Responders (DFR) pilot program in the Fourth Precinct. The report detailed how drones could reduce 911 response times, improve situational awareness, and enhance safety for MPD, Fire, 911, Regulatory Services, and Traffic Control. Discussion included regulatory compliance (FAA, state law), a public transparency dashboard, and community engagement efforts. Significant concerns were raised by council members regarding data security vulnerabilities, potential for federal government overreach in surveillance, Fourth Amendment privacy issues (e.g., looking into backyards), and the need for a comprehensive cost analysis post-pilot.
Notable Quotes (21)
I'm working really closely with the city attorney's office because we are anticipating the next semi-annual Elifa report for the settlement agreement implementation, where there would be really valuable information in that report as it relates to how we're doing on the implementation of the settlement agreement. I think it would be extraordinarily important for us as decision-makers, but almost more importantly the public to be able to see the contents of that report before we do take that final determination of a vote.
This contract demonstrates that we can rent a gun range and meet that need for about 100,000 dollars per year, which is truly a tiny fraction of the astronomical amount that we're talking about paying for the mayor's proposed Cop City.
It's it's pretty extensive overall what the police department provides handgun and as well as rifle... related to um just in general, we do handgun qualifications once a year... It's more of a um an exam. We examine their firearms, their equipment that is uh securing the firearms... We don't We don't really consider it a training. We consider that an assessment or um their qualifications to meet the state standards.
This program won't have a financial impact on the city and it in fact won't use any city resources as a part of this program. This is a community-centric approach that will bolster community support for the growing number of animals in our need.
I know this is one piece of of many needs that our animal control facility has and for me um I know our in our capital um, or in our capital program, a big piece too is making sure you all can have a a new home, um, to accommodate not only, you know, increased numbers of animals, but also having a 21st century, um, facility space to carry out the services that you're doing at a very high quality level.
One of the main concerns that I have is what protocols do we have in place in the police department in the city of Minneapolis when our law enforcement gets deputized by the federal government, what rules they have to follow, who is enforcing our city separation laws regardless. I think I hear the concerns from the constituents that I represent that when you deputize our law enforcement with the federal government, we need to make sure that there are strong protections in place to make sure that there isn't a violation of human rights.
Residents have made it clear that they want to see no collaboration whatsoever or coordination whatsoever happen between our police department and our federal um agents as it pertains to de- detaining, kidnapping, terrorizing not only our immigrant neighbors, but as we've known, our the targeting of our immigration uh neighbors then become becomes a catch-all for terrorizing um non-immigrant neighbors as well as shown throughout the recent federal occupation.
One other thing that would be good for us to know is what kind of um transparency measures uh our officers are um when they're in collaboration with HSI, what's what's going on in terms of transparency measures? I'm thinking back to previous task force where officers weren't required to wear body cam um devices uh and that that caused troubles in our city uh particularly around the the uh killing of Winston Smith.
It It was me against this terrorist, this racist terrorist. And I I I deluded myself into thinking that the officers who showed up to my house eventually would get the message and and try to do something. And it wasn't until I was attacked by my neighbor and the responding officer told me to just move that it really struck me that they they don't care about my life.
I remember being in the hospital and thinking to myself, 'Great. Finally, I woke up.' I was thinking, 'Great. Finally, he's going to be arrested.' And that didn't happen for 5 days. You know, I was forced to watch the police chief and then the mayor throw dirt on my name and blame me for getting shot. That press conference was insane.
One thing that I just want to amplify that you shared um in making sure that we're not reducing what transpired in your situation. It was not a neighbor-to-neighbor conflict. This was a hate crime committed against you and your family. And I think that is also critical piece of work that needs to be uplifted um at the city of not only just with the police department. How are we neglecting to recognize hate crimes when they're being enacted against black residents?
I wrote down a quote that you said that I'll be keeping with me and that's I hope one day to be a fraction of who I used to be. That is devastating to hear. Absolutely devastating. I'll be keeping that quote with me. Um I have one question for you. You mentioned that what what you said was there had been no accountability and I was wondering it doesn't have to be the fullness of your thoughts and we can have future conversations but just in this moment what does accountability look like to you?
It is important that as the body of the Public Health, Safety, and Equity Committee that we are tracking any of the proposed changes to policies, procedures, training protocol, um staffing issues, 911 emergency response dispatch policies and procedures, and other recommendations uh to make sure that uh we address the concerns that were highlighted in the after-action review.
We know that our tiering system is not working the way it is intended. So, I think it's also important to remember that tiering doesn't tell the whole story of what is happening at the property and while some code violations might feel very impactful to renters, they're not always life safety issues. So, the way we're weighting tiering right now, they have less of an impact.
I think this body, of course, wants to make sure that we are upholding a standard of quality housing for every resident across um the city and even seeing that those dotted lines are concentrated in certain pockets of the city that are largely more diverse, usually low income, and your zip code, your economic background, or your racial identity shouldn't dictate if you have access to quality housing or not.
Drones as first responders are drones that launch immediately to certain 911 calls, arrive before officers or firefighters, and provide live video so first responders uh know what they're responding to before they get there.
Another really important piece that this can be used for is if we have a missing person, we have to contact the state patrol and ask them to get the helicopter up into flight for us to help look in certain locations for them. That can take an hour or longer to get that helicopter fly up and flying where a drone can be over an area, as he said, in just a matter of moments to be able to look and see.
I have a lot of concern from a governance perspective on how um we don't end up having a technology platform that is ultimately managed by a vendor who also has direct relationships with the federal government. How do we like protect our residents from, you know, under this telling almost every resident of the city of Minneapolis could be categorized as a terrorist in the way that the rhetoric is used by this federal government.
Considering y'all are already running or MPD is running into a $23 million deficit, I think any cost analysis proactively is helpful if you're talking about bringing this in as a operational like line item.
I just wanted to remind the Council of its own ordinance requiring a public hearing before um, acquiring any surveillance technology um, or um, signing a contract to to procure anything like that.
I personally found myself oscillating between wow, this could be extremely useful and oh my god, this is Big Brother coming to uh, ruin our lives.
Ordinances & Resolutions (14)
File containing background information on the Forest Lake Sportsman's Club contract.
Semi-annual report for the settlement agreement implementation, deemed crucial for police chief nomination decision-making.
Directive inquiring into MPD's collaboration with the federal government on the Homeland Security Task Force.
Discussed in relation to MPD interactions with federal agents and potential human rights violations.
Discussed as having loopholes that allow for perceived collaboration with federal agents.
Previous directive that requires a presentation date from OCS.
Directive for quarterly updates on the McAterry-Lucero after-action review recommendations.
New ordinance approved in 2025, effective January 1, 2027, requiring high-risk rental properties to go before council.
A list of problematic property portfolios, potentially being updated by regulatory services.
Minnesota state law regulating UAV drone operation, including authorized uses, reporting, and prohibitions.
MPD's internal policy governing UAV usage, including quarterly reporting to the chief of police.
Settlement agreement with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights, impacting MPD drone video retention policies.
MPD incident reports that must be completed for drone-related incidents.
Cited for its ominous language regarding targeting specific political groups, raising concerns about federal government overreach.