Minneapolis City Council — Transcript
Monday, October 5, 2026
Minneapolis Police Department Internal Affairs Report
Minneapolis Police Department Implementation Unit Report
Corrective Action Matrix Recommendations
Community Engagement Committee Report
Police Chief Hiring Process Update
Policy Feedback for Policy 2-701: Compliance, Audits, and Reports
Review of Regular Staff Update Frequency and Content
Resolution on Police Chief Attendance at Meetings
Votes (7)
Minneapolis Police Department Internal Affairs and Implementation Unit Reports
Dissent: None
Moved by Clerk (implied) [00:39:26] · Seconded by N/A
Lily Hastings reported IIA staffing challenges (23% unstaffed hours) and progress on backlog reduction (65% closed), noting the approval of Grant Thornton to assist with supervised review cases by late November 2026. Commander Bryce Robinson then presented on IU community engagement, officer wellness initiatives (hiring Director Ryan Vanwick for EIS), policy developments (66 approved, several more for public feedback), and data system improvements like a revamped force dashboard. Commissioners primarily sought clarification on youth engagement feedback and acknowledged the reports.
Police Policy Research Recommendations Committee (PPRR) Report on Corrective Action Matrix
Dissent: None
Moved by Commissioner Barts [00:47:33] · Seconded by Unknown [00:47:40]
Commissioner Barts presented PPRR's recommendations for the Corrective Action Matrix, praising its specificity. Key points included developing clear definitions for 'impacts and risks,' limiting Category A coaching, and recommending the removal of 'outdated policy and procedures' as a mitigating factor to prevent 'past practice as policy.' They also suggested elevating disciplinary categories for serious violations like false accusations and sexual harassment. Commissioners expressed appreciation for the thorough work.
Community Engagement Committee Report
Dissent: None
Moved by Clerk (implied) [00:52:16] · Seconded by N/A
Commissioner Smith reported on the Community Engagement Committee's activities, including arranging a screening of 'Paradox echoes a reform of the Minneapolis Police Department' for October 31st. The committee is also developing resolutions based on community input in three areas: evaluating the Lethality Assessment Protocol for domestic violence, establishing a trigger for reviewing the Chief's departures from panel decisions, and researching 911 response times.
Update on Police Chief Hiring Process and Public Hearing Topics
Dissent: None
Moved by Clerk (implied) [01:05:43] · Seconded by N/A
Commissioner Todd Barnett provided an update on the police chief search, outlining the aggressive timeline, the consultant-led national search, and the multi-panel interview process involving community members, law enforcement experts, and Office of Community Safety department heads. He clarified a prior miscommunication regarding Interim Chief Peterson's absence, explaining it stemmed from a misreading of an email and the Chief's commitment to thorough preparation. Commissioner questions probed vetting candidates on civilian oversight, MPD's stance on ICE cooperation, and specific incident protocols, with Commissioner Barnett reiterating limitations on discussing ongoing investigations.
Policy Feedback for Policy Number 2-701, Compliance, Audits, and Reports
Dissent: None
Moved by Vice Chair Olsen [01:11:30] · Seconded by Unknown [01:11:51]
Vice Chair Olsen provided an overview of Policy 2-701, an audit policy establishing the Implementation Division's role in conducting independent assessments of MPD policies and practices, distinct from disciplinary processes. Commissioner Melhenny questioned the differentiated treatment of disciplinary categories in the review process, while Commissioner Smith advocated for more robust language detailing how auditor independence would be protected. The committee decided to refer the policy to the PPRR for further review and recommendations.
Discussion on Regular Updates from OPCR, MPDIA, and IU
Dissent: None
Moved by N/A · Seconded by N/A
Chair Reeves initiated a discussion to revisit the type and frequency of information received from city staff, aiming for effective use of meeting time. While some commissioners suggested streamlining repetitive procedural overviews, many emphasized the crucial role of these regular updates for transparency, public accountability (especially regarding the backlog), and informing commissioners and the public. There was a general consensus that the current level of detail and frequency, particularly as reports become more efficient, is appropriate and should continue.
Resolution Asking Police Chief to Attend Meetings
Dissent: Commissioner Stewart abstained from the vote.
Moved by Commissioner Baker [01:28:44] · Seconded by Unknown [01:28:51]
Commissioner Baker presented a resolution requesting the police chief's attendance at commission meetings, initially drafted due to a perceived reluctance to engage, which was later clarified as a scheduling conflict and miscommunication. Discussion ensued on the resolution's necessity given the clarification and the city charter's limitations on compelling attendance. Commissioners emphasized the importance of regular engagement with the chief for community representation and setting a precedent for future chiefs. The resolution was amended to remove outdated context and to state the CCPO's expectation that the chief attend at least two meetings annually, then approved.
Notable Quotes (17)
We are currently understaffed and we would need to approximately double in size in order to effectively move forward and maintain our current workload.
educating the community on uh what we're actually doing because if we don't do that, people aren't going to know.
Justice, you know, looks different in many different ways. And I think this guy just he really just wanted his bike back or his bikes back. And um sometimes justice is just recovering some bicycles and going to community meetings and uh developing those relationships.
what we've heard is well two things. um respect and one of the big ones is explaining uh why why they're stopped and like what's going on with the officer like are they like if they're being searched like tell me why I'm being searched you know and just be respectful and acknowledge that they might not know what's going on because they are a kid and that's one of the big things that we we we kind of learned from that and that's one of the things that we're incorporating in our engaging with minors policies
policy should always govern. Um you know the the quoting quoting the uh the language is um who's decide uh who's to decide when quote policy language is no longer operational and what practice quote is clearly established when for example uh some members follow the written policy and some follow quote established practice. So, it's problematic and I'm not a labor lawyer, but I know that this is a highly controversial issue and I think um it's a recipe for chaos if this is in in the matrix and um we thought that it should be removed um because again it's you know who you have to interpret interpret these things and it's it's subjective subject to misinterpretation and manip manipulation by the parties involved by the stakeholders involved.
The mayor, my boss, has a very aggressive timeline of 16 weeks uh to get this done. And so, uh, what we have done for the search, we have a national search. We're using the same consultant that we use for the, uh, fire chief that we just hired, uh, is also helping us with this, with this search.
If there has been any miscommunication as far as when he should appear in front of the body, I'll take responsibility for the email that I sent to Chair Reeves and since have talked to her about it. So, uh he's not here tonight. Uh he plans to come before this body. [snorts] Uh he's not shying away from that. I can tell you when we got notice of it, he would have if if he had responded first, he would have told you that he couldn't make it tonight.
as a civilian you could tell me that you've done all these different things and I probably wouldn't pick up that for instance that's a practice that we've stopped doing 5 years ago. But when you have uh people like um Sheriff Wit, you have police chief uh Booker out of Bloomington as a representative from Noble. Uh when you have um you know someone like um uh Chief Harris well not I'm sorry now he's deputy mayor uh in New Orleans like Michael Harrison who actually had you know was on the team before taking on that job. When you have, I think, those type of people on a panel, they seem to be able to get at those questions and be able to really vet um those those folks because they actually can speak the language in a way that um if you're not really engrossed in that work, you don't.
I will respectfully disagree with you about Minneapolis police cooperating with ICE. Um I know that that is a hot topic for some some of our members in the community. Uh, but I would say that our Minneapolis Police Department does not cooperate with ICE. We follow our separation ordinance.
I'm curious why B would also fall into that category because that is disciplinary action.
I'm just I can't think of any ideas off the top of my head, but it seems to me be worthwhile to have more articulation of how that independence will be protected and preserved and assured. It seems like traditionally that's a challenge.
I think we're also here to hear these updates kind of on behalf of the public. We know that we have I mean we have people in the room but we know we also have people uh watching this remotely people again watching it after the fact uh and you know researching issues etc. So, I I think that public record aspect uh all of those combined led me to conclude that I think it's good to continue hearing from these three sources and and get the um the updates at each meeting.
I think we're an important source of community accountability to deal with that backlog. And if we get to the point where we're really current and so let's report every other month because we're so current, that's a different scenario, but I don't think we're there yet.
I talked to a lot of people in the community who still don't know what our process is, and their question is, 'How do you get from point A to point B?' um they like getting the information, but they still don't understand the internal process of how this all works because it's a lot of information.
I I'm trying to decide how important this is. like is it worth a debate and everything at this point? And I would love some feedback on that. Do we need this in light of what we heard tonight?
So under under the city charter the only person who has the authority to compel the chief to attend something is the mayor. So that is why your resolution was tweaked to use the ordinance powers that you do have to be able to compel to the extent that you can. So it's not necessarily compelling. It's recommending that he come and my understanding is he has expressed that he will.
I think you know the city of Minneapolis is unique in what it's been dealing with in the creation of this body and all the reasons we're here. And I think any police chief should want to come before us and answer our questions. they're from the public and I think that should happen regardless of whether the police chief takes us up on that or not because the absence of that is, you know, in some ways uh equally powerful.
Ordinances & Resolutions (9)
Policy on interactions with transgendered and gender non-conforming individuals, currently under development.
ID for a published disciplinary decision.
ID for a published disciplinary decision.
ID for a published disciplinary decision.
A protocol for assessing risk in domestic violence incidents, proposed for evaluation.
Formerly known as the discipline matrix, outlining potential punishments for officer violations. PPRR presented recommendations for its refinement.
Policy concerning compliance, audits, and reports, which outlines the role of the Implementation Division in conducting independent audits of MPD policies and practices.
The ordinance governing the Minneapolis Police Department's interaction with ICE, stating non-cooperation.
The fundamental governing document of Minneapolis, cited regarding mayoral authority to compel chief attendance.