RecordingTranscript available32:05
March 25, 2025 Intergovernmental Relations Committee
Minneapolis City CouncilWednesday, March 26, 2025
Watch on original sourceDocument Analysis
Analyze the transcript to extract topics, key quotes, people, and more — then generate focused stories for any topic.
Transcript
[0:01] .
[0:22] >> GOOD MORNING, AND WELCOME MY NAME IS AUMARINE CHOWDHURY AND I'M THE CHAIR OF THE
[0:29] INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE. AT THIS TIME I'M GOING TO ON CALL TO OUR REGULAR MEETING FOR TUESDAY, MARCH 25TH,
[0:34] 2025. I WANT TO OFFER A FRIENDLY REMINDER TO ALL COMMITTEE MEMBERS, STAFF AND THE PUBLIC
[0:40] THAT THESE MEETINGS ARE BROADCAST LIVE TO ENABLE GREATER PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. THESE BROADCASTS INCLUDE
[0:46] REALTIME CAPTIONING AS A FURTHER METHOD TO INCREASE THE ACCESSIBILITY OF OUR PROCEEDINGS TO THE COMMUNITY THEREFORE, ALL
[0:52] PERIODS NEED TO BE MINDFUL OF THE RATE -- THEREFORE, ALL MEMBERS NEED TO BE MINDFUL OF
[0:58] THEIR SPEED SO ALL COMMENTS WESTBOUND TRANSCRIBED FOR THE BROADCAST. WE ASK ALL SPEAKERS TO MODERATE THEIR SPEED FOR
[1:06] CLARITY IN THEIR COMMENTS. I'LL NOW HAVE THE CLERK CALL THE
[1:13] ROLL. (ROLL CALL.)
[1:40] >> THERE ARE 8 MEMBERS PRESENT. >> LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT WE HAVE A QUORUM. I'LL ALSO
[1:46] REMIND MY COLLEAGUES THAT WE'RE USING SPEAKER MANAGEMENT TODAY SO PLEASE MAKE SURE TO BE SIGNED
[1:52] IN. BEFORE WE MOVE ON OUR PUBLISHED AGENDA, THERE IS A PROPOSED ADDITION BEFORE YOU,
[1:57] WHICH IS A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE 2025 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA AND
[2:03] POLICY POSITIONS RELATED TO AMORTIZATION FOR NONFORMING INDUSTRIAL USE IN ENVIRONMENTAL
[2:10] JUSTICE FROM COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAYNE AND MYSELF. WE'RE MAKING A MOTION TO ADD THIS ITEM TO THE
[2:16] AGENDA AS ITEM NO. 2. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON
[2:23] INCLUDING THIS ITEM? OKAY. SEEING NONE, COUNCIL
[2:31] PRESIDENT PAYNE WHO REQUESTED THE AGENDA TO BE AGENDA. ALL
[2:37] THOSE AYE. THE AGENDA IS AMENDED. WE HAVE ONE ITEM ON OUR
[2:43] POSTED AGENDA TODAY WHICH IS AN UPDATE ON FEDERAL AND STATE ACTIONS AFFECTING THE CITIES.
[2:50] I'LL NOW INVITE DIRECTOR TOPANKA TO BEGIN THE PRESENTATION ON WHAT'S BEEN HAPPENING AT THE
[2:57] STATE CAPITOL. CAPITAL. >> THANK YOU, CHAIR CHOWDHURY AND COMMITTEE MEMBERS I'M HAPPY TO BE HERE TODAY TO PROVIDE YOU
[3:03] AN UPDATE. I WILL DIVE RIGHT INTO IT.
[3:08] SO WE ARE ABOUT HALFWAY THROUGH THE STATE LEGISLATIVE
[3:13] SESSION AND AS OF MARCH 17TH THE HOUSE IS NOW TIED 67-67 AFTER
[3:19] THE SPECIAL ELECTION IN THE ROSEVILLE AREA SO THE HOUSE IS NOW OPERATING UNDER A POWER
[3:26] SHARING AGREEMENT WITH COCHAIRS OF ALL COMMITTEES SO THERE'S A DFL AND A GOP COCHAIR FOR EACH
[3:32] COMMITTEE AND SO THEY'RE TAKING TURNS RUNNING COMMITTEE MEETING AND SETTING THE AGENDAS.
[3:37] TYPICALLY ON DAYS THAT A GOP MEMBER IS CHAIRING THEY'RE HEARING MORE GOP DEALS AND THE
[3:43] DAY DFL THEY'RE WE'LL HAVE MORE DFL BILLS. IT'S NOT UNIFORMED
[3:48] KEYBOARD BUT THAT'S GENERAL HOW IT'S WORKING AND THEY'RE -- GENERALLY HOW IT'S WORKING AND THEY'RE WORKING ON THEIR
[3:55] COMMITTEE BUSINESS. IN THE SENATE THERE IS NOW A VACANCY AFTER THE RESIGNATION
[4:00] OF A GLP COUPLE YOU'LL SEE THAT YOU SAW IN THE NEWS. THERE'S
[4:08] 34DLP THERE WILL BE A SPECIAL ELECTION CALLED FOR THAT SEAT. IT'S IN NORTHERN MINNESOTA BUT I
[4:14] DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHEN YET BUT I THINK THE EXPECTATION IS THAT THERE WILL BE A NEW MEMBER PRIOR TO THE END OF SESSION BUT
[4:21] PROBABLY EARLY MAY SOMETIME. SO JUST WITH ALSO NOTE THAT THERE ARE COMMITTEE DEADLINES
[4:30] COMING UP SOON. THE FIRST ONE FRIDAY APRIL 4TH AND THAT DEADLINE IS FOR BILLS TO PASS IN BOTH THE HOUSE AND THE SENATE.
[4:37] THIS IS FOR POLICY BILLS TO BE PASSED OUT OF COMMITTEE BY APRIL 4TH. FOR THEM TO CONTINUE
[4:43] MOVING FORWARD. THE APRIL 11TH DEADLINE IS FOR ALL BILLS A FISCAL COMPONENT
[4:50] TO BE OUT OF OUR HOUSES WAYS AND MEANS A SENATE FINANCE
[4:55] COMMITTEE. THAT REALLY WILL BE THE BUDGET BILLS THAT WILL BE GOING THROUGH THE VARIOUS COMMITTEES. THEY HAVE TO BE THROUGH COMMITTEE BY APRIL 11TH.
[5:01] SO THOSE ARE COMING UP QUICKLY. I'LL GET INTO THE FEBRUARY FORECAST IN A MOMENT BUT BUDGET
[5:08] TARGETS ARE GOING TO REALLY SET THE PARAMETERS FOR HOW THOSE
[5:13] BUDGET BILLS COME TOGETHER. THOSE ARE NOT RELEASED YET. BUT WE EXPECT THEY WILL BE SOON
[5:20] POTENTIALLY NEXT WEEK. THERE ARE A COUPLE BREAKS COMING UP THIS WEEKEND. THERE'S A LEGISLATIVE BREAK FOR HE'D AND
[5:28] APRIL 11TH-21st IS THE EASTER PASSOVER AND THEN THE SESSION ENDS MAY 25TH, 2025.
[5:35] SO AS I MENTIONED THE FEBRUARY FORECAST WAS RELEASED IN EARLY MARCH AND THE STATE DID
[5:42] ADJUST ADJUST -- SAY THE OFFICE BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT DID ADJUST THE FORECAST DOWNWARD AMID SOME
[5:51] SIGNIFICANT NEAR TERM ECONOMIC FISCAL UNCERTAINTY I THINK PARTICULARLY SOME OF THE ACTIVITY AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL AT CREATING UNCERTAINTY.
[5:57] AND SO THE PROJECTED SURPLUS IS $160 MILLION LOWER THAN IT HAD BEEN IN THE NOVEMBER
[6:03] FORECAST, SO THE SURPLUS FOR THE UPCOMING BIENNIUM IS $456 MILLION BUT THEN THERE IS
[6:14] PROJ PROJECTED SHORTFALL OF ALMOST $6 BILLION AND THAT DID WORSEN FROM THE NOVEMBER FORECAST AS WELL.
[6:20] SO AS I MENTIONED, PRETTY SOON I THINK WE'RE EXPECTING LIKELY NEXT WEEK THE DIFFERENT
[6:26] BUDGET COMMITTEES AT THE LEGISLATURE WILL GET THEIR TARGETS, WHICH DETERMINES HOW MUCH MONEY THEY GOT TO, YOU
[6:33] KNOW, SPEND FOR THIS BIENNIUM AND GIVEN THIS FORECAST, I THINK
[6:39] PEOPLE ARE ANTICIPATING VERY LOW, IF ANY, TARGET FOR NEW
[6:44] SPENDING. IN THE VARIOUS COMMITTEES. THE GOVERNOR DID RELEASE A
[6:49] REVISED BUDGET LATE LAST WEEK BASED ON THE FEBRUARY FORECAST SO HIS BUDGET REVISION INCLUDES
[6:57] AN ADDITIONAL $250 MILLION IN CUTS FOR THIS UPCOMING BIENNIUM AND IN FUTURE BUDGETS.
[7:03] HE DID PROPOSE SOME SMALL ONE TIME INVESTMENTS FOR AVIAN
[7:09] FLU RESPONSE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING AND THEN HIS BUDGET LEAVES 2 BILLION DOLLARS ON THE BOTTOM LINE PRESUMABLY TO TRY TO
[7:17] ACCOUNT FOR SOME OF THE FISCAL UNCERTAINTY WE'RE FACING. AND THEN WE DID GO OVER THE
[7:22] GOVERNOR'S BUDGET WHICH WE HAVE PRESENTED IN JANUARY SO SOME OF THE THINGS THAT ARE UNCHANGED
[7:27] FROM THAT PROPOSAL ARE REDUCING GROWTH IN THE DISABILITY WAIVER SERVICES AND THAT DOES PASS SOME OF THOSE COSTS DOWN TO THE
[7:34] COUNTIES, WHICH THEY'VE BEEN ENGAGED IN CONVERSATIONS ON DURING SESSION ABOUT THAT. IT
[7:41] ALSO GLOOIRNLTS TAX FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, WHICH 1% WOULD COME TO CITIES. WE HAVE BEEN
[7:49] DISCUSSING WITH MEMBERS THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT TEXT PRESERVED TO HELP WITH PUBLIC
[7:55] HEALTH-RELATED RELATED NEEDS HERE IN THE CITY. THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET
[8:03] REDUCES THE BUDGET EDUCATION TRANSPORTATION SCOMBLOIRJSD THE STATEWIDE SALES TAX RATE BUT
[8:09] BROUGHT IN TO THE BASE. SO THAT BILL WAS HEARD LAST WEEK --
[8:20] THERE WAS LIFESTYLE DISCUSSION WHEN PIF --
[8:26] (TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES.) >> THE GOVERNMENT SET SO I LIKED $40 MILLION WITHOUT EAR MARKING
[8:32] ANY SPECIFIC PROJECTS. SO WITH THAT I'LL JUST THEN GO THROUGH AND PROVIDE AN UPDATE
[8:37] ON CITY PRIORITIES AND KIND OF WHERE THINGS STAND TO IT CLOSE OUT THE STATE UPDATE. SO LISTED HERE ARE NOT ALL
[8:46] OF OUR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PRIORITIES BUT SORT OF THE 3 THAT HAVE BEEN IN QUEUE FOR THE LONGEST THAT WE ARE FOCUSING ON
[8:52] WHEN WE'RE HAVING OUR CONVERSATIONS WITH DELEGATION MEMBERS WHICH INCLUDES $2 MILLION FOR THE NICOLLET AVENUE
[8:57] BRIDGE, $5.7 MILLION FOR THE WATER YARD PROJECT AND THEN
[9:03] 12.36 MILLION FOR THE 36" WITH ANY. WE ARE TALKING WITH
[9:09] DELEGATION MOBS ■ABOUT THOSE PROJECTS -- DELEGATION MEMBERS ABOUT THOSE PROPULSIONS. W--
[9:48] CAPITAL PROJECT DEFINITE ( -- IS DEAD NEED THAT BIPARTISAN SUPPORT TO BE ABLE TO PASS A BOVENGD BILL. THEN MOVING TO PRIORITIES
[9:55] AROUND ECONOMIC INCLUSION AND RECOVERY, SO ONE OF THE PROPOSALS WE TALKED A LOT ABOUT WITH ALL OF YOU IS THE CUB
[10:03] CREDIT THAT'S CONVERT UNDERUTILIZING BUILDINGS THAT WOULD BE A TAX CREDIT TO HELP
[10:09] INCENTIVIZE TURNING VACANT COMMERCIAL SPACES INTO RESIDENTIAL OR OTHER USES. THAT BILL HAS A REPUBLICAN AUTHOR IN
[10:17] THE HOUSE AND THEN THE
[10:22] SENATOR FROM MINNEAPOLIS IS CARRYING IT ON THE SENATE SIDE. IT'S BEEN HEARD ON THE HOUSE --
[10:28] EXCUSE ME, HOUSING AND TAX COMMITTEES IN THE HOUSE. IT DOES HAVE A HEARING THIS WEEK IN
[10:33] THE SENATE TAX COMMITTEE AND SO THERE DOES SEEM TO BE A LOT OF SUPPORT FOR IT. THE CHALLENGE,
[10:39] OF COURSE, AS I ALREADY MENTIONED IS THE BUDGET TARGETS, YOU KNOW, THIS IS NOT -- THIS IS SOMETHING THAT DOES HAVE A COST
[10:45] TO IT AND SO ANYTHING THAT HAS A COST MAY BE CHALLENGING TO GET
[10:51] ACROSS THE SFLOOIJS. -- THIS SESSION. BUT IT HAS ZBUGSD SO
[10:59] FAR. WE ALSO HAVE INTRODUCED A ACTIVE TIF LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL THAT WOULD ALLOW THE CITY TO
[11:05] CREATE A SPECIFIC TIF DISTRICT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONVERTING
[11:11] UNDERUTILIZED BUILDINGS DOWNTOWN AND SENATOR MOHAMMED IS CARRYING
[11:17] REALLY CARING THAT ON WHICH WOULD GIVE THE CITY ANOTHER TOOL
[11:22] TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE. WE ALSO HAVE THE DOWNTOWN TAXING BOUNDARY BILL THAT WE'VE
[11:28] BEEN WORKING ON. LAST WEEK THE HOUSE TAX COMMITTEE DID HEAR A
[11:34] VERSION OF IT IS ON HIM BUSINESS -- OMNIBUS TAX BUSINESS
[11:40] THAT WOULD INCLUDE THE DOWNTOWN TAXING PROPOSAL AS PART OF IT SO THAT TECHNICALLY HAD ITS HEARING
[11:46] IN HOUSE TAXES LAST WEEK AND WE'RE WORKING WITH OUR DELEGATION MEMBERS TO SEE IF THERE'S A PATHWAY FORWARD FOR
[11:52] THAT THIS SESSION AS WELL. AS A REMINDER THAT'S A PROPOSAL TO ADD THE NORTH LOOP
[11:58] INTO THE DOWNTOWN TAXING BOUNDARY WHICH CURRENTLY INCLUDES DOWNTOWN BUT NOT THE
[12:03] NORTH LOOP, AND THAT'S SPECIFICALLY FOR LIQUOR AND RESTAURANT TAXES.
[12:09] ON HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE, I THINK WE ARE FOCUSED
[12:16] ON THE BRIDGE TO SHELTER BILL WHICH IS A BILL THAT IS INTENDED TO ADDRESS THE SHELTER FISCAL
[12:21] CLIFF. THAT BILL HAD A HEARING TWO WEEKS' AGO IN THE SENATE HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE,
[12:28] MAYOR FREY CAME AND TO TESTIFY AND THERE WAS A LETTER SIGNED BY SEVERAL COUNCIL MEMBERS IN SUPPORT AS WELL. IT HAD A GOOD
[12:35] HEARING. THE BILL ADDRESSES CRITICAL FUNDING GAPS IN
[12:42] HOMELESS SERVICES AND IT CREATES A COUNTY TO COUNTY CAPACITY-BUILDING PROGRAM BETWEEN GREATER MINNESOTA AND
[12:48] THE METRO SO SOME OF THE PROVIDERS CAN HELP PROVIDE
[12:54] TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO BUILD SHELTER CAPACITY THERE AS WELL SO IT IS INTENDED TO BE A STATEWIDE PROPOSAL. AGAIN, I'M
[13:02] SORT OF REPEATING MYSELF BUT WE, YOU KNOW, HAD A GOOD HEARING BUT
[13:07] THE BUDGET TARGET MAY MAKE IT CHALLENGING TO MOVE THAT FORWARD BUT WE ARE -- WE ARE CONTINUING
[13:14] TO REITERATE THAT AS A TOP PRIORITY FOR THE CITY AS WE'RE TALKING TO DELEGATION MEMBERS AND OTHERS AT THE CAPITAL.
[13:20] FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY SPECIFICALLY THE BILL WOULD FUND OPERATIONS AND SERVICES AT THE
[13:25] MINNEAPOLIS LOW BARRIER SHELTERS LIKE AVIVO VILLAGE AND HOMEWARD BOUND IT WOULD PROVIDE THE 24/7
[13:34] SHELTERS AND HOUSING-FOCUSED CASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES.
[13:40] AND THEN MOVING TO CLIMATE ACTION. THERE'S A COUPLE OF
[13:46] BILLS WE'VE BEEN FOCUSED ON AROUND THE CITIES 0 WASTE PRIORITIES. ONE IS THE SCORE
[13:52] BILL AND THAT'S A BILL THAT WOULD GRADUALLY INCREASE THE
[13:58] FUNDS FROM THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT TAX THAT IS DIST INDICATED TO -- IT'S -- THAT IS
[14:04] DEDICATED TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL FUND SO IT WOULD INCREASE THE PERCENTAGE OF THAT TAX THAT'S COMING BACK TO COUNTIES AND IN
[14:11] OUR CASE THAT GETS PASSED DOWN TO THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS AND RECYCLING AND OTHER
[14:19] ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS TO INCREASE OUR RECYCLING EFFORTS.
[14:25] WE ALSO * TLONG TRANQ WASTE
[14:30] BILL FOR DISPOSING OFS IT NEED
[14:39] REPLACE THE MINNESOTA RECYCLING ACT AND IT IS DESIGNED FOR THE INTENTION TO ELIMINATE THE
[14:44] DISPOSAL OF THESE PRODUCTS THROUGH THE CURBSIDE WASTE AND HELP KEEP THOSE PRODUCTS OUT OF
[14:52] LANDFILLS. SO THOSE ARE THE COUPLE OF BILLS THAT OUR TEAM THAT HAVE HAD HEARINGS AND SOME MOVEMENT
[14:57] THIS SESSION THAT OUR TEAM HAS BEEN FOCUSED ON ADVOCATING FOR AROUND OUR ZERO WASTE GOALS.
[15:03] ON TRANSPORTATION, WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH REPRESENTATIVE
[15:09] MURRAH AND SENATOR FATEH ON A TRAFFIC-CALMING BILL. IT WAS HEARD IN THE SENATE
[15:14] TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE EARLIER THIS SESSION AND I KNOW THIS IS SOMETHING THAT'S A PRIORITY FOR A LOT OF COUNCIL MEMBERS SO THIS
[15:19] WOULD PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR TRAFFIC CALMING NEEDS AROUND THE CITY.
[15:25] WE ARE, YOU KNOW, CONTINUING TO WORK WITH THE AUTHORS. WE ARE ANTICIPATING A HEARING IN THE HOUSE
[15:31] TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE AHEAD OF DEADLINE AND WE'RE JUST WORKING ON, YOU KNOW, TRYING TO GET THE LANGUAGE IN A PLACE
[15:36] WHERE IT'S MOST LIKELY TO BE ADOPTED. SO THAT'S BEEN GOING
[15:42] PRETTY WELL. AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE DARNGS A FUNDING -- ADA FUNDING
[15:49] BILL THAT'S BEEN INTRODUCED AND WE'RE CONTINUING OUR CONVERSATIONS WITH TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS
[15:54] AROUND THAT BILL, OF COURSE, YOU KNOW, WE ARE WELL POSITIONED IN TRANSPORTATION WITH
[16:00] SENATOR SCOTT TIM BELIEVE IN THE CHAIR AND CHAT AND IN THE HOUSE WE HAVE BOTH TWO REPRESENTATIVES
[16:06] ON THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. AND THEN I'LL JUST WRAP UP WITH COMMUNITY SAFETY ON THE.
[16:12] ON THE SLIDE, YOU KNOW, ARE A COUPLE OF PRIORITIES IN THE
[16:18] UPCOMING SESSIONS. WE ARE LOOKING FOR OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUPPORTIVE INITIATIVES TALKING TO THE CHAIRS AND THE COMMITTEE
[16:26] MEMBERS, YOU KNOW, WE'RE AGAIN WAITING ON BUDGET TARGETS TO SEE IF THEY'LL HAVE ANY ROOM FOR SPENDING ON ITEMS AROUND YOUTH
[16:33] INTERVENTION PROGRAMS AND PEACE OFFICER RECRUITMENTS AND WE ARE
[16:39] GLAD THAT WE NOW HAVE TWO MINNEAPOLIS MEMBERS ON PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEES REPRESENTATIVE EMMA GREENMAN IN THE HOUSE AND
[16:44] SENATOR DOREN CLARK IN THE SENATE. LAST BIENNIUM WE DID
[16:49] NOT HAVE ANY MINNEAPOLIS MEMBERS ON PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEES SO THAT'S BEEN VERY HELPFUL.
[16:55] SO WITH THAT I WILL PAUSE BECAUSE THAT WRAPS UP THE STATE UPDATE. WE DO HAVE A FEDERAL UPDATE BUT I'LL PAUSE HERE TO
[17:01] SEE IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS? >> YEAH, MEMBERS IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THE STATE PORTION?
[17:08] I'LL RECOGNIZE COUNCIL MEMBER CASHMAN. >> THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR AND THANK YOU, DIRECTOR.
[17:14] I WAS JUST WONDERING WHAT THE STATUS OF THE METRO AREA SALES TAX FOR TRANSCRIT PROCESS
[17:21] BECAUSE I'VE HEARD THE GOVERNOR IS TRYING TO CLAW BACK THAT FROM
[17:27] TRANSPORTATION AND THAT EX MINNEAPOLIS CLOTS * PROCESS --
[17:36] PROCESS RIGHT NOW.
[17:57] AND I THINK IT WAS TO SUPPORT TRANSIT PRODUCTS. BUT TO YOUR SPECIFIC QUESTION IN WANT TO DOUBLE-CHECK TO SEE IF
[18:05] THERE WAS ANYTHING PROPOSED IN THE REVISED BUDGET LAST WEEK. I DO KNOW -- YOU KNOW, I THINK
[18:11] GIVEN THE TIGHT BUDGET SITUATION, THERE ARE, YOU KN KNOW, -- LIKE THEY'RE LOOKING
[18:17] INTO LOTS OF DIFFERENT PLACES
[18:22] FOR SFWROOIJTSING -- TRANSIT SALES TAX WAS A PRIORITY FOR THE
[18:27] TRANSPORTATION CHAIRS. LAST SESSION, I THINK, THEY'LL BE LOOKING TO PROTECT THAT BUT I
[18:32] WILL -- I WILL FOLLOW UP -- WE CAN FOLLOW UP WITH THE COMMITTEE ON MORE DETAILS ON WHAT'S
[18:44] SNOOIFLTHSSTSTSTST --ES NTSB
[18:49] REL* >> ON THE REDUCTION ON THE METRO AREA SALES TAX FOR TRANSPORTATIO
[18:58] TRANSPORTATION. MEMBERS ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I'LL QUICK ASK A QUESTION WHILE OTHERS -- IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO
[19:03] GET INTO QUEUE. THANK YOU DIRECTOR TOPENKA FOR YOUR
[19:10] PARTICIPATION. CAN YOU MAYBE EXPLAIN THE WHY TO THE PROPOSAL
[19:15] AROUND ELIMINATING 2% OF THE CANNABIS TAX FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS? WHAT HAVE YOU BEEN
[19:21] HEARING AND WHAT'S KIND OF OUR APPROACH BEEN AT THE CAPITAL AROUND THIS?
[19:27] >> YES, CHAIR CHOWDHURY, YES, GOING BACK TO THE GOVERNOR'S
[19:33] REVISED BUDGET AND HIS INITIAL BUDGET HE DID PROPOSE ELIMINATING THE 2% SHARE OF THE
[19:39] CANNABIS TAX THAT WOULD HAVE GONE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. I THINK IT'S A SOMEWHAT A FACTOR
[19:45] OF -- THERE WERE QUESTIONS -- YOU KNOW, ONE OF THE THINGS WE'VE HEARD IS THAT THE STATE HANDLES LICENSING AND HANDLES A
[19:52] LOT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE WORK AROUND CANNABIS AND SO SOME FOLKS HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW MUCH DO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS REALLY
[19:59] NEED. IF THAT'S BEING HANDLED BY THE STATES AND WE ARE ALLOWED TO CHARGE A REGISTRATION FEE FOR
[20:07] CANNABIS BUSINESSES. YOU KNOW, OUR PERSPECTIVE IS THAT THAT REGISTRATION FEE ISN'T BE GOING
[20:12] TO COVER ALL OF THE COSTS THAT WE WILL INCUR AND WE ALSO, YOU KNOW, AS A CITY THAT HAS A
[20:17] PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT, YOU KNOW, HAS PLANS FOR PUBLIC
[20:22] HEALTH EDUCATION INITIATIVES AS IT RELATES TO CANNABIS LEGALIZATION. SO THAT'S BEEN THE CONVERSATION. WE ARE -- WE'VE
[20:28] BEEN WORKING WITH STAFF TO PULL TOGETHER MORE DETAILED LIST OF
[20:34] WHAT WE WOULD ANTICIPATE SPENDING THAT REVENUE ON SO THAT WE CAN SHARE THAT WITH MEMBERS
[20:40] AS, YOU KNOW, THESE ARE THE ANTICIPATED COSTS WE THINK WE'LL HAVE AS LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. BUT I THINK IT'S A QUESTION OF JUST
[20:46] SORT OF PERHAPS A DIFFERENT -- DIFFERING PERSPECTIVES ON HOW
[20:51] MUCH COSTS WILL BE PASSED DOWN TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WHEN IT COMES TO CANNABIS LEGALIZATION.
[20:59] >> THANK YOU, I REALLY APPRECIATE IT. I'LL JUST QUICK MAKE A NOTE -- I KNOW MOBS -- MEMBERS A
[21:07] LOT OF US ARE IN TOUCH OF REPRESENTATIVES THAT REPRESENT EACH OF OUR WARDS. THIS IS A REALLY GOOD TIME IF YOU'RE
[21:17] HAVING CONVERSATION WITH FOLKS OF THE LEGISLATIVE AGENDA AND REACH OUT TO DIRECTOR TOPINKA
[21:24] FOR TALKING POINTS AS YOU'RE HAVING CONVERSATIONS IN SESSION. I'M NOT SEEING ANY OTHER
[21:30] QUESTIONS SO WE CAN MOVE ON TO THE FEDERAL PORTION.
[21:37] >> GREAT, THANK YOU, CHAIR CHOWDHURY. ALL RIGHT. SO JUST I WANTED TO START -- THIS IS A
[21:43] PICTURE OF THE GROUP OF US FROM MINNEAPOLIS WHO WERE OUT IN WASHINGTON FOR THE NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFERENCE A
[21:49] COUPLE WEEKS AGO. INCLUDING SOME COUNCIL AIDES AND IGR STAFF AND SEVERAL OF YOU AND SO WE
[21:55] WERE ABLE TO MEET WITH ALL THREE OF OUR CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION
[22:00] MEMBERS REPRESENTATIVE OMAR, SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR AND TINA SMITH WHILE WE WERE THERE AND
[22:05] ALSO ENGAGE WITH OTHER CITIES AND LEARN MORE ABOUT HOW CITIES CAN WORK TOGETHER TO EFFECTIVELY
[22:12] TRY TO NAVIGATE WHAT'S HAPPENING AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL. AND SO IT WAS A REALLY GOOD
[22:18] OPPORTUNITY TO THANK THE DELEGATION FOR WORK THEY'VE BEEN DOING TO SUPPORT IMPORTANT
[22:25] EARMARKS AND GRANT APPLICATIONS FROM THE CITY INCLUDING THE CONNECTING CAMDEN PROJECT, THE
[22:31] NICOLLET AVENUE BRIDGE AND THE RAISE -- OR THE BUILD GRANT, EXCUSE ME, FOR FIRST AVENUE.
[22:37] AND SO -- AND THEN WE'RE ALSO ABLE TO, YOU KNOW, ASK QUESTIONS AND EXPRESS CONCERNS
[22:42] ABOUT HOW CHANGES AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL ARE BEING FELT ON THE GROUND IN MINNEAPOLIS SO CONCERNS FROM OUR IMMIGRANT AND
[22:51] REFUGEE COMMUNITIES, THERE'S CONCERNS ABOUT FEDERAL FUNDING AND POTENTIAL CUTS AND WHAT THAT WOULD -- OR HOW THAT WOULD
[22:56] IMPACT THE CITY AND ITS RESIDENTS. SO IT FELT LIKE PRODUCTIVE
[23:03] TIME WE HAD OUT THERE EVEN THOUGH IT'S IN MANY WAYS A CHALLENGING TIME TO BE IN
[23:10] WASHINGTON. AND WE WERE THERE THE WEEK THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DID
[23:17] PASS THE CONTINUING RESOLUTION TO KEEP THE GOVERNMENT FUNDED THROUGH THE END OF SEPTEMBER, SO
[23:24] THE CONTINUING RESOLUTION PASSED OUT OF THE SENATE ON MARCH 14TH
[23:30] BY A NARROW VOTE AND IT WAS NOT A CLEAN CONTINUING RESOLUTION.
[23:36] MEANING IT DID NOT EXTEND LAST YEAR'S FUNDING. THEY DID END UP MAKING CUTS TO NONDIFFERENT
[23:42] SPENDING BY APPROXIMATELY 13 MILLION DOLLARS AND THEN INCREASED DEFENSE SPENDING BY
[23:47] ABOUT $6 BILLION. AND THEN ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE -- THEY
[23:52] DID STRIP ALL EARMARKS OUT OF THE CONTINUING RESOLUTION SO OUR TWO EARMARKS THAT HAD BEEN UNDER
[23:59] CONSIDERATION, THE FIRE ALERTING SYSTEM AND THEN ADA UPGRADES WERE NOT INCLUDED. NO EARMARKS
[24:07] WERE INCLUDED ACROSS-THE-BOARD. SO, YOU KNOW, CERTAINLY CONCERNS I THINK FROM THE CITY'S PERSPECTIVES ABOUT THE CUTS 'CAUSE IT WAS INTOX-- IT WAS TH
[24:17] TO MEDICAID AND HOUSING SYSTEMS SO THINGS OUR RESIDENTS REALLY RELY ON. AND, OF COURSE,
[24:22] OBVIOUSLY, DISAPPOINTING TO NOT HAVE THOSE EARMARKS MOVE
[24:28] FORWARD. I SHOULD JUST SHOAT THAT ALL THREE MEMBERS -- I SHOULD
[24:33] MENTION ALL MEMBERS ALL THREE MEMBERS VOTED AGAINST THE CONTINUING RESOLUTION.
[24:40] SO NOW THE CONTINUING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. THEY MOVE INTO CONSIDERATION FOR THE
[24:45] FISCAL YEAR 2026 BUDGET. THE ADMINISTRATION WILL BE PROPOSING
[24:50] ITS BUDGET SOMETIME THIS SPRING. THE LATEST I SAW IT WILL BE
[24:55] EITHER APRIL OR MAY, AND THE GOP HAS SAID THEY'RE CONSIDERING
[25:03] SPENDING CUTS 2.5 TO $3 TRILLION FOR NEXT YEAR'S BUDGET. AND SO THE HOUSE HAS IDENTIFIED SOME
[25:09] AREAS WHERE THEY MAY BE CONSIDERING CUTS INCLUDING MEDICAID, STUDENT LOANS, FOOD
[25:14] ASSISTANCE, AMONG OTHERS, AND SO THE WORK IS STARTING NOW TO
[25:21] IDENTIFY WHERE THOSE CUTS MAY COME FROM. BUT WE EXPECT THE BUDGET RECONCILIATION PROCESS TO
[25:27] HAPPEN IN THE FALL WHERE THEY ADOPT THE FY26 BUDGET.
[25:33] THERE IS NOT CLARITY AROUND EARMARKS AT THIS POINT FOR 2026.
[25:39] BUT THERE IS STILL POTENTIAL FOR EARMARKS. NO ONE HAS RELEASED -- NONE OF THE
[25:48] APPROP APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEES HAVE RELEASED CRITERIA BUT TWO OF OUR OFFICES HAVE SET DEADLINES TO SUBMIT PROJECTS AND THEY ARE
[25:56] ENCOURAGING US TO REAPPLY WITH OUR 2025 PROJECTS SO OUR STAFF
[26:01] IS IN CONTACT WITH THE RELEVANT CITY DEPARTMENTS, PUBLIC WORKS AND FIRE FOR THOSE TWO PROJECTS
[26:07] JUST TO GET UP TO SPEED AND GET THOSE RESUBMITTED.
[26:12] WE ALSO ARE WORKING WITH STAFF ACROSS DEPARTMENTS TO DEVELOP SOME PROJECTS THAT COULD
[26:18] BE GOOD -- A GOOD FIT IF THERE IS A 2026 PROCESS USING THE
[26:24] HOUSE CRITERIA FROM 2025. THE REASON FOR THAT IS THE GOP WAS IN THIS WHAT OF THE HOUSE LAST
[26:30] YEAR. THEY SET PRETTY NARROW CRITERIA FOR WHAT WAS POEFKSD
[26:37] CONS -- COULD BE CONSIDERED FOR EARMARKS WHICH IS PRIMARILY FOCUSED ON INFRASTRUCTURE AND
[26:43] NOT HHS-RELATED THINGS SO WE'RE USING THOSE CRITERIA TO DEVELOP
[26:48] LISTS THAT COULD POTENTIALLY FIT ONCE WE KNOW THE CRITERIA THAT ARE OUT THERE TO OUR
[26:54] CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION NOW. AND SO WE'LL LEARN MORE AS
[27:01] THE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEES COME OUT WITH MORE CRITERIA. BUT WE ARE TRYING TO BE READY IF
[27:07] THERE IS A POSSIBILITY FOR EARMARKS BUT AGAIN RIGHT NOW IT'S A LITTLE UNCERTAIN.
[27:14] SO I THINK -- YES, THAT WAS ALL WE HAD FOR A FEDERAL UPDATE AS WELL. SO THEY WERE OUT OF
[27:19] SESSION LAST WEEK. I THINK THEY'RE BACK THIS WEEK AND WE'RE CONTINUING TO HAVE REGULAR COMMUNICATION WITH OUR
[27:26] CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION ABOUT ALL THE DIFFERENT THINGS COMING
[27:31] ACROSS OUR DESKS, SO THAT IS ALL I HAD. BUT I'M HAPPY TO TAKE
[27:38] ANY QUESTIONS IF THERE ARE ANY. >> MEMBERS, ANY QUESTIONS? I'M
[27:44] NOT SEEING ANY QUESTIONS. SO THANK YOU SO MUCH, DIRECTOR TOPANKA, FOR YOUR PRESENTATION
[27:49] AND ALL OF YOUR TEAMS' WORKS. I
[27:59] SEE COUNCIL MEMBER JENKINS KIN. >> K-I DID JUST WANT TO THANK
[28:04] DIRECTOR TOPINKA AND HER STAFF FOR US IN WASHINGTON, DC. A
[28:12] VISIT WITH OUR LEGISLATORS, YOU KNOW, IT'S A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF EFFORT TO -- TO PULL THAT
[28:19] TRIP TOGETHER AND SCHEDULE ALL THOSE MEETINGS AND HELP US
[28:26] UNDERSTAND THE LOGISTICS AND PRIORITIES. SO I JUST WANT TO
[28:32] SAY THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU, IS THERE ANYBODY
[28:39] ELSE? YEAH, I'LL ECHO THAT THANKS. IT WAS REALLY INCREDIBLE TO BE OUT OF IN IT
[28:45] WASHINGTON, DC, IT WAS DEFINITELY A DIFFERENT TONE THAN IT WAS THE LAST TIMES AROUND,
[28:51] AND IT WAS ALSO KIND OF AN
[28:59] INCREDIBLE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE CONTINUING RESOLUTION AND I'M PROUD OF OUR SENATORS AND OUR CONGRESSWOMAN FOR VOTING AGAINST
[29:05] THAT AND LISTENING TO THE PEOPLE OF MINNESOTA. AND JUST THANK YOU FOR ALL THE WORK THAT YOU'RE
[29:10] TAKING ON AND LAUREN ESPECIALLY ON THE FEDERAL SIDE. HER WORK HAS REALLY CHANGED. SO I
[29:19] APPRECIATE IT. AND I WILL ASK THE CLERKS TO RECEIVE AND FILE
[29:25] THAT PRESENTATION.
[29:31] ALL RIGHT. OUR ADDENDUM ITEM IS A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO
[29:36] THE 2025 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA AND POLICY POSITIONS RELATED TO
[29:42] AMORTIZATION FOR NONCONFORMING INDUSTRIAL USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE BEING BROUGHT FORWARD BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAYNE AND
[29:47] MYSELF. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAYNE WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS
[29:53] ITEM? >> YEAH, THANK YOU, CHAIR CHOWDHURY. THIS IS A PROPOSAL I'M BRINGING FORWARD JUST TO STATE
[30:00] OUR SUPPORT FOR THE LEGISLATURE TO GIVE US THE ABILITY TO PHASE
[30:08] OUT NONCONFORMING USES AND IT'S NARROWLY DEFINED WITHIN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AREAS SO
[30:13] THIS WOULD BE HEAVY INDUSTRY THAT'S IN AN AREA THAT IS NOT ZONED FOR THAT ANYMORE. GIVING US THE TOOLS THAT WE NEED TO
[30:21] REALLY ADDRESS SOME OF THOSE -- ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ISSUES. WE'VE HEARD FROM A LOT OF OUR CONSTITUENTS. I HEAR A LOT
[30:28] OF IT IN WARD 1 IN NORTHEAST KIND OF AN OLD INDUSTRIAL AREA.
[30:33] A LOT OF THOSE AREAS ARE NO LONGER HEAVY INDUSTRY BUT THERE'S JUST SOME LEFT OVER FROM
[30:40] A PRIOR ERA AND THIS WOULD ALLOW US TO HAVE THE TOOLS TO, LIKE, PLAN TO PHASE THOSE HEAVY USES
[30:45] OUT. >> WOULD YOU LIKE TO MOVE THAT ITEM FOR APPROVAL?
[30:51] >> I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE APPROVAL OF THIS AMENDMENT TO OUR
[30:56] LEGISLATIVE AGENDA. >> GREAT, AND I WILL SECOND THAT. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION FROM MEMBERS? I'M NOT SEEING
[31:06] ANY SO ON THE MOTION TO APPROVE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. >> AYE. >> ALL THOSE OPPOSED SAY NAY.
[31:14] THE AYES HAVE IT AND THE MOTION CARRIES. ALL RIGHT. MEMBERS, WITH
[31:19] THAT WE'VE CONCLUDED ALL BUSINESS TO COME BEFORE THE COMMITTEE TODAY AND WITHOUT OBJECTION, WE ARE ADJOURNED.