RecordingTranscript available104:20
June 25, 2025 Board of Estimate and Taxation
Minneapolis City CouncilThursday, June 26, 2025
Watch on original sourceDocument Analysis
Analyze the transcript to extract topics, key quotes, people, and more — then generate focused stories for any topic.
Transcript
[0:12] >> THE BOARD OF ESTIMATE AND TAXATION FOR JUNE 25, 2025, MY NAME IS STEVE BRANDT AND I'M THE
[0:18] PRESIDENT OF THE BET. BEFORE WE BEGIN THE MEETING, I'D ASK THE
[0:25] CLERK SINCE WE'RE EXPECTING PUBLIC TESTIMONY TODAY TO OFFER THE ADVISORY TO PEOPLE REGARDING CAPTIONING.
[0:32] >> THESE MEETINGS ARE BROADCAST LIVE TO ENABLE GREATER PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. THESE BROADCASTS
[0:39] INCLUDE REAL-TIME CAPTIONING AS A FURTHER METHOD TO INCREASE
[0:45] ACCESSIBILITY OF OUR PROCEEDINGS TO THE COMMUNITY. THEREFORE, ALL SPEAKERS NEED TO BE MINDFUL OF
[0:50] THE RATE OF THEIR SPEECH SO THAT OUR CAPTIONERS CAN FULLY CAPTURE AND TRANSCRIBE ALL COMMENTS FOR
[0:56] THE BROADCAST. WE ASK ALL SPEAKERS TO MODERATE THE SPEED AND CLARITY OF THEIR COMMENTS.
[1:01] >> THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME I'LL ASK THE CLERK TO CALL THE ROLL SO WE CAN VERIFY THE PRESENCE OF
[1:06] A QUORUM. >> COMMISSIONER FREY IS ABSENT. ABENE. >> HERE.
[1:12] >> PAYNE. >> PRESENT. >> CHUGHTAI IS ABSENT.
[1:18] VICE-PRESIDENT PREE-STINSON. >> PRESENT. >> PRESIDENT BRANDT. >> PRESENT. >> THERE ARE FOUR MEMBERS PRESENT. >> OKAY. WE HAVE ESTABLISHED
[1:23] THAT WE HAVE A QUORUM. I WILL NOW OFFER AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT WE MEET TODAY ON THE
[1:29] TRADITIONAL LANDS OF THE DAKOTA. AND WE WILL PROCEED TO OUR AGENDA. A COPY OF WHICH WAS
[1:34] POSTED FOR PUBLIC ACCESS IN THE CITY'S LEGISLATIVE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, WHICH IS
[1:42] AVAILABLE AT
[1:48] LIMS.MINNEAPOLISMN.GOV. BOARD MEMBERS, TODAY'S AGENDA IS BEFORE US. MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE AGENDA?
[1:53] >> SO MOVED. >> SECOND. >> SECOND. >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. >> AYE. >> OPPOSED. OKAY. WE HAVE AN
[2:00] AGENDA ADOPTED. NEXT IS THE ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM THE
[2:05] JUNE 11, 2025, MEETING. CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES. >> SO MOVED. >> SECOND.
[2:11] >> ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. >> AYE.
[2:16] >> OPPOSED. OKAY. WE HAVE AN AGENDA BEFORE US. AND I'M SORRY, WE HAVE MINUTES ARE ADOPTED.
[2:24] ITEM NUMBER 4 ON OUR AGENDA TODAY IS THE ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC COMMENT. AND THE CLERK
[2:30] INFORMED WE DO HAVE INDIVIDUALS HERE WHO ARE INTERESTED IN COMMENTING. WE HAVE -- I WONDER
[2:38] IF WE CAN HAVE A SHOW OF HANDS OF HOW MANY PEOPLE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. OKAY, ONE, TWO,
[2:44] THREE, FOUR, FIVE. OKAY. >> I THINK THAT'S SIX. >> WE HAVE A 10-MINUTE LIMIT.
[2:50] THAT GIVES EVERYBODY TWO MINUTES APIECE. AND WE'LL START WITH TONY TILLMAN, PLEASE.
[3:06] >> THANK YOU, BOARD MEMBERS, FOR HEARING ME TODAY. MY NAME IS TONY TILLMAN AND I LIVE AT
[3:14] 1037 36th AVENUE NORTHEAST WITH MY WIFE MOLLY, AND TWO DAUGHTERS, MARINA AND SONYA. THE
[3:22] PARK BOARD BUDGET PROPOSES THE ELIMINATION OF FIVE ICE RINKS. SO I'M HERE TO TALK ABOUT ICE
[3:28] RINKS. THE BEST THING I DID THIS PAST YEAR WAS HOLDING MY WIFE'S HAND AS SHE GAVE BIRTH TO OUR
[3:35] DAUGHTER SONYA. THE SECOND BEST THING I DID THIS PAST YEAR WAS HOLDING MY DAUGHTER MARINA'S
[3:42] HAND AS SHE LEARNED TO ICE SKATE AT WYNDHAM PARK. IN THE DEAD OF WINTER, NIGHTS ARE LONG AND
[3:49] BEDTIMES COME EARLY. I'LL RUSH HOME AFTER A LONG DAY AT WORK, SCRAMBLE TOGETHER OUR WARM
[3:55] CLOTHES AND SKATES. I GRAB MARINA AND SWING DOWN TO WYNDHAM
[4:01] WHERE THE LIGHTS ARE ON AND WAITING FOR US. IT MAY BE 12 DEGREES OUTSIDE, BUT WHEN WE STEP OUT ON TO THE ICE, OUR
[4:07] WORRIES MELT. FRIENDS FROM THE COMMUNITY ARE THERE TOO. I WATCH AS SHE RACES ACROSS THE ICE WITH
[4:12] A FRIEND TRYING TO CATCH SOMEONE'S DAD. THE SKATES SLIDE
[4:18] ACROSS THE ICE, WHILE SMILES AND LAUGHTER IGNITE ACROSS THEIR FACES. THIS IS WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT. THESE ARE THE MOMENTS WE
[4:30] EXIST FOR. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ICE RINK IS THE PLACE WHERE WE CAN GATHER OUTSIDE WITH FRIENDS AND
[4:37] NEIGHBORS ON COLD, DARK EVENINGS. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ICE RINK IS THE PLACE WHERE MY LITTLE BROTHER TJ THROUGH BIG
[4:44] BROTHERS BIG SISTERS HAS ACCESS TO AN OUTDOOR WINTER SPORT.
[4:51] THEY'RE THE LIFE BLOOD PUMPING THROUGH A CITY THAT LOVES AND EMBRACES WINTER. OUR
[4:56] NEIGHBORHOOD ICE RINK IS TO MY FAMILY, MY COMMUNITY, AND SO MANY IN OUR CITY A PLACE OF
[5:01] WINTER MAGIC. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. PLEASE, LET'S
[5:07] KEEP THE ICE RINKS. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. CRAIG, IS IT
[5:17] CARLON? >> KARLAN, YEAH. FOLKS, THANKS FOR HAVING ME. THAT'S GREAT.
[5:24] YEAH. TWO MORE SECONDS TO PLAN. LIKE MY NEW FRIEND TONY WHO I
[5:30] MET A LITTLE BIT AGO, I'M JUST A LITTLE FURTHER DOWN THE ROAD. I
[5:36] LIVE RIGHT BY BRACKET PARK. I RECENTLY SPOKE AT A PARK BOARD MEETING ABOUT KEEPING THE
[5:42] MATTHEWS RINK. I LIVED IN MINNESOTA MY WHOLE LIFE. I'M A
[5:48] SAINT PAUL SCHOOL TEACHER. AND I MARRIED INTO LIFERS. THANKS FOR
[5:54] WELCOMING ME. SINCE THEY WERE LITTLE AND FOR GENERATIONS BEYOND, WE'VE BEEN DOING THE LIONS SHARE OF OUR STUFF AT THE
[6:02] PARKS. LONGFELLOW PARK, HIAWATHA SCHOOL PARK, MATTHEWS PARK.
[6:07] LATELY I'VE JUST BEEN THINKING ABOUT HOW MUCH IMPACT THE RINKS THEMSELVES HAVE HAD ON OUR FAMILY. BOTH OF MY KIDS STILL
[6:13] PLAY REC HOCKEY. I'VE GOTTEN INTO IT MYSELF. BUT MAYBE MY FAVORITE MOMENT THIS WINTER WAS
[6:19] WHEN I WAS AT PLAY IT AGAIN SPORTS AND I BUMPED INTO A STUDENT OF MINE. SHE AND HER
[6:24] SISTER WHOSE FAMILY IS ORIGINALLY FROM MEXICO AND THEY WERE BUYING THEIR FIRST PAIR OF ICE SKATES. I WAS SO HAPPY. I
[6:31] TOLD THEM HAVE A GREAT TIME. BUT YOU GOTTA PROMISE ME IF IT DOESN'T GO WELL, YOU'VE GOTTA GO
[6:38] A SECOND TIME. WHERE I GREW UP IN MADISON, MY PARENTS TOOK ME SKATING WHEN I WAS LITTLE. I
[6:44] LIVED IN MILWAUKEE, THEY HAD NONE. SAINT PAUL, WHICH I LOVE,
[6:50] HAS LOVELY RINKS BUT THEY FILL UP QUICK. I KNOW SOME OF THEM ARE DEPENDENT ON VOLUNTEERS,
[7:01] WHICH IS GREAT. HERE IN MINNEAPOLIS, WE HAVE LIKE A
[7:07] UNIQUELY SPECIAL, WE ALL KNOW THAT, RIGHT? BUT AS FAR AS THE ICE RINKS GO, THERE'S NO OTHER
[7:12] CITY AROUND THAT I'VE EVER EVEN HEARD OF THAT HAS ANYTHING LIKE WHAT WE HAVE FOR OUR OUTDOOR
[7:19] RINKS. IT'S THE BEST SIX WEEKS OF WINTER. I KNOW IT'S EXPENSIVE BUT PLEASE KEEP THEM BECAUSE NO
[7:25] ONE ELSE HAS THEM. AND ONCE THEY'RE GONE, I THINK THEY'RE GONE. SO THANK YOU, FOLKS.
[7:31] >> WHILE I'M CALLING UP CADAR
[7:37] DISSPONDA, I SHOULD REMIND PEOPLE THAT YOU'RE NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE YOUR ADDRESS IF THAT CAUSES YOU A CONCERN. BUT YOU
[7:44] ARE CERTAINLY FREE TO DO SO. AND MAYBE IF YOU GIVE YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WOULD HELP
[7:52] PEOPLE LOCATE WHERE YOUR CONCERNS ARE COMING FROM. OKAY. >> GOOD AFTERNOON,
[7:57] COMMISSIONERS, MR. MAYOR. MY NAME IS CADAR DISHPONDE AND I
[8:05] LIVE IN WHITTIER. I'M HERE TO ADVOCATE FOR THE PARKS. THEY
[8:11] PROVIDE GREEN SPACE. THEY PROVIDE EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AND JOBS AND
[8:17] MENTORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUNG PEOPLE IN THE CITY. YOU'LL HEAR A LOT OF STATS AND FIGURES ABOUT THAT AND YOU PROBABLY KNOW THAT YOURSELF. BUT I THINK
[8:24] WHAT'S MORE IMPORTANT ARE THE SOCIAL CONNECTIONS THAT THE PARKS CREATE. I RECENTLY MET ONE WOMAN, A SINGLE MOTHER WHO MOVED
[8:30] TO MINNEAPOLIS RECENTLY WITH HER FAMILY, WITH HER YOUNG KIDS. SHE'S A REFUGEE, AND SHE WAS
[8:35] LOOKING FOR STABILITY IN HER LIVES FOR HER CHILDREN. THE PARKS ARE WHAT PROVIDED THAT
[8:40] STABILITY. THEY PROVIDED EDUCATION. THEY PROVIDED SWIM LESSONS. THEY PROVIDED BIO BOOKS
[8:51] FOR THE KIDS TO LEARN ABOUT ANIMALS AND FLORA IN THEIR NEW CITY. THEY PROVIDED STABILITY
[8:57] FOR THESE KIDS AND THEIR FAMILIES. IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, THIS WOMAN ALSO SUFFERED
[9:03] THROUGH A PAINFUL DIVORCE LATER ON. AND THOSE KIDS FELT THAT ACUTELY. ONCE AGAIN, IT WAS THE
[9:08] PARK STAFF AND THE REC CENTERS THAT PROVIDED THE STABILITY THAT THEY NEEDED TO GET THROUGH THIS
[9:14] PAIN. SHE'S NOW THRIVING. HER KIDS ARE THRIVING. AND THAT CAME AT A RELATIVELY LOW COST TO THE
[9:19] CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THIS GREAT PLACE THAT WE LOVE. SO
[9:25] THANK YOU FOR REMEMBERING THE PARKS. THANK YOU FOR THE SERVICE THAT YOU PROVIDE TO OUR CITY AND TO OUR RESIDENTS. I APPRECIATE
[9:32] IT. >> THANK YOU. WE NEXT HAVE ON OUR LIST BRITNEY, IS SHE HERE?
[9:40] OKAY. THANK YOU. >> HI, EVERYBODY. THANKS FOR HAVING ME. MY NAME IS BRITNEY
[9:48] ZELINSKI. I'M A MOM OF THREE YOUNG KIDS AGES 13 TO 5. SO I'M JUST HERE TO SPEAK ABOUT HOW
[9:56] ESSENTIAL THE PARKS ARE. WE LIVE IN NORTH MINNEAPOLIS, HARRISON PARK TO BE EXACT. AND IT'S NOT JUST A GREEN SPACE, IT'S BEEN A
[10:02] LIFE LINE FOR ME. THROUGH THE PARK PROGRAMS, MY SON'S ACTUALLY BEEN ABLE TO SKATE, ICE FISH,
[10:10] KAYAK, RIDE BIKES, PLAY BASKETBALL, AND EVEN TEACH HIM HOW TO COOK. THERE WERE TIMES
[10:15] WHEN I'VE STRUGGLED TO AFFORD GROCERIES, AND THE PARK PROVIDED LUNCH FOR MY KIDS, AND THAT MEANS EVERYTHING TO ME. SO I'VE
[10:22] STRUGGLED QUITE A BIT, AND THE PARKS HAVE DONE MORE THAN
[10:27] ENOUGH. MY DAUGHTER LOOKS FORWARD TO ARTS AND CRAFTS EVERY WEDNESDAY. IT'S HER TIME TO BE
[10:33] CREATIVE AND FEEL SEEN. SHE'S BEEN BULLIED AT SCHOOLS, AND THE PARK HAS ACTUALLY GIVEN HER SPACE WHERE SHE'S WELCOMED AND
[10:40] INCLUDED. NEARLY EVERY DAY WE'RE AT THE PLAYGROUND OR THE POOL OR JUST BEING TOGETHER AS A FAMILY
[10:46] AT THE PARKS. SO EVERY EVENT, EVERY ACTIVITY, WE'RE THERE. SO BECAUSE THESE PARKS -- SORRY.
[10:52] BECAUSE THESE PARKS HAVE GIVEN MY CHILDREN EXPERIENCES THAT I COULD NOT GIVE THEM, I'M VERY
[10:58] CONFIDENT THAT THESE PARKS NEED TO STAY AROUND. THEY'VE MADE THEM BUILD -- HAVE FRIENDS,
[11:04] BUILD CONFIDENCE, STAY OUT OF TROUBLE, STAY ACTIVE AND FEEL LIKE THEY BELONG IN THE
[11:09] COMMUNITY MPLET SO WHEN YOU'RE THINKING ABOUT FUNDING OR SUPPORT, PLEASE KNOW THAT INVESTING IN OUR PARKS ISN'T ABOUT LAND OR FACILITIES, IT'S
[11:16] ABOUT INVESTING IN KIDS LIKE MINE AND FAMILIES LIKE OURS WHO DEPEND ON THESE SPACES TO GROW,
[11:22] CONNECT AND THRIVE. THANK YOU. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. >> THANK YOU. NEXT WE HAVE
[11:29] CHRISTINE ARMBUSTER. EXCUSE ME
[11:34] IF I BUTCHER ANYBODY'S NAME. >> YOU WERE PRETTY CLOSE. YOU DID A PRETTY CLOSE JOB OF THAT.
[11:41] I'M CHRISTINE ARMBREWSTER. I'M A RESIDENT OF LIND ALE NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU FOR HAVING US HERE TODAY AND ABLE TO
[11:48] SPEAK AND CAREFULLY CONSIDER THESE BIG BUDGET CHOICES. I AM A TRANSPLANT TO MINNEAPOLIS. I
[11:53] MOVED HERE A YEAR AND A HALF AGO. I HAD A LIST AS I WAS DEBATING BETWEEN STAYING IN
[12:00] PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, WHERE MY FAMILY IS AND MOVING HERE. I
[12:06] HAD A PROS AND CONS LIST. THINGS RELATED TO THE PARKS HERE WERE THE TOP FOUR THINGS WHY TO MOVE
[12:12] TO MINNEAPOLIS. IT INCLUDES TRAIL RUNNING CLUBS THAT I'M A PART OF. I SWAM ACROSS NACOMAS
[12:21] YESTERDAY. I ABSOLUTELY LOVE ICE SKATING. 37-YEAR OLD WOMAN TO GET A PAIR OF ICE SKATES UNDER
[12:28] THE CHRISTMAS TREE YESTERDAY -- NOT YESTERDAY, CHRISTMAS FROM MY FATHER BROUGHT ME SO MUCH JOY I
[12:34] CANNOT EVEN EXPRESS. EVEN FALLING FELT OKAY. BECAUSE I WAS
[12:39] ABLE TO GET BACK UP AND DO IT AGAIN. BUT I ABSOLUTELY LOVE THE COMMUNITY PARK SERVICE HERE AND
[12:45] I'M VERY GRATEFUL FOR IT. I AM A PARTNER WITH A MEET MINNEAPOLIS, ONE OF THE BIG TOURISM PROGRAMS
[12:52] HERE. MY BUSINESS IS ONE OF THEIR PARTNERS. I GET SO MUCH INFORMATION FROM THEM CONSTANTLY
[12:57] REMINDING US THAT THIS IS ONE OF THE GREATEST PLACES TO LIVE IN THE COUNTRY. IT HAS HIGH
[13:04] HAPPINESS RATES. IT HAS SO MUCH ACCESS TO THE OUTDOORS. AND IT'S INCREDIBLE TO LEARN THAT 99% OF
[13:13] CITIZENS OF MINNEAPOLIS HAS ACCESS TO PARKS WITHIN A 10-MINUTE WALK. AND THAT GOES ACROSS EVERY DEMOGRAPHIC, THAT
[13:19] GOES ACROSS EVERY INCOME BRACKET. THAT GOES ACROSS EVERY
[13:25] GEOGRAPHICAL PART OF THE CITY. THAT IS WONDERFUL. THAT MEANS THAT THE PARK SYSTEM IS THE BACKBONE OF OUR ENTIRE CITY
[13:31] ALMOST AS MUCH AS EVERY ROAD AND EVERY OTHER PIECE OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND SLOWLY
[13:36] GUTTING IT WILL SLOWLY GUT THE INSIDES OF OUR CITY. PLEASE TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. WE HAVE ONE
[13:45] ADDITIONAL NAME HERE. CLAUDIA CALLAHAN. IS THERE ANYBODY IN
[13:56] THE ROOM WHO HASN'T SIGNED THE SIGN-IN SHEET TO SPEAK? OKAY.
[14:03] WHY DON'T YOU COME UP AND GIVE YOUR NAME PLEASE -- OH, THERE YOU ARE. APPARENTLY TWO MORE. GO
[14:10] AHEAD. JUST GIVE US YOUR NAME
[14:16] AND YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD IF YOU COULD, PLEASE.
[14:23] >> I WAS TRYING TO GET THROUGH THE GOVERNMENT CENTER AND THE TUNNEL STALL. I DIDN'T KNOW HOW
[14:32] TO SIGN IN. >> GO AHEAD. YOU HAVE A COMMENT
[14:37] RELATED TO THE PARKS? OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE ON OUR AGENDA? >> AM I READY TO GO?
[14:43] >> YEAH, YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES. >> OKAY. I WAS BORN IN
[14:49] MINNEAPOLIS, AND WHEN ME AND MY FRIENDS WOULD GO OVER TO THE LYNDALE PARK ROSE GARDEN, THIS
[14:55] ROSE GARDEN IS THE COUNTRY'S SECOND OLDEST PUBLIC ROSE
[15:00] GARDEN. IT IS ALMOST 120 YEARS OLD. THIS GARDEN IS A 60-YEAR
[15:06] PRECURSOR TO THE WHITE HOUSE ROSE GARDEN THAT WAS DESIGNED BY JACQUELINE KENNEDY. IN 2006, I
[15:13] STARTED TO VOLUNTEER AT THE ROSE GARDEN. MANY OF THE ROSE BEDS
[15:18] WERE EMPTY. THESE ROSE BUSHES HAD ROSE HIPS, WEEDS AND
[15:27] SUCKERS. A COLLEGE EDUCATED ROSE GARDENER WAS -- 450 ROSE BUSHES
[15:39] DONATED. THE ROSE GARDENER ALSO SAID ROSES GROW WITH OTHER FLOWERS. THE ROSE GARDEN USES
[15:46] BENEFICIAL FLOWERS AND BEES INSTEAD OF PESTICIDES. ROSES
[15:52] GROW EVERY DAY WITH OVER 4,000 ROSE BUSHES AND THIS GARDEN
[15:58] NEEDS MORE THAN DAILY EMPLOYEES TO HELP MAINTAIN THE ROSE GARDEN. NOW WITH LIMITED HOURS,
[16:04] THE STUDENTS AND OTHER VOLUNTEERS HAVE STOPPED COMING.
[16:11] WE HAVE SATURDAY, EVERY SATURDAY VOLUNTEER HOURS, BUT NOW IT'S
[16:16] CUT BACK TO TWO HOURS A MONTH. SO FROM 15 HOURS TO 14 HOURS
[16:23] VOLUNTEER TIME. BEAUTIFUL ROSES DO NOT GROW WILD. THIS 4,000
[16:29] BUSH ROSE GARDEN NEEDS MORE THAN ONE MAN TO UPKEEP IT. FOR THE ROSE GARDEN TO HAVE A CHANCE TO
[16:35] LIVE ANOTHER CENTURY, IT MUST HAVE MORE EMPLOYEES AND NEW GENERATIONS OF VOLUNTEERS
[16:42] WORKING FOR MORE THAN 4 HOURS. I ALWAYS TELL THE SMALL CHILDREN THAT THIS IS THEIR GARDEN. WE
[16:47] MUST TAKE CARE OF THE ROSE GARDEN TO MAKE IT LAST ANOTHER CENTURY. >> AND COULD YOU GIVE US YOUR
[16:53] NAME, PLEASE. >> LINDA JOHNSON. >> OKAY. THANK YOU, MS. JOHNSON.
[17:03] I BELIEVE THE COMPANION PLANTING WITH THE ROSES THIS YEAR IS
[17:11] ELISUM, IT'S PURPLE IN THE ROSE GARDEN. >> YES. TO GET RID OF THE JAPANESE BEETLES. YES.
[17:17] >> OKAY. THANK YOU. WE HAVE ONE MORE. >> THANK YOU.
[17:22] >> -- PERSON. ERIC VEGEL. I'M
[17:36] JUST GOING TO EXERCISE THE CHAIR'S DISCRETION TO BEND THE RULES AND GO BEYOND THE 10-MINUTE LIMIT. SO GO AHEAD.
[17:42] >> HI, MY NAME IS ERIC VIGO. I'M HERE TO TALK ABOUT PARK FUNDING.
[17:49] I'VE BEEN A COACH IN THE TITANS ORGANIZATION, WHICH IS A YOUTH HOCKEY ORGANIZATION IN NORTH
[17:54] MINNEAPOLIS FOR ABOUT EIGHT YEARS NOW. I ALSO COACH RBI
[18:00] BASEBALL, RBI SOFTBALL AT WYNDHAM PARK, LOGAN PARK, WHEREVER IT WILL TAKE ME AND
[18:06] WHEREVER THERE'S A FIELD TO PLAY. I JUST THINK THESE PARKS
[18:12] PROVIDE FOR YOUTH TO LEARN SKILLS THEY DON'T GET ANYWHERE ELSE. CORE VALUE OF MINNEAPOLIS
[18:18] TO PROVIDE THESE OPPORTUNITIES FOR OUR YOUTH. AND MAKING SURE OUR FIELDS ARE SAFE FOR OUR KIDS. THAT THEY HAVE A SAFE
[18:24] PLACE TO PLAY. I WAS LISTENING TO THE SOFTBALL FIELD NEEDS. I
[18:29] KNOW BASEBALL WE HAVE NEEDS. THE OUTDOOR RINKS IN THE WINTER. I THINK ABOUT WHAT IT MEANS TO BE
[18:35] A MINNEAPOLIS RESIDENT, TO BE A MINNESOTAN. AND HAVING THESE OUTDOOR OPPORTUNITIES ARE
[18:41] VALUABLE. I SAW YOU AT THE MAYOR'S CUP GAME. KIDS LOVE THOSE OPPORTUNITIES AND THEY
[18:46] GROW SO MUCH. I ESPECIALLY THINK COMING OUT OF COVID, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE TO PROVIDE THOSE OPPORTUNITIES AND MAKE SURE
[18:52] THEY'RE FUNDED. PEOPLE MAKE OUR LIFE. AND YOU GET THAT EXPERIENCE AT TEAM OR GROUP OR
[18:58] PLAYING WITH YOUR FRIENDS IN THE PARK. SUPER VALUABLE. THANKS FOR YOUR TIME.
[19:04] >> THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE A CLAUDIA HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? THANK YOU. IF YOU COULD
[19:11] GIVE US YOUR NAME AND YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WOULD BE WONDERFUL. >> YES. MY NAME IS CLAUDIA
[19:17] CALLAHAN AND I LIVE IN KINGFIELD. ONE OF THE MAIN
[19:22] REASONS -- WHAT'S ONE OF THE MAIN REASONS MINNEAPOLIS IS A GREAT CITY? THIS YEAR, THE
[19:28] MINNEAPOLIS PARK SYSTEM PLACED THIRD ON THE NATIONAL 2025 PARK
[19:35] SCORE INDEX, ONLY AFTER WASHINGTON D.C. AND IRVING,
[19:41] CALIFORNIA. IT'S SOMETHING WE CAN BE PROUD OF. IN MINNESOTA, WE TAKE PARKS SERIOUSLY. THERE'S
[19:47] ANOTHER PICTURE WE CAN BE EVEN MORE PROUD OF, IT'S HOW THESE
[19:52] PARKS MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN THE LIVES OF INDIVIDUALS, CHILDREN AND FAMILIES AND OLDER FOLKS WHO
[20:01] LIVE IN MINNEAPOLIS. IT'S OUR PARK BOARD STAFF WHO DEMONSTRATE GREAT WORK ETHIC AND DEDICATION
[20:07] EVERY DAY. COMMUNITY GARDEN, A
[20:14] PARK BOARD LEGACY GARDEN TEMPORARILY CLOSED LAST SPRING. AND BECCA GROSS, THE COORDINATOR
[20:22] PROCURED RAISED BEDS, COMPOST, AND SET UP THE WATER FOR GARDENERS AT THE WHITTIER REC
[20:28] CENTER. THIS SUMMER, WE AGAIN HAVE GARDENERS IN THIS SPACE AND IT IS ALSO USED BY WHITTIER KIDS
[20:36] IN THEIR SUMMER PROGRAMMING. AND INCLUDING IN THEIR DAILY CHORE AS THEY'RE LEARNING ABOUT PLANTS
[20:43] AND GARDENING. AS A GARDENER, I'M GRATEFUL FOR THE PARK BOARD.
[20:50] IN MINNEAPOLIS, MOST FOLKS LIVE IN APARTMENTS, WITH MORE
[20:56] APARTMENTS BEING BUILT ALL THE TIME. OUR PARKS WILL BE MORE
[21:02] IMPORTANT NOT LESS IMPORTANT TO THESE FOLKS AND THESE APARTMENTS, AND THE COMMUNITY AS TIME GOES ON. IN 2024,
[21:10] MINNEAPOLIS PARKS WON THE NATIONAL GOLD MEDAL AWARD FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PARKS
[21:16] AND RECREATION ADMINISTRATION.
[21:23] WE HAVE SUCH AN AMAZING PARK SYSTEM HERE. PLEASE VOTE TO KEEP
[21:31] AND MAINTAIN IT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. >> THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO
[21:37] TESTIFY ABOUT PARKS? OKAY. IT LOOKS LIKE WE'VE EXHAUSTED THE SUPPLY OF PEOPLE WHO WANTED TO
[21:44] DISCUSS THIS ISSUE TONIGHT. I CAN ASSURE YOU THAT WE'LL KEEP YOUR COMMENTS IN MIND DURING THE
[21:50] BUDGET PRESENTATION BY THE PARK BOARD THAT IS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THIS. AND ALSO IN
[21:56] SEPTEMBER WHEN WE TAKE ACTION ON THE LEVY. NEXT, I'LL ASK THE
[22:02] CLERK TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE COMMENTS. AND WE HAVE NOW ITEM 5
[22:07] ON THE AGENDA. IT IS LISTED AS THE ANNUAL REPORT ON THE
[22:15] NPP20-YEAR PARK PLAN. BUT IT ALSO WILL INCLUDE THE 2026 BUDGET OUTLOOK FOR THE PARK
[22:20] BOARD. AND WHO WILL BE
[22:27] PRESENTING? >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, MEMBERS, THANK YOU FOR HAVING US HERE TODAY. I'M JENNIFER RINGOLD, I'M
[22:34] THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT FOR THE PARK BOARD. SUPERINTENDENT
[22:41] BEN GORA IS OUT. YOU DO HAVE TWO
[22:46] BODIES. ONE IS THE -- THE OTHER ONE IS REFLECTIVE OF OUR WORK ON
[22:51] NPP20 AND 2024. JULIA WEISSMANN
[22:56] WILL LEAD THIS, AND THEN MICHAEL SCHROEDER WILL JOIN HER.
[23:10] >> WELCOME. >> GOOD EVENING, PRESIDENT
[23:15] BRANDT, AND VICE PRESIDENT PREE-STINSON, AND BOARD MEMBERS. I'M JULIA WEISSMANN. I'M GOING
[23:32] TO START WITH OUR 2026 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET PLAN. THIS IS SIMILAR BUT DIFFERENT THAN THE CITY'S CURRENT SERVICE LEVEL
[23:39] PRESENTATION THAT THEY GAVE TO THIS BODY AT THE LAST MEETING.
[23:45] WE USE THE 2026 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET PLAN AS THE BASE FOR OUR
[23:52] DEVELOPMENT OF OUR 2026 BUDGET. WHAT I'M PRESENTING TO YOU THIS
[23:57] EVENING IS PRELIMINARY NUMBERS. IT IS NOT THE FORMAL ASK FOR
[24:04] MAXIMUM PROPERTY TAX LEVY. OUR BOARD WILL DO THAT WORK IN JULY,
[24:09] AND WE WILL COME BACK TO THIS BODY IN SEPTEMBER AND PRESENT
[24:15] THE FORMAL BOARD APPROVED MAXIMUM TAX LEVY. THIS FOCUS --
[24:27] THE FOCUS OF THIS PRESENTATION WILL BE ON THE GENERAL FUND. THE
[24:35] ADOPTED PLAN INCLUDED 6.33%
[24:40] PROPERTY TAX LEVY INCREASE, AND HELD BOTH LGA AND OTHER REVENUES
[24:49] CONSTANT. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THIS PIE CHART, 82% OF OUR GENERAL FUND IS FUNDED THROUGH PROPERTY
[24:56] TAXES. SO WE ARE MUCH MORE HEAVILY RELIANT ON THAT ONE
[25:02] FUNDING SOURCE THAN THE CITY.
[25:10] OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS OUR PROPERTY TAX LEVY INCREASE HAS BEEN APPROXIMATELY 5.6%. I'LL
[25:19] HIGHLIGHT ON THIS CHART, IN 2017, THAT IS WHEN THE NPP20
[25:27] STARTED. THAT'S WHERE YOU SEE THE 10% INCREASE. IN 2022 IS WHEN THE INVESTMENT IN YOUTH
[25:34] BEGAN WITH THE $1.3 MILLION INCREASE IN 2022, AND THEN
[25:42] GRADUAL INCREASES BETWEEN 2023,
[25:51] 2027 OF $260,000. SO THAT IN 2027, WE WILL HAVE A TOTAL OF
[25:57] $2.6 MILLION FOR THE YOUTH INVESTMENT. 2025 INCREASE OF
[26:06] 8.3% AS REMINDER TO THIS BODY WAS LARGELY TO SUPPORT THE MPRB
[26:14] WORKFORCE AS WELL AS TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO DISCOUNTED YOUTH PROGRAMMING. FOR LGA, IT IS
[26:27] BEING HELD CONSTANT. AT THE END OF THIS CURRENT LEGISLATIVE SESSION, THERE WERE NO INCREASES
[26:33] IN LGA, AND LUCKILY NO DECREASES IN LGA. SO IT IS BEING HELD
[26:39] CONSTANT. OUR OTHER REVENUES
[26:45] AVERAGE 10.5 MILLION OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS. AND YOU'LL SEE
[26:52] FOR 2025, OUR 2026 PLAN, WE ARE HOLDING THAT AMOUNT CONSTANT AS WELL. I'LL JUST SAY THAT OUR
[27:07] YOUTH FEES DISCOUNTED CITY WIDE THAT IS THE FIRST, 2025 IS THE FIRST YEAR WE HAVE DONE THAT.
[27:13] OUR PRELIMINARY NUMBERS ARE REALLY POSITIVE. BUT IT'S TOO
[27:20] SOON TO UNDERSTAND THE FULL IMPACT. -- TO THE REVENUE. ALL
[27:27] FEES ARE ADJUSTED ANNUALLY BASED ON MARKET RESEARCH. ON THE
[27:36] EXPENDITURE SIDE, OUR 2026 PLAN, YOU'LL SEE THAT SALARY AND FRINGE MAKE UP ALMOST 73% OF THE
[27:45] GENERAL FUND BUDGET. THE 2026 PLAN PROVIDES THE TAIL FOR THE
[27:52] MPRB UNION CONTRACTS, WITH MOST UNIONS SETTLED THROUGH
[28:00] 12-31-2026. YOU'LL SEE THAT AS A LINE ITEM IN FURTHER SLIDE. OUR
[28:15] 2026 PLAN PROJECTS FOR A 5.1%
[28:21] OVERALL GROWTH TO THE MPRB GENERAL FUND, WITH ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP DIVISION HAVING THE
[28:28] LARGEST PORTION OF OUR GENERAL FUND BUDGET, ALMOST 50%. AND THAT INCLUDES OUR ASSET
[28:34] MANAGEMENT, FORESTRY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. SO IN
[28:43] ORDER TO HAVE A BALANCED BUDGET IN 2025, OVER THE TWO-YEAR
[28:50] BUDGET CYCLE, WE HAD TO IMPLEMENT SERVICE LEVEL
[28:55] REDUCTIONS. AND THEY WERE LARGELY IN OUR RECREATION CENTERS WHERE WE REDUCED OUR REC
[29:01] CENTERS BY ONE HOUR SO THEY CLOSE AT 8 P.M. INSTEAD OF 9 P.M. ALL RECREATION CENTERS
[29:07] ARE NOW CLOSED ON SUNDAYs, AND ALL RECREATION CENTERS ARE NOW CLOSED ON ALL FEDERAL HOLIDAYS.
[29:14] AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE REDUCTION OF THE FIVE ICE RINKS OF WHICH WE HAD THE PUBLIC
[29:21] SPEAKERS SPEAKING TO DIRECTLY. WE ALSO USED ONE-TIME TEMPORARY
[29:26] BUDGET REDUCTIONS. IF YOU REMEMBER, WE HAD REQUESTED A BUDGET INCREASE FOR GRACO PARK,
[29:33] WHICH WAS NOT FUNDED LAST YEAR. GRACO PARK HAS OPENED, AND WE
[29:40] HAVE LIMITED ACTIVATION AT THE NEW GRACO PARK IN NORTHEAST MINNEAPOLIS. AND WE UTILIZED
[29:49] BUDGET SAVINGS FROM THE CLOSURE OF THE NORTH COMMONS POOL. IT IS CLOSED AND BEING DEMOLISHED FOR
[29:56] THE NORTH COMMONS CONSTRUCTION. AND SO IT'S A TEMPORARY FIX AND IT ALLOWED US LIMITED
[30:04] ACTIVATION. SO IT'S ONLY OPEN WEDNESDAY THROUGH SUNDAYs. AND THEN WE CLOSED THE YOUTH
[30:10] INVESTMENT GAP, WHICH WAS
[30:16] $520,000 IN 2025 -- OR -- YEAH, IN 2025. AND WE DID THAT BY
[30:22] HOLDING POSITIONS VACANT AND NOT
[30:27] DOING A TRANSFER TO PARK LAND ACQUISITION FUND. SO WHAT
[30:34] CHANGES HAVE HAPPENED SINCE THE BUDGET PLAN WAS ADOPTED BY OUR BOARD? THIS SLIDE SHOWS
[30:41] ADJUSTMENTS TO OUR ASSUMPTIONS
[30:48] FOR THE 2026 PLAN, WHICH CENTER ROUNDS CITY CHARGES TO THE MPRB. THE FIRST IS GENERAL FUND
[30:53] OVERHEAD CHARGE. AND IT IS CURRENTLY ESTIMATED AT 35.8%
[31:01] INCREASE. CONVERSATION AROUND THIS CHARGE IS CONTINUING. WE ARE DOWN TO ONE ITEM OF
[31:07] DISCUSSION THAT WILL TAKE PLACE BETWEEN PARK BOARD STAFF AND
[31:14] CITY STAFF TOMORROW. THE MPRB AGREES THAT WE SHOULD PAY THE PAIR SHARE OF SERVICES THAT ARE
[31:21] PROVIDED TO THE MPRB. DISCUSSION HAS BEEN AROUND CLARIFYING WHAT
[31:28] SERVICES ARE BEING PROVIDED AND TO WHAT EXTENT. FOR EXAMPLE, A
[31:35] PREVIOUS VERSION OF THIS CHARGE INCLUDED $502,000 FOR 311
[31:42] SERVICES. AFTER FURTHER RESEARCH TO UNDERSTAND CALL LEVELS, THIS NUMBER WAS CHANGED TO JUST UNDER
[31:48] $67,000. THE NEXT CHART SHOWS
[31:58] COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WORK DAY. THE MPRB DOES NOT PAY A DIRECT
[32:05] CHARGE FOR THE CURRENT FINANCIAL SYSTEM COMMENT. WE PAY
[32:10] INDIRECTLY THROUGH OUR GENERAL FUND OVERHEAD RATE MODEL BUT DO NOT PAY A DIRECT CHARGE. GOING
[32:15] FORWARD, THE PARK BOARD WILL PAY FOR WORK DAY IN THE NEW FINANCIAL SYSTEM, ONGOING USER
[32:23] LICENSE FEES AND A SEPARATE BUDGET TOOL. SO THIS IS NOW PUT
[32:32] INTO THE SIX-YEAR PROJECTIONS. I WILL ALSO SAY THAT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF WORK DAY HAS
[32:39] BEEN -- OR IS BEING PAID FOR BY THE CITY. THE PARK BOARD HAS NOT
[32:44] BEEN ASKED TO PAY ANY PORTION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION FEE. SO WE
[32:51] REALLY APPRECIATE THAT. HERE ARE
[32:57] SIXth YEAR FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS. THEY ARE VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT WE PRESENTED
[33:02] LAST YEAR. THE ONLY CHANGES IN 2026 WITH THE INCREASE INSTEAD OF BEING 6.33%, IT'S 7.15%. AND
[33:14] THAT IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE CITY CHARGES. ALSO INCLUDED IN
[33:25] OUR PROJECTIONS ARE WORKFORCE AND OTHER OPERATING COSTS BUILT IN TO PROVIDE THE SAME LEVEL OF
[33:31] SERVICE FOR NEW PARKS, FACILITIES, AND AMENITIES. 2026
[33:36] INCLUDES GRACO AND UPPER HARBOR TERMINAL PARKS. 2027 INCLUDES
[33:43] NORTH COMMONS. THIS CHART SHOWS THE FTE CHANGES BETWEEN 2023 AND
[33:53] 2026. AND I'LL HIGHLIGHT 2025. THAT IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE SERVICE LEVEL REDUCTIONS AND THE
[34:00] RECREATION CENTER. THAT 13.71 DECREASE IN FTEs. AND THEN THE
[34:06] 2026 PLAN, THE 9.72FTEs IS
[34:12] DIRECTLY RELATED TO GRACO AND UPPER HARBOR TERMINAL PARKS. SO
[34:18] NOW THE MAXIMUM PROPERTY TAX LEVY PLAN. THE ADOPTED BUDGET
[34:27] FOR THE CITY INCLUDES CITY'S FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE PARK
[34:33] BOARD. AND IT IS 1.37%. INCLUDED
[34:43] IN THAT IS THE $260,000 FOR THE YOUTH INVESTMENT. $300,000 FOR
[34:49] GRACO AND UPPER HARBOR TERMINAL
[34:57] PARK. YOU'LL SEE I HAVE A CHART NUMBER ONE, TWO, AND THREE SHOWN ON THIS. WE'LL GET TO THE CHARTS
[35:03] LATER. BUT IF YOU GO BACK TO THIS PRESENTATION, THE NUMBERS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THAT CORRESPONDING CHART. SO FOR THE
[35:16] PARK BOARD, WE HAVE OUR PROVISION FOR WAGE ADJUSTMENTS,
[35:21] THE 3.2 MILLION. SO THAT IS ALL OF OUR WAGE INCREASES DUE TO OUR
[35:27] UNION CONTRACTS, OUR RECLASSIFICATION, OUR MARKET ADJUSTMENTS, OUR EQUITY
[35:35] ADJUSTMENTS, HEALTH INSURANCE, WORKER COMP, PERA, AND STATE
[35:46] FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE. THIS NUMBER IS SET AT APPROXIMATELY 4%. AND IT INCLUDES A SLIGHT
[35:55] CATCH UP ON THE INFLATION. WE HAVE SEEN 26% INFLATION, AND
[36:02] HAVE ONLY BUDGETED 12%. SO THIS IS JUST A SLIGHT INCREASE OVER
[36:07] OUR NORMAL INFLATION TO DO A SLIGHT CATCH UP. IT ALSO
[36:13] INCLUDES INCREASES TO OUR INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION, AND OUR
[36:19] EQUIPMENT OPERATIONS, AGAIN, DUE TO UNION CONTRACTS AS WELL AS
[36:25] STATE MANDATED CHANGES TO WORKERS COMPENSATION. YOU'LL SEE
[36:31] THE TWO ITEMS HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW. THOSE ARE THE NEW ITEMS. AND THEN GRACO AND UPPER HARBOR
[36:38] TERMINAL PARK. SO CURRENTLY THIS
[36:43] IS THE GAP BETWEEN WHAT THE PARK BOARD IS ESTIMATING FOR THE 2026
[36:50] BUDGET, AND WHAT THE CITY IS CURRENTLY ESTIMATING FOR US. SO
[36:57] CHART ONE IS THE FULL BUDGET. WE ARE REQUESTING ALMOST $7 MILLION
[37:04] OF THE MAYOR'S ADOPTED BUDGET AT
[37:11] 1.3 -- THAT'S A GAP OF
[37:16] 5.1 MILLION. IF YOU LOOK JUST AT THE SALARY AND FRINGE TO SUPPORT
[37:23] OUR WORKFORCE AND NOT HAVE ANY POSITION ELIMINATIONS, THE GAP
[37:30] IS 2.5 MILLION, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 22 FTEs. AND THEN
[37:37] TO MAINTAIN OUR SERVICE LEVELS WITH THE ADDITION OF GRACO AND UPPER HARBOR TERMINAL PARKS, WE
[37:44] HAVE A GAP OF 560,000. JUST
[37:53] GOING TO TOUCH ON OUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. WE HAVE
[38:01] $146.4 MILLION INVESTMENT. IT'S BROKEN UP BETWEEN NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND REGIONAL PARKS. THEY'RE FUNDED VERY DIFFERENTLY,
[38:07] AS YOU KNOW. THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK CAPITAL BUDGET IS FUNDED THROUGH THE BONDS, OF WHICH THIS
[38:16] BODY AUTHORIZES. CAPITAL LEVY PARK DEDICATION GRANTS AND
[38:21] DONATIONS. OUR REGIONAL PARK SYSTEM IS LARGELY FUNDED THROUGH THE STATE AND METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, FOLLOWED BY OTHER
[38:27] GRANTS AND DONATIONS. IN THE 2025 LEGISLATIVE SESSION, IT
[38:34] INCLUDED A SLIGHT INCREASE IN O & M LOTTERY PROCEEDS, ALLOCATION
[38:42] OF NEW LOCAL GOVERNMENT ROAD FUNDING GAP ASSISTANCE. SO THAT'S A NEW AMOUNT TO SUPPORT
[38:48] OUR PARKWAYS. LCCMR ALLOCATION, LEGACY, AND SKATE PARK FUNDING.
[38:57] WE ALSO HAVE EARLIER THIS YEAR, THE MPRB AND THE MINNEAPOLIS
[39:03] PARK FOUNDATION APPROVED AN AGREEMENT TO ESTABLISH A NEW AND
[39:09] FORWARD LOOKING ENDOWMENT. ONCE FUNDED, THE ENDOWMENT WILL
[39:15] PROVIDE ONGOING SUPPORT FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, HISTORIC INFRASTRUCTURE, AND REGIONAL
[39:21] PARK AND TRAIL CARE AND MAINTENANCE WITHIN THE MINNEAPOLIS PARK SYSTEM. THESE
[39:28] AREAS WERE CHOSEN FOR THE ENDOWMENT BECAUSE THEY ARE -- THEY RECEIVED THE LEAST AMOUNT
[39:33] OF FUNDING THROUGH OTHER SOURCES. >> I'M SORRY. COULD YOU REPEAT
[39:39] THOSE AREAS, PLEASE. >> IT IS NATURAL RESOURCES,
[39:45] HISTORIC INFRASTRUCTURE, AND REGIONAL PARK AND TRAIL CARE AND
[39:51] MAINTENANCE. >> THANK YOU.
[39:56] >> SO GOING FORWARD, AS I SAID IN THE BEGINNING, OUR BOARD WILL TAKE UP THE MAXIMUM PROPERTY TAX
[40:05] LEVY CONVERSATION IN JULY, WITH THE ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE ON JULY 2ND, AND THE
[40:10] FULL BOARD ON JULY 16TH. AND THEN THE MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET WILL COME OUT. THE BET
[40:19] WILL SET THE MAXIMUM PROPERTY TAX LEVY. ON OCTOBER 15TH, THE SUPERINTENDENT WILL PRESENT THE
[40:24] RECOMMENDED 2026 BUDGET. SO DO
[40:29] YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ON THIS PART OF THE PRESENTATION?
[40:37] >> COMMISSIONER PAYNE. >> THANK YOU, PRESIDENT BRANDT.
[40:43] BACK ON PAGE 9, WE HAVE SOME PRETTY HIGH LEVEL BUCKETS AND I'M WONDERING IF YOU COULD GIVE
[40:50] SOME MORE DETAIL. AND SPECIFICALLY, I'M LOOKING IN TO WHAT THE BREAKDOWN MIGHT BE OF
[40:56] THE SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE AND THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE. >> SURE. MEMBER PAYNE AND
[41:06] PRESIDENT BRANDT, THE SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE INCLUDES
[41:11] THE OUTWARD SERVING DEPARTMENTS. SO IT'S PARK POLICE, OUR
[41:17] COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION, AND OUR COMMUNICATIONS AND MARKETING DEPARTMENT. THE DEPUTY
[41:24] SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE INCLUDES THE INTERNAL SERVICES. SO
[41:31] FINANCE, I.T., VISITOR SERVICES,
[41:37] WHICH HAS BOTH FACING WHOM I FORGET, HR. THAT'S A BIG ONE. HR. >> SO IT WOULD BE ALL THE FTE
[41:45] BUDGET AS WELL AS WHATEVER PROGRAMMATIC BUDGET WOULD BE
[41:51] INCLUDED? >> THAT'S CORRECT. >> THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. I THINK I'LL HOLD MINE.
[41:57] DO YOU WANT -- OH, DID YOU HAVE A QUESTION? >> NO.
[42:03] >> OKAY. COMMISSIONER CHUGHTAI.
[42:08] >> THANK YOU, MR. PRESIDENT. I'M SORRY. I JUST DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS IS. CAN YOU TELL ME WHAT
[42:14] VISITOR SERVICES IS IN THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE. >> SAY THAT ONE MORE TIME, PLEASE. >> WHAT'S VISITOR SERVICES?
[42:21] >> VISITOR SERVICES IS, NUMBER ONE, OUR CALL CENTER. IT'S ALSO
[42:29] OUR ACTIVATION OF NON-RECREATION AREAS. SO OUR MAJOR EVENTS. SO
[42:38] LIKE PRIDE AND JUNETEENTH AND BOTH PERMITTED EVENTS AND PARK
[42:47] BOARD RELATED EVENTS. AM I MISSING ANYTHING?
[42:57] >> THANK YOU, MEMBERS. THIS IS ALSO WHERE DOWNTOWN PARKS
[43:02] PROGRAMMING COMES OUT OF. ANYTHING OUT OF WATERWORKS COMMONS, GRACO COMES OUT OF THAT
[43:08] SPACE AS WELL. YEAH. SO ALL OF OUR PERMITTED EVENTS. SO IF YOU
[43:16] WANT TO ERASE SOMETHING THAT'S IN THE SYSTEM, THIS IS THE GROUP
[43:22] THAT'S DOING IT. >> THANK YOU. >> ALL RIGHT. GO AHEAD.
[43:28] >> IF THERE'S NO OTHER QUESTIONS, WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE
[43:33] NPP 20 ANNUAL REPORT. SO AGAIN,
[43:40] PRESIDENT BRANDT, WE ARE HERE TO PRESENT OUR 20-YEAR NEIGHBORHOOD
[43:49] PARK PLAN 2024 ANNUAL REPORT. THIS IS RESULTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2024. THIS IS GOING
[43:55] TO BE SLIGHTLY ABBREVIATED THAN WHAT YOU'VE SEEN IN THE PAST SINCE YOU GRACIOUSLY ALLOWED US
[44:01] TO DO THE BUDGET INFORMATION. SO THE GUARANTEED ANNUAL MINIMUM
[44:07] AMOUNT, THAT IS THE BONDING AMOUNT. AND YOU'LL SEE STARTING
[44:13] IN 2027 THAT THAT'S HELD CONSTANT AT 13.1 MILLION AND
[44:19] THAT IS BECAUSE BY ORDINANCE, THE PARK BOARD AND THE CITY MUST
[44:24] AGREE ON THE NEXT FIVE YEARS OF
[44:29] MINIMUM AMOUNTS FOR 2027 AND 2031. SO WE HAVE PROVIDED OUR
[44:35] PROPOSAL TO THE CITY, AND WE WILL START DISCUSSIONS ON THAT.
[44:41] WE NEED TO ADOPT THAT LEVEL OF FUNDING BY DECEMBER 15TH OF THIS YEAR. I'LL NOW TURN IT OVER TO
[44:52] ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL SCHROEDER.
[44:57] >> THANK YOU, PRESIDENT AND MEMBERS. I WILL RUN THROUGH OUR CAPITAL PROGRAM AND OUR REHABILITATION PROGRAM. AND IT
[45:05] WILL BE AN OVERVIEW, AND WILL STAND FOR QUESTIONS. IF YOU THINK ABOUT THE CAPITAL PROGRAM,
[45:10] THESE ARE NEW INVESTMENTS AND PARKS AS OPPOSED TO THE REHABILITATION PROGRAM WHICH IS
[45:16] OUR ABILITY TO CARRY A PARK ASSET FORWARD WITH REPAIRS OR REPLACEMENTS UNTIL IT GETS
[45:22] REPLACED IN A CAPITAL PROGRAM. SO THE CAPITAL PROGRAM IS REFLECTED IN THE BUDGET IN THE
[45:27] SIX-YEAR BUDGET APPROVED BY THE BOARD. IT FOLLOWS THE EQUITY ORDINANCE. SO WE DO AN EVALUATION OF ALL OF OUR PARKS
[45:33] AND NEIGHBORHOODS EVERY YEAR. AND WE'RE ANTICIPATING THAT WE
[45:38] WILL COMPLETE ALL CAPITAL INVESTMENTS IN ALL PARKS IN THE
[45:43] FIRST ROUND OF CAPITAL INVESTMENTS PROBABLY IN 2035.
[45:52] MAYBE 2034. THE REHABILITATION PROGRAM IS FOCUSED ON THOSE THINGS THAT MIGHT FAIL DURING THE REGULAR USE OF A PARK, AND
[45:58] BEFORE WE GET TO A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT. BUT SEVERAL OTHER THINGS HAVE HAPPENED. WE'VE HAD SOME CRITICAL FAILURES. IN THE
[46:05] FIRST YEAR OF NPP20, ONE OF OUR RECREATION CENTERS HAD A CRACKED BEAM. REQUIRED THE CLOSURE OF
[46:12] THE BUILDINGS. BUT THIS IS REALLY FOCUSED ON REPAIRS AND
[46:18] REPLACEMENT TO TIDE US OVER UNTIL WE GET TO A CAPITAL PROJECT. EVERY YEAR WE DO AN
[46:23] ASSESSMENT OF OUR PARKS. RANKING THOSE ASSETS THAT NEEDS REHABILITATION AND TAKING THEM
[46:30] ON PRIORITY ORDER. UPDATING THAT BECAUSE THINGS CONTINUE TO FAIL AS WE MOVE THROUGH ANY ONE OF
[46:36] OUR OPERATIONAL YEARS. IN 2023,
[46:42] THERE WERE NINE REHABILITATION CATEGORIES. I WON'T GO THROUGH THEM ALL. BUT YOU SEE THEM LISTED HERE ON THE PAGE. THESE
[46:51] SEVERAL PAGES WILL IDENTIFY THOSE CATEGORIES OF REHABILITATION ALLOCATIONS, THE DOLLAR AMOUNT AND THE PERCENTAGE
[46:57] ALLOCATED, AND THE PERCENTAGE COMPLETED. 2023, WE HAVE COMPLETED 100% OF THE DOLLARS
[47:05] THAT WERE ALLOCATED BY THE BOARD FOR THESE NINE CATEGORIES. 2024,
[47:12] IT'S MOSTLY SIMILAR EXCEPT THERE ARE SOME THINGS LIKE ADA IMPROVEMENTS. SOME OF THE
[47:19] PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE IN REHABILITATION WILL REQUIRE MORE DOLLARS THAT ARE AVAILABLE IN A
[47:24] SINGLE YEAR. AND SO WE WILL CARRY THOSE OVER. SO THAT'S WHY THE ADA IMPROVEMENTS ARE LOWER.
[47:31] IT'S SIMILAR WITH THE HVAC SYSTEMS IN BUILDINGS. THAT'S WHY THAT NUMBER IS LOWER. AND THEN
[47:38] THERE WAS A NEW CATEGORY ADDED BY THE BOARD IN 2024 FOR THE REHABILITATION OF ATHLETIC
[47:45] FIELDS. VERY FEW DOLLARS HAVE BEEN SPENT THERE. WE NEED TO
[47:51] BUILD UP DOLLARS. PARTICULARLY BASEBALL DIAMONDS. AS DIRECTOR
[47:57] WEISSMAN NOTED, IN 2025, THE ALLOCATIONS PERCENT BUDGETED WAS
[48:02] ZERO BECAUSE THIS WAS DONE AS OF THE LAST DAY OF DECEMBER 2024.
[48:09] FOR CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, AS I NOTED, WE EVALUATE, SCORE, AND
[48:15] RANK ALL OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS IN THE SYSTEM EVERY YEAR. USING THE CRITERIA THAT ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE ORDINANCE. AND
[48:20] THEN WE ALLOCATE FUNDING TO THOSE PARKS. THE DIAGRAM AT THE
[48:27] BOTTOM IS IMPORTANT NOT SO MUCH FOR THE COLORS AND WORDS BUT BECAUSE IT REFLECTS THE
[48:33] THREE-YEAR PROCESS IT TAKES US. THE FIRST YEAR IS REALLY ABOUT SCOPING THE PROJECT AND ENGAGING THE COMMUNITY. THE SECOND YEAR
[48:40] IS DESIGN AND PROCURING BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION. AND TYPICALLY, THAT WORK CONTINUES INTO THE
[48:46] THIRD YEAR WHERE WE'RE ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTING. AND WE'RE LIMITED IN THIS IN SOME WAYS BECAUSE WE
[48:52] HAVE A LIMITED SEASON FOR IMPROVEMENTS AS WE LOOK AT HOW PARKS ARE ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTED.
[48:58] THESE ARE THE PROJECTS THAT WERE IDENTIFIED AS 2023 CAPITAL
[49:07] INVESTMENTS. SOME OF THESE PROJECTS ARE COMPLETED. SEVERAL ARE STILL LAGGING BEHIND. AND I CAN COME BACK AND FILL THOSE IN.
[49:16] BUT IF YOU LOOK AT THE ADUBON WILL BE COMPLETE BY THIS FALL.
[49:22] IT WAS JUST RECENTLY BID. AND THERE WERE SEVERAL FROM 2023 WHERE THE CONSTRUCTION WILL BE COMPLETED BY THE END OF THIS
[49:27] YEAR. AS WE GO INTO 2024, THERE
[49:35] ARE FEWER OF THEM THAT ARE COMPLETED BECAUSE THIS IS THE YEAR WE WILL BE DOING DESIGN AND
[49:41] PROCUREMENT OF BIDS. ALTHOUGH SOME PROJECTS ARE FURTHER ALONG THAN OTHERS. BUT THERE WILL BE
[49:47] BY THE TIME WE GET TO 2026 PRESENTATION, YOU'LL SEE THOSE
[49:53] NUMBERS REFLECT PROBABLY MORE CLOSELY WHAT WE HAVE IN 2023. AND OF COURSE BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T
[49:58] HAD A CHANCE TO IMPLEMENT THINGS AS OF DECEMBER 31ST USING $2,025, ALL OF THESE ARE AT
[50:05] $0.00 PERCENT. BUT WE ARE MOVING FORWARD WITH SEVERAL OF THESE
[50:11] IMPROVEMENTS. AS I NOTED, THE
[50:16] AUDUBON PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED IN 2025 THIS YEAR YET. THERE WERE STILL A NUMBER OF
[50:22] PROJECTS FROM PRIOR YEARS THAT WE HAVE YET TO BE COMPLETED. SOME OF THEM FOR ANY NUMBER OF
[50:30] REASONS. 28TH STREET TOTLOT,
[50:41] WE'RE MAKING IMPROVEMENTS. EACH ONE HAS A STORY TO TELL AS WE MAKE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS.
[50:47] YOU'LL NOTE THAT THERE ARE SOME PROJECTS IN THE LITTLE BOX AT THE BOTTOM THAT WE'RE STILL
[50:52] WORKING TO COMPLETE CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROJECTS FROM 2022.
[50:58] MOST OF THOSE PROJECTS OR PRACTICALLY ALL OF THOSE PROJECTS WILL BE COMPLETED BY THE END OF THIS YEAR. AND THAT
[51:04] WAS A VERY HIGH LEVEL OVERVIEW. BUT DIRECTOR WEISSMANN AND
[51:10] DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT RINGOLD. I WILL STAND FOR QUESTIONS. >> ANY QUESTIONS? I HAVE ONE
[51:16] QUESTION. WONDERING IF THE CRACKED BEAM AT LONGFELLOW PARK
[51:21] HAS BEEN REPLACED? >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, THAT WAS ONE OF THE FIRST PROJECTS WE
[51:26] UNDERTOOK CLOSING THAT BUILDING AND MAKING SURE THAT BUILDING WAS SAFE FOR OCCUPANCY. IT WAS A
[51:34] GREAT DEMONSTRATION OF HOW NPP20 WORKS. IDENTIFIED WE HAD A
[51:39] PROBLEM IN THE BUILDINGS AND BE ABLE TO CORRECT IT IMMEDIATELY. >> I'M GLAD TO HEAR THAT. THAT
[51:45] WAS SORT OF THE MARQUEE EXAMPLE OF UNDERFUNDING OF NEIGHBORHOOD
[51:50] PARK BUILDINGS. I HAD A NUMBER OF QUESTIONS BUT MOST OF THEM DATE BACK TO MS. WEISMAN'S
[51:56] PRESENTATION. SORT OF AT A HIGH
[52:07] LEVEL, I READ THROUGH THIS PRESENTATION AND ON PAGE 16, I
[52:15] FOUND A LEVY FIGURE OF
[52:21] $90.7 MILLION. PAGE 12 I FOUND A FIGURE OF 94.4 MILLION. ON PAGE
[52:27] 4, I FOUND A FIGURE OF 95.6. ON
[52:32] PAGE -- WHICH I BELIEVE IS SORT OF YOUR IDEAL FUNDING. BUT I
[52:38] WONDER IF YOU COULD PARSE THE OTHERS FOR ME, PLEASE.
[52:45] >> SO CAN YOU TELL ME THE FIRST. >> SURE. THE FIRST ONE WAS
[52:59] 90.7 MILLION ON PAGE 16. >> SO THIS IS THE CITY'S FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS IN PARK
[53:10] BOARD LEVY. THAT'S INCLUDED IN
[53:15] THE CITY'S ANNUAL BUDGET. >> WOULD THAT BE THE FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL DIRECTION?
[53:21] >> CORRECT. >> OKAY. AND THEN PAGE 12, 94.4.
[53:34] >> PRESIDENT BRANDT AND BOARD
[53:40] MEMBERS, WE BUDGET PROPERTY
[53:45] TAXES AT 98.5% COLLECTION RATE.
[53:52] SO THE 94.4 MILLION IS 98.5% OF
[53:59] THE MILLION WE ARE SEEKING, OR PLANNING. >> SO THAT'S THE ADJUSTMENT FOR THE COLLECTION FACTOR. PAGE 4,
[54:07] 93,669.
[54:12] >> THAT WAS THE 2026 PLAN THAT WAS ADOPTED BY OUR BOARD IN
[54:19] DECEMBER, AND THAT REPRESENTED A 6.33% PROPERTY TAX LEVY
[54:25] INCREASE. AND WE HAVE CHANGED OUR ASSUMPTIONS BASED ON THE
[54:34] CITY CHARGES THAT INCREASES TO THE 7.15% THAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE IN OUR PROJECTIONS.
[54:40] >> SO JUST TO BE CLEAR, THAT WAS
[54:47] THE 2026 FIGURE? >> CORRECT. >> ALL RIGHT. AND THAT WAS ADOPTED IN DECEMBER. >> CORRECT. >> TO A YEAR AHEAD OF TIME.
[54:52] >> CORRECT. >> OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE THAT. YOU SPOKE OF
[55:00] SOME OF THE FACTORS IN TERMS OF FUNDING LIKE THE YOUTH PROGRAM.
[55:06] AND THE KICKING IN OF THE NPP. BUT I NOTE THAT IN SEVEN OF THE
[55:15] LAST NINE YEARS, THE PARKS -- THE PARK LEVY HAS INCREASED BY
[55:21] MORE THAN THE RATE OF INFLATION. IF YOU LOOK AT NATIONAL INDICATORS. COULD YOU TALK A
[55:26] LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT FACTORS IS THAT MAINLY SERVICE
[55:32] IMPROVEMENTS? >> PRESIDENT BRANDT AND MEMBERS,
[55:38] SO IN 2022 WAS THE 1.3 MILLION FOR THE YOUTH INVESTMENT. IN 23,
[55:48] 24, AND 25, THERE'S -- FOR THE YOUTH INVESTMENT. I'M NOT GOING
[55:54] TO GET THESE YEARS CORRECT, BUT WE DID ADD A PROJECT POSITION.
[56:00] WE ADDED ONE POSITION ONE YEAR.
[56:08] AND WE HAD -- INVESTMENT FOR
[56:13] WHICH PLACES? YEAH. AND WE'VE HAD THE ADDED AMENITIES AND
[56:21] PARKS FOR LIKE NORTH LOOP, WATER WORKS, AND THOSE WERE INCLUDED
[56:29] IN '23 AND '24 AS WELL. >> OKAY. ON PAGE -- I'M SORRY, I
[56:37] DON'T HAVE THE PAGE NUMBER ON MY SCREEN. I NOTED IN 2024, YOU
[56:45] SPENT WELL UNDER $1 MILLION IN REVENUES THROUGH ARPA. IS THAT
[56:54] REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ROAD, I MEAN, THE CITY SPENT $700 MILLION. DID YOU NOT SHARE
[57:00] IN THE LARGESSE TO THE EXTENT THAT YOU'RE, FOR EXAMPLE, DOING
[57:06] THE LGA SPLIT 8812. >> PRESIDENT BRANDT AND MEMBERS,
[57:13] WE APPLIED FOR ARPA FUNDS THROUGH THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS
[57:18] AS OTHER ORGANIZATIONS DID TO RECEIVE ARPA FUNDS, AND WE
[57:27] RECEIVED $1 MILLION FOR TREES PLANTING, ADDITIONAL TREE PLANTING. AND WE RECEIVED THE --
[57:35] IN ORDER TO MEET THE 2.6 MILLION
[57:41] IN 2022, WE RECEIVED 1.3 MILLION OF PROPERTY TAX DOLLARS, AND
[57:50] $1.3 MILLION OF ARPA DOLLARS. IN 2023 AND 2024, AS THE PROPERTY
[57:56] TAX LEVY INCREASED, OUR ARPA DOLLARS DECREASED. BUT AS YOU
[58:01] KNOW, ARPA ENDED AT THE END OF 2024. AND SO THAT'S WHY WE HAVE
[58:07] THE YOUTH INVESTMENT GAP THAT WE
[58:13] TALK ABOUT FOR '25, '26, AND '27. AND WE ARE FUNDING THAT
[58:20] THROUGH HOLDING VACANCY SAVINGS. >> OKAY. >> AND OTHER THINGS.
[58:26] >> ALL RIGHT. AND THEN I NOTE WITH INTEREST THE LGA, WHICH IS
[58:33] NO SURPRISE. THAT'S BEEN THE HISTORY WITH LGA BOTH FOR THE CITY AND THE PARK BOARD. WANTED
[58:44] TO ASK YOU -- I'LL SKIP OVER THE
[58:51] DISPUTE OVER THE FEES THAT ARE CHARGED BY THE CITY. I'M
[59:05] DISAPPOINTED THAT RECREATION CENTERS ARE CLOSED ON FEDERAL HOLIDAYS. THAT'S THE DAY WHEN
[59:11] SOME PARENTS ARE AROUND, BUT MANY ARE NOT. THAT'S WHEN KIDS ARE OUT OF SCHOOL. AND WE SAW
[59:19] WHAT HAPPENED IN 2020 WHEN KIDS WERE SUDDENLY LEFT WITHOUT PARK
[59:25] PROGRAMMING, AND THE RATE OF CRIME AMONG YOUNGER PEOPLE JUMPED DRAMATICALLY. I
[59:31] UNDERSTAND YOU HAVE IT MAKE CUTS SOMEWHERE. BUT I REALLY REGRET
[59:38] THAT ONE. THERE'S ALSO A -- DID
[59:47] YOU SAY THAT GRACO PARK IS OPEN WEDNESDAY THROUGH SUNDAY?
[59:52] >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, THAT'S CORRECT. WE DO HAVE -- I SHOULD
[59:58] CORRECT. WE DO HAVE A SPARK STUDIO LOCATED AT THAT FACILITY. AND THAT SPARK STUDIO IS ALREADY
[1:00:05] INCLUDED IN OUR BUDGET. SO THERE'S NOT AN ADDITIONAL ASK FOR THAT. THAT WAS PART OF THE
[1:00:12] $2.6 MILLION YOUTH INVESTMENT. AND THAT FACILITY IS OPEN MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY.
[1:00:20] >> OKAY. WHY IS GRACO PARK OPEN WHEN OTHER RECREATIONAL CENTERS ARE NOT? I MEAN, I'M HAPPY IT
[1:00:32] IS. I'M GOING TO A RETIREMENT PARTY THERE. BUT -- >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, MEMBERS, SO
[1:00:37] WHEN WE ANALYZED HOW TO OPEN UP THAT FACILITY, WE REALLY LOOKED AT THE NATURE OF IT BEING IN A
[1:00:44] REGIONAL PARK, AND WHERE WE THOUGHT FOLKS WOULD BE NEEDING TO USE RESTAURANTS AND OTHER
[1:00:52] AMENITIES IN THE PARK. SO WE SWITCHED TO INCLUDE WEEKENDS. IF WE WERE TYPICAL RECREATION
[1:00:58] CENTER MODEL, WE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO HIT THE WEEKENDS IN THE WAY WE FELT THE PARK NEEDED TO.
[1:01:05] WE ALSO HAVE A PARK THAT ALLOWS RENTALS ON MONDAY AND TUESDAY. SO THERE'S THAT POSSIBILITY. IF
[1:01:12] WE'RE ABLE TO RECOUP THE COST OF THE STAFFING TO COVER THOSE RENTALS, THERE WOULD BE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE IN THAT SPACE
[1:01:17] ON THOSE DAYS. >> OKAY. AND I BELIEVE IT WAS MENTIONED THAT IN ORDER TO MAKE
[1:01:24] THE BUDGET FIT INTO THE RESOURCES YOU HAD THAT THE
[1:01:31] ACQUISITION FUND WAS NOT FUNDED IN ONE OF THE RECENT YEARS. AM I REMEMBERING CORRECTLY THAT
[1:01:37] THAT'S ABOUT A $400,000 ITEM? MAYBE I'M OUT OF DATE.
[1:01:43] >> JUST GOT THE NUMBER FROM THE SIDE. PRESIDENT BRANDT, MEMBERS,
[1:01:51] THAT'S $276,000 THAT WE PUT TOWARD THAT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. >> THAT WAS USED FOR THE
[1:01:58] INVESTMENT. >> AND THAT WAS USED FOR THE YOUTH INVESTMENT GAP. COMMISSIONERS MIGHT MAKE
[1:02:04] DECISIONS ON THAT IN FUTURE YEARS IN TERMS OF HOW TO PRIORITIZE THOSE DOLLARS. BUT THAT'S HOW IT WAS USED THIS
[1:02:09] YEAR. >> IS THAT PROPERTY TAX MONEY? >> THAT IS PROPERTY TAX MONEY. >> ALL RIGHT. WANTED TO ASK YOU
[1:02:18] AS WELL ABOUT THE ENDOWMENT AGREEMENT, WHICH INCLUDES THE
[1:02:23] HISTORIC INFRASTRUCTURE. I GUESS THE STEVEN'S HOUSE PROJECT IS PRETTY MUCH COMPLETE. BUT THAT
[1:02:30] WOULD BE CERTAINLY AN EXAMPLE OF HISTORIC INFRASTRUCTURE THAT WAS BADLY IN NEED OF REPAIR EVEN
[1:02:36] BEFORE THE VANDALISM THAT OCCURRED THERE. FOR EXAMPLE, THE
[1:02:44] GODFREE HOUSE GETS SOME OF THAT MONEY. ARE THERE OTHER PROJECTS YOU HAVE FOR THAT?
[1:02:49] >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, MEMBERS, I SHOULD FIRST SAY WE ANTICIPATE IT COULD TAKE UP TO 10 YEARS TO
[1:02:55] BE ABLE TO SECURE ENOUGH FUNDING INTO THE ENDOWMENT FOR US TO HAVE REGULAR PAYOUTS. WHEN WE
[1:03:03] THINK ABOUT THE INFRASTRUCTURE -- HISTORIC AND OUR ICONIC HOMES. GODFREY IS ONE
[1:03:09] OF THOSE. STEVEN'S HOUSE WOULD BE ONE OF THOSE. BUT WE'RE ALSO THINKING ABOUT OTHER HISTORIC
[1:03:14] INFRASTRUCTURE. WPA WALLS AND SOME OF THE OTHER FAILING INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE SYSTEM THAT WE DON'T HAVE A DEPENDABLE
[1:03:21] AND CONSISTENT SOURCE OF FUNDING FOR. >> THANK YOU. I WANTED TO ASK
[1:03:31] JUST GENERALLY ABOUT REGIONAL PARKS. THAT'S CERTAINLY BEEN AN ISSUE FROM THE STANDPOINT OF
[1:03:37] CAPITAL FUNDING. DEVELOPMENT,
[1:03:42] REHAB, ACQUISITION AND SO ON. AND I'VE URGED THE
[1:03:48] SUPERINTENDENT IN PAST APPEARANCES TO TRY TO COME UP
[1:03:54] WITH A PLAN THAT THINKS OUT OF THE CURRENT SYSTEM FOR RAISING MONEY EITHER FOR THE CAPITAL
[1:04:01] SIDE, WHICH ACTUALLY SEEMS TO BE BETTER FUNDED THAN THE OPERATING
[1:04:07] SIDE. HAS PARK BOARD MADE ANY PROGRESS IN THAT AREA? I MEAN, I'M NOT A BIG GAMBLING FAN, BUT
[1:04:16] I CAN ENVISION SELLING TABS AT THE REFRACTORY, FOR EXAMPLE.
[1:04:21] >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, MEMBERS,
[1:04:27] YEAH. IT'S IMPORTANT TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE CAPITAL SIDE AND THE OPERATING SIDE. ON THE CAPITAL SIDE, CURRENTLY ALL
[1:04:33] THE FUNDING WE RECEIVE IS EITHER STATE FUNDING OR MET COUNCIL FUNDING, OR IT IS MAYBE THROUGH
[1:04:40] A FEDERAL GRANT PROGRAM OR THROUGH SOME TYPE OF A DONATION.
[1:04:46] THERE ISN'T PROPERTY TAX DOLLAR OR CITY-BASED BONDING THAT GOES TOWARDS THE REGIONAL SYSTEM. SO
[1:04:53] THAT IS 100% NON-TAXPAYER, MINNEAPOLIS TAXPAYER BASED
[1:04:58] FUNDED IN THOSE CATEGORIES. ON THE OPERATING SIDE, HOWEVER,
[1:05:04] THAT'S ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY PAID BY THE MINNEAPOLIS TAXPAYER. YOU WILL NOTE THAT IN THE ENDOWMENT
[1:05:10] AGREEMENT, ONE OF THE CATEGORIES THAT WE HAVE IS THE CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF REGIONAL PARKS.
[1:05:18] THERE IS ON STATE LAW THE REQUIREMENT FOR 40% OF THE EXPENSES THAT WE HAVE FOR
[1:05:24] OPERATING THE REGIONAL PARKS SHOULD BE PAID BY THE STATE OF MINNESOTA OR MET COUNCIL. AND WE
[1:05:30] ARE NOT RECEIVING THAT LEVEL OF FUNDING. WE'RE RECEIVING SOMETHING MORE IN THE 10% RANGE,
[1:05:38] IF DEPENDING ON WHICH DOLLARS THEY CHOOSE TO COUNT. >> I UNDERSTAND THAT'S THE
[1:05:43] REQUIREMENT OF STATE LAW, AND I ALSO FEEL QUITE STRONGLY THAT ANYBODY WHO BELIEVES THAT'S EVER
[1:05:49] GOING TO HAPPEN ALSO BELIEVES IN THE TOOTH FAIRY. THAT'S WHY I ASK. DO YOU HAVE ANY SENSE OF,
[1:05:57] AND MAYBE THIS IS SOMETHING YOU CAN GET BACK TO US THROUGH OUR STAFF, BUT IF YOU LOOK AT THE
[1:06:05] PROPORTION OF THE MPRB LAND MASS EXCLUDE WATER FOR THE SAKE OF
[1:06:12] ARGUMENT, AND DIVIDE IT BETWEEN REGIONAL PARKS AND NEIGHBORHOOD
[1:06:17] PARKS, DOES THE FUNDING FOR OPERATING PURPOSES FOLLOW THAT
[1:06:23] PROPORTION? AND I SUPPOSE THEY'RE DIFFERENT SOME WAYS BECAUSE ONE INVOLVES A LOT OF
[1:06:29] PROGRAMMING AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, AND THERE ARE DIFFERENT NEEDS. BUT I AM JUST CONCERNED THAT THE REGIONAL PARKS, I MEAN,
[1:06:37] WE'VE DONE A GOOD JOB FUNDING THROUGH THE NPP20 PLAN, CITY
[1:06:43] FOLKS AND PARK BOARD FOLKS HAVE NEGOTIATED THAT. WE'VE DONE A
[1:06:48] GOOD JOB FUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS CAPITAL NEEDS, GETTING THE
[1:06:54] GRASS CUT, MOWED, SO ON. I WORRY ABOUT THINGS LIKE THE SEAWALL FOR EXAMPLE, AS YOU MENTIONED.
[1:07:00] SOME OF THE OTHER FACILITIES. JUST NOT GETTING THE SAME LEVEL
[1:07:06] OF ATTENTION WHILE WE'RE TAKING CARE OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS.
[1:07:12] >> PRESIDENT BRANDT AND MEMBERS, IF I UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION IS KIND OF HOW MUCH OF OUR
[1:07:20] OPERATING DOLLARS GOING MAYBE BY PROPORTION TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK VERSUS THEIR REGIONAL PARK
[1:07:26] SYSTEM. I WILL SAY THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SYSTEM IS MORE RICH IN TERMS OF THE AMOUNT OF
[1:07:33] OPERATING EXPENSES AND PROCEDURES THAT WE HAVE WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SYSTEM. BUT I WOULD WANT TO GET YOU
[1:07:40] OFFICIAL NUMBERS BEFORE I GUESSED AT THAT. >> OKAY. I ASKED THAT IN PART LOOKING AT THE NUMBERS FOR GRACO
[1:07:47] AND UPPER HARBOR TERMINAL IN 2026 AS AN OPERATING COST
[1:07:53] INCREASE. IT WOULD BE NICE TO HAVE, AGAIN, A DEDICATED FUNDING SOURCE THAT COULD BE USED EITHER
[1:08:00] FOR CAPITAL OR FOR OPERATING OR FOR BOTH THAT'S NOT WAITING FOR
[1:08:06] THE STATE TO -- WHEN THE STATESHIP COMES IN, LET'S SAY.
[1:08:12] IT'S FRUSTRATING, BUT THAT'S MOST LIKELY NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. SO WITH THAT, I THINK I'VE
[1:08:19] EXHAUSTED MY QUESTIONS AND I HOPE I HAVEN'T EXHAUSTED YOU AND I HOPE I HAVEN'T EXHAUSTED MY
[1:08:25] COLLEAGUES' PATIENCE. LET'S FILE THIS ITEM AND MOVE ON TO THE NEXT. WE THANK THE PARK BOARD
[1:08:31] PEOPLE WHO APPEARED BEFORE US TODAY. OKAY. ITEM NUMBER 6 IS
[1:08:39] THE DRAFT BET BUDGET FOR 2026.
[1:09:01] AND MS. KEIDERLING WILL PRESENT THAT TO US. GO AHEAD.
[1:09:25] >> OKAY. THANK YOU, SIR. GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE. I'M HERE TO
[1:09:30] PRESENT THE DRAFT BET BUDGET FOR 2026. THIS IS NOT SOMETHING YOU'RE GOING TO TAKE A RESOLUTION ON TONIGHT. THIS IS A
[1:09:38] DRAFT. THESE NUMBERS MIGHT CHANGE SLIGHTLY. THERE'S VARIABLE EXPENSES. NOW THAT I'M
[1:09:43] YOUR STAFFER, ONCE I ENROLL INTO BENEFITS AND THINGS LIKE THAT, THERE MIGHT BE SOME CHANGES.
[1:09:49] ALSO, THE WIDELY ELECTED MEMBERS OF THIS BOARD GET A COST OF LIVING INCREASE EVERY YEAR. WE WON'T KNOW THAT UNTIL THE
[1:09:56] CONSUMER PRICE INDEX COMES OUT LATER ON BECAUSE WE GO BASED ON
[1:10:01] THE OCTOBER 2025 NUMBERS FOR YOUR 2026 PAY. THAT'S ALL TO SAY THERE WILL BE SLIGHT LITTLE
[1:10:08] ADJUSTMENTS. BUT THIS GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT. BECAUSE I WAS
[1:10:13] HIRED SO LATE IN THE YEAR ACTUALLY HAD A DRAFT OF WHAT THEY THOUGHT THE 2026 BUDGET
[1:10:19] WOULD BE. I HAVE MADE SOME ADJUSTMENTS TO THAT. IN COLUMN
[1:10:24] G, YOU WILL SEE MY PROJECTIONS. ANYTHING THAT'S IN RED, IF IT'S AN INDIVIDUAL ITEM, IT'S
[1:10:29] SOMETHING I CHANGED THE AMOUNT ON. IF IT'S A LINE ITEM, IT'S A NEW LINE ITEM THAT I'VE ADDED.
[1:10:35] FOR SOME EXAMPLES OF THAT, THE 2026BET STAFFER SALARY, I DID
[1:10:42] INCREASE SLIGHTLY BOTH FOR THE STAFFER AND FOR THE ELECTED OFFICIALS. FOR THE ELECTED OFFICIALS, I WAS TRYING TO DO A
[1:10:48] BEST GUEST OF WHAT YOUR COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT IS GOING TO BE. THAT IS OF COURSE A BEST GUEST BUT I DID INCLUDE IT. FOR
[1:10:54] THE BET STAFFER, I INCLUDED WHAT THE COST WOULD BE IF YOU WERE TO PROMOTE THE STAFFER TO A STEP 2,
[1:11:02] LIKE ANY OTHER MINNEAPOLIS EMPLOYEE, YOU CERTAINLY DON'T
[1:11:08] HAVE ANY OBLIGATION TO BUT YOU CERTAINLY COULD. SO THAT IS IN
[1:11:14] ROW 4 THAT YOU CAN SEE THAT SLIGHT INCREASE NUMBER. I HAVE IT FOR JUST SHY OF $5,000 HIGHER
[1:11:20] THAN WHAT BUDGET ORIGINALLY HAD IT FOR. OTHER THAN THAT, I DON'T MEAN TO TAKE YOU THROUGH EVERY
[1:11:25] SINGLE LINE ITEM, BUT THE MONTHLY PARKING EXPENSES I ALSO ADDED IN BECAUSE YOU PAY FOR THE
[1:11:31] STAFFERS PARKING, WHICH I'M VERY GRATEFUL FOR. ALSO IT WAS EXPRESSED TO ME THAT WE SHOULD
[1:11:37] REALLY BE PRIORITIZING THE GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION ANNUAL MEETING NOT
[1:11:43] ONLY FOR THE STAFFER TO ATTEND BUT POSSIBLY THE WIDELY ELECTED MEMBERS IF THEY CHOOSE TO. IT IS
[1:11:48] A LITTLE BIT OF EYE WATERING NUMBER IN MY OPINION BUT I'VE
[1:11:54] BEEN TOLD IT'S WORTH WHILE. I DO HAVE LINE EYE EM -- ITEMS IN
[1:12:01] THERE. THAT WILL BE IN CHICAGO OF NEXT YEAR. TAKING INTO ACCOUNT ALL OF THE DIFFERENT
[1:12:06] THINGS THAT I'VE ADDED IN, I HAVE EXPENSES ABOUT $14,300
[1:12:14] ABOVE WHAT ESTIMATIONS WERE. JUST TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA HOW WE'RE DOING OVERALL FINANCIALLY,
[1:12:19] WELL THE BET'S FUND BALANCE WAS
[1:12:30] $362,000. IT WAS ESTIMATED THAT $56,000 WOULD BE USED THIS YEAR
[1:12:35] IN 2025. BUT BY MY PROJECTIONS, IT WILL BE CLOSER TO $32,000,
[1:12:41] JUST OVER $24,000 GOING BACK INTO THE BET'S FUND BALANCE. THE REASON FOR THAT IS BECAUSE I WAS
[1:12:48] HIRED SO LATE IN THE YEAR THAT YOU GUYS BUDGETED MORE. YOU'RE
[1:12:54] GOING TO HAVE THAT SURPLUS GO BACK TO THE GENERAL FUND BALANCE. BY THE END OF 2025, YOU
[1:13:02] COULD EXPECT TO HAVE AROUND $330,000. TO GET AN IDEA OF WHETHER OR NOT IF YOU'RE FINANCIALLY HEALTHY, WE WOULD
[1:13:09] HAVE TO LOOK AT INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICES. THAT'S A LITTLE DIFFICULT BECAUSE YOU'RE INDEPENDENT BOARD. BUT IF WE
[1:13:15] WERE COMPARING YOU TO THE GENERAL FUND, THE GENERAL FUND'S BEST PRACTICES IS TO HAVE TWO TO
[1:13:22] THREE MONTHS OPERATING EXPENSES. WHICH FOR YOU WOULD BE $52,000. SO YOU ARE SIGNIFICANTLY OVER
[1:13:29] THAT. FOR THE CITY'S FINANCIAL POLICY IS TO HAVE 17% OF THE FOLLOWING YEAR'S ESTIMATED
[1:13:36] BUDGET UNOBLIGATED PLUS A 1% CONTINGENCY. IF YOU WERE TO FOLLOW THAT YOU WOULD BE
[1:13:42] REQUIRED TO HAVE JUST OVER $37,000 IN RESERVES. YOU HAVE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE THAN THAT IN
[1:13:48] RESERVES. I THINK THE BET'S FUND BALANCE IS QUITE HEALTHY. CERTAINLY GOING INTO 2026, I
[1:13:55] DON'T THINK THAT'S ANYTHING TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT. THAT'S NOT TO SAY WE WOULD REASSESS WHAT
[1:14:01] THE LEVY IS. THE BET IS IN A FINANCIALLY ADVANTAGEOUS
[1:14:08] POSITION. I WOULD SAY THAT AS OF RIGHT NOW IT IS SMOOTH SAILING FOR THE BET. IF THERE'S ANY
[1:14:15] INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONS ABOUT LINE ITEMS, PLEASE LET ME KNOW AND I'D LOVE TO ANSWER THEM.
[1:14:22] >> VICE PRESIDENT PREE-STINSON. >> YES. DID YOU TELL ME WHEN I WE MET THAT THE SALARIES AND WAGES ALSO INCLUDED AN AMOUNT
[1:14:29] FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT? >> NOT IN THE SALARIES LINE ITEM. THIS DOES INCLUDE NOT ON
[1:14:35] THE 2026, BUT IF YOU GO TO THE
[1:14:43] 2025 REPORTED BUDGET, I HAVE UPDATED IT FOR WHAT YOU GUYS VOTED IN LAST SESSION, WHICH
[1:14:49] INCLUDED AN ADDITIONAL $2,000 FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH WAS TAKEN FROM THE SALARY
[1:14:55] LINE ITEM. ORIGINALLY YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO SAVE $27,000 BUT
[1:15:01] BECAUSE YOU MOVED OVER TO PARKING AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, THAT'S WHERE THAT
[1:15:07] $3 $3,000 DIFFERENCE COMES FROM. >> THANK YOU. >> COULD YOU BRING UP THE 2026
[1:15:12] AGAIN. ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? OKAY. THE PARKING DAILY, THAT'S
[1:15:18] JUST THE BOARD MEMBERS WHEN WE PARK AT THE OFF RAMP, I ASSUME.
[1:15:23] >> YES, AND ANY GUESTS WHO YOU ARE REQUIRING PARKING FOR.
[1:15:31] >> ALL RIGHT. AS WE SIT HERE TODAY, DO YOU HAVE ANY THOUGHTS
[1:15:38] ABOUT HOW FAR -- I MEAN, OUR FUND BALANCE IS I WOULD SAY
[1:15:45] EMBARRASSINGLY BIG AND THAT RESULTS, AS YOU KNOW, FOR NOT HAVING A STAFFER ON FOR ALMOST FIVE YEARS.O YOU HAVE ANY
[1:15:54] THOUGHTS ABOUT THE ADVISABLE DEGREE TO DRAW THAT DOWN RATHER
[1:16:01] THAN USING LEVY OBVIOUSLY TO PAY FOR THE 2026 EXPENSE? >> YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. SO LIKE I
[1:16:12] STATED PREVIOUSLY PER CITY FINANCIAL POLICY PER BEST PRACTICES IF YOU WERE TO MODEL
[1:16:17] AFTER THE GENERAL FUND, YOU COULD PULL IT DOWN SIGNIFICANTLY MORE. IS THAT BEST PRACTICE?
[1:16:23] THAT'S DEBATABLE. I HAVE REQUESTED ACCESS TO COMET, THE
[1:16:29] CITY'S FINANCIAL SYSTEM. I HAVE NOT GOT THAT YET. FROM MY
[1:16:34] UNDERSTANDING, THE BET HAS ALWAYS HAD A PRETTY SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT IN RESERVES, AND I WANT TO BE ABLE TO DO MORE
[1:16:41] INVESTIGATION TO SEE IF THERE'S A REASON FOR THAT SPECIFICALLY BEFORE I COMMIT TO IT. BUT MY INITIAL THOUGHT WOULD BE THAT IT
[1:16:47] COULD BE SPENT DOWN MORE THAN IT CURRENTLY IS. I KNOW FROM TALKING TO SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES
[1:16:54] IN BUDGET, THEIR THOUGHT ON FINANCIAL HEALTH IS WE MIGHT WANT TO LOOK AT LEVY CHANGES
[1:17:00] GOING FORWARD. BUT THEY'RE NOT CONSIDERING IT FOR 2026. I CAN TELL YOU CONFIDENTLY THAT'S
[1:17:06] ABSOLUTELY NOT NEEDED IN 2026. WOULD IT BE NEEDED FOR 2027
[1:17:12] FORWARD, I WOULD NOT ANTICIPATE SO BUT I'D LIKE TO LOOK AT THE DATA BEFORE I ANSWER THAT, SIR.
[1:17:18] >> VERY GOOD. REMIND MY COLLEAGUES THAT WE'LL ADOPT THIS LATE IN THE YEAR. ALL RIGHT. I
[1:17:26] THINK WE'VE -- IF THERE ARE NO OTHER QUESTIONS, I THINK WE'VE DISPOSED OF THIS ITEM AND WE
[1:17:31] WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 6. WHICH IS THE -- EXCUSE ME, ITEM
[1:17:38] 7, BET WORK PLAN. AND PROCEED,
[1:17:44] PLEASE. >> YES, ABSOLUTELY, SIR. SO FROM
[1:17:49] OUR BET WORK PLAN DISCUSSION THAT WAS CONTINUED FROM THE LAST SESSION, WE DID GET SOME UPDATED
[1:17:55] INFORMATION FOR YOU FROM PRESIDENT BRANDT'S ORIGINAL MEMO THAT CAME SEVERAL MONTHS AGO.
[1:18:00] SEVERAL MONTHS AGO PRESIDENT BRANDT CIRCULATED HIS MEMO THAT ALL OF YOU UP ON THE COMMISSION
[1:18:06] SAW. AND THE ANSWER WE GOT BACK WAS SOME OF THESE ITEMS MIGHT BE AVAILABLE OFF THE SHELF FROM
[1:18:12] FINANCE. I FOLLOWED UP WITH OUR CFO MS. DYE AND ASKED ARE THESE
[1:18:20] READILY AVAILABLE OR SOMETHING I COULD POTENTIALLY PURSUE. AFTER SPEAKING WITH FINANCE, I PARED
[1:18:28] DOWN PRESIDENT BRANDT'S ORIGINAL LIST AND CAME UP WITH A LIST OF THINGS THAT ARE NOT CURRENTLY
[1:18:34] AVAILABLE THAT MAYBE THE BET STAFFER COULD LOOK INTO. I'VE DIVIDED IT INTO NEAR TERM AND
[1:18:39] FAR TERM. FOR THE NEAR TERM, I WANTED TO MAKE SURE IT WASN'T SOMETHING THAT WOULD REQUIRE
[1:18:45] SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT IN FINANCE DURING THE BUSIEST TIME OF YEAR FOR THEM. I WANTED IT
[1:18:51] THING SPECIFICALLY THAT I COULD INVESTIGATE ON MY OWN. SO FOR THE NEAR TERM, THERE WERE TWO
[1:18:58] THINGS THAT ARE NOT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE OFF THE SHELF FROM FINANCE THAT I THINK THE BET
[1:19:03] STAFFER COULD INVESTIGATE FOR YOU. DEBT LOAD COMPARED TO PEER
[1:19:13] CITIES. FINANCE DOES NOT HAVE ANYTHING LIKE THIS. IT WOULD TAKE A DEFINITION OF WHAT IS A PEER CITY. BUT I THINK THAT'S
[1:19:20] SOMETHING THAT THE BET STAFFER COULD INVESTIGATE FOR YOU AND WOULDN'T TAKE A LOT OF RESOURCES FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS. THE
[1:19:26] SECOND THING THAT I THINK COULD BE ADDRESSED IN THE NEAR TERM, AS A CAVEAT, THIS WOULD REQUIRE
[1:19:33] AN INVITATION FOR THE BET FROM THE CITY COUNCIL. THE CITY COUNCIL IS CURRENTLY HAVING
[1:19:38] POLICY AND RESEARCH INVESTIGATE ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF REVENUE. WE HAVE A MEETING BETWEEN
[1:19:45] PRESIDENT BRANDT AND VP PREE-STINSON TO MEET WITH CITY COUNCIL TO GO OVER WHAT THE SCOPE OF THAT REQUEST IS. POLICY
[1:19:50] AND RESEARCH, I MET WITH THEIR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, THEY MORE THAN WELCOMED THE IDEA OF THE
[1:19:57] BET STAFFER JOINING THAT EFFORT IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. THEY ARE PRETTY STRETCHED THIN WITH THEIR
[1:20:02] REQUEST. SO THEY WOULD LOVE ACCESS TO SOMEONE WHO CLD TAKE
[1:20:08] ON THIS WORK LOAD. IF CITY COUNCIL DOES DECIDE TO INVITE THE BET TO BE PART OF THAT PROJECT, I WOULD SAY THAT IT
[1:20:14] WOULD BE A GOOD NEAR TERM PROJECT FOR THE BET STAFFER TO EITHER TAKE OVER A PORTION OF OR
[1:20:20] WORK WITH POLICY AND RESEARCH TO TURN AROUND THAT REQUEST FROM BOTH THE CITY COUNCIL AND THEN WHAT WOULD BE THE BET. CURRENTLY
[1:20:27] RIGHT NOW THEY PLAN TO TURN THAT AROUND BY THE END OF QUARTER 3. SO BY THE END OF SEPTEMBER THEY
[1:20:33] WERE HOPING TO HAVE A REPORT BACK TO THE CITY COUNCIL. IF I HELP THEM WITH THAT, WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO GET IT TURNED AROUND A
[1:20:39] LITTLE SOONER. BUT LIKE I SAID, THAT DOES COME WITH THE CAVEAT THAT YOU GUYS WOULD ALLOW ME TO
[1:20:46] DO THAT, NUMBER ONE, AND CITY COUNCIL WOULD CHOOSE ME TO BE A PART OF THAT. FOR THE FAR TERM,
[1:20:52] THESE ARE THINGS THAT ARE NOT AVAILABLE FROM FINANCE OR OTHER
[1:20:57] CITY DEPARTMENTS OFF THE SHELF. THEY WOULD TAKE MORE INVESTIGATION AND RELATIONSHIPS AND INVESTMENT FROM PEOPLE. THIS
[1:21:04] IS WHY I HAVE THEM IN THE FAR TERM. GEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS. THIS
[1:21:09] IS INFORMATION THAT'S NOT READILY AVAILABLE FOR MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. SO IT WOULD TAKE A PARTNERSHIP WITH
[1:21:15] THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. I WOULD HAVE TO DO PROBABLY SEVERAL REQUESTS TO
[1:21:21] COME UP WITH THIS INFORMATION. IT WOULD BE A HEAVIER LIFT AND PARTNERSHIPS WHICH IS WHY I HAVE
[1:21:26] IT IN THE FAR TERM CATEGORY. FOLLOWING ON, THE MAPPING OF DOLLAR FLOWS FROM SALES AND
[1:21:32] SPECIAL TAXES FROM THE DOWNTOWN ASSETS FUND WITH STATE RESTRICTIONS, VARIANCES AND
[1:21:38] TYPES OF USES. THERE IS SOME INFORMATION PROVIDED BY FINANCE ALREADY. HOWEVER, IT WOULD NEED
[1:21:43] TO BE DISSEMINATED OUT TO TRULY ANSWER THIS QUESTION. IT'S PROBABLY GOING TO TAKE A LITTLE
[1:21:50] BIT MORE WITH FINANCE. I DON'T WANT TO REQUEST THIS REPORT NOW BECAUSE IT WOULD BE MORE OF A REPORT REQUEST FROM FINANCE. AND
[1:21:57] THEN FINALLY, ANALYSIS OF THE MAJOR COST DRIVERS IN THE CITY
[1:22:03] BUDGET GROWTH PERHAPS SUBJECT BY PANELED EXPERTS. IT WOULD BE BOTH AN INTERNAL TEAM AND AN
[1:22:08] EXTERNAL TEAM. IT'S GOING TO REQUIRE QUITE A BIT MORE RESOURCES AND QUITE A BIT MORE
[1:22:14] RELATIONSHIPS. ALTHOUGH I THINK IT'S NOT READILY AVAILABLE SO A GOOD IDEA FOR A BET STAFFER TO
[1:22:20] PURSUE, I THINK IT SHOULD GO IN THE FAR TERM CATEGORY. EVERYTHING ELSE THAT'S NOT LISTED ON THIS LIST WAS REPLIED
[1:22:26] TO US BY FINANCE THAT THEY ARE WANTING TO TAKE SOME TIME TO COME UP WITH AN ANSWER FOR US
[1:22:32] BUT THEY THINK THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO PROVIDE IT. WHICH IS WHY IT'S NOT IN THE NEAR OR FAR TERM
[1:22:39] CATEGORY. SO COULD I ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS? >> COMMISSIONER PAYNE. >> THANK YOU, PRESIDENT BRANDT.
[1:22:45] I WAS JUST GOING TO ADD SOME CONTEXT FOR THE COUNCIL REQUEST.
[1:22:50] WE DID ACTUALLY BRING SOMETHING FORWARD AT THE LAST COUNCIL CYCLE BUT HELD IT FOR A LITTLE
[1:22:55] BIT MORE REVIEW AND REFINEMENT BEFORE DOING A FINAL ACTION ON IT. >> THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE?
[1:23:04] COMMISSIONER ABENE. >> THANK YOU. YOU KNOW, I WILL SORT OF DEFER TO THE ELECTED
[1:23:11] BOARD MEMBERS HERE FOR THE WORK PLAN. BUT I DO THINK THIS LOOKS GOOD. I ALSO THINK THAT ON THE
[1:23:19] FAR TERM IT LOOKS ACCURATE TO ME THAT THESE ARE FAR TERM ITEMS.
[1:23:24] BUT I THINK THE FINAL BULLET ON THERE IS WORKING INSIDE THE CITY MORE AND IT'S A GOOD ACTIVITY TO
[1:23:31] KICK OFF PRETTY SOON BECAUSE I THINK IT'S SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE VALUABLE TO MAYBE THIS BODY,
[1:23:37] THE COUNCIL AND SO ON. IT WOULD HELP WITH LEARNING THE INTERNAL CITY FUNCTIONS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. I DON'T KNOW. OF THE FAR
[1:23:44] TERM ONES, I DON'T KNOW IF THEY'RE TABLED FOR NOW AND WILL COME UP LATER. BUT I THINK THAT
[1:23:49] ONE SEEMS LIKE IT'S ONE THAT COULD BEGIN FAIRLY SOON. JUST A THOUGHT.
[1:23:54] >> IF I COULD JUMP IN ON THAT POINT. AS I TALK TO PEOPLE
[1:23:59] AROUND THE CITY ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF REVENUE, A COMMON
[1:24:06] RESPONSE FROM PEOPLE IS THAT THEY WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT
[1:24:15] PROVERBIAL WASTE, FRAUD AND ABUSE IS NOT HAPPENING IN THE CITY BUDGET. I THINK IT'S IRONIC
[1:24:21] THAT WE ALWAYS ASSUME THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS THOSE
[1:24:26] CHARACTERISTICS. BUT WE GET OUR UTILITY BILLS AND WE NEVER ASSUME THERE'S WASTE, FRAUD AND ABUSE OR ANYTHING ELSE. I THINK
[1:24:33] IT'S VALID WANTING TO MAKE SURE THAT CITY'S EXISTING RESOURCES ARE WELL SPENT IS CERTAINLY A
[1:24:41] VALID AREA FOR ANALYSIS, AND THE GROWTH IN THOSE AREAS EXPANDING.
[1:24:49] THERE'S A MODEL FOR THIS WHICH IS WHY I SUGGESTED IT COULD BE EITHER INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL
[1:24:55] FOLKS OVER IN SAINT PAUL WHERE CITIZENS COMMISSION THAT INCLUDED A FORMER CITY BUDGET
[1:25:01] DIRECTOR AND SOME OTHER FOLKS WITH FINANCIAL ACUMEN DID TAKE A
[1:25:07] LOOK AT SAINT PAUL'S CITY BUDGET, AND NOT IN A SENSATIONALISTIC WAY, BUT THEY
[1:25:13] LOOKED AT THE DRIVERS IN THE INCREASE IN THAT CITY'S BUDGET AND GAVE A BODY OF INFORMATION
[1:25:19] FOR CITIZENS TO DISCUSS. I WOULD LOVE TO TACKLE THAT BEFORE WE GO
[1:25:28] TO THE LEGISLATURE FOR SURE IF WE DECIDE TO PURSUE ANY
[1:25:33] STRUCTURE FOR ALTERNATIVE REVENUES. BECAUSE I THINK THAT THAT WOULD HELP PUBLIC
[1:25:39] ACCEPTANCE IF WE HAD PERFORMED A STUDY LIKE THIS. SO THAT'S WHY I PUT IT ON THE LIST HERE. I GUESS
[1:25:48] MY QUESTION FOR MS. KEIDERLING IS, WHEN YOU SAY NEAR TERM AND
[1:25:53] FAR TERM, DO YOU HAVE A SENSE OF HOW FAR OUT FAR TERM IS?
[1:26:00] >> I DO NOT, SIR. BUT I CAN CERTAINLY COME UP -- IF YOU
[1:26:07] WOULD LIKE TO TAKE ACTION ON EACH OF THESE FIVE ITEMS, I COULD CERTAINLY PROVIDE YOU WITH A TURNAROUND TIME. I'M NOT SURE
[1:26:15] FOR A RESOLUTION IF THERE NEEDS TO BE A DUE DATE. BUT IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A RESOLUTION AND PUT IT IN THE BET STAFFER'S WORK
[1:26:23] PLAN, I DON'T BELIEVE YOU WOULD NEED A DUE DATE TO DO THAT. >> OKAY. I WONDER WHAT THE
[1:26:28] THOUGHTS OF MY COLLEAGUES ARE ON WHETHER WE ADOPT SOMETHING IN
[1:26:33] THIS AREA OR JUST GIVE INFORMAL DIRECTION BASED ON THIS
[1:26:38] PRESENTATION. COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON. >> I THINK IT GOES BACK TO WHAT I WAS SAYING AT THE LAST MEETING ABOUT WHAT'S IN THE JOB
[1:26:44] DESCRIPTION VERSUS WHAT HAS TO GO IN THE WORK PLAN. IT SOUNDS
[1:26:50] INITIALLY INVESTIGATIVE, IF YOU WILL. BUT ALSO ONE OF THE KEY WORDS HERE IS PARTNERSHIP. SO I FEEL -- I DON'T THINK THE DATES
[1:26:56] NEED TO GO IN THERE. I AGREE WITH THAT. BUT I ALSO THINK BEFORE YOU CAN GET DATES, YOU WOULD HAVE TO SPEAK WITH THOSE
[1:27:04] DEPARTMENTS TO TALK ABOUT WORK LOAD AND WHEN THAT MAY BE. BUT I DON'T THINK THERE NEEDS TO BE
[1:27:10] DATES ATTACHED IN ORDER TO MAKE IT REAL. AND SPECIFIC TO THE WORK PLAN, I THINK IT COULD JUST
[1:27:17] GO IN THERE IF WE WANT TO NAME IT SPECIFICALLY. AND GO BACK TO
[1:27:23] THOSE WORDS THAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT LAST TIME AS WELL WHEN I TALKED ABOUT INVESTIGATE RATHER THAN RESEARCH, COORDINATE,
[1:27:30] PARTICIPATE. THOSE ARE THE TYPES OF THINGS THAT WILL BE GETTING DETERMINED THROUGH DOING AN
[1:27:35] INITIAL INVESTIGATION. SO I THINK WE COULD ADD IT TO THE WORK PLAN, WHICH EVERYBODY DOES
[1:27:41] HAVE A COPY OF. I BELIEVE THE ONLY THING THAT WE WERE BACK AND
[1:27:47] FORTH ABOUT IN THIS BRANDT MEMO WAS THE LAST ONE. THIS ANALYSIS
[1:27:52] OF ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF REVENUE. I THINK THAT'S THE ONE THAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT
[1:27:59] REFRAMING. AND I THINK WE HAVE. BETWEEN LAST MEETING AND THIS ONE, I THINK WE HAVE. I THINK WE
[1:28:04] JUST NEED TO CHANGE THAT LANGUAGE OF ANALYSIS. TO INVESTIGATE WHAT THE COORDINATION LOOKS LIKE,
[1:28:11] TIMELINE, THINGS LIKE THAT. OTHERWISE, I'M COMFORTABLE WITH WHAT WE HAVE FOR THE WORK PLAN.
[1:28:17] I THINK IT'S A SIZEABLE AMOUNT FOR SOMEONE TO GET THROUGH TO
[1:28:22] THE END OF THE YEAR. >> IT SOUNDS LIKE WHAT I'M HEARING IS WE WOULD LIKE YOU TO FURTHER REFINE THIS. AND BRING
[1:28:31] IT BACK. I DON'T SEE ANY REASON TO HOLD OFF ON THE DEBT LOAD
[1:28:40] ANALYSIS, FOR EXAMPLE. IF MY COLLEAGUES ARE AGREED, THAT SEEMS FAIRLY CUT AND DRY. AND
[1:28:46] THERE ARE PEER CITIES THAT ARE COMMONLY USED TO COMPARE TO MINNEAPOLIS, AND I DON'T KNOW
[1:28:52] WHO WOULD BE THE BEST ENTITY TO CALL THOSE OUT FOR YOU. BUT
[1:28:59] PERHAPS WOULD THE AUDITOR HAVE DONE SOME WORK IN THAT AREA?
[1:29:07] >> POLICY AND RESEARCH TEAM HAS DONE SOME PEER CITY ANALYSIS. >> GREAT. SO THAT WOULD BE A
[1:29:14] RESOURCE FOR DETERMINING LIST OF POTENTIAL PEER CITIES. OKAY. ALL
[1:29:20] RIGHT. COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON. >> JUST A CLARIFYING QUESTION. SO ARE WE GOING TO VOTE ON THIS,
[1:29:25] WE CALLED IT THE BRANDT MEMO BEFORE. BUT ARE WE GOING TO FORMALLY VOTE ON THE WORK PLAN
[1:29:32] TODAY OR ARE WE STILL WAITING FOR WHAT WE'D BE WAITING FOR? >> I WOULDN'T VOTE ON THE BRANDT
[1:29:37] MEMO BECAUSE THAT INCLUDES SOME THINGS THAT WE MAY HAVE TAKEN
[1:29:44] OFF THE TABLE OR BEING DONE THROUGH FINANCE. UNLESS MY
[1:29:49] COLLEAGUES FEEL OTHERWISE. BUT I'D BE -- I GUESS I'M TRYING TO GET A SENSE OF WHETHER PEOPLE
[1:29:55] ARE COMFORTABLE VOTING ON WHAT'S BEFORE US ON THE SCREEN OR
[1:30:03] WHETHER THEY WANT OUR STAFF TO COME BACK WITH SOME MORE
[1:30:09] FLESHING OUT IN THIS AREA. COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON. >> I COULD SEE THIS GETTING DRAGGED OUT FOR QUITE SOME TIME.
[1:30:16] I THINK GENERAL WORK DIRECTION AND SOMEONE HAVING GENERAL WORK DIRECTION IS IMPORTANT. SO I THINK IF WE'RE NOT GOING TO VOTE
[1:30:22] TODAY, I WOULD LIKE SOME CONFIDENCE AND REASSURANCE THAT WE CAN AGREE THAT BY THE NEXT
[1:30:27] AGENDA SETTING, ALL OF OUR MEMBERS HAVE SOMETHING IN FRONT OF US THAT WE'RE PLANNING TO VOTE ON THAT COULD INCLUDE THESE
[1:30:34] UPDATES TO BE PUT INTO A PROPER PROPOSAL FOR A WORK PLAN SO THAT WE DON'T DRAG THIS OUT TOO MUCH
[1:30:41] LONGER. >> COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON, DO YOU SEE THAT AS
[1:30:47] A RESOLUTION? >> POINT OF CLARIFICATION TO THE CLERK, WOULD THAT JUST NEED TO
[1:30:53] BE A DIRECTION THAT WE GIVE OR FORMAL DRAFT RESOLUTION THAT WE VOTE ON AS THE WORK PLAN?
[1:31:03] >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, AND VICE-PRESIDENT PREE-STINSON, I THINK IF THE BODY WANTS TO ADOPT
[1:31:09] SOMETHING THAT IS, YOU KNOW, VERY DETAILED AS A WORK PLAN I THINK IT SHOULD PROBABLY BE IN A RESOLUTION. BUT I THINK THE BODY
[1:31:16] COULD ALSO JUST SIMPLY KIND OF DO SOMETHING A LITTLE BIT MORE INFORMAL, BUT KIND OF BE LIKE AS
[1:31:24] DESCRIBED IN MS. KEIDERLING'S
[1:31:31] PRESENTATION. I THINK IT COULD BE ONE OR THE OTHER. >> I'M CERTAINLY COMFORTABLE
[1:31:37] WITH THE LATTER. I HAVE NO OBJECTIONS TO THE FORMER. BUT
[1:31:42] SHOULD WE GIVE THAT DIRECTION TODAY? ARE PEOPLE PREPARED TO GIVE THAT DIRECTION TODAY? >> I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THAT WAY
[1:31:50] TODAY. >> ALL RIGHT. DO YOU WANT TO PUT THAT -- I GUESS WE DON'T REALLY
[1:31:55] NEED A RESOLUTION. DO WE JUST WANT TO PROPOSE STAFF DIRECTION THAT MS. KEIDERLING BEGIN ON THE
[1:32:06] SHORT TERM, NEAR TERM ITEMS SUBJECT OF COURSE TO THE MEETING THAT WE WILL HAVE WITH THE POWER
[1:32:13] PEOPLE NEXT MONTH. AND THAT SHE WILL FLESH OUT WHAT THE REQUIREMENTS WILL BE FOR THE FAR
[1:32:19] TERM ITEMS. OKAY. >> YES. >> ALL RIGHT. >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, IF I MAY,
[1:32:25] SORRY. I APPRECIATE THAT AND I'M HAPPY TO TAKE ACTION ON THE NEAR TERM. FOR THE FAR TERM,
[1:32:30] ESPECIALLY IF YOU WANT AN ANSWER BY NEXT MEETING AS TO WHEN THESE CAN BE TURNED AROUND. JUST SO
[1:32:35] EVERYONE IS ON THE SAME PAGE, I'M GOING TO NEED FOR EXAMPLE, THE FIRST ONE TO REACH OUT TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
[1:32:42] REVENUE, FIND THE RIGHT PERSON AND GET A RESPONSE FROM THEM. AND WE HAVE HOLIDAYS IN BETWEEN
[1:32:48] THERE. GOVERNMENT TYPICALLY DOES -- I'M NOT 100% POSITIVE I'M GOING TO BE ABLE TO TELL YOU I'M GOING TO GET THIS TO YOU BY
[1:32:56] DECEMBER 31ST IF THAT'S THE DIRECTION I'M GETTING NOW. >> WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST IS THAT
[1:33:02] YOU NOT -- THAT YOU BUNDLE THE FAR TERM ITEMS AND MAYBE BRING THEM BACK TO US WHEN YOU HAVE A
[1:33:10] REASONABLE SENSE OF WHAT CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AND HOW. BUT NOT
[1:33:18] SHOOT NECESSARILY FOR THE NEXT MEETING. COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON. >> YEAH, I WOULD SAY THAT OUR EXPECTATION WOULD BE REGULAR
[1:33:24] UPDATES. >> YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU. >> VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. ANY
[1:33:30] OTHER COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE NO FURTHER DISCUSSIONS SO WE'LL MOVE TO OUR NEXT ITEM
[1:33:35] WHICH IS THE LAST DISCUSSION ITEM. IT'S THE DISCUSSION OF THE
[1:33:40] VICE PRESIDENTIAL DUTIES ON THE BET. AND I'M ACTUALLY GOING TO
[1:33:47] ASK COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON, VICE-PRESIDENT PREE-STINSON TO LEAD ON THIS ITEM. >> JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT
[1:33:52] I WANTED US TO THINK ABOUT. NOW THAT WE HAVE A STAFFER IN PLACE,
[1:33:59] WHAT WE OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS HAVE REALIZED IS THERE'S A LOT OF PROCESS THINGS JUST NOT
[1:34:04] IN PLACE. SOME OF THAT IS ALSO DUE TO NEW GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE. THERE ARE JUST THINGS THAT
[1:34:09] DIDN'T GET THOUGHT ABOUT. VERY SMALL THINGS AS FAR AS WHEN WE GET A NEW STAFFER, WHERE DO THEY
[1:34:16] SIT? WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSIGNING? THEY COULD BE VERY
[1:34:21] SMALL THINGS. THEY COULD ALSO BE LARGER ITEMS. SO I JUST, I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT THE FACT
[1:34:27] THAT THROUGH PROCESS THERE'S JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT WE HAVEN'T TALKED ABOUT. ONE IS THAT THE VICE PRESIDENT DOESN'T
[1:34:34] EXACTLY HAVE ANY DUTIES. THEY'LL SIT IN IF THEY HAVE TO. BUT I THINK NOW ONE OF THE THINGS TO THINK ABOUT THAT'S RIGHT BEFORE
[1:34:40] US IS WE DO NOW HAVE A FULL-TIME STAFFER THAT WE WORKED VERY HARD TO GET. AND WE ALSO WANT TO MAKE
[1:34:46] SURE THIS PERSON IS GETTING THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FROM THEIR SUPERVISOR, WHICH THE WAY
[1:34:52] THAT IT'S WRITTEN, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, MR. HAMMER, BUT IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE THE
[1:34:57] PRESIDENT. IT COULD BE THE VICE PRESIDENT, IS THAT CORRECT?
[1:35:02] >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, VICE PRESIDENT PREE-STINSON AND COMMISSIONERS, YES, THAT'S CORRECT. THE ONLY THING IN THE
[1:35:09] BYLAWS JUST SAYS THAT THE PRESIDENT PRESIDES OVER THE MEETINGS, AND THE VICE PRESIDENT
[1:35:16] PRESIDES OVER THE MEETINGS IF THE PRESIDENT IS ABSENT. ANY COMMISSIONER ON THE BOARD,
[1:35:21] PRESIDENT, VICE PRESIDENT, ANOTHER COMMISSIONER, THAT WILL ALL BE FINE. >> OKAY. I JUST THINK IT'S
[1:35:27] SOMETHING WE SHOULD THINK ABOUT BECAUSE AS WE KNOW IT MIGHT NOT ALWAYS BE US SITTING HERE. IT
[1:35:32] COULD BE ANYBODY. DIFFERENT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT EXPERIENCES WITH THAT. HAVING A TITLE DOESN'T MEAN YOU'RE GOING TO BE A GREAT SUPERVISOR. SOME
[1:35:38] OF THE THINGS THAT WE SHOULD BE THINKING ABOUT ACROSS THE BOARD IS TRAINING FOR THE TWO ELECTED
[1:35:47] MEMBERS TO KNOW HOW TO SUPERVISE AND WHAT ARE THE TOOLS AT OUR DISPOSAL TO BE GIVING END OF YEAR EVALUATIONS AND THINGS LIKE
[1:35:53] THAT. THOSE ARE ALL IMPORTANT THINGS AND WE NEED TO KNOW HOW TO DO THEM. DO WE HAVE ACCESS TO
[1:35:59] THOSE SYSTEMS. THAT'S ONE THING. BUT IT ALSO COULD BE THAT THE
[1:36:04] VICE PRESIDENT WANTS THOSE DUTIES OR HAS MORE EXPERIENCE WITH THOSE DUTIES. I WANT TO
[1:36:12] MAKE SURE IT'S CLEAR. WE NEED TO MAKE SURE FOLKS ARE AWARE AND ALSO WHO IS GOING TO DO WHAT.
[1:36:18] THE THIRD THING I'M BRING UP AND IT'S FOOD FOR THOUGHT. I'M NOT EXPECTING FOR US TO DO ANYTHING
[1:36:23] TODAY. I JUST WANTED TO HAVE A SMALL DISCUSSION. ESPECIALLY AS WE'RE MOVING TOWARDS BUDGET. BECAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE SOMEBODY
[1:36:30] SERVING IN THAT CAPACITY BEFORE BECAUSE WE WERE WITHOUT A STAFFER FOR FIVE YEARS, HAVING
[1:36:36] SOME INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT IT TOOK FROM PREVIOUS ITERATIONS MIGHT BE HELPFUL ON HOW MUCH
[1:36:43] TIME THEY ACTUALLY SPENT WITH THEIR STAFFER. AND WE MAY WANT TO CONSIDER AN INCREASE IN THE PAY FOR THE PAID BOARD MEMBERS.
[1:36:51] BECAUSE IT IS A SIGNIFICANT MORE AMOUNT OF WORK IF YOU'RE GOING TO DO IT RIGHT AND WELL AND DO IT JUST. AND ACTUALLY BE THERE
[1:36:58] FOR THE PERSON AND BE THEIR GUIDE IN THAT WAY. SO JUST SOME THINGS I WANTED US TO THINK ABOUT WITHIN THAT REALM OF IT'S
[1:37:06] NOT JUST A VICE PRESIDENT DUTY THING, IT'S REALLY A WHOLE BOARD THING TO THINK ABOUT. I'M CURIOUS IF THERE'S ANY OTHER
[1:37:11] THOUGHTS ON ANY OF THE THINGS THAT I'VE TALKED ABOUT. THAT
[1:37:17] ALSO WOULD INCLUDE THINGS, JUST ANOTHER PROCESS THING TO BE CLEAR ABOUT IS WHEN THERE'S NEW
[1:37:22] MEMBERS TO THE BOARD. OUR PREVIOUS STAFFER THAT WE HAD FOR ONLY A MONTH OR TWO, MR. STERL
[1:37:30] WAS THE ONE WHO DID OUR ONBOARDING FOR US. BUT THERE'S
[1:37:35] NOTHING WRITTEN ANYWHERE THAT SAYS THAT NOR DOES IT SAY WHAT ONBOARDING MEANS. ELECTED
[1:37:42] OFFICIALS THAT COULD BE ONE EXAMPLE. THESE TRAININGS THAT I TALKED ABOUT IS YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE. WE NEED PROCESS FOR
[1:37:48] THAT AS WELL. I THINK WE'RE IN A PROCESS SPACE. I THINK MS.
[1:37:54] KEIDERLING CAN HELP WITH THAT. I THINK WE NEED TO STRONGLY CONSIDER THESE THINGS AS WE MOVE
[1:37:59] FORWARD AND WE'RE IN A DIFFERENT SITUATION THAT WE HAVEN'T BEEN FOR A LONG TIME AND THESE ARE THE TYPES OF THINGS THAT COULD
[1:38:06] GET LOST. THANK YOU. >> COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON, I WOULD REACT IN THIS WAY. I THINK
[1:38:12] THE AREAS THAT YOU BRING UP AS
[1:38:19] WORTHY OF CONSIDERING, FOR EXAMPLE, THE NEW STAFFER, ARE
[1:38:28] APPROPRIATE AND NEEDED. WHOEVER THE TWO BOARD MEMBERS WHO WILL SERVE IN THIS POSITION NOW AND
[1:38:34] IN THE FUTURE HAVE DIFFERING SKILLS. FOR EXAMPLE, I WOULD GLADLY DEFER TO YOUR EXPERTISE
[1:38:42] IN THE AREA OF PERSONNEL. AND I
[1:38:47] THINK ONE WAY WE COULD HANDLE THIS IS TO SIMPLY OPERATE WITH
[1:38:54] THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PRESIDENT WILL ASSIGN DUTIES AS
[1:39:02] NEEDED TO THE VICE PRESIDENT. FOR EXAMPLE, IF WE FOLLOW THE ROTATION THAT WE'VE HAD FOR THE ELECTED MEMBERS IN THE PAST AND
[1:39:09] SHOULD BOTH OF US BE REELECTED, I BELIEVE WOULD BE APPROPRIATE
[1:39:17] NEXT YEAR TO CHANGE SO THAT YOU ARE THE PRESIDENT AND I AM THE
[1:39:23] VICE PRESIDENT. SO IF WE LOCKED IN CERTAIN DUTIES FOR VICE PRESIDENT IN THE BYLAWS THEN I MIGHT BE STUCK WITH THINGS THAT
[1:39:29] I MIGHT NOT DO BETTER THAN YOU OR YOU MIGHT DO BETTER THAN ME.
[1:39:34] ANY THOUGHTS? DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? OKAY. >> I THINK THAT'S A GOOD CATCH AND I REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR
[1:39:41] THINKING ABOUT THIS, VICE PRESIDENT. BUT I THINK YOUR BACKGROUND IS REALLY IMPORTANT
[1:39:46] HERE. I WOULD SAY MAKE IT A LITTLE MORE FLEXIBLE BECAUSE IT
[1:39:51] MAY RESULT IN AMENDS TO THE BYLAWS. YOU WOULDN'T WANT TO GET SO PRESCRIPTIVE THAT YOU'RE
[1:39:57] CREATING A PROBLEM IN THE FUTURE. I THINK THAT'S A REALLY GREAT IDEA. THE TYPES OF ASSIGNMENTS OR OVERSIGHT AREAS
[1:40:03] ARE REALLY IMPORTANT. AT THE PARK BOARD, WE HAD AN EXCELLENT ONBOARDING FOR THE COMMISSIONERS. AND IT REALLY GOT
[1:40:10] US GOING. AND IF ANY WAY TO FORMALIZE THAT I THINK FOR PEOPLE IN YOUR SPOTS COMING IN,
[1:40:17] EVEN THE PARK BOARD COMMISSIONER COMING IN, AND ALLOWING, ALSO HELPING US ALL TO UNDERSTAND THE
[1:40:24] CONNECTIONS IN THE CITY AND STAFF. THAT'S A GREAT IDEA. >> COMMISSIONER ABENE, THAT
[1:40:30] CERTAINLY POINTS UP THE BENEFITS OF HAVING INSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE, WHICH WE DON'T HAVE HERE AT THE BOARD OF ESTIMATE
[1:40:37] AND TAXATION AT THE STAFF LEVEL. WE DID OUR LAST STAFFER WAS HERE FOR 38 YEARS, AND THEN WE HAD A GAP. SO I APPRECIATE WHAT YOU'RE
[1:40:47] SAYING. UNDER NEW BUSINESS, I GUESS WE'LL MOVE ON SEEING NO FURTHER DISCUSSION. UNDER NEW
[1:40:53] BUSINESS, WE HAVE A LIST OF PROJECTS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL FOR WHICH THE BOARD OF ESTIMATE
[1:40:58] AND TAXATION WILL CONSIDER APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF TAX EXEMPT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
[1:41:04] AT A FUTURE DATE. MY COLLEAGUES HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT? OKAY. AND SEEING NONE, I'LL ASK
[1:41:12] THE CLERK TO RECEIVE AND FILE THAT MEMO. ANNOUNCEMENTS ARE NEXT ON OUR AGENDA. DO MY
[1:41:19] COLLEAGUES HAVE ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS? COMMISSIONER ABENE. >> NO ANNOUNCEMENTS. BUT I JUST
[1:41:24] WANT TO -- I DON'T THINK ANYONE IS LEFT IN THE ROOM THAT CAME TO
[1:41:30] SPEAK FOR THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD, BUT I APPRECIATE THE SPEAKERS WHO CAME DURING THE
[1:41:36] MONSOON SEASON HERE IN MINNEAPOLIS. THERE WAS ONE WOMAN TRYING TO ARRIVE HERE WITH HER CHILDREN AND WAS SOMEWHERE
[1:41:44] NEARBY AND COULDN'T FIND LOCATION AND WAS TRYING TO DO IT IN THE SKYWAYS. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I LOVE THIS CITY AND I
[1:41:49] THINK WE HAVE THE BEST CITIZENS IN THE WORLD HERE. SO THANK YOU. >> I HAVE ONE QUICK
[1:41:59] ANNOUNCEMENT. I'VE ASKED MS. KEIDERLING TO DO SOME INITIAL
[1:42:05] WORK ON A CALENDAR FOR 2026. AND TO LOOK AT, YOU KNOW, WHAT DATES
[1:42:12] ARE BLACKED OUT ON THE, FOR EXAMPLE, THE COUNCIL'S SCHEDULE
[1:42:17] BY VIRTUE OF FALLING ON RELIGIOUS HOLIDAYS OR OTHER
[1:42:24] THINGS. AND I'VE ALREADY GIVEN HER ONE MEAN TIME WHEN I EXPECT TO BE OUT OF THE COUNTRY NEXT
[1:42:30] WINTER. AND IF YOU KNOW OF ANY OTHER CONFLICTS THAT YOU MIGHT WANT TO SCHEDULE AROUND, FEEL
[1:42:37] FREE TO FORWARD THOSE TO HER. OKAY. COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON. >> I JUST HAD ONE OTHER QUICK
[1:42:43] NOTE ABOUT THE PARTICIPATION TODAY. THE GOOD WORK THAT WE DO
[1:42:49] OFTEN GOES UNSEEN. BUT ONE OF THE GOOD THINGS THAT WE DID FOUR YEARS AGO WAS IN OUR VERY FIRST
[1:42:55] MEETING TOGETHER WAS TO DECIDE THAT WE'D HAVE PUBLIC COMMENTARY AT EVERY SINGLE MEETING AND NOT
[1:43:00] JUST THE CHARTEDER REQUIRED ONES. AND I WANT TO NOTE THAT EVERY TIME WHEN PEOPLE SHOW UP
[1:43:05] IT'S NOT AN ACCIDENT. MEMBERS OF THIS BOARD HAVE DONE THE WORK TO DO THAT OUTREACH AND TURNOUT.
[1:43:11] AND THE TIMES THAT WE'VE HAD THIS CHAMBER BE FILLED WITH PUBLIC COMMENT IT HAS BROKEN THE
[1:43:16] RECORD. WHICH FROM THE CLERK'S OFFICE I ASKED SEVERAL YEARS AGO WAS 10 FOLKS WERE THE MAX THAT HAD EVER SHOWED UP. AND EVERY
[1:43:23] TIME WE'VE HAD PEOPLE SHOW UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENTARY, WE'VE BROKEN THAT RECORD. IT GOES TO
[1:43:28] SHOW THAT THE SMALLEST OF DECISIONS DO MATTER FOR PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO SHOW UP AND SPEAK
[1:43:34] THEIR VOICE. THEY PUT US HERE SO THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO. IT'S A WONDERFUL THING WHEN WE SEE THAT
[1:43:40] HAPPEN HERE AND RECORDS BE BROKEN PERSON BY PERSON. I JUST WANTED TO ADD THAT COMMENT. >> OKAY. THANK YOU. WE'VE
[1:43:46] COMPLETED ALL THE BUSINESS SCHEDULES THAT HAVE COME BEFORE US, WITHOUT OBJECTION, WE STAND ADJOURNED.