RecordingTranscript available104:20

June 25, 2025 Board of Estimate and Taxation

Minneapolis City CouncilThursday, June 26, 2025
Watch on original source

Document Analysis

Analyze the transcript to extract topics, key quotes, people, and more — then generate focused stories for any topic.

Transcript
[0:12] >> THE BOARD OF ESTIMATE AND TAXATION FOR JUNE 25, 2025, MY NAME IS STEVE BRANDT AND I'M THE [0:18] PRESIDENT OF THE BET. BEFORE WE BEGIN THE MEETING, I'D ASK THE [0:25] CLERK SINCE WE'RE EXPECTING PUBLIC TESTIMONY TODAY TO OFFER THE ADVISORY TO PEOPLE REGARDING CAPTIONING. [0:32] >> THESE MEETINGS ARE BROADCAST LIVE TO ENABLE GREATER PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. THESE BROADCASTS [0:39] INCLUDE REAL-TIME CAPTIONING AS A FURTHER METHOD TO INCREASE [0:45] ACCESSIBILITY OF OUR PROCEEDINGS TO THE COMMUNITY. THEREFORE, ALL SPEAKERS NEED TO BE MINDFUL OF [0:50] THE RATE OF THEIR SPEECH SO THAT OUR CAPTIONERS CAN FULLY CAPTURE AND TRANSCRIBE ALL COMMENTS FOR [0:56] THE BROADCAST. WE ASK ALL SPEAKERS TO MODERATE THE SPEED AND CLARITY OF THEIR COMMENTS. [1:01] >> THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME I'LL ASK THE CLERK TO CALL THE ROLL SO WE CAN VERIFY THE PRESENCE OF [1:06] A QUORUM. >> COMMISSIONER FREY IS ABSENT. ABENE. >> HERE. [1:12] >> PAYNE. >> PRESENT. >> CHUGHTAI IS ABSENT. [1:18] VICE-PRESIDENT PREE-STINSON. >> PRESENT. >> PRESIDENT BRANDT. >> PRESENT. >> THERE ARE FOUR MEMBERS PRESENT. >> OKAY. WE HAVE ESTABLISHED [1:23] THAT WE HAVE A QUORUM. I WILL NOW OFFER AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT WE MEET TODAY ON THE [1:29] TRADITIONAL LANDS OF THE DAKOTA. AND WE WILL PROCEED TO OUR AGENDA. A COPY OF WHICH WAS [1:34] POSTED FOR PUBLIC ACCESS IN THE CITY'S LEGISLATIVE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, WHICH IS [1:42] AVAILABLE AT [1:48] LIMS.MINNEAPOLISMN.GOV. BOARD MEMBERS, TODAY'S AGENDA IS BEFORE US. MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE AGENDA? [1:53] >> SO MOVED. >> SECOND. >> SECOND. >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. >> AYE. >> OPPOSED. OKAY. WE HAVE AN [2:00] AGENDA ADOPTED. NEXT IS THE ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM THE [2:05] JUNE 11, 2025, MEETING. CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES. >> SO MOVED. >> SECOND. [2:11] >> ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. >> AYE. [2:16] >> OPPOSED. OKAY. WE HAVE AN AGENDA BEFORE US. AND I'M SORRY, WE HAVE MINUTES ARE ADOPTED. [2:24] ITEM NUMBER 4 ON OUR AGENDA TODAY IS THE ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC COMMENT. AND THE CLERK [2:30] INFORMED WE DO HAVE INDIVIDUALS HERE WHO ARE INTERESTED IN COMMENTING. WE HAVE -- I WONDER [2:38] IF WE CAN HAVE A SHOW OF HANDS OF HOW MANY PEOPLE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. OKAY, ONE, TWO, [2:44] THREE, FOUR, FIVE. OKAY. >> I THINK THAT'S SIX. >> WE HAVE A 10-MINUTE LIMIT. [2:50] THAT GIVES EVERYBODY TWO MINUTES APIECE. AND WE'LL START WITH TONY TILLMAN, PLEASE. [3:06] >> THANK YOU, BOARD MEMBERS, FOR HEARING ME TODAY. MY NAME IS TONY TILLMAN AND I LIVE AT [3:14] 1037 36th AVENUE NORTHEAST WITH MY WIFE MOLLY, AND TWO DAUGHTERS, MARINA AND SONYA. THE [3:22] PARK BOARD BUDGET PROPOSES THE ELIMINATION OF FIVE ICE RINKS. SO I'M HERE TO TALK ABOUT ICE [3:28] RINKS. THE BEST THING I DID THIS PAST YEAR WAS HOLDING MY WIFE'S HAND AS SHE GAVE BIRTH TO OUR [3:35] DAUGHTER SONYA. THE SECOND BEST THING I DID THIS PAST YEAR WAS HOLDING MY DAUGHTER MARINA'S [3:42] HAND AS SHE LEARNED TO ICE SKATE AT WYNDHAM PARK. IN THE DEAD OF WINTER, NIGHTS ARE LONG AND [3:49] BEDTIMES COME EARLY. I'LL RUSH HOME AFTER A LONG DAY AT WORK, SCRAMBLE TOGETHER OUR WARM [3:55] CLOTHES AND SKATES. I GRAB MARINA AND SWING DOWN TO WYNDHAM [4:01] WHERE THE LIGHTS ARE ON AND WAITING FOR US. IT MAY BE 12 DEGREES OUTSIDE, BUT WHEN WE STEP OUT ON TO THE ICE, OUR [4:07] WORRIES MELT. FRIENDS FROM THE COMMUNITY ARE THERE TOO. I WATCH AS SHE RACES ACROSS THE ICE WITH [4:12] A FRIEND TRYING TO CATCH SOMEONE'S DAD. THE SKATES SLIDE [4:18] ACROSS THE ICE, WHILE SMILES AND LAUGHTER IGNITE ACROSS THEIR FACES. THIS IS WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT. THESE ARE THE MOMENTS WE [4:30] EXIST FOR. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ICE RINK IS THE PLACE WHERE WE CAN GATHER OUTSIDE WITH FRIENDS AND [4:37] NEIGHBORS ON COLD, DARK EVENINGS. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ICE RINK IS THE PLACE WHERE MY LITTLE BROTHER TJ THROUGH BIG [4:44] BROTHERS BIG SISTERS HAS ACCESS TO AN OUTDOOR WINTER SPORT. [4:51] THEY'RE THE LIFE BLOOD PUMPING THROUGH A CITY THAT LOVES AND EMBRACES WINTER. OUR [4:56] NEIGHBORHOOD ICE RINK IS TO MY FAMILY, MY COMMUNITY, AND SO MANY IN OUR CITY A PLACE OF [5:01] WINTER MAGIC. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. PLEASE, LET'S [5:07] KEEP THE ICE RINKS. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. CRAIG, IS IT [5:17] CARLON? >> KARLAN, YEAH. FOLKS, THANKS FOR HAVING ME. THAT'S GREAT. [5:24] YEAH. TWO MORE SECONDS TO PLAN. LIKE MY NEW FRIEND TONY WHO I [5:30] MET A LITTLE BIT AGO, I'M JUST A LITTLE FURTHER DOWN THE ROAD. I [5:36] LIVE RIGHT BY BRACKET PARK. I RECENTLY SPOKE AT A PARK BOARD MEETING ABOUT KEEPING THE [5:42] MATTHEWS RINK. I LIVED IN MINNESOTA MY WHOLE LIFE. I'M A [5:48] SAINT PAUL SCHOOL TEACHER. AND I MARRIED INTO LIFERS. THANKS FOR [5:54] WELCOMING ME. SINCE THEY WERE LITTLE AND FOR GENERATIONS BEYOND, WE'VE BEEN DOING THE LIONS SHARE OF OUR STUFF AT THE [6:02] PARKS. LONGFELLOW PARK, HIAWATHA SCHOOL PARK, MATTHEWS PARK. [6:07] LATELY I'VE JUST BEEN THINKING ABOUT HOW MUCH IMPACT THE RINKS THEMSELVES HAVE HAD ON OUR FAMILY. BOTH OF MY KIDS STILL [6:13] PLAY REC HOCKEY. I'VE GOTTEN INTO IT MYSELF. BUT MAYBE MY FAVORITE MOMENT THIS WINTER WAS [6:19] WHEN I WAS AT PLAY IT AGAIN SPORTS AND I BUMPED INTO A STUDENT OF MINE. SHE AND HER [6:24] SISTER WHOSE FAMILY IS ORIGINALLY FROM MEXICO AND THEY WERE BUYING THEIR FIRST PAIR OF ICE SKATES. I WAS SO HAPPY. I [6:31] TOLD THEM HAVE A GREAT TIME. BUT YOU GOTTA PROMISE ME IF IT DOESN'T GO WELL, YOU'VE GOTTA GO [6:38] A SECOND TIME. WHERE I GREW UP IN MADISON, MY PARENTS TOOK ME SKATING WHEN I WAS LITTLE. I [6:44] LIVED IN MILWAUKEE, THEY HAD NONE. SAINT PAUL, WHICH I LOVE, [6:50] HAS LOVELY RINKS BUT THEY FILL UP QUICK. I KNOW SOME OF THEM ARE DEPENDENT ON VOLUNTEERS, [7:01] WHICH IS GREAT. HERE IN MINNEAPOLIS, WE HAVE LIKE A [7:07] UNIQUELY SPECIAL, WE ALL KNOW THAT, RIGHT? BUT AS FAR AS THE ICE RINKS GO, THERE'S NO OTHER [7:12] CITY AROUND THAT I'VE EVER EVEN HEARD OF THAT HAS ANYTHING LIKE WHAT WE HAVE FOR OUR OUTDOOR [7:19] RINKS. IT'S THE BEST SIX WEEKS OF WINTER. I KNOW IT'S EXPENSIVE BUT PLEASE KEEP THEM BECAUSE NO [7:25] ONE ELSE HAS THEM. AND ONCE THEY'RE GONE, I THINK THEY'RE GONE. SO THANK YOU, FOLKS. [7:31] >> WHILE I'M CALLING UP CADAR [7:37] DISSPONDA, I SHOULD REMIND PEOPLE THAT YOU'RE NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE YOUR ADDRESS IF THAT CAUSES YOU A CONCERN. BUT YOU [7:44] ARE CERTAINLY FREE TO DO SO. AND MAYBE IF YOU GIVE YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WOULD HELP [7:52] PEOPLE LOCATE WHERE YOUR CONCERNS ARE COMING FROM. OKAY. >> GOOD AFTERNOON, [7:57] COMMISSIONERS, MR. MAYOR. MY NAME IS CADAR DISHPONDE AND I [8:05] LIVE IN WHITTIER. I'M HERE TO ADVOCATE FOR THE PARKS. THEY [8:11] PROVIDE GREEN SPACE. THEY PROVIDE EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AND JOBS AND [8:17] MENTORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUNG PEOPLE IN THE CITY. YOU'LL HEAR A LOT OF STATS AND FIGURES ABOUT THAT AND YOU PROBABLY KNOW THAT YOURSELF. BUT I THINK [8:24] WHAT'S MORE IMPORTANT ARE THE SOCIAL CONNECTIONS THAT THE PARKS CREATE. I RECENTLY MET ONE WOMAN, A SINGLE MOTHER WHO MOVED [8:30] TO MINNEAPOLIS RECENTLY WITH HER FAMILY, WITH HER YOUNG KIDS. SHE'S A REFUGEE, AND SHE WAS [8:35] LOOKING FOR STABILITY IN HER LIVES FOR HER CHILDREN. THE PARKS ARE WHAT PROVIDED THAT [8:40] STABILITY. THEY PROVIDED EDUCATION. THEY PROVIDED SWIM LESSONS. THEY PROVIDED BIO BOOKS [8:51] FOR THE KIDS TO LEARN ABOUT ANIMALS AND FLORA IN THEIR NEW CITY. THEY PROVIDED STABILITY [8:57] FOR THESE KIDS AND THEIR FAMILIES. IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, THIS WOMAN ALSO SUFFERED [9:03] THROUGH A PAINFUL DIVORCE LATER ON. AND THOSE KIDS FELT THAT ACUTELY. ONCE AGAIN, IT WAS THE [9:08] PARK STAFF AND THE REC CENTERS THAT PROVIDED THE STABILITY THAT THEY NEEDED TO GET THROUGH THIS [9:14] PAIN. SHE'S NOW THRIVING. HER KIDS ARE THRIVING. AND THAT CAME AT A RELATIVELY LOW COST TO THE [9:19] CITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF THIS GREAT PLACE THAT WE LOVE. SO [9:25] THANK YOU FOR REMEMBERING THE PARKS. THANK YOU FOR THE SERVICE THAT YOU PROVIDE TO OUR CITY AND TO OUR RESIDENTS. I APPRECIATE [9:32] IT. >> THANK YOU. WE NEXT HAVE ON OUR LIST BRITNEY, IS SHE HERE? [9:40] OKAY. THANK YOU. >> HI, EVERYBODY. THANKS FOR HAVING ME. MY NAME IS BRITNEY [9:48] ZELINSKI. I'M A MOM OF THREE YOUNG KIDS AGES 13 TO 5. SO I'M JUST HERE TO SPEAK ABOUT HOW [9:56] ESSENTIAL THE PARKS ARE. WE LIVE IN NORTH MINNEAPOLIS, HARRISON PARK TO BE EXACT. AND IT'S NOT JUST A GREEN SPACE, IT'S BEEN A [10:02] LIFE LINE FOR ME. THROUGH THE PARK PROGRAMS, MY SON'S ACTUALLY BEEN ABLE TO SKATE, ICE FISH, [10:10] KAYAK, RIDE BIKES, PLAY BASKETBALL, AND EVEN TEACH HIM HOW TO COOK. THERE WERE TIMES [10:15] WHEN I'VE STRUGGLED TO AFFORD GROCERIES, AND THE PARK PROVIDED LUNCH FOR MY KIDS, AND THAT MEANS EVERYTHING TO ME. SO I'VE [10:22] STRUGGLED QUITE A BIT, AND THE PARKS HAVE DONE MORE THAN [10:27] ENOUGH. MY DAUGHTER LOOKS FORWARD TO ARTS AND CRAFTS EVERY WEDNESDAY. IT'S HER TIME TO BE [10:33] CREATIVE AND FEEL SEEN. SHE'S BEEN BULLIED AT SCHOOLS, AND THE PARK HAS ACTUALLY GIVEN HER SPACE WHERE SHE'S WELCOMED AND [10:40] INCLUDED. NEARLY EVERY DAY WE'RE AT THE PLAYGROUND OR THE POOL OR JUST BEING TOGETHER AS A FAMILY [10:46] AT THE PARKS. SO EVERY EVENT, EVERY ACTIVITY, WE'RE THERE. SO BECAUSE THESE PARKS -- SORRY. [10:52] BECAUSE THESE PARKS HAVE GIVEN MY CHILDREN EXPERIENCES THAT I COULD NOT GIVE THEM, I'M VERY [10:58] CONFIDENT THAT THESE PARKS NEED TO STAY AROUND. THEY'VE MADE THEM BUILD -- HAVE FRIENDS, [11:04] BUILD CONFIDENCE, STAY OUT OF TROUBLE, STAY ACTIVE AND FEEL LIKE THEY BELONG IN THE [11:09] COMMUNITY MPLET SO WHEN YOU'RE THINKING ABOUT FUNDING OR SUPPORT, PLEASE KNOW THAT INVESTING IN OUR PARKS ISN'T ABOUT LAND OR FACILITIES, IT'S [11:16] ABOUT INVESTING IN KIDS LIKE MINE AND FAMILIES LIKE OURS WHO DEPEND ON THESE SPACES TO GROW, [11:22] CONNECT AND THRIVE. THANK YOU. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. >> THANK YOU. NEXT WE HAVE [11:29] CHRISTINE ARMBUSTER. EXCUSE ME [11:34] IF I BUTCHER ANYBODY'S NAME. >> YOU WERE PRETTY CLOSE. YOU DID A PRETTY CLOSE JOB OF THAT. [11:41] I'M CHRISTINE ARMBREWSTER. I'M A RESIDENT OF LIND ALE NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU FOR HAVING US HERE TODAY AND ABLE TO [11:48] SPEAK AND CAREFULLY CONSIDER THESE BIG BUDGET CHOICES. I AM A TRANSPLANT TO MINNEAPOLIS. I [11:53] MOVED HERE A YEAR AND A HALF AGO. I HAD A LIST AS I WAS DEBATING BETWEEN STAYING IN [12:00] PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, WHERE MY FAMILY IS AND MOVING HERE. I [12:06] HAD A PROS AND CONS LIST. THINGS RELATED TO THE PARKS HERE WERE THE TOP FOUR THINGS WHY TO MOVE [12:12] TO MINNEAPOLIS. IT INCLUDES TRAIL RUNNING CLUBS THAT I'M A PART OF. I SWAM ACROSS NACOMAS [12:21] YESTERDAY. I ABSOLUTELY LOVE ICE SKATING. 37-YEAR OLD WOMAN TO GET A PAIR OF ICE SKATES UNDER [12:28] THE CHRISTMAS TREE YESTERDAY -- NOT YESTERDAY, CHRISTMAS FROM MY FATHER BROUGHT ME SO MUCH JOY I [12:34] CANNOT EVEN EXPRESS. EVEN FALLING FELT OKAY. BECAUSE I WAS [12:39] ABLE TO GET BACK UP AND DO IT AGAIN. BUT I ABSOLUTELY LOVE THE COMMUNITY PARK SERVICE HERE AND [12:45] I'M VERY GRATEFUL FOR IT. I AM A PARTNER WITH A MEET MINNEAPOLIS, ONE OF THE BIG TOURISM PROGRAMS [12:52] HERE. MY BUSINESS IS ONE OF THEIR PARTNERS. I GET SO MUCH INFORMATION FROM THEM CONSTANTLY [12:57] REMINDING US THAT THIS IS ONE OF THE GREATEST PLACES TO LIVE IN THE COUNTRY. IT HAS HIGH [13:04] HAPPINESS RATES. IT HAS SO MUCH ACCESS TO THE OUTDOORS. AND IT'S INCREDIBLE TO LEARN THAT 99% OF [13:13] CITIZENS OF MINNEAPOLIS HAS ACCESS TO PARKS WITHIN A 10-MINUTE WALK. AND THAT GOES ACROSS EVERY DEMOGRAPHIC, THAT [13:19] GOES ACROSS EVERY INCOME BRACKET. THAT GOES ACROSS EVERY [13:25] GEOGRAPHICAL PART OF THE CITY. THAT IS WONDERFUL. THAT MEANS THAT THE PARK SYSTEM IS THE BACKBONE OF OUR ENTIRE CITY [13:31] ALMOST AS MUCH AS EVERY ROAD AND EVERY OTHER PIECE OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND SLOWLY [13:36] GUTTING IT WILL SLOWLY GUT THE INSIDES OF OUR CITY. PLEASE TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. WE HAVE ONE [13:45] ADDITIONAL NAME HERE. CLAUDIA CALLAHAN. IS THERE ANYBODY IN [13:56] THE ROOM WHO HASN'T SIGNED THE SIGN-IN SHEET TO SPEAK? OKAY. [14:03] WHY DON'T YOU COME UP AND GIVE YOUR NAME PLEASE -- OH, THERE YOU ARE. APPARENTLY TWO MORE. GO [14:10] AHEAD. JUST GIVE US YOUR NAME [14:16] AND YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD IF YOU COULD, PLEASE. [14:23] >> I WAS TRYING TO GET THROUGH THE GOVERNMENT CENTER AND THE TUNNEL STALL. I DIDN'T KNOW HOW [14:32] TO SIGN IN. >> GO AHEAD. YOU HAVE A COMMENT [14:37] RELATED TO THE PARKS? OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE ON OUR AGENDA? >> AM I READY TO GO? [14:43] >> YEAH, YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES. >> OKAY. I WAS BORN IN [14:49] MINNEAPOLIS, AND WHEN ME AND MY FRIENDS WOULD GO OVER TO THE LYNDALE PARK ROSE GARDEN, THIS [14:55] ROSE GARDEN IS THE COUNTRY'S SECOND OLDEST PUBLIC ROSE [15:00] GARDEN. IT IS ALMOST 120 YEARS OLD. THIS GARDEN IS A 60-YEAR [15:06] PRECURSOR TO THE WHITE HOUSE ROSE GARDEN THAT WAS DESIGNED BY JACQUELINE KENNEDY. IN 2006, I [15:13] STARTED TO VOLUNTEER AT THE ROSE GARDEN. MANY OF THE ROSE BEDS [15:18] WERE EMPTY. THESE ROSE BUSHES HAD ROSE HIPS, WEEDS AND [15:27] SUCKERS. A COLLEGE EDUCATED ROSE GARDENER WAS -- 450 ROSE BUSHES [15:39] DONATED. THE ROSE GARDENER ALSO SAID ROSES GROW WITH OTHER FLOWERS. THE ROSE GARDEN USES [15:46] BENEFICIAL FLOWERS AND BEES INSTEAD OF PESTICIDES. ROSES [15:52] GROW EVERY DAY WITH OVER 4,000 ROSE BUSHES AND THIS GARDEN [15:58] NEEDS MORE THAN DAILY EMPLOYEES TO HELP MAINTAIN THE ROSE GARDEN. NOW WITH LIMITED HOURS, [16:04] THE STUDENTS AND OTHER VOLUNTEERS HAVE STOPPED COMING. [16:11] WE HAVE SATURDAY, EVERY SATURDAY VOLUNTEER HOURS, BUT NOW IT'S [16:16] CUT BACK TO TWO HOURS A MONTH. SO FROM 15 HOURS TO 14 HOURS [16:23] VOLUNTEER TIME. BEAUTIFUL ROSES DO NOT GROW WILD. THIS 4,000 [16:29] BUSH ROSE GARDEN NEEDS MORE THAN ONE MAN TO UPKEEP IT. FOR THE ROSE GARDEN TO HAVE A CHANCE TO [16:35] LIVE ANOTHER CENTURY, IT MUST HAVE MORE EMPLOYEES AND NEW GENERATIONS OF VOLUNTEERS [16:42] WORKING FOR MORE THAN 4 HOURS. I ALWAYS TELL THE SMALL CHILDREN THAT THIS IS THEIR GARDEN. WE [16:47] MUST TAKE CARE OF THE ROSE GARDEN TO MAKE IT LAST ANOTHER CENTURY. >> AND COULD YOU GIVE US YOUR [16:53] NAME, PLEASE. >> LINDA JOHNSON. >> OKAY. THANK YOU, MS. JOHNSON. [17:03] I BELIEVE THE COMPANION PLANTING WITH THE ROSES THIS YEAR IS [17:11] ELISUM, IT'S PURPLE IN THE ROSE GARDEN. >> YES. TO GET RID OF THE JAPANESE BEETLES. YES. [17:17] >> OKAY. THANK YOU. WE HAVE ONE MORE. >> THANK YOU. [17:22] >> -- PERSON. ERIC VEGEL. I'M [17:36] JUST GOING TO EXERCISE THE CHAIR'S DISCRETION TO BEND THE RULES AND GO BEYOND THE 10-MINUTE LIMIT. SO GO AHEAD. [17:42] >> HI, MY NAME IS ERIC VIGO. I'M HERE TO TALK ABOUT PARK FUNDING. [17:49] I'VE BEEN A COACH IN THE TITANS ORGANIZATION, WHICH IS A YOUTH HOCKEY ORGANIZATION IN NORTH [17:54] MINNEAPOLIS FOR ABOUT EIGHT YEARS NOW. I ALSO COACH RBI [18:00] BASEBALL, RBI SOFTBALL AT WYNDHAM PARK, LOGAN PARK, WHEREVER IT WILL TAKE ME AND [18:06] WHEREVER THERE'S A FIELD TO PLAY. I JUST THINK THESE PARKS [18:12] PROVIDE FOR YOUTH TO LEARN SKILLS THEY DON'T GET ANYWHERE ELSE. CORE VALUE OF MINNEAPOLIS [18:18] TO PROVIDE THESE OPPORTUNITIES FOR OUR YOUTH. AND MAKING SURE OUR FIELDS ARE SAFE FOR OUR KIDS. THAT THEY HAVE A SAFE [18:24] PLACE TO PLAY. I WAS LISTENING TO THE SOFTBALL FIELD NEEDS. I [18:29] KNOW BASEBALL WE HAVE NEEDS. THE OUTDOOR RINKS IN THE WINTER. I THINK ABOUT WHAT IT MEANS TO BE [18:35] A MINNEAPOLIS RESIDENT, TO BE A MINNESOTAN. AND HAVING THESE OUTDOOR OPPORTUNITIES ARE [18:41] VALUABLE. I SAW YOU AT THE MAYOR'S CUP GAME. KIDS LOVE THOSE OPPORTUNITIES AND THEY [18:46] GROW SO MUCH. I ESPECIALLY THINK COMING OUT OF COVID, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE TO PROVIDE THOSE OPPORTUNITIES AND MAKE SURE [18:52] THEY'RE FUNDED. PEOPLE MAKE OUR LIFE. AND YOU GET THAT EXPERIENCE AT TEAM OR GROUP OR [18:58] PLAYING WITH YOUR FRIENDS IN THE PARK. SUPER VALUABLE. THANKS FOR YOUR TIME. [19:04] >> THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE A CLAUDIA HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? THANK YOU. IF YOU COULD [19:11] GIVE US YOUR NAME AND YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WOULD BE WONDERFUL. >> YES. MY NAME IS CLAUDIA [19:17] CALLAHAN AND I LIVE IN KINGFIELD. ONE OF THE MAIN [19:22] REASONS -- WHAT'S ONE OF THE MAIN REASONS MINNEAPOLIS IS A GREAT CITY? THIS YEAR, THE [19:28] MINNEAPOLIS PARK SYSTEM PLACED THIRD ON THE NATIONAL 2025 PARK [19:35] SCORE INDEX, ONLY AFTER WASHINGTON D.C. AND IRVING, [19:41] CALIFORNIA. IT'S SOMETHING WE CAN BE PROUD OF. IN MINNESOTA, WE TAKE PARKS SERIOUSLY. THERE'S [19:47] ANOTHER PICTURE WE CAN BE EVEN MORE PROUD OF, IT'S HOW THESE [19:52] PARKS MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN THE LIVES OF INDIVIDUALS, CHILDREN AND FAMILIES AND OLDER FOLKS WHO [20:01] LIVE IN MINNEAPOLIS. IT'S OUR PARK BOARD STAFF WHO DEMONSTRATE GREAT WORK ETHIC AND DEDICATION [20:07] EVERY DAY. COMMUNITY GARDEN, A [20:14] PARK BOARD LEGACY GARDEN TEMPORARILY CLOSED LAST SPRING. AND BECCA GROSS, THE COORDINATOR [20:22] PROCURED RAISED BEDS, COMPOST, AND SET UP THE WATER FOR GARDENERS AT THE WHITTIER REC [20:28] CENTER. THIS SUMMER, WE AGAIN HAVE GARDENERS IN THIS SPACE AND IT IS ALSO USED BY WHITTIER KIDS [20:36] IN THEIR SUMMER PROGRAMMING. AND INCLUDING IN THEIR DAILY CHORE AS THEY'RE LEARNING ABOUT PLANTS [20:43] AND GARDENING. AS A GARDENER, I'M GRATEFUL FOR THE PARK BOARD. [20:50] IN MINNEAPOLIS, MOST FOLKS LIVE IN APARTMENTS, WITH MORE [20:56] APARTMENTS BEING BUILT ALL THE TIME. OUR PARKS WILL BE MORE [21:02] IMPORTANT NOT LESS IMPORTANT TO THESE FOLKS AND THESE APARTMENTS, AND THE COMMUNITY AS TIME GOES ON. IN 2024, [21:10] MINNEAPOLIS PARKS WON THE NATIONAL GOLD MEDAL AWARD FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PARKS [21:16] AND RECREATION ADMINISTRATION. [21:23] WE HAVE SUCH AN AMAZING PARK SYSTEM HERE. PLEASE VOTE TO KEEP [21:31] AND MAINTAIN IT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. >> THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO [21:37] TESTIFY ABOUT PARKS? OKAY. IT LOOKS LIKE WE'VE EXHAUSTED THE SUPPLY OF PEOPLE WHO WANTED TO [21:44] DISCUSS THIS ISSUE TONIGHT. I CAN ASSURE YOU THAT WE'LL KEEP YOUR COMMENTS IN MIND DURING THE [21:50] BUDGET PRESENTATION BY THE PARK BOARD THAT IS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THIS. AND ALSO IN [21:56] SEPTEMBER WHEN WE TAKE ACTION ON THE LEVY. NEXT, I'LL ASK THE [22:02] CLERK TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE COMMENTS. AND WE HAVE NOW ITEM 5 [22:07] ON THE AGENDA. IT IS LISTED AS THE ANNUAL REPORT ON THE [22:15] NPP20-YEAR PARK PLAN. BUT IT ALSO WILL INCLUDE THE 2026 BUDGET OUTLOOK FOR THE PARK [22:20] BOARD. AND WHO WILL BE [22:27] PRESENTING? >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, MEMBERS, THANK YOU FOR HAVING US HERE TODAY. I'M JENNIFER RINGOLD, I'M [22:34] THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT FOR THE PARK BOARD. SUPERINTENDENT [22:41] BEN GORA IS OUT. YOU DO HAVE TWO [22:46] BODIES. ONE IS THE -- THE OTHER ONE IS REFLECTIVE OF OUR WORK ON [22:51] NPP20 AND 2024. JULIA WEISSMANN [22:56] WILL LEAD THIS, AND THEN MICHAEL SCHROEDER WILL JOIN HER. [23:10] >> WELCOME. >> GOOD EVENING, PRESIDENT [23:15] BRANDT, AND VICE PRESIDENT PREE-STINSON, AND BOARD MEMBERS. I'M JULIA WEISSMANN. I'M GOING [23:32] TO START WITH OUR 2026 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET PLAN. THIS IS SIMILAR BUT DIFFERENT THAN THE CITY'S CURRENT SERVICE LEVEL [23:39] PRESENTATION THAT THEY GAVE TO THIS BODY AT THE LAST MEETING. [23:45] WE USE THE 2026 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET PLAN AS THE BASE FOR OUR [23:52] DEVELOPMENT OF OUR 2026 BUDGET. WHAT I'M PRESENTING TO YOU THIS [23:57] EVENING IS PRELIMINARY NUMBERS. IT IS NOT THE FORMAL ASK FOR [24:04] MAXIMUM PROPERTY TAX LEVY. OUR BOARD WILL DO THAT WORK IN JULY, [24:09] AND WE WILL COME BACK TO THIS BODY IN SEPTEMBER AND PRESENT [24:15] THE FORMAL BOARD APPROVED MAXIMUM TAX LEVY. THIS FOCUS -- [24:27] THE FOCUS OF THIS PRESENTATION WILL BE ON THE GENERAL FUND. THE [24:35] ADOPTED PLAN INCLUDED 6.33% [24:40] PROPERTY TAX LEVY INCREASE, AND HELD BOTH LGA AND OTHER REVENUES [24:49] CONSTANT. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THIS PIE CHART, 82% OF OUR GENERAL FUND IS FUNDED THROUGH PROPERTY [24:56] TAXES. SO WE ARE MUCH MORE HEAVILY RELIANT ON THAT ONE [25:02] FUNDING SOURCE THAN THE CITY. [25:10] OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS OUR PROPERTY TAX LEVY INCREASE HAS BEEN APPROXIMATELY 5.6%. I'LL [25:19] HIGHLIGHT ON THIS CHART, IN 2017, THAT IS WHEN THE NPP20 [25:27] STARTED. THAT'S WHERE YOU SEE THE 10% INCREASE. IN 2022 IS WHEN THE INVESTMENT IN YOUTH [25:34] BEGAN WITH THE $1.3 MILLION INCREASE IN 2022, AND THEN [25:42] GRADUAL INCREASES BETWEEN 2023, [25:51] 2027 OF $260,000. SO THAT IN 2027, WE WILL HAVE A TOTAL OF [25:57] $2.6 MILLION FOR THE YOUTH INVESTMENT. 2025 INCREASE OF [26:06] 8.3% AS REMINDER TO THIS BODY WAS LARGELY TO SUPPORT THE MPRB [26:14] WORKFORCE AS WELL AS TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO DISCOUNTED YOUTH PROGRAMMING. FOR LGA, IT IS [26:27] BEING HELD CONSTANT. AT THE END OF THIS CURRENT LEGISLATIVE SESSION, THERE WERE NO INCREASES [26:33] IN LGA, AND LUCKILY NO DECREASES IN LGA. SO IT IS BEING HELD [26:39] CONSTANT. OUR OTHER REVENUES [26:45] AVERAGE 10.5 MILLION OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS. AND YOU'LL SEE [26:52] FOR 2025, OUR 2026 PLAN, WE ARE HOLDING THAT AMOUNT CONSTANT AS WELL. I'LL JUST SAY THAT OUR [27:07] YOUTH FEES DISCOUNTED CITY WIDE THAT IS THE FIRST, 2025 IS THE FIRST YEAR WE HAVE DONE THAT. [27:13] OUR PRELIMINARY NUMBERS ARE REALLY POSITIVE. BUT IT'S TOO [27:20] SOON TO UNDERSTAND THE FULL IMPACT. -- TO THE REVENUE. ALL [27:27] FEES ARE ADJUSTED ANNUALLY BASED ON MARKET RESEARCH. ON THE [27:36] EXPENDITURE SIDE, OUR 2026 PLAN, YOU'LL SEE THAT SALARY AND FRINGE MAKE UP ALMOST 73% OF THE [27:45] GENERAL FUND BUDGET. THE 2026 PLAN PROVIDES THE TAIL FOR THE [27:52] MPRB UNION CONTRACTS, WITH MOST UNIONS SETTLED THROUGH [28:00] 12-31-2026. YOU'LL SEE THAT AS A LINE ITEM IN FURTHER SLIDE. OUR [28:15] 2026 PLAN PROJECTS FOR A 5.1% [28:21] OVERALL GROWTH TO THE MPRB GENERAL FUND, WITH ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP DIVISION HAVING THE [28:28] LARGEST PORTION OF OUR GENERAL FUND BUDGET, ALMOST 50%. AND THAT INCLUDES OUR ASSET [28:34] MANAGEMENT, FORESTRY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. SO IN [28:43] ORDER TO HAVE A BALANCED BUDGET IN 2025, OVER THE TWO-YEAR [28:50] BUDGET CYCLE, WE HAD TO IMPLEMENT SERVICE LEVEL [28:55] REDUCTIONS. AND THEY WERE LARGELY IN OUR RECREATION CENTERS WHERE WE REDUCED OUR REC [29:01] CENTERS BY ONE HOUR SO THEY CLOSE AT 8 P.M. INSTEAD OF 9 P.M. ALL RECREATION CENTERS [29:07] ARE NOW CLOSED ON SUNDAYs, AND ALL RECREATION CENTERS ARE NOW CLOSED ON ALL FEDERAL HOLIDAYS. [29:14] AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE REDUCTION OF THE FIVE ICE RINKS OF WHICH WE HAD THE PUBLIC [29:21] SPEAKERS SPEAKING TO DIRECTLY. WE ALSO USED ONE-TIME TEMPORARY [29:26] BUDGET REDUCTIONS. IF YOU REMEMBER, WE HAD REQUESTED A BUDGET INCREASE FOR GRACO PARK, [29:33] WHICH WAS NOT FUNDED LAST YEAR. GRACO PARK HAS OPENED, AND WE [29:40] HAVE LIMITED ACTIVATION AT THE NEW GRACO PARK IN NORTHEAST MINNEAPOLIS. AND WE UTILIZED [29:49] BUDGET SAVINGS FROM THE CLOSURE OF THE NORTH COMMONS POOL. IT IS CLOSED AND BEING DEMOLISHED FOR [29:56] THE NORTH COMMONS CONSTRUCTION. AND SO IT'S A TEMPORARY FIX AND IT ALLOWED US LIMITED [30:04] ACTIVATION. SO IT'S ONLY OPEN WEDNESDAY THROUGH SUNDAYs. AND THEN WE CLOSED THE YOUTH [30:10] INVESTMENT GAP, WHICH WAS [30:16] $520,000 IN 2025 -- OR -- YEAH, IN 2025. AND WE DID THAT BY [30:22] HOLDING POSITIONS VACANT AND NOT [30:27] DOING A TRANSFER TO PARK LAND ACQUISITION FUND. SO WHAT [30:34] CHANGES HAVE HAPPENED SINCE THE BUDGET PLAN WAS ADOPTED BY OUR BOARD? THIS SLIDE SHOWS [30:41] ADJUSTMENTS TO OUR ASSUMPTIONS [30:48] FOR THE 2026 PLAN, WHICH CENTER ROUNDS CITY CHARGES TO THE MPRB. THE FIRST IS GENERAL FUND [30:53] OVERHEAD CHARGE. AND IT IS CURRENTLY ESTIMATED AT 35.8% [31:01] INCREASE. CONVERSATION AROUND THIS CHARGE IS CONTINUING. WE ARE DOWN TO ONE ITEM OF [31:07] DISCUSSION THAT WILL TAKE PLACE BETWEEN PARK BOARD STAFF AND [31:14] CITY STAFF TOMORROW. THE MPRB AGREES THAT WE SHOULD PAY THE PAIR SHARE OF SERVICES THAT ARE [31:21] PROVIDED TO THE MPRB. DISCUSSION HAS BEEN AROUND CLARIFYING WHAT [31:28] SERVICES ARE BEING PROVIDED AND TO WHAT EXTENT. FOR EXAMPLE, A [31:35] PREVIOUS VERSION OF THIS CHARGE INCLUDED $502,000 FOR 311 [31:42] SERVICES. AFTER FURTHER RESEARCH TO UNDERSTAND CALL LEVELS, THIS NUMBER WAS CHANGED TO JUST UNDER [31:48] $67,000. THE NEXT CHART SHOWS [31:58] COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WORK DAY. THE MPRB DOES NOT PAY A DIRECT [32:05] CHARGE FOR THE CURRENT FINANCIAL SYSTEM COMMENT. WE PAY [32:10] INDIRECTLY THROUGH OUR GENERAL FUND OVERHEAD RATE MODEL BUT DO NOT PAY A DIRECT CHARGE. GOING [32:15] FORWARD, THE PARK BOARD WILL PAY FOR WORK DAY IN THE NEW FINANCIAL SYSTEM, ONGOING USER [32:23] LICENSE FEES AND A SEPARATE BUDGET TOOL. SO THIS IS NOW PUT [32:32] INTO THE SIX-YEAR PROJECTIONS. I WILL ALSO SAY THAT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF WORK DAY HAS [32:39] BEEN -- OR IS BEING PAID FOR BY THE CITY. THE PARK BOARD HAS NOT [32:44] BEEN ASKED TO PAY ANY PORTION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION FEE. SO WE [32:51] REALLY APPRECIATE THAT. HERE ARE [32:57] SIXth YEAR FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS. THEY ARE VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT WE PRESENTED [33:02] LAST YEAR. THE ONLY CHANGES IN 2026 WITH THE INCREASE INSTEAD OF BEING 6.33%, IT'S 7.15%. AND [33:14] THAT IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE CITY CHARGES. ALSO INCLUDED IN [33:25] OUR PROJECTIONS ARE WORKFORCE AND OTHER OPERATING COSTS BUILT IN TO PROVIDE THE SAME LEVEL OF [33:31] SERVICE FOR NEW PARKS, FACILITIES, AND AMENITIES. 2026 [33:36] INCLUDES GRACO AND UPPER HARBOR TERMINAL PARKS. 2027 INCLUDES [33:43] NORTH COMMONS. THIS CHART SHOWS THE FTE CHANGES BETWEEN 2023 AND [33:53] 2026. AND I'LL HIGHLIGHT 2025. THAT IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE SERVICE LEVEL REDUCTIONS AND THE [34:00] RECREATION CENTER. THAT 13.71 DECREASE IN FTEs. AND THEN THE [34:06] 2026 PLAN, THE 9.72FTEs IS [34:12] DIRECTLY RELATED TO GRACO AND UPPER HARBOR TERMINAL PARKS. SO [34:18] NOW THE MAXIMUM PROPERTY TAX LEVY PLAN. THE ADOPTED BUDGET [34:27] FOR THE CITY INCLUDES CITY'S FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE PARK [34:33] BOARD. AND IT IS 1.37%. INCLUDED [34:43] IN THAT IS THE $260,000 FOR THE YOUTH INVESTMENT. $300,000 FOR [34:49] GRACO AND UPPER HARBOR TERMINAL [34:57] PARK. YOU'LL SEE I HAVE A CHART NUMBER ONE, TWO, AND THREE SHOWN ON THIS. WE'LL GET TO THE CHARTS [35:03] LATER. BUT IF YOU GO BACK TO THIS PRESENTATION, THE NUMBERS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THAT CORRESPONDING CHART. SO FOR THE [35:16] PARK BOARD, WE HAVE OUR PROVISION FOR WAGE ADJUSTMENTS, [35:21] THE 3.2 MILLION. SO THAT IS ALL OF OUR WAGE INCREASES DUE TO OUR [35:27] UNION CONTRACTS, OUR RECLASSIFICATION, OUR MARKET ADJUSTMENTS, OUR EQUITY [35:35] ADJUSTMENTS, HEALTH INSURANCE, WORKER COMP, PERA, AND STATE [35:46] FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE. THIS NUMBER IS SET AT APPROXIMATELY 4%. AND IT INCLUDES A SLIGHT [35:55] CATCH UP ON THE INFLATION. WE HAVE SEEN 26% INFLATION, AND [36:02] HAVE ONLY BUDGETED 12%. SO THIS IS JUST A SLIGHT INCREASE OVER [36:07] OUR NORMAL INFLATION TO DO A SLIGHT CATCH UP. IT ALSO [36:13] INCLUDES INCREASES TO OUR INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION, AND OUR [36:19] EQUIPMENT OPERATIONS, AGAIN, DUE TO UNION CONTRACTS AS WELL AS [36:25] STATE MANDATED CHANGES TO WORKERS COMPENSATION. YOU'LL SEE [36:31] THE TWO ITEMS HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW. THOSE ARE THE NEW ITEMS. AND THEN GRACO AND UPPER HARBOR [36:38] TERMINAL PARK. SO CURRENTLY THIS [36:43] IS THE GAP BETWEEN WHAT THE PARK BOARD IS ESTIMATING FOR THE 2026 [36:50] BUDGET, AND WHAT THE CITY IS CURRENTLY ESTIMATING FOR US. SO [36:57] CHART ONE IS THE FULL BUDGET. WE ARE REQUESTING ALMOST $7 MILLION [37:04] OF THE MAYOR'S ADOPTED BUDGET AT [37:11] 1.3 -- THAT'S A GAP OF [37:16] 5.1 MILLION. IF YOU LOOK JUST AT THE SALARY AND FRINGE TO SUPPORT [37:23] OUR WORKFORCE AND NOT HAVE ANY POSITION ELIMINATIONS, THE GAP [37:30] IS 2.5 MILLION, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 22 FTEs. AND THEN [37:37] TO MAINTAIN OUR SERVICE LEVELS WITH THE ADDITION OF GRACO AND UPPER HARBOR TERMINAL PARKS, WE [37:44] HAVE A GAP OF 560,000. JUST [37:53] GOING TO TOUCH ON OUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. WE HAVE [38:01] $146.4 MILLION INVESTMENT. IT'S BROKEN UP BETWEEN NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND REGIONAL PARKS. THEY'RE FUNDED VERY DIFFERENTLY, [38:07] AS YOU KNOW. THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK CAPITAL BUDGET IS FUNDED THROUGH THE BONDS, OF WHICH THIS [38:16] BODY AUTHORIZES. CAPITAL LEVY PARK DEDICATION GRANTS AND [38:21] DONATIONS. OUR REGIONAL PARK SYSTEM IS LARGELY FUNDED THROUGH THE STATE AND METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, FOLLOWED BY OTHER [38:27] GRANTS AND DONATIONS. IN THE 2025 LEGISLATIVE SESSION, IT [38:34] INCLUDED A SLIGHT INCREASE IN O & M LOTTERY PROCEEDS, ALLOCATION [38:42] OF NEW LOCAL GOVERNMENT ROAD FUNDING GAP ASSISTANCE. SO THAT'S A NEW AMOUNT TO SUPPORT [38:48] OUR PARKWAYS. LCCMR ALLOCATION, LEGACY, AND SKATE PARK FUNDING. [38:57] WE ALSO HAVE EARLIER THIS YEAR, THE MPRB AND THE MINNEAPOLIS [39:03] PARK FOUNDATION APPROVED AN AGREEMENT TO ESTABLISH A NEW AND [39:09] FORWARD LOOKING ENDOWMENT. ONCE FUNDED, THE ENDOWMENT WILL [39:15] PROVIDE ONGOING SUPPORT FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, HISTORIC INFRASTRUCTURE, AND REGIONAL [39:21] PARK AND TRAIL CARE AND MAINTENANCE WITHIN THE MINNEAPOLIS PARK SYSTEM. THESE [39:28] AREAS WERE CHOSEN FOR THE ENDOWMENT BECAUSE THEY ARE -- THEY RECEIVED THE LEAST AMOUNT [39:33] OF FUNDING THROUGH OTHER SOURCES. >> I'M SORRY. COULD YOU REPEAT [39:39] THOSE AREAS, PLEASE. >> IT IS NATURAL RESOURCES, [39:45] HISTORIC INFRASTRUCTURE, AND REGIONAL PARK AND TRAIL CARE AND [39:51] MAINTENANCE. >> THANK YOU. [39:56] >> SO GOING FORWARD, AS I SAID IN THE BEGINNING, OUR BOARD WILL TAKE UP THE MAXIMUM PROPERTY TAX [40:05] LEVY CONVERSATION IN JULY, WITH THE ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE ON JULY 2ND, AND THE [40:10] FULL BOARD ON JULY 16TH. AND THEN THE MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET WILL COME OUT. THE BET [40:19] WILL SET THE MAXIMUM PROPERTY TAX LEVY. ON OCTOBER 15TH, THE SUPERINTENDENT WILL PRESENT THE [40:24] RECOMMENDED 2026 BUDGET. SO DO [40:29] YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ON THIS PART OF THE PRESENTATION? [40:37] >> COMMISSIONER PAYNE. >> THANK YOU, PRESIDENT BRANDT. [40:43] BACK ON PAGE 9, WE HAVE SOME PRETTY HIGH LEVEL BUCKETS AND I'M WONDERING IF YOU COULD GIVE [40:50] SOME MORE DETAIL. AND SPECIFICALLY, I'M LOOKING IN TO WHAT THE BREAKDOWN MIGHT BE OF [40:56] THE SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE AND THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE. >> SURE. MEMBER PAYNE AND [41:06] PRESIDENT BRANDT, THE SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE INCLUDES [41:11] THE OUTWARD SERVING DEPARTMENTS. SO IT'S PARK POLICE, OUR [41:17] COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION, AND OUR COMMUNICATIONS AND MARKETING DEPARTMENT. THE DEPUTY [41:24] SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE INCLUDES THE INTERNAL SERVICES. SO [41:31] FINANCE, I.T., VISITOR SERVICES, [41:37] WHICH HAS BOTH FACING WHOM I FORGET, HR. THAT'S A BIG ONE. HR. >> SO IT WOULD BE ALL THE FTE [41:45] BUDGET AS WELL AS WHATEVER PROGRAMMATIC BUDGET WOULD BE [41:51] INCLUDED? >> THAT'S CORRECT. >> THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. I THINK I'LL HOLD MINE. [41:57] DO YOU WANT -- OH, DID YOU HAVE A QUESTION? >> NO. [42:03] >> OKAY. COMMISSIONER CHUGHTAI. [42:08] >> THANK YOU, MR. PRESIDENT. I'M SORRY. I JUST DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS IS. CAN YOU TELL ME WHAT [42:14] VISITOR SERVICES IS IN THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE. >> SAY THAT ONE MORE TIME, PLEASE. >> WHAT'S VISITOR SERVICES? [42:21] >> VISITOR SERVICES IS, NUMBER ONE, OUR CALL CENTER. IT'S ALSO [42:29] OUR ACTIVATION OF NON-RECREATION AREAS. SO OUR MAJOR EVENTS. SO [42:38] LIKE PRIDE AND JUNETEENTH AND BOTH PERMITTED EVENTS AND PARK [42:47] BOARD RELATED EVENTS. AM I MISSING ANYTHING? [42:57] >> THANK YOU, MEMBERS. THIS IS ALSO WHERE DOWNTOWN PARKS [43:02] PROGRAMMING COMES OUT OF. ANYTHING OUT OF WATERWORKS COMMONS, GRACO COMES OUT OF THAT [43:08] SPACE AS WELL. YEAH. SO ALL OF OUR PERMITTED EVENTS. SO IF YOU [43:16] WANT TO ERASE SOMETHING THAT'S IN THE SYSTEM, THIS IS THE GROUP [43:22] THAT'S DOING IT. >> THANK YOU. >> ALL RIGHT. GO AHEAD. [43:28] >> IF THERE'S NO OTHER QUESTIONS, WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE [43:33] NPP 20 ANNUAL REPORT. SO AGAIN, [43:40] PRESIDENT BRANDT, WE ARE HERE TO PRESENT OUR 20-YEAR NEIGHBORHOOD [43:49] PARK PLAN 2024 ANNUAL REPORT. THIS IS RESULTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2024. THIS IS GOING [43:55] TO BE SLIGHTLY ABBREVIATED THAN WHAT YOU'VE SEEN IN THE PAST SINCE YOU GRACIOUSLY ALLOWED US [44:01] TO DO THE BUDGET INFORMATION. SO THE GUARANTEED ANNUAL MINIMUM [44:07] AMOUNT, THAT IS THE BONDING AMOUNT. AND YOU'LL SEE STARTING [44:13] IN 2027 THAT THAT'S HELD CONSTANT AT 13.1 MILLION AND [44:19] THAT IS BECAUSE BY ORDINANCE, THE PARK BOARD AND THE CITY MUST [44:24] AGREE ON THE NEXT FIVE YEARS OF [44:29] MINIMUM AMOUNTS FOR 2027 AND 2031. SO WE HAVE PROVIDED OUR [44:35] PROPOSAL TO THE CITY, AND WE WILL START DISCUSSIONS ON THAT. [44:41] WE NEED TO ADOPT THAT LEVEL OF FUNDING BY DECEMBER 15TH OF THIS YEAR. I'LL NOW TURN IT OVER TO [44:52] ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL SCHROEDER. [44:57] >> THANK YOU, PRESIDENT AND MEMBERS. I WILL RUN THROUGH OUR CAPITAL PROGRAM AND OUR REHABILITATION PROGRAM. AND IT [45:05] WILL BE AN OVERVIEW, AND WILL STAND FOR QUESTIONS. IF YOU THINK ABOUT THE CAPITAL PROGRAM, [45:10] THESE ARE NEW INVESTMENTS AND PARKS AS OPPOSED TO THE REHABILITATION PROGRAM WHICH IS [45:16] OUR ABILITY TO CARRY A PARK ASSET FORWARD WITH REPAIRS OR REPLACEMENTS UNTIL IT GETS [45:22] REPLACED IN A CAPITAL PROGRAM. SO THE CAPITAL PROGRAM IS REFLECTED IN THE BUDGET IN THE [45:27] SIX-YEAR BUDGET APPROVED BY THE BOARD. IT FOLLOWS THE EQUITY ORDINANCE. SO WE DO AN EVALUATION OF ALL OF OUR PARKS [45:33] AND NEIGHBORHOODS EVERY YEAR. AND WE'RE ANTICIPATING THAT WE [45:38] WILL COMPLETE ALL CAPITAL INVESTMENTS IN ALL PARKS IN THE [45:43] FIRST ROUND OF CAPITAL INVESTMENTS PROBABLY IN 2035. [45:52] MAYBE 2034. THE REHABILITATION PROGRAM IS FOCUSED ON THOSE THINGS THAT MIGHT FAIL DURING THE REGULAR USE OF A PARK, AND [45:58] BEFORE WE GET TO A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT. BUT SEVERAL OTHER THINGS HAVE HAPPENED. WE'VE HAD SOME CRITICAL FAILURES. IN THE [46:05] FIRST YEAR OF NPP20, ONE OF OUR RECREATION CENTERS HAD A CRACKED BEAM. REQUIRED THE CLOSURE OF [46:12] THE BUILDINGS. BUT THIS IS REALLY FOCUSED ON REPAIRS AND [46:18] REPLACEMENT TO TIDE US OVER UNTIL WE GET TO A CAPITAL PROJECT. EVERY YEAR WE DO AN [46:23] ASSESSMENT OF OUR PARKS. RANKING THOSE ASSETS THAT NEEDS REHABILITATION AND TAKING THEM [46:30] ON PRIORITY ORDER. UPDATING THAT BECAUSE THINGS CONTINUE TO FAIL AS WE MOVE THROUGH ANY ONE OF [46:36] OUR OPERATIONAL YEARS. IN 2023, [46:42] THERE WERE NINE REHABILITATION CATEGORIES. I WON'T GO THROUGH THEM ALL. BUT YOU SEE THEM LISTED HERE ON THE PAGE. THESE [46:51] SEVERAL PAGES WILL IDENTIFY THOSE CATEGORIES OF REHABILITATION ALLOCATIONS, THE DOLLAR AMOUNT AND THE PERCENTAGE [46:57] ALLOCATED, AND THE PERCENTAGE COMPLETED. 2023, WE HAVE COMPLETED 100% OF THE DOLLARS [47:05] THAT WERE ALLOCATED BY THE BOARD FOR THESE NINE CATEGORIES. 2024, [47:12] IT'S MOSTLY SIMILAR EXCEPT THERE ARE SOME THINGS LIKE ADA IMPROVEMENTS. SOME OF THE [47:19] PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE IN REHABILITATION WILL REQUIRE MORE DOLLARS THAT ARE AVAILABLE IN A [47:24] SINGLE YEAR. AND SO WE WILL CARRY THOSE OVER. SO THAT'S WHY THE ADA IMPROVEMENTS ARE LOWER. [47:31] IT'S SIMILAR WITH THE HVAC SYSTEMS IN BUILDINGS. THAT'S WHY THAT NUMBER IS LOWER. AND THEN [47:38] THERE WAS A NEW CATEGORY ADDED BY THE BOARD IN 2024 FOR THE REHABILITATION OF ATHLETIC [47:45] FIELDS. VERY FEW DOLLARS HAVE BEEN SPENT THERE. WE NEED TO [47:51] BUILD UP DOLLARS. PARTICULARLY BASEBALL DIAMONDS. AS DIRECTOR [47:57] WEISSMAN NOTED, IN 2025, THE ALLOCATIONS PERCENT BUDGETED WAS [48:02] ZERO BECAUSE THIS WAS DONE AS OF THE LAST DAY OF DECEMBER 2024. [48:09] FOR CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, AS I NOTED, WE EVALUATE, SCORE, AND [48:15] RANK ALL OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS IN THE SYSTEM EVERY YEAR. USING THE CRITERIA THAT ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE ORDINANCE. AND [48:20] THEN WE ALLOCATE FUNDING TO THOSE PARKS. THE DIAGRAM AT THE [48:27] BOTTOM IS IMPORTANT NOT SO MUCH FOR THE COLORS AND WORDS BUT BECAUSE IT REFLECTS THE [48:33] THREE-YEAR PROCESS IT TAKES US. THE FIRST YEAR IS REALLY ABOUT SCOPING THE PROJECT AND ENGAGING THE COMMUNITY. THE SECOND YEAR [48:40] IS DESIGN AND PROCURING BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION. AND TYPICALLY, THAT WORK CONTINUES INTO THE [48:46] THIRD YEAR WHERE WE'RE ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTING. AND WE'RE LIMITED IN THIS IN SOME WAYS BECAUSE WE [48:52] HAVE A LIMITED SEASON FOR IMPROVEMENTS AS WE LOOK AT HOW PARKS ARE ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTED. [48:58] THESE ARE THE PROJECTS THAT WERE IDENTIFIED AS 2023 CAPITAL [49:07] INVESTMENTS. SOME OF THESE PROJECTS ARE COMPLETED. SEVERAL ARE STILL LAGGING BEHIND. AND I CAN COME BACK AND FILL THOSE IN. [49:16] BUT IF YOU LOOK AT THE ADUBON WILL BE COMPLETE BY THIS FALL. [49:22] IT WAS JUST RECENTLY BID. AND THERE WERE SEVERAL FROM 2023 WHERE THE CONSTRUCTION WILL BE COMPLETED BY THE END OF THIS [49:27] YEAR. AS WE GO INTO 2024, THERE [49:35] ARE FEWER OF THEM THAT ARE COMPLETED BECAUSE THIS IS THE YEAR WE WILL BE DOING DESIGN AND [49:41] PROCUREMENT OF BIDS. ALTHOUGH SOME PROJECTS ARE FURTHER ALONG THAN OTHERS. BUT THERE WILL BE [49:47] BY THE TIME WE GET TO 2026 PRESENTATION, YOU'LL SEE THOSE [49:53] NUMBERS REFLECT PROBABLY MORE CLOSELY WHAT WE HAVE IN 2023. AND OF COURSE BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T [49:58] HAD A CHANCE TO IMPLEMENT THINGS AS OF DECEMBER 31ST USING $2,025, ALL OF THESE ARE AT [50:05] $0.00 PERCENT. BUT WE ARE MOVING FORWARD WITH SEVERAL OF THESE [50:11] IMPROVEMENTS. AS I NOTED, THE [50:16] AUDUBON PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED IN 2025 THIS YEAR YET. THERE WERE STILL A NUMBER OF [50:22] PROJECTS FROM PRIOR YEARS THAT WE HAVE YET TO BE COMPLETED. SOME OF THEM FOR ANY NUMBER OF [50:30] REASONS. 28TH STREET TOTLOT, [50:41] WE'RE MAKING IMPROVEMENTS. EACH ONE HAS A STORY TO TELL AS WE MAKE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. [50:47] YOU'LL NOTE THAT THERE ARE SOME PROJECTS IN THE LITTLE BOX AT THE BOTTOM THAT WE'RE STILL [50:52] WORKING TO COMPLETE CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROJECTS FROM 2022. [50:58] MOST OF THOSE PROJECTS OR PRACTICALLY ALL OF THOSE PROJECTS WILL BE COMPLETED BY THE END OF THIS YEAR. AND THAT [51:04] WAS A VERY HIGH LEVEL OVERVIEW. BUT DIRECTOR WEISSMANN AND [51:10] DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT RINGOLD. I WILL STAND FOR QUESTIONS. >> ANY QUESTIONS? I HAVE ONE [51:16] QUESTION. WONDERING IF THE CRACKED BEAM AT LONGFELLOW PARK [51:21] HAS BEEN REPLACED? >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, THAT WAS ONE OF THE FIRST PROJECTS WE [51:26] UNDERTOOK CLOSING THAT BUILDING AND MAKING SURE THAT BUILDING WAS SAFE FOR OCCUPANCY. IT WAS A [51:34] GREAT DEMONSTRATION OF HOW NPP20 WORKS. IDENTIFIED WE HAD A [51:39] PROBLEM IN THE BUILDINGS AND BE ABLE TO CORRECT IT IMMEDIATELY. >> I'M GLAD TO HEAR THAT. THAT [51:45] WAS SORT OF THE MARQUEE EXAMPLE OF UNDERFUNDING OF NEIGHBORHOOD [51:50] PARK BUILDINGS. I HAD A NUMBER OF QUESTIONS BUT MOST OF THEM DATE BACK TO MS. WEISMAN'S [51:56] PRESENTATION. SORT OF AT A HIGH [52:07] LEVEL, I READ THROUGH THIS PRESENTATION AND ON PAGE 16, I [52:15] FOUND A LEVY FIGURE OF [52:21] $90.7 MILLION. PAGE 12 I FOUND A FIGURE OF 94.4 MILLION. ON PAGE [52:27] 4, I FOUND A FIGURE OF 95.6. ON [52:32] PAGE -- WHICH I BELIEVE IS SORT OF YOUR IDEAL FUNDING. BUT I [52:38] WONDER IF YOU COULD PARSE THE OTHERS FOR ME, PLEASE. [52:45] >> SO CAN YOU TELL ME THE FIRST. >> SURE. THE FIRST ONE WAS [52:59] 90.7 MILLION ON PAGE 16. >> SO THIS IS THE CITY'S FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS IN PARK [53:10] BOARD LEVY. THAT'S INCLUDED IN [53:15] THE CITY'S ANNUAL BUDGET. >> WOULD THAT BE THE FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL DIRECTION? [53:21] >> CORRECT. >> OKAY. AND THEN PAGE 12, 94.4. [53:34] >> PRESIDENT BRANDT AND BOARD [53:40] MEMBERS, WE BUDGET PROPERTY [53:45] TAXES AT 98.5% COLLECTION RATE. [53:52] SO THE 94.4 MILLION IS 98.5% OF [53:59] THE MILLION WE ARE SEEKING, OR PLANNING. >> SO THAT'S THE ADJUSTMENT FOR THE COLLECTION FACTOR. PAGE 4, [54:07] 93,669. [54:12] >> THAT WAS THE 2026 PLAN THAT WAS ADOPTED BY OUR BOARD IN [54:19] DECEMBER, AND THAT REPRESENTED A 6.33% PROPERTY TAX LEVY [54:25] INCREASE. AND WE HAVE CHANGED OUR ASSUMPTIONS BASED ON THE [54:34] CITY CHARGES THAT INCREASES TO THE 7.15% THAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE IN OUR PROJECTIONS. [54:40] >> SO JUST TO BE CLEAR, THAT WAS [54:47] THE 2026 FIGURE? >> CORRECT. >> ALL RIGHT. AND THAT WAS ADOPTED IN DECEMBER. >> CORRECT. >> TO A YEAR AHEAD OF TIME. [54:52] >> CORRECT. >> OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE THAT. YOU SPOKE OF [55:00] SOME OF THE FACTORS IN TERMS OF FUNDING LIKE THE YOUTH PROGRAM. [55:06] AND THE KICKING IN OF THE NPP. BUT I NOTE THAT IN SEVEN OF THE [55:15] LAST NINE YEARS, THE PARKS -- THE PARK LEVY HAS INCREASED BY [55:21] MORE THAN THE RATE OF INFLATION. IF YOU LOOK AT NATIONAL INDICATORS. COULD YOU TALK A [55:26] LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT FACTORS IS THAT MAINLY SERVICE [55:32] IMPROVEMENTS? >> PRESIDENT BRANDT AND MEMBERS, [55:38] SO IN 2022 WAS THE 1.3 MILLION FOR THE YOUTH INVESTMENT. IN 23, [55:48] 24, AND 25, THERE'S -- FOR THE YOUTH INVESTMENT. I'M NOT GOING [55:54] TO GET THESE YEARS CORRECT, BUT WE DID ADD A PROJECT POSITION. [56:00] WE ADDED ONE POSITION ONE YEAR. [56:08] AND WE HAD -- INVESTMENT FOR [56:13] WHICH PLACES? YEAH. AND WE'VE HAD THE ADDED AMENITIES AND [56:21] PARKS FOR LIKE NORTH LOOP, WATER WORKS, AND THOSE WERE INCLUDED [56:29] IN '23 AND '24 AS WELL. >> OKAY. ON PAGE -- I'M SORRY, I [56:37] DON'T HAVE THE PAGE NUMBER ON MY SCREEN. I NOTED IN 2024, YOU [56:45] SPENT WELL UNDER $1 MILLION IN REVENUES THROUGH ARPA. IS THAT [56:54] REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ROAD, I MEAN, THE CITY SPENT $700 MILLION. DID YOU NOT SHARE [57:00] IN THE LARGESSE TO THE EXTENT THAT YOU'RE, FOR EXAMPLE, DOING [57:06] THE LGA SPLIT 8812. >> PRESIDENT BRANDT AND MEMBERS, [57:13] WE APPLIED FOR ARPA FUNDS THROUGH THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS [57:18] AS OTHER ORGANIZATIONS DID TO RECEIVE ARPA FUNDS, AND WE [57:27] RECEIVED $1 MILLION FOR TREES PLANTING, ADDITIONAL TREE PLANTING. AND WE RECEIVED THE -- [57:35] IN ORDER TO MEET THE 2.6 MILLION [57:41] IN 2022, WE RECEIVED 1.3 MILLION OF PROPERTY TAX DOLLARS, AND [57:50] $1.3 MILLION OF ARPA DOLLARS. IN 2023 AND 2024, AS THE PROPERTY [57:56] TAX LEVY INCREASED, OUR ARPA DOLLARS DECREASED. BUT AS YOU [58:01] KNOW, ARPA ENDED AT THE END OF 2024. AND SO THAT'S WHY WE HAVE [58:07] THE YOUTH INVESTMENT GAP THAT WE [58:13] TALK ABOUT FOR '25, '26, AND '27. AND WE ARE FUNDING THAT [58:20] THROUGH HOLDING VACANCY SAVINGS. >> OKAY. >> AND OTHER THINGS. [58:26] >> ALL RIGHT. AND THEN I NOTE WITH INTEREST THE LGA, WHICH IS [58:33] NO SURPRISE. THAT'S BEEN THE HISTORY WITH LGA BOTH FOR THE CITY AND THE PARK BOARD. WANTED [58:44] TO ASK YOU -- I'LL SKIP OVER THE [58:51] DISPUTE OVER THE FEES THAT ARE CHARGED BY THE CITY. I'M [59:05] DISAPPOINTED THAT RECREATION CENTERS ARE CLOSED ON FEDERAL HOLIDAYS. THAT'S THE DAY WHEN [59:11] SOME PARENTS ARE AROUND, BUT MANY ARE NOT. THAT'S WHEN KIDS ARE OUT OF SCHOOL. AND WE SAW [59:19] WHAT HAPPENED IN 2020 WHEN KIDS WERE SUDDENLY LEFT WITHOUT PARK [59:25] PROGRAMMING, AND THE RATE OF CRIME AMONG YOUNGER PEOPLE JUMPED DRAMATICALLY. I [59:31] UNDERSTAND YOU HAVE IT MAKE CUTS SOMEWHERE. BUT I REALLY REGRET [59:38] THAT ONE. THERE'S ALSO A -- DID [59:47] YOU SAY THAT GRACO PARK IS OPEN WEDNESDAY THROUGH SUNDAY? [59:52] >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, THAT'S CORRECT. WE DO HAVE -- I SHOULD [59:58] CORRECT. WE DO HAVE A SPARK STUDIO LOCATED AT THAT FACILITY. AND THAT SPARK STUDIO IS ALREADY [1:00:05] INCLUDED IN OUR BUDGET. SO THERE'S NOT AN ADDITIONAL ASK FOR THAT. THAT WAS PART OF THE [1:00:12] $2.6 MILLION YOUTH INVESTMENT. AND THAT FACILITY IS OPEN MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY. [1:00:20] >> OKAY. WHY IS GRACO PARK OPEN WHEN OTHER RECREATIONAL CENTERS ARE NOT? I MEAN, I'M HAPPY IT [1:00:32] IS. I'M GOING TO A RETIREMENT PARTY THERE. BUT -- >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, MEMBERS, SO [1:00:37] WHEN WE ANALYZED HOW TO OPEN UP THAT FACILITY, WE REALLY LOOKED AT THE NATURE OF IT BEING IN A [1:00:44] REGIONAL PARK, AND WHERE WE THOUGHT FOLKS WOULD BE NEEDING TO USE RESTAURANTS AND OTHER [1:00:52] AMENITIES IN THE PARK. SO WE SWITCHED TO INCLUDE WEEKENDS. IF WE WERE TYPICAL RECREATION [1:00:58] CENTER MODEL, WE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO HIT THE WEEKENDS IN THE WAY WE FELT THE PARK NEEDED TO. [1:01:05] WE ALSO HAVE A PARK THAT ALLOWS RENTALS ON MONDAY AND TUESDAY. SO THERE'S THAT POSSIBILITY. IF [1:01:12] WE'RE ABLE TO RECOUP THE COST OF THE STAFFING TO COVER THOSE RENTALS, THERE WOULD BE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE IN THAT SPACE [1:01:17] ON THOSE DAYS. >> OKAY. AND I BELIEVE IT WAS MENTIONED THAT IN ORDER TO MAKE [1:01:24] THE BUDGET FIT INTO THE RESOURCES YOU HAD THAT THE [1:01:31] ACQUISITION FUND WAS NOT FUNDED IN ONE OF THE RECENT YEARS. AM I REMEMBERING CORRECTLY THAT [1:01:37] THAT'S ABOUT A $400,000 ITEM? MAYBE I'M OUT OF DATE. [1:01:43] >> JUST GOT THE NUMBER FROM THE SIDE. PRESIDENT BRANDT, MEMBERS, [1:01:51] THAT'S $276,000 THAT WE PUT TOWARD THAT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. >> THAT WAS USED FOR THE [1:01:58] INVESTMENT. >> AND THAT WAS USED FOR THE YOUTH INVESTMENT GAP. COMMISSIONERS MIGHT MAKE [1:02:04] DECISIONS ON THAT IN FUTURE YEARS IN TERMS OF HOW TO PRIORITIZE THOSE DOLLARS. BUT THAT'S HOW IT WAS USED THIS [1:02:09] YEAR. >> IS THAT PROPERTY TAX MONEY? >> THAT IS PROPERTY TAX MONEY. >> ALL RIGHT. WANTED TO ASK YOU [1:02:18] AS WELL ABOUT THE ENDOWMENT AGREEMENT, WHICH INCLUDES THE [1:02:23] HISTORIC INFRASTRUCTURE. I GUESS THE STEVEN'S HOUSE PROJECT IS PRETTY MUCH COMPLETE. BUT THAT [1:02:30] WOULD BE CERTAINLY AN EXAMPLE OF HISTORIC INFRASTRUCTURE THAT WAS BADLY IN NEED OF REPAIR EVEN [1:02:36] BEFORE THE VANDALISM THAT OCCURRED THERE. FOR EXAMPLE, THE [1:02:44] GODFREE HOUSE GETS SOME OF THAT MONEY. ARE THERE OTHER PROJECTS YOU HAVE FOR THAT? [1:02:49] >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, MEMBERS, I SHOULD FIRST SAY WE ANTICIPATE IT COULD TAKE UP TO 10 YEARS TO [1:02:55] BE ABLE TO SECURE ENOUGH FUNDING INTO THE ENDOWMENT FOR US TO HAVE REGULAR PAYOUTS. WHEN WE [1:03:03] THINK ABOUT THE INFRASTRUCTURE -- HISTORIC AND OUR ICONIC HOMES. GODFREY IS ONE [1:03:09] OF THOSE. STEVEN'S HOUSE WOULD BE ONE OF THOSE. BUT WE'RE ALSO THINKING ABOUT OTHER HISTORIC [1:03:14] INFRASTRUCTURE. WPA WALLS AND SOME OF THE OTHER FAILING INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE SYSTEM THAT WE DON'T HAVE A DEPENDABLE [1:03:21] AND CONSISTENT SOURCE OF FUNDING FOR. >> THANK YOU. I WANTED TO ASK [1:03:31] JUST GENERALLY ABOUT REGIONAL PARKS. THAT'S CERTAINLY BEEN AN ISSUE FROM THE STANDPOINT OF [1:03:37] CAPITAL FUNDING. DEVELOPMENT, [1:03:42] REHAB, ACQUISITION AND SO ON. AND I'VE URGED THE [1:03:48] SUPERINTENDENT IN PAST APPEARANCES TO TRY TO COME UP [1:03:54] WITH A PLAN THAT THINKS OUT OF THE CURRENT SYSTEM FOR RAISING MONEY EITHER FOR THE CAPITAL [1:04:01] SIDE, WHICH ACTUALLY SEEMS TO BE BETTER FUNDED THAN THE OPERATING [1:04:07] SIDE. HAS PARK BOARD MADE ANY PROGRESS IN THAT AREA? I MEAN, I'M NOT A BIG GAMBLING FAN, BUT [1:04:16] I CAN ENVISION SELLING TABS AT THE REFRACTORY, FOR EXAMPLE. [1:04:21] >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, MEMBERS, [1:04:27] YEAH. IT'S IMPORTANT TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE CAPITAL SIDE AND THE OPERATING SIDE. ON THE CAPITAL SIDE, CURRENTLY ALL [1:04:33] THE FUNDING WE RECEIVE IS EITHER STATE FUNDING OR MET COUNCIL FUNDING, OR IT IS MAYBE THROUGH [1:04:40] A FEDERAL GRANT PROGRAM OR THROUGH SOME TYPE OF A DONATION. [1:04:46] THERE ISN'T PROPERTY TAX DOLLAR OR CITY-BASED BONDING THAT GOES TOWARDS THE REGIONAL SYSTEM. SO [1:04:53] THAT IS 100% NON-TAXPAYER, MINNEAPOLIS TAXPAYER BASED [1:04:58] FUNDED IN THOSE CATEGORIES. ON THE OPERATING SIDE, HOWEVER, [1:05:04] THAT'S ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY PAID BY THE MINNEAPOLIS TAXPAYER. YOU WILL NOTE THAT IN THE ENDOWMENT [1:05:10] AGREEMENT, ONE OF THE CATEGORIES THAT WE HAVE IS THE CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF REGIONAL PARKS. [1:05:18] THERE IS ON STATE LAW THE REQUIREMENT FOR 40% OF THE EXPENSES THAT WE HAVE FOR [1:05:24] OPERATING THE REGIONAL PARKS SHOULD BE PAID BY THE STATE OF MINNESOTA OR MET COUNCIL. AND WE [1:05:30] ARE NOT RECEIVING THAT LEVEL OF FUNDING. WE'RE RECEIVING SOMETHING MORE IN THE 10% RANGE, [1:05:38] IF DEPENDING ON WHICH DOLLARS THEY CHOOSE TO COUNT. >> I UNDERSTAND THAT'S THE [1:05:43] REQUIREMENT OF STATE LAW, AND I ALSO FEEL QUITE STRONGLY THAT ANYBODY WHO BELIEVES THAT'S EVER [1:05:49] GOING TO HAPPEN ALSO BELIEVES IN THE TOOTH FAIRY. THAT'S WHY I ASK. DO YOU HAVE ANY SENSE OF, [1:05:57] AND MAYBE THIS IS SOMETHING YOU CAN GET BACK TO US THROUGH OUR STAFF, BUT IF YOU LOOK AT THE [1:06:05] PROPORTION OF THE MPRB LAND MASS EXCLUDE WATER FOR THE SAKE OF [1:06:12] ARGUMENT, AND DIVIDE IT BETWEEN REGIONAL PARKS AND NEIGHBORHOOD [1:06:17] PARKS, DOES THE FUNDING FOR OPERATING PURPOSES FOLLOW THAT [1:06:23] PROPORTION? AND I SUPPOSE THEY'RE DIFFERENT SOME WAYS BECAUSE ONE INVOLVES A LOT OF [1:06:29] PROGRAMMING AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, AND THERE ARE DIFFERENT NEEDS. BUT I AM JUST CONCERNED THAT THE REGIONAL PARKS, I MEAN, [1:06:37] WE'VE DONE A GOOD JOB FUNDING THROUGH THE NPP20 PLAN, CITY [1:06:43] FOLKS AND PARK BOARD FOLKS HAVE NEGOTIATED THAT. WE'VE DONE A [1:06:48] GOOD JOB FUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS CAPITAL NEEDS, GETTING THE [1:06:54] GRASS CUT, MOWED, SO ON. I WORRY ABOUT THINGS LIKE THE SEAWALL FOR EXAMPLE, AS YOU MENTIONED. [1:07:00] SOME OF THE OTHER FACILITIES. JUST NOT GETTING THE SAME LEVEL [1:07:06] OF ATTENTION WHILE WE'RE TAKING CARE OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS. [1:07:12] >> PRESIDENT BRANDT AND MEMBERS, IF I UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION IS KIND OF HOW MUCH OF OUR [1:07:20] OPERATING DOLLARS GOING MAYBE BY PROPORTION TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK VERSUS THEIR REGIONAL PARK [1:07:26] SYSTEM. I WILL SAY THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SYSTEM IS MORE RICH IN TERMS OF THE AMOUNT OF [1:07:33] OPERATING EXPENSES AND PROCEDURES THAT WE HAVE WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SYSTEM. BUT I WOULD WANT TO GET YOU [1:07:40] OFFICIAL NUMBERS BEFORE I GUESSED AT THAT. >> OKAY. I ASKED THAT IN PART LOOKING AT THE NUMBERS FOR GRACO [1:07:47] AND UPPER HARBOR TERMINAL IN 2026 AS AN OPERATING COST [1:07:53] INCREASE. IT WOULD BE NICE TO HAVE, AGAIN, A DEDICATED FUNDING SOURCE THAT COULD BE USED EITHER [1:08:00] FOR CAPITAL OR FOR OPERATING OR FOR BOTH THAT'S NOT WAITING FOR [1:08:06] THE STATE TO -- WHEN THE STATESHIP COMES IN, LET'S SAY. [1:08:12] IT'S FRUSTRATING, BUT THAT'S MOST LIKELY NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. SO WITH THAT, I THINK I'VE [1:08:19] EXHAUSTED MY QUESTIONS AND I HOPE I HAVEN'T EXHAUSTED YOU AND I HOPE I HAVEN'T EXHAUSTED MY [1:08:25] COLLEAGUES' PATIENCE. LET'S FILE THIS ITEM AND MOVE ON TO THE NEXT. WE THANK THE PARK BOARD [1:08:31] PEOPLE WHO APPEARED BEFORE US TODAY. OKAY. ITEM NUMBER 6 IS [1:08:39] THE DRAFT BET BUDGET FOR 2026. [1:09:01] AND MS. KEIDERLING WILL PRESENT THAT TO US. GO AHEAD. [1:09:25] >> OKAY. THANK YOU, SIR. GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE. I'M HERE TO [1:09:30] PRESENT THE DRAFT BET BUDGET FOR 2026. THIS IS NOT SOMETHING YOU'RE GOING TO TAKE A RESOLUTION ON TONIGHT. THIS IS A [1:09:38] DRAFT. THESE NUMBERS MIGHT CHANGE SLIGHTLY. THERE'S VARIABLE EXPENSES. NOW THAT I'M [1:09:43] YOUR STAFFER, ONCE I ENROLL INTO BENEFITS AND THINGS LIKE THAT, THERE MIGHT BE SOME CHANGES. [1:09:49] ALSO, THE WIDELY ELECTED MEMBERS OF THIS BOARD GET A COST OF LIVING INCREASE EVERY YEAR. WE WON'T KNOW THAT UNTIL THE [1:09:56] CONSUMER PRICE INDEX COMES OUT LATER ON BECAUSE WE GO BASED ON [1:10:01] THE OCTOBER 2025 NUMBERS FOR YOUR 2026 PAY. THAT'S ALL TO SAY THERE WILL BE SLIGHT LITTLE [1:10:08] ADJUSTMENTS. BUT THIS GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT. BECAUSE I WAS [1:10:13] HIRED SO LATE IN THE YEAR ACTUALLY HAD A DRAFT OF WHAT THEY THOUGHT THE 2026 BUDGET [1:10:19] WOULD BE. I HAVE MADE SOME ADJUSTMENTS TO THAT. IN COLUMN [1:10:24] G, YOU WILL SEE MY PROJECTIONS. ANYTHING THAT'S IN RED, IF IT'S AN INDIVIDUAL ITEM, IT'S [1:10:29] SOMETHING I CHANGED THE AMOUNT ON. IF IT'S A LINE ITEM, IT'S A NEW LINE ITEM THAT I'VE ADDED. [1:10:35] FOR SOME EXAMPLES OF THAT, THE 2026BET STAFFER SALARY, I DID [1:10:42] INCREASE SLIGHTLY BOTH FOR THE STAFFER AND FOR THE ELECTED OFFICIALS. FOR THE ELECTED OFFICIALS, I WAS TRYING TO DO A [1:10:48] BEST GUEST OF WHAT YOUR COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT IS GOING TO BE. THAT IS OF COURSE A BEST GUEST BUT I DID INCLUDE IT. FOR [1:10:54] THE BET STAFFER, I INCLUDED WHAT THE COST WOULD BE IF YOU WERE TO PROMOTE THE STAFFER TO A STEP 2, [1:11:02] LIKE ANY OTHER MINNEAPOLIS EMPLOYEE, YOU CERTAINLY DON'T [1:11:08] HAVE ANY OBLIGATION TO BUT YOU CERTAINLY COULD. SO THAT IS IN [1:11:14] ROW 4 THAT YOU CAN SEE THAT SLIGHT INCREASE NUMBER. I HAVE IT FOR JUST SHY OF $5,000 HIGHER [1:11:20] THAN WHAT BUDGET ORIGINALLY HAD IT FOR. OTHER THAN THAT, I DON'T MEAN TO TAKE YOU THROUGH EVERY [1:11:25] SINGLE LINE ITEM, BUT THE MONTHLY PARKING EXPENSES I ALSO ADDED IN BECAUSE YOU PAY FOR THE [1:11:31] STAFFERS PARKING, WHICH I'M VERY GRATEFUL FOR. ALSO IT WAS EXPRESSED TO ME THAT WE SHOULD [1:11:37] REALLY BE PRIORITIZING THE GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION ANNUAL MEETING NOT [1:11:43] ONLY FOR THE STAFFER TO ATTEND BUT POSSIBLY THE WIDELY ELECTED MEMBERS IF THEY CHOOSE TO. IT IS [1:11:48] A LITTLE BIT OF EYE WATERING NUMBER IN MY OPINION BUT I'VE [1:11:54] BEEN TOLD IT'S WORTH WHILE. I DO HAVE LINE EYE EM -- ITEMS IN [1:12:01] THERE. THAT WILL BE IN CHICAGO OF NEXT YEAR. TAKING INTO ACCOUNT ALL OF THE DIFFERENT [1:12:06] THINGS THAT I'VE ADDED IN, I HAVE EXPENSES ABOUT $14,300 [1:12:14] ABOVE WHAT ESTIMATIONS WERE. JUST TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA HOW WE'RE DOING OVERALL FINANCIALLY, [1:12:19] WELL THE BET'S FUND BALANCE WAS [1:12:30] $362,000. IT WAS ESTIMATED THAT $56,000 WOULD BE USED THIS YEAR [1:12:35] IN 2025. BUT BY MY PROJECTIONS, IT WILL BE CLOSER TO $32,000, [1:12:41] JUST OVER $24,000 GOING BACK INTO THE BET'S FUND BALANCE. THE REASON FOR THAT IS BECAUSE I WAS [1:12:48] HIRED SO LATE IN THE YEAR THAT YOU GUYS BUDGETED MORE. YOU'RE [1:12:54] GOING TO HAVE THAT SURPLUS GO BACK TO THE GENERAL FUND BALANCE. BY THE END OF 2025, YOU [1:13:02] COULD EXPECT TO HAVE AROUND $330,000. TO GET AN IDEA OF WHETHER OR NOT IF YOU'RE FINANCIALLY HEALTHY, WE WOULD [1:13:09] HAVE TO LOOK AT INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICES. THAT'S A LITTLE DIFFICULT BECAUSE YOU'RE INDEPENDENT BOARD. BUT IF WE [1:13:15] WERE COMPARING YOU TO THE GENERAL FUND, THE GENERAL FUND'S BEST PRACTICES IS TO HAVE TWO TO [1:13:22] THREE MONTHS OPERATING EXPENSES. WHICH FOR YOU WOULD BE $52,000. SO YOU ARE SIGNIFICANTLY OVER [1:13:29] THAT. FOR THE CITY'S FINANCIAL POLICY IS TO HAVE 17% OF THE FOLLOWING YEAR'S ESTIMATED [1:13:36] BUDGET UNOBLIGATED PLUS A 1% CONTINGENCY. IF YOU WERE TO FOLLOW THAT YOU WOULD BE [1:13:42] REQUIRED TO HAVE JUST OVER $37,000 IN RESERVES. YOU HAVE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE THAN THAT IN [1:13:48] RESERVES. I THINK THE BET'S FUND BALANCE IS QUITE HEALTHY. CERTAINLY GOING INTO 2026, I [1:13:55] DON'T THINK THAT'S ANYTHING TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT. THAT'S NOT TO SAY WE WOULD REASSESS WHAT [1:14:01] THE LEVY IS. THE BET IS IN A FINANCIALLY ADVANTAGEOUS [1:14:08] POSITION. I WOULD SAY THAT AS OF RIGHT NOW IT IS SMOOTH SAILING FOR THE BET. IF THERE'S ANY [1:14:15] INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONS ABOUT LINE ITEMS, PLEASE LET ME KNOW AND I'D LOVE TO ANSWER THEM. [1:14:22] >> VICE PRESIDENT PREE-STINSON. >> YES. DID YOU TELL ME WHEN I WE MET THAT THE SALARIES AND WAGES ALSO INCLUDED AN AMOUNT [1:14:29] FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT? >> NOT IN THE SALARIES LINE ITEM. THIS DOES INCLUDE NOT ON [1:14:35] THE 2026, BUT IF YOU GO TO THE [1:14:43] 2025 REPORTED BUDGET, I HAVE UPDATED IT FOR WHAT YOU GUYS VOTED IN LAST SESSION, WHICH [1:14:49] INCLUDED AN ADDITIONAL $2,000 FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH WAS TAKEN FROM THE SALARY [1:14:55] LINE ITEM. ORIGINALLY YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO SAVE $27,000 BUT [1:15:01] BECAUSE YOU MOVED OVER TO PARKING AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, THAT'S WHERE THAT [1:15:07] $3 $3,000 DIFFERENCE COMES FROM. >> THANK YOU. >> COULD YOU BRING UP THE 2026 [1:15:12] AGAIN. ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? OKAY. THE PARKING DAILY, THAT'S [1:15:18] JUST THE BOARD MEMBERS WHEN WE PARK AT THE OFF RAMP, I ASSUME. [1:15:23] >> YES, AND ANY GUESTS WHO YOU ARE REQUIRING PARKING FOR. [1:15:31] >> ALL RIGHT. AS WE SIT HERE TODAY, DO YOU HAVE ANY THOUGHTS [1:15:38] ABOUT HOW FAR -- I MEAN, OUR FUND BALANCE IS I WOULD SAY [1:15:45] EMBARRASSINGLY BIG AND THAT RESULTS, AS YOU KNOW, FOR NOT HAVING A STAFFER ON FOR ALMOST FIVE YEARS.O YOU HAVE ANY [1:15:54] THOUGHTS ABOUT THE ADVISABLE DEGREE TO DRAW THAT DOWN RATHER [1:16:01] THAN USING LEVY OBVIOUSLY TO PAY FOR THE 2026 EXPENSE? >> YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. SO LIKE I [1:16:12] STATED PREVIOUSLY PER CITY FINANCIAL POLICY PER BEST PRACTICES IF YOU WERE TO MODEL [1:16:17] AFTER THE GENERAL FUND, YOU COULD PULL IT DOWN SIGNIFICANTLY MORE. IS THAT BEST PRACTICE? [1:16:23] THAT'S DEBATABLE. I HAVE REQUESTED ACCESS TO COMET, THE [1:16:29] CITY'S FINANCIAL SYSTEM. I HAVE NOT GOT THAT YET. FROM MY [1:16:34] UNDERSTANDING, THE BET HAS ALWAYS HAD A PRETTY SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT IN RESERVES, AND I WANT TO BE ABLE TO DO MORE [1:16:41] INVESTIGATION TO SEE IF THERE'S A REASON FOR THAT SPECIFICALLY BEFORE I COMMIT TO IT. BUT MY INITIAL THOUGHT WOULD BE THAT IT [1:16:47] COULD BE SPENT DOWN MORE THAN IT CURRENTLY IS. I KNOW FROM TALKING TO SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES [1:16:54] IN BUDGET, THEIR THOUGHT ON FINANCIAL HEALTH IS WE MIGHT WANT TO LOOK AT LEVY CHANGES [1:17:00] GOING FORWARD. BUT THEY'RE NOT CONSIDERING IT FOR 2026. I CAN TELL YOU CONFIDENTLY THAT'S [1:17:06] ABSOLUTELY NOT NEEDED IN 2026. WOULD IT BE NEEDED FOR 2027 [1:17:12] FORWARD, I WOULD NOT ANTICIPATE SO BUT I'D LIKE TO LOOK AT THE DATA BEFORE I ANSWER THAT, SIR. [1:17:18] >> VERY GOOD. REMIND MY COLLEAGUES THAT WE'LL ADOPT THIS LATE IN THE YEAR. ALL RIGHT. I [1:17:26] THINK WE'VE -- IF THERE ARE NO OTHER QUESTIONS, I THINK WE'VE DISPOSED OF THIS ITEM AND WE [1:17:31] WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 6. WHICH IS THE -- EXCUSE ME, ITEM [1:17:38] 7, BET WORK PLAN. AND PROCEED, [1:17:44] PLEASE. >> YES, ABSOLUTELY, SIR. SO FROM [1:17:49] OUR BET WORK PLAN DISCUSSION THAT WAS CONTINUED FROM THE LAST SESSION, WE DID GET SOME UPDATED [1:17:55] INFORMATION FOR YOU FROM PRESIDENT BRANDT'S ORIGINAL MEMO THAT CAME SEVERAL MONTHS AGO. [1:18:00] SEVERAL MONTHS AGO PRESIDENT BRANDT CIRCULATED HIS MEMO THAT ALL OF YOU UP ON THE COMMISSION [1:18:06] SAW. AND THE ANSWER WE GOT BACK WAS SOME OF THESE ITEMS MIGHT BE AVAILABLE OFF THE SHELF FROM [1:18:12] FINANCE. I FOLLOWED UP WITH OUR CFO MS. DYE AND ASKED ARE THESE [1:18:20] READILY AVAILABLE OR SOMETHING I COULD POTENTIALLY PURSUE. AFTER SPEAKING WITH FINANCE, I PARED [1:18:28] DOWN PRESIDENT BRANDT'S ORIGINAL LIST AND CAME UP WITH A LIST OF THINGS THAT ARE NOT CURRENTLY [1:18:34] AVAILABLE THAT MAYBE THE BET STAFFER COULD LOOK INTO. I'VE DIVIDED IT INTO NEAR TERM AND [1:18:39] FAR TERM. FOR THE NEAR TERM, I WANTED TO MAKE SURE IT WASN'T SOMETHING THAT WOULD REQUIRE [1:18:45] SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT IN FINANCE DURING THE BUSIEST TIME OF YEAR FOR THEM. I WANTED IT [1:18:51] THING SPECIFICALLY THAT I COULD INVESTIGATE ON MY OWN. SO FOR THE NEAR TERM, THERE WERE TWO [1:18:58] THINGS THAT ARE NOT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE OFF THE SHELF FROM FINANCE THAT I THINK THE BET [1:19:03] STAFFER COULD INVESTIGATE FOR YOU. DEBT LOAD COMPARED TO PEER [1:19:13] CITIES. FINANCE DOES NOT HAVE ANYTHING LIKE THIS. IT WOULD TAKE A DEFINITION OF WHAT IS A PEER CITY. BUT I THINK THAT'S [1:19:20] SOMETHING THAT THE BET STAFFER COULD INVESTIGATE FOR YOU AND WOULDN'T TAKE A LOT OF RESOURCES FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS. THE [1:19:26] SECOND THING THAT I THINK COULD BE ADDRESSED IN THE NEAR TERM, AS A CAVEAT, THIS WOULD REQUIRE [1:19:33] AN INVITATION FOR THE BET FROM THE CITY COUNCIL. THE CITY COUNCIL IS CURRENTLY HAVING [1:19:38] POLICY AND RESEARCH INVESTIGATE ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF REVENUE. WE HAVE A MEETING BETWEEN [1:19:45] PRESIDENT BRANDT AND VP PREE-STINSON TO MEET WITH CITY COUNCIL TO GO OVER WHAT THE SCOPE OF THAT REQUEST IS. POLICY [1:19:50] AND RESEARCH, I MET WITH THEIR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, THEY MORE THAN WELCOMED THE IDEA OF THE [1:19:57] BET STAFFER JOINING THAT EFFORT IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. THEY ARE PRETTY STRETCHED THIN WITH THEIR [1:20:02] REQUEST. SO THEY WOULD LOVE ACCESS TO SOMEONE WHO CLD TAKE [1:20:08] ON THIS WORK LOAD. IF CITY COUNCIL DOES DECIDE TO INVITE THE BET TO BE PART OF THAT PROJECT, I WOULD SAY THAT IT [1:20:14] WOULD BE A GOOD NEAR TERM PROJECT FOR THE BET STAFFER TO EITHER TAKE OVER A PORTION OF OR [1:20:20] WORK WITH POLICY AND RESEARCH TO TURN AROUND THAT REQUEST FROM BOTH THE CITY COUNCIL AND THEN WHAT WOULD BE THE BET. CURRENTLY [1:20:27] RIGHT NOW THEY PLAN TO TURN THAT AROUND BY THE END OF QUARTER 3. SO BY THE END OF SEPTEMBER THEY [1:20:33] WERE HOPING TO HAVE A REPORT BACK TO THE CITY COUNCIL. IF I HELP THEM WITH THAT, WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO GET IT TURNED AROUND A [1:20:39] LITTLE SOONER. BUT LIKE I SAID, THAT DOES COME WITH THE CAVEAT THAT YOU GUYS WOULD ALLOW ME TO [1:20:46] DO THAT, NUMBER ONE, AND CITY COUNCIL WOULD CHOOSE ME TO BE A PART OF THAT. FOR THE FAR TERM, [1:20:52] THESE ARE THINGS THAT ARE NOT AVAILABLE FROM FINANCE OR OTHER [1:20:57] CITY DEPARTMENTS OFF THE SHELF. THEY WOULD TAKE MORE INVESTIGATION AND RELATIONSHIPS AND INVESTMENT FROM PEOPLE. THIS [1:21:04] IS WHY I HAVE THEM IN THE FAR TERM. GEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS. THIS [1:21:09] IS INFORMATION THAT'S NOT READILY AVAILABLE FOR MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. SO IT WOULD TAKE A PARTNERSHIP WITH [1:21:15] THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. I WOULD HAVE TO DO PROBABLY SEVERAL REQUESTS TO [1:21:21] COME UP WITH THIS INFORMATION. IT WOULD BE A HEAVIER LIFT AND PARTNERSHIPS WHICH IS WHY I HAVE [1:21:26] IT IN THE FAR TERM CATEGORY. FOLLOWING ON, THE MAPPING OF DOLLAR FLOWS FROM SALES AND [1:21:32] SPECIAL TAXES FROM THE DOWNTOWN ASSETS FUND WITH STATE RESTRICTIONS, VARIANCES AND [1:21:38] TYPES OF USES. THERE IS SOME INFORMATION PROVIDED BY FINANCE ALREADY. HOWEVER, IT WOULD NEED [1:21:43] TO BE DISSEMINATED OUT TO TRULY ANSWER THIS QUESTION. IT'S PROBABLY GOING TO TAKE A LITTLE [1:21:50] BIT MORE WITH FINANCE. I DON'T WANT TO REQUEST THIS REPORT NOW BECAUSE IT WOULD BE MORE OF A REPORT REQUEST FROM FINANCE. AND [1:21:57] THEN FINALLY, ANALYSIS OF THE MAJOR COST DRIVERS IN THE CITY [1:22:03] BUDGET GROWTH PERHAPS SUBJECT BY PANELED EXPERTS. IT WOULD BE BOTH AN INTERNAL TEAM AND AN [1:22:08] EXTERNAL TEAM. IT'S GOING TO REQUIRE QUITE A BIT MORE RESOURCES AND QUITE A BIT MORE [1:22:14] RELATIONSHIPS. ALTHOUGH I THINK IT'S NOT READILY AVAILABLE SO A GOOD IDEA FOR A BET STAFFER TO [1:22:20] PURSUE, I THINK IT SHOULD GO IN THE FAR TERM CATEGORY. EVERYTHING ELSE THAT'S NOT LISTED ON THIS LIST WAS REPLIED [1:22:26] TO US BY FINANCE THAT THEY ARE WANTING TO TAKE SOME TIME TO COME UP WITH AN ANSWER FOR US [1:22:32] BUT THEY THINK THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO PROVIDE IT. WHICH IS WHY IT'S NOT IN THE NEAR OR FAR TERM [1:22:39] CATEGORY. SO COULD I ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS? >> COMMISSIONER PAYNE. >> THANK YOU, PRESIDENT BRANDT. [1:22:45] I WAS JUST GOING TO ADD SOME CONTEXT FOR THE COUNCIL REQUEST. [1:22:50] WE DID ACTUALLY BRING SOMETHING FORWARD AT THE LAST COUNCIL CYCLE BUT HELD IT FOR A LITTLE [1:22:55] BIT MORE REVIEW AND REFINEMENT BEFORE DOING A FINAL ACTION ON IT. >> THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE? [1:23:04] COMMISSIONER ABENE. >> THANK YOU. YOU KNOW, I WILL SORT OF DEFER TO THE ELECTED [1:23:11] BOARD MEMBERS HERE FOR THE WORK PLAN. BUT I DO THINK THIS LOOKS GOOD. I ALSO THINK THAT ON THE [1:23:19] FAR TERM IT LOOKS ACCURATE TO ME THAT THESE ARE FAR TERM ITEMS. [1:23:24] BUT I THINK THE FINAL BULLET ON THERE IS WORKING INSIDE THE CITY MORE AND IT'S A GOOD ACTIVITY TO [1:23:31] KICK OFF PRETTY SOON BECAUSE I THINK IT'S SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE VALUABLE TO MAYBE THIS BODY, [1:23:37] THE COUNCIL AND SO ON. IT WOULD HELP WITH LEARNING THE INTERNAL CITY FUNCTIONS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. I DON'T KNOW. OF THE FAR [1:23:44] TERM ONES, I DON'T KNOW IF THEY'RE TABLED FOR NOW AND WILL COME UP LATER. BUT I THINK THAT [1:23:49] ONE SEEMS LIKE IT'S ONE THAT COULD BEGIN FAIRLY SOON. JUST A THOUGHT. [1:23:54] >> IF I COULD JUMP IN ON THAT POINT. AS I TALK TO PEOPLE [1:23:59] AROUND THE CITY ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF REVENUE, A COMMON [1:24:06] RESPONSE FROM PEOPLE IS THAT THEY WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT [1:24:15] PROVERBIAL WASTE, FRAUD AND ABUSE IS NOT HAPPENING IN THE CITY BUDGET. I THINK IT'S IRONIC [1:24:21] THAT WE ALWAYS ASSUME THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS THOSE [1:24:26] CHARACTERISTICS. BUT WE GET OUR UTILITY BILLS AND WE NEVER ASSUME THERE'S WASTE, FRAUD AND ABUSE OR ANYTHING ELSE. I THINK [1:24:33] IT'S VALID WANTING TO MAKE SURE THAT CITY'S EXISTING RESOURCES ARE WELL SPENT IS CERTAINLY A [1:24:41] VALID AREA FOR ANALYSIS, AND THE GROWTH IN THOSE AREAS EXPANDING. [1:24:49] THERE'S A MODEL FOR THIS WHICH IS WHY I SUGGESTED IT COULD BE EITHER INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL [1:24:55] FOLKS OVER IN SAINT PAUL WHERE CITIZENS COMMISSION THAT INCLUDED A FORMER CITY BUDGET [1:25:01] DIRECTOR AND SOME OTHER FOLKS WITH FINANCIAL ACUMEN DID TAKE A [1:25:07] LOOK AT SAINT PAUL'S CITY BUDGET, AND NOT IN A SENSATIONALISTIC WAY, BUT THEY [1:25:13] LOOKED AT THE DRIVERS IN THE INCREASE IN THAT CITY'S BUDGET AND GAVE A BODY OF INFORMATION [1:25:19] FOR CITIZENS TO DISCUSS. I WOULD LOVE TO TACKLE THAT BEFORE WE GO [1:25:28] TO THE LEGISLATURE FOR SURE IF WE DECIDE TO PURSUE ANY [1:25:33] STRUCTURE FOR ALTERNATIVE REVENUES. BECAUSE I THINK THAT THAT WOULD HELP PUBLIC [1:25:39] ACCEPTANCE IF WE HAD PERFORMED A STUDY LIKE THIS. SO THAT'S WHY I PUT IT ON THE LIST HERE. I GUESS [1:25:48] MY QUESTION FOR MS. KEIDERLING IS, WHEN YOU SAY NEAR TERM AND [1:25:53] FAR TERM, DO YOU HAVE A SENSE OF HOW FAR OUT FAR TERM IS? [1:26:00] >> I DO NOT, SIR. BUT I CAN CERTAINLY COME UP -- IF YOU [1:26:07] WOULD LIKE TO TAKE ACTION ON EACH OF THESE FIVE ITEMS, I COULD CERTAINLY PROVIDE YOU WITH A TURNAROUND TIME. I'M NOT SURE [1:26:15] FOR A RESOLUTION IF THERE NEEDS TO BE A DUE DATE. BUT IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A RESOLUTION AND PUT IT IN THE BET STAFFER'S WORK [1:26:23] PLAN, I DON'T BELIEVE YOU WOULD NEED A DUE DATE TO DO THAT. >> OKAY. I WONDER WHAT THE [1:26:28] THOUGHTS OF MY COLLEAGUES ARE ON WHETHER WE ADOPT SOMETHING IN [1:26:33] THIS AREA OR JUST GIVE INFORMAL DIRECTION BASED ON THIS [1:26:38] PRESENTATION. COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON. >> I THINK IT GOES BACK TO WHAT I WAS SAYING AT THE LAST MEETING ABOUT WHAT'S IN THE JOB [1:26:44] DESCRIPTION VERSUS WHAT HAS TO GO IN THE WORK PLAN. IT SOUNDS [1:26:50] INITIALLY INVESTIGATIVE, IF YOU WILL. BUT ALSO ONE OF THE KEY WORDS HERE IS PARTNERSHIP. SO I FEEL -- I DON'T THINK THE DATES [1:26:56] NEED TO GO IN THERE. I AGREE WITH THAT. BUT I ALSO THINK BEFORE YOU CAN GET DATES, YOU WOULD HAVE TO SPEAK WITH THOSE [1:27:04] DEPARTMENTS TO TALK ABOUT WORK LOAD AND WHEN THAT MAY BE. BUT I DON'T THINK THERE NEEDS TO BE [1:27:10] DATES ATTACHED IN ORDER TO MAKE IT REAL. AND SPECIFIC TO THE WORK PLAN, I THINK IT COULD JUST [1:27:17] GO IN THERE IF WE WANT TO NAME IT SPECIFICALLY. AND GO BACK TO [1:27:23] THOSE WORDS THAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT LAST TIME AS WELL WHEN I TALKED ABOUT INVESTIGATE RATHER THAN RESEARCH, COORDINATE, [1:27:30] PARTICIPATE. THOSE ARE THE TYPES OF THINGS THAT WILL BE GETTING DETERMINED THROUGH DOING AN [1:27:35] INITIAL INVESTIGATION. SO I THINK WE COULD ADD IT TO THE WORK PLAN, WHICH EVERYBODY DOES [1:27:41] HAVE A COPY OF. I BELIEVE THE ONLY THING THAT WE WERE BACK AND [1:27:47] FORTH ABOUT IN THIS BRANDT MEMO WAS THE LAST ONE. THIS ANALYSIS [1:27:52] OF ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF REVENUE. I THINK THAT'S THE ONE THAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT [1:27:59] REFRAMING. AND I THINK WE HAVE. BETWEEN LAST MEETING AND THIS ONE, I THINK WE HAVE. I THINK WE [1:28:04] JUST NEED TO CHANGE THAT LANGUAGE OF ANALYSIS. TO INVESTIGATE WHAT THE COORDINATION LOOKS LIKE, [1:28:11] TIMELINE, THINGS LIKE THAT. OTHERWISE, I'M COMFORTABLE WITH WHAT WE HAVE FOR THE WORK PLAN. [1:28:17] I THINK IT'S A SIZEABLE AMOUNT FOR SOMEONE TO GET THROUGH TO [1:28:22] THE END OF THE YEAR. >> IT SOUNDS LIKE WHAT I'M HEARING IS WE WOULD LIKE YOU TO FURTHER REFINE THIS. AND BRING [1:28:31] IT BACK. I DON'T SEE ANY REASON TO HOLD OFF ON THE DEBT LOAD [1:28:40] ANALYSIS, FOR EXAMPLE. IF MY COLLEAGUES ARE AGREED, THAT SEEMS FAIRLY CUT AND DRY. AND [1:28:46] THERE ARE PEER CITIES THAT ARE COMMONLY USED TO COMPARE TO MINNEAPOLIS, AND I DON'T KNOW [1:28:52] WHO WOULD BE THE BEST ENTITY TO CALL THOSE OUT FOR YOU. BUT [1:28:59] PERHAPS WOULD THE AUDITOR HAVE DONE SOME WORK IN THAT AREA? [1:29:07] >> POLICY AND RESEARCH TEAM HAS DONE SOME PEER CITY ANALYSIS. >> GREAT. SO THAT WOULD BE A [1:29:14] RESOURCE FOR DETERMINING LIST OF POTENTIAL PEER CITIES. OKAY. ALL [1:29:20] RIGHT. COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON. >> JUST A CLARIFYING QUESTION. SO ARE WE GOING TO VOTE ON THIS, [1:29:25] WE CALLED IT THE BRANDT MEMO BEFORE. BUT ARE WE GOING TO FORMALLY VOTE ON THE WORK PLAN [1:29:32] TODAY OR ARE WE STILL WAITING FOR WHAT WE'D BE WAITING FOR? >> I WOULDN'T VOTE ON THE BRANDT [1:29:37] MEMO BECAUSE THAT INCLUDES SOME THINGS THAT WE MAY HAVE TAKEN [1:29:44] OFF THE TABLE OR BEING DONE THROUGH FINANCE. UNLESS MY [1:29:49] COLLEAGUES FEEL OTHERWISE. BUT I'D BE -- I GUESS I'M TRYING TO GET A SENSE OF WHETHER PEOPLE [1:29:55] ARE COMFORTABLE VOTING ON WHAT'S BEFORE US ON THE SCREEN OR [1:30:03] WHETHER THEY WANT OUR STAFF TO COME BACK WITH SOME MORE [1:30:09] FLESHING OUT IN THIS AREA. COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON. >> I COULD SEE THIS GETTING DRAGGED OUT FOR QUITE SOME TIME. [1:30:16] I THINK GENERAL WORK DIRECTION AND SOMEONE HAVING GENERAL WORK DIRECTION IS IMPORTANT. SO I THINK IF WE'RE NOT GOING TO VOTE [1:30:22] TODAY, I WOULD LIKE SOME CONFIDENCE AND REASSURANCE THAT WE CAN AGREE THAT BY THE NEXT [1:30:27] AGENDA SETTING, ALL OF OUR MEMBERS HAVE SOMETHING IN FRONT OF US THAT WE'RE PLANNING TO VOTE ON THAT COULD INCLUDE THESE [1:30:34] UPDATES TO BE PUT INTO A PROPER PROPOSAL FOR A WORK PLAN SO THAT WE DON'T DRAG THIS OUT TOO MUCH [1:30:41] LONGER. >> COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON, DO YOU SEE THAT AS [1:30:47] A RESOLUTION? >> POINT OF CLARIFICATION TO THE CLERK, WOULD THAT JUST NEED TO [1:30:53] BE A DIRECTION THAT WE GIVE OR FORMAL DRAFT RESOLUTION THAT WE VOTE ON AS THE WORK PLAN? [1:31:03] >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, AND VICE-PRESIDENT PREE-STINSON, I THINK IF THE BODY WANTS TO ADOPT [1:31:09] SOMETHING THAT IS, YOU KNOW, VERY DETAILED AS A WORK PLAN I THINK IT SHOULD PROBABLY BE IN A RESOLUTION. BUT I THINK THE BODY [1:31:16] COULD ALSO JUST SIMPLY KIND OF DO SOMETHING A LITTLE BIT MORE INFORMAL, BUT KIND OF BE LIKE AS [1:31:24] DESCRIBED IN MS. KEIDERLING'S [1:31:31] PRESENTATION. I THINK IT COULD BE ONE OR THE OTHER. >> I'M CERTAINLY COMFORTABLE [1:31:37] WITH THE LATTER. I HAVE NO OBJECTIONS TO THE FORMER. BUT [1:31:42] SHOULD WE GIVE THAT DIRECTION TODAY? ARE PEOPLE PREPARED TO GIVE THAT DIRECTION TODAY? >> I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THAT WAY [1:31:50] TODAY. >> ALL RIGHT. DO YOU WANT TO PUT THAT -- I GUESS WE DON'T REALLY [1:31:55] NEED A RESOLUTION. DO WE JUST WANT TO PROPOSE STAFF DIRECTION THAT MS. KEIDERLING BEGIN ON THE [1:32:06] SHORT TERM, NEAR TERM ITEMS SUBJECT OF COURSE TO THE MEETING THAT WE WILL HAVE WITH THE POWER [1:32:13] PEOPLE NEXT MONTH. AND THAT SHE WILL FLESH OUT WHAT THE REQUIREMENTS WILL BE FOR THE FAR [1:32:19] TERM ITEMS. OKAY. >> YES. >> ALL RIGHT. >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, IF I MAY, [1:32:25] SORRY. I APPRECIATE THAT AND I'M HAPPY TO TAKE ACTION ON THE NEAR TERM. FOR THE FAR TERM, [1:32:30] ESPECIALLY IF YOU WANT AN ANSWER BY NEXT MEETING AS TO WHEN THESE CAN BE TURNED AROUND. JUST SO [1:32:35] EVERYONE IS ON THE SAME PAGE, I'M GOING TO NEED FOR EXAMPLE, THE FIRST ONE TO REACH OUT TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF [1:32:42] REVENUE, FIND THE RIGHT PERSON AND GET A RESPONSE FROM THEM. AND WE HAVE HOLIDAYS IN BETWEEN [1:32:48] THERE. GOVERNMENT TYPICALLY DOES -- I'M NOT 100% POSITIVE I'M GOING TO BE ABLE TO TELL YOU I'M GOING TO GET THIS TO YOU BY [1:32:56] DECEMBER 31ST IF THAT'S THE DIRECTION I'M GETTING NOW. >> WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST IS THAT [1:33:02] YOU NOT -- THAT YOU BUNDLE THE FAR TERM ITEMS AND MAYBE BRING THEM BACK TO US WHEN YOU HAVE A [1:33:10] REASONABLE SENSE OF WHAT CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AND HOW. BUT NOT [1:33:18] SHOOT NECESSARILY FOR THE NEXT MEETING. COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON. >> YEAH, I WOULD SAY THAT OUR EXPECTATION WOULD BE REGULAR [1:33:24] UPDATES. >> YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU. >> VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. ANY [1:33:30] OTHER COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE NO FURTHER DISCUSSIONS SO WE'LL MOVE TO OUR NEXT ITEM [1:33:35] WHICH IS THE LAST DISCUSSION ITEM. IT'S THE DISCUSSION OF THE [1:33:40] VICE PRESIDENTIAL DUTIES ON THE BET. AND I'M ACTUALLY GOING TO [1:33:47] ASK COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON, VICE-PRESIDENT PREE-STINSON TO LEAD ON THIS ITEM. >> JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT [1:33:52] I WANTED US TO THINK ABOUT. NOW THAT WE HAVE A STAFFER IN PLACE, [1:33:59] WHAT WE OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS HAVE REALIZED IS THERE'S A LOT OF PROCESS THINGS JUST NOT [1:34:04] IN PLACE. SOME OF THAT IS ALSO DUE TO NEW GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE. THERE ARE JUST THINGS THAT [1:34:09] DIDN'T GET THOUGHT ABOUT. VERY SMALL THINGS AS FAR AS WHEN WE GET A NEW STAFFER, WHERE DO THEY [1:34:16] SIT? WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSIGNING? THEY COULD BE VERY [1:34:21] SMALL THINGS. THEY COULD ALSO BE LARGER ITEMS. SO I JUST, I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT THE FACT [1:34:27] THAT THROUGH PROCESS THERE'S JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT WE HAVEN'T TALKED ABOUT. ONE IS THAT THE VICE PRESIDENT DOESN'T [1:34:34] EXACTLY HAVE ANY DUTIES. THEY'LL SIT IN IF THEY HAVE TO. BUT I THINK NOW ONE OF THE THINGS TO THINK ABOUT THAT'S RIGHT BEFORE [1:34:40] US IS WE DO NOW HAVE A FULL-TIME STAFFER THAT WE WORKED VERY HARD TO GET. AND WE ALSO WANT TO MAKE [1:34:46] SURE THIS PERSON IS GETTING THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FROM THEIR SUPERVISOR, WHICH THE WAY [1:34:52] THAT IT'S WRITTEN, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, MR. HAMMER, BUT IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE THE [1:34:57] PRESIDENT. IT COULD BE THE VICE PRESIDENT, IS THAT CORRECT? [1:35:02] >> PRESIDENT BRANDT, VICE PRESIDENT PREE-STINSON AND COMMISSIONERS, YES, THAT'S CORRECT. THE ONLY THING IN THE [1:35:09] BYLAWS JUST SAYS THAT THE PRESIDENT PRESIDES OVER THE MEETINGS, AND THE VICE PRESIDENT [1:35:16] PRESIDES OVER THE MEETINGS IF THE PRESIDENT IS ABSENT. ANY COMMISSIONER ON THE BOARD, [1:35:21] PRESIDENT, VICE PRESIDENT, ANOTHER COMMISSIONER, THAT WILL ALL BE FINE. >> OKAY. I JUST THINK IT'S [1:35:27] SOMETHING WE SHOULD THINK ABOUT BECAUSE AS WE KNOW IT MIGHT NOT ALWAYS BE US SITTING HERE. IT [1:35:32] COULD BE ANYBODY. DIFFERENT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT EXPERIENCES WITH THAT. HAVING A TITLE DOESN'T MEAN YOU'RE GOING TO BE A GREAT SUPERVISOR. SOME [1:35:38] OF THE THINGS THAT WE SHOULD BE THINKING ABOUT ACROSS THE BOARD IS TRAINING FOR THE TWO ELECTED [1:35:47] MEMBERS TO KNOW HOW TO SUPERVISE AND WHAT ARE THE TOOLS AT OUR DISPOSAL TO BE GIVING END OF YEAR EVALUATIONS AND THINGS LIKE [1:35:53] THAT. THOSE ARE ALL IMPORTANT THINGS AND WE NEED TO KNOW HOW TO DO THEM. DO WE HAVE ACCESS TO [1:35:59] THOSE SYSTEMS. THAT'S ONE THING. BUT IT ALSO COULD BE THAT THE [1:36:04] VICE PRESIDENT WANTS THOSE DUTIES OR HAS MORE EXPERIENCE WITH THOSE DUTIES. I WANT TO [1:36:12] MAKE SURE IT'S CLEAR. WE NEED TO MAKE SURE FOLKS ARE AWARE AND ALSO WHO IS GOING TO DO WHAT. [1:36:18] THE THIRD THING I'M BRING UP AND IT'S FOOD FOR THOUGHT. I'M NOT EXPECTING FOR US TO DO ANYTHING [1:36:23] TODAY. I JUST WANTED TO HAVE A SMALL DISCUSSION. ESPECIALLY AS WE'RE MOVING TOWARDS BUDGET. BECAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE SOMEBODY [1:36:30] SERVING IN THAT CAPACITY BEFORE BECAUSE WE WERE WITHOUT A STAFFER FOR FIVE YEARS, HAVING [1:36:36] SOME INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT IT TOOK FROM PREVIOUS ITERATIONS MIGHT BE HELPFUL ON HOW MUCH [1:36:43] TIME THEY ACTUALLY SPENT WITH THEIR STAFFER. AND WE MAY WANT TO CONSIDER AN INCREASE IN THE PAY FOR THE PAID BOARD MEMBERS. [1:36:51] BECAUSE IT IS A SIGNIFICANT MORE AMOUNT OF WORK IF YOU'RE GOING TO DO IT RIGHT AND WELL AND DO IT JUST. AND ACTUALLY BE THERE [1:36:58] FOR THE PERSON AND BE THEIR GUIDE IN THAT WAY. SO JUST SOME THINGS I WANTED US TO THINK ABOUT WITHIN THAT REALM OF IT'S [1:37:06] NOT JUST A VICE PRESIDENT DUTY THING, IT'S REALLY A WHOLE BOARD THING TO THINK ABOUT. I'M CURIOUS IF THERE'S ANY OTHER [1:37:11] THOUGHTS ON ANY OF THE THINGS THAT I'VE TALKED ABOUT. THAT [1:37:17] ALSO WOULD INCLUDE THINGS, JUST ANOTHER PROCESS THING TO BE CLEAR ABOUT IS WHEN THERE'S NEW [1:37:22] MEMBERS TO THE BOARD. OUR PREVIOUS STAFFER THAT WE HAD FOR ONLY A MONTH OR TWO, MR. STERL [1:37:30] WAS THE ONE WHO DID OUR ONBOARDING FOR US. BUT THERE'S [1:37:35] NOTHING WRITTEN ANYWHERE THAT SAYS THAT NOR DOES IT SAY WHAT ONBOARDING MEANS. ELECTED [1:37:42] OFFICIALS THAT COULD BE ONE EXAMPLE. THESE TRAININGS THAT I TALKED ABOUT IS YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE. WE NEED PROCESS FOR [1:37:48] THAT AS WELL. I THINK WE'RE IN A PROCESS SPACE. I THINK MS. [1:37:54] KEIDERLING CAN HELP WITH THAT. I THINK WE NEED TO STRONGLY CONSIDER THESE THINGS AS WE MOVE [1:37:59] FORWARD AND WE'RE IN A DIFFERENT SITUATION THAT WE HAVEN'T BEEN FOR A LONG TIME AND THESE ARE THE TYPES OF THINGS THAT COULD [1:38:06] GET LOST. THANK YOU. >> COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON, I WOULD REACT IN THIS WAY. I THINK [1:38:12] THE AREAS THAT YOU BRING UP AS [1:38:19] WORTHY OF CONSIDERING, FOR EXAMPLE, THE NEW STAFFER, ARE [1:38:28] APPROPRIATE AND NEEDED. WHOEVER THE TWO BOARD MEMBERS WHO WILL SERVE IN THIS POSITION NOW AND [1:38:34] IN THE FUTURE HAVE DIFFERING SKILLS. FOR EXAMPLE, I WOULD GLADLY DEFER TO YOUR EXPERTISE [1:38:42] IN THE AREA OF PERSONNEL. AND I [1:38:47] THINK ONE WAY WE COULD HANDLE THIS IS TO SIMPLY OPERATE WITH [1:38:54] THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PRESIDENT WILL ASSIGN DUTIES AS [1:39:02] NEEDED TO THE VICE PRESIDENT. FOR EXAMPLE, IF WE FOLLOW THE ROTATION THAT WE'VE HAD FOR THE ELECTED MEMBERS IN THE PAST AND [1:39:09] SHOULD BOTH OF US BE REELECTED, I BELIEVE WOULD BE APPROPRIATE [1:39:17] NEXT YEAR TO CHANGE SO THAT YOU ARE THE PRESIDENT AND I AM THE [1:39:23] VICE PRESIDENT. SO IF WE LOCKED IN CERTAIN DUTIES FOR VICE PRESIDENT IN THE BYLAWS THEN I MIGHT BE STUCK WITH THINGS THAT [1:39:29] I MIGHT NOT DO BETTER THAN YOU OR YOU MIGHT DO BETTER THAN ME. [1:39:34] ANY THOUGHTS? DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? OKAY. >> I THINK THAT'S A GOOD CATCH AND I REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR [1:39:41] THINKING ABOUT THIS, VICE PRESIDENT. BUT I THINK YOUR BACKGROUND IS REALLY IMPORTANT [1:39:46] HERE. I WOULD SAY MAKE IT A LITTLE MORE FLEXIBLE BECAUSE IT [1:39:51] MAY RESULT IN AMENDS TO THE BYLAWS. YOU WOULDN'T WANT TO GET SO PRESCRIPTIVE THAT YOU'RE [1:39:57] CREATING A PROBLEM IN THE FUTURE. I THINK THAT'S A REALLY GREAT IDEA. THE TYPES OF ASSIGNMENTS OR OVERSIGHT AREAS [1:40:03] ARE REALLY IMPORTANT. AT THE PARK BOARD, WE HAD AN EXCELLENT ONBOARDING FOR THE COMMISSIONERS. AND IT REALLY GOT [1:40:10] US GOING. AND IF ANY WAY TO FORMALIZE THAT I THINK FOR PEOPLE IN YOUR SPOTS COMING IN, [1:40:17] EVEN THE PARK BOARD COMMISSIONER COMING IN, AND ALLOWING, ALSO HELPING US ALL TO UNDERSTAND THE [1:40:24] CONNECTIONS IN THE CITY AND STAFF. THAT'S A GREAT IDEA. >> COMMISSIONER ABENE, THAT [1:40:30] CERTAINLY POINTS UP THE BENEFITS OF HAVING INSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE, WHICH WE DON'T HAVE HERE AT THE BOARD OF ESTIMATE [1:40:37] AND TAXATION AT THE STAFF LEVEL. WE DID OUR LAST STAFFER WAS HERE FOR 38 YEARS, AND THEN WE HAD A GAP. SO I APPRECIATE WHAT YOU'RE [1:40:47] SAYING. UNDER NEW BUSINESS, I GUESS WE'LL MOVE ON SEEING NO FURTHER DISCUSSION. UNDER NEW [1:40:53] BUSINESS, WE HAVE A LIST OF PROJECTS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL FOR WHICH THE BOARD OF ESTIMATE [1:40:58] AND TAXATION WILL CONSIDER APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF TAX EXEMPT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS [1:41:04] AT A FUTURE DATE. MY COLLEAGUES HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT? OKAY. AND SEEING NONE, I'LL ASK [1:41:12] THE CLERK TO RECEIVE AND FILE THAT MEMO. ANNOUNCEMENTS ARE NEXT ON OUR AGENDA. DO MY [1:41:19] COLLEAGUES HAVE ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS? COMMISSIONER ABENE. >> NO ANNOUNCEMENTS. BUT I JUST [1:41:24] WANT TO -- I DON'T THINK ANYONE IS LEFT IN THE ROOM THAT CAME TO [1:41:30] SPEAK FOR THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD, BUT I APPRECIATE THE SPEAKERS WHO CAME DURING THE [1:41:36] MONSOON SEASON HERE IN MINNEAPOLIS. THERE WAS ONE WOMAN TRYING TO ARRIVE HERE WITH HER CHILDREN AND WAS SOMEWHERE [1:41:44] NEARBY AND COULDN'T FIND LOCATION AND WAS TRYING TO DO IT IN THE SKYWAYS. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I LOVE THIS CITY AND I [1:41:49] THINK WE HAVE THE BEST CITIZENS IN THE WORLD HERE. SO THANK YOU. >> I HAVE ONE QUICK [1:41:59] ANNOUNCEMENT. I'VE ASKED MS. KEIDERLING TO DO SOME INITIAL [1:42:05] WORK ON A CALENDAR FOR 2026. AND TO LOOK AT, YOU KNOW, WHAT DATES [1:42:12] ARE BLACKED OUT ON THE, FOR EXAMPLE, THE COUNCIL'S SCHEDULE [1:42:17] BY VIRTUE OF FALLING ON RELIGIOUS HOLIDAYS OR OTHER [1:42:24] THINGS. AND I'VE ALREADY GIVEN HER ONE MEAN TIME WHEN I EXPECT TO BE OUT OF THE COUNTRY NEXT [1:42:30] WINTER. AND IF YOU KNOW OF ANY OTHER CONFLICTS THAT YOU MIGHT WANT TO SCHEDULE AROUND, FEEL [1:42:37] FREE TO FORWARD THOSE TO HER. OKAY. COMMISSIONER PREE-STINSON. >> I JUST HAD ONE OTHER QUICK [1:42:43] NOTE ABOUT THE PARTICIPATION TODAY. THE GOOD WORK THAT WE DO [1:42:49] OFTEN GOES UNSEEN. BUT ONE OF THE GOOD THINGS THAT WE DID FOUR YEARS AGO WAS IN OUR VERY FIRST [1:42:55] MEETING TOGETHER WAS TO DECIDE THAT WE'D HAVE PUBLIC COMMENTARY AT EVERY SINGLE MEETING AND NOT [1:43:00] JUST THE CHARTEDER REQUIRED ONES. AND I WANT TO NOTE THAT EVERY TIME WHEN PEOPLE SHOW UP [1:43:05] IT'S NOT AN ACCIDENT. MEMBERS OF THIS BOARD HAVE DONE THE WORK TO DO THAT OUTREACH AND TURNOUT. [1:43:11] AND THE TIMES THAT WE'VE HAD THIS CHAMBER BE FILLED WITH PUBLIC COMMENT IT HAS BROKEN THE [1:43:16] RECORD. WHICH FROM THE CLERK'S OFFICE I ASKED SEVERAL YEARS AGO WAS 10 FOLKS WERE THE MAX THAT HAD EVER SHOWED UP. AND EVERY [1:43:23] TIME WE'VE HAD PEOPLE SHOW UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENTARY, WE'VE BROKEN THAT RECORD. IT GOES TO [1:43:28] SHOW THAT THE SMALLEST OF DECISIONS DO MATTER FOR PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO SHOW UP AND SPEAK [1:43:34] THEIR VOICE. THEY PUT US HERE SO THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO. IT'S A WONDERFUL THING WHEN WE SEE THAT [1:43:40] HAPPEN HERE AND RECORDS BE BROKEN PERSON BY PERSON. I JUST WANTED TO ADD THAT COMMENT. >> OKAY. THANK YOU. WE'VE [1:43:46] COMPLETED ALL THE BUSINESS SCHEDULES THAT HAVE COME BEFORE US, WITHOUT OBJECTION, WE STAND ADJOURNED.