Council Passes Immigration Resolution, Delays Police Oversight Changes
The Minneapolis City Council unanimously passed a resolution opposing mass deportations and scheduled a public hearing on the city's separation ordinance during its Committee of the Whole meeting Tuesday.
The resolution, co-authored by Committee Chair Jason Chavez and Councilmembers Chowdhury and Osman, was developed in partnership with the Immigrant Defense Network, an alliance of over 90 immigrant, legal, faith and community organizations. The council also set a public comment period for August 5 at 1:30 p.m. to receive input on the city's separation ordinance and employee authority in immigration matters.
Chavez emphasized the impact on families, noting that many students fear attending school due to concerns about Immigration and Customs Enforcement actions. "Many families in this city and in this state and in this country are afraid to go to school," Chavez said, referencing fears that parents might be detained while children are at school.
The meeting also addressed proposed amendments to the police conduct oversight ordinance, but the council voted to delay consideration by one cycle. Councilmember Wonsley requested the delay to incorporate community feedback and work with families impacted by police violence on potential amendments. The delay allows for refinement of amendments with community input before the August 12 deadline.
Civil Rights Director Michelle Phillips presented the proposed oversight changes, which include clarifying review panel composition, adding compensation for panelists, and establishing temporary commission members to address staffing gaps. The amendments also would require at least one seated Community Commission on Police Oversight member on each review panel and provide $50 payment per case reviewed.
Our proprietary artificial intelligence agent analyzed publicly available documents including meeting agendas, minutes, and transcripts to write this story to help inform local residents. Feedback helps us improve, so please consider rating how we did with the thumbs up or down below.
Go deeper on this topic
Research related meeting documents and build a brief — without rewriting the story.
Full analysis
- Minneapolis City Council struggling with jurisdictional limits in implementing state-level police accountability reforms.
- Tensions rise over ICE involvement in local incidents following June 3rd events on East Lake Street.
- Proposed doubling of 'use of force' reviews by August 2025 triggers urgent budget increase requests for external investigators.
- Internal friction regarding the efficacy of the Civilian Police Oversight Commission (CCPO) and calls for a complete structural overhaul.
Approval of immigrant families resolution and setting public hearing for August 5
Moved by Jason Chavez · Seconded by N/A
Delay police conduct oversight ordinance amendments by one cycle
Moved by Wonsley · Seconded by Councilmember Cashman
Local government, state government, federal government needs to hear from you that you want government to step up to protect our immigrant community members.
I want toground us in some real truth that there's going to be limits to what a civilian review board can do.
I would add that in addition to the information that's listed, I would add the names of the subject officers, their badge numbers.
Effective the end of August, when the force policy changes, our number of level II force reviews will require a full quality assurance review... will more than double from 33 a month to 72 a month.
Source document
[0:12] >> GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS JASON CHAVEZ, THE CHAIR OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. I WANT
[0:19] TO CALL TO ORDER OUR REGULAR COMMITTEE MEETING FOR TUESDAY,
[0:24] JULY 22, 2025. BEFORE WE BEGIN THE MEETING, I WANT TO OFFER A FRIENDLY REMINDER TO THE
[0:30] MEMBERS, PUBLIC, AND STAFF THESE MEETINGS ARE BROADCAST LIVE TO ENABLE GREATER PUBLIC
[0:36] PARTICIPATION. THESE BROADCASTS INCLUDE REAL TIME CAPTIONING AS A FURTHER METHOD TO INCREASE THE
[0:41] ACCESSIBILITY OF OUR PROCEEDINGS TO THE COMMUNITY. THEREFORE ALL SPEAK NEEDERS TO BE MINDFUL OF
[0:48] THE RATE OF OUR SPEECH IS OUR CAPTIONERS CAN FULLY CAPTURE AND TRANSCRIBE ALL COMMENTS FOR THE
[0:53] BROADCAST. WE ASK ALL SPEAKERS TO MODERATE THE SPEED AND CLARITY OF THEIR COMMENTS. AT THIS TIME, I'LL ASK THE CLERK TO
[1:00] CALL THE ROLL TO INT VERIFY THE PRESENCE OF A
[1:06] QUORUM. >> PAYNE. >> PRESENT. >> WONSLEY. >> PRESENT.
[1:12] >> RAINVILLE IS ABSENT. VIE TALL. >> PRESENT. >> ELLISON.
[1:18] >> HERE. >> OSMAN. >> HERE. >> CASHMAN. >> PRESENT. >> JENKINS IS ABSENT. >> CHUGHTAI.
[1:23] >> PRESENT. >> KOSKI. >> PRESENT.
[1:29] >> PALMISANO. >> PRESENT. >> RAINVILLE. >> PRESENT.
[1:34] >> VICE CHAIR CHOWDHURY IS ABSENT. CHAIR CHAVEZ. >> PRESENT.
[1:39] >> 11 MEMBERS PRESENT. >> WE HAVE A QUORUM. THANK YOU.
[1:44] BEFORE WE BEGIN THE PUBLIC HEARING, WE'LL TAKE UP THE CONSENT AGENDA. THE FIRST ITEM
[1:50] WE HAVE IS SETTING A PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR OUR NEXT MEETING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS REGARDING THE CITY SEPARATION
[1:56] ORDINANCE AND CITY EMPLOYEE AUTHORITY AND IMMIGRATION MATTERS. THIS PERIOD WILL BE ON
[2:02] AUGUST 5th AT 1:30 THE SECOND ITEM IS A PASSAGE OF A RESOLUTION CALLING ON THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ON THE
[2:08] CAMPAIGN OF MASS DEPORTATIONS AND FAMILY SEPARATIONS. I'LL
[2:20] MAKE THE FIRST COMMENTS. I'D LIKE TO TALK ABOUT ITEM NUMBER
[2:26] THREE. EXCITED TO BRING FORWARD THE RESOLUTION CALLING ON THE
[2:31] TRUMP CAMPAIGN TO END ITS CAMPAIGN OF MASS DEPORTATIONS AND FAMILY SEPARATIONS WITH
[2:36] COUNCILMEMBER CHOWDHURY AND OSMAN. AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, THE IMMIGRANT DEFENSE NETWORK
[2:43] WHICH ESTABLISHED THIS YEAR AND IN ALLIANCE OF OVER 90 IMMIGRANT OF LEGAL FAITH AND COMMUNITY
[2:49] ORGANIZATIONS DEDICATED TO PROTECTING AND ADVANCING THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF IMMIGRANT COMMUNITIES IN THE
[2:54] STATE OF MINNESOTA. WE SNOW T KNOW THE SAINT PAUL CITY COUNCIL WILL BE BRINGING FORWARD
[3:02] SIMILAR RESOLUTIONS AND ENCOURAGE OTHER MUNICIPALITIES ACROSS THE STATES AND COUNTRY TO DO THE SAME. ONE THING I WANT
[3:08] TO MENTION, AS WE MOVE FORWARD THIS RESOLUTION, IS THAT THERE ARE MANY FAMILIES IN THIS CITY
[3:13] AND IN THIS STATE AND IN THIS COUNTRY THAT ARE AFRAID TO GO TO SCHOOL. I MENTIONED THIS
[3:18] YESTERDAY AT AN EVENT I WAS AT. MANY OF IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE
[3:25] FEARFUL TO GETTING THEIR EDUCATION BECAUSE THE FEAR THAT I.C.E. MIGHT BE -- AND THE
[3:30] COMMUNITY -- OR FEAR THEIR PARENTS MIGHT BE TAKEN AWAY WHILE THEY'RE AT SCHOOL. AS WE THINK ABOUT THE WAYS THAT WE
[3:37] NEED TO IMPROVE OR UNJUST IMMIGRATION SYSTEM, IT'S IMPORTANT TO CENTER THE KIDS AND
[3:42] THE STUDENTS AND THE YOUNG PEOPLE THAT ARE BEING IMPACTED FROM THESE INHUMANE ACTIONS FROM
[3:48] THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. I ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR
[3:55] AUTHORS OF THE RESOLUTION HAD A TIME TO SPEAK, IF THEY WOULD WANT. FIRST PERSON ON QUEUE IS
[4:01] COUNCILMEMBER WONSLEY. >> OH. THIS IS IN REGARDS TO THE FIRST ITEM OF THE PUBLIC
[4:06] COMMENT. BUT FEEL FREE TO CONTINUE ON WITH COAUTHORS. >> PERFECT. THANK YOU. IF
[4:15] NOBODY ELSE IS ON CUE. >> VICE CHAIR CHOWDHURY. >> THANK YOU. I'LL KEEP THE REMARKS BRIEF. UMM, I WANT TO
[4:21] SAY I HAVE REALLY APPRECIATED ALL OF THE MINNEAPOLIS
[4:27] RESIDENTS, UMM, IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS. ESPECIALLY SINCE THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION BEGAN.
[4:33] REACHING TO THE COUNCIL OFFICES AND PUSHING THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS TO DO BETTER BY THE
[4:38] IMMIGRANT COMMUNITY. YOUR VOICE IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT IN THIS MOMENT. UMM, LOCAL GOVERNMENT,
[4:45] STATE GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO HEAR FROM YOU THAT YOU WANT GOVERNMENT TO STEP UP TO PROTECT OUR IMMIGRANT
[4:50] COMMUNITY MEMBERS. STRONGER SEPARATION ORDINANCE, UMM, E EFFORTS TO MAKE PATHWAY
[4:56] TO CITIZENSHIP BETTER, STANDING UP AGAINST XENOPHOBIA AND ISLAM PHOBIA. YOU HAVE A VOICE AND
[5:03] ROLE IN NEIGHBORS IN DOING THAT AND SHARING THAT IN YOUR
[5:08] NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS, BLOCK PARTIES, APARTMENT BUILDINGS. WORDS AND ACTIONS, THEY CARRY WEIGHT IN THIS MOMENT. IT IS A
[5:15] RATHER SCARY TIME IN OUR COUNTRY, BUT AS A CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, I SEE THE WAYS IN WHICH EVERYONE IS TRYING TO FIND
[5:21] WAYS TO LEAN IN AND BECOME MORE RESILIENT. AND MY HEART JUST GOES OUT TO OUR IMMIGRANT
[5:26] COMMUNITY MEMBERS WHO EVERY SINGLE DAY ARE JUST FIGHTING TO
[5:32] THRIVE IN OUR CITY. TO SURVIVE IN OUR CITY. OFTENTIMES FEEL LIKE THEY ARE PUSHED TO BE INVISIBLE. AND I WANT TO SAY
[5:39] YOU ARE NOT INVISIBLE. YOU ABSOLUTELY MATTER. AND WE, AS A CITY COUNCIL AND A LOCAL
[5:45] GOVERNMENT, WE'LL PUSH ALONGSIDE YOU TO DO EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT CITY -- THE CITY OF
[5:51] MINNEAPOLIS STAYS TO ITS VALUES OF BEING A WELCOMING CITY. AND THAT'S ALL I WANTED TO ADD.
[6:00] [APPLAUSE] OK >> OKAY. NEXT UP COUNCILMEMBER
[6:05] WONSLEY. >> THANK YOU, CHAIR CHAVEZ. I WANTED TO SPEAK TO ITEM NUMBER 2, WHICH IS THE IMMIGRATION
[6:12] ENFORCEMENT PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD, WHICH TODAY WILL BE VOTING ON SETTING THAT FOR
[6:18] AUGUST 5th, 2025. FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS TO COME AND SHARE THEIR THOUGHTS, THEIR
[6:24] FEELINGS REGARDING THE CITY'S CURRENT SEPARATION ORDINANCE. AND, ALSO ENCOURAGE THE PUBLIC
[6:29] TO WATCH THE PRESENTATION THAT WE RECEIVE FROM CITY STAFF, SPECIFICALLY MINNEAPOLIS POLICE.
[6:37] REGARDING HOW THEY ARE CURRENTLY IN COMPLIANCE WITH OUR SEPARATION ORDINANCE. UMM, AND I KNOW MUCH OF THE FEEDBACK THAT
[6:44] WE RECEIVED FROM THAT PRESENTATION AND COUPLING THAT WITH THE HORRIBLE EVENTS THAT
[6:50] TRANSPIRED ON EAST LAKE STREET ON JUNE 3rd WHERE WE NOW KNOW THE OWNERS OF THE VERY BUSINESS
[6:56] THAT WAS TARGETED WERE UNDER I.C.E., UMM, CUSTODY AND
[7:02] DETENTION. AND WE WERE TOLD MANY TIMES I.C.E. WAS NOT PRESENT. I.C.E. WAS NOT INVOLVED. SO THAT HAS PUT IN TO
[7:10] QUESTION HOW WE ARE TRULY ENFORCING AND STANDING BEHIND OUR SEPARATION ORDINANCE. AND I
[7:16] KNOW RESIDENTS WANT TO SHARE THOUGHTS AROUND THAT. AND AS COUNCILMEMBER CHOWDHURY HIGHLIGHTED, WAYS IN WHICH WE
[7:22] CAN STRENGTHEN OUR CURRENT SEPARATION ORDINANCE SO THE EVENTS THAT UNFOLDED ON JUNE 3rd NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN.
[7:28] AND E ARE NOT BEING COMPLICIT IN THE SEPARATION OF OUR IMMIGRANT FAMILIES. AND COMPLICIT WITH
[7:33] THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. [ APPLAUSE ] THAT IS TARGETING OUR IMMIGRANT
[7:39] COMMUNITIES. SO I ENCOURAGE THE PUBLIC TO TURN OUT AUGUST 5-th. THAT WOULD BE AN
[7:44] OPPORTUNITY TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS AND TO ALLOW THIS BODY TO TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION AS WE'RE PURSUING LEGISLATIVE
[7:51] STEPS TO, AGAIN, HOPEFULLY RECTIFY THOSE HARMFUL ACTIONS
[7:56] THAT TOOK PLACE. SO THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. SEEING NO ONE
[8:02] ELSE ON QUEUE, I'LL MOVE APPROVAL TO SET THE PUBLIC HEARING PERIOD FOR AUGUST 5th,
[8:08] AND MOVE APPROVAL OF THE IMMIGRANT FAMILIES RESOLUTION. AND IF THE CLERK CAN PLEASE CALL THE ROLL ON THAT.
[8:14] >> COUNCILMEMBER PAYNE. WONSLEY. >> AYE.
[8:19] >> RAINVILLE. >> AYE. >> VETAW. >> AYE. >> ELLISON. >> AYE. >> OSMAN.
[8:25] >> AYE. >> CASHMAN. >> AYE. >> JENKINS. >> AYE >> CHUGHTAI. >> AYE.
[8:30] >> KOSKI. >> AYE. >> PALMISANO. >> AYE. >> PAYNE. >> AYE.
[8:35] >> VICE CHAIR CHOWDHURY. >> AYE. >> CHAIR CHAVEZ. >> AYE. >> 13 AYES . NO NAYS.
[8:43] >> THANK YOU. THAT MOTION CARRIES. ALL RIGHT, COLLEAGUES.
[8:49] AH, NOW WE'LL TAKE UP THE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. THIS ITEM IS AN ORDINANCE RELATED TO THE POLICE CONDUCT OVERSIGHT.
[9:02] BEFORE WE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, I WANT TO WELCOME UP MICHELLE PHILIPS AND KRISTIN
[9:08] ANDERSON TO SPEAK BRIEFLY ABOUT THE CHANGES IN THE ORDINANCE. WELCOME.
[9:13] >> GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIR CHAVEZ, VICE CHAIR, AND MEMBERS OF THE
[9:19] CITY COUNCIL. THE ORDINANCE CHANGES BEING ADDRESSED TODAY ARE TO TITLE IX, CHAPTER 172 OF
[9:25] THE MINNEAPOLIS CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATED TO THE FIRE AND POLICE PROTECTION, POLICE CONDUCT OVERSIGHT. THE CHANGES
[9:33] TO THE ORDINANCE YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU ARE THE FIRST STEP IN ADDRESSING SOME OF THE UNCLEAR
[9:40] LANGUAGE. THE CHANGES TO THE ORDINANCE, 1 172.20D, THE
[9:47] AUTHORS AND STAFF INCLUDED THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN THE TRACKING AND PRODUCTION OF DATA, AS THAT RESPONSIBILITY DOES NOT
[9:54] SOLELY LIE WITHIN THE CIVIL RIGHTS DEPARTMENT. AND SECTION
[10:00] 172.30C DATA SHARING, THIS SECTION WAS EDITED AS TO ENSURE ALL CCPO MEMBERS, AND MEMBERS OF
[10:07] THE PUBLIC, HAD ACCESS TO STATISTICAL DATA TO INFORM THEIR
[10:12] WORK. CONSENT DECREE REQUIRES SUBSTANTIAL DATA REPORTING.
[10:17] THIS PROVISION WILL ALIGN, AS WELL AS THE POLICY AND RESEARCH UNIT OF OPCR THAT SUPPORTS THE
[10:25] CCPO AS OUTLINED IN PARAGRAPH 339 OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.
[10:31] IN SECTION 172.40, REVIEW PANEL, CLARIFICATION FOR THE
[10:36] MAKEUP OF THE REVIEW PANELS WAS ADDED TO ENSURE TH THAT AT LEAST ONE SEATED CCPO MEMBER IS
[10:42] ON EACH REVIEW PANEL. IT MUST ALSO BE NOTED THE REVIEW PANELISTS VOLUNTEER A LOT OF
[10:49] TIME, ENERGY, AND EFFORT IN REVEALING CASE FILES AND INFORMATION TO PREPARE FOR THE
[10:56] PANELS. THEREFORE, WE CLARIFIED THAT PANELISTS WOULD BE PAID $50
[11:02] PER CASE PER REVIEW PANEL SESSION. OPPOSED TO MULTIPLE CASES IN ONE SESSION. SECTION
[11:13] 172.60, CCPO ADDS FIVE PANELISTS WHO WILL SERVE AS TEMPORARY CCPO
[11:20] MEMBERS, SHOULD A VACANT SEAT ARISE ON THE COMMISSION. THIS IS A TEMPORARY FIX TO ALLOW FOR
[11:27] THE CCPO REVI RECRUITMENT TO RUN THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE
[11:32] COURSE AND A ACTUALLY PERMANENT CCPO MEMBER WILL BE SEATED. THE
[11:38] FIVE PANELISTS WILL BE RECRUITED FOR THE PURPOSES OF ENSURING THAT WE WILL HAVE ENOUGH MEMBERS
[11:44] TO HAVE PANEL REVIEWS REGULARLY TO ENSURE THERE IS NOT A BACKLOG
[11:50] AT THE FEET OF THE PANEL. THIS PROVISION WILL STAY IN EFFECT WHEN THE PRIOR TEMPORARY
[11:55] AMENDMENT THAT ADDED THE CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSIONERS CENSUS AT THE END OF THE YEAR.
[12:01] ADDITIONALLY, THIS SECTION CLARIFIES THE REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERS TO ADHERE TO APPLICABLE
[12:09] POLICIES, TRAINING, ATTENDANCE, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND PROVIDE
[12:14] FOR A FORFEITURE SECTION OUTLINING A CCPO MEMBER NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ANY REFERENCED
[12:21] POLICIES AND/OR PROCEDURES OR REQUIREMENTS OF THE BODY WILL HAVE THEN FORFEITED THEIR SEAT.
[12:27] IT IS MADE CLEAR THAT THE CCPO MEMBERS MAY REQUEST STATISTICAL
[12:32] DATA AND MOM MAZED CASE
[12:37] SUMMARIES. WITHIN THE LEGAL PARAMETERS IS OUTLINED BY THE
[12:43] CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. LASTLY, IN AN EFFORT TO ENSURE THERE IS
[12:48] ADDITIONAL -- AN ADDITIONAL LAYER OF OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE CITY,
[12:55] SECTION 172.20 AUDITS WITH ADDED TO THE CHAPTER. THIS SECTION
[13:01] OUTLINES THAT THE CITY AUDITOR HAS THE INDEPENDENT AUTHORITY, AS SET FORTH IN THE CHARTER, TO
[13:07] AUDIT POLICE SERVICES AND POLICE CONDUCT OVERSIGHT SYSTEMS, WHICH IS INCLUSIVE OF ITS OVERARCHING
[13:14] AUTHORITY TO AUDIT ANY DEPARTMENT OR PROGRAM WITHIN THE CITY. I STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS
[13:22] EITHER BEFORE AND AFTER PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. I'LL FIRST PASS
[13:28] IT TO COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAYNE. >> THANK YOU, CHAIR CHAVEZ. THANK YOU, DIRECTOR. JUST FOR THE PUBLIC, JUST TO HAVE A
[13:34] LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND. I ORIGINALLY OPENED UP CCPO FOR
[13:39] AMENDMENT AT THE BEGINNING OF THE TERM. AND IT IT WAS FOLLOWING SOME STRENGTHENED LAW
[13:45] AT THE STATE LEVEL. ONE OF THE FIRST THINGS WE LEARNED AS WE STARTED THIS WORK, IS THAT THERE
[13:52] ARE SOME BARRIERS TO IMPLEMENTING THE STRONGER STATE LANGUAGE AT THE CITY LEVEL BECAUSE OF THE CHARTER. AND SO
[13:57] THAT'S GOING TO BE SOMETHING THAT I'M GOING TO BE INTERESTED IN CONTINUING TO WORK ON, OBVIOUSLY, A CITY CHARTER
[14:03] AMENDMENT IS A MUCH BIGGER LIFT THAN AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT. SO WHILE WE HAVE THE BOOKS OPEN, WE WORKED WITH OUR PROFESSIONAL
[14:10] STAFF. I MET WITH MY COMMISSIONER AT THE TIME, I MET WITH THE CHAIR OF CCPO. WE
[14:17] HOSTED A COMMUNITY LISTENING SESSION TO TRY TO GATHERING FEEDBACK AROUND WHAT WAS WORKING AND WHAT WASN'T WORKING. AND
[14:23] ONE OF THE BIGGEST AREAS THAT WE IDENTIFIED WAS JUST THE VOLUME
[14:28] OF CASES THAT THE BODY NEEDS TO REVIEW. AND JUST THE AMOUNT OF TIME THAT THESE VOLUNTEERS HAVE
[14:34] TO BE ABLE TO SIT IN FRONT OF THE REVIEW PANELS. AND SO AS WE THINK ABOUT HOW WE CAN
[14:39] STRENGTHEN THIS THROUGH CHARTER AMENDMENT, WE CAN STILL MAKE THE BODY BE MORE EFFECTIVE IN TERMS
[14:45] OF AT LEAST ITS CAPACITY TO REVIEW THESE CASES. I WANT TO GROUND US IN SOME REAL TRUTH
[14:52] THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE LIMITS TO WHAT A CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD CAN DO. THE AUTHORITY OF
[14:59] DISCIPLINE IS VESTED IN THE CHIEF AND THE OVERSIGHT IS THE
[15:05] MAYOR'S OVERSIGHT ALONE. CITY COUNCIL DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE THE TYPE OF
[15:10] PERSONNEL DECISIONS AROUND DISCIPLINE AND WHETHER THE MATRIX IS ACCURATE AND WHETHER OR NOT WE ARE HOLDING PEOPLE TO THE DISCIPLINE MATRIX. THOSE
[15:17] ARE THINGS THAT ARE OUTSIDE OF THE SCOPE OF WHAT WE CAN DO BY ORDINANCE. AND I WANT TO REMIND OURSELVES THAT WE DO HAVE THE
[15:24] AUTHORITY INSTITUTIONALLY TO HOLD OUR DEPARTMENT ACCOUNTABLE. THAT AUTHORITY SITS WITH THE CHIEF AND MAYOR. SO I'M HOPING
[15:30] THESE AMENDMENTS HELP TO MAKE IT A MORE EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT BODY FOR REVIEW, I WANT TO
[15:37] GROUND US IN THE HARD CONSTRAINTS AROUND BOTH OUR CHARTER AND THE AUTHORITY THAT IS GOING TO BE LIMITED WITHIN
[15:44] ORDINANCE. SO JUST WANTED TO SHARE THAT BACKGROUND. >> THANK YOU. I'M TRYING TO SEE
[15:50] IF ANYBODY ELSE IS ON QUEUE. OKAY. I DID WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE
[15:56] WE'VE BEEN JOINED BY COUNCILMEMBER RAINVILLE. DID I MISS ANYBODY ELSE? OKAY.
[16:04] COUNCILMEMBER JENKINS. I HAD -- SORRY. COUNCILMEMBER YES AND
[16:11] THEN CHOWDHURY WERE REFLECTED. OKAY. GREAT. AWESOME. I WANT TO THE REMIND THE PUBLIC, AS COUNCILMEMBER WONSLEY SAID,
[16:17] THERE WOULD BE PUBLIC HEARING ON IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT ON AUGUST 5th. THE RESOLUTION
[16:22] DID PASS, IN CASE FOLKS MISSED IT. I WANT TO CLARIFY FOR THE
[16:29] PUBLIC. NEXT UP, PROCEED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU
[16:37] HAVEN'T SIGNED UP, THE SIGN UP LIST IS UP THERE. I HAVE FOLKS
[16:43] HERE. TWO MINUTES TO SPEAK. PLEASE ANNOUNCE YOUR NAME, IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK. I'LL
[16:49] FIRST CALL UP HOWARD.
[16:54] >> GOOD AFTERNOON, COUNCIL CHAIR CHAVEZ, COUNCILMEMBERS. I KNEW WHEN MICHELLE PHILIPS WAS COMING
[17:01] TO US, SHE'S WHAT MINNEAPOLIS NEEDED. BECAUSE SHE'S -- SHE KNOWS BALTIMORE, SHE KNOWS
[17:08] OAKLAND. AND SHE KNOWS THE CIVIL RIGHTS RIGHT NOW -- I TOLD
[17:13] OMAR, WE'RE IN AN EPISODE OF "STAR WARS" AND YOU'RE A YESJEDI. WE CAN'T LOOK TO
[17:22] THE DOJ. WE NEED A ROBUST CIVIL RIGHTS DEPARTMENT. CASE IN POINT, I BROUGHT YOU ALLISON --
[17:30] JANET WILLIAMS. WE'RE STILL SEEKING JUSTICE FOR ALLISON. THAT'S ON FILE. JANET TOLD ME
[17:40] THERE WAS AN 11-YEAR-OLD RUNNING AROUND LOOKING FOR NARCAN BECAUSE A 17-YEAR-OLD WAS OVERDOSING. THEY WENT TO AN MPD
[17:47] OFFICER. THE OFFICER SAID "I'M NOT CALLING IT IN. YOU CENTER
[17:53] HAVE TO CALL IT IN." THAT 17-YEAR-OLD WAS REVIVED. BUT THE OVERSIGHT NEEDS TO DO RETRAINING OF OUR FIRST
[17:59] RESPONDERS. THOSE OFFICERS DID NOT HAVE NARCAN ON THEM. THE OFFICER REFUSED TO CALL IT
[18:05] IN, THAT 17-YEAR-OLD COULD HAVE DIED THAT'S WHY WE NEED A ROBUST CIVIL RIGHTS, ROBUST OVERSIGHT.
[18:13] SO PLEASE LOOK INTO THAT. I'VE ASKED O'HARA GOMEZ TO FIND OUT WHO THE OFFICER WAS WHO WOULD
[18:20] NOT CALL IT IN. >> THANK YOU. NEXT UP WE HAVE
[18:25] MICHELLE GROSS. WELCOME.
[18:39] >> THANK YOU. GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIR CHAVEZ AND MEMBERS. MY NAME IS MICHELLE GROSS,
[18:45] PRESIDENT OF COMMUNITY UNITED AGAINST POLICE BRUTALITY AND
[18:50] WARD 7 RESIDENT. I'M HERE SPECIFICALLY TO THE ORDINANCE PROPOSAL. AND, UMM, I'D LIKE TO
[18:55] FIRST START WITH, UMM, 172.20,
[19:00] UMM, D1, WHICH IS TECHNICAL-SOUNDING NAMES. BASICALLY, THE, UMM, THERE'S A
[19:06] LIST OF DATA THAT MUST BE REVEALED BY THE CIVIL RIGHTS DEPARTMENT AND/OR POLICE DEPARTMENT. WHICH I THINK IS A
[19:12] GOOD ADDITION. BUT I WOULD ADD SOMETHING ELSE TO THIS ORDINANCE. I WOULD ADD THAT IN ADDITION TO THE INFORMATION
[19:18] THAT'S LISTED, I WOULD ADD THE NAMES OF THE SUBJECT OFFICERS, THEIR BADGE NUMBERS, AND THEN FOR ANY COMPLAINTS THAT ARE
[19:25] SUSTAINED, DISCIPLINED, AND PASSED THE PERIOD, ACTUAL DISCIPLINED. THIS WOULD ENABLE THE COMMUNITY TO KNOW THE FULL DEPTH OF WHAT WE'RE ALLOWED TO
[19:31] KNOW UNDER THE DATA PRACTICES ACT, FOR ANY COMPLAINT, AND PREVENT US FROM HAVING TO DO
[19:38] REQUESTS TO GET THE INFORMATION. I'D ADD THAT. UNDER 172.30C2,
[19:44] YOU'VE GOT IN HERE THAT THE RECORDS -- THAT PROVISION IS BEING REMOVED. THAT IS A REAL
[19:50] PROBLEM. THE REASON IT'S A PROBLEM, BECAUSE THE, UMM, PANEL MEMBERS ONLY SIT ON A FEW PANELS
[19:56] EACH. THEY DON'T HAVE THE INFORMATION THEY NEED ABOUT ALL THE COMPLAINTS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO SEE THE TRENDS THAT ARE
[20:01] NEEDED TO WORK ON POLICY. SO I'D RECOMMEND REMOVING THAT STRIKE THROUGH ABOUT THE
[20:09] ANONYMIZED RECORDS. THEY SHOULD GET THE RECORDS. ON THE, UMM, -- WHOOP. SORRY, GOT TO
[20:15] KEEP UP WITH MY PAGES HERE. SORRY ABOUT THAT. A COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS ON 172.60. YOU'VE
[20:22] GOT THAT, UMM, AGAIN, THEY HAVE TO -- THAT THE -- THAT THE DUTY IS TO ENGAGE IN RESEARCH AND STUDY AND PROVIDE POLICY
[20:28] RECOMMENDATIONS. THAT'S A GREAT THING FOR THEM TO DO! THAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF COMBINING THE
[20:33] HEARING PANELS WITH THE, UMM, THE FORWARD-FACING COMMISSION MEMBERS. PUTTING THAT FUNCTION
[20:38] ALL TOGETHER. BUT, AGAIN, CANNOT BE DONE IF YOU DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO A WIDE BREADTH OF --
[20:44] MAY I FINISH A LITTLE BIT MORE. >> 10 SECONDS. >> TWO MORE LITTLE THINGS. >> YOU CAN E-MAIL IT.
[20:51] >> 172.602C. THAT PANEL MEMBERS
[20:56] ARE OR COMMISSION MEMBERS HAVE CERTIFICATION. THAT PRECLUDES.
[21:04] [ OVERLAPPING SPEAKERS ] THAT MEANS A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO MIGHT BE CUSTOMERS OF THE BODY
[21:09] CANNOT BE COMMISSIONERS ON THIS BODY. FINALLY, LAST THING, UMM,
[21:15] UNDER 172.40, LETTER A. IT SAYS "EACH PANEL SHALL BE CONSISTENT OF FIVE PANELISTS AND LIST TWO
[21:22] OFFICERS." WE SHOULD GET RID OF OFFICERS ON THE PANELS. A LOT OF OFFICERS ON THE PANELS --
[21:28] >> MICHELLE, MICHELLE, SUBMIT -- [ OVERLAPPING SPEAKERS ]
[21:38] [ OVERLAPPING SPEAKERS ] WE APPRECIATE IT, MICHELLE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. DAVE.
[21:44] >> CHAIR CHAVEZ, I WAS GOING TO GO FOR A POINT OF ORDER ON THE TIME. BUT, MICHELLE, I'LL LOOK
[21:49] FOR YOU AFTER THE MEETING. >> OKAY. SOUNDS GOOD. >> WE APPRECIATE THOSE PUBLIC
[21:56] COMMENTS BE SUBMITTED SO WE CAN READ THEM. HIE, DAVE. >> HI. >> MY NAME IS DAVE BIKKING, WARD
[22:03] 8. I WAS A MEMBER OF THE CIVILIAN REVIEW AUTHORITY BACK A LONG TIME AGO WHEN IT EXISTED.
[22:09] AND I'VE BEEN CLOSELY FOLLOWING CIVILIAN REVIEW SINCE THEN. WE
[22:17] HAVE OPPOSED THE CREATION OF THE OPCR IN 2012 AND THE CCPO
[22:25] ORDINANCE IN 2022. BOTH WERE DESIGNED TO FAIL, AND BOTH HAVE
[22:31] FAILED BEYOND EXPECTATIONS. THEY DO NOT FUNCTION AS TRUE
[22:37] CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT. THE CCPO, IN PARTICULAR, HAS BECOME
[22:42] TOTALLY DYSFUNCTIONAL. THE ONLY SOLUTION IS TO SCRAP IT AND
[22:50] START OVER WITH A MODEL THAT ACTUALLY SERVES THE COMMUNITY. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS MERELY
[22:56] REARRANGE THE DECK CHAIRS ON THE TITANIC. THE OPCR AND THE CCPO
[23:03] ARE DOMINATED BY THE POLICE AND THE CITY STAFF. IN PARTICULAR, THE POLICE HAVE ONE UNDUE
[23:10] INFLUENCE ON THE PANEL DECISIONS DUE TO THEIR AUTHORITY, EXPERIENCE, AND LONG HISTORY OF
[23:17] JUSTIFYING AND EXCUSING POLICE MISCONDUCT AND POLICE CULTURE.
[23:23] AT THE VERY LEAST, THE POLICE SHOULD NOT BE ON THE PANELS.
[23:28] UMM, THE RESULT OF ALL THIS IS THERE'S BEEN REMARKABLY
[23:34] DISCIPLINE FOR MISCONDUCT. WHAT LITTLE DISCIPLINE THAT HAS BEEN IMPOSED IS LARGELY AN EXPEDITED
[23:42] CASES, IN WHICH THE OFFICER ADMITS TO THE MISCONDUCT, THUS
[23:49] BYPASSING THE REVIEW PANEL PROCESS. OR IN CASES WHERE THE OFFICER HAS BEEN CONVICTED OF A
[23:54] CRIME. CONSISTENT DISCIPLINE IS IMPORTANT, NOT JUST FOR PUNISHMENT, BUT MORE SO --
[24:02] [ BEEP ] FOR ESTABLISHING A DETERRENT AND CHANGING CULTURE. THE CURRENT SYSTEM COMES NOWHERE CLOSE. AND
[24:09] TWO MINUTES COMES NOWHERE CLOSE TO WHAT WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT. >> THANKS, DAVE. IF YOU CAN
[24:16] SUBMIT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. E-MAIL TO CITY COUNCIL, THAT'S HELPFUL. I'M GOING TO ASK FOLKS TO PLEASE STICK TO THE TWO
[24:22] MINUTES. WHEN I GIVE SOMEONE EXTRA TIME, THAT MEANS I WANT TO BE FAIR AND I'M GOING TO GIVE SOMEBODY ELSE MORE TIME. I NEED
[24:28] US TO STICK TO TWO MINUTES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT UP, WE HAVE KEITH.
[24:44] >> THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK. I'M SPEAKING AS A PRIVATE CITIZEN. I'VE SPOKEN BEFORE ABOUT THE COMMUNITY
[24:53] OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY. I HAVE A BIG TRUST ISSUE AND, OBVIOUSLY, I'M NOT ALONE IN
[24:59] THAT. WE'VE SEEN OVER 30 YEARS OF HISTORY WITH COMMUNITY REVIEW
[25:06] BOARDS, IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, FAILING FORWARD. AND WE -- I -- I CAN'T EVEN FATHOM A DEPARTMENT
[25:14] THAT PROMOTES AN OFFICER WHO COULDN'T EVEN RESTRAIN HIMSELF
[25:20] FOR 10 SECONDS WITHOUT SHOOTING SOMEBODY TO DEATH AS BEING THE HEAD OF THE USE OF FORCE.
[25:28] TRAINING. SO ... YEAH. ACCOUNTABILITY -- ACCOUNTABILITY
[25:33] AND EARNING THE TRUST OF THE PUBLIC? I DON'T SEE IT HAPPENING IN MY LIFETIME. AND
[25:40] UNTIL THAT SORT OF BEHAVIOR IS CORRECTED, I DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING ANYWHERE. SO I GOT TO
[25:46] SAY. AND I LOOK FOR JUSTICE FOR
[25:52] AMIR LOCKE. >> SUBMIT YOUR NAME FOR THE PUBLIC RECORD. >> THAT'S OKAY. >> NEXT UP, WE HAVE CHRISTINA.
[26:02] >> I THINK I SIGNED UP ON THE WRONG SHEET. WHEN IT'S TIME FOR DYKES AGAINST DEPORTATION, CALL
[26:08] MY NAME AGAIN. [ LAUGHTER ] WHAT ISL I'LL SAY IS, THAT
[26:14] PUBLIC HEARING IS NEXT CYCLE. >> NO TALKING ABOUT IT TODAY. >> THAT CAN BE CONFUSING ON THE PUBLIC AGENDA. SO TODAY WE
[26:21] VOTED FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. THAT'S ON AUGUST 5-th. THAT'S GOING TO BE GREAT! FOR THE
[26:26] PUBLIC TO KNOW 1:30:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 5th IN THIS ROOM. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THAT. AND,
[26:32] CAROL, ARE YOU HERE FOR THE SAME THING? FOR AUGUST 5th OR
[26:37] TODAY? >> HELLO. CAN YOU HEAR ME? MY NAME IS CAROL ENGELHART. WARD
[26:47] 10, 50 YEARS AN RN. I TRAINED PEOPLE TO HOW TO RESPOND 9-1-1. UNTIL GEORGE FLOYD WAS MURDERED,
[26:53] I WAS CONFIDENT THE RIGHT ACTION WOULD BE DONE. I APPLAUD WHAT WE'RE DOING NOW. A MONTH AGO, I
[27:01] HAD A CAR ACCIDENT WHERE SOMEBODY WAS GOING DOWN 42nd SPEEDING LIKE 70 OR 80
[27:07] 80 MILES PER HOUR AND SIDESWIPED MY CAR. THE PAR ME
[27:14] PARAMEDICS WERE CALLED. THE POLICE WERE CALLED. THEY WERE KIND AND RESPECTFUL. I WANT
[27:20] THE STAFFING WE HAVE FOR POLICE. I WANT THE POLICE WE HAVE NOW BUT I WANT THEM TO BE HELD
[27:26] ACCOUNTABLE. AND I WELCOME THE CHARTER YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. WE NEED SERIOUS CHANGES. BUT ONE THING THAT BOTHERS ME, I'M
[27:32] GOING TO SAY, FOR EVERY POLICEMAN THAT DOES A GOOD JOB,
[27:37] LET'S BE THANKFUL. LET'S BE THANKFUL! I THINK WE'VE ENDED UP WITH THIS ATTITUDE OF,
[27:45] "ALWAYS SEEING THE WRONG." AND I'M HERE TO SAY LET'S STAND UP TO THE WRONG AND LET'S GET THIS
[27:52] PASSED! THANK YOU. [ APPLAUSE ] DO WE HAVE ANY MORE PEOPLE
[28:01] SIGNED UP TOP TESTIFY? ALL RIGHT. ANY DISCUSSIONS OR
[28:11] QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE MEMBERS. COUNCILMEMBER WONSLEY. >> THANK YOU. I KNOW I'VE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH COUNCIL
[28:17] PRESIDENT PAYNE REGARDING THIS. I'M GOING TO MAKE A MOTION TO DELAY ONE CYCLE. I SHARED THIS
[28:24] IN OUR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY COMMITTEE, BUT, AND THIS WAS BROUGHT UP DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, AS WELL, IN TERMS OF
[28:30] WHAT ARE SOME ACCOUNTABILITY STEPS THAT THE COUNCIL CAN DO WITHIN OUR AUTHORITY IN RESPONSE
[28:38] TO THE PUBLIC AND ALL OF US LEARNING WE REPEATED A PATTERN THAT LED TO GEORGE FLOYD'S DEATH
[28:45] BY PROMOTING ANOTHER OFFICER INTO A POSITION OF LEADERSHIP. UMM, AND DOING THAT IN THE SAME
[28:51] CASE WITH SERGEANT HANNEMANN AND KNOWING THAT ACTIONS -- THE
[28:57] ACTIONS OF THAT OFFICER LED TO THE DEATH OF AMIR LOCKE, AS WELL. SO THIS GIVES US A
[29:03] LEGISLATIVE OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT. I KNOW A NUMBER OF US ARE MEETING WITH COMMUNITY ADVOCATES IN THE NEXT WEEK. UMM,
[29:09] ESPECIALLY FAMILIES WHO HAVE BEEN IMPACTED BY POLICE VIOLENCE AROUND WAYS IN WHICH WE COULD INCORPORATE SOME OF THEIR
[29:15] FEEDBACKS AND SUGGESTIONS INTO THIS ORDINANCE. SO I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE A CYCLE TO BE ABLE TO REFINE OUR AMENDMENTS. WORK
[29:21] WITH STAFF, WORK WITH THE AUTHORS, UMM, AROUND BRINGING THOSE AMENDMENTS FORWARD. AND A
[29:28] CYCLE ALLOWS US DO THAT. WITH THAT, I WILL. >> I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FIRST.
[29:34] >> OKAY. >> THANK YOU, FIRST. LAST CALL FOR PUBLIC HEARING. ALL RIGHT. SO SEEING NO ONE WISHING TO
[29:40] SPEAK, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. COUNCILMEMBER WONSLEY. >> THANK YOU. SO I WILL MAKE A
[29:45] MOTION TO DELAY BY ONE CYCLE. TO TAKE THIS UP FOR CONSIDERATION. >> I'LL SECOND THAT.
[29:52] >> COUNCILMEMBER CASHMAN, ARE YOU ON QUEUE? >> NOT WITH REGARDS TO THE
[29:59] MOTION BUT THE UNDERLYING ORDER ORDINANCE. QUESTION FOR
[30:05] DIRECTOR PHILIPS. DID YOU DETAIL HOW WE'LL RECRUIT AND SELECT THE CIVILIAN REVIEWERS? >> IT WILL BE THE -- SORRY.
[30:12] MICHELLE PHILIPS, DIRECTOR OF CIVIL RIGHTS. IT WOULD BE THE SAME, UMM, RECRUITMENT PROCESS
[30:18] WE HAVE TO DO FOR CCPO MEMBERS. WE'LL PUT IT OUT AND IT'S AS OUTLINED IN PARAGRAPH 337 OF THE
[30:24] SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THAT WE MUST DO A DIVERSE RECRUITMENT. >> OKAY. >> HAPPY TO SHARE THAT
[30:29] RECRUITMENT PLAN WITH YOU, IF YOU DON'T HAVE IT ALREADY. >> OKAY. WILL THERE BE ANY, AH,
[30:35] ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS OTHER THAN WHAT'S REQUIRED OF CCPO MEMBERS? >> YES. THERE'S ADDITIONAL
[30:41] ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS THAT IS SET FORTH IN THE ORDINANCE. BECAUSE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THESE INDIVIDUALS ARE
[30:47] ELIGIBLE TO DO ANY TYPE OF CASE WITH THE PANELISTS. SO THAT ALSO INCLUDES, AH, REVIEW PANEL
[30:54] CASES THAT HAVE DATA. THOSE FOLKS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE ABLE TO
[30:59] PASS, UMM, THE APPROPRIATE TRAININGS, AS WELL AS THE APPROPRIATE BACKGROUND. CCPO MEMBERS, TO BE SEATED ON THE
[31:06] COMMISSION, ARE NOT REQUIRED TO DO SO. >> OKAY. THANK YOU. UMM, YEAH,
[31:14] HAPPY TO SUPPORT THIS MOTION, AS WELL, TO DELAY ONE CYCLE. AND JUST THANKS TO THE FOLKS WHO HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS.
[31:19] THANK YOU TO YOU. >> THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSIONS
[31:25] FROM COMMITTEE MEMBERS? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NO FURTHER
[31:32] DISCUSSIONS, LET ME -- ON THE MOTION TO DELAY THIS TO THE NEXT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING,
[31:38] ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. OPPOSED? ANY ABSTENTIONS? AND THAT MOTION CARRIES. NOW I'LL
[31:46] RETURN THIS MEETING TO COUNCILMEMBER PRESIDENT PAYNE AS THE CHAIR OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE.
[31:52] >> THANK YOU, CHAIR CHAVEZ. FIRST ITEM AUTHORIZES AN INCREASE TO THE CONTRACT WITH
[31:59] DLG CONSULTING AND ADVISORY SERVICES. THEY PROVIDE EXTERNAL INVESTIGATOR SERVICES TO THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS DIVISION OF THE
[32:05] POLICE DEPARTMENT. AND I BELIEVE MPD STAFF IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE ITEM. DO ANY COLLEAGUES HAVE
[32:11] ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON THIS? SEEING NONE. I'LL ASK
[32:19] THE -- OH. >> MR. CHAIR, I'M SORRY. IT'S NOT ALLOWING ME -- ANY OF US. THERE'S NO MAIN MOTION TO PUT
[32:25] OURSELVES INTO QUEUE. BUT I -- I AM -- THERE WE GO. I AM JUST
[32:33] CURIOUS, DID WE, IN INDEED, GET THE BACKLOG CLEARED IN JUNE?
[32:40] >> IS THERE SOMEONE HERE THAT CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION?
[32:49] >> WELCOME. THE COMMANDER, INTERNAL AFFAIRS INVESTIGATION UNIT. WE WERE SEATED IN THE
[32:56] OVERFLOW ROOM. I DIDN'T HEAR THE QUESTION, PLEASE. >> UMM, THANK YOU. MR. CHAIR, UMM, I'M JUST CURIOUS, DID WE,
[33:03] INDEED, PREVIOUSLY GET THE BACKLOG CLEARED, AS WE HAD EXPECTED TO BY JUNE. >> YES, THE BACKLOG IS CURRENTLY
[33:09] CLEARED RIGHT NOW. UMM, HOWEVER, WITH THE CURRENT STAFFING THAT WE HAVE, WITHIN THE FORCE INVESTIGATION UNIT,
[33:15] UMM, WE ARE NOT ABLE TO KEEP UP WITH THE AMOUNT OF CASES THAT'S DEVELOPED EVERY MONTH. WE ARE
[33:21] UNDER CONTRACT WITH DLG UNTIL JUNE OF 2026. WE'RE PROPOSING TO INCREASE THE FUNDING TO BE
[33:28] ABLE TO KEEP UP WITH THE WORK FLOW THAT IS GOING TO CONTINUE TO COME IN. EFFECTIVE THE END
[33:33] OF AUGUST, WHEN THE FORCE POLICY CHANGES, OUR NUMBER OF LEVEL II FORCE REVIEWS WILL REQUIRE A
[33:40] FULL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW OF EACH USE OF FORCE WILL MORE THAN DOUBLE FROM 33 A MONTH TO 72 A
[33:47] MONTH. WE NEED THE ASSISTANCE OF DLG TO KEEP UP WITH OUR CASE LOAD UNTIL WE'RE ABLE TO BUILD THE SIZE OF THE UNIT.
[33:53] >> THANK YOU. THAT'S HELPFUL INFORMATION. IT GIVES ME CONFIDENCE TO KNOW THAT WE WERE
[33:58] ABLE TO CLEAR THE BACKLOG, AND I APPRECIATE YOUR SENSE OF WHAT THE SIZE OF ADDITIONAL HELP
[34:03] LOOKS LIKE HERE. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. >> COUNCILMEMBER CASHMAN. >> THANK YOU. THANK YOU,
[34:09] PRESIDENT PAYNE. I WAS WONDERING IF YOU COULD EXPLAIN WHY THE NEW POLICY IS EXPECTED
[34:14] TO DOUBLE THE RATE OF REVIEWS FROM 33 TO 72. >> YES. EFFECTIVE WITH THE NEW
[34:20] FORCE POLICY, TAKE DOWNS ARE CONSIDERED A LEVEL I USE OF FORCE BECOMES LEVEL II USES OF
[34:26] FORCE. THAT'S GOING TO BRING OUR LEVEL II USES OF FORCE THAT WILL REQUIRE A FULL QUALITY
[34:31] ASSURANCE REVIEW FROM 30 TO 33 A MONTH TO APPROXIMATELY 72 A MONTH. SO MORE THAN DOUBLING
[34:37] THE AMOUNT OF QARS WE'LL HAVE TO COMPLETE EVERY MONTH. >> AND HOW -- DID YOU ANALYZE
[34:45] HOW WE CAN DO THIS, UMM, WITHIN OUR OWN CAPACITY? AND IF THAT WOULD BE MORE COST EFFECTIVE
[34:51] RATHER THAN CONTRACTING IT OUT TO DLG. >> YES. SO, UMM, UNDER THE -- SO I'LL LET YOU KNOW, WE
[34:57] CURRENTLY HAVE FOR STAFFING NOW. WE HAVE ONE COMMANDER, ONE LIEUTENANT, TWO SERGEANT
[35:05] INVESTIGATORS, THREE CASE INVESTIGATORS, AND NO ANALYSTS AND NO ADMIN SUPPORT. UNDER THE
[35:10] CURRENT POLICY, WHEN WE LOOK AT THE NUMBERS, UMM, WE WOULD NEED TO ADD TWO SERGEANT
[35:16] INVESTIGATORS AND FOUR CASE INVESTIGATORS, IN ADDITION TO A BWC ANALYST AND ADMINISTRATION
[35:22] SUPPORT. WITH THE NEW POLICY GOING INTO EFFECT, THEN WE WOULD BE LOOKING AT A TOTAL OF SEVEN
[35:28] SERGEANTS AND 11 INVESTIGATORS, IN ADDITION TO THE ANALYSTS AND THE ADMINISTRATION SUPPORT. THAT'S WHAT WE WOULD NEED FOR
[35:35] STAFFING WITH OUR UNIT UNDER THE NEW POLICY, WHEN IT GOES INTO EFFECT TO KEEP UP WITH THE CASE LOAD.
[35:40] >> OKAY. SO YOU WOULD ANALYZE IT WOULD COST MORE TO ADD THE POSITIONS THAN THE TOTAL $
[35:50] $1.7 MILLION CONTRACT OF THIS CONSULTING? >> WELL I HAVEN'T PERSONALLY CRUNCHED THE NUMBERS. THAT'S UP
[35:56] TO THE IMPLEMENTATION UNIT TO FIGURE IT OUT. IT'S A BRIDGE TO GET US UNTIL WE CAN STAFF OUR UNIT ADEQUATELY.
[36:01] >> OKAY. IS THERE A PLAN FOR THAT? >> YES. THERE IS. >> OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK
[36:08] YOU. >> YEP. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? THANK YOU FOR THAT
[36:16] PRESENTATION. AND SEEING NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS ITEM.
[36:21] >> SO MOVED. >> IS THERE A SECOND. >> SECOND. >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY "AYE."
[36:28] OPPOSED SAY "NAY." ABSTENTIONS? THE AYES HAVE IT. AND THAT
[36:34] CARRIES. NEXT WE HAVE A CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH BENCHMARK SOLUTIONS TO AMEND THE
[36:39] SCOPE OF SERVICES IN ORDER TO INCLUDE A PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT MODULE FOR MPD SERVICES. I'LL
[36:46] WELCOME UP NICK BARKLEY TO GIVE THE CONTRACTUAL PRESENTATION ABOUT THE AMENDMENT. WELCOME.
[36:55] >> THANK YOU, CHAIR AND COMMITTEE. MY NAME IS NICK. I MANAGE THE EARLY INTERVENTION
[37:01] SYSTEM HERE AT THE MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT. AND JUST TOO MAKE SURE, CAN EVERYBODY SEE THE PRESENTATION? EXCELLENT.
[37:07] EXCUSE ME. SO I STAND BEFORE YOU TODAY ASKING TO AMEND THE CONTRACT THAT WE HAVE WITH
[37:14] BENCHMARK ANALYTICS FOR THE EARLY INTERVENTION SYSTEM TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL MODULE THEY PROVIDE, WHICH THEY CALL
[37:21] PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. THE CONTRACT CURRENTLY IN PLACE IS FOR $2,275,000 OVER FIVE YEARS.
[37:29] WE'RE SEEKING AN AMENDMENT TO ADD ANOTHER 1,409D -FOR THE
[37:37] ADDITIONAL OF THE MODULE FOR THE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT. AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, IT IS BROKEN DOWN
[37:43] OVER FIVE YEARS WITH AN ADDITIONAL COST OF $27,370 FOR
[37:49] THE ADDITIONAL MODULE. THE MODULE DOESN'T CHANGE ANY OF THE OTHER BENEFITS THAT WE HAVE WITH
[37:55] THIS CONTRACT, IN TERMS OF HOSTING OR ANY FEES OR IMPLEMENTATION FEES OR CHANGE
[38:03] ORDER FEES. THOSE ARE ALL INCLUDED IN THE TOTALITY OF THE EXISTING CONTRACT. THIS WOULD SIMPLY BE FOR AN EXPANSION OF
[38:09] SERVICES ALLOWED WITHIN THE CONTRACT. WHY ARE WE LOOKING FOR THE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
[38:15] MODULE? THERE ARE SEVERAL REASONS. ONE, THE CURRENT WAY WE DO PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS AT
[38:21] THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT DOESN'T CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OR THE
[38:29] LANGUAGE OF THE CONSENT DECREE, WHEN WE HAVE BEEN ORDERED TO IMPLEMENT AS WRITTEN. THE
[38:34] SYSTEM IS HIGHLY CONFIGURATION TO THE UNIQUE NEEDS OF THE
[38:41] POLICING PROFESSION. IT'S, AGAIN, VERY CHANGEABLE AND NO COSTS ARE INCURRED BY THE CITY
[38:47] FOR MAKE ANY OF THE CHANGES. FOR EXAMPLE, IF A PRECINCT WANTS
[38:52] TO TRACK CERTAIN MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE OVER A CERTAIN PERIOD OF TIME, THEY WOULD HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE A SPECIFIC
[39:00] PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT OR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTION OR FORM FOR WHATEVER IT IS THEY'RE LOOKING TO TRACK. IT
[39:06] WILL BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FIRST SIGN MODULE, THIER
[39:11] INTERVENTION SYSTEM, AS PART OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION. JUST RECENTLY
[39:17] PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WAS HOUSED WITHIN EARLY INTERVENTION SYSTEM FOR THE PURPOSES OF KEEPING ALL
[39:23] OF OUR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS IN ONE PLACE. AND THIS WILL REDUCE THE NUMBER OF
[39:30] SYSTEMS THAT OUR SUPERVISORS, IN PARTICULAR, ARE REQUIRED TO OPERATE WITHIN THE DAY-TO-DAY
[39:37] FUNCTIONS OF THEIR SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES. IT ALSO INCREASES THE ADDITION OF THE MODULE WOULD INCREASE THE
[39:43] PROBABILITY THAT WE WOULD ACHIEVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT COMPLIANCE ON TIME, AS IT RELATES TO PERFORMANCE
[39:48] MANAGEMENT. UMM, THE ADDITION OF THIS MODULE DOES MEET SEVERAL
[39:56] REQUIREMENTS OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, AS IT PERTAINS TO
[40:02] PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND ALLOW FOR THE COMPLIANCE TO OCCUR WITHIN THE ESTABLISHED DEADLINE
[40:07] SET FORTH IN THE AGREEMENT. AND WITH THAT, WITH I STAND FOR
[40:14] QUESTIONS. >> COLLEAGUES, ANY REQ
[40:22] QUESTIONS? HOW ARE WE MANAGING EI S PRIOR TO THE SYSTEM? >> EIS, EXCUSE ME, CHAIR,
[40:30] THROUGH COMMITTEE. EIS HAS BEEN MANAGED, UMM, PRIOR TO BENCHMARK
[40:36] THROUGH A SERIES OF EXCEL SPREAD SHEETS AND WORD DOCUMENTS AND E-MAIL. THAT HAVE BEEN, YOU
[40:42] KNOW, KIND OF LIVING IN DIFFERENT AREAS ACROSS THE ENTERPRISE. WERE DIRECTED BY THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT TO
[40:47] CONTINUE OPERATING IN FASHION UNTIL WE HAVE THE SYSTEM. THIS PARTICULAR MOOD YULE IS SEPARATE
[40:52] FROM THE FIRST EARLY INTERVENTION SYSTEM. BUT WOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR EVALUATION AS
[40:59] PART OF THE FIRST SIGN EARLY INTERVENTION SYSTEM. >> SO THEN AS A FOLLOW UP, DO
[41:05] YOU ENVISION, UMM, TRYING TO ADOPT YOUR CURRENT WORK FLOWS IN THIS KIND OF HODGEPODGE OF
[41:11] DOCUMENTS AND TOOLS. ARE YOU GOING TO TRY TO INCORPORATE ALL THE WORK FLOW INTO THE
[41:16] CENTRALIZED SYSTEM? OR ARE THEY GOING TO KIND OF LIVE PARALLEL WITH EACH OTHER? >> YES, GOOD QUESTION, CHAIR.
[41:22] AND COMMITTEE, THE BIG WIN, FROM
[41:27] MY POINT, IN ADDING THIS MODULE, IS THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL ELEMENTS WITHIN THE SETTLEMENT
[41:33] AGREEMENT THAT REQUIRE SUPERVISOR CHECK INS ON A STANDARD BASIS. SOME OF IT IS MONTHLY. SOME IS QUARTERLY.
[41:40] SOME OF IT IS ANNUALLY. HAVING THE MOOD YULE IN PLACE WILL DO A
[41:45] COUPLE OF THINGS. ONE, REDUCE THE NUMBER OF SYSTEMS AN OFFICER OR SUPERVISOR NEEDS TO WORK IN.
[41:50] TWO, ALLOWING FOR THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS TO BE BUILT WHILE ACCOMPLISHING OTHER
[41:56] REQUIRED CHECK INS. IN THEORY, BEING IF WE DID GET THIS RIGHT, UMM, THOSE MONTHLY CHECK
[42:03] INS WILL BUILD UPON THEMSELVES TO MAKE THE ANNUAL EVALUATION MUCH MORE STREAMLINED AND MORE
[42:08] EFFICIENT. SO THE LONG ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION IS, YES, IT
[42:13] WILL CONSOLIDATE AND MAKE THE PROCESSES MORE EFFICIENT. >> COOL. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR
[42:19] COMMENTS? COUNCILMEMBER CHOWDHURY. >> THANK YOU, PRESIDENT PAYNE. I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY MY
[42:30] UNDERSTANDING ON THE CONTRACT ITSELF AND JUST THE BUDGET
[42:35] ALLOCATION. SO THIS SPECIFIC ITEM THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT, IT'S
[42:41] FOR AN AMOUNT OF $109,000 AND SOME HUNDREDS OF DOLLARS. AND
[42:48] IT COMES FROM A BASE CONTRACT THAT WAS PASSED THROUGH THIS COUNCIL OF $.4 MILLI
[43:00] $2 2.4 MILLION OR A LITTLE BIT
[43:07] OVER THAT. >> THAT'S CORRECT. IT'S AN AMENDMENT TO THE ALREADY-EXISTING CONTRACT. IT'S NOT A NEW CONTRACT. >> GREAT. IT'S PULLING FROM THE
[43:14] ALLOCATED AMOUNT THAT ALREADY EXISTS. OKAY. THANK YOU. >> YES, MA'AM. >> I WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT.
[43:20] >> SEEING NO ONE ELSE IN QUEUE, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS ITEM.
[43:27] >> SO MOVED. >> SECOND. >> THAT'S BEEN MOVED AND SECONDED. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR
[43:33] SAY "AYE." OPPOSED SAY "NAY." ABSTENTIONS? THAT ITEM
[43:40] CARRIES. THE NEXT ITEM WE HAVE HERE IS AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT
[43:46] WITH WELLNESS THAT FITS FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND BEHAVIORAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT. HERE TO SPEAK MORE ON THE ITEM
[43:51] IS MPD MANAGER OF HEALTH AND WELLNESS MEREDITH MRYTYR. AND
[44:08] COMMANDER REISDORFER. >> THANK YOU. I'M THE HEALTH AND WELLNESS MANAGER FOR THE MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT.
[44:14] I'M EXCITED TO BE HERE TODAY TOO PRESENT ON THE CONTRACT WITH WELLNESS THAT FITS AND PROVIDE A
[44:20] BIT MORE CONTEXT. SO THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CONSENT
[44:26] DECREE STATE FOR THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE CITY TO OFFER THEY ORED MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES TO
[44:31] OFFICERS, INCLUDING TRAUMA INFORMED CARE, SUBSTANCE USE, STRESS MANAGEMENT, PEER SUPPORT, CRISIS COUNSELING, AND TRAINING
[44:38] AREAS. IN ADDITION, THE CONSORTIUM RESEARCH TEAM, THE INDEPENDENT EVALUATOR, WHO
[44:43] PROVIDED THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT REQUIRED BY THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT HIGHLY RECOMMENDED A VAST IMPROVEMENT IN MENTAL
[44:48] HEALTH SERVICES. LEFA REQUIRED WE ACT ON THE
[44:55] CONSORTIUM'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE OUR SERVICES IN ORDER TO FULFILL THE DECREE AND AGREEMENT. THEREFORE, THE CITY
[45:01] RECOGNIZES THE NEED TO PROVIDE SUPPORT TO MPD OFFICERS THAT MAY EXPOSE THEMSELVES TO SIGNIFICANT
[45:07] DANGER, HIGH-STRESS, AND A WIDE SPECTRUM OF HUGE TRAGEDY. MENTAL HEALTH AND EMOTIONAL
[45:13] WELLNESS ARE CRITICAL TO JOB PERFORMANCE AND GENERAL SAFETY.
[45:19] WE KNOW LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL FACE EXTRAORDINARILY
[45:24] PSYCHOLOGICAL DEMANDS AND OFTEN RELUCTANT TO SEEK SUPPORT.
[45:29] THEREFORE, THE CITY MUST SECURE A MENTAL HEALTH MANAGER THAT GROUNDS THEIR WORK IN BUILDING TRUST AND ACCESSIBILITY THROUGH
[45:35] SERVICES THAT ARE INTEGRATED, FLEXIBLE, AND TRAUMA INFORMED.
[45:41] CITY COUNCIL HAD PREVIOUSLY APPROVED A SIMILAR CONTRACT FOR
[45:46] 2023 TO 2025 WITH OPTIONS FOR TWO ADDITIONAL YEARS FOR A TOTAL ANNUAL COMPENSATION TO NOT
[45:52] EXCEED AROUND $950,000. HOWEVER, THE SERVICES RENDERED BY THE VENDOR DID NOT MEET OUR
[45:57] NEEDS AND HAVE BEEN DETERMINED THEY WILL NOT FULFILL THE NEEDS OUTLINED IN THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CONSENT DECREE.
[46:04] WE ARE REQUESTING NOW SIMILAR CONTRACT WITH INCREASED SERVICES TO FULFILL THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CONSENT DECREE
[46:11] REQUIREMENTS. THE CURRENT VENDOR CONTRACT WILL EXPIRE AT THE END OF 2025, AND THE NEW
[46:16] CONTRACT WITH WELLNESS THAT FITS WILL ENSURE THERE ARE NO INTERRUPTIONS TO SERVICES PROVIDED TO MPD MEMBERS. AND
[46:24] THEN JUST TO GIVE A LITTLE BIT OF A BACKGROUND AROUND WELLNESS THAT FITS. UMM, THEY ARE A COLLECTIVE OF LICENSED MENTAL
[46:30] HEALTH PROFESSIONALS THAT SPECIALIZE IN SERVING FIRST RESPONDERS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
[46:36] ACROSS MINNESOTA, BUT PRIMARILY IN THE TWIN CITIES METRO ■AREA. THEY OFFER COMPREHENSIVE, CULTURALLY MINDFUL, AND
[46:42] RESPONSIVE CARE THAT WOULD PROVIDE EXCEPTIONAL CARE TO MPD STAFF AND LOVED ONES. THE
[46:49] CONTRACT THAT WE HAVE DRAFTED BETWEEN WELLNESS THAT FITS AND THE CITY FOCUSES ON THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CONSENT
[46:56] DECREE REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING TRAUMA INFORMED CARE, PEER SUPPORT TEAM CLINICAL
[47:01] ASSISTANCE, AND CONSULTATION, AND DEVELOPING, REVIEWING, RECRUIT AND IN-SERVICE TRAININGS. WELLNESS THAT FITS
[47:08] IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL ADA, HIPPAA AND LEGAL GUIDELINES.
[47:13] WE'LL HAVE A THREE-YEAR BUDGET CAP OF $2.76 MILLION, AND THE TOTAL COMPENSATION SHALL NOT
[47:20] EXCEED $.6 MIL
[47:26] 4.6 MILLION. TO GIVE A BREAK DOWN, WE HAVE THEM LISTED ON THE
[47:31] SLIDE. AN ESTIMATED 4,000 COUNSELING SESSIONS PER YEAR. THERE'S GOING TO BE ACCESS TO
[47:38] OVER 24/7 PHONE LINE OFFERING SUPPORT AND REFERRAL SERVICES TO MPD EMPLOYEES AND LOVED ONES.
[47:43] THERE WILL BE PEER SUPPORT TEAM, CLINICAL CONSULTATION, AND OVERSIGHT BY A CLINICAL LEAD.
[47:48] THERE WILL BE URGENT TRAUMATIC BRIEFING SESSIONS AS WELL AS MAJOR OPERATIONS AND MULTIPLE
[47:55] INCIDENT SUPPORT SYSTEMS. AND APPOINTMENTS. ANNUAL WELLNESS CHECK IN APPOINTMENTS, AS NEEDED
[48:00] OR WANTED. FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES, WHICH WILL BE AN ARRAY OF OFFERINGS SUPPORT GROUPS,
[48:06] FAMILY NIGHTS, AND TRAINING SPECIFICALLY TAILORED TO LOVED ONES OF FIRST RESPONDERS. THEY
[48:12] WILL ALSO BE FACILITATED AN ESTIMATED 40 TRAININGS PER YEAR ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT,
[48:18] RESILIENCY, AND TRAUMA. AND, LASTLY, PROVIDING CLINICAL CONSULTATION AND PRESENTATIONS
[48:24] FOR DEPARTMENTAL SUPPORT, AS REQUESTED AND NEEDED. THANK YOU FOR LISTENING TO THIS
[48:30] PRESENTATION. AND CONSIDERING THE CONTRACT. AND I WELCOME, OF COURSE, ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU
[48:36] HAVE. THANK YOU. >> COUNCILMEMBER WONSLEY. >> THANK YOU, PRESIDENT PAYNE. I'M GOING BACK TO SLIDE THREE.
[48:44] UMM, AND THE SPECIFICS OR BULLET POINTS AROUND SERVICES RENDERED
[48:50] DID NOT MEET OUR NEEDS. IF YOU CAN SHARE A LITTLE BIT MORE IN TERMS WHAT WAS MISSING HA-HA
[48:55] AND THE PREVIOUS CONTRACT THAT WAS NOT MET. >> YEAH. YEAH. THANK YOU, COUNCILMEMBER. GREAT QUESTION.
[49:01] SO, UMM, WELL, FIRST OFF, SO, OF COURSE, BEING UNDER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CONSENT DECREE, THERE WERE SPECIFIC ELEMENTS
[49:07] THAT HAVE TO BE MET WITHIN THE CONTRACT. SO THEY'RE JUST
[49:13] JU GENERALLY UNIQUE NEEDS THAT ARE PROVIDING MORE
[49:19] EXCEPTIONAL HIGH-LEVEL OF SERVICES AND RESPONSE THAT JUST KIND OF ALREADY LIMITS THE TYPE OF VENDORS THAT CAN RESPOND AS A
[49:24] WHOLE TO THE NEEDS OF MPD. WELLNESS THAT FITS HAS THE ABILITY TO CUSTOMIZE AND MEET
[49:30] OUR NEEDS. AND SO THEY'RE AN AGENCY THAT STILL KIND OF HAS
[49:35] THE LATITUDE TO TAKE IN IMMEDIATE FEEDBACK AND IMMEDIATELY IMPLEMENT THOSE CHANGES, MAYBE VERSUS COMPARED
[49:40] TO, LIKE, LARGER-SCALE NATIONAL CLINICS. RIGHT. THE SERVICES WILL ALSO BE BETTER
[49:45] ACCOMPLISHED. SO, FOR EXAMPLE, THE 24/7 LINE IS A NECESSARY
[49:50] REQUIREMENT OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. AND SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT THEY HAVE GUARANTEED THEY CAN PROVIDE TO
[49:56] US AND HAVE PROVIDED ELEMENT STEP-BY-STEP PROCESS OF HOW THEY WILL IMPLEMENT THAT. AND THEN,
[50:04] ALSO, THEY HAVE -- THEIR CLINICAL LEAD IS KIND OF ONE OF THE TOP FOLKS IN THE STATE FOR
[50:09] PEER SUPPORT CONSULTATION. AND SO SHE REALLY PROVIDES A LEVEL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPERTISE AND
[50:16] PREVENTION THAT, I THINK OUR TEAM WOULD LOVE TO BE SEEN AND APPLIED TO MPD.
[50:22] >> AWESOME THANK YOU FOR THE INFORMATION. >> THANK YOU.. >> AND THEN GOING OVER TO SLIDE
[50:27] SIX, WHERE IT SAYS AT THE TOP "ESTIMATED 4,000 COUNSELING
[50:33] SESSIONS PER YEAR." CAN YOU SHARE A LITTLE BIT OF IN TERMS OF HOW WE'LL BE CAPTURING THE
[50:38] USAGE OF THOSE. OR, LIKE, INFORMATION, AROUND THAT. >> OH, SURE. UMM, YES. SO JUST
[50:44] TO GIVE A QUICK BACKGROUND OF WHY I SAID 4,000 COUNSELING SESSIONS PER YEAR. SO WHAT I
[50:50] DID, I CONSULTED THE NIH NUMBERS AROUND JUST GENERAL NATIONAL
[50:56] NUMBERS OF FOLKS THAT ACCESS MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, AND ON AVERAGE IT'S ABOUT 20 TO 25% OF
[51:01] THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT WILL ACCESS SPECIFICALLY COUNSELING. IT'S HIGHER FOR PSYCHIATRIC
[51:07] CARE. AND SO THEN WE LOOK AT THE NUMBER OF AVERAGE COUNSELING SESSIONS TO SEE, YEAH, THAT
[51:13] MARKED MENTAL HEALTH IMPROVEMENT. SO DEMANDING ON T -- DEPENDING ON TYPE OF
[51:19] THERAPY BEING USED, IT GENERALLY TAKES 10 TO 20 SESSIONS TO SEE
[51:24] MARKED CLINICAL IMPROVEMENT. BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND THE NUMBER OF STAFF AT MPD, WE KIND OF WORKED OUT A ROUGH ESTIMATE
[51:30] OF WHAT POTENTIALLY COULD BE THE UPWARDS NUMBER PER A YEAR OF COUNSELING SESSIONS. I WILL
[51:36] JUST SAY, IN MY PROFESSIONAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE, IT PROBABLY
[51:42] WON'T GET TO 4,000. TO BE SAFE, THAT'S SOMETHING WE WANT TO BASE IT ON THE NUMBERS AND THE DATA WE HAVE. TO GET BACK TO YOUR
[51:49] OTHER QUESTION, OR THE MAIN QUESTION ABOUT HOW WE'LL BE TRACKING THAT DATA. SO, OBVIOUSLY, CONSIDERING THE
[51:55] IMPORTANCE OF HIPPAA AND CONFIDENTIALITY, AND WANTING TO HOLD TRUE TO THAT, WE ARE
[52:01] ALREADY IN TALKS WITH WELLNESS THAT FITS -- AND THIS WAS PART OF THEIR PROPOSAL TO US -- OF HOW THEY WERE GOING TO TRACK
[52:07] DATA THAT WOULD BE GIVEN TO US SO WE COULD OF COURSE, REPORT OUT THE USAGE OF INFORMATION.
[52:14] BUT WOULDN'T COMPLETELY DEIDENTIFY. JUST FOR BASIC,
[52:19] WE'LL BE TRACKING NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT ARE UTILIZING SPECIFIC SERVICES. SO WE WENT
[52:25] EVER KNOW, YOU KNOW, THE NAME OF THE PERSON THAT'S USING OAR OR EVEN THE RANKS OR ANYTHING
[52:32] LIKE THAT. >> DO YOU KNOW IF IT'S QUARTERLY UPDATES YOU'LL BE RECEIVING? AND I'M GLAD YOU MENTIONED THE
[52:39] 25% AVERAGE BASED ON THE NIH FIGURES. I WAS THINKING THAT, TOO. WE CAN'T, OF COURSE, LIKE,
[52:46] RECEIVE SENSITIVE OR CONFIDENTIAL OR PERSONNEL INFORMATION. DO WE HAVE A
[52:52] METRIC THAT WE'RE REACHING THAT IS BAKED INTO THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AROUND 25% OF THE
[52:57] 4,000 OR, LIKE, SO EVEN JUST SEEING HOW WE'RE ACTUALLY MAKING
[53:02] USE OF THE TOTALITY OF THE SERVICE. >> YEAH. YEP. THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION, COUNCILMEMBER. SO
[53:09] THERE ISN'T A SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT THAT'S BAKED INTO THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF THE A SPECIFIC GOAL THAT WE'RE
[53:15] SUPPOSED TO GET TO. I MEAN, YOU KNOW, I'LL A LITTLE BIT BASED AS A CLINICAL PROFESSIONAL BUT I WOULD LOVE TO SEE ANYONE AND
[53:22] EVERYONE ACCESSING SERVICES. ESPECIALLY IF THEY'RE FREE AND ACCESSIBLE. THAT BEING SAID, UMM, I THINK THAT, YOU KNOW,
[53:29] WHAT WE'RE GOING TO BE DOING WITH WELLNESS THAT FITS, TRYING TO DO A CAMPAIGN THAT ADDRESSES
[53:34] THE STIGMA AND CULTURAL MISTRUST AND FEAR OF FOLKS HAVING ACCESS TO THE INFORMATION. DID THAT
[53:44] ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? >> AND THE REPORTING AND THE FREQUENCY OF THAT? >> SO SORRY ABOUT THAT. THANK YOU. AT MINIMUM, IT'S GOING TO
[53:49] BE QUARTERLY. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT I PERSONALLY WOULD WORK
[53:55] WITH DR. BRITTANY, THE DIRECTOR OF WELLNESS THAT FITS, TO POTENTIALLY TO DO MONTHLY BUT FORMALLY AT MINIMUM, IT'LL
[54:01] BE QUARTERLY. >> OKAY. THANK YOU FOR THAT. THOSE ARE ALL THE QUESTIONS I HAVE, PRESIDENT PAYNE. >> THANK YOU.
[54:07] >> SEEING NO ONE ELSE IN QUEUE, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. >> SO MOVED.
[54:14] >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY "AYE." OPPOSED SAY "NAY." ABSTENTIONS?
[54:21] THAT CARRIES. AND I WILL RETURN THE CHAIR BACK TO COUNCILMEMBER CHAVEZ FOR OUR STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS.
[54:26] >> THANK YOU, PRESIDENT PAYNE. WE'LL FINISH IT OFF WITH
[54:32] COMMITTEE REPORTS. FIRST, I'LL PASS IT TO THE ADMINISTRATION AND ENTERPRISE OVERSIGHT
[54:38] COMMITTEE. COUNCILMEMBER WONSLEY. >> THANK YOU. THE ADMINISTRATION AND COMPRISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE IS BRINGING
[54:44] FORWARD 17 ITEMS. THE FIRST IS A GIFT ACCEPTANCE FROM LOCAL PROGRESS OF REGULAR CONCENTRATION, TRAVEL, AND
[54:50] LODGING EXPENSES. TWO IS A COLLECTIVE BAR BEGANNING AGREEMENT AFSCME GENERAL UNIT
[54:58] 2025-2027. THREE IS A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT MINNEAPOLIS BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL,
[55:05] AFL-CIO. FOUR IS A CONTRACTS WITH THE VARIOUS VENDORS FOR INTERPRETING AND TRANSLATION
[55:12] SERVICES. FIVE IS CONTRACT WITH VARIOUS VENDORS FOR THE
[55:18] 2025-2028 VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES FOR NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY DEPARTMENT, IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO
[55:26] EXCEED $3.1 MILLION IN TOTAL. SIX A CONTRACT WITH TWIN CITIES
[55:32] HABITAT FOR HOMEOWNER REPAIRS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. SEVEN IS A
[55:37] CONTRACT WITH METER, LLC FOR
[55:42] RECYCLING AWARENESS CAMPAIGN PRODUCTION AND PLACEMENT SERVICES. EIGHT IS A CONTRACT WITH 2022CIPP MATERIALS
[55:49] CONTRACT. NINE IS A CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH UMOJO, INC. IN THE SUPPORT OF STAGE 1 OF THE
[55:56] S.M.A.R.T. GRANT PROGRAM. 10 IS A CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH THE
[56:01] STANEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
[56:06] SERVICES FOR PERSHING NEIGHBORHOOD CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. 11 IS LEASE AGREEMENT
[56:16] WITH MNJV CROSS TROWN, LLC. 123 IS A BID FOR LEAD SERVICE
[56:22] REPLACEMENTS YEAR TWO RESTORATION ONLY PROJECTS. 13 IS A BID FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE
[56:27] SECOND PHASE OF THE BIOCHAR PRODUCTION FACILITY. 14 IS A BID FOR PLANTINGS,ED SO, AND
[56:34] MAINTENANCE FOR FIRST AVENUE SOUTH. 15 IS A LEGAL SETTLEMENT
[56:42] WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIM OF DAN YOU DREWS. 16 IS A LEGAL
[56:48] SETTLEMENT DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION OF MINNEAPOLIS BICYCLE COALITION. 17 IS A MINNEAPOLIS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
[56:53] ON AGING APPOINTMENTS. WITH THAT, I STAND FOR QUESTIONS.
[57:00] >> THANK YOU. NEXT TO THE BUSINESS, HOUSING, AND ZONING COMMITTEE.
[57:09] >> THANK YOU. BRINGING 25 ITEMS. ONE IS APPROVING A LIQUOR LICENSE FOR PUTTSHACK.
[57:19] TWO FOR ANIMALES BBQ. THREE IS
[57:26] EXTENDED HOURS OF OPERATIONS FOR MR. DESSERT AND KUMIRP FOUR IS
[57:32] AN EXTENDED HOURS WITH BUSINESS LICENSE OPERATING CONDITIONS FOR MR. DESSERT AND KUMPIR AND LAKE
[57:41] STREET. FIVE IS A LAND SALE FOR PROPERTIES OF THE UPPER HARBOR
[57:49] TERMINAL SITE. SIX IS DENYING A ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY AT
[57:55] 4428 EDMUND BOULEVARD. SEVEN IS GRANTING A VARIANCE APPEAL TO
[58:01] ADD TODD PETERSON ON B.
[58:09] EIGHT IS APPROVING FIVE LIQUOR LICENSES. NINE IS APPROVING 24 LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS. 10 IS
[58:19] APPROVING THREE GAMBLING LICENSES. 11 IS APPROVING NINE GAMBLING LICENSE RENEWALS. 12
[58:25] IS APPROVING AN AMENDED BUSINESS LICENSE OPERATING CONDITION FOR
[58:35] PIZZERIA. 13 IS OPERATING CONDITION FOR CAFE. 14 IS
[58:41] APPROVING A REZONING ORDINANCE FOR PROPERTY AT 2933 FIFTH
[58:46] AVENUE SOUTH. 15 IS APPROVING SUB BOARD NATION OF EXISTING
[58:53] LOAN TO PROVISION LLC. 16 IS AUTHORIZING A LOAN FORGIVENESS TO THE JOSEPH SELL INITIATIVE
[59:04] PROJECT. 18 IS A FORGIVENESS OF
[59:19] GAP FINANCE LOAN TO EMERGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. 19 IS APPROVING ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR
[59:25] THE LITTLE EARTH PROJECT. 20 ACCEPTING YOUTH WORK GRANT FROM
[59:32] THE STATE. EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING SERVICES. 21 IS AC
[59:38] ACCEPTING MULTIPLE STATE GRANTS FOR EMPLOYMENT TRAINING SERVICES. 22 IS APPROVING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE MINNEAPOLIS
[59:44] ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON HOUSING FOR SEAT 10. 2 23
[59:49] RESOLUTION APPROVING A LAND SALE FOR THE HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY. 24 IS
[59:59] APPROVING TENANT RELOCATION ASSISTANCE LEGISLATIVE DIRECTIVE. 20 IS AUTHORIZING A
[1:00:04] AGREEMENT FOR NEW COWLES CENTER
[1:00:10] OPERATOR. WITH THAT, ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER CASHMAN. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. I WANT
[1:00:19] TO COMMENT ON ITEM FIVE. IN BIZ COMMITTEE, THE LLC DID CONFIRM
[1:00:28] THEY HAVE -- AND THEY PLAN TO NEGOTIATE THAT. THEY STILL HAVE BEEN SILENT ON UNITE HERE LOCAL
[1:00:35] 17. THE HOSPITALITY UNION. I REPRESENT MANY, MANY MEMBERS WHO LIVE DOWNTOWN AND I JUST REALLY
[1:00:41] BELIEVE THAT IF WE'RE INVESTING IN OUR PERFORMING ARTS INDUSTRY, WE SHOULD BE INVESTING IN GOOD
[1:00:46] UNION JOBS IN THIS INDUSTRY WHERE OUR RESIDENTS CAN WORK THERE. UNDER A GOOD CONTRACT.
[1:00:52] AND SO I REALLY URGE THE LLC TO TALK TO UNITE, GET TO THE TABLE WITH THEM, OR AT LEAST ANSWER
[1:00:58] E-MAILS SO WE CAN ALL MOVE FORWARD TOGETHER ON THIS PROJECT. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. NO ONE ELSE ON
[1:01:07] QUEUE. SO WE'LL RETURN BACK TO YOU, COUNCILMEMBER CASHMAN, AS THE CHAIR OF THE CLIMATE AND
[1:01:13] INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE. >> OKAY. THANK YOU. WE'RE BRINGING NINE ITEMS. ONE IS AN
[1:01:20] ORDINANCE AMENDMENT RELATED TO THE SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICTS ADVISORY BOARD COMPOSITION. TWO
[1:01:26] IS ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ELIMINATING THE SUNSET PROVISION FOR THE WEST BROADWAY IMPROVEMENT SPECIAL SERVICE
[1:01:32] DISTRICT. THREE IS PASSAGE OF RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A GRANT FROM MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
[1:01:37] TRANSPORTATION FOR THE SOUTH FOLWELL SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS AND AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT FOR THE
[1:01:42] GRANT. FOUR IS PASSAGE OF A RESOLUTION GRANT FOR THE
[1:01:49] MINNESOTA PLUS CONTROL AGENCY FOR OLIVER AVENUE SOUTH FLOOD MITIGATION PROJECT. FIVE IS
[1:01:56] RESOLUTION ACCEPTING LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GRANT FROM MNDOT ARE FOR ADA RAMPS IN THE
[1:02:03] SHINGLE CREEK WEST RESIDENTIAL PROJECT. SIX IS APPROVING AN APPOINTMENT FOR THE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE. THANK YOU
[1:02:09] TO THE RESIDENTS WHO APPLIED FOR THE CITY BOARD. SEVEN IS AUTHORIZING RENEWAL OF THE PILOT
[1:02:15] PERMIT FOR PERSONAL DELIVERY DEVICES. EIGHT IS APPROVING A SOUND PERMIT FOR THE WALKER ARTS
[1:02:21] CENTER ON SEPTEMBER 20th. AND NINE IS APPROVING THE TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMERA PILOT FRAMEWORK
[1:02:27] I'LL STAND FOR QUESTIONS..
[1:02:33] >> THANK YOU. NO ONE IS ON QUEUE. LASTLY, THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY COMMITTEE. AND THE VICE CHAIR,
[1:02:40] COUNCILMEMBER WONSLEY. >> THANK YOU, CHAIR CHAVEZ. THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY
[1:02:45] COMMITTEE IS BRINGING FORWARD SEVEN ITEMS. THE FIRST IS AUTHORIZING A GRANT APPLICATION
[1:02:51] FROM THE MINNESOTA DIVISION OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT FOR EMERGENCIES AND
[1:02:58] DISASTERS IN ACCEPTING SAID GRANT. TWO IS AUTHORIZING A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF BROOKLYN PARK TOO
[1:03:05] CONDUCT WAGE INVESTIGATIONS.
[1:03:11] THREE IS AUTHORIZING A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TO PROVIDE BOMB SQUAD SERVICES TO OTHER
[1:03:17] MUNICIPALITIES IN THE STATE. FOUR AND FIVE ARE JOINT POWER
[1:03:22] AGREEMENTS WITH CITIES OF MAPLE GROF AND MINNETONKA RESPECTIVELY
[1:03:27] TO PROVIDE LEGAL SERVICES. SIX IS APPROVING VARIOUS APPOINTMENTS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
[1:03:36] SEVEN IS AUTHORIZING A FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH THE LAKES COMMUNITY LAND TRUST FOR REAL ESTATE PURPOSE TO FACILITATE
[1:03:44] URBAN FARMING ON THE PURCHASE LOTS. WITH THAT, ANY QUESTIONS.
[1:03:50] >> THANK YOU. NO ONE ELSE ON QUEUE. WITH THAT, WE HAVE CONCLUDED ALL BUSINESS TO COME
[1:03:55] BEFORE COMMITTEE TODAY. I HEAR NO OBJECTION AND DECLARE THE MEETING ADJOURNED. THANK YOU.
Was this story helpful?
Other Topics from This Document
Public comment period for City Separation Ordinance and immigration matters
Resolution calling for an end to mass deportations and family separations
Ordinance amendments regarding Police Conduct Oversight (CCPO)
Contract extension/increase for DLG Consulting and Advisory Services for police investigations
Want to know when new stories arrive?
Enter your email to receive updates.
We will not use your email for any other purpose. You can unsubscribe at any time.