Minnetonka City Council — Transcript
Saturday, March 15, 2025
Story
Minnetonka eyes major overhaul of zoning rules and recreation facilities
Community Facilities Study: Glen Lake Activity Center
Community Facilities Study: Community Center
Community Facilities Study: Williston Fitness Center
Community Facilities Study: The Marsh
Votes (5)
Zoning Diagnostic Report
Sean Suder of Zone Co presented the diagnostic report, highlighting that Minnetonka's zoning code, largely unchanged since the 1980s despite 338 amendments, is inconsistent with the city's 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The report found the code to be text-heavy, lacking modern graphics, and administratively complex, leading to reliance on Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) due to base zoning inflexibility. Key recommendations included reorganizing the code, streamlining administrative processes, and potentially creating special, geographically-calibrated districts to allow for mixed-use and housing diversity (especially 'missing middle' housing) in targeted areas. Council and Planning Commission members discussed balancing predictability for residents with the need for flexibility for development, addressing housing affordability challenges, and integrating design guidelines and sustainability measures.
Community Facility Study: Glen Lake Activity Center
The Glen Lake Activity Center, currently used for meetings, a police substation, and storage, was identified as underutilized and dated, requiring a roof replacement. Options presented were demolition for $113,000 to free up the site for a regional skate park (funded in 2025 CIP), partial renovation for $838,000, or continuing as is. Council members largely agreed on demolishing the building due to its poor condition and low utility, preferring the site be used for the planned skate park, which would also include necessary facilities.
Community Facility Study: Community Center
The Community Center, where the meeting was held, was noted for its good event spaces and natural light but suffered from poor wayfinding, accessibility to senior areas, and dated public spaces. An original renovation project was paused due to The Marsh acquisition. Options included implementing the original plan (estimated $2.7 million for lobby, wayfinding, restrooms, and public space refresh) or adding minor enhancements like a lobby connection ($346k-$423k) or coffee bar ($150k+). Council members expressed that the building needs a refresh to remain competitive for rentals and improve user experience, with a general inclination to support the original renovation plan as a wise investment, pending financing discussions for all facilities.
Community Facility Study: Williston Fitness Center
The Williston Fitness Center was recognized for its popular youth amenities, swim programs, and tennis, but also had issues with dated locker rooms, parking, and a need for more fitness and pickleball space. Proposed renovations and expansions ranged from $16.6 million to $22.2 million, including additional parking, lobby improvements, expanded locker rooms, fitness space, and a new addition for indoor play and pickleball courts. Council members, while acknowledging its value and popularity, expressed significant reservations about the high cost and extensive scope, suggesting it be a lower priority compared to The Marsh and other city needs. Concerns were raised about expanding the footprint on an already constrained site and the cost-effectiveness of certain improvements like air conditioning the tennis barn.
Community Facility Study: The Marsh
The Marsh, a recently acquired unique health and wellness facility, was praised for its high demand, unique programming (seniors, adults, spa), and connection to nature. Challenges included its age, underutilized spaces, and code upgrade needs. Options presented were an interior refresh ($6.9 million), a heavier renovation to expand programming ($13.4 million - $17.9 million), or adding an event pavilion ($4.9 million - $5.9 million). Council members strongly dismissed selling the property, citing overwhelmingly positive community feedback and the strategic value of the acquisition. There was a strong inclination towards Option 2 (heavy renovation) to amplify its unique offerings, enhance spa services, improve dining, and ensure its long-term financial sustainability.
Notable Quotes (12)
The purpose of the diagnostic report is exactly that to audit your existing zoning regulations and see um you know whether they are advancing your plan vision and you have the 2040 plan in place it's been adopted uh spoiler alert it's not consistent I think you all know that.
If you find that it's serving as a barrier to trying to get things that you want in this community uh then that's a problem we need to eliminate those barriers and PVE the pave the way.
I think that this concept of automatically allowing more density will create more affordability is a little flawed on that front um that's just what I think because I've seen it and I've done the math and it doesn't work.
I think the unintended consequence of trying to do things the right way sometimes take you down that path and then uh yeah and that that's a problem as well.
I don't have any questions but it's a dump and we should demolish it.
I don't believe this is the highest best use of this land particularly given what we know about the skate park.
I just think it's overdo particularly you know the restrooms um if we're I mean that would be a deterrent I think for me if I were looking at a budget place for even a budget place for a wedding I would go into those restrooms and be like I can't do it so I think we're losing and Miss opportunity and I just you know as much as I I hate to spend the money it's it's just it's tired and it needs the refresh one way or another.
This space is um is fundamental and and uh it it does need updating and I think we you know when I think of you know people having a wedding here and things like that and and I've had family members who've had weddings here um you know and and it's it's it's a it's a nice space but it needs it needs a needs a little bit more so I think it's a I think that would be a wise spend that would be in the public interest.
I am so conflicted on this because I'd like to see our attention I think to the marsh and what needs to happen there but Willison is just such a great Community Asset that i'd love to there's nothing here that I don't think makes sense so I'm very torn but I think in kind of the Continuum of what we need to prioritize at least for right now feels like we need to PRI put our attention towards the marsh.
Willison is kind of my common man appro you know we do things you know that appeal to the Common Man in minaka we don't have to have the newest brightest and shiniest and so that's that's one part of me and but then the other part of it is that question of who do we want to really attract... spending $20 million on this location is a mistake and I wouldn't do it.
I love the Pavilion option um it reminds me of there's a really cool Pavilion at madens that they is like almost year round and they've they've heat they've got heaters very cool I just don't think I think we've got some similar space that we've developed with Ridell Commons and you know I again if we had a blank check I love it but I think we have to show some restraint here however I think option two would have a payback I I think we're closer to cash flowing the property especially if we take into account from an accounting perspective the business use of the city's use of that space.
I mean to me that's a no-brainer I at this points off the table for me the I agree that the the public feedback is extraordinarily positive I uh write to me you know when they when they see me at the store or whatever they literally go out of their way to thank me about the marsh and um so I just think it's a wonderful Community Asset.
Ordinances & Resolutions (9)
A comprehensive audit and evaluation of the city's existing zoning regulations.
The city's comprehensive plan, which the zoning ordinance is intended to implement but is currently inconsistent with.
The city's land use regulations, established in the '60s, overhauled in the '80s, and amended 338 times since 1986.
Section of the zoning code where design guidelines are loosely found today.
Upcoming city plan, prompting questions about incorporating sustainability into zoning.
A study evaluating the future uses and potential renovations of Minnetonka's four recreational facilities.
Mentioned as a past ordinance the city has responded to and updated.
Mentioned as a past ordinance the city has responded to and updated twice.
Capital Improvement Program funding for 2025, which includes the skate park and potentially Glen Lake demolition.