Minnetonka City Council — Transcript
Thursday, March 26, 2026
Planning Commission Operational Procedures
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Standards and Exceptions
Residential Subdivision and Redevelopment
School Campus Parking Expansion
Licensed Residential Care Facility Development
Votes (5)
Consent Agenda (Items 7A & 7B)
Dissent: None
Moved by Commissioner Minion [9:15] · Seconded by Commissioner Johnson [9:20]
The consent agenda included an expansion permit for a second-story addition at 15120 Belvoir Drive and front yard setback variances for a garage addition at 5642 Scenic Drive. Commissioner Johnson inquired about Item 7B, clarifying that the garage addition itself had been previously approved. No members of the audience or commission wished to remove items for separate discussion. The public hearing was opened and closed without public comment.
Conditional Use Permit for a detached accessory dwelling unit at 15815 Minnetonka Boulevard
Dissent: None
Moved by Commissioner Johnson [37:44] · Seconded by Commissioner Brink [38:00]
Staff recommended denial due to the proposed ADU significantly exceeding city code limits for size (2,376 sq ft vs. 1,000 sq ft or 35% of principal structure) and height (30 ft vs. 24 ft, and taller than the principal dwelling). The applicant argued that the 1.35-acre property, substantial distance from neighbors, existing and proposed screening, and the multi-functional nature of the structure (combining garage, screen porch, and ADU) justified an exception allowed for City Council approval if no undue adverse impacts result. Commissioners expressed concerns about setting a precedent for approving structures so far outside the ordinance's intent and difficulty in maintaining long-term landscaping effectiveness. No public comments were received.
Preliminary and final plat of Oakland Estate second edition, the two lot subdivision at 1915 and 1929 Oakland Road
Dissent: None
Moved by Commissioner Johnson [47:33] · Seconded by Commissioner Brink [47:40]
The application proposed reconfiguring two unplatted R1 zoned parcels (3.44 acres) into two slightly adjusted lots. The primary goal was to create a larger, more buildable area on the currently vacant 1915 Oakland Road parcel, by shifting the lot line and removing existing retaining walls. The project included demolishing the existing 1942 home at 1929 Oakland Road and constructing two new single-family homes. Staff confirmed that all proposed lots met city code standards, including wetland setbacks and tree protection (despite significant tree removal). No comments were received from neighbors or the public.
Conditional use permit and site plan review for parking lot addition at 18301 Highway 7 and 18407 Delton Avenue
Dissent: None
Moved by Commissioner Brink [58:55] · Seconded by Commissioner Minion [59:00]
Minnetonka High School sought to expand an existing 19-stall parking lot by 14 net spaces on a recently acquired 0.5-acre property adjacent to its 97-acre campus. Staff confirmed the proposal met all conditional use permit, site plan review, parking, and steep slope ordinance requirements, noting the expansion avoided steep slope areas and included new stormwater chambers connecting to existing infrastructure. While 29 trees would be removed, this was considered minor given the campus size and compliance with the tree protection ordinance. The applicant confirmed no further western expansion and plans for a safety railing on the retaining wall. No public comments were received.
Conditional use permit for two 10 resident licensed residential care facilities at 2000 Hopkins Crossroad
Dissent: None
Moved by Commissioner Johnson [1:25:30] · Seconded by Commissioner Brink [1:26:00]
The proposal involved demolishing the vacant 1920 Oaknull Elementary School building to construct two 10-bedroom licensed residential care facilities for individuals with Alzheimer's or dementia. Staff noted that while retaining the historic building was explored, it was deemed economically unfeasible. The design included two one-story buildings, extensive parking, three engineered rain gardens for stormwater management (one with a secure community feature), and a commitment to preserving historical elements like the school sign and salvaged bricks. An email of support was received from a neighbor, praising the use and operator's reputation. Commissioners lauded the project as a well-designed, much-needed community asset.
Notable Quotes (14)
as I read the report, I think it's in addition to the home that the garage edition was previously approved.
The city code limits the ADU to 1,000 square ft or 35% of the floor area of the principal structure, whichever is less.
One of the important goals of the ADU ordinance is to limit ADUs in size so that they appear and function as an accessory to the principal dwelling, not as a separate standalone building.
The proposed structure exceeds the standard sides because it serves three functions. A garage, a screen porch, pool support space, as well as the ADU itself.
This is so far in excess of the 1,000 square foot limit that the code says. It is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan that this be accessory not an additional uh main structure.
So, while both lots are buildable currently, uh the proposal to subdivide is essentially to create uh a little bit of a larger lot or more buildable area at 1915 Oakland Road.
is this one of those where since all the standards are met, we're effectively obligated to approve it?
So everything to the left is steep and everything to the right is not. So you can see this where it's being proposed is outside of that steep slope area.
this was a piece of land that we bought a year ago. worked with the homeowner uh uh to um uh actually the the person who was living here passed away and the the the property was somewhat distressed and and we purchased it for a fair price and looking to add this on.
to answer the question about the storm water management, those those those chamber systems actually do percolate into the ground. However, during heavier storm events, there is an elevated outlet and it does get to the storm sewer system just during those heavy rainfall events.
The group did consult... with both a construction company and an affordable housing developer who actually specializes in historic reuse projects but simply found that the cost to refurbish to bring this building up to current standards whether it was for office or commercial use or to convert it to housing were just simply um too great.
Staff does recognize that removing that school building that's been in place for hundred years over um will certainly visually change that that corridor um that may be disappointing, but we do think that again in the opinion of staff, this proposal has been very well thought out.
We have been working with the Minnesota or the Minnotonka Historical Society and um we'll be working with them to document and photograph the building... and then we'll be um salvaging some of the bricks from the building as well and plan to use it to line the sidewalks... and then to incorporate it um to some extent at least on the monument sign um for the community as well.
I really do think it's an improvement to the neighborhood. I appreciate the uh the approach that um the developers been been so in much contact with the uh city and with the residents. They've done a really great job putting this together. Um it meets so many of the standards, does it well, and it's it's really something that's needed for our community.
Ordinances & Resolutions (19)
City document that guides development, balancing individual rights and community responsibilities.
City regulations governing land use and development.
City rules governing the division of land into smaller parcels.
Permit for a pool on Ford Road, previously recommended by the Planning Commission and approved by City Council.
Action reviewed by City Council on Liner Road and Oakland Road.
Action reviewed by City Council on Liner Road and Oakland Road.
Item 7A on the consent agenda for 15120 Belvoir Drive.
Item 7B on the consent agenda for a garage addition at 5642 Scenic Drive.
City code regulating accessory dwelling units, including size and height limits.
Specific permit type for Item 8A, debated for its proposed size and height deviations.
The proposed action for the ADU at 15815 Minnetonka Boulevard.
Guiding document for land use classification (e.g., low-density residential).
The subdivision request for 1915 and 1929 Oakland Road (Item 8B).
The proposed action for the Oakland Estate second edition subdivision.
City regulations concerning tree removal and preservation during development.
Request for Minnetonka High School parking expansion (Item 8C).
City regulations on required parking spaces and loading facilities.
City regulations protecting areas with significant elevation changes from development.
Request for the development at 2000 Hopkins Crossroad (Item 8D).