00:00:05.634 --> 00:00:09.000

So we’re gonna go ahead and call the meeting to order, so

00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:13.734

we’re first gonna start with the reconvened local Board of 00:00:13.734 --> 00:00:15.500

Appeals and equalization meeting before we jump into

00:00:15.500 --> 00:00:22.233

that, um, Got about 1000 papers here. So I need to uh Uh, just 00:00:22.233 --> 00:00:24.634

make an opening statement regarding interactive

00:00:24.634 --> 00:00:30.233

technology. So as previously noted, uh, board members, uh, 00:00:30.233 --> 00:00:33.467

I’m gonna call out Maria Tran cause I’m not sure if she is

00:00:33.467 --> 00:00:37.266

going to attend, um, and Amanda Jung of the city council will

00:00:37.266 --> 00:00:40.400

be participating in the meeting by interactive technology 00:00:40.400 --> 00:00:44.934

pursuant to Minnesota statute, Section 13D.02 rather than in

00:00:44.934 --> 00:00:47.567

person at the board’s regular meeting place at City Hall

00:00:47.567 --> 00:00:51.767

council chambers, 5,28 5th Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, 00:00:51.767 --> 00:00:54.300

Minnesota. I am physically present in the city council

00:00:54.300 --> 00:00:56.500

chambers along with board members Christian. generics in

00:00:56.500 --> 00:00:59.634

Nicole Kanowski, Shelley P Paige, and Tony McGarvey, all

00:00:59.634 --> 00:01:03.367

members can hear one another and can hear all discussion and 00:01:03.367 --> 00:01:06.567

testimony, members of the public can monitor the Board of

00:01:06.567 --> 00:01:14.033

Appeal and equalization meeting by calling 1 218302-5973 and 00:01:14.033 --> 00:01:19.900

entering meeting meeting ID 131393434 and then pressing um

00:01:19.900 --> 00:01:23.133

I can’t, I can never remember what that is. The pound sign. 00:01:23.133 --> 00:01:26.834

When you’re asked to enter a participant ID or by watching

00:01:26.834 --> 00:01:37.000

it on CCX Media, Channel 16, or by live streaming it at HTTPS 00:01:37.000 --> 00:01:38.233

uh www. Brooklynark.org/City-council.

00:01:38.233 --> 00:01:42.834

All right, so we can go ahead, um, and, uh, and again, that 00:01:42.834 --> 00:01:45.667

was not too uh call customer train out in a disrespectful

00:01:45.667 --> 00:01:49.033

manner. It was just in case she uh does decide to attend. I

00:01:49.033 --> 00:01:54.100

want to make that clear. So we’ll go ahead and we’ll head 00:01:54.100 --> 00:01:59.000

into the Winston. Oh yeah we need so we gotta do the roll

00:01:59.000 --> 00:02:01.767

call and then we’ll head into the next portion. Board member 00:02:01.767 --> 00:02:08.767

Erickson. Board member John. Why is that? Board member

00:02:08.767 --> 00:02:13.533

Klenowski. Yeah. Chair of Winston. Present board member 00:02:13.533 --> 00:02:19.800

page. Board member McGarvey Board member uh Tran. Chair

00:02:19.800 --> 00:02:23.500

Winston, you have a quorum. All right, thank you. So, uh, if we 00:02:23.500 --> 00:02:30.500

can go ahead and head into the assessor’s report. Very good. 00:02:30.500 --> 00:02:33.634

Uh, thank you, council members in City of Broken Park. So this

00:02:33.634 --> 00:02:36.834

is a reconvened meeting from the original. Local Board of

00:02:36.834 --> 00:02:40.000

Appeals and equalization meeting on April 14th. Uh, 00:02:40.000 --> 00:02:43.266

gives us a chance to review parcels said property owners to

00:02:43.266 --> 00:02:46.500

come in at that time and make a decision on that. Yeah, I’m,

00:02:46.500 --> 00:02:51.233

I’m sorry, I’m not trying to be rude, but it looks like someone 00:02:51.233 --> 00:03:03.000

called in a 651-214-425. 5 number. Yeah OK, thank you. OK. 00:03:03.000 --> 00:03:07.367

So, uh, as a PowerPoint here, Goes through. This is the

00:03:07.367 --> 00:03:13.133

reconvened meeting. And click on that. There we go. So again, 00:03:13.133 --> 00:03:16.233

the meeting overview and assessment procedures on this

00:03:16.233 --> 00:03:19.500

to recap on this. The purpose is to provide a form for

00:03:19.500 --> 00:03:22.300

property owners who appealed their 2025 valuation and 00:03:22.300 --> 00:03:25.400

classification. On that previously mentioned April 14,

00:03:25.400 --> 00:03:29.767

2025, local Board of Appeal and equalization date or have

00:03:29.767 --> 00:03:32.300

appealed between that local board date and the reconvened 00:03:32.300 --> 00:03:35.634

meeting, which was originally scheduled um prior to the 28th

00:03:35.634 --> 00:03:42.000

this week earlier. Uh, to recap, you cannot review the amount or 00:03:42.000 --> 00:03:46.734

percentage change over the previous years. The tax amount

00:03:46.734 --> 00:03:51.000

or potential tax impact. Is not to be taken into consideration. 00:03:51.000 --> 00:03:55.767

We are here for the taxable the property valuation purposes.

00:03:55.767 --> 00:04:00.533

The board can determine to increase, decrease or sustain 00:04:00.533 --> 00:04:06.467

the assessed value. The adjustments must be

00:04:06.467 --> 00:04:09.266

substantiated by factual evidence, i.e., supporting

00:04:09.266 --> 00:04:12.300

documentation, that I feel statements. And we are 00:04:12.300 --> 00:04:16.000

requesting the time limit for presentation to be 3 minutes.

00:04:16.000 --> 00:04:21.367

Per Ah, so again, the adjustments must be 00:04:21.367 --> 00:04:23.500

substantiated by factual evidence, the burden of proof

00:04:23.500 --> 00:04:27.200

rests with the property owners who must present factual

00:04:27.200 --> 00:04:30.033

evidence to disprove the assessor’s value for the 00:04:30.033 --> 00:04:34.734

assessment January 2, 2025 for taxes payable in 2026.

00:04:34.734 --> 00:04:38.900

Reasonable effort must be made on behalf of the property owner

00:04:38.900 --> 00:04:42.166

to communicate regarding appeal, as well as allow interior 00:04:42.166 --> 00:04:46.000

viewing of the property and additional structures. That is

00:04:46.000 --> 00:04:52.467

a state statute, Minnesota state statute 274.01 00:04:52.467 --> 00:04:55.567

subdivision one paragraph B. Uh, the sentence starts with the

00:04:55.567 --> 00:04:59.133

board may not make individual market value adjustments or

00:04:59.133 --> 00:05:03.734

classifications. Change that would benefit the property 00:05:03.734 --> 00:05:07.300

owner if the property, if the owner or other persons having

00:05:07.300 --> 00:05:10.467

control of the property has refused the assessor access to 00:05:10.467 --> 00:05:18.000

inspect the property. And the interior of any buildings or

00:05:18.000 --> 00:05:21.266

structures provided in subsection 273.20, which breaks 00:05:21.266 --> 00:05:27.033

down the assessor’s function. Um, also per state statute, any

00:05:27.033 --> 00:05:31.300

city council person members acting as a board member with a 00:05:31.300 --> 00:05:34.000

property appeal or appeals must excuse or recuse themselves

00:05:34.000 --> 00:05:36.634

from any actions pertaining to their property or property use.

00:05:36.634 --> 00:05:40.467

If they wish to comment, it will be the same its manner and 00:05:40.467 --> 00:05:45.300

procedure which residents will be able to do so. That is uh

00:05:45.300 --> 00:05:50.033

also in the same statue. Uh, starting with the a board 00:05:50.033 --> 00:05:52.734

member may not or shall not participate in any actions of

00:05:52.734 --> 00:05:55.900

the board, which results in market value adjustments or

00:05:55.900 --> 00:05:58.033

classification changes to property owned by the board

00:05:58.033 --> 00:06:03.400

member. The spouse, parent, stepparent, child, stepchild, 00:06:03.400 --> 00:06:06.500

grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, uncle, aunt,

00:06:06.500 --> 00:06:09.367

nephew, or niece of a board member or property in which

00:06:09.367 --> 00:06:13.000

board member has a financial interest. The relationship may 00:06:13.000 --> 00:06:20.467

be by blood or by marriage. So that being said, we have 00:06:20.467 --> 00:06:23.100

example C.1, which were the appeals that were received on

00:06:23.100 --> 00:06:28.900

April 14th of 2025. I’m not gonna recap these as they were.

00:06:28.900 --> 00:06:31.233

We’ll get through those in a moment, but those are the 00:06:31.233 --> 00:06:36.634

individuals who Presented themselves. And their parcels

00:06:36.634 --> 00:06:44.033

and the 14th date. Um, after the 14th between that date and 00:06:44.033 --> 00:06:55.734

the reconvened, one member, uh, parcel ID 0511921130040 for 00:06:55.734 --> 00:06:59.400

Joshua and Susan Hegel, residing at 6941, 105th Trail

00:06:59.400 --> 00:07:05.367

North. appealed their property valuation and the settlement 00:07:05.367 --> 00:07:14.367

was reached on that. Uh, at this time, we are The Appeal 00:07:14.367 --> 00:07:20.233

summary was sent out to the council members, I believe on 00:07:20.233 --> 00:07:23.467

Thursday the 24th, or documentation that the

00:07:23.467 --> 00:07:26.233

assessor’s office has received from property owners, as well

00:07:26.233 --> 00:07:30.467

as our recommendation changes on that for your review prior 00:07:30.467 --> 00:07:37.300

to this meeting tonight. In the instance for appeal A1. The

00:07:37.300 --> 00:07:40.667

residents of 8328 Fairfield Road North. We are here this 00:07:40.667 --> 00:07:45.900

evening to present their case before the board and uh. Take a

00:07:45.900 --> 00:07:49.367

moment to invite them to come up. To speak on their behalf if

00:07:49.367 --> 00:07:58.734

they wish. To readdress the board. I think we’re asking 00:07:58.734 --> 00:08:03.000

folks to limit it to 3 minutes. Was that the suggestion? OK. 00:08:03.000 --> 00:08:10.900

Yeah. Thank you. Hi, I’m Kevin Holler, and I live at 83. 28 00:08:10.900 --> 00:08:13.367

Fairfield Road, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, and that’s my wife

00:08:13.367 --> 00:08:19.000

Valerie. And I’d just like to say that uh um I appreciate you

00:08:19.000 --> 00:08:23.300

working late today and uh. I spent my day today working on 00:08:23.300 --> 00:08:28.033

setting stone on the new fire department building in Idina.

00:08:28.033 --> 00:08:31.200

And I know it takes a lot of tax dollars to build such a 00:08:31.200 --> 00:08:37.100

structure. But what I’m asking is that those tax dollars are

00:08:37.100 --> 00:08:44.667

Gathered in a more equitable manner. And so I briefly want 00:08:44.667 --> 00:08:49.533

to address the use of the map factor and the challenges Of

00:08:49.533 --> 00:08:54.233

the mass appraisal method. Uh, especially when applied to 00:08:54.233 --> 00:08:59.567

unique and uh outlier homes like ours. The map factor is

00:08:59.567 --> 00:09:02.200

supposed to make adjustments based on neighborhood market 00:09:02.200 --> 00:09:07.300

trends. But in practice, it’s part of a mass appraisal system.

00:09:07.300 --> 00:09:14.100

These systems by nature aren’t precise. They rely on formulas 00:09:14.100 --> 00:09:18.300

and averages that work best when homes are uniform and

00:09:18.300 --> 00:09:22.166

sales are consistent. But our home is not typical for the 00:09:22.166 --> 00:09:27.500

neighborhood. It’s newer Has different features and doesn’t

00:09:27.500 --> 00:09:33.800

match the surrounding homes. Because of this, the mass 00:09:33.800 --> 00:09:38.033

appraisal can lead to inaccurate values. And that’s

00:09:38.033 --> 00:09:42.767

exactly what we’re seeing here. Even though the assessor says 00:09:42.767 --> 00:09:48.867

the map factor is applied uniformly. It can produce

00:09:48.867 --> 00:09:53.000

inconsistent results even between similar homes. And 00:09:53.000 --> 00:09:57.233

there’s no transparency on exactly how it’s calculated.

00:09:57.233 --> 00:10:02.567

Making it hard for homeowners to verify or challenge it. In 00:10:02.567 --> 00:10:09.500

short, mass appraisal. is known to make heirs. Especially for

00:10:09.500 --> 00:10:13.800

unique properties. That’s why the Department of Revenue 00:10:13.800 --> 00:10:19.634

allows appeals like what’s happened here. The map factor.

00:10:19.634 --> 00:10:24.000

Inflated our value beyond What’s supported by sales of 00:10:24.000 --> 00:10:27.634

larger or more updated homes and stronger neighborhoods.

00:10:27.634 --> 00:10:35.734

Thank you. Hi, I’m Valerie Holler, 8328 Fairfield Road, 00:10:35.734 --> 00:10:39.900

Brooklyn Park, and thank you for your time, um, I trust that

00:10:39.900 --> 00:10:42.800

you had the opportunity to take a look at all of the materials 00:10:42.800 --> 00:10:47.467

that I sent, they were pretty extensive, and they were also

00:10:47.467 --> 00:10:52.900

images, um, and The um Assessor’s report is riddled 00:10:52.900 --> 00:10:57.100

with errors. Just to point out a couple, um, we have one

00:10:57.100 --> 00:11:02.900

egress window, the assessor said, we have 2. we have a back 00:11:02.900 --> 00:11:10.367

hall with no built-ins, the assessor said we have 2. there 00:11:10.367 --> 00:11:16.767

is the uh so-called vaulted ceiling, it’s 7.5 ft high. So

00:11:16.767 --> 00:11:21.000

it’s riddled with errors, um, and I don’t have a, a speech 00:11:21.000 --> 00:11:25.000

prepared here, but I do have um a couple of things I wanted to

00:11:25.000 --> 00:11:28.000

talk about. You might wonder why I selected the homes that I

00:11:28.000 --> 00:11:33.834

had when I put the, a couple of homes in these appeals. Um, the 00:11:33.834 --> 00:11:37.133

first one was over in Edinburgh. I have, we have friends over

00:11:37.133 --> 00:11:40.767

there and I saw this beautiful house and I wondered, I wonder 00:11:40.767 --> 00:11:43.500

what that’s assessed for, and I, I quite frankly, I was shocked

00:11:43.500 --> 00:11:47.800

that it was assessed for a lower value. than our home. Um,

00:11:47.800 --> 00:11:52.133

and then I was scanning the Hennepin County map. Um, 00:11:52.133 --> 00:11:56.367

recently, in, in the new information, one of the things

00:11:56.367 --> 00:12:01.133

that I, um, shared was a house on the river, and that one I 00:12:01.133 --> 00:12:07.000

had just seen it had gone down in value, the estimated market

00:12:07.000 --> 00:12:10.734

value by the assessors as it had gone down in value, a 00:12:10.734 --> 00:12:13.033

percentage, I don’t remember the exact percentage, but it’s

00:12:13.033 --> 00:12:19.233

in the documents that you have. And yet our property has gone

00:12:19.233 --> 00:12:23.634

up 7.2% in a year. It’s the only one I, I’ve given you the 00:12:23.634 --> 00:12:28.867

data there. You can see it, the numbers don’t lie. Um, and so,

00:12:28.867 --> 00:12:34.166

as, um, my husband brought out about the map factor, um, there 00:12:34.166 --> 00:12:37.900

have been problems with map factors when they’re doing mass

00:12:37.900 --> 00:12:44.834

appraisals for properties that are unlike some others. Um, I 00:12:44.834 --> 00:12:49.300

wanted to look at that map. It’s in the, it’s in Q2

00:12:49.300 --> 00:12:52.900

additional information, um, and I’ve circled our property on my 00:12:52.900 --> 00:12:56.667

picture. I think yours if you have it in color, it’s in blue,

00:12:56.667 --> 00:13:02.500

but our property value went up from 510 to 546, I think it 00:13:02.500 --> 00:13:08.367

says, and um we’re asking for a reassessment all the way down

00:13:08.367 --> 00:13:12.100

to $450,000 because that’s what our realtor has said that’s 00:13:12.100 --> 00:13:15.934

what the data shows. So what we’re asking is that you look

00:13:15.934 --> 00:13:21.166

at those data or look at all of that data and take all of that 00:13:21.166 --> 00:13:24.467

data into consideration and reduce the estimated market

00:13:24.467 --> 00:13:29.233

value of our property. Um, and I was wondering if you had any

00:13:29.233 --> 00:13:37.200

questions for us. Can you, can you give me the address again? 00:13:37.200 --> 00:13:41.000

Sorry. 8328 Fairfield Road, Brooklyn Park. OK. And I, I 00:13:41.000 --> 00:13:44.767

have put pictures of the egress, we had one egress window, and,

00:13:44.767 --> 00:13:47.500

you know, I put, I gave you pictures of all of the things

00:13:47.500 --> 00:13:50.100

that, you know, the upstairs bathroom, it adds vinyl 00:13:50.100 --> 00:13:54.200

flooring. The assessor said it was tile. We don’t have

00:13:54.200 --> 00:13:59.200

wainscoting, so it’s just um. brings one to question. What’s

00:13:59.200 --> 00:14:02.300

really going on here. We also in the in the garage attic, 00:14:02.300 --> 00:14:07.634

it’s not, it’s not some attic you can go into. Um, so. So

00:14:07.634 --> 00:14:10.867

anyway, I have, those are the things that I had to share this 00:14:10.867 --> 00:14:14.033

evening, so I hope that you will take this into

00:14:14.033 --> 00:14:18.233

consideration and Um, reassess or whatever the correct term is,

00:14:18.233 --> 00:14:21.734

I don’t know, reduce the estimated market value. Thank 00:14:21.734 --> 00:14:26.233

you. So thank you for that. Mr. so Mr. Anderson, I guess if we

00:14:26.233 --> 00:14:31.033

can get um an understanding of the timeline necessary in terms 00:14:31.033 --> 00:14:34.400

of making these decisions, uh. And then kind of the the city’s

00:14:34.400 --> 00:14:38.500

thoughts on that particular property as it stands. And then

00:14:38.500 --> 00:14:41.767

I guess uh, you know, uh, board members, if you had any 00:14:41.767 --> 00:14:47.233

questions, please let me know. So the, but You’re questioning

00:14:47.233 --> 00:14:52.367

the timeline on the appeal or no, yeah, in terms of um. I 00:14:52.367 --> 00:14:57.467

think They’re saying, I’m, I’m looking at as the top property,

00:14:57.467 --> 00:15:01.000

right? So do we need to, regarding them, do we need to 00:15:01.000 --> 00:15:04.400

make a decision today regarding them or is it something they

00:15:04.400 --> 00:15:07.900

can do for the research into or what I just kind of want to

00:15:07.900 --> 00:15:12.734

understand the various options that are available. So we have 00:15:12.734 --> 00:15:18.634

You can have the You print on the purpose, you don’t. You. of

00:15:18.634 --> 00:15:25.266

the No. OK. That’s OK. So essentially tonight, this 00:15:25.266 --> 00:15:28.734

evening, the purpose of that would be to make a make a

00:15:28.734 --> 00:15:34.033

decision on that with to lower the value to increase the value 00:15:34.033 --> 00:15:38.367

or to retain the value of the assessment year. Uh, a lot of

00:15:38.367 --> 00:15:41.734

the information that they pointed out earlier, it’s not 00:15:41.734 --> 00:15:45.300

actually a factor that we take into account in valuation, the

00:15:45.300 --> 00:15:48.367

number of egress windows are not anything that’s taken into

00:15:48.367 --> 00:15:52.934

consideration. The vast majority of it is done through 00:15:52.934 --> 00:15:57.567

your overall square footage. And quality of finish on that.

00:15:57.567 --> 00:16:02.834

Also taking a look into account. The property does have a 00:16:02.834 --> 00:16:09.834

detached 2 car garage that has a 3/4 bathroom. In that

00:16:09.834 --> 00:16:14.100

detached garage as well. So overall there’s a 4 car stall 00:16:14.100 --> 00:16:21.033

total garage on this property. The Other items. recall 00:16:21.033 --> 00:16:22.900

anything. The assessor who actually did the inspection is

00:16:22.900 --> 00:16:25.100

here this evening, so is there anything else that you can

00:16:25.100 --> 00:16:33.467

think of to point out? OK, like I said, the detached garages. 00:16:33.467 --> 00:16:37.867

Sure. So and a lot of the, they mentioned the landscaping of

00:16:37.867 --> 00:16:41.300

that nature. It’s also not anything that takes into 00:16:41.300 --> 00:16:43.166

consideration for evaluation purposes. It essentially makes

00:16:43.166 --> 00:16:46.734

the property look more appealing from the street view.

00:16:46.734 --> 00:16:51.033

The reason for the adjustment is because prior year there was 00:16:51.033 --> 00:16:55.767

a 17% depreciation placed onto the property. That was updated

00:16:55.767 --> 00:17:00.767

this year to 10%. To a 10% depreciation, that 7% change is 00:17:00.767 --> 00:17:03.834

also a factor in taking into account a larger bump. If you

00:17:03.834 --> 00:17:10.166

will, in that valuation. The successor’s office have, as we 00:17:10.166 --> 00:17:12.834

mentioned in the documentation sent out last week. We

00:17:12.834 --> 00:17:16.567

recommend that no change for the valuation on there.

00:17:16.567 --> 00:17:19.767

Whatever your decision is tonight. The property owners

00:17:19.767 --> 00:17:23.500

still have the opportunity to go to the county board for 00:17:23.500 --> 00:17:26.400

Hennepin County as well, should they wish to do that. Yeah, so

00:17:26.400 --> 00:17:29.367

that was gonna be my follow up that this just so folks know

00:17:29.367 --> 00:17:32.667

they can go to the county for that appeal if we were to make 00:17:32.667 --> 00:17:38.367

a particular decision, so. All right. All right, thank you. Uh,

00:17:38.367 --> 00:17:44.867

did you? OK. Um, chair, uh, not chair but uh board member, uh, 00:17:44.867 --> 00:17:49.166

Paige. That’s good for the future. I’m kidding. Um, I just

00:17:49.166 --> 00:17:52.000

want you to know, I just want to put commentary. I drove 00:17:52.000 --> 00:17:54.100

right after the last one I drove by, I did all the

00:17:54.100 --> 00:17:57.100

research, um, and I’m not sure that you’re aware, but there

00:17:57.100 --> 00:18:02.100

are two properties that were almost 15%, um, and I, the 00:18:02.100 --> 00:18:07.300

market is so hot, you’re in a highly desirable area. I

00:18:07.300 --> 00:18:09.467

couldn’t find supporting information to reduce, and I

00:18:09.467 --> 00:18:12.634

worked really hard to go through everything and some of 00:18:12.634 --> 00:18:17.100

the things you’re looking for selling, compensating factors,

00:18:17.100 --> 00:18:19.567

and then assessing. Compensating factors. So

00:18:19.567 --> 00:18:22.400

they’re two different, right? The market drives with the 00:18:22.400 --> 00:18:29.166

market and, and right now, I, I think you would I think Your

00:18:29.166 --> 00:18:31.834

realtor would be doing a disservice if you went with the 00:18:31.834 --> 00:18:35.000

value that you’re listing here because your home appears in

00:18:35.000 --> 00:18:37.367

the market right now to be worth so much more. So I just

00:18:37.367 --> 00:18:40.900

want you to know, we did, I did the due diligence. I went 00:18:40.900 --> 00:18:44.166

through all those properties. I think I looked at 27 properties.

00:18:44.166 --> 00:18:47.900

I drove by your home. I compared it to the recent sales,

00:18:47.900 --> 00:18:51.667

the pendings, um, I think there were 4 that went into sold 00:18:51.667 --> 00:18:54.834

since the last meeting that supported a higher value for

00:18:54.834 --> 00:18:58.133

you, so the market is still very strong, um, and I wasn’t

00:18:58.133 --> 00:19:03.533

able to based on your data. Um, challenge what the assessor did. 00:19:03.533 --> 00:19:05.834

So I just want to share that with you from my personal

00:19:05.834 --> 00:19:09.667

experience. I don’t know what you’re, I don’t think we’re

00:19:09.667 --> 00:19:12.734

having a conversation. I’m just giving commentary for you. 00:19:12.734 --> 00:19:19.467

Thank you. All right, thank you. Were there, um, any other folks

00:19:19.467 --> 00:19:23.800

that wanted to, that we’re gonna go speak or. For this 00:19:23.800 --> 00:19:27.467

hearing? Not in regards to this parcel, no, we to any other

00:19:27.467 --> 00:19:30.033

persons. Yeah, I was saying so I would recommend making a 00:19:30.033 --> 00:19:32.200

motion on this parcel to move on to the next one, do the same

00:19:32.200 --> 00:19:36.900

thing, and then the remainder ones are a bulk, if you will.

00:19:36.900 --> 00:19:44.033

Sorry. So, yeah, I’m in, I mean, I’m inclined to keep it the 00:19:44.033 --> 00:19:47.834

same based on the information I’m hearing, you know, from

00:19:47.834 --> 00:19:51.100

various sources, um. But I, I guess my question then because 00:19:51.100 --> 00:19:53.133

what we have in front of us is a motion, right? It says

00:19:53.133 --> 00:19:55.634

basically accept the city assess valuation

00:19:55.634 --> 00:19:59.467

recommendations, but that’s for all, all of these, right? This

00:19:59.467 --> 00:20:06.367

whole list. Correct. Right. So that’s what one are present and 00:20:06.367 --> 00:20:09.133

a2 would also potentially be present. And they are the ones

00:20:09.133 --> 00:20:17.100

that would be to contest the Valuation A 3 through A 16 on 00:20:17.100 --> 00:20:21.667

the screen here omitting a few are either continuously working. 00:20:21.667 --> 00:20:26.567

On the valuation or have refused entrance to the

00:20:26.567 --> 00:20:30.900

property. So we haven’t either been able to get into the 00:20:30.900 --> 00:20:35.233

properties to view it, one way, shape, or form. Or we are

00:20:35.233 --> 00:20:40.000

continuing to work with them up to the county board to reach an 00:20:40.000 --> 00:20:41.734

agreement on valuation. Just haven’t done that at this point.

00:20:41.734 --> 00:20:47.734

And I’m, I’m not seeing a 2 here, so. Pardon? A 2, I’m not

00:20:47.734 --> 00:20:52.000

saying here. Right. So I think we would just go ahead and move 00:20:52.000 --> 00:20:58.166

forward with the motion then. I just want to make sure we’re on

00:20:58.166 --> 00:21:02.467

the same page. Make the motion for a one. Is what I would 00:21:02.467 --> 00:21:06.934

recommend or to accept it. To accept. I, I guess maybe I’m

00:21:06.934 --> 00:21:11.500

confused on this one. So just one second. So we have, you 00:21:11.500 --> 00:21:17.100

know, 81 through B6 listed, right on, uh, D1, basically

00:21:17.100 --> 00:21:20.467

this motion to accept the city assessor’s valuation 00:21:20.467 --> 00:21:24.400

recommendations, right for the board and so I guess we’re just

00:21:24.400 --> 00:21:28.033

voting to accept all of these, which are no change. Or are you

00:21:28.033 --> 00:21:34.000

saying we’re gonna go by, we’re gonna look at, yeah, OK. I just 00:21:34.000 --> 00:21:37.200

traditionally in in years past, the property owner is present,

00:21:37.200 --> 00:21:39.767

make the motion with the property owner there and send

00:21:39.767 --> 00:21:43.734

it under the bulk situation. Oh, OK. I mean, we can do that. I 00:21:43.734 --> 00:21:47.867

just feel like they’re gonna be included with everybody else,

00:21:47.867 --> 00:21:51.634

so, um, Mr. Chair, uh, I, I think you’re actually gonna be 00:21:51.634 --> 00:21:55.834

going to item D1, which that, that is one motion to accept

00:21:55.834 --> 00:21:59.033

this assess his evaluation on. Recommendations and that does

00:21:59.033 --> 00:22:02.367

include a one and includes all the A’s. So I think you can 00:22:02.367 --> 00:22:05.000

move to D and the property owner’s present. So if you make

00:22:05.000 --> 00:22:08.033

one motion for all of them. I think you’ll understand what

00:22:08.033 --> 00:22:16.100

the motion is. OK. So, that, that was what I was saying is 00:22:16.100 --> 00:22:19.033

that, uh, they’re all on the same one and so we were making

00:22:19.033 --> 00:22:21.634

D1 and that would just include everyone. So I don’t know if 00:22:21.634 --> 00:22:25.300

you, did you have a statement or no? OK, so I would just say,

00:22:25.300 --> 00:22:29.467

I’ll go ahead. So we’re all on the same page with this. And

00:22:29.467 --> 00:22:32.634

I’ll make the motion to accept the city assessor’s valuation 00:22:32.634 --> 00:22:39.000

recommendations. All right, so Moshe was made by myself, uh,

00:22:39.000 --> 00:22:42.467

Chair Winston, and then seconded by a board member Page, 00:22:42.467 --> 00:22:49.834

although we need a roll call. Yes. We’re voting on item D1, a

00:22:49.834 --> 00:22:58.300

board member Erikson. Board member Jean. OK. Board member 00:22:58.300 --> 00:23:05.166

Glenowski, board member Page. Board member McGarvey. I Uh, 00:23:05.166 --> 00:23:09.900

Chair Winston. The motion passes. 6 yes votes, 0 no votes.

00:23:09.900 --> 00:23:15.500

All right, thank you, and I, if I could just so the record’s 00:23:15.500 --> 00:23:21.467

clear that that motion was on parcels A1 appeals A1 through A 00:23:21.467 --> 00:23:24.567

16 and B4 and B6. That’s, that’s what I have in front of

00:23:24.567 --> 00:23:26.767

me. So that’s, that was the confusion. I, I thought I was

00:23:26.767 --> 00:23:29.767

being asked to vote on just one, but I had all of them in front

00:23:29.767 --> 00:23:33.100

of us. So, so we’re on the same page with that and that’s what 00:23:33.100 --> 00:23:36.634

that motion accomplished. So, um, I know y’all showed up. I

00:23:36.634 --> 00:23:38.233

apologize that we couldn’t necessarily do that, but I

00:23:38.233 --> 00:23:42.567

think we are, we have to stay kind of in line in line with Um, 00:23:42.567 --> 00:23:45.400

the assessors criteria, so I know there’s a different

00:23:45.400 --> 00:23:47.934

criteria for selling or or buying, however you look at it,

00:23:47.934 --> 00:23:51.634

and then there’s one that the, the county and then we use as a 00:23:51.634 --> 00:23:55.367

city in our our assessors use, and we have to stay, uh, within

00:23:55.367 --> 00:23:58.100

the lines of that. Otherwise we could cause some issues not

00:23:58.100 --> 00:24:00.767

only for us as a city, but for the whole system in terms of 00:24:00.767 --> 00:24:04.467

how it works and just some equity and fairness issues as

00:24:04.467 --> 00:24:08.166

well. Um, but thank you for coming. Um, and then, so if we

00:24:08.166 --> 00:24:15.800

want to go to D2, certainly, uh. A2 is property address is 7335 00:24:15.800 --> 00:24:24.734

Zane Avenue North. The 2025 market value was 2,700,500. Uh 00:24:24.734 --> 00:24:29.634

And we just vote to accept that one with, I think the mayor’s,

00:24:29.634 --> 00:24:37.533

the chairs that go to item D2 D as in Delta 2, correct? So D2, 00:24:37.533 --> 00:24:41.767

so D2, just so we’re on the same page is gonna be approval 00:24:41.767 --> 00:24:45.100

evaluation agreements between April 15th, April 28th, file,

00:24:45.100 --> 00:24:49.233

reviewed, agreement reached between owner and assessor for

00:24:49.233 --> 00:24:52.634

2025 value change. So that’s gonna be a pill numbers A9, B5, 00:24:52.634 --> 00:24:58.867

B 8, and B9. is what I have in front of me. All the other ones

00:24:58.867 --> 00:25:02.634

we voted on, those were the ones with no change. Now we’re 00:25:02.634 --> 00:25:05.000

voting on the ones that have some adjusted market value.

00:25:05.000 --> 00:25:13.367

Very good. So these are D2 These are files that were 00:25:13.367 --> 00:25:16.500

reviewed, inspected, and agreement reached between the

00:25:16.500 --> 00:25:21.300

property owner and assessment for the 2025 valuation. Those 00:25:21.300 --> 00:25:34.634

parcels are. Addres uh 7347 Zane Avenue. The original 00:25:34.634 --> 00:25:42.100

market value was 246,200. After inspection and correction, the 00:25:42.100 --> 00:25:51.367

adjusted value is 2,420,400. Appeals and the B5 at address 00:25:51.367 --> 00:25:56.734

7208, Idaho Avenue North. The original assessment value is

00:25:56.734 --> 00:26:03.500

3,650,600. The recommended adjusted value is 337,000. 00:26:03.500 --> 00:26:12.800

Appeal be 8. Address 1400 92nd Avenue North. Real values 00:26:12.800 --> 00:26:22.734

421,000. The recommended adjustment value is 389,500. 00:26:22.734 --> 00:26:29.567

And address 6941 105th Trail North. The original market

00:26:29.567 --> 00:26:34.734

value was 6,630,300. The recommended adjustment value 00:26:34.734 --> 00:26:38.200

was 6,340,900. And again, these are all parcels of the

00:26:38.200 --> 00:26:41.667

assessment staff have been able to inspect and make corrections 00:26:41.667 --> 00:26:44.166

adjustment on, on the particular field cards and

00:26:44.166 --> 00:26:46.367

those have resulted in the valuation adjustments, we would

00:26:46.367 --> 00:26:50.533

recommend those changes to the board. OK. And we don’t have 00:26:50.533 --> 00:26:54.233

anybody in the audience who’s gonna that wants to speak or

00:26:54.233 --> 00:26:56.667

Push against that. I just want to make sure so everybody has a

00:26:56.667 --> 00:27:01.233

chance. OK. All right, so are there any questions from 00:27:01.233 --> 00:27:05.200

council members or board members? If that’s the case,

00:27:05.200 --> 00:27:10.266

then I’ll go ahead and make the motion to approve. The 00:27:10.266 --> 00:27:14.533

evaluation agreements between April 15, 2025 and April 28,

00:27:14.533 --> 00:27:17.734

2025. Is there, all right, so the motion was made by myself,

00:27:17.734 --> 00:27:21.867

a chair, uh, Winston, seconded by board member Kloanowski. Uh, 00:27:21.867 --> 00:27:26.367

we will need a roll call. OK, you’re voting on item D2, uh,

00:27:26.367 --> 00:27:32.867

board members young. Bye. Board member Klenowski. Board member 00:27:32.867 --> 00:27:41.166

page. Board member McGarvey. Right. Board member Erikson. 00:27:41.166 --> 00:27:48.100

Chair Winston. I motion passes with 6 yes votes, 0 no votes.

00:27:48.100 --> 00:27:55.166

All right. Thank you. Uh, and the next. It says approval of 00:27:55.166 --> 00:27:58.834

additional appeals received between April 24, 2025, and

00:27:58.834 --> 00:28:04.166

April 28, 2025. Correct. There was only one individual who was 00:28:04.166 --> 00:28:09.000

part of the settlement on there, which was prior D2 motion B

00:28:09.000 --> 00:28:13.200

appeal B 9. They were the individuals that were. Listed 00:28:13.200 --> 00:28:19.233

on that, on D3, aside from that one, there were no further

00:28:19.233 --> 00:28:22.300

appealings or individual property owners contesting the 00:28:22.300 --> 00:28:24.367

evaluation between that time frame. OK. There’s nothing to

00:28:24.367 --> 00:28:29.367

make a motion on at that point. Wait, so you’re saying we do,

00:28:29.367 --> 00:28:33.634

we do need emotion on this one. There no, there’s there’s an 00:28:33.634 --> 00:28:36.900

emotion needed on this one. OK, that makes more sense. OK. All

00:28:36.900 --> 00:28:42.667

right. So then I think we can um Are there any, any closing 00:28:42.667 --> 00:28:45.934

remarks or the only other slide is just the eels that were

00:28:45.934 --> 00:28:47.734

withdrawn between that there’s a motion on that, but just for

00:28:47.734 --> 00:28:55.467

records. That the property owner at 10129 Ewing Lane 10703 00:28:55.467 --> 00:29:00.166

Jersey Cord North 7824 Noble Avenue North, 8529 Inverness 00:29:00.166 --> 00:29:03.467

Lane North. All those individuals spoke with the

00:29:03.467 --> 00:29:06.634

assessment office or determined that they wish to withdraw

00:29:06.634 --> 00:29:10.934

their appeal for this year. OK. I believe that is. All that I 00:29:10.934 --> 00:29:15.767

have. All right, wonderful. All right, so we can go ahead and

00:29:15.767 --> 00:29:18.367

thank you for um the presentation. Thanks for folks

00:29:18.367 --> 00:29:21.500

who showed up. I know it’s not an easy process, um, and then 00:29:21.500 --> 00:29:25.467

we’ll go ahead and adjourn that meeting, um, and then we’re

00:29:25.467 --> 00:29:28.634

gonna head, I’ll give everybody about 2 minutes, uh, and then 00:29:40.900 --> 00:29:45.734

meeting, I’ve been asked by the county to make a formal motion

00:29:45.734 --> 00:29:49.100

to adjourn, um, the hearing. So if we can just have, I, I’ll

00:29:49.100 --> 00:29:54.767

make the motion, uh, a motion to, um, To officially adjourn 00:29:54.767 --> 00:29:57.500

the assessors meeting or the whatever the annual assessors

00:29:57.500 --> 00:30:01.734

meeting, uh, or hearing. Is there a second? All right, so 00:30:01.734 --> 00:30:04.467

motion was made by myself, uh, Chair Winston, seconded by a

00:30:04.467 --> 00:30:08.634

board member, uh, McGarvey. I guess we will need a roll call

00:30:08.634 --> 00:30:11.367

again with the motion is to adjourn, uh, board member at 00:30:11.367 --> 00:30:21.500

Klenowski. Hi remember Page. Board member McGarvey. Board 00:30:21.500 --> 00:30:29.467

member Erikson. Board members young. I Chair Winston. A

00:30:29.467 --> 00:30:33.467

motion passes 6 yes votes, 0 no votes. I know we have actually 00:30:33.467 --> 00:30:37.500

a commissioner here, so maybe they can uh we can ask him to

00:30:37.500 --> 00:30:40.233

work on just allowing us to adjourn without a vote in the