CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS SEPTEMBER 14, 2026 7:00 PM For those wishing to listen live to the meeting, please go to shorewoodMN.gov/CityCouncil for the meeting link. Pursuant to MN Statute 2024, Section 13D.02, subdivision 4, members may participate in the meeting by interactive technology. AGENDA 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call Mayor Labadie _____ Councilmember Maddy _____ Councilmember Sanschagrin _____ Councilmember Gorham _____ Councilmember DiGruttolo _____ C. Review and Adopt Agenda 2. CONSENT AGENDA The Consent Agenda is a series of actions which are being considered for adoption this evening under a single motion. Motion to approve items on the Consent Agenda & Adopt Resolutions Therein: A. City Council Work Session Minutes B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes C. Claims List D. Tree Removal Quote and Service Agreement E. 2026 Pavement Striping 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR This is an opportunity for members of the public to bring a matter related to the governance of the City of Shorewood to the attention of the City Council. If the matter relates to a topic that is identified on tonight’s agenda as a public hearing, please hold your comments until the public hearing is opened. The full rules for this forum can be found on the agenda table in back and on the City’s webpage. Anyone wishing to address the Council should raise their hand, or if attending remotely, please use the “raise hand” function on your screen and wait to be called on. Please make your comments from the podium and identify yourself by your first and last name and your address for the record. Please limit your comments to five minutes. Page 1 of 568 No discussion or action will be taken by the Council on this matter. If requested by the Council, City staff will prepare a report for the Council regarding the matter and place it on the next agenda. 4. GENERAL BUSINESS A. Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis B. Preliminary 2027 Budget, Proposed 2027 Tax Levy, and Establish Budget Hearing Date C. Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Due to Recent Municipal Boundary Adjustment D. Street Sign Sale E. Safe Routes To School Grant - Galpin Lake Trail F. Galpin Lake Trail Construction Contract G. Limited Use Permit with MnDOT - Galpin Lake Trail 5. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS A. Staff i. Informational Update on Parcel ID 2911723440024 & 2911723440025 Lot Combination Request ii. Tentative Upcoming Agenda Topics B. Mayor and City Council 6. ADJOURN Page 2 of 568 City Council Item 2.A. Title/Subject: City Council Work Session Minutes Meeting Date: September 14, 2026 Prepared By: Sandie Thone, City Clerk/ HR Director Attachments 1. 08.24.2026 WS Meeting Minutes Background 08-24-26 City Council Work Session Minutes Strategic Alignment Organizational Strength & Good Governance • Sound and strategic record keeping of government activities lead to comprehensive long- term planning, principled, data, and stakeholder-driven decisions, and a culture of continuous improvement. Budget Impact Minute preparation costs vary based on length of meeting and level of detail. Action Requested Simple majority vote is required. Page 3 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, AUGUST 24, 2026 5:30 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING Mayor Labadie called the meeting to order at 5:31 P.M. A. Roll Call Present. Mayor Labadie; Councilmembers Maddy (arrived at 5:37 P.M.), Sanschagrin, Gorham, and DiGruttolo; City Administrator Nevinski; City Clerk/HR Director Thone; Finance Director Schmuck; and Director of Public Works Morreim Absent: None B. Review Agenda Sanschagrin moved, DiGruttolo seconded, approving the agenda as presented. Motion passed 4/0. 2. DISCUSSION A. Budget Work Session #5: Compiled 2027 Budgets Finance Director Schmuck reviewed the schedule and the compiled 2027 budgets as found in the Agenda Packet. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked why the City is only allowed a three percent debt limit, even though the City has an 11 percent limit. Finance Director Schmuck shared that the City has 11 percent of the three percent that it could have. Councilmember Gorham asked what the three percent totals to. Finance Director Schmuck noted that it would be about three million, with the City holding 11 percent of that. Councilmember Sanschagrin noted that the Agenda Packet has a different number. Finance Director Schmuck shared that the total taxable market value is different because the County just sent out a new update, so she updated it after the packet had gone out. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that the antenna revenue is now moving from the General Fund, where it benefits 100 percent of Shorewood taxpayers, to the Water Fund, which benefits only people who pay for water. Finance Director Schmuck stated that this is correct because the antenna revenue is using water infrastructure and water staff. Revenue is generated based on water activity. Public Works Director Morreim pointed out that water customers have paid for the majority of the water infrastructure. Whether that is a new development or water infrastructure projects paid for by water customers. Mayor Labadie explained that the $200,000 allocated towards future hookups is being paid for by current water users. Councilmember Sanschagrin asked whether the information the Council is reviewing is annual or quarterly. Finance Director Schmuck noted that the expenditures are annual. Page 4 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 2 of 17 Councilmember Sanschagrin asked whether the $225,000 antenna lease revenue is annual. Finance Director Schmuck stated that is correct. Councilmember Sanschagrin stated that the only quarterly number on the bottom of slide 33 for the average user is $9.63. Finance Director Schmuck stated that is correct. Councilmember DiGruttolo pointed out that it would make more sense to set that number annually as well, since the other numbers are annual. Finance Director Schmuck stated she could do that. Councilmember Sanschagrin noted that it would be helpful for consistency in presentation. Finance Director Schmuck shared that, at the end of the presentation, she annualizes everything so that it is all pulled together with the estimated levy. Councilmember Gorham asked if the water rates reflect the Mill Street cancellation. Finance Director Schmuck stated that, as of this point, they do not, but in October, when it is updated, they will. That is why Staff believes revenue will decline. She added that part of Mill Street would also have to be financed with debt service so that the net effect would be zero. There will be a slight reduction in that, but the $1,000,000 will not affect the reserves. Councilmember Sanschagrin asked whether the $5,000 connection fee covers the entire cost of the connection. Finance Director Schmuck stated that it is a pass-through fee to the State for its connection program. Councilmember Sanschagrin asked if the City charges the State $5,000. Finance Director Schmuck shared that the State requires the City to charge residents a fee, which is passed back to them. She added that the same applies to water; there are State surcharges for lead and various other things. It is similar to sales tax: a fee that the State has the City collect on its behalf and remit to the State. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked what the Miscellaneous $46,000 is in the 2027 sanitary sewer fund revenue. Finance Director Schmuck explained that it is miscellaneous revenue and that the details are further back in the budget book and memo. She noted it is interest earnings and outside sewer repair. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked whether there was a reason the Long-Term Financial Management Plan chose 8,000 times the cost of living. Finance Director Schmuck explained that for many years, Shorewood raised its utility rates by eight, nine, and ten percent without analyzing the associated expenditures. The Plan took a step back to assess the actual need to achieve a balanced budget, move forward, and maintain the reserves policy. She noted that the Council established the reserve policy in 2025. Then, when the Long-Term Financial Management Plan was completed, there were discussions about whether increases should be larger every year or every one or two years, with a taper to a small percentage increase to be more manageable for a household budget. Council decided to rip the band-aid off in the first couple of years, and then, in the future, 2028-2035 will be the three- to four-percent increase. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked whether that can be changed this year, since it can be. Finance Director Schmuck shared that the Council can definitely decide that. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked if the $17.05 for stormwater management is per quarter. Finance Director Schmuck shared that it is per quarter. Councilmember DiGruttolo noted that it is a lot, and residents have spoken extensively about this increase and about water and utilities. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked what percentage of people are over 50,000 square feet and are paying a higher percentage. Finance Director Schmuck shared that she had not calculated that but could do so. She explained that the $17.05 is 0.7 percent of the rate increase because most properties are on the lower end. She added that she would get the actual numbers for her Page 5 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 3 of 17 when the Council discusses it at the Long-Term Financial Management Plan session, since the Staff will have that detail. Councilmember Sanschagrin asked if Staff could refresh his memory about the stormwater management fees. He noted that his understanding is that the higher fees are to fill up more reserves. He asked what capital projects are driving the need for higher reserves. Finance Director Schmuck explained that it is less about establishing reserves than about keeping up with the State's mitigation and reporting requirements. The State continues to up the ante on what the City needs to do regarding stormwater management. She asked whether Public Works Director Morreim wanted to discuss pond water maintenance and runoff further. Public Works Director Morreim shared that there are a fair number of capital programs for pond maintenance and structure rehabilitation, which go hand in hand with the street capital projects. There is also significant ongoing maintenance such as street sweeping and disposal of sweepings. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked about pond maintenance and whether there is anything the City is not doing. Public Works Director Morreim explained that there are typically annual funds for pond maintenance; however, the amount is for the City's cleaning projects and does not go very far. Staff will put two years of capital projects on hold and wait until the end of the first year of that to look at pond maintenance. There is some upfront work in surveying ponds and determining how much sediment there is, so they can accurately provide contractors with a cost estimate once the work is done. Councilmember Gorham asked why the Miscellaneous revenue was so high in 2026 compared to other years. Finance Director Schmuck shared that the City received a $236,000 grant for 2026. Councilmember Gorham asked whether the budget would stay at $1,200,000 every year. Finance Director Schmuck noted that it remains in the vicinity of that amount; there are no significant changes within this, except for projects. Councilmember Gorham asked whether the City budgets for stormwater management capital items. Finance Director Schmuck explained that all enterprise funds have capital activity. Within the City's $1,000,000 in expenditures, depreciation of $145,000 and debt service interest are also allocated. She added that interest is an expenditure within the fund, and the principal expenses are on the balance sheet. Councilmember Gorham stated that the 2026 budget was $890,000 and did not include a $250,000 miscellaneous capital item. The capital expense does not exist in 2027, yet the City grows by $320,000, and the same number of catch basins are being cleaned. Finance Director Schmuck noted that expenditures are being reduced from $1,300,000 down to $1,056,000. Councilmember Gorham asked if the amount of the capital is reducing it. Finance Director Schmuck confirmed that this is correct and that the majority of the activity in this fund varies from year to year. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked why the City has so much money in reserves for the recycling fund. Finance Director Schmuck stated that the City would do an eight, nine, or ten percent rate increase that was put in the reserve, and there had not been a rate increase in a few years, and there is a surplus based on the RFP that had gone out based on the recycling services for 2026. She added that the $400,000 will be a great asset for curbside collection of organics and for rolling it out; the City will be required to have that mandate in place by 2030. Similarly, recycling is mandated by Hennepin County. She shared that in the last presentation the Recycling Coordinator gave, he listed various options for when to roll out the organics and how to utilize the money. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked whether the City expects curbside organics to be as much as, or more than, the regular recycling fund. Finance Director Schmuck replied yes, Page 6 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 4 of 17 because organics is very expensive. City Administrator Nevinski shared that, in his experience, the rolling curbside organics program is priced the same as recycling, effectively doubling the recycling cost. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked if the City would keep the extra $200,000 in the fund until 2030. Finance Director Schmuck explained that the Staff is hoping the Council will want to roll it out incrementally over a few years, so it can be used as an incentive and help mitigate the doubling of everyone's recycling expenses. City Administrator Nevinski added that the rate could be brought down so it is not such a shock. Councilmember Gorham stated that his understanding is that the City cannot phase the organics implementation. City Administrator Nevinski noted that by 2030 the City must have it implemented. That part of what has been discussed is starting to roll out organics across different areas and conducting some testing. That is more of a conversation as the City gets into it. He added that a lot of education will be needed for the process as well, because people do not know. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked whether the City expects to receive any grant money, given that the City is being compelled to implement the program. Finance Director Schmuck shared that they do not, as grant money was allocated about 12 to 15 years ago when organics were first rolled out, and the larger cities were required to implement by 2026 and 2027. That is where the majority of the grant activity went. She stated that the City only receives $19,000 from the regular recycling grant, and it does not sound like organics will be anything beyond that. There is a small amount in that for organics, about $3,000 to $4,000, that is used now at the drop-off sites. Councilmember Gorham stated that the City must roll out curbside organics by 2030, but it might implement it in a limited fashion. He asked whether the City might subsidize portions of it before 2030 and keep the funds in the fund. He noted that the premise is that the City would roll it out to only certain communities and subsidize first adopters. City Administrator Nevinski shared that the City could consider many different scenarios. That will be part of what the Recycling Coordinator will be working on over the next year or so. He shared that one option is to ride it out until the City absolutely has to do it, or until things are implemented early. There is some interest in the community. Staff must analyze the situation and present recommendations to the Council. Finance Director Schmuck stated that doubling the recycling rate in one year would be a shock to most residents, so any kind of mitigation would be helpful. She added that education will be huge at the end of 2027 and into 2028, and they are trying to grow the program out and promote it as well. Councilmember Sanschagrin asked whether other cities are building up their reserves to help with the transition. Finance Director Schmuck shared that, in Plymouth, they had to implement this year because Plymouth is a larger city, and they used reserves to spend down the rates. Plymouth is charging residents a lower rate than they are currently being charged and phasing it in over the next few years, so there is no mandatory rate increase in the first year. Councilmember Gorham pointed out that it does not make sense to use the surplus before 2030, but if it is being kept for 2030, then that is a different discussion. Mayor Labadie noted that those are all future discussions. Councilmember Gorham stated that it would be a discussion now only if the Council wanted to reduce the reserves ahead of 2030. Finance Director Schmuck shared that the reserves would also need to be increased to cover the expenses for organics and regular recycling. Page 7 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 5 of 17 Councilmember DiGruttolo asked where the numbers in the fund performance measures come from, the projected and expected. Finance Director Schmuck explained that those are numbers the City is required to report to Hennepin County regarding the collections conducted in the City. Councilmember DiGruttolo noted that the number continues to increase; in two years, it will rise from 760 to 850. She asked why there is a difference between the projected and the expected. City Clerk/HR Director Thone explained that the residual tonnage changes as people use the program. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that she is asking where the numbers in many of the forecasts and projections come from, and that the expected numbers do not seem to use the same math to project different outcomes. She asked how the Staff is extrapolating higher when it would suggest that it should be lower. City Clerk/HR Director Thone stated that all the numbers come from the haulers, and the hope is that recycling will take hold and grow, increasing tonnage each year. When looking at projections, a lot of that is factored in, but when the actuals come in, it may not have grown as much as Staff anticipated. Finance Director Schmuck added that over the last year and a half, there has been much more promotion of the recycling program and educational pieces put in place; the anticipation is growth as well. City Clerk/HR Director Thone explained that education is one of the areas that grant money is used for; the City has to commit certain things every year to receive the grant. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that when talking about the increases, it is now down to eight percent. This is an increase over last year's amount. She pointed out that last year, the City had some very large, unexpected expenses at the end. She asked if this is an 8.1 percent increase over something that was already increased before. Finance Director Schmuck stated that this is an increase in the levy, not the overall budget. The SCBAs and the Chiller, those types of things, Council approved taking out of the reserves of the general fund. She added this is just an increase in the levy over levy. The overall budget was a 4.31 percent increase across the general fund. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that it was then a 4.31 percent increase over the last budget, with all the other stuff included. Finance Director Schmuck stated no; those are budgeted adjustments, and they are not qualified as what is being compared, budget to budget. She explained that the new original budget is compared to the original budget. Those adjustments were not added to the budget as constants; they were one-time budget items drawn from the reserve. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked how the City could take money from the reserves, since the reserves must be at a certain level. She added that she was told that the reserves are not used for emergencies; money is only put into the reserves at exactly what is needed to pay the City bills. Finance Director Schmuck stated that this is what the policy says and that the City has maintained a larger reserve in the General Fund for some time. When the Council discussed the Long-Term Financial Management Plan, they were looking at the reserve to even out the levy increase over the years and to be more systematic and forward-thinking in making data-driven decisions. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked what the reserve is now. Finance Director Schmuck stated that there is a surplus in the General Fund reserve, but there are shortfalls in the reserves of other funds. Mayor Labadie pointed out that the Council went into detail about all of this two retreats ago, as well as during last budget season. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that a more helpful table would show the annual increase for each scenario. She shared that the chart did not help her to understand who is paying what. When things are done this way, it does not sound like the City is charging people a lot of money, but for some people it could be a big deal, and she would like to know how many people would be affected. Finance Director Schmuck stated that the $290 per year is for a water user, which is half of the residents in Shorewood, and less than 30,000 square feet of stormwater, which is the majority of residents in Shorewood. The $138 is the median value and the highest tax Page 8 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 6 of 17 amount, and 66.9 percent are below that, so $138 was included instead of the $49. Councilmember DiGruttolo shared that a chart would make it easier, but she cannot hold all of that in her head. Finance Director Schmuck explained that the hard part is determining whether a resident is a water user, whether they have over 30,000 square feet, and whether they have three different stormwater scenarios, so the chart would be large and not fit on a screen. City Administrator Nevinski stated that Staff could look into doing something. Councilmember DiGruttolo noted that she would like to know where the majority of people fall, because $290 a year is what most people are experiencing. Councilmember Gorham asked how the number gets to $290. Finance Director Schmuck explained that the $290 comes from the $11.09 sanitary sewer increase, $17.05 from stormwater management over four quarters, plus the $10 infrastructure fee, or $9.63 if the resident is on City water, over four quarters, and the $138 annual property tax increase. Councilmember Gorham asked if it is $40 for water and $40 for the infrastructure fee. Finance Director Schmuck explained that the resident is either paying water or the infrastructure fee. The infrastructure fee applies to those not on City water and without City water available; they are not paying the infrastructure base fee currently in place for people with water available. Councilmember Sanschagrin asked whether those without water are paying more. Finance Director Schmuck stated no; the $9.63 is the increase that a resident would have. Councilmember Gorham noted that he still does not get it. Mayor Labadie reminded Council that they had to set the preliminary levy by the end of September, so to make sure to ask questions now. The work session will end at 6:45 P.M. The regular Council meeting has a shorter agenda; if the work session does not finish, it can be continued at the end of the meeting. She anticipated a large crowd at the regular meeting, so she wanted to give Staff enough time. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that she thought the State had to pay for the special election. City Clerk/HR Director Thone shared that the City mostly pays for its own elections, unless the County mandates them or there is a special election due to a seat opening, like there was in 2024, then the County reimburses the city for most costs. She added that this special election is just like paying for the Governor's general election. Mayor Labadie shared that the discussion is whether, if Amy Klobuchar wins the election for Governor, her Senate seat would become vacant and a special election would be needed to fill it. The discussion is whether the City should budget this amount for next year, since it could happen and would cost the City about $33,000. Finance Director Schmuck continued with the budget options to lower the proposed levy, as outlined in the Agenda Packet. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked when the options would be discussed. Mayor Labadie noted that they would now be discussed. She asked if Council had any questions for the Finance Director. Councilmember Sanschagrin stated that he would like to add to the list of options because there are potentially areas where the Council could reduce the rate. For example, the Council could discuss the park equipment tax levy, reviewing some rollover items and where the City has underspent, such as the community infrastructure fund and fiscal disparities (there was $138,000 last year but not this year) and park dedication fees. He added that the park dedication fees have been discussed, and Staff believes it would be aggressive or risky to Page 9 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 7 of 17 budget for them. Still, if it happens every year and there is a pipeline of new properties that will pay a park fee, it should be budgeted for. Finance Director Schmuck explained that the first two items that Councilmember Sanschagrin noted- the park equipment and the rollover of the unspent infrastructure fund are capital project funds and are not levy dollars directly related to a specific project. The City levies a set amount and applies gradual increases to account for fluctuations in funds. She explained that even if a reduction is made to an item, it would not be covered. These funds are falling short in their reserves to roll forward expenditures and cover the activity. She noted that the City can reduce the levy and finance the projects through debt and other mechanisms, if the Council would like to do so going forward. She explained that fiscal disparities were adjusted in the budget because the City’s contribution and distribution are calculated based on the taxable market value. So it was an unused item within the budget. She shared that park dedication dollars are only received when a development comes through. The revenues seen in prior years are the result of a few ongoing projects. She added that the last development contract the Council approved was in the first quarter of 2025, and no projects are going forward, so it is advantageous to be fiscally responsible by not budgeting revenue that is not anticipated to come through. She added that the teardown-and-build-a-new-house does not bring in park dedication dollars. There are very few developable parcels in Shorewood. She pointed out that when a project comes through, the park dedication dollars could be budgeted for. City Administrator Nevinski reiterated that park dedication kicks in when there is subdivision. He noted that if the Staff know a project is going to happen, it can be anticipated and included as revenue coming in that year. Councilmember Sanschagrin asked whether the fees for the development happening near City Hall had already been collected. City Administrator Nevinski stated that money was probably collected in 2024/2025. The fee is paid when the plat is filed. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that if the Council decided to cap the playground equipment at $250,000 instead of $350,000, the extra $100,000 is already bonded for, so it has to stay in the parks' reserves. Finance Director Schmuck stated that it is not bonded, as it is levied. The City levies and capital funds are subject to a three-year rolling CIP, so there must be sufficient reserves for each of the three years. She explained that if the Council reduced the amount for playground equipment, there would still be projects that are up and down. That is why it is best to look at the Long-Term Financial Management Plan, as the ups and downs over all ten years can be seen. Councilmember DiGruttolo pointed out that would be best. Still, Council elections happen every two years and could lead to an entirely different Council that might not necessarily align with what the last Council said. She appreciated the point but noted that Finance Director Schmuck did not need to keep making it, since she gets it. She asked if the Council did not want to spend $350,000, would that not reduce the levy? Finance Director Schmuck stated that the levy for the park fund is not $350,000; the City is already tapping into reserves there, and the reserve is already not meeting the reserve policy. Suppose the Council would like to change the policy; that can be done. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked if the park fund is meeting the reserve policy right now. Finance Director Schmuck noted that to be correct. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked whether the Council could decide to continue not being under policy. Finance Director Schmuck shared that Council’s goal, when the City decided to establish a Long-Term Financial Management Plan, is data-driven decision-making and the establishment of policies that are adhered to. That is what Staff is trying to work towards, but if Council has a different direction, then Staff would need a collective understanding of that. She added that the Long-Term Financial Management Plan would be brought to the Council in October, when data would be available, and further discussions could be held then. Mayor Labadie noted that, as part of the Park Improvement Plan, the City has a long-term vision for Page 10 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 8 of 17 park improvements and the money being put into the parks. She added that she did not see any benefit to slashing the money that will be put into the public parks. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that no one on the Council understands why decisions were made ten years ago. Hence, the discussions need to take place now so that people in ten years understand why those decisions were made. Mayor Labadie shared that this is why the City is pursuing the Park Improvement Plan: so the plan, in theory, can outlast the current Council. Councilmember DiGruttolo shared that is true, but economic conditions change. She noted that a conversation and discussion need to take place so that people understand why the Council is making the decisions it is. Mayor Labadie pointed out that the decisions were made because the Staff came back with estimates based on their field knowledge of the cost to replace the playground equipment. Finance Director Schmuck noted that it also included the consultant fees for the amenities in the park and the public feedback. She noted that the park is not yet designed but will be a topic of future discussion for the Council. That levy is based on a ten-year trajectory and aims to reach the reserve policy. She added that the park projects themselves can change year over year; that is why the CIP is looked at every year. She noted that all of the plans roll into the Long-Term Financial Management Plan and then there can be a discussion, but the individual pieces will always go before Council, and then it is decided what will go into each project. Councilmember DiGruttolo noted that those are all guesses and estimates of what the City thinks the economic environment will look like, so the Council should be able to change them when those hypotheses do not turn out to be what they thought they were, which is why the discussion is needed. Mayor Labadie shared that this is why the City needs to budget for it now, with a forecast in place. Mayor Labadie asked Councilmember Maddy what the cost of the fire truck was and what it would cost today if it were the same one. Councilmember Maddy shared that from pre- pandemic to post-pandemic, there was around a 40 percent increase across all equipment, so for the same truck, it would be about a $400,000 difference. Mayor Labadie stated that the City has to put it in as best it can in the moment, but the final price of the playground equipment would be voted on at the time of the final design and would not impact the overall levy. Councilmember DiGruttolo shared that purchasing a fire truck would affect the levy, just as purchasing a playground would this year. She stated that Finance Director Schmuck said that about $83,000 equals about one percent, so the levy could be lowered by one percent if the Council found $83,000; if the playground were lowered, then the levy would be one percent less. Finance Director Schmuck shared that the levy for the park fund is established to increase by $50,000 annually until the last two years of the ten-year financial management plan, when reserves could be established. So, reducing it by $100,000, it is still projected to have that levy increase by $50,000; it may shorten the number of years that it has to be done. Staff would not recommend lowering the levy, even if the project were reduced in cost, because it is a rolling- forward budget covering three to five years of capital activity. She added that unless the Council wants to reduce three to five years of park improvements at this point, it would behoove the Council to lower the levy. Mayor Labadie recessed the meeting at 6:52 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:52 P.M. Mayor Labadie reviewed that the Council had been discussing the estimated market value map and was moving on to the SCEC staffing analysis. She asked if the document stood on its own. Finance Director Schmuck stated that the document stands on its own; it is just a little guidance on where the City is in assessing the position and what has been pulled together for different options. Mayor Labadie noted that the document included five options, which are not Page 11 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 9 of 17 exhaustive. This is happening because the Council directed Staff to bring forward proposals to cut costs and lower the levy. Councilmember Sanschagrin pointed out that the Council is unaware of the new staffing position because it has not yet received the SCEC report, and therefore cannot address it. Mayor Labadie noted, "Yes and no." There are five options in the document. The Council has not yet received the SCEC task force report but could comment on the five options or hold off and discuss after the task force summary comes in. Councilmember Gorham asked what that means from a timing standpoint. Mayor Labadie shared that it would be cutting it tight. The City Clerk/HR Director explained that the options were put together before the task force prepared its recommendations. The Council will note that the options may be similar to the task force's options, but this document is only the staffing portion and does not address the different uses of the SCEC. She added that it would not be a bad idea to consider some of the options so that the Council is ready when the task force brings forth its recommendations. She explained that the options are viable and range from spending $8,000 to $60,000 more; there is a lot of room to have some of these things in the Council's mind before the task force comes back with recommendations, given the limited time. City Administrator Nevinski noted that by the end of September the preliminary levy needs to be approved. Historically, the City has set the preliminary levy and kept that for the final levy, but this could be a year that the Council decides to lower the levy when it gets to December. There will be a lot coming at the Council that will need more discussion over the course of the fall before making a final decision. In September, the Council will need to set the max levy and then lower it from there. Councilmember Sanschagrin stated that, of the entire list, the antenna revenue seems to be the easiest to adjust if the Council wanted to reduce the levy. He noted that there is also the special election. He asked how Staff arrived at a $33,000 budget for the special election. City Clerk/HR Director Thone stated that it is based on the numbers and on what election judges are paid, with most of the cost going toward staffing the elections. Councilmember Sanschagrin asked when the special election would happen. City Clerk/HR Director Thone shared that it would happen in January or February most likely. Councilmember Sanschagrin pointed out that he had suggested considering places where the City underspent funds last year, such as the community infrastructure fund. Finance Director Schmuck shared that the community infrastructure fund is just starting to be levied; this had not been levied in the past. When the Long-Term Financial Management Plan was established, the Council talked about putting $50,000 a year in there to build up funds for things; the money is used for the carpet and painting at City Hall, upgrades for the Council chambers in the CIP, and the Public Works facility that was not in the whole CIP process. She added that there is $40,000 in reserves in the fund that will not sustain going forward, given $150,000 in annual one-time projects. Councilmember Sanschagrin noted that he had suggested downgrading the park equipment. He asked if the community would prefer the equipment. He asked if there is an estimate for the cost of park equipment. City Administrator Nevinski stated that he asked Park and Recreation Director Czech for information on the cost. Mr. Czech went back and reviewed the Master Plan, which reflected what was heard during the planning process about what people wanted to see in the park. He added that Mr. Czech explained that equipment is bought, but additional prep work is also done. There are additional costs beyond just purchasing the equipment, and the number came from that. If the project moves forward, then getting some quotes would be part of moving beyond that. Page 12 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 10 of 17 Councilmember DiGruttolo asked what the number in the CIP was before the Parks Master Plan was done. Finance Director Schmuck stated that the total dollars over the ten years are the same as the total in the CIP at the time the Parks Master Plan was completed. Staff chose to stay within the budget of the existing ten-year plan, which meant that priorities had to be set when they developed the Parks Master Plan. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that, having been on the Parks Commission two years ago when this was done, the number was the same. So, that cannot be an updated number that was done with a lot of other work, because that is the same number it has been for the last ten years. She shared that it is disingenuous to cite that number and claim it was derived from expert research. To her, the number $350,000 was thrown out a while ago, and now the City is stuck to it and cannot move off of it. If they move away from the number, then they are being accused of not caring for parks or kids, which is not true. Councilmember Gorham stated that a counterpoint is that reducing it is just a frivolous exercise, because neither one is grounded in anything. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that she is not saying the numbers need to be reduced, but she is asking where they came from. She is asking for data to make decisions on, because they have not had it since she has been on the Council. Finance Director Schmuck shared that in the future, when a parks project is brought to the Council, the options will be shared. Many of the expenses will be for the necessary prior work, and many of the amenities in the park will be flexible. Councilmember Gorham stated that there are better ways to get closer to the actual numbers, but without Park and Recreation Director Czech present, the conversation is difficult. Finance Director Schmuck stated that Mr. Czech believes that $350,000 is a solid number with what has happened with the Parks Master Plan and the study that has been done. Councilmember Gorham added that the park will not be the top playground; however, it is the marquee playground. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that all the playgrounds are $350,000. Councilmember Gorham explained that maybe Mr. Czech looked at it and, based on what he is seeing, that is a good rough estimate. Finance Director Schmuck added that the wording in the memo came from Mr. Czech and justified the $350,000. Councilmember Gorham asked to talk about the staffing position. He noted that he is having a hard time with what will happen on January 1 and who will be running things in the SCEC. City Administrator Nevinski stated that at the last meeting, a comment was made about the lack of context with the position and the SCEC study. That is a fair point. He noted that having the study helps determine the direction and how fast to move with things. Three scenarios are being proposed, and they will require discussion and analysis to determine what will happen on January 1. He added that this was included to let the Council know that there are options and scenarios. The Council could set a number they are comfortable with, but make a final decision once more information comes in. Councilmember Gorham asked if $67,000 is the staffing allocation or the budgetary impact. Finance Director Schmuck noted the budgetary impact. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked which staffing option is embedded in the levy. Finance Director Schmuck stated that it is the full $67,000. City Administrator Nevinski stated that if the Council was not comfortable with the number, they could choose a different option. Councilmember DiGruttolo noted that the Council cannot say that until they know what they are losing or if one person could even do everything that the City has been relying on several volunteers to do. Councilmember Gorham shared that the task force will not be arming the Council with information on how to run a senior center. The task force is just giving options. Page 13 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 11 of 17 Mayor Labadie agreed. She pointed out that the Council needs to look at things in different categories: the results coming from the task force and the current activities at the SCEC. The Council could get an accurate printout of how many hours a day there is activity in the building. She added that, to maintain the current level, the City will need someone at the desk. That is a different issue from what the task force will present in the future. She added that unless someone is at the desk, the senior programming currently offered will have to either stop or pause. She noted that reviewing staffing options will be important. She asked if the current number of hours someone is at the desk is known. City Clerk/HR Director Thone shared that the desk is currently staffed 9AM to 3PM, Monday through Friday, by the seniors. Mayor Labadie noted that during weekend hours, a part-time paid staff member is at the desk. City Clerk/HR Director shared that, looking at the options, staff tried to get creative because benefits could get expensive, and on January 1, the City does not know where it will be. She suggested that gradually adding hours to the person already there may fill the gap as the City begins to decide what to do with the SCEC. There are many different scenarios. Councilmember DiGruttolo noted that a person is there from 9 to 3, five days a week. She asked if Staff knows whether the person needs to be there the whole time, or if what is being done now could be done in less time. She added that it does not make much sense to select a job classification before a service model is approved, senior programming responsibilities, hours of operation, or revenue expectations are known. The Council does not actually have the data or the information to make the decision. She would have loved to gather more information from attendees about how often they go to the SCEC. City Clerk/HR Director Thone agreed that Councilmember DiGruttolo is correct; there is a desire for a decision to be made on the budget before all the SCEC answers are received. She asked if maybe there were other ways to find a creative solution. She added that the number of people attending the regular meeting was a strong show of support for the programs, and when people support things, they may be willing to go the extra mile by volunteering, which may help mitigate some of the costs. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated she would like to know what the City can do and what is within the realm of possibility before the Council is pushed into choosing without the information. This year, the Council is making budget decisions without the audit, the Long-Term Financial Management Plan, and the SCEC task force results. Councilmember Gorham stated that Ms. Thone is saying the Council needs a tool to be flexible in 2027, rather than picking an option and not knowing what will be done with the SCEC in the future. He shared that he did not know how to avoid shutting everything out in 2027. He noted that a decision needs to be made soon, given the information the Council has. Mayor Labadie noted that the decision needs to be made in the next month. Councilmember Gorham pointed out that the task force will help, but the decision will still have to be made and will be a leap of faith. Finance Director Schmuck shared that the decision made in September is not final and that the Council will have more time to discuss and gather additional information. She shared that Staff’s view is to identify the largest option, so that would be covered if the Council decides to do so. The budget can always be lowered from September to December. There is still room to decide with the safeguard in place, because a levy can never be raised after the preliminary is set. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked whether Finance Director Schmuck said that the Council will not receive the information in the SCEC report. Finance Director Schmuck shared that the SCEC report will include some of the information and will be well-rounded because the task force is being diligent in their work. Page 14 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 12 of 17 Councilmember Sanschagrin shared that if the City can get volunteers to run the SCEC, that would be amazing. Finance Director Schmuck shared that when the Senior Partners submitted their resignation, they said they were getting burned out and that things needed to be rejuvenated. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked if the City has looked into any grants. Finance Director Schmuck noted that Shorewood does not qualify for many grants. She does not know what is available in senior programming. For the grants the City applies for, Shorewood has too high a market value and average income to qualify. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked if the City actually knows that. Finance Director Schmuck shared that the City was rejected because of those factors. City Administrator Nevinski stated that it can be challenging because Shorewood does not have census tracts with lower incomes. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked if Shorewood is the only senior center for the five communities. She asked if it is based only on Shorewood. City Administrator Nevinski stated that it depends on the specific grant and who is applying. He added that it is an area that Staff can look into; it may present particular challenges, but it could be looked into to fund specific activities or investments. Councilmember DiGruttolo shared that she looked into grants to fix the HVAC or to purchase furniture that is easier to move. Then, if the City does not need to pay for that, the money could be used to pay Staff. She added that the City cannot have everything that it wants. She noted that she wants the seniors to have a center and a place to go with programming, but she also wants the City to be able to do other things. The seniors are the ones most at risk of being priced out of the neighborhood if taxes keep being raised. She shared that she is not opposed in theory to having a Recreation Coordinator, but she wants to make sure there will be enough people attending to make it worthwhile. She suggested having a part-time coordinator. City Administrator Nevinski stated that the question of what the position should be would not be answered at the meeting. He asked what Council thinks about putting some amount of money toward certain items, then continuing the discussions and refining them with more data and timeframes as more information is received. Councilmember DiGruttolo noted that there has to be some number put in to cover what the volunteers were doing. She added that as long as the Council can change the number come December, that is the smart thing to do. The Council wants to show the seniors that this is important, but she does not want to earmark a large amount and be committed to it. Shorewood never gets tax refunds; it is always put into the reserve. Finance Director Schmuck shared that the money would not be refunded as a tax refund, but the levy would be lowered. Councilmember Maddy shared that this is what the fire board did: there were some unknowns, so they threw the number on the high side, hoping it would be resolved and still meet the timeline. He suggested setting a $20,000 budget and seeing what that turns into. The large number may seem too large, but it could help coordinate and recruit more volunteers in the community. Mayor Labadie asked about the options for a part-time rec specialist and how many hours are dedicated to that. City Clerk/HR Director shared that currently the part-time rec specialist is a 20-hour-a-week position. Mayor Labadie asked whether that would apply to options 3a and 3b. Ms. Thone explained that option three is to add a part-time desk attendant, which is a different position. That would make it a lower salary than the programmer. Mayor Labadie asked if the amount is for 20 hours at that salary. Ms. Thone noted that to be correct. She shared that it will cost $20,000 to add a desk attendant and $27,000 to add a rec specialist. Having a desk Page 15 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 13 of 17 attendant would mean the rec specialist would not be full-time, and there would be no benefit costs, making it less expensive. Mayor Labadie shared that someone mans the desk 30 hours a week. She agreed that it would be nice to have volunteers do it, but that is why the senior partners folded: they do not have the volunteers. She noted that budgeting less than 30 hours would not be wise because that is what things are at right now. Even if Council waits until the next meeting, there will still be many unknowns, so a number will have to be put in while more information is gathered. Ms. Thone pointed out that all the scenarios add 20 hours; even the $67,000 scenario adds 20 hours per week to the current rec specialist. She noted that no scenario adds 30 hours, which is currently how the desk is being manned. She shared that 20 hours of staff time would be equal to the 30 hours. Mayor Labadie noted that she is the desk attendant, but managing programming is a step up to a rec specialist role. She pointed out that Staff has laid out the annual impact depending on when new staff would start. Councilmember Gorham noted that he did not think adding more part-time desk support was a recommendation from the task force. Mayor Labadie suggested that two part-time rec specialists could be hired to start later in the year. Councilmember Gorham stated that it does not solve a problem; it just solves who will run the desk. He noted that what is really needed is another person like Park and Recreation Director Czech. The other options do not solve the problem of boosting revenue and making the SCEC sustainable. Ms. Thone stated that if that is the Council’s objective, it will be discussed when the task force recommendations come in, and that is when the decision is made. She noted that Councilmember Gorham is correct the options before the Council will not be providing marketing or be the ideas person; they will just be there to help support the building and programs. Councilmember DiGruttolo pointed out that whatever number is put in the budget will push it further away from the 70 percent self-sustaining threshold. She would love to do this if the City had more money and had made trade-offs elsewhere, but hard choices are not being made. There is not enough revenue to do everything the City wants to do without trade-offs. Mayor Labadie asked what position is budgeted in the current proposed levy. Finance Director Schmuck pointed out that the rec coordinator is at $67,000. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated there would be a rec coordinator, but no one would be manning the desk. Finance Director Schmuck shared that the rec coordinator could do their work while manning the desk. The Staff has given and taken quite a bit in the budget for this year. For a $49 or $ 138-per-year increase in the levy, she does not think it is taxing anyone out of their homes this year. Councilmember Sanschagrin shared that he leaned toward keeping the full amount in the budget until the full report is heard. Councilmember Gorham agreed. Mayor Labadie agreed. Councilmember Maddy agreed. Councilmember DiGruttolo agreed. Councilmember Sanschagrin stated, moving on to the antenna revenue. Councilmember DiGruttolo suggested moving it. Mayor Labadie noted that it was moved out of the water fund. Finance Director Schmuck stated it was in the water fund upon its initiation, was moved out as a temporary transfer for the general fund levy reduction, and then stayed there. Councilmember Gorham stated that now the City has to levy when it is removed. He suggested phasing it, which was one of Staff’s ideas. Finance Director Schmuck shared that it is a viable option to phase it so it is not such a hard hit, but the same conversation will have to be had for two years. She added that the water fund rate increase will not be reduced substantially. This was all done Page 16 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 14 of 17 to help mitigate the 9.7 percent increase in water rates. She added that many times, looking at the numbers makes it seem like a large amount, but it does not amount to as much money. She asked at what point the dollars are considered, or what the right thing to do is. Councilmember DiGruttolo shared that it would help to have the chart, as staff would be massive and not visible. She would like to see it because it seems low right now, and if it were just $40, it would be fine. Finance Director Schmuck shared that she pulled the numbers together during the Council meeting. City Administrator Nevinski asked whether the thought of phasing in the antenna revenue is over a period of more than two years. Councilmember Sanschagrin suggested that it does not all go to water; perhaps it is shared revenue, with half covering water costs and half supporting the SCEC as a community benefit. He noted that it is connected to the water towers, but the residents also look at the antennas. He asked if the City can get more antennas. City Administrator Nevinski stated that Staff has been trying, as there is an opportunity. Finance Director Schmuck shared a spreadsheet with the Council. She stated that there are about 16,042 water customers, and if they have the base rate and consume 15,000 gallons, their bill will go up by $9.63; multiplied by four quarters, that is $38.52. In that scenario, the resident will be on sanitary sewer because they have water. Then there are three different options for stormwater management fees depending on lot size, and there are two valued homes: $400,000, which is the first tier, versus $978,000, which is the fourth tier, with 66.9 percent of people under $978,000. There will be either a $49 or $138 tax rate increase, depending on the scenario. She explained that water customers would see either a $179.62 annual increase or up to a $309 annual increase for all City services, including water, storm, sewer, recycling, and levy. She shared that she applied the same scenario to the 400 people who paid the $32 fee in 2026; their increase would be only on the base fee, which is $3.17 per quarter or $12.68 per year. They are on sanitary sewer, so there are three different scenarios for stormwater: recycling is not going up, and the two values of those homes. Those 400 people would pay between $153 and $283 per year for all City services. Then there are 1,020 sewer- only customers, so those are the residents that will get the $10 fee this year times four quarters, sanitary sewer because everyone is on that, the three different stormwater options, no recycling increase, and the two rates. Those people would see $181.10 or $311.02. The range goes from $153.78 to $311.02 per year. She shared that anything that could be done within the budget would only change the $49 or the $138, because if the antenna rent is messed with, the numbers won't go down, and those are bigger numbers. She pointed out on the spreadsheet where the impact would be seen. She added that this is why Staff recommends moving the entire $225,000 from the general fund to the water fund, where it should be, in Staff’s view. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked about the other scenario in which the antenna revenue is spread over two years; how does that change things? Finance Director Schmuck shared that the water numbers should decrease once the Long-Term Financial Management Plan is completed. If the Council were to surge into the fund, $225,000 a year over ten years, that would be substantial revenue that would not be needed from user rates. She believed that if the $225,000 were moved to the water fund, user rates would come down substantially. Councilmember DiGruttolo noted that if it were done as Councilmember Sanschagrin suggested, with half to the water and half to the general fund, it could offset the SCEC costs. Councilmember Sanschagrin noted that it would cover the $67,000 for the staff position at the SCEC. He pointed out that Councilmember DiGruttolo had expressed concern that all antenna Page 17 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 15 of 17 revenue goes only to water customers. Still, the reality is that the antenna occupies space in Shorewood, so the revenue should go to the entire community. If the revenue were split evenly between the general fund and the water fund, it would allow the levy to come down and demonstrate to residents that Council is doing what it can to lower it. Finance Director Schmuck pointed out that the levy is at less than $138 for the majority of residents. There have been many meetings about the water fund's unsustainability, so she would recommend fully funding the water fund's antenna rent to address shortcomings that have arisen over the years. Councilmember Gorham agreed. Mayor Labadie agreed and pointed out that the concept of the City cannot have everything could be applied to the water as well. Money has been set aside for hookup assistance and education, as well as for many things that have been discussed but not implemented. The antenna revenue going into the general fund was not intended to be permanent. Finance Director Schmuck shared that the documentation that she read stated that it was done to shorten the gap for that year. Councilmember Sanschagrin asked how Shorewood’s user rates compare with those of other cities. Finance Director Schmuck stated that when the Long-Term Financial Management Plan was last done, some charts in the back showed the overall picture. Shorewood is pretty low on utility rates. Councilmember Sanschagrin stated that it seems like that is where the correction should be made. Finance Director Schmuck noted that the Council has said that they do not want 65 to 80 percent rate increases, so she is trying to accommodate that. Councilmember Maddy noted that it seems like a big accounting trick. Either the Council pulls money from the water fund and raises rates to pay for staff at the SCEC, or leaves the money in the water fund. He shared that he is happy to keep the money in the water fund, because it should not have been moved in the first place. If the money is moved, then it throws off the whole long-term planning with the water plan. He noted that he was comfortable putting the money back into the water fund and fixing the trajectory, which has been in a downward spiral for years. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that she is fine with that, as long as the Council acknowledges it is penalizing others for their mistakes. Council stopped forcing people to hook up and pay, so now the water fund is underfunded. To fix the mistakes made by the Council, the money that belongs to all residents will be given to the people who pay for water. She does not want to pretend that the Council is fixing a problem they did not create; they are fixing a problem they did create. Public Works Director Morreim stated that water customers pay for the water towers. Finance Director Schmuck shared that water customers pay for the water staff. Water customers are paying to bring in this revenue. Public Works Director Morreim pointed out that residents as a whole have not funded the water towers on which all these antennas are mounted. Councilmember Sanschagrin stated that, to some extent, Shorewood residents have funded the water towers. Finance Director Schmuck noted that only the water users are affected. Councilmember Sanschagrin asked if the water fund needed funding from the general fund. Finance Director Schmuck stated no. The capital project funds are funded with surplus, not the enterprise funds; they are based on user fees. Councilmember Sanschagrin noted that he is trying to think through the financials of the water fund, which has been underwater. He asked about the water fund, beginning with the extent of the deficits. Finance Director Schmuck explained that it is pooled cash, so it is based on the pooled cash, but it is based on the water fund and the user fees. The water fund transfers $12,500, along with the sanitary sewers, to the general fund for administrative overhead. Councilmember Sanschagrin stated that it is just cost allocation. Finance Director Schmuck noted that is correct, but there are no transfers from the general fund to any of the utilities. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked if it has always been that way. She remembered being told that something had to be done to prevent money from being drawn from the general fund to pay for the water fund. Finance Director Schmuck stated that Page 18 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 16 of 17 enterprise funds are always self-sufficient; that is why they are enterprise funds and function like a private business. Councilmember Gorham asked to move on to the next topic, as three agree on what to do. Mayor Labadie noted that with the Special Election, it has to be what it has to be. City Administrator Nevinski pointed out that it could be taken out in December once things are known. City Clerk/HR Director Thone noted that she is happy to look into any flexibility with the cost for that election. Mayor Labadie asked about the last three. Councilmember Maddy suggested leaving them in. Councilmember Gorham stated that the City did not want to reduce AIS inspections and that management cannot be big. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated it is around $5,000. Councilmember Gorham stated that $17,000 for Public Works will not cost much. Finance Director Schmuck pointed out that they were just suggestions. Councilmember Gorham appreciated the effort by Staff. Councilmember Maddy noted that one unlucky tree fall would cost more than $17,000. Mayor Labadie stated at the end of the SLMPD budget meeting that they were discussing small things, and that feels like where the Council is at. She added that a lot are up in the air and placeholders. Councilmember Gorham asked how the staffing positions will be discussed. He also asked if there is a work session to discuss the task force report. City Administrator Nevinski stated that the consultant will present the task force report at the next regular meeting, with task force members in attendance. Once Council has the full report, he suspected that the Council would want some time to think about it and tell Staff which directions to consider. He noted that there has been a lot of talk about seniors, but there will also be discussion about marketing and related efforts to bolster activity at the SCEC. He added that they will not be ready to discuss on September 14, but a work session could be held to discuss the position in more detail and what it would look like with the $67,000 cap. Councilmember Gorham asked what the next work session is about. City Administrator Nevinski stated that he could not remember, but the discussion about staffing at the SCEC would probably come up on September 28. Finance Director Schmuck shared that September 14 will be the local speed limit discussion, September 28 will be the annual strategic planning process, and October 10 will be the Long-Term Financial Management Plan. City Administrator Nevinski stated that some of those items can be rearranged because this is a priority. Finance Director Schmuck shared that SCEC optional scenarios are on the agenda for the September 14 regular meeting. Councilmember Sanschagrin noted that Council had discussed the UPS equipment for police and fire at the last meeting and had decided that if the money is not spent, it would go into their reserves, which are underfunded. City Administrator Nevinski stated that the Council had decided that their preference was for the money to be returned to the cities. Still, the Council was on the fence and could be okay with putting it into the reserves. He noted that it would be a decision by the boards. Mayor Labadie agreed that the money should be returned to the cities, although she had not said that at the last meeting. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated she thought it was said to give it to police and fire because, by the time the City’s portion comes back, it is $17,000, which is nothing and does not lower the levy. Councilmember Gorham noted it was a good discussion, but his point was that the police and fire should come with a Page 19 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD WORK SESSION COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 17 of 17 number, not fake numbers, and then keep the change. He noted that Council wanted to know one way or the other fairly soon. City Administrator Nevinski stated that he would check with the chiefs to see where they are in determining the number for the UPS system. Mayor Labadie stated that Council has not given final decisions on everything, which may not have been possible, but they are making baby steps. City Administrator Nevinski stated that the levy is where it started at the beginning of the night, 8.31 percent. He noted that the staffing position would stay in for now; the majority want to move the antenna rent to the water fund; the special election can stay and be cut in December if needed; and the last three are small enough to stay. He shared that this is where it started and has come full circle after a good discussion, with more to come. Maddy moved, Sanschagrin seconded, Adjourning the City Council Work Session Meeting of August 24, 2026, at 9:59 P.M. Motion passed 5/0. ATTEST: Jennifer Labadie, Mayor Sandie Thone, City Clerk Page 20 of 568 City Council Item 2.B. Title/Subject: City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Meeting Date: September 14, 2026 Prepared By: Sandie Thone, City Clerk/ HR Director Attachments 1. 08.24.2026 CC Reg Meeting Minutes Background 08-24-26 City Counci Regular Meeting Minutes Strategic Alignment Organizational Strength & Good Governance • Sound and strategic record keeping of government activities lead to comprehensive long- term planning, principled, data, and stakeholder-driven decisions, and a culture of continuous improvement. Budget Impact Minute preparation costs vary based on length of meeting and level of detail. Action Requested Simple majority vote is required. Page 21 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, AUGUST 24, 2026 7:00 P.M. MINUTES 1. CONVENE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING Mayor Labadie called the meeting to order at 7:02 P.M. A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call Present: Mayor Labadie; Councilmembers Maddy, Sanschagrin, Gorham, and DiGruttolo; City Administrator Nevinski; City Clerk/HR Director Thone; Director of Public Works Morreim; and Finance Director Schmuck Absent: None C. Review Agenda Sanschagrin moved, DiGruttolo seconded, approving the agenda as presented. Motion passed 5/0. 2. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember DiGruttolo asked to review Items 2. A, 2. B, and 2. F. Mayor Labadie asked if the Items needed to be removed or just talked about. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that they were clerical errors and could be discussed. Mayor Labadie suggested doing each item one by one. Councilmember DiGruttolo noted on Item 2. A that Mayor Labadie is listed as Councilmember Labadie. She noted an incomplete sentence on Item 2. B, page 30 of the Agenda Packet, which should read: "Councilmember DiGruttolo asked about the resignation." Also, on page 30, the minutes refer to Mayor Labadie as "he". Then, on page 33, the minutes state that Staff confirmed the Long-Term Financial Management Plan would not be available until October, and immediately after that, state that the City would have it before the preliminary levy on October 13, which cannot be right. She added that the minutes should accurately state what was said. Mayor Labadie stated that the Recording Secretary was taking note of the corrections. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked for Item 2. F to be pulled from the Consent Agenda. DiGruttolo moved, Sanschagrin seconded, Approving the Motions Contained on the Consent Agenda and Adopting the Resolutions Therein. A. City Council Work Session Minutes B. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 22 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 2 of 14 C. June 2, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes D. Claims List E. Recruitment for Public Works Supervisor Position F. Accept Resignation and Approve Recruitment for LEO-Utilities Position (moved to 4.C.) G. Records Retention Annual Review, Adopting RESOLUTION NO. 26-50, “A Resolution Approving the Annual Review of the Minnesota General Records Retention Schedule and the Records Retention Policy for the City of Shorewood.” Motion passed 5/0. 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR David Cooley, 24725 Smithtown Road, stated he would be discussing old business. He explained that a couple of years ago he was helping his wife load things into the car for the quilting club that she was a part of at the community center. He added that his home is about 100 years old and 3.5 feet from the property line, right next to a metal fence that abuts the east side of his property. He noted that, before taking his wife to the quilting club during the winter, he had been at City Hall about a barking dog problem, and they told him to call the police. He explained that while he was loading the car to go, the neighbor’s dog came over, and the neighbor came over to get it. The neighbor asked why he had not bought the property when it was for sale; in other words, then he and his wife would not have to put up with them. He remembered that the neighbor said they know about you at City Hall. That tells him that all the City's employees are doing something they are not supposed to do: talking about individual citizens. He noted that the employees are overstepping their job and should have been fired a long time ago. He shared that his neighbor had other things to say, such as that he and his wife do not pay enough property taxes to live here. Not a nice neighbor to live next to. Tena Brandhorst, 27215 Smithtown Road, stated that she was at the meeting as the President of the Southshore Senior Partners (SSSP). She explained that they are a senior group that meets at the Shorewood Community and Events Center (SCEC). She noted that the nonprofit will disband at the end of the year and is very concerned that senior programming will not continue at the SCEC. It is very important to a large part of the population in Shorewood that the activities already in place continue and that the city expand, hopefully. The SCEC has been a wonderful resource for all residents of Shorewood. Still, for seniors, it has been a place to gather and make meaningful connections, which is very important for the health and well-being of older adults. Another benefit is that it is also a way for seniors to connect with the City, a gathering place for seniors to be part of the City, which is very important. She shared that the SSSP has been supplying the City with countless hours of volunteer time to provide activities for seniors at no cost to the City, but has paid rent to the City for this service. She added that no other city does this; cities usually provide for seniors. She stated that the Council is concerned about every penny spent in the budget and that all in the City share this concern. When tallying up all the money spent on City parks that are only used three months out of the year, think of the possibilities of a building that can be used year-round. The SSSP believes that the SCEC is a great asset not only for the seniors, but for the City as a whole. She noted that the SCEC needs to be promoted more Page 23 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 3 of 14 widely, as some residents do not even know it exists. The residents need to know that the City has a wonderful asset in the building, and this starts with the City Council. She shared that she spent many hours and many years in the SCEC, and the only Councilmember she has seen in the building is the Mayor. She encouraged the Council to find out more about the SCEC. She suggested coming on a Tuesday morning to see what is being done in the building, talk to people, and learn about the topic. Maria Medina, 23080 Stratford Place, stated that she knows no decisions are being made at the meeting. Still, she wanted to share her perspective on priorities for the 2027 budget. She asked the Council to focus the limited resources on the City’s core responsibilities, not by shortchanging residents of the services and amenities they have chosen to call Shorewood home. She noted that she would share her perspective as a resident, but she is also a former city employee, councilmember, and city mayor for Richfield. She understood the financial pressures that the Council faces because she has had to make the same decisions a dozen times. She stated that something she likes to remind herself of, and would like the Council to remember, is that fiscal responsibility and serving residents are not opposing goals. When resources are limited, the City needs to focus on and protect its core responsibilities: public safety, infrastructure, parks and recreation, and civic spaces that connect residents and enhance quality of life. She stated that other needs being considered for next year’s budget, including providing mental health supports to residents in Shorewood, are very important but are specialized services that are better provided by counties, healthcare providers, and nonprofits that focus on these services. The City can convene partners, connect residents to resources, and provide space for those resources without taking them on as a core responsibility within the budget. She shared that she and her husband moved to Shorewood two years ago because it was a peaceful community with great services and amenities. Her family moved from a rambler in Richfield to a larger rambler in Shorewood, which allowed them to have her mother-in-law, who has dementia, move in with them and will allow them to age in place as well. The family participates in the dementia caregiver group that convenes at the SCEC; they have attended forums and vote at the SCEC. She noted that the SCEC has given her family a warm and welcoming place and, as caregivers, the support they need. She noted that when thinking about the support group and what is shared there, support groups need neutral places that are accessible, not a coffee shop where difficult situations would be hard to share in those settings. She added that a faith-based building will not feel as welcoming to everyone. She noted that, for her family, the SCEC is not just a building; it is how they have felt connected to their new community and supported by Shorewood. She asked the Council to continue investing in the SCEC, a space that has already been invested in, and to provide the resources and support the building needs to continue thriving. It is clear that, for many community members in the room, the SCEC means something. Her family has only been in the community for two years, and the SCEC is how they have been welcomed and embraced, and she does not know what they would do without it. Being a caregiver is a difficult role, and having a resource in the SCEC where she feels comfortable and safe has been amazing for her family. She stated that if there are items in the budget that are not core responsibilities or requirements of the City, she asked that they be put on the back burner or that the City partner with organizations to provide them, so that things such as park investments and the SCEC can continue. If the Council values the residents, she asked that it continue to invest in the SCEC and the parks by focusing on the core services of local government. Jeanine Renard, 25515 Park Lane, stated that everything that everyone has said is exactly what she would have wanted to say. She shared that if the City loses the SCEC, abandons it, or lets it slide, it will be gone forever. There is no coming back from it. She noted that all of the communities in the western suburban area provide this amenity to their residents. She shared Page 24 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 4 of 14 that she was on the Minnetonka school board for nine years. She added that 50 to 70 percent of people who vote in a referendum in Minnetonka are not voting for themselves; they are voting for community amenities. When people start voting for their own personal needs, then they miss the boat. The SCEC cannot be seen as just for seniors; it needs to be a community center for all ages. She explained that it is the Council’s job to revitalize the SCEC and make it an all-city, all- community, all-age-group community center using the available funds. To say that the SCEC costs too much and can be abandoned would be a tremendous mistake. Teresa Zerby, 5680 Christopher Road, stated she was in attendance to ask the Council to support the SCEC and preserve the asset. The building is unique to the Lake Minnetonka community area, a wonderful gathering place for seniors, but serves more purposes than just for one group. The SCEC belongs to the entire community. She noted that she is on the board of the SSSP, and every year they team up with the American Legion to honor local veterans and host a Veterans Day lunch. There have been as many as 100 people attend, and this is an event that the Legion cannot accommodate. She added that Shorewood has also hosted primary voting at the SCEC and is a great location for voting. She explained that during tax season, February through April, over 250 residents turn to the AARP to have their taxes done at the SCEC. Families count on the SCEC for life’s biggest moments. Homeowners’ association meetings are hosted at the SCEC. If the City invested in upgrading the kitchen, the doors could be opened to local food entrepreneurs, and more rentals could become available. She stated that the SCEC is an irreplaceable asset that deserves property funding. It is easy to focus strictly on the bottom line, but the SCEC cannot be measured purely on dollars spent. As stated in a previous letter sent to the Council, it is incredibly easy to tear something down, but creating something of lasting human value takes true vision and a dedicated commitment of members of the City. She urged the City leadership to maintain the vision. She added that a petition, with over 100 signatures, has been circulating, asking the Council to support the SCEC. Mayor Labadie asked for a copy of the petition to be sent to the City Administrator, who would distribute copies to the Council. Jeanna Raap, 5795 Echo Road, stated she has lived in her home for 21 years, has volunteered at the SCEC for 10 years, and is a current board member on the SSSP. She noted that she is very invested in the SCEC. She shared that in addition to volunteering, she also works part-time at the SCEC as a desk attendant. She noted that the SCEC is a vital part of her life, but most importantly, of Shorewood. The City has a place that is underused and underfunded, but that does not mean it lacks value. There is a diamond in the building that needs polishing to see what it can achieve. She shared that she used to be a marketer, so the low-hanging marketing fruit is the City’s. A contracted expert could set the SCEC up for success; an updated activity room could bring steady dance and exercise rentals; the kitchen should be safe and streamlined to use; tables and chairs should be safe and easy to use so that people are not injured or turned down because setup takes too long; and senior programming is essential. Senior programming helps to support seniors physically, mentally, and emotionally. She added that one in five Shorewood residents is age 65 or older. These residents are taxpayers. She noted her concern that January 1 cannot become a cliff; when SSSP dissolves at the end of 2026, voluntary desk coverage ends, and a gap could drive participants away in a way that is very difficult to correct. She urged the City to ensure that the 2027 budget includes sufficient staffing to increase rentals and adequate practical investment to help the whole community center succeed. She asked the Council to prevent a service gap and to provide the community with the services it needs. The City already owns the diamond, and a diamond is forever. Page 25 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 5 of 14 Ann Maranzano, 28115 Woodside Road, stated that she loves this community. As she heard about some of the things that are going on, she thought about what makes a community great. For her, a budget is a consideration, but the true strength is measured by how a community brings people together and how spaces are created for the community to grow and connect. She noted she was concerned to hear about two areas that might not be considered by the City in 2027: parks and the SCEC. She shared that she is in a stage of her life where she is not using either, with all three kids in high school. She stated that 15 years ago, when her family moved to Shorewood, Freeman Park was where she brought her kids, where her kids met friends, and where she met parents who supported her. In five years, she hopes to retire, and after looking at flyers about what goes on at the SCEC, she was excited to be part of those programs. The services provided to families are something she wants to be a part of. She could not imagine the community without the SCEC. She hoped that the community would measure its health by what is offered to one another to grow, support, and care for one another. Sandra Bullock, Shorewood Ponds, stated she lives in a 55-plus community and, upon looking around the room, noted that many residents are present at the meeting. She shared that she has been in Shorewood for three and a half years and has lived around the lake for over 40 years; this is the first community that she has been in where, within one year, she could say she knew 50 percent of the people. She noted that the Shorewood Ponds residents use the SCEC for their annual meeting and Christmas party. Several people in her neighborhood also use the SCEC for events and volunteer. She added that losing the community would be difficult for many people. She shared that she did not know about the SCEC until after a year and a half of living in the City. She stated that a key factor in sustaining the SCEC's expenses is marketing. Marketing is very important, and she does not know that she has seen anything come out specifically marketing the SCEC. It is very important to keep the community alive, and it is a great way to meet people. She volunteered to help with marketing. This is a needed center that keeps the community together. She echoed what others said. Tiffany Frazier, 6125 Seamans Drive, stated that she is an instructor at the SCEC for a Fit, Fabulous, and Fun class that meets every Thursday at 10:00 A.M. She shared that when she started, only a few people showed up, but now the room is full. She noted that everyone is there, regardless of age. There have been great strides in fitness over the 40 years she has been teaching; if someone stays active, they stay active. She added that the SCEC is a great place with a wonderful environment and many opportunities. The space is so fun because people come together knowing it needs to be more profitable, yet there are a ton of opportunities. She shared that more exercise programming could be offered in the SCEC; her dream would be to have a free class every single day for seniors, along with other exercise classes. She hoped the Council would consider the options. She noted that the parking lot is perfect, with many wonderful spaces that could be used for various purposes. If the City is trying to make it profitable, that can be done. She hoped the SCEC stays. Mayor Labadie recessed the meeting for five minutes. Jim Jason, 1124 Parkview Court, stated that he lives in Victoria and is at the meeting to represent the 10:00 A.M. coffee group. The group meets five days a week; there are 18 seniors, ages 59 to 97. The group can come and go as they want, but they respect the opportunity to get together for the camaraderie. Some members have family members who were involved in the building's original construction. He added that the group would like to see the SCEC move forward and that there is significant opportunity with some advertising and promotion. There could be more money made to cover the losses. Page 26 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 6 of 14 Rich Glover, 2357 Fawn Hill Court, shared that there are some people from Shorewood in the coffee group, but many are from all over with a lot of different backgrounds. He added that the group loves using the SCEC as it is a wonderful place to meet. The group does pay to use the building, but he liked the idea of marketing, and that would make a difference. He asked that Council support the SCEC. Peggy Wilson, 5475 Gideons Lane, shared that she only heard about the meeting a few weeks ago, but it is such an important matter, and she did not understand why the community was not given any notice. She agreed that the community could do a lot to help; some are in marketing, and she was in sales. She noted that so many wonderful things are done in the SCEC, and there is a great variety: from a Spanish immersion school to getting your toenails cut. She noted that it is really important for the younger generation to think about the older generation. The City needs the SCEC. She shared that on the first day she volunteered, the phone rang only once, but now it rings all the time. David Rains, 2500 Yukon Lane, stated that he appreciates the SCEC, even though he does not live there. He added that he wood-carves there two times a week; he has rented the facility for parties; he had his wedding reception in the SCEC; Veterans luncheons; took classes; and the men’s garden club in Excelsior has rented it for a Christmas party. He thanked the Council for all the programming and expressed concern that the SCEC would disappear. Mayor Labadie shared that a task force has been meeting to discuss the future of the SCEC. The task force consists of residents, interested stakeholders, and building tenants. There is a consultant that the City hired to run the task force meetings and the Parks and Recreation Director. She stated that they have met several times, but they decided to have one more meeting on August 26. The Council was anticipating receiving the task force's report with recommendations at the meeting, but that will now come at the September 14 meeting because the task force wanted to meet one more time. When the Council has the report, they will have a more substantive discussion around the SCEC, beyond just budgetary concerns. She added that all are welcome at the meeting and can find the materials online. The task force's results will be posted online. If anyone has trouble, they can call City Hall, and City Hall will help. 4. GENERAL BUSINESS A. Accept LMCC 2027 Budget City Administrator Nevinski reviewed the LMCC 2027 Budget as found in the Agenda Packet. Councilmember Gorham noted that LMCC revenue is down due to cost-cutting. The LMCC is getting Midco franchise fees but not at the same rate, as they are losing Mediacom franchise fees. People are leaving Mediacom for cord-cutting. He shared that the LMCC is cutting into the property's sale, which is not a long-term plan. He explained that sometime in the next year, the Council needs to discuss LMCC budgeting and what should happen to it. He added that it is a sad state of community television. Councilmember Sanschagrin stated that there appear to be about $710,000 in funds to support its future. Councilmember Gorham agreed. He noted that the money would dwindle, but this year is $18,000 in the red due to rising insurance costs, and costs will continue to rise as revenues decline. It is bleak. Page 27 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 7 of 14 Mayor Labadie shared that, to her understanding, the LMCC cannot make further cuts, as they have already cut staff and equipment and changed the building. They have done everything they can. Councilmember Sanschagrin pointed out that new revenue is coming in from Midco. Councilmember Gorham stated that is true, but it is not enough. There is new revenue coming in from Midco, but it's all from cable subscribers. Public Works Director Morreim added that, anecdotally, based on Gopher State One calls, 20- to-1 residents are going to Metronet right now. He understood that with Metronet there are zero franchise fees. Metronet has fully deployed through Shorewood, and Midco is 50 percent deployed. He noted that in any given week, there are 20 Gopher State One calls for Metronet and two to three for Midco. Councilmember Maddy shared that T-Mobile Fiber bought Metronet. Public Works Director Morreim stated that this is anecdotal, based on cable drops. Each time somebody signs up, they do a Gopher State One locate, which goes to the City and all the other utility providers, so, anecdotally, the City sees much more T-Mobile. Mayor Labadie asked Councilmember Gorham if there is anything wrong with the budget. Councilmember Gorham stated no; he and the LMCC went through the small budget line by line and reviewed the details. They are trying to get better insurance, but there is nothing to cut, since there is only one salaried worker doing everything. Gorham moved, Maddy seconded, Accepting the LMCC 2027 Budget. Motion passed 5/0. B. Report on Proposed Amendment to Excelsior Fire Department JPA City Administrator Nevinski explained the Proposed Amendment as found in the Agenda Packet. Mayor Labadie asked whether anyone on Council wished to pursue this at this time. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated no. She asked whether the City still retained its prerogative to review certain matters that Deephaven was trying to raise inappropriately with the JPA, once a new Chief is in place. She added this was not the tool or the mechanism to do it. City Administrator Nevinski stated that the City can still take action. That is the feeling among all the member cities, but given the transition period, taking on the JPA is no small task, and the board did not feel this was the right time. Councilmember Maddy added, except for Deephaven. Councilmember Sanschagrin shared that it would be a great idea to pursue, when the timing is right, the annual review of the Fire Chief and more accountability around all of that. Councilmember DiGruttolo noted that some accounting mechanism would also be appropriate. The Chief cannot be an expert in everything, so having someone on at least a part-time basis would help and could have helped avoid some of the issues. Councilmember Maddy shared that the positions have already been interviewed for, so the same conversations have taken place extensively at the fire board level and with the staff. Page 28 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 8 of 14 City Administrator Nevinski stated that there was an interview process for five candidates for the interim district administrator position, who is being referred to as the interim consultant because it is a contract position, not a full-time, permanent employee. The idea is to bring someone in who understands fire departments and municipalities, can handle HR and budgeting issues, and can stabilize and provide more structure. He noted that the department is not in bad shape; it just needs more structure. Operationally, the fire department is doing very well, but the administrative side is where the struggle is. He added that interviews with two finalists would continue later in the week, and the Council would be informed of the outcome. He shared that this is a temporary situation to see how things go and what the role could turn into or what is needed. Mayor Labadie shared that Staff is hearing from the Council that there is no action on the matter. C. Accept Resignation and Approve Recruitment for LEO Utilities Position (formerly Consent Agenda 2.F.) Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that, in the past, the Council has discussed recruiting for positions and attracting the best talent, but does the City need to offer top pay for everything? She noted that she would like to have the conversation about the position before everything is already in place. She asked about the thinking and the philosophy, what the City is doing, and whether someone as experienced as the guy who is leaving is being sought. She suggested looking for someone who is more junior and can be molded, trained, and work for the City for a long time. City Clerk/HR Director Thone shared that, for this position, it is a little different because the City will probably not find someone with 25 years of experience, nor does the City really need that level of experience. She explained that the previous person in the position had 25 years of experience and, in 2022, was promoted to the utilities position. On the public works union scale, the pay for the position is higher and requires more education. She added that it is a coveted position. Some LEOs came in and started in their new positions, so there is an expectation that an internal application process will be opened first for the position, and that there will be some internal applicants. She noted that the expectation is that internal candidates would be placed in their current years of service. The Memo contained the 2026 classification for each position and the pay scale. She gave an example of an internal applicant with four years of service; they would be at $37.34, and if they were hired for the position, then they would move to the utilities position of $38.75. She noted that this would mean that an LEO would be taken off the table, and the City would need to hire one. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked whether the City is already planning for this process. City Clerk/HR Director Thone shared that it is being planned for, which is why this process is starting early. The retirement will not happen until early October, so if the internal recruitment can happen before then, that person would not have to start until November. She added that, then, the LEO position would be recruited for and most likely hired at a starting rate. Staff can keep that in mind during the recruitment process. Public Works Director Morreim noted that the last two LEOs hired began with significant experience and did not start at the first step. This has been valuable, as they come in with a lot of experience, knowing the type of work and what to do in different areas. He shared that the City is competing with private entities and other cities for this role, and those are the going rates for the type of work. He added that the City is in the ballpark. When advertisements are put out, they are getting great candidates, but they are not being paid at the highest step. Councilmember DiGruttolo shared that she has every faith and confidence in Public Works Director Morreim to take a new person and turn them into a seasoned guy. City Clerk/HR Director Page 29 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 9 of 14 Thone shared that Public Works has done that. She added that with the two positions available: Public Works Supervisor and this LEO position, she thinks that some of the more seasoned guys that came in with more experience and now have worked in Shorewood may apply for the positions, which is where other people have come from, but that is hard to find and hard to do in a city of this size. Public Works Director Morreim stated that he dealt with this a lot at his last job, but very green people are a 50/50 proposition at best. He noted that he has not dealt with this a lot in Shorewood, but he takes the probationary period very seriously and will let the person go if they are not cutting it. He added that, in general, hiring someone with more experience tends to pan out in the long run. Hiring new people for roles can be more challenging, but it is not being ruled out; rather, they are going into interviews with an open mind about what the right fit is for the City. Labadie moved, seconded by Maddy, to accept the Resignation and approve recruitment for the LEO Utilities Position. Motion passed 5/0. 5. STAFF AND COUNCIL REPORTS AND DISCUSSION A. Staff City Clerk/HR Director Thone presented the Primary Election Update Memo as found in the Agenda Packet. Mayor Labadie pointed out that the Memo also included special thanks to the Public Works employees who set up and tear down the polling places, as well as the election staff including Ms. Thone, and she thanked all staff for helping. Public Works Director Morreim shared that the City is officially in a drought, and for those who enjoy Lake Minnetonka, the water level will begin to decline because the dam has been closed. He noted that, as far as the City goes, it is seeing fairly sustained high water usage, which is typical right now as well. The tree removal contract approved about a month ago is nearly complete, and another will come before the Council soon. He shared that the tree removal contracts focus on the larger dead trees that the City lacks the equipment or expertise to remove. He stated that Public Works has been doing right-of-way trimming, stump grinding, and additional tree removal at Freeman and will continue to do more. He noted that the lead and copper testing through the Department of Health is complete, with the test results expected in the next couple of months and then provided to residents and included in the annual report to the Council. He pointed out that the fiber deployment through Midco is continuing and is mostly on the east side of Shorewood on Radisson Road, which has been difficult. The hope is to be done by the end of the year, but he is not sure they will be. Lastly, he recognized Chris Heitz, who is resigning from Shorewood to take a position at Mound Fire, and he will be missed, as he does a great job. Finance Director Schmuck shared that the Finance Department is still doing staff training and transitioning. They are continuing to wrap up the 2025 audit and are moving forward with the 2027 budget. In the coming weeks, the department will work on the Long-Term Financial Management Plan and the Fee Schedule. Page 30 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 10 of 14 City Clerk/HR Director Thone shared that there has been an official request for a recount at the Republican Governor/Lieutenant Governor level, so all ballots are being prepared for delivery to the County to begin the recount. Last week, she and the City Attorney proofread the ballots for the general election and submitted them to the County. Early voting begins at City Hall on October 16. She noted that the City did issue a lower-potency hemp edible retail registration to Holiday on Highway 7. The City now registers State licenses for hemp edibles and handles the registration. She added that it is the second one in the City, with one having been issued to the Bottle Shop earlier in the year. She explained that people come in with a zoning request, and once that is cleared through the Planning Department, a retail registration is completed, which includes a check to ensure they are current on their taxes and a $125 fee. Cannabis businesses are a learning experience for the Staff. She added that the City has been notified of a preliminary license approval for the property at 19215 Highway 7. It is in one of the approved cannabis zoning areas and is intended for a cannabis microbusiness, specifically a dispensary. The Planning Department is working on an Interim Use Permit, which is required, and it will come to the Council in the next 60 to 90 days. If that is approved, her department will handle the retail registration. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked if the Dodopop wants to put in a marijuana dispensary 100 meters from the high school. City Clerk/HR Director Thone shared that the location is within the City's established zoning for Cannabis retail business. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked if that is next to the Starbucks that all the high schoolers go to. City Clerk/HR Director Thone confirmed it. Councilmember Maddy noted that is the reason the Council loosened the regulations to try to get them farther from the high school, but they did not get lucky. City Clerk/HR Director Thone shared that the City did go with the greater restrictions, which is why the City did not allow the County to handle the process for them, as they wanted to implement the greater restrictions. The City still includes the two possible sites, and one site does not allow it under their lease, so this was the only parcel with the correct zoning for this type of business. She recalled that Shorewood did limit the retail registration of a retail cannabis business to one in the City. At this point, everything is lining up with the City Code. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked whether, if the law changes between now and the election, the City would receive additional training. City Clerk/HR Director Thone shared that yes - part of their training is to be made aware of what things are coming up or a possibility and to be prepared for them. She noted that for the early voting, the Legislation change only gave them one week to get things to council and then get the decision back to them. There is potential for change every year, but this year there have been many. Mayor Labadie asked if there is one cannabis/THC business in the City right now with a valid license. City Clerk/HR Director Thone explained that there is currently no cannabis in the City. She added that lower-potency hemp is a different process than cannabis. There are currently two Lower Potency Hemp Edibles Retail Registrations (LPHER) in the City. Many times, these are seen at a liquor stores because they are in drinks or other products in a tobacco store or seller like Holiday. Mayor Labadie asked if the location next to Dodopop is a cannabis application. City Clerk/HR Director Thone shared that Dodopop has a preliminary license from the State, not a full license, so the City is not acting on the retail license yet. Under Shorewood’s process, once it checks the zoning box, it has to go through the Interim Use Permit process, which the Planning Department is working on with the applicant. Page 31 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 11 of 14 Mayor Labadie remembered voting to limit cannabis businesses to one in the City. She asked if the LPHER qualifies as one. City Clerk/HR Director Thone explained that there is no limit on the LPHERs. If it is approved through the State and the City receives the approved license through the State with the LPHER. The City must go through the retail registration process for any applicant approved by the State. If they meet the requirements, the City issues them a registration, and then they are allowed to sell at the business. Mayor Labadie asked if the LPHER comes to the Council. City Clerk/HR Director Thone stated no. Mayor Labadie asked whether the cannabis license would come before the Council for approval or denial, accompanied by a memo from the Planning Department. City Clerk/HR Director Thone stated that yes the IUP for the Cannabis business would come to council for approval. If the Council approves the IUP, and everything else aligns, and the applicant gets their full cannabis license from the State and can meet the two criteria for retail registration, the City would issue the registration. Councilmember Gorham asked if the owners of Dodopop are the applicant. City Clerk/HR Director Thone stated no, and staff has not gotten far enough into the process to understand any further details of that situation. City Clerk/HR Director Thone stated that the Minnesota Department of Deed informed the City that the State plans to keep the paid leave at 0.88 percent, which Staff was happy about. She noted that the Tree Preservation Policy survey was posted on the City website, and there has already been a strong response. Tree sales are still open until September 14. City Administrator Nevinski shared that, back in July, he mentioned to Council that there was some discussion on the SLMPD board about Greenwood’s role, where Greenwood’s mayor also serves as the city administrator and has therefore been attending the operating committee meetings. The Operating Committee consists of the Police Chief and city administrators who meet to receive updates and guide the Chief through questions and related matters. The SLMPD board felt it was not appropriate for Greenwood’s mayor to serve in both roles and voted 3-1 to stop the mayor from serving in both roles. Greenwood feels strongly that they should be able to continue to serve in both roles. The issue has been discussed a couple of times at board meetings, and the board is stuck on it. He added that Greenwood has been in talks with Deephaven about joining its police department and leaving the SLMPD. He said he did not know whether that would happen, but Greenwood would discuss it at an upcoming meeting on September 3. He added that Greenwood may give notice of their intent to leave, which must be submitted by October 1. That would not be effective in 2027, but in 2028. He shared that they reached out to the League of Minnesota’s Insurance Trust, which does mediation and conflict resolution work. The League of Minnesota’s Insurance Trust has reviewed the situation and is willing to collaborate with the SLMPD to find a solution. Greenwood will also discuss that at their meeting, but the other communities are in favor of it. He added that there is no cost to go through the process. He noted that he does not know where Deephaven stands on the topic, as there are pros and cons for them. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked if there are numbers on how much more that would cost the City if Greenwood left. City Administrator Nevinski shared that he does not have the numbers, but has been thinking about it. Some factors would affect what that would mean for the SLMPD and how their demands could shift. The numbers are worth considering, and the Staff could make an estimate. Councilmember Sanschagrin suggested it would be about half of what their share Page 32 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 12 of 14 is in the budget. City Administrator Nevinski stated that it is a good estimate and that Greenwood accounts for seven percent of the budget right now. Mayor Labadie noted that the issue is not a matter of flippancy; the administrators, the Chief, and the mayors are all concerned. She noted that having a mayor on two committees, one of which does not report back to the councils, is neither transparent nor consistent with the concept of good governance. She shared that there were issues with the fire department this last year, and they do not want issues with the police department. It is not a small thing to have roles assigned to the proper people and have people accountable to the councils. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked why the issue has taken so long to become an issue. Mayor Labadie noted that the mayor before Mayor Fletcher bowed out more and understood when there was a conflict of interest. It has put the committee, the council, the administrators, and mayors in a bad spot multiple times. The issue has been talked about for almost two years. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked if something actually happened that was illegal or unethical. Mayor Labadie stated that she is not in both committee meetings, so she cannot say for sure. However, it is not how things are set up, and it is not how it is supposed to be. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked who raised the concern and why. Mayor Labadie stated that all of the other mayors raised the concern. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked whether all the mayors raised the concern at the same time, without any prompting. She added that it does not sound right. Mayor Labadie shared that when going back through records from four or five years ago, she and the mayor of Tonka Bay raised the concern, as did the mayors before the current mayors. She added that the mayor of Greenwood before the current mayor made things work better, but it is time if true transparency is wanted in the departments. She noted that it is difficult for the Police Chief to be in a meeting with the administrators, discussing day-to-day administrative matters about the department, when one of those administrators, who is not an administrator, also has the power to fire the Chief. Councilmember DiGruttolo noted that they could not fire them on their own. Mayor Labadie explained that they have the power to bring it to their council and blow up the JPA. She noted that if one city does not approve the budget, it can revert to last year’s budget. In the current era, policing would probably not cover anything. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked whether Mayor Labadie has that authority over the SLMPD when she is on the commission. Mayor Labadie stated that she does not because she brings everything back to the Council. Greenwood’s council is unanimous that the mayor should also be the administrator. The other councils are unanimous that this is an overstep, an overreach, a lack of transparency, and two hats. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked what this Council is. She noted that the Council has not had a vote on it. She asked whether the other cities had held a vote on the issue and whether they had voted unanimously. Mayor Labadie stated that she does not know. Greenwood voted; Excelsior has had the discussion, and she is unsure about Tonka Bay. Councilmember DiGruttolo shared that there is not transparency in the Council either, because they do not understand what is going on. She noted that this does not seem like an issue the City should be taking on, and that tacking another three percent onto the budget because they felt something hypothetically could be not transparent. Mayor Labadie suggested Councilmember DiGruttolo attend the police board meetings and see some of the tension in the room. She noted that asking City Administrator Nevinski questions about what is going on will get him to tell what he is allowed to tell. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that it is not transparent; if the Council cannot know everything, then that is not transparency. Mayor Labadie shared that the mayors are not on the committee of administrators and that is how the JPA is set up. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that it is great that it is set up that way, but that is not Page 33 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 13 of 14 transparent. Mayor Labadie invited Councilmember DiGruttolo to attend the meetings and feel some tension. Councilmember DiGruttolo stated that "tension" is not legal terminology; people may not like it, but unless someone has actually committed an unethical crime or intended to do so, it does not meet the threshold for substantial change. Mayor Labadie shared that any of the cities have the right to withdraw from the JPA at any time. Councilmember Gorham asked if the removal of Greenwood is the result of the ongoing tension over this one issue. Mayor Labadie stated that any city can withdraw and that she does not know for sure why Greenwood is looking to do so; all she knows is what City Administrator Nevinski stated. She added that when Staff says these are the things the City needs, then Council needs to trust them; she is the representative in the room, and things are tense and not transparent. If she is not trusted, Councilmembers can start attending the meetings. She noted that there has always been a division of the Council representing the City for different matters, and there has never been any issue with not trusting the representative. She noted that Councilmember Sanschagrin attends the budget meetings. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked whether, if she attends the meetings and still feels the same way, Mayor Labadie would change her opinion. Mayor Labadie pointed out that it would have to be brought up at Council, as others cannot speak at the meeting, but opinions can be given later. Councilmember DiGruttolo asked if Councilmember Sanschagrin felt there was tension at the meetings. Councilmember Sanschagrin noted that there was some. Mayor Labadie pointed out that Councilmember Sanschagrin has not attended every meeting, only select meetings when the budget is discussed. Councilmember Sanschagrin shared that he is glad the committee is pursuing the vehicle as a means to resolve the issue. City Administrator Nevinski stated that an outside party can help to break down and articulate some of the issues. Hopefully the cities can move past the issue. City Administrator Nevinski noted that the 2050 Comprehensive Plan is underway and that the Council has a copy of the schedule of planned community events. He stressed that there are great opportunities for people to share how they feel about the community, which is information the City has not always had. He noted that Zoning Code updates are moving forward and Planning is very busy with Code inspections and enforcement. B. Mayor and City Council Councilmember DiGruttolo pointed out that she looked at the rules for the Matters from the Floor and that they do not state that a resident cannot speak twice. She stated that the Mayor owes the resident an apology for how he was treated. Mayor Labadie noted that she would not do that. Councilmember DiGruttolo shared that she personally thinks the way colleagues are treated on the dais is unprofessional and not in accordance with Robert's Rules that everyone agreed to. She noted that, more than once, in her personal opinion, she has been treated unprofessionally by two members on the Council, and tonight it was the Mayor. Mayor Labadie apologized and noted that she is tired of the eye contact between Councilmember DiGruttolo and residents, and of going back and forth with residents in the hallway between meetings to discuss documents. 6. ADJOURN Maddy moved, Sanschagrin seconded, Adjourning the City Council Regular Meeting of August 24, 2026, at 8:48 P.M. Page 34 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 24, 2026 Page 14 of 14 Motion passed. ATTEST: Jennifer Labadie, Mayor Sandie Thone, City Clerk Page 35 of 568 City Council Item 2.C. Title/Subject: Claims List Meeting Date: September 14, 2026 Prepared By: Dalton Kraay, Senior Accountant Attachments 1. Payroll 08-24-2026 2. Payroll 08-24-2026 AP 3. Payroll 09-08-2026 4. Payroll 09-08-2026 AP 5. Payroll 09-08-2026 Primary Election 6. Council 09-14-2026 Background Council is asked to verify payment of the attached claims. The claims include compensation, operational or contractual expenditures anticipated in the current budget, or otherwise approved by the Council. Funds will be distributed following approval of the claims list. Claims for Council Authorization: Payroll 08-24-2026 $67,219.26 Payroll 08-24-2026 AP $56,703.26 Payroll 09-08-2026 $61,386.54 Payroll 09-08-2026 AP $90,098.76 Payroll Primary Election $12,516.00 Council 09-14-2026 $320,402.73 Total Claims: Checks & ACH $608,326.55 Strategic Alignment Fiscal Responsibility • Implement best practices to support sound financial management • Maintain stable and predictable finances over the long-term Page 36 of 568 Budget Impact The expenditures have been reviewed and determined to be reasonable, necessary, and consistent with the City's budget. Action Requested Motion to approve the claims list as presented. Simple Majority is required. Page 37 of 568Clearing House Distribution Report User: DKraay@shorewoodmn.gov Printed: 08/25/2026 - 10:37AM Batch: 00024.08.2026 Account Number Debit Credit Account Description 700-00-1010-0000 0.00 67,219.26 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 700-00-2170-0000 67,219.26 0.00 GROSS PAYROLL CLEARING 67,219.26 67,219.26 Report Totals: 67,219.26 67,219.26 CH-Distribution Report (08/25/2026 - 10:37 AM) Page 1 Page 38 of 568Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: DKraay@shorewoodmn.gov Printed: 08/26/2026 - 2:07PM Batch: 00005.08.2026 - PR-08-26-2026 Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 12 AFSCME MN COUNCIL 5 - UNION DUES Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Union Dues 216.30 08/25/2026 700-00-2182-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Union Dues Check Total: 216.30 Vendor: 1511 ALLSTATE BENEFITS Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Insurance-Critical Benefit 571.28 08/25/2026 700-00-2189-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Insurance-Critical Benefit Check Total: 571.28 Vendor: 5 EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Medicare Employee Portion 1,454.92 08/25/2026 700-00-2174-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Medicare Employee Portion PR Batch 00002.08.2026 FICA Employer Portion 6,221.16 08/25/2026 700-00-2174-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 FICA Employer Portion PR Batch 00002.08.2026 FICA Employee Portion 6,221.16 08/25/2026 700-00-2174-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 FICA Employee Portion PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Federal Income Tax 8,334.95 08/25/2026 700-00-2172-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Federal Income Tax PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Medicare Employer Portion 1,454.92 08/25/2026 700-00-2174-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Medicare Employer Portion Check Total: 23,687.11 Vendor: 6 HEALTH PARTNERS-MEDICAL Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Health Insurance - CoPay 79.01 08/25/2026 700-00-2171-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Health Insurance - CoPay PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Health Insurance-HSA 718.47 08/25/2026 700-00-2171-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Health Insurance-HSA PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Health Insurance-HSA-Benefit -302.96 08/25/2026 700-00-2171-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Health Insurance-HSA-Benefit PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Health Insurance-HSA 315.30 08/25/2026 700-00-2171-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Health Insurance-HSA Check Total: 809.82 Vendor: 11 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00002.08.2026 State Income Tax 4,418.18 08/25/2026 700-00-2173-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 State Income Tax AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (08/26/2026 - 2:07 PM) Page 1 Page 39 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 4,418.18 Vendor: 869 MINNESOTA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00002.08.2026 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM-BENEFIT 850.57 08/25/2026 700-00-2190-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM-BENEFIT Check Total: 850.57 Vendor: 2 MISSION SQUARE RETIREMNT-302131-457 Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00002.08.2026 MissionSq-Flat Amount-Pre-Tax 4,718.85 08/25/2026 700-00-2176-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 MissionSq-Flat Amount-Pre-Tax PR Batch 00002.08.2026 MissionSq-ER2 306.83 08/25/2026 700-00-2176-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 MissionSq-ER2 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 MissionSq-ER 711.16 08/25/2026 700-00-2176-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 MissionSq-ER PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Mission Sq-Flat Amount-Roth457 122.47 08/25/2026 700-00-2176-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Mission Sq-Flat Amount-Roth457 Check Total: 5,859.31 Vendor: 665 OPTUM BANK Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00002.08.2026 HSA-Optum Bank-Employee 512.61 08/25/2026 700-00-2183-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 HSA-Optum Bank-Employee PR PR Batch 00002.08.2026 HSA-Optum Bank-Benefit 1,566.09 08/25/2026 700-00-2183-0000 Batch 00002.08.2026 HSA-Optum Bank-Benefit Check Total: 2,078.70 Vendor: 9 PERA Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00002.08.2026 MN-PERA Deduction 6,473.53 08/25/2026 700-00-2175-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 MN-PERA Deduction PR Batch 00002.08.2026 MN PERA Benefit Employer 7,469.48 08/25/2026 700-00-2175-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 MN PERA Benefit Employe Check Total: 13,943.01 Vendor: 1091 VOYA FINANCIAL Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Deferred Com-Voya 450.58 08/25/2026 700-00-2176-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Deferred Com-Voya PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Deferred Comp-Voya-Roth457 100.00 08/25/2026 700-00-2176-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Deferred Comp-Voya-Roth457 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Deferred Com-Voya 1,683.02 08/25/2026 700-00-2176-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Deferred Com-Voya PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Deferred Comp-Voya-Pre 2,035.38 08/25/2026 700-00-2176-0000 PR Batch 00002.08.2026 Deferred Comp-Voya-PreTax Check Total: 4,268.98 Tax AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (08/26/2026 - 2:07 PM) Page 2 Page 40 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference Total for Check Run: 56,703.26 Total of Number of Checks: 10 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (08/26/2026 - 2:07 PM) Page 3 Page 41 of 568Clearing House Distribution Report User: DKraay@shorewoodmn.gov Printed: 09/10/2026 - 7:24AM Batch: 00008.09.2026 Account Number Debit Credit Account Description 700-00-1010-0000 0.00 61,386.54 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 700-00-2170-0000 61,386.54 0.00 GROSS PAYROLL CLEARING 61,386.54 61,386.54 Report Totals: 61,386.54 61,386.54 CH-Distribution Report (09/10/2026 - 7:24 AM) Page 1 Page 42 of 568Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: DKraay@shorewoodmn.gov Printed: 09/10/2026 - 7:26AM Batch: 00001.09.2026 - PR-09-08-2026 Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 4 AFSCME CO 5 MEMBER HEALTH FUND-UNION DENTAL Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Dental-Union Benefit 294.00 09/08/2026 700-00-2185-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Dental-Union Benefit Check Total: 294.00 Vendor: 12 AFSCME MN COUNCIL 5 - UNION DUES Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Union Dues 216.37 09/08/2026 700-00-2182-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Union Dues Check Total: 216.37 Vendor: 1511 ALLSTATE BENEFITS Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Insurance-Hospital Benefit 269.49 09/08/2026 700-00-2189-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Insurance-Hospital Benefit PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Insurance-Accident Benefit 102.18 09/08/2026 700-00-2189-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Insurance-Accident Benefit PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Insurance-Critical Benefit 473.61 09/08/2026 700-00-2189-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Insurance-Critical Benefit Check Total: 845.28 Vendor: 5 EFTPS - FEDERAL W/H Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 FICA Employee Portion 5,820.12 09/08/2026 700-00-2174-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 FICA Employee Portion PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Federal Income Tax 8,008.13 09/08/2026 700-00-2172-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Federal Income Tax PR Batch 00001.09.2026 FICA Employer Portion 5,820.12 09/08/2026 700-00-2174-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 FICA Employer Portion PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Medicare Employee Portion 1,361.15 09/08/2026 700-00-2174-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Medicare Employee Portion PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Medicare Employer Portion 1,361.15 09/08/2026 700-00-2174-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Medicare Employer Portion Check Total: 22,370.67 Vendor: 1165 FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Vision-Avesis Benefit 267.05 09/08/2026 700-00-2186-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Vision-Avesis Benefit Check Total: 267.05 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 7:26 AM) Page 1 Page 43 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 1510 GEN DIGITAL, INC. Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Protection-NortonLife Benefit 94.41 09/08/2026 700-00-2188-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Protection-NortonLife Benefit Check Total: 94.41 Vendor: 6 HEALTH PARTNERS-MEDICAL Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Health Insurance-CoPay Benefit 13,330.16 09/08/2026 700-00-2171-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Health Insurance-CoPay Benefit PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Health Insurance - CoPay 79.01 09/08/2026 700-00-2171-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Health Insurance - CoPay PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Health Insurance-HSA-Benefit 19,190.61 09/08/2026 700-00-2171-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Health Insurance-HSA-Benefit PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Health Insurance-HSA 749.77 09/08/2026 700-00-2171-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Health Insurance-HSA Check Total: 33,349.55 Vendor: 1166 HEALTHPARTNER-DENTAL Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Dental-Non Union Benefit 1,882.80 09/08/2026 700-00-2184-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Dental-Non Union Benefit Check Total: 1,882.80 Vendor: 686 KANSAS CITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Long Term Disability Benefit 953.37 09/08/2026 700-00-2181-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Long Term Disability Benefit PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Short Term Disability Benefit 1,009.67 09/08/2026 700-00-2181-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Short Term Disability Benefit Check Total: 1,963.04 Vendor: 11 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 State Income Tax 4,187.79 09/08/2026 700-00-2173-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 State Income Tax Check Total: 4,187.79 Vendor: 869 MINNESOTA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM-BENEFIT 809.86 09/08/2026 700-00-2190-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM-BENEFIT Check Total: 809.86 Vendor: 2 MISSION SQUARE RETIREMNT-302131-457 Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 MissionSq-Flat Amount-Pre-Tax 4,718.85 09/08/2026 700-00-2176-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 MissionSq-Flat Amount-Pre-Tax PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Mission Sq-Flat Amount-Roth457 122.47 09/08/2026 700-00-2176-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Mission Sq-Flat Amount-Roth457 Check Total: 4,841.32 Vendor: 10 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: True AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 7:26 AM) Page 2 Page 44 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference PR Batch 00001.09.2026 PERA Life Benefit 112.00 09/08/2026 700-00-2180-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 PERA Life Benefit Check Total: 112.00 Vendor: 665 OPTUM BANK Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 HSA-Optum Bank-Employee 512.61 09/08/2026 700-00-2183-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 HSA-Optum Bank-Employee PR Batch 00001.09.2026 HSA-Optum Bank-Benefit 1,758.91 09/08/2026 700-00-2183-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 HSA-Optum Bank-Benefit Check Total: 2,271.52 Vendor: 9 PERA Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 MN-PERA Deduction 6,175.34 09/08/2026 700-00-2175-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 MN-PERA Deduction PR Batch 00001.09.2026 MN PERA Benefit Employer 7,125.39 09/08/2026 700-00-2175-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 MN PERA Benefit Employer Check Total: 13,300.73 Vendor: 1512 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES, INC Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Protection-LegalShield Benefit 131.70 09/08/2026 700-00-2187-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Protection-LegalShield Benefit Check Total: 131.70 Vendor: 7 SECURIAN FINANCIAL Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 MN-Life Insurance Benefit 1,025.29 09/08/2026 700-00-2180-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 MN-Life Insurance Benefit Check Total: 1,025.29 Vendor: 1091 VOYA FINANCIAL Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Deferred Comp-Voya-Roth457 100.00 09/08/2026 700-00-2176-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Deferred Comp-Voya-Roth457 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Deferred Comp-Voya-PreTax 2,035.38 09/08/2026 700-00-2176-0000 PR Batch 00001.09.2026 Deferred Comp-Voya-PreTax Check Total: 2,135.38 Total for Check Run: 90,098.76 Total of Number of Checks: 18 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 7:26 AM) Page 3 Page 45 of 568Clearing House Distribution Report User: DKraay@shorewoodmn.gov Printed: 09/08/2026 - 3:14PM Batch: 00011.08.2026 Account Number Debit Credit Account Description 700-00-1010-0000 0.00 12,516.00 CASH AND INVESTMENTS 700-00-2170-0000 12,516.00 0.00 GROSS PAYROLL CLEARING 12,516.00 12,516.00 Report Totals: 12,516.00 12,516.00 CH-Distribution Report (09/08/2026 - 3:14 PM) Page 1 Page 46 of 568Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: DKraay@shorewoodmn.gov Printed: 09/10/2026 - 1:40PM Batch: 00002.09.2026 - Council-09-14-26 Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 105 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True INV385998 Toner for Konica Printer/Copier 20.30 09/14/2026 101-19-4221-0000 INV386257 Toner for Konica Copier/Printer 20.30 09/14/2026 101-19-4221-0000 Check Total: 40.60 Vendor: 1412 ARVIG Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True Aug-26 Phone Services - August 2026 884.44 09/14/2026 101-19-4321-0000 Sep-26 Phone Services - September 2026 & Phone Repairs 1,086.94 09/14/2026 101-19-4321-0000 Check Total: 1,971.38 Vendor: 868 BANK OF MONTREAL Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True BrendaJul2026 Adv Academy Sandie 325.00 09/14/2026 101-13-4331-0000 BrendaJul2026 Adv Academy Brenda 325.00 09/14/2026 101-13-4331-0000 BrendaJul2026 Election Judge - Training Food 11.39 09/14/2026 101-14-4245-0000 BrendaJul2026 Membership MCFOA 50.00 09/14/2026 101-13-4331-0000 BruceJul2026 Saw Blades 26.99 09/14/2026 101-52-4221-0000 ChrisJul2026 Water Bags/String 295.95 09/14/2026 101-52-4247-0000 ChrisJul2026 MRWA Training 150.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4331-0000 ChrisJul2026 Weed Whipping Line 46.04 09/14/2026 101-52-4221-0000 ChrisJul2026 Turf Field Glue 43.50 09/14/2026 101-52-4245-0000 ChrisJul2026 MRWA Training 150.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4331-0000 ChrisJul2026 Weed Whipping Line 40.98 09/14/2026 101-52-4221-0000 ChristopherJul2 Flag Parts 7.59 09/14/2026 101-32-4223-0000 ChristopherJul2 Form Tools 68.26 09/14/2026 101-52-4240-0000 ChristopherJul2 Concrete-Parks 271.00 09/14/2026 101-52-4223-0000 ChristopherJul2 Concrete-Parks 136.53 09/14/2026 101-52-4223-0000 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 1:40 PM) Page 1 Page 47 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference ChristopherJul2 Flag Parts 7.59 09/14/2026 101-32-4223-0000 CtyCrdJul2026 Water Svc August CH 40.00 09/14/2026 101-19-4400-0000 CtyCrdJul2026 Organic Recycling 361.92 09/14/2026 621-00-4400-0026 CtyCrdJul2026 SCEC Garbage 160.87 09/14/2026 201-00-4400-0000 CtyCrdJul2026 Chanhassen-18505-000 water 11.31 09/14/2026 601-00-4263-0000 CtyCrdJul2026 Public Works 505.51 09/14/2026 101-32-4400-0000 CtyCrdJul2026 Chanhassen-18505-000 water 1,557.05 09/14/2026 601-00-4263-0000 EricJul2026 Tabling Supplies - Recycling 29.99 09/14/2026 621-00-4400-0000 EricJul2026 Sandie Business Cards 30.38 09/14/2026 101-13-4351-0000 JakeJul2026 Office Supplies 65.32 09/14/2026 101-18-4245-0000 JakeJul2026 Office Supplies 9.49 09/14/2026 101-18-4245-0000 JakeJul2026 Office Supplies 82.15 09/14/2026 101-18-4245-0000 JeanneJul2026 MNGFOA Conference 138.51 09/14/2026 101-15-4331-0000 JeanneJul2026 MNGFOA Conference 138.51 09/14/2026 101-15-4331-0000 JeremyJul2026 Weed Whip Head 57.49 09/14/2026 101-52-4221-0000 JeremyJul2026 Chain Saw Sharpening 139.05 09/14/2026 101-52-4221-0000 JeremyJul2026 Weed Whip Head & Line 173.01 09/14/2026 101-52-4221-0000 JeremyJul2026 Fuel 26.03 09/14/2026 101-32-4212-0000 JeremyJul2026 Oil Filter/Head Lights 190.91 09/14/2026 101-52-4221-0000 JeremyJul2026 Weed Whip Head 35.01 09/14/2026 101-52-4221-0000 JeremyJul2026 Oil Filter/Spark Plugs 442.05 09/14/2026 101-52-4221-0000 JeremyJul2026 Altoz Parts 72.32 09/14/2026 101-52-4221-0000 MarcJul2026 Credentialed Manager 50.00 09/14/2026 101-13-4433-0000 MarcJul2026 ICMA Management Assessment 75.00 09/14/2026 101-13-4331-0000 MarcJul2026 ICMA Conference 595.00 09/14/2026 101-13-4331-0000 MarcJul2026 LMC Confernce Hotel - Labadie 366.10 09/14/2026 101-11-4331-0000 MattJul2026 Metal Posts-Return -84.98 09/14/2026 101-52-4245-0000 MattJul2026 Communications 17.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4321-0000 MattJul2026 Pest Control-PW 90.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4400-0000 MattJul2026 Metal Posts-Return -84.98 09/14/2026 101-52-4245-0000 MattJul2026 Metal Posts-Return -84.98 09/14/2026 101-52-4245-0000 MitchellJul2026 SCEC Office Supplies 92.55 09/14/2026 201-00-4200-0000 MitchellJul2026 SCEC Brooms and AV Cart Supplies 122.13 09/14/2026 201-00-4245-0000 MitchellJul2026 Staff Scheduling 15.00 09/14/2026 101-53-4245-0000 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 1:40 PM) Page 2 Page 48 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference MitchellJul2026 SCEC Printer Paper 48.99 09/14/2026 201-00-4200-0000 MitchellJul2026 SCEC Pest Control 90.00 09/14/2026 201-00-4400-0000 MitchellJul2026 Tablecloth Cleaning 263.02 09/14/2026 201-00-4400-0000 NeliaJul2026 SCEC AED Battery 249.00 09/14/2026 101-53-4245-0000 NeliaJul2026 General Supplies 136.58 09/14/2026 101-19-4245-0000 RobertJul2026 Downspout Extender 8.98 09/14/2026 101-19-4223-0000 RobHJul2026 Fuel 37.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4212-0000 RyanJul2026 Bottled Water 50.28 09/14/2026 101-32-4245-0000 SandieJul2026 Elections Ballot Counter Cleaning Kits 77.01 09/14/2026 101-14-4245-0000 TimJul2026 SE Well Parts 26.72 09/14/2026 601-00-4223-0000 TimJul2026 Water Test Delivery 11.00 09/14/2026 601-00-4433-0000 ToddJul2026 Trim Line 16.99 09/14/2026 101-52-4221-0000 Check Total: 8,406.11 Vendor: 677 BOLTON & MENK, INC. Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True 0405210 Proj.# 24X.136948-2025 Mill & Overlay Design Aug 2026 729.50 09/14/2026 420-00-4303-0000 0405221 Proj.# 0C1.123603-General Engineering Aug 2026 4,103.50 09/14/2026 101-31-4303-0000 0405222 Proj.# 24X.135610-Denman Subdivision Aug 2026 142.00 09/14/2026 880-00-2210-0000 0405223 Proj.# 26X.144849-5980 Glencoe Road Aug 2026 165.00 09/14/2026 880-00-2210-0000 0405224 Proj.# 24X.135611-6180 Cardinal Drive Aug 2026 278.00 09/14/2026 880-00-2210-0000 0405227 Proj.# 25X.141779-Engineering Building Permit Aug 2026 1,384.50 09/14/2026 101-31-4303-0000 0405228 Proj.# 0C1.127485-Excelsior Woods Aug 2026 421.50 09/14/2026 880-00-2210-0000 0405229 Proj.# 26X.144934-Excelsior Woods 2nd Addition Aug 2026 1,017.00 09/14/2026 880-00-2210-0000 0405231 Proj.# 0C1.125586-Galpin Lake Road/TH7 Trail Aug 2026 8,574.50 09/14/2026 422-00-4303-0000 0405238 Proj.# 0C1.120898-1-GIS-Utilities-Sewer Aug 2026 1,274.25 09/14/2026 611-00-4303-0000 0405238 Proj.# 0C1.120898-3-GIS-Utilities-Stormwater Aug 2026 1,075.50 09/14/2026 631-00-4303-0000 0405238 Proj.# 0C1.120898-5-GIS-Planning Aug 2026 729.00 09/14/2026 101-31-4303-0000 0405238 Proj.# 0C1.120898-2-GIS-Utilities-Water Aug 2026 809.25 09/14/2026 601-00-4303-0000 0405238 Proj.# 0C1.120898-4-GIS-Utilities-Street Aug 2026 640.50 09/14/2026 101-31-4303-0000 0405240 Proj.# 0C1.130016-Lake Park Villas-24250Smithtown Aug 2026 413.50 09/14/2026 880-00-2210-0000 0405243 Proj.# 0C1.129164-Mill Street Trail Aug 2026 213.00 09/14/2026 417-00-4303-0000 0405247 Proj.# 24X.136257-SE Area Water Improvement Aug 2026 714.50 09/14/2026 601-00-4303-0000 0405248 Proj.# C16.120341-Shorewood Ln Ravine Restore Aug 2026 2,269.00 09/14/2026 631-00-4303-0000 0405250 Proj.# 26X.143042-Woodside Lane Drainage Aug 2026 106.50 09/14/2026 631-00-4303-0000 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 1:40 PM) Page 3 Page 49 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 25,060.50 Vendor: 125 BOYER FORD TRUCKS, INC. Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: True 095S18774 Plow Truck Troubleshooting Repair & Parts 4,500.00 09/14/2026 101-33-4245-0000 095S18774 Plow Truck Troubleshooting Repair & Parts 5,490.41 09/14/2026 101-32-4221-0000 Check Total: 9,990.41 Vendor: 136 CENTERPOINT ENERGY-GAS Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True 7945688-5 Aug26 5735 Country Club Rd-SCEC - Aug 2026 57.29 09/14/2026 201-00-4380-0000 8650180-6 Aug26 20630 Manor Rd - Aug 2026 21.00 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 Check Total: 78.29 Vendor: 915 CINTAS CORPORATION (Formerly HUEBSCH) Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False 4280451971 Mat Services - City Hall - Sept 2026 189.14 09/14/2026 101-19-4400-0000 4280451990 Mat Services - SCEC - Aug 2026 70.90 09/14/2026 201-00-4223-0000 Check Total: 260.04 Vendor: 1394 CSG FORTE PAYMENTS, INC Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True 0016279823 Credit Card Processing - Aug 2026 186.82 09/14/2026 201-00-4450-0000 0016279824 Credit Card Fees - Aug 2026 8.80 09/14/2026 201-00-4450-0000 Check Total: 195.62 Vendor: 167 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: True 1111252 2025 TIF Disclosure 76.50 09/14/2026 470-00-4351-0019 1112011 Publication for Bids 191.25 09/14/2026 422-00-4303-0000 Check Total: 267.75 Vendor: 186 FERGUSON WATERWORKS, LLC. No.2518 Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 0571266 Water PRV 946.45 09/14/2026 601-00-4265-0000 0572256 Road Patch Material 901.50 09/14/2026 101-32-4250-0000 Check Total: 1,847.95 Vendor: 200 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: True 6080752 GSOC Online Services - Aug 2026 200.00 09/14/2026 631-00-4400-0000 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 1:40 PM) Page 4 Page 50 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference 6080752 GSOC Online Services - Aug 2026 200.00 09/14/2026 611-00-4400-0000 6080752 GSOC Online Services - Aug 2026 137.30 09/14/2026 601-00-4400-0000 Check Total: 537.30 Vendor: 1199 GREENER BLADE FERTILIZATION CO. LLC Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False 126318 Turf Treatment - Freeman Park - Aug 26 1,051.00 09/14/2026 101-52-4400-0000 126320 Manor Park - Turf Treatment - Aug 2026 290.00 09/14/2026 101-52-4400-0000 Check Total: 1,341.00 Vendor: 211 HAWKINS, INC. Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: True 7538851 Water Treatment Chemicals 2,129.46 09/14/2026 101-32-4245-0000 Check Total: 2,129.46 Vendor: 1384 HD SUPPLY FORMERLY HOME DEPOT PRO Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False 9252904984 SCEC Supplies 174.60 09/14/2026 201-00-4245-0000 Check Total: 174.60 Vendor: 216 HENNEPIN COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False Easement 6135 SW Easement Recording Fees - 6135 Cathcart 46.00 09/14/2026 101-13-4400-0000 Res 26-26 Tonka Bay Detachment/Annexation Recording Fees 46.00 09/14/2026 101-13-4400-0000 Check Total: 92.00 Vendor: 689 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 1000273167 Hennepin County RecordEASE Subscription 35.00 09/14/2026 101-18-4433-0000 Check Total: 35.00 Vendor: 1667 Home Care Heating & Air Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False 7101 Refund Permit - 7101 10.00 09/14/2026 101-00-2085-0000 7101 Refund Permit - 7101 500.00 09/14/2026 101-24-3221-0000 Check Total: 510.00 Vendor: UB*00769 Jane Hoyt Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 009995-000, 27665 Island Vw Rd 41.47 09/14/2026 621-00-2010-0000 Refund Check 009995-000, 27665 Island Vw Rd 31.57 09/14/2026 631-00-2010-0000 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 1:40 PM) Page 5 Page 51 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference Refund Check 009995-000, 27665 Island Vw Rd 69.26 09/14/2026 611-00-2010-0000 Check Total: 142.30 Vendor: 1401 JENCO PROPERTY MAINTENANCE Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: True 7418 Badger Park Landscaping Maintenance - Sept 2026 600.00 09/14/2026 101-52-4223-0000 7418 Badger Complex Landscaping Maintenance - Sept 2026 625.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4223-0000 Check Total: 1,225.00 Vendor: 1515 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE CO. Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: True 13622 Fuel for Trailer 1,006.28 09/14/2026 101-32-4212-0000 14056 Fuel for Trailer 1,255.46 09/14/2026 101-32-4212-0000 Check Total: 2,261.74 Vendor: UB*00770 Lake Park Villas HOA Inc Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 009864-005, 5635 Buffington Lane 48.71 09/14/2026 631-00-2010-0000 Check Total: 48.71 Vendor: 1619 LB Carlson, LLP Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: False 258873 Auditing Services - Aug 2026 2,373.75 09/14/2026 101-16-4301-0000 258873 Auditing Services - Aug 2026 2,373.75 09/14/2026 611-00-4301-0000 258873 Auditing Services - Aug 2026 2,373.75 09/14/2026 601-00-4301-0000 258873 Auditing Services - Aug 2026 2,373.75 09/14/2026 631-00-4301-0000 Check Total: 9,495.00 Vendor: UB*00753 Kim W. & Lori Michelle MacFarlane Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False Refund Check 009291-000, 20680 Garden Rd 46.42 09/14/2026 611-00-2010-0000 Refund Check 009291-000, 20680 Garden Rd 19.90 09/14/2026 631-00-2010-0000 Refund Check 009291-000, 20680 Garden Rd 19.89 09/14/2026 621-00-2010-0000 Check Total: 86.21 Vendor: 279 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL (WASTEWATER) Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: True 0001211886 MCES WW Treatment Services - Oct 2026 100,018.09 09/14/2026 611-00-4385-0000 Check Total: 100,018.09 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 1:40 PM) Page 6 Page 52 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 1068 MISSION COMMUNICATIONS, LLC Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: True 2027101 Mission Communications Annual Service 2026 8,932.00 09/14/2026 611-00-4101-0000 2027101 Mission Communications Annual Service 2026 3,986.00 09/14/2026 601-00-4321-0000 Check Total: 12,918.00 Vendor: 1668 Neighborly Property Group Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False 7229 Refund Permit - 7229 175.00 09/14/2026 101-24-3221-0000 7229 Refund Permit - 7229 1.00 09/14/2026 101-00-2085-0000 Check Total: 176.00 Vendor: 325 ON SITE SANITATION-TWIN CITIES Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: True 0002104288 Disputed - credit invoice in folder 44.45 08/24/2026 101-52-4400-0000 0002116073 Refund for Mischarged Services -44.45 09/14/2026 101-52-4400-0000 0002124489 Portable Toilet Rental 90.48 09/14/2026 101-52-4400-0000 0002124490 Portable Toilet Rental 180.95 09/14/2026 101-52-4400-0000 0002124491 Portable Toilet Rental 202.92 09/14/2026 101-52-4400-0000 0002124492 Portable Toilet Rental 90.48 09/14/2026 101-52-4400-0000 0002124493 Portable Toilet Rental 90.48 09/14/2026 101-52-4400-0000 Check Total: 655.31 Vendor: 9 PERA Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: True 202340 01/13/2026-01/25/2026 81.97 09/14/2026 101-15-4440-0000 Check Total: 81.97 Vendor: 903 PERRILL Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: True 266597 ROW Web Application Monthly Fee - Sept 2026 150.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4400-0000 Check Total: 150.00 Vendor: 336 PITNEY BOWES BANK INC PURCHASE POWER Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: True 3108044175 Postage Machine Lease 4th Quarter - 2026 195.00 09/14/2026 101-19-4410-0000 Check Total: 195.00 Vendor: 1669 Jonathan Rienstra Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: False VarApp2026 Escrow Refund - 23120 Summit Ave Variance 414.80 09/14/2026 880-00-2200-0000 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 1:40 PM) Page 7 Page 53 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 414.80 Vendor: 305 SAFEBUILT LLC-LOCKBOX #88135 Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: False 4569541 Consulting Building Permit Inspections 1,509.67 09/14/2026 101-24-4400-0000 Check Total: 1,509.67 Vendor: 1424 SHADYWOOD TREE EXPERTS & LANDSCAPING Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: True 59033 Tree Removal Services - Aug 2026 197.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4400-0000 59034 Tree Removal Services - Aug 2026 875.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4400-0000 59035 Tree Removal Services - Aug 2026 4,627.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4400-0000 59066 Tree Removal Services - Aug 2026 1,875.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4400-0000 59067 Tree Removal Services - Aug 2026 1,475.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4400-0000 59068 Tree Removal Services - Aug 2026 1,675.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4400-0000 59100 Tree Removal Services-Grant Lorenz - Aug 2026 14,137.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4400-0000 59126 Tree Removal Services-Academy - Aug 2026 12,735.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4400-0000 59127 Tree Removal Services - Aug 2026 575.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4400-0000 59150 Tree Removal Services - Aug 2026 2,175.00 09/14/2026 101-32-4400-0000 Check Total: 40,346.00 Vendor: 355 SHRED-N-GO _446138 Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: True 203191 Shred Services - Aug 2026 93.60 09/14/2026 101-19-4400-0000 Check Total: 93.60 Vendor: 1181 SPLIT ROCK MANAGEMENT, INC. Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: True 101390 Cleaning Service - City Hall - Sept 2026 502.00 09/14/2026 101-19-4400-0000 Check Total: 502.00 Vendor: 1101 SPRINGBROOK HOLDING COMPANY LLC Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: True INV-024933 CivicPay Transaction Fees - Aug 2026 57.25 09/14/2026 611-00-4450-0000 INV-024933 CivicPay Transaction Fees - Aug 2026 57.25 09/14/2026 601-00-4450-0000 INV-024933 CivicPay Transaction Fees - Aug 2026 57.25 09/14/2026 631-00-4640-0000 INV-024933 CivicPay Transaction Fees - Aug 2026 57.25 09/14/2026 621-00-4450-0000 Check Total: 229.00 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 1:40 PM) Page 8 Page 54 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 296 STATE OF MN-MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: False Q3 2026 3rd Quarter Water Surcharge - 2026 6,095.00 09/14/2026 880-00-2015-0000 Check Total: 6,095.00 Vendor: 372 SWANK MOTION PICTURES, INC. Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False BO2867567 Zootopia 2 495.00 09/14/2026 101-53-4444-0000 Check Total: 495.00 Vendor: 694 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL, INC. Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: True 32921 CC Meeting Minutes 8/10/2026 703.13 09/14/2026 101-13-4400-0000 32923 Planning Commission Minutes 08/18/2026 303.75 09/14/2026 101-18-4400-0000 32924 CC Meeting Minutes 8/24/2026 703.13 09/14/2026 101-13-4400-0000 Check Total: 1,710.01 Vendor: 1666 Tina J Brandhorst Trustees Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False 27225Esc Escrow Refund - 27225 Smithtown Rd 37,500.00 09/14/2026 880-00-2200-0000 Check Total: 37,500.00 Vendor: 1348 TOSHIBA AMERICA BUSINESS SOLUT Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: True 5039809071 Printer/Copier/Scanner Lease - Sept 2026 130.07 09/14/2026 101-32-4400-0000 6926489 SCEC Printer - Aug 2026 8.01 09/14/2026 201-00-4400-0000 Check Total: 138.08 Vendor: 391 US BANK - CORPORATE TRUST SERVICES Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: True 8307885 Acct#0103911NS GO Series 2020A Fiscal Agent Fees 27.49 09/14/2026 611-00-4720-0000 8307885 Acct#0103911NS GO Series 2020A Fiscal Agent Fees 58.57 09/14/2026 601-00-4720-0000 8307885 Acct#0103911NS GO Series 2020A Fiscal Agent Fees 232.29 09/14/2026 320-00-4720-0000 8307885 Acct#0103911NS GO Series 2020A Fiscal Agent Fees 256.65 09/14/2026 631-00-4720-0000 Check Total: 575.00 Vendor: 392 VALLEY-RICH CO. INC. Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False 35893 Tree Removal Services - Jul 2026 4,400.00 09/14/2026 601-00-4400-0000 35936 Two Water Main Repairs on Near Mtn Blvd 16,126.11 09/14/2026 601-00-4400-0000 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 1:40 PM) Page 9 Page 55 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 20,526.11 Vendor: 680 WALKER ROOFING Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False 7239 Building Permit Refund - 7239 175.00 09/14/2026 101-24-3221-0000 7239 Building Permit Refund - 7239 1.00 09/14/2026 101-00-2085-0000 Check Total: 176.00 Vendor: 408 WM MUELLER & SONS INC Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: True 327256 Asphalt Patch Material 580.35 09/14/2026 101-32-4250-0000 327313 Asphalt Patch Material 954.56 09/14/2026 101-32-4250-0000 Check Total: 1,534.91 Vendor: 411 XCEL ENERGY, INC. Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: True 4531711-9Aug1 26055 Birch Bluff Rd - Aug 2026 14.45 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 9.63 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 30.75 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug1 23750 Highway 7 - Aug 2026 72.38 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 31.56 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug1 3801 W 62nd St - Aug 2026 23.04 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 26550 Noble Rd - Aug 2026 19.87 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 27922 Smithtown Rd - Aug 2026 63.42 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 4996 Shady Island Pt /MOUND CITY - Aug 2026 17.75 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 28125 Boulder Bridge Dr - Aug 2026 3,835.84 09/14/2026 601-00-4396-0000 4531711-9Aug1 4390 Enchanted Ln /MOUND CITY - Aug 2026 88.22 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 43.88 09/14/2026 101-19-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5295 Shady Island Rd /MOUND CITY - Aug 2026 34.98 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5700 County Rd 19 - Aug 2026 58.92 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5700 County Rd 19 - Aug 2026 109.59 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 4.26 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 240.21 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5590 Covington Road - Aug 2026 2.15 09/14/2026 101-19-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 20405 Knightsbridge - Aug 2026 2,285.13 09/14/2026 601-00-4394-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 6.37 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 0.80 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 1:40 PM) Page 10 Page 56 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference 4531711-9Aug1 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 11.11 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug1 20995 Minnetonka Blvd - Aug 2026 46.81 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 24253 Smithtown Rd - Aug 2026 436.92 09/14/2026 601-00-4395-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 1,282.68 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 73.14 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug1 19832 State Highway 7 - Aug 2026 85.12 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug1 25800 State Highway 7 - Aug 2026 11.14 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 20630 Manor Rd - Aug 2026 39.20 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 27145 Edgewood Rd - Aug 2026 115.98 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 24200 Smithtown Rd - Aug 2026 361.61 09/14/2026 101-32-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 4773 Lakeway Terr - Aug 2026 40.58 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 4931 Shady Island Road - Aug 2026 16.70 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5755 Country Club Rd - Aug 2026 684.43 09/14/2026 101-19-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 25800 State Highway 7 - Aug 2026 17.90 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5600 Woodside Ln - Aug 2026 39.42 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 25800 Highway 7 - Aug 2026 91.51 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 20630 Manor Road - Aug 2026 9.89 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 4915 Shady Island Rd /MOUND CITY - Aug 2026 22.67 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 5.59 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug1 20630 Manor Road - Aug 2026 5.83 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 5735 Country Club Rd - Aug 2026 680.43 09/14/2026 201-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug1 26352 Smithtown Rd - Aug 2026 20.52 09/14/2026 601-00-4396-0000 4531711-9Aug1 25800 Highway 7 - Aug 2026 139.35 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug2 21382 Highway 7 - Aug 2026 46.63 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug2 25800 State Highway 7 - Aug 2026 10.45 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5505 Radisson Ent - Aug 2026 10.67 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5500 Old Market Rd - Aug 2026 56.51 09/14/2026 601-00-4398-0000 4531711-9Aug2 20630 Manor Road - Aug 2026 9.31 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug2 25800 State Highway 7 - Aug 2026 17.90 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug2 20630 Manor Road - Aug 2026 5.50 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5590 Covington Road - Aug 2026 2.01 09/14/2026 101-19-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 5.23 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5500 Old Market Rd - Aug 2026 22.98 09/14/2026 601-00-4398-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 3.71 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 1:40 PM) Page 11 Page 57 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference 4531711-9Aug2 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 9.02 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5755 Covington Rd - Aug 2026 3,244.38 09/14/2026 601-00-4398-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5705 Christmas Lake - Aug 2026 30.31 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 0.75 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 28.78 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 3.97 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug2 20465 Radisson Rd - Aug 2026 107.91 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 824.48 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 5.95 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug2 20615 Radisson Rd - Aug 2026 8.70 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5655 Merry Lane - Aug 2026 33.26 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug2 Late Fee - Aug 2026 168.30 09/14/2026 101-15-4440-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 68.86 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 1,197.79 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug2 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 108.60 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug3 4931 Shady Island Road - Aug 2026 16.70 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5295 Shady Island Rd /MOUND CITY - Aug 2026 22.38 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 26352 Smithtown Rd - Aug 2026 20.16 09/14/2026 601-00-4396-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5590 Covington Road - Aug 2026 2.15 09/14/2026 101-19-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 20405 Knightsbridge - Aug 2026 2,004.06 09/14/2026 601-00-4394-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5755 Country Club Rd - Aug 2026 763.23 09/14/2026 101-19-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5735 Country Club Rd - Aug 2026 677.96 09/14/2026 201-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 26055 Birch Bluff Rd - Aug 2026 13.91 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 20630 Manor Road - Aug 2026 5.91 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 25800 State Highway 7 - Aug 2026 17.90 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 3801 W 62nd St - Aug 2026 23.04 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 27922 Smithtown Rd - Aug 2026 53.84 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 206.16 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5700 County Rd 19 - Aug 2026 54.28 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 6.40 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug3 20630 Manor Road - Aug 2026 10.02 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 25800 Highway 7 - Aug 2026 100.54 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 1,283.67 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug3 25800 Highway 7 - Aug 2026 123.86 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 1:40 PM) Page 12 Page 58 of 568Invoice No Description Amount Pmt Date Acct Number Reference 4531711-9Aug3 19832 State Highway 7 - Aug 2026 88.58 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 30.88 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug3 4996 Shady Island Pt /MOUND CITY - Aug 2026 16.69 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 4915 Shady Island Rd /MOUND CITY - Aug 2026 20.91 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 20995 Minnetonka Blvd - Aug 2026 46.23 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5600 Woodside Ln - Aug 2026 31.83 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 9.67 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug3 4390 Enchanted Ln /MOUND CITY - Aug 2026 77.48 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 24200 Smithtown Rd - Aug 2026 346.93 09/14/2026 101-32-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 27145 Edgewood Rd - Aug 2026 98.31 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 20630 Manor Rd - Aug 2026 41.89 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 5.61 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug3 28125 Boulder Bridge Dr - Aug 2026 3,730.66 09/14/2026 601-00-4396-0000 4531711-9Aug3 4773 Lakeway Terr - Aug 2026 41.50 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 4.27 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 0.80 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug3 26550 Noble Rd - Aug 2026 18.65 09/14/2026 611-00-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 27.17 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 74.11 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5755 Country Club Road - Aug 2026 71.70 09/14/2026 101-19-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 23750 Highway 7 - Aug 2026 72.47 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug3 5700 County Rd 19 - Aug 2026 111.99 09/14/2026 101-32-4399-0000 4531711-9Aug3 25800 State Highway 7 - Aug 2026 11.21 09/14/2026 101-52-4380-0000 4531711-9Aug3 24253 Smithtown Rd - Aug 2026 516.81 09/14/2026 601-00-4395-0000 Check Total: 28,166.21 Total for Check Run: 320,402.73 Total of Number of Checks: 46 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (09/10/2026 - 1:40 PM) Page 13 Page 59 of 568 City Council Item 2.D. Title/Subject: Tree Removal Quote and Service Agreement Meeting Date: September 14, 2026 Prepared By: Matt Morreim, Public Works Director Attachments 1. Services Agreement Tree Removal TCTA Background The city utilizes a tree removal company to help remove large and dangerous trees in the city right-of-way and in city parks that require specialized equipment and resources. Staff met with three contractors to review the trees identified for removal. The removals include dead and dying trees that pose a safety risk. The work quoted includes all tree removal work, cleanup, disposal and necessary equipment. City staff will perform traffic control as needed for the contractor. Staff solicited quotes from three tree removal companies and are summarized below: • Twin City Tree Authority: $28,888.00 • Shadywood Tree Experts & Landscaping: $36,499.50 • Mangold Horticulture: $92,728.18 Twin City Tree Authority is a responsible contractor and has completed similar and related tree removal work. Tree removal services are a separate service than the city's forestry consultant, Davey Resource Group. Strategic Alignment Safe and Secure Community • Strong, proactive, strategic, and cost-effective public safety services — Proactively removing dead and/or dying public right-of-way trees provide increased safety for the public and residents. Budget Impact The city budget accounts for and programs tree removal services in the public works operating budget (Fund 32-Public Works Service). Action Requested Motion to approve the service contract with Twin City Tree Authority for tree removal services. Simple Majority is required. Page 60 of 568 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR TREE REMOVAL SERVICES THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made this September 14, 2026 (“Effective Date”), and is by and between Twin City Tree Authority a Minnesota corporation, with its principal office located at 7816 Credit River Boulevard, Prior Lake, MN 55372 (“Contractor”), and the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, located at 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, MN 55331 (the “City”): RECITALS A. Contractor is engaged in the business of providing tree removal services. B. The City desires to hire Contractor to provide tree removal services of specified trees in the city right-of-way and city property. C. Contractor represents that it has the professional expertise and capabilities to provide the City with the requested services described in this Agreement. D. The City desires to engage Contractor to provide the services described in this Agreement and Contractor is willing to provide such services on the terms and conditions in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions expressed in this Agreement, the City and Contractor agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Scope of Services. Contractor agrees to provide the City with the services as described and subject to the additional conditions set forth in Exhibit A (the “Services”). All Services shall be provided in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by professionals currently providing similar services. 2. Additional Services. Additional services must be approved in advance and in writing by the City. No payment will be due or made for services outside the terms of this Agreement in advance of such approval. 3. Obligations of Contractor. Contractor shall provide the Services in accordance with this Agreement. Contractor shall not begin performance of any Services until the City has received the signed Agreement, has reviewed and approved the insurance certificates, and has given Contractor written notice to proceed. 4. Time for Completion. The Services shall be completed on or before December 31, 2026, provided that the parties may extend the stated deadlines upon mutual written agreement. This Agreement shall remain in force and effect commencing from the Effective Date and continuing until the completion of the Services, unless terminated by the City or amended pursuant to this Agreement. 5. Consideration. The City shall pay Contractor for the Services according to the terms set forth in Exhibit A. The consideration shall be for both the Services performed by Contractor and any expenses 225405v3 2026 update 1 Page 61 of 568 incurred by Contractor in performing the Services. Contractor shall submit statements to the City upon completion of the Services. The City shall pay Contractor within thirty (35) days after Contractor’s statements are submitted. 6. Qualifications and Standard of Care. Contractor and its employees will maintain all required licenses and meet all required standards in order to provide the Services as described by the State of Minnesota. Contractor shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the Services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by members of the profession under similar circumstances in Minnesota. Contractor shall be liable to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law, without limitation, for any injuries, loss or damages proximately caused by Contractor’s breach of this standard of care. 7. Documents and Copyright. All reports, plans, models, software, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement shall be the property of the City. The City may use the information for its purposes. The City shall be the copyright owner. The vesting of the City’s ownership of the copyright in materials created by the Contractor shall be contingent upon the City’s fulfillment of its payment obligations under this Agreement. Unless the City gives prior written consent, the Contractor shall not be allowed to use a description of the services provided under this Agreement, including the name of the City, and photographs, or renderings of any projects which develop from the planning or other services provided by the Contractor, in the normal course of its marketing activities. Contractor shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting from such use or adoption. 8. Patented Devices, Materials, and Processes. If the contract requires, or Contractor desires, the use of any design, device, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark, or trade name, Contractor shall provide for, such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the City. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material, or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the Services agreed to be performed under the agreement, and shall indemnify and defend the City for any costs, liability, expenses, and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. 9. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof to the contrary, this Agreement may be terminated as follows: A. The parties, by mutual written agreement, may terminate this Agreement at any time; B. Contractor may terminate this Agreement in the event of a breach of the Agreement by the City upon providing thirty (30) days’ written notice to the City; C. The City may terminate this Agreement at any time at its option, for any reason or no reason at all; or D. The City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon Contractor’s failure to have in force any insurance required by this Agreement. In the event of a termination, the City shall pay Contractor for Services performed to the date of termination and for all costs or other expenses incurred prior to the date of termination. 225405v3 2026 update 2 Page 62 of 568 10. Amendments. No amendments may be made to this Agreement except in a writing signed by both parties. 11. Remedies. In the event of a termination of this Agreement by the City because of a breach by Contractor, the City may complete the Services either by itself or by contract with other persons or entities, or any combination thereof. These remedies provided to the City for breach of this Agreement by Contractor shall not be exclusive. The City shall be entitled to exercise any one or more other legal or equitable remedies available because of Contractor’s breach. 12. Records/Inspection. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, subd. 5, Contractor agrees that the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of Contractor, that are relevant to the contract or transaction, are subject to examination by the City and the state auditor or legislative auditor for a minimum of six years. Contractor shall maintain such records for a minimum of six years after final payment. The parties agree that this obligation will survive the completion or termination of this Agreement. 13. Insurance Requirements. The Contractor, at its expense, shall procure and maintain in force for the duration of this Agreement the following minimum insurance coverages: A. General Liability. The Contractor agrees to maintain commercial general liability insurance in a minimum amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence; $2,000,000 annual aggregate. The policy shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, products completed operations, personal injury, advertising injury, and contractually assumed liability. The City shall be endorsed as additional insured. B. Automobile Liability. If the Contractor operates a motor vehicle in performing the Services under this Agreement, the Contractor shall maintain commercial automobile liability insurance, including owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles, with a minimum liability limit of $1,000,000 combined single limit. C. Workers’ Compensation. The Contractor agrees to provide workers’ compensation insurance for all its employees in accordance with the statutory requirements of the State of Minnesota. The Contractor shall also carry employers liability coverage with minimum limits are as follows: • $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease per employee • $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease aggregate • $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Accident The Contractor shall, prior to commencing the Services, deliver to the City a Certificate of Insurance as evidence that the above coverages are in full force and effect. The insurance requirements may be met through any combination of primary and umbrella/excess insurance. The Contractor’s policies shall be the primary insurance to any other valid and collectible insurance available to the City with respect to any claim arising out of Contractor’s performance under this Agreement. The Contractor’s policies and Certificate of Insurance shall contain a provision that coverage afforded under the policies shall not be cancelled without at least thirty (30) days advanced written notice to the City. 225405v3 2026 update 3 Page 63 of 568 14. Independent Contractor. Contractor is an independent contractor. Contractor’s duties shall be performed with the understanding that Contractor has special expertise as to the services which Contractor is to perform and is customarily engaged in the independent performance of the same or similar services for others. Contractor shall provide or contract for all required equipment and personnel. Contractor shall control the manner in which the services are performed; however, the nature of the Services and the results to be achieved shall be specified by the City. The parties agree that this is not a joint venture and the parties are not co-partners. Contractor is not an employee or agent of the City and has no authority to make any binding commitments or obligations on behalf of the City except to the extent expressly provided in this Agreement. All services provided by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by Contractor as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City for any purpose, including but not limited to: income tax withholding, workers' compensation, unemployment compensation, FICA taxes, liability for torts and eligibility for employee benefits. 15. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its employees, officials, and agents from and against all claims, actions, damages, losses, and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, arising out of the Contractor’s negligence or the Contractor’s performance or failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement. The Contractor’s indemnification obligation shall apply to the Contractor’s sub-contractor(s), or anyone directly or indirectly employed or hired by the Contractor, or anyone for whose acts the Contractor may be liable. The Contractor agrees this indemnity obligation shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement. 16. Compliance with Laws. Contractor shall exercise due professional care to comply with applicable federal, state and local laws, rules, ordinances and regulations in effect as of the date Contractor agrees to provide the Services. Contractor’s guests, invitees, members, officers, officials, agents, employees, volunteers, representatives, and subcontractors shall abide by the City’s policies prohibiting sexual harassment and tobacco, drug, and alcohol use as defined on the City’s Tobacco, Drug, and Alcohol Policy, as well as all other reasonable work rules, safety rules, or policies, and procedures regulating the conduct of persons on City property, at all times while performing duties pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor agrees and understands that a violation of any of these policies, procedures, or rules constitutes a breach of the Agreement and sufficient grounds for immediate termination of the Agreement by the City. 17. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, any attached exhibits, and any addenda signed by the parties shall constitute the entire agreement between the City and Contractor, and supersedes any other written or oral agreements between the City and Contractor. This Agreement may only be modified in a writing signed by the City and Contractor. If there is any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the referenced or attached items, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. 18. Third Party Rights. The parties to this Agreement do not intend to confer any rights under this Agreement on any third party. 19. Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Minnesota. Any disputes, controversies, or claims arising out of this Agreement shall be heard in the state or federal courts of Hennepin County, Minnesota, and all parties to this Agreement waive any objection to the jurisdiction of these courts, whether based on convenience or otherwise. 225405v3 2026 update 4 Page 64 of 568 20. Conflict of Interest. Contractor shall use reasonable care to avoid conflicts of interest and appearances of impropriety in representation of the City. In the event of a conflict of interest, Contractor shall advise the City and, either secure a waiver of the conflict, or advise the City that it will be unable to provide the requested Services. 21. Agreement Not Exclusive. The City retains the right to hire other professional contractor service providers for this or other matters, in the City’s sole discretion. 22. Data Practices Act Compliance. Any and all data provided to Contractor, received from Contractor, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement shall be administered in accordance with, and is subject to the requirements of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13. Contractor agrees to notify the City within three business days if it receives a data request from a third party. This paragraph does not create a duty on the part of Contractor to provide access to public data to the public if the public data are available from the City, except as required by the terms of this Agreement. These obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement. 23. No Discrimination. Contractor agrees not to discriminate in providing products and services under this Agreement on the basis of race, color, sex, creed, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, status with regard to public assistance, religion, or any other basis now or hereafter prohibited by law. Violation of any part of this provision may lead to immediate termination of this Agreement. Contractor agrees to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act as amended (“ADA”), section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 363A. Contractor agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City from costs, including but not limited to damages, attorneys’ fees and staff time, in any action or proceeding brought alleging a violation of these laws by Contractor or its guests, invitees, members, officers, officials, agents, employees, volunteers, representatives and subcontractors. Upon request, Contractor shall provide accommodation to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all Services under this Agreement. Contractor agrees to utilize its own auxiliary aid or service in order to comply with ADA requirements for effective communication with individuals with disabilities. 24. Authorized Agents. The City’s authorized agent for purposes of administration of this contract is the City Administrator of the City, or designee. Contractor’s authorized agent for purposes of administration of this contract is , or designee, who shall perform or supervise the performance of all Services. 25. Notices. Any notices permitted or required by this Agreement shall be deemed given when personally delivered or upon deposit in the United States mail, postage fully prepaid, certified, return receipt requested, addressed to: Contractor The City Twin City Tree Authority Marc Nevinski, City Administrator 7816 Credit River Boulevard City of Shorewood Prior Lake, MN 55372-9173 5755 Country Club Rd Shorewood, MN 55331 952-960-7900 mnevinski@ci.shorewood.mn.us 225405v3 2026 update 5 Page 65 of 568 or such other contact information as either party may provide to the other by notice given in accordance with this provision. 26. Waiver. No waiver of any provision or of any breach of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any other provisions or any other or further breach, and no such waiver shall be effective unless made in writing and signed by an authorized representative of the party to be charged with such a waiver. 27. Headings. The headings contained in this Agreement have been inserted for convenience of reference only and shall in no way define, limit or affect the scope and intent of this Agreement. 28. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be illegal or otherwise unenforceable, such provision shall be severed, and the balance of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 29. Signatory. Each person executing this Agreement (“Signatory”) represents and warrants that they are duly authorized to sign on behalf of their respective organization. In the event Contractor did not authorize the Signatory to sign on its behalf, the Signatory agrees to assume responsibility for the duties and liability of Contractor, described in this Agreement, personally. 30. Counterparts and Electronic Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement may be transmitted by electronic mail in portable document format (“pdf”) and signatures appearing on electronic mail instruments shall be treated as original signatures. 31. Incorporation of Recitals and Exhibit. The Recitals at the beginning of this Agreement, and the Exhibit attached to this Agreement, are each one true and correct, and are fully incorporated into and made part of this Agreement. [Remainder of page left blank intentionally. Signature page follows.] 225405v3 2026 update 6 Page 66 of 568 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Contractor have caused this Professional Services Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives in duplicate on the respective dates indicated below. Twin City Tree Authority City of Shorewood: By: _________________________________ By: _________________________________ Jennifer Labadie, Mayor Name: ______________________________ Title: _______________________________ By: _________________________________ Sandie Thone, City Clerk 225405v3 2026 update 7 Page 67 of 568 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES & FEE SCHEDULE 225405v3 Page 68 of 568 EXHIBIT A ESTIMATE Twin City Tree Authority TCTA365@gmail.com 7816 Credit River Blvd +1 (612) 834-8917 Prior Lake, MN 55372-9173 http://www.twincitytreeauthority.co m/ Bill to Chris Heitz The City Of Shorewood 24200 Smithtown Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Estimate details P.O. Number: 612-296-4245 Estimate no.: 5419 Sales Rep: Slibe Hodge Estimate date: 09/01/2026 # Product or service Description Qty Rate Amount 1. Tree Removal Remove 1 ash tree at Vine and Covington 1 $28,888.00 $28,888.00 Court. 1 Elm at Old Market and Covington Road. 1 ash at Old Market and Waterford. 2 ash at 20245 Manor Road each side of the drive. 6 ash (3 clumps) at 21035 Minnetonka Blvd. 1 large ash at Latonka and Timber with crane. 1 ash at 23930 Yellowstone Trail. 1 (6 clump) ash at 6055 Lake Linden Drive. 2 ash at 23980 Yellowstone with a crane. Ridge Point and Country Club Road 1 on path 4 over the road. 4 ash at 5600 Wedgwood. 1 ash at 26020 Birch Bluff. 1 ash at Grant Lorenz. 2 ash at 5960 Seamans Drive. 1 (triple clump) cottonwood with a crane. Haul all wood and brush very detailed clean up . Total $28,888.00 Accepted date Accepted by to k e n = Page 69 of 568 City Council Item 2.E. Title/Subject: 2026 Pavement Striping Meeting Date: September 14, 2026 Prepared By: Andrew Budde, City Engineer Matt Morreim, Public Works Director Attachments 1. 2026 Pavement Striping - Quote Package 2. Quote Tabulation 2026 Pavement Striping 3. Quote Abstract 2026 Pavement Striping 4. Resolution 26-53 Pavement Striping Award Background The city has planned for pavement maintenance in the Capital Improvement Plan to be able to efficiently maintain its roadway infrastructure. Pavement striping is a maintenance practice that helps improve the safety and operation of a roadway. In Shorewood, pavement striping only exists on higher-usage roadways or where striping can help improve safety at intersections. Striping typically consists of lines delineating traffic lanes and is most often a double yellow line in the center of the roadway and single white lines along the curb lines and at turn lanes. Pavement symbols consist of turn lane arrows, bike lane symbols, and pedestrian crosswalks. Public Works has recently utilized equipment to stripe parking lots and most of the roadway pavement symbols and plan to continue to do so in the future. However, utilizing a contractor for the longer lines is more economical due to the speed at which they are able to apply the markings. Quotes for the 2026 Pavement Striping project were solicited and were received on September 9, 2026. Two quotes were received. The low quote was $22,546.80 by Sir Lines A Lot, LLC and is $7000 below the Engineers Estimate of $30,000. Sir Lines a Lot has completed the last several striping projects for the city. Staff have reviewed the quotes and the quotes received are accurate. Staff recommends an award in the amount of $22,546.80 to the low quote, Sir Lines A Lot out of Edina, MN. Strategic Alignment Functionally & Financially Sound Infrastructure • Define standards and goals for infrastructure development • Plans to finance infrastructure improvements, maintenance, and replacement Periodic pavement striping helps to maintain and ensure safe and efficient operations of the City's roadways. Budget Impact Page 70 of 568The project is to be funded from the Street Reconstruction Fund (403) item LR-99-099 where adequate funding remains out of the $315,000 has been budgeted. Action Requested Motion to approve resolution 26-53 accepting the quotes for the 2026 Pavement Striping Project and awarding the project to Sir Lines A Lot. Simple majority vote is required. Page 71 of 568 City of Shorewood 2026 Pavement Striping Table of Contents Contract EXHIBIT A – Plans and Specifications and Bid Form EXHIBIT B – Responsible Contractor Compliance Verification 238814v1 Page 72 of 568PROJECT NO. ______ 2026 Pavement Striping Date 8/28/2026 Shorewood, MN CONTRACT FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PAVEMENT STRIPING 2026 Pavement Striping THIS CONTRACT FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT (“Agreement”) is made this ___ day of ________, 20__ (“Effective Date”), and is by and between _____________, a [state and business type], with its principal office at ___________ (“Contractor”), and the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, located at 5755 Country Club Rd, Shorewood, MN 55331 (the “City”): RECITALS A. Contractor is engaged in the business of ____________________. B. The City desires to hire Contractor to complete _________________________ at [address] (the “Project”). C. Contractor represents that it has the professional expertise and capabilities to provide the City with the requested work described in this Agreement. D. The City desires to engage Contractor to provide the work described in this Agreement and Contractor is willing to provide such work on the terms and conditions in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions expressed herein, the City and Contractor agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. The Work. Contractor shall perform the work more fully described as set forth in Exhibit A (Plans and Specifications). The Work includes all work and services required by this Agreement, whether completed or partially completed, and includes all labor, materials, equipment, and services provided or to be provided by Contractor to fulfill Contractor’s obligations. All Work shall be completed according to the specifications set forth in Exhibit A – Plans and Specifications. Contractor shall at all times keep the premises free from accumulation of waste materials and debris caused by Contractor’s operations. 2. Time for Completion & Liquidated Damages. After contract execution and approval of submittals, Contractor shall attend the construction planning meeting, where the City and Contractor shall create a project schedule and coordinate with other work being completed in the Project. Contractor shall provide the City with a product delivery schedule and agree to a substantial completion date (“Substantial Completion Date”). The Contractor shall proceed diligently and shall complete the Work to the satisfaction and approval of the City’s _____________ on or before the Substantial Completion Date. If Contractor fails to complete the Work by the Substantial Completion Date, the City may immediately, or at any time thereafter, proceed to complete the Work at the Contractor’s expense. If Contractor gives written notice of a delay over which Contractor has no control, the City may, at its discretion, extend the Substantial 2 238814v1 2026 update Page 73 of 568PROJECT NO. ______ 2026 Pavement Striping Date 8/28/2026 Shorewood, MN Completion Date. The Substantial Completion Date, or extended Substantial Completion Date, shall be used as the date that any liquid damages then apply to. Contractor shall prosecute the Work continuously and effectively, with the least possible delay, to the end that the Work is completed before the Substantial Completion Date. The City is entitled to damages for failure of the Contractor to complete the Work before the Substantial Completion Date. In view of the difficulty in making a precise determination of actual damages incurred, the City will assess a daily charge not as a penalty but as liquidated damages to compensate the City for additional costs incurred. Failure to substantially complete the Work by the Substantial Completion Date shall result in the City charging Contractor, and withholding any monies due as liquidated damages, the amount of $1,000 per calendar day until all Work is completed. If Contractor is delayed for any reason in the commencement or performance of the Work, to the extent of such delay will prevent the Contractor from completing the Work (or any portion of the Work) by the Substantial Completion Date, Contractor’s sole remedy for such delay shall be an extension of the Substantial Completion Date. All such extension requests shall be made according to the requirements and procedures set forth in this Agreement. 3. Consideration. The consideration, which the City shall pay to Contractor, shall not exceed $________ (the “Contract Sum”). The Contract Sum shall be for both the Work performed by Contractor and the expenses incurred by Contractor in performing the Work. The City shall make progress payments to Contractor monthly. Contractor shall submit statements to the City containing a detailed list of project labor and hours, rates, titles, and amounts undertaken by Contractor during the relevant billing period. The City shall pay Contractor within thirty (30) days after receiving a statement from Contractor. 4. Extra Work. Unless approved by the City in writing, Contractor shall make no claim for extra work done or materials furnished, nor shall Contractor do any work or furnish any materials not covered by the plans and specifications of this Agreement. Any such work or materials furnished by Contractor without written City approval shall be at Contractor’s own risk and expense. Contractor shall perform any altered plans ordered by the City; if such alteration reduces the cost of doing such work, the actual amount of such reduction shall be deducted from the contract price for the Work. 5. Contract Documents. The Contract Documents shall consist of this Agreement; all Recitals and exhibits to this Agreement; any supplementary drawings, plans, and specifications; and other documents listed in this Agreement. In the event of a conflict among the various provisions of the Contract Documents, the terms shall be interpreted in the following order of priority: a. Modifications to this Agreement or exhibits b. This Agreement, including all exhibits c. Supplementary drawings, plans, specifications d. Other documents listed in this Agreement Drawings shall control over Specifications, and detail in drawings shall control over large-scale drawings. All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Agreement, but defined elsewhere in the Contract Documents, shall have the meaning set forth in the Contract Documents. 3 238814v1 2026 update Page 74 of 568PROJECT NO. ______ 2026 Pavement Striping Date 8/28/2026 Shorewood, MN 6. Expense Reimbursement. Contractor shall not be compensated separately for necessary incidental expenses. All expenses of Contractor shall be built into Contractor’s fixed compensation rate, unless reimbursement is provided for an expense that received the prior written approval of the City, which approval may be provided via electronic mail. 7. Approvals. Contractor shall secure the City’s written approval before making any expenditures, purchases, or commitments on the City’s behalf beyond those listed in the Work. Notwithstanding the notice requirements set forth in Section 34 if this Agreement, for purposes of this Section 7, the City’s approval may be provided via electronic mail. 8. Protection of Persons and Property. Contractor shall be responsible for initiating, maintaining, and supervising all safety precautions and programs in connection with the performance of the Work. Contractor shall take reasonable precautions for the safety of, and shall provide reasonable protection to prevent damage, injury, or loss to: a. Persons performing the Work and other persons who may be affected by the Work; b. The Work and materials and equipment to be incorporated therein; and c. Other property at the site or adjacent to the site, such as trees, shrubs, lawns, walks, pavement, roadways, structures and utilities. Contractor shall promptly remedy damage and loss to property caused in whole or in part by Contractor or any of its subcontractors, agents, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them. 9. Acceptance of the Work. All of the Contractor’s work and labor shall be subject to the inspection and approval of the City. If any materials or labor are rejected by the City as defective or unsuitable, then the materials shall be removed and replaced with other approved materials and the labor shall be done to the satisfaction and approval of the City at the Contractor’s sole cost and expense. Contractor shall replace at Contractor’s expense any loss or damage to the Work, however caused, which occurs during the construction thereof or prior to the final delivery to and acceptance of the Work by the City. Any payment made to Contractor, shall not be construed as operating to relieve Contractor from responsibility for the construction and delivery of Work. Acceptance of the completed Work shall be evidenced only by a Certificate of Final Completion issued by the City, which shall state the date on which the City accepts the completed Work (the “Final Completion Date”). 10. Warranty. Contractor represents and warrants that it has the requisite training, skills, and experience necessary to complete the Work, is appropriately licensed by all applicable agencies and governmental entities, and will complete the Work in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by professionals currently providing similar work. Contractor further represents and warrants to the City that the materials and equipment furnished under this Agreement are of good quality and new, unless this Agreement requires or permits otherwise. Contractor further warrants that the Work will conform to the requirements of this Agreement and will be free from defects. The City may consider and deems any Work, materials, or equipment not conforming to these requirements to be defective, and may be rejected by the City as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall promptly correct any defective Work, and replace any defective materials or equipment. Costs of correcting such defective Work, or replacing any defective materials or equipment, including additional testing and inspections, the cost of uncovering and replacement, and compensation for any additional services and expenses made necessary thereby, shall be at Contractor’s expense. Contractor’s warranty shall exclude remedy for damage or 4 238814v1 2026 update Page 75 of 568PROJECT NO. ______ 2026 Pavement Striping Date 8/28/2026 Shorewood, MN defect caused by abuse, alterations to the Work not executed by Contractor or its subcontractors, agents, or anyone hired or employed by any of them, improper or insufficient maintenance, improper operation or normal wear and tear under normal usage. 11. Guarantee. Contractor guarantees and agrees to maintain the stability of the Work and materials furnished and installed under this contract for a period of one year after the Final Completion Date (the “Guarantee Period”). Contractor agrees to perform fully all other guarantees as set forth in the specifications. If any of the Work is found to be not in accordance with the requirements of the Contract during the Guarantee Period, Contractor shall correct it promptly after receipt of notice from the City to do so. The City shall give such notice promptly after discovery of the condition. If Contractor fails to correct nonconforming Work within a reasonable time after receipt of notice from the City, the City may correct the Work at Contractor’s expense. The Guarantee Period shall be extended with respect to portions of Work first performed after the Final Completion Date by the period of time between final payment and the actual completion of that portion of the Work. The one-year period for correction of Work shall not be extended by corrective Work performed by Contractor pursuant to this Section. Nothing contained in this Section shall be construed to establish a period of limitation with respect to other obligations Contractor has under the Contract Documents. Establishment of the one-year period for correction of Work as described in this Section relates only to the specific obligation of Contractor to correct the Work, and has no relationship to the time within which the obligation to comply with the Contract Documents may be sought to be enforced, nor to the time within which proceedings may be commenced to establish Contractor’s liability with respect to Contractor’s obligations other than specifically to correct the Work. 12. Termination. This Agreement shall remain in force and effect commencing from the effective date and continuing until the completion of all of the parties’ obligations hereunder, unless terminated by the City or amended pursuant to the Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof to the contrary, this Agreement may be terminated as follows: a. The parties, by mutual written agreement, may terminate this Agreement at any time; b. Contractor may terminate this Agreement in the event of a breach of the Agreement by the City upon providing thirty (30) days’ written notice to the City; c. The City may terminate this Agreement at any time at its option, for any reason or no reason at all; or d. The City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon Contractor’s failure to have in force any insurance required by this Agreement. In the event of a termination, the City shall pay Contractor for Work performed to the date of termination and for all costs or other expenses incurred prior to the date of termination. 13. Changes in the Work. Changes in the Work may be accomplished after execution of the Contract by change order. The City, without invalidating the Agreement, may order changes in the Work within the general scope of the Agreement consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, with the Contract Sum and Substantial Completion Date being adjusted accordingly. Such changes in the Work shall be authorized by written Change Order signed by the City and Contractor, or by written Construction Change Directive signed by the City and the City’s design consultant (“Designer”). Upon issuance of the Change 5 238814v1 2026 update Page 76 of 568PROJECT NO. ______ 2026 Pavement Striping Date 8/28/2026 Shorewood, MN Order or Construction Change Directive, the Contractor shall proceed promptly with such changes in the Work, unless otherwise provided in the Change Order or Construction Change Directive. Adjustments in the Contract Sum and Substantial Completion Date resulting from a change in the Work shall be determined by mutual agreement of the parties or, in the case of a Construction Change Directive signed only by the City and Designer, by the Contractor’s cost of labor, material, equipment, and reasonable overhead and profit, unless the parties agree on another method for determining the cost or credit. Pending final determination of the total cost of a Construction Change Directive, the Contractor may request payment for Work completed pursuant to the Construction Change Directive. When the City and Contractor agree on adjustments to the Contract Sum and Substantial Completion Date arising from a Construction Change Directive, the City and Designer will prepare a Change Order. The Designer, in consultation with the City, will have authority to order minor changes in the Work not involving adjustment in the Contract Sum or extension of the Substantial Completion Date and not inconsistent with the intent of the Contract Documents. Such changes shall be effected by written order and shall be binding on the City and Contractor. The Contractor shall carry out such written orders promptly. If the Contractor believes that the proposed minor change in the Work will affect the Contract Sum or Substantial Completion Date, the Contractor shall notify the Designer and shall not proceed to implement the change in the Work. 14. Amendments. No amendments may be made to this Agreement except in a writing signed by both parties. 15. Remedies. In the event of a termination of this Agreement by the City because of a breach by Contractor, the City may complete the Work either by itself or by contract with other persons or entities, or any combination thereof. These remedies provided to the City for breach of this Agreement by Contractor shall not be exclusive. The City shall be entitled to exercise any one or more other legal or equitable remedies available because of Contractor’s breach. 16. Records/Inspection. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, subd. 5, Contractor agrees that the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of Contractor, that are relevant to the contract or transaction, are subject to examination by the City and the state auditor or legislative auditor for a minimum of six years. Contractor shall maintain such records for a minimum of six years after final payment. The parties agree that this obligation will survive the completion or termination of this Agreement. 17. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor, and Contractor’s successors or assigns, agree to protect, defend, indemnify, save, and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, volunteers, and employees from any and all claims; lawsuits; causes of actions of any kind, nature, or character; damages; losses; and costs, disbursements, and expenses of defending the same, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, professional services, and other technical, administrative or professional assistance resulting from or arising out of Contractor’s (or its subcontractors, agents, volunteers, members, invitees, representatives, or employees) performance of the duties required by or arising from this Agreement, or caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission or willful misconduct by Contractor, or arising out of Contractor’s failure to obtain or maintain the insurance required by this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver or limitation of any immunity or limitation on liability to 6 238814v1 2026 update Page 77 of 568PROJECT NO. ______ 2026 Pavement Striping Date 8/28/2026 Shorewood, MN which the City is entitled. The parties agree that these indemnification obligations shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement. 18. Insurance. Contractor shall maintain reasonable insurance coverage throughout this Agreement. Contractor agrees that before any work related to the approved project can be performed, Contractor shall maintain at a minimum: a. Worker’s Compensation Insurance as required by Minnesota Statutes § 176.181; b. Business Auto Liability covering vehicles owned by Contractor and non-owned vehicles used by Contractor, with policy limits not less than $2,000,000 per accident, for bodily injury, death of any person, and property damage arising out of the ownership, maintenance, and use of such motor vehicles, along with any statutorily required automobile coverage; c. Commercial General Liability in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, and $2,000,000 for products-completed operations hazard, providing coverage for claims including: i. Damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, including occupational sickness or disease, and death of any person; ii. Personal and advertising injury; iii. Damages because of physical damage to or destruction of property, including loss of use of such property; iv. Bodily injury or property damage arising out of completed operations; and v. Contractor’s indemnity obligations under this Agreement. To meet the Commercial General Liability and Business Auto Liability requirements, Contractor may use a combination of Excess and Umbrella coverage. Prior to commencement of the Work, Contractor shall provide the City with a current certificate of insurance including the following language: “The City of Shorewood is named as an additional insured with respect to the commercial general liability, business automobile liability and umbrella or excess liability, as required by the contract. The umbrella or excess liability policy follows form on all underlying coverages.” Such certificate of liability insurance shall list the City as an additional insured and contain a statement that such policies of insurance shall not be canceled or amended unless 30 days’ written notice is provided to the City, or 10 days’ written notice in the case of non-payment. 19. Compliance with State Withholding Tax. Before final payment is made for the Work on this project, Contractor must make a satisfactory showing that it has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes § 290.92 requiring the withholding of State Income Tax for wages paid employees on this project by providing to the Physical Development Director a Certificate of Compliance from the Commissioner of Taxation. Contractor is advised that before such Certificate can be issued, Contractor must first place on file with the Commissioner of Taxation an affidavit, in the form of an IC-134, that Contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes § 290.92. 20. Performance and Payment Bond. Prior to Commencement of the Work, Contractor shall make, execute and deliver to the City corporate surety bonds in a form acceptable to the City, in the sum of $______________ for the use of the City and of all persons furnishing labor, skill, tools, machinery or materials to the project. Said bonds shall secure the faithful performance and payment of the Contract by 7 238814v1 2026 update Page 78 of 568PROJECT NO. ______ 2026 Pavement Striping Date 8/28/2026 Shorewood, MN the Contractor and shall be conditioned as required by law. This Agreement shall not become effective unless and until said bonds have been received and approved by the City. 21. Assignment. Neither the City nor Contractor shall assign this Agreement or any rights under or interest in this Agreement, in whole or in part, without the other party’s prior written consent. Any assignment in violation of this provision is null and void. Neither the City nor Contractor shall assign, or transfer any rights under or interest (including, but without limitation, moneys that may become due or moneys that are due) in the Agreement without the written consent of the other except to the extent that the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent Contractor from employing such independent consultants, associates, and subcontractors, as it may deem appropriate to assist it in the performance of the Work required by this Agreement. Any instrument in violation of this provision is null and void. 22. Independent Contractor. Contractor is an independent contractor. Contractor’s duties shall be performed with the understanding that Contractor has special expertise as to the Work which Contractor is to perform and is customarily engaged in the independent performance of the same or similar work for others. Contractor shall provide or contract for all required equipment and personnel. Contractor shall control the manner in which the Work is performed; however, the nature of the Work and the results to be achieved shall be specified by the City. The parties agree that this is not a joint venture and the parties are not co-partners. Contractor is not an employee or agent of the City and has no authority to make any binding commitments or obligations on behalf of the City except to the extent expressly provided in this Agreement. All Work provided by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by Contractor as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City for any purpose, including but not limited to: income tax withholding, workers' compensation, unemployment compensation, FICA taxes, liability for torts and eligibility for employee benefits. 23. Compliance with Laws. Contractor shall exercise due professional care to comply with applicable federal, state and local laws, rules, ordinances and regulations in effect as of the Effective Date. Contractor’s guests, invitees, members, officers, officials, agents, employees, volunteers, representatives, and subcontractors shall abide by the City’s policies prohibiting sexual harassment and tobacco, drug, and alcohol use as defined on the City’s Tobacco, Drug, and Alcohol Policy, as well as all other reasonable work rules, safety rules, or policies, and procedures regulating the conduct of persons on City property, at all times while performing duties pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor agrees and understands that a violation of any of these policies, procedures, or rules constitutes a breach of the Agreement and sufficient grounds for immediate termination of the Agreement by the City. 24. Permits and Fees. Unless otherwise provided in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall secure and pay for the building permit as well as other permits, fees, licenses, and inspections by government agencies necessary for proper execution and completion of the Work that are customarily secured after execution of the Contract and legally required at the time bids are received or negotiations concluded. 25. Entire Agreement. The Contract Documents shall constitute the entire agreement between the City and Contractor, and supersede any other written or oral agreements between the City and Contractor. 8 238814v1 2026 update Page 79 of 568PROJECT NO. ______ 2026 Pavement Striping Date 8/28/2026 Shorewood, MN 26. Third Party Rights. The parties to this Agreement do not intend to confer any rights under this Agreement on any third party. 27. Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Minnesota. Any disputes, controversies, or claims arising out of this Agreement shall be heard in the state or federal courts of Hennepin County, Minnesota, and all parties to this Agreement waive any objection to the jurisdiction of these courts, whether based on convenience or otherwise. 28. Work Products and Ownership of Documents. All records, information, materials and other work products, including, but not limited to the completed reports, drawings, plans, and specifications prepared and developed in connection with the provision of the Work pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of the City, but reproductions of such records, information, materials and other work products in whole or in part may be retained by Contractor. Regardless of when such information was provided, Contractor agrees that it will not disclose for any purpose any information Contractor has obtained arising out of or related to this Agreement, except as authorized by the City or as required by law. These obligations survive the termination of this Agreement. 29. Conflict of Interest. Contractor shall use reasonable care to avoid conflicts of interest and appearances of impropriety in representation of the City. In the event of a conflict of interest, Contractor shall advise the City and, either secure a waiver of the conflict, or advise the City that it will be unable to provide the requested Work. 30. Agreement Not Exclusive. The City retains the right to hire other professionals, contractors and service providers for this or other matters, in the City’s sole discretion. 31. Data Practices Act Compliance. Any and all data provided to Contractor, received from Contractor, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement shall be administered in accordance with, and is subject to the requirements of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13. Contractor agrees to notify the City within three business days if it receives a data request from a third party. This paragraph does not create a duty on the part of Contractor to provide access to public data to the public if the public data are available from the City, except as required by the terms of this Agreement. These obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement. 32. No Discrimination. Contractor agrees not to discriminate in providing the Work under this Agreement on the basis of race, color, sex, creed, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, status with regard to public assistance, religion, or any other basis now or hereafter prohibited by law. Violation of any part of this provision may lead to immediate termination of this Agreement. Contractor agrees to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act as amended (“ADA”), section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 363A. Contractor agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City from costs, including but not limited to damages, attorneys’ fees and staff time, in any action or proceeding brought alleging a violation of these laws by Contractor or its guests, invitees, members, officers, officials, agents, employees, volunteers, representatives and subcontractors. Upon request, Contractor shall provide accommodation to allow individuals with disabilities to participate 9 238814v1 2026 update Page 80 of 568PROJECT NO. ______ 2026 Pavement Striping Date 8/28/2026 Shorewood, MN in all Work under this Agreement. Contractor agrees to utilize its own auxiliary aid or service in order to comply with ADA requirements for effective communication with individuals with disabilities. 33. Authorized Agents. The City’s authorized agent for purposes of administration of this contract is City Administrator or designee. Contractor’s authorized agent for purposes of administration of this contract is __________________________, or designee who shall perform or supervise the performance of all Work. 34. Notices. Any notices permitted or required by this Agreement shall be deemed given when personally delivered or upon deposit in the United States mail, postage fully prepaid, certified, return receipt requested, addressed to: CONTRACTOR THE CITY City of Shorewood ATTN: Marc Nevinski 5755 Country Club Rd City of Shorewood, MN mnevinski@shorewoodmn.gov or such other contact information as either party may provide to the other by notice given in accordance with this provision. 35. Waiver. No waiver of any provision or of any breach of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any other provisions or any other or further breach, and no such waiver shall be effective unless made in writing and signed by an authorized representative of the party to be charged with such a waiver. 36. Headings. The headings contained in this Agreement have been inserted for convenience of reference only and shall in no way define, limit or affect the scope and intent of this Agreement. 37. Payment of Subcontractors. Contractor agrees to pay all laborers employed and all subcontractors furnishing material to Contractor in the performance of this contract. If Contractor fails to pay any claims and demands for labor and materials, the City may apply the monies due to Contractor toward paying and satisfying such claims and demands. The City has the right to apply monies due to Contractor towards paying any accrued indebtedness or any claim which may hereafter come due against Contractor. The amount of such payments shall be deducted from the balance due to the Contractor; provided that nothing herein nor any variation from the amounts and timing of the installments shall be construed as impairing the right of the City or of those to whose benefit the bond herein agreed upon shall insure, to hold Contractor or surety liable on the bond for any breach of the conditions of the same nor as imposing upon the City any obligation to laborers, materialmen, contractors, or sureties to pay or to retain for their benefit any monies coming to the contractor hereunder. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.425, Subd. 4a, Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of Contractor’s receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. Contractor must pay interest of one and one-half percent (1½%) per month or any part of 10 238814v1 2026 update Page 81 of 568PROJECT NO. ______ 2026 Pavement Striping Date 8/28/2026 Shorewood, MN a month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the Contractor shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney’s fees, incurred in bringing the action. 38. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be illegal or otherwise unenforceable, such provision shall be severed, and the balance of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 39. Signatory. Each person executing this Agreement (“Signatory”) represents and warrants that they are duly authorized to sign on behalf of their respective organization. In the event Contractor did not authorize the Signatory to sign on its behalf, the Signatory agrees to assume responsibility for the duties and liability of Contractor, described in this Agreement, personally. 40. Counterparts and Electronic Communication. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement may be transmitted by electronic mail in portable document format (pdf) and signatures appearing on electronic mail instruments shall be treated as original signatures. 41. Incorporation of Recitals and Exhibits. The Recitals at the beginning of this Agreement, and the Exhibits attached to this Agreement, are each one true and correct and are fully incorporated into and made part of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Contractor have caused this Independent Contractor Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives in duplicate on the respective dates indicated below. _______________________________: CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MN: By: _________________________________ By: _________________________________ _______________ , Mayor Name: ______________________________ Title: _______________________________ By: _________________________________ Name, title 11 238814v1 2026 update Page 82 of 568PROJECT NO. ______ 2026 Pavement Striping Date 8/28/2026 Shorewood, MN EXHIBIT A PLANS SPECIFICATIONS AND BID FORM 1. The location of the work shall be as delineated in the plans. 2. The Contractor will only be paid for items in the proposal. All other work required to complete the work is incidental to the project with no direct compensation paid. 3. Working hours are 7AM – 7PM Monday – Friday and 9AM – 5PM on Saturday. 48 hours’ notice is required prior to working on Saturdays. 4. By signing the proposal, the Contractor acknowledges that he has reviewed the site and has a clear understanding of the work that needs to be done and the expectations of the Engineer. 5. The Engineer’s involvement in the application of the material shall be limited to field consultation and inspection. The Contractor will place necessary “spotting” at appropriate points to provide horizontal control for striping and to determine necessary starting and cutoff points. Longitudinal joints, pavement edges and existing markings may serve as horizontal control when so directed. 6. Edge lines and lane lines are to be broken only at intersections with public roads and at private entrances if they are controlled by an agency placed yield sign, stop sign or traffic signal. The break point is to be at the start of the radius for the intersection or at marked stop lines or crosswalks. 7. A tolerance of ¼-inch under or ¼-inch over the specified width will be allowed for striping provided the variation is gradual and does not detract from the general appearance. Broken line segments may vary up to 3-inches from the specified lengths provided the over and under variations are reasonably compensatory. Alignment deviations from the control guide shall not exceed 1-inch. Material shall not be applied over longitudinal joints. Establishment of application tolerances shall not relieve the Contractor of their responsibility to comply as closely as practicable with the planned dimensions. 8. Just prior to the placement of pavement markings the road surface shall be cleaned and free of contamination as recommended by the material manufacturer and acceptable to the Engineer. Portland cement concrete surfaces shall be sandblast cleaned to remove any surface treatments and/or laitance. 9. Apply all pavement markings as recommended by the material manufacturer. 10. Permanent pavement markings shall not be placed over temporary tape markings. 11. The filling of tanks, pouring of materials or cleaning of equipment shall not be performed on unprotected pavement surfaces unless adequate provisions are made to prevent spillage of material. 12. Glass beads shall be applied at a rate of at least 8 lbs/gallon immediately after application of the paint line. 13. Pavement markings shall only be applied when air and pavement temperatures are above 50 degrees and shall not be applied when the wind or other conditions cause a film or dust to be deposited on the pavement surface before the paint can be applied. 14. Pavement markings shall be High Solids Water Based Traffic Paints with Drop-On Glass Beads in accordance with MnDot 2582,3354,3590,3591 and 3592. 238814v1 Page 83 of 568PROJECT NO. ______ 2026 Pavement Striping Date 8/28/2026 Shorewood, MN 15. By submitting a Bid, Bidder certifies under oath that Bidder is in compliance with each of the minimum criteria listed in Minnesota Statute § 16C.285 Subdivision 3 at the time of submitting this bid. Bidder acknowledges that if Bidder’s certification is later found to be false, it may result in the termination of a construction contract that has already been awarded. Bidder also acknowledges that Owner is not liable for declining to award a contract or terminating a contract based on a reasonable determination that the contractor falsely verified that it meets the minimum criteria. 16. All work shall be completed by October 30, 2026. 17. Contact Andrew Budde at (612) 756-2486 or Andrew.budde@bolton-menk.com if you have any questions. 18. If you are interested in providing a quote. Email your quote to Andrew Budde by 9:00 AM on September 4, 2026. 238814v1 Page 84 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MN CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR 2026 PAVEMENT STRIPING AUGUST 2026 LAKE MINNETONKA RESOURCE LIST CITY OF MOUND CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MN City Hall 5755 Country Club Lane CITY OF DEEPHAVEN SHEET INDEX Shorewood, MN 55331 CARSON BAY City Administrator: SPRING PARK BAY SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE Marc Nevinski C1.01 TITLE SHEET BLVD City Engineer: C1.02-C1.03 STRIPING OVERVIEW MAPS (Consultant) C1.04 - C1.06 STRIPING PLANS Andrew Budde P.E. Bolton & Menk, Inc. MINNETONKA ST ALBANS Director of Public Works CITY OF GREENWOOD RD Matt Morreim CHRISTMAS LAKE 14 13 12 11 10 STALL COUNT = 30 2 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING 15 16 9 17 8 7 18 6 19 5 20 4 21 22 3 23 2 1 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 MANOR CR 19 TH 7 GIDEON BAY BAY BLVD EXCELSIOR BAY AVE ROAD BLUFF PLEASANT AVE BIRCH DELTON RD EUREKA ROAD EUREKA ST ALBANS BAY OLD HOWARDS EDGEWOOD ROAD GRANT LORENZ ROAD LORENZ GRANT EXCELSIOR AVE NOBLE MAR VINE HILL ROAD MAP OF THE DELTON ROAD KET CITY OF MINNETONKA CITY OF SHOREWOOD 27 39 28 38 26 29 37 25 POINT 30 36 24 31 35 23 22 21 20 19 SON 18 32 33 34 4 17 RD 3 16 2 15 POLICESTALL COUNT STATION = 42 PUBLICSTALL COUNT WORKS = 4 3 BLUE HANDICAP 0(DOUBLE HANDICAP CHECKED WITH GOOGLE) 14 13 1 12 11 10 9 8 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN 7 6 5 40 4 41 CITY OF EXCELSIOR 3 2 1 42 RD 25 24 23 RADIS 22 21 16 17 18 19 20 FIRESTALL STATION COUNT = 25 NOEX STALLS HANDICAP = 9 X 20 CR 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 SMITHTOWN 2 3 4 STALL COUNT = 7 DRIVE-THRU 1 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING? 5 6 7 45 44 43 COUNTRY CLUB RD CLUB COUNTRY 46 25 47 49 48 24 50 26 51 23 27 22 28 21 29 42 20 30 41 19 31 40 33 34 35 36 38 32 18 37 39 SOUTH SHORE CENTER STALL3 HANDICAP-NEED COUNT = 51 SIGNING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 68 67 66 65 ROAD 64 63 69 62 61 60 59 70 57 58 ROAD 52 53 54 55 56 71 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 72 EUREKA ROAD EUREKA 39 40 41 42 43 73 74 75 76 STALL COUNT = 11 BADGERSTALL COUNT PARK =ZONE 82 1 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING 3 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING 77 5 78 79 4 81 80 6 82 3 38 7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 27 15 2 8 18 17 16 1 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 15 14 9 10 27 16 14 11 26 17 13 25 18 12 24 19 11 8 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 13 23 20 10 22 21 CITY HALL ZONE STALL2 HANDICAP-NEED COUNT = 27 SIGNING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 COVING TON RD STRAWBERRY LANE STRAWBERRY CATHCART DR CATHCART CHRISTMAS LAKE 132 131 ROAD 130 129 128 133 GRAVEL STALL COUNT = 137 127 5ADJACENT HANDICAP-NEED TO EDDY SIGNING STATION 62 126 134 61 63 125 135 60 64 65 136 59 124 137 58 66 123 57 122 67 56 68 121 1 55 69 120 2 54 119 70 3 71 53 118 4 52 72 117 5 51 73 116 6 50 74 7 115 49 75 114 8 48 113 76 9 112 47 77 10 46 78 111 11 45 110 79 12 44 109 80 13 43 81 108 14 42 82 107 15 41 83 106 16 40 105 84 17 104 39 85 18 38 103 86 102 19 37 87 20 36 88 101 21 35 89 100 22 99 34 90 23 33 98 FREEMAN PARK 91 24 32 92 97 25 96 31 93 26 95 27 30 94 28 29 GALPIN LAKE LAKE 1 SMITHTOWN 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 GRAVEL2 HANDICAP-NEED STALL COUNT SIGNING = 3552 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 25 26 24 23 22 21 20 19 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 MILL STREET 1 12 2 3 3 4 45 5 6 6 GRAVEL STALL COUNT = 25 7 7 8 8 9 910 11 2 HANDICAP-NEEDGRAVEL2 HANDICAP-NEED STALLSIGNING COUNT SIGNING = 25 10 1112 12 13 13 14 1415 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 LAKE MINNETONKA REGIONAL TRAIL 19 19 20 2021 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 49 50 5551 5652 53 45 5046 5147 5248 53 54 42 4743 4844 49 42 43 44 40 4541 46 4037 41 38 39 3734 3835 3936 GRAVEL2 HANDICAP-NEED STALL COUNT SIGNING = 3753 STONE 2018 1917 22 24 2321 2220 2119 29 28 2725 2624 2523 3331 3230 3129 3028 27 26 3533 3432 36 17 1816 15 16 15 1211 1312 1413 14 6 87 98 109 1110 21 32 43 54 5 6 7 1 YELLOW TRAIL LINDEN 40 39 38 41 37 36 42 TH 7 35 STALL COUNT = 59 43 3 HANDICAP 34 44 DR 33 45 32 46 31 47 30 48 29 49 50 28 27 51 SILVER LAKE 26 52 25 53 24 54 23 55 56 22 57 21 20 58 19 59 18 17 9 8 16 7 6 15 14 5 13 4 3 12 11 2 10 1 TH 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 STALL2 HANDICAP-NEED COUNT = 32 SIGNING 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 30 29 R 8/28/2026 9:39 AM CITY OF CHANHASSEN SMITHTOWN BAY CITY OF CHANHASSEN TH 41 LAKE VICTORIA LAKE MINNEWASHTA 0 2000 4000 GALPIN BLVD POWERS BLVD SCALE FEET , All Rights Reserved 2023 DESIGNED NO. ISSUED FOR DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED SHEET BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 PJS CITY OF SHOREWOOD PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 DRAWN JWH 2026 PAVEMENT STRIPING Phone: (952) 448-8838 CHECKED Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com ALB C1.01 ANDREW L. BUDDE R www.bolton-menk.com CLIENT PROJ. NO. Bolton & Menk, Inc. 46585 08/25/2026 TITLE SHEET c LIC. NO. DATE H:\SHWD\_General\Roadways\Pavement Maintenance\2026\2026 Pavement Striping\CAD\C3D\MISC_2026_132460G001.dwg 0C1.132460 Page 85 of 568 LAKE MINNETONKA LEGEND: STREETS STRIPED WITH PAINT CITY OF TONKA BAY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY UPPER LAKE ROAD EXCELSIOR BAY BLUFF PLEASANT AVE R BIRCH EDGEWOOD ROAD TABLE 1 EUREKA ROAD HOWARDS PAVEMENT MARKINGS EUREKA ROAD EUREKA ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY NO. NOBLE 1 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT LIN FT 3,110 2 4" SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT LIN FT 6,200 39 27 38 28 26 GRANT LORENZ ROAD LORENZ GRANT 29 37 25 30 36 ROAD 24 31 35 23 22 21 20 19 3 24" SOLID LINE WHITE- PAINT LIN FT 50 18 32 33 34 4 17 3 16 15 2 POLICE STATION STALL COUNT = 42 PUBLIC WORKS 3 BLUE HANDICAP STALL COUNT = 4 0 HANDICAP 14 (DOUBLE CHECKED WITH GOOGLE) 13 1 POINT 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 40 4 41 3 2 1 42 4 CROSSWALK MARKING WHITE-PAINT (3'X6') SQ FT 90 25 24 23 22 21 16 17 18 20 19 FIRE STATION STALL COUNT = 25 NO HANDICAP EX STALLS = 9 X 20 1 2 6 11 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 CR 19 ROAD SMITHTOWN 45 44 TABLE 8 43 25 46 47 48 24 49 26 50 TABLE 8 51 23 27 22 28 21 29 42 20 30 41 19 31 40 18 33 34 35 36 38 32 37 39 SOUTH SHORE CENTER STALL COUNT = 51 3 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 11 13 14 15 16 17 SMITHTOWN ROAD-EUREKA TO HECO BOUNDARY 68 67 66 65 64 63 69 62 61 60 70 59 58 ROAD 57 56 71 55 52 53 54 50 51 48 49 72 47 44 45 46 39 40 42 43 41 73 74 75 76 BADGER PARK ZONE STALL COUNT = 82 3 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING SMITHTOWN ROAD 77 78 79 80 81 82 38 36 32 33 34 35 37 30 31 28 29 27 15 16 18 17 22 21 20 19 24 23 26 25 14 15 27 16 14 26 17 13 25 18 12 PAVEMENT MARKINGS 24 19 11 11 8 10 12 6 7 9 13 3 5 1 2 4 23 20 10 22 21 CITY HALL ZONE STALL COUNT = 27 2 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY NO. COUNTRY CLUB RD CLUB COUNTRY EUREKA ROAD EUREKA STRAWBERRY LANE STRAWBERRY 1 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT LIN FT 12,220 2 4" SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT LIN FT 25,170 3 24" SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT LIN FT 110 5 CROSSWALK MARKING WHITE-PAINT SQ FT 220 132 131 25.79' 130 129 128 127 GRAVEL STALL COUNT = 137 133 62 5 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING ADJACENT TO EDDY STATION 126 61 134 63 125 135 60 64 59 65 136 124 137 58 66 123 57 122 67 121 56 68 1 55 69 120 2 54 119 70 3 71 53 118 4 52 72 117 5 116 51 73 6 50 74 115 7 49 75 114 8 113 48 76 9 112 47 77 10 111 78 46 11 110 45 79 12 109 44 80 13 43 108 81 14 42 82 107 15 106 83 41 105 40 16 84 104 17 39 25.58' 85 18 38 103 23.34' 86 102 19 87 37 20 101 88 36 21 35 100 89 22 99 34 90 98 23 33 91 24 32 97 92 25 96 31 93 26 95 30 27 94 28 32.14' ROAD 29 20.94' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 GRAVEL STALL COUNT = 3552 2 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING 22.78' 25.17' 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 25 26 24 23 22 21 20 19 23.67' 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 18.25' 50 51 52 1 1 2 23 LAKE 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 GRAVEL STALLGRAVEL COUNT STALL = COUNT25 = 25 7 7 8 8 2 HANDICAP-NEED2 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING SIGNING 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 23 22 23 24 24 25 25 53 51 5256 49 50 55 54 47 48 53 51 52 4549 4650 4844 42 4743 46 4541 4440 42 43 39 41 38 4037 3936 3835 SMITHTOWN 3734 GRAVEL STALL COUNT = 3753 2 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING 22' 17 18 19 20 22 2119 23 20 2224 21 2523 2624 28 2725 29 26 3028 27 32 3129 30 32 3331 34 TABLE 1 3533 36 17 18 16 15 16 15 14 1413 11 1312 1110 12 28.89' 109 98 6 87 4 56 7 34 5 1 32 1 2 CATHCART DR CATHCART 20.99' EUREKA RD TR LOW STONE YEL LINDEN LAKE MINNETONKA REGIONAL TRAIL 40 39 38 41 37 36 42 35 43 STALL COUNT = 59 3 HANDICAP 34 44 33 45 32 46 31 47 30 48 29 DR 49 50 28 51 27 26 52 25 53 24 54 23 55 56 22 57 21 58 20 19 59 18 17 9 8 16 7 15 6 14 5 13 4 12 3 11 2 10 1 TH 7 TH 7 10 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 STALL COUNT = 32 2 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING 28 27 26 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 25 30 29 INTERSECTION DETAIL SEE SHEET C1.04 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PAVEMENT MARKING NOTES & GUIDELINES GENERAL INFORMATION: THE ENGINEER'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE APPLICATION OF THE MATERIAL SHALL BE LIMITED TO FIELD CONSULTATION AND INSPECTION. THE SYMBOLS & MATERIALS LEGEND 8/28/2026 9:39 AM CONTRACTOR WILL PLACE NECESSARY "SPOTTING" AT APPROPRIATE POINTS TO PROVIDE HORIZONTAL CONTROL FOR STRIPING AND TO DETERMINE STRIPING KEY NECESSARY STARTING AND CUTOFF POINTS. LONGITUDINAL JOINTS, PAVEMENT EDGES AND EXISTING MARKINGS MAY SERVE AS HORIZONTAL CIRCLE - MULTI COMPONENT CONTROL WHEN SO DIRECTED. TRIANGLE - PAINT EDGE LINES AND LANE LINES ARE TO BE BROKEN ONLY AT INTERSECTIONS WITH PUBLIC ROADS AND AT PRIVATE ENTRANCES IF THEY ARE CONTROLLED BY A YIELD SIGN, STOP SIGN OR TRAFFIC SIGNAL. THE BREAK POINT IS TO BE AT THE START OF THE RADIUS FOR THE INTERSECTION OR AT MARKED PENTAGON - PREF TAPE STOP LINES OR CROSSWALKS. SQUARE - PREF THERMO A TOLERANCE OF ¼ INCH UNDER OR ¼ INCH OVER THE SPECIFIED WIDTH WILL BE ALLOWED FOR STRIPING, PROVIDED THE VARIATION IS GRADUAL AND CROSSWALK BLOCK WHITE (EXISTING) DOES NOT DETRACT FROM THE GENERAL APPEARANCE. BROKEN LINE SEGMENTS MAY VARY UP TO ONE-HALF FOOT FROM THE SPECIFIED LENGTHS, 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT PROVIDED OVER AND UNDER VARIATIONS ARE REASONABLY COMPENSATORY. ALIGNMENT DEVIATIONS FROM THE CONTROL GUIDE SHALL NOT WIDTH PATTERN COLOR EXCEED 1 INCH. MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE APPLIED OVER LONGITUDINAL JOINTS. ESTABLISHMENT OF APPLICATION TOLERANCES SHALL NOT RELIEVE PAVEMENT 4", 8", ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE THE CONTRACTOR OF THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO COMPLY AS CLOSELY AS PRACTICABLE WITH THE PLANNED DIMENSIONS. MESSAGE (TYP) B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW (EXISTING) D - DOTTED/DOUBLE B - BLACK PAINT: BL - BLUE AT THE TIME OF APPLYING THE MARKING MATERIAL, THE APPLICATION AREA SHALL BE FREE OF CONTAMINATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN THE HANDICAP SYMBOL WHITE (EXISTING) ROADWAY SURFACE PRIOR TO THE LINE APPLICATION IN A MANNER AND TO THE EXTENT REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER. EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - PAINT BICYCLE SYMBOL WHITE (EXISTING) GLASS BEADS SHALL BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY AFTER APPLICATION OF THE PAINT LINE. EXCEPT WHEN USED AS TEMPORARY MARKING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL ONLY BE APPLIED IN SEASONABLE WEATHER WHEN AIR TEMPERATURE IS 50º F OR HIGHER AND SHALL NOT BE APPLIED WHEN THE WIND OR OTHER CONDITIONS CAUSE A FILM OF DUST TO BE DEPOSITED ON THE PAVEMENT SURFACE AFTER CLEANING AND BEFORE THE MARKING MATERIAL CAN BE APPLIED. THE FILLING OF TANKS, POURING OF MATERIALS OR CLEANING OF EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE PERFORMED ON UNPROTECTED PAVEMENT SURFACES, , All Rights Reserved UNLESS ADEQUATE PROVISIONS ARE MADE TO PREVENT SPILLAGE OF MATERIAL. 2023 DESIGNED NO. ISSUED FOR DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED SHEET BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 PJS CITY OF SHOREWOOD PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 DRAWN 0 600 1200 JWH 2026 PAVEMENT STRIPING Phone: (952) 448-8838 CHECKED Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com ALB C1.02 SCALE FEET ANDREW L. BUDDE R www.bolton-menk.com CLIENT PROJ. NO. Bolton & Menk, Inc. 46585 08/25/2026 PROJECT MAP WEST c LIC. NO. DATE H:\SHWD\_General\Roadways\Pavement Maintenance\2026\2026 Pavement Striping\CAD\C3D\MISC_2026_132460G001.dwg 0C1.132460 Page 86 of 568 CITY OF GREENWOOD TABLE 5 TABLE 9 RADISSON ROAD & RADDSION INN ROAD COVINGTON ROAD PAVEMENT MARKINGS PAVEMENT MARKINGS ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY 1 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT LIN FT 2,020 1 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT LIN FT 4,900 R 2 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW-PAINT LIN FT 460 2 4" SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT LIN FT 1,240 BLVD 3 24" SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT LIN FT 20 TABLE 10 TABLE 11 TABLE 12 VINE HILL ROAD ST. ALBANS BAY ROAD MINNETONNKA BLVD PAVEMENT MARKINGS PAVEMENT MARKINGS ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY 1 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT LIN FT 6,780 1 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT LIN FT 1,620 MINNETONKA 2 4" SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT LIN FT 10,100 2 24" SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT LIN FT 40 TABLE 12 TABLE 13 CITY OF EXCELSIOR MINNETONKA BOULEVARD MANOR ROAD TABLE 11 PAVEMENT MARKINGS PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHEET C1.06 TABLE 13 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TABLE 11 MANOR RD 1 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT LIN FT 3,540 1 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT LIN FT 5,200 ST ALBANS RD ST ALBANS BAY RD 2 4" SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT LIN FT 7,170 2 24" SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT LIN FT 20 TH 7 PAVEMENT MARKING NOTES & GUIDELINES MANOR 14 13 12 11 10 STALL COUNT = 30 2 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING 15 16 9 17 8 18 7 19 6 20 5 21 4 22 3 23 2 24 1 25 26 27 28 29 30 GENERAL INFORMATION: THE ENGINEER'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE APPLICATION OF THE MATERIAL SHALL BE LIMITED TO FIELD CONSULTATION AND INSPECTION. THE CONTRACTOR WILL PLACE NECESSARY "SPOTTING" AT BAY APPROPRIATE POINTS TO PROVIDE HORIZONTAL CONTROL FOR STRIPING AND TO DETERMINE NECESSARY STARTING AND CUTOFF POINTS. LONGITUDINAL JOINTS, PAVEMENT EDGES AND EXISTING MARKINGS MAY SERVE AS HORIZONTAL CONTROL WHEN SO DIRECTED. ST. ALBANS BAY AVE EDGE LINES AND LANE LINES ARE TO BE BROKEN ONLY AT INTERSECTIONS WITH PUBLIC ROADS AND AT PRIVATE ENTRANCES IF THEY ARE CONTROLLED BY A YIELD SIGN, STOP SIGN OR TRAFFIC RD SIGNAL. THE BREAK POINT IS TO BE AT THE START OF THE RADIUS FOR THE INTERSECTION OR AT MARKED STOP LINES OR CROSSWALKS. DELTON BLVD A TOLERANCE OF ¼ INCH UNDER OR ¼ INCH OVER THE SPECIFIED WIDTH WILL BE ALLOWED FOR STRIPING, PROVIDED THE VARIATION IS GRADUAL AND DOES NOT DETRACT FROM THE GENERAL APPEARANCE. BROKEN LINE SEGMENTS MAY VARY UP TO ONE-HALF FOOT FROM THE SPECIFIED LENGTHS, PROVIDED OVER AND UNDER VARIATIONS ARE REASONABLY COMPENSATORY. ALIGNMENT DEVIATIONS FROM THE CONTROL GUIDE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 INCH. MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE APPLIED OVER LONGITUDINAL JOINTS. ESTABLISHMENT OF APPLICATION TOLERANCES EXCELSIOR SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO COMPLY AS CLOSELY AS PRACTICABLE WITH THE PLANNED DIMENSIONS. PAINT: OLD TABLE 5 COV AT THE TIME OF APPLYING THE MARKING MATERIAL, THE APPLICATION AREA SHALL BE FREE OF CONTAMINATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN THE ROADWAY SURFACE PRIOR TO THE LINE MAR APPLICATION IN A MANNER AND TO THE EXTENT REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER. RADISSON ROAD & ING GLASS BEADS SHALL BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY AFTER APPLICATION OF THE PAINT LINE. RADISSON INN RD TON KET EXCEPT WHEN USED AS TEMPORARY MARKING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL ONLY BE APPLIED IN SEASONABLE WEATHER WHEN AIR TEMPERATURE IS 50º F OR HIGHER AND SHALL NOT BE APPLIED RD RD WHEN THE WIND OR OTHER CONDITIONS CAUSE A FILM OF DUST TO BE DEPOSITED ON THE PAVEMENT SURFACE AFTER CLEANING AND BEFORE THE MARKING MATERIAL CAN BE APPLIED. RADISSON RD THE FILLING OF TANKS, POURING OF MATERIALS OR CLEANING OF EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE PERFORMED ON UNPROTECTED PAVEMENT SURFACES, UNLESS ADEQUATE PROVISIONS ARE MADE TO TABLE 10 VINE HILL ROAD PREVENT SPILLAGE OF MATERIAL. VINE HILL ROAD 1 2 3 4 STALL COUNT = 7 DRIVE-THRU 1 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING? SYMBOLS & MATERIALS LEGEND 5 6 7 CITY OF MINNETONKA OF CITY STRIPING KEY CIRCLE - MULTI COMPONENT 8/28/2026 9:39 AM STALL COUNT = 11 1 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING TRIANGLE - PAINT 5 4 6 3 7 2 8 1 9 10 11 PENTAGON - PREF TAPE COVING TON RD SQUARE - PREF THERMO CROSSWALK BLOCK WHITE (EXISTING) 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT WIDTH PATTERN COLOR PAVEMENT 4", 8", ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE MESSAGE (TYP) B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW CHRISTMAS LAKE (EXISTING) D - DOTTED/DOUBLE B - BLACK BL - BLUE TABLE 9 HANDICAP SYMBOL WHITE (EXISTING) EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - PAINT COVINGTON ROAD BICYCLE SYMBOL WHITE (EXISTING) LEGEND: STREETS STRIPED WITH PAINT MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY , All Rights Reserved 2023 DESIGNED NO. ISSUED FOR DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED SHEET BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 PJS CITY OF SHOREWOOD PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 DRAWN 0 600 1200 JWH 2026 PAVEMENT STRIPING Phone: (952) 448-8838 CHECKED Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com ALB C1.03 SCALE FEET ANDREW L. BUDDE R www.bolton-menk.com CLIENT PROJ. NO. Bolton & Menk, Inc. 46585 08/25/2026 PROJECT MAP EAST c LIC. NO. DATE H:\SHWD\_General\Roadways\Pavement Maintenance\2026\2026 Pavement Striping\CAD\C3D\MISC_2026_132460G001.dwg 0C1.132460 Page 87 of 568 R EUREKA ROAD 8/28/2026 9:39 AM 4SW 4SW 4DY TH 7 TH 7 , All Rights Reserved SEE SHEET C1.02 TABLE 1 FOR EUREKA ROAD QUANTITIES 2023 DESIGNED NO. ISSUED FOR DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED SHEET BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 PJS CITY OF SHOREWOOD 0 20 40 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 DRAWN HORZ. JWH 2026 PAVEMENT STRIPING Phone: (952) 448-8838 CHECKED SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com ALB C1.05 ANDREW L. BUDDE R www.bolton-menk.com CLIENT PROJ. NO. Bolton & Menk, Inc. 46585 08/25/2026 EUREKA RD & LAKE LINDEN DR INTERSECTION AT TH 7 c LIC. NO. DATE H:\SHWD\_General\Roadways\Pavement Maintenance\2026\2026 Pavement Striping\CAD\C3D\MISC_2026_132460G001.dwg 0C1.132460 Page 88 of 568 BIKE SYMBOL-PAINT (TYP) CIRCLE MUIRFIELD R OLD MARKET RD SEE SHEET C1.03 TABLE 8 FOR BIKE PATH STRIPING (TYP) R VINE HILL ROAD WATERFORD PLACE 4DY SEE SHEET C1.03 VINE HILL EXISTING CURB EDGE ROAD TABLE 10 VINE HILL ROAD WATERFORD PLACE FOR PAVEMENT MARKINGS & STRIPING QUANTITIES EXISTING CURB EDGE HILL VINE RIDGE ROAD WELL 4SW CHART 4DY 4SW 0 40 80 STALL COUNT = 11 1 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING 5 HORZ. 4 6 3 7 2 8 1 9 SCALE FEET 10 11 COVINGTON SEE SHEET C1.03TABLE 9 FOR COVINGTON ROAD PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND STRIPING QUANTITIES. 4DY 8/28/2026 9:39 AM ROAD COVINGTON RD VINE HILL ROAD 0 200 400 HORZ. 4SW SCALE FEET , All Rights Reserved 2023 DESIGNED NO. ISSUED FOR DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED SHEET BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 PJS CITY OF SHOREWOOD PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 DRAWN JWH 2026 PAVEMENT STRIPING Phone: (952) 448-8838 CHECKED Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com ALB C1.05 ANDREW L. BUDDE R www.bolton-menk.com CLIENT PROJ. NO. COVINGTON ROAD INTERSECTIONS Bolton & Menk, Inc. 46585 08/25/2026 c LIC. NO. DATE H:\SHWD\_General\Roadways\Pavement Maintenance\2026\2026 Pavement Striping\CAD\C3D\MISC_2026_132460G001.dwg 0C1.132460 Page 89 of 568 SUBURBAN DR SUBURBAN MANOR POND R MANOR PARK 4SW ROAD 14 ST ALBANS BAY ROAD4SY 13 4DY MANOR 12 11 10 STALL COUNT = 30 2 HANDICAP-NEED SIGNING 15 16 9 17 8 18 7 19 6 20 5 21 4 22 3 23 2 24 1 25 26 27 28 MANOR ROAD 29 30 MANOR POND MANOR ROAD 4DY TABLE 11 ST. ALBANS BAY ROAD PAVEMENT MARKINGS TABLE 13 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY MANOR ROAD 1 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT LIN FT 1,620 PAVEMENT MARKINGS 2 24" SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT LIN FT 40 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY 1 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT LIN FT 5,200 2 24" SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT LIN FT 20 8/28/2026 9:39 AM , All Rights Reserved 2023 DESIGNED NO. ISSUED FOR DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED SHEET BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 PJS CITY OF SHOREWOOD 0 40 80 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 DRAWN JWH 2026 PAVEMENT STRIPING HORZ. Phone: (952) 448-8838 CHECKED SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com ALB C1.06 ANDREW L. BUDDE R www.bolton-menk.com CLIENT PROJ. NO. MANOR ROAD, MANOR PARK, ST ALBANS BAY ROAD Bolton & Menk, Inc. 46585 08/25/2026 c LIC. NO. DATE H:\SHWD\_General\Roadways\Pavement Maintenance\2026\2026 Pavement Striping\CAD\C3D\MISC_2026_132460G001.dwg 0C1.132460 Page 90 of 568 QUOTING SCHEDULE 2026 PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHOREWOOD, MN Quoter Name: QUOTER agrees to perform all of the work described in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS for the following unit prices: NOTE: Quotes shall include sales tax and all applicable taxes and fees. QUOTER must fill in unit prices in numerals, make extension for each item, and total. ITEM APPROX. UNIT NO. ITEM QUANT. UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LS 2 4-INCH SOLID WHITE 49880 LF 3 4-INCH BROKEN YELLOW 460 LF 4 4-INCH DOUBLE YELLOW 39390 LF 5 24-INCH SOLID WHITE 240 LF 6 CROSSWALK MARKING WHITE - PAINT 220 SQ FT TOTAL QUOTE: $ Page 91 of 568PROJECT NO. ______ 2026 Pavement Striping Date 8/28/2026 Shorewood, MN EXHIBIT B RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTOR VERIFICATION 238814v1 Page 92 of 568 RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTOR VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE PRIME CONTRACTOR BID FORM ATTACHMENT PROJECT NUMBER: 25-02 This form includes changes by statutory references from the Laws of Minnesota 2015, chapter 64, sections 1-9. This form must be submitted with the bid form submitted for this project. A bid form received without this form, may be rejected. Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, Subd. 7. IMPLEMENTATION. … any prime contractor or subcontractor or motor carrier that does not meet the minimum criteria in subdivision 3 or fails to verify that it meets those criteria is not a responsible contractor and is not eligible to be awarded a construction contract for the project or to perform work on the project… Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, Subd. 3. RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTOR, MINIMUM CRITERIA. "Responsible contractor" means a contractor that conforms to the responsibility requirements in the solicitation document for its portion of the work on the project and verifies that it meets the following minimum criteria: (1) The Contractor: (i) is in compliance with workers' compensation and unemployment insurance requirements; (ii) is in compliance with Department of Revenue and Department of Employment and Economic Development registration requirements if it has employees; (iii) has a valid federal tax identification number or a valid Social Security number if an individual; and (iv) has filed a certificate of authority to transact business in Minnesota with the Secretary of State if a foreign corporation or cooperative. (2) The contractor or related entity is in compliance with and, during the three-year period before submitting the verification, has not violated section 177.24, 177.25, 177.41 to 177.44, 181.03, 181.101, 181.13, 181.14, or 181.722, and has not violated United States Code, title 29, sections 201 to 219, or United States Code, title 40, sections 3141 to 3148. For purposes of this clause, a violation occurs when a contractor or related entity: (i) repeatedly fails to pay statutorily required wages or penalties on one or more separate projects for a total underpayment of $25,000 or more within the three-year period, provided that a failure to pay is “repeated” only if it involves two or more separate and distinct occurrences of underpayment during the three-year period; (ii) has been issued an order to comply by the commissioner of Labor and Industry that has become final; (iii) has been issued at least two determination letters within the three-year period by the Department of Transportation finding an underpayment by the contractor or related entity to its own employees; (iv) has been found by the commissioner of Labor and Industry to have repeatedly or willfully violated any of the sections referenced in this clause pursuant to section 177.27; (v) has been issued a ruling or findings of underpayment by the administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the United States Department of Labor that have become final or have been upheld by an administrative law judge or the Administrative Review Board; or (vi) has been found liable for underpayment of wages or penalties or misrepresenting a construction worker as an independent contractor in an action brought in a court having jurisdiction. Provided that, if the contractor or related entity contests a determination of underpayment by the Department of Transportation in a contested case proceeding, a violation does not occur until the contested case proceeding has concluded with a determination that the contractor or related entity underpaid wages or penalties;* This document is a MODIFIED version of the MnDOT Responsible Contractor Verification and Certification of Compliance form City of Shorewood – 2025 Pavement Sealing RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTOR VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE V122921 © Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights Reserved Page 93 of 568(3) The contractor or related entity is in compliance with and, during the three-year period before submitting the verification, has not violated section 181.723 or chapter 326B. For purposes of this clause, a violation occurs when a contractor or related entity has been issued a final administrative or licensing order;* (4) The contractor or related entity has not, more than twice during the three-year period before submitting the verification, had a certificate of compliance under section 363A.36 revoked or suspended based on the provisions of section 363A.36, with the revocation or suspension becoming final because it was upheld by the Office of Administrative Hearings or was not appealed to the office;* (5) The contractor or related entity has not received a final determination assessing a monetary sanction from the Department of Administration or Transportation for failure to meet targeted group business, disadvantaged business enterprise, or veteran-owned business goals, due to a lack of good faith effort, more than once during the three-year period before submitting the verification;* *Any violations, suspensions, revocations, or sanctions, as defined in clauses (2) to (5), occurring prior to July 1, 2014, shall not be considered in determining whether a contractor or related entity meets the minimum criteria. (6) The contractor or related entity is not currently suspended or debarred by the federal government or the state of Minnesota or any of its departments, commissions, agencies, or political subdivisions that have authority to debar a contractor; and (7) All subcontractors and motor carriers that the contractor intends to use to perform project work have verified to the contractor through a signed statement under oath by an owner or officer that they meet the minimum criteria listed in clauses (1) to (6). Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, Subd. 5. SUBCONTRACTOR VERIFICATION. A prime contractor or subcontractor shall include in its verification of compliance under subdivision 4 a list of all of its first-tier subcontractors that it intends to retain for work on the project. Prior to execution of a construction contract, and as a condition precedent to the execution of a construction contract, the apparent successful prime contractor shall submit to the contracting authority a supplemental verification under oath confirming compliance with subdivision 3, clause (7). Each contractor or subcontractor shall obtain from all subcontractors with which it will have a direct contractual relationship a signed statement under oath by an owner or officer verifying that they meet all of the minimum criteria in subdivision 3 prior to execution of a construction contract with each subcontractor. If a prime contractor or any subcontractor retains additional subcontractors on the project after submitting its verification of compliance, the prime contractor or subcontractor shall obtain verifications of compliance from each additional subcontractor with which it has a direct contractual relationship and shall submit a supplemental verification confirming compliance with subdivision 3, clause (7), within 14 days of retaining the additional subcontractors. A prime contractor shall submit to the contracting authority upon request copies of the signed verifications of compliance from all subcontractors of any tier pursuant to subdivision 3, clause (7). A prime contractor and subcontractors shall not be responsible for the false statements of any subcontractor with which they do not have a direct contractual relationship. A prime contractor and subcontractors shall be responsible for false statements by their first-tier subcontractors with which they have a direct contractual relationship only if they accept the verification of compliance with actual knowledge that it contains a false statement. Subd. 5a. Motor carrier verification. A prime contractor or subcontractor shall obtain annually from all motor carriers with which it will have a direct contractual relationship a signed statement under oath by an owner or officer verifying that they meet all of the minimum criteria in subdivision 3 prior to execution of a construction contract with each motor carrier. A prime contractor or subcontractor shall require each such motor carrier to provide it with immediate written notification in the event that the motor carrier no longer meets one or more of the minimum criteria in subdivision 3 after submitting its annual verification. A motor carrier shall be ineligible to perform work on a project covered by this section if it does not meet all the minimum criteria in subdivision 3. Upon request, a prime contractor or subcontractor shall submit to the contracting authority the signed verifications of compliance from all motor carriers providing for-hire transportation of materials, equipment, or supplies for a project. This document is a MODIFIED version of the MnDOT Responsible Contractor Verification and Certification of Compliance form City of Shorewood – 2025 Pavement Sealing RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTOR VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE V122921 © Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights Reserved Page 94 of 568Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, Subd. 4. VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE. A contractor responding to a solicitation document of a contracting authority shall submit to the contracting authority a signed statement under oath by an owner or officer verifying compliance with each of the minimum criteria in subdivision 3, with the exception of clause (7), at the time that it responds to the solicitation document. A contracting authority may accept a signed statement under oath as sufficient to demonstrate that a contractor is a responsible contractor and shall not be held liable for awarding a contract in reasonable reliance on that statement. A prime contractor, subcontractor, or motor carrier that fails to verify compliance with any one of the required minimum criteria or makes a false statement under oath in a verification of compliance shall be ineligible to be awarded a construction contract on the project for which the verification was submitted. A false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria may result in termination of a construction contract that has already been awarded to a prime contractor or subcontractor or motor carrier that submits a false statement. A contracting authority shall not be liable for declining to award a contract or terminating a contract based on a reasonable determination that the contractor failed to verify compliance with the minimum criteria or falsely stated that it meets the minimum criteria. A verification of compliance need not be notarized. An electronic verification of compliance made and submitted as part of an electronic bid shall be an acceptable verification of compliance under this section provided that it contains an electronic signature as defined in section 325L.02, paragraph (h). CERTIFICATION By signing this document I certify that I am an owner or officer of the company, and I certify under oath that: 1) My company meets each of the Minimum Criteria to be a responsible contractor as defined herein and is in compliance with Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, and 2) if my company is awarded a contract, I will submit Attachment A-1 prior to contract execution, and 3) if my company is awarded a contract, I will also submit Attachment A-2 as required. Authorized Signature of Owner or Officer: Printed Name: Title: Date: Company Name: NOTE: Minn. Stat. § 16C.285, Subd. 2, (c) If only one prime contractor responds to a solicitation document, a contracting authority may award a construction contract to the responding prime contractor even if the minimum criteria in subdivision 3 are not met. ****END OF SECTION**** This document is a MODIFIED version of the MnDOT Responsible Contractor Verification and Certification of Compliance form City of Shorewood – 2025 Pavement Sealing RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTOR VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE V122921 © Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights Reserved Page 95 of 568 City of Shorewood Project Bid Tabulation 2026 PAVEMENT STRIPING Soliciting agent: Bolton & Menk, Inc. Contact: Andrew Budde, P.E. Bid Date: 09/04/2026 9:00 AM CDT Firm Total Bid Sir Lines-A-Lot $22,546.80 Safety Signs $34,997.60 Engineer's Opinion of Cost - Base Bid $30,284.00 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on September 4, 2026 for the 2026 Pavement Striping, City Project 26-02. Andrew Budde, P.E., City Engineer Sandie Thone, City Clerk Page 96 of 568ABSTRACT OF BIDS 2026 PAVEMENT STRIPING CITY OF SHOREWOOD Bid Date: September 4, 2026 12 Engineers Estimate Sir Lines-A-Lot Safety Signs ITEM APPROX. UNIT UNIT UNIT NO. BID ITEM QUAN. UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT BASE BID 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 2 4-INCH SOLID WHITE 49,880 LF $0.20 $9,976.00 $0.14 $6,983.20 $0.24 $11,971.20 3 4-INCH BROKEN YELLOW 460 LF $0.20 $92.00 $0.14 $64.40 $0.24 $110.40 4 4-INCH DOUBLE YELLOW 39,390 LF $0.40 $15,756.00 $0.28 $11,029.20 $0.40 $15,756.00 5 24-INCH SOLID WHITE 240 LF $5.00 $1,200.00 $5.00 $1,200.00 $10.00 $2,400.00 6 CROSSWALK MARKING WHITE - PAINT 220 SQ FT $8.00 $1,760.00 $3.50 $770.00 $8.00 $1,760.00 TOTAL BID: $30,284.00 $22,546.80 $34,997.60 H:\SHWD\_General\Roadways\Pavement Maintenance\2026\2026 Pavement Striping\Quotes Recieved\Bid Abstract_Shorewood 2026 Pavement Striping.xls Page 1 Page 97 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 26-53 A RESOLUTION TO AWARD CONTRACT FOR 2026 PAVEMENT STRIPING CITY PROJECT 26-02 WHEREAS, pursuant to the request for quotes for the 2026 Pavement Striping Project, two quotes were received on September 4, 2026, opened and tabulated according to law, with the following quotes received; and Contractor Total Quote SIR LINES-A-LOT, LLC $22,546.80 SAFETY SIGNS, LLC $34,997.60 WHEREAS, Sir Lines-A-Lot is the lowest responsible bidder; and WHEREAS, Sir Lines-A-Lot is a responsible and responsive contractor, that has completed projects of similar size and scope successfully; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: The City Council of the City of Shorewood hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Sir Lines-A-Lot based on the lowest bid amount in the name of the City of Shorewood for the 2026 Pavement Striping Project according to the plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk. Adopted by the City Council of Shorewood, Minnesota this 14th day of September 2026. __________________________ Jennifer Labadie, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Sandie Thone, City Clerk Page 98 of 568 City Council Item 4.A. Title/Subject: Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Meeting Date: September 14, 2026 Prepared By: Mitchell Czech, Park/Rec Director Marc Nevinski, City Administrator Attachments 1. SCEC Operational Analysis 2. SCEC Analysis Presentation Background The operational analysis of the Shorewood Community & Event Center has been completed. During the May 11, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting, a purpose statement and members for a community task force were approved. The task force worked with staff and the consultant to evaluate the facility's operations, utilization, programming, financial performance, and long- term opportunities. Jay Lotthammer from ISG will present the study. Council members are encouraged to ask questions and discuss their thoughts about the study's findings and recommendations. This will help staff prepare for anticipated future discussions about the SCEC, such as implementation, staffing, and budgetary needs. Considerations may include: • What findings or conclusions of the study and SCEC stood out? • How does the study inform the Council's priorities for the SCEC? Of the Key Recommendations, which might be the most important to focus on in 2027? • Does the pace shown in the Implementation Roadmap make sense? Are there tasks within the roadmap that should be prioritized? Strategic Alignment Fiscal Responsibility • Align City policies and practices with strategic direction • Implement best practices to support sound financial management • Maintain stable and predictable finances over the long-term Completing the SCEC Operational Analysis, combined with the Facility Analysis, provides background information and data to guide strategy, investment, and resource allocation to achieve objectives the Council has to increase awareness, use and cost-recovery of the SCEC. Budget Impact Although there is no budgetary impact to accepting the study, the recommendations of the study do have impacts that will need to be considered when implementing, Page 99 of 568 Action Requested Motion to accept the SCEC Operational Analysis. Page 100 of 568Community & Event Center Operational Analysis September 2026 Page 101 of 568This page is intentionally left blank. Page 102 of 568Acknowledgments This report is the product of those that contributed their information, time and resources, including: City Staff Task Force Members Mitchell Czech To support the SCEC operational analysis, the City of Parks and Recreation Director (Project Lead) Shorewood established a Facility Analysis Task Force comprised of community members and professionals Marc Nevinski representing a diverse range of perspectives relevant to City Administrator the facility's operations and future success. Stephany Vassar Barry Brown Recreation Specialist Janet Sylvester City Council Jeanna Raap Jennifer Labadie Mayor Kelsey Vercruysse Dustin Maddy Kim Carlson Councilmember Laura McCauley Guy Sanschagrin Nick Ruehl Councilmember Scott Graul Nat Gorham Councilmember Tena Brandhorst Michelle DiGruttolo Councilmember Consultant Page 103 of 568Table of Contents 01. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 02. Project Background + Objectives ����������������������������������������������������������������������������� 3 Project Overview �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������4 Analysis Objectives ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������5 Project Approach �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������6 03. Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input ............................................................. 7 Task Force ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������8 Task Force Takeaways ............................................................................................................. 13 Facility User Feedback ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 17 04. Existing Conditions Assessment ����������������������������������������������������������������������������27 Community Context ................................................................................................................. 28 Background + Existing Conditions ..................................................................................... 30 Operations + Staffing �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 38 Financial + Budget Overview ............................................................................................... 40 Programming + Facility Use ...................................................................................................41 Existing Conditions Summary .............................................................................................. 47 05. Benchmark Comparison Analysis...........................................................................49 Public Facility Analysis ............................................................................................................ 50 Key Takeaways ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 54 06. Market Positioning, Customer Development, and Marketing Strategy ........55 Overview ...................................................................................................................................... 56 Target Markets + Customer Profiles .................................................................................. 57 Market Positioning .................................................................................................................... 60 Branding + Messaging Strategy .......................................................................................... 61 Marketing Channels + Tactics .............................................................................................. 62 Partnership-Based Marketing .............................................................................................. 63 Booking + Customer Experience ......................................................................................... 64 07. Operational Scenarios ...............................................................................................65 Key Operational Drivers .......................................................................................................... 66 Operational Scenarios ............................................................................................................. 68 08. Recommendations + Implementation Strategy .................................................71 Preferred Operational Direction .......................................................................................... 72 Key Recommendations ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 73 Implementation Roadmap ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 77 Ongoing Evaluation ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 78 Page 104 of 56801 Introduction Page 105 of 568Executive Summary Purpose The City of Shorewood hired ISG to conduct an operational analysis of the Shorewood Community & Event Center (SCEC) to better understand current Focus Areas facility performance, identify opportunities for improvement, and evaluate future operating strategies. The study focuses on facility operations, financial performance, community use, and market positioning to support informed decision-making. Process Facility This analysis included a comprehensive review of documents and financial Operations data, stakeholder engagement through a Task Force and community survey results, and comparisons of similar rental spaces in the regional market. Findings Key findings indicate that SCEC serves an important role as a flexible civic gathering space and faces challenges related to scheduling efficiency, market Financial positioning, and clarity of operational goals. Usage patterns and assumptions, Performance including reported occupancy levels, require further alignment with actual demand and scheduling practices to maximize performance. The study also identified opportunities to strengthen the facility’s role by clarifying whether its primary function, is as a community-focused space, an event-driven facility, or a hybrid model aligning operations, pricing, and marketing strategies accordingly. Community Use Recommendations Based on the analysis, ISG developed a series of operational scenarios that illustrate potential paths forward. These scenarios provide insight into the trade-offs between community access, financial performance, and operational complexity. The resulting recommendations are designed to help the City refine its approach, improve usage, and position the facility for Market long‑term sustainability. Positioning 2 | Introduction City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 106 of 56802 Project Background + Objectives Page 107 of 568 Project Overview The SCEC serves as an important community asset, providing space for recreational programming, community gatherings, private events, senior activities, and municipal functions. Context for Analysis As use of the facility has evolved, City leadership has Along with these discussions, the City initiated several engaged in a series of discussions to better understand efforts to better understand the facility’s condition and the facility’s operational performance, financial future potential. These efforts included development sustainability, and long-term role within the community. of a Task Force framework and a facility assessment completed by Kraus Anderson to understand future Beginning in 2025, the Shorewood City Council capital investment needs for the facility. Findings from identified improving the financial performance and the facility assessment were presented to the City usage of the facility as a priority. During the City’s 2025 Council in November 2025, and provided additional Annual Retreat, City Council members expressed a context regarding the building’s physical condition and desire to reduce the gap between operating expenses future needs. and revenues and explore pathways toward a more financially sustainable operating model. Subsequent Building upon this work, the City retained ISG in Spring City Council work sessions further examined facility of 2026 to conduct a comprehensive operational operations, performance data, and potential approaches analysis of the Shorewood Community & Event Center. for evaluating future opportunities. This analysis evaluates current operations, staffing, programming, facility usage, marketing, and financial By May 2025, discussions regarding facility performance performance while exploring opportunities to increase concluded that a fully self-sustaining model was unlikely awareness, improve usage, strengthen cost recovery, under the existing operational structure. Instead, the and support informed decision-making regarding the City identified improving usage and increasing cost facility’s future role in the community. recovery as key objectives, with a preliminary discussion centered around achieving approximately 70% cost A key element of the analysis was the participation of a recovery while continuing to provide community value. City Council-selected task force. 2025–2026 Context Timeline Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Apr May November 24 April 2026 Facility SCEC Assessment Operational May 27 Findings Analysis Cost Recovery Discussion (70% Target) Presented begins April 28 Council Discussion of Task Force Framework February 18 October 9 City Council Annual Retreat Facility Assessment Initiated 4 | Project Background + Objectives City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 108 of 568Analysis Objectives The operational analysis was guided by several key objectives: 1 2 Evaluate current operations, including staffing, Assess facility revenues, expenses, scheduling, programming, facility use, and cost recovery performance, and overall service delivery. financial sustainability. 3 4 Identify operational strengths, Compare SCEC to similar community challenges, constraints, and opportunities and event facilities through market and for improvement. benchmark analysis. 5 6 Develop customer and user profiles to better Identify target markets and develop marketing understand existing and potential audiences, strategies to improve awareness, attract new including community groups, program users, strengthen customer retention, and participants, renters, and event users. support increased usage. 7 8 Evaluate alternative operational scenarios Develop practical, actionable recommendations and their potential impacts on usage, staffing, that support informed decision-making and the revenue generation, and community outcomes. long-term success of the facility City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Project Background + Objectives | 5 Page 109 of 568Project Approach To meet the objectives, ISG completed a multi-faceted evaluation process that combined data analysis, stakeholder engagement, market research, and operational planning. The process was designed to evaluate existing conditions, understand community and stakeholder perspectives, identify opportunities for improvement, and develop actionable recommendations for the future of the Shorewood Community & Event Center. Evaluation of facility policies, operational documents, financial information, Document + Data Review usage data, rental information, and previous planning efforts. Facility Users + Task Collaboration with City staff, elected officials, Task Force members, facility users, and stakeholders to better understand operational strengths, Force Engagement challenges, and future aspirations. Analysis of current staffing structures, programming, scheduling practices, Facility + Operational Assessment event operations, customer experience, and service delivery. Review of comparable community and event facilities to identify Market + Benchmark Analysis industry trends, operational models, programming approaches, and cost recovery practices. Customer Profile Development Identification of key customer segments, assessment of existing marketing efforts, and evaluation of opportunities to improve awareness, + Marketing Assessment recruitment, retention, and facility usage. Scenario Evaluation + Exploration of alternative operational approaches and development of strategies intended to strengthen usage, community impact, and Recommendation Development financial performance. Together, these efforts provide a comprehensive understanding of the facility's current performance and establish a framework for future decision-making regarding operations, marketing, programming, and long-term sustainability. 2026 Analysis Timeline Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Document + Data Review Draft Report Development Final Report Task Force August 26 Formation Task Force Meeting 4 August 12 September 14 April 9 May 20 July 9 Task Force City Council Project Kickoff Meeting Task Force Meeting 1 Task Force Meeting 2 Meeting 3 Presentation 6 | Project Background + Objectives City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 110 of 56803 Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input Page 111 of 568Task Force Composition + Role To support the SCEC operational analysis, the City of Shorewood established Purpose a Facility Analysis Task Force comprised of community members and Statement professionals representing a diverse range of perspectives relevant to the facility's operations and future success. The Task Force included The Shorewood representatives from City government, the Park Commission, local business Community & Event and tourism organizations, senior programming providers, facility renters, Center (SCEC) community education, event venue management, facility operations, business Task Force serves development, finance, and residents. The City intentionally recruited members in an advisory with distinct backgrounds and areas of expertise to ensure that a variety of capacity to provide industry perspectives and community interests were represented throughout the planning process. community‑based insight and feedback that supports the Member Profile Representation evaluation of current operations and City Staff Parks + Recreation Director the development Park Commission Liaison Shorewood Park Commissioner of practical, financially‑realistic Excelsior-Lake Minnetonka recommendations Local Business Connector Chamber of Commerce to increase use and revenue at SCEC. Senior Programming SouthShore Senior Partners (SSSP) Current Renter/Partner Just for Kix Minnetonka Shorewood Resident and Resident Expert Business Professional Youth/Adult Programming Minnetonka Community Education Facility Operations SCEC Operations Staff Hospitality + Event Event Venue Industry Representative Venue Operations Market + Business Business Development and Development Strategist Marketing Professional Financial Planning and Finance + Cost-Recovery Analyst Cost-Recovery Specialist 8 | Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 112 of 568Key Meetings + Topics Process Through a series of facilitated discussions, facility tours, data reviews, and strategy workshops, members helped identify challenges, opportunities, and priorities that informed the operational analysis and resulting recommendations. Four Task Force meetings were conducted throughout the project to gather stakeholder input, review findings, and evaluate potential strategies for the future operation of the SCEC. Discussions progressed from understanding existing conditions and defining success measures, to evaluating operational opportunities and challenges, and ultimately refining recommendations and implementation strategies. Input received from the Task Force provided an important community and industry perspective that informed the findings and recommendations presented in this report. Meeting 1: May 20, 2026 Topics Themes Summary • Task Force introductions and overview of group • Strong community value beyond roles and responsibilities financial performance. • Review scope of services for this study • Importance of maintaining accessibility and affordability. • Tour facility • Desire to increase usage and awareness. • Open discussion of current role of SCEC, identify facility strengths and benefits to the community, • Opportunity to better define target audiences. and discuss comparable facilities • Need to balance community programming with revenue generation. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input | 9 Page 113 of 568 Meeting 2: July 9, 2026 Topics Themes Summary • Discuss implications of SSSP Program sunsetting • Senior programming transition creates both at the end of 2026 challenges and opportunities. • Review benchmark analysis and discuss • Existing renter relationships remain critical comparable facilities to success. • Review of recurring rentals, brainstorm ideas, • Underutilized time periods represent and identify target market rentals for recurring growth opportunities open times on calendar - Increasing recurring rentals such as corporate • Review of current budget meetings, team-building events, and regularly scheduled community activities. - Exploring specialty markets and seasonal events such as indoor farmers markets, arts and crafts fairs, vintage markets, and holiday markets. - Expanding educational, culinary, arts, and youth-focused programming to attract new audiences and fill available daytime and evening time slots. - Developing strategic partnerships and targeted marketing efforts to connect with nearby communities, sports facility users, local businesses, and potential renters. • Improved marketing and outreach are necessary to success. • Cost recovery must be balanced with community benefit. 10 | Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 114 of 568 Meeting 3: August 12, 2026 Topics Themes Summary • Reviewed and discussed SCEC user • Marketing is the highest-priority opportunity for survey results increasing facility use and revenue. • Reviewed and discussed three (3) draft • The transition away from the SSSP model operational scenarios, considering the will create operational and staffing gaps that assumptions, opportunities, and operational must be addressed. Feedback stressed that challenges associated with each facility oversight, customer service, program coordination, and setup assistance currently • Shared a draft marketing strategy supported by volunteers must be provided under any future operating model. • Expanded programming and rentals must be paired with adequate staffing and operational support. The Task Force cautioned against increasing facility activity without corresponding resources, noting that setup, customer service, facility operations, and program support require dedicated staffing capacity. • Long-term success will likely require a phased implementation strategy. Participants expressed support for building capacity over time, using a gradual approach that aligns future staffing, marketing, programming, and operational investments with demonstrated demand and revenue growth. • The facility should continue pursuing a diversified use model. Discussion reinforced opportunities to serve a mix of community programming, senior activities, family-oriented offerings, rentals and other revenue generating uses, rather than relying on a single user group or rental market. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input | 11 Page 115 of 568 Meeting 4: August 26, 2026 Topics Themes Summary • Reviewed draft report and discussed refinements • Staffing decisions should be directly tied to prior to City Council presentation service levels, programming capacity, marketing efforts, customer service, and facility operations. • Discussed staffing scenarios, operational Participants emphasized the importance of clearly responsibilities, and implementation phasing communicating the responsibilities and outcomes • Explored marketing, branding, and programming associated with each scenario. opportunities to increase facility awareness • Long-term success will depend on balancing and usage community benefit with operational • Discussed facility operations, rental support sustainability. Discussion focused on setting needs, and setup/teardown requirements realistic expectations for usage, cost recovery, programming growth, and future investments. • Reviewed capital improvement priorities and operational implications of future investments • Marketing, outreach, and partnerships remain critical opportunities for increasing awareness • Identified key messages and recommendations and use of the facility. The Task Force reinforced for the City Council presentation that successful implementation will require dedicated capacity for promotion, community engagement, and relationship building. • Additional programming and rental opportunities exist during underused evening and weekend periods. Participants highlighted opportunities to expand enrichment, wellness, and educational activities through partnerships and third-party providers. • Facility operations extend beyond programming and require support for scheduling, customer service, setup and teardown, cleaning coordination, rentals, and building oversight. These needs should be reflected in future staffing and budgeting discussions. • Future investments should be phased and strategically coordinated. Participants supported aligning staffing, marketing, programming, and facility improvements to ensure the community experience and operational capacity keep pace with demand. • The facility serves as an important community asset that provides value beyond revenue generation. Participants emphasized preserving existing programming while broadening the facility’s identity and appeal to attract a wider range of community users. 12 | Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 116 of 568Task Force Takeaways The Task Force played an important role in helping to evaluate the current role of SCEC, by identifying opportunities for improvement, and exploring strategies to enhance usage, community value, and financial sustainability. Through a series of facilitated discussions, facility tours, data reviews, and brainstorming exercises, several recurring themes emerged. These themes helped shape the recommendations contained within this report. Throughout the engagement process, Task Force members consistently Community emphasized that SCEC provides value that extends beyond direct financial Value Remains performance. Participants described the facility as an important community gathering place that supports recreation, social connections, senior services, the Foundation educational opportunities, and community events. While improving financial performance was broadly supported, members generally agreed that future of Future decisions should consider both financial outcomes and community benefit. Decision‑Making Task Force members identified several measures of success, including increased usage, stronger cost recovery, improved public awareness, continued community access, and implementation of realistic, actionable recommendations that align with City Council objectives. Members consistently identified increased facility use as one of the most Increased Usage important opportunities for improving both community impact and financial Represents performance. Discussions focused on activating underused times of the day and week, particularly weekday daytime periods, evenings, and weekends. the Greatest Participants noted that many opportunities exist to attract new users while Opportunity expanding services for existing audiences. Examples discussed by the Task Force included: • Recurring programs and community activities • Corporate meetings, retreats, and team-building events • Specialty markets and seasonal events • Educational and enrichment programming • Social gatherings and family celebrations • Expanded community partnerships and shared-use opportunities City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input | 13 Page 117 of 568 Throughout the discussion process, Task Force members emphasized Phase + Align that future investments should be implemented in a coordinated and Implementation phased manner. Participants noted that marketing, programming, facility improvements, and staffing are interconnected, and that increasing demand with Operational without adequate operational support could negatively impact customer Capacity experience and service quality. Members generally supported a gradual approach that allows the City to build capacity over time while monitoring usage, financial performance, and community needs. The Task Force also emphasized that the operational scenarios presented in this report should be viewed as flexible implementation pathways rather than mutually exclusive choices, allowing future investments to be adjusted as priorities, resources, and community demand evolve. A recurring feedback theme was the need to strengthen marketing and Marketing, outreach efforts. Participants noted that many residents and potential Awareness, and renters may not fully understand the facility’s amenities, rental opportunities, and program offerings. Members frequently discussed the need to better Defining a Clear define the facility’s identity and communicate a clear value proposition to Market Position target audiences. Task Force members generally viewed the facility as occupying a unique are Critical position between basic community gathering spaces and higher-end private event venues. Participants identified opportunities to strengthen awareness through improved marketing materials, digital outreach, targeted customer recruitment, and enhanced communication with both residents and potential renters. Participants also discussed the importance of clearly defining the facility’s identity and target audiences. Members noted that the current branding may not fully communicate the facility’s role as a community gathering space and suggested that future marketing efforts should consider how the facility is positioned to serve both existing users and emerging demographic groups while maintaining support for longstanding senior programming. 14 | Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 118 of 568 Task Force members repeatedly emphasized the importance of partnerships Future Success in supporting future facility operations, programming, and usage. Discussions Will Require highlighted opportunities to work with community organizations, schools, businesses, nonprofits, recreation providers, and existing user groups to Strategic expand programming and increase awareness. Partnerships Participants noted that partnerships could help the City reach new audiences, diversify programming offerings, share operational responsibilities, and leverage existing community networks. The group also discussed opportunities to better connect with nearby communities and capitalize on activity generated by adjacent park and recreation facilities. The Task Force identified numerous opportunities to diversify facility use Programming and through both programming and rentals. Members noted that future offerings Rental Strategies should be aligned with demonstrated community interests while also attracting new audiences to the facility. Discussions frequently centered on Should Reflect creating a balanced mix of community-focused programs, recurring rentals, Community and revenue-generating events. Several themes emerged regarding future programming and Needs and rental opportunities: Market Demand • Expanded youth, adult, and senior programming • Educational and enrichment classes • Culinary, arts, and specialty workshops • Corporate and business-related rentals • Community celebrations and family events • Seasonal programs and niche-interest activities City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input | 15 Page 119 of 568 Task Force discussions highlighted several operational considerations that Operational may affect the facility’s future direction. Members noted challenges related to Capacity + staffing capacity, facility setup requirements, operational efficiency, storage limitations, and customer service delivery. Participants also discussed the Staffing Influence future transition of senior programming and its potential implications for Long‑Term staffing, facility operations, and programming delivery models. The group consistently noted that future success will require balancing three Success key functions: • Marketing and customer recruitment • Sales and rental development • Facility operations and customer service Members generally agreed that staffing structure and operational responsibilities should be considered alongside any future recommendations for programming expansion, marketing initiatives, or utilization growth. Participants also emphasized that staffing scenarios should be clearly linked to service outcomes, operational responsibilities, and community expectations. Members discussed the importance of documenting the work required to support programming, rentals, marketing, customer service, facility setup, and building operations, so decision-makers can better understand the implications of future investment choices. The Task Force generally supported a phased implementation approach that aligns staffing growth with demonstrated demand and operational needs. While participants supported efforts to improve financial performance, Financial discussions generally acknowledged that the facility provides important public Sustainability benefits that extend beyond revenue generation. Members frequently framed future success as improving cost recovery, reducing reliance on subsidy, Should Focus on and maximizing community benefit rather than achieving complete financial Cost Recovery self-sufficiency. The Task Force discussed a variety of approaches to strengthening revenue Rather Than Full performance, including: Self-Sufficiency • Adjustments to rental pricing • Expanded usage • Sponsorship and naming-rights opportunities • Donations and philanthropic support • New programs and recurring rentals. 16 | Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 120 of 568Facility User Feedback During the study, the City collected feedback from past facility users and renters through a survey. Approximately 70 individuals completed the survey. Because responses were not required for every question, the number of responses varies by question. In what years did you use or rent the facility (please select all that apply)? 61 responses 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 and earlier 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% How often have you visited the SCEC in the past three years? 72 responses 0 1 2–4 5–10 Weekly Monthly 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input | 17 Page 121 of 568 Which best describes the event or activity you have used the facility most frequently for in the past three years? 67 responses Private social event (wedding, birthday, celebration, etc.) Business or organization meeting Community event that is open to the public Recreational program or event (dance, Arctic Fever, Oktoberfest, camp, etc.) Senior program or weekday activity Other* (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% *While 27% of respondents selected "Other," many of the accompanying write-in responses described activities that align with the survey's predefined categories, including private events, community events, business meetings, recreational programs, and senior activities. Several respondents also indicated using the facility for multiple types of events rather than a single primary use. Overall, how would you rate your experience at the facility? 67 responses 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Excellent Good Fair Poor 18 | Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 122 of 568 Please rate your satisfaction with the following components of the facility: 66 responses Facility condition and cleanliness Room layout and amenities Technology (AV system, sound, TV’s, projector, Wi-Fi, etc.) Reservation process and communication Staff support and customer service Cost relative to overall value 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Neutral Somewhat Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied N/A City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input | 19 Page 123 of 568 What aspects of your facility rental or use did you enjoy the most or were the most positive? 47 responses Summary of Open‑Ended Responses: Respondents were overwhelmingly positive about their experiences at the facility. Several common themes emerged regarding what users value most. Facility Comfort, Convenience, 1 Friendly + Helpful Staff 4 and Accessibility The most frequently mentioned positive aspect Users appreciated several physical aspects of the facility: was the quality of staff and volunteer support. • Comfortable and welcoming atmosphere Respondents highlighted: • Easy access into the building • Friendly, welcoming, and helpful staff • Convenient location • Responsive customer service and communication • Typically adequate parking • Accommodating assistance before and during events • Accessible layout and room configurations • Appreciation for volunteers and senior center leadership • Attractive views and abundant natural light Sense of Community + 2 5 Flexible + Functional Event Space Social Connection Many respondents emphasized the facility’s role as a Rental users frequently praised the facility’s functionality: gathering place: • Large and adaptable spaces • Opportunities to connect with friends and neighbors • Flexible room layouts • Bringing people together for programs and activities • Convenient access to kitchens and restrooms • Building and maintaining social connections • Availability of tables, chairs, and equipment • Providing a community-focused environment • Suitable size for meetings, celebrations, showers, within Shorewood elections, and community events 3 Senior Programming + Activities 6 Cleanliness + Facility Condition A wide variety of senior-focused programs were Many respondents described the facility as: praised, including: • Clean and well-maintained • Exercise classes • Comfortable and inviting • Coffee club gatherings • Appropriate for both community programming and • Games, knitting, and craft activities private events • Information and educational programs • Special events and celebrations for seniors 7 Affordability + Value Several respondents noted that these programs support social engagement, health, and well-being. A number of rental users cited: • Affordable rental rates • Good value for the space provided • Availability of amenities needed to host events successfully 20 | Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 124 of 568 What challenges or issues have you faced with the facility, if any? 40 responses Summary of Open‑Ended Responses: A significant portion of respondents indicated they have experienced no major challenges with the facility. Among those who did identify concerns, several recurring themes emerged. Operations, Staffing, 1 Parking Availability 4 and Communication Parking was the most frequently mentioned operational A number of comments focused on customer service and concern, particularly during larger events or when facility operations: adjacent facilities are heavily used. Comments included: • Building access issues (facility locked during a • Insufficient parking during major events scheduled meeting) and communication challenges • Turf field users impacting parking availability regarding reservations and event logistics • Limited accessible/handicapped parking • Requests for earlier setup access Programming, Activities, 5 2 Technology + Equipment and Marketing Several respondents noted challenges with facility Respondents identified opportunities to expand technology and equipment, including: programming and community outreach: • Outdated technology and furnishings • More organized outings, excursions, and special events for seniors • Desire for more professional technology capabilities • Interest in music-based programs and • Equipment maintenance issues social activities (e.g., freezer out of order) • Greater marketing and promotion of the facility Facility Amenities, Furnishings, • Concerns about potential closure and 3 and Space long-term sustainability Some respondents felt the facility could benefit from upgrades or expanded amenities: 6 Cost + Location • Dated decor and furniture A few respondents noted: • Room size limitations • The Shorewood location may be less convenient for • Kitchen-related concerns some users traveling from across the metro area • Cleanliness concerns in some spaces • Concerns about value relative to price paid City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input | 21 Page 125 of 568 If you could add one thing or make one change to enhance your experience within the facility, what would it be? 31 responses Summary of Open‑Ended Responses: While many respondents indicated they are satisfied with the facility as it currently operates, some identified opportunities for enhancement across programming, amenities, facility improvements, and operations. 1 Expanded Programming + Activities 4 Kitchen Improvements The most common theme was interest in additional or Multiple respondents suggested enhancements to more diverse programming: kitchen facilities: • Additional community-wide programming • Updated stoves, refrigeration, and freezer capacity • Greater variety and diversity of activities for all ages • More functional kitchen space for caterers • Return of popular community traditions and events and events • Intergenerational programming opportunities • Expanded capabilities for food preparation involving local schools and service • More activities and events for seniors Technology + Audio‑Visual 5 Improvements 2 Outdoor Gathering Space Several comments focused on technology upgrades: A recurring facility enhancement request was the • Updated technology throughout the building addition of an outdoor social space: • Improved speaker and sound systems • Outdoor patio with seating and tables • Modern equipment to support meetings, events, • Gathering areas overlooking natural surroundings and programming • Expanded opportunities for outdoor events and socialization 6 Amenities A variety of smaller amenity improvements 3 Facility Upgrades + Modernization were suggested: Respondents identified several areas where facility • Soda vending machines improvements could enhance the user experience: • A piano for programs and community use • General refresh of interior finishes and furnishings Operations, Communication, • Updated meeting and activity rooms 7 and Staffing • Improved flooring for dance and activity programs • Building modernization to create a more Some respondents identified operational improvements: contemporary feel • Increased communication and responsiveness from staff • Consistent availability of a contact person during open hours • Continued municipal support and investment in the facility 22 | Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 126 of 568 Would you consider renting, visiting, or using the facility again in the future? 62 responses Yes, definitely Maybe, if changes or improvements were made No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% If “No” or “Maybe,” what is the main reason why (select all that apply)? 13 responses Facility is in need of repairs or updates Facility is lacking desired amenities Rental rates are too high The facility is not available when needed The reservation process is too difficult Other venues better meet my needs Other (please specify) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Other Responses: • Limited Current Need for Facility Use • Enhancements • Distance and Convenience Factors • Facility Furnishings and Interior Improvements • Communication and Outreach City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input | 23 Page 127 of 568 Which improvements or enhancements would most influence your desire to rent or visit the facility in the future (select top 3 choices)? 47 responses Updated restrooms and finishes Updated rental spaces and finishes New furniture or equipment Technology or audio-visual upgrades Different rental structure or packages Expanded programming or community events Other (please specify) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Other Responses: • Need for stronger marketing and visibility to • Specialized rental rates for groups with showcase facility offerings limited budgets • More on-site available staff • Facility currently works well or that no major updates are needed How important is affordability in your decision to rent or use the facility? 60 responses 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Very Important Somewhat Important Not Important 24 | Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 128 of 568 If the City were to update, remodel, or repurpose the facility, what types of use would you like to see offered (select all that apply)? 64 responses Event rentals (weddings, parties, meetings, etc.) Senior or adult programming Youth or family programming Fitness or wellness programming Arts, culture, or performance events Business or coworking spaces Community gatherings or events Other (please specify) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Other Responses: • Expand educational, wellness, and enrichment • Broaden the facility’s appeal to a wider audience, programming, including health clinics, educational with uses and programs that serve multiple workshops, historical presentations, and generations, families, and community groups. organized outings. • Modernize the facility’s identity and operations, • Increase community events and social activities, including improved marketing, updated spaces, and such as movie nights, community meals, consideration of financially sustainable uses that craft shows, ice cream socials, and other maximize community value. gathering opportunities. Are you a resident of Shorewood? 71 responses 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Yes No City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input | 25 Page 129 of 568 What best describes your relationship to the facility? 66 responses Individual renter or user Representative of a business or organization Representative of a non-profit or community group Representative or member of the SouthShore Senior Partners Other (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Many “Other” responses overlapped with the listed categories, suggesting respondents often view their relationship to the facility through multiple roles, such as resident, renter, activity participant, or community member. How did you hear about this survey? 61 responses Shore Report Newsletter City Website Social Media Flyer SCEC Staff and/or Volunteer Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 26 | Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 130 of 56804 Existing Conditions Assessment Page 131 of 568Community Context Community Demographics 7,768 The City adopted a Park System Plan in February 2026, including a Total comprehensive demographic analysis. These demographic trends are relevant Population to this analysis: • Shorewood is a modestly-sized suburban community with an estimated population of 7,768 residents. 45.3 Median • According to the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Shorewood’s Age population is projected to remain relatively stable, with an estimated growth rate of 1.3% between 2020 and 2040. This limited growth contrasts with Hennepin County, which is projected to grow by 12.1% 65+ over the same period. Shorewood’s stable population outlook is largely Age cohort is fastest attributed to the lack of large vacant parcels and limited redevelopment growing segment of opportunities for higher-density residential development. the population • The community is predominantly White (90.7%), with residents also identifying as two or more races (7.3%), Asian (1%), or another race (1%). $170,262 • Shorewood has a median age of 45.3 years, and the 65+ age cohort is Median expected to be the fastest-growing segment of the population in the Household Income coming years. • Shorewood is a relatively affluent community, with a median home value of $657,895 and a median household income of $170,262, both substantially $1,828 higher than Hennepin County, which has a median home value of Median $410,000 and a median income of $96,300. The United States median Monthly Rent home value is $403,800 and the median income is $83,700. • Rental housing costs are also higher than the County average, with a median rent of approximately $1,828, compared to $1,735 countywide. 4% Population Below • The City has low poverty and unemployment rates, with the share of Poverty Line residents living below the poverty line (4%) well below county and state averages of 10.1% and 10.6%, respectively. Shorewood Park System Plan bit.ly/shorewoodparksystemplan 28 | Existing Conditions Assessment City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 132 of 568Key Takeaways Shorewood’s population is projected to remain relatively stable through 2040. While Stable Local Population stable population growth may limit future demand generated by residents alone, within a Growing Region continued growth throughout Hennepin County presents opportunities to attract regional users through targeted programming, rentals, and marketing. Growing Senior Residents aged 65 and older represent the fastest-growing demographic segment within the community. This trend reinforces the importance of continuing to provide Population senior-focused programs, services, and gathering opportunities. Regional Rental SCEC serves a broader market than Shorewood residents alone. Competitive rental pricing and the facility’s location within the western Twin Cities region position it to Market Opportunity attract event users, organizations, and renters from surrounding communities. Shorewood’s relatively high household incomes suggest that residents may have Income Influences elevated expectations regarding customer service, facility quality, event experiences, Customer Expectations and program offerings. Therefore, the facility must compete within a regional marketplace where users have a variety of public and private alternatives available. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Existing Conditions Assessment | 29 Page 133 of 568Background + Existing Conditions The existing conditions assessment draws from a detailed Facility History review of facility The facility originally opened in 1996 as the SouthShore Senior Center assessments, through a partnership among the communities of Shorewood, Deephaven, budget documents, Excelsior, Greenwood, and Tonka Bay. Operations, maintenance, senior rental reports, programming, and private rentals were managed by Friends of the survey responses, SouthShore Center. and operational In 2009, a working group was established to evaluate the facility's long-term policies. These operational model. As a result, operations and maintenance responsibilities materials provide were transferred to the City of Shorewood, the facility was renamed the insight into how SouthShore Community Center, and programming was expanded beyond SCEC operates senior services to serve a broader range of community interests. The City and how it has also contracted with Community Recreation Resources to assist with facility performed management, marketing, and programming. over time. Additional discussions regarding the facility's future occurred in 2013, when an advisory committee evaluated long-term ownership, operations, and financial sustainability. Following those discussions, Shorewood assumed sole ownership and responsibility for the facility, which was subsequently renamed the Shorewood Community & Event Center (SCEC). 30 | Existing Conditions Assessment City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 134 of 568Facility Overview SCEC is an approximately The facility functions as both a community center and event venue, 9,000-square-foot facility adjacent accommodating a diverse mix of programming, civic uses, private rentals, to Shorewood City Hall and and community events. While this flexibility is a significant strength, it can Badger Park. The facility functions also create competing demands related to scheduling, staffing, marketing, as a multi-purpose community pricing, and facility operations. A central question of this study is how the center and event venue, City can best position the facility to balance community value, use, and supporting a variety of users and financial sustainability. activities, including: In addition to its operational functions, SCEC provides substantial community • Community programming value that extends beyond traditional financial measures. The facility serves as a civic gathering place, supports social connections, promotes health • Private rentals and well-being through recreation and senior programming, strengthens community identity, and provides opportunities for residents of all ages • Meetings to engage in educational, cultural, and social activities. These community • Celebrations outcomes represent important public benefits that should be considered alongside usage, revenue generation, and cost recovery when evaluating • Civic functions future operating strategies. • Senior services SCEC offers multiple rental spaces suitable for: • Birthday parties • Graduations • Weddings A • Receptions B • Memorials C • Homeowner association meetings • Business functions 157 Parking Stalls • Teleconferencing • Dances 11 Accessible Stalls • Community events Its location adjacent to City Hall and Badger Park creates 51 Parking Stalls A opportunities for shared use and SCEC 4 Accessible Stalls supports its role as a community 78 Parking Stalls gathering place. Badger Park B 5 Accessible Stalls 28 Parking Stalls City Hall C 5 Accessible Stalls City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Existing Conditions Assessment | 31 Page 135 of 568Facility Spaces Storage 446 sq. ft. 174 sq. ft. 174 Mechanical Banquet Room 1,871 sq. ft. Side Door Restrooms Kitchen Access to Patio 99 sq. ft. 87 sq. ft. 172 sq. ft. Corridor 295 sq. ft. Side Door Access to Patio Lobby 445 sq. ft. Conference Room Activity Room 732 sq. ft. 1,108 sq. ft. Office 73 sq. ft. Front 55 sq. ft. 44 sq. ft. Storage Entrance 32 | Existing Conditions Assessment City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 136 of 568 Kitchen Staff Offices Restrooms The kitchen serves as a Parks and Recreation staff Recent fixture improvements supporting amenity for events offices are located within have enhanced restroom and rentals and is included a repurposed storage area functionality, although with Banquet Room rentals. within the facility. The finishes remain dated The kitchen was originally space accommodates both and may warrant designed for commercial the Parks and Recreation future upgrades. food preparation, but is Director and Specialist. While used primarily for warming functional, space limitations and serving food. Future and circulation constraints investment decisions regarding create operational and the kitchen should be customer service challenges. considered within the context of the facility’s long-term operational strategy. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Existing Conditions Assessment | 33 Page 137 of 568 Activity Room The Activity Room accommodates up to 60 participants and is frequently used for meetings, classes, birthday parties, presentations, and small events. Like the Banquet Room, the space can be divided into smaller rooms using a movable partition. While functional, several stakeholders noted that interior finishes could be updated. Lobby The lobby provides seating, gathering space, and visitor reception functions. It includes a staffed welcome desk operated by SSSP and serves as a point of contact for facility users. During periods of concurrent programming or rentals, the lobby can experience congestion and circulation challenges. 34 | Existing Conditions Assessment City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 138 of 568 Conference Room The Conference Room is a recently renovated meeting space accommodating 12 to 15 people. The room features a large television with laptop connectivity and mobile video conferencing capabilities, making it well-suited for business meetings, board meetings, and small group gatherings. Banquet Room The Banquet Room is the largest space within the facility and serves as its primary event venue. The room can be divided into two spaces using a movable partition and is furnished with tables and chairs to accommodate up to 160 tabled-guests. Theatre-style seating can accommodate up to 200 attendees for presentations and seminars. The Banquet Room hosts a wide variety of uses including weddings, celebrations of life, business meetings, seminars, birthday parties, community gatherings, and recurring dance programming. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Existing Conditions Assessment | 35 Page 139 of 568Facility Condition Assessment Kraus-Anderson completed a SCEC Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) in October 2025. The facility was in fair condition based on the Facility Condition Index (FCI), which compares deferred maintenance costs to the estimated building replacement value. The assessment identified approximately $1.15 million in deferred maintenance needed over the next 10 years, including capital investments and routine maintenance. Areas requiring near-term investment included the exterior enclosure, fire protection, and HVAC systems, as these components were noted as aging and critical to facility operations. The assessment also recommended interior and equipment upgrades to enhance functionality and user experience. 36 | Existing Conditions Assessment City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 140 of 568City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Existing Conditions Assessment | 37 Page 141 of 568Operations + Staffing The City provided staffing information, organizational responsibilities, position descriptions, and operational policies for review. Operational Snapshot Category Current Staffing Structure Facility Oversight Parks and Recreation Director Administrative Support Part-Time Recreation Specialist Event Staffing Community Center Attendants Maintenance Parks and Recreation Director Cleaning Contracted cleaners clean once per week in summer and twice per week in winter It was contracted out to one person who worked on an as-needed bases. Room Configuration It is now handled by staff and volunteers. Senior Services SSSP (Planned dissolution of SSSP at end of 2026) Current operations are supported through a combination of City staff, contracted services, volunteers, and established operating policies. Staffing structures and service delivery models reflect the facility’s hybrid nature, balancing municipal oversight with event-based operations. • The Parks and Recreation Director oversees • SSSP provides volunteer front desk staffing and facility operations, staffing, budgeting, scheduling, senior programming during weekday daytime marketing, and coordination with partners. hours. Additionally, volunteers of the organization would provide front desk and phone support during • Day to day scheduling and rental support are the day. assisted by a part-time Recreation Specialist and part-time Community Center Attendants who staff • City staff are at capacity and rely on SSSP the facility during evenings and weekends. volunteers for assistance in front desk operations, phone answering, program development and • Maintenance support is provided by Public Works set ups. staff. In the past, a contractor was used for routine maintenance, but staff has absorbed most duties internally. During the study, it became known that the SSSP intends to cease operations at the end of 2026 due to increasing challenges related to volunteer capacity, funding constraints, and long-term sustainability. The anticipated transition of SSSP at the end of 2026 may create service delivery, programming, and staffing gaps that will require future City consideration. SSSP provided or facilitated almost all senior programming for the building, which will require future City involvement to maintain current service levels. 38 | Existing Conditions Assessment City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 142 of 568Operational Observations The review identified several themes that influence current operations and future opportunities: • Staff capacity is largely focused on maintaining existing operations. • Marketing, business development, and program expansion efforts are limited by available staff resources. • Room configuration changes for events were identified as one of the most labor-intensive operational tasks. • Volunteer support plays an important role in weekday operations and customer service. • The anticipated transition of senior programming responsibilities presents both challenges and opportunities for future service delivery. • Future growth in usage will likely require additional capacity dedicated to marketing, customer recruitment, programming development, and facility operations. The review indicated that operational responsibilities, scheduling practices, and service expectations would benefit from greater alignment and coordination. Existing staff resources are focused on maintaining current operations, while future growth opportunities and the anticipated dissolution of SSSP will likely require additional staffing, operational support, or alternative service delivery strategies. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Existing Conditions Assessment | 39 Page 143 of 568Financial + Budget Overview The City provided budget and financial data spanning multiple years, offering a basis for understanding revenue generation and cost structure. As part of the analysis, ISG reviewed SCEC 2024 and 2025 annual budgets, and rental reports. The rental reports provided a monthly breakdown of rental revenue, total number of reservations, and room usage across the facility, offering insight into usage patterns and demand for the space. Together, the budget and rental data reflect a funding structure that relies on facility rentals and program use, interest earnings, donations, and City support through transfers to support ongoing operations and capital needs. Expenses reflect staffing, maintenance, and operational overhead. As is typical for facilities of this type, cost recovery levels are influenced by pricing strategy, usage rates, and the balance between community access and revenue-generating events. Financial Takeaways Current financial performance • The facility operates through a combination of rental revenue, should be evaluated in the context programming revenue, donations, interest earnings, and City support. of the facility’s intended purpose. If the goal is to maximize community • Cost recovery is heavily influenced by usage, rental pricing, staffing access, lower cost recovery may be requirements, and community programming objectives. acceptable. Conversely, a stronger • Financial performance reflects a hybrid operating model that prioritizes event-focused model would both community access and revenue generation. emphasize increased revenue generation and improved usage. • Future operational decisions will require balancing financial sustainability with community benefit. 40 | Existing Conditions Assessment City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 144 of 568Programming + Facility Use The SCEC accommodates a diverse mix of community programs, recurring rentals, civic functions, and private events. Facility use varies throughout the year and reflects its dual role as both a community gathering space and event venue. Existing scheduling patterns provide insight into current demand, recurring user groups, and opportunities to increase use. Major User Groups Municipal + Community Use SCEC serves a variety of users and organizations, In addition to public rentals and recreation programming, recurring and sporadically, including: the facility supports a variety of City and community functions at little or no cost to users. Based on 2025 • SouthShore • Business and usage, these events represent approximately $6,960 Senior Partners professional groups in annual rental value that would otherwise need to be absorbed through department budgets or paid to an • Just For Kix Dance • City-sponsored meetings and functions outside venue. Examples include: • Community organizations and • Recreation, • Elections and civic functions nonprofit groups educational, and • Council and committee meetings enrichment programs • Private event renters • Community events Together, these users create a diverse programming • Public safety celebrations and recognition events mix that supports community access while generating revenue through rentals and events. • Staff training and retreats Usage Patterns Review of rental reports, schedules, and recurring reservations identified several consistent patterns in facility use. Weekday daytime hours are heavily influenced by senior programming and activities coordinated Weekday by SSSP. While these activities provide significant community value and maintain regular use of Daytime Use the facility, the anticipated transition of SSSP operations at the end of 2026 may alter future use patterns and create opportunities to re-evaluate daytime programming and facility use. Evening hours represent some of the most consistently utilized periods within the facility. Recurring Weekday rentals, youth activities, meetings, classes, and community programming contribute to steady Evening Use demand during these time periods. Weekend facility use is more variable and is often driven by private event rentals including Weekend celebrations, receptions, meetings, and special events. Usage levels can fluctuate significantly Use depending on season, event schedules, and marketing efforts. Facility use varies throughout the year, with certain programs and rental activities concentrated Seasonal during specific seasons. Weather, school calendars, community events, and recreation schedules Trends all influence demand patterns and should be considered when evaluating future programming and marketing efforts. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Existing Conditions Assessment | 41 Page 145 of 568Recurring Rentals Monday Tuesday Banquet Room Activity Room Conference Room Kitchen Banquet Room Activity Room Conference Room Kitchen 6 a.m. 7 a.m. 8 a.m. Excelsior Chamber Engage (4th 9 a.m. PT Tuesday) Wood 10 a.m. Quilting 10 10 Knit + Carvers O’Clock O’Clock Crochet 11 a.m. Coffee Coffee Card 12 p.m. Crafters 1 p.m. Crafts + 2 p.m. Bingo Cribbage Creative Arts 3 p.m. 4 p.m. 5 p.m. 6 p.m. Dance Dance (During (During 7 p.m. School School AA Year) Year) Group 8 p.m. 9 p.m. 10 p.m. 11 p.m. 12 a.m. SSSP Programming Paid Rentals Partnership/Paid 42 | Existing Conditions Assessment City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 146 of 568 Wednesday Thursday Banquet Room Activity Room Conference Room Kitchen Banquet Room Activity Room Conference Room Kitchen 6 a.m. 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 9 a.m. Senior 10 a.m. 10 Exercise 10 O’Clock O’Clock Coffee 11 a.m. Coffee 12 p.m. Book Club (2nd 1 p.m. Thursday) 2 p.m. Bingo Bridge Just Write It! (3rd Thursday) 3 p.m. 4 p.m. 5 p.m. 6 p.m. Dance Dance (During 7 p.m. (During School School Year) Year) 8 p.m. 9 p.m. 10 p.m. 11 p.m. 12 a.m. SSSP Programming Paid Rentals Partnership/Paid City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Existing Conditions Assessment | 43 Page 147 of 568 Friday Saturday/Sunday Banquet Room Activity Room Conference Room Kitchen Banquet Room Activity Room Conference Room Kitchen 6 a.m. 7 a.m. 8 a.m. Dementia 9 a.m. Support Group (1st, 3rd, 5th 10 a.m. Wood Carvers 10 O’clock Friday) Coffee 11 a.m. 12 p.m. 318 Café 1 p.m. 2 p.m. 3 p.m. 4 p.m. 5 p.m. 6 p.m. 7 p.m. 8 p.m. 9 p.m. 10 p.m. 11 p.m. 12 a.m. SSSP Programming Paid Rentals Partnership/Paid A more refined scheduling framework, including block scheduling by season or user type, may provide greater clarity on availability and support improved use. 44 | Existing Conditions Assessment City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 148 of 568 Utilization Opportunities Scheduling Analysis of schedules and stakeholder feedback identified several + Facility opportunities to increase usage and improve overall performance. Management Recurring programs, classes, and rentals provide Considerations Expand predictable revenue and are generally easier to The flexible nature of the Recurring schedule and manage than one-time events. facility is one of its greatest Uses Opportunities may exist to attract additional strengths; however, it also recurring users during underutilized periods. introduces scheduling and operational complexity. Several weekday and seasonal time periods appear Multiple user groups often Activate to have capacity for additional programming or have different space needs, Underutilized rentals. Strategic scheduling, targeted marketing, setup requirements, staffing Time Blocks and new partnerships could help increase expectations, and preferred occupancy during these periods. reservation times. Current operations require Diversify The facility serves a broad audience but may benefit staff to balance: from expanded educational, recreational, social, and Programming enrichment programming that responds to evolving • Community programming Offerings community interests and demographic trends. and public access • Recurring tenant and Stakeholder discussions identified opportunities to user group needs Strengthen better align facility offerings with specific customer Target Market • Private event rentals groups, including seniors, community organizations, Development business users, families, and regional event renters. • City functions and meetings • Facility setup and turnover requirements Utilization Snapshot As usage increases, scheduling practices and space allocation Primary Recurring User SouthShore Senior Partners policies should become more Largest Recurring intentional and standardized to Just For Kix Rental Fee User maximize efficiency. Highest Demand Periods Weekday evenings and select weekends Lowest Demand Periods Weekday daytime (future post-SSSP) Increased usage through recurring Primary Opportunity programs, rentals, and targeted marketing City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Existing Conditions Assessment | 45 Page 149 of 568Programming + Utilization Takeaways Several themes emerged from the review of programming and facility usage: • The facility serves a diverse mix of user groups and activities. • Existing recurring users provide an important foundation of usage. • Opportunities exist to increase use during select daytime, evening, and seasonal periods. • The expected transition of SSSP will significantly affect future daytime usage patterns. • Improved scheduling strategies, targeted marketing, and expanded programming could increase facility usage while supporting both community benefit and financial sustainability. 46 | Existing Conditions Assessment City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 150 of 568Existing Conditions Summary Strengths Challenges Opportunities SCEC benefits from several Several operational and The assessment identified several characteristics that support its facility-related challenges limit opportunities that could improve continued value as a community the Center’s ability to maximize usage, strengthen financial asset and event venue. usage, improve cost recovery, and performance, and enhance expand services. community value. • Established community asset with strong local recognition • Lack of a clearly defined • Clarify the facility’s role and and history. operating focus between market position within the community center and event community and broader region. • Flexible facility capable of venue functions. accommodating a wide range • Increase usage through more of users, programs, and events. • Limited staffing capacity intentional scheduling and to support additional management of available • Attractive setting adjacent to marketing, programming, time blocks. City Hall and Badger Park. business development, and facility operations. • Expand recurring • Existing base of recurring programming, rentals, and renters and established • Dependence on strategic partnerships. user groups. volunteer-supported senior • Develop customer-focused • Dividable event and programming and customer service functions. marketing and business programming spaces development efforts. that support multiple • Underutilized periods activities simultaneously. throughout the weekly and • Better align staffing resources seasonal schedule. with operational goals and • Support kitchen and related service expectations. amenities that enhance • Aging facility components event capabilities. that will require • Evaluate pricing structures ongoing investment. and rental policies relative to • Historical usage and financial peer facilities. data are available to support • Pricing and rental structures future decision-making. that may not fully align • Leverage demographic trends, with market demand or including a growing senior facility positioning. population and nearby regional market growth. • Operational complexity is created by serving a diverse • Use changes in senior mix of user types and programming as an rental activities. opportunity to reevaluate daytime operations and service delivery models. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Existing Conditions Assessment | 47 Page 151 of 568Key Existing Conditions Findings Based on the assessment of facility conditions, operations, finances, usage patterns, stakeholder input, and community context, several overarching findings emerged: 1 2 The facility provides substantial community Increasing usage represents the single greatest value but is unlikely to operate as a fully opportunity to improve both community impact self-supporting enterprise. and financial performance. 3 4 The facility’s hybrid identity as both Marketing, customer recruitment, and a community center and event venue business development functions appear to creates flexibility, but also introduces be under-resourced relative to the City’s operational complexity. usage goals. 5 6 The anticipated transition of SouthShore Senior Staff resources are largely Partners will have significant implications for focused on maintaining existing staffing, programming, customer service, and services rather than pursuing facility operations. growth opportunities. 7 Future success will depend on aligning staffing, programming, pricing, marketing, and operations around a clearly defined strategic direction. 48 | Existing Conditions Assessment City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 152 of 56805 Benchmark Comparison Analysis Page 153 of 568Public Facility Analysis Facilities Reviewed Purpose of Benchmark Seven facilities were analyzed as part of this benchmark analysis, including: Comparison • SCEC This market analysis was conducted to benchmark • Brooklyn Park Community Activity Center comparable community • Gillespie Center and event facilities across the region and evaluate • Plymouth Community Center how SCEC aligns with • Maple Grove Community Center existing market offerings. The analysis inventoried • Brookview Golden Valley key characteristics of • The Marsh (City of Minnetonka) peer facilities, including facility size and capacity, The comparison shows that while SCEC is competitively priced, programming and event particularly for large rooms on an hourly basis, it has fewer rooms types, pricing structures, and a lower overall capacity than most peer facilities. This limits its user groups, and flexibility and ability to accommodate a wider range of events. operational policies and Competitors generally offer more diverse room types and, in several practices. By comparing cases, additional amenities such as outdoor ceremony spaces, these elements across which enhance their overall value. Across room sizes, pricing is a range of venues, consistent, but facilities differentiate themselves through capacity, the study provides pricing structure—hourly versus daily for example—and the range of tangible benchmarks available spaces. Maple Grove Community Center and Brooklyn Park for understanding Community Activity Center stood out for strong event-oriented value and Gillespie Center offered more competitive hourly rates. market conditions and identifying opportunities for Shorewood to expand Fees, Catering, and Alcohol Policies services, strengthen usage, and better align The comparison shows a wide range of policies related to fees, its offerings with regional catering, and alcohol service across facilities, which significantly trends and customer influence overall event flexibility and cost. SCEC is one of the more flexible and affordable options, allowing outside food and alcohol with expectations. The findings minimal additional fees and only a modest large-group surcharge. In are intended to inform contrast, many peer facilities, such as the Plymouth Community Center future decisions regarding and the Maple Grove Community Center, require the use of exclusive facility operations, or approved caterers and prohibit outside food and beverages, often programming, and increasing total event costs. The Gillespie Center and Brookview long‑term revenue and Golden Valley also rely on preferred or on-site catering, while the service strategies. Brooklyn Park Community Activity Center and The Marsh offer more flexibility with outside food and beverage. Most facilities include additional fees for alcohol service. 50 | Benchmark Comparison Analysis City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 154 of 568Event Facility Comparison The table provides an overview of the number of rooms at each facility, including total capacity and whether there is an outdoor ceremony space for rent. Out of the seven facilities compared, SCEC had the fewest rooms available and the second lowest overall capacity. Four of the seven facilities rented an outdoor ceremony space. Facility Rooms Total Capacity Outdoor Ceremony Space Brooklyn Park Community Activity Center 7 692 Yes Brookview Golden Valley 7 314 Yes Gillespie Center 5 670 No Maple Grove Community Center 7 464 No Plymouth Community Center 7 486 Yes SCEC 3 275 No The Marsh 5 230 Yes Medium‑Large Room Value Comparison Among medium-large room (100-199 occupants) competitors, the Maple Grove Community Center offers the lowest equivalent hourly rate among the day-rate venues. SCEC offers strong value by pairing relatively low hourly rates with a larger 160-person capacity, while the Plymouth Community Center and The Marsh trend toward the higher end of the pricing range. Facility Capacity Hourly Cost Cost Listed Per Hour/Day Maple Grove Community Center* 128 $39.25 to $69 Day SCEC 160 $65 to $115 Hour Brooklyn Park Community Activity Center 100 $70 to $95 Both, but hourly rate was used Gillespie Center 100 $70 to $100 Hour Plymouth Community Center* 128 $87.50 to $103.13 Day The Marsh 100 $130 to $230 Hour Plymouth Community Center* 139 $195 to $240 Hour *To compare hourly and daily pricing on the same basis, daily venues were converted to hourly rates by dividing the total day rate by eight hours. The Plymouth Community Center has two rooms in this capacity range. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Benchmark Comparison Analysis | 51 Page 155 of 568Public Venue Comparison Table Rooms at the seven facilities are organized by room size, capacity, and cost. The range in cost is attributed to resident and non-resident rates across the various days being combined. If a range was provided for the capacity, the highest value with tables and chairs was considered. Room Size: Very Large 300+ Occupants Facility Capacity Cost Notes Brooklyn Park Community Activity Center 330 $700 to $1,140/day Only three of the seven facilities Gillespie Center 300 $120 to $140/hour had a room with capacity for 300 or more. Plymouth Community Center 300 $1,100 to $3,810/day Room Size: Large 200–299 Occupants Facility Capacity Cost Notes Maple Grove Community Center 256 $520 to $1,091/day SCEC Banquet Room capacity fits 160 with tables and chairs and 200 if only chairs, so Gillespie Center 200 $90 to $100/hour it is classified as a medium large room. $105 to $180/hour or Brookview Golden Valley 200 $1,600 to $2,400/day SCEC offers pricing on the lower end of both the medium large Brooklyn Park Community Activity Center 200 $420 to $1,300/day and large rooms range. Room Size: Medium Large 100–199 Occupants Facility Capacity Cost Notes SCEC 160 $65 to $115/hour Plymouth Community Center 139 $195 to $240/hour A large room value comparison Maple Grove Community Center 128 $314 to $552/day to normalize hourly versus daily rates can be found in the Plymouth Community Center 128 $700 to $825/day following table. $70 to $95/hour or The Plymouth Community Brooklyn Park Community Activity Center 100 $230 to $460/day Center has two rooms available in this range. Gillespie Center 100 $70 to $100/hour The Marsh 100 $130 to $230/hour 52 | Benchmark Comparison Analysis City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 156 of 568 Room Size: Medium 40–99 Occupants Facility Capacity Cost Notes The Marsh 80 $55 to $100/hour Maple Grove Community Center 80 $529 to $617/day Brookview Golden Valley 64 $70 to $105/hour The Marsh offers the lowest starting rates for higher-capacity rooms, SCEC and Plymouth SCEC 60 $65 to $85/hour Community Center provide mid-range value, and Brookview Gillespie Center 60 $80 to $100/hour Golden Valley and Gillespie Center generally trend toward Plymouth Community Center 46 $65/hour the higher end of hourly costs. The Marsh 50 $45 to $85/hour Brookview Golden Valley 50 $85 to $100/hour Room Size: Small 1–39 Occupants Facility Capacity Cost Notes Maple Grove Community Center 15 to 36 $39 to $50/hour Brookview Golden Valley 25 $55 to $65/hour The Marsh 25 $85 to $135/hour SCEC 15 $30 to $50/hour Small room pricing is largely consistent across facilities, Plymouth Community Center 12 $30 to $40/hour with most hourly rates between $30 and $50. Brooklyn Park Community Activity Center 12 $30 to $40/day The Marsh 12 $46 to $85/hour Brookview Golden Valley 10 $30 to $40/hour Gillespie Center 10 $50/hour Note: Capacities are approximate and based on analyzed room offerings described in the comparison set. Rate formats vary by facility (hourly/daily), and pricing can vary by year (Gillespie Center rates are 2023), so pricing should be considered directional rather than one-to-one. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Benchmark Comparison Analysis | 53 Page 157 of 568Key Takeaways Shorewood already provides a strong baseline of event-support amenities, Amenity Options including audio-visual, furnishings, kitchen access, and linens. There is to Enhance Event opportunity to further enhance the event experience by offering additional optional amenities that allow renters to customize their space and elevate the Experience overall atmosphere. To control staffing costs, storage needs, and operating costs, a turnkey approach of partnering with rental and event support providers is recommended. Some examples of enhancements include: • Rentable arches, boards, or other photo backdrops • Expanded lighting options (uplighting, decorative lighting packages) • Linens and dishes • DJs and music options • Bundled add-on packages for common event types (meetings, receptions, celebrations) Several regional competitors integrate outdoor elements such as ceremony Promote + areas, patios, decks, or scenic backdrops into their event offerings. SCEC Integrate with already benefits from a wooded setting and adjacency to Badger Park, creating an opportunity to more intentionally use and promote these spaces as Outdoor Space part of the rental experience without requiring major capital investment. for Events An opportunity for SCEC to expand its competitiveness relative to peer Space facilities is constrained by the lack of a true large-event venue space. While Constraints SCEC offers competitive hourly pricing and a flexible layout, its maximum practical event capacity is limited to approximately 160 people, which falls below the larger formats available at several comparable facilities. Many peer venues include dedicated spaces that accommodate 200 to 300+ attendees, allowing them to capture a wider range of events such as large weddings, banquets, and community gatherings. Without comparable large-capacity space, SCEC’s ability to compete for these higher-attendance event types remains limited. 54 | Benchmark Comparison Analysis City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 158 of 56806 Market Positioning, Customer Development, and Marketing Strategy Page 159 of 568Overview While the facility's flexibility is a significant asset, a broad and The long‑term undefined identity can limit marketing effectiveness, create success of SCEC uncertainty around operational priorities, and make it difficult to allocate resources toward activities that generate the greatest depends on its ability community benefit and usage. to clearly define its A focused market positioning and marketing strategy should: role in the market, • Increase awareness of the facility and its offerings. identify priority • Improve usage during underperforming days and times. customer groups, • Attract customer groups that align with the City's preferred and consistently operating model. communicate its value • Improve customer retention and repeat bookings. • Support both community programming and to both residents and revenue-generating activities. non‑resident users. 56 | Market Positioning, Customer Development, and Marketing Strategy City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 160 of 568Target Markets + Customer Profiles Successful marketing begins with a clear understanding of who the facility is intended to serve. The Community & Event Center serves multiple audiences, each with different needs, expectations, and motivations. Community Users Community users include Shorewood residents, civic groups, nonprofit organizations, schools, and recreation participants. These users help support the facility’s role as a community asset and contribute to regular usage throughout the year. Primary Needs Potential Uses • Accessibility and affordability • Elections and polling places • Consistent programming opportunities • Board meetings • Community gathering space • Neighborhood association meetings • Flexible meeting and event facilities • Health and fitness classes • Community engagement events Event Hosts Event hosts include individuals and families seeking space for celebrations, gatherings, and milestone events. Primary Needs Potential Uses • Attractive event setting • Weddings • Flexible rental options • Receptions • Convenient planning process • Family gatherings • Competitive pricing • Bridal and baby showers • Reliable customer service • Celebrations of life • Graduation parties • Anniversary celebrations City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Market Positioning, Customer Development, and Marketing Strategy | 57 Page 161 of 568 Businesses + Organizations Businesses, associations, nonprofit organizations, and professional groups represent an important opportunity for weekday usage. Primary Needs Potential Uses • Meeting and workshop space • Team retreats • Technology and presentation capabilities • Strategic planning sessions • Convenient location • Board meetings • Professional environment • Training events • Small conferences Program Participants Program participants may include seniors, adults, youth, families, and special-interest groups seeking recreational, educational, cultural, or social opportunities. Primary Needs Potential Uses • High-quality programming The anticipated transition of senior programming operations creates an opportunity to reevaluate • Convenient scheduling future programming strategies and identify • Affordable participation opportunities additional audiences that could benefit from facility-based programs. • Ongoing engagement 58 | Market Positioning, Customer Development, and Marketing Strategy City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 162 of 568Events + Markets 2026 2025 2024* Through July 13 Event Total Events Total Paid Total Events Total Paid Total Events Total Paid Baby Shower 1 $1,610.00 1 $407.0 0 2 $963.00 Banquet 4 $722.50 3 $894.50 4 $825.00 Birthday Party 2 $930.00 12 $4,579.00 1 $665.00 Bridal Shower 2 $857.50 1 $465.00 N/A N/A Celebration of Life 4 $1,735.00 7 $3,206.00 1 $295.00 Formal 4 $1,302.75 2 $550.00 2 $1,035.00 Grad Party 4 $2,135.00 5 $2,898.50 N/A N/A Retirement Party N/A N/A 1 $177.0 0 N/A N/A Wedding 1 $1,000.00 2 $707.0 0 6 $2,708.83 AA 27 $756.00 55 $3,454.50 38 $988.00 Business Meeting 12 $1,626.00 42 $2,241.00 35 $1,423.00 Church Group N/A N/A 46 $10,343.25 48 $8,892.50 Dance 73 $8,640.00 134 $14,340.00 85 $8,500.00 Fair/Sale 2 $1,530.00 N/A N/A 1 $860.00 HOA Meeting 6 $977.50 11 $1,715.00 8 $1,145.20 Kitchen (Individual) 4 $480.00 6 $180.00 5 $210.00 Kitchen (Monthly) 28 $2,625.00 52 $4,725.00 N/A $4,325.00 10 O'Clock Coffee 121 $980.00 260 $1,680.00 260 $1,680.00 Seminar N/A N/A 8 $3,038.00 N/A N/A Spanish Camp 4 $2,410.00 18 $6,119.00 18 $6,055.00 Yoga N/A N/A 1 $375.00 N/A N/A Civic/Political 4 $715.63 2 $85.50 1 $295.00 Cultural Event 1 $688.08 1 $374.50 14 $4,289.18 Dinner 1 $720.00 4 $1,600.50 2 $565.00 Other 4 $1,103.63 5 $1,567.50 20 $5,098.40 Total 309 $33,544.59 679 $65,722.75 551 $50,818.11 Event hosts Program participants Businesses + organizations Community users *CivicRec software was implemented in 2024, so previous years’ data accuracy is limited. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Market Positioning, Customer Development, and Marketing Strategy | 59 Page 163 of 568Market Positioning Based on user input, facility characteristics, usage patterns, and benchmark analysis, the Community & Event Center is best positioned as a: Core Community-Focused Venue with Event Flexibility Positioning Rather than competing directly with large banquet facilities or destination event venues, the facility should emphasize its strengths as: Statement • A community gathering place. SCEC provides a welcoming, flexible, • A flexible event and meeting venue. and affordable • A convenient location for celebrations and organizational events. space for community gathering, recreation, • A space that balances community access and revenue generation. meetings, and special This hybrid positioning recognizes the facility’s physical limitations while events while serving leveraging its strengths related to affordability, flexibility, location, and as an important civic community value. asset for residents and visitors alike. 60 | Market Positioning, Customer Development, and Marketing Strategy City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 164 of 568Branding + Messaging Strategy Messaging Priorities Marketing materials should consistently reinforce: Facility Flexibility Affordability Once a desired market position has been established, all communications + Value should reinforce a consistent message regarding who the facility serves and the experiences it provides. Core Messaging Themes Attractive Natural Setting Community Emphasize the center’s role as a welcoming space for connection, recreation, education, and Gathering Place civic engagement. Highlight the facility’s wooded setting, proximity to Badger Park, and ability to host Ease of Booking + Scenic Event Venue memorable celebrations in a comfortable, Customer Support community-oriented environment. Promote the facility as an accessible and Flexible Meeting + convenient option for meetings, workshops, Event Space celebrations, and organizational events. Community Connection + Engagement City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Market Positioning, Customer Development, and Marketing Strategy | 61 Page 165 of 568Marketing Channels + Tactics Digital Foundations Program + Event Promotion Several opportunities exist to strengthen Marketing efforts should support both the facility’s digital presence and community programming and private rentals. improve discoverability. Potential strategies include: Potential improvements include: • Promoting facility programs through • Enhanced website organization City communications. and navigation. - Promotion through Parks and • Search engine optimization (SEO) and Recreation programming metadata enhancements. • Regularly highlighting facility success • Improved online visibility for room rentals stories and events. and programming opportunities. • Seasonal marketing campaigns • High-quality photography featuring targeting event types such as actual events and facility users. graduations, meetings, celebrations, and holiday gatherings. • Virtual tours and updated room descriptions. • Expanded use of social media to showcase facility use and amenities. • More intentional alignment between website content and target • Consistent promotion of recurring customer groups. programs and activities. A strong digital presence is particularly important because many prospective users begin their search online. Targeted Outreach Outreach should focus on groups most likely to generate repeat usage. Examples include: • Community organizations • Schools and educational organizations • Local businesses • Event planners • Nonprofit groups • Existing renters and program providers 62 | Market Positioning, Customer Development, and Marketing Strategy City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 166 of 568Partnership‑Based Marketing Strategic partnerships can significantly expand marketing reach while minimizing additional demands on City resources. Partnerships can provide referral opportunities, increase awareness, and improve customer experience through coordinated promotion and service delivery Potential Partnership Opportunities Caterers Florists Event Planners Photographers Community Organizations Local Businesses Chamber of Recreation + Schools + Community Commerce Partners Sports Organizations Education Providers City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Market Positioning, Customer Development, and Marketing Strategy | 63 Page 167 of 568Booking + Customer Experience Marketing effectiveness is closely connected to customer experience. Users who encounter a clear, responsive, and professional booking process are more likely to proceed with a reservation and recommend the facility to others. Opportunities include: • Simplifying rental information and policies. • Providing transparent pricing structures. • Improving responsiveness to inquiries. • Standardizing room setups and rental options. • Creating event packages tailored to common customer needs. • Providing clearer guidance regarding amenities, procedures, and available services. A positive booking experience can be one of the most effective forms of marketing by generating repeat reservations and positive word-of-mouth referrals. 64 | Market Positioning, Customer Development, and Marketing Strategy City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 168 of 56807 Operational Scenarios Page 169 of 568Key Operational Drivers To support decision‑making, ISG developed three operational scenarios for SCEC that reflect different levels of staffing investment, service delivery, and operational support. The scenarios are informed by existing conditions, stakeholder input, and benchmarking of comparable facilities. While each scenario represents a different level of financial commitment, all are influenced by several key operational drivers that will affect and influence future facility performance regardless of the approach ultimately selected. The anticipated dissolution of SSSP at the end of 2026 represents the most significant Loss of operational change facing the facility. SSSP currently provides senior programming, volunteer staffing, participant communications, front desk support, and a daytime Volunteer presence within the facility. Supported As these services transition away from SSSP, the City will need to determine what Senior level of programming, customer service, and facility support it intends to continue providing. Existing staff capacity is limited, and without additional resources, Programming maintaining current service levels may be challenging. + Facility The transition presents both challenges and opportunities. Additional staffing could support continued senior programming, customer service, and facility operations, Operations while also increasing capacity for marketing, programming, and utilization efforts. Alternatively, modifications to the service delivery model, such as consolidating senior programming into fewer days per week, could reduce staffing demands while increasing facility availability for rentals and other programming. It is recommended to continue to charge a annual membership for most senior programs. This method continues the approach of SSSP and other similar types of facilities. The annual rate should be adjusted to coincide with the amount and types of programs offered. Implications • Loss of approximately $7,200 in annual revenue associated with SSSP activities. • Reduced volunteer presence and daytime customer service support. • Potential need for additional staffing resources to maintain current service levels. • Replacing key SSSP operational functions may require approximately 0.5 FTE equivalent staffing support. • Increased City responsibility for senior programming and participant support. • Opportunities to redesign programming and facility operations to better align with long-term goals. • Potential to consolidate senior programming and create additional rental availability. 66 | Operational Scenarios City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 170 of 568 Current staff are operating at capacity. As a result, staffing levels will be the primary Staffing factor influencing how the City can pursue program growth, rental recruitment, Levels + customer service improvements, and usage management. Higher staffing levels provide greater flexibility to support programming, rentals, Organizational scheduling, marketing implementation, and customer service. Lower staffing levels Capacity generally require prioritization of existing services and may limit growth opportunities. Implications • Influences the City’s ability to maintain senior programming. • Impacts customer responsiveness and facility oversight. • Determines the capacity available for rental recruitment and programming growth. • Directly affects usage and cost recovery opportunities. All scenarios assume a minimum of 5% increase in rental rates. Benchmarking indicates 5% Base that SCEC remains competitively priced and generally falls at the lower end of the Rental Rate  market for comparable medium-large, medium, and small event spaces. As a result, a modest rate increase is unlikely to alter the facility’s competitive position while providing Increase additional revenue support. The City may also consider implementing a higher rental rate for non-residents, to be implemented by a percent increase compared to residents. Rental rates and program fees should be analyzed and adjusted on an annual basis to ensure revenue generation and lessen large increases in the future. Implications • Generates modest revenue growth across all scenarios. • Maintains competitive positioning within the marketplace. • Supports improved cost recovery. • Creates greater financial benefit when paired with increased rental activity and marketing efforts. Scenarios two and three assume an increase in contracted marketing services to Enhanced improve awareness, facility usage, and rental recruitment. Marketing As recommended, Marketing should include website improvements, photography, promotional materials, rental outreach, event promotion, and digital communications. Support The effectiveness of these efforts will depend on the City’s ability to respond to inquiries, convert leads into bookings, and manage customer relationships. Some efforts may be able to be implemented by city staff; however, a budget increase in contracted services is proposed to engage marketing expertise to address the suggestions listed in the Marketing and Position section of the report. Implications • Increased awareness of facility offerings. • Supports rental recruitment and program participation. • Most effective when supported by adequate City staffing capacity. • Improves alignment between facility goals and target audiences. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Operational Scenarios | 67 Page 171 of 568Operational Scenarios Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Current Staffing + Senior Programming Backfill Service Adjustments + Limited Enhancement Key Drivers Key Drivers • No increase in staffing. • Replaces a 0.5 Recreation Specialist with a 1.0 Recreation Coordinator. • Decrease in senior programming and hours of operation. • Staffing primarily focused on replacing volunteer-supported senior programming functions • Senior programming transitions from volunteers to with some ability to recruit rentals + programs. existing City staff. • 5% rental rate increase. • Volunteer reduction expected along with less replacement of staff duties. • Increased contracted marketing support to deliver strategies and templates. • 5% rental rate increase + no volume increase. • Some Senior membership revenue. Likely Results This scenario is primarily focused on maintaining continuity rather than creating significant operational Likely Results growth. Additional staffing capacity allows the City to Since existing staff are already operating at capacity, continue senior programming after SSSP dissolution and maintaining current service levels would be challenging. provide weekday operational support while reducing The loss of SSSP volunteer support, of approximately disruption associated with the loss of volunteers. 0.5 FTE, would likely require reductions in programming, facility oversight, or other operational activities to Because most of the added capacity is directed toward accommodate new responsibilities. replacing existing volunteer services, only modest improvements in programming expansion, rental activity, The rental rate increase would provide modest revenue and facility usage are anticipated. improvement, but staffing limitations could restrict the City’s ability to capitalize on internal marketing efforts, recruit new rentals, or pursue programming growth. Expected Outcomes • Maintains senior programming service levels. • Reduces operational disruption created by Expected Outcomes volunteer loss. • Improves weekday program administration • Lowest financial investment. and participant communication. • Reduction in programming or service levels. • Supports modest usage growth. • Increased reliance on part-time staffing for • Provides moderate improvement in facility coverage. financial performance. • Limited opportunity for utilization growth. • Represents a balanced approach between • Modest improvement in financial performance. investment and service continuity. 68 | Operational Scenarios City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 172 of 568 Scenario 3 Decision-Making Considerations Expanded Hybrid Operations, The primary decision for the City is how much Programming, and Rental Increases staffing investment it Key Drivers is willing to make in response to the loss of • Maintains a .5 Recreation Specialist and adds a 1.0 Recreation Coordinator volunteer-supported and a .5 Recreation Specialist. senior programming. • Senior programming backfill plus expanded operational responsibilities. Scenario 1 minimizes financial • 5% rental rate increase. commitment but • Increased contracted marketing support to deliver strategies, templates likely requires service reductions and provides and Implementation. limited opportunity for Likely Results operational improvement. The addition of staff capacity not only replaces volunteer-supported senior programming functions but also creates the ability to expand facility Scenario 2 focuses on maintaining scheduling, rental recruitment, community programming, customer service, existing service levels and overall facility management. through a modest staffing Combined with enhanced marketing efforts and modest rental rate investment and offers a transition strategy. adjustments, this scenario presents the strongest opportunity to improve facility use, revenue generation, and cost recovery. This scenario assumes Scenario 3 a phased growth period with annual revenue increases of approximately provides the strongest 15%, 10%, and 8%, while operating expenses are projected to increase alignment with the by approximately 3% annually. Under these assumptions, facility cost preferred hybrid recovery improves significantly while supporting a higher level of service and operating model and community use. offers the greatest opportunity for improved usage, customer experience, and financial Expected Outcomes performance, but requires • Maintains and strengthens senior programming. the highest level of ongoing investment. • Expands community programming opportunities. • Improves rental recruitment and customer responsiveness. • Supports more intentional scheduling and usage management. • Enhances customer experience. • Creates the greatest opportunity for improved cost recovery and revenue generation. • Requires the highest staffing investment and produces the largest revenue to expense difference. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Operational Scenarios | 69 Page 173 of 568Scenario Summary Budget Metric Actual 2025 Budget 2026 Proposed 2027 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 3 (2030) Revenue $87,364 $71,150 $84,500 $89,000 $94,300 $122,320 $167,20 0 Expense $174,501 $152,030 $201,971 $155,371 $211,668 $274,047 $299,458 Difference ($86,867) ($80,880) ($117,471) ($66,371) ($117,709) ($151,727) ($132,258) Cost Recovery 50% 47% 42% 57% 44% 45% 56% Subsidy/General $122,000 $145,000 $177,677 — — — — Fund Contribution Capital Investment $5,995 $21,500 $32,021 $32,021 $32,021 $75,000 TBD 70 | Operational Scenarios City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 174 of 56808 Recommendations + Implementation Strategy Page 175 of 568SCEC serves an important role as both a community gathering space and event venue. Through the review of facility operations, stakeholder input, usage patterns, market comparisons, and operational scenarios, several opportunities emerged to strengthen the facility's performance, improve usage, enhance customer experiences, and support long-term sustainability. The recommendations presented in this chapter are intended to: • Clarify the facility's operational direction. • Improve usage and financial performance. • Enhance customer and renter experiences. • Strengthen marketing and customer development efforts. • Align staffing, operations, and programming with long-term goals. • Support implementation of the preferred operational scenario. Together, these recommendations provide a roadmap for improving both community value and operational effectiveness while maintaining flexibility for future adjustments. Preferred Operational Direction The analysis supports a hybrid community operational model as the preferred long-term operational direction for SCEC. This approach balances: Community access and Revenue-generating Recreational, Operational flexibility public benefit. rentals and events. educational, and social and responsiveness. programming. Rather than pursuing either a purely event-focused venue or a traditional community center model, the hybrid approach recognizes the facility's existing strengths, physical limitations, community expectations, and financial realities. Under this model, the facility continues to serve as a valued community asset while pursuing strategic opportunities to improve usage, increase revenue generation, and strengthen customer experiences. 72 | Recommendations + Implementation Strategy City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 176 of 568Key Recommendations Recommendation Justification Priority Timeframe Establishes a consistent foundation Define and Communicate a 1 for operations, marketing, pricing, and High Near-Term Clear Facility Identity future decisions. Usage represents the greatest opportunity Increase Usage Through 2 to improve both community impact and High Near-Term Intentional Scheduling financial performance. Align Pricing with Market Supports revenue goals while maintaining 3 High Near-Term Position and Demand accessibility and competitiveness. Develop a Customer-Focused Improves awareness, attracts new users, and 4 High Near-Term Marketing Program strengthens repeat business. Enhance the Encourages repeat rentals, positive referrals, 5 Medium Near-Term Customer Experience and stronger community perception. Align Staffing and Operations Ensures sufficient capacity to implement 6 High Mid-Term with Operational Goals marketing, programming, and facility initiatives. Implement Strategic Facility Supports usage, customer experience, and 7 Medium Mid-Term Improvements operational efficiency. Develop a Programming and Supports usage growth, community value, and 8 High Mid-Term Partnership Strategy service diversification. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Recommendations + Implementation Strategy | 73 Page 177 of 568 While flexibility remains an important strength of the facility, a clearly defined 1: Define and identity will improve decision-making and help consistently communicate the Communicate facility’s purpose to residents, renters, staff, and partners. a Clear Facility Action Steps Identity • Formally adopt the preferred hybrid operating model. • Develop a facility positioning statement. • Align policies, pricing, scheduling, and marketing efforts with the selected direction. • Communicate the preferred operating model through all customer-facing materials. Increasing usage represents the most significant opportunity to improve both 2: Increase community impact and financial performance. Future scheduling practices Usage Through should focus on balancing community use, programming opportunities, and revenue-generating rentals. Intentional Action Steps Scheduling • Implement seasonal or user-based scheduling blocks. • Identify underutilized periods and actively market available space. • Establish scheduling priorities and use guidelines. • Monitor room usage by season, day, and time of day. The benchmark analysis indicates that SCEC remains competitively priced 3: Align Pricing within the regional marketplace. Continued evaluation of pricing structures can with Market help improve cost recovery while maintaining accessibility. Position and Action Steps Demand • Regularly benchmark rates against comparable facilities. • Evaluate tiered pricing by demand period, room type, and user group. • Consider premium pricing during peak periods. • Maintain affordable options for priority community uses. 74 | Recommendations + Implementation Strategy City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 178 of 568 Marketing should focus on attracting target customer groups, increasing 4: Develop a awareness, and supporting repeat usage. Customer‑Focused Action Steps Marketing • Develop customer profiles and target market segments. Program • Improve website organization, navigation, and booking visibility. • Implement search engine optimization (SEO) best practices. • Expand photography and marketing materials featuring real facility users and events. • Promote both facility rentals and community programming through City communication channels. • Develop partnerships with event service providers and community organizations. A positive customer experience encourages repeat bookings, generates 5: Enhance referrals, and strengthens the facility’s reputation within the community. Customer Action Steps Experience • Simplify rental policies and customer documentation. • Consolidate rental materials into a user-friendly renter guide. • Improve responsiveness to customer inquiries. • Create standardized room setup options. • Develop event packages and partnership referrals for common rental types. Staffing resources are largely focused on maintaining existing operations. 6: Align Staffing Additional capacity may be necessary to support increased usage, expanded + Operations with programming, and implementation of marketing initiatives. Operational Goals Action Steps • Evaluate staffing impacts associated with the preferred operational scenario. • Clarify responsibilities for marketing, programming, rentals, and customer service. • Explore partnerships, contracted services, and volunteer support opportunities. • Develop a transition plan for senior programming and support services following the dissolution of SSSP. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Recommendations + Implementation Strategy | 75 Page 179 of 568 Targeted improvements can enhance customer experiences while supporting 7: Implement operational efficiency and long-term sustainability. Strategic Facility Action Steps Improvements • Evaluate conversion of the kitchen to a warming/cooling kitchen model. • Continue implementation of capital improvements identified in the Facility Condition Assessment. • Improve furnishings, decor, and event-support amenities. • Explore lower-cost event enhancements such as lighting packages, decorative furnishings, and outdoor event amenities. • Prioritize projects that provide meaningful user benefits while minimizing ongoing operating costs. Programming and partnerships represent important tools for increasing usage, 8: Develop a expanding community benefit, and diversifying facility activity throughout Programming the year. + Partnership Action Steps Strategy • Establish priority programming areas following the transition of senior services. • Expand partnerships with schools, recreation providers, nonprofits, and community organizations. • Develop formal agreements or MOU’s with current and future partners. • Identify recurring programs and rentals that support predictable usage. • Pursue programs that align with demographic trends, community interests, and identified market opportunities. • Use partnerships to expand marketing reach and reduce operational burdens. 76 | Recommendations + Implementation Strategy City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 180 of 568Implementation Roadmap Near‑Term Mid‑Term Long‑Term Priorities Priorities Considerations (0–12 Months) (1–3 Years) (3+ Years) • Confirm and adopt the • Expand strategic • Reassess facility positioning preferred hybrid operating marketing efforts. as demographics and market model. conditions evolve. • Build partnerships with • Update facility positioning and community organizations and • Continue implementing messaging. event service providers. capital improvements. • Improve website organization • Refine programming and rental • Evaluate emerging and marketing materials. offerings based on demand. programming and partnership opportunities. • Implement targeted scheduling • Evaluate staffing needs and improvements. service delivery models. • Pursue additional amenities or facility enhancements • Review pricing structures and • Complete priority facility if supported by rental policies. and customer experience demonstrated demand. improvements. • Develop a transition strategy • Periodically update for senior programming and • Monitor usage growth and pricing, marketing, and support services. financial performance. operational strategies to • Begin development of remain competitive. customer profiles and target market strategies. City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Recommendations + Implementation Strategy | 77 Page 181 of 568Ongoing Evaluation Successful implementation will require regular monitoring and periodic adjustment. The City should establish an annual review process that evaluates both operational and community outcomes. Recommended Performance Measures Facility usage by room and time of day. Utilization Metrics Number of rentals by customer type. Recurring versus one-time reservations. Cost recovery performance. Financial Metrics Revenue by program and rental category. Revenue per reservation. Customer satisfaction. Repeat rental rates. Customer Metrics Referral sources. Program participation trends. Community program attendance. Senior participation. Community Impact Metrics Partnership activity. Community access and usage trends. Regular evaluation of these metrics will allow the City to adjust strategies, respond to changing conditions, and ensure that SCEC continues to balance community value, usage, and financial sustainability. 78 | Recommendations + Implementation Strategy City of Shorewood Community & Event Center Operational Analysis Page 182 of 568This page is intentionally left blank. Page 183 of 568Page 184 of 568Community & Event Center Operational Analysis City Council Meeting September 14, 2026 Page 185 of 568Project Overview Purpose Support informed decision-making to improve usage and position the facility for long-term sustainability. Focus Areas Facility Operations Financial Performance Community Use Market Positioning Page 186 of 568Engagement Process + Stakeholder Input Approach • Document + Data Review • Market + Benchmark Analysis • Facility Users + Task • Customer Profile Development + Force Engagement Marketing Assessment • Facility + Operational Assessment • Scenario Evaluation + Recommendation Development Page 187 of 568 Project Background + Objectives 2025 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec November 24 February 18 May 27 Facility Assessment City Council Annual Retreat Cost Recovery Discussion Findings Presented April 28 October 9 Council Discussion of Task Force (TF) Framework Facility Assessment Initiated 2026 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Document + Data Review Draft Report Development Final Report Task Force August 26 Formation TF Meeting 4 September 14 April 9 May 20 July 9 August 12 City Council Project Kickoff Meeting TF Meeting 1 TF Meeting 2 TF Meeting 3 Presentation Page 188 of 568Community Survey Highlights 70 Individuals 18 Questions Page 189 of 568Survey Highlights: Improvements Which improvements or enhancements would most influence your desire Other Responses: to rent or visit the facility in the future (select top 3 choices)? 47 responses • Need for stronger marketing Updated restrooms and finishes and visibility to showcase Updated rental spaces and finishes facility offerings New furniture or equipment • More on-site available staff Technology or audio-visual upgrades • Specialized Different rental structure or packages rental rates for groups with Expanded programming or community events limited budgets • Facility currently Other (please specify) works well or that no major updates 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% are needed Page 190 of 568Survey Highlights: Frequency of Events + Activities Which best describes the event or activity you have used the facility most frequently for in the past three years? 67 responses Private social event (wedding, birthday, celebration, etc.) Business or organization meeting Community event that is open to the public Recreational program or event (dance, Arctic Fever, Oktoberfest, camp, etc.) Senior program or weekday activity 0% 10% 20% 30% Page 191 of 568 Task Force Themes Operational Strengths + Challenges Future Aspirations Page 192 of 568Task Force Takeaways Community Value Remains the Future Success Will Require Strategic Foundation of Future Decision‑Making Partnerships Increased Usage Represents the Programming and Rental Strategies Greatest Opportunity Should Reflect Community Needs and Market Demand Phase + Align Implementation with Operational Capacity + Staffing Influence Operational Capacity Long ‑Term Success Marketing, Awareness, and Defining a Financial Sustainability Should Focus on Cost Clear Market Position are Critical Recovery Rather Than Full Self‑Sufficiency Page 193 of 568Summary of Findings Page 194 of 568Findings: Intangible Benefits • Community Connection • Senior Health + Social Well‑Being • Recreation, Enrichment, and Learning • Civic Life + Community Engagement • Community Identity + Pride • Staff Offices + Internal City Events Page 195 of 568Current Conditions • Active + Appreciated • Affordable • Lightly Staffed + Heavily Reliant on Volunteers • Opportunities for Growth • Needing Capital Investments Page 196 of 568Physical Update Opportunities • Kitchen Usage • Activity Room Updates • Overall Décor • Mechanical System Improvements Page 197 of 568Utilization Opportunities • Expand Recurring Uses • Activate Underutilized Time Blocks • Diversify Program Offerings • Strengthen Target Market Development Page 198 of 568Operational Scenarios Page 199 of 568Scenario Assumptions Current staff are at capacity Updated and strategic marketing and have duties outside efforts will result in increased use of the SCEC and increased demand for staff efforts and follow through South Shore Senior efforts have Components of each scenario can equated to a 0.5 staff effort and be interchanged and implemented are going away over time Page 200 of 568Options #1 #2 #3 Stabilize Maintain Grow + Activate the facility with minimal today’s service model the facility through new investment, through a modest additional staffing, accepting service staffing investment programming, reductions and that replaces key marketing, customer limited operational SSSP functions. service, and rental improvement. development. Page 201 of 568Scenario Summary Budget Metric Actual 2025 Budget 2026 Proposed 2027 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 3 Scenario (2030) Revenue $87,364 $71,150 $84,500 $89,000 $94,300 $122,320 $167,20 0 Expense $174,501 $152,030 $201,971 $155,371 $211,668 $274,047 $299,458 Difference ($86,867) ($80,880) ($117,471) ($66,371) ($117,70 9) ($151,727) ($132,258) Cost Recovery 50% 47% 42% 57% 44% 45% 56% Subsidy/General $122,000 $145,000 $177,677 — — — — Fund Contribution Capital Investment $5,995 $21,500 $32,021 $32,021 $32,021 $75,000 TBD Page 202 of 568Takeaways Define and Communicate a Enhance Customer Experience #1 Clear Facility Identity #5 Increase Usage Through Align Staffing + Operations with #2 Intentional Scheduling #6 Operational Goals Align Pricing with Market Implement Strategic Facility #3 Position and Demand #7 Improvements Develop a Customer‑Focused #4 Marketing Program Page 203 of 568Q+A Thank You Page 204 of 568 City Council Item 4.B. Title/Subject: Preliminary 2027 Budget, Proposed 2027 Tax Levy, and Establish Budget Hearing Date Meeting Date: September 14, 2026 Prepared By: Jeanne Schmuck, Finance Director Attachments 1. Resolution Adopting the 2027 Preliminary Property Tax Levy and Establishing the Budget Meeting Date 2. Presentation - 2027 Preliminary Levy 3. 2027 Preliminary Budget 4. 2027 - 2036 Capital Improvement Plan 5. Estimated Market Value Map 2022 Background This year six budget work sessions were held over several months where the Council reviewed the proposed City expenditures as well as projected revenues, discussed the proposed property tax levy and estimated tax rate, reviewed tax impacts on properties, updated the 10-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), and discussed the Fee Schedule (scheduled to be set in the fall). The first two work sessions consisted of goal setting, discussing the schedule and process, and direction on initiatives and expectations for the 2027 budget. The Council then reviewed the citywide personnel expenses, followed by two work sessions to review the CIP. On August 24th the Council reviewed the compiled budget. The Council is requested to adopt the preliminary budget and levy at its September 14th regular City Council meeting. The 2027 property tax levy must be certified to Hennepin County by September 30th. After certification, the preliminary levy cannot be increased but can be decreased. The City will certify the levy to Hennepin County and the information will be used in preparing truth-in-taxation notices sent to property owners in November. General Fund The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City and accounts for all revenues and expenditures which are not accounted for in other funds. It is usually the largest and most important accounting activity for the City. It receives revenue in the form of general property taxes, licenses and permits, fines and penalties, rents, charges for current services, state grants and aids, and interest earnings. In turn, the General Fund finances a larger range of municipal services, including police, fire, street and park maintenance, recreation programs, administration, planning and zoning, and building inspections. The General Fund reflects a projected revenue stream of $7,720,483, which is an increase of 4.31% over the projected 2026 revenue. Please note that in the 2027 budget antenna rent is proposed to be returned to the Water Fund instead of being reflected in the General Fund. The Page 205 of 5682027 General Fund Budget is funded primarily from ad valorem taxes (property taxes in proportion to the value). The following chart shows the General Fund revenue amounts by category, as a percentage of total revenue. The General Fund expenditure budget is proposed at $7,720,483 for 2027 to generate a balanced budget. Operating activity decreased 1.09% over the 2026 General Fund budget, while contracted Public Safety activity increased 26.95%. Public Safety makes up 48.04% of the General Fund budget. General Government includes 25.61% of the budget. Public Works is 17.81% of the General Fund budget. Park and Recreation is 8.54% of the General Fund budget and incudes personnel changes discussed in the previous budget work session. Page 206 of 568The majority of the changes in the 2027 budget are incremental and reflect the continuing cost of operations. The significant changes to the General Fund budget include an increase in Police & Fire due to contractual obligations, increasing $467,050. General Fund Personnel is the main increase within the General Fund and includes a position for Parks & Recreation/SCEC, which will proportionally affect each budget by $42,221 & $25,418 respectively. Staff has worked diligently to reduce budgets everywhere possible to offset the personnel increases as well as a 32% increase of $148,389 in the Police & Fire budgets. The following chart shows the General Fund Expenditures by function. Public Safety accounts for the largest portion of the budget or 48.04%, at $3,708,987. Streets is at 17.81% of the General Funds budget at $1,375,010. Parks and Recreation is now 8.54% or $659,343 in the 2027 budget. Wages and Benefits, $2,942,630, make up 38.11% of the General Fund budget. Personnel increases in the General Fund for 2027 total $127,080 as discussed in the June 22nd work session. Contracted Public Safety is in the Other Services and Charges Use for the General Fund. The Police contract increased $424,948, 22.37%, and the Fire budget and contract has a $47,102, 4.64%, increase. Shorewood Community and Event Center Fund (SCEC) The City’s special revenue fund is the Shorewood Community and Event Center. A thorough review of the Center’s operations has been underway during 2026. While an effort is being made to generate additional rental revenues, budget forecasts indicate that revenues will not Page 207 of 568fully cover expenses for 2027 and a tax levy subsidy will be required. The levy support for this fund is a levy increase of $30,607 to include the projected levy increase as well as an increase for the proposed staffing change. This budget reflects an increase of $58,392, which is mainly personnel costs, and capital outlay is reflected at $32,021, which is an increase of $10,521 over 2026 due to the nature of the projects within the CIP. Capital Funds Capital Project Funds include the Park Improvement Fund, the Equipment Replacement Capital Fund, the Street Improvement Projects Fund, the Municipal State Aid Street Improvement Fund, and the Community Infrastructure Fund. Budgeted expenditures for these funds are detailed and included in the 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Plan, discussed at the July 27th and August 10th budget work sessions. Capital Funds do not levy dollar for dollar relative to the projects or purchases included in the CIP. Rather, the funds receive annual funding based on the CIP and Financial Management Plan. This reduces peaks and valleys for those financial needs, allowing the funds to build and expend dollars as needed while maintaining a steady operational reserve. The Park Improvement Capital Fund has historically been supported by Property Tax Levy, Contributions, and Grants. This budget includes a Property Tax Levy increase of $50,000 for 2027. The CIP includes total project costs of approximately $2.39 million between 2027–2036, with $350,000 in the 2027 budget. In 2027 the northern play structure is scheduled to be replaced in Freeman Park. This project is detailed in the City’s Park Master Plan and the project includes play equipment and installation costs, such as demolition, site grading, site prep, drainage, contractor mobilization, construction contingency, design and engineering, surfacing (engineered play mulch), and the container (8” concrete ribbon curb). Future projects are based on the City’s Park Master Plan which was approved and adopted by the City Council during the February 23, 2026, meeting. This Park Master Plan identifies a path to plan for and manage the costs of providing the resources and amenities residents have identified. The Equipment Replacement Capital Fund is supported by Property Taxes and there have been transfers from the General Fund over the years as well. The preliminary 2027 budget includes a Property Tax Levy increase of $60,000 in 2027. The CIP includes planned equipment purchases, which includes vehicles, trucks, skid steers, mowers, among other types of equipment. The City plans to spend approximately $3.2 million on equipment purchases between 2027–2036, with $367,600 in the 2027 budget. The Street Improvement Capital Fund is supported by Property Tax Levy, and Bond Proceeds. There have also been transfers periodically to supplement the fund with a general operating surplus. The City’s strategy for financing projects has been to issue bonds. Bonds were issued from 2020 to 2023 to finance various projects within the fund and approximately $2 million for a mill & overlay project and are expected to be funded through bonding or transfers. The City’s outstanding debt will essentially grow larger each year until the first bonds issued in 2020 are paid off. The 2027 CIP reflects $320,000 in pavement maintenance to be funded through the Street Improvement Fund. The CIP includes total project costs to be funded from the Street Improvement Fund of approximately $21 million, with $250,000 funded from outside sources. In accordance with the pavement management plan, mill and overlay projects are scheduled in odd years throughout the CIP. The Municipal State Aid (MSA) Street Improvement Capital Fund is supported by the MSA Page 208 of 568Street program and is administered through the State of Minnesota’s Department of Transportation and are allotted to the City for designated roads. State funding comes from transportation-related taxes and is distributed following a statutory formula. The City plans to utilize approximately $3.5 million between 2027-2036. There is potential for additional county grant funding for some of these projects. Annually, the City Council will adopt the 10-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP lists major capital improvements, and the sources to pay for them. Items in the CIP are not mandated, and the Council reviews capital spending throughout the year. The CIP provides an estimation of the timing and cost of future projects. The CIP includes activity of the SCEC and four capital project funds detailed above, as well as the enterprise funds activity. There are $4,498,375 in projects for 2027 and a total of $47,320,023 for projects across the ten years. Debt Service Funds State law (Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.53) sets forth the debt limit for Minnesota cities. The “net debt” of a city cannot exceed 3% of a city's estimated total market value of taxable property. The definition of net debt (Minnesota Statute, Section 475.51,Subd. 4) excludes many forms of debt from the statutory debt limit. As a general rule, bonds that are 100% supported by property taxes are subject to the debt limit. This type of debt includes equipment certificates, street reconstruction bonds and capital improvement plan bonds, for example. Debt Service Funds are used for the collection of ad valorem taxes and revenues from other sources for the payment of principal, interest and fiscal agent fees of general obligation bonds. The debt service levy is proposed at $1,089,634. This is a decrease of $5,952 from 2026 fiscal year. Enterprise Funds Enterprise Funds include the Water, Sanitary Sewer, Stormwater Management, and Recycling funds. Included within these budgets are capital expenses to fund the utility portion of street projects, and other utility infrastructure projects. These improvement projects are detailed in the 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Plan. The Enterprise Funds reflect increases in personnel costs related to COLA, wage steps, and health insurance benefits. The utility rate changes are based upon several discussions with the Council and will be considered as part of the 2027 Master Fee Schedule in November. The Master Fee Schedule Utility Rates will be based on the rate analysis included within the long-term financial plan, which will be discussed in October. Water Infrastructure Fee is added beginning in 2027 based on 2025 water discussions. This fee is for all property owners where City water is not currently available. Although this was not effective until 2027 it had been included in 2026 Fee Schedule and all previous water fee discussions for additional transparency as we move forward with educational and informational Page 209 of 568materials throughout 2026. The Residential Recycling Fee is proposed to have no increase in the rates for 2027. Hennepin County updated Ordinance 13, an ordinance outlining recycling requirements, to ensure residents have access to organic recycling via curbside service, hauler-provided service or drop- off options. Shorewood currently has drop-off options. As discussed at the June 22, 2026, Council Meeting, the requirement to provide a curbside organics collection service will need to be extended to all households within Shorewood by 2030. Discussions on the City’s organics program will be forthcoming. Recycling rates have generated a reserve to be utilized as the City is required to roll out curbside organics by 2030. Options to utilize these funds were provided and discussed as they would appropriately assist in rolling out the City’s program to have less of an initial impact on residents. Overall Property Tax Levies and Impact The estimated values from the County include a taxable market value of $3,019,484,300, which is a 4.63% increase. The net tax capacity is $34,554,231, adjusted for fiscal disparities. This is an increase of $1,642,433, or a 4.99% increase. With the additions to date (Personnel, Fees, General, Shorewood Community and Event Center, Capital, and Debt Service Funds), the Net Tax Levy would increase by $653,413, or 8.6%. This would equate to a 1.994 increase to the City Tax Rate from 23.088 to 25.082. Strategic Alignment Fiscal Responsibility • Align City policies and practices with strategic direction • Implement best practices to support sound financial management • Maintain stable and predictable finances over the long-term Functionally & Financially Sound Infrastructure • Define standards and goals for infrastructure development • Plans to finance infrastructure improvements, maintenance, and replacement The proposed 2027 budget and preliminary levy include funding for investment in city operations and infrastructure that support core municipal services, responds to increases in public safety costs, and support objectives of adopted plans and goals. Budget Impact The impact of the 2027 budget is an 8.31% levy increase over the 2026 levy. Page 210 of 568 This levy is being presented as the Preliminary Levy and must be certified to Hennepin County by September 30th. From that point forward, the levy can only remain the same, or be decreased but not increased. Hennepin County will use that amount to calculate the preliminary property tax estimates to be utilized in the November Truth-in-Taxation notices they distribute to all property owners. Page 211 of 568 New in the 2027 proposed budget are the staffing changes for SCEC discussed during the personnel work session and in subsequent meetings. Further discussion regarding this position and the SCEC will occur in future meetings. Financing of the Community Infrastructure Fund for Public Works Facility items increase of $100,000 was discussed as part of the two CIP work sessions. Finally, the allocation of Antenna Lease Revenue of $225,000 was previously discussed. It was a revenue source within the Water Fund from the time of inception until 2011 and 2012, when these dollars were moved to the General Fund to finance a funding gap rather than a levy increase at that time. Staff has proposed these revenues be properly allocated to the Water Fund as the antennas are located on the water towers, and it is water department staff that work with the lessees as needed. This will also aid in the financing of shortfalls in the Water Fund. Attached is a heat map of estimated market values of single-family homes compiled for the Metropolitan Council Comprehensive plan process. This map is as of 2022 and will be updated as part of the current comp plan that is underway. The County Assessor's office has provided a summary of the valuations of residential properties as of 2026 within the City into quintiles reflected below. There are 66.9% of Shorewood properties that fall below the median value. Page 212 of 568 Property values are estimated to increase by 2.8% and the median value home in Shorewood is $978,310. This average increase in value on a $400,000 property would increase property tax by $31 alone. Based on the preliminary budget and estimated tax rate, property owners with no change in market value from payable 2026 to payable 2027 would experience an approximate 5.3%, or $49, increase in the City portion of their overall property tax bill. In the event of a market value decrease or increase from payable in 2026 to payable 2027, City property taxes would change proportionately. The following table calculates the property tax impact on residential homesteads that had no market value change from 2026 to 2027: The following tables calculate the property tax impact on residential homesteads that had an average market value growth increase of 2.8%, and 5.0% for 2027. Page 213 of 568 The impact of the above discussion and the previous work sessions have been included in the compiled budgets to be reviewed for an all-inclusive look at the individual budgets to date, as well as review various budget reduction options for further Council discussion and actions. Council should also discuss if there are further items to be adjusted prior to the September 14th Council meeting or if the Council has other initiatives for 2027 that involve additional spending or savings. After the Preliminary Levy is set, the amount can only remain the same or be decreased, it cannot be increased. The final budget work session is scheduled for the final review of all funds, levies, and tax impacts to be discussed at the November 23rd work session. Following will be the December 14th City Council meeting, which will include a budget discussion, a truth-in- taxation public meeting, and Council approval of the final 2027 Budgets, Tax Levies, and 2027- 2036 CIP. Action Requested Motion to approve Resolution 26-52 Adopting the 2027 Preliminary Tax Levy, Preliminary General Fund Budget, and Establishing the Budget Meeting Date. Simple majority vote is required. Page 214 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 26-52 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2027 PRELIMINARY TAX LEVY, PRELIMINARY GENERAL FUND BUDGET, AND ESTABLISHING THE BUDGET MEETING DATE WHEREAS, the City annually adopts an operating levy for the coming year in accordance with Minnesota State Statutes; and WHEREAS, City staff have presented the preliminary 2027 budget and property tax levy at work sessions in May through September 2026; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the budget and property tax levy and made modifications to each that reflect desired community service levels; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 275.065, Subdivision 1 requires cities to certify a maximum proposed levy on or before September 30, 2026, and to establish a public meeting date for the purpose of discussing said proposed levy; and WHEREAS, the Shorewood City Council has reviewed the preliminary levy as found attached in ‘Exhibit A’. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: 1. 2027 Preliminary General Fund Budget is hereby set at $7,720,483. 2. The preliminary 2027 net tax levy to be certified to the Hennepin County Auditor of $8,932,479 is hereby established as the maximum possible net tax levy for property tax payable in 2027. 3. That Monday, December 14, 2026, is hereby established for the public meeting on the proposed 2027 budget and tax levy to be held at the City Hall Council Chambers beginning at 7:00 p.m. Adopted by the City Council of Shorewood, Minnesota on this 14th day of September 2026. __________________________ Jennifer Labadie, Mayor Attest: _________________________ Sandie Thone, City Clerk Page 215 of 568City of Shorewood Exhibit A 2027 Property Tax Levy Information 2026 2027 Change in $ Change in % General Fund Levy: Operating Levy$ 727,169 $ 627,879 $ (99,290) -13.65% Personnel 2,815,550 2,893,630 78,080 2.77% Public Safety Fire JPA Levy + Mound 1,016,151 1,063,254 47,103 4.64% Public Safety Police JPA levy 1,877,027 2,301,975 424,948 22.64% Total General Fund Levies$ 6,435,897 $ 6,886,738 $ 450,841 7.01% Shorewood Community & Event Center Fund Levy: SCEC Operating$ 76,520 $ 50,667 $ (25,853) -33.79% Personnel$ 68,480 $ 124,940 56,460 82.45% Total SCEC Fund Levies$ 145,000 $ 175,607 $ 30,607 21.11% Capital Fund Levies: Park Improvement Capital Fund$ 305,500 $ 355,500 $ 50,000 16.37% Equipment Replacement Capital Fund 215,000 275,000 60,000 27.91% Street Improvement Fund - - - Community Infrastructure Fund 50,000 150,000 100,000 200.00% Total Capital Levies$ 570,500 $ 780,500 $ 210,000 36.81% Debt Service Fund Levies: 2020A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds$ 229,752 $ 227,704 $ (2,048) -0.89% 2021A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 309,708 306,873 (2,835) -0.92% 2022A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 288,376 287,517 (859) -0.30% 2023A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 267,750 267,540 (210) -0.08% Total Debt Service Levies$ 1,095,586 $ 1,089,634 $ (5,952) -0.54% Actual Net Levy (Including Fiscal Disparities)$ 8,246,983 $ 8,932,479 $ 685,496 8.31% Page 216 of 568 2027 Preliminary Levy, General Fund Budget, & Truth-in Taxation Date SEPTEMBER 14, 2026 Page 217 of 568 January 12 – 2026 Budget Process Debrief 2027 April 27 – #1 - Goal Setting Session/Calendar BUDGET June 23 – #2 - Personnel July 27 - #3 - 2027-2036 CIP August 10 - #4 –2027-2036 Detailed CIP SCHEDULE August 24 - #5 – Compiled Budgets OVERVIEW September 14 - Approve Preliminary Levy October 13 - #6 – Long-Term Financial Management Plan October 26 – Adopt Ordinances & Master Fee Schedule November 23 - #7 - Final Review December 14 - TNT & Final Approvals 2 Page 218 of 568 General Property Resolution Tax Levy 26-52 Preliminary General Fund Budget Truth In Taxation 3 Page 219 of 568 Main Operating Fund General Fund Overview Variety of Taxes & Revenues Municipal Services 4 Page 220 of 568 2027 GENERAL FUND REVENUES 2027 General Fund Revenues Taxes$ 6,886,738 Licenses & Permits 340,875 Intergovernmental 140,620 Charges for Services 68,500 Fines & Forfeitures 75,000 Special Assessments 5,000 Miscellaneous 178,750 Transfers 25,000 Total Revenues$ 7,720,483 5 Page 221 of 5682027 GENERAL FUND REVENUES 6 Page 222 of 568 2027 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 2027 General Fund Expenditures by Program General Government$ 1,977,143 Public Safety 3,708,987 Streets 1,375,010 Park & Recreation 659,343 Total Expenditures$ 7,720,483 7 Page 223 of 5682027 GF EXPENDITURES BY PROGRAM 8 Page 224 of 5682027 GF EXPENDITURES BY USE 9 Page 225 of 5682027 GF EXPENDITURE CHANGES Police Fire Personnel Services Parks & Recreation/ SCEC Position 10 Page 226 of 568 2027 GF LEVY IMPACT 2026 2027 Change in $ Change in % General Fund Levy: Operating Levy$ 727,169 $ 627,879 $ (99,290) -13.65% Personnel 2,815,550 2,893,630 78,080 2.77% Public Safety Fire JPA Levy + Mound 1,016,151 1,063,254 47,103 4.64% Public Safety Police JPA levy 1,877,027 2,301,975 424,948 22.64% Total General Fund Levies$ 6,435,897 $ 6,886,738 $ 450,841 7.01% 11 Page 227 of 568 2027 GF LEVY IMPACT Police JPA Fire JPA + Contract 61.99% 6.87% Personnel Operations 11.39% (14.48%) 12 Page 228 of 568 Special Revenue funds are used to account for revenue derived from Special specific taxes and Revenue earmarked revenue sources. They are usually Fund required by MN State Statute or local ordinances to finance particular functions or other activities of government. 13 Page 229 of 568 $175,607 Levy SCEC Fund Overview Personnel Discussions Task Force 14 Page 230 of 568 2027 SCEC CHANGES Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes$ 105,000 $ 122,000 $ 145,000 $ 175,607 $ 30,607 21.11% Charges for Services 66,286 82,269 68,000 82,000 14,000 20.59% Miscellaneous 3,040 5,364 3,150 2,500 (650) -20.63% TOTAL REVENUES $ 174,326 $ 209,634 $ 216,150 $ 260,107 $ 43,957 20.34% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services$ 88,701 $ 112,390 $ 68,480 $ 124,940 $ 56,460 82.45% Supplies 33,093 22,145 29,340 27,510 (1,830) -6.24% Other Services and Charges 35,326 38,415 54,210 47,451 (6,759) -12.47% Capital Outlay 21,280 5,995 21,500 32,021 10,521 48.93% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 178,401 $ 178,946 $ 173,530 $ 231,922 $ 58,392 33.65% 15 Page 231 of 568 2027 SCEC LEVY IMPACT Personnel Operations 8.25% (3.8%) Overall 4.46% 16 Page 232 of 568 Debt Service funds are Debt used to account for the payment of interest and Service principal on long-term Funds general obligation debt other than debt issued for and serviced primarily by enterprise funds. 17 Page 233 of 568 State law sets forth the debt limit for Minnesota cities. Debt  Net debt cannot exceed 3% of the estimated market value Service of taxable property. Funds Bonds that are 100% supported by property taxes are subject to the debt limit. This type of debt includes equipment certificates, street reconstruction bonds and capital improvement plan bonds. 18 Page 234 of 5682027 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS DEBT LIMIT 3% $92,961,354 ESTIMATED 11% USED 19 Page 235 of 568 2027 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS GENERAL OBLIGATIONS (300’S) 2027-2044 $10,670,000 20 Page 236 of 568 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 2020A GO Bonds 2021A GO Bonds $227,704 $306,873 2022A GO Bonds 2023A GO Bonds $287,517 $267,540 21 Page 237 of 568 2027 DEBT SERVICE LEVY IMPACT 2026 2027 Change in $ Change in % Debt Service Fund Levies: 2020A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds$ 229,752 $ 227,704 $ (2,048) -0.89% 2021A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 309,708 306,873 (2,835) -0.92% 2022A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 288,376 287,517 (859) -0.30% 2023A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 267,750 267,540 (210) -0.08% Total Debt Service Levies$ 1,095,586 $ 1,089,634 $ (5,952) -0.54% (0.87%) of Levy Increase 22 Page 238 of 568 Capital Project funds Capital are used to account for Project the acquisition and construction of major Funds capital facilities other than those financed by enterprise funds. 23 Page 239 of 568 Park Improvement (402) Capital  Project Equipment Replacement (403) Funds Street Reconstruction (404) MSA Road Reconstruction (405) Community Infrastructure (450) 24 Page 240 of 568 2027 CAPITAL FUNDS PARK IMPROVEMENT (402) Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes$ 128,000 $ 135,000 $ 305,500 $ 355,500 $ 50,000 16.37% Park Dedication Fees 112,500 97,600 - - - Miscellaneous 321,979 67,873 2,230 2,230 - 0.00% Transfers In 105,000 150,000 - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 667,479 $ 450,473 $ 307,730 $ 357,730 $ 50,000 16.25% EXPENDITURES Supplies$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other Services and Charges 23,688 42,191 - - - Capital Outlay 45,120 (769) 45,000 350,000 305,000 677.78% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 68,808 $ 41,422 $ 45,000 $ 350,000 $ 305,000 677.78% 25 Page 241 of 568 2027 CAPITAL FUNDS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT (403) Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes$ 128,000 $ 165,000 $ 215,000 $ 275,000 $ 60,000 27.91% Sale of Capital Assets 3,854 198,508 - - - Miscellaneous 11,815 3,117 920 920 - 0.00% Transfers In - 400,000 - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 143,669 $ 766,625 $ 215,920 $ 275,920 $ 60,000 27.79% EXPENDITURES Buildings & Structures$ 30,901 $ 680,897 $ - $ - $ - Machinery & Equipment 113,193 344,994 74,900 344,000 269,100 359.28% Furniture & Fixtures - 242 11,200 23,600 12,400 110.71% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 144,094 $ 1,026,132 $ 86,100 $ 367,600 $ 281,500 326.95% 26 Page 242 of 568 2027 CAPITAL FUNDS STREET RECONSTRUCTION (404) Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes$ 128,000 $ 170,500 $ - $ - $ - Miscellaneous 181,602 615,646 65,510 365,510 300,000 457.95% Bond Proceeds - - - - - Transfers In - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 309,602 $ 786,146 $ 65,510 $ 365,510 $ 300,000 457.95% EXPENDITURES Supplies$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other Services and Charges 415,240 629,140 - - - Capital Outlay 985,347 1,693,796 315,000 2,262,119 1,947,119 618.13% Transfers Out - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,400,587 $ 2,322,935 $ 315,000 $ 2,262,119 $ 1,947,119 618.13% 27 Page 243 of 568 2027 CAPITAL FUNDS MSA ROAD RECONSTRUCTION (405) Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Municipal State Aid - - 1,072,000 - (1,072,000) -100.00% Miscellaneous 1,639 1,575 468,580 580 (468,000) -99.88% Transfers In - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 1,639 $ 1,575 $ 1,540,580 $ 580 $ (1,540,000) -99.96% EXPENDITURES Supplies$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other Services and Charges - - - - - Capital Outlay - - 1,540,000 - (1,540,000) -100.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ - $ - $ 1,540,000 $ - $ (1,540,000) -100.00% 28 Page 244 of 568 2027 CAPITAL FUNDS COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE (450) Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes$ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ 100,000 200.00% Miscellaneous 89,049 3,207 - - - Transfers In - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 89,049 $ 3,207 $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ 100,000 200.00% EXPENDITURES Supplies$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other Services and Charges - - - - - Capital Outlay 88,158 - 245,000 150,000 (95,000) -38.78% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 88,158 $ - $ 245,000 $ 150,000 $ (95,000) -38.78% 29 Page 245 of 568 Park Improvement Capital $355,500 Improvement Equipment Funds $275,000 Community Infrastructure $150,000 30 Page 246 of 568 2027 CAPITAL LEVY IMPACT 2026 2027 Change in $ Change in % Capital Fund Levies: Park Improvement Capital Fund$ 305,500 $ 355,500 $ 50,000 16.37% Equipment Replacement Capital Fund 215,000 275,000 60,000 27.91% Street Improvement Fund - - - Community Infrastructure Fund 50,000 150,000 100,000 200.00% Total Capital Levies$ 570,500 $ 780,500 $ 210,000 36.81% 30.63% of Levy Increase 31 Page 247 of 568 PRELIMINARY TAX LEVY SUPPORT General Fund SCEC Fund $6,886,738 $175,607 $450,841 $30,607 Capital Funds Debt Service Funds $780,500 $1,089,634 $210,000 ($5,952) 32 Page 248 of 5682027 ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX LEVY April 27th 12.14% July 27th 10.28% August 24th 8.31% 33 Page 249 of 568 PROPOSED TAX LEVY SUPPORT General Fund SCEC Fund $6,886,738 $175,607 $450,841 $30,607 Capital Funds Debt Service Funds $780,500 $1,089,634 $210,000 ($5,952) Proposed Levy $8,932,479 34 Page 250 of 5682027 ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX LEVY 2026 2027 Change in $ Change in % General Fund Levy: Operating Levy$ 727,169 $ 627,879 $ (99,290) -13.65% Personnel 2,815,550 2,893,630 78,080 2.77% Public Safety Fire JPA Levy + Mound 1,016,151 1,063,254 47,103 4.64% Public Safety Police JPA levy 1,877,027 2,301,975 424,948 22.64% Total General Fund Levies$ 6,435,897 $ 6,886,738 $ 450,841 7.01% Shorewood Community & Event Center Fund Levy: SCEC Operating$ 76,520 $ 50,667 $ (25,853) -33.79% Personnel$ 68,480 $ 124,940 56,460 82.45% Total SCEC Fund Levies$ 145,000 $ 175,607 $ 30,607 21.11% Capital Fund Levies: Park Improvement Capital Fund$ 305,500 $ 355,500 $ 50,000 16.37% Equipment Replacement Capital Fund 215,000 275,000 60,000 27.91% Street Improvement Fund - - - Community Infrastructure Fund 50,000 150,000 100,000 200.00% Total Capital Levies$ 570,500 $ 780,500 $ 210,000 36.81% Debt Service Fund Levies: 2020A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds$ 229,752 $ 227,704 $ (2,048) -0.89% 2021A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 309,708 306,873 (2,835) -0.92% 2022A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 288,376 287,517 (859) -0.30% 2023A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 267,750 267,540 (210) -0.08% Total Debt Service Levies$ 1,095,586 $ 1,089,634 $ (5,952) -0.54% Actual Net Levy (Including Fiscal Disparities)$ 8,246,983 $ 8,932,479 $ 685,496 8.31% 35 Page 251 of 5682027 ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX LEVY 36 Page 252 of 568 SIGNIFICANT LEVY IMPACT ITEMS Police Public $424,948 – 22.64% Safety Fire Joint $47,103 – 4.64% Powers 68.86% of Levy Agreements Increase 37 Page 253 of 568 SIGNIFICANT LEVY IMPACT ITEMS CIP Meeting th Capital July 27 Improvements Detailed CIP August 11th 31% of Levy Increase 38 Page 254 of 568 SIGNIFICANT LEVY IMPACT ITEMS Personnel Personnel & 19.5% of Levy Operations Operations (18.25%) of Levy 1.4% of Levy Increase 39 Page 255 of 568MARKET VALUE/TAX CAPACITY HISTORY 40 Page 256 of 568TAX LEVY HISTORY 41 Page 257 of 5682027 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUES 42 Page 258 of 5682027 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUES 43 Page 259 of 568 2027 ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL LEVY IMPACT 2027 CITY PROPERTY TAXES (WITH NO MARKET VALUE CHANGE) Homestead City Local City Property Percentage Market Market Value Tax Tax Capacity Property Taxes Tax Value Exclusion Capacity Rate Taxes Increase Increase 2027 2027 2027 Pay 2027 2027 (Decrease) (Decrease) $ 400,000 $ (10,600) $ 3,894 25.183%$ 981 $ 49 5.3% $ 600,000 $ - $ 6,250 25.183%$ 1,574 $ 79 5.3% $ 978,310 $ - $ 10,979 25.183%$ 2,765 $ 138 5.3% $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 11,250 25.183%$ 2,833 $ 141 5.3% $ 1,200,000 $ - $ 13,750 25.183%$ 3,463 $ 173 5.3% 44 Page 260 of 568 General Property Tax Levy $8,932,479 Resolution Preliminary General Fund Budget 26-52 $7,720,483 Truth In Taxation December 14, 2026 45 Page 261 of 568 2027 PRELIMINARY BUDGET September 14, 2026 Page 262 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 2027 ANNUAL BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. INTRODUCTION Budget Message .................................................................................................... 1 Directory of Officials .............................................................................................. 5 Budget Calendar .................................................................................................... 6 Overall Levy ........................................................................................................... 7 Authorizing Resolutions ........................................................................................ 8 GENERAL FUND .......................................................................................................... 12 General Fund Revenue Charts ............................................................................. 13 General Fund Expenditure Charts ....................................................................... 14 General Fund Budget Summary .......................................................................... 16 General Government ........................................................................................... 18 Council ............................................................................................................ 19 Administration ................................................................................................ 20 Elections ......................................................................................................... 21 Finance ........................................................................................................... 22 Professional Services ...................................................................................... 23 Planning .......................................................................................................... 24 Municipal Building .......................................................................................... 25 Public Safety ........................................................................................................ 26 Police .............................................................................................................. 27 Fire .................................................................................................................. 28 Protective Inspection ...................................................................................... 29 Streets ................................................................................................................. 30 City Engineer ................................................................................................... 31 Public Works Service ....................................................................................... 32 Ice and Snow Removal .................................................................................... 33 Parks and Recreation ........................................................................................... 34 Parks Maintenance ......................................................................................... 35 Recreation....................................................................................................... 36 Other ................................................................................................................... 37 Other Financing Uses ...................................................................................... 38 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS ........................................................................................... 39 Shorewood Community & Event Center Fund ..................................................... 40 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ................................................................................................. 41 General Obligation Funds .................................................................................... 42 Page 263 of 568 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS ............................................................................................ 43 Capital Improvement Fiscal Policy ....................................................................... 44 Capital Projects Summary ................................................................................... 45 Park Capital Outlay Fund ..................................................................................... 46 Equipment Replacement Fund ............................................................................ 47 Street Reconstruction Capital Fund ..................................................................... 48 Municipal State Aid Capital Fund ........................................................................ 49 Community Infrastructure Fund .......................................................................... 50 ENTERPRISE FUNDS .................................................................................................... 51 Enterprise Summary ............................................................................................ 52 Water Fund ......................................................................................................... 53 Sanitary Sewer Fund ............................................................................................ 54 Stormwater Management Fund .......................................................................... 55 Recycling Fund .................................................................................................... 56 GENERAL FUND DETAIL ............................................................................................... 57 General Government Council ............................................................................................................ 61 Administration ................................................................................................ 62 Elections ......................................................................................................... 63 Finance ........................................................................................................... 64 Professional Services ...................................................................................... 65 Planning .......................................................................................................... 66 Municipal Building .......................................................................................... 68 Public Safety Police .............................................................................................................. 70 Fire .................................................................................................................. 71 Protective Inspection ...................................................................................... 72 Streets City Engineer ................................................................................................... 74 Public Works Service ....................................................................................... 75 Ice and Snow Removal .................................................................................... 77 Parks and Recreation Parks Maintenance ......................................................................................... 78 Recreation....................................................................................................... 80 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND DETAIL ................................................................................. 84 Shorewood Community & Event Center Fund ..................................................... 85 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS DETAIL ..................................................................................... 89 General Obligation Funds .................................................................................... 90 Page 264 of 568 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS DETAIL ................................................................................ 99 Park Capital Outlay Fund ................................................................................... 100 Equipment Replacement Fund .......................................................................... 103 Street Capital Outlay Fund ................................................................................ 105 MSA Street Construction Fund .......................................................................... 109 Community Infrastructure Fund ........................................................................ 137 ENTERPRISE FUNDS DETAIL ...................................................................................... 142 Water Fund ....................................................................................................... 143 Sanitary Sewer Fund .......................................................................................... 148 Recycling Fund .................................................................................................. 152 Stormwater Management Fund ........................................................................ 155 GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................ 160 Page 265 of 568 September 14, 2026 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Residents of the City of Shorewood INTRODUCTION We are pleased to present to you the preliminary City of Shorewood 2027 Annual Operating Budget. This document, after adoption by the City Council, becomes the guide for the delivery of services to the residents of the City in the coming year. The budgets anticipate the level of funding necessary to provide these services. The budget requests herein are the result of careful consideration by Staff, guided by the direction of the City Council at its budget work-sessions in June through August. Shorewood provides essential services at a very reasonable cost, with a lean budget and small staff. Staff members perform at a high level with economy and efficiency; professional staff consistently spend countless extra hours to meet and exceed the high expectations of performance. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City Council held several work sessions to discuss the proosed 2027 General Fund operating budget and property tax levy. The City Council needs to adopt a 2027 preliminary budget and property tax levy at its September 14th meeting. The City then certifies the 2027 property tax levy to Hennepin County in late September. In November, the County sends Truth-in-taxation notices to property owners, showing preliminary 2027 property taxes. The City’s 2027 overall preliminary property tax levy of $8,932,479 is 8.31% higher than the 2026 total levy of $8,246,983. The General Fund portion of the property tax levy is preliminary to increase by $450,841, or 7.01%, with all other non-General Fund tax levies (SCEC, capital and debt levies) budgeted to increase $234,655, or 12.96%. The City’s overall estimated market value increased by 2.8% from 2026 to 2027, including existing value increases and new construction. Based on a property tax capacity increase of 2.8%, the City is proposing to increase the estimated payable 2027 City tax rate by 1.223 from 23.926% in 2026 to 25.149% in 2027. Property owners with no change in market values from payable 2026 to payable 2027 should experience an approximate 5.1% increase in the City portion of their overall property tax bill which would be estimated at $48 for a $400,000 valued home. In the event of a market value City of Shorewood | 5755 Country Club Road | Shorewood, MN 55331 952.960.7900 | www.shorewoodmn.gov Page 266 of 568 decrease or increase from payable 2026 to payable 2027, City property taxes would change proportionately. 2027 GENERAL FUND BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS The General Fund is the chief operating fund of the City. It accounts for all revenues and expenditures of a governmental unit which are not accounted for in other funds. It is usually the largest and most important accounting activity for state and local governments, normally receiving a greater variety and number of taxes and revenues than any other fund. Specifically, it receives such revenue as general property taxes, licenses and permits, fines and penalties, rents, charges for current services, state grants and aids, and interest earnings. In turn, the General Fund finances a larger range of municipal services including police, fire, street and park maintenance, recreation programs, administration, planning and zoning, and building inspections. Revenue Highlights General Fund 2027 revenues and transfers in are budgeted at $7,720,483, or a 4.31% increase from the 2026 budget. Property taxes account for 89.2% of the 2027 General Fund revenue budget and are increasing 7.01% over 2026 General Fund Property Taxes. In addition to the levy, the 2027 budget also contemplates other sources of funding such as fees, licenses, and permits outlined in the City’s Master Fee Schedule. Expenditure Highlights Overall, the 2027 General Fund expenditures and transfers out are also budgeted at $7,720,483, or a 4.31% increase from the 2026 General Fund budget. Most of the changes in the 2027 budget are incremental for the continuing cost of doing business. The significant changes to the General Fund budget include increases in Police & Fire due to contractual obligations. Legal Services are increasing due to increased prosecution costs. Other changes involve personnel costs, including 3.0% COLA and no change to benefit contributions which effects all departments. ENTERPRISE FUND HIGHLIGHTS Water Fund The Water Fund budget is comprised of two parts: the Water Operating budget and the Water Debt Service budget. The 2027 Water Debt Service payments for the four existing bond issues are scheduled at approximately $223,727. The 2027 Water Operating budget revenues are projected at $1,599,860 and the expenses (including depreciation) are forecasted at $1,729,421. This results in a shortfall, or deficit, of about $129,561. Preliminary capital expenditures include Watermain Reconstruction activity ($57,881), the Water Meter Radio Read project ($10,000), SE Well Pump and add VFD ($80,000), and Boulder Bridge Well Pump ($45,000). There is also an additional $200,000 estimated for the Page 2 of 162 Page 267 of 568 water service connection program and $35,000 for a Water & Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure Report. In order for the Water Funds to be self-supporting, to assure the system can provide for improvements and enhancements, and to preserve fund balance at current levels, a water rate increase is necessary in 2027. A $10 Infrastructure Fee was adopted as part of the 2026 Maseter Fee Schedule to begin in 2027 for all users without City water being available. Beginning in 2027 annual increases to the new tier rates are proposed for future years, ranging from approximately 8-10% between 2027-2032; then 3.0% annually after 2032. The 8-10% range will be adjusted with the transition of the Antenna Rent to the Water Fund from the General Fund. These rates will be reviewed as part of the long-term financial management plan update. Sanitary Sewer Fund The City currently has about 3,030 connections to its Sanitary Sewer System. Preliminary operating revenues of $2,396,945 and expenses of $2,128,006 for the year 2027 are contemplated for a $268,939 change in net position. In addition, capital improvements of approximately $241,500 are planned. Capital improvements for the year 2027 include sewer repairs with roadway construction. In addition, funds have also been designated for Inflow & Infiltration Control and Reduction projects ($90,000). There is also $35,000 for the Water & Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure Report. As part of the 2025 rate analysis, an annual fee increase of 6% is proposed for 2027, then approximately 3-4% annually as defined in the long-term financial management plan. Stormwater Management Budget The 2027 Stormwater Management Budget contemplates revenues of $1,220,360 and expenses of about $1,056,139. This includes operations and debt service payments for the 2020-2023 debt issuances. Capital improvement projects anticipated include Storm Pond sediment cleaning & disposal, catch basin reconstruction, and additional infrastructure ($587,254) laid out in the ten- year capital improvement plan. As part of the 2025 rate analysis, an annual fee increase of 35% ($24.36) is proposed for 2027, then dropping to 2% annually as defined in the long-term financial management plan. The average dollar increase for the system rate is $4.50 between 2026-2035. Fee increases are needed to offset the transition of franchise fee revenues from a revenue source back to the street improvement fund. Recycling Budget The Recycling Budget draft contemplates revenues of $253,300 and expenditures of about $256,690. Currently there is no plan to increase the Recycling Rate for 2027. Further discussions will be needed regarding the timing of implementation of organic recycling mandated by 2030. Page 3 of 162 Page 268 of 568CONCLUSION The 2027 budgets and levy were prepared according to the priorities and directions from the City Council. The City Council and Staff share a mutual goal to provide budgets that represent a responsible plan to balance the City’s service delivery needs, provide for infrastructure needs, and maintain the City’s financial position while providing quality services to our residents with a spirit of fiscal prudence. Respectfully submitted, Marc Nevinski Jeanne Schmuck City Administrator Finance Director/Treasurer Page 4 of 162 Page 269 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2027 DIRECTORY OF OFFICIALS (Upon Adoption) Jennifer Labadie Mayor Nat Gorham Councilmember Dustin Maddy Councilmember Guy Sanschagrin Councilmember Michelle DiGruttolo Councilmember Marc Nevinski, City Administrator Jeanne Schmuck, Finance Director Matt Morreim, Public Works Director Sandie Thone, City Clerk/Human Resources Director Jake Griffiths, Planning Director Mitch Czech, Parks & Recreation Director Page 5 of 162 Page 270 of 568 City of Shorewood 2027 Budget Preparation Calendar (Subject to Change) Date Event City Council Budget Work Session #1: Goal Setting Session - Schedule, Process, Council provide direction on initiatives and Monday, April 27, 2026 expectations for the 2027 budget. (City Administrator) Departments' Budget roll out. Departments receive electronic access to the 2027 Budget Entry Instructions and Budget Calendar. Review use of Extended Budget module in Springbrook software. Administrator provides budget instructions and Monday, May 4, 2026 outlines City goals and challenges. Friday, May 29, 2026 Personnel Requests due to Finance Department with City Administrator approval. Friday, June 12, 2026 Fee Schedule revisions due to Finance Department. Budget Requests due to Finance Department via Extended Budgeting. Monday, June 22, 2026 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Requests due to Finance Department (2027-2036). Monday, June 22, 2026 City Council Budget Work Session #2: Personnel. Updated Budget Book Information (Dept. Descriptions, Budget Goals & Objectives, Dept. Statistics, Staffing Levels, Friday, June 26, 2026 Changes/Challenges, and Budget Summary) due to Finance Department. Monday, July 6, 2026 Directors Meet with City Administrator and Finance Director to review budget goals, issues, personnel, and CIP requests. Monday, July 6, 2026 Obtain preliminary property valuations/net tax capacity from Hennepin County. Monday, July 27, 2026 City Council Budget Work Session #3: 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Plan. Friday, July 31, 2026 Last day for Department of Revenue to notify City of Local Government Aid amounts. Friday, July 31, 2026 Finalize 2027 budget entries into Extended Budgeting in Springbrook. Monday, August 10, 2026 City Council Budget Work Session #4: 2027-2036 Detailed Capital Improvement Plan. Monday, August 24, 2026 City Council Budget Work Session #5: Compiled Budgets. Friday, September 4, 2026 Obtain preliminary property valuations/net tax capacity from Hennepin County. City Council Meeting - 7:00 p.m. City Council approves preliminary 2027 Budget, sets proposed 2027 Tax Levy, and Monday, September 14, 2026 establishes Budget Hearing Date. Adopt 2027 fee ordinances and fee schedule. Wednesday, September 30, 2026 Last day to certify preliminary 2027 levy and budget hearing date to the County Auditor. Special for to State, if necessasry. Tuesday, October 13, 2026 City Council Budget Work Session #6: Long-Term Financial Management Plan. Monday, October 26, 2026 City Council Meeting - 7:00 p.m. City Council Adopt 2027 fee ordinances and Approve fee schedule. Monday, November 23, 2026 City Council Budget Work Session #7: Final Review - If necessary Monday, December 14, 2026 City Council Meeting - 7:00 p.m. Budget Hearing - City Council approves final 2027 Budget, Tax Levies, and CIP. Cities must certify the final property tax levy to the county auditor on or before December 28, 2026 (5 working days after Monday, December 28, 2026 December 20). Page 6 of 162 Page 271 of 568City of Shorewood 2027 Property Tax Levy Information 2026 2027 Change in $ Change in % General Fund Levy: Operating Levy $ 3,542,719 $ 3,521,509 $ (21,210) -0.60% Public Safety Fire JPA Levy + Mound 1,016,151 1,063,254 47,103 4.64% Public Safety Police JPA levy 1,877,027 2,301,975 424,948 22.64% Total General Fund Levies $ 6,435,897 $ 6,886,738 $ 450,841 7.01% Shorewood Community & Event Center Fund Levy: Regular Levy $ 145,000 $ 175,607 $ 30,607 21.11% Capital Fund Levies: Park Improvement Capital Fund $ 305,500 $ 355,500 $ 50,000 16.37% Equipment Replacement Capital Fund 215,000 275,000 60,000 27.91% Street Improvement Fund - - - Community Infrastructure 50,000 150,000 100,000 200.00% Total Capital Levies $ 570,500 $ 780,500 $ 210,000 36.81% Debt Service Fund Levies: 2020A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds $ 229,752 $ 227,704 $ (2,048) -0.89% 2021A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 309,708 306,873 (2,835) -0.92% 2022A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 288,376 287,517 (859) -0.30% 2023A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 267,750 267,540 (210) -0.08% Total Debt Service Levies $ 1,095,586 $ 1,089,634 $ (5,952) -0.54% Actual Net Levy (Including Fiscal Disparities) $ 8,246,983 $ 8,932,479 $ 685,496 8.31% Page 7 of 162 Page 272 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 26-XXX A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2027 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET AND APPROVING THE PROPERTY TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 2027 WHEREAS, the 2027 budget and property tax levies collectible in 2026 for the City of Shorewood have been prepared and reviewed by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the budget has been modified by the City Council to meet service delivery goals; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a Truth-in-Taxation public meeting on December 14, 2026, to receive public comment regarding the adoption of such budgets and property tax levies. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: 1. That a budget of $7,720,483 is adopted to pay for 2027 General Fund operations. 2. That the sum of $8,932,479 is levied for 2026, collectible in 2027, upon taxable property in the City of Shorewood. Individual fund property tax levies are as follows: General Fund $ 6,886,738 Shorewood Community and Event Center $ 175,607 Debt Service Funds: 2020A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds $ 227,704 2021A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds $ 306,873 2022A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds $ 287,517 2023A G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds $ 267,540 Capital Project Funds: Park Improvements $ 355,500 Equipment Replacement $ 275,000 Community Infrastructure $ 150,000 $ 8,932,479 Page 8 of 162 Page 273 of 568 3. That the City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Adopted by the City Council of Shorewood, Minnesota this 14th day of December 2026. __________________________ Jennifer Labadie, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Sandie Thone, City Clerk Page 9 of 162 Page 274 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 26-XXX A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2026 SHOREWOOD COMMUNITY AND EVENT CENTER AND ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS WHEREAS, City staff have presented the preliminary 2026 budgets at meetings through December, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the budgets and made modifications to each that reflect desired community service levels; and WHEREAS, these budgets represent a reasonable estimate of what needs to be spent to provide the desired service level. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Shorewood Community & Event Center 2027 budget is hereby adopted as presented. 2. The Water, Sewer, Storm Water, and Recycling 2027 budgets are hereby adopted as presented. Adopted by the City Council of Shorewood, Minnesota this 14th day of December 2026. __________________________ Jennifer Labadie, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Sandie Thone, City Clerk Page 10 of 162 Page 275 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 26-XXX A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2027-2036 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND 2026 CAPITAL PROJECT FUND BUDGETS WHEREAS, City staff have presented the proposed 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and 2027 capital project fund budgets at meetings through December, 2026; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the CIP and budgets and made modifications to each that reflect desired community service levels; and WHEREAS, these budgets represent a reasonable estimate of what needs to be spent to provide the desired service level. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: 1. The 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Plan is hereby adopted as presented with this adoption subject to Planning Commission review and determination of compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Park Improvement, Equipment Replacement, Street Reconstruction, MSA, Trail Construction, and Community Infrastructure budgets are hereby adopted as presented. Adopted by the City Council of Shorewood, Minnesota this 14th day of December 2026. __________________________ Jennifer Labadie, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Sandie Thone, City Clerk Page 11 of 162 Page 276 of 568 GENERAL FUND The General Fund is used to account for resources traditionally associated with government which are not required legally or by sound financial management to be accounted for in other funds. It normally receives a greater variety and number of taxes and other general revenues than any other fund. The majority of the current day-to-day operations will be financed from this fund. Page 12 of 162 Page 277 of 568 2027 General Fund Revenues Taxes $ 6,886,738 Licenses & Permits 340,875 Intergovernmental 140,620 Charges for Services 68,500 Fines & Forfeitures 75,000 Special Assessments 5,000 Miscellaneous 178,750 Transfers 25,000 Total Revenues $ 7,720,483 2027 General Fund Revenues 89.20% 0.32% 2.32% 0.06% 0.97% 1.82% 0.89% 4.42% Taxes Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Fines & Forfeitures Special Assessments Miscellaneous Transfers Page 13 of 162 Page 278 of 568 2027 General Fund Expenditures by Program General Government $ 1,977,143 Public Safety 3,708,987 Streets 1,375,010 Park & Recreation 659,343 Total Expenditures $ 7,720,483 2027 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY PROGRAM Public Safety 48.04% General Government 25.61% Park & Recreation Streets 8.54% 17.81% Page 14 of 162 Page 279 of 568 2027 General Fund Expenditures by Use Personnel Services $ 2,942,630 Supplies 369,110 Other Services and Charges 4,408,743 Total Expenditures $ 7,720,483 2027 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY USE Other Services and Charges 57.10% Personnel Services Supplies 38.11% 4.78% Page 15 of 162 Page 280 of 568General Fund 2027 Budget Summary Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes $ 5,654,785 $ 5,885,634 $ 6,435,897 $ 6,886,738 $ 450,841 7.01% Licenses & Permits 561,581 650,774 305,575 340,875 35,300 11.55% Intergovernmental 195,836 140,682 133,300 140,620 7,320 5.49% Charges for Services 283,954 274,864 271,450 68,500 (202,950) -74.77% Fines & Forfeitures 69,438 100,941 64,500 75,000 10,500 16.28% Special Assessments 4,438 5,733 5,000 5,000 - 0.00% Miscellaneous 414,931 227,561 161,100 178,750 17,650 10.96% Transfers In 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 - 0.00% TOTAL REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 7,209,964 $ 7,311,189 $ 7,401,822 $ 7,720,483 $ 318,661 4.31% EXPENDITURES General Government $ 2,162,931 $ 1,849,803 $ 2,125,718 $ 1,977,143 $ (148,575) -6.99% Public Safety 2,513,554 3,052,099 3,238,259 3,708,987 470,728 14.54% Streets 1,163,699 1,216,071 1,431,700 1,375,010 (56,690) -3.96% Parks and Recreation 540,688 488,601 606,145 659,343 53,198 8.78% Other Financing Uses - 550,000 - - - Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses $ 6,380,872 $ 7,156,574 $ 7,401,822 $ 7,720,483 $ 318,661 4.31% EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES $ 829,092 $ 154,615 $ - $ - Page 16 of 162 Page 281 of 568General Fund 2027 Budget Summary Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes $ 5,654,785 5,885,634$ 6,435,897$ $ 6,886,738 $ 450,841 7.01% Licenses & Permits 561,581 650,774 305,575 340,875 35,300 11.55% Intergovernmental 195,836 140,682 133,300 140,620 7,320 5.49% Charges for Services 283,954 274,864 271,450 68,500 (202,950) -74.77% Fines & Forfeitures 69,438 100,941 64,500 75,000 10,500 16.28% Special Assessments 4,438 5,733 5,000 5,000 - 0.00% Miscellaneous 414,931 227,561 161,100 178,750 17,650 10.96% Contingency - - - - - Transfers In 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 - 0.00% TOTAL REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 7,209,964 7,311,189$ 7,401,822$ $ 7,720,483 $ 318,661 4.31% EXPENDITURES GENERAL GOVERNMENT Council $ 71,073 $ 74,591 $ 100,370 $ 97,420 $ (2,950) -2.94% Administration 688,257 689,470 715,380 808,540 93,160 13.02% Elections 41,958 982 133,160 33,100 (100,060) -75.14% Finance 335,250 267,210 282,275 281,755 (520) -0.18% Professional Services 361,204 178,107 158,000 160,000 2,000 1.27% Planning 339,548 394,814 400,723 352,238 (48,485) -12.10% Municipal Buildings 325,641 244,628 335,810 244,090 (91,720) -27.31% TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2,162,931 1,849,803 2,125,718 1,977,143 (148,575) -6.99% PUBLIC SAFETY Police 1,545,366 1,865,903 1,882,027 2,301,975 419,948 22.31% Fire 779,007 967,326 1,016,152 1,063,254 47,102 4.64% Protective Inspections 189,180 218,871 340,080 343,758 3,678 1.08% TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 2,513,554 3,052,099 3,238,259 3,708,987 470,728 14.54% STREETS Engineer 138,359 113,774 145,000 100,000 (45,000) -31.03% Public Works 913,665 964,149 1,131,440 1,125,980 (5,460) -0.48% Ice and Snow Removal 111,675 138,148 155,260 149,030 (6,230) -4.01% TOTAL STREETS 1,163,699 1,216,071 1,431,700 1,375,010 (56,690) -3.96% PARKS AND RECREATION Park Maintenance 440,942 355,037 444,670 449,380 4,710 1.06% Recreation 99,746 133,564 161,475 209,963 48,488 30.03% TOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION 540,688 488,601 606,145 659,343 53,198 8.78% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,380,872 6,606,574 7,401,822 7,720,483 318,661 4.31% OTHER FINANCING USES Transfers Out - 550,000 - - - TOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES - 550,000 - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 6,380,872 7,156,574 7,401,822 7,720,483 318,661 4.31% EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES $ 829,092 $ 154,615 $ - $ - Page 17 of 162 Page 282 of 568GENERAL GOVERNMENT Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 GENERAL GOVERNMENT Council $ 71,073 74,591$ 100,370$ $ 97,420 $ (2,950) -2.94% Administration 688,257 689,470 715,380 808,540 93,160 13.02% Elections 41,958 982 133,160 33,100 (100,060) -75.14% Finance 335,250 267,210 282,275 281,755 (520) -0.18% Professional Services 361,204 178,107 158,000 160,000 2,000 1.27% Planning 339,548 394,814 400,723 352,238 (48,485) -12.10% Municipal Buildings 325,641 244,628 335,810 244,090 (91,720) -27.31% TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2,162,931 1,849,803 2,125,718 1,977,143 (148,575) -6.99% Page 18 of 162 Page 283 of 568GENERAL GOVERNMENT COUNCIL (11) Department Mission The Mayor and City Council set policy for the City and provide general direction to the administrator in policy implementation. The department's budget supports council development, information efforts, and special city associations and programs. Department Description/Services This activity provides the City Council with legislative control over matters of policy. The Council exercises budgetary control through the adoption of an annual budget certified by major funds. The Council appoints various citizen boards, commissions, and committees to render advice on legislative and policy related matters and provides general direction to the operating departments through the City Administrator. The City Council meets twice monthly and in periodic work sessions and special meetings to consider and adopt legislative and administrative policies that pertain to the services provided to residents. The City Council also sits as the Shorewood Economic Development Authority (EDA). Department Goals  Ensure community engagement and citizen participation in setting city policy.  Communicate effectively to inform and educate constituents, promoting transparency and accountability.  Enhance effective governance based on knowledge and expertise, ensuring consistency and alignment with goals, policies, and activities. Department Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Resolutions/Ordinances Passed 114/8 118/20 110/10 110/10 Elected officials attended LMC events 4 7 5 5 Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Personnel Services $ 27,451 $ 22,876 27,670$ $ 27,670 $ - 0.00% Supplies 2,125 1,180 3,000 2,500 (500) -16.67% Other Services and Charges 41,498 50,536 69,700 67,250 (2,450) -3.52% Total Council $ 71,073 $ 74,591 100,370$ 97,420$ $ (2,950) -2.94% Page 19 of 162 Page 284 of 568GENERAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTATION (13) Department Mission The Administration Department provides efficient, effective, and transparent services to the community under the direction of the City Council. The department supports the city's day-to-day operations through sound management practices, innovative solutions, and a commitment to excellence in customer service and community support to enhance public trust, ensure the responsible use of resources, and foster a collaborative civic environment. Department Description/Services The Department manages the daily operations of the city through the following activities:  Customer Service: Providing efficient and effective services to the community.  Community Engagement and Communications: providing accurate and timely communications and facilitating citizen participation in council meetings, public forums, and community events.  Human Resources: Managing recruitment, hiring, training, and employee relations.  City Services: Effectively and efficiently issuing licenses, permits, and administrative services. Department Goals  Manage recruitment, hiring, training, and employee relations effectively.  Increase effectiveness and efficiency in administrative processes for city services.  Communicate effectively and timely to keep citizens informed and provide engagement. Department Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Employee Retention Rate N/A N/A 84% 88% Licenses and Permits Processed 102 111 110 110 Successful New Hires Onboarded 15 14 13 13 Communications: # of Social Media Reach, Website Views, Email Opens 305,928 328,013 325,000 325,000 Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Personnel Services $ 591,336 $ 605,311 $ 579,380 $ 725,280 $ 145,900 25.18% Supplies 18,425 15,855 19,000 13,610 (5,390) -28.37% Other Services and Charges 78,496 68,303 117,000 69,650 (47,350) -40.47% Total Administration $ 688,257 $ 689,470 $ 715,380 $ 808,540 93,160$ 13.02% Page 20 of 162 Page 285 of 568GENERAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS (14) Department Mission This activity ensures the integrity, transparency, and accessibility of the electoral process through fair and impartial elections, fostering public trust, and promoting civic engagement. Key objectives include providing accurate and timely information, facilitating voter participation, and upholding the highest standards of professionalism and accountability in electoral operations. Department Description/Services The City Clerk is the Elections Administrator and prepares for all elections including management of city election staff, polling places, administering absentee and early voting, recruitment and training of election judges and the absentee ballot board, and oversight of the vote tabulations. The Elections Administrator partners with Hennepin County and the Secretary of State’s Office, and provides voter outreach via the city website, in-person outreach, social media, and local media. Elections: Overseeing elections, including managing polling places, administering absentee voting, training election judges, and ensuring the integrity and security of elections. Department Goals  Manage polling places effectively and efficiently by providing quality training to poll workers.  Administer Early Voting with expert support and training for election staff.  Recruit and train election judges/absentee ballot board by promoting a positive and competent environment for them to work in.  The city is budgeting for a special election in 2027, depending on the General election results. Department Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Voter Outreach Opportunities/Events 4 N/A 4 NA Voter Turnout 91% N/A 85% NA Election Judges Recruited 56 N/A 62 NA Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Personnel Services $ 30,881 $ -$ 121,160 $ 24,000 $ (97,160) -80.19% Supplies 9,761 982 10,000 7,100 (2,900) -29.00% Other Services and Charges 1,317 - 2,000 2,000 - 0.00% Total Elections $ 41,958 $ 982$ 133,160 $ 33,100 $ (100,060) -75.14% Page 21 of 162 Page 286 of 568GENERAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE (15) Department Mission The Finance Department goal is to present timely, accurate, and complete financial information in an understandable and friendly manner to the council, residents, and staff members of the city. This department also protects and manages the assets of the City in accordance with council policies. Department Description/Services This activity directs the City’s financial affairs pursuant to generally accepted accounting standards. This includes initiation of financial plans, review and implementation of internal controls, safeguarding assets and accounting of financial transactions, including: encompassing accounts receivable, accounts payable, payroll, cash and investment management, debt management and oversight, special assessments, and accounting control as well as facilitating the annual preparation of the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, Long Term Financial Plan, budget documents and Capital Improvement Plan. Department Goals  Implement accounts receivable module within the integrated financial system.  Convert Utility Billing on line merchant services.  Continue to review and analyze internal controls.  Increase number of vendors payments processed through automated clearing house.  Maintain the city’s AA credit rating for bond issuance. Department Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Number of Checks/ACH Issued 645/903 481/875 600/900 500/1,000 Utility Customers/Electronic Statements 3,212/589 3,245/545 3,230/560 3,255/750 Rate of Return on Cash/Investments 1.6% 3.6% 4.0% 5.0% Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Personnel Services $ 160,447 $ 232,428 $ 231,260 $ 234,570 $ 3,310 1.43% Supplies 22,038 25,215 30,515 34,350 3,835 12.57% Other Services and Charges 152,766 9,567 20,500 12,835 (7,665) -37.39% Total Finance $ 335,250 $ 267,210 $ 282,275 281,755$ $ (520) -0.18% Page 22 of 162 Page 287 of 568GENERAL GOVERMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (16) Department Mission This account provides contracted legal, assessing and auditing services for the City. Department Description/Services This activity directs the overall legal services for the City, including the issuance of legal opinions, preparation of ordinances, resolutions, contracts and agreements, and the conduct of civil litigation. In addition, this account group provides prosecution of misdemeanor criminal violations, preparation of complaints, processing of evidence, and the trial work associated with prosecution. Legal services are provided by two private law firms, one for criminal prosecution and the other for civil matters. Assessing services provide property valuation information for tax purposes. In 2024 the County began providing free assessing services to small cities. Audit services provide for the annual financial audit required by Minnesota State Statutes. Department Goals  Continue to prosecute misdemeanor crimes.  Continue to have annual audits with no findings. Department Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Total Court Appearances (Prosecution) 294 410 400 415 Audit Findings 0 0 0 0 Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Other Services and Charges $ 361,204 178,107$ 158,000$ 160,000$ 2,000$ 1.27% Total Professional Services $ 361,204 178,107$ 158,000$ 160,000$ 2,000$ 1.27% Page 23 of 162 Page 288 of 568GENERAL GOVERNMENT PLANNING (18) Department Mission Guide the growth and physical development of the community through the Comprehensive Plan, City Code, and review of planning and subdivision applications. Department Description/Services This department is responsible for the review of development proposals, preparing and updating the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and other long range planning activities. It provides for administration and enforcement of the City’s zoning code, and preparation and upkeep of zoning, subdivision, floodplain, and other planning and zoning related ordinances. Specific responsibilities of the Planning Department include the following:  Provide liaison and support to the Planning Commission, the Development Review Committee, and the City Council.  Interpret, administer and update the Comprehensive Plan, City Code, and other city policies as they relate to planning and zoning.  Review development applications and permits for zoning compliance.  Coordinate the development review and approval process.  Enforce zoning violations.  Coordinate and administer the City’s Comprehensive Plan and long-term planning processes.  Coordinate and administer the City’s Deer Management Program and other environmental programs and regulations.  Assist with economic development activities and administrative projects as requested. Department Goals  Continue the 2050 Comprehensive Plan update process.  Continue updates and amendments to the City Code.  Continue to implement a comprehensive approach to planning and development. Department Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Zoning Permits Approved 56 65 60 65 Planning Applications Processed 11 28 30 35 Public Hearing Notices Mailed to Residents 1,354 1,840 2,000 2,200 Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Personnel Services $ 317,758 332,357$ 290,450$ $ 284,880 $ (5,570) -1.92% Supplies 2,475 2,113 1,500 1,050 (450) -30.00% Other Services and Charges 19,315 60,344 108,773 66,308 (42,465) -39.04% Total Planning 339,548$ 394,814$ 400,723$ 352,238$ $ (48,485) -12.10% Page 24 of 162 Page 289 of 568GENERAL GOVERNMENT MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS (19) Department Mission The Municipal Building activity ensures the safety, functionality, and aesthetic quality of City Hall including adequate coverage of general liability, property, and casualty insurance of all city facilities and functions. City facilities should remain vibrant, well maintained, and functional to reflect the character of the community and provide high-quality services to residents. Department Description/Services This activity includes the maintenance and upkeep of utilities, office equipment, office furnishings, and overall building infrastructure. The activity encompasses several key areas:  Building Maintenance: Regular inspection, repair, and maintenance of city buildings to ensure safety and functionality.  FF&E Maintenance: Upkeep, servicing and replacement of FF&E.  Insurance Requirements: Managing and ensuring adequate coverage for general liability, property, and casualty insurance for all city facilities.  Systems Management: Overseeing the maintenance and operation of HVAC and other systems within buildings to ensure efficiency and reliability. Department Goals  Scheduled interior and exterior building maintenance.  Maintenance or replacement of fixture, furniture and equipment (FF&E).  Regular inspection and maintenance of building systems (e.g. HVAC, alarms, generator). Department Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Interior & exterior maintenance projects 1 1 1 1 FF&E maintenance or replacement 0 1 2 1 Systems inspections 8 6 6 6 Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Personnel Services $ - -$ $ 15,810 $ 17,190 $ 1,380 8.73% Supplies 28,614 32,049 23,000 11,600 (11,400) -49.57% Other Services and Charges 297,027 212,580 297,000 215,300 (81,700) -27.51% Total Municipal Buildings $ 325,641 $ 244,628 335,810$ $ 244,090 $ (91,720) -27.31% Page 25 of 162 Page 290 of 568PUBLIC SAFETY Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 PUBLIC SAFETY Police $ 1,545,366 $ 1,865,903 $ 1,882,027 $ 2,301,975 $ 419,948 22.31% Fire 779,007 967,326 1,016,152 1,063,254 47,102 4.64% Protective Inspections 189,180 218,871 340,080 343,758 3,678 1.08% TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY $ 2,513,554 $ 3,052,099 $ 3,238,259 $ 3,708,987 $ 470,728 14.54% Page 26 of 162 Page 291 of 568PUBLIC SAFETY POLICE (21) Department Mission Provide a modern, flexible, full-service criminal justice agency which is responsive to community needs. Department Description/Services The South Lake Minnetonka Police Department (SLMPD) is a joint powers entity comprised of the cities of Shorewood, Excelsior, Greenwood and Tonka Bay. The department provides for the safety of citizens in the community, the prevention and detection of crime, and the enforcement of all local, state, and federal laws in a cost-effective manner. Costs and staff are allocated to each of the participating cities on a set percentage basis. Shorewood's share of policing costs is approximately 50%, which is amended periodically per the formula established in the joint powers agreement. Department Goals  Maintain department staffing at 18 officers.  Maintain reliable and adequate equipment to support department operations.  Establish a capital improvement plan for the public safety building. Department Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated UCR Code – Part I & II Crimes (all cities) 477 392 425 450 Yearly Calls for Service (all cities) 11,164 11,708 12,000 12,300 Yearly Calls for Service (Shorewood) 5,765 6,723 6,800 6,900 Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Other Services and Charges$ 1,545,366 $ 1,865,903 $ 1,882,027 $ 2,301,975 $ 419,948 22.31% Total Police$ 1,545,366 $ 1,865,903 $ 1,882,027 $ 2,301,975 $ 419,948 22.31% Page 27 of 162 Page 292 of 568PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE (22) Department Mission Provide a high-quality fire education, prevention, suppression, and first responder emergency services. Department Description/Services Fire service is provided to the City through the Excelsior Fire District and the City of Mound (serving the properties on the islands). The departments provide for the protection of life and property of the residents of Shorewood through fire prevention and suppression, fire inspection, building inspection, fire code enforcement and emergency medical services. The Excelsior Fire District operates as a Joint Powers organization. Shorewood contracts with the City of Mound. Department Goals (EFD)  Maintain firefighter staffing levels between 45 to 50.  Maintain reliable and adequate equipment to support department operations.  Maintain an average response time of 2.00 minutes or less with duty officer and duty crew.  Establish a capital improvement plan for the public safety building. Department Performance Measures (EFD) Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Total Calls by Year 1,145 1,326 1,282 1,325 Duty Crew Calls by Year 232 434 425 430 Average Minutes to get on Scene na 7.02 <7.00 <7.00 (Time from page to arrival) Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Other Services and Charges 779,007$ 967,326$ $ 1,016,152 $ 1,063,254 $ 47,102 4.64% Total Fire 779,007$ 967,326$ $ 1,016,152 $ 1,063,254 $ 47,102 4.64% Page 28 of 162 Page 293 of 568PUBLIC SAFETY PROTECTIVE INSPECTION (24) Department Mission The Protective Inspections Department ensures public health and safety through enforcement of the Minnesota State Building Code, City Code, and related regulations through plan review and inspections. Department Description/Services This department provides enforcement of the Minnesota State Building Code, City Code requirements, property maintenance codes, reviews plans and conducts inspections for all new construction, alteration, and/or repair projects within the City. The department also administers the Rental Housing Licensing and inspections program. The purpose of these inspections is to protect property owners and the general health and safety of members of the public through ensuring compliance with applicable codes. Services provided by the department include:  Building permit administration and plan review.  Building code enforcement and inspections.  Mechanical code enforcement and inspections.  Plumbing code enforcement and inspections.  Property maintenance, code enforcement, and inspections.  Rental housing licensing and inspections.  Administrative projects as needed. Department Goals  Continue review of permit applications in a timely manner.  Continue education efforts through interactions with residents and online resources.  Continue providing exceptional customer service to residents and contractors. Department Performance Measures 2027 Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Total Market Value Added $41,571,370 $47,935,222 $45,000,000 $47,000,000 Building Permits Issued 933 970 950 975 Inspections Conducted 2,230 2,711 2,500 2,600 Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Personnel Services 159,664$ 187,900$ 297,460$ 299,290$ $ 1,830 0.62% Supplies 1,304 4,803 2,000 1,700 (300) -15.00% Other Services and Charges 28,213 26,168 40,620 42,768 2,148 5.29% Total Protective Inspections $ 189,180 218,871$ 340,080$ 343,758$ $ 3,678 1.08% Page 29 of 162 Page 294 of 568STREETS Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 STREETS Engineer 138,359 113,774 145,000 100,000 (45,000) -31.03% Public Works 913,665 964,149 1,131,440 1,125,980 (5,460) -0.48% Ice and Snow Removal 111,675 138,148 155,260 149,030 (6,230) -4.01% TOTAL STREETS 1,163,699 1,216,071 1,431,700 1,375,010 (56,690) -3.96% Page 30 of 162 Page 295 of 568STREETS CITY ENGINEER (31) Department Mission Provide engineering and construction management services for the city. Department Description/Services This department is responsible for general engineering services in the City such as attending required city meetings, meeting and responding to general resident inquiries, technical resource to city staff on engineering matters, manage infrastructure projects, assist in capital and budget planning, and reviews all development proposals and plans. General city engineering duties described above are budgeted for under department 31. Project related engineering services are funded through specific projects. Additionally, development review services are passed through costs to the developers. Department Goals  Provide quality engineering services.  Aid in the implementation of the asset management system.  Aid in miscellaneous engineering and resident issues. Department Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Amount of general engineering hours 1,246.5 1,183.5 850 750 spent by consulting staff Grant funding secured for city services/ $125,000 $518,000 $262,137 $7M projects # of site plan reviews 47 36 40 35 Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Other Services and Charges $ 138,359 $ 113,774 $ 145,000 $ 100,000 $ (45,000) -31.03% Total City Engineer 138,359$ $ 113,774 $ 145,000 $ 100,000 $ (45,000) -31.03% Page 31 of 162 Page 296 of 568STREETS PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES (32) Department Mission Provide for all general public works duties, maintenance of all public works equipment, and maintenance of the public works facility. Department Description/Services This activity provides for maintenance of City streets, public right-of-way and public property (excluding city park maintenance – see Department 52). Maintenance performed includes road patching, tree trimming and removal, mowing and trimming of roadsides, street sweeping and street signs and signals. In addition, this budget includes the equipment costs for ice and snow removal from City streets and pedestrian facilities along with traffic control signals/signage. Lastly, the Public Works facility’s operational and maintenance costs are included in this budget. Department Goals  Continue to provide efficient maintenance of roads, signs, etc.  Continue improving maintenance of existing PW building and facility and all public works maintenance equipment.  Perform maintenance of public right-of-way in accordance with the new Vegetation Management Plan. Department Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Replace old street signs (each) 31 95 89 75 Sweep and dispose of street sweepings (CY) N/A 125 115 115 Maintain PCI of 70 or above 76 77 70 70 Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Personnel Services $ 590,918 $ 631,386 $ 711,240 $ 725,780 $ 14,540 2.04% Supplies 145,236 141,395 207,400 183,200 (24,200) -11.67% Other Services and Charges 177,512 191,368 212,800 217,000 4,200 1.97% Total Public Works $ 913,665 $ 964,149 $ 1,131,440 $ 1,125,980 $ (5,460) -0.48% Page 32 of 162 Page 297 of 568STREETS ICE AND SNOW REMOVAL (33) Department Mission Provide ice and snow removal on city streets and city-owned parking lots to allow for the safe and efficient movement of traffic during and after a winter event. Department Description/Services This activity provides for maintenance and materials for ice and snow control on City streets, trails, sidewalks and parking lots. Costs include the winter maintenance materials and staff needed for safely and efficiently providing winter maintenance throughout the city. Department Goals  Continue employee training and expand training opportunities as needed.  Continue event and seasonal documentation including Winter Operations Plan.  Expand liquids program with new capital equipment. Department Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Provide necessary and required winter 100% 100% 100% 100% operations training to staff (% of staff) Complete all winter operations within 24 90% 95% 100% 100% hours of weather ending (% of events) Efficiently and safely treat roads per N/A 10-12 10-12 10-12 industry standards (tons/event)? Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Personnel Services $ 60,760 $ 81,002 $ 81,260 $ 83,030 $ 1,770 2.18% Supplies 49,074 56,229 70,000 64,000 (6,000) -8.57% Other Services and Charges 1,841 917 4,000 2,000 (2,000) -50.00% Total Ice and Snow Removal $ 111,675 $ 138,148 $ 155,260 $ 149,030 $ (6,230) -4.01% Page 33 of 162 Page 298 of 568PARKS AND RECREATION Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 PARKS AND RECREATION Park Maintenance 440,942 355,037 444,670 449,380 4,710 1.06% Recreation 99,746 133,564 161,475 209,963 48,488 30.03% TOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION 540,688 488,601 606,145 659,343 53,198 8.78% Page 34 of 162 Page 299 of 568PARKS AND RECREATION PARK MAINTENANCE (52) Department Mission Provides maintenance for city parks, trails, and beaches to provide safe and enjoyable recreational opportunities for residents of all ages and abilities. Department Description/Services This department is responsible for the maintenance of city parks, playing fields, trails, ice rinks, buildings, parking lots, and play structures. Department Goals  Continue successful park maintenance with public works employees, seasonal employees and additional partnerships.  Perform maintenance of parks and open spaces in accordance with the new Vegetation Management Plan.  Continue to manage tree removals and tree planting. Department Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Successfully maintain buckthorn per the city’s vegetation management plan 20 25 25 27 (acres) Provide volunteer opportunities to aid in 4 1 2 4 the maintenance of parks (events/year) Plant new trees in parks to aid in 30 125 75 40 reforestation Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Personnel Services $ 289,431 $ 272,594 $ 341,370 $ 351,580 $ 10,210 2.99% Supplies 38,517 34,175 45,700 42,700 (3,000) -6.56% Other Services and Charges 112,993 48,269 57,600 55,100 (2,500) -4.34% Total Park Maintenance $ 440,942 $ 355,037 $ 444,670 $ 449,380 $ 4,710 1.06% Page 35 of 162 Page 300 of 568PARKS AND RECREATION RECREATION (53) Department Mission This department has been separated from Parks Maintenance since 2012. Provides recreational programs for residents of all ages and abilities. Department Description/Services This department is responsible for the oversight of park shelter and field rentals, providing recreation programs & events, organizing community special events, managing the parks & recreation sponsorship program, and winter warming houses. Department Goals  Execute the recommendations included in the newly adopted Park System Master Plan.  Leverage community partnerships to expand upon existing community events.  Implement a Memorial Bench Program to provide a seamless, transparent, and meaningful way for park users to honor loved ones while enhancing the park system.  Evaluate existing events and prepare to adapt. Department Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Park Fees and Rental Revenue $44,840 $42,051 $43,000 $45,000 Special Event Attendance (est.) 550 544 800 850 Sponsorship Revenue $2,100 $4,350 $4,500 $4,750 Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Personnel Services 66,869$ 101,110$ 118,490$ 169,360$ $ 50,870 42.93% Supplies 1,827 2,151 4,800 7,300 2,500 52.08% Other Services and Charges 31,051 30,302 38,185 33,303 (4,882) -12.79% Total Recreation $ 99,746 133,564$ 161,475$ 209,963$ $ 48,488 30.03% Page 36 of 162 Page 301 of 568OTHER Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Transfers Out $ - $ 550,000 $ - $ - $ - Total Transfers Out $ - $ 550,000 $ - $ - $ - Page 37 of 162 Page 302 of 568OTHER OTHER FINANCING USES Department Mission This activity provides for the administration of miscellaneous accounts not established in the previous activities. Department Description/Services This budget included a one-time transfer of $400,000 to the Equipment Replacement Fund (403). As well as a one-time transfer of $150,000 to the Park Improvement Capital Fund (402). These transfers utilized part of the General Fund Fund Balance. Going forward the transfers will be managed in accordance with the adopted Reserve Policy revised April 14, 2025. Department Goals  Designate fund balance to classifications that disclose constraints for which amounts can be spent.  Review, determine, and assign use of excess fund balance.  Maintain an adequate level of fund balance to provide for cash flow requirements and contingency needs. Department Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Transfers to Park Improvement Capital $0 $150,000 $0 $0 Transfers to Equipment Replacement $0 $400,000 $0 $0 Transfers to Community Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $0 Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 Transfers Out $ - $ 550,000 $ - -$ -$ Total Transfers Out $ - $ 550,000 $ - -$ -$ Page 38 of 162 Page 303 of 568 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Special Revenue funds are established for specific revenues or sources that are designated for financing particular functions or activities as required by federal regulations, state statute, city charter provisions, local ordinances or specific grant agreements. Shorewood Community and Event Center - This fund was established to account for the resources accumulated from events and activities held at the City’s community center, and the payment of expenditures related to operations of the community center. The City has committed charges for services revenues for operations. Property taxes support the community center when fees generated from facility rental are not sufficient to cover expenses. Page 39 of 162 Page 304 of 568 SPECIAL REVENUE SHOREWOOD COMMUNITY AND EVENT CENTER FUND (201) Fund Mission This fund was established to account for the resources accumulated from events and activities held at the City’s community center, and the payment of expenditures related to operations of the community center. The City has committed charges for services revenues for operations. Property taxes support the community center when fees generated from facility rental are not sufficient to cover expenses. Fund Description/Services The Shorewood Community & Event Center (SCEC) is nestled in the woods right next to Shorewood City Hall and Badger Park to provide recreational services and programs. The City partners with the South Shore Senior Partners to provide Senior programming. The SCEC offers multiple room rentals, with spaces for birthday parties, graduations, weddings, receptions, memorials, HOA meetings, teleconferencing, dances, and more. Fund Goals  Implement recommendations provided by the SCEC Task Force.  Increase rental income while decreasing expenditures to achieve 70% cost recovery.  Maintain a functional facility by performing routine maintenance and providing incremental building updates. Fund Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Total Rental Income $66,075 $82,269 $82,000 $85,000 Total Facility Rentals 371 432 440 500 Cost Recovery – 70% Target 38.86% 48.68% 49% 55% Revenue/Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes $ 105,000 122,000$ $ 145,000 $ 175,607 $ 30,607 21.11% Charges for Services 66,286 82,269 68,000 82,000 14,000 20.59% Miscellaneous 3,040 5,364 3,150 2,500 (650) -20.63% TOTAL REVENUES $ 174,326 209,634$ $ 216,150 $ 260,107 $ 43,957 20.34% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services 88,701$ 112,390$ 68,480$ $ 124,940 $ 56,460 82.45% Supplies 33,093 22,145 29,340 27,510 (1,830) -6.24% Other Services and Charges 35,326 38,415 54,210 47,451 (6,759) -12.47% Capital Outlay 21,280 5,995 21,500 32,021 10,521 48.93% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 178,401 178,946$ $ 173,530 $ 231,922 $ 58,392 33.65% BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 78,404 74,329$ $ 105,016 $ 147,636 Net Change in Fund Balance (4,075) 30,687 42,620 28,185 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 74,329 105,016$ $ 147,636 $ 175,821 Page 40 of 162 Page 305 of 568 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Debt service funds are used to account for the payment of interest and principal on long-term general obligation debt other than debt issued for and serviced primarily by enterprise funds. The City issues general obligation bonds for the acquisition of major capital facilities and infrastructure. General obligation bonds have been issued for both governmental and business-type activities. These bonds are reported in the proprietary funds if they are expected to be repaid from proprietary revenues. In addition, general obligation bonds have been issued to refund special assessments related bonds. General obligation bonds are direct obligations and pledge the full faith and credit of the City. Page 41 of 162 Page 306 of 568 DEBT SERVICE GENERAL OBLIGATION FUNDS Fund Mission This fund was established to account for the resources accumulated for the payment of interest and principal on the outstanding governmental debt service activities. The City has pledged the full faith and credit and these bonds will be repaid from future tax levies. General Obligation Debt Service Levies General Obligation Street Reconstruction Bonds Annual Service Requirements to Maturity Principal Interest Total 2027$ 730,000 $ 305,581 $ 1,035,581 2028 740,000 289,705 1,029,705 2029 760,000 273,363 1,033,363 2030 770,000 256,556 1,026,556 2031 790,000 239,060 1,029,060 2032-2036 3,205,000 919,590 4,124,590 2037-2041 2,510,000 479,594 2,989,594 2042-2044 1,165,000 62,266 1,227,266 $ 10,670,000 $ 2,825,715 $ 13,495,715 Revenues/Expenditures 2020A G.O. Street 2021A G.O. Street 2022A G.O. Street 2023A G.O. Street Total Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Reconstruction Debt Service Description Fund (320) Fund (321) Fund (322) Fund (323) Funds REVENUES Taxes $ 227,704 $ 306,873 $ 287,517 $ 267,540 $ 1,089,634 TOTAL REVENUES $ 227,704 $ 306,873 $ 287,517 $ 267,540 $ 1,089,634 EXPENDITURES Other Services and Charges $ 235 $ 440 $ - $ 345 $ 1,020 Debt Service 214,765 291,285 272,450 257,600 1,036,100 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 215,000 $ 291,725 $ 272,450 $ 257,945 $ 1,037,120 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 263,675 $ 348,236 $ 249,604 $ 310,333 $ 1,171,848 Net Change in Fund Balance 12,704 15,148 15,067 9,595 52,514 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 276,379 $ 363,384 $ 264,671 $ 319,928 $ 1,224,362 Page 42 of 162 Page 307 of 568 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Capital Projects funds are used to account for the acquisition and construction of major capital facilities other than those financed by enterprise funds. Details of these funds can be found in the 10-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Park Capital Improvement Fund - This fund accounts for parkland acquisition and other capital improvements in the City parks. Equipment Replacement Fund - This fund was established to account for various capital acquisitions for the City governmental funds. This fund was developed in order to eliminate fluctuations in departmental operating budgets from year to year due to capital outlay purchases. Street Reconstruction Fund - This fund was established for the purpose of funding the periodic reconstruction of City streets and roadways. MSA Road Reconstruction Fund - This fund was established to account for the accumulation of Municipal State Aid (MSA) to fund the periodic reconstruction of MSA designated roads. Community Infrastructure Fund - This fund was established to account for various capital improvement projects that may be financed without the need to issue bonds. Page 43 of 162 Page 308 of 568 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL POLICY GENERAL POLICY Shorewood’s Capital Improvements Program reflects an assessment of the community’s needs and its ability to pay for major improvements. It is founded on the policy that reinvestment required for replacement, maintenance, or the increased efficiency of existing systems shall have priority over investments for expansion of existing systems or the provision of new services. FUNDING PRIORITIES Capital spending proposals will generally be funded on the following priority basis: 1. Those projects necessary for contributing to the public health and welfare. 2. Those projects which will help to maintain an existing system. 3. Those projects that will make an existing system more efficient. 4. Those projects representing the expansion of an existing system for new service or completely new public facility or service. FUNDING PRINCIPLES As a result, the following principles shall govern the implementation of the recommended Capital Improvements Program: 1. The City will make all capital improvements in accordance with the adopted Capital Improvements Program. 2. The City will develop a multi-year plan for Capital Improvements and update it annually. 3. The City will coordinate development of the Capital Improvements Program with development of the annual operating budget. Future optional costs associated with new capital improvements will be projected and included in operation budget forecasts. Page 44 of 162 Page 309 of 568CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY Capital Funds Capital Projects funds are used to account for the acquisition and construction of major capital facilities other than those financed by enterprise funds. Details of these funds can be found in the 10-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Fund Description/Services Park Capital Improvement Fund - This fund accounts for parkland acquisition and other capital improvements in the City parks. Equipment Replacement Fund - This fund was established to account for various capital acquisitions for the City governmental funds. This fund was developed in order to eliminate fluctuations in departmental operating budgets from year to year due to capital outlay purchases. Street Reconstruction Fund - This fund was established for the purpose of funding the periodic reconstruction of City streets and roadways. MSA Road Reconstruction Fund - This fund was established to account for the accumulation of Municipal State Aid (MSA) to fund the periodic reconstruction of MSA designated roads. Community Infrastructure Fund - This fund was established to account for various capital improvement projects that may be financed without the need to issue bonds. Revenue/Expenditures Park Equipment Street Municipal Community Total Improvement Replacement Improvement State Aid Infrastructure Capital Description Fund (402) Fund (403) Fund (404) Fund (405) Fund (450) Funds REVENUES Taxes $ 355,500 $ 275,000 $ - -$ $ 150,000 $ 780,500 Municipal State Aid - - - - - - Miscellaneous 2,230 920 365,510 580 - 369,240 Transfers In - - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 357,730 $ 275,920 $ 365,510 $ 580 $ 150,000 $ 1,149,740 EXPENDITURES Supplies $ - $ - $ - -$ $ - $ - Other Services and Charges - - - - - - Capital Outlay 350,000 367,600 2,262,119 - 150,000 3,129,719 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 350,000 $ 367,600 $ 2,262,119 -$ $ 150,000 $ 3,129,719 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 624,594 $ 178,713 $ 1,861,224 $ 43,663 $ 42,769 Net Change in Fund Balance 7,730 (91,680) (1,896,609) 580 - ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 632,324 $ 87,033 $ (35,385) $ 44,243 $ 42,769 Page 45 of 162 Page 310 of 568CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PARK IMPROVEMENT CAPITAL FUND (402) Fund Mission This fund was established to account for the resources accumulated from events and activities held at the City’s community center, and the payment of expenditures related to operations of the community center. The City has committed charges for services revenues for operations. Property taxes support the community center when fees generated from facility rental are not sufficient to cover expenses. Fund Description/Services The Park Improvement Capital Fund provides for major facilities and equipment for City parks. Fees collected from new subdivision development and transfers from the General Fund are dedicated for the development and improvement of City parks. Revenue/Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes $ 128,000 $ 135,000 $ 305,500 $ 355,500 $ 50,000 16.37% Park Dedication Fees 112,500 97,600 - - - Miscellaneous 321,979 67,873 2,230 2,230 - 0.00% Transfers In 105,000 150,000 - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 667,479 $ 450,473 $ 307,730 $ 357,730 $ 50,000 16.25% EXPENDITURES Supplies $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other Services and Charges 23,688 42,191 - - - Capital Outlay 45,120 (769) 45,000 350,000 305,000 677.78% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 68,808 $ 41,422 $ 45,000 $ 350,000 $ 305,000 677.78% BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ (645,858) $ (47,187) $ 361,864 $ 624,594 Net Change in Fund Balance 598,671 409,051 262,730 7,730 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ (47,187) $ 361,864 $ 624,594 $ 632,324 Page 46 of 162 Page 311 of 568CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CAPITAL FUND (403) Fund Mission This fund was established for the purpose of funding the replacement of capital equipment. Fund Description/Services The Equipment Replacement Capital Fund is supported by Property Taxes and there have been transfers from the General Fund over the years as well. These sources provide for the accumulation of funds for acquisition and replacement of equipment utilized in City operations and infrastructure. Revenue/Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes $ 128,000 165,000$ 215,000$ $ 275,000 $ 60,000 27.91% Sale of Capital Assets 3,854 198,508 - - - Miscellaneous 11,815 3,117 920 920 - 0.00% Transfers In - 400,000 - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 143,669 766,625$ 215,920$ $ 275,920 $ 60,000 27.79% EXPENDITURES Buildings & Structures$ 30,901 $ 680,897 $ - $ - $ - Machinery & Equipment 113,193 344,994 74,900 344,000 269,100 359.28% Furniture & Fixtures - 242 11,200 23,600 12,400 110.71% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 144,094 $ 1,026,132 $ 86,100 $ 367,600 $ 281,500 326.95% BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 308,826 $ 308,400 $ 48,893 $ 178,713 Net Change in Fund Balance (426) (259,507) 129,820 (91,680) ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 308,400 $ 48,893 $ 178,713 $ 87,033 Page 47 of 162 Page 312 of 568CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT STREET RECONSTRUCTION CAPITAL FUND (404) Fund Mission This fund was established for the purpose of funding the periodic maintenance, upgrade, and reconstruction of City streets and roadways. Fund Description/Services The Street Improvement Capital Fund is supported by Property Tax Levy, Bond Proceeds. There have also been transfers periodically to supplement the fund with general operating surplus. The City’s strategy to finance projects has been to bond. Bonds were issued from 2020-2023 to finance various projects within the fund, the City’s outstanding debt will essentially grow larger each year until the first bonds issued in 2020 are paid off. Revenue/Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes $ 128,000 $ 170,500 $ - $ - $ - Miscellaneous 181,602 615,646 65,510 365,510 300,000 457.95% Bond Proceeds - - - - - Transfers In - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 309,602 $ 786,146 $ 65,510 $ 365,510 $ 300,000 457.95% EXPENDITURES Supplies $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other Services and Charges 415,240 629,140 - - - Capital Outlay 985,347 1,693,796 315,000 2,262,119 1,947,119 618.13% Transfers Out - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,400,587 $ 2,322,935 $ 315,000 $ 2,262,119 $ 1,947,119 618.13% BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 4,738,489 $ 3,647,503 $ 2,110,714 $ 1,861,224 Net Change in Fund Balance (1,090,986) (1,536,790) (249,490) (1,896,609) ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 3,647,503 $ 2,110,714 $ 1,861,224 $ (35,385) Page 48 of 162 Page 313 of 568CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT MUNICIPAL STATE AID CAPITAL FUND (405) Fund Mission This fund was established to account for the accumulation of Municipal State Aid (MSA) to fund the periodic reconstruction of MSA designated roads. Fund Description/Services The MSA Street Improvement Capital Fund is supported by Municipal State Aid (MSA) Funds. The MSA Street program is administered through the State of Minnesota’s Department of Transportation. The funds are used for the maintenance, upgrade, and reconstruction of City streets and roadways designated on the City’s MSA system. Revenue/Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Municipal State Aid - - 1,072,000 - (1,072,000) -100.00% Miscellaneous 1,639 1,575 468,580 580 (468,000) -99.88% Transfers In - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 1,639 1,575$ $ 1,540,580 $ 580 $ (1,540,000) -99.96% EXPENDITURES Supplies $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other Services and Charges - - - - - Capital Outlay - - 1,540,000 - (1,540,000) -100.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ - $ -$ 1,540,000 $ - $ (1,540,000) -100.00% BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 39,869 41,508$ 43,083$ $ 43,663 1.35% Net Change in Fund Balance 1,639 1,575 580 580 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 41,508 43,083$ 43,663$ $ 44,243 Page 49 of 162 Page 314 of 568CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL FUND (450) Fund Mission This fund was established to account for various capital improvement public facilities projects that may be financed without the need to issue bonds. Fund Description/Services The Community Infrastructure Capital Fund provides for the accumulation of funds for acquisition, maintenance, and replacement of public facilities within the City. Revenue/Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes $ - $ -$ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ 100,000 200.00% Miscellaneous 89,049 3,207 - - - Transfers In - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 89,049 $ 3,207$ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ 100,000 200.00% EXPENDITURES Supplies $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other Services and Charges - - - - - Capital Outlay 88,158 - 245,000 150,000 (95,000) -38.78% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 88,158 $ -$ 245,000 $ 150,000 $ (95,000) -38.78% BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 233,672 $ 234,563 $ 237,769 $ 42,769 -82.01% Net Change in Fund Balance 891 3,207 (195,000) - ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 234,563 $ 237,769 $ 42,769 $ 42,769 Page 50 of 162 Page 315 of 568 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Enterprise funds are used to account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business, where the costs of providing services to the general public are financed primarily through user charges. Water Operations Fund - This fund is used to account for the activities of the City water system. Sanitary Sewer Fund - This fund is used to account for the activities of the City sanitary sewer system. Stormwater Management Fund - This fund is used to account for the activities of the City Stormwater Management system. Recycling Fund - This fund is used to account for the activities of the City recycling program. Page 51 of 162 Page 316 of 568ENTERPRISE The four Enterprise Funds of the City consist of the Water Fund, Sanitary Sewer Fund, Stormwater Management Fund, and the Recycling Fund. These funds are classified as enterprise, or proprietary funds, relying on user fees to support the operations, infrastructure, and capital improvements of the funds. Water Fund Sanitary Sewer Fund 2024 & 2025 Actual, 2026-2027 Budget 2024 & 2025 Actual, 2026-2027 Budget $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $- $500,000 $(500,000) $(1,000,000) $- $(1,500,000) $(500,000) 2024202520262027 2024 2025 2026 2027 Revenues $972,747 $1,232,041 $1,271,320 $1,599,860 Revenues $1,549,563 $1,839,239 $2,306,649 $2,396,945 Expenses $1,205,979 $904,961 $2,387,610 $1,729,421 Expenses $1,753,293 $1,628,870 $2,090,842 $2,128,006 Change in Net Position (233,233) 327,080 (1,116,290) (129,561) Change in Net Position (203,730) 210,369 215,807 268,939 Stormwater Management Fund Recycling Fund 2024 & 2025 Actual, 2026-2027 Budget 2024 & 2025 Actual, 2026-2027 Budget $1,600,000 $300,000 $1,400,000 $250,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $200,000 $800,000 $150,000 $600,000 $400,000 $100,000 $200,000 $50,000 $- $- $(200,000) $(400,000) $(50,000) 2024 2025 2026 2027 2024 2025 2026 2027 Revenues $908,030 $648,187 $1,136,500 $1,220,360 Revenues $230,847 $254,863 $238,800 $253,300 Expenses $629,279 $410,735 $1,328,595 $1,056,139 Expenses $211,187 $228,360 $251,610 $256,690 Change in Net Position 278,752 237,452 (192,095) 164,221 Change in Net Position 19,660 26,503 (12,810) (3,390) Page 52 of 162 Page 317 of 568 ENTERPRISE WATER FUND (601) Fund Mission This fund is used to account for the activities of the City water system. To provide a safe, clean, uninterrupted supply of drinking water to all City residents connected to the municipal water system. Fund Description/Services The municipal water fund is responsible for operation and maintenance of six (6) well systems, including all pumps and well houses, maintenance of water towers, and extension of new water-main and construction of new water facilities, as necessary. This fund provides for the operation of the water system so that a continuous quality supply of water is furnished to customers at a reasonable cost. The water supply is maintained at proper pressure levels and bacteria free. Metering devices are also maintained to account for usage. The primary services provided by this fund are production and distribution of potable water for the residents, businesses, and institutions in the City of Shorewood. The distribution system also provides the general fire protection system (hydrants) for the City and is also responsible for City utility locates under the Gopher State One Call system. Fund Goals  Begin implementation of asset management system.  Continue to maintain current infrastructure, including valve exercising, water tower cleaning, hydrant flushing, etc.  Implement Council objectives to provide more fund sustainability.  Update wellhead protection plan. Fund Performance Measures 2024 2025 2026 2027 Performance Measure Actual Actual Projected Estimated Exercise every valve once per year (% of valves) 20% 25% 25% 25% Minimize non-read water meters (each) 200-300 10 5 5 Fix watermain breaks w/ minimal disruption 5 6 9 5 Revenue/Expenses Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Utility Revenue $ 763,277 $ 932,550 $ 1,160,502 $ 1,279,860 $ 119,358 10.29% Water Connection Fees 85,300 91,950 90,618 50,000 (40,618) -44.82% Utility Permit Fees 2,760 1,860 - - - Water Meter Sales 16,438 8,775 10,000 10,000 - 0.00% Miscellaneous Revenue 104,971 196,905 10,200 260,000 249,800 2449.02% TOTAL REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 972,747 $ 1,232,041 $ 1,271,320 $ 1,599,860 $ 328,540 25.84% EXPENSES Personnel Services $ 361,313 $ 345,674 $ 357,220 $ 365,090 $ 7,870 2.20% Supplies 114,692 99,605 132,900 132,800 (100) -0.08% Other Services and Charges 596,575 279,487 867,000 951,000 84,000 9.69% Non-Operating 133,399 180,195 1,030,490 280,531 (749,959) -72.78% TOTAL EXPENSES $ 1,205,979 $ 904,961 $ 2,387,610 $ 1,729,421 $ (658,189) -27.57% BEGINNING NET POSITION $ 7,677,961 $ 7,444,728 $ 7,771,808 $ 6,655,518 Change in Net Position (233,233) 327,080 (1,116,290) (129,561) ENDING NET POSITION $ 7,444,728 $ 7,771,808 $ 6,655,518 $ 6,525,957 *Net Position includes Net Investment in Capital Assets Page 53 of 162 Page 318 of 568ENTERPRISE SANITARY SEWER FUND (611) Fund Mission This fund is used to account for the activities of the City sanitary sewer system. Fund Description/Services The Sanitary Sewer Fund finances the operation and maintenance of the City’s wastewater collection, including fourteen sanitary sewer lift stations throughout the system. As well as cleaning, televising and repairing sewer mains to control inflow and infiltration. Sewage treatment is performed by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) and is provided for in this area. Fund Goals  Begin implementation of asset management system.  Continue to maintain current infrastructure, including sewer cleaning, etc.  Begin maintenance and repair of sewer structures and castings to reduce I&I. Fund Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Clean 20% of the sanitary sewer system 20% 20% 20% 20% Reconstruct, fix, or seal sanitary casting N/A 122 8 70 structure to improve I&I. Clean and televise 10% of sanitary sewer N/A 15% 10% 10% system outside of road accessible locations Revenue/Expenses Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Utility Revenue $ 1,481,058 $ 1,762,438 $ 2,276,649 $ 2,344,945 $ 68,296 3.00% Sewer Connection Fees 1,200 23,140 5,000 5,000 - 0.00% Utility Permit Fees 120 - 1,000 1,000 - 0.00% Miscellaneous Revenue 67,185 53,661 24,000 46,000 22,000 91.67% TOTAL REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 1,549,563 $ 1,839,239 $ 2,306,649 $ 2,396,945 $ 90,296 3.91% EXPENSES Personnel Services $ 309,284 $ 289,301 $ 301,135 $ 308,175 $ 7,040 2.34% Supplies 18,660 10,487 17,200 16,800 (400) -2.33% MCES SAC Payables Charges 1,076,772 1,074,424 1,200,217 1,179,366 (20,851) -1.74% Other Services and Charges 253,504 134,647 280,300 331,300 51,000 18.19% Non-Operating 95,073 120,011 291,990 292,365 375 0.13% TOTAL EXPENSES $ 1,753,293 $ 1,628,870 $ 2,090,842 $ 2,128,006 $ 37,164 1.78% BEGINNING NET POSITION $ 3,455,125 $ 3,251,395 $ 3,461,764 $ 3,677,571 Change in Net Position (203,730) 210,369 215,807 268,939 ENDING NET POSITION $ 3,251,395 $ 3,461,764 $ 3,677,571 $ 3,946,510 *Net Position includes Net Investment in Capital Assets Page 54 of 162 Page 319 of 568 ENTERPRISE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND (631) Fund Mission This fund is used to account for the activities of the City Stormwater Management system. Fund Description/Services The Stormwater Management Fund is utilized to provide the operation, maintenance and repair of the stormwater conveyance system, including 14 miles of infrastructure, including catch basins, drainage ditches, and retention posts. As well as implementation of the city-wide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) for compliance with the NPDES Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit program, which authorized the City to discharge stormwater runoff. Infrastructure and stormwater facilities are properly maintained to manage, convey, and treat stormwater runoff. In addition, infrastructure improvements are constructed and repaired as deemed necessary. Fund Goals  Begin implementation of asset management system.  Continue to manage existing stormwater features through maintenance activities, including pond cleaning, street sweeping, storm drain cleaning, etc.  Continue to be in compliance with federal, state and local agencies, including the city’s MS4 permit. Fund Performance Measures 2024 2025 2026 2027 Performance Measure Actual Actual Projected Estimated Number of catch basins cleaned N/A 25 50 50 Provide communication related to stormwater N/A 0 4 4-6 quality & best management practices Inspect inlets & outlets of storm ponds. Clean as N/A N/A 20% 20% needed for proper functionality Revenue/Expenses Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Utility Revenue 544,516$ $ 598,117 $ 890,000 $ 1,210,360 $ 320,360 36.00% Franchise Fees 324,387 - - - - Miscellaneous Revenue 39,127 50,069 246,500 10,000 (236,500) -95.94% TOTAL REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 908,030 $ 648,187 $ 1,136,500 $ 1,220,360 $ 83,860 7.38% EXPENSES Personnel Services $ 85,757 $ 84,992 $ 96,580 $ 98,360 $ 1,780 1.84% Supplies 7,776 7,226 9,800 9,550 (250) -2.55% Other Services and Charges 233,640 117,572 260,450 253,550 (6,900) -2.65% Non-Operating 302,106 200,944 961,765 694,679 (267,086) -27.77% TOTAL EXPENSES $ 629,279 $ 410,735 $ 1,328,595 $ 1,056,139 $ (272,456) -20.51% BEGINNING NET POSITION $ 5,872,097 $ 6,150,849 $ 6,388,301 $ 6,196,206 Change in Net Position 278,752 237,452 (192,095) 164,221 ENDING NET POSITION $ 6,150,849 $ 6,388,301 $ 6,196,206 $ 6,360,427 *Net Position includes Net Investment in Capital Assets Page 55 of 162 Page 320 of 568 ENTERPRISE RECYCLING FUND (621) Fund Mission This fund is used to account for the activities of the city’s recycling program. Fund Description/Services The city’s recycling services are dedicated to promoting sustainable waste management practices within the community. The department's primary goal is to reduce the amount of waste sent to landfills by encouraging residents and businesses to recycle and compost. Key components include recycling programs, education, outreach, partnerships, composting, innovation, and improvement. The city contracts with a recycling hauler for bi-weekly residential (including all single family, duplex and quad homes) curbside recycling services. In addition, the city offers two organics collection sites for residents to recycle organic materials as well. Sustainability: Fostering environmental stewardship through recycling programs, green energy projects, and community education on sustainability. Fund Goals  Increase material tonnage of recyclable materials.  Decrease residual garbage in recycling.  Increase participation rate for organics recycling and plan for curbside organics in 2030. Fund Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Expected Total tonnage 770.91 760.5 800 850 Residential tonnage versus 96.51 68.4 70 80 % residual 13% 9% 9% 8% Participation of households registered 149 167 195 225 % of participation in organics recycling 4.5% 5.5% 6.5% 7.5% Revenue/Expenses Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Utility Revenue 189,187$ $ 217,002 $ 216,000 $ 228,000 $ 12,000 5.56% Intergovernmental Grant 18,479 17,402 18,000 19,000 1,000 5.56% Miscellaneous Revenue 16,277 16,123 300 300 - 0.00% City Cleanup Charges 6,904 4,336 4,500 6,000 1,500 33.33% TOTAL REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 230,847 $ 254,863 $ 238,800 $ 253,300 $ 14,500 6.07% EXPENSES Personnel Services $ 24,459 $ 13,019 $ 32,360 $ 33,740 $ 1,380 4.26% Supplies 1,580 1,613 7,500 4,200 (3,300) -44.00% Other Services and Charges 185,148 213,728 211,750 218,750 7,000 3.31% TOTAL EXPENSES $ 211,187 $ 228,360 $ 251,610 $ 256,690 $ 5,080 2.02% BEGINNING NET POSITION $ 426,519 $ 446,179 $ 472,682 $ 459,872 Change in Net Position 19,660 26,503 (12,810) (3,390) ENDING NET POSITION $ 446,179 $ 472,682 $ 459,872 $ 456,482 Page 56 of 162 Page 321 of 568 GENERAL FUND DETAILED BUDGETS Page 57 of 162 Page 322 of 568 General Ledger Budget Analysis User: jschmuck@ci.shorewood.mn.us Printed: 08/18/2026 - 7:18AM Fiscal Year: 2027 Fiscal Periods: All 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 101 General Fund R01 Taxes 5,586,854.48 5,730,418.61 6,435,897.00 0.00 3010-0000 CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES 0.00 7,168,324.00 6,886,738.00 0.00 0.00 33,618.31 15,598.96 0.00 0.00 3011-0000 DELINQUENT AD VALOREM TAXES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 137,505.21 138,561.27 0.00 0.00 3100-0000 FISCAL DISPARITIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,807.04 1,054.84 0.00 0.00 3191-0000 PENALTIES & INT. ON AD VALOREM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,759,785.04 5,885,633.68 6,435,897.00 0.00 Taxes Totals: 0.00 7,168,324.00 6,886,738.00 0.00 0.00 R02 Licenses & Permits 2,730.00 2,240.00 3,500.00 0.00 3211-0000 LIQUOR LICENSES 0.00 3,500.00 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 1,750.00 2,250.00 0.00 3212-0000 TOBACCO LICENSES 0.00 2,250.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,425.00 1,150.00 1,825.00 0.00 3215-0000 REFUSE COLLECTION LICENSES 0.00 1,825.00 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 1,110.00 1,760.00 600.00 0.00 3216-0000 TREE TRIMMING LICENSES 0.00 600.00 1,700.00 0.00 0.00 2,122.55 1,212.00 1,200.00 0.00 3218-0000 OTHER BUSINESS LICENSES&PEN 0.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 170.00 200.00 0.00 3219-0000 LAWN FERTILIZER LICENSE 0.00 200.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 44,298.30 99,360.20 0.00 0.00 3221-0000 BUILDING PERMITS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,542.60 1,272.55 1,000.00 0.00 3223-0000 DOG LICENSES 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 700.00 250.00 0.00 0.00 3224-0000 FARM ANIMAL PERMIT 0.00 0.00 250.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 3225-0000 HORSE PERMITS 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3226-0000 OTHER NON-BUSINESS LICENSES AN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 600.00 500.00 0.00 3235-0000 SOLICITOR PERMIT 0.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 56,903.45 109,789.75 11,075.00 0.00 Licenses & Permits Totals: 0.00 11,075.00 11,375.00 0.00 0.00 R03 Intergovernmental 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3340-0000 PUBLIC SAFETY AID 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.86 0.00 0.00 3343-0000 MKT VALUE CREDIT AID 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3344-0000 PERA AID 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 1 Page 58 of 162 Page 323 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 118,815.00 138,920.00 131,500.00 0.00 3345-0000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID FOR STREET 0.00 138,920.00 138,920.00 0.00 0.00 22,973.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 3348-0000 PRES NOMINATION PRIMARY REIMB 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3362-0000 MISC GRANTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,797.14 1,699.81 1,800.00 0.00 3365-0000 EXCELSIOR ANNEX-DETACH 0.00 1,700.00 1,700.00 0.00 0.00 195,835.82 140,681.67 133,300.00 0.00 Intergovernmental Totals: 0.00 140,620.00 140,620.00 0.00 0.00 R04 Charges for Service 0.00 3,937.50 0.00 0.00 3400-0000 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 645.64 (10,483.00) 0.00 0.00 3414-0000 PASS-THRU CHARGES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 185.90 168.72 100.00 0.00 3415-0000 SALE OF COPIES 0.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 275.00 (150.00) 0.00 0.00 3417-0000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SEARCHES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3420-0000 ELECTION FILING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,867.35 3,978.70 4,000.00 0.00 3472-0000 TREE SALES 0.00 4,000.00 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3474-0000 ARCTIC FEVER DONATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 450.00 300.00 350.00 0.00 3482-0000 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT FEES 0.00 350.00 350.00 0.00 0.00 10,535.89 (2,248.08) 4,450.00 0.00 Charges for Service Totals: 0.00 4,450.00 6,450.00 0.00 0.00 R05 Fines & Forfeits 69,438.33 100,940.90 64,500.00 0.00 3510-0000 FINES & FORFEITS 0.00 75,000.00 75,000.00 0.00 0.00 69,438.33 100,940.90 64,500.00 0.00 Fines & Forfeits Totals: 0.00 75,000.00 75,000.00 0.00 0.00 R07 Special Assessments 4,437.77 5,471.13 5,000.00 0.00 3610-0000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT-CURRENT 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,437.77 5,471.13 5,000.00 0.00 Special Assessments Totals: 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 R08 Investment Revenue 65,949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3622-0000 LEASE INTEREST REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65,949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R09 Misc Revenues 240,418.88 198,495.61 130,000.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 148,400.00 148,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3621-0000 GAIN / (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,476.40 37,187.95 30,000.00 0.00 3624-0000 REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 0.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 227,684.85 202,062.12 209,800.00 0.00 3627-0000 CELLULAR ANTENNA REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59,255.52 224.72 1,000.00 0.00 3670-0000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 0.00 250.00 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3790-0000 CASH OVER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 2 Page 59 of 162 Page 324 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 575,835.65 437,970.40 370,800.00 0.00 Misc Revenues Totals: 0.00 178,650.00 178,650.00 0.00 0.00 R11 Other Financing Sources 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 3920-0000 TRANSFERS IN 0.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 Other Financing Sources Totals: 0.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 6,763,720.95 6,703,239.45 7,050,022.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 7,608,119.00 7,328,833.00 0.00 0.00 E09 Other Financing Use 0.00 550,000.00 0.00 0.00 4820-0000 OPERATING TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 550,000.00 0.00 0.00 Other Financing Use Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 550,000.00 0.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 3 Page 60 of 162 Page 325 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 11 Council E01 Personal Services 25,500.00 21,250.00 25,500.00 0.00 4103-0000 PART-TIME 0.00 25,500.00 25,500.00 0.00 0.00 1,950.72 1,625.60 1,950.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 1,950.00 1,950.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 240.00 220.00 0.00 0.00 27,450.72 22,875.60 27,670.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 27,690.00 27,670.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 2,125.16 1,179.75 3,000.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 3,000.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 2,125.16 1,179.75 3,000.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 3,000.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4321-0000 COMMUNICATIONS - VOICE/DATA 0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,747.66 5,144.59 5,000.00 0.00 4331-0000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 12,000.00 0.00 4346-0000 EVENTS 0.00 12,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.13 0.00 200.00 0.00 4351-0000 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 200.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 1,430.80 2,645.34 4,500.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 6,400.00 2,900.00 0.00 0.00 28,792.00 35,246.00 48,000.00 0.00 4433-0000 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 57,217.00 57,150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4440-0000 MISC SERVICES/CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41,497.59 50,535.93 69,700.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 82,817.00 67,250.00 0.00 0.00 71,073.47 74,591.28 100,370.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 113,507.00 97,420.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 71,073.47 74,591.28 100,370.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 113,507.00 97,420.00 0.00 0.00 (71,073.47) (74,591.28) (100,370.00) 0.00 Council Totals: 0.00 (113,507.00) (97,420.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 4 Page 61 of 162 Page 326 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 13 Administration E01 Personal Services 455,083.26 463,214.05 425,330.00 0.00 4101-0000 FULL-TIME REGULAR 0.00 531,220.00 531,220.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,329.60 0.00 0.00 4102-0000 OVERTIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 4103-0000 PART-TIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4107-0000 ELECTION JUDGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,397.62 34,750.39 31,900.00 0.00 4121-0000 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 39,840.00 39,840.00 0.00 0.00 34,003.21 34,178.92 32,540.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 40,640.00 40,640.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,740.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 5,100.00 4,670.00 0.00 0.00 65,138.04 69,881.54 84,580.00 0.00 4131-0000 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 0.00 107,300.00 107,300.00 0.00 0.00 2,713.45 1,956.76 1,290.00 0.00 4151-0000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 0.00 1,610.00 1,610.00 0.00 0.00 591,335.78 605,311.26 579,380.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 725,710.00 725,280.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 6,253.18 4,550.96 5,000.00 0.00 4200-0000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 5,000.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 7,448.68 6,709.97 9,000.00 0.00 4208-0000 POSTAGE 0.00 9,000.00 6,610.00 0.00 0.00 4,723.47 4,594.42 5,000.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 5,000.00 4,500.00 0.00 0.00 18,425.33 15,855.35 19,000.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 19,000.00 13,610.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 1,546.69 1,235.85 2,000.00 0.00 4321-0000 COMMUNICATIONS - VOICE/DATA 0.00 4,000.00 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 7,936.01 4,005.06 9,000.00 0.00 4331-0000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 0.00 9,000.00 6,200.00 0.00 0.00 8,620.52 10,854.91 14,000.00 0.00 4351-0000 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 14,800.00 8,000.00 0.00 0.00 56,942.24 47,436.20 88,000.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 78,500.00 50,300.00 0.00 0.00 3,450.72 4,771.12 4,000.00 0.00 4433-0000 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 4,000.00 3,650.00 0.00 0.00 78,496.18 68,303.14 117,000.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 110,300.00 69,650.00 0.00 0.00 688,257.29 689,469.75 715,380.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 855,010.00 808,540.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 688,257.29 689,469.75 715,380.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 855,010.00 808,540.00 0.00 0.00 (688,257.29) (689,469.75) (715,380.00) 0.00 Administration Totals: 0.00 (855,010.00) (808,540.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 5 Page 62 of 162 Page 327 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 14 Elections E01 Personal Services 0.00 0.00 64,520.00 0.00 4101-0000 FULL-TIME REGULAR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4102-0000 OVER-TIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,880.50 0.00 28,000.00 0.00 4107-0000 ELECTION JUDGE 0.00 24,000.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,840.00 0.00 4121-0000 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,940.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB-CITY SHARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 570.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,090.00 0.00 4131-0000 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 4151-0000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,880.50 0.00 121,160.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 24,000.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 264.29 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 4200-0000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 2,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 4208-0000 POSTAGE 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 981.94 3,000.00 0.00 4221-0000 MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT 0.00 2,100.00 1,100.00 0.00 0.00 9,496.26 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 9,760.55 981.94 10,000.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 9,100.00 7,100.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 988.69 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 4331-0000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 328.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 4351-0000 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4440-0000 MISC SERVICES/CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,316.69 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 41,957.74 981.94 133,160.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 35,100.00 33,100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41,957.74 981.94 133,160.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 35,100.00 33,100.00 0.00 0.00 (41,957.74) (981.94) (133,160.00) 0.00 Elections Totals: 0.00 (35,100.00) (33,100.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 6 Page 63 of 162 Page 328 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 15 Finance E01 Personal Services 126,837.73 154,585.08 170,920.00 0.00 4101-0000 FULL-TIME REGULAR 0.00 171,600.00 171,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4103-0000 PART-TIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,308.94 11,595.82 12,820.00 0.00 4121-0000 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 12,870.00 12,870.00 0.00 0.00 10,452.34 13,765.47 13,080.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 13,130.00 13,130.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 1,650.00 1,510.00 0.00 0.00 14,121.89 22,364.53 32,420.00 0.00 4131-0000 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 0.00 34,940.00 34,940.00 0.00 0.00 726.31 701.27 520.00 0.00 4151-0000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 0.00 520.00 520.00 0.00 0.00 160,447.21 203,012.17 231,260.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 234,710.00 234,570.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 726.19 175.47 1,000.00 0.00 4200-0000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 900.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 21,311.45 25,039.83 29,515.00 0.00 4221-0000 MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT 0.00 33,450.00 33,450.00 0.00 0.00 22,037.64 25,215.30 30,515.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 34,350.00 34,350.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 0.00 431.94 0.00 0.00 4321-0000 COMMUNICATIONS - VOICE/DATA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 714.06 441.29 3,200.00 0.00 4331-0000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 0.00 3,200.00 3,200.00 0.00 0.00 1,414.50 1,792.23 2,000.00 0.00 4351-0000 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 1,800.00 1,800.00 0.00 0.00 135,606.45 4,042.50 1,500.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 800.00 0.00 4433-0000 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 835.00 835.00 0.00 0.00 1,665.07 1,945.89 0.00 0.00 4440-0000 MISC SERVICES/CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,365.48 673.23 13,000.00 0.00 4450-0000 BANK SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 13,000.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 152,765.56 9,567.08 20,500.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 20,335.00 12,835.00 0.00 0.00 335,250.41 237,794.55 282,275.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 289,395.00 281,755.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 335,250.41 237,794.55 282,275.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 289,395.00 281,755.00 0.00 0.00 (335,250.41) (237,794.55) (282,275.00) 0.00 Finance Totals: 0.00 (289,395.00) (281,755.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 7 Page 64 of 162 Page 329 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 16 Professional Services E04 Professional Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4351-0000 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 91,224.00 39,072.00 10,000.00 0.00 4301-0000 AUDITING & ACCOUNTING 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 87,903.91 126,582.76 128,000.00 0.00 4304-0000 LEGAL FEES 0.00 128,000.00 130,000.00 0.00 0.00 182,075.98 12,452.38 20,000.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4440-0000 MISC SERVICES/CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 361,203.89 178,107.14 158,000.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 158,000.00 160,000.00 0.00 0.00 361,203.89 178,107.14 158,000.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 158,000.00 160,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 361,203.89 178,107.14 158,000.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 158,000.00 160,000.00 0.00 0.00 (361,203.89) (178,107.14) (158,000.00) 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 (158,000.00) (160,000.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 8 Page 65 of 162 Page 330 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 18 Planning R02 Licenses & Permits 0.00 18,300.00 10,000.00 0.00 3413-0000 ZONING & SUBDIVISION FEES 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,300.00 10,000.00 0.00 Licenses & Permits Totals: 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,300.00 10,000.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 E01 Personal Services 238,889.19 258,865.43 208,260.00 0.00 4101-0000 FULL-TIME REGULAR 0.00 206,450.00 206,450.00 0.00 0.00 17,567.65 16,889.04 15,620.00 0.00 4121-0000 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 15,480.00 15,480.00 0.00 0.00 17,211.23 19,057.50 15,930.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 15,790.00 15,790.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,830.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 1,980.00 1,820.00 0.00 0.00 42,436.59 35,805.50 48,000.00 0.00 4131-0000 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 0.00 44,530.00 44,530.00 0.00 0.00 1,499.25 1,324.46 810.00 0.00 4151-0000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 0.00 810.00 810.00 0.00 0.00 317,603.91 331,941.93 290,450.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 285,040.00 284,880.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 0.00 381.99 1,500.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 1,800.00 1,050.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 381.99 1,500.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 1,800.00 1,050.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 0.00 270.00 0.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4304-0000 LEGAL FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,155.27 871.50 1,095.00 0.00 4321-0000 COMMUNICATIONS - VOICE/DATA 0.00 1,130.00 1,130.00 0.00 0.00 579.76 1,909.86 2,000.00 0.00 4331-0000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,340.23 3,740.37 3,000.00 0.00 4351-0000 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 13,311.39 52,455.44 100,000.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 67,500.00 57,500.00 0.00 0.00 1,928.00 1,366.43 2,678.00 0.00 4433-0000 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 2,678.00 2,678.00 0.00 0.00 19,314.65 60,613.60 108,773.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 76,308.00 66,308.00 0.00 0.00 336,918.56 392,937.52 400,723.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 363,148.00 352,238.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 9 Page 66 of 162 Page 331 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 0.00 18,300.00 10,000.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 336,918.56 392,937.52 400,723.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 363,148.00 352,238.00 0.00 0.00 (336,918.56) (374,637.52) (390,723.00) 0.00 Planning Totals: 0.00 (353,148.00) (342,238.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 10 Page 67 of 162 Page 332 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 19 Municipal Buildings E01 Personal Services 0.00 0.00 11,590.00 0.00 4101-0000 FULL-TIME REGULAR 0.00 12,780.00 12,780.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 870.00 0.00 4121-0000 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 960.00 960.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 890.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB-CITY SHARE 0.00 980.00 980.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 120.00 110.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,320.00 0.00 4131-0000 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 0.00 2,320.00 2,320.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 4151-0000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 0.00 40.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,810.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 17,200.00 17,190.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4200-0000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,614.82 7,089.63 12,000.00 0.00 4221-0000 MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT 0.00 16,500.00 8,600.00 0.00 0.00 17,335.55 22,037.71 7,000.00 0.00 4223-0000 MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS 0.00 11,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,663.36 2,921.32 4,000.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 4,500.00 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 28,613.73 32,048.66 23,000.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 32,000.00 11,600.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 103,437.70 73,201.34 99,000.00 0.00 4321-0000 COMMUNICATIONS - VOICE/DATA 0.00 99,000.00 72,600.00 0.00 0.00 167,154.00 108,699.00 150,000.00 0.00 4360-0000 INSURANCE 0.00 135,000.00 105,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,905.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 4361-0000 INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,565.99 12,107.80 15,000.00 0.00 4380-0000 UTILITY SERVICES 0.00 26,000.00 13,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,056.47 14,781.35 30,000.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 32,600.00 17,600.00 0.00 0.00 590.84 8.33 1,000.00 0.00 4410-0000 RENTALS 0.00 1,000.00 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 317.10 892.82 1,000.00 0.00 4433-0000 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 500.00 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 4437-0000 TAXES/LICENSES 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 297,027.10 212,190.64 297,000.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 295,100.00 215,300.00 0.00 0.00 325,640.83 244,239.30 335,810.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 344,300.00 244,090.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 11 Page 68 of 162 Page 333 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 325,640.83 244,239.30 335,810.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 344,300.00 244,090.00 0.00 0.00 (325,640.83) (244,239.30) (335,810.00) 0.00 Municipal Buildings Totals: 0.00 (344,300.00) (244,090.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 12 Page 69 of 162 Page 334 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 21 Police Protection E05 Other Services and Charges 1,537,795.25 1,810,894.73 1,877,027.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 2,400,849.00 2,296,975.00 0.00 0.00 7,570.77 55,007.82 5,000.00 0.00 4440-0000 MISC SERVICES/CONTINGENCY 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,545,366.02 1,865,902.55 1,882,027.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 2,405,849.00 2,301,975.00 0.00 0.00 1,545,366.02 1,865,902.55 1,882,027.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 2,405,849.00 2,301,975.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,545,366.02 1,865,902.55 1,882,027.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 2,405,849.00 2,301,975.00 0.00 0.00 (1,545,366.02) (1,865,902.55) (1,882,027.00) 0.00 Police Protection Totals: 0.00 (2,405,849.00) (2,301,975.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 13 Page 70 of 162 Page 335 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 22 Fire Protection E05 Other Services and Charges 666,726.16 873,990.85 1,016,152.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 1,023,849.00 1,063,254.00 0.00 0.00 666,726.16 873,990.85 1,016,152.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 1,023,849.00 1,063,254.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay 112,281.24 93,335.08 0.00 0.00 4620-0000 BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 112,281.24 93,335.08 0.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 779,007.40 967,325.93 1,016,152.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 1,023,849.00 1,063,254.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 779,007.40 967,325.93 1,016,152.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 1,023,849.00 1,063,254.00 0.00 0.00 (779,007.40) (967,325.93) (1,016,152.00) 0.00 Fire Protection Totals: 0.00 (1,023,849.00) (1,063,254.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 14 Page 71 of 162 Page 336 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 24 Protective Inspections R02 Licenses & Permits 7,329.45 4,060.00 4,500.00 0.00 3217-0000 RENTAL HOUSING LICENSES 0.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 0.00 0.00 352,151.28 379,845.82 220,000.00 0.00 3221-0000 BUILDING PERMITS 0.00 240,000.00 240,000.00 0.00 0.00 145,196.68 157,078.55 70,000.00 0.00 3222-0000 PLAN CHECK FEES 0.00 85,000.00 85,000.00 0.00 0.00 504,677.41 540,984.37 294,500.00 0.00 Licenses & Permits Totals: 0.00 329,500.00 329,500.00 0.00 0.00 504,677.41 540,984.37 294,500.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 329,500.00 329,500.00 0.00 0.00 E01 Personal Services 120,887.58 141,737.53 212,910.00 0.00 4101-0000 FULL-TIME REGULAR 0.00 216,490.00 216,490.00 0.00 0.00 9,014.33 10,497.86 15,970.00 0.00 4121-0000 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 16,240.00 16,240.00 0.00 0.00 9,077.94 10,655.35 16,290.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 16,560.00 16,560.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,870.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 2,080.00 1,910.00 0.00 0.00 20,016.22 24,209.66 49,400.00 0.00 4131-0000 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 0.00 47,040.00 47,040.00 0.00 0.00 667.44 799.77 1,020.00 0.00 4151-0000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 0.00 1,050.00 1,050.00 0.00 0.00 159,663.51 187,900.17 297,460.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 299,460.00 299,290.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 1,155.83 731.85 1,500.00 0.00 4212-0000 MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS 0.00 1,500.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 2,506.18 500.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 1,168.83 3,238.03 2,000.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 2,000.00 1,700.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 777.41 698.38 830.00 0.00 4321-0000 COMMUNICATIONS - VOICE/DATA 0.00 763.00 763.00 0.00 0.00 362.75 875.31 2,000.00 0.00 4331-0000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 26,653.87 24,594.04 37,190.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 334.00 0.00 600.00 0.00 4433-0000 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 15,005.00 15,005.00 0.00 0.00 28,128.03 26,167.73 40,620.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 42,768.00 42,768.00 0.00 0.00 188,960.37 217,305.93 340,080.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 344,228.00 343,758.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 15 Page 72 of 162 Page 337 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 504,677.41 540,984.37 294,500.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 329,500.00 329,500.00 0.00 0.00 188,960.37 217,305.93 340,080.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 344,228.00 343,758.00 0.00 0.00 315,717.04 323,678.44 (45,580.00) 0.00 Protective Inspections Totals: 0.00 (14,728.00) (14,258.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 16 Page 73 of 162 Page 338 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 31 City Engineer R02 Licenses & Permits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3221-0000 BUILDING PERMITS ENGINEERING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Licenses & Permits Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 138,359.14 113,774.40 145,000.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 138,359.14 113,774.40 145,000.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 138,359.14 113,774.40 145,000.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 138,359.14 113,774.40 145,000.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 (138,359.14) (113,774.40) (145,000.00) 0.00 City Engineer Totals: 0.00 (100,000.00) (100,000.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 17 Page 74 of 162 Page 339 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 32 Public Works Service E01 Personal Services 415,227.13 454,720.87 486,100.00 0.00 4101-0000 FULL-TIME REGULAR 0.00 497,930.00 497,930.00 0.00 0.00 312.29 5,049.65 5,000.00 0.00 4102-0000 OVERTIME 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4103-0000 PART-TIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,065.78 1,267.42 8,500.00 0.00 4105-0000 STREET PAGER PAY 0.00 8,500.00 8,500.00 0.00 0.00 34,007.04 34,265.00 36,460.00 0.00 4121-0000 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 37,350.00 37,350.00 0.00 0.00 33,094.05 33,776.62 37,190.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 38,090.00 38,090.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,280.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 4,780.00 4,380.00 0.00 0.00 77,691.98 82,487.07 117,470.00 0.00 4131-0000 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 0.00 117,890.00 117,890.00 0.00 0.00 27,519.32 19,819.48 16,240.00 0.00 4151-0000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 0.00 16,640.00 16,640.00 0.00 0.00 590,917.59 631,386.11 711,240.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 726,180.00 725,780.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 409.83 223.19 700.00 0.00 4200-0000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 700.00 700.00 0.00 0.00 47,597.30 46,565.57 54,000.00 0.00 4212-0000 MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS 0.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 33,957.97 30,314.12 35,000.00 0.00 4221-0000 MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT 0.00 35,000.00 35,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,236.25 13,235.08 17,000.00 0.00 4223-0000 MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS 0.00 17,000.00 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,342.62 3,962.42 4,500.00 0.00 4240-0000 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 0.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 0.00 0.00 22,987.02 21,492.11 31,000.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 28,000.00 28,000.00 0.00 0.00 21,704.76 25,343.59 65,200.00 0.00 4250-0000 ROAD MAINT MATERIALS 0.00 50,000.00 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 145,235.75 141,136.08 207,400.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 195,200.00 183,200.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 964.55 1,322.45 1,200.00 0.00 4305-0000 DRUG TESTING 0.00 1,200.00 1,400.00 0.00 0.00 8,509.10 7,129.81 10,000.00 0.00 4321-0000 COMMUNICATIONS - VOICE/DATA 0.00 9,000.00 8,000.00 0.00 0.00 5,201.44 3,726.59 7,500.00 0.00 4331-0000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 0.00 7,000.00 4,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.93 0.00 0.00 4351-0000 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,257.01 8,233.92 15,000.00 0.00 4380-0000 UTILITY SERVICES 0.00 13,000.00 13,000.00 0.00 0.00 47,928.41 52,893.46 52,000.00 0.00 4399-0000 UTILITIES - STREET LIGHTS 0.00 50,000.00 46,000.00 0.00 0.00 103,287.63 115,245.20 123,000.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 140,000.00 140,000.00 0.00 0.00 957.03 (10.24) 1,400.00 0.00 4410-0000 RENTALS 0.00 1,400.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 341.49 1,515.23 1,000.00 0.00 4433-0000 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 1,000.00 1,400.00 0.00 0.00 2,065.06 1,265.43 1,700.00 0.00 4437-0000 TAXES/LICENSES 0.00 1,700.00 1,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4440-0000 MISC SERVICES/CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 18 Page 75 of 162 Page 340 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 177,511.72 191,367.78 212,800.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 224,300.00 217,000.00 0.00 0.00 E09 Other Financing Use 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4820-0000 OPERATING TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Financing Use Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 913,665.06 963,889.97 1,131,440.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 1,145,680.00 1,125,980.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 913,665.06 963,889.97 1,131,440.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 1,145,680.00 1,125,980.00 0.00 0.00 (913,665.06) (963,889.97) (1,131,440.00) 0.00 Public Works Service Totals: 0.00 (1,145,680.00) (1,125,980.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 19 Page 76 of 162 Page 341 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 33 Ice & Snow Removal E01 Personal Services 41,443.26 43,074.20 48,770.00 0.00 4101-0000 FULL-TIME REGULAR 0.00 50,200.00 50,200.00 0.00 0.00 46.42 16,328.93 10,000.00 0.00 4102-0000 OVERTIME 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4103-0000 PART-TIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,827.20 4,096.71 3,660.00 0.00 4121-0000 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 3,770.00 3,770.00 0.00 0.00 3,480.15 4,336.09 3,730.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 3,840.00 3,840.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 430.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 480.00 440.00 0.00 0.00 8,148.02 10,863.46 13,040.00 0.00 4131-0000 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 0.00 13,100.00 13,100.00 0.00 0.00 3,814.83 2,302.27 1,630.00 0.00 4151-0000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 0.00 1,680.00 1,680.00 0.00 0.00 60,759.88 81,001.66 81,260.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 83,070.00 83,030.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 49,074.19 56,229.14 70,000.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 70,000.00 64,000.00 0.00 0.00 49,074.19 56,229.14 70,000.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 70,000.00 64,000.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 0.00 194.34 2,000.00 0.00 4321-0000 COMMUNICATIONS - VOICE/DATA 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,840.76 722.46 2,000.00 0.00 4331-0000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,840.76 916.80 4,000.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 4,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 111,674.83 138,147.60 155,260.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 157,070.00 149,030.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 111,674.83 138,147.60 155,260.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 157,070.00 149,030.00 0.00 0.00 (111,674.83) (138,147.60) (155,260.00) 0.00 Ice & Snow Removal Totals: 0.00 (157,070.00) (149,030.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 20 Page 77 of 162 Page 342 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 52 Park Maintenance E01 Personal Services 180,646.23 167,884.14 192,850.00 0.00 4101-0000 FULL-TIME REGULAR 0.00 201,300.00 201,300.00 0.00 0.00 33.80 2,026.72 1,500.00 0.00 4102-0000 OVERTIME 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 29,334.32 32,126.14 43,710.00 0.00 4103-0000 PART-TIME 0.00 43,710.00 43,710.00 0.00 0.00 15,458.39 15,131.83 17,740.00 0.00 4121-0000 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 18,380.00 18,380.00 0.00 0.00 15,717.90 15,134.99 18,100.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 18,740.00 18,740.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,080.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 2,350.00 2,160.00 0.00 0.00 32,369.40 30,568.87 55,760.00 0.00 4131-0000 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 0.00 55,820.00 55,820.00 0.00 0.00 15,871.08 9,720.97 9,630.00 0.00 4151-0000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 0.00 9,970.00 9,970.00 0.00 0.00 289,431.12 272,593.66 341,370.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 351,770.00 351,580.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 2,636.31 7,453.16 8,000.00 0.00 4221-0000 MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT 0.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 0.00 0.00 12,158.18 7,921.17 10,000.00 0.00 4223-0000 MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,103.55 171.22 1,200.00 0.00 4240-0000 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 0.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 10,306.46 4,441.66 9,500.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 9,500.00 9,500.00 0.00 0.00 12,312.46 14,187.56 17,000.00 0.00 4247-0000 TREES PURCHASED 0.00 17,000.00 14,000.00 0.00 0.00 38,516.96 34,174.77 45,700.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 45,700.00 42,700.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 3,387.98 2,108.17 3,000.00 0.00 4321-0000 COMMUNICATIONS - VOICE/DATA 0.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 766.95 1,200.00 0.00 4331-0000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 0.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 4351-0000 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 400.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 8,153.64 8,471.92 9,000.00 0.00 4380-0000 UTILITY SERVICES 0.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 0.00 0.00 95,306.38 31,001.63 35,000.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 35,000.00 35,000.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 4402-0000 CHRISTMAS LAKE AIS INSPECTIONS 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 845.48 920.14 4,000.00 0.00 4410-0000 RENTALS 0.00 3,000.00 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4433-0000 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4440-0000 MISC SERVICES/CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 112,993.48 48,268.81 57,600.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 56,600.00 55,100.00 0.00 0.00 440,941.56 355,037.24 444,670.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 454,070.00 449,380.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 21 Page 78 of 162 Page 343 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 440,941.56 355,037.24 444,670.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 454,070.00 449,380.00 0.00 0.00 (440,941.56) (355,037.24) (444,670.00) 0.00 Park Maintenance Totals: 0.00 (454,070.00) (449,380.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 22 Page 79 of 162 Page 344 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 53 Recreation R04 Charges for Service 44,840.00 42,051.00 43,000.00 0.00 3471-0000 PARK FEES & RENTALS 0.00 45,000.00 45,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 0.00 3474-0000 EVENT SPONSORSHIP AND DONATION 0.00 4,750.00 4,750.00 0.00 0.00 1,325.00 1,415.00 1,300.00 0.00 3476-0000 COMM GARDEN PLOT RENTAL 0.00 1,400.00 1,400.00 0.00 0.00 365.20 (30.00) 0.00 0.00 3478-0000 SAFETY CAMP 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3479-0000 MUSIC IN THE PARK 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3480-0000 PARK PROGRAM FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46,565.20 46,436.00 47,300.00 0.00 Charges for Service Totals: 0.00 52,150.00 52,150.00 0.00 0.00 R09 Misc Revenues 0.00 850.00 0.00 0.00 3623-0000 PARK DONATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 850.00 0.00 0.00 Misc Revenues Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46,565.20 47,286.00 47,300.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 52,150.00 52,150.00 0.00 0.00 E01 Personal Services 35,761.91 42,351.72 78,120.00 0.00 4101-0000 FULL-TIME REGULAR 0.00 115,260.00 115,260.00 0.00 0.00 21,711.62 39,319.46 8,510.00 0.00 4103-0000 PART-TIME 0.00 3,200.00 3,200.00 0.00 0.00 2,328.45 5,034.24 6,500.00 0.00 4121-0000 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 8,880.00 8,880.00 0.00 0.00 2,639.86 5,600.53 6,630.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 9,060.00 9,060.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 760.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 1,140.00 1,040.00 0.00 0.00 3,510.84 7,827.80 17,050.00 0.00 4131-0000 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 0.00 30,670.00 30,670.00 0.00 0.00 916.22 976.68 920.00 0.00 4151-0000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 0.00 1,250.00 1,250.00 0.00 0.00 66,868.90 101,110.43 118,490.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 169,460.00 169,360.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 0.00 225.45 0.00 0.00 4208-0000 POSTAGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,072.67 880.14 2,500.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 945.85 1,500.00 0.00 4246-0000 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 0.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 553.90 100.00 800.00 0.00 4248-0000 OTHER PROGRAMS FEE 0.00 800.00 800.00 0.00 0.00 1,826.57 2,151.44 4,800.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 7,300.00 7,300.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4302-0000 CONSULTING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (164.18) 0.00 0.00 4321-0000 COMMUNICATIONS - VOICE/DATA 0.00 922.00 922.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 23 Page 80 of 162 Page 345 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 821.52 574.00 1,250.00 0.00 4331-0000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 0.00 1,750.00 1,250.00 0.00 0.00 3,385.04 1,726.52 2,000.00 0.00 4351-0000 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 2,300.00 2,300.00 0.00 0.00 10,474.88 10,338.02 12,000.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 11,877.00 11,877.00 0.00 0.00 634.59 545.00 1,010.00 0.00 4433-0000 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 1,254.00 1,254.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4437-0000 TAXES/LICENSES 0.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 4,853.18 4,321.61 5,425.00 0.00 4438-0000 OKTOBERFEST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,859.27 8,977.60 9,700.00 0.00 4441-0000 ARCTIC FEVER PROGRAMS 0.00 5,650.00 5,650.00 0.00 0.00 1,206.98 756.50 2,800.00 0.00 4443-0000 SAFETY CAMP 0.00 2,800.00 2,800.00 0.00 0.00 2,815.24 3,226.98 4,000.00 0.00 4444-0000 ENTERTAINMENT IN THE PARK 0.00 7,150.00 7,150.00 0.00 0.00 31,050.70 30,302.05 38,185.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 33,803.00 33,303.00 0.00 0.00 E09 Other Financing Use 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4820-0000 OPERATING TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Financing Use Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99,746.17 133,563.92 161,475.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 210,563.00 209,963.00 0.00 0.00 46,565.20 47,286.00 47,300.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 52,150.00 52,150.00 0.00 0.00 99,746.17 133,563.92 161,475.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 210,563.00 209,963.00 0.00 0.00 (53,180.97) (86,277.92) (114,175.00) 0.00 Recreation Totals: 0.00 (158,413.00) (157,813.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 24 Page 81 of 162 Page 346 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 7,314,963.56 7,309,809.82 7,401,822.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 7,999,769.00 7,720,483.00 0.00 0.00 6,378,022.74 7,123,069.02 7,401,822.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 7,999,769.00 7,720,483.00 0.00 0.00 936,940.82 186,740.80 0.00 0.00 General Fund Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 25 Page 82 of 162 Page 347 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 7,314,963.56 7,309,809.82 7,401,822.00 0.00 REPORT REVENUES 0.00 7,999,769.00 7,720,483.00 0.00 0.00 6,378,022.74 7,123,069.02 7,401,822.00 0.00 REPORT EXPENSES 0.00 7,999,769.00 7,720,483.00 0.00 0.00 936,940.82 186,740.80 0.00 0.00 REPORT TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 26 Page 83 of 162 Page 348 of 568 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND DETAILED BUDGETS Page 84 of 162 Page 349 of 568 General Ledger Budget Analysis User: jschmuck@ci.shorewood.mn.us Printed: 08/18/2026 - 7:18AM Fiscal Year: 2027 Fiscal Periods: All 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 201 Shorewood Comm. & Event Center R01 Taxes 0.00 122,000.00 145,000.00 0.00 3010-0000 CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES 0.00 177,677.00 175,607.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 122,000.00 145,000.00 0.00 Taxes Totals: 0.00 177,677.00 175,607.00 0.00 0.00 R04 Charges for Service 66,075.01 82,269.25 68,000.00 0.00 3410-0000 RENTAL INCOME 0.00 82,000.00 82,000.00 0.00 0.00 211.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3480-0000 PROGRAM (CLASS) FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66,286.01 82,269.25 68,000.00 0.00 Charges for Service Totals: 0.00 82,000.00 82,000.00 0.00 0.00 R08 Investment Revenue 3,044.83 2,664.36 3,150.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 3,044.83 2,664.36 3,150.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 R09 Misc Revenues (5.00) 1,700.00 0.00 0.00 3670-0000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3790-0000 CASH OVER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (5.00) 1,700.00 0.00 0.00 Misc Revenues Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 69,325.84 208,633.61 216,150.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 262,177.00 260,107.00 0.00 0.00 E01 Personal Services 36,641.86 63,388.18 33,480.00 0.00 4101-0000 FULL-TIME REGULAR 0.00 67,870.00 67,870.00 0.00 0.00 33,058.17 23,273.94 18,760.00 0.00 4103-0000 PART-TIME 0.00 21,370.00 21,370.00 0.00 0.00 5,893.31 6,223.17 3,920.00 0.00 4121-0000 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 6,690.00 6,690.00 0.00 0.00 7,030.76 6,788.40 4,000.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 6,830.00 6,830.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 460.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 860.00 790.00 0.00 0.00 4,781.67 11,329.69 7,310.00 0.00 4131-0000 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 0.00 20,450.00 20,450.00 0.00 0.00 1,295.60 1,387.08 550.00 0.00 4151-0000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 0.00 940.00 940.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 1 Page 85 of 162 Page 350 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 88,701.37 112,390.46 68,480.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 125,010.00 124,940.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 3,836.95 389.34 1,500.00 0.00 4200-0000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 1,500.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4208-0000 POSTAGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,095.57 11,701.26 12,000.00 0.00 4223-0000 MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS 0.00 13,670.00 13,670.00 0.00 0.00 2,871.59 1,639.25 4,500.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 4,500.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4246-0000 EVENT SUPPLIES EXPENSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 85.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 4247-0000 COMMUNITY EVENT EXPENSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,203.75 8,415.50 11,340.00 0.00 4248-0000 PROGRAM (CLASS) EXPENSES 0.00 11,340.00 11,340.00 0.00 0.00 33,093.26 22,145.35 29,340.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 31,010.00 27,510.00 0.00 0.00 E03 Oil and Utility Charges 10,922.20 11,347.08 13,800.00 0.00 4380-0000 UTILITY SERVICES 0.00 13,800.00 13,800.00 0.00 0.00 10,922.20 11,347.08 13,800.00 0.00 Oil and Utility Charges Totals: 0.00 13,800.00 13,800.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 0.00 4,500.00 0.00 0.00 4302-0000 CONSULTING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,187.44 16,053.67 30,000.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 30,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,187.44 20,553.67 30,000.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 30,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 1,889.46 2,227.75 2,600.00 0.00 4321-0000 COMMUNICATIONS - VOICE/DATA 0.00 2,600.00 2,350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 600.00 0.00 4331-0000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 0.00 600.00 250.00 0.00 0.00 1,842.64 1,740.00 2,000.00 0.00 4351-0000 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,752.76 1,058.42 800.00 0.00 4433-0000 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,017.00 1,393.77 3,410.00 0.00 4437-0000 TAXES/LICENSES 0.00 4,051.00 4,051.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 4440-0000 MISC SERVICES 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,533.56 94.64 0.00 0.00 4450-0000 BANK SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,035.42 6,514.58 10,410.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 10,251.00 8,651.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay 21,279.99 5,995.00 21,500.00 0.00 4620-0000 BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 0.00 32,021.00 32,021.00 0.00 0.00 21,279.99 5,995.00 21,500.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 32,021.00 32,021.00 0.00 0.00 178,219.68 178,946.14 173,530.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 242,092.00 231,922.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 2 Page 86 of 162 Page 351 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 69,325.84 208,633.61 216,150.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 262,177.00 260,107.00 0.00 0.00 178,219.68 178,946.14 173,530.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 242,092.00 231,922.00 0.00 0.00 (108,893.84) 29,687.47 42,620.00 0.00 Shorewood Comm. & Event Center Totals: 0.00 20,085.00 28,185.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 3 Page 87 of 162 Page 352 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 69,325.84 208,633.61 216,150.00 0.00 REPORT REVENUES 0.00 262,177.00 260,107.00 0.00 0.00 178,219.68 178,946.14 173,530.00 0.00 REPORT EXPENSES 0.00 242,092.00 231,922.00 0.00 0.00 (108,893.84) 29,687.47 42,620.00 0.00 REPORT TOTALS: 0.00 20,085.00 28,185.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 4 Page 88 of 162 Page 353 of 568 DEBT SERVICE FUND DETAILED BUDGETS Page 89 of 162 Page 354 of 568 General Ledger Budget Analysis User: jschmuck@ci.shorewood.mn.us Printed: 08/18/2026 - 7:18AM Fiscal Year: 2027 Fiscal Periods: All 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 320 2020A GO Street Reconstr Bonds R01 Taxes 228,492.00 226,497.00 229,752.00 0.00 3010-0000 CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES 0.00 227,704.00 227,704.00 0.00 0.00 228,492.00 226,497.00 229,752.00 0.00 Taxes Totals: 0.00 227,704.00 227,704.00 0.00 0.00 R09 Misc Revenues 5,223.99 4,168.27 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,223.99 4,168.27 0.00 0.00 Misc Revenues Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 233,715.99 230,665.27 229,752.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 227,704.00 227,704.00 0.00 0.00 E08 Debt Service 190,000.00 190,000.00 190,000.00 0.00 4701-0000 BOND PRINCIPAL 0.00 190,000.00 190,000.00 0.00 0.00 28,561.26 26,661.26 24,765.00 0.00 4711-0000 BOND INTEREST 0.00 24,765.00 24,765.00 0.00 0.00 823.20 582.42 235.00 0.00 4720-0000 FISCAL AGENT FEES 0.00 235.00 235.00 0.00 0.00 219,384.46 217,243.68 215,000.00 0.00 Debt Service Totals: 0.00 215,000.00 215,000.00 0.00 0.00 219,384.46 217,243.68 215,000.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 215,000.00 215,000.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 1 Page 90 of 162 Page 355 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 233,715.99 230,665.27 229,752.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 227,704.00 227,704.00 0.00 0.00 219,384.46 217,243.68 215,000.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 215,000.00 215,000.00 0.00 0.00 14,331.53 13,421.59 14,752.00 0.00 2020A GO Street Reconstr Bonds Totals: 0.00 12,704.00 12,704.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 2 Page 91 of 162 Page 356 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 321 2021A GO Street Reconstr Bonds R01 Taxes 310,023.00 307,241.00 309,708.00 0.00 3010-0000 CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES 0.00 306,873.00 306,873.00 0.00 0.00 310,023.00 307,241.00 309,708.00 0.00 Taxes Totals: 0.00 306,873.00 306,873.00 0.00 0.00 R09 Misc Revenues 6,674.75 5,244.44 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,674.75 5,244.44 0.00 0.00 Misc Revenues Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R11 Other Financing Sources 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3930-0000 BOND PROCEEDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Financing Sources Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 316,697.75 312,485.44 309,708.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 306,873.00 306,873.00 0.00 0.00 E08 Debt Service 265,000.00 265,000.00 265,000.00 0.00 4701-0000 BOND PRINCIPAL 0.00 265,000.00 265,000.00 0.00 0.00 31,585.00 28,935.00 26,285.00 0.00 4711-0000 BOND INTEREST 0.00 26,285.00 26,285.00 0.00 0.00 1,107.63 1,095.01 440.00 0.00 4720-0000 FISCAL AGENT FEES 0.00 440.00 440.00 0.00 0.00 297,692.63 295,030.01 291,725.00 0.00 Debt Service Totals: 0.00 291,725.00 291,725.00 0.00 0.00 297,692.63 295,030.01 291,725.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 291,725.00 291,725.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 3 Page 92 of 162 Page 357 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 316,697.75 312,485.44 309,708.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 306,873.00 306,873.00 0.00 0.00 297,692.63 295,030.01 291,725.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 291,725.00 291,725.00 0.00 0.00 19,005.12 17,455.43 17,983.00 0.00 2021A GO Street Reconstr Bonds Totals: 0.00 15,148.00 15,148.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 4 Page 93 of 162 Page 358 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 322 2022A GO Street Reconstr Bonds R01 Taxes 289,416.00 289,009.00 288,376.00 0.00 3010-0000 CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES 0.00 287,517.00 287,517.00 0.00 0.00 289,416.00 289,009.00 288,376.00 0.00 Taxes Totals: 0.00 287,517.00 287,517.00 0.00 0.00 R09 Misc Revenues 4,465.82 3,218.21 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,465.82 3,218.21 0.00 0.00 Misc Revenues Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R11 Other Financing Sources 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3930-0000 BOND PROCEEDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Financing Sources Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 293,881.82 292,227.21 288,376.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 287,517.00 287,517.00 0.00 0.00 E08 Debt Service 40,000.00 125,000.00 130,000.00 0.00 4701-0000 BOND PRINCIPAL 0.00 130,000.00 130,000.00 0.00 0.00 151,496.51 147,940.75 142,450.00 0.00 4711-0000 BOND INTEREST 0.00 142,450.00 142,450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 4720-0000 FISCAL AGENT FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 191,496.51 272,940.75 272,950.00 0.00 Debt Service Totals: 0.00 272,450.00 272,450.00 0.00 0.00 191,496.51 272,940.75 272,950.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 272,450.00 272,450.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 5 Page 94 of 162 Page 359 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 293,881.82 292,227.21 288,376.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 287,517.00 287,517.00 0.00 0.00 191,496.51 272,940.75 272,950.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 272,450.00 272,450.00 0.00 0.00 102,385.31 19,286.46 15,426.00 0.00 2022A GO Street Reconstr Bonds Totals: 0.00 15,067.00 15,067.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 6 Page 95 of 162 Page 360 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 323 2023A GO Street Reconstr Bonds R01 Taxes 160,331.00 273,210.00 267,750.00 0.00 3010-0000 CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES 0.00 267,540.00 267,540.00 0.00 0.00 160,331.00 273,210.00 267,750.00 0.00 Taxes Totals: 0.00 267,540.00 267,540.00 0.00 0.00 R09 Misc Revenues 9,571.30 5,710.96 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,571.30 5,710.96 0.00 0.00 Misc Revenues Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R11 Other Financing Sources 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3930-0000 BOND PROCEEDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Financing Sources Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 169,902.30 278,920.96 267,750.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 267,540.00 267,540.00 0.00 0.00 E08 Debt Service 0.00 125,000.00 130,000.00 0.00 4701-0000 BOND PRINCIPAL 0.00 130,000.00 130,000.00 0.00 0.00 142,335.56 132,700.00 127,600.00 0.00 4711-0000 BOND INTEREST 0.00 127,600.00 127,600.00 0.00 0.00 979.01 818.31 345.00 0.00 4720-0000 FISCAL AGENT FEES 0.00 345.00 345.00 0.00 0.00 143,314.57 258,518.31 257,945.00 0.00 Debt Service Totals: 0.00 257,945.00 257,945.00 0.00 0.00 143,314.57 258,518.31 257,945.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 257,945.00 257,945.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 7 Page 96 of 162 Page 361 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 169,902.30 278,920.96 267,750.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 267,540.00 267,540.00 0.00 0.00 143,314.57 258,518.31 257,945.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 257,945.00 257,945.00 0.00 0.00 26,587.73 20,402.65 9,805.00 0.00 2023A GO Street Reconstr Bonds Totals: 0.00 9,595.00 9,595.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 8 Page 97 of 162 Page 362 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 1,014,197.86 1,114,298.88 1,095,586.00 0.00 REPORT REVENUES 0.00 1,089,634.00 1,089,634.00 0.00 0.00 851,888.17 1,043,732.75 1,037,620.00 0.00 REPORT EXPENSES 0.00 1,037,120.00 1,037,120.00 0.00 0.00 162,309.69 70,566.13 57,966.00 0.00 REPORT TOTALS: 0.00 52,514.00 52,514.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:18 AM) Page 9 Page 98 of 162 Page 363 of 568 CAPITAL PROJECT FUND DETAILED BUDGETS Page 99 of 162 Page 364 of 568General Ledger Budget Analysis User: jschmuck@ci.shorewood.mn.us Printed: 08/18/2026 - 7:20AM Fiscal Year: 2027 Fiscal Periods: All 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 402 Park Capital Improvement R01 Taxes 128,000.00 135,000.00 305,500.00 0.00 3010-0000 CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES 0.00 355,500.00 355,500.00 0.00 0.00 128,000.00 135,000.00 305,500.00 0.00 Taxes Totals: 0.00 355,500.00 355,500.00 0.00 0.00 R05 Fines & Forfeits 112,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3470-0000 PARK DEDICATION FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 112,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fines & Forfeits Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R08 Investment Revenue 40.43 12,872.91 2,230.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 2,230.00 2,230.00 0.00 0.00 40.43 12,872.91 2,230.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 2,230.00 2,230.00 0.00 0.00 R09 Misc Revenues 321,938.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 3624-0000 REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 321,938.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 Misc Revenues Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R11 Other Financing Sources 105,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 3920-0000 TRANSFERS IN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 Other Financing Sources Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 667,478.85 297,872.91 307,730.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 357,730.00 357,730.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 2,027.00 1,995.00 0.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4351-0000 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,661.34 40,196.00 0.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVPCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,688.34 42,191.00 0.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 1 Page 100 of 162 Page 365 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 1,337.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 4620-0000 BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43,782.50 (769.37) 45,000.00 0.00 4680-0000 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 350,000.00 350,000.00 0.00 0.00 45,119.80 (769.37) 45,000.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 350,000.00 350,000.00 0.00 0.00 68,808.14 41,421.63 45,000.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 350,000.00 350,000.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 2 Page 101 of 162 Page 366 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 667,478.85 297,872.91 307,730.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 357,730.00 357,730.00 0.00 0.00 68,808.14 41,421.63 45,000.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 350,000.00 350,000.00 0.00 0.00 598,670.71 256,451.28 262,730.00 0.00 Park Capital Improvement Totals: 0.00 7,730.00 7,730.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 3 Page 102 of 162 Page 367 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 403 Equipment Replacement R01 Taxes 128,000.00 165,000.00 215,000.00 0.00 3010-0000 CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES 0.00 275,000.00 275,000.00 0.00 0.00 128,000.00 165,000.00 215,000.00 0.00 Taxes Totals: 0.00 275,000.00 275,000.00 0.00 0.00 R08 Investment Revenue 11,814.78 3,116.56 920.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 920.00 920.00 0.00 0.00 11,814.78 3,116.56 920.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 920.00 920.00 0.00 0.00 R09 Misc Revenues 3,853.75 198,508.43 0.00 0.00 3910-0000 SALES OF CAPITAL ASSETS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,853.75 198,508.43 0.00 0.00 Misc Revenues Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R11 Other Financing Sources 0.00 400,000.00 0.00 0.00 3920-0000 TRANSFERS IN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400,000.00 0.00 0.00 Other Financing Sources Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 143,668.53 766,624.99 215,920.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 275,920.00 275,920.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay 30,901.10 680,896.80 0.00 0.00 4620-0000 BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 113,193.17 344,993.85 74,900.00 0.00 4640-0000 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 0.00 344,000.00 344,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 241.50 11,200.00 0.00 4660-0000 FURNITURE AND FIXTURES 0.00 23,600.00 23,600.00 0.00 0.00 144,094.27 1,026,132.15 86,100.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 367,600.00 367,600.00 0.00 0.00 144,094.27 1,026,132.15 86,100.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 367,600.00 367,600.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 4 Page 103 of 162 Page 368 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 143,668.53 766,624.99 215,920.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 275,920.00 275,920.00 0.00 0.00 144,094.27 1,026,132.15 86,100.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 367,600.00 367,600.00 0.00 0.00 (425.74) (259,507.16) 129,820.00 0.00 Equipment Replacement Totals: 0.00 (91,680.00) (91,680.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 5 Page 104 of 162 Page 369 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 404 Street Capital Improvement R01 Taxes 128,000.00 170,500.00 0.00 0.00 3010-0000 CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 175,282.85 0.00 0.00 3195-0000 FRANCHISE FEES - ELECTRIC 0.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 151,535.80 0.00 0.00 3196-0000 FRANCHISE FEES - GAS 0.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 128,000.00 497,318.65 0.00 0.00 Taxes Totals: 0.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 R03 Intergovernmental 0.00 105,529.49 0.00 0.00 3362-0000 MISC GRANTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105,529.49 0.00 0.00 Intergovernmental Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R08 Investment Revenue 142,578.47 152,049.99 65,510.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 65,510.00 65,510.00 0.00 0.00 142,578.47 152,049.99 65,510.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 65,510.00 65,510.00 0.00 0.00 R09 Misc Revenues 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3624-0000 REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Misc Revenues Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R11 Other Financing Sources 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3920-0000 TRANSFERS IN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Financing Sources Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 270,578.47 754,898.13 65,510.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 365,510.00 365,510.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 286.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 286.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4620-0005 MILL & OVERLAY PROJECT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 315,000.00 0.00 4620-0006 SEALCOAT PROJECT 0.00 320,000.00 320,000.00 0.00 0.00 93,190.16 6,111.00 0.00 0.00 4620-0007 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN 0.00 1,942,119.00 1,942,119.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 123,286.98 0.00 0.00 4680-0000 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 93,190.16 129,397.98 315,000.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 2,262,119.00 2,262,119.00 0.00 0.00 E08 Debt Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4730-0000 BOND ISSUANCE COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 6 Page 105 of 162 Page 370 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Debt Service Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 93,476.66 129,397.98 315,000.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 2,262,119.00 2,262,119.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 7 Page 106 of 162 Page 371 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 31 City Engineer E04 Professional Services 0.00 72,537.16 0.00 0.00 4400-0012 HWY 7 TMO STUDY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72,537.16 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72,537.16 0.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPT REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72,537.16 0.00 0.00 DEPT EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (72,537.16) 0.00 0.00 City Engineer Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 8 Page 107 of 162 Page 372 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 270,578.47 754,898.13 65,510.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 365,510.00 365,510.00 0.00 0.00 93,476.66 201,935.14 315,000.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 2,262,119.00 2,262,119.00 0.00 0.00 177,101.81 552,962.99 (249,490.00) 0.00 Street Capital Improvement Totals: 0.00 (1,896,609.00) (1,896,609.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 9 Page 108 of 162 Page 373 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 405 MSA Capital Improvement R03 Intergovernmental 0.00 0.00 1,072,000.00 0.00 3345-0000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID FOR STREET 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 468,000.00 0.00 3362-0000 MISC GRANTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,540,000.00 0.00 Intergovernmental Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R08 Investment Revenue 1,639.25 1,575.23 580.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 580.00 580.00 0.00 0.00 1,639.25 1,575.23 580.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 580.00 580.00 0.00 0.00 1,639.25 1,575.23 1,540,580.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 580.00 580.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay 0.00 0.00 1,540,000.00 0.00 4680-0000 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,540,000.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,540,000.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 10 Page 109 of 162 Page 374 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 1,639.25 1,575.23 1,540,580.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 580.00 580.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,540,000.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,639.25 1,575.23 580.00 0.00 MSA Capital Improvement Totals: 0.00 580.00 580.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 11 Page 110 of 162 Page 375 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 407 Glen Rd, Amlee Rd, Manitou Ln R08 Investment Revenue 2,786.81 2,673.13 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,786.81 2,673.13 0.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,786.81 2,673.13 0.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4680-0000 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E09 Other Financing Use 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4820-0000 OPERATING TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Financing Use Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 12 Page 111 of 162 Page 376 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 2,786.81 2,673.13 0.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,786.81 2,673.13 0.00 0.00 Glen Rd, Amlee Rd, Manitou Ln Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 13 Page 112 of 162 Page 377 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 408 Woodside Road & Woodside Lane R08 Investment Revenue (195.13) 0.00 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (195.13) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (195.13) 0.00 0.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 14 Page 113 of 162 Page 378 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted (195.13) 0.00 0.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (195.13) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Woodside Road & Woodside Lane Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 15 Page 114 of 162 Page 379 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 409 Strawberry Lane R08 Investment Revenue 11,537.51 4,905.83 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,537.51 4,905.83 0.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,537.51 4,905.83 0.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 56,732.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,094.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 4304-0000 LEGAL SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59,826.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4610-0000 LAND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 146,599.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 4680-0000 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 146,599.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 206,425.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 16 Page 115 of 162 Page 380 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 11,537.51 4,905.83 0.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 206,425.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (194,888.33) 4,905.83 0.00 0.00 Strawberry Lane Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 17 Page 116 of 162 Page 381 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 412 Smithtown Ponds R08 Investment Revenue 5,594.79 6,452.54 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,594.79 6,452.54 0.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,594.79 6,452.54 0.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 18 Page 117 of 162 Page 382 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 5,594.79 6,452.54 0.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,594.79 6,452.54 0.00 0.00 Smithtown Ponds Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 19 Page 118 of 162 Page 383 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 414 Birch Bluff Road R08 Investment Revenue 17,064.84 10,060.64 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,064.84 10,060.64 0.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R11 Other Financing Sources 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3920-0000 TRANSFERS IN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3930-0000 BOND PROCEEDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3940-0000 BOND PREMIUM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Financing Sources Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,064.84 10,060.64 0.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 62,403.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4304-0000 LEGAL SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 62,403.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4610-0000 LAND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 261,152.79 21,342.42 0.00 0.00 4680-0000 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 261,152.79 21,342.42 0.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E08 Debt Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4730-0000 BOND ISSUANCE COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Debt Service Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 323,555.97 21,342.42 0.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 20 Page 119 of 162 Page 384 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 17,064.84 10,060.64 0.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 323,555.97 21,342.42 0.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (306,491.13) (11,281.78) 0.00 0.00 Birch Bluff Road Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 21 Page 120 of 162 Page 385 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 415 Galpin Lake Road/Trail R08 Investment Revenue (8.75) 0.00 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (8.75) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (8.75) 0.00 0.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 12,007.00 3,179.50 0.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,007.00 3,179.50 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,007.00 3,179.50 0.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 22 Page 121 of 162 Page 386 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted (8.75) 0.00 0.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,007.00 3,179.50 0.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (12,015.75) (3,179.50) 0.00 0.00 Galpin Lake Road/Trail Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 23 Page 122 of 162 Page 387 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 416 Mill & Overlay-2022 R08 Investment Revenue 2,228.43 2,155.23 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,228.43 2,155.23 0.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,228.43 2,155.23 0.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4680-0000 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 24 Page 123 of 162 Page 388 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 2,228.43 2,155.23 0.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,228.43 2,155.23 0.00 0.00 Mill & Overlay-2022 Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 25 Page 124 of 162 Page 389 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 417 Mill Street Trail R08 Investment Revenue 7.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 4,118.00 77,938.00 0.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,118.00 77,938.00 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,118.00 77,938.00 0.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 26 Page 125 of 162 Page 390 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 7.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,118.00 77,938.00 0.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (4,110.90) (77,938.00) 0.00 0.00 Mill Street Trail Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 27 Page 126 of 162 Page 391 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 418 Eureka Road N R08 Investment Revenue 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 13,772.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,772.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,772.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 28 Page 127 of 162 Page 392 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,772.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (13,764.88) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Eureka Road N Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 29 Page 128 of 162 Page 393 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 419 Mill & Overlay-2024 E04 Professional Services 259,037.86 8,140.00 0.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 259,037.86 8,140.00 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay 495,554.53 120,415.82 0.00 0.00 4680-0000 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 495,554.53 120,415.82 0.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 754,592.39 128,555.82 0.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 30 Page 129 of 162 Page 394 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 754,592.39 128,555.82 0.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (754,592.39) (128,555.82) 0.00 0.00 Mill & Overlay-2024 Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 31 Page 130 of 162 Page 395 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 420 Mill & Overlay-2025 E04 Professional Services 3,788.50 319,194.49 0.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,788.50 319,194.49 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay (252.57) 1,422,639.61 0.00 0.00 4680-0000 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (252.57) 1,422,639.61 0.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,535.93 1,741,834.10 0.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 32 Page 131 of 162 Page 396 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,535.93 1,741,834.10 0.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (3,535.93) (1,741,834.10) 0.00 0.00 Mill & Overlay-2025 Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 33 Page 132 of 162 Page 397 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 421 Pavement Preservation E04 Professional Services 0.00 16,074.00 0.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,074.00 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,074.00 0.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 34 Page 133 of 162 Page 398 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,074.00 0.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (16,074.00) 0.00 0.00 Pavement Preservation Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 35 Page 134 of 162 Page 399 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 422 Galpin Lake Road R11 Other Financing Sources 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3940-0000 BOND PREMIUM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Financing Sources Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 0.00 65,679.50 0.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65,679.50 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65,679.50 0.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 36 Page 135 of 162 Page 400 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65,679.50 0.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (65,679.50) 0.00 0.00 Galpin Lake Road Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 37 Page 136 of 162 Page 401 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 450 Community Infrastructure R01 Taxes 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 3010-0000 CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES 0.00 230,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 Taxes Totals: 0.00 230,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 R08 Investment Revenue 3,391.01 3,206.59 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,391.01 3,206.59 0.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,391.01 3,206.59 50,000.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 230,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4400-0024 RENEWABLE ENERGY IMPLEMENTATIO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay 88,158.25 0.00 245,000.00 0.00 4620-0000 BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 0.00 200,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 88,158.25 0.00 245,000.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 200,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 88,158.25 0.00 245,000.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 230,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 38 Page 137 of 162 Page 402 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 3,391.01 3,206.59 50,000.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 230,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 88,158.25 0.00 245,000.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 230,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 (84,767.24) 3,206.59 (195,000.00) 0.00 Community Infrastructure Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 39 Page 138 of 162 Page 403 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 470 TIF 2 Oppidan Senior Housing R01 Taxes 211,151.45 225,866.88 0.00 0.00 3105-0000 TAX INCREMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 211,151.45 225,866.88 0.00 0.00 Taxes Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R08 Investment Revenue 2,122.92 1,227.83 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,122.92 1,227.83 0.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 213,274.37 227,094.71 0.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 183,371.72 192,243.86 0.00 0.00 4400-0019 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 183,371.72 192,243.86 0.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 133.25 116.05 0.00 0.00 4351-0019 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 133.25 116.05 0.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 183,504.97 192,359.91 0.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 40 Page 139 of 162 Page 404 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 213,274.37 227,094.71 0.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 183,504.97 192,359.91 0.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,769.40 34,734.80 0.00 0.00 TIF 2 Oppidan Senior Housing Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 41 Page 140 of 162 Page 405 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 1,339,053.70 2,077,519.93 2,179,740.00 0.00 REPORT REVENUES 0.00 1,229,740.00 1,149,740.00 0.00 0.00 1,896,049.92 3,516,452.17 2,231,100.00 0.00 REPORT EXPENSES 0.00 3,209,719.00 3,129,719.00 0.00 0.00 (556,996.22) (1,438,932.24) (51,360.00) 0.00 REPORT TOTALS: 0.00 (1,979,979.00) (1,979,979.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 42 Page 141 of 162 Page 406 of 568 ENTERPRISE FUND DETAILED BUDGETS Page 142 of 162 Page 407 of 568 General Ledger Budget Analysis User: jschmuck@ci.shorewood.mn.us Printed: 08/18/2026 - 7:20AM Fiscal Year: 2027 Fiscal Periods: All 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 601 Water Utility R03 Intergovernmental 464.00 1,920.00 0.00 0.00 3362-0000 MISC GRANTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 464.00 1,920.00 0.00 0.00 Intergovernmental Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R05 Fines & Forfeits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3717-0000 WATER METER PERMIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3720-0000 WATER PENALTIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fines & Forfeits Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R07 Special Assessments 6,581.12 5,738.63 0.00 0.00 3610-0000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS - CURRENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3611-0000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS-DELINQUENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3614-0000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS-INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,581.12 5,738.63 0.00 0.00 Special Assessments Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R08 Investment Revenue 81,153.91 73,214.21 10,200.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 35,000.00 35,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3621-0000 GAIN / (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 81,153.91 73,214.21 10,200.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 35,000.00 35,000.00 0.00 0.00 R09 Misc Revenues 4,569.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3353-0000 PERA PENSION OTHER REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,904.37 750.00 0.00 0.00 3624-0000 REFUNDS & REIMURSEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3627-0000 CELLULAR ANTENNA REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,750.00 113,733.54 0.00 0.00 3670-0000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 0.00 0.00 225,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3910-0000 SALES OF CAPITAL ASSETS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,223.37 114,483.54 0.00 0.00 Misc Revenues Totals: 0.00 0.00 225,000.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 1 Page 143 of 162 Page 408 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted R10 Utility Charges 763,277.42 932,550.33 1,160,502.00 0.00 3710-0000 UTILITY REVENUE 0.00 1,311,500.00 1,279,860.00 0.00 0.00 85,300.00 91,950.00 90,618.00 0.00 3711-0000 WATER CONNECTION FEES 0.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,760.00 1,860.00 0.00 0.00 3712-0000 UTILITY PERMIT FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,437.75 8,775.00 10,000.00 0.00 3713-0000 WATER METER SALES 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 133.12 181.84 0.00 0.00 3715-0000 STATE SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 867,908.29 1,035,317.17 1,261,120.00 0.00 Utility Charges Totals: 0.00 1,371,500.00 1,339,860.00 0.00 0.00 R11 Other Financing Sources 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3900-0000 CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3920-0000 TRANSFERS IN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,549.00 1,549.00 0.00 0.00 3940-0000 BOND PREMIUM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,549.00 1,549.00 0.00 0.00 Other Financing Sources Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 972,879.69 1,232,222.55 1,271,320.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 1,406,500.00 1,599,860.00 0.00 0.00 E01 Personal Services 267,172.81 245,719.86 234,050.00 0.00 4101-0000 FULL-TIME REGULAR 0.00 240,540.00 240,540.00 0.00 0.00 309.28 5,242.64 5,000.00 0.00 4102-0000 OVERTIME 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,591.04 7,146.85 5,500.00 0.00 4105-0000 WATER PAGER PAY 0.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 17,552.14 19,330.55 17,550.00 0.00 4121-0000 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 18,040.00 18,040.00 0.00 0.00 17,701.81 19,133.46 19,000.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 19,000.00 19,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,060.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 2,310.00 2,120.00 0.00 0.00 40,589.65 52,697.55 58,280.00 0.00 4131-0000 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 0.00 59,000.00 59,000.00 0.00 0.00 13,450.59 6,230.10 3,920.00 0.00 4151-0000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 0.00 4,030.00 4,030.00 0.00 0.00 946.00 (16,952.00) 11,860.00 0.00 4161-0000 PENSION EXPENSE 0.00 11,860.00 11,860.00 0.00 0.00 361,313.32 338,549.01 357,220.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 365,280.00 365,090.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 255.02 0.00 400.00 0.00 4200-0000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 300.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 1,397.49 1,401.21 2,000.00 0.00 4208-0000 POSTAGE 0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 14,540.03 9,435.73 25,000.00 0.00 4221-0000 MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT 0.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 16,521.04 3,598.80 20,000.00 0.00 4223-0000 MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS 0.00 17,000.00 17,000.00 0.00 0.00 943.43 348.51 2,000.00 0.00 4240-0000 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 14,182.16 26,698.56 18,000.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 21,000.00 21,000.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 2 Page 144 of 162 Page 409 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 6,193.86 6,068.09 6,500.00 0.00 4260-0000 WATER PURCHASES - TONKA BAY 0.00 6,500.00 6,500.00 0.00 0.00 28,782.19 29,982.28 35,000.00 0.00 4261-0000 WATER PURCHASES - EXCELSIOR 0.00 35,000.00 35,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,180.44 10,582.60 14,000.00 0.00 4263-0000 WATER PURCHASES - CHANHASSEN 0.00 14,000.00 14,000.00 0.00 0.00 20,696.33 11,489.19 10,000.00 0.00 4265-0000 WATER METER PURCHASES 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 114,691.99 99,604.97 132,900.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 132,800.00 132,800.00 0.00 0.00 E03 Oil and Utility Charges 17,139.60 23,210.20 10,000.00 0.00 4394-0000 UTILITIES - AMESBURY WELL 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 8,858.84 7,835.56 12,000.00 0.00 4395-0000 UTILITIES - BADGER WELL 0.00 11,000.00 11,000.00 0.00 0.00 25,101.58 29,590.69 26,000.00 0.00 4396-0000 UTILITIES - BOULDER BRIDGE 0.00 29,000.00 29,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,657.69 11,621.95 35,000.00 0.00 4398-0000 UTILITIES - SE AREA WELL 0.00 33,000.00 33,000.00 0.00 0.00 66,757.71 72,258.40 83,000.00 0.00 Oil and Utility Charges Totals: 0.00 83,000.00 83,000.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 4301-0000 AUDITING & ACCOUNTING 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 13,212.00 108,307.76 20,000.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 67,334.32 79,892.03 90,000.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 125,000.00 175,000.00 0.00 0.00 80,546.32 188,199.79 120,000.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 155,000.00 205,000.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 3,389.13 5,613.89 7,000.00 0.00 4321-0000 COMMUNICATIONS - VOICE/DATA 0.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,255.89 1,366.46 2,500.00 0.00 4331-0000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 0.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 655.00 500.00 0.00 4351-0000 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 800.00 1,600.00 2,000.00 0.00 4410-0000 RENTALS 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,536.15 3,924.25 3,500.00 0.00 4433-0000 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 0.00 0.00 952.09 3,068.86 5,000.00 0.00 4437-0000 TAXES/LICENSES 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.91 200,000.00 0.00 4440-0000 MISC SERVICES/CONTINGENCY 0.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,005.55 2,733.59 6,000.00 0.00 4450-0000 BANK SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,938.81 19,028.96 226,500.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 225,500.00 225,500.00 0.00 0.00 E06 Depreciation 437,331.75 0.00 437,500.00 0.00 4420-0000 DEPRECIATION 0.00 437,500.00 437,500.00 0.00 0.00 437,331.75 0.00 437,500.00 0.00 Depreciation Totals: 0.00 437,500.00 437,500.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay 0.00 78,100.00 84,200.00 0.00 4640-0000 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 0.00 125,000.00 125,000.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 3 Page 145 of 162 Page 410 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 24,700.00 0.00 845,000.00 0.00 4680-0000 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 57,881.00 57,881.00 0.00 0.00 24,700.00 78,100.00 929,200.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 182,881.00 182,881.00 0.00 0.00 E08 Debt Service 95,887.16 89,043.70 88,565.00 0.00 4711-0000 BOND INTEREST 0.00 84,925.00 84,925.00 0.00 0.00 312.33 550.81 225.00 0.00 4720-0000 FISCAL AGENT FEES 0.00 225.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4730-0000 BOND ISSUANCE COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 96,199.49 89,594.51 88,790.00 0.00 Debt Service Totals: 0.00 85,150.00 85,150.00 0.00 0.00 E09 Other Financing Use 12,500.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 0.00 4820-0000 OPERATING TRANSFERS 0.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 0.00 0.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 0.00 Other Financing Use Totals: 0.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 0.00 0.00 1,205,979.39 897,835.64 2,387,610.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 1,679,611.00 1,729,421.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 4 Page 146 of 162 Page 411 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 972,879.69 1,232,222.55 1,271,320.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 1,406,500.00 1,599,860.00 0.00 0.00 1,205,979.39 897,835.64 2,387,610.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 1,679,611.00 1,729,421.00 0.00 0.00 (233,099.70) 334,386.91 (1,116,290.00) 0.00 Water Utility Totals: 0.00 (273,111.00) (129,561.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 5 Page 147 of 162 Page 412 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 611 Sanitary Sewer Utility R02 Licenses & Permits 4,719.00 6,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 3727-0000 OUTSIDE SEWER REPAIR 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,719.00 6,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 Licenses & Permits Totals: 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 R03 Intergovernmental 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3362-0000 MISC GRANTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Intergovernmental Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R05 Fines & Forfeits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3720-0000 SEWER PENALTIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fines & Forfeits Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R07 Special Assessments 1,243.48 189.30 0.00 0.00 3610-0000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS - CURRENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3611-0000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS-DELINQUENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3614-0000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS-INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,243.48 189.30 0.00 0.00 Special Assessments Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R08 Investment Revenue 53,947.69 46,348.95 23,000.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 45,000.00 45,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3621-0000 GAIN / (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53,947.69 46,348.95 23,000.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 45,000.00 45,000.00 0.00 0.00 R09 Misc Revenues 3,826.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3353-0000 PERA PENSION OTHER REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3670-0000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,325.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 3910-0000 SALES OF CAPITAL ASSETS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,151.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 Misc Revenues Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R10 Utility Charges 1,481,058.08 1,762,437.65 2,276,649.00 0.00 3710-0000 UTILITY REVENUE 0.00 2,344,945.00 2,344,945.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 3712-0000 UTILITY PERMIT FEES 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 23,140.00 5,000.00 0.00 3725-0000 LOCAL SAC CHARGES PAYABLE 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,482,378.08 1,785,577.65 2,282,649.00 0.00 Utility Charges Totals: 0.00 2,350,945.00 2,350,945.00 0.00 0.00 R11 Other Financing Sources 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3900-0000 CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 6 Page 148 of 162 Page 413 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 1,123.00 1,123.00 0.00 0.00 3940-0000 BOND PREMIUM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,123.00 1,123.00 0.00 0.00 Other Financing Sources Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,549,563.18 1,839,238.90 2,306,649.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 2,396,945.00 2,396,945.00 0.00 0.00 E01 Personal Services 223,306.15 204,480.59 196,430.00 0.00 4101-0000 FULL-TIME REGULAR 0.00 201,790.00 201,790.00 0.00 0.00 217.94 8,197.95 5,000.00 0.00 4102-0000 OVERTIME 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,591.04 4,992.79 5,500.00 0.00 4105-0000 SEWER PAGER PAY 0.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 14,696.71 16,299.24 14,730.00 0.00 4121-0000 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 15,130.00 15,130.00 0.00 0.00 14,837.78 16,188.71 15,030.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 15,440.00 15,440.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,730.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 1,940.00 1,780.00 0.00 0.00 33,195.51 42,058.42 47,800.00 0.00 4131-0000 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 0.00 48,460.00 48,460.00 0.00 0.00 10,067.64 4,735.45 5,540.00 0.00 4151-0000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 0.00 5,700.00 5,700.00 0.00 0.00 9,371.00 (13,461.00) 9,375.00 0.00 4161-0000 PENSION EXPENSE 0.00 9,375.00 9,375.00 0.00 0.00 309,283.77 283,492.15 301,135.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 308,335.00 308,175.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 1,344.20 1,401.22 1,800.00 0.00 4208-0000 POSTAGE 0.00 1,800.00 1,800.00 0.00 0.00 16,320.92 7,888.71 12,000.00 0.00 4221-0000 MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT 0.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,400.00 0.00 4240-0000 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 758.54 1,196.65 2,000.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 2,500.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 18,423.66 10,486.58 17,200.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 17,300.00 16,800.00 0.00 0.00 E03 Oil and Utility Charges 2,125.89 3,623.03 5,000.00 0.00 4380-0000 UTILITY SERVICES 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,076,772.36 1,074,424.32 1,200,217.00 0.00 4385-0000 MCES SAC PAYABLES CHARGES 0.00 1,179,366.00 1,179,366.00 0.00 0.00 1,078,898.25 1,078,047.35 1,205,217.00 0.00 Oil and Utility Charges Totals: 0.00 1,184,366.00 1,184,366.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 4301-0000 AUDITING & ACCOUNTING 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 41,472.50 24,874.50 40,000.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 40,000.00 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 22,685.63 51,812.09 35,000.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 70,000.00 70,000.00 0.00 0.00 64,158.13 76,686.59 85,000.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 120,000.00 120,000.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 2,322.06 2,727.60 8,000.00 0.00 4321-0000 COMMUNICATIONS - VOICE/DATA 0.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 7 Page 149 of 162 Page 414 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 23.00 1,011.55 1,500.00 0.00 4331-0000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 655.00 1,000.00 0.00 4351-0000 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4360-0000 INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,300.45 0.00 0.00 4361-0000 INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,851.92 45,550.00 32,000.00 0.00 4386-0000 EXCELSIOR SEWER CHARGES 0.00 32,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.18 500.00 0.00 4437-0000 TAXES/LICENSES 0.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 1,374.72 136.31 0.00 0.00 4440-0000 MISC SERVICES/CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,350.08 4,200.71 7,000.00 0.00 4450-0000 BANK SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 0.00 0.00 46,921.78 55,637.80 50,000.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 48,000.00 66,000.00 0.00 0.00 E06 Depreciation 140,297.96 0.00 140,300.00 0.00 4420-0000 DEPRECIATION 0.00 140,300.00 140,300.00 0.00 0.00 140,297.96 0.00 140,300.00 0.00 Depreciation Totals: 0.00 140,300.00 140,300.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 4640-0000 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,265.24 200,000.00 0.00 4680-0000 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 206,500.00 206,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4680-0011 MCES FORCEMAIN IMPROVEMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,265.24 203,000.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 206,500.00 206,500.00 0.00 0.00 E08 Debt Service 82,433.05 77,003.37 76,385.00 0.00 4711-0000 BOND INTEREST 0.00 73,260.00 73,260.00 0.00 0.00 139.61 242.88 105.00 0.00 4720-0000 FISCAL AGENT FEES 0.00 105.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4730-0000 BOND ISSUANCE COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 82,572.66 77,246.25 76,490.00 0.00 Debt Service Totals: 0.00 73,365.00 73,365.00 0.00 0.00 E09 Other Financing Use 12,500.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 0.00 4820-0000 OPERATING TRANSFERS 0.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 0.00 0.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 0.00 Other Financing Use Totals: 0.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 0.00 0.00 1,753,056.21 1,624,361.96 2,090,842.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 2,110,666.00 2,128,006.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 8 Page 150 of 162 Page 415 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 1,549,563.18 1,839,238.90 2,306,649.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 2,396,945.00 2,396,945.00 0.00 0.00 1,753,056.21 1,624,361.96 2,090,842.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 2,110,666.00 2,128,006.00 0.00 0.00 (203,493.03) 214,876.94 215,807.00 0.00 Sanitary Sewer Utility Totals: 0.00 286,279.00 268,939.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 9 Page 151 of 162 Page 416 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 621 Recycling Utility R03 Intergovernmental 18,479.37 17,401.88 18,000.00 0.00 3362-0000 MISC GRANTS 0.00 19,000.00 19,000.00 0.00 0.00 18,479.37 17,401.88 18,000.00 0.00 Intergovernmental Totals: 0.00 19,000.00 19,000.00 0.00 0.00 R07 Special Assessments 358.51 187.20 300.00 0.00 3610-0000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS - CURRENT 0.00 300.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 358.51 187.20 300.00 0.00 Special Assessments Totals: 0.00 300.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 R08 Investment Revenue 15,665.14 15,935.82 0.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,665.14 15,935.82 0.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R09 Misc Revenues 253.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3353-0000 PERA PENSION OTHER REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 253.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Misc Revenues Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R10 Utility Charges 189,187.25 217,001.96 216,000.00 0.00 3710-0000 UTILITY REVENUE 0.00 216,000.00 228,000.00 0.00 0.00 6,904.00 4,336.00 4,500.00 0.00 3732-0000 CITY CLEANUP CHARGES 0.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 196,091.25 221,337.96 220,500.00 0.00 Utility Charges Totals: 0.00 222,000.00 234,000.00 0.00 0.00 230,847.27 254,862.86 238,800.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 241,300.00 253,300.00 0.00 0.00 E01 Personal Services 18,386.43 11,087.82 22,840.00 0.00 4101-0000 FULL-TIME REGULAR 0.00 24,030.00 24,030.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.29 0.00 0.00 4102-0000 OVERTIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 973.04 834.24 1,710.00 0.00 4121-0000 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 1,800.00 1,800.00 0.00 0.00 946.77 832.53 1,750.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 1,840.00 1,840.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 230.00 210.00 0.00 0.00 1,322.26 1,506.20 5,790.00 0.00 4131-0000 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 0.00 5,790.00 5,790.00 0.00 0.00 121.38 41.57 70.00 0.00 4151-0000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 0.00 70.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 2,709.00 (2,573.00) 0.00 0.00 4161-0000 PENSION EXPENSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,458.88 11,777.65 32,360.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 33,760.00 33,740.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 236.08 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 4200-0000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 2,000.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 1,344.19 1,552.85 1,500.00 0.00 4208-0000 POSTAGE 0.00 1,500.00 1,700.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 10 Page 152 of 162 Page 417 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 0.00 60.57 4,000.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 4,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,580.27 1,613.42 7,500.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 7,500.00 4,200.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 163,854.89 189,434.34 192,000.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 192,000.00 192,000.00 0.00 0.00 163,854.89 189,434.34 192,000.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 192,000.00 192,000.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 4321-0000 COMMUNICATIONS - VOICE/DATA 0.00 200.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 73.36 52.10 1,000.00 0.00 4331-0000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 0.00 1,000.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 14,674.07 16,005.92 11,500.00 0.00 4347-0000 CITY CLEANUP EXPENSES 0.00 11,500.00 16,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,795.80 1,500.00 0.00 4351-0000 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,749.11 4,237.99 5,000.00 0.00 4400-0026 ORGANIC GARBAGE 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 371.56 550.00 0.00 4433-0000 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 550.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 1,796.61 1,829.95 0.00 0.00 4450-0000 BANK SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 21,293.15 24,293.32 19,750.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 21,250.00 26,750.00 0.00 0.00 211,187.19 227,118.73 251,610.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 254,510.00 256,690.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 11 Page 153 of 162 Page 418 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 230,847.27 254,862.86 238,800.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 241,300.00 253,300.00 0.00 0.00 211,187.19 227,118.73 251,610.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 254,510.00 256,690.00 0.00 0.00 19,660.08 27,744.13 (12,810.00) 0.00 Recycling Utility Totals: 0.00 (13,210.00) (3,390.00) 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 12 Page 154 of 162 Page 419 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 631 Storm Water Utility R03 Intergovernmental 0.00 38,680.36 236,000.00 0.00 3362-0000 MISC GRANTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38,680.36 236,000.00 0.00 Intergovernmental Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R05 Fines & Forfeits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3720-0000 STORM WATER PENALTIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fines & Forfeits Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R07 Special Assessments 529.19 237.27 0.00 0.00 3610-0000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS - CURRENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3611-0000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS-DELINQUENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3614-0000 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS-INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 529.19 237.27 0.00 0.00 Special Assessments Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R08 Investment Revenue 36,190.56 9,950.73 10,500.00 0.00 3620-0000 INTEREST EARNINGS 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 36,190.56 9,950.73 10,500.00 0.00 Investment Revenue Totals: 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 R09 Misc Revenues 1,086.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3353-0000 PERA PENSION OTHER REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 3670-0000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,206.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 Misc Revenues Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R10 Utility Charges 544,515.78 598,117.37 890,000.00 0.00 3710-0000 UTILITY REVENUE 0.00 1,210,360.00 1,210,360.00 0.00 0.00 544,515.78 598,117.37 890,000.00 0.00 Utility Charges Totals: 0.00 1,210,360.00 1,210,360.00 0.00 0.00 R11 Other Financing Sources 1,201.00 1,201.00 0.00 0.00 3940-0000 BOND PREMIUM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,201.00 1,201.00 0.00 0.00 Other Financing Sources Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 583,643.21 648,186.73 1,136,500.00 0.00 REVENUES TOTALS: 0.00 1,220,360.00 1,220,360.00 0.00 0.00 E01 Personal Services 68,104.76 61,480.56 68,180.00 0.00 4101-0000 FULL-TIME REGULAR 0.00 69,370.00 69,370.00 0.00 0.00 8.63 1,742.92 800.00 0.00 4102-0000 OVERTIME 0.00 800.00 800.00 0.00 0.00 4,173.49 4,722.17 5,110.00 0.00 4121-0000 PERA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 5,200.00 5,200.00 0.00 0.00 4,481.43 5,034.68 5,220.00 0.00 4122-0000 FICA CONTRIB - CITY SHARE 0.00 5,310.00 5,310.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 13 Page 155 of 162 Page 420 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 0.00 0.00 600.00 0.00 4125-0000 MN PAID LEAVE PREMIUM 0.00 670.00 610.00 0.00 0.00 8,356.56 9,896.21 14,140.00 0.00 4131-0000 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE - CITY 0.00 14,500.00 14,500.00 0.00 0.00 1,860.02 1,747.60 1,530.00 0.00 4151-0000 WORKERS COMPENSATION 0.00 1,570.00 1,570.00 0.00 0.00 (1,228.00) (3,766.00) 1,000.00 0.00 4161-0000 PENSION EXPENSE 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 85,756.89 80,858.14 96,580.00 0.00 Personal Services Totals: 0.00 98,420.00 98,360.00 0.00 0.00 E02 Supplies 236.08 0.00 500.00 0.00 4200-0000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 250.00 250.00 0.00 0.00 1,344.19 1,401.22 1,800.00 0.00 4208-0000 POSTAGE 0.00 1,800.00 1,800.00 0.00 0.00 4,810.23 5,370.25 5,000.00 0.00 4221-0000 MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4240-0000 SMALL TOOLS/MINOR EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,385.83 454.38 2,500.00 0.00 4245-0000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 7,776.33 7,225.85 9,800.00 0.00 Supplies Totals: 0.00 9,550.00 9,550.00 0.00 0.00 E04 Professional Services 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 4301-0000 AUDITING & ACCOUNTING 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 79,648.17 80,795.76 45,000.00 0.00 4303-0000 ENGINEERING FEES 0.00 45,000.00 45,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4304-0000 LEGAL FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,685.52 19,369.26 25,000.00 0.00 4400-0000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 82,333.69 100,165.02 80,000.00 0.00 Professional Services Totals: 0.00 80,000.00 80,000.00 0.00 0.00 E05 Other Services and Charges 3,082.50 13,633.50 26,000.00 0.00 4302-0009 MS4 SERVICES 0.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 295.97 178.86 1,000.00 0.00 4321-0000 COMMUNICATIONS - VOICE/DATA 0.00 600.00 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 180.53 2,500.00 0.00 4331-0000 TRAVEL, CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 655.00 0.00 0.00 4351-0000 PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 1,200.00 0.00 4437-0000 TAXES/LICENSES 0.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 2,776.82 2,359.04 4,500.00 0.00 4450-0000 BANK SERVICE CHARGES 0.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 0.00 0.00 6,155.29 17,406.93 35,200.00 0.00 Other Services and Charges Totals: 0.00 28,300.00 28,300.00 0.00 0.00 E06 Depreciation 145,150.65 0.00 145,250.00 0.00 4420-0000 DEPRECIATION 0.00 145,250.00 145,250.00 0.00 0.00 145,150.65 0.00 145,250.00 0.00 Depreciation Totals: 0.00 145,250.00 145,250.00 0.00 0.00 E07 Capital Outlay 0.00 60,000.00 3,000.00 0.00 4640-0000 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 0.00 74,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 14 Page 156 of 162 Page 421 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 48,373.91 0.00 820,500.00 0.00 4680-0000 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 562,254.00 562,254.00 0.00 0.00 48,373.91 60,000.00 823,500.00 0.00 Capital Outlay Totals: 0.00 636,954.00 562,254.00 0.00 0.00 E08 Debt Service 148,193.72 139,983.71 137,875.00 0.00 4711-0000 BOND INTEREST 0.00 132,035.00 132,035.00 0.00 0.00 538.22 960.57 390.00 0.00 4720-0000 FISCAL AGENT FEES 0.00 390.00 390.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4730-0000 BOND ISSUANCE COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 148,731.94 140,944.28 138,265.00 0.00 Debt Service Totals: 0.00 132,425.00 132,425.00 0.00 0.00 524,278.70 406,600.22 1,328,595.00 0.00 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 0.00 1,130,899.00 1,056,139.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 15 Page 157 of 162 Page 422 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 583,643.21 648,186.73 1,136,500.00 0.00 FUND REVENUES 0.00 1,220,360.00 1,220,360.00 0.00 0.00 524,278.70 406,600.22 1,328,595.00 0.00 FUND EXPENSES 0.00 1,130,899.00 1,056,139.00 0.00 0.00 59,364.51 241,586.51 (192,095.00) 0.00 Storm Water Utility Totals: 0.00 89,461.00 164,221.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 16 Page 158 of 162 Page 423 of 568 2024 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Account Description FTE Requested Proposed Approved Adopted 3,336,933.35 3,974,511.04 4,953,269.00 0.00 REPORT REVENUES 0.00 5,265,105.00 5,470,465.00 0.00 0.00 3,694,501.49 3,155,916.55 6,058,657.00 0.00 REPORT EXPENSES 0.00 5,175,686.00 5,170,256.00 0.00 0.00 (357,568.14) 818,594.49 (1,105,388.00) 0.00 REPORT TOTALS: 0.00 89,419.00 300,209.00 0.00 0.00 GL-Budget Analysis (8/18/2026 - 7:20 AM) Page 17 Page 159 of 162 Page 424 of 568 GLOSSARY ALLOCATED Distribute costs between reporting departments or funds. APPROPRIATION A grant of money by a legislative body to carry out a governmental function or program. BOND ISSUE A security representing a long-term promise to pay a certain sum of money at specified times with a fixed rate of interest payable to the holder. BUDGET (1) A statement describing the revenues and expenditures of all governmental units, and (2) a mechanism for controlling, managing, planning and evaluating the activities of each governmental unit. CAPITAL ASSET Assets of significant value and having a useful life of several years (Fixed Asset). CAPITAL OUTLAY Expenditures for the acquisition of capital assets. CAPITAL PROJECTS Funds used to account for activity of capital projects and FUND initiated or purchased by the City. COMPARABLE Mandated by State law; a system which establishes the value of WORTH jobs by weighting tasks performed on a point scale. Ensures comparable wages for jobs within a comparable point range within the jurisdiction. CONTRACTUAL A legally binding document that provides both parties perform specific duties. COMPREHENSIVE A comprehensive short-range and long-range plan intended to PLAN guide the growth and development of a community, and one that includes analysis, recommendations, and proposals for the community's population, economy, housing, transportation, community facilities, and land use. DEBT LEVY A tax collected to pay for bonds issued. DEBT SERVICE Established to account for the accumulation of financial sources FUND for the payment of principal and interest on debt incurred by the City. Debt incurred for improvements of an enterprise are accounted for in the appropriate enterprise fund. Page 160 of 162 Page 425 of 568 ENTERPRISE FUND Established to account for operations that are financed and managed in a manner similar to private business enterprises where the intent of the governing body is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation) of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. EXPENDITURE The amount of cash or property paid, or to be paid, for a service rendered, goods received, or an asset purchased. FISCAL DISPARITIES A metropolitan program that distributes a percentage of property tax revenue from new commercial and industrial development to all metropolitan communities. FUND A fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balance set of accounts that are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives. FUND BALANCE The residual balance resulting from all fiscal activity within a fund which is available for appropriation. FUND EQUITY The residual balance, reserved and unreserved, resulting from all fiscal activity within a fund. GENERAL FUND Used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The General Fund includes most operating functions of City government. GRANT A contribution or gift of cash or other assets from another government to be used or expended for a specified purpose, activity or facility. JOINT POWERS A contract between two or more government jurisdictions to AGREEMENT provide a common service. MUNICIPAL STATE State of Minnesota program which provides for the distribution of AID PROGRAM (MSA) highway user funds to qualifying cities over a population of 5,000. Funds are appropriated annually for construction and maintenance of MSA streets and roads. MUNICIPAL STATE Designated by the City to be eligible for Municipal State Aid AID STREETS (MSA) payments for construction and maintenance of collector streets and roads. Page 161 of 162 Page 426 of 568 OBJECTIVE Desired output which can be measured and achieved within a given time period. ORDINANCE A municipal law. SPECIAL A cost paid by landowners for specific improvements to their ASSESSMENT property that adds at least as much value and benefit as the amount of the special assessment. TAX INCREMENT The additional, or incremental, property taxes collected within a tax increment district. Increments are the difference between the taxes collected on the total value of the district and the taxes collected on the original value of the district. Increments include taxes levied by all taxing jurisdictions. TAX LEVY The total amount of dollars assessed in taxes against property for the purpose of producing funds to meet financial obligations. TAXING A geographic area permitted to tax landowners within. JURISDICTION TRANSFERS Money moved from one fund to another with City Council authorization. TRUTH-IN- State law that provides residents notice of proposed TAXATION property tax changes through public hearings and newspaper publications. ZONING Regulation of land use by districts ensuring that certain land uses are compatible. Page 162 of 162 Page 427 of 568 2027-2036 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Proposed July 27, 2026 Page 428 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 2027-2036 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. INTRODUCTION Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Authorizing Resolution .......................................................................................... 4 Capital Improvement Fiscal Policy ......................................................................... 5 Planning Commission Review ................................................................................ 6 TABLES Funding Source Summary ...................................................................................... 7 Department Summary ........................................................................................... 8 Project by Funding Source and Department ......................................................... 9 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FUNDS Special Revenue Fund Shorewood Community and Event Center Fund (201) ........................................ 15 Capital Funds ................................................................................................................. 17 Park Improvement Capital Fund (402) ................................................................ 18 Equipment Replacement Capital Fund (403) ....................................................... 21 Street Reconstruction Capital Fund (404) ........................................................... 24 Municipal State Aid Capital Fund (405) ............................................................... 28 Community Infrastructure Fund (450) ................................................................. 32 Enterprise Funds Water Fund (601) ................................................................................................ 35 Sanitary Sewer Fund (611) .................................................................................. 37 Stormwater Management Fund (631) ................................................................. 39 Page 429 of 568July 27, 2026 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Residents of the City of Shorewood Dear Mayor and City Council: 2027-2036 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OVERVIEW The 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a coordinated schedule of municipal capital projects, improvements, and purchases for the years 2027 through 2036. This ten-year planning document represents the combined efforts of City Staff, advisory commission, residents, and the City Council. It is intended to alert the Council and residents to the major capital needs on the horizon. The first year of the plan becomes part of the various budgets and relates almost completely to the operating budget that is approved on an annual basis. The remaining years represent an estimate of project and equipment needs and funding capabilities of the City. A Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a planning tool and is therefore structured to present a meaningful, long-range perspective of the City’s capital needs. The CIP lists significant improvements in infrastructure and equipment that the City should plan for. It becomes a financial planning tool that identifies funding sources and funding availability and helps decision- makers to determine affordability. With the approval or amendment by the Council, the CIP provides an implementation program for Staff to work on. A CIP should be developed to combine realistic needs with realistic expectations about expenditures and should reflect projects of other units of government (e.g. MnDOT, Hennepin County, watershed districts, etc.), when known, so that opportunities to coordinate City projects can be identified. Shorewood has developed a philosophy about what is to be included when a CIP is presented. The following points, subject to Council modification, are part of that understanding.  Projects in Shorewood’s CIP are listed with particular care in terms of the likelihood that they will be implemented in the first or second year of the program.  Projects listed in years three through five of the program identify projects and opportunities that merit further evaluation.  There are programs for on-going outlays for which individual projects are not well-defined currently. For instance, the City has a pavement management program to assess the Page 430 of 568 condition of local streets, and it is updated every year. It is acceptable to budget funds for bituminous overlays each year without listing specific streets after the first year. • Placing a project or outlay in the CIP does not commit the City Council to accomplish it. The Council’s normal processes of authorizing studies to be prepared and gaining public comment need to be followed. A CIP listing does not in any way imply a done deal. The League of Minnesota Cities’ Handbook for Minnesota Cities contains the following discussion of Capital Improvement Budgeting. “Capital budgeting is a list of needed capital improvements, their order of priority, and the means of financing them. Besides being one of the major tools of planning, a capital budget can provide some or all of the following advantages: • Keep the public informed of future needs and protect council members from pressure groups seeking projects rated low on the priority list • Often reduce or stabilize the tax rate • Establish an orderly capital improvement program, preventing the peaks and valleys in a community’s debt retirement program • Frequently allow a community to move gradually to a pay-as-you-go program of capital expenditure financing for a considerable portion of its improvements • Capital improvements take place in a logical and orderly manner, rather than haphazardly • Integrate the plans and projects of all city departments and agencies, eliminating conflicting and overlapping projects • By ensuring prior consideration for all capital improvements, it helps guarantee ample time for detailed and careful planning of the actual program.” “The City puts improvement projects into a multiple-year capital improvement program on the basis of the established priority. When the council reviews it in light of the community’s financial situation, it may find the city should defer some of the projects beyond the improvement period and other projects indefinitely.” “Following this, the budget officer recommends projects for the coming budget year. The recommendations, in effect, become the recommended program.” “Priorities in the capital budget program for the following years remain tentative, and the council should review them annually. At that time, the council should consider the addition of new projects and the deletion of others.” A CIP is not a document set in stone. It is a snapshot of needs, schedule of improvements, and schedule of financing, typically five years into the future, with an additional five years for long- term financial planning. It is intended that the CIP be reviewed and changed as physical conditions, financial conditions, and changes in priorities occur. Page 431 of 568 Page 2 of 42FUNDING SOURCES AND FINANCING Planning for capital improvements requires sound and economical financing. The exact funding method is based on the City’s general policies, past practices, legal and practical considerations. The preparation of a ten-year CIP requires City Staff to make material estimates about project scope, costs of labor and materials, future interest rates, and other items. Many times, these estimates come from Staff experience, projections published in other sources, vendor estimates, or a combination of several sources. Generally, the estimates for earlier years are more precise than later years. Prioritization is a critical part of the CIP process because the City doesn’t have enough resources to do all the projects that we would like. Some projects have reliable funding sources, but many do not. CIP AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The CIP is an implementation program of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Minn. Stat. §462.356 Subd. 2 and City Code 201.07 Subd. 10 provides that the City’s Planning Commission is to review the CIP prior to its adoption by the City Council. On October 6, 2026, the Shorewood Planning Commission will review the proposed CIP and to ensure that the capital projects within the CIP are generally consistent with, and/or generally contemplated by the City’s Comprehensive Plan. SUMMARY The 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Plan was prepared according to the priorities and direction of the City Council and Staff believes it provides a responsible plan to balance the City’s infrastructure needs and financial position. Respectfully submitted, Marc Nevinski Jeanne Schmuck City Administrator Finance Director Matt Morreim Andrew Budde Public Works Director City Engineer Page 432 of 568 Page 3 of 42 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 26-XXX A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2027-2036 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND 2027 CAPITAL PROJECT FUND BUDGETS WHEREAS, City staff have presented the proposed 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and 2027 capital project fund budgets at meetings through December, 2026; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the CIP and budgets and made modifications to each that reflect desired community service levels; and WHEREAS, these budgets represent a reasonable estimate of what needs to be spent to provide the desired service level. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: 1. The 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Plan is hereby adopted as presented with this adoption subject to Planning Commission review and determination of compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Park Improvement, Equipment Replacement, Street Reconstruction, MSA, Trail Construction, and Community Infrastructure budgets are hereby adopted as presented. Adopted by the City Council of Shorewood, Minnesota this 14th day of December 2026. __________________________ Jennifer Labadie, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Sandie Thone, City Clerk Page 433 of 568 Page 4 of 42 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FISCAL POLICY GENERAL POLICY Shorewood’s Capital Improvements Program reflects an assessment of the community’s needs and its ability to pay for major improvements. It is founded on the policy that reinvestment required for replacement, maintenance, or the increased efficiency of existing systems shall have priority over investments for expansion of existing systems or the provision of new services. FUNDING PRIORITIES Capital spending proposals will generally be funded on the following priority basis: 1. Those projects necessary for contributing to the public health and welfare. 2. Those projects which will help to maintain an existing system. 3. Those projects that will make an existing system more efficient. 4. Those projects representing the expansion of an existing system for new service or completely new public facility or service. FUNDING PRINCIPLES As a result, the following principles shall govern the implementation of the recommended Capital Improvements Program: 1. The City will make all capital improvements in accordance with the adopted Capital Improvements Program. 2. The City will develop a multi-year plan for Capital Improvements and update it annually. 3. The City will coordinate development of the Capital Improvements Program with development of the annual operating budget. Future optional costs associated with new capital improvements will be projected and included in operation budget forecasts. Page 434 of 568 Page 5 of 42 To: Shorewood Mayor & City Council From: Shorewood Planning Commission Date: October 6, 2026 Subject: 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) At the October 6, 2026 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed 2027-2036 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes 462.356, Subd. 2. and City Code 201.07, Subd. 10. Findings and Conclusions: NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with Minnesota State Statute 462.356, Subd. 2. and City Code 201.07, Subd. 10, the Planning Commission finds that the capital projects within the CIP are generally consistent with, generally implement, and/or are generally contemplated by the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Ken Huskins, Chair ATTEST: Sandie Thone, City Clerk 5755 Country Club Road, Shorewood, MN 55331 ● 952.960.7900 ● www.ci.shorewood.mn.us Page 435 of 568 Page 6 of 42 Page 436 of 568 Page 7 of 42 Page 437 of 568 Page 8 of 42 Page 438 of 568 Page 9 of 42 Page 439 of 568 Page 10 of 42 Page 440 of 568 Page 11 of 42 Page 441 of 568 Page 12 of 42 Page 442 of 568 Page 13 of 42 Page 443 of 568 Page 14 of 42SPECIAL REVENUE SHOREWOOD COMMUNITY AND EVENT CENTER FUND (201) Fund Mission This fund was established to account for the resources accumulated from events and activities held at the City’s community center, and the payment of expenditures related to operations of the community center. The City has committed charges for services revenues for operations. Property taxes support the community center when fees generated from facility rental are not sufficient to cover expenses. Fund Description/Services The Shorewood Community & Event Center (SCEC) is nestled in the woods right next to Shorewood City Hall and Badger Park to provide recreational services and programs. The City partners with the South Shore Senior Partners to provide Senior programming. The SCEC offers multiple room rentals, with spaces for birthday parties, graduations, weddings, receptions, memorials, HOA meetings, teleconferencing, dances, and more. Fund Goals  Implement recommendations provided by the SCEC Task Force.  Increase rental income while decreasing expenditures to achieve 70% cost recovery.  Maintain a functional facility by performing routine maintenance and providing incremental building updates. Fund Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Total Rental Income $66,075 $82,269 $82,000 $85,000 Total Facility Rentals 371 432 440 500 Cost Recovery – 70% Target 38.86% 48.68% 49% 55% Revenue/Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes $ 105,000 $ 122,000 145,000$ 177,677$ $ 32,677 22.54% Charges for Services 66,286 82,269 68,000 82,000 14,000 20.59% Miscellaneous 3,040 5,364 3,150 2,500 (650) -20.63% TOTAL REVENUES $ 174,326 $ 209,634 216,150$ 262,177$ $ 46,027 21.29% EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $ 88,701 $ 113,363 $ 68,480 125,010$ $ 56,530 82.55% Supplies 33,093 22,145 29,340 29,510 170 0.58% Other Services and Charges 35,326 38,992 54,210 47,451 (6,759) -12.47% Capital Outlay 21,280 5,995 21,500 32,021 10,521 48.93% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 178,401 $ 180,496 173,530$ 233,992$ $ 60,462 34.84% BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 78,404 $ 74,329 103,467$ 146,087$ Net Change in Fund Balance (4,075) 29,138 42,620 28,185 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 74,329 $ 103,467 146,087$ 174,272$ Page 444 of 568 Page 15 of 42 Page 445 of 568 Page 16 of 42CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY Capital Funds Capital Projects funds are used to account for the acquisition and construction of major capital facilities other than those financed by enterprise funds. Details of these funds can be found in the 10- Year Capital Improvement Plan. Fund Description/Services Park Capital Improvement Fund - This fund accounts for parkland acquisition and other capital improvements in the City parks. Equipment Replacement Fund - This fund was established to account for various capital acquisitions for the City governmental funds. This fund was developed in order to eliminate fluctuations in departmental operating budgets from year to year due to capital outlay purchases. Street Reconstruction Fund - This fund was established for the purpose of funding the periodic reconstruction of City streets and roadways. MSA Road Reconstruction Fund - This fund was established to account for the accumulation of Municipal State Aid (MSA) to fund the periodic reconstruction of MSA designated roads. Community Infrastructure Fund - This fund was established to account for various capital improvement projects that may be financed without the need to issue bonds. Revenue/Expenditures Park Equipment Street Municipal Community Total Improvement Replacement Improvement State Aid Infrastructure Capital Description Fund (402) Fund (403) Fund (404) Fund (405) Fund (450) Funds REVENUES Taxes $ 355,500 $ 275,000 $ - -$ $ 230,000 $ 860,500 Municipal State Aid - - - - - - Miscellaneous 2,230 920 365,510 580 - 369,240 Transfers In - - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 357,730 $ 275,920 $ 365,510 580$ $ 230,000 $ 1,229,740 EXPENDITURES Supplies $ - $ - $ - -$ $ - $ - Other Services and Charges - - - - 30,000 30,000 Capital Outlay 350,000 367,600 2,262,119 - 200,000 3,179,719 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 350,000 $ 367,600 $ 2,262,119 -$ $ 230,000 $ 3,209,719 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 473,825 $ 178,713 $ 1,851,792 43,663$ $ 42,769 Net Change in Fund Balance 7,730 (91,680) (1,896,609) 580 - ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 481,555 $ 87,033 $ (44,817) $ 44,243 $ 42,769 Page 446 of 568 Page 17 of 42CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PARK IMPROVEMENT CAPITAL FUND (402) Fund Mission This fund was established to account for the resources accumulated from events and activities held at the City’s community center, and the payment of expenditures related to operations of the community center. The City has committed charges for services revenues for operations. Property taxes support the community center when fees generated from facility rental are not sufficient to cover expenses. Fund Description/Services The Park Improvement Capital Fund provides for major facilities and equipment for City parks. Fees collected from new subdivision development and transfers from the General Fund are dedicated for the development and improvement of City parks. Revenue/Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes $ 128,000 135,000$ 305,500$ $ 355,500 $ 50,000 16.37% Park Dedication Fees 112,500 97,600 - - - Miscellaneous 321,979 67,873 2,230 2,230 - 0.00% Transfers In 105,000 - - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 667,479 300,473$ 307,730$ $ 357,730 $ 50,000 16.25% EXPENDITURES Supplies $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other Services and Charges 23,688 42,191 - - - Capital Outlay 45,120 - 45,000 350,000 305,000 677.78% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 68,808 $ 42,191 45,000$ $ 350,000 $ 305,000 677.78% BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ (645,858) $ (47,187) 211,095$ $ 473,825 Net Change in Fund Balance 598,671 258,282 262,730 7,730 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ (47,187) 211,095$ 473,825$ $ 481,555 Page 447 of 568 Page 18 of 42 Page 448 of 568 Page 19 of 42 Page 449 of 568 Page 20 of 42CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CAPITAL FUND (403) Fund Mission This fund was established for the purpose of funding the replacement of capital equipment. Fund Description/Services The Equipment Replacement Capital Fund is supported by Property Taxes and there have been transfers from the General Fund over the years as well. These sources provide for the accumulation of funds for acquisition and replacement of equipment utilized in City operations and infrastructure. Revenue/Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes $ 128,000 165,000$ 215,000$ $ 275,000 $ 60,000 27.91% Sale of Capital Assets 3,854 123,508 - - - Miscellaneous 11,815 3,117 920 920 - 0.00% Transfers In - 400,000 - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 143,669 691,625$ 215,920$ $ 275,920 $ 60,000 27.79% EXPENDITURES Buildings & Structures$ 30,901 605,897$ $ - $ - $ - Machinery & Equipment 113,193 344,994 74,900 344,000 269,100 359.28% Furniture & Fixtures - 242 11,200 23,600 12,400 110.71% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 144,094 951,132$ 86,100$ $ 367,600 $ 281,500 326.95% BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 308,826 308,400$ 48,893$ $ 178,713 Net Change in Fund Balance (426) (259,507) 129,820 (91,680) ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 308,400 48,893$ 178,713$ $ 87,033 Page 450 of 568 Page 21 of 42 Page 451 of 568 Page 22 of 42 Page 452 of 568 Page 23 of 42CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT STREET RECONSTRUCTION CAPITAL FUND (404) Fund Mission This fund was established for the purpose of funding the periodic maintenance, upgrade, and reconstruction of City streets and roadways. Fund Description/Services The Street Improvement Capital Fund is supported by Property Tax Levy, Bond Proceeds. There have also been transfers periodically to supplement the fund with general operating surplus. The City’s strategy to finance projects has been to bond. Bonds were issued from 2020-2023 to finance various projects within the fund, the City’s outstanding debt will essentially grow larger each year until the first bonds issued in 2020 are paid off. Revenue/Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes $ 128,000 $ 170,500 $ - $ - $ - Miscellaneous 181,602 615,646 65,510 365,510 300,000 457.95% Bond Proceeds - - - - - Transfers In - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 309,602 $ 786,146 $ 65,510 $ 365,510 $ 300,000 457.95% EXPENDITURES Supplies $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other Services and Charges 415,240 629,140 - - - Capital Outlay 985,347 1,703,227 315,000 2,262,119 1,947,119 618.13% Transfers Out - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,400,587 $ 2,332,367 $ 315,000 $ 2,262,119 $ 1,947,119 618.13% BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 4,738,489 $ 3,647,503 $ 2,101,282 $ 1,851,792 Net Change in Fund Balance (1,090,986) (1,546,221) (249,490) (1,896,609) ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 3,647,503 $ 2,101,282 $ 1,851,792 $ (44,817) Page 453 of 568 Page 24 of 42 Page 454 of 568 Page 25 of 42CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT MUNICIPAL STATE AID CAPITAL FUND (405) Fund Mission This fund was established to account for the accumulation of Municipal State Aid (MSA) to fund the periodic reconstruction of MSA designated roads. Fund Description/Services The MSA Street Improvement Capital Fund is supported by Municipal State Aid (MSA) Funds. The MSA Street program is administered through the State of Minnesota’s Department of Transportation. The funds are used for the maintenance, upgrade, and reconstruction of City streets and roadways designated on the City’s MSA system. Revenue/Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Municipal State Aid - - 1,072,000 - (1,072,000) -100.00% Miscellaneous 1,639 1,575 468,580 580 (468,000) -99.88% Transfers In - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 1,639 $ 1,575 $ 1,540,580 $ 580 $ (1,540,000) -99.96% EXPENDITURES Supplies $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other Services and Charges - - - - - Capital Outlay - - 1,540,000 - (1,540,000) -100.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ - $ - $ 1,540,000 $ - $ (1,540,000) -100.00% BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 39,869 $ 41,508 $ 43,083 $ 43,663 1.35% Net Change in Fund Balance 1,639 1,575 580 580 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 41,508 $ 43,083 $ 43,663 $ 44,243 Page 457 of 568 Page 28 of 42 Page 458 of 568 Page 29 of 42CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL FUND (450) Fund Mission This fund was established to account for various capital improvement public facilities projects that may be financed without the need to issue bonds. Fund Description/Services The Community Infrastructure Capital Fund provides for the accumulation of funds for acquisition, maintenance, and replacement of public facilities within the City. Revenue/Expenditures Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Taxes $ - $ -$ 50,000 $ 230,000 $ 180,000 360.00% Miscellaneous 89,049 3,207 - - - Transfers In - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES $ 89,049 3,207$ 50,000$ $ 230,000 $ 180,000 360.00% EXPENDITURES Supplies $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other Services and Charges - - - 30,000 30,000 Capital Outlay 88,158 - 245,000 200,000 (45,000) -18.37% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 88,158 $ - 245,000$ $ 230,000 $ (15,000) -6.12% BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 233,672 234,563$ 237,769$ $ 42,769 -82.01% Net Change in Fund Balance 891 3,207 (195,000) - ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 234,563 237,769$ 42,769$ $ 42,769 Page 461 of 568 Page 32 of 42 Page 462 of 568 Page 33 of 42 2027-2032 Public Works Facility Improvements PROJECT SCOPE • Update outdated air exchange system and fans in the public works garage. • Upgrade the outdated heating units in the public works garage to a radiant heat system. • Construct an addition to the existing public works building along with renovating the existing building to include expanded office space, employee area and restroom/locker rooms. • Construct an addition to the existing public works equipment shop Forced Air Heating Unit to include an additional mechanics bay. • Construct an addition to the existing public works building to Air Exchange Unit include heated storage. FUNDING • Shorewood - General fund and enterprise utility funds. BUDGET/SCHEDULE • Air exchange system & fans (garage) – 2027: $200,000 • Radiant heat (garage) – 2028: $200,000 • Rehab floor (garage) – 2029: $192,000 • PW building addition & renovation – 2031: $1,384,500 • Mechanic’s bay – 2032: $520,000 Mechanics Bay • Heated storage – 2032: $162,500 ISSUES/OPPORTUNITIES • In 2023, the City conducted a public works facility study that showed a significant deficiency in office, work and storage space. • Since the original public works building was built, the department (fleet and personnel) has more than doubled in size. • The facility heating units and air exchange systems is original to the building and requires a compliance upgrade. • Garage heating is done through inefficient forced air units. Garage Area Sign area Page 463 of 568 Page 34 of 42 ENTERPRISE WATER FUND (601) Fund Mission This fund is used to account for the activities of the City water system. To provide a safe, clean, uninterrupted supply of drinking water to all City residents connected to the municipal water system. Fund Description/Services The municipal water fund is responsible for operation and maintenance of six (6) well systems, including all pumps and well houses, maintenance of water towers, and extension of new water-main and construction of new water facilities, as necessary. This fund provides for the operation of the water system so that a continuous quality supply of water is furnished to customers at a reasonable cost. The water supply is maintained at proper pressure levels and bacteria free. Metering devices are also maintained to account for usage. The primary services provided by this fund are production and distribution of potable water for the residents, businesses, and institutions in the City of Shorewood. The distribution system also provides the general fire protection system (hydrants) for the City and is also responsible for City utility locates under the Gopher State One Call system. Fund Goals  Begin implementation of asset management system.  Continue to maintain current infrastructure, including valve exercising, water tower cleaning, hydrant flushing, etc.  Implement Council objectives to provide more fund sustainability.  Update wellhead protection plan. Fund Performance Measures 2024 2025 2026 2027 Performance Measure Actual Actual Projected Estimated Exercise every valve once per year (% of valves) 20% 25% 25% 25% Minimize non-read water meters (each) 200-300 10 5 5 Fix watermain breaks w/ minimal disruption 5 6 9 5 Revenue/Expenses Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Utility Revenue 763,277$ $ 932,550 $ 1,160,502 $ 1,279,860 $ 119,358 10.29% Water Connection Fees 85,300 91,950 90,618 50,000 (40,618) -44.82% Utility Permit Fees 2,760 1,860 - - - Water Meter Sales 16,438 8,775 10,000 10,000 - 0.00% Miscellaneous Revenue 104,971 191,474 10,200 260,000 249,800 2449.02% TOTAL REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 972,747 $ 1,226,610 $ 1,271,320 $ 1,599,860 $ 328,540 25.84% EXPENSES Personnel Services $ 361,313 $ 343,868 $ 357,220 $ 365,280 $ 8,060 2.26% Supplies 114,692 99,605 132,900 132,800 (100) -0.08% Other Services and Charges 596,575 278,176 867,000 951,000 84,000 9.69% Non-Operating 133,399 180,195 1,030,490 280,531 (749,959) -72.78% TOTAL EXPENSES $ 1,205,979 $ 901,843 $ 2,387,610 $ 1,729,611 $ (657,999) -27.56% BEGINNING NET POSITION $ 7,677,961 $ 7,444,728 $ 7,769,494 $ 6,653,204 Change in Net Position (233,233) 324,766 (1,116,290) (129,751) ENDING NET POSITION $ 7,444,728 $ 7,769,494 $ 6,653,204 $ 6,523,453 *Net Position includes Net Investment in Capital Assets Page 464 of 568 Page 35 of 42 Page 465 of 568 Page 36 of 42ENTERPRISE SANITARY SEWER FUND (611) Fund Mission This fund is used to account for the activities of the City sanitary sewer system. Fund Description/Services The Sanitary Sewer Fund finances the operation and maintenance of the City’s wastewater collection, including fourteen sanitary sewer lift stations throughout the system. As well as cleaning, televising and repairing sewer mains to control inflow and infiltration. Sewage treatment is performed by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) and is provided for in this area. Fund Goals  Begin implementation of asset management system.  Continue to maintain current infrastructure, including sewer cleaning, etc.  Begin maintenance and repair of sewer structures and castings to reduce I&I. Fund Performance Measures Performance Measure 2024 2025 2026 2027 Actual Actual Projected Estimated Clean 20% of the sanitary sewer system 20% 20% 20% 20% Reconstruct, fix, or seal sanitary casting N/A 122 8 70 structure to improve I&I. Clean and televise 10% of sanitary sewer N/A 15% 10% 10% system outside of road accessible locations Revenue/Expenses Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Utility Revenue $ 1,481,058 $ 1,762,696 $ 2,276,649 $ 2,344,945 $ 68,296 3.00% Sewer Connection Fees 1,200 23,140 5,000 5,000 - 0.00% Utility Permit Fees 120 - 1,000 1,000 - 0.00% Miscellaneous Revenue 67,185 54,044 24,000 46,000 22,000 91.67% TOTAL REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 1,549,563 $ 1,839,880 $ 2,306,649 $ 2,396,945 $ 90,296 3.91% EXPENSES Personnel Services $ 309,284 $ 288,645 $ 301,135 $ 308,335 $ 7,200 2.39% Supplies 18,660 10,487 17,200 16,800 (400) -2.33% MCES SAC Payables Charges 1,076,772 1,074,424 1,200,217 1,179,366 (20,851) -1.74% Other Services and Charges 253,504 131,799 280,300 331,300 51,000 18.19% Non-Operating 95,073 120,011 291,990 292,365 375 0.13% TOTAL EXPENSES $ 1,753,293 $ 1,625,366 $ 2,090,842 $ 2,128,166 $ 37,324 1.79% BEGINNING NET POSITION $ 3,455,125 $ 3,251,395 $ 3,465,909 $ 3,681,716 Change in Net Position (203,730) 214,514 215,807 268,779 ENDING NET POSITION $ 3,251,395 $ 3,465,909 $ 3,681,716 $ 3,950,495 *Net Position includes Net Investment in Capital Assets Page 466 of 568 Page 37 of 42 Page 467 of 568 Page 38 of 42 ENTERPRISE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND (631) Fund Mission This fund is used to account for the activities of the City Stormwater Management system. Fund Description/Services The Stormwater Management Fund is utilized to provide the operation, maintenance and repair of the stormwater conveyance system, including 14 miles of infrastructure, including catch basins, drainage ditches, and retention posts. As well as implementation of the city-wide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) for compliance with the NPDES Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit program, which authorized the City to discharge stormwater runoff. Infrastructure and stormwater facilities are properly maintained to manage, convey, and treat stormwater runoff. In addition, infrastructure improvements are constructed and repaired as deemed necessary. Fund Goals  Begin implementation of asset management system.  Continue to manage existing stormwater features through maintenance activities, including pond cleaning, street sweeping, storm drain cleaning, etc.  Continue to be in compliance with federal, state and local agencies, including the city’s MS4 permit. Fund Performance Measures 2024 2025 2026 2027 Performance Measure Actual Actual Projected Estimated Number of catch basins cleaned N/A 25 50 50 Provide communication related to stormwater N/A 0 4 4-6 quality & best management practices Inspect inlets & outlets of storm ponds. Clean as N/A N/A 20% 20% needed for proper functionality Revenue/Expenses Proposed Budget Percentage Actual Actual Budget Budget Change Change Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 2027 REVENUES Utility Revenue $ 544,516 598,150$ 890,000$ $ 1,210,360 $ 320,360 36.00% Franchise Fees 324,387 - - - - Miscellaneous Revenue 39,127 50,026 246,500 10,000 (236,500) -95.94% TOTAL REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $ 908,030 648,175$ 1,136,500$ $ 1,220,360 $ 83,860 7.38% EXPENSES Personnel Services $ 85,757 $ 85,145 $ 96,580 $ 98,420 1,840$ 1.91% Supplies 7,776 7,226 9,800 9,550 (250) -2.55% Other Services and Charges 233,640 116,702 260,450 253,550 (6,900) -2.65% Non-Operating 302,106 200,944 961,765 694,679 (267,086) -27.77% TOTAL EXPENSES $ 629,279 410,017$ 1,328,595$ $ 1,056,199 $ (272,396) -20.50% BEGINNING NET POSITION $ 5,872,097 $ 6,150,849 $ 6,389,007 $ 6,196,912 Change in Net Position 278,752 238,159 (192,095) 164,161 ENDING NET POSITION $ 6,150,849 $ 6,389,007 $ 6,196,912 $ 6,361,073 *Net Position includes Net Investment in Capital Assets Page 468 of 568 Page 39 of 42 Page 469 of 568 Page 40 of 42Page 472 of 568 City Council Item 4.C. Title/Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Due to Recent Municipal Boundary Adjustment Meeting Date: September 14, 2026 Prepared By: Jake Griffiths, Planning Director Attachments 1. August 18, 2026 Planning Commission Memorandum 2. Draft Relevant August 18, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 3. Resolution 26-51 Approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment 4. Ordinance No. 633 Municipal Boundary Adjustment Rezonings 5. Resolution 26-56 for Summary Publication Background Please see the attached August 18, 2026, Planning Commission Memorandum for detailed background on this request. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning at its August 18, 2026, meeting and draft relevant minutes are attached for reference. No public comments were received prior to or during the public hearing and the Commission ultimately recommended approval (5-yes, 0-no) to the City Council after a brief discussion. Strategic Alignment Comprehensive Approach to Planning & Development • Clear standards and processes for development with strong controls • Set clear plans and diligently work to achieve them The request generally relates to the City Council's strategic priority of a comprehensive approach to planning and development. However, planning and land use related requests are reviewed on their own merits based on the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan and the City Code. By updating the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map to account for recent adjustments to the municipal boundary, the City is ensuring that it has clear plans and standards in place going forward for the land that has been added to the community. Budget Impact If the request is approved, there will be costs associated with publication of a summary ordinance, which are typically less than $100.00. The Planning & Protective Inspections Department has adequate funds remaining in its 2026 budget to cover the publication cost. Action Requested The City Council is requested to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission and make the following motion: Page 473 of 568 Motion to approve Resolution 26-51, Ordinance No. 633 and Resolution 26-56 approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Rezonings, and Summary Ordinance for Publication related to the recent municipal boundary adjustment with the City of Tonka Bay. A super majority (4/5) vote is required. Page 474 of 568 Planning Commission Item 4.A. Title/Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Due to Recent Municipal Boundary Adjustment Meeting Date: August 18, 2026 Prepared By: Jake Griffiths, Planning Director Attachments 1. Map of Boundary Adjustments 2. Municipal Boundary Adjustment Initiating Documents 3. Municipal Boundary Adjustment Order 4. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments & Rezonings Background On April 27, 2026, the Shorewood City Council adopted a Joint Resolution with the City of Tonka Bay to adjust the municipal boundary between the two cities. The boundary adjustment was proposed in order to resolve an issue with five properties which were split along the municipal boundary between the two communities. The municipal boundary adjustment was approved by the State of Minnesota Court of Administrative Hearings on July 15, 2026. Now that the municipal boundary has been adjusted, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning are needed to account for the properties that have been added and removed from the City of Shorewood. This project is being initiated by the City of Shorewood as a housekeeping item in order to complete the boundary adjustment process and is not associated with any development proposal or other applications. A map showing the location of the boundary adjustments is attached for reference. All the properties involved are generally located near the intersection of County Road 19 and the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail. Comprehensive Plan Amendments & Rezonings The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Rezonings are attached. Three properties at Parcel ID 3311723120090, 3311723120001 and 3311723120020 are being removed from the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map as they are now a part of the City of Tonka Bay. The two properties which were annexed from Tonka Bay at Parcel ID 3311723110089 and 3311723110045 are a part of the Xcel Energy facility located on Country Road 19 already in the City of Shorewood. These properties are proposed to be guided Public/Semi-Public in the Comprehensive Plan and C-1 General Commercial on the City's Zoning Map so they would be consistent with the existing Xcel Energy facility. There are no proposed changes to the City's sewer staging plan, as none of the affected properties are currently served with sanitary sewer service as they do not have principal structures. There is sufficient capacity in the sanitary sewer system to serve the parcels annexed into the City of Shorewood in the future through the existing sanitary mains near County Road 19 that currently serve the main Xcel Energy building. There are no impacts to PagePage 475 12 of 108568regional transportation, wastewater or regional parks systems, no changes to stormwater management on the site, no changes to projected water use, and none of the properties are currently enrolled in any Agricultural Preserves program. Public Engagement Prior to tonight's meeting, property owners within 750 feet of the affected properties were notified of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Rezonings via a postcard notification sent by U.S. Mail on July 22nd and a public hearing notice sent by U.S. Mail on August 4, 2026. Notice was also published in the City’s official newspaper, on the City's website, at City Hall and distributed via email to those residents which have signed up to receive email notifications regarding public hearing notices. As of the publication of this report, no public comments have been received regarding this item. Next Steps Following a recommendation from the Planning Commission, the City Council will consider this item at an upcoming meeting. If the City Council approves the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Rezonings, the Comprehensive Plan Amendments will be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and authorization. This process can take up to 120 days, but is typically much quicker for amendments of this nature. City staff have been in contact with the City's Sector Representative from the Metropolitan Council regarding this item and they have not expressed any concerns. After the Metropolitan Council authorizes the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Rezonings, the City may place them into effect. Action Requested The Planning Commission is requested to hold a public hearing on the propoed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezonings and make a recommendation based on findings of fact to the City Council. PagePage 476 13 of 108568 Document Path: M:\026568-000\GIS\Maps\TonkaBayParcelAnnexation\AnnexedParcels Date Saved: 10/24/2025 M TONKA o u n BAY d A Annexed Parcels v e M a n i SHOREWOOD t o u R d TONKA BAY Northrup Ave B ay St t S e n a l Brentwood Ave d o o W Amlee Rd G i d e o n s L C n o u n Gln Rd t y R d 1 9 n L n o t SHOREWOOD g n i f f u B 9 1 d R y t n u o C C h r i s t o p h e r R d Smithtown Rd Smithtown Rd Annexed Parcels W To Tonka Bay o o d e To Shorewood n C l e e Country Clb Rd City Boundaries k D e r i r TONKA BAY e h y t a a B SHOREWOOD e F Annexed Parcels 0 200 Hennepin County, MN Feet ¯ 1 inch = 200 feet PagePage 477 14 of 108568 Document Path: M:\026568-000\GIS\Maps\TonkaBayParcelAnnexation\CityOverview Date Saved: 10/24/2025 TONKA BAY SHOREWOOD Annexed Parcels To Tonka Bay To Shorewood City Boundaries SHOREWOOD TONKA BAY City Boundaries City Overview 0 1,500 Parcel Annexation Map Feet Hennepin County, MN ¯ 1 inch = 1,500 feet PagePage 478 15 of 568108June 5, 2026 PagePage 479 16 of 108568PagePage 480 17 of 108568PagePage 481 18 of 108568PagePage 482 19 of 108568PagePage 483 20 of 108568PagePage 484 21 of 108568PagePage 485 22 of 108568PagePage 486 23 of 108568 Document Path: M:\026568-000\GIS\Maps\TonkaBayParcelAnnexation\AnnexedParcels Date Saved: 10/24/2025 M TONKA o u n BAY d A Annexed Parcels v e M a n i SHOREWOOD t o u R d TONKA BAY Northrup Ave B ay St t S e n a l Brentwood Ave d o o W Amlee Rd G i d e o n s L C n o u n Gln Rd t y R d 1 9 n L n o t SHOREWOOD g n i f f u B 9 1 d R y t n u o C C h r i s t o p h e r R d Smithtown Rd Smithtown Rd Annexed Parcels W To Tonka Bay o o d e To Shorewood n C l e e Country Clb Rd City Boundaries k D e r i r TONKA BAY e h y t a a B SHOREWOOD e F Annexed Parcels 0 200 Hennepin County, MN Feet ¯ 1 inch = 200 feet PagePage 487 24 of 108568 Document Path: M:\026568-000\GIS\Maps\TonkaBayParcelAnnexation\CityOverview Date Saved: 10/24/2025 TONKA BAY SHOREWOOD Annexed Parcels To Tonka Bay To Shorewood City Boundaries SHOREWOOD TONKA BAY City Boundaries City Overview 0 1,500 Parcel Annexation Map Feet Hennepin County, MN ¯ 1 inch = 1,500 feet PagePage 488 25 of 568108 CAH 50-0333-41827 STATE OF MINNESOTA COURT OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS In the Matter of the Concurrent Detachment ORDER APPROVING and Annexation of Certain Real Property CONCURRENT DETACHMENT AND from the City of Tonka Bay to the City of ANNEXATION Shorewood (MBAU Docket D-685/A-8558) In the Matter of the Concurrent Detachment and Annexation of Certain Real Property from the City of Shorewood to the City of Tonka Bay (MBAU Docket D-686/A-8559) City of Tonka Bay Resolution No. 2026-07/City of Shorewood Resolution No. 26- 26 (Joint Resolution), adopted by the City of Shorewood on April 27, 2026 and the City of Tonka Bay on May 12, 2026, requests the concurrent detachment from Tonka Bay and annexation to Shorewood of certain real property (Tonka Bay/Shorewood Property) and the concurrent detachment from Shorewood and annexation to Tonka Bay of certain real property (Shorewood/Tonka Bay Property) pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 414.061 (2024). The City of Tonka Bay filed the Joint Resolution with the Court of Administrative Hearings on June 5, 2026. The record closed on June 12, 2026, upon receipt of confirmation of the total acreage. The Property is legally described as follows: Tonka Bay/Shorewood Property 1. Parcel ID: 3311723110089 Owner: Northern States Power Company That part of Government Lot 1, Section 33, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the Fourth Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the following described tract: The West 200 feet, measured at right angles to the West line, of that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 482, County of Hennepin, lying Northerly of a line drawn Easterly from a point on the West line of said Tract A, to a point on the East line of said West 200 feet, distant 100 feet Southerly of the Northeast corner of said West 200 feet; PagePage 489 26 of 108568 thence Westerly along the Northerly line of the above described tract to a point distant 25 feet Southerly, measured radially, from the center line of the main track of the Chicago North Western Transportation Company (formerly the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway Company), as said main track is now located; thence Northerly along the Westerly line of Government Lot 1 a distance of 25 feet; thence Easterly and parallel to the northerly line of the above-described tract to a point on a line extending northerly of, and on the same course as the Easterly line of said tract; thence southerly along said extension a distance of 25 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. 2. Parcel ID: 3311723110045 Owner: Northern States Power Company The West 200 feet, measured at right angles to the West line, of that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 482, County of Hennepin, lying Northerly of a line drawn Easterly from a point on the West line of said Tract A, to a point on the East line of said West 200 feet, distant 100 feet Southerly of the Northeast corner of said West 200 feet. (Torrens, Cert 1051934) Shorewood/Tonka Bay Property 1. Parcel ID: 3311723120090 Owner: JR Mega, Inc. That part of the Northwest ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of Section 33, Township 117 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal meridian, bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Southwesterly line of County Road No. 19, distant 50 feet Northerly, measured at right angles, from the center line of the main tract of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company (now the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company), as said main track center line was originally located and established across said Section 33; thence Westerly parallel with said original main track center line a distance of 227.08 feet; thence Southerly at right angles to the last described course a distance of 25 feet, more or less, to a point distant 25 feet Northerly, measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company (Formerly the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company), as said main tract is now located; thence Easterly parallel with said last described main track center line a distance of 235 feet, more or less, to a point on the Southwesterly line of said County Road No. 19; thence Northwesterly along said Southwesterly line of County Road No. 19 to the point of beginning. 2 PagePage 490 27 of 108568 2. Parcel ID: 3311723120001 Owner: RLP 3 LLC That part of the Northwest ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of Section 33, Township 117, North, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, bounded and described as follows: beginning at a point on the Northeasterly line of County Road No. 19, distant 50 feet Northerly measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway Company (now the Chicago and North western Railway Company), as said main track center line was originally located and established across said Section 33; thence Easterly parallel with said original main track center line a distance of 450 feet; thence Southerly at right angles to the last described course to a point distant 25 feet Northerly, measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of the Chicago and North Western Railway Company (formerly the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway Company) as said main track is now located; thence Westerly parallel with said last described main track center line to a point on the Northeasterly line of said County Road No. 19; thence Northwesterly along said Northeasterly line of County Road No. 19 to the point of beginning. 3. Parcel ID: 3311723120020 Owner: Fred Hanus, James Hanus, Florence Hanus and Susan Hanus All that part of the following described tract: Lot Five (5), Auditor’s Subdivision Number One Hundred Thirty-three (133), Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of deeds in and for said Hennepin County, Which lies Southerly of the following-described line: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Lot 5, distant 518.85 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof; thence Southwesterly, deflecting 36 degrees 30 minutes, measured from South to West a distance of 144.46 feet; thence Westerly deflecting 27 degrees 0 minutes, a distance of 34.65 feet, more or less to the Northeasterly line of County Road No. 19 and there terminating. Based upon a review of the Joint Resolution, the Administrative Law Judge makes the following: ORDER 1. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 414.061, the Joint Resolution is deemed adequate in all legal respects and properly supports this Order. 2. Pursuant to this Order, the Tonka Bay/Shorewood Property is concurrently DETACHED from Tonka Bay and ANNEXED to Shorewood. 3 PagePage 491 28 of 108568 3. Pursuant to this Order, the Shorewood/Tonka Bay Property is concurrently DETACHED from Shorewood and ANNEXED to Tonka Bay. Dated: July 15, 2026 _________________________________ NICHOLAS LIENESCH Administrative Law Judge NOTICE This Order is the final administrative order in this case under Minn. Stat. §§ 414.061, .07, .09, .12 (2024). Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 414.07, subd. 2, any person aggrieved by this Order may appeal to Hennepin County District Court by filing an Application for Review with the Court Administrator within 30 days of this Order. An appeal does not stay the effect of this Order. Any party may submit a written request for an amendment of this Order within seven days from the date of the mailing of the Order pursuant to Minn. R. 6000.3100 (2025). However, no request for amendment shall extend the time of appeal from this Order. 4 PagePage 492 29 of 108568 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments & Rezonings The following properties have been detached from the City of Shorewood and are now a part of the City of Tonka Bay. The Future Land Use Map in the City of Shorewood 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the City of Shorewood Zoning Map shall be amended to reflect the updated municipal boundary and as follows: Property #1 Address: Unaddressed Property Parcel ID: 3311723120090 Current Future Land Use Classification: Right-of-Way Proposed Future Land Use Classification: None, removed from City of Shorewood. Current Zoning District: None Proposed Zoning District: None, removed from the City of Shorewood. PagePage 493 30 of 108568 Property #2 Address: Unaddressed Property Parcel ID: 3311723120001 Current Future Land Use Classification: Right-of-Way Proposed Future Land Use Classification: None, removed from City of Shorewood. Current Zoning District: None Proposed Zoning District: None, removed from the City of Shorewood. PagePage 494 31 of 108568Property #3 Address: Unaddressed Property Parcel ID: 3311723120020 Current Future Land Use Classification: Commercial Proposed Future Land Use Classification: None, removed from City of Shorewood. Current Zoning District: C-1 General Commercial Proposed Zoning District: None, removed from the City of Shorewood. PagePage 495 32 of 108568The following properties have been annexed to the City of Shorewood. The Future Land Use Map in the City of Shorewood 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the City of Shorewood Zoning Map shall be amended to reflect the updated municipal boundary and re-guide the properties to be consistent with other properties under common ownership. Property #4 Address: Unaddressed Property Parcel ID: 3311723110089 Current Future Land Use Classification: Commercial (from the City of Tonka Bay 2040 Comprehensive Plan) Proposed Future Land Use Classification: Public/Semi-Public Current Zoning District: C-2 General Commercial (from the City of Tonka Bay Zoning Map) Proposed Zoning District: C-1 General Commercial PagePage 496 33 of 108568 Property #5 Address: Unaddressed Property Parcel ID: 3311723110045 Current Future Land Use Classification: Commercial (from the City of Tonka Bay 2040 Comprehensive Plan) Proposed Future Land Use Classification: Public/Semi-Public Current Zoning District: C-2 General Commercial (from the City of Tonka Bay Zoning Map) Proposed Zoning District: C-1 General Commercial PagePage 497 34 of 108568CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 2026 7:00 P.M. DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Huskins called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Huskins; Commissioners Holker, Longo, Magistad, and Braithwaite; Planning Director Griffiths; Planner Osowski; and Council Liaison Gorham Absent: None 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Longo moved, Braithwaite seconded, approving the agenda for August 18, 2026, as presented. Motion passed 5/0. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES  June 2, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Chair Huskins asked the public comment for the meeting on July 7 that was referred to in the June 2 meeting, which was to be closed on June 5. Planning Director Griffiths shared that the application had been delayed and that the information would probably come before the Commission in October. Holker moved, Magistad seconded, approving the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 2, 2026, as presented. Motion passed 5/0. 3. MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR No one wished to address the Commission. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT & REZONING DUE TO RECENT MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT Planning Director Griffiths reviewed the Plan Amendment and Rezoning as found in the Agenda Packet. Chair Huskins asked whether the reason this is coming before the Commission is that the Joint Resolution is contingent upon the Commission's approval and transmission to the City Council. Planning Director Griffiths noted that it was not true. He explained that the boundary adjustment has already been completed. The reason this matter is before the Commission now is that the boundary between the two cities has changed; Shorewood must update its Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map to reflect the change. Both of those updates are within the purview of the Page 498 of 568CITY OF SHOREWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 18, 2026 Page 2 of 12 Planning Commission, so this is the follow-up in the process and the reason it is before the Commission. Commissioner Magistad stated that these properties are proposed to be designated Public/Semi- Public in the Comprehensive Plan and C-1 General Commercial on the City's Zoning Map. He asked how the two are compatible. Planning Director Griffiths explained that in the current Comprehensive Plan, the future land use designation is Public/Semi-Public. Still, the City Zoning Code specifies that the only district where semi-public uses are allowed is the commercial district. That Comprehensive Plan notes that these are typically commercial properties. He added that it is not a one-to-one district with the same name and title, but the Zoning Code implements the direction of this district through the C-1 zoning designation. The City does not currently have a semi-public zoning district. Commissioner Magistad asked if Excel’s current use is not considered legally nonconforming. Planning Director Griffiths stated that it is a conditional use in the C-1 district and that Excel has a conditional use permit from the City dating back to the 1960s that allows them to operate. Commissioner Magistad asked if the Comprehensive Plan is implemented, what are the potential implications for a new development. Planning Director Griffiths noted that if there were a new development, it would be very important, as the City's plans are currently inconsistent. A new property was added to the City and has no guidance. He added that if a development proposal were submitted now, the City would have no rules for the back part of the property. By making the update, the City is ensuring consistency. He noted that it does not really change anything, but the reason for doing this is to ensure the City has the controls in place if something were to happen on the property. Commissioner Magistad asked whether an amendment is likely in the future. Planning Director Griffiths stated that it could be. He shared that Excel has tried to market the property for sale, as they are not currently using it. He added that the City has not received any application for that project, so he does not know. Chair Huskins asked if that is how it is currently guided with the current Codes. Planning Director Griffiths noted that to be correct. Chair Huskins asked whether anything would change in the Code updates underway. Planning Director Griffiths shared that it would not. He added that with the Comprehensive Plan update happening in the next few years, things could change. He imagined that there would be discussion about the property, but the City is not there yet. In the short term, the City needs to update now to ensure there are controls in place should something come to light. Chair Huskins opened the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 7:16 P.M. No one wished to comment on the application. Chair Huskins closed the Public Testimony portion of the Public Hearing at 7:16 P.M. Holker moved, Longo seconded, recommending approval for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning due to recent municipal boundary adjustments. Motion passed 5/0. Chair Huskins asked when the matter would go before the City Council. Planning Director Griffiths shared that it would be on September 14. Page 499 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 26-51 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR 5 PARCELS LOCATED AT PARCEL ID 3311723110089, 3311723110045, 3311723120020, 3311723120001, AND 3311723120090 DUE TO A RECENT MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT WITH THE CITY OF TONKA BAY WHEREAS, on April 27, 2026, the Shorewood City Council adopted a Joint Resolution with the City of Tonka Bay to adjust the municipal boundary between the two cities affecting 5 parcels legally described below; and, Parcel ID: 3311723110089 That part of Government Lot 1, Section 33, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the Fourth Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the following described tract: The West 200 feet, measured at right angles to the West line, of that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 482, County of Hennepin, lying Northerly of a line drawn Easterly from a point on the West line of said Tract A, to a point on the East line of said West 200 feet, distant 100 feet Southerly of the Northeast corner of said West 200 feet; thence Westerly along the Northerly line of the above described tract to a point distant 25 feet Southerly, measured radially, from the center line of the main track of the Chicago North Western Transportation Company (formerly the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway Company), as said main track is now located; thence Northerly along the Westerly line of Government Lot 1 a distance of 25 feet; thence Easterly and parallel to the northerly line of the above-described tract to a point on a line extending northerly of, and on the same course as the Easterly line of said tract; thence southerly along said extension a distance of 25 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. Parcel ID: 3311723110045 The West 200 feet, measured at right angles to the West line, of that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 482, County of Hennepin, lying Northerly of a line drawn Easterly from a point on the West line of said Tract A, to a point on the East line of said West 200 feet, distant 100 feet Southerly of the Northeast corner of said West 200 feet. (Torrens, Cert 1051934) Parcel ID: 3311723120090 That part of the Northwest ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of Section 33, Township 117 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal meridian, bounded and described as follows: Page 500 of 568Beginning at a point on the Southwesterly line of County Road No. 19, distant 50 feet Northerly, measured at right angles, from the center line of the main tract of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company (now the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company), as said main track center line was originally located and established across said Section 33; thence Westerly parallel with said original main track center line a distance of 227.08 feet; thence Southerly at right angles to the last described course a distance of 25 feet, mor or less, to a point distant 25 feet Northerly, measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company (Formerly the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company), as said main tract is now located; thence Easterly parallel with said last described main track center line a distance of 235 feet, more or less, to a point on the Southwesterly line of said County Road No. 19; thence Northwesterly along said Southwesterly line of County Road No. 19 to the point of beginning. Parcel ID: 3311723120001 That part of the Northwest ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of Section 33, Township 117, North, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, bounded and described as follows: beginning at a point on the Northeasterly line of County Road No. 19, distant 50 feet Northerly measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway Company (now the Chicago and North western Railway Company), as said main track center line was originally located and established across said Section 33; thence Easterly parallel with said original main track center line a distance of 450 feet; thence Southerly at right angles to the last described course to a point distant 25 feet Northerly, measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of the Chicago and North Western Railway Company (formerly the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway Company) as said main track is now located; thence Westerly parallel with said last described main track center line to a point on the Northeasterly line of said County Road No. 19; thence Northwesterly along said Northeasterly line of County Road No. 19 to the point of beginning. Parcel ID: 3311723120020 All that part of the following described tract: Lot Five (5), Auditor’s Subdivision Number One Hundred Thirty-three (133), Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of deeds in and for said Hennepin County, Which lies Southerly of the following-described line: Beginning at a point on the East line of aid Lot 5, distant 518.85 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof; thence Southwesterly, deflecting 36 degrees 30 minutes, measured from South to West a distance of 144.46 feet; thence Westerly deflecting 27 degrees 0 minutes, a distance of 34.65 feet, more or less to the Northeasterly line of County Road No. 19 and there terminating. Page 501 of 568WHEREAS, on July 15, 2026, the municipal boundary adjustment was approved by the State of Minnesota Court of Administrative Hearings; and, WHEREAS, the municipal boundary adjustment resulted in three properties which were previously located within the City of Shorewood being detached and two new properties being annexed to the City and the City of Shorewood Comprehensive Plan needs to be updated to account for the adjusted municipal boundary; and, WHEREAS, Parcel ID 3311723120090, 3311723120001 and 3311723120020 are no longer within the City of Shorewood and the Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to reflect the adjusted municipal boundary placing these properties within the jurisdiction of the City of Tonka Bay; and, WHEREAS, Parcel ID 3311723110089 and 3311723110045 were annexed to the City of Shorewood and the Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to guide them within the Commercial Future Land Use district and updated to reflect the adjusted municipal boundary; and, WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment has been submitted in the manner required under the Shorewood City Code and under Chapter 462 of Minnesota Statutes, and all proceedings have been duly consistent thereunder; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shorewood that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved, subject to the required review by the Metropolitan Council. ADOPTED by the Shorewood City Council on this 14th day of September, 2026. __________________________ Jennifer Labadie, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Sandie Thone, City Clerk Page 502 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 633 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1201.09, SUBD. 2 OF THE SHOREWOOD ZONING CODE - THE SHOREWOOD ZONING MAP FOR 5 PARCELS LOCATED AT PARCEL ID 3311723110089, 3311723110045, 3311723120020, 3311723120001, AND 3311723120090 Section 1: Section 1201.09 Subd. 2. of the Shorewood City Code and the City of Shorewood Zoning Map is hereby amended to remove Parcel ID 3311723120020, 3311723120001 and 3311723120090 from the City of Shorewood; and include Parcel ID 3311723110089 and 3311723110045 within the C-1 General Commercial zoning district. The Parcels are legally described as follows: Parcel ID: 3311723110089 That part of Government Lot 1, Section 33, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the Fourth Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the following described tract: The West 200 feet, measured at right angles to the West line, of that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 482, County of Hennepin, lying Northerly of a line drawn Easterly from a point on the West line of said Tract A, to a point on the East line of said West 200 feet, distant 100 feet Southerly of the Northeast corner of said West 200 feet; thence Westerly along the Northerly line of the above described tract to a point distant 25 feet Southerly, measured radially, from the center line of the main track of the Chicago North Western Transportation Company (formerly the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway Company), as said main track is now located; thence Northerly along the Westerly line of Government Lot 1 a distance of 25 feet; thence Easterly and parallel to the northerly line of the above-described tract to a point on a line extending northerly of, and on the same course as the Easterly line of said tract; thence southerly along said extension a distance of 25 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. Parcel ID: 3311723110045 The West 200 feet, measured at right angles to the West line, of that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 482, County of Hennepin, lying Northerly of a line drawn Easterly from a point on the West line of said Tract A, to a point on the East line of said West 200 feet, distant 100 feet Southerly of the Northeast corner of said West 200 feet. (Torrens, Cert 1051934) Parcel ID: 3311723120090 That part of the Northwest ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of Section 33, Township 117 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal meridian, bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Southwesterly line of County Road No. 19, distant 50 feet Page 503 of 568 Northerly, measured at right angles, from the center line of the main tract of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company (now the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company), as said main track center line was originally located and established across said Section 33; thence Westerly parallel with said original main track center line a distance of 227.08 feet; thence Southerly at right angles to the last described course a distance of 25 feet, mor or less, to a point distant 25 feet Northerly, measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company (Formerly the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company), as said main tract is now located; thence Easterly parallel with said last described main track center line a distance of 235 feet, more or less, to a point on the Southwesterly line of said County Road No. 19; thence Northwesterly along said Southwesterly line of County Road No. 19 to the point of beginning. Parcel ID: 3311723120001 That part of the Northwest ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of Section 33, Township 117, North, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, bounded and described as follows: beginning at a point on the Northeasterly line of County Road No. 19, distant 50 feet Northerly measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway Company (now the Chicago and North western Railway Company), as said main track center line was originally located and established across said Section 33; thence Easterly parallel with said original main track center line a distance of 450 feet; thence Southerly at right angles to the last described course to a point distant 25 feet Northerly, measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of the Chicago and North Western Railway Company (formerly the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway Company) as said main track is now located; thence Westerly parallel with said last described main track center line to a point on the Northeasterly line of said County Road No. 19; thence Northwesterly along said Northeasterly line of County Road No. 19 to the point of beginning. Parcel ID: 3311723120020 All that part of the following described tract: Lot Five (5), Auditor’s Subdivision Number One Hundred Thirty-three (133), Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of deeds in and for said Hennepin County, Which lies Southerly of the following-described line: Beginning at a point on the East line of aid Lot 5, distant 518.85 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof; thence Southwesterly, deflecting 36 degrees 30 minutes, measured from South to West a distance of 144.46 feet; thence Westerly deflecting 27 degrees 0 minutes, a distance of 34.65 feet, more or less to the Northeasterly line of County Road No. 19 and there terminating. Section 2: That the Zoning Administrator is hereby authorized to revise the Zoning Map of the City of Shorewood to reflect the amendments. Page 504 of 568 Section 3: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon authorization being received from the Metropolitan Council to place the related Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted in City Council Resolution 26-51 into effect; and, upon publication in the Official Newspaper of the City of Shorewood. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Shorewood, Minnesota, this 14th day of September, 2026. Jennifer Labadie, Mayor ATTEST: Sandie Thone, City Clerk Page 505 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 26-56 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY PUBLICATION FOR ORDINANCE 633 AMENDING SECTION 1201.09, SUBD. 2 OF THE SHOREWOOD ZONING CODE - THE SHOREWOOD ZONING MAP FOR 5 PARCELS LOCATED AT PARCEL ID 3311723110089, 3311723110045, 3311723120020, 3311723120001, AND 3311723120090 WHEREAS, at a duly called meeting on September 14, 2026, the City Council of the City of Shorewood adopted Ordinance No. 633 entitled “AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1201.09, SUBD. 2 OF THE SHOREWOOD ZONING CODE - THE SHOREWOOD ZONING MAP FOR 5 PARCELS LOCATED AT PARCEL ID 3311723110089, 3311723110045, 3311723120020, 3311723120001, AND 3311723120090”; and, WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 633 rezones two parcels which were previously zoned C-2 General Commercial by the City of Tonka Bay and recently annexed into the City of Shorewood, to the C-1 General Commercial zoning district; and, removes three parcels from the Zoning Map as they are now a part of the City of Tonka Bay; and, WHEREAS, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment was also approved in Resolution 26-51 guiding the future land use of the subject properties as Commercial within the City of Shorewood’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the rezonings implement that direction; and, WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 633 is lengthy; and WHEREAS, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191, subd. 4, the City Council has determined that publication of the title and summary of the ordinance will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD: 1. The City Council finds that the above title and summary of Ordinance No. 633 clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the Ordinance. 2. The City Clerk is directed to publish Ordinance No. 633 by title and summary, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191, Subdivision 4. 3. A full copy of the Ordinance is available at Shorewood City Hall during regular office hours and on the city’s website. ADOPTED by the Shorewood City Council on this 14th day of September, 2026. __________________________ Jennifer Labadie, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Sandie Thone, City Clerk Page 506 of 568 City Council Item 4.D. Title/Subject: Street Sign Sale Meeting Date: September 14, 2026 Prepared By: Matt Morreim, Public Works Director Attachments Background As part of the City's routine street sign maintenance and replacement, older street signs are removed from service and replaced with new signs that meet current standards. While these signs are no longer suitable for public roadway use, many remain in good condition and may have historical or sentimental value to residents. Staff is proposing a program to make retired street signs available for purchase by the public. The street signs were declared by Council as surplus and authorized the sale on February 26, 2024. This program provides residents with an opportunity to obtain a unique piece of local history while allowing the City to responsibly manage surplus materials. Under the proposed program: • City staff would promote the program as detailed below, including having an inventory posted on the city's website • Retired street signs would be made available for purchase on a first-come, first-served basis • Signs would be purchased and picked up at City Hall during normal business hours • Signs would be sold as-is and would be labeled as no longer be approved for traffic control purposes • Availability would be limited to signs removed through routine replacement activities To ensure residents are aware of the opportunity and the details for purchasing and pick up, City staff would promote the sale of street signs through the following communication channels: • City's website • City email communications • City's social media accounts • ShoreReport newsletter Staff welcomes council feedback and ideas to enhance the proposed program. Strategic Alignment Fiscal Responsibility & Environmental Stewardship • The sale of retired street signs generate revenue from surplus City assets while Page 507 of 568 extending the useful life of materials through reuse rather than disposal. Budget Impact Staff recommends establishing a purchase price of $20 per sign. This price is intended to offset modest administrative costs and provide a minor revenue source for the City. All revenues from the sale of the street signs would be directed into the General Fund. Action Requested Motion by Council to approve the plan to sell the retired street signs. Page 508 of 568 City Council Item 4.E. Title/Subject: Safe Routes To School Grant - Galpin Lake Trail Meeting Date: September 14, 2026 Prepared By: Andrew Budde, City Engineer Attachments 1. Safe Routes To School Agreement SAP 216-010-010 2. 26-055 Safe Route To School Grant Background The City of Shorewood has long been pursuing a pedestrian connection from Galpin Lake Road at the Chanhassen border to the signalized intersection of Oak Street/CSAH 19 along TH 7 in Excelsior. In 2022, the city was awarded and completed the Planning – Safe Routes to School Grant. MnDOT has completed a Safety Audit and Corridor Study along TH 7. All this research and planning has helped form the backbone of future grant applications for the city to improve safety along the corridor for both vehicles and pedestrians. In 2024, staff pursued the Safe Routes to School Implementation grant that would fund the construction of a shared use path from the intersection of Galpin Lake Road to Oak Street/CSAH 19. The city was notified in late April of the award of the grant. The grant does not include a sidewalk or trail parallel to Galpin Lake Road as the preliminary information of the MnDOT Corridor Study explored a variety of options at the TH 7/Galpin Lake Road intersection including closure, routing, and one-way traffic. Any of these potential modifications would significantly change vehicle routes and likely improve existing pedestrian/vehicle conflicts. An eight-foot shared-use path is proposed to connect Galpin Lake Road to the existing trail crossing at Oak Street/CSAH 19. The trail will go on the lakeside of the existing guardrail and requires the construction of a reinforced soil slope along its length as it is the most economical method to address poor underlying soils and meet watershed permitting requirements adjacent to the lake. To access the funds the city is required to enter into a Safe Routes to School Grant Agreement and have an approving resolution; both items are attached. Additional actions required by council to advance the project include awarding the low-bid contract and entering into a Limited Use Permit with MnDOT to allow the trail to be constructed within MnDOT right of way. Both of those items require separate resolutions and are therefore addressed as separate items on the agenda. Strategic Alignment Fiscal Responsibility • Implement best practices to support sound financial management • Secured outside funding Page 509 of 568 Budget Impact The SRTS grant award amount is $447,572 and covers all proposed construction costs based on the recently opened low bid results. The grant is only applicable to the construction costs. The total estimated project costs are $582,000. The city is responsible for all design, administration, and construction costs above the grant award amount and can utilize Municipal State Aid funds for this balance. The current MSA construction fund balance is $1.993 million. The city has budgeted $500,000 in Fund 405- MSA Construction under time ST-24-03. Action Requested Staff recommend the city council approve resolution 26-55 authorizing approval of the agreement and staff to execute the agreement. Page 510 of 568 MnDOT Agreement No. 1064222 SAP No. 216-010-010 STATE OF MINNESOTA SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT This Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”) is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Transportation ("State"), and ("Grantee"): Public Entity (Grantee) name, address and contact person: City of Shorewood 5755 County Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Contact: City Administrator – Marc Nevinski RECITALS 1. Minn. Stat. § 174.40 authorizes State to enter into this Agreement. 2. General Funds were appropriated for the Safe Routes to School Program in Minnesota Laws 2023, Chapter 68- H.F. 2887. 3. Grantee has been awarded Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program funds under Minn. Stat. § 174.40. 4. Grantee represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this Agreement to the satisfaction of State. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, Subd. 1, Grantee agrees that administrative costs must be necessary and reasonable as a condition of this Agreement. AGREEMENT TERMS 1 Term of Agreement, Survival of Terms, and Incorporation of Exhibits Effective Date. This Agreement will be effective on the date State obtains all required signatures under Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, Subd. 5. As required by Minn. Stat. § 16B.98 Subd. 7, no payments will be made to Grantee until this Agreement is fully executed. Grantee must not begin work under this Agreement until this Agreement is fully executed and Grantee has been notified by State’s Authorized Representative to begin the work. Expiration Date. This Agreement will expire on December 31, 2030, or when all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. Survival of Terms. All clauses which impose obligations continuing in their nature and which must survive in order to give effect to their meaning will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, without limitation, the following clauses: 8. Liability; 9. State Audits; 10. Government Data Practices; 11. Workers’ Compensation; 12. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and 14. Data Disclosure. Exhibits. Exhibit A: Sources and Uses of Funds Schedule; Exhibit B: Grant Application; Exhibit C: Grantee Resolution Approving Grant Agreement are attached and incorporated into this agreement. 2 Grantee’s Duties Grantee will conduct activities in accordance with its grant application, or in the case of legislatively selected projects, in accordance with the enabling session law, which is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit B. Grantee will comply with all required grants management policies and procedures set forth through Minn.Stat.§16B.97, Subd. 4 (a) (1). Grantee will submit written progress reports at least annually. Progress reports will be considered to be documentation of right of way acquisition costs incurred or consultant/contractor invoices that demonstrate work complete. Progress reports must be included with each state aid pay request. Payments will not be made under section 4.2 if a progress report is past due unless Grantee has been given a written extension by the State. Asset Monitoring. If Grantee uses funds obtained by this agreement to acquire a capital asset, the Grantee is required to use that asset for a public purpose for the normal useful life of the asset. Grantee may not sell or change the purpose of use for the capital asset(s) obtained with grant funds under this agreement without the prior written consent of the State and an agreement executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this 1 CM State Aid SRTS Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2026) Page 511 of 568 MnDOT Agreement No. 1064222 SAP No. 216-010-010 agreement, or their successors in office. 3 Time Grantee must comply with all the time requirements described in this Agreement. In the performance of this grant Agreement, time is of the essence. 4 Consideration and Payment Consideration. State will pay for all services performed by Grantee under this Agreement as follows: 4.1.1 Compensation. Grantee will be reimbursed for actual, incurred costs that are eligible under Minn. Stat. § 174.38. Grantee shall use this grant solely to reimburse itself for expenditures it has already made to pay for the costs of one or more of the activities listed under section 2.1. 4.1.2 Sources and Uses of Funds. Grantee represents to State that the Sources and Uses of Funds Schedule attached as Exhibit A accurately shows the total cost of the Project and all of the funds that are available for the completion of the Project. Grantee agrees that it will pay for any costs that are ineligible for reimbursement and for any amount by which the costs exceed State’s total obligation in section 4.1.3. Grantee will return to State any amount appropriated but not required. 4.1.3 Total Obligation. The total obligation of State for all compensation and reimbursements to Grantee under this Agreement will not exceed $447,572.00. Payment 4.2.1 Invoices. Grantee will submit state aid pay requests for reimbursements requested under this Agreement. State will promptly pay Grantee after Grantee presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. 4.2.2 All Invoices Subject to Audit. All invoices are subject to audit, at State’s discretion. 4.2.3 State’s Payment Requirements. State will promptly pay all valid obligations under this Agreement as required by Minn. Stat. § 16A.124. State will make undisputed payments no later than thirty (30) days after receiving Grantee’s invoices and progress reports for services performed. If an invoice is incorrect, defective or otherwise improper, State will notify Grantee within ten (10) days of discovering the error. After State receives the corrected invoice, State will pay Grantee within thirty (30) days of receipt of such invoice. 4.2.4 Grant Monitoring Visit and Financial Reconciliation. During the period of performance, State will make at least annual monitoring visits and conduct annual financial reconciliations of Grantee’s expenditures. 4.2.4.1 State’s Authorized Representative will notify Grantee’s Authorized Representative where and when any monitoring visit and financial reconciliation will take place, which State employees and/or contractors will participate, and which Grantee staff members should be present. Grantee will be provided with at least seven (7) calendar days of notice prior to any monitoring visit or financial reconciliation. 4.2.4.2 Following a monitoring visit or financial reconciliation, Grantee will take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies identified by State. 4.2.4.3 At least one monitoring visit and one financial reconciliation must be completed prior to final payment being made to Grantee. 4.2.5 Unexpended Funds. Grantee must promptly return to State at grant closeout any unexpended funds that have not been accounted for in a financial report submitted to State. 4.2.6 Closeout. State will determine, at its sole discretion, whether a closeout audit is required prior to final payment approval. If a closeout audit is required, final payment will be held until the audit has been completed. Monitoring of any capital assets acquired with grant funds will continue following grant closeout. Contracting and Bidding Requirements. If Grantee is a municipality as defined by Minn. Stat. § 471.345, Subd. 1, then Grantee shall comply with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 471.345 for all procurement under this Agreement. 5 Conditions of Payment All services provided by Grantee under this Agreement must be performed to State’s satisfaction, as determined at the sole discretion of State’s Authorized Representative and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. Grantee will not receive payment for work found by State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal, state, or local law. 2 CM State Aid SRTS Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2026) Page 512 of 568 MnDOT Agreement No. 1064222 SAP No. 216-010-010 6 Authorized Representatives State's Authorized Representative is: Marc Briese, Programs Manager, MnDOT State Aid Office 395 John Ireland Boulevard, MS 500 St. Paul, MN 55155 Office: 651-366-3802 marc.briese@state.mn.us or his/her successor. State’s Authorized Representative has the responsibility to monitor Grantee’s performance and the authority to accept the services provided under this agreement. If the services are satisfactory, State's Authorized Representative will certify acceptance on each invoice submitted for payment. Grantee’s Authorized Representative is: Marc Nevinski City Administrator Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Office: 952-960-7905 mnevinski@ci.shorewood.mn.us If Grantee’s Authorized Representative changes at any time during this Agreement, Grantee will immediately notify State. 7 Assignment Amendments, Waiver, and Grant Agreement Complete Assignment. Grantee may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of State and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this Agreement, or their successors in office. Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original agreement, or their successors in office. Waiver. If State fails to enforce any provision of this Agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or State’s right to subsequently enforce it. Grant Agreement Complete. This Agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between State and Grantee. No other understanding regarding this Agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. 7.5 Electronic Records and Signatures. The parties agree to contract by electronic means. This includes using electronic signatures and converting original documents to electronic records. 7.6 Certification. By signing this Agreement, Grantee certifies that it is not suspended or debarred from receiving federal or state awards. 8 Liability Grantee and State agree that each will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law, and neither shall be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. The liability of State is governed by the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 3.736. If Grantee is a “municipality” as that term is used in Minn. Stat. Chapter 466, then the liability of Grantee is governed by the provisions of Chapter 466. Grantee’s liability hereunder shall not be limited to the extent of insurance carried by or provided by Grantee, or subject to any exclusion from coverage in any insurance policy. 9 State Audits 3 CM State Aid SRTS Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2026) Page 513 of 568 MnDOT Agreement No. 1064222 SAP No. 216-010-010 Under Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, Subd.8, the Grantee’s books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of Grantee, or other party relevant to this Agreement or transaction, are subject to examination by State and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, the Attorney General, as appropriate, for a minimum of six (6) years from the end of this Agreement, receipt and approval of all final reports, or the required period of time to satisfy all state and program retention requirements, whichever is later. Grantee will take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies identified by an audit. 10 Government Date Practices Grantee and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by State under this Agreement, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Grantee under this agreement. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either Grantee or State. 11 Workers’ Compensation Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. § 176.181, Subd. 2, pertaining to workers’ compensation insurance coverage. Grantee’s employees and agents will not be considered State employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees are in no way State’s obligation or responsibility. 12 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue Minnesota law, without regard to its choice-of-law provisions, governs this Agreement. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this Agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 13 Termination; Suspension Termination by the State. State may terminate this Agreement with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Grantee. Upon termination, Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. If funding is canceled, withdrawn, or terminated, State may suspend its performance until funding is restored. Suspension of performance does not release State from its obligations under the agreement. Termination for Cause. State may immediately terminate this grant Agreement if State finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement, that reasonable progress has not been made, that fraudulent or wasteful activity has occurred, that Grantee has been convicted of a criminal offense relating to a state grant agreement, or that the purposes for which the funds were granted have not been or will not be fulfilled. State may take action to protect the interests of the State of Minnesota, including the refusal to disburse additional funds and requiring the return of all or part of the funds already disbursed. Termination for Insufficient Funding. State may immediately terminate this Agreement if: 13.3.1 It does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature; or 13.3.2 If funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination must be by written or fax notice to Grantee. State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However, Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. State will not be assessed any penalty if the Agreement is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. State will provide the Grantee notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of State’s receiving that notice. Suspension. State may immediately suspend this Agreement in the event of a total or partial government shutdown due to the failure to have an approved budget by the legal deadline. Work performed by Grantee during a period of suspension will be deemed unauthorized and undertaken at risk of non-payment. 14 Data Disclosure Under Minn. Stat. § 270C.65, Subd. 3, and other applicable law, Grantee consents to disclosure of its social security number, federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action 4 CM State Aid SRTS Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2026) Page 514 of 568 MnDOT Agreement No. 1064222 SAP No. 216-010-010 requiring Grantee to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any. 15 Fund Use Prohibited. Grantee will not utilize any funds received pursuant to this Agreement to compensate, either directly or indirectly, any contractor, corporation, partnership, or business, however organized, which is disqualified or debarred from entering into or receiving a State contract. This restriction applies regardless of whether the disqualified or debarred party acts in the capacity of a general contractor, a subcontractor, or as an equipment or material supplier. This restriction does not prevent Grantee from utilizing these funds to pay any party who might be disqualified or debarred after Grantee’s contract award on this Project. 16 Discrimination Prohibited by Minnesota Statutes § 181.59. Grantee will comply with the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 181.59 which requires that every contract for or on behalf of the State of Minnesota, or any county, city, town, township, school, school district or any other district in the state, for materials, supplies or construction will contain provisions by which Contractor agrees: 1) That, in the hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work under any contract, or any subcontract, no Contractor, material supplier or vendor, will, by reason of race, creed or color, discriminate against the person or persons who are citizens of the United States or resident aliens who are qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates; 2) That no Contractor, material supplier, or vendor, will, in any manner, discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employment of any person or persons identified in clause 1 of this section, or on being hired, prevent or conspire to prevent, the person or persons from the performance of work under any contract on account of race, creed or color; 3) That a violation of this section is a misdemeanor; and 4) That this contract may be canceled or terminated by the state of Minnesota, or any county, city, town, township, school, school district or any other person authorized to grant contracts for employment, and all money due, or to become due under the contract, may be forfeited for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms or conditions of this Agreement. 17 Limitation. Under this Agreement, State is only responsible for receiving and disbursing funds. Nothing in this Agreement will be construed to make State a principal, co-principal, partner, or joint venturer with respect to the Project(s) covered herein. State may provide technical advice and assistance as requested by Grantee, however, Grantee will remain responsible for providing direction to its contractors and consultants and for administering its contracts with such entities. Grantee’s consultants and contractors are not intended to be third party beneficiaries of this Agreement. 18 Additional Provisions Prevailing Wages. Grantee agrees to comply with all of the applicable provisions contained in Minn. Stat. Chapter 177, and specifically those provisions contained in Minn. Stat. § 177.41 through 177.435 as they may be amended or replaced from time to time with respect to the Project. By agreeing to this provision, Grantee is not acknowledging or agreeing that the cited provisions apply to the Project. E-Verification. Grantee agrees and acknowledges that it is aware of Minn. Stat. § 16C.075 regarding e-verification of employment of all newly hired employees to confirm that such employees are legally entitled to work in the United States, and that it will, if and when applicable, fully comply with such order. Telecommunications Certification. If federal funds are included in Exhibit A, by signing this Agreement, Grantee certifies that, consistent with Section 889 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Pub. L. 115-232 (Aug. 13, 2018), Grantee does not and will not use any equipment, system, or service that uses “covered telecommunications equipment or services” (as that term is defined in Section 889 of the Act) as a substantial or essential component of any system or as critical technology as part of any system. Grantee will include this certification as a flow down clause in any contract related to this Agreement. Title VI/Non-discrimination Assurances. Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable US DOT Standard Title VI/Non-Discrimination Assurances contained in DOT Order No. 1050.2A, and in particular Appendices A and E, which can be found at: https://edocs-public.dot.state.mn.us/edocs_public/DMResultSet/download?docId=11149035. If federal funds are included in Exhibit A, Grantee will ensure the appendices and solicitation language within the assurances are inserted into contracts as required. State may conduct a review of the Grantee’s compliance with this provision. Grantee must cooperate with State throughout the review process by supplying all requested information and documentation to 5 CM State Aid SRTS Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2026) Page 515 of 568 MnDOT Agreement No. 1064222 SAP No. 216-010-010 State, making Grantee staff and officials available for meetings as requested, and correcting any areas of non- compliance as determined by State. Use, Maintenance, Repair and Alterations. The Grantee shall not, without the written consent of the State and the Commissioner, (i) permit or allow the use of any of the property improved with these grant funds (the “Real Property”) for any purpose other than in conjunction with or for nonmotorized transportation, (ii) substantially alter any of the Real Property except such alterations as may be required by laws, ordinances or regulations, or such other alterations as may improve the Real Property by increasing its value or which improve its ability to be used for the purposes set forth in section (i), (iii) take any action which would unduly impair or depreciate the value of the Real Property, (iv) abandon the Real Property, or (v) commit or permit any act to be done in or on the Real Property in violation of any law, ordinance or regulation. If Grantee fails to maintain the Real Property in accordance with this Section, State may perform whatever acts and expend whatever funds necessary to so maintain the Real Property, and Grantee irrevocably authorizes State to enter upon the Real Property to perform such acts as may be necessary to so maintain the Real Property. Any actions taken or funds expended by State shall be at its sole discretion, and nothing contained herein shall require State to take any action or incur any expense and State shall not be responsible, or liable to Grantee or any other entity, for any such acts that are performed in good faith and not in a negligent manner. Any funds expended by State pursuant to this Section shall be due and payable on demand by State and will bear interest from the date of payment by State at a rate equal to the lesser of the maximum interest rate allowed by law or 18% per year based upon a 365-day year. Grant Administrator and Organizational Leadership Contact Information. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, Subd. 5(d), if grantee has a website, the names and contact information for the grant administrator(s) and organization’s leadership must be clearly published. [The remainder of this page has intentionally been left blank.] 6 CM State Aid SRTS Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2026) Page 516 of 568 MnDOT Agreement No. 1064222 SAP No. 216-010-010 GRANTEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have Approval and Certifying Encumbrance as required by executed the grant agreement on behalf of the Grantee as Minnesota Statutes § 16A.15 and 16C.05 required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. By: By: __________________________________ Title: State Aid Programs Manager (with delegated authority) Date: Date: ________________________________ By: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Title: CONTRACT MANAGEMENT Date: By: By: Date: Title: Date: 7 CM State Aid SRTS Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2026) Page 517 of 568 MnDOT Agreement No. 1064222 SAP No. 216-010-010 EXHIBIT A SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS SCHEDULE SOURCES OF FUNDS USES OF FUNDS Entity Supplying Funds Amount Expenses Amount State Funds: Items Paid for with SRTS 2023 SRTS Funds $447,572.00 General Fund Grant (SAAS Acct 412) Funds: Other: Construction of the TH7 $447,572.00 Multi-Use Trail Subtotal $447,572.00 Subtotal $447,572.00 Public Entity Funds: Items paid for with Non- Matching Funds $0.00 SRTS General Fund Grant Funds: Other: Subtotal $0.00 Subtotal $0.00 TOTAL FUNDS $447,572.00 = TOTAL PROJECT $447,572.00 COSTS 8 CM State Aid SRTS Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2026) Page 518 of 568 MnDOT Agreement No. 1064222 SAP No. 216-010-010 EXHIBIT B GRANT APPLICATION Attach the grant application for the project 9 CM State Aid SRTS Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2026) Page 519 of 568Form Name: 2024 Minnesota State Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program: Infrastructure Solicitation Application Submission Time: January 14, 2025 10:42 am Browser: Chrome 131.0.0.0 / Windows IP Address: 63.137.120.66 Unique ID: 1305154578 Location: 44.9427, -93.2871 Minnesota Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program: Infrastructure Solicitation Application I. Project Information A. Applicant Entity Information Name Marc Nevinski Entity Name City of Shorewood Job Title/Position City Administrator Phone (952) 960-7905 Email mnevinski@ci.shorewood.mn.us Entity Type State Aid City Address 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 County Hennepin MnDOT District Metro District B. Project Sponsor Information As a grant applicant, are you No, I am not a township, non-state aid city, or a school or school district representing a township, non-state aid city, or a school or school district? If yes, you are required to have a project sponsor. C. Project Funding Has this project been selected for No federal funding? Is this project applying for competitive No funding from another source in addition to this program? SRTS Grant Request 500000 Page 520 of 568Federal Funds 0 County State Aid Funds 0 Municipal State Aid Funds 0 Local Township Funds 0 Local City Funds 56671 Local County Funds 0 MnDOT Trunk Highway Funds 0 Tribal Funds 0 Other Funds 0 Total project cost 556671 Are funds from all sources committed? Yes D. Project Location Will any proposed infrastructure Yes improvements be constructed on the right-of-way or property of a township, city, or county other than the applicant entity or project sponsor? If yes, list all public entities that are a Minnesota Department of Transportation part of this project. An entity should be listed if it is partnering on this project or if this project will be constructed at any point within its city/township/county limits. Beginning Point - Latitude 44.897885 Beginning Point - Longitude -93.567838 E. Brief Project Description Enter a brief description or title of your Install 550 feet of 8-foot multi-use trail on the south side of Trunk Highway project. Example: Construct shared use 7 to provide students with a safe crossing of Trunk Highway 7 from Galpin path along north side of CSAH 12 Lake Road and connect to the larger trail network along Trunk Highway 7. (Cedar Street) including bumpouts at all quadrants at the CSAH 12 and Main Street intersection in the City of Moose River. Page 521 of 568F. Eligibility Check The applicant must have a full Yes resolution (not just a letter of support) from their council or governing board approving the project and pledging support to fund engineering, right of way, inspection, and other non-SRTS eligible costs, as well as SRTS-eligible items in excess of the SRTS Infrastructure grant amount. The applicant understands this eligibility requirement and has executed the signed resolution for attachment to the application. Schools, school districts, townships, Not applicable (application is from a state aid city, county, or Federally and non-state aid cities will need a state Recognized Indian Tribe) aid city or county to serve as their project sponsor. If a project sponsor is required, the applicant must have a full resolution (not just a letter of support) from the sponsoring entity's council supporting the project and agreeing to act as the project sponsor. The applicant understands this eligibility requirement and has obtained the signed resolution for attachment to the application. The applicant must have a full Not applicable (no other public entity right-of-way is impacted) resolution (not just a letter of support) from all non-Tribal entities (except MnDOT) other than the applicant entity or project sponsor whose property or right-of-way will be impacted by the proposed project. The applicant understands this eligibility requirement and has obtained, if required, the signed resolution(s) from all impacted entities for attachment to the application. Does the applicant entity have the Yes - project will be maintained and provide a service life of 10 or more ability to maintain the infrastructure years improvement and provide an expected service life of a minimum of 10 years? The applicant affirms to the best of their current knowledge and belief that this requirement will be met. Page 522 of 568Does the school district have plans to No - benefiting school facilities will not be relocated or repurposed in the relocate or repurpose the school next 10 years facilities benefiting from the infrastructure improvement within the next 10 years? The applicant affirms to the best of their current knowledge and belief that this requirement will be met. Projects are required to be ready for Yes construction in 2025 or 2026. The applicant understands this eligibility requirement and will award a contract and be under construction by December 31, 2026. Please select the anticipated 2026 construction year Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Yes grant funds cannot be used on impacts to trunk highways or trunk highway right-of-way without an explicit letter of support from the MnDOT District Engineer. The applicant understands this eligibility requirement and has obtained, if required, the letter of support for attachment to the application. All non-Tribal eligible applicants for Yes Safe Routes to School infrastructure funds must have adopted subdivision regulations that require Safe Routes to School infrastructure in developments authorized on or after June 1, 2016. The applicant understands this eligibility requirement and can attach proof of compliance to the application via ordinance or other language that demonstrates how it is applied. Page 523 of 568Only construction costs are eligible for Yes the program. Development of engineering and construction plans are not eligible expenses nor are right-of-way acquisition costs. All selected projects must follow the State Aid process, which includes identifying applicable design standards and developing a construction plan set signed by a licensed engineer. The applicant must have the ability to develop this plan set or the funds to pay a consultant to develop this plan set. Exhibits from engineering studies do not qualify as a construction plan set. The applicant understands this requirement and has the ability or funds to develop the plan set. Safe Routes to School funds cannot be Yes used to pay school, local entity, or Federally Recognized Indian Tribe staff time to construct or install any improvements. School, local entity, or Federally Recognized Indian Tribe staff time is not an eligible cost for SRTS Infrastructure funds. All selected projects must be put out to bid and awarded to a contractor. The applicant understands this program requirement and plans to bid the project out to a contractor. Has the project received a legislative No appropriation (also known as an "earmark")? Page 524 of 568Statute 16B.981 Subd. 2 (6) requires that Yes no current principals of a grantee have been convicted of a felony financial crime in the last 10 years. A principal is defined as a public official, a board member, or staff (paid or volunteer) with the authority to access funds provided by this grant opportunity or to determine how those funds are used. Political subdivisions as defined in Statute 465.719 (including school districts) and Federally Recognized Indian Tribes are not subject to this requirement. Checking "yes" is acknowledgement that if selected to receive a grant and if required by statute, the applicant will be required to complete a form certifying that no current principal of its organization has been convicted of a felony financial crime in the last 10 years. G. Project Evaluation Name Sandie Thone Job Title / Role City Clerk Email sthone@ci.shorewood.mn.us Phone 9529607911 II. Project Improvements & Safety H. School Information School 1: School Name Excelsior Elementary School School 1: School Location 441 Oak Street, Excelsior, MN 55331 School 1: Grades Available K-5 School 1: Number of Students Enrolled 800 School 1: Percentage of Students 3% Walking or Biking to School School 1: Percentage of Students 36% Taking Bus to School Page 525 of 568School 1: School Type Public I. Safety Concerns At any location in the project area, do Yes pedestrians or bicyclists travel where safe infrastructure is not provided? Check any that apply below: Pedestrians walk along the grass or ditch. People walk or bike within a vehicle travel lane or roadway People cross a roadway at any point other than an intersection or marked crossing Have safety risks or hazards related to Yes vehicles been identified within the project area that prevent people from safely walking or biking in or near the project area? Check any that are present in the High vehicle speeds project area: High levels of traffic Low stop or yield compliance for pedestrians or cyclists Low visibility of pedestrians or cyclists / Drivers unable to see pedestrians or cyclists List and concisely describe the safety Excelsior Elementary School is located directly north of State Highway 7, a risks, hazards, or uncomfortable four-lane divided highway connecting western Minnesota to the Twin Cities walking or biking conditions that have Metropolitan Area. Highway 7 has a posted speed limit of 55 mph, has an been identified above, including the AADT of 30,385 (MnDOT, 2023), and is a safety hazard for the students locations of these risks and conditions. who live in the neighborhoods south of the school. Currently, there is no Applicants may also reference any bicycle or pedestrian infrastructure or connection to the safe crossing of survey data, crash data, pedestrian or Highway 7 at Oak Street and vehicle drivers rarely yield for pedestrians and bicycle plan, or other relevant sources. cyclists. Non-motorized users must either share the road with vehicles Upload any referenced sources when (8-foot shoulder) or walk along the grass. It is also common for students to submitting this application. Each cross Highway 7 on the west side of the intersection where there is no attachment must be referenced in the marked crossing. Construction of this trail behind the existing guardrail will application, otherwise the attachment provide dedicated space for non-motorized users, ensuring safe access to will not be considered in the scoring of Excelsior Elementary School as well as the existing trail system via the the application. Highway 7 crossing at Oak Street. In 2011, Shorewood completed a Trail Priority Plan in which this segment was listed as a top priority. This project was also listed as a top priority in the 2022 Safe Routes to School Plan. In 2013, the city completed a Feasibility Study followed by final design and bidding, though the project was never constructed. In 2022, MnDOT completed a Highway 7 Safety Audit that also identified safe ped/bike crossings as a priority in this vicinity. In 2024, the Metropolitan Council eliminated a lift station located in the SE quadrant of Galpin Lake Road and Highway 7, eliminating construction obstacles. Page 526 of 568J. Types of Improvements Signage and striping New signage (all types) RRFB School zone signage or markings Sidewalks and trails ADA ramps Trails and shared use paths Provide a full project description This project includes the installation of 550 feet of 8-foot multi-use trail on including specific locations of each the south side of Highway 7 from the Oak Street crossing to Galpin Lake improvement identified above. Please Road. The project will include ADA-accessible ramps, not currently include descriptions for other available, to get onto the path from Galpin Lake Road and onto the existing improvements not listed above as well. ADA landing at Oak Street and the installation of an RRFB to alert drivers Include any project maps or design of non-motorized users. The trail will be located behind the existing guard exhibits. These exhibits may be rail and a fence will be placed along the south side to act as a barrier for uploaded with your application. pedestrians/bicycles and wildlife. New signage will signal the school zone and access to the existing crossing. This trail will connect to the existing trail system along Highway 7 at Oak Street, encouraging users to cross at the marked crosswalk. K. Project Improvements Schools: Describe how listed The proposed trail will connect the neighborhoods of Shorewood and improvements would connect students Chanhassen, south of Highway 7 to the Excelsior Elementary School via a to schools within your community. If safe, separated trail. No connection currently exists, but it is a high priority your school provides hazard busing or for residents, the school, and the city. The project will eliminate unsafe has a no walking/biking to school policy pedestrian and bicycle crossings of Highway 7 at an unmarked crossing as in place currently, would these be it will link to the marked Oak Street crossing. It will also prevent student removed or altered with construction of walkers and bikers from using the road shoulder or adjacent grass for travel this project? along this 55 MPH highway corridor that carries 30,385 vehicles per day. The proposed trail will connect to the larger regional system at Oak Street, filling an existing trail gap while allowing for safe access to the school. Page 527 of 568Safety Risk Mitigation: Explain how Safety for non-vehicular travelers will be improved with the addition of a each of the listed improvements in trail behind the existing guard rail along Highway 7 from Galpin Lake Road "Section J. Types of Improvements" to Oak Street. No trail currently exists in the project area, forcing students would mitigate the safety risks and into the roadway or grass. Users will be separated from high-speed traffic hazards described in "Section I. Safety and have increased visibility and comfort. Daily trips to and from school will Concerns." be safer and easier for students coming to school from south of Highway 7. Students and parents traveling from the residential neighborhoods of Shorewood and Chanhassen, south of Highway 7, are often seen using the narrow roadway shoulder or grass to access Excelsior Elementary School. The project will include ADA-accessible ramps, not currently available, to get onto the path from Galpin Lake Road and onto the existing ADA landing adjacent to the signal and push buttons at Oak Street. ADA-compliant ramps will ensure that people of all ages, abilities, and mobilities can access the proposed facility as well as the crossing of Highway 7 at Oak Street. The project will include the installation of an RRFB to alert drivers of non-motorized users. New signage will signal the school zone and better alert drivers to the existing crossing. The multi-use trail will connect to the existing trail system along Highway 7 at Oak Street, encouraging users to cross at the marked crosswalk rather than the unmarked crossing. The proposed trail will be located behind the existing guard rail with a four-foot turf boulevard, and a fence along the south side as a barrier for pedestrians/bicycles and wildlife. III. Community Engagement & Transportation Policies L. Plans, Policies, & Studies Does the applicant entity or project Yes - please attach to application sponsor have a Safe Routes to School (SRTS) plan or any other non-motorized transportation plan(s) in place or under development? Describe the contents and extents of The Safe Routes to School plan was adopted in 2022 and lists the the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) plan proposed trail as a high priority project. and/or non-motorized transportation plan(s). Include the year of adoption for each document listed. Has the adopted plan received any No updates, addendums, surveys, public engagement sessions, or any other changes since it was adopted? Page 528 of 568EVALUATION: Please describe events, The development team for the Shorewood Safe Routes to School Plan policies and programs serving this implemented engagement strategies to gather feedback on the proposed strategy. plan and priority of projects during plan development. These included a student survey for Excelsior Elementary School students, a caregiver survey, and the publication of a project website with information and an interactive map. EQUITY - Please describe events, The development team for the Shorewood Safe Routes to School Plan policies and programs serving this implemented engagement strategies to gather feedback on the proposed strategy. plan and priority of projects during plan development. These included a student survey for Excelsior Elementary School students, a caregiver survey, and the publication of a project website with information and an interactive map. ENGAGEMENT/ENFORCEMENT: Please Students and families have provided essential recommendations and describe events, policies and programs feedback for the development of the Shorewood SRTS program; their serving this strategy. participation and critiques have been essential to projects forward. The proposed trail will promote walking and biking to school, an outcome that aligns with the goals and policies of Excelsior Elementary School. EDUCATION: Please describe events, All programming under the SRTS plan includes preemptive educational policies and programs serving this elements that demonstrate best practices for students walking or biking to strategy. school. Activities have included a Bike Rodeo in advance of Walk/Bike to School Day to provide safety education. ENCOURAGEMENT: Please describe The SRTS program includes several sub-programs to encourage walking events, policies and programs serving and biking to school. Initial programming includes a Walking School Bus this strategy. where parents and older students act as walking leaders for students living near them. A Bike Rodeo and Walk/Bike to School Day have been hosted to provide training and resources to encourage students and/or incentivize them to walk or bike to school. ENGINEERING: Please describe events, In 2013, the City of Shorewood and Hennepin County completed the Galpin policies and programs serving this Lake Road Trail Improvements Feasibility Report which recommended the strategy. construction of 3,000 feet (0.57 miles) of bituminous trail on the east side of Galpin Lake Road between the southern Shorewood City limits and TH 7. This project would complete part of that proposed trail. Installation of a pedestrian and bicycle connection across TH 7 is essential for the safety and comfortability of students south of the highway. N. Advancing Equity Priority Populations Residents of Color Low Income Limited or Non-English Speaking Renter or Non-Owner Disabled or Low Mobility Page 530 of 568Describe how the ability for priority This project benefits many members of the Shorewood community, populations to use active transportation especially users with disabilities. IN the two census tracts surrounding the will be advanced with this proposed project area, 7% of the population has a disability and 13% of students project. Include specific project area receive special education. Students and families living south of Highway 7 schools and statistics that support the do not currently have a safe way to access Excelsior Elementary School priority population boxes checked via walking or biking. The proposed shared-use path will create above. ADA-accessible access to an existing crossing of Highway 7, a high-speed roadway with an AADT of 30,385. This project would also ensure that users can access the crossing safely with the shared-use path being separate from motorized traffic. Currently, users must either travel along the side of the road (which can be hazardous or sometimes not possible during the winter months or weather events) or share the road with vehicles, which is dangerous for motorists and active transportation users. The project area is also home to residents of color, low-income residents, limited/non-English speaking residents, and renters. Excelsior Elementary School offers a Chinese immersion program, which contributes to the school's large Asian student population. The census tracts populations surrounding the project are home to 7% who speak English less than "very well," 11% with household incomes less than $35,000, 22% renter households, and 32% cost-burdened households. All children should have access to a safe way to get to school. This project would allow students living south of Highway 7 to walk or bike to school without concern for their safety. O. Safe Routes to School Equity Score V. Attachments Approved applicant entity resolution of https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17448964265 support (PDF) For all eligible non-Tribal applicants: https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17448964266 Applicant entity subdivision certification, regulations, or ordinances. (PDF) Approved Letter of Support from https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17448964267 MnDOT District Engineer if the project has Trunk Highway impacts (if applicable) (PDF) Engineering or planning-based cost https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17448964288 estimate with itemized breakdown (Excel) Page 531 of 568Timeline of project indicating major https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17448964289 milestones and their anticipated completion dates (PDF) Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17448964290 and/or other non-motorized transportation plan or study that identifies the proposed project or improvements (PDF) - or - a link to the documents if publicly available elsewhere At least one location map with project https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17448964291 routes or improvements identified. If you choose to include project photos, please make sure the project location map is the first page in this attachment (PDF) Upload additional supporting document https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17448964297 here. Please merge multiple similar documents together (say three letters of support) or if additional upload slots are required. Upload additional supporting document https://www.formstack.com/admin/download/file/17448964316 here. Please merge multiple similar documents together (say three letters of support) or if additional upload slots are required. VI. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Having had the opportunity to review Determined that no potential organization conflict of interest exists the above Organizational Conflict of Interest Checklist, the applicant hereby indicates that it has, to the best of its knowledge and belief: VII. Affirmation of Noncollusion The Applicant affirms that this Yes solicitation response has been submitted without collusion. VIII. 2024 SRTS Infrastructure Application Submittal Page 532 of 568The applicant affirms to the best of their Yes current knowledge and belief that this grant application submittal is accurate and complete. Page 533 of 568 MnDOT Agreement No. 1064222 SAP No. 216-010-010 EXHIBIT C GRANTEE RESOLUTION APPROVING GRANT AGREEMENT 10 CM State Aid SRTS Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2026) Page 534 of 568 MnDOT Agreement No. 1064222 SAP No. 216-010-010 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 26-055 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL GRANT AGREEMENT FOR THE GALPIN LAKE TRAIL PROJECT; CITY PROJECT 25-01 GRANT TERMS AND CONDITIONS SAP NO. 216-010-010 WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has applied to the Commissioner of Transportation for a grant from the Safe Routes to Schools Account for the Galpin Lake Trail Project, City Project 25-01; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation has given notice that funding for this project is available; and WHEREAS, the amount of the grant has been determined to be $447,572.00 by reason of the lowest responsible bid; NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City of Shorewood does hereby agree to the terms and conditions of the grant consistent with Minnesota Statutes, section 174.40, and will pay any additional amount by which the cost exceeds the estimate and will return to the Safe Routes to Schools Account any amount appropriated for the project but not required. The proper City officers are authorized to execute a grant agreement and any amendments thereto with the Commissioner of Transportation concerning the above-referenced grant. Adopted by the City Council of Shorewood, Minnesota this 14th day of September 2026. __________________________ Jennifer Labadie, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Sandie Thone, City Clerk 11 CM State Aid SRTS Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2026) Page 535 of 568 MnDOT Agreement No. 1064222 SAP No. 216-010-010 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 26-055 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL GRANT AGREEMENT FOR THE GALPIN LAKE TRAIL PROJECT; CITY PROJECT 25-01 GRANT TERMS AND CONDITIONS SAP NO. 216-010-010 WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has applied to the Commissioner of Transportation for a grant from the Safe Routes to Schools Account for the Galpin Lake Trail Project, City Project 25-01; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation has given notice that funding for this project is available; and WHEREAS, the amount of the grant has been determined to be $447,572.00 by reason of the lowest responsible bid; NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City of Shorewood does hereby agree to the terms and conditions of the grant consistent with Minnesota Statutes, section 174.40, and will pay any additional amount by which the cost exceeds the estimate and will return to the Safe Routes to Schools Account any amount appropriated for the project but not required. The proper City officers are authorized to execute a grant agreement and any amendments thereto with the Commissioner of Transportation concerning the above-referenced grant. Adopted by the City Council of Shorewood, Minnesota this 14th day of September 2026. __________________________ Jennifer Labadie, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Sandie Thone, City Clerk 11 CM State Aid SRTS Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2026) Page 536 of 568 City Council Item 4.F. Title/Subject: Galpin Lake Trail Construction Contract Meeting Date: September 14, 2026 Prepared By: Andrew Budde, City Engineer Matt Morreim, Public Works Director Attachments 1. Galpin Lake Trail-Bid Tabulation-signed 2. Galpin Lake Trail-Bid Abstract 3. 26-054 Galpin Lake Trail Award Background On December 8, 2025, Council approved the final plan set and authorized bidding. It was stated that the plans had been submitted to MnDOT State Aid for review and approval. Since the infrastructure is located on MnDOT right of way, the plan has gone through a more robust review by their functional groups. MnDOT required soil borings be acquired to confirm the retaining wall design assumptions. Soil borings could not be acquired until tree removal occurred and council awarded a tree removal contract last winter which allowed soil boring to be completed in March. The soil boring identified about 10 to 15 feet of poor soil under the proposed trail. Upon consultation with MnDOT, geotechnical engineers, and structural engineers, it was determined the best path forward was to utilize a Reinforced Soil Slope (RSS) that provides many benefits compared to modular block retaining walls that required expensive foundations or extensive excavation of poor soils. The benefits of RSS include: 1. More uniformly distributed loads, therefore reducing bearing pressures on the underlying soils 2. More forgiving with settlement. RSS are made of geotextile fabrics, wire forms, and engineered soils that have vegetation growing on the face of the wall 3. More economical due to a lower amount of excavation and dewatering concerns 4. Once established, RSS's blend into the natural environment better due to the vegetated face and slopes 5. Allows for uniform lifts of controlled fill to be placed to slowly allow underlying soils to compress. It is estimated that the initial construction of the RSS could result in settlement of up to 3 inches. An RSS can handle this amount of settlement and staff plan to monitor the amount of settlement with settlement plates during construction and into the spring of 2027. The design of the trail was also adjusted to account for potential long-term settlement, ADA requirements and adequate drainage. Once settlement has slowed or stopped, the contractor will be allowed to place additional aggregate base, if needed, and then curb and pave the trail in the early summer of 2027. Staff opened bids on September 2, 2026, at 10:00 AM and received four bids. The bid Page 537 of 568tabulation and bid abstract are included as attachments. The low bid was received from Boulder Creek, Inc in the amount of $447,572.00 and is approximately $10,000 or 2% below the engineers' estimate. If awarded, the contractor would start construction in October and plans to complete the construction of the RSS and aggregate base by November 25. Final completion is scheduled for June 18, 2027. Strategic Alignment Fiscal Responsibility and Functionally & Financially Sound Infrastructure • Secured outside funding • Plans to finance infrastructure improvements, maintenance, and replacement Budget Impact The total estimated project costs are $582,000. The city has secured up to $447,572 in Safe Route To School construction funds and any balance can be paid through Municipal State Aid (MSA) construction funds. The city has also budgeted $500,000 in Fund 405- MSA Construction under item ST-24-03. The low bid is $447,572.00 and is approximately $10,000 or 2% below the engineers' estimate. Action Requested Staff recommend the city council approve resolution 26-54 accepting bids and awarding the low bid to Boulder Creek, Inc in the amount of $447,572.00. Page 538 of 568 City of Shorewood Project Bid Tabulation GALPIN LAKE TRAIL Soliciting agent: Bolton & Menk, Inc. BMI PROJECT NO. 0C1.125586 Contact: Andrew Budde, P.E. Bid Date: 09/02/2026 10:00 AM CDT Firm Total Bid Boulder Creek, Inc. $447,572.00 Sunram Construction, Inc. $525,111.00 Urban Companies $675,227.00 S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. $984,218.50 Engineer's Opinion of Cost - Base Bid $457,935.00 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on September 2, 2026 for the Galpin Lake Trail Project, City Project 25-01. Andrew Budde, P.E., City Engineer Sandie Thone, City Clerk Page 539 of 568ABSTRACT OF BIDS * bid amount changed due to found calculation/addition error GALPIN LAKE TRAIL SAP 216-010-010 CITY PROJECT NO. 25-01 CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MN BID DATE: 9/2/2026 TIME: 10:00 AM 1234 Engineer's Estimate Boulder Creek, Inc. Sunram Construction, Inc. Urban Companies S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. ITEM MNDOT APPROX. Bolton & Menk, Inc. NO. SPEC NO. ITEM NOTES QUANT. UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT BASE BID 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION 1 LUMP SUM $27,000.00 $27,000.00 $81,500.00 $81,500.00 $28,455.50 $28,455.50 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 2 2104.502 SALVAGE SIGN 4 EACH $82.00 $328.00 $115.00 $460.00 $80.00 $320.00 $83.00 $332.00 $85.00 $340.00 3 2104.502 REMOVE RAILING POST 3 EACH $250.00 $750.00 $88.00 $264.00 $55.00 $165.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $320.00 $960.00 4 2104.503 REMOVE RETAINING WALL 10 LIN FT $50.00 $500.00 $127.00 $1,270.00 $68.00 $680.00 $100.00 $1,000.00 $438.00 $4,380.00 5 2104.503 REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE (SPECIAL) (2) 615 LIN FT $15.00 $9,225.00 $4.50 $2,767.50 $24.00 $14,760.00 $10.00 $6,150.00 $5.00 $3,075.00 6 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) (1) 20 LIN FT $25.00 $500.00 $40.00 $800.00 $45.00 $900.00 $50.00 $1,000.00 $81.00 $1,620.00 7 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON (EV) (P) 508 CU YD $44.00 $22,352.00 $20.00 $10,160.00 $34.50 $17,526.00 $40.00 $20,320.00 $50.00 $25,400.00 8 2106.507 COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV) (P) 565 CU YD $20.00 $11,300.00 $22.50 $12,712.50 $61.00 $34,465.00 $40.00 $22,600.00 $74.00 $41,810.00 9 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE (3) 50 CU YD $50.00 $2,500.00 $44.00 $2,200.00 $61.00 $3,050.00 $40.00 $2,000.00 $50.00 $2,500.00 10 2106.507 STABILIZING AGGREGATE (CV) (3) 50 CU YD $120.00 $6,000.00 $90.00 $4,500.00 $71.50 $3,575.00 $75.00 $3,750.00 $171.00 $8,550.00 11 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV) 290 CU YD $35.00 $10,150.00 $46.00 $13,340.00 $55.25 $16,022.50 $40.00 $11,600.00 $200.00 $58,000.00 12 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 150 CU YD $50.00 $7,500.00 $67.00 $10,050.00 $100.00 $15,000.00 $55.00 $8,250.00 $233.00 $34,950.00 13 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE (2,B) 120 TON $250.00 $30,000.00 $173.00 $20,760.00 $138.00 $16,560.00 $132.00 $15,840.00 $161.00 $19,320.00 14 2411.604 REINFORCED SOIL SLOPE 350 SQ YD $600.00 $210,000.00 $457.00 $159,950.00 $635.00 $222,250.00 $950.00 $332,500.00 $1,643.00 $575,050.00 15 2501.502 12" RC PIPE APRON 2 EACH $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $2,365.00 $4,730.00 $1,935.00 $3,870.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $2,977.00 $5,954.00 16 2501.502 30" GS PIPE APRON 1 EACH $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,525.00 $2,525.00 $2,050.00 $2,050.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,275.00 $2,275.00 17 2503.503 12" RC PIPE SEWER 32 LIN FT $80.00 $2,560.00 $122.00 $3,904.00 $122.00 $3,904.00 $150.00 $4,800.00 $205.00 $6,560.00 18 2503.503 30" CS PIPE SEWER 12 GAUGE 24 LIN FT $200.00 $4,800.00 $209.00 $5,016.00 $192.00 $4,608.00 $150.00 $3,600.00 $271.00 $6,504.00 19 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN R-1 (2X3) 2 EACH $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,830.00 $3,660.00 $3,750.00 $7,500.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $4,465.00 $8,930.00 20 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY 2 EACH $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 $1,685.00 $3,370.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,086.00 $4,172.00 21 2506.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER 1 EACH $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,060.00 $1,060.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,286.00 $2,286.00 22 2511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III 22 CU YD $150.00 $3,300.00 $114.00 $2,508.00 $170.00 $3,740.00 $150.00 $3,300.00 $353.00 $7,766.00 23 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK 55 SQ FT $25.00 $1,375.00 $24.00 $1,320.00 $23.00 $1,265.00 $17.00 $935.00 $19.00 $1,045.00 24 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN D412 370 LIN FT $40.00 $14,800.00 $55.00 $20,350.00 $40.00 $14,800.00 $55.00 $20,350.00 $47.00 $17,390.00 25 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES 20 SQ FT $72.00 $1,440.00 $87.00 $1,740.00 $69.00 $1,380.00 $66.00 $1,320.00 $79.00 $1,580.00 26 2557.503 WIRE FENCE DES 60-9322 (4) 650 LIN FT $40.00 $26,000.00 $35.00 $22,750.00 $48.00 $31,200.00 $66.00 $42,900.00 $33.00 $21,450.00 27 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LUMP SUM $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $25,500.00 $25,500.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $31,000.00 $31,000.00 28 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN 4 EACH $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,130.00 $4,520.00 $1,100.00 $4,400.00 $1,100.00 $4,400.00 $1,137.00 $4,548.00 29 2572.503 TEMPORARY FENCE 650 LIN FT $5.00 $3,250.00 $8.00 $5,200.00 $22.00 $14,300.00 $15.00 $9,750.00 $8.00 $5,200.00 30 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION 2 EACH $250.00 $500.00 $280.00 $560.00 $150.00 $300.00 $400.00 $800.00 $313.00 $626.00 31 2573.503 SILT FENCE - MACHINE SLICED 1400 LIN FT $3.00 $4,200.00 $4.00 $5,600.00 $4.00 $5,600.00 $5.00 $7,000.00 $6.00 $8,400.00 32 2574.505 SOIL BED PREPARATION 0.5 ACRE $1,000.00 $500.00 $5,700.00 $2,850.00 $6,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,500.00 $1,250.00 $284.00 $142.00 33 2574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 3 60 POUND $1.75 $105.00 $2.00 $120.00 $2.00 $120.00 $3.00 $180.00 $2.30 $138.00 34 2575.504 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 20 1500 SQ YD $5.00 $7,500.00 $1.85 $2,775.00 $3.35 $5,025.00 $3.00 $4,500.00 $3.40 $5,100.00 35 2575.505 SEEDING 0.5 ACRE $1,000.00 $500.00 $2,200.00 $1,100.00 $8,400.00 $4,200.00 $40,000.00 $20,000.00 $2,275.00 $1,137.50 36 2575.508 RESIDENTIAL TURF GRASS 100 POUND $20.00 $2,000.00 $32.00 $3,200.00 $4.50 $450.00 $6.00 $600.00 $11.00 $1,100.00 37 2575.508 SEED SOUTHERN TALLGRASS ROADSIDE 10 POUND $100.00 $1,000.00 $35.00 $350.00 $55.00 $550.00 $70.00 $700.00 $46.00 $460.00 38 2575.601 VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $14,400.00 $14,400.00 $500.00 $500.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 39 2575.603 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,100.00 $4,100.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 TOTAL BID: $457,935.00 $447,572.00 $525,111.00 $675,227.00 $984,218.50 NOTES: (P) PLAN QUANTITY (1) INCLUDES CM APRON (2) BURIED ANIMAL CONTAINMENT FENCE (3) AS DIRECTED IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER (4) BLACK VINYL COATED - 5 FOOT HEIGHT Page 540 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 26-054 A RESOLUTION TO AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR GALPIN LAKE TRAIL PROJECT; CITY PROJECT 25-01 WHEREAS, The City of Shorewood submitted for and was awarded up to $447,572 in Safe Routes To School (SRTS) Implementation grant for the construction of a shared use trail between Galpin Lake Road and the signalized intersection of Oak Street/CSAH 19, to provide a safe pedestrian crossing of TH 7 to Excelsior Elementary School; and WHEREAS, the advertised the project for bidding and opened bids according to law; and WHEREAS, four bids were received and the low bid was submitted by Boulder Creek, Inc in the amount $447,572.00 and is $10,000 or 2% below the engineer estimate; and WHEREAS, Boulder Creek, Inc is a responsible contractor and has completed projects in similar scope and magnitude; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: 1. Hereby accepts the bids and awards a construction contract to the low bidder for the Galpin Lake Trail project, City Project 25-01 in the amount of $447,572.00 to Boulder Creek, Inc. 2. Staff and the Mayor are hereby authorized to execute the necessary project and contract related documents. Adopted by the City Council of Shorewood, Minnesota this 14th day of September 2026. Jennifer Labadie, Mayor Attest: Sandie Thone, City Clerk Page 541 of 568 City Council Item 4.G. Title/Subject: Limited Use Permit with MnDOT - Galpin Lake Trail Meeting Date: September 14, 2026 Prepared By: Andrew Budde, City Engineer Matt Morreim, Public Works Director Attachments 1. Limited Use Permit 2700-0285 2. 26-057 Limited Use Permit Background The City of Shorewood is required to enter into a Limited Use Permit (LUP) with MnDOT for the Galpin Lake Trail project since it is located within MnDOT right of way. These agreements are common between municipalities and the MnDOT, and utilize a standard agreement. Currently, Shorewood has four other LUP's for sidewalk & trail in MnDOT right of way of TH 41 and TH 7. The LUP's general purpose is to permit the city to construct its infrastructure and clarify long- term maintenance responsibilities. Strategic Alignment Functionally & Financially Sound Infrastructure • Plans to finance infrastructure improvements, maintenance, and replacement Budget Impact The total estimated project costs are $582,000. The city has secured up to $447,572 in Safe Route To School construction funds and any balance can be paid through Municipal State Aid (MSA) construction funds. The city has also budgeted $500,000 in Fund 405- MSA Construction under time ST-24-03. The city will be responsible for long term maintenance of the trail and related infrastructure. Action Requested Staff recommend the city council approve resolution 26-57 authorizing entering into the Limited Use Permit and directing staff to execute the permit. Page 542 of 568 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LIMITED USE PERMIT C.S. 2700 (T.H. MN5) C.S. 1004 (T.H. 7) Counties of Carver, Hennepin LUP # 2700-0285 Permittee: City of Shorewood Expiration Date: 02/23/2036 Coop./Const. Agmt # N/A In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 161.434, the State of Minnesota, through its Commissioner of Transportation, (“MnDOT”), hereby grants a Limited Use Permit (the “LUP”) to City of Shorewood, (“Permittee”), to use the area within the right of way of Trunk Highway No. MN5, 7 as shown in red on Exhibit "A", (the “Area”) attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. This Limited Use Permit is executed by the Permittee pursuant to resolution, a certified copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Non-Motorized Trail The Permittee's use of the Area is limited to only the constructing, maintaining and operating a nonmotorized trail, retaining wall, concrete head wall, chain link fence and small animal containment fence ("Facility") and the use thereof may be further limited by the Code of Federal Regulations, including, but not limited to 23 C.F.R. 217 also published as the Federal-Aid Policy Guide. In addition, the following special provisions shall apply: SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1. TERM. This LUP terminates at 11:59PM on 02/20/2036 (“Expiration Date”) subject to the right of cancellation by MnDOT, with or without cause, by giving the Permittee ninety (90) days written notice of such cancellation. This LUP will not be renewed except as provided below. Provided this LUP has not expired or terminated, MnDOT may renew this LUP for a period of up to ten (10) years, provided Permittee delivers to MnDOT, not later than ninety (90) days prior to the Expiration Date, a written request to extend the term. Any extension of the LUP term will be under the same terms and conditions in this LUP, provided: LUP 2700-0285 Page 1 of 6 8/11/2026 Page 543 of 568 (a) At the time of renewal, MnDOT will review the Facility and Area to ensure the Facility and Area are compatible with the safe and efficient operation of the highway and the Facility and Area are in good condition and repair. If, in MnDOT’s sole determination, modifications and repairs to the Facility and Area are needed, Permittee will perform such work as outlined in writing in an amendment of this LUP; and (b) Permittee will provide to MnDOT a certified copy of the resolution from the applicable governmental body authorizing the Permittee’s use of the Facility and Area for the additional term. If Permittee’s written request to extend the term is not timely given, the LUP will expire on the Expiration Date. Permittee hereby voluntarily releases and waives any and all claims and causes of action for damages, costs, expenses, losses, fees and compensation arising from or related to any cancellation or termination of this LUP by MnDOT. Permittee agrees that it will not make or assert any claims for damages, costs, expenses, losses, fees and compensation based upon the existence, cancellation or termination of the LUP. Permittee agrees not to sue or institute any legal action against MnDOT based upon any of the claims released in this paragraph. 2. REMOVAL. Upon the Expiration Date or earlier termination, at the Permittee’s sole cost and expense Permittee will: (a) Remove the Facility and restore the Area to a condition satisfactory to the MnDOT District Engineer; and (b) Surrender possession of the Area to MnDOT. If, without MnDOT’s written consent, Permittee continues to occupy the Area after the Expiration Date or earlier termination, Permittee will remain subject to all conditions, provisions, and obligations of this LUP, and further, Permittee will pay all costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees, in any action brought by MnDOT to remove the Facility and the Permittee from the Area. 3. CONSTRUCTION. The construction, maintenance, and supervision of the Facility shall be at no cost or expense to MnDOT. Before construction of any kind, the plans for such construction shall be approved in writing by the MnDOT's District Engineer. Approval in writing from MnDOT District Engineer shall be required for any changes from the approved plan. The Permittee will construct the Facility at the location shown in the attached Exhibit "A", and in accordance with MnDOT-approved plans and specifications. Further, Permittee will construct the Facility using construction procedures compatible with the safe and efficient operation of the highway. LUP 2700-0285 Page 2 of 6 8/11/2026 Page 544 of 568 Upon completion of the construction of the Facility, the Permittee shall restore all disturbed slopes and ditches in such manner that drainage, erosion control and aesthetics are perpetuated. The Permittee shall preserve and protect all utilities located on the lands covered by this LUP at no expense to MnDOT and it shall be the responsibility of the Permittee to call the Gopher State One Call System at 1-800-252-1166 at least 48 hours prior to performing any excavation. Any crossings of the Facility over the trunk highway shall be perpendicular to the centerline of the highway and shall provide and ensure reasonable and adequate stopping sight distance. 4. MAINTENANCE. Any and all maintenance of the Facility shall be provided by the Permittee at its sole cost and expense, including, but not limited to, plowing and removal of snow and installation and removal of regulatory signs. No signs shall be placed on any MnDOT or other governmental agency signpost within the Area. MnDOT will not mark obstacles for users on trunk highway right of way. 5. USE. Other than as identified and approved by MnDOT, no permanent structures or no advertising devices in any manner, form or size shall be allowed on the Area. No commercial activities shall be allowed to operate upon the Area. Any use permitted by this LUP shall remain subordinate to the right of MnDOT to use the property for highway and transportation purposes. This LUP does not grant any interest whatsoever in land, nor does it establish a permanent park, recreation area or wildlife or waterfowl refuge. No rights to relocation benefits are established by this LUP. This LUP is non-exclusive and is granted subject to the rights of others, including, but not limited to public utilities which may occupy the Area. 6. APPLICABLE LAWS. This LUP does not release the Permittee from any liability or obligation imposed by federal law, Minnesota Statutes, local ordinances, or other agency regulations relating thereto and any necessary permits relating thereto shall be applied for and obtained by the Permittee. Permittee at its sole cost and expense, agrees to comply with, and provide and maintain the Area, Facilities in compliance with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances and regulations issued by any federal, state or local political subdivision having jurisdiction and authority in connection with said Area including the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). If the Area and Facilities are not in compliance with the ADA or other applicable laws MnDOT may enter the Area and perform such obligation without liability to Permittee for any loss or damage to Permittee thereby incurred, and Permittee shall reimburse MnDOT for the cost thereof, plus 10% of such cost for overhead and supervision within 30 days of receipt of MnDOT’s invoice. LUP 2700-0285 Page 3 of 6 8/11/2026 Page 545 of 5687. CIVIL RIGHTS. The Permittee for itself, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree that in the event improvements are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the Property described in this Limited Use Permit for a purpose for which a MnDOT activity, facility, or program is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, the Permittee will maintain and operate such improvements and services in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Acts and Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in federally-assisted programs of the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, (as may be amended) such that no person on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, income- level, or limited English proficiency will be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said improvements. 8. SAFETY. MnDOT shall retain the right to limit and/or restrict any activity, including the parking of vehicles and assemblage of Facility users, on the highway right of way over which this LUP is granted, so as to maintain the safety of both the motoring public and Facility users. 9. ASSIGNMENT. No assignment of this LUP is allowed. 10. IN WRITING. Except for those which are set forth in this LUP, no representations, warranties, or agreements have been made by MnDOT or Permittee to one another with respect to this LUP. 11. ENVIRONMENTAL. The Permittee shall not dispose of any materials regulated by any governmental or regulatory agency onto the ground, or into any body of water, or into any container on the State’s right of way. In the event of spillage of regulated materials, the Permittee shall notify in writing MnDOT’s District Engineer and shall provide for cleanup of the spilled material and of materials contaminated by the spillage in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, at the sole expense of the Permittee. 12. MECHANIC’S LIENS. The Permittee (for itself, its contractors, subcontractors, its materialmen, and all other persons acting for, through or under it or any of them), covenants that no laborers', mechanics', or materialmens' liens or other liens or claims of any kind whatsoever shall be filed or maintained by it or by any subcontractor, materialmen or other person or persons acting for, through or under it or any of them against the work and/or against said lands, for or on account of any work done or materials furnished by it or any of them under any agreement or any amendment or supplement thereto. LUP 2700-0285 Page 4 of 6 8/11/2026 Page 546 of 56813. NOTICES. All notices which may be given, by either party to the other, will be deemed to have been fully given when served personally on MnDOT or Permittee or when made in writing addressed as follows: to Permittee at: and to MnDOT at: City Administrator State of Minnesota City of Shorewood Department of Transportation 5755 Country Club Road Metro District Right of Way Shorewood, MN 55331 1500 W. County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 The address to which notices are mailed may be changed by written notice given by either party to the other. 14. INDEMNIFICATION AND RELEASE. Permittee shall indemnify, defend to the extent authorized by the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office, hold harmless and release the State of Minnesota, its Commissioner of Transportation, employees, the FHWA, and any successors and assigns of the foregoing, from and against all claims, demands, and causes of action for injury to or death of persons or loss of or damage to property (including Permittee’s property) occurring on the Area and Facility or arising out of or associated with Permittee’s use and occupancy of the Area and Facility, regardless of whether such injury, death, loss, or damage (i) is caused in part by the negligence (but not the gross negligence or willful misconduct) of MnDOT or (ii) is deemed to be the responsibility of MnDOT because of its failure to supervise, inspect, or control the operations of Permittee or otherwise discover or prevent actions or operations of Permittee giving rise to liability to any person. Nothing in this LUP shall obligate Permittee to indemnify or save MnDOT harmless from (a) any gross negligence or willful misconduct of MnDOT or its employees, contractors, agents, or anyone for whom MnDOT is legally responsible, or (b) any claims, demands or causes of action not arising out of or associated with Permittee’s occupancy or use of the Area and Facility. Permittee hereby releases the State of Minnesota, its Commissioner of Transportation, employees, the FHWA, and any successors and assigns of the foregoing, from and against all claims, demands, suits, losses, costs, expenses, and causes of action for loss of or damages to the Area and Facility or to Permittee’s property on or about the Area and Facility, except when such loss or damage is caused solely by the negligence of MnDOT or its employees, contractors, agents, or anyone for whom MnDOT is legally responsible. MnDOT’s liability is subject to the Minnesota Tort Claims Act, Minn. Stat. §3.736 and other applicable law. LUP 2700-0285 Page 5 of 6 8/11/2026 Page 547 of 568 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT CITY OF SHOREWOOD OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By: ______________________________ By__________________________________ District Engineer _ Its Mayor Date________________________________ APPROVED BY: And________________________________ COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION Its City Clerk By: ______________________________ Director, Office of Land Management Date___________________________ _ The Commissioner of Transportation by the execution of this permit certifies that this permit is necessary in the public interest and that the use intended is for public purposes. LUP 2700-0285 Page 6 of 6 8/11/2026 Page 548 of 568 MINN. PROJ. NO. STATE FUNDS DESIGN DESIGNATION GALPIN LAKE TRAIL MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STA. 100+46.29 TO STA. 106+98.20 CITY OF SHOREWOOD --- GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS --- DESIGN SPEED = 20 MPH THE 2025 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION" SHALL GOVERN. DESIGN SPEED FOR ROADWAY BASED ON HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALL CONFORM AND BE INSTALLED IN ON STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE: ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST "MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES" HEIGHT OF EYE = 4.5 FT MUNICIPAL STATE AID (MN MUTCD), INCLUDING THE LATEST "FIELD MANUAL" FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS. HEIGHT OF OBJECT = 0.0 FT CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR: GRADING, AGGREGATE BASE, BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, RETAINING WALL, ADA IMPROVEMENTS AND RELATED APPURTENANCES SHEET ID SHEET TITLE SAP 216-010-010 LOCATED ON TRUNK HIGHWAY 7 FROM GALPIN LAKE ROAD TO OAK STREET (CSAH 19) (GEOGRAPHICAL DESCRIPTION) THE CENTER OF SECTION 34, THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 34, 1 TITLE SHEET FROM TOWNSHIP 117 N, RANGE 23 W TO TOWNSHIP 117 N, RANGE 23 W (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) 2 LEGEND 3 CONSTRUCTION NOTES GALPIN ROAD TRAIL (SAP 216-010-010) 4 STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES/TABULATIONS 5 TYPICAL SECTIONS, DETAILS, & STANDARD PLANS GROSS LENGTH 673.1 FEET 0.127 MILES 6 EROSION CONTROL PLAN BRIDGE LENGTH FEET MILES 7 EXISTING CONDITIONS EXCEPTION LENGTH FEET MILES 8 REMOVAL PLAN NET LENGTH 673.1 FEET 0.127 MILES 9 TRAIL PLAN & PROFILE LENGTH AND DESCRIPTION BASED UPON 10 PROPOSED CENTERLINE RETAINING WALL PLAN 11 SIGNAGE & STRIPING PLAN 12 - 14 CROSS SECTIONS THIS PLAN SET CONTAINS 14 SHEETS. END PROJECT: SAP 216-010-010 STA.106+98.20 VICINITY MAP OAK STREET (CSAH 19) EXCELSIOR SHOREWOOD MILL ST R EXCELSIOR TH 7 TYPICAL PLAN SCALE SHOREWOOD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: 0 500 1000 0 30 60 INDEX MAP HORIZONTAL SCALE SCALE FEET SCALE FEET EXCELSIOR 0 5 10 SHOREWOOD VERTICAL SCALE SCALE FEET Engineer, P.E. Design Engineer: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT LOCATION RD LAKE GALPIN Date XX/XX/XXXX License Number XXXXX BEGIN PROJECT: SAP 216-010-010 Date CHASKA RD STA.100+46.29 Approved: City of Shorewood Engineer CITY: SHOREWOOD 12/3/2025 1:15:10 PM COUNTY: HENNEPIN DISTRICT: METRO Date District State Aid Engineer: Reviewed for compliance with State Aid and Federal Aid Rules/Policy THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY RECORD DRAWING QUALITY LEVEL “D”. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED BM=950.61 PROJECT DATUM: Hennipen County US Foot INFORMATION OBSERVER: ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-22, ENTITLED TOWNSHIP 117N - RANGE 23W - SECTION 34 PED SOUTH EAST CORNER DIMPLE Date HORIZONTAL: NAV83 “STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR INVESTIGATING AND DOCUMENTING CONTRACTOR: Approved for State Aid and Federal Aid Funding: State Aid Engineer , All Rights Reserved EXISTING UTILITIES.” VERTICAL: VAVD 88 DATE: 2025 DESIGNED NO. ISSUED FOR DATE SHEET 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 MPS SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA CHASKA, MN 55318 DRAWN MPS 1 Phone: (952) 448-8838 GALPIN LAKE TRAIL S.A.P 216-010-010 CHECKED OF Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com KLB R www.bolton-menk.com CLIENT PROJ. NO. Bolton & Menk, Inc. STATE AID PROJECT NO. 216-010-010 c 14 H:\SHWD\0C1125586\CAD\C3D\Galpin Lake Trail\125586G001.dwg 0C1.125586 Page 549 of 568 TYPICAL TRAIL SECTION TYPICAL TRAIL SECTION STA 100+53 TO STA 102+49 STA 100+34 TO STA 100+53 STA 105+61 TO STA 107+01 STA 102+49 TO STA 105+61 GUARDRAIL 5' CHAIN LINK FENCE GUARDRAIL 5' CHAIN LINK FENCE 6' MIN 4' CLEAR 8' 3' MIN 4' CLEAR 8' MIN ℄TRAIL 6" CONCRETE SIDEWALK (2521) RETAINING WALL ℄TRAIL 6" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 (2211) 6" 1.5% 5% 6" 1.5% 14% SUBGRADE PREPARATION (2112) 1:1 1:1 1:3 MAX 6" CONCRETE WALK 3" BITUMINOUS TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240B) (2360) NOT TO SCALE 6" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 3" BITUMINOUS TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240B) (2360) 6" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 6" MINIMUM TOPSOIL 6" MINIMUM TOPSOIL A 12" OR 18" B D C FOR 12" WALL NO. 4 BARS AT 12" O.C.E.W. FOR 18" WALL 2 ROWS OF NO. 4 BARS AT 12" O.C.E.W. DIMENSION SCHEDULE PIPE DIA. A B C D APPROX. WEIGHT 12" 48" 60" 24" 36" 3,000 LBS 15" 84" 72" 42" 37.5" 6,300 LBS 18" 84" 72" 42" 39" 6,300 LBS NOTES: 21" 120" 84" 60" 40.5" 10,500 LBS 1. 1" CHAMFER ON EXPOSED EDGES 12/3/2025 1:15:23 PM 24" 120" 84" 60" 42" 10,500 LBS 2. CONCRETE TEST TO 4000 PSI @ 28 DAYS 27" 120" 84" 60" 43.5" 10,500 LBS 30" 120" 84" 60" 45" 10,500 LBS 36" 192" 96" 96" 48" 19,200 LBS CONCRETE HEADWALL NOT TO SCALE , All Rights Reserved 2025 DESIGNED NO. ISSUED FOR DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED SHEET BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 MPS SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHASKA, MN 55318 DRAWN MPS 5 Phone: (952) 448-8838 GALPIN LAKE TRAIL S.A.P 216-010-010 CHECKED OF Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com KLB ANDREW BUDDE R www.bolton-menk.com CLIENT PROJ. NO. Bolton & Menk, Inc. 46585 MM/DD/YYYY G0 - GENERAL c LIC. NO. DATE 14 H:\SHWD\0C1125586\CAD\C3D\Galpin Lake Trail\125586C101.dwg 0C1.125586 Page 550 of 568 0 10 20 NOTE: LEGEND HORZ. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES THAT ARE SHOWN, ARE SCALE FEET 6" CONCRETE WALK LANDING SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. IT IS NOT GUARANTEED THAT ANY OR ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE 3" BITUMINOUS TRAIL EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL TRUNCATED DOMES DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. C-D MODULAR RETAINING WALL CONNECT TO EX STRM PIPE C-D 30" CMP THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, SUCH X X 5' CHAIN LINK FENCE AS TRENCH BOXES OR SHEETING, TO PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES AND C-D 107+00 X C-DC-DC-D FACILITIES AND TO CONTAIN THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TO THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENTS. X C-D X EX 30" STM C-D R HWY 7 X C-DC-DC-D 102+00 C-D C-D C-D C-D X STA:101+61.01 C-D 30" CMP X X C-D 20" STM X X C-D 0.00' X X C-DC-D X X C-D C-D 20" CMP LINED X C-D >> X X WITH 18" HDPE X X 103+00C-D H 8' F C-D X X P X STA:101+33.21U X C-D C-D C-DC-D X X 100+00 C-D X C-D X X 0.00'C-D X X R53' X C-D X P X X 104+00C-D X X X X C-D X C-DC-D8'C-D X X X C-D C-D X X H X X F C-D GALPIN LAKE RD X B X STA:104+95.09 X C-D X X C-DC-DC-D X C-D0.00'105+00 101+00C-D X X X C-D X RCP X 24" C-D X X X 24" RCP C-D C-DC-DC-D X C-D X X C-D S WETLAND DELINEATION X X C-D X P X 106+00 X X C-D X X H H X X C-DC-DC-D F C-D C-D X X X C-D P X X P X C-D R13' C-DC-DC-D X X C-D C-D X X C-D X 107+00 X X C-DC-DC-D BEGIN SAP 216-010-010 X C-D X STA: 100+46.29 107+49.99 END SAP 216-010-010 GALPIN LAKE STA: 106+98.20 955 955 OHWL = 943.33 100 YR HWL = 946.19 PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE TRAIL 950 950 CONNECT TO EXISTING RETAINING WALL 970 945 945 970 36' - EX 30" STM @ 0.70% 24'24' - 30" STM @ MATCH TO EX. EX 30" CMP 30 CMP 965 940 (MATCH EX SLOPE) 940 965 VPI: 106+98.63 EL: 950.71 VPI: 101+56.20 A = -9.34% 960 935 950.2 950.21 946.4 946.42 935 960 EL: 948.65 VPI: 104+34.27 K = 1.90 A = 4.35% VPI: 103+59 EL: 947.70 VPI: 106+13.98 L=17.74' K = 5.75 EL: 946.94 A = -2.00% EL: 946.90 EL: 953.68 L=25' A = 1.60% K = 10.00 A = 4.96% 955 K = 15.62 L=20' K = 5.04 955 VPI: 100+51.29 L=25' L=25' -2.00% EL: 950.51 EL: 950.04 -4.80% EL: 949.25 EL: 948.59 HP: 106+98.32 EL: 948.45 VPI: 107+12.51 EL: 947.46 VPC: 101+43.70 EL: 947.06 EL: 947.02 EL: 947.23 950 EL: 946.95 950 VPT: 101+68.70 -4.83% VPI: 102+00.05 -0.45% EL: 946.99 4.51% VPT: 106+26.47 VPI: 104+03.57 VPC: 103+46.50 -0.95% VPT: 103+71.50 VPC: 106+01.47 LP: 103+61.34 1.55% -0.45% VPI: 100+46.29 0.65% EL: 953.78 945 945 EX 20" CMP W/ 16" HDPE STM ℄ 30" CMP STM PROPOSED PROFILE HP: 104+39.77 EL: 947.67 940 100 YR HWL = 946.19 EXISTING ℄ PROFILE LP: 106+03.74 EL: 946.95 940 OHWL = 943.33 EX 24" RCP STM 12/3/2025 1:18:32 PM 935 935 EXISTING PROFILE 930 PROPOSED ℄ PROFILE 930 953.6 950.6 948.9 947.5 948.0 947.9 947.8 947.4 946.8 946.4 946.2 946.2 946.1 946.0 946.3 946.6 946.5 946.5 946.5 946.2 946.4 946.1 946.2 947.4 947.4 947.9 950.5 953.71 952.54 951.34 950.14 948.98 948.56 948.45 948.21 947.98 947.74 947.50 947.26 947.03 947.04 947.21 947.56 947.63 947.52 947.41 947.30 947.18 947.07 946.96 947.40 948.52 949.65 950.50 , All Rights Reserved 925 925 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 104+00 105+00 106+00 107+00 107+50 2025 DESIGNED NO. ISSUED FOR DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED SHEET BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 MPS SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 0 25 50 0 5 10 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHASKA, MN 55318 DRAWN MPS 9 HORZ. VERT. Phone: (952) 448-8838 GALPIN LAKE TRAIL S.A.P 216-010-010 CHECKED OF SCALE FEET SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com KLB ANDREW BUDDE R www.bolton-menk.com CLIENT PROJ. NO. Bolton & Menk, Inc. 46585 MM/DD/YYYY TRAIL PLAN & PROFILE c LIC. NO. DATE 14 H:\SHWD\0C1125586\CAD\C3D\Galpin Lake Trail\125586C601.dwg 0C1.125586 Page 551 of 568 NOTE: >> THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES THAT ARE SHOWN, ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. IT IS NOT GUARANTEED THAT ANY OR >> ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BEFORE >> COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE >> AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. >> THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, SUCH >> AS TRENCH BOXES OR SHEETING, TO PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES AND HWY 7 FACILITIES AND TO CONTAIN THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TO THE EXISTING 30" CMP RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENTS. >> C-DC-DC-D R C-D >> C-D C-D C-D 102+00 C-D C-DC-D C-D C-D C-D >> C-D 103+00 C-D X X X X X X C-D >> 202+00X X C-D X C-D C-DC-DC-D 104+00 X C-D >> X X C-D >> C-D X X X 203+00 C-D X X H H X X C-D 20" CMP LINED F P X X F X X X C-D >> X X C-D 105+00 WITH 18" HDPE X X 204+00 U X X C-D C-DC-D X C-D X X X C-D RCP X 24" >> C-D X C-D X X C-D X >> P X X X C-D X 205+00 106+00 100+00 X C-DH H BP: 100+00.00 X C-D X X X X F C-DC-DC-D X X 201+00 X X C-D C-D P X X C-D X X C-D X B X C-D 206+00X X X 107+00 X C-DC-DC-D X EP: 107+49.99 GALPIN LAKE RD X 101+00C-D X X X 107+49.99 BEGIN SAP 216-010-010 X X 207+00 STA: 100+34.28 EP: 207+41.24 C-DC-DC-D X C-D 207+41.24 200+00 BP: 200+00.00 S X END SAP 216-010-010 X C-DC-DC-D STA: 106+98.20 C-D X P P C-DC-DC-D C-D C-DC-DC-D C-D GALPIN LAKE OHWL = 943.33 100 YR HWL = 946.19 975 975 970 970 965 965 960 SMALL ANIMAL CONTAINMENT 960 5' CHAINLINK FENCE STA: 200+30.06 ELEV: 953.24 STA: 200+67.16 STA: 200+45.46 955 ELEV: 951.24 955 ELEV: 952.24 STA: 200+88.86 STA: 206+29.51 STA: 206+74.31 ELEV: 950.24 ELEV: 949.20 ELEV: 950.20 STA: 206+09.21 STA: 201+09.16 MATCH EXISTING WALL 950 STA: 201+53.26 STA: 202+12.32 ELEV: 948.20 950 ELEV: 949.24 ELEV: 948.24 ELEV: 948.13 PROPOSED FINISHED GROUND AT TW STA: 205+58.11 ELEVATION, SALVAGE & STA: 200+27.26 ELEV: 947.20 REINSTALL PORTIONS OF ELEV: 947.97 THE EXISTING WALL TO TIE TOGETHER 945 STA: 200+30.76 945 ELEV: 946.97 STA: 200+41.26 STA: 202+14.86 ELEV: 945.97 STA: 201+46.96 100 YR HWL = 946.19 12/3/2025 1:19:31 PM ELEV: 943.97 940 ELEV: 942.97 STA: 205+18.91 STA: 206+71.69 940 EXISTING GROUND ELEV: 942.89 STA: 200+54.56 OHWL = 943.33 ELEV: 942.93 ELEV: 944.97 6" - 12" MINIMUM EMBEDMENT DEPTH STA: 200+72.06 30" CMP 935 ELEV: 943.97 EXISTING 16" HDPE 935 STA: 200+95.86 STA: 200+86.76 ELEV: 941.97 ELEV: 942.97 EXISTING 24" RCP , All Rights Reserved 930 930 200+00 201+00 202+00 203+00 204+00 205+00 206+00 207+00 207+41 2025 DESIGNED NO. ISSUED FOR DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED SHEET BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 MPS SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 0 25 50 0 5 10 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHASKA, MN 55318 DRAWN MPS 10 HORZ. VERT. Phone: (952) 448-8838 GALPIN LAKE TRAIL S.A.P 216-010-010 CHECKED OF SCALE FEET SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com KLB ANDREW BUDDE R www.bolton-menk.com CLIENT PROJ. NO. Bolton & Menk, Inc. 46585 MM/DD/YYYY RETAINING WALL PLAN & PROFILE c LIC. NO. DATE 14 H:\SHWD\0C1125586\CAD\C3D\Galpin Lake Trail\125586C602.dwg 0C1.125586 Page 552 of 568 956 956 956 956 GUARDRAIL 101+25 GUARDRAIL 102+00 WL WL 954 OHW 954 954 OHW 954 952 8.0 950.4 952 952 952 -8.2 949.9 -9.0 949.6 1.5% 1.5% 8.0 948.7 -12.5% 5% 950 1:8 950 950 1:3 950 33.3% 1.5% 1.5% 5% 948 948 948 948 946 946 946 946 100 YR HWL 100 YR HWL 944 5% 944 944 5% 944 942 942 942 942 941 947.5 950.14 941 941 947.8 948.45 941 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 956 956 956 GUARDRAIL 101+00 956 GUARDRAIL 101+75 WL WL OHW 954 OHW 954 954 954 8.0 951.6 952 952 -9.0 949.8 -9.0 952 950.3 1.5% 952 1.5% 5% 8.0 948.8 1:5-21.7% 950 1:4 950 23.0% 950 950 1.5% 1.5% 5% 948 948 948 948 946 946 100 YR HWL 946 946 5% 100 YR HWL 5% 944 944 944 944 942 942 942 948.9 951.34 942 941 947.9 948.56 941 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 956 GUARDRAIL 100+75 956 954 GUARDRAIL 101+61.01 954 WL WL OHW OHW 954 8.0 952.8 954 952 952 -9.0 951.9 -9.0 1.5% 1.5% 949.5 8.0 948.9 -13.5% 5% 952 1:7 952 950 950 1:616.1% 1.5% 1.5% 5% 950 950 948 948 948 948 946 946 100 YR HWL 5% 946 5% 946 944 944 100 YR HWL 944 944 942 942 942 950.6 952.54 942 940 948.0 948.68 940 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 956 956 960 100+50 960 GUARDRAIL 101+50 WL 954 OHW 954 958 958 952 952 -9.0 949.5 956 956 8.0 949.2 950 950 -9.0 953.0 9.5%1:11 954 1.5% 1.5% 954 1.5% 1.5% 5% 1:7-15.0% 33% 948 948 952 952 946 946 100 YR HWL 950 950 5% 944 944 948 948 942 942 946 953.6 946 941 948.0 948.98 941 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 956 GUARDRAIL 101+33.21 956 WL OHW 954 954 12/3/2025 1:20:03 PM 952 952 8.0 950.0 -9.0 949.4 1.5% 950 -8.8%1:11 1.5% 5% 950 948 948 946 946 100 YR HWL 944 5% 944 942 942 , All Rights Reserved -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 2025 DESIGNED NO. ISSUED FOR DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED SHEET BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 MPS SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 0 10 20 0 5 10 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHASKA, MN 55318 DRAWN MPS 12 HORZ. VERT. Phone: (952) 448-8838 GALPIN LAKE TRAIL S.A.P 216-010-010 CHECKED OF SCALE FEET SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com KLB ANDREW BUDDE R www.bolton-menk.com CLIENT PROJ. NO. Bolton & Menk, Inc. 46585 MM/DD/YYYY CROSS SECTIONS c LIC. NO. DATE 14 H:\SHWD\0C1125586\CAD\C3D\Galpin Lake Trail\125586C803.dwg 0C1.125586 Page 553 of 568 956 956 GUARDRAIL 103+25 954 GUARDRAIL 104+50 954 WL WL 954 OHW 954 OHW 952 952 -9.6 952 952 949.4 -10.8 949.3 950 950 1:3 950 950 30.7% 1:3 948 1.5% 1.5%14% 948 29.3% 33.33% 948 1.5% 1.5%14% 948 33.33% 946 946 946 946 100 YR HWL 100 YR HWL 944 944 944 944 942 942 942 942 941 946.2 947.26 941 940 946.5 947.63 940 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 954 GUARDRAIL 103+00 954 954 GUARDRAIL 104+25 954 WL WL OHW OHW 952 952 952 952 -10.8 949.7 -9.7 949.5 950 950 950 950 1:3 1:3 31.2% 32.5% 948 1.5% 1.5%14% 948 948 1.5% 1.5%14% 948 33.33% 33.33% 946 946 946 946 100 YR HWL 100 YR HWL 944 944 944 944 942 942 942 942 940 946.2 947.50 940 940 946.6 947.56 940 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 954 GUARDRAIL 102+75 954 954 GUARDRAIL 104+00 954 WL WL OHW OHW 952 -10.7 950.0 952 952 952 -11.6 949.8 950 950 950 950 1:3 33.4% 1:3 33.3% 948 1.5% 1.5%14% 948 948 948 1.5% 1.5%14% 33.33% 33.33% 946 946 946 946 100 YR HWL 100 YR HWL 944 944 944 944 942 942 942 942 940 946.4 947.74 940 940 946.3 947.21 940 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 954 GUARDRAIL 102+50 954 954 GUARDRAIL 103+75 954 WL WL OHW OHW 952 952 952 952 -10.3 950.0 -10.6 949.4 950 1:3 950 950 950 31.2% 1:3 948 1.5% 1.5%14% 948 948 34.3% 948 33.33% 1.5% 1.5%14% 33.33% 946 946 946 946 100 YR HWL 100 YR HWL 944 944 944 944 942 942 942 942 940 946.8 947.98 940 940 946.0 947.04 940 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 956 GUARDRAIL 102+25 956 954 GUARDRAIL 103+50 954 WL WL OHW OHW 954 954 952 952 -10.7 949.4 12/3/2025 1:20:04 PM 952 952 950 950 -9.5 949.8 1:3 34.4% 8.0 948.5 950 1:3 950 948 948 28.6% 1.5% 1.5%14%33.3% 1.5% 1.5% 948 5% 948 946 946 100 YR HWL 946 946 944 944 100 YR HWL 5% 944 944 942 942 942 947.4 948.21 942 940 946.1 947.03 940 , All Rights Reserved -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 2025 DESIGNED NO. ISSUED FOR DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED SHEET BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 MPS SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 0 10 20 0 5 10 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHASKA, MN 55318 DRAWN MPS 13 HORZ. VERT. Phone: (952) 448-8838 GALPIN LAKE TRAIL S.A.P 216-010-010 CHECKED OF SCALE FEET SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com KLB ANDREW BUDDE R www.bolton-menk.com CLIENT PROJ. NO. Bolton & Menk, Inc. 46585 MM/DD/YYYY CROSS SECTIONS c LIC. NO. DATE 14 H:\SHWD\0C1125586\CAD\C3D\Galpin Lake Trail\125586C803.dwg 0C1.125586 Page 554 of 568 954 GUARDRAIL 105+50 954 956 GUARDRAIL 106+75 956 WL WL OHW OHW 952 952 954 954 -9.3 948.6 -9.8 950 950 952 950.2 952 8.0 949.9 1:4 1:12 26.1% 8.4% 948 948 950 1.5% 1.5% 950 1.5% 1.5%14% 5% 33.33% 946 946 948 948 100 YR HWL 944 944 946 946 100 YR HWL 942 942 944 5% 944 940 946.4 947.18 940 942 947.9 949.65 942 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 954 GUARDRAIL 105+25 954 956 GUARDRAIL 106+50 956 WL WL OHW OHW 952 952 954 954 -9.5 950 948.7 950 952 952 -9.9 950.0 1:4 8.0 948.8 948 24.7% 948 950 1:4 950 1.5% 1.5%14% 24.3% 33.33% 1.5% 1.5% 5% 946 946 948 948 100 YR HWL 944 944 946 946 100 YR HWL 942 942 944 5% 944 940 946.2 947.30 940 942 947.4 948.52 942 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 954 GUARDRAIL 105+00 954 954 GUARDRAIL 106+25 954 WL WL OHW OHW 952 952 952 952 -10.4 949.6 -9.6 950 948.9 950 950 950 1:3 8.0 947.6 1:4 33.3% 25.7% 948 1.5% 1.5%14% 948 948 1.5% 1.5% 5% 948 33.33% 946 946 946 946 100 YR HWL 100 YR HWL 5% 944 944 944 944 942 942 942 942 940 946.5 947.41 940 940 947.4 947.40 940 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 952 GUARDRAIL 104+95.09 952 954 GUARDRAIL 106+00 954 WL WL OHW OHW 950 -9.6 948.9 950 952 952 1:4 25.9% -9.4 948.7 948 1.5% 1.5%14% 948 950 950 8.0 947.2 33.33% 1:3 946 100 YR HWL 946 948 31.8% 948 1.5% 1.5% 5% 944 944 946 946 100 YR HWL 942 942 944 5% 944 940 940 942 942 938 938 940 946.2 946.96 940 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 954 GUARDRAIL 104+75 954 954 GUARDRAIL 105+75 954 WL WL OHW OHW 952 952 952 952 -9.6 949.3 -8.9 948.4 12/3/2025 1:20:05 PM 950 950 950 950 1:3 8.0 947.3 31.2% 1:4 948 1.5% 1.5%14% 948 948 25.5% 948 1.5% 1.5% 5% 33.33% 946 946 946 946 100 YR HWL 100 YR HWL 944 944 944 5% 944 942 942 942 942 940 946.5 947.52 940 940 946.1 947.07 940 , All Rights Reserved -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 CL +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 2025 DESIGNED NO. ISSUED FOR DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED SHEET BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED 2638 SHADOW LANE, SUITE 200 MPS SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 0 10 20 0 5 10 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHASKA, MN 55318 DRAWN MPS 14 HORZ. VERT. Phone: (952) 448-8838 GALPIN LAKE TRAIL S.A.P 216-010-010 CHECKED OF SCALE FEET SCALE FEET Email: Chaska@bolton-menk.com KLB ANDREW BUDDE R www.bolton-menk.com CLIENT PROJ. NO. Bolton & Menk, Inc. 46585 MM/DD/YYYY CROSS SECTIONS c LIC. NO. DATE 14 H:\SHWD\0C1125586\CAD\C3D\Galpin Lake Trail\125586C803.dwg 0C1.125586 Page 555 of 568 CITY OF SHOREWOOD COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 26-057 LIMITED USE PERMIT FOR THE GALPIN LAKE TRAIL PROJECT; CITY PROJECT 25-01 SAP NO. 216-010-010 WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood has opened bids and plans to award a construction contract for the Galpin Lake Trail Project, City Project 25-01; and WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood is required to enter a Limit Use Permit for the construction and future maintenance of the Galpin Lake Trail Project due to it being located within MnDOT right of way; and WHEREAS, the Limited Use Permit No. 2700-0285 has been prepared and reviewed by both parties; NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City of Shorewood does hereby agree to enter into Limited Use Permit No. 2700-0285 with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes: 1. To provide for maintenance and use by the City of Shorewood upon, along, and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 7 and the limits of which are defined in said Limited Use Permit. 2. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute Limited Use Permit and its amendments, and that the City of Shorewood entire into Limited Use Permit No. 2700-0285 with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation. Adopted by the City Council of Shorewood, Minnesota this 14th day of September 2026. __________________________ Jennifer Labadie, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Sandie Thone, City Clerk Page 556 of 568 City Council Item 5.A.i. Title/Subject: Informational Update on Parcel ID 2911723440024 & 2911723440025 Lot Combination Request Meeting Date: September 14, 2026 Prepared By: Jake Griffiths, Planning Director Attachments 1. Site Location Map 2. Private Driveway & Utility Easement Background The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the City Council and the public with information regarding a request from the current property owner, Gravity Investment LLC, concerning Parcel ID 2911723440024 and 2911723440025, located north of the property associated with the proposed Watten Ponds 2nd Addition development. A map showing the request's location is attached. The property owner has indicated that it intends to sell these two parcels, along with 25725 Birch Bluff Rd, to another party. As part of the property sale, Gravity Investment LLC has requested to combine these two parcels into a single property, and, the new property owner would construct one single-family dwelling on the resulting property with access proposed through a private easement connecting to Birch Bluff Rd. Under ordinary circumstances, a lot combination request falls within an administrative review procedure which would be reviewed and approved or denied by City staff without placing an item on the City Council agenda. Given the substantial public interest surrounding development in this area, staff believe it is appropriate to provide the Council and residents with a clear explanation of the request. Discussion Based on the request by Gravity Investment LLC, the following would be their plans for the subject properties going forward: 1. Combining Parcel ID 2911723440024 and 2911723440025 into one parcel; 2. Selling the resulting property to a new owner; 3. Constructing one single-family home on the resulting parcel; and, 4. Providing access to the home from Birch Bluff Rd to the north, through a shared driveway within a private easement across 25725 Birch Bluff Rd. Combining Parcel ID 2911723440024 and 2911723440025 A lot combination is the process by which two immediately adjacent properties under common ownership are combined to create one resulting property. A property owner may initiate this process by completing the Owner Request Form provided by Hennepin County. Upon receipt of the completed form, City staff reviews the request and, when appropriate, completes the City's approval documentation. The request is then forwarded to Hennepin County, which is Page 557 of 568responsible for formally adjusting the property boundaries and tax parcel records. A lot combination is distinct from a subdivision. City Code §1202.10 defines a subdivision as: “The division of a parcel of land into two or more lots or parcels for the purpose or transfer of ownership or building developments. The term includes subdivision and, when appropriate to the context, shall relate to the process of subdividing or to the land subdivided.” Because a lot combination does not divide property into additional lots or parcels, the subdivision requirements contained in City Code Chapter 1202 do not apply to a lot combination of this nature. City staff's review is instead focused on confirming that the properties are eligible to be combined and that the resulting property complies with applicable City and State requirements. In this case, Parcel IDs 2911723440024 and 2911723440025 are immediately adjacent properties under common ownership. Both are platted lots of record within the Manns Addition to Birch Bluff (Lake Minnetonka) plat. The proposed combination would therefore consolidate two contiguous properties into a single resulting property rather than create any additional development parcels. The proposed combination is also consistent with the requirements applicable to nonconforming lots in shoreland areas. Minnesota Statutes §462.357, subdivision 1e(d), and Minnesota Rules parts 6120.2500 through 6120.3900 establish requirements for managing nonconforming lots in shoreland areas, including provisions addressing multiple contiguous nonconforming lots under common ownership. Where applicable criteria are met, contiguous lots are to be combined to the extent necessary to create a conforming parcel or otherwise bring the property into greater conformity with applicable dimensional requirements. Both properties are entirely located within a shoreland protection zone due to their proximity to Lake Minnetonka. Parcel ID 2911723440025 is 9,119.25 square feet in area and therefore does not meet the 20,000-square-foot minimum lot area required for the R-1C zoning district. Parcel ID 2911723440024, by comparison, is 25,328.25 square feet and independently satisfies the minimum lot-area requirement. Combining the two parcels would result in a single property containing approximately 34,447.50 square feet. The resulting property would therefore exceed the City's 20,000-square-foot minimum lot-area requirement and would bring the existing undersized parcel into conformity with the applicable lot-area standard. Accordingly, the proposed lot combination is consistent with both the City's regulations governing lot area and the State requirements applicable to nonconforming shoreland lots. The combination would not create an additional lot or development opportunity; rather, it would consolidate two contiguous properties under common ownership into a single, larger property that satisfies the applicable minimum lot-area requirement. Selling the Resulting Property to a New Owner The City Code does not regulate the sale of private property, and the City has no role in reviewing, denying or approving any potential sale. The current property owner has informed City staff that it has an agreement in principle to sell the property, along with the adjacent property at 25725 Birch Bluff Rd, to a new owner. Constructing One Single-Family Home on the Resulting Parcel Once the resulting property is combined, a building permit could be submitted to the City for construction of one single-family home. The proposed home would need to meet all applicable City Code requirements such as the following: Page 558 of 568 • 35 foot front yard setback. • 40 foot rear yard setback. • 10 food side yard setback, or 35 foot setback from side yards abutting a street. • Maximum building height of 35 feet. • Maximum impervious surface coverage of 25%. • Approval of a stormwater management plan. • Approval of a tree preservation and replacement plan. • Appropriate wetland buffers and setbacks are provided. • Connection to the sanitary sewer system. • Connection to the municipal water system. Based on the information currently available, City staff believes a new single-family home could be constructed on the resulting property while meeting all applicable City Code requirements. If part of the building permit application did not meet City Code requirements, then the permit would not be issued or the applicant would need to seek variance approval from the City Council. As part of the building permit process, a potential home building project would also need a permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Providing Shared Driveway Access Gravity Investment LLC has recorded a private easement across the property at 25725 Birch Bluff Road that would allow shared driveway and utility access from Birch Bluff Road. City Code permits shared driveways serving two homes, and similar arrangements exist elsewhere in the surrounding area. Both existing parcels also have legal access through the unimproved right-of- way known as Clara Avenue. Although Clara Avenue is not currently improved, it could potentially be used to provide driveway and utility access from Eureka Road. The City has historically allowed similar arrangements in this area, including three existing homes to the west that utilize the unimproved Clara Avenue right-of-way for shared driveway and sanitary sewer infrastructure. From a site-impact perspective, the Birch Bluff Road easement provided by Gravity Investment LLC provides an alternative to improving Clara Avenue. Utilizing the Clara Avenue right-of-way would require improvements through a currently unimproved area, potentially resulting in tree removal, grading, and impacts to adjacent homeowners, including two Eureka Road residences located only a few feet from the right-of-way. The proposed Birch Bluff Road access would avoid those impacts while providing shared driveway and utility access to the resulting property. For these reasons, City staff are strongly in favor of a future property owner utilizing this easement area rather than the unimproved Clara Avenue right-of-way. Ultimate Condition Based on the information currently available to the City, and assuming all applicable City Code requirements are satisfied, the development scenario contemplated for the area north of Clara Avenue and south of Birch Bluff Road would result in one single-family home on the combined property. The existing property at 25725 Birch Bluff Road, which previously contained a single- family home that was demolished in 2025, also remains a buildable property. Accordingly, based on the properties and development scenario currently under consideration, the area could accommodate two additional single-family homes: one on the combined property and one at 25725 Birch Bluff Road. Both homes would utilize access from Birch Bluff Road to the north. Page 559 of 568 Next Steps Following tonight's meeting, City staff will likely provide the approval necessary for the lot combination to be processed by Hennepin County. At that point, it is City staff's understanding that the property will be sold to a new owner who plans on submitting a building permit application in the coming months. There would not be another public hearing or meeting related to these properties unless a variance or some other application requiring City Council approval was submitted. As with any building project, residents may always call City Hall for more information on projects occurring in their area and to share any concerns or questions with City staff. Strategic Alignment Comprehensive Approach to Planning & Development • Clear standards and processes for development with strong controls • Align private development with public improvements • Leverage resources (land use controls, EDA) to achieve outcomes • Set clear plans and diligently work to achieve them • Balance the desires of both new and long-term residents Planning and land use related requests generally relate to the City Council's Strategic Priority of a comprehensive approach to planning and development. However, these requests are reviewed on their own merits based on applicable state and federal laws, the Comprehensive Plan, and the City Code. Budget Impact None. Action Requested This item is for informational purposes only, no formal action is requested. Page 560 of 568 Parcel ID 2911723440024 & 2911723440025 8/17/2026, 9:28:21 AM 1:5,755 0 190 380 760 ft City Limits Low Resolution 15m Imagery Citations 0 55 110 220 m Parcels High Resolution 60cm Imagery 1.2m Resolution Metadata This dataset is compiled monthly by the Hennepin County GIS Office from parcel geometry that is created and maintained by the Hennepin County World Imagery High Resolution 30cm Imagery Page 561 of 568Page 562 of 568Page 563 of 568Page 564 of 568Page 565 of 568Page 566 of 568 City Council Item 5.A.ii. Title/Subject: Tentative Upcoming Agenda Topics Meeting Date: September 14, 2026 Prepared By: Marc Nevinski, City Administrator Attachments 1. Sept 14 2026 Tentative Upcoming Agendas Background Attached is a list of anticipated topics for future City Council work sessions and regular meetings. The list is not exhaustive and topics and their meeting dates are subject to change. Strategic Alignment NA Budget Impact NA Action Requested NA Page 567 of 568 Tentative Meeting Topic Meeting Type 9/28/2026 Discuss Annual Strategic Planning Process Work Session 9/28/2026 SCEC Study - Implementation Work Session 9/28/2026 Ordinance Amending Chapter 700 Regarding Animal Licensing Regular Meeting 9/28/2026 Shorewood 2050 Comprehensive Plan Project Update Regular Meeting 9/28/2026 Engineering Consultant Contract Regular Meeting 9/28/2026 Liability Coverage Waiver Regular Meeting 9/28/2026 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report Regular Meeting 10/12/2026 Work Session 10/12/2026 Annual Tobacco License Renewal Regular Meeting 10/12/2026 Certify Special Assessments-on or before October 31st Regular Meeting 10/12/2026 Certify Unpaid Charges-on or before October 31st Regular Meeting 10/12/2026 3nd Quarter Communications Report Regular Meeting City Council Budget Work Session #6: Long-Term Financial 10/26/2026 Work Session Management Plan 10/26/2026 Zoning Code Update Regular Meeting 10/26/2026 5980 Glencoe Rd Variance for Detached Garage Regular Meeting 10/26/2026 19215 State Highway 7 Interim Use Permit for Cannabis Business Regular Meeting 10/26/2026 Fire and Police Chief Updates Regular Meeting 11/9/2026 Discuss Code Enforcement Work Session 11/9/2026 Discuss Municipal Water Point of Sale Program Work Session 11/9/2026 Annual Employee Service Recognition ? Regular Meeting 11/9/2026 Adopt 2027 Fee Ordinances & Fee Schedule Regular Meeting 11/9/2026 Approve Agreement - Minutes Services Regular Meeting 11/9/2026 Presentation by LMCD Regular Meeting 11/23/2026 LMCC Future Work Session 11/23/2026 Set 2027 Regular City Council Meeting Schedule Regular Meeting 12/14/2026 Work Session City Council Meeting - 7:00 p.m. Budget Hearing - City Council 12/14/2026 Regular Meeting approves final 2027 Budget, Tax Levies, and CIP. Page 568 of 568