--- ## title: CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS author: lisa.anderson date: D:20260821120058-05'00' --- ## CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS ## City Council Workshop ## City Hall ## 2077 West Larpenteur Avenue ## AGENDA August 26, 2026 ## 6:00 P.M. ## A. CALL TO ORDER: ## B. ROLL CALL: GUSTAFSON____ MAY___ ## MIELKE___ MOGEN ___ WASSENBERG___ ## STAFF PRESENT: LINEHAN___ ## C. POLICY ITEMS: 1. 2027 Budget Workshop #2 (6:00 P.M.) ## a. Pavement Management Project ## b. 2027 Preliminary Capital Project Fund Preview ## D. ADJOURNMENT: DISCLAIMER: City Council Workshops are held monthly as an opportunity for Council Members to discuss policy topics in greater detail prior to a formal meeting where a public hearing may be held and/or action may be taken. Members of the public that would like to make a comment or ask questions about an item on the agenda for an upcoming workshop should send them to mail@falconheights.org prior to the meeting. Alternatively, time is regularly allotted for public comment during Regular City Council Meetings (typically 2nd and 4th Wednesdays) during the Community Forum. ## BLANK PAGE ## REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ## City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota __________________________ ## Item ## 2026 Pavement Management Plan Workshop: 5 Year Capital Improvement ## Program ## Description Staff has completed a draft update to the City's 2026 Pavement Management Plan (PMP). The PMP provides a framework for evaluating, preserving, and rehabilitating the City's pavement network and serves as a long-term planning tool for identifying future pavement needs and developing the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The purpose of this workshop is to review the proposed 2027–2031 Five-Year Pavement CIP and receive City Council feedback before the PMP is finalized. Key points of interest for the proposed program include: ## 1. Current Pavement Condition. The City's pavement network is currently in good overall condition. GoodPointe completed the City's most recent pavement condition survey in 2025, resulting in a weighted average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 85.9. This compares to a weighted average PCI of 69.0 in 2022. The City's long-term goal is to maintain a citywide weighted average PCI of 75 or greater. ## 2. Pavement Management Approach. The updated PMP emphasizes a proactive approach to pavement preservation and rehabilitation, with the goal of applying the right treatment to the right street at the right time. PCI is an important planning tool, but project selection also considers pavement age, maintenance history, observed distress, available funding, coordination opportunities, and engineering judgment. 3. Proposed Five-Year CIP. The proposed 2027–2031 program identifies approximately $1.695 million in anticipated transportation capital needs, including approximately $150,000 for crack sealing, $860,000 for pavement reclamation and rehabilitation projects, and $685,000 in anticipated local costs associated with Ramsey County's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The program does not currently include any mill-and-overlay projects. The CIP is intended as a planning ## Meeting Date August 26, 2026 ## Agenda Item ## Attachment ## Draft 2026 PMP ## Submitted By ## Erik Henricksen, City Engineer framework and will continue to be reviewed annually based on pavement conditions, available funding, construction costs, and coordination opportunities. ## 4. Northome Neighborhood Alley Rehabilitation – 2027. The most significant consideration in the proposed CIP is a potential 2027 rehabilitation of the alleys in the Northome Neighborhood, currently estimated at approximately $340,000 in total street cost. The alleys are in poor condition, and staff has identified rehabilitation as necessary to provide an adequate and maintainable pavement surface and address drainage needs. This need has become more significant following the City's 2026 decision to assume responsibility for winter snow plowing and maintenance of alleys, which was previously the responsibility of adjacent property owners. With the City now responsible for maintaining these facilities, staff believes the condition of the alleys warrants consideration of a City-led rehabilitation project. The proposed project would be subject to the City's assessment policy, under which approximately 90% of eligible project costs would be assessed to benefiting property owners. This follows the 2025 Northome Neighborhood street improvement project, for which property owners were assessed approximately 40% of eligible street project costs. Staff recognizes that proceeding with the alley rehabilitation in 2027 could result in a significant additional financial burden to the affected property owners shortly after the 2025 street project. Staff is therefore seeking Council direction on whether the alley rehabilitation should remain in the 2027 CIP, be deferred to a future year, or whether alternative approaches should be considered for addressing the condition and maintenance of the alleys. It is important to note that two additional alleys have been identified for consideration by city staff following this draft CIP: Crawford between Snelling Service and Arona as well as between Arona and Pascal, and the Iowa/Idaho alley between Pascal and Albert. The PCI on Crawford may not require it to be reconstructed at this time, but should be evaluated, and we believe the PCI for the Iowa/Idaho alley isn’t correct at 100 as it was not redone in 2023 like the section to the west way. 5. Prior Avenue Rehabilitation – 2029. The proposed 2029 CIP includes approximately $175,000 in total street costs for reclamation of Prior Avenue, which currently has a PCI of approximately 37. The proposed treatment reflects the poor pavement condition and the City's objective of addressing streets before further deterioration results in substantially greater rehabilitation or reconstruction costs. ## 6. Ramsey County Coordination – 2028–2030. The CIP includes approximately $685,000 in anticipated local costs associated with ## potential Ramsey County improvements to Larpenteur Avenue. Ramsey County has programmed anticipated Falcon Heights participation of approximately $50,000 in 2028, $100,000 in 2029, and $535,000 in 2030. ## The City monitors Ramsey County's five-year Transportation Improvement Program annually and incorporates anticipated local participation into its long-term capital planning when County projects may affect the City. 7. Roselawn Avenue Rehabilitation – 2031. The proposed 2031 CIP includes approximately $345,000 for reclamation of Roselawn Avenue ## from Fairview Avenue to Fulham Street. Staff anticipates coordinating this project with the City of Roseville to improve project efficiency and share costs where practical. 8. Preventative Maintenance. Beginning in 2027, the CIP proposes $50,000 every other year for a contractor-performed crack sealing program. Staff anticipates initially targeting streets approximately three to five years following major pavement improvements and subsequently performing crack sealing based on pavement condition and need. The program is intended to preserve recently improved pavement and extend its useful service life. The City reintroduced an active crack sealing program in 2025 as part of its broader pavement preservation strategy. Additional preventative treatments such as chip seal and spray on rejuvenators are also being evaluated. Staff is particularly seeking Council feedback on the proposed Northome alley rehabilitation (including the three alleyway segments not identified in the draft), including whether the project should remain in the 2027 program given the recent 2025 street improvement project and the anticipated assessment burden to affected property owners. ## Budget Impact The proposed 2027–2031 Pavement Management Plan identifies approximately $1.695 million in anticipated transportation capital needs. Project costs include contingencies but will be refined as projects advance through design and annual budget development. The Five-Year CIP will be reviewed and updated annually based on available funding, pavement conditions, project coordination opportunities, construction costs, and other City priorities. ## Attachment(s) ## Draft 2026 PMP ## Action(s) ## Requested Review the 2026 Draft Pavement Management Plan and proposed 2027–2031 Pavement Capital Improvement Program and provide staff with direction regarding project priorities and timing, with particular consideration given to the proposed 2027 Northome Neighborhood alley rehabilitation project. i ## 2026 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN ## CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA ii ## PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN ## CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA August 2026 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. ## __________________________P.E. 8/26/2026 ## Erik Henricksen Date ## License Number 59414 ## City of Falcon Heights ## 2077 Larpenteur Ave W ## Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Phone: 651-792-7600 iii ## TABLE OF CONTENTS ## Contents I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 4 II. PURPOSE OF THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................................................... 4 III. PAVEMENT INVENTORY ............................................................................................................................ 5 IV. PAVEMENT CONDITION ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................... 5 V. PAVEMENT CONDITION RATING METHODOLOGY .............................................................................. 6 VI. EXISTING PAVEMENT CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................ 6 VII. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PHILOSPHY .............................................................................................. 7 VIII. MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION STRATEGIES ..................................................................... 8 IX. PROJECT SELECTION METHODOLOGY................................................................................................... 9 X. FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM................................................................................ 10 XI. LONG-TERM FUNDING STRATEGY ........................................................................................................ 11 XII. RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 11 4 ## I. INTRODUCTION The City of Falcon Heights maintains approximately 14.1 miles of municipal streets and alleyways that serve residents, businesses, schools, parks, and emergency services throughout the community. The City's street system represents one of its most valuable public infrastructure assets, requiring ongoing investment to preserve its condition, extend its useful life, and provide safe and reliable transportation for all users. The 2026 Pavement Management Plan (PMP) provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the condition of the City's pavement network, identifying maintenance and rehabilitation needs, and prioritizing future capital investments. The plan serves as a decision- making tool that assists City staff and elected officials in developing annual maintenance programs and the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The City's pavement management program is founded on the principle of preserving existing infrastructure through timely maintenance and rehabilitation. Applying the appropriate treatment at the appropriate time maximizes the service life of each street while minimizing long-term lifecycle costs. By investing in preventive maintenance strategies and timely rehabilitations before pavement deterioration accelerates, the City can reduce the need for costly reconstruction and maintain a higher overall level of service across the transportation network. The recommendations contained within this plan are based on pavement condition data, engineering judgment, maintenance history, coordination with utility improvements and other public infrastructure projects, available funding, and the City's long-term capital planning objectives. While pavement condition is an important factor, project selection also considers opportunities to coordinate construction activities and maximize the value of public investment. This PMP will continue to be updated periodically as pavement conditions are reassessed and additional information becomes available. Regular updates allow the City to monitor pavement performance, evaluate the effectiveness of maintenance strategies, and adjust future capital investments based on changing conditions and community needs. ## II. PURPOSE OF THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN The purpose of the PMP is to provide the City with a systematic and data-driven approach for preserving its street infrastructure while making efficient use of available financial resources. The plan serves as a long-term planning tool that assists the City in identifying future pavement needs, estimating capital expenditures, and developing the CIP. The foundation of the City's pavement management program is the principle of applying the right treatment, on the right street, at the right time. By identifying deterioration early and selecting the most appropriate maintenance or rehabilitation strategy, the City can maximize pavement service life, reduce long-term lifecycle costs, and delay the need for costly reconstruction. 5 While pavement conditions are a primary consideration in project planning, the City recognizes that successful asset management requires balancing multiple factors. Project selection considers pavement condition data, street age, maintenance history, available funding, coordination with surrounding jurisdiction’s transportation projects, opportunities to coordinate with utility improvements, and engineering judgment. Together, these factors allow the City to prioritize projects that provide the greatest long-term value to the community. The PMP is intended to remain a living document that is updated as pavement conditions change, infrastructure improvements are completed, and future capital needs are identified. ## III. PAVEMENT INVENTORY The City of Falcon Heights owns and maintains approximately 14.1 centerline miles of public streets and alleyways. The municipal street network consists primarily of local residential streets that provide access to homes, parks, schools, and community facilities. In addition to the street system, the City maintains three municipal parking lots serving City Hall, Community Park, and Curtis Field Park. The City's street network includes approximately 12.2 miles of local and collector streets and 1.9 miles of alleyways, divided into 133 pavement segments for pavement management purposes. Segmentation allows each street section to be evaluated independently based on pavement condition, maintenance history, and rehabilitation needs. The City's street system consists almost entirely of bituminous (asphalt) pavement, except for one short concrete alley segment approximately 350 feet in length. This relatively uniform pavement structure allows the City to apply consistent maintenance and rehabilitation strategies throughout the network. The pavement management inventory includes only City-owned and maintained streets, alleyways, and municipal parking lots. Streets owned and maintained by Ramsey County are excluded from the inventory, although planned County transportation improvements are considered during the City's capital improvement planning process to maximize coordination opportunities, minimize construction impacts, and anticipate cost-share needs with the County. ## IV. PAVEMENT CONDITION ASSESSMENT The City evaluates pavement conditions through comprehensive pavement condition surveys performed every three years by GoodPointe Technology. These surveys provide a consistent and objective assessment of the City's pavements and establishes the foundation for long-term pavement management planning. During each assessment, trained pavement inspectors perform detailed field evaluations by walking every City-owned street and alleyway. Each pavement segment is inspected for surface distresses, including cracking, rutting, raveling, patching, utility cuts, settlement, and other signs of deterioration. The type, severity, and extent of each distress are documented and used to calculate the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for every segment. 6 Between formal pavement surveys, City staff continually monitor pavement conditions during routine public works operations. These observations provide valuable information regarding pavement performance, emerging maintenance needs, and changing street conditions between survey cycles. This combination of periodic comprehensive assessments and ongoing field observations provides the City with a reliable understanding of its pavement network and supports informed decision-making for future maintenance and capital improvements. ## V. PAVEMENT CONDITION RATING METHODOLOGY The City uses the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) as the primary measure of pavement condition. The PCI, originally developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the 1970s and later standardized in ASTM D5340, is a nationally recognized engineering methodology that evaluates pavement surface condition on a numerical scale from 0 to 100, where a value of 100 represents new pavement in excellent condition and 0 represents pavement that has reached the end of its service life. PCI values are determined by evaluating the type, severity, and quantity of visible pavement distresses observed during the field survey. The resulting score provides a standardized method for documenting pavement conditions throughout the City's transportation network and tracking changes over time. For planning purposes, Falcon Heights’ pavement segments are grouped into the following condition categories: ## PCI Condition 100-86 Excellent 85-71 Good 70-56 Fair 55-40 Poor 39-0 Failed Appendix A illustrates the PCI of each segment of the pavement network as of 2025. While PCI is an important indicator of pavement condition, it is only one component of the City's pavement management process. Engineering judgment, pavement age, maintenance history, available funding, and opportunities to coordinate improvements with other agencies are also considered when determining the most appropriate maintenance or rehabilitation strategy. ## VI. EXISTING PAVEMENT CONDITIONS The most recent pavement condition survey was completed in 2025, resulting in a weighted average PCI of 85.9 for the City's street network. This represents a significant improvement over previous survey cycles and reflects the City's continued investment in pavement preservation, rehabilitation, and reconstruction. 7 Maintaining a high average network PCI is a key objective of the City's pavement management program. Falcon Heights has established a long-term goal of maintaining a citywide weighted average PCI of 75 or greater, recognizing that preserving pavement in good condition is substantially more cost-effective than allowing streets to deteriorate to the point where reconstruction becomes necessary. The historical weighted average PCI ratings for the City's pavement network can be seen below: ## Survey Year Average Weighted PCI 2016 76.9 2019 72.0 2022 69.0 2025 85.9 The substantial increase in average PCI between 2022 and 2025 reflects the City's recent capital investments and demonstrates the effectiveness of its pavement management strategy. Continuing to prioritize timely maintenance and rehabilitation will help preserve these improvements and maximize the long-term value of the City's transportation infrastructure. ## VII. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PHILOSPHY The City of Falcon Heights is committed to preserving its transportation infrastructure through proactive asset management. The objective of the pavement management program is to maximize the long-term performance of the City's street network while making efficient use of available public resources. Rather than allowing pavements to deteriorate until reconstruction becomes necessary, the City emphasizes timely maintenance and rehabilitation that preserve the underlying pavement structure and extend its useful life. This approach reduces lifecycle costs as preserving underlying pavement is less costly than reconstructions, minimizes disruption to residents, and allows available funding to improve a greater portion of the City's transportation network. This concept is best depicted by the National Park Service’s pavement preservation approach and seen below: 8 The City's pavement management philosophy is founded on applying the right treatment, on the right street, at the right time. While pavement condition is an important factor in determining appropriate improvements, treatment selection also considers pavement age, maintenance history, observed distress, available funding, coordination opportunities with Ramsey County and utility providers, and engineering judgment. By balancing these considerations, the City is able to prioritize investments that provide the greatest long-term benefit while maintaining a safe, reliable, and sustainable transportation system. ## VIII. MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION STRATEGIES ## Routine Maintenance (100-0 PCI) Routine maintenance consists of activities performed throughout the year to address localized pavement deficiencies and maintain safe road conditions. Typical activities include pothole patching, localized asphalt repairs, and catch basin and manhole adjustments. These activities preserve safety and help prevent localized deterioration from expanding into larger pavement failures. ## Preventive Maintenance (100-71 PCI) Preventive maintenance is performed on pavements that remain in generally good structural condition but are beginning to exhibit the first signs of minor deterioration. These treatments are the least expensive and most cost effective and are intended to reduce moisture infiltration, slow oxidation of the asphalt binder, and delay more costly rehabilitation. Preventive maintenance activities may include: • Crack sealing • Rejuvenators (under evaluation) • Chip Seal (under evaluation) The City reintroduced an active crack sealing program in 2025 and considers it an important component of preserving pavement performance. Crack sealing reduces moisture infiltration into the pavement structure, slows pavement deterioration, and helps extend the service life of streets between major rehabilitation activities. In 2016, the City suspended its chip seal program after widespread delamination issues were experienced throughout the metropolitan area, resulting in poor adhesion between the chip seal surface and the underlying pavement. City staff have continued to monitor industry research and guidance regarding these issues. While the Local Road Research Board (LRRB) has identified freeze-thaw cycles as a contributing factor to chip seal bond failure (Report No. 2020-34), no definitive construction or material practices have been identified to consistently eliminate the issue. As a result, chip sealing remains under evaluation and is not currently incorporated into the City's routine pavement preservation program. 9 The City is also evaluating emerging pavement preservation technologies, including spray-on pavement rejuvenators. Recent LRRB research (Report No. 2025-39) has shown promising results for restoring asphalt binder properties and slowing pavement oxidation. Staff will continue to monitor research findings and industry performance to determine whether rejuvenators should become part of the City's long-term pavement preservation strategy. ## Rehabilitation (85-40 PCI) When pavement deterioration progresses beyond the point where preventive maintenance alone is effective, rehabilitation treatments are used to restore pavement condition while preserving as much of the existing roadway structure as practical. Depending on pavement condition and engineering evaluation, rehabilitation strategies may include: • Mill and overlay • Full-depth mill and overlay • Localized full-depth pavement replacement • Associated curb and gutter replacement • Utility structure adjustments These improvements restore pavement condition, improve drainage, and extend pavement service life while avoiding the substantially higher cost of complete reconstruction where feasible. ## Major Rehabilitation and Reconstruction (55-0 PCI) For pavements that have reached the end of their structural service life, major rehabilitation or reconstruction may be the most effective long-term solution. Depending on existing pavement conditions, this may include full-depth reclamation, complete pavement reconstruction, or other structural improvements necessary to restore the street. Although these treatments represent the largest capital investment, they establish a new pavement lifecycle that can subsequently be preserved through routine and preventive maintenance activities. ## IX. PROJECT SELECTION METHODOLOGY The Pavement Management Plan provides a framework for identifying future capital improvements; however, project selection is not based solely on pavement condition. The PCI ranges noted in Section VI. above are simply a starting point to anticipate the maintenance and rehabilitation needs. The City evaluates a variety of engineering, operational, and financial considerations when ## developing the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program. These considerations include: ## • Pavement Condition Index (PCI) • Pavement age and maintenance history • Type and severity of pavement distress 10 • Available annual funding ## • Coordination with Ramsey County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) • Coordination with utility improvements • Opportunities to maximize construction efficiencies with neighboring cities • Engineering judgment Using these factors collectively allows the City to develop projects that maximize the long-term value of public investment while minimizing disruption to residents and coordinating improvements whenever practical. The Five-Year Capital Improvement Program, outlined in Section X. below, is reviewed annually and adjusted as pavement conditions, funding availability, and coordination opportunities change. ## X. FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Pavement Management Plan serves as the foundation for the City's Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for transportation infrastructure. The CIP identifies anticipated pavement preservation and rehabilitation projects while balancing available funding, infrastructure needs, and opportunities for coordination with outside agencies. Rather than following a fixed annual expenditure, Falcon Heights develops its pavement program based on the needs of the street network. This approach allows the City to concentrate available funding on projects that provide the greatest long-term benefit while maintaining flexibility to respond to changing pavement conditions and coordination opportunities. Historically, the City has completed major pavement improvement projects approximately every other year. Projects frequently include multiple street segments and may be coordinated with neighboring communities, Ramsey County, or utility providers when opportunities exist to improve efficiency and reduce overall project costs. Preventive maintenance activities, including crack sealing, are incorporated into the CIP as an essential component of preserving recently improved pavements. Beginning in 2027, the City anticipates budgeting approximately $50,000 every other year for a contractor-performed crack sealing program targeting streets approximately three to five years after rehabilitation, with additional applications performed as warranted by pavement condition. Municipal parking lots are also evaluated as part of the pavement management program and are incorporated into the CIP as needed. Recent investments include the mill and overlay of the Curtis Field parking lot in 2025 and the reconstruction of the Community Park parking lot in 2026. Future preventive maintenance is planned for the City Hall parking lot as part of the 2027 crack sealing program. The table below summarizes the anticipated pavement preservation and rehabilitation activities included in the 2027-2031 CIP. Appendix B illustrates these projects areas in Falcon Heights. 11 ## 5-Year Capital Improvement Program ## Estimated Costs ## Year ## Crack ## Sealing Mill and ## Overlay ## Reclaim ## Ramsey ## County TIP ## Total Cost 2027 $50,000 $340,000.00 $390,000.00 2028 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 2029 $50,000 $175,000.00 $100,000.00 $325,000.00 2030 $535,000.00 $535,000.00 2031 $50,000 $345,000.00 $395,000.00 ## XI. LONG-TERM FUNDING STRATEGY Maintaining the City's transportation infrastructure requires long-term investment in preservation and rehabilitation activities. Delaying maintenance often results in accelerated pavement deterioration and substantially higher future capital costs. Falcon Heights' pavement management strategy emphasizes preserving existing infrastructure before significant structural deterioration occurs. By investing in routine maintenance, crack sealing, rehabilitation, and timely major rehabilitation when warranted, the City can maximize the useful life of its pavement assets while reducing lifecycle costs. The Pavement Management Plan provides a framework for forecasting future capital needs; however, annual funding levels will continue to be evaluated through the City's budget process and adjusted to reflect changing pavement conditions, construction costs, available funding sources, and coordination opportunities. This flexible funding approach allows the City to respond to changing infrastructure needs while continuing to pursue its long-term objective of maintaining a high-quality transportation network. ## XII. RECOMMENDATIONS To continue the success of the City's pavement management program, the following practices are recommended: 1. Continue completing comprehensive pavement condition surveys every three years. 2. Continue monitoring pavement conditions throughout the year during routine public works operations. 3. Continue routine maintenance operations such as pothole patching and localized pavement repairs. 4. Maintain the City's proactive crack sealing program and evaluate additional pavement preservation techniques as research and industry experience continue to evolve. 5. Continue prioritizing rehabilitation before major structural deterioration occurs to maximize pavement service life and minimize lifecycle costs. 12 6. Coordinate pavement improvements with Ramsey County, Roseville, Lauderdale, St. Paul, St. Paul Regional Water Services, and other utility providers whenever practical. 7. Review and update the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program annually to reflect current needs, funding availability, and coordination opportunities. 8. Continue managing the transportation system with the objective of maintaining a citywide weighted average PCI of 75 or greater while applying the right treatment to the right street at the right time. 13 ## APPENDIX A ## 2025 CITY WIDE PCI RATINGS ## Community ## Park ## Curtis ## Field ## Grove ## Park ## University of Minnesota ## Golf Course ## LARPENTEUR AVE W ## INTERCAMPUS TRANSIT W ## CLEVELAND AVE N ## ARONA ST ## UNDERWOOD ST N ## GORTNER AVE ## COMMONWEALTH AVE ## FRY ST ## SNELLING AVE N ## SNELLING AVE N ## LINDIG ST ## COSGROVE ST N ## BUFORD PL ## SNELLING AVE N ## CLEVELAND AVE N ## CLEVELAND AVE N ## SNELLING DR ## DAN ELMER WAY ## FIELD AVE ## FAIRVIEW AVE ## COFFMAN ST ## FOLWELL AVE ## ECKLES AVE ## DAN PATCH AVE ## CRAWFORD AVE ## SAINT MARYS ST ## MOORE ST ## LEE AVE ## STEVENS ST N ## BUFORD CIR ## MAPLE CT ## LIGGETT ST N ## AUTUMN ST ## FITCH AVE ## LINDIG AVE ## CLOUGH ST N ## QUESTWOOD DR ## FORD ST ## FIFIELD PL ## BURTON ST ## VINCENT ST ## MAPLE KNOLL DR ## HOLLYWOOD CT ## COSGROVE ST ## CARTER ## AVE N ## SNELLING AVE N ## CALIFORNIA AVE W ## MURPHY AVE ## PRIOR AVE N ## BOYD AVE ## GARDEN AVE ## HENDON AVE ## SUMMER ST ## SHELDON ST ## CARTER AVE ## FOLWELL AVE ## FIFIELD ST ## ALBERT ST N ## PRIOR AVE N ## HOWELL ST N ## TATUM ST ## FAIRVIEW AVE N ## UPPER ## BUFORD CIR ## BUFORD AVE ## RANDALL AVE W ## MINNESOTA AVE W ## NELSON ST N ## JUDSON AVE W ## LARPENTEUR AVE W ## COOPER ST N ## UNDERWOOD ST N ## WRIGHT AVE W ## RANDALL AVE W ## HOYT AVE W ## GARDEN AVE ## GARDEN ## AVE ## GARDEN AVE ## ASBURY ST ## SIMPSON ST ## RUGGLES ST ## PASCAL ST N ## HOLTON ST ## ALBERT ST N ## HOLTON ST ## ARONA ST ## ALBERT ST N ## PASCAL ST N ## IDAHO AVE W ## IDAHO AVE W ## HOYT AVE W ## HOYT AVE W ## IOWA AVE W ## IOWA AVE W ## HAMLINE AVE N ## ROSELAWN AVE W ## LARPENTEUR AVE W ## LARPENTEUR AVE W ## MAPLE CT ## ROSELAWN AVE W ## HAMLINE AVE N ## JUDSON AVE W ## KNAPP ST ## GIBBS AVE ## FIFIELD AVE ## COMMONWEALTH AVE ## GORTNER AVE ## BUFORD AVE ## BUFORD CIR ## DUDLEY AVE ## ROSELAWN AVE W ## FULHAM ST ## NORTHROP AVE ## COFFMAN ST ## FULHAM ST ## HOYT AVE W ## FOLWELL AVE 94 90 96 97 93 92 95 100 99 86 73 79 89 91 91 71 83 24 30 60 21 27 74 51 98 69 54 49 81 37 33 80 85 61 26 42 84 84 65 48 48 16 39 88 88 64 38 35 77 72 63 82 100 93 100 79 98 100 100 89 93 69 100 91 83 100 89 91 95 100 100 91 100 93 92 94 91 100 90 94 100 100 95 91 100 100 100 98 100 93 98 89 95 37 100 100 100 93 90 100 100 96 91 100 94 93 100 93 90 92 100 100 100 100 54 98 90 100 81 100 89 94 94 99 94 91 96 100 98 71 94 83 83 100 100 99 94 93 97 100 94 100 100 91 97 97 95 100 100 100 89 93 92 100 100 100 86 96 89 24 030070010001000 ## Feet 2025PCIRatings ## L Prepared by: ## City of Roseville Engineering Department 8/27/2025 ## 2025 PCI Ratings ## DISCLAIMER: This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 651-792-7075. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. ## Data Sources and Contacts: ## * Ramsey County GIS Base Map (8/26/25) ## * City of Roseville Engineering Department For further information regarding the contents of this map contact: ## City of Roseville, Engineering Department, ## 2660 Civic Center Drive, Roseville MN 71-100 51-70 21-50 1-20 14 ## APPENDIX B ## 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ## LARPENTEUR AVE W ## INTERCAMPUS TRANSIT W ## CLEVELAND AVE N ## ARONA ST ## UNDERWOOD ST N ## GORTNER AVE ## COMMONWEALTH AVE ## FRY ST ## SNELLING AVE N ## SNELLING AVE N ## LINDIG ST ## COSGROVE ST N ## BUFORD PL ## SNELLING AVE N ## CLEVELAND AVE N ## CLEVELAND AVE N ## SNELLING DR ## DAN ELMER WAY ## FIELD AVE ## FAIRVIEW AVE ## COFFMAN ST ## FOLWELL AVE ## ECKLES AVE ## DAN PATCH AVE ## CRAWFORD AVE ## SAINT MARYS ST ## MOORE ST ## LEE AVE ## STEVENS ST N ## BUFORD CIR ## MAPLE CT ## LIGGETT ST N ## AUTUMN ST ## FITCH AVE ## LINDIG AVE ## CLOUGH ST N ## QUESTWOOD DR ## FORD ST ## FIFIELD PL ## BURTON ST ## VINCENT ST ## MAPLE KNOLL DR ## HOLLYWOOD CT ## COSGROVE ST ## CARTER ## AVE N ## SNELLING AVE N ## CALIFORNIA AVE W ## MURPHY AVE ## PRIOR AVE N ## BOYD AVE ## GARDEN AVE ## HENDON AVE ## SUMMER ST ## SHELDON ST ## CARTER AVE ## FOLWELL AVE ## FIFIELD ST ## ALBERT ST N ## PRIOR AVE N ## HOWELL ST N ## TATUM ST ## FAIRVIEW AVE N ## UPPER ## BUFORD CIR ## BUFORD AVE ## RANDALL AVE W ## MINNESOTA AVE W ## NELSON ST N ## JUDSON AVE W ## LARPENTEUR AVE W ## COOPER ST N ## UNDERWOOD ST N ## WRIGHT AVE W ## RANDALL AVE W ## HOYT AVE W ## GARDEN AVE ## GARDEN ## AVE ## GARDEN AVE ## ASBURY ST ## SIMPSON ST ## RUGGLES ST ## PASCAL ST N ## HOLTON ST ## ALBERT ST N ## HOLTON ST ## ARONA ST ## ALBERT ST N ## PASCAL ST N ## IDAHO AVE W ## IDAHO AVE W ## HOYT AVE W ## HOYT AVE W ## IOWA AVE W ## IOWA AVE W ## HAMLINE AVE N ## ROSELAWN AVE W ## LARPENTEUR AVE W ## LARPENTEUR AVE W ## MAPLE CT ## ROSELAWN AVE W ## HAMLINE AVE N ## JUDSON AVE W ## KNAPP ST ## GIBBS AVE ## FIFIELD AVE ## COMMONWEALTH AVE ## GORTNER AVE ## BUFORD AVE ## BUFORD CIR ## DUDLEY AVE ## ROSELAWN AVE W ## FULHAM ST ## NORTHROP AVE ## COFFMAN ST ## FULHAM ST ## HOYT AVE W ## FOLWELL AVE 030070010001000 ## Feet 5YearCIP2027 ## L Prepared by: ## City of Roseville Engineering Department 7/22/2026 5-year CIP (2027-2031) ## Disclaimer: The maps provided by the City of Roseville are compilations of records, information and data from various sources, and they are to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant or guarantee that the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data or maps are complete, current, or accurate. The data is offered “as is” and the City of Roseville does not represent that the GIS data can be used or is accurate for legal, navigational, or any purposes requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 466.03, Subdivision 21, the City of Roseville disclaims any liability for claims based on alleged or actual inaccuracies in the GIS data or maps. For more information, please contact 651-792-7044. ## Data Sources: ## * Ramsey County GIS (4/26/2026) ## * City of Roseville Engineering Department 2027 Reconstruction 2028 County 2029 Reclaim 2031 Reclaim ## 2027 Crack Seal ## 2029 Crack Seal ## 2031 Crack Seal ## 2027 Parking Lot Crack Seal ## 2029 Parking Lot Crack Seal ## BLANK PAGE ## REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ## City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota __________________________ ## Item ## Budget Workshop #2: 2027 Preliminary Capital Project Funds Budget ## Description Staff will present the preliminary capital project funds plan. ## 2027 Preliminary Capital Plan The following are the highlights of the 2027 Capital Plan: ## • General Capital Improvements: o Minimal general expected expenditures – Computer replacement schedule and software licenses o 2 in 1 Tablets/Laptops for Mayor and Councilmembers - $20,000  This is a continued capital item for 2025 & 2026($10,000 each year, unspent) as an initiative to reduce packet printing, as well as a security measure to transition council from using their own devices for city business to moving to managed devices ## • Parks/Recreation/Public Facilities Improvements: ## o Prairie Site/Land Prep for Community Park - $25,000 o Park Signs - $15,000 o Rooftop Furnace & A/C - $20,000 o Water Heater for City Hall - $10,000 o Drinking Fountain and water line installation for Curtiss Field - $15,000 o 2 Zero-Turn Mowers - $35,000 (sale of old equipment ~ $6,000) o Stump Grinder - $11,000 ## o 1407 Larpenteur Avenue: TBD • Infrastructure (outside of PMP): o Monument Signs: Lighting and Planting - $10,500 ## • Fairway Commons - TBD ## • Les Bolstad Consultant – TBD o Money was transferred from capital in 2026 to the project fund as a start- up. Since that time, the City received notice of $100,000 from the Met Council in small area planning costs that will likely cover expenses in 2026 & 2027. ## Budget Impact ## TBD ## Attachment(s) ## Capital Budget Summary ## Action(s) ## Requested No action required at this time. ## Meeting Date August 26, 2026 ## Agenda Item Policy 1.b ## Attachment ## Capital Budget Summary ## Submitted By ## Jack Linehan, City Administrator ## ACCOUNTACTUALACTUALBUDGETESTIMATEDBUDGET ## NUMBERACCOUNT TITLE20242025202620262027 ## REVENUES: ## 401GENERAL CAPITAL 32,54730,44914,50025,50017,500 ## 402PUBLIC SAFETY CAPITAL 1,208646300350300 ## 403PARKS/REC./PUBLIC FACILITIES CAPITAL170,852155,14730,000108,83346,000 ## 414TIF DISTRICT #1-3 IMPROVEMENTS386,522170,585230,500232,000215,500 ## 415TIF DISTRICT #1-4 IMPROVEMENTS276,37547,88945,10045,30045,100 ## 419INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS399,167383,550327,222335,494477,189 ## 424FALCON WOODS0628,71020012,0000 ## 4262021 STREET PROJECT9,6077,4201,0001,5000 ## 428AMBER UNION2,4020000 ## 4292023 STREET PROJECT/GARDEN AVE16,0722,807000 ## 430FAIRWAY COMMONS000496,8380 ## 432UMN LES BOLSTAD GOLF COURSE REDEVELOPMENT00200800200 ## TOTAL REVENUES1,294,7541,427,204649,0221,258,614801,789 ## OTHER FINANCING SOURCES ## 39130BOND PROCEEDS01,005,411000 ## 39140INDURANCE & BONDS99,5940000 ## 39101PROCEEDS FROM SALE OF CAPITAL ASSETS00000 ## 39200TRANSFERS1,698,543265,00040,000365,0000 ## 39210BOND PROCEEDS01,044,680000 ## TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES1,798,1362,315,09140,000365,0000 ## TOTAL REVENUES & ## OTHER FINANCING SOURCES3,092,8903,742,295689,0221,623,614801,789 ## EXPENDITURES: ## -401GENERAL CAPITAL 17,70656,38815,85015,82432,350 ## -402PUBLIC SAFETY CAPITAL 5,2088,9128501,7241,350 ## -403PARKS/REC./PUBLIC FACILITIES CAPITAL215,4801,301,5161,669,9661,662,173331,850 ## -414TIF DISTRICT #1-3 IMPROVEMENTS375,910161,295237,850237,000222,850 ## -415TIF DISTRICT #1-4 IMPROVEMENTS264,27348,99845,85045,82446,350 ## -419INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS455,67661,24460,85061,864480,465 ## -424FALCON WOODS01,271,73696,05025,8240 ## -4262021 STREET PROJECT3,90869,699000 ## -428AMBER UNION7480000 ## -4292023 STREET PROJECT/GARDEN AVE30,8870000 ## -430FAIRWAY COMMONS000442,8570 ## -432UMN LES BOLSTAD GOLF COURSE REDEVELOPMENT0075,85075,8500 ## TOTAL EXPENDITURES1,369,7962,979,7882,203,1162,568,9401,115,215 ## OTHER FINANCING USES ## 97000TRANSFERS348,543574,640000 ## TOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES348,543574,640000 ## TOTAL EXPENDITURES & ## OTHER FINANCING USES1,718,3383,554,4282,203,1162,568,9401,115,215 ## FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 12,952,1124,326,6644,514,5314,514,5313,569,205 ## CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE1,374,552187,867(1,514,094)(945,326)(313,426) ## FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 314,326,6644,514,5313,000,4373,569,2053,255,779 ## TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS ## ACCOUNTACTUALACTUALBUDGETESTIMATEDBUDGET ## NUMBERACCOUNT TITLE20242025202620262027 ## EXPENDITURES: ## OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES ## 80100ENGINEERING SERVICES38,408104,48920,00020,10010,000 ## 80200LEGAL SERVICES0002,2000 ## 80310AUDIT5,9836,4806,8005,7945,100 ## 80400DEED GRANT000441,8370 ## 80500MET COUNCIL TBRA00000 ## 81900OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES13,8387,96865,00066,0205,500 ## 81910CONSULTING-STREETSCAPE00000 ## 82000TIF LOAN500000 ## 83010PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT06,131000 ## 89000MISCELLANEOUS7476,7492,2003,0412,000 ## 89001MN ST AID CRRSAA FUNDS00000 ## 89100PARK APPRAISALS00000 ## TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES59,026131,81694,000538,99222,600 ## CAPITAL OUTLAY ## 90100FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT16,95852,07815,00015,00031,500 ## 91000MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT48,62233,484334,116335,016276,500 ## 91100POLICE OFFICE RENOVATION07,328000 ## 91500COMMUNITY PARK LAND/BUILDING166,1101,099,5981,000,0001,000,00040,000 ## 91550CURTISS FIELD0010,000015,000 ## 91650ROOF SOLAR PANELS0124,871000 ## 91800DNR GRANT EXP00325,000323,9920 ## 91900POLICE SQUAD00000 ## 92000OTHER IMPROVEMENTS010,57510,00010,0001,000 ## 92005SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT3,0421,15410,00010,0002,000 ## 92007CURB IMPROVEMENT00000 ## 92008CITY MONUMENTS21,5181,44040,00040,00010,500 ## 92009GAZEBO MONUMENT02,873000 ## 92022SIDEWALK PANELS00000 ## 92030STREET ALLEY PAVEMENT MGMT00000 ## 92035PARKING LOT- TESTING19,9417,58405040 ## 92056LARPENTEUR MEDIAN00000 ## 92060CRACK SEALING07,3300050,000 ## 92070SEAL COATING00000 ## 920862025 STREET PROJECT4,2804,437000 ## 92087LES BOLSTAD GOLF COURSE00000 ## 92088CHELSEA HEIGHTS0009566,115 ## 920982027 STREET PROJECT0000340,000 ## 924002021 STREET PROJECT01,211,84490,00020,0000 ## 924502023 STREET PROJECT11,0020000 ## 92460GARDEN SIDEWALK14,5530000 ## 92470IDAHO AVE ALLEY1,0920000 ## 92500LARPENTEUR STREET LIGHTS357,971003410 ## 92600ROSELAWN M&O 2024108,0510000 ## 93000DEBT PAY AS YOU GO PYMT537,630197,961275,000275,000260,000 ## 94900BOND FEES085,415000 ## CAPITAL OUTLAY1,310,7702,847,9712,109,1162,029,9481,092,615 ## TOTAL EXPENDITURES1,369,7962,979,7882,203,1162,568,9401,115,215 ## OTHER FINANCING USES ## 97000TRANSFERS348,543574,640000 ## TOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES348,543574,640000 ## TOTAL EXPENDITURES & ## OTHER FINANCING USES1,718,3383,554,4282,203,1162,568,9401,115,215 ## TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND EXPENDITURES BY LINE ITEM