North St. Paul City Council — Transcript
Saturday, March 15, 2025
Southwood Nature Preserve Management and Funding
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Review and Prioritization
Code of Conduct Review
Park Hours Policy
Park Policy Updates
Public Works Updates and HGA Open Houses
Votes (4)
Southwood Nature Preserve Management and Funding
David (Citizen) initiated a passionate discussion about the decline of Southwood Nature Preserve due to aging volunteers and lack of funding. He detailed various methods for invasive species removal (Buckthorn, Japanese knotweed), highlighting both traditional pulling/cutting and newly discovered effective methods for knotweed. Concerns were raised about the need for repair or replacement of the metal bridge and observation deck, as well as the need for general maintenance to address high trees and wood chip trails. The public's use of the park, especially for those with mobility issues, was emphasized. Commissioner Lloyd Grotek acknowledged the issues, noting difficulties with the Southwood Task Force and city ordinance restrictions for solutions like using goats. The topic of turtle crossings was also raised, with proposals for infrastructure changes rather than just signage.
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Review and Prioritization
The commission engaged in a structured discussion to review and reprioritize the city's 10-year Capital Improvement Plan for parks. Commissioners provided individual 'wish lists' with rough cost estimates for parks under their liaison. Key themes included the need for playgrounds catering to older children (as highlighted by Sue Springborn and Laura Greenley Karp), repurposing underutilized spaces (Ben Hansen's proposal for Casey Lake's ball field), and addressing critical infrastructure like bridges and observation decks (David's recommendations for Southwood). The master planning efforts for McKnight Fields and downtown parks were acknowledged as significant ongoing investments. The discussion aimed to provide City Council with commission priorities for future budget planning.
Code of Conduct Review
Riley (Staff) led a review of the commission's Code of Conduct, an older document that outlines expectations for respectful, integral, and communicative behavior among commissioners, staff, and the public. The review served as a refresher, with Riley emphasizing the value of diverse perspectives while stressing the need for mutual respect. No formal votes or actions were taken, but an annual review was recommended to ensure ongoing awareness, especially with new commission members.
Public Works Updates and HGA Open Houses
Sarah (Staff) provided an update from Public Works, announcing the completion of a comprehensive park inventory detailing existing amenities like benches, picnic tables, and grills, along with their condition. This data will be digitized for future reference. Additionally, information regarding upcoming open houses with HGA for park planning was shared. Commissioners were reminded of the need to attend specific dates to ensure a quorum for public engagement, highlighting the importance of commission representation.
Notable Quotes (12)
I'm not in favor of using poison I'm in favor of pulling the stuff rather than the poison because that's the beginning of St Paul's water supply going through there
we were the first city in North St Paul to win the leap award because when we first started that Lloyd help we were uh Japanese not weed Dave was there and that a lot of hours but by cutting it and Hauling it out we were doing it uh without poisons so that's why the city won was the very first city in this in uh Minnesota to win the leap award
I would like to see some money put in there rather than leave it go dormant
Ramsey County will have the guys come out cut or whatever however method we want to do it and they're cheaper than uh the miracor
we just put the poison around the break the plant was gone that that following spring the reason why that is because the knotweed pushes the uh blew it up and at night it brings it back so it's it's pumping back and forth it's taking drawing the poison back
I think this should go towards the new plans that were looking at
Council asked us to put more information into this document about what we as a commission would like to focus on in an Ideal World so that as they are planning and reviewing the budget process they have an idea of how we want to allocate the fund balance that we have
it just seems like every time we've put in a new playground it's for little kids... maybe it would be worth it to take a playground as not all of a sudden but I mean as we're doing this consider that and make it a little more difficult for a little older child
my heart of hearts would like to see kids stay kids longer and if there isn't a place for a 10-year-old to play what's he going to do
Shore View's new playground that's across from their Community Center and they did this really amazing thing where they essentially created five different parks within one park and each pocket within the park was a different place structure geared towards... you could bring any age including adults to this playground and somebody everybody would have something to do
making it a place where you can sit in a park and talk with your friends but you can also um you know play on this playground or do this fun Ninja Warrior course uh setup and so I I know it's not set up to be a destination Park like we don't have the parking for it... but I do think that we can make it like a destination park within uh like North St Paul
essentially what what the code of conduct is reviewing is uh it it spells out the respect Integrity quality communication esteem regard Behavior Uh that's what this document shows
Ordinances & Resolutions (7)
Award won by North St. Paul for its early efforts in non-poison invasive species removal at Southwood Nature Preserve.
A foundational document used for the Capital Improvement Plan discussion, outlining previous park project priorities.
A section within the meeting packet outlining budgeted amounts and funding sources for park improvements from 2024-2034.
An existing document for commissioners and staff, reviewed for its principles of respect, integrity, and communication.
Cited as a reason preventing the use of goats or electric fences within city limits for Buckthorn removal without a variance.
An agreement with the Department of Natural Resources dictating the placement and storage of turtle crossing signs by the city.
A policy undergoing staff-recommended updates, to be reviewed by the commission at a later date.