you would have to go into all the det I don't have a specific answer you'd have to go and look at the detail that W provided which is is a part of this attach to see if they have the boiler included or not

the funding that's been made available to us covers Us from zero to the first five years we have six years before we have to start we have six years we're able to plan for the next round of the $1.7 million that we talk to as a potential deficit

we could wait we could wait till year six and then increase something to the tune of 15% or we ratchet it up 2% so it does it so you're right but I think the planning process needs to start sooner than later

to me one of the parameters that it kind of says is that we have to find partners and that's what we've been trying to do and that's what we did with the RFI

the last line on here am I correct in that unless we sell the building that should be something we're planning for regardless of the outcome

a rule of thumb in the industry is that you should be putting one and a half to two and a half% of your replacement value away on an annual basis

but averaging 30 people for every single hour they're open seems to me high and unattainable for anything I've seen there

the problem is we didn't get that results when we went went out and advertised and and did that but I absolutely agree that yeah we need more information because a partnership is the only way this this this is actually going to work and have a a minimum impact on our residents

if the grant recipient does not repay any portion of the amount specified under that section 2.06 B within 30 days of Demand by either the state entity or the to by this either State entity or the budget then such amount May unless precluded by law be taken off or offset against any AIDS or any monies that the grant recipient is entitled to receive from the state of Minnesota

I clarify I was not comfortable with the 25 years you said we were comfortable oh sure so I st I wasn't okay just want to be on the record on that

the way in which I read this is actually to demo is more costly to us as a city if the Gap is 1.7 then a demo option A would be 3.1 million

there's two demo options the the first one was to demo everything except for the library which just just just because of how you would have to do that surgically right the cost goes way up so you would never do an option A

is option b if we could look at very similar to how the financials were put together with what could potentially be the highest liability can we look at what that would look like

what is the city council's goal Envision of the programming component that they want Within within this city council or within this community center and that has not become clear to staff

a potential friendly Amendment to the second to the last bullet point acceptance of this grant will increase acceptance of the grant may increase we don't know just to your point what it's going to be and the other bullet point that I would like to add is not accepting the grant causes of financial liability to the city as well anywhere from 1.3 to 4 whatever the dollar amount was million dollars we don't have an answer for those funds either

I'd encourage you to somehow come up with some ideas on your own of what you're really specifically looking for if anything I did notice Banquet Center in the draft RFP which startled me because I thought where did that come from