RecordingTranscript available157:49
Committee of the Board of Education Meeting - May 5, 2026
Saint Paul Public SchoolsTuesday, May 5, 2026
Watch on original sourceDocument Analysis
Analyze the transcript to extract topics, key quotes, people, and more — then generate focused stories for any topic.
Transcript
Most of you are already here. Um, it is 4:30, so good
afternoon and welcome to the May 5th, 2026 Committee
of the board meeting. The time is 4:30 p.m. If you
would like your name to be included in the meeting
notes, please sign in at the table near the door. This
meeting is also recorded and audio streamed. As a
note. That's not the note. As a note, the North Star
Policy action presentation on the cost of charter
schools for SPPS is planned to begin at 5:00 p.m.
and the American Indian Parent Advisory Committee
report is time serving for 6:00 p.m. We may need to
take a short break or pause a presentation to accommodate
the timing of these items. We will begin with introductions
for those at this table. Director Ward and Director
Carrillo will be absent from today's meeting. And
I will start. Erica Vallier, vice chair. Carl Franco
board treasurer, Brandon Lou, director. Sarah LG board
secretary Paula Anderson, director Katie Bergstrom
general counsel, Stacey Stanley, superintendent. Thank
you. Next, I move to, um, approve the agenda. Is there
a second, seconded by Director Lowe? Comments or discussion
All right. All those in favor, please indicate by
saying aye. Aye. Those opposed, please indicate by
saying nay. All right, motion passes. The agenda has
been approved. Next, we'll move on to the superintendent's
announcements and I will turn it over to Superintendent
Stanley. Thank you, Vice Chair. Um, so Saturday, we
had an amazing time at the Cinco de Mayo parade, um
I was just talking to Director Franco. I parked a
little bit away from where our float was, probably
about 2.5 miles, but, um, got my husband to walk really
really fast, and then we actually found somebody to
like. So first, um, it was fantastic. Oh my God, there
were so many people there. Kids were excited. Our
float was absolutely amazing. Shout out to the Office
of Family Engagement. Um, there was nothing like having
35 kids on the float, and they were so proud to be
there, but um, it was just what we needed, I believe
after Having a community under siege for so many months
and um also downstairs, if you did not come in the
front door, I'm going to encourage you when you go
down to go out in the front, it is Asian Pacific Islander
Hmong, and there are beautiful Hmong, um, artifacts
that are down there among um where, I mean they're
not artifacts because folks would use them today, um
and they're absolutely beautiful, so I encourage folks
to take a look at that. Thank you. All right. Thank
you. Are there any comments or questions? OK, I will
comment. The float was beautiful. I was looking for
a school bus and I saw the float, and I was like, What
And then my son was like, what? It, it's all, it was
fun. It was a lot of fun. All right, next we'll move
on to the 2025, 2026 Gender and Sexual diversity Parent
Advisory Council, GSD PAC board update presentation
and I will turn it over again to Superintendent Stanley
Thank you very much, Vice Chair. Um. Uh, Director
Dana Abrams is going to provide an overview of this
information, and I think it is important to have on
record that members of our GSPAC said that they want
to share information with us, but quite honestly, they
do not feel safe coming out publicly right now, and
I think that that um is a horrific statement in and
of itself, and, um, Director Abrams, I'm really grateful
that you are willing to come and share the information
on their behalf. Thank you. Thank you so much. uh
Vice Chairman Valiant members of the board, Superintendent
Stanley, and to my colleagues and community members
thank you for having me. Um, one of the things I'm
hoping to get, um, in the next few months is a more
in-depth report that is actually written by our members
One of the things I wanted to do today is to make
it kind of twofold, especially we have a new director
on board and so that we can start scheduling in the
future. Um, last September 9, 2025, we were here and
our board agreed that they would like to hear from
our parent advisory council. Um, as Superintendent
Stanley stated that there are some groups that wanna
present or have me present and or they submit something
in writing or board members can attend a PAC meeting
And so, looking forward into September. Um, we are
going to work with, um, Tai Ying and with Sarah on
getting on the schedule so we can start getting folks
on a regular basis. Um, one of the things, uh, Superintendent
mentioned, um, we kind of put a stall on things because
this past spring our Latino consentre PAC was supposed
to, uh, present, but due to safety concerns as mentioned
we weren't able to move forward with that. And so
uh, all of our packs are excited to know that they've
reached the level of the ear of our board and of our
superintendent, which that says a lot. So on a personal
level, I say thank you to you all for having that
ear and wanting to hear from our parents. Um, So, our
GSD pack or our Gender and Sexual diversity Pack is
our newest pack under the Office of Family Engagement
It initially started in our Office of Equity and through
staffing changes and the fact that all other PACs
were under the Office of Family Engagement, it became
a part of our group. Um, It was started because we
have students who are experiencing um a lot of things
in our schools, um, and we have parents who are wanting
to know how can they support their students. And so
we do have um a collective group. We have what we
call a community and we also have the actual member
Now I'm excited to hear for them to be able to share
their voice in their initial report. So I'm gonna
be very transparent. I am not speaking for them. I
am bringing awareness to the GSC PAC, um, because
they are newer. You've heard of all the other ones
But I wanted folks to know about them too. And again
they will uh be a part of the rotation as we start
bringing them regularly to our COP meeting. So Dana
is not speaking for them at this time. Again, more
so informing you all of what we have going on. Um
we were fortunate in that we had a team member who
graciously accepted to leave the work of the GSP PAC
Um, they meet monthly. Um, they have become, um, have
had a presence at different outreach opportunities
which is brand new because for about a year, once
they were in, we weren't, we didn't have a presence
We didn't even know how to become involved. So our
project coordinator who leads the work, worked really
closely with the members to make it happen. They had
the table, Saint Paul schools, GSD pack and we're
able to have a presence, presence at an outreach um
event, which is important because folks see those
tablecloths with those names on it and it's like a
Relief. I can go to, to a place where I'm accepted
where it's a part of my school district, makes parents
feel a lot more comfortable. Um, Going back to a little
bit of the history, the DSVPC had their first uh meeting
back in October of 2014. Um, it started, kind of lost
leadership, came back, and so we're going really strong
now, actively looking, um, or creating a space for
access for parents to come and join the group. Um
we have Roughly when you look at our high schools
because as we're entering graduation season, um, our
members, students who, um, Who will receive a rainbow
tassel. And when we look at our numbers, we were told
before it's roughly about 10% of the graduating class
will receive a tassel. What we further looked at is
that that number is actually higher. We're looking
at about 13% student population that our members are
rising sexual diversity community. So numbers are
rising. Um, they need to have a voice, they need to
have a stand. Um, and trust me, parents and, and folks
are wanting it. Um, we know we have a policy, we know
we have, um, we have support. I can tell you last
year, um, I attended the meeting right, right after
our administration changed in, uh, January. And you
know, some of the statements and the mean, cruel things
that were coming forward. Um, I attended the meeting
um, at the time, Doctor Tyne had put out a statement
Doctor Stanley wasn't here yet, and I attended the
meeting and assured the, the group that, hey, Just
because this came out of that office, it doesn't mean
that it's coming from Saint Paul's Schools, and we're
gonna continue to support you all and the students
and continue to move forward. I can tell you that
it meant so much to people. Um, after that, I received
a couple of emails from folks thanking us for taking
a stand and, and saying something publicly, um, meant
a whole lot to the community, a whole, whole lot. Um
Any questions? I feel like I'm talking fast and uh
I know that you all have. A sheet that has some of
the statistics that's on there, that are on there
Um, so numbers are real folks. These are our students
that must be included. For the 2526 school year, the
um the council created priority areas of focus for
their group. They're looking at membership and recruitment
They're looking at strengthening core responsibilities
And they're looking at strengthening collaborations
with other departments. One of the things in working
with them right now, they are very proud that they
created a pronoun poster. Right? And this is actually
an opportunity that I can get input from you all. They
created a a a um pronoun poster, and we have it in
English, and they also wanted it in Spanish and in
French to ensure that it was gonna go into the emerging
programs. One of the huge challenges right now is
the fact that the way in the Spanish language in order
to change the pronouns, changes the way The language
is taught. And so if and we have a parent that is
feels extremely strong about this and so this is where
I, I won't be the decision maker here. I look forward
to connecting with perhaps Doctor Yowsky along with
Doctor Sarah Smith Kotwa. Esperant to look at what
are we following, what are we obligated as a um learning
institution to put on the pronoun, um posters for
the Spanish language. Um. So we do have them in English
and I tell you my, the group is uh very firm in their
beliefs because they've asked right now that we hold
off on even sending the English ones out until we
can figure out the, the language piece for Spanish
So that is something that um They feel strongly about
I feel strongly about because to get the pronoun posters
out there is a big deal. It's a big deal. I've connected
with the um director Becky Schmidt, who has agreed
to allow posters to be in the nurse's office and hopefully
when I connect with administrators that it can also
be displayed in the school office. Um, They are very
proud of the work that um Saint Paul has done when
looking at inclusive restrooms. Um, they created their
bylaws and approved them during 2025, and we're gonna
continue to work with our REA department to figure
out Or to make sure that we're not missing any of
our students. And so, my ask today is that you open
your mind and be prepared for when our PAC groups
come and present or share information, or they make
a request for you to attend a PAC meeting. Um, it
is at that time, they'll do a more intensive report
to you, um, with data that they'd like to share, requests
they would like to have heard, um, and share the great
work that they are doing so much. I'm very proud of
my team that works directly, boots on the ground, right
with our families, and it shows. Um, but I also felt
compelled to bring the issue of the poster piece up
because that's a huge piece for us right now and to
know that they are working on real life things that
affect our students and can be a resource for them
So with that, I'm open for any questions you may have
All right. Any questions how much been doing on this
Well, oh yes, few questions just to say, you know
I think the GSD practice does really needed a wonderful
work. I had the pleasure of being able to be with
them a couple of times and find them to be Incredible
staff and parents and clearly advocating not just
for their own kids but for the whole school communities
right, when we understand and are um unified and our
education is equitable and happy inside but I, I really
appreciated there. Willingness not only to to think
about their own kids but our entire school. Thank
you. Well, I certainly look forward to um standing
beside whichever techs choose to come forward and
present in person and or reading their reports if
they would like to just share it in written format
So with that, I thank you for your time. Thank you
All right. Yes, um, do I need to announce roll call
that I'm here? You need to let people know I'm there
Allen has arrived, everyone. No, you know what, it
was in my head to say that and then as per usual, it
went this way something else came in. I was tired
Would you like to say your name since you're at the
table? Oh, I'm Director Alan, uh. All right. So, are
we ready for the OK. All right. Next we are gonna
move on to the analyzing the cost of charter schools
percentile public schools presentation, and I'm gonna
turn over to our partners at North Star Policy Action
Lovely. Well, hello everybody. Good afternoon. I am
Aaron Rosenthal. I am the research director for Northsota
Policy Action. Uh, we are a think tank dedicated to
improving the lives of working Minnesotans. I'm presenting
a report today, uh, co-authored with Doctor Hilary
Wething, who's an economist at the Economic Policy
Institute. I will also say I'm a graduate of Saint
Al's schools. What was Webster Elementary, uh, now
Brock and Michelle Service Learning, Ramsey Middle
School, now Hidden River, and, uh, Saint Paul Central
Thank you, um. Uh, and I apologize for my voice, uh
as I'm sure I need to tell nobody in this room, kids
bring home more than education with them. Uh, so my
13 month old has brought me a cold that I'll be battling
tonight as well. So, um, yeah, I'm here to present
this report, um, Uh. I just There we go. Oh, there
we go. Perfect. OK. Um, so just to walk back to the
sort of purpose, uh, for the study that I'm presenting
today. In September, we presented a proposal to the
board for a report on the fiscal relationship between
charter schools and Saint Paul public schools. Uh
in November, the board unanimously approved this report
I just wanna, uh, underline that this is a very narrow
report. We are focused exclusively on this fiscal
relationship between charter schools and district
schools. We're not looking at educational superiority
of one over the other, um. Whether one is better or
worse or how this financial relationship may be beneficial
or not. Uh, what we are looking at is this conventional
wisdom that money follows students, right? So, under
this conventional wisdom, if a student leaves one
school to go to another, the funding goes with that
student. Now, the former school has less revenue, but
also has one fewer student to educate, theoretically
creating a net zero cost for that former school. The
reality is actually a little bit more complicated
than that conventional wisdom. First, there's an indirect
cost that's created, which essentially uh sits with
the reality that schools do not shed costs as fast
as they lose students. And so, uh, when those costs
remain, certain costs remain with the former school
it creates an indirect cost for what we refer to in
the report as a fiscal externality. Second, there's
actually a direct cost between charter schools and
district schools, which is that charter schools bill
resident districts for certain services, especially
in special education. So our report in essence looks
at both of those kinds of costs and to do so we look
at the movement of students, so how students have
shifted between district and charter schools in Saint
Paul. The movement of those students is actually what
dictates what kind of indirect cost exists in Saint
Paul. So what does the movement of students mean for
these fiscal externalities that we're talking about
and then we look at the direct costs, these direct
bills that charter schools, uh, put onto, uh, Saint
Paul public schools. So to walk through those points
uh, what has the movement of students looked like
in Saint Paul? So, uh, the headline here is that charter
enrollment has really surged and district enrollment
has declined. So the dark bars there show you. The
decline in district enrollment over the last 25 years
or so. The light blue bars representing the growth
of charter school enrollment and then the yellow line
showing the share of total public school enrollment
in charter schools in Saint Paul. This is perhaps
best understood by just looking at the fact that in
2001, 2002, roughly 1 in 13 public school students
in Saint Paul were enrolled in a district in a charter
school. In 2022-2023, it was more than 1 in 3 students
So over this time charter enrollment has grown by
about 655. Students per year, uh, while, uh, while
district schools have lost about 630 students per
year and so this is the movement that we refer to
when we talk about a fiscal externality or an indirect
cost being placed onto district schools by charter
schools and I'll go into what that looks like more
in a second. Um, we also looked in this report and
I'll just talk about this very briefly, the populations
being served by district schools and charter schools
roughly the populations do look the same. Uh, the
biggest gap is in students receiving special education
services. A little bit more than 18% of districts
uh, students are receiving special education services
Whereas fewer than 13% in charter schools are receiving
those same services, so about a 45% greater share
in district schools that get special education services
compared to charter schools, but otherwise racially
economically, the student populations look quite similar
We then looked at where charter schools are located
in Saint Paul. Um, for the most part what we see is
that the neighborhoods in which charter schools are
located look like the rest of the city again, both
racially and economically. You'll also see a map here
that shows the locations of charter schools throughout
Saint Paul. Again, uh, you know, relatively wide distribution
through the city, notable neighborhoods that don't
have as much charter school, uh, don't have as many
charter school locations, uh, Battle Creek, for example
the McAllister Groveland neighborhood, Summit University
um, but there is wide distribution and again the neighborhoods
do look similar to what the city looks like. OK, so
now let's talk about the meat of the report, which
is this fiscal relationship. So the basis of the uh
fiscal externality is understanding that when a district
loses students, it loses revenue but doesn't shed
costs at the same pace and an easy way to understand
this is to think about school buses. So if a school
bus carries 20 students. And then one student leaves
it now carries 19 students, so the district that that
student was in has fewer resources, but if the bus
is making the same stops and running the same route
it costs the same amount of money to operate that
bus. So the school now has fewer resources but is
spending the same amount of money on that bus. So
that means basically the, the school in which that
bus is running has to provide a a larger share of
its funding to maintain the operation of that bus
That money has to come from somewhere else, perhaps
from a. Teaching budget or something of that nature
the same logic could be applied to heating a school
building, right? It costs roughly the same to do that
if you have 100 students in the building or 90 students
in the building. So those are what we're talking about
when we're talking about a fiscal externality, the
gap between the revenue lost and the costs that stay
the same. Now to actually apply this, we break down
the costs uh within Saint Paul Public schools or within
within uh education I should say into three different
categories, and this is based on a methodology that
was developed by Doctor Wething who's the co-author
of this report, um, so basically we, we utilize these
categories to look at what are different ways in which
school districts can adjust to lost enrollment. So
the first is instructional costs, teachers, classroom
staff, we assume that this is the easiest to adjust
in relation to lost enrollment, that it's easier to
bring down the number of teachers when students leave
so we uh assume not a 1 to 1 rate where you could
adjust perfectly for loss enrollment. But a 0.8 to
1% rate, meaning if 10% of students leave, we would
assume that instructional costs dropped by 8%, so
that 2% gap, that's the fiscal externality we're talking
about there. For service costs, things like clerical
and administrative staff, where there's more limited
staff numbers, we assume it will be more difficult
to bring down costs. So there we talk about a 0.2%
adjustment rate, so 10% decline in students, just
a 2% decline in administrative or in service costs
so that 8% gap in the fiscal externality. And then
for capital costs, uh, you know, maintenance facilities
things like that, we treat those as fully fixed in
the short run, which is to say if there's a 10% decline
in students, we assume capital costs remain the same
right? And that basically follows the logic that closing
a building right after students leave, uh, you know
if 10% of students leave is quite difficult. I should
note this just represents one year, right? And I'll
talk a little bit more about how we might think about
projecting these into the future, um, but this is
just what happens in the short run. What is an indirect
cost look like for one year. So we apply these two
numbers in Saint Paul Public Schools. We look at three
different scenarios for student enrollment declines
The first is a 1.7% decline in students. There we
go, uh, 1.7% decline in students. That is the historical
average. So since 2001, 2002, Saint Paul Public schools
have seen about 1.7% of students drop out into charter
schools. Um, if we take that scenario, the district
loses about $218 per remaining student or about $7.2
million total. If we look at what the post-pandemic
average has been for enrollment shift, 3.7%, that
would be $484 lost per remaining student or $15.6
million and then if we take the largest single year
decline, which was uh 2122, that would be a 4.2% shift
uh, $552 lost per remaining student or $17.7 million
total. So I said that I was gonna talk about this
is a one year drop, right? The totals above are not
necessarily anticipated losses that you could use
to project what it would look like next year, and
that reflects the fact that at the same time that
this enrollment decline is happening, districts are
trying to make changes to account for this, right
Buildings will be closed, for example, transportation
options may be consolidated to reflect enrollment
shifts. But at the same time you're doing that on
top of ongoing enrollment declines, so it makes bringing
this fiscal externality down to zero very, very difficult
It's why we don't try to project out into other years
but it's why it's also likely that these exist every
year, especially given the consistent decline in students
OK. And then direct costs, so, um, charter schools
like every school, uh, are required to serve special
education students when state and federal reimbursements
for those services do not fully cover their costs
charters bill 80% of the unreimbursed amount to a
student's resident district now. Uh, this can be for
things like special education instruction, specialized
transportation. Going back to 2020, uh, district schools
would get 2.6% of this back from the state. That increased
to 44% in 2024. From 27 forward, districts will get
50% of this cost back but will still absorb 50% of
the cost into their own budgets. So, can you? Yeah
to say that again. Like I just, I think I might need
to hear that again just to like let it like get the
numbers and the math going in my head in private schools
So, uh, yeah, I will repeat it. So charter schools
bill 80% of any unreimbursed amount for special education
services to the resident district school, the resident
district rather, right? So wherever those students
are coming from. 50% of that amount from 27 forward
will be reimbursed by the state and 50% will be absorbed
by the resident district providing services for students
who are not at their school. Or not in their district
I should say. So what do these costs look like? Uh
they've increased substantially over time. In 2023
2024, it was $13.6 million billed to Saint Paul Public
Schools. If we look since 2007, 2008, which is when
the data that I could find goes back to, uh, it's
been $125 million in nominal dollars. If we adjust
that for inflation, it's over $150 million since 2007
2008. Now you'll see that this is a trend line going
up. Most of that actually comes from just the increased
number of students, so on a per student cost. Uh, since
2011 or 2012, 2013, it's generally been between $7500
and $9200 billed per student receiving special education
services at charter schools in Saint Paul. For comparison
the state provides about $15,600 in funding for special
education services, so the district is providing a
little bit more than half of what the state provides
through these direct bills. So to conclude, uh, right
the top line is that charter schools are placing a
financial burden onto Saint Paul public schools through
both indirect and direct costs. A lot of this comes
from, especially in the indirect costs from student
movement. Uh, the average annual increase in Saint
Paul resident students enrolling into charter schools
has been 450 students per year. That has created this
indirect cost which we estimate to be between 7 and
$18 million on an annual basis, though again not projecting
forwards or backwards. The direct cost of $13.6 million
in 2324 or if we look over time $125 million since
2007. Again, I'll just note something I said at the
beginning. This report is only about the fiscal relationship
We are not assessing whether charter schools are educationally
better or worse. A fuller assessment of the value
of this financial relationship would ultimately require
an analysis of student outcomes. That's not something
we did in this report, but we believe would be valuable
for assessing, uh, the financial value of this relationship
in future research. OK, that is all I have. I'm happy
to take any questions. Thank you. Any comments or
questions from board members? No Interesting. I. It's
OK. I just wanna, just for the record to be clear
um, we are, we cannot bill for students, special ed
that are not enrolled in our school district. So we're
even though we're paying that 80% out, we are not
billing for those students, correct. That's my understanding
Um, yes, I. Heidi. So, so just to be clear, I just
wanna put this out there to be clear, we are not billing
for those students that are enrolled in charter schools
We are only being, we are only paying out for their
services, uh, through the charter, that is correct
When a family enrolls their child in a charter school
the charter school makes all of the decisions, and
they bill us. We have no Ability to consent or be
part of the process about making decisions. Thank
you. That was, that was my one question because I
just wanted to make that clear. Can, can I just add
one point, I, I think clarification, I'm gonna defer
to our guest now what comes back to the district is
the unreimbursed amount on the charter school. So
the charter school will take care of something, something
and it's the part that's unreimbursed that we get
the bill, not the total, the total, right? Yeah, I
mean, my understanding is that 80% of the unreimbursed
amount is what's coming back to the resident district
right? So the charter school is also, I, as I understand
it, absorbing 20% of that cost on their own, and then
80% will come to the resident district. OK. I would
also differ heavily. This all comes from MDE experts
so, um, there are a lot of other people that I would
reference to for trusting everything that I say on
this. And then if we could back up to, um, a couple
slides ago where you were looking at like the 2023
20 and, uh, no, if it was forward, right there, I
think OK. Or this. No, dang, I should have wrote down
the slide number, but I couldn't see it. Yeah, yeah
yeah, 2023, and you were looking at like the, the
amount of adjustments per year. Did that take into
consideration ARP funds at all? And that so the drop
in in um revenue per student, I think, I don't think
that that was the slide this one. Yes, yes, that, that
slide. And so they did take into consideration the
ARP funds that existed. So it just looked like a. So
this only reflects the amount of money per student
that is going it was being billed by charter schools
to Saint Paul Public schools. So it doesn't have, it
doesn't at all account for any changes on the revenue
side for what the district was bringing in during
that time. OK, yeah, and then I'll hold the next question
because I think it's for the administration. Any other
questions or comments? I have a question. I, I think
that this is. Important information to have, to have
on hand, um, would remind board members that while
there isn't necessarily an action item that we can
take on this, I think it's important for us to be
able to share this with decision makers who can take
action on this. Um, it's not to shame or blame or
um cast any sort of judgment on the Areas of choice
that we have across the city, but instead to name
that if the goal is to continue to invest in our public
schools, and we actually need to understand all of
the different places and ways in which we are losing
revenue and that there are actions that can be taken
Um, I'm sure that there are future conversations that
we can have as individuals about what that might look
like, but it's also a piece of We started this conversation
Because we understood that we were asking our taxpayers
for, for more money and to do so we said that we needed
to understand all of the different ways in which um
Decisions across the city, across the state, and across
the district have impacted our financial picture, and
this is an important piece of that picture. Um, I
think that there's also opportunities to have conversations
with city leaders about what this looks like and what
this means for not just us but for our city as a whole
And so I would encourage folks to, to think about
that and to think about um how we continue to talk
about the reality and the reality and the impacts
it has on the students that are in our buildings. Um
so I've been over here trying to like think about
how to word this question, and it may or may not come
out in the way that I desire, but, um, so I guess
I'm just like trying to like get a thumbprint on Like
what the actual like. Basically, like what the dollar
amount that's coming out of our general fund to like
offset these like costs to our district are or become
and I think like. Because I know that there are several
different revenue or there's several different expenses
that come through that are reimbursed that like we
just manage the costs on, right, which like, I mean
I'm curious if we have like an administrative reimbursement
for just processing those fees and like what some
of that looks like, but I also wonder. Like if our
general fund is picking up the tab on any of these
The um, the bill from the charters, like what that
solid dollar amount becomes, um, because I think that's
for me really helpful, um. To like really understanding
because I know, like, again, I just know that there's
some things that we pass dollars through for because
that's how the state allocates it. And I know that
I assume that we have additional hard costs whether
that be processing the reimbursement payments, um
processing or just like absorbing costs in general
so like I don't know if anyone has. A dollar amount
or, and that may not be something today, but. Any
questions to, um, for those costs, the special educational
costs. Can you just like give us a general understanding
of Um How that impacts the revenue that you would
receive, or is it completely An expense. Um, through
the chair, all of these students do come into consideration
when the state is, um, Calculating our special education
aid, so we do receive, they go into our special education
funding formula in a couple of different ways. Those
expenditures where it really comes out at the end
is as was described with those tuition billing, and
there is a lot of indirect costs in processing this
Every student who enrolls in a charter school, that
charter school has to send a tuition agreement to
Saint Paul that we have to. Sign and send back. So
there's costs associated with that. They also have
to send us copies of the IEP and evaluation report
because we're the resident district, so that we can
confirm that this is a student who has an active IEP
So, there's a lot of processing that goes in, um, to
supporting the students in charter schools, um, even
outside of the direct tuition bills that we received
Doctor in another just one example. To share with
The chair, um, trying to think of one example on direct
costs similar to Doctor Rosenthal, um, shared is transportation
So for instance, um, One of our, um, schools, one
of our middle schools, we share, um, bussing with
one of the charter schools because we are, um, liable
for bussing all the charter schools if they elect
to use our system. And so this particular charter
school has elected to use, um, our service for that
school. We pair the two buses, the two schools together
because of the close proximity, and without that, um
Busing those charter school students, we would be
able to save um. Two, this year, two routes, or two
buses, and our buses, each bus costs about $879 a
day to operate. And so over the course of 170 days
two routes, it's about $300,000. Um, and that's just
in this year. Um, we have considerably went down. There
was a time when we bused probably anywhere between
6 and 8 charters, although when we made the decision
to go to move our Secondaries changed that impacted
uh fewer of our charter schools elected, and then
also we as a district did more um decision making
around uh we can elect. To have our charter schools
go at the time we decide, and they can get a ticket
or not. And there was a time when our charter schools
were getting um our top tier 8:30. And so, um, we
made a very conscious decision several years ago that
if you were going to bus as a church school, you either
have to be in close proximity like this particular
one, or you had to take the 4th tier that starts at
2. That's one of how you elected to be. That's helpful
I appreciate that, and I just assume that there are
many more of those. And I know that this report is
like looking kind of at the big picture of what, um
how that those dollars follow, um, students, which
I, I appreciate and anyone who knows me knows like
the granular nature of this is where I really get
um, interested in seeing like what that. True cost
right, cuz I think like if like. Related to the revenue
we receive, like what, how does, I mean, this is just
me generally speaking, like how does that revenue
um, increase based on the charter enrollment or decrease
and like really trying to get an understanding of
like how big of an impact possibly, um, you know, something
like the, um, like Doctor Nistler mentioned, like
how does that. Cause I, I guess what I'm trying to
say is I assume that there is still a gap, right? A
big gap in the hard costs that were required for, um
that we're unreimbursed for, and I think if, if we
can get a dollar amount of that at some point, I think
that would be really helpful, although I know it's
like. It's, that would be really helpful, so. So like
Chief Turner did for buses, and you're also talking
about like HR costs. How do we figure out what are
those HR costs as director, assistant superintendent
talked about. Right, or like finance, right? Like
I'm sure finance takes time to be able to process
payments and like, and and I know that this isn't
I've assumed that this isn't something that we have
historically tracked because it's all kind of baked
into the overall education. Kind of formulas that
exist, but I just think if we like pairing something
like that with a report such as this, I feel like
is that that anchor that would really allow us to
go to our partners and say, this is, because, you
know, they all like that like kind of causal data
or like the real like. All of that, right? And so
um, I just. I feel like pairing those two things together
would really be. In addition to everything that they've
presented. You know, if I just may add as well, you
know, um, that this is why this topic of the cross-subsidy
is so important because we know that this year we'll
expense about $190 million in special education. OK
Round numbers will get reimbursed by about 58% of
that. It's usually 2/3 of salary, but not all benefits
are covered. So, you know, about 58% of 190 million
Then add to that the revenue that we are now receiving
that helps a little bit more and that's, the cross-subsidy
aid, OK. But nonetheless, there remains an enormous
gap. So that's, that's a big part of this, I think
conversation. Um, and I just want to share also that
Heidi was so, so, uh, uh, efficient. She had shared
with me the actual expense that comes to us from tuition
billing. Only from charters. Um, this is, uh, right
from the MDE report, uh, you know, it's, it's $10,230,000
So that's the part where they're providing 20% they're
paying for 20%, the 80% that they're not, um. We're
not uh covering that comes to us, that comes to the
10 million. Of that 10 million, then we'll try to
claim some reimbursement from the state on that. So
big numbers. And, um, you know, big impact on our
budget and our budget planning. One other super technical
question that kind of shift, but in, while like kind
of doing this research, was there ever any like, is
there an assessment of like how many seats exist? Like
how many available seats there are in across charters
um in our, in our city, um, cause I, what I've like
understood is, I mean like I know some of our schools
are underenrolled, right? I also know that that is
not unique to Saint Paul Public schools that there's
just significantly more chairs and uh seats available
in our school buildings and we have children in our
city, and so I'm wondering, do you guys have any insight
into what that looks like for charters? We didn't
look at, you know, potential open seats. One of the
things you'll see, um, so we provide this map. Of
um, the locations of charter schools, we provide that
also over time so you can just see charter growth
so you'll see the number of schools growing in addition
to the number of students, but whether those are aligning
appropriately where the schools are filling with students
that was not something that we, we looked at. Mm Can
you tell me, and I think maybe this was Part of a
question that I thought we had started and I don't
know where we landed on it. Um, what happens to, maybe
this is more for Heidi, to spend costs if a student
were to go to a charter originally and then return
post-October? Numbers. To like, no. I can just say
I had a conversation with MDE on this topic. Um, my
our original understanding when we started this report
was that students transferring after the October 1st
date or or the 12/1 date for special education students
when those censuses are happening was important that
it would shift money. The conversation I had with
MDE suggested that the money actually does track students
more often than that. And so those census dates are
important for a very small group of costs, but for
the most part, the funding will follow the student
regardless of when that movement is happening. That's
my understanding based on a conversation I had. Through
the chart that December 1st child count date is what
is the date that really goes into calculating some
of the special education funding formulas and different
aspects to it. There are some funding mechanisms that
are strictly adhered to as a result of that December
1st, but especially if the student has some higher
levels of services and that. Student is no longer
there, um, we wouldn't give the services, and we do
I have tried to work really hard to build relationships
with many of the charter schools in our community
so that when a student might be needing a higher level
of service that they would have to either build a
program themselves or we already have a program. I
have tried to build relationships to welcome students
back to Saint Paul. Thank you. Any more questions
or comments? Mhm OK. Well, thank you. Thank you. All
right, so Uh, we've got our TAC conversation scheduled
for 6 o'clock and it is 5:22. Do we want to amend
and move up the budget conversation? Ok, so Um, do
we need to vote because it's sometimes certain at
6. Can we just move to the next part of the agenda
because we've voted approve it. All right, I've moved
to amend our, um, agenda today to move the, um, community
the fiscal year 2026-20207 community budget meeting
um, agenda item. To. Precede the Tribal Nations Education
Committee and AIPAC resolution response. Um, is there
a second? Seconded by Director Franco, um. On Thursday
ay ay aye in your polls say nay. All right, so, we
are now going to move on to the FY 27 budget update
presentation, and I'm gonna turn it over to you so
we're intend to down. All right, um, last week we
had the opportunity to engage the community, um, in
alignment with the, uh, school board's policy, um
and, um, Chief Sager is going to come and provide
OK Mhm All right. Well, good afternoon. Vice chair
and other members of the board, Doctor, uh, what we
have here tonight is we wanted to review with all
board members and the present, uh, the information
that we had shared last week, a week ago tonight, uh
with our community and our community engagement team
A couple of our board members were able to be there
Uh, not everybody can make it, but that's all right
And so we wanted to just make sure everybody has, uh
this information, um, as we move into. Uh, in May
um, so what we talked about, we gave a quick overview
of how school budgets work. We also gave an overview
of anticipated FY 2627 budget. We, um, answered questions
about the budget shortfall as it pertains to the referendum
OK. And how, uh, budget decisions are made, school
district, uh, and school reductions for 27, 26, 27
year, and then the next steps in the budget process
So here we talked about the importance of creating
a balanced budget. And uh the expenses on school districts
uh from various funding sources. The, the graph on
the left is all funding sources, and you can see there
um, they're all important and especially important
to state aid. Property tax, federal, and then all
others. And then our general fund budget, we always
break that up into three buckets. We have the administrative
support services. We have, uh, student, uh, school
and student programs and services and then maintenance
and operations and the one thing that we'd like to
highlight here and point out and we did this last
week was these percentages here, like 7% for administrative
support services, the, uh, statewide average on that
is more like about 8.6%. So we're below state average
in that area. Conversely, um. The school and student
uh, uh, programs and services were at 80%. State average
is about 77%. So putting more, more resources into
school and student, uh, programs, fewer resources
into administration, administrative support services
So, uh, here you can see our budget shortfall for
next year. Um, we're anticipating the, uh, expenses
to be at the 828.8 million. Our revenues. 814.5. The
difference is that 14.35 million shortfall that we've
been talking about, uh, for quite some time. Um, and
that does represent 1.7% of our total, uh, budget
That number would be much bigger if it weren't for
the successful referendum. So, we, we went into the
budget season knowing that we have to make some reductions
that will be necessary both at the school and district
levels to balance the budget for the next year. Here's
our funding gap, um. chart that we've used a lot and
you can see there the amount per pupil uh on base
formula and what it would have been if it just kept
pace with inflation over the last 20 years. And that
gap for school districts in Minnesota right now, not
just ours, but this is true for all, uh, is 1470. And
when you can put that against 34,000 students, that
gap is about 51 $51 million. So, I'll pause here and
just as an aside, in the previous presentation, um
I thought of this graph. Here, this chart, because
that one chart he had that showed the expense related
to um charter schools, and there was a range in there
I think it was from 9 and up to 17 million or something
that would be in addition to this. That's pretty staggering
when you think about it. OK, so that's why we went
and asked the voters, um, for help, for help and their
support. And there you can see the other part to this
um, if we had a funding gap just based on that previous
slide of the formula allowance, compared to what we
brought in on the operating referendum, the difference
between 51 and 37 is 14. That's not a coincidence
you know, it's just, it kind of the arrows are pointing
in that direction as to how we're getting at this
funding gap, in addition to a decline in enrollment
um. Well, the referendum revenue stabilized. To avoid
uh bigger cuts, it, you know, it didn't completely
solve all of our championships. So, we did ask for
37 37.2 million that did put us in line with neighboring
districts and well staying under the legal limit um
that we could request. Asking voters to approve more
funding would have overburdened. Uh, residents and
to exceed the legal limit. And last, last week, what
we reminded people who were present was that remember
the survey that we went out with in the spring and
we got a really uh dialed in a number of what could
be supported and what would be supported, A, and then
B, what the legal limit was. So we have had a number
of questions of like, why didn't you just ask for
more? And the reason was because survey said that
this is gonna be kind of it, and we couldn't have
asked for much more because we're almost really at
that limit. We're, we're slightly under, but we're
we're there, we're already there. So, um, and as we
explained that to members in the community like, oh
OK, that's why you didn't ask for more, OK. Mhm Um
the other thing that we're, um, we're up against a
little bit or have been, and you've seen this before
so starting this year, we started off the year with
500 fewer students that we originally were planning
on. Then from there, moving into next year, about
another 400. So over the course of two years, and
that's what's happening as we move into FY 27, we're
really making a two-year correction. So we're making
a correction for this year, and we're also making
a correction for next year, and that's why uh this
is a challenging circumstance, and that's what we're
working through. We also pointed out because people
have asked again, why didn't you know more? Well, when
you all had to decide, we all decided, you ultimately
did, uh, what the number was going to be on the referendum
that was well before we knew what our enrollment was
going to be. That's the other part of it. And the
survey was telling us what, what we would have a good
chance of passing. Um, we talked about this, how are
decisions made. Um, we start with the district vision
and community values. We move into board parameters
Then we do some budget decisions where the district
leaders make decisions on funding and reductions based
on the parameters and community values, and then budget
implementation where principals and department leaders
make choices around staffing and contracts and, and
uh, programming. Um, the other thing we, we, we point
out, and it's important, is that a lot of the Expense
that we incur, we don't have a lot of flexibility
over. You know, so we put that in there, um, we know
that that those types of things fall outside of priorities
but must be funded with our resources, and these things
are like utilities and we have to keep the lights
on, we have to keep the buildings, um, insurance, state
and federal mandates, staffing ratios, and, and other
fixed costs. So, um, there is a lot of constraints
that are built into the process before we even start
making decisions. Here we did some community engagement
um, on the far left. You can see those are the groups
that participated. Um, in the middle, you can see
the, the, the number of participants totaling over
6000 people had voice, uh, into what these priorities
and values should be. And then we have the dates, and
that's what we did back in December to help drive
our work through the spring. Our community, um, priorities
we defined these actually a couple of years ago, and
we went back to the community to say, these are the
ones we've been using. Are they, should we keep them
or should we do something different? And overwhelmingly
we got feedback that no, these are good, let's stick
with respectful and reflective schools, uh, literacy
and safety and a sense of belonging. Also, we found
out that it was reinforced strong support for arts
and music, mental health, required course offerings
building upkeep, facilities, college and career readiness
and language and cultural programs. Parameters that
um our board gave us uh to guide our work, which were
helpful, was to maintain. Our commitment to a full
day pre-K, uh, and that includes all the seats that
we serve that aren't being funded. So our board said
you all said, don't touch that, keep that rolling
So we did. Um, and then retain at least 95% of our
instructional support services. That was achieved
demonstrate a commitment to language and cultural
programs that was referenced earlier, and of course
the uh budget policy requiring to land our unassigned
fund balance at or above 5%. And this is how we got
there, um, we had. Uh, school-based FTEs and that
was essentially aligning, uh, school staffing with
enrollment and if you remember that, that grid that
we worked on, um, that, you know, um, in the workshop
and the, uh, we're gonna have no splits in pre-K through
1 specialists rounded the 5 middle schools, um, retained
staff of 4 or below class size. These were, um. That
was the uh the one we landed on. I think we ended
up saving about $5 million with that. It wasn't the
most um extreme and it wasn't the most um loose either
It was kind of the one in the middle. Um, and then
we had district uh FTEs and central office staff, reduction
across all central office departments, reduction in
carryover, cutting that in half by 50%. Uh, staff
attrition, again, we have about 850 employees leave
the system every year, and if we just don't hire back
6 of them, we'll save about $500,000. Now, we may
end up with more than that, um, we'll see, but it's
kind of a case by case basis, uh, depending on what
the position is. And then we wanted to continue to
maximize kindergarten enrollment. So this is, um, we
explained this and, and Chief Turner, um, helped out
uh, I guess that was the last month, was when during
the summer or spring and summer, um, what this means
is we're going to continue to allow a roster of 3
over the cap. And what happens is when by the time
school comes around, There's some students that don't
come and don't show up, so we, we don't go 3 over
the cap, but we end up landing where we should be
If it turns out that we're 3 over the cap, that's
where we use those resources to set aside for fall
adjustments. So we have a plan for that. Um, and then
um, there's our fall adjustments, we talked about
that. Um, 2% increase on supply budgets, uh, instead
of a 4% increase. That's a $12 million budget. We're
gonna allow those to go up by 2%, not 4. We save a
couple 100 $240,000 there. And then finally we did
keep in um a maintained partnerships where grants
are needed so we're gonna use we could use some general
fund dollars to replace lost grant revenue so that's
why that um that number is a negative where we actually
take away at that point. Yes, 14.2. If we took that
out of there, that would be 14.65. Uh, a couple words
a little bit about where the reductions came. Uh, school-related
services will make, uh, $10.5 million of reductions
and that represents 1.5% of the reductions in the
school's overall budgets. OK, so. Next part was non-school
services, make $3 million of reduction, that is 2.3%
reduction in administrative areas. 130. So in administrative
areas a higher percentage came out of that budget
and a lower percentage out of the school-based budgets
Overall you can see, no surprise there's your 1.7%.
So 1.7% is the average overall, but a little lower
on the school side, a little higher percentage in
the administrative side of of the deductions and what
Our budget priorities, I referenced this earlier, and
this is what we came to in our board work sess, uh
board work session, and then applied that to allocations
And the main part here is that we wanted to, uh, retain
current levels of instructional support staff and
demonstrate a continued commitment in language and
cultural and adhere to class size averages in all
schools. So, um, Again, as that enrollment went down
the applications went down, the ratios generally overall
remained the same. And here's our budget timeline
Uh, later in the month, um, 2 weeks from tonight, as
a matter of fact, the SA will move over to the month
of May, and, um, we'll provide the proposed budget
We'll go through that and come back in June to, uh
recommend approval for the adopted budget. And there's
May 19th. That's two weeks from tonight, and then
the board meeting, uh, POE in June on June 23rd, and
we are providing, if you're interested, um, we are
providing, um. Uh, updates on our website and people
have been going there, um, to look at things and answer
questions and it's a nice referral. They say, we got
this question, let me show you where that is. Thank
you. Thank you. Are there any questions or comments
from board members? Uh, this, thank you for this. I
sat through this presentation last week but missed
a couple parts and so it was nice to get some of that
Um, just one question around the feedback that was
collected there. I know that that was just last week
so is that feedback that we're gonna be getting maybe
at the BOE meeting as compiled and, and just shared
with the rest of the board around. Um, what community
members had to say. Yeah, because that's, um, I thank
you, my director Aco. So each, um, each room had a
note taker, and so what we're gonna do is compile
all those notes and then we, you know, summarize everything
report them back out to all of you so you can see
what that feedback was for sure. Because of the feedback
from what I understand, I wasn't in the other rooms
I was in our room, right? Um, so I heard that feedback
but I wasn't privy at the time. Because what was being
said in the other room, so we'll have to compile all
that here. Any other questions or comments from board
members? All right. Thank you. OK, OK. So next we
have. Our. T neck, um, an APAC resolution response
at 6 o'clock. So we are gonna break until 6 o'clock
It's 5:41. Please do what you gotta do. See y'all
in about 15. But. couldn't be happier. Turn that off
So turn off like that. I'm so short, You can, you
can introduce yourself so people know who you are
and then just talk through you slides and it's all
the good stuff. Um, good evening, um, Tian, Doctor
um, Stacy Stanley and our school board and our head
learner team at large. Um, uh, I'm gonna introduce
myself traditionally just because, um, that is something
that I continue to practice each day. So, um, I will
say I mean, um, I'm Doctor Miganupwe, um, in, um, indigenea
kwabaremonica in Dujaba Makwendodam. Um, and my name
is Regan Kluger. I'm the director of American Indian
Education here in Saint Paul Public Schools, and, um
I'm gonna talk a little bit about our timeline and
um, what I know about this process to share with you
that, um, would be helpful. Um, and so as, uh, executive
Director Green mentioned, um, this is not only the
right thing to do because our American Indian students
are our lowest performing demographic of students
we also have an obligation through state statutes
to make sure that we are doing. Everything that we
can to support the education of our American Indian
students and so part of that process, um, and again
this is the world that I live in is is American Indian
education. So, uh, Minnesota State statute 124 0.78
subdivision 2 is. That part is I, um, you know, if
we have, uh, 10 or more American Indian students in
a school district that we are required by the state
to have an American Indian Parent Advisory Committee
We proudly serve 1,167 students here in Saint Paul
um, with the longest standing, um, uh, recognized
American Indian education program of over 50 years
in the metro area, which is really amazing. And so
part of that process, um, written into state statute
is the, the process of compliance and what that timeline
looks like. And so, um, our parent committee has those
unique laws and regulations and has those opportunities
to speak with you all and to share and learn about
our district in a way that's different than other
PACs, um, because it's written into our law. It is
you know, in, in a really strong way, it's sovereignty
in action, um, and the work that we have all done
up until this point through this. the school year
and even being here today speaking to you all, we
are working on our indigenous sovereignty for our
students and our nations too. Um, and so that compliance
happens usually in the spring, um, happens every single
year, uh, but we, we start our school year, you know
May and June with the previous year, looking at the
areas that were addressed by our AIPAC. Um, we work
in current way back in 20. 17, um, and we've been
non-concurrent, um, since then and since I've been
here for about two school years now, um, but that
letter helps inform the work that we do as a district
Um, September through February, we are providing our
American Indian pack with information about how our
students are doing, especially in the areas that they've
identified as that need the most support and our attention
Um, in our case, it is in the areas of attendance
behavior, curriculum and development, and, um, curriculum
instruction and, um, human resources and retention
uh, and recruitment of American Indian staff. Uh, we
provide them information throughout the school year
In March, we start that resolution process and our
parents get to vote. Our parents voted non-concurrent
and it was not unanimous. And at first we're like
Oh, that's, you know, that's a win, it's great. But
there was a really good dialogue and discussion that
parents said, this is, you know, I will quote one
of our parents, she's not here today, but she's given
me permission to share that, you know, she's had students
with us for over 23 years and this is the most she's
ever felt change for her for her for her kid who is
still here. Um, and so that was huge. And it was a
good conversation of we really can see what we've
been doing, we've been hearing from principals, we're
hearing from area leads in these departments. We just
want to make sure it continues. And so, um, and we're
reminded at our TNEC that, you know, if we ever do
receive a vote of concurrency, it shouldn't be taken
as a negative or a positive. It's not net positive
not net negative. It is, um, a non-concurrent vote
solidifies that we have the opportunity, our parents
have the opportunity to bring forward formally to
a school board meeting their biggest concerns and
advise how we move forward. To address those um concerns
that they have and so we voted no concurrent this
year. Um, one of our parents presented at the March
17th school board meeting and um throughout this whole
timeline process um and based in state statutes, the
district has 60 days to have a formal response to
our parent committee of how they're going to address
those concerns and that kind of puts us at where we
are, um, now we had a little bit of a, um, we typically
Quickly try to vote and have our decision as an AIPAC
um, me supporting them in that role in January, February
but given, you know, what our communities were facing
and up against, we had a lot of families that were
out doing what they needed to do and we so we postponed
a little bit. So our timeline for this year is pushed
back ever so slightly, um, but we have a great relationship
with MDE who helps us keep compliant and so they're
they're right along with us in what we're doing. Um
but yes, I know I kind of talked through this a little
bit, um, I got ahead of myself, but, um, you know
like I said, um, just a reminder for us, even just
this past Monday is, um, no matter what happens through
our votes, it allows us to have an open dialogue and
to con to continue the conversations and to care for
our American Indian students. Um, I'll briefly touch
on the structure. So, um, you know, how we go through
this vote and how we do this process and communicate
with our families, um, is we have our PAC, um, our
chair, vice chair, and our members. Um, illegally
both federally through Title 6 and through the state
of Minnesota, our AIPAC has to be made up of 50% American
Indian identifying parents. It can also be made up
of grandparents, community members, Members of your
Canadian teachers and non-native commu or teaching
staff within SPPS, um, we have a really amazing AIPAC
Um, a lot of folks get to get along, we're able to
talk and have good conversations, um, and our AIPAC
here in Saint Paul is very strong. Our core team, um
Creta Green, executive director, um, and myself, we
support, we're always at every single AIPAC. If one
of us can't be there, the other is, um, being. Able
to be that liaison between our area leads and their
departments and when data is ready to be able to provide
to our parents and say, OK, they're gonna be on the
agenda at this time of year because we know graduation
data is now available so let's talk about it, um, and
so and again we have the rotating principals and the
district leadership that attends those meetings, um
and the area leads too, um, Kathy Kamani, Craig Anderson
Nancy Paez, Lauren Bakin. In ours in India, um, and
those that support them in this work. Uh, with this
structure too, when I look at it, I'm a visual learner
I'd like to just make a comment and note that this
does not silo our communication at all. I know for
a fact our co-chair calls her her principal all the
time over at Capitol Hill to be like, What are you
doing for my kids? And they have a really open communication
and a dialogue. And so this, I don't want the visual
here. To say, you know, we have these certain channels
that we go through. I think um working with our AIPAC
and the, the building of an even stronger relationship
we've started to adopt some of our ways of communicating
I think that that's, you know, I'll speak for myself
and that um we've kind of, there's still a processes
but, um, you know, any type of hierarchy kind of gets
met at the door with with how we communicate with
each other, which I think is a really great thing
Um, so it's a little bit about our structure and how
we do this work and how it funnels back into the APAC
and um, it's an ongoing, almost corkscrew process
I'm gonna turn it over to Kathy. Thank you. Thank
you. You too. Valiant members of the board. I'm here
to um talk a little bit about the district response
for areas one and two, which are attendance and behavior
So, first of all, for attendance, um, we just know
and acknowledge how extremely important it is to really
um, make every effort and work to increase consistent
attendance, school attendance amongst, um, all students
but specifically, um, focusing on American Indian
students. Even though we've seen, um, progress over
the last couple of years, um, in rates of consistent
attendance, um, American Indian students as a whole
group. Um, continue to have the highest rates of absenteeism
And one thing we did a few years ago is we did add
uh, American Indian attendance Specialist position
to our school attendance Matters team. And I was really
happy to, thrilled actually to welcome Jenny Bush
to um our team, and we are really committed to sustaining
that position. So Jenny is back with us again next
year and um really is going to build on the work that
she has really started up, which I can't really say
enough about. Um, her passion for it, her commitment
um, towards serving the American Indian community
and actually to, um, also one of the exciting things
we've started is really, um, building a community
partnership with several American serving, um, community
agencies in the, um, in our Saint Paul area so that
we can, um, try to get, um, outside our school walls
support also for attendees. Um, so excited to continue
Jenny's work and, um, working closely with Regan Kluber
and her um team of people so that we're aligned and
have some intentional connections with the American
Indian Education Program. Um, and Also, I have to
say this is, it's all of our jobs. Maybe some of you
have heard me say that attendance is not just Jenny's
job, it's not the job, it's not just the school attendance
Matters team's job, but everyone's job around attendance
And so, um, for this effort, we, we really, um, want
to work with school attendance teams. So Our whole
school attendance Matters teams out visiting school
attendance teams. And when we're doing that, pulling
out, which is our ad hoc reports on campus, which
they created so that we could look just at our state
identified American Indian students and pulling those
reports up and using those regularly with school teams
so that Um, they can monitor the attendance of their
students, celebrate successes, and, um, do outreach
to families when kids are, they're noticing are missing
school. And like Reagan talked about working closely
with the AIPAC, we're really trying to have two-way
communication. Jenny and I were just there at the
last AIPAC meeting to provide some information about
attendance and get some ideas from, from the AIPAC
OK, move on right now. I could talk about attendance
for a long time, but we'll move on to area number
2, which is also an area that the APEC did identify
as an area of, of concern, um, that our American Indian
students are overrepresented in our, our data, um
in our office disciplinein referrals and in suspensions
and dismissals. Um, so we have done a few things already
about how we monitor that data, um, make sure to add
state identified American Indian, um, data to the
quarterly reports that come out of, um, our research
evaluation assessment department, which allows us
to really look school by school and, and see where
our students are. We know there are large groups of
students at American Indian Magnet and at Harding
But we have to also look at the schools where there's
5 students or 3 students or, you know, smaller numbers
of students and, and, um, you know, and, and monitor
that and see, uh, is there other things that we could
do to support those students in those schools. So
um, and Jenny Bush is also helping us work with that
as well, so we've done some work on that together
Um, we are aligning with, so out of my office, our
team is aligning with, um, our Office of Specialized
Services. Um, they have hired an American Indian cultural
specialist recently, um, so we're excited to, to partner
with them, and, um, they also have, um, begun the
Dreamcatcher program with, um, the Department of Education
um, are actually well into that work right now, and
um, And so some of that outreach just again trying
to really align it with um between different departments
um, including some of the restorative practices that
that is coming out of our Office of school support
so that we are um using restorative practices in community
building, which I believe can also help with attendance
and that sense of belonging, but it's how we're also
responding when there is some harm that happens. And
so how, how we can use those practices. And then, um
you know, professional development, I think crosses
all the areas, but really, um, took some intentional
time at Leadership Academy, um, to talk with principals
and assistant principals about how we pull up these
reports, how we are really monitoring how the students
are doing and what we might be able to do differently
And we also have done some training with our mental
health support teams just on um cultural practices
how to Indian education staff, um provide a session
that was well attended for um Or, um, sorry, my phone
started ringing on my wrist there. Um yeah, so just
you know, doing that professional development so that
You know, staff are ensuring to embed kind of culturally
relevant practices and all the interventions that
they do. And with that, I'm gonna turn it over to
Executive Director Anderson. Good evening. Cheerful
Superintendent. Um, so this year the instruction area
is a continuation of last year's and we're going deeper
And so last year the families came to us and um requested
that we really do a database of state identified American
Indian students and Um, a team out of Office of Teaching
and Learning built that database with the FAS data
and the HMH data and the SASS data, and attendance
data, and then what we were gonna do about what the
data was telling us, just for the American Indian
uh state identified students. And um through that
process, every principal then had a professional development
in how to use that database, um, and then they took
that back to their school and leadership teams and
and did that with the teachers who served those students
and asked, what are we gonna do about how the kids
are doing? And they did that over time because we
get fall data, winter data, and spring data. Um, and
so the three areas we're focusing on is leadership
development and having the principals and really involved
at Leadership Academy. Adult professional development
which I'm gonna introduce, uh, Jason Brissett, uh
to you are uh indigenous TOSA, and that position was
created during the pandemic, uh, and we've been able
to sustain that, and it is uh Solid, and I believe
it's now even in the A&I plan. And moving forward
uh, we will, um, continue to have this position and
it's the only. position of its kind in the state, so
it's uh TNEC really appreciates that, and so does
the AIPAC, and all of the teachers really appreciate
it too, when they have that professional learning
series from Mr. Brissett. And then the data-driven
instructional support is that database and the ongoing
use of that database. And we started the database
again this year, but we decided to be a little smarter
and work more with REA and work more with the campus
team and get, and actually even have more sets of
data in there. So we added all the data that was, is
part of Of the response. So there's the academic data
in reading and math, there's the attendance data on
an ongoing basis, and then there's the office referral
data. And so we can see what, what the ODRs were for
those kids, because sometimes when you look at the
academics, that might be, we need to look at attendance
because. If they weren't here, how could they get
the learning? Well, what are we gonna do about attendance
first and then get, get at that, those learning targets
And then what if, what if we were out of the classroom
for ODRs too frequently to get the learning? And so
what are we gonna do about that and just that specific
group of students? And so we're gonna continue to
work in, in that way and um there. Rooted in our commitment
to um Improving academic outcomes for American Indian
students. And the feedback from the parents and the
TED is that this is essential and um and they're, and
appreciated. And they've, they've seen examples um
at the meetings when we bring that data. Little celebration
at the end of last year, um, and I believe our intentional
focus on these students was a result of this. We had
4% gains in MCAs in reading and in math across the
um state identified American Indian students in Saint
Paul. So And I'll introduce Jason Burset, and he's
gonna tell you a little about some of the professional
learning and things that he's done with our teachers
on the ground. Um, one of the questions TEC always
asks is, how do you continue to support all of the
native students in the district, and this is our response
to that. Um, and he does beautiful work, and if you
ever get a chance to hear him speak, you'll be happy
you did. Uh, thank you, Chair Valiant, Doctor Stanley
board members, uh, Migwich, uh, Buju and Dinoue Maondo
uh, Jason Brissette and Dijnikaz, Kamsquaakkang and
Dunjaba, Mog and Durum. Um, my name is Jason Brissette
I said hello, uh, friends and relatives. I'm from
the Redcliffe Reservation up in northern Wisconsin
Um, I'm from the Loon clan, and, um, I've actually
been here in the district for over 15 years. I'm a
former middle school teacher at the American Indian
Magnet School. And I feel very lucky and grateful
that I get to step into this role and really help
as much as I can. Um, these two bullet points are
a lot of what my work is, what I, I focus on. Uh, this
year with, uh, leadership development. I've had the
opportunity to go to Leadership Academy, um, and work
with all the different principals in the district
Um, one of the things that we've been trying to focus
on is creating land acknowledgments for each school
site, um, even though, um, we're working to standardize
things with standards-based learning this year and
last year I got to visit all the schools and each
school has its own culture. So we felt it was appropriate
that each school when they create their land acknowledgment
they do it with intent and meaning and really connect
to the land. A lot of the teaching, uh, that I try
to provide is how do we connect to this place? How
do we learn from this land and the stories of this
land. Um, I've had the opportunity to work with counselors
and the big question that they brought to me is how
do we reach our students that we might be struggling
with. And so I provided resources on how to indigenize
lesson plans, how to approach our students, um, kind
of in a different way, how to really establish that
trust right away because without that trust, uh, we're
not gonna get anywhere so we try to start with that
foundation. Um, with the adult professional development
I've been able to work with all of the content areas
in the district. So, and I'm reluctant to say this
and hopefully it'll be my next step, but the only
content area that I haven't had professional development
in is music. But everywhere else, all grade levels
I work with everybody. I'm a resource for everybody
Um, every time we have a session, uh, we try to indigenize
everything we're doing. Um. And so to back up our
teachers with re-licenser, I've created courses for
teachers. I've had schoolology courses. Um, I try
to make everything accessible for everybody, um, trying
to bring a comfort level to everybody so they can
you know, take a risk, try something new, try to do
these things to meet our students. Um, a lot of my
focus has been indigenizing, uh, lesson plans to meet
all the updated standards that we're facing. Um, and
so I, I really, um, use, uh, Zorretta Hammond's framework
Um, I try to create lesson plans that everyone can
understand, some consistency. We really like the Ignite
Chung Chuu review, uh, format. It seems to work really
well with our students. Everything that I try to bring
uh to our educators is trying to change people's thinking
Um, for our students, we wanna try to bring everything
into more of an inquiry-based framework. We wanna
help our students to have a good foundation with vocabulary
with that vocabulary. They'll have the confidence
to be able to speak more in class. They'll be able
to have conversations, they'll be able to uh participate
and engage in class, and at the same time, they won't
be afraid to try new things. They'll be hopefully
able to know that if they make a mistake, that that's
OK. So we try to teach that, especially with the counselors
um. Really like changing the idea to embrace making
mistakes, to actually find the sacredness in mistakes
because that is actually how we learn, how we grow
is from our mistakes and if we don't, if we don't
try, we, we won't know and I try to, you know. Uh
talk about the analogy as educators, you know, we're
we're having our students, we're teaching them how
to ride a bike. We are the ones with the training
wheels. Hopefully, we can help them become independent
take those training wheels off, and then they will
become independent learners. If they have a, a foundation
of inquiry, they will become smarter, um, and, uh
they will raise their intelligence. So we really try
to work on that. Um, the data-driven instructional
support that really guides my work. Um, I'm a social
studies teacher, but with my, my work right now, I've
really found out that literacy is the, the main foundation
Um, I feel without a foundation of literacy, our students
you know, we want them to do well in math. They might
not do well in math if they, they can't read it, right
And so, Everything I'm doing starts with literacy
um, you know, and, and there's been times when I thought
you know, maybe my, my role would not be here. What
could I do to leave a sustainable impact on our district
Something that our district can take and something
that will hopefully be there forever. And so with
that idea of literacy. I've really updated our website
Saint Paul Public Schools website, and the indigenous
integration website, and I've included so many resources
for all of our contents, pre-K through 12th grade
um, to help people do that. At the same time, while
I was doing that, I was working with our ELA, uh, coordinators
And our AIPAC and trying to create like a feedback
loop for our parents, our community to really understand
what are our students learning. We hear a lot of things
about our students don't see themselves in the curriculum
uh, they don't. Don't see themselves up in the, on
the hallways, on the walls, in the classrooms and
so we're trying to change that thinking and trying
to make that a part of what we do as a district, trying
to include everyone here into the indigenous community
because we are on indigenous land and if we don't
teach the truth about being on this land, um. Negativity
will be perpetuated, and we want, we want to change
that. And um so I do a lot of that with my work. So
Um, I created honoring our indigenous community. This
is a a literacy program that will be all year long
Um, I don't want these things to be just a one-off
thing. I definitely do not want these things to be
an add-on for our educators, something that they have
to take on and takes more time because as a teacher
I know how those things are. So I try to create a
way for them, uh, to just. Incorporate it and uh make
it part of their their education culture. I work with
our librarians. So I will be sending out save the
dates for next year on how to get ready for things
like Indigenous Peoples' Day, all of our seasonal
events that happen, uh, with our native people as
a way to support what is happening in the classrooms
The other point of view that I bring into this is
that, you know, I don't believe that our content areas
are in silos. I think for our students to learn, we
need to bring all of the content areas together and
to do that, we do that through the indigenous. And
so I'm trying to provide resources that are real and
vetted. I work with all of our, our tribes, community
members, elders to make sure things are the real deal
and so teachers are comfortable with that. They don't
question, oh, can I use this? Yes. And I try to vouch
for teachers all the time. I say take a risk. Use
my name, Jason Brissette. I will back you up 100%
So through that work, I've developed a partnership
with the Minnesota Humanities Center. We are working
on um a literacy project through the Native American
Lives Series books, and these books are so good. They're
elementary and middle school, and through our partnership
with the Equity department, we are able to next year
get e-books of all the Native American Lives series
for every elementary and middle school in our district
Um, and we're just, we continue to grow with that
Um. I work really closely with Como Planetarium. We
try to indigenize all our lesson plans. We have lesson
plans from 1st grade through 6th grade. And it is
so incredible. I was there once with the German immersion
school, and they were speaking Ojibwe. They were talking
about our star knowledge and constellations. It was
so amazing, and that's the kind of impact I'd like
to make. We continue to work with our Badote field
trip, learning from this place, this place of Dakota
uh, Makoche, Minnesota Makoche. And um you know, at
this point we've had over 5000 5th grade students
in our district participate in this field trip and
you can ask any sixth grader in Saint Paul Public
schools anything about Hodote, about the US Dakota
War of 1862, and our. Our tremendous educators in
the district are teaching that and when I was a kid
I did not get that. And so as a team we are, we are
doing really great things and so, um, again we're
just trying to vet everything through the community
and do it the right way and, uh, grateful that I got
to share that. So thank you. Good job. I I I just
I can go home. Good evening, to uh, Doctor Stanley
Ford. I am Lauren B Hopkins. I am the talent acquisition
manager, um, with the HR department for Saint Paul
Public Schools. I have the response for Area 4 for
staffing. Um, the AIPAC has, has continued to mention
wanting a second principal at AIMS, and, um, Assistant
Sue Paez continues to watch the numbers to see if
that's something that's doable. Uh, the current enrollment
looks like it's projected to be a 598%. Next school
year so we're seeing improvements in terms of recruiting
um, our, my team and our recruiters, we, we have two
we have a lead and a specialist. Uh, they continue
to do intentional recruitment efforts across different
universities that we have partnered with for student
teaching as well as different organizations within
the communities. Um, they're trying to establish an
American Indian career pathway and make more community
connections. Some of the job fairs we have attended
this year have been at UW Eau Claire. We've attended
La Crosse, the twin, uh, UFM Twin Cities, uh, Bemidji
State, um, and then for some of our organizations
actually, we have one coming up next week with the
American Indian Opportunities Industrial, um, Industrialization
Center or the AIOIC. You say that 3 times fast. In
Minneapolis on Franklin Street, they are having a
Founders's Day Career Fair on the 14th, and our recruiters
will be attending that event. Um, they have also started
building a relationship with the American Indian Family
Center in Saint Paul. Um, they actually hosted an
uh, an employer in residence day, and our staff was
able to attend and give a little bit about why Saint
Paul and the different positions that we're, we're
looking to staff at that point in time. Um. In regards
to our hiring numbers as of late March, we have 35
new staff members to Saint Paul that are self self-identified
American Indian staff members. That is up from last
year's actual 19. Um, overall in the district, we
have 146. Self-identified American Indian staff members
they are in, and I gotta look at my numbers here, they
are in over 39 of our different builds, um, schools
as well as 4 of our admin buildings, um, in classroom
specific positions, so teachers, EAs, um, and TAs
they are in 30 different buildings. For 30 different
schools for us. Um, since January 20th of this year
we have attended over 20 different hiring events, trying
to continue to recruit, and we are actually starting
our schedule for next year's recruiting and making
sure to add to our list an event in uh South Dakota
that um brings in a lot of the Native American and
American Indian population. Um So, and then in terms
of retention, our retention team, um, Lyle is working
very closely and having exit interviews as well as
state interviews and talking and asking people why
do you continue to choose Saint Paul and a lot of
it is the support that they get from these wonderful
people that I'm up here with tonight, um, and so that's
basically what we do, um, pass it back to work. All
right, to, to close out, um, as you can see, so Jason
talked a lot, and one of the reasons, no. One of the
reasons is because our AIPAC said they really want
us to focus in on instruction, and it's just amazing
all the things, um, that are, are happening and, um
with, with the vote they also said that they want
us to continue to work in these key areas. We don't
wanna change anything. I said, uh things are working
we want you to continue to go. Deeper and do and do
the work. So I'm just very thankful for the team. I'm
grateful that we've seen improvement and we've we've
listed some numbers, but there's even more numbers
um that we can share and just really appreciate um
anyone's time and I will stand or sit for questions
Thank you. Any questions or comments from board members
I'll go. I'll go. I'll go after you. It's like a pattern
I tag team. So it, they said that you said there was
like 30 buildings that had representation of staff
and I'm just wondering how many buildings do we have
that have representation of students that identify
as. Don't mess this up. through the chair. Rivers
Thank you. All right. We have American Indian students
at 68 of our buildings, and that includes our online
school and our alternative rooms. OK, well. Thank
you. I, I just wanted to say I appreciate um. This
conversation and the district response or really the
AIPAC and all the work that they do to really support
their students. I had an opportunity to join one of
their meetings last year and um. Just seeing everyone
in that space committed to better outcomes for students
and um it's really inspiring and I will say um it's
also great to hear that we're making some progress
and um. Getting out of a space of not only non-concurrence
but really what that means is that we're supporting
our students in the ways that uh improve their academic
outcomes. I had a question really related to areas
one and two, so like attendance and behavior and. Um
just wondering if you could provide some insight into
what, um. Like knowing that we're providing like quarterly
reports around attendance and um behavior, um, what
does that look like for staff in buildings, 68 buildings
that have American Indian um students in them? What
do they kind of do with that to really start, um. Kinda
hyper focusing on interventions for students and that
might need higher levels of support even if they're
not in uh receiving office of specialized service
for us. Support. Sure, thank you, um, through the
chair, Director Franco, um, appreciate that question
and I really appreciate the question of where, how
many buildings have students in them, because what
has happened around some of this attendance work is
We will actually go, so a member of our school attendance
Manners team will go to a building attendance team
and we'll say, OK, where are your, what's your attendance
looking like? And those teams usually meet, they can
be weekly, biweekly, mostly biweekly or monthly, those
teams will meet, say, how is your attendance for American
Indian students? They'll say, well, we don't have
any. We'll say, Well, no. So that was the beginning
of our work. It was visibility. No, you do. As a matter
of fact, here's how you pull up the ad hoc report
on campus. You have 5 American Indian students, and
3 of them have been attending school inconsistently
So Like who's called the family, who's made a home
visit, who's reached out. And so that's the type, kind
of how granular we want to get with that is so. Maybe
I look at the quarterly reports, but we're trying
to get school teams to look at those reports much
more regularly. And so when um Executive Director
Anderson talks about that data sheet for state identified
American Indian students that has the reading, the
math, the um attendance right there, so they can be
looking at that regularly. Um, the other thing is
every one of our secondary schools, so middle and
high schools, they all have, um, an attendance specialist
um, an EA 2 off the school attendance Matters team
that is assigned to their school, so each of them
have like 3 or 4 schools, but they go to all those
attendance teams, and so I supervise them and have
worked hard to get them to say, to get them to know
how to pull up those attendance reports on campus
and say. In addition to all the attendance things
you're doing about, OK, who's you're gonna referred
to for this step in SAM or who's got an attendance
letter, I want you to pull these up and a little bit
of hyperfocus, like you said, on these students, so
that we're doing things more proactively, um, we're
reaching out, we're finding out why, what's in your
way. Thank you for that and um just appreciate that
and then I know executive uh director Anderson kinda
made that kind of connection to um you really can't
do any of the literacy or any of the um learning unless
if you are physically there and feeling safe and so
um I appreciate that and I know that um. With our
attendants really across our entire system, right
that there is. Never enough, um, kind of uh those
wrap around supports and services, but I know that
the team works hard and it sounds like there's a lot
of progress in the kind of systems building of how
um, how folks are, um, accessing those reports more
regularly and actually acknowledging. What is the
reality, of course. Yeah, then there's a lot of work
that education team does on attendance as well, of
course, she's the chair director Frankville. So in
addition to those pieces, um, I hope that it's been
shared to you in some form or fashion this year, but
the entire district CLC focus for our counseling team
is American Indian attendance, and that's been that
this whole year. And so I've had the pleasure of supporting
their professional development throughout the school
year. Different times, um, to make sure that we're
first starting with relationships, right? You can't
make attendance calls in, you know, with integrity
if you don't know this kid very well and expect to
get a good response from, you know, whoever's at home
um, but it's also been professional development to
not mystify the experience of working with our American
Indian kids, um, uh, you know, I've gone on record
to say, you know, don't you can't be putting on flute
music and doing all this because the kid's going to
say you're chopped and not want to. Talk to you. And
so, um, to know, you know, we've got our American
Indian families, they're into heavy metal, they like
tattoos, they have, you know, there's such a bigger
picture of the intersectional identity of our kids
They're athletes, they're artists. And so, um, being
able to meet um with intention throughout the year
um, and I know that the um counselor leads that we
have, um, um, all of the counselors will be presenting
on their PLC focus. Which has been American Indian
attendance at the end of this year, so there should
be some data coming out to see how the intentionality
has has shifted a few things, and we're really excited
about it, um, and our our office does things too, we
make calls, we do home visits, but I just wanted to
add that in there too, that that's a preventative
before, before, you know, getting that call or a student
is at risk for attendance and worth mentioning, so
thank you. Any more questions or comments? Thank you
thank you, thank you. um, I just had a comment that
was just a lot of good news. I mean, we were not concurring
but it was still a lot of like good news and you know
I was smiling, not that I was proud, but it's just
like oh it's just so good, you know, so thank you
you're not hollow, but alright, um. Yeah, that's fine
Before we reserve a point of clarification, I'm not
the chair, I'm the vice chair. Come here for you on
this flight. Miami Vice. They only get dark when I
eat pasta. Maybe it'll help. But I do appreciate the
compliment. All right, um, let's call for questions
and comments. Related to this that's that's it. It's
a wrap. All right, well. Next is the adjournment of
the meeting. Sorry. Well, not, it's not related to
this item. I was just wondering if there was a space
Oh, OK. You weren't. Are there any comments or questions
from board members? Yes, yeah. So, uh thank you for
the budget presentation earlier. I just want to put
on the table that, you know, I, for one, continue
to get emails about the ELL, um, model, and so I just
just wanna make sure that that is on everyone's radar
that as we move into the kind of the next phases of
the budget, that that is. A continued concern. That
is a continued concern. That's all. That's, I just
wanted to put that on the table. Can you provide some
time just for you to about high-level update of what
you've been going through related to that. Hi. Sure
Um, I've been in many conversations over the last
couple of weeks with SPF leadership and Lauren did
a presentation earlier, and I and Brenda, um, actually
met with, uh, several people from SPFE on Friday. We
met for over 2 hours. Um, and we, um, have some agreements
on a couple of things. Um, one of the things that
I've said, I said at our meeting as recently as Friday
is, you know, a decision's been made. I have to move
forward based on the decision that's been made. And
so the goal is for us to be able to work together
Um, and with that goal, um, it's really about us trying
to do everything we can to minimize disruption at
schools. And so we've made some procedural changes
um, as an HR team to try to help to facilitate minimizing
the disruption at school, um, at the school level
Um, we also had a meeting. A pop-up meeting with principals
on Monday morning to give them updated information
One of the concerns that we had was that there were
when people signed their forms previously, that they
didn't really understand what it meant, and were they
really taking a voluntary reduction, or did they still
have the ability to go to make themselves whole. We
made significant changes, which we together agreed
on what that updated form would look like. We've shared
that form and the process. The process with principals
yesterday. Principals started meeting with um both
licensed and non-licensed staff who got any kind of
FTE change yesterday, and Thursday is the deadline
date for them to then submit to HR any updated forms
so that everybody is really clear about what they're
agreeing to in terms of either retaining uh a partial
FTE at a building and having the ability to go someplace
else to make themselves. or the ability to fully displace
themselves and um be able to retain their 1.0 FTE
We also talked about the fact that we're working with
Doctor Schmidde Carranza who is then going to be pairing
positions together um and one of the things that we
specifically requested was that 0.2 positions not
be posted in the interview and select process, but
that rather, um, Doctor Schmidt Carranz. We'll actually
be able to pair that with the existing 0.8 and make
sure that schedules match so that people would have
the ability to remain at their current locations. We
also talked about the fact, um, legal and I had conferred
and agreed that there was no reason why we could not
move up the notification date to probationary teachers
that we would need to release, um, because we would
need to release them for budget reasons in order for
us to create vacancies to make. Those teachers who've
been displaced whole. And so we will be notifying
them between the 2nd round and 3rd round of interview
and select. We'll send them an informal notice letting
them know that um they're gonna be recommended um
on the June 9th board list for um a probationary release
due to budget reasons. Um, we'll also be informing
them at that time that they will not be eligible to
participate in the interview and select process. And
then The vacancies that we create, um from those releases
will then be all posted in the 3rd round of interview
and select, so that the teachers then that are remaining
will actually then be able to the interview and select
process to be, most of them to be able to secure a
position. Those individuals who are not able to secure
a position through the interview and select process
will then come to placement with HR with the date
that we've already shared, um, and then we will then
By seniority order, um, have them claim positions
So we've been in dialogue for multiple weeks. We've
been working through a number of issues, um, and, um
with SPFB and like I said, we met on Friday, and, um
I think we're, we left our meeting, I think at a very
Positive and a very good place. The only thing that's
I'm still waiting on a decision on is for the points
that we requested not to be posted, but that we can
simply pair those people up, get them taken care of
and then just take care of the rest of the people
who are still displaced. So hopefully that helps. Yeah
I mean, there was, I think it's fair to put on the
table and just. Share a pet, but there was a concern
that there would be 5.2. In a building making up. 15
different. 2s in the building making up a 0.1, no
a 10, sorry. Is what you're sharing about preparing
is that. Prevent that from happening. I can't say
that we can 100, 100% prevent it from happening, but
I want you to know that that's at the very top of
our list. That again is a shared interest that um
the district has with the union, and our goal is to
try to mitigate that um from happening, which is another
reason why it's so important for us to be able to
pair positions together in advance rather than people
trying to get a piece, get a piece, get a piece. So
I think that's really important for administration
Um To know is that if the board is going to Um, request
that we move away from where we're at right now, that
I, I will request from you. I'll just request from
you that we know that as soon as possible because
it is very difficult to go through releases, unrequested
leaves of absences, and all of those things, and then
have to turn around. And change that around. So I
just request that if it does change its parameters
that we have that information as soon as possible
Hmm. Um, I will also say that I do realize, and I've
said this to many community groups as I've been out
speaking, that it seems like this $14.35 million reduction
has had a greater impact than even the 160-something
million that are before, and I completely acknowledge
that, because people are really filling this in our
buildings, that coupled with um The fact that we did
overstaff for our EL ESL teachers in our buildings
Uh, I think that I heard one board member say it seems
like a double whammy, and I honor that as well, that
it, it, it does seem. I just, and I can't believe
I'm explaining the meaning now, but can I just offer
I think that's real and I think that's true, and I'm
not surprised by that sentiment considering that over
the last few years, one of the repeated requests that
we've made is to keep cuts as far away from the classroom
keep them as far away from the classroom, and now
we're at the point where the cuts are, there is really
nowhere else for them to go. So I, I, I think that
is a real reality that folks are feeling. And I acknowledge
that there also isn't a lot of space for us to move
one way or the other. Mhm. It'll, that's what I'll
say. That's what's my thoughts and feelings on this
Yeah, and I think like for me, ensuring folks are
whole is really important. And, and so the update
around how you all have been conversing about that's
really helpful, so I appreciate that and I think avoiding
any opportunity where young people's. Young people's
learning is more disrupted because there's maybe different
teachers in front of them at different points in time
I know it was a, a fear that emerged that I think
um I would imagine um it's just not the best. Um, Practice
in a lot of ways to have different teachers on a day
as opposed to a B day in the secondary or something
and then I think um. Really mitigating the like like
really understanding how much. Um, possible staff
time it would take to really be itinerant and moving
from building to building and is that gonna detract
more so from our ability to like have more time in
front of students and I mean like I know that those
are all things that you all are considering and I
think um having a full understanding of. That grasp
or that impact, I think is, will continue to be helpful
and I, uh, I know that those conversations are happening
with SPFE leaders and, um. And if, yeah, anyway, I'll
leave it at that, but, um, I think those are things
that are really still sticking in my brain. Um You
know, I guess my main concern would be impact to students
you know that I have students and I are here. From
them. What it's like when they have different teachers
when their teachers change or especially in the middle
of the year or just on different days, how difficult
it can be for them to like catch up or maybe one teacher
does it one way and that's just another way or you
know, sometimes they're just on completely different
pages. So I just, that is a worry. Um, Because that
is the most important part is to, you know, make sure
that we are. Teaching and supporting the students
um, more so than anything cause that, that's, that's
the whole point. So that it just, it just worries
me, you know. A lot. But I personally, I'll, I'll
speak for myself. I, I don't necessarily anticipate
like requesting a change in direction or anything
like that. I, I sincerely appreciate the intentionality
with which you're, you know, you're operating and
all of these factors like we're talking about transitions
midday, we're talking about, you know. No. 0.1.1.1
no 0.2 0.2 0.2. I, I, I appreciate that a lot. It
it does this, I mean this has been kind of a long
time coming, I think is your point, and, um, and still
it feels really hard to make this decision at this
time just having come out of Metro Surge, just, you
know, being where we are right now, it feels really
hard to make, to have to, you know. Make these decisions
at this point and I just wanna acknowledge and honor
the The community input and, and, you know, the teachers
who've been reaching out. This is a hard, hard time
to do this, and I know that no one. And the administration
here takes it lightly. I, I know that, yeah. Oh. That
was heavy. Are there any other questions or comments
before we, uh, adjourn? All right, well, That concludes
our committee of the board meeting for May 5th, 2026
As a reminder, our guest regular meeting of the Board
of Education will be on Tuesday, May 19, 2026, beginning
at 5:30 p.m. Public comment will be included as an
agenda item in the meeting. Um, thank you, everybody
and our motion to adjourn. Is there a second? Seconded
by Director Henderson. All in favor say aye. Aye. I
I say nay. All right, motion is approved. We are now
6:58. Have a great night. 5. I'll see some of y'all
I Next month. Next month I'm gonna go. Is it because
oh, I'm ready. I'm ready. I am ready. Ready to be
done with all of y'all. No, no, it, it. Only when
it's time to adjourn or when we're asking too many
questions. Well, no, I can't be with you forever, but
I can be rid of this. Not quizzing, not quizzing the
audience. I see your lobbyist. I want to offer some
pro bono hours to end slavery? Yeah, you know, I'm
just saying. You know, Harriet Tubman, she can't complete
the job and it's kind of up to us to wrap it all up
I know you've seen yourself in Harriet Tubman's shoes
before. But it could be you, Hana. You could be the
2026, 2027 Harriet Tubman. that,