Agenda · Roseville City Council

Roseville City CouncilAgendaTuesday, September 1, 2026

Not yet analyzed

Analyze this document to extract topics and generate news stories.

Agenda Text
## Parks & Recreation Commission Agenda Tuesday, September 1, 2026 ## 6:30 PM ## City Council Chambers Commission Members: Karen Beckman (Chair), Jamie Penny (Vice-Chair), Luci Botzek, Nick Boulton, Bryan Donaldson, Jayne Harris, Chris Her, Mia Huntley (Youth), Chad Kooistra, Lindsay Matts-Benson. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes §13D.02 and City policy, Council and Commission members may attend meetings remotely up to three times per calendar year. (Times listed are approximate – please note that items may be earlier or later than listed on the agenda) ## 1. Roll Call ## 2. Approve Agenda ## 3. Receive Public Comment ## 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes a. Approval of the August 6, 2026 Meeting Minutes ## 5. Business Items ## a. Parks and Recreation Proposed 2027 Budget Discussion b. Prepare for Joint Meeting with the City Council on September 21, 2026 ## c. Maintenance and Operations Center Update (Standing Agenda Item) ## 6. Commission Direction on Member Initiated Agenda Items ## 7. Other Business ## a. Departmental Updates ## b. Other New or Relevant Communication Items 8. Adjourn Page 1 of 33 ## Roseville Parks & Recreation Commission ## Agenda Item DATE: September 1, 2026 ITEM: 4.a. ## ITEM DESCRIPTION: Approval of the August 6, 2026 Meeting Minutes ## Background Enclosed is a draft of the minutes of August 6, 2026. Please be prepared to approve or amend. ## Recommendation Approve/amend meeting minutes of August 6, 2026. ## Attachments 1. 8. Minutes - August 6, 2026 Page 2 of 33 1 ## 1 ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION ## 2MEETING MINUTES FOR 3AUGUST 6, 2026 6:30 p.m. 4 ## 5PRESENT: Beckman, Botzek, Boulton, Donaldson, Harris, Huntley, Matts-Benson, 6Kooistra. 7ABSENT: Her, Penny. 8STAFF: Anderson, Johnson. 9 ## 101. ROLL CALL 11 12Roll Call Commissioners: Beckman, Botzek, Boulton, Donaldson, Harris, Huntley, 13Matts-Benson, Kooistra. 14 ## 152. APPROVE AGENDA 16 17Commissioner Matts-Benson moved to approve the agenda as presented. Commissioner 18Donaldson seconded. 19 20Roll Call 21Ayes: Beckman, Botzek, Boulton, Donaldson, Harris, Huntley, Matts-Benson, Kooistra. 22Nays: None. 23Abstain: None. 24 ## 253. RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT 26No public in attendance. 27 ## 284. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 29 30Commissioner Botzek moved to approve the June 2, 2026 meeting minutes. 31Commissioner Matts-Benson seconded. 32 33Roll Call 34Ayes: Beckman, Botzek, Boulton, Harris, Huntley, Matts-Benson, Kooistra. 35Nays: None. 36Abstain: Donaldson. 37 38 39 40 Page 3 of 33 2 ## 415. BUSINESS ITEMS ## 42a) ROSEFEST REVIEW AND COMMUNITY FEEDBACK 43Assistant Parks and Recreation Director Carrie Anderson introduced the 2026 Rosefest 44community survey, which was distributed during Rosefest and throughout July to gather 45community feedback. 46 47Staff reviewed 2026 Rosefest events and participation as well as the results of the community 48survey. A total of 105 responses were received, with 88 respondents attending at least one event. 49Of the respondents, 76 were Roseville residents and 10 were non-residents. The Parade and Party 50in the Park/Fireworks were the most frequently attended events. 51 52Overall feedback was positive, with Rosefest receiving an average rating of 4.26 out of 5. Fifty 53respondents indicated they were very likely to attend Rosefest again and 18 indicated they were 54likely to attend. Additionally, 28 respondents strongly agreed and 35 agreed that Rosefest helps 55them feel more connected to the Roseville community. 56 57Common positive feedback included the parade, fireworks, music, community atmosphere, 58family activities, and opportunities to connect with neighbors. Suggested improvements included 59the pace and length of the parade, Party in the Park vendors, event accessibility, the Medallion 60Hunt, and entertainment before the fireworks. Suggestions for future events included a children's 61parade, street dance, community bike ride, bingo, carnival games, food truck events, and 62additional activities for different age groups. 63 64For those who did not attend, scheduling conflicts were the most common reason, followed by 65lack of awareness of events and parking/accessibility concerns. 66 67Looking ahead to Rosefest 2027, staff will explore partnerships and new events, evaluate 68existing events and potential improvements, and continue looking for efficiencies that balance 69Rosefest activities with regular department services. 70 71The Commission discussed the survey results and potential opportunities for future Rosefest 72events. Commissioner Boulton shared that he had heard feedback from residents interested in a 73drone show as an alternative to the traditional fireworks display. 74 75Commissioner Huntley suggested potentially adding a yoga event, with or without animals, in 76the park. Commissioner Matts-Benson suggested offering additional events geared toward pre- 77teens and teenagers. Other ideas discussed included community karaoke, a giant slip-and-slide, 78additional Police and Fire Department engagement, a fire truck spray-and-play event, community 79bike ride, and music that appeals to younger audiences. Page 4 of 33 3 80Commissioner Matts-Benson noted that a street dance could be a fun addition but acknowledged 81potential safety and substance-related concerns. Staff noted that ongoing discussions have 82focused on finding new events that appeal to a variety of age groups while recognizing the 83challenge of introducing new offerings without eliminating long-standing Rosefest traditions. 84 85Commissioner Botzek noted that the Rosefest Golf Tournament could benefit from a refresh. The 86Commission discussed opportunities to enhance the event through additional games and prizes or 87by incorporating more unique/odd golf experiences into the tournament. 88 89Commissioner Kooistra noted appreciation that cost was not identified as a barrier to 90participation in Rosefest events. Commissioner Donaldson noted that he felt this year’s fireworks 91display was the best Rosefest has had in several years. 92 93Commissioner Harris asked how residents were notified of the Rosefest survey. Staff responded 94that the survey was promoted through yard signs placed in eight parks, the City newsletter and 95website, and flyers distributed at Discover Your Parks events. Staff noted that outreach was 96intentionally designed to gather feedback from both those who participate in Rosefest and those 97who have not historically participated. 98 ## 99b) REVIEW 2026 COMMUNITY SURVEY (PARKS AND RECREATION FOCUS) 100Staff reviewed the results of the 2026 City of Roseville Community Survey, which included 101telephone interviews with a random sample of 400 Roseville households. Staff provided an 102overview of general community perceptions, including quality of life and the most serious issues 103facing the community. Staff noted that declines in quality-of-life ratings have been seen in 104similar community surveys and may reflect broader influences, including the current political 105climate and social media. 106 107Staff reviewed survey results related specifically to Parks and Recreation. Staff noted that sense 108of community was identified as the most important aspect of quality of life, while open 109space/nature and parks and recreation were also identified as important factors. Staff noted that 110these areas are closely connected and provide an opportunity to strengthen messaging around 111how parks, recreation, and natural spaces contribute to a sense of community. 112 113Staff reviewed ratings of City parks and recreation facilities, noting a decrease in “excellent” 114ratings since 2018 while the majority of respondents continue to rate facilities as “good.” Staff 115noted that significant investments were made throughout the park system as part of the 2014– 1162016 Park Renewal Program, which likely contributed to the higher ratings seen in 2018. 117Staff also reviewed facility usage, with trails and neighborhood parks identified as the most 118frequently used park amenities. Page 5 of 33 4 119Regarding upkeep and maintenance, staff noted a similar shift from “excellent” to “good” 120ratings. Staff discussed the challenge of maintaining aging amenities while the park system has 121continued to grow, including the addition of three parks, new amenities, and inclusive 122playgrounds without corresponding increases in maintenance staffing. Staff noted that 123maintaining a high level of service remains a priority and that these trends will continue to be 124monitored. 125 126Staff reviewed additional survey results related to recreation participation, trails, public facilities, 127City services, and perceptions of value. Staff noted that participation in City recreation programs 128has remained strong and consistent over the past several years, with 38% of respondents 129reporting participation and 94% reporting satisfaction with their experience. 130 131Trail use also remains strong, with respondents identifying connections between neighborhoods 132and parks as the highest priority for the trail and sidewalk system, followed by connections 133between neighborhoods and businesses and opportunities for exercise within parks. 134 135Staff noted that 39% of respondents reported using City public buildings, with 90% indicating 136that the facilities meet their needs. 137 138Parks and pathway-related services continued to receive generally positive ratings, including 139parks trail/pathway plowing, neighborhood trail/pathway plowing, and parks and neighborhood 140pathway repair. 141 142Staff also reviewed broader findings related to the value of City services and property taxes, 143noting that many respondents continue to favor a tax increase when necessary to maintain City 144services. 145 146The Commission discussed how the presentation and wording of survey questions may impact 147responses. Commissioners asked whether results were ever reported by age and whether the 148survey was conducted solely by phone. Staff responded that results are not broken down by age 149or other demographics to protect respondent anonymity and confirmed that the survey is 150conducted solely by phone. 151 ## 152c) PREPARE FOR JOINT MEETING WITH THE ROSEVEILLE CITY COUNCIL ## 153(TENTATIVELY: SEPTEMBER 14, 2026) 154Staff noted that the Commission meets annually with the City Council to provide updates and 155discuss Parks and Recreation priorities. Staff provided a list of topics discussed at previous joint 156meetings to assist the Commission in developing an agenda. The Commission also discussed 157attendance for the joint meeting. 158 Page 6 of 33 5 159The Commission identified several potential discussion topics, including the importance of 160updating the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan, Harriet Alexander Nature Center 161updates, Friends groups, and Commissioner-initiated agenda items. The Commission agreed to 162focus on key priorities and reinforce the connection between parks and community, emphasizing 163that investment in parks and recreation is an investment in the community. 164 165Commissioner Harris suggested considering whether any items from the City Council's budget 166discussions should be highlighted. 167 168The Commission discussed the importance of Parks and Recreation programs in bringing people 169into the community, building connections, and contributing to a safe and strong community. 170 171Commissioner Donaldson suggested highlighting the continued growth in park services, parks, 172and amenities without a corresponding increase in staffing. The Commission agreed that as Parks 173and Recreation facilities, amenities, and services are modernized and expanded, appropriate 174resources are needed to support them. Commissioners noted that parks and recreation are a 175highly visible use of tax dollars that provide benefits throughout the community. 176 177Commissioner Matts-Benson suggested potentially highlighting that the Commission has 178received ongoing updates regarding the Maintenance and Operations Center project. 179 180Commissioner Kooistra suggested recognizing the significant contributions volunteers make to 181the Parks and Recreation Department and the value of having a staff position dedicated to 182volunteer coordination. 183 184Chair Beckman noted that the suggestions from the discussion would be used to develop a 185preliminary outline for the joint meeting with the City Council, which the Commission can 186review and finalize at its next meeting. 187 ## 188d) MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS CENTER UPDATE (STANDING AGENDA ## 189ITEM) 190Staff reviewed the anticipated final site plan for the Maintenance and Operations Center project. 191Staff noted that the existing ballfield at Veteran’s Park will become a 200-foot fastpitch field and 192that staff are working with local youth fastpitch organizations to ensure the field meets their 193needs. The park plan also includes a playground, full-court basketball court, and potential 194veteran’s memorial. 195 196Staff reviewed aerial and elevation renderings for the proposed License and Passport Center and 197Dance Studio, along with the proposed site layout, noting the parking lot will include Page 7 of 33 6 198approximately 150 parking stalls. Staff also reviewed the Dance Studio layout, which includes 199three restrooms that will be available for park users. 200 201The Maintenance Center site plan was also reviewed and staff noted that the design focuses on 202maximizing storage and operational efficiency through shared spaces rather than constructing 203separate maintenance garages. 204 205Commissioner Matts-Benson expressed appreciation that feedback from users of the fastpitch 206field and dance program was heard and incorporated into the project design. She also noted 207appreciation for the inclusion of public restrooms that will be available to park users. 208 ## 2096. COMMISSION DIRECTION ON MEMBER INITIATED AGENDA ITEMS 210The Commission did not have any member-initiated agenda items. 211 ## 2127. OTHER BUSINESS ## 213a) DEPARTMENTAL UPDATES 214Staff provided the following departmental updates: 215• Community engagement for the proposed nature playground at the Harriet Alexander Nature 216Center has included meetings at Central Park School, engagement at the Nature Center, and 217an online survey that has received approximately 300 responses. Staff noted that feedback 218received to date has been overwhelmingly positive. The survey is anticipated to close on 219August 10. Next steps include reviewing survey results, developing a concept plan, and 220pursuing available grant opportunities. 221• Construction at Rosebrook Park continues to progress, with the new playground, parking lot, 222and concrete work nearing completion. Safety surfacing is anticipated to be installed the 223week of August 10. The final component of the project is the splash pad. Staff are currently 224working through the permitting process with the Minnesota Department of Health in order to 225begin working on the splash pad. 226• A community build for the new Applewood Park playground was held on July 29, with the 227Sandcastle Park community build taking place on August 6. 228• The Applewood Park playground is anticipated to open August 10, with the Sandcastle Park 229playground anticipated to open the following week. 230• Summer concerts continue to be very popular despite recent periods of very warm weather. 231• The Touch-a-Truck event will be on Wednesday, August 19 from 5-7 p.m. at the Central 232Park – Dale St. Athletic Fields. 233• Fall program registration opened with 248 registrations successfully processed through Dash 234within the first nine minutes, accounting for approximately $61,000 in revenue. Staff noted 235that while the registration process was not perfect, it operated much more smoothly than 236summer registration. Staff continue to work with Dash to address remaining issues. 237• The City Council approved the Climate Equity Action Plan. Page 8 of 33 7 238• A $50,000 donation from the Friends of the OVAL Foundation is anticipated to be accepted 239at the next City Council meeting. The donation will fund renovations to the lower OVAL 240lobby. 241• Staff will discuss Roseville Skating Center roof repairs at the next City Council meeting, as 242bonding funds were not secured for the project. Staff noted that there are currently holes in 243the roof and a decision will need to be made regarding how to move forward with the 244necessary repairs. 245• The City Manager will present the preliminary City budget to the City Council on August 24. 246Staff will provide an overview of the budget to the Commission at its September meeting. 247 ## 248b) OTHER NEW OR RELEVANT COMMUNICATION ITEMS 249 250 ## 2518. ADJOURN 252 253Meeting adjourned at approximately 8:03pm. 254 255Respectfully Submitted, ## 256Danielle Christensen, Parks and Recreation Department Assistant Page 9 of 33 ## Roseville Parks & Recreation Commission ## Agenda Item DATE: September 1, 2026 ITEM: 5.a. ## ITEM DESCRIPTION: Parks and Recreation Proposed 2027 Budget Discussion ## Background In 2023, the Parks and Recreation Commission asked staff to annually provide a summary of the proposed Parks and Recreation budget. The purpose of this annual review is to help the Commission understand the Department’s funding structure, budget priorities, and anticipated service impacts, and to provide an opportunity for Commission feedback. Consistent with that request, staff has prepared a summary of the Parks and Recreation components of the City Manager’s proposed 2027 budget. The City’s 2027 budget process began with City Council work sessions in April and July, during which the City Manager and Department Heads presented preliminary budget projections, departmental requests, and potential levy impacts. Following direction from the City Council to evaluate potential reductions, alternative funding sources, and expenditure deferrals, the City Manager presented his recommended 2027 budget on August 24, 2026 (see City Council Meeting Packet from August 24, 2026). The City Manager’s recommendation includes a base property tax levy increase of 7.8%. An additional 2% levy increase is recommended to strengthen the General Fund balance, resulting in a total proposed levy increase of 9.8%. The proposed budget reflects several significant financial pressures, including rising operating costs, the continued budget impact of the 22 public safety positions added in 2026, and the need to maintain adequate General Fund reserves. The Parks and Recreation Fund currently has a reserve balance equal to approximately 27% of annual operating expenditures. This is within the 20% to 30% range established for the fund by the City’s operating fund balance policy. As part of developing the recommended budget, departments were asked to identify potential expenditure reductions, deferrals, alternative funding sources, and opportunities to increase revenue. The resulting proposal includes several changes to the Parks and Recreation budget. The proposed 2027 Parks and Recreation budget includes total expenditures of approximately $7.88 million, an increase of $496,561, or 6.7%, from the adopted 2026 budget. Non-property-tax revenues are projected at approximately $3.84 million, an increase of $243,680, or 6.8%, from the 2026 budget. The remaining $4.04 million represents the Department’s net property tax levy requirement. The Department’s proposed net levy requirement increases by approximately $252,881, or 6.7%, compared with 2026 (Attachment A). ## Significant Budget Recommendations The City Manager’s proposed budget includes the addition of one full-time Park Maintenance Worker. The estimated annual levy cost of the position is $100,206, including wages and benefits. The additional position is intended to help address the growth of the park system and the increasing maintenance demands placed Page 10 of 33 on the Department’s existing workforce. The proposed budget also begins the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan update process. The anticipated $175,000 cost of the plan would be funded using Parks and Recreation Fund reserves rather than through the property tax levy. Additionally, the proposed budget includes several reductions and deferrals affecting Parks and Recreation: • The proposed Recreation Coordinator position was not included, reducing the budget request by $117,208. • The Parks and Recreation internship was eliminated for 2027, reducing the budget by $11,000. • Seasonal staffing for outdoor skating rinks was reduced by $12,000. • The number of summer concerts in Central Park was reduced, lowering the budget by $10,000. • The Parks and Recreation System Master Plan was shifted from property tax levy support to Parks and Recreation Fund reserves, reducing the 2027 levy requirement by $175,000. Together, these adjustments reduce the Department’s proposed levy requirement compared with the budget presented to the City Council in July, while preserving the proposed Park Maintenance Worker position. ## Departmental Functions and Cost Recovery Parks and Recreation services are funded through varying combinations of property taxes, user fees, rentals, memberships, grants, donations, and other revenues. Some functions generate substantial direct revenue, while others are supported primarily by the property tax levy because they provide services and benefits broadly available to the community. Staff will present a summary of the revenues, expenditures, cost-recovery percentage, and net levy support associated with each major departmental function. This information is intended to provide a clearer understanding of the cost of each function, the extent to which it is supported by direct users, and the community services supported through the property tax levy. At the August 24 City Council meeting, there was some conversation around possible additional revenue sources. Staff will preliminarily review these options, with the possibility of a more in-depth conversation at a later date. ## Recommendation Receive the presentation, discuss the proposed 2027 Parks and Recreation budget, and provide feedback regarding departmental priorities for consideration during the remainder of the City’s budget process. ## Attachments ## 1. Parks and Recreation Budget Proposal Summary Page 11 of 33 ## Budget Function ## Recreation Administration ## Recreation Fee Programs ## Category2025 Actual2026 Budget2027 Proposed$ Change% ChangeRecreation Non Fee ## ExpendituresNature Center Personnel4,444,590.28 4,740,131.00 5,061,473.42 321,342.42 6.78%Skating Center Supplies & Materials443,961.80 532,005.00 535,985.00 3,980.00 0.75%Activity Center Contractual Services1,041,412.18 1,122,750.00 1,313,955.00 191,205.00 17.03%Park Maintenenace Utilities432,329.08 480,800.00 448,800.00 (32,000.00) -6.66%Golf Course Other Charges376,417.75 437,720.00 430,754.00 (6,966.00) -1.59% Capital Outlay225,365.71 66,000.00 85,000.00 19,000.00 28.79% Total6,964,076.80 7,379,406.00 7,875,967.42 496,561.42 6.73% ## Revenues - Excludes Property Tax Charges for Services679,944.24 541,000.00 658,300.00 117,300.00 21.68% Non Fee Programs46,312.00 35,350.00 43,900.00 8,550.00 24.19% Recreation Fee Programs1,422,426.42 1,433,895.00 1,468,225.00 34,330.00 2.39% Nature Center108,133.07 109,500.00 118,500.00 9,000.00 8.22% Skating Center1,375,874.12 1,380,700.00 1,438,700.00 58,000.00 4.20% ## Miscellaneous12,958.72 Interest78,643.60 27,500.00 25,000.00 (2,500.00) -9.09% Transfer In82,168.59 66,000.00 85,000.00 19,000.00 28.79% Total3,806,460.76 3,593,945.00 3,837,625.00 243,680.00 6.78% ## Organizational Responsibility: Parks and Recreation Director Proposed 2027 Budget (August 2026) Page 12 of 33 Page 13 of 33 ## Roseville Parks & Recreation Commission ## Agenda Item DATE: September 1, 2026 ITEM: 5.b. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Prepare for Joint Meeting with the City Council on September 21, 2026 ## Background The Parks and Recreation Commission is tentatively scheduled for a joint meeting with the City Council on Monday, September 21, 2026. These joint meetings provide an opportunity for the Commission to meet with the Council, highlight recent work, share feedback, and hear input or requests from the Council. At its August meeting, the Commission discussed a number of topics that it would like to share with the City Council. Attached are slides that Chair Beckman developed based on that conversation, for the Commission to review and discuss. ## Recommendation Review proposed slides, provide feedback, and discuss what topics shall be discussed with the City Council. ## Attachments ## 1. Chair Beckman's Joint Meeting Prep Slides (Draft 1) Page 14 of 33 ## Parks and Recreation ## Commission Joint ## Meeting September 21, 2026 Page 15 of 33 ## 2026 Highlights: What We Accomplished Together ## Visible Progress Across the Park System ## Rosebrook Park Splash pad, inclusive playground, trail lighting and expanded parking moved into construction, supported by a water-reuse grant. DASH went live The new recreation platform replaced a 20-year-old system and improves registration, access to information and long-term cost efficiency. ## Bike Plan advanced The Commission recommended adoption of Roseville’s first community Bike Plan after a grant-supported, community- informed process. Neighborhood parks Autumn Grove planning advanced; Lexington’s inclusive play structure was completed; Sandcastle and Applewood engagement continued. Natural resources Secured $700,000 grant, Master Plan implementation, habitat restoration, EAB work, tree planting and volunteer stewardship all moved forward. Staff, Residents, the Commission, and Council moved important work from discussion to delivery. Page 16 of 33 ## Working Together Where Our Roles Overlap ## Commission Listens, questions and advises Council ## Community Shares priorities, volunteers and support ## Staff Plans, delivers and maintains the system Shared stewardship of parks Page 17 of 33 ## Information into Advice . 1 ## Listen Resident concerns and staff reports 2 ## Learn Public comment, engagement results and subject-matter presentations 3 ## Question Commission-led topics and emerging needs 4 ## Advise Feedback, motions and recommendations to Council Staff reports reviewed ## Budget and CIP, Skating Center, park rentals, Rosefest, deer management, forestry and natural resources. Commission-led topics Nature play, mountain biking and pump tracks, EV charging, pickleball, park connectivity and Veterans Park. Recommendations made Bike Plan adoption, park dedication, park concepts, engagement priorities and Commission goals. Page 18 of 33 Friends of the OVAL Providing a substantial donation toward an OVAL lobby remodel and building community through events such as the winter kickoff. ## FOR Parks Funding visible improvements, leading successful fundraisers and supporting both the Nature Playground and Lexington flower plantings. ## Central Park Foundation ## Funding the Nature Playground study, considering a substantial project pledge and supporting a stronger Central Park experience. Volunteer power More than 100 volunteers planted Lexington flowers; over 40 volunteers completed winter seeding in extreme cold. Project-based giving A donor-ready capital wishlist and clear recognition can connect community generosity to high-impact, system-aligned priorities. ## Friends Groups Turn Community Pride into Impact Page 19 of 33 ## Exceptional Staff Make the System Work Delivering every day 27.75 FTE support programs, events, rentals and facilities while moving capital projects and planning initiatives forward. Caring for 680 acres Staff maintain parkland, natural areas, trails, fields, buildings, the OVAL, Skating Center, Cedarholm and Nature Center. Managing responsibly The team stewards a $6.6 million operating budget with 44% cost recovery and a deliberate focus on affordability and access. Serving community Park buildings exceeded 1,100 bookings in 2025 while programs, events and facilities continued to evolve. Securing resources Staff win and administer grants, coordinate donors and Friends groups, and manage complex reporting and stewardship obligations. Building capacity Leadership development, cross-training, retention and succession planning are essential as the system grows more complex. Commission priority: support staff growth and capacity alongside the responsibilities of an evolving parks system. Page 20 of 33 ## Funding Secured by Staff Multiplies Local Impact $500K CPL grant ## Supports Natural Resources Master Plan implementation from fall 2025 through spring 2028. $250K tree grant Met Council funding supports Phase 3 of the accelerated EAB program and replacement of about 200 hazardous ash trees. $200K Rosebrook grant A climate-resilience conservation grant supports splash-pad water reuse and additional shade features. Page 21 of 33 ## Nature Play Shows What Partnership Can Unlock Nature-based experience A natural playground would invite creative play, exploration and connection to HANC’s 52-acre setting while protecting sensitive resources. Planning first ## The Central Park Foundation is funding an initial site study to evaluate location, scale, accessibility, environmental impacts and cost. Friends pledges ## The Central Park Foundation and FOR Parks each discussed preliminary pledges of $100,000–$200,000 toward implementation. Major private donor A preliminary $250,000–$500,000 donation from John Robertson- Smith could provide a major share of the project’s capital funding. Grant + stewardship A DNR grant could fund up to $500,000. The City should also plan for operations, maintenance and eventual replacement. Page 22 of 33 Our priorities for the year ahead Update the system vision Review and advise on the Parks and ## Recreation System Master Plan update, grounded in community needs and asset conditions. Advance campus planning Support a revised Campus Master vision that protects Veterans Park and connects facilities, parkland and public use. Complete key investments ## Finish Rosebrook and Autumn Grove work; advance the Nature Playground with disciplined planning and lifecycle responsibility. Strengthen partnerships Align with Friends groups, donors, volunteers and grant opportunities on community priorities to provide visible public benefit. Invest in the team Support staff development, leadership capacity, succession planning, operational tools and maintenance resources. Page 23 of 33 ## Council Feedback Page 24 of 33 ## THANK YOU ## Parks and Recreation Page 25 of 33 ## Roseville Parks & Recreation Commission ## Agenda Item DATE: September 1, 2026 ITEM: 5.c. ## ITEM DESCRIPTION: Maintenance and Operations Center Update (Standing Agenda Item) ## Background At each meeting throughout the planning and construction process, staff will provide updates on the progress of the Maintenance and Operations Center. ## Recommendation Receive update, ask questions, and provide feedback. ## Attachments ## None Page 26 of 33 ## Roseville Parks & Recreation Commission ## Agenda Item DATE: September 1, 2026 ITEM: 7.a. ## ITEM DESCRIPTION: Departmental Updates ## Background At each Commission meeting, city staff provides updates on Parks and Recreation activities and projects. ## Recommendation Receive report and provide feedback. ## Attachments 1. 9.1.26 Departmental Updates Page 27 of 33 Page 28 of 33 Page 29 of 33 Page 30 of 33 Page 31 of 33 ## BEGINNER I ## MON ## MON ## TUES ## WED 4:45-5:30 pm 6:45-7:30 pm 5:45-6:30pm 4:30-5:15 pm ## BEGINNER II ## INTERMEDIATE ## ADVANCED ## BEGINNER I ## BEGINNER II ## INTERMEDIATE I ## SAT 9-9:45 am ## MON ## TUES ## WED 5:45-6:30 pm 4:45-5:30pm 5:30-6:15 pm ## SAT 10-10:45 am ## WED ## SAT 6:30-7:30 pm 11 am-12 pm ## TUES 6:45-7:45 pm ## MON ## TUES ## THUR ## SAT 4:30-5:30 pm 4:45-5:45 pm 6:15-7:15 pm 10:45-11:45 am ## MON ## WED ## SAT 5:45-7 pm 4:30-5:45 pm 12-1:15 pm ## THUR ## SAT 4:30-6pm 9-10:30 am ## INTERMEDIATE II ## TUES 6-7:30pm ## ADVANCED II ## TUES 6-8pm ## SCAN FOR MORE INFO! ## ROSEVILLE ## GYMNASTICS ## CENTER ## P R E S C H O O L ( A G E S 3 - 5 ) 651-792-7006 ## P: ## 1238 W. County Road B2 attached to the HS ## A: ## RosevilleGymnastics@cityofroseville.com ## E: www.cityofroseville.com/parks ## W: ## I N S T R U C T I O N A L ( A G E S 6 - 1 4 ) ## FALL GYMNASTICS 2026 ## SEPTEMBER 14 - NOVEMBER 14 ## * N O C L A S S T H U R S , O C T 3 1 - ## M A K E U P C L A S S T H U R S , N O V 1 4 ## WED 6-7:30 pm ## ADVANCED I ## SAT 9-10:30 am ## REGISTRATION OPENS BY GROUPS BELOW: ## ROSEVILLE RESIDENTS - TUESDAY, AUGUST 25TH ## 2026 PARTICIPANTS - WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 26TH ## GENERAL REGISTRATION - THURSDAY, AUGUST 27TH Page 32 of 33 ## Roseville Parks & Recreation Commission ## Agenda Item DATE: September 1, 2026 ITEM: 7.b. ## ITEM DESCRIPTION: Other New or Relevant Communication Items ## Background At each commission meeting, city staff provides updates on city activities and projects ongoing within the city that pertain to Parks and Recreation activities. ## Recommendation Receive report and provide feedback. ## Attachments ## None Page 33 of 33
Agenda — Roseville City Council - Roseville Recorder