## Public Works, Environment and Transportation ## Commission Agenda Tuesday, August 25, 2026 ## 6:30 PM ## City Council Chambers In accordance with Minnesota Statutes §13D.02 and City policy, Council and Commission members may attend meetings remotely up to three times per calendar year. (Times listed are approximate – please note that items may be earlier or later than listed on the agenda) 6:30 p.m. 1. Roll Call 6:32 p.m. 2. Approve Agenda 6:34 p.m. 3. Receive Public Comment 6:40 p.m. 4. Business Items 6:40 p.m. a. Communication Items 6:45 p.m. b. Metro Transit Update 7:15 p.m. c. Streetlight Policy/Assessment Policy ## 8:00 p.m. d. City Council Joint Meeting Review ## 8:20 p.m. 5. Commission Direction on Member Initiated Agenda Items ## a. Commission Direction on Member Initiated Agenda Items 8:28 p.m. 6. Approval of Meeting Minutes ## a. Approve July Minutes 8:30 p.m. 7. Adjourn Page 1 of 47 ## Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission ## Agenda Item DATE: August 25, 2026 ITEM: 4.a. ## ITEM DESCRIPTION: Communication Items ## Background At each commission meeting, City staff provides updates on City activities and projects ongoing within the city that pertain to public works activities. ## Recommendation Receive report and provide feedback. ## Attachments ## 1. Communications Memo ## 2. 2026 Roseville Project Map ## 3. June Development Activity Report Page 2 of 47 ## Public Works Department ## Memo ## To: P ## ublic Works Environmental and Transportation Commission Members ## From: Jennifer Lowry, City Engineer Date: August 20, 2026 ## Re: Communications Items The following are updates to projects and other activities happening in Roseville since the last commission meeting. Note that links to most planned or active construction projects can be found on our construction projects website. http://www.cityofroseville.com/697/Construction-Projects ## R oseville Public Works project updates: •Maintenance Operation Center (MOC) / License & Passport Centers / Dance Studio (LPCDS) Staff continues to work with consultants to develop the construction plans and anticipate bidding this fall. A design development update will be provided to Council on Sept 14. •Lexington Avenue Pathway - County Road B to TH 36 oThe construction of the pathway is substantially complete and open to pedestrians with the decorative fence being installed in the coming weeks. •Hamline Avenue – County Road C to Snelling Avenue oConstruction of the Hamline Avenue Reconstruction Project was suspended after field verification identified a conflict with an existing Xcel Energy gas main. Xcel anticipates installing the new gas main in September/October and completing the project early 2027 (re-energizing after winter). Staff and project partners are evaluating phasing options for resuming the project following the relocation in 2027. ## •2026 PMP Project oNearly 6 miles of roads are planned for rehabilitation in 2026. Construction continues on schedule and is now in the Grandview area. ## •Twin Lakes Trail Phase 2 oEasement needs to be negotiated with property owner. Construction likely in 2027 due to tree removal date restrictions. •Wagner/Western Pathway oEasement being negotiated with Ramsey County. ## •2026 Sewer Cleaning & Lining oLining will resume in September near County Road C and Snelling Avenue and is currently on schedule. ## •Booster Station Phase 4 Improvements oBuilding improvements to occur in coordination with the solar installation in 2026. •Lift Stations oCohansey Lift Station upgrade awarded with start date anticipated beginning of October. oBrenner Lift Station design and construction administration contract approved on July 20. Design is anticipated to be completed this fall. •Wayfinding Signage oRemaining signs to be coordinated with upcoming construction projects and/or pending easements from others. Attachment 1 Page 3 of 47 ## PWET Communications Memo Page 2 ## • Alameda Pond o Staff is working with the University of MN Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory (SAFL) on a research project aimed to better understand how aeration and mixing of water within storm ponds can improve water quality. In the next few months, an aerator will be installed adjacent to the pond on Alameda Street. SAFL will monitor the pond to find out how the aeration system affects the water quality. Currently, our electrician is working with Xcel Energy to run power to the aerator location, and City staff will install a concrete pad. • Lighting o Intersection lighting in eastern Roseville planned for 2026. Construction is anticipated to begin after September 11. o Owasso Hills was asked to decide standard vs enhanced lighting – see Streetlight agenda item for more information. ## • Bike Plan o PWET and the Parks Commission recommended Council approve the Bike Plan – a Council date is TBD for later this year. ## • Rosebrook Park o Parks and Rec construction is underway to remove the existing southern parking lot, playground, and kiddie pool, and add a new larger parking lot, splash pad, and playground. Other agency project updates: ## • Ramsey County o County Road C 4:3 Conversion from Lexington Avenue to Little Canada Road and bridge over railroad  Construction is underway and anticipated to be complete this fall. The intersection of County Road C and Lexington Avenue will have a temporary traffic signal during the State Fair and stop signs into the fall when a new signal will be installed. Bridge construction planned for 2027. ## o Fairview from Larpenteur Avenue to County Road B2  Fairview is reopened to traffic and traffic control will be removed during the State Fair. Remaining work to be completed after the Fair. ## o County Road D from Fairview Avenue to Cleveland Avenue  The Public Open House has been rescheduled for August 24 from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. at Oasis Park. Design in process for 2027 project to include resurfacing and construction of a path on the south side. o Victoria Street Path from County Road C to Harriet Avenue  Design in process for 2028 project. Presentation made to City Council on July 20. ## o Rice from Wheelock Parkway to County Road B  Design in process for 2028 project. Public Open House held June 24. ## o Larpenteur Corridor Study  Consultant proposals for study of entire corridor have been received and are under review. • MnDOT ## o Snelling Avenue from TH 36 to Grey Fox Road Page 4 of 47 ## PWET Communications Memo Page 3  Lane reductions due to utility and pathway construction will be removed prior to the State Fair. Southbound closure of Snelling Avenue is tentatively planned for September 25-27. o TH 280 from Wabash Avenue in St. Paul to I35 W  Project is on schedule to open lanes prior to State Fair. Minor work may continue after State Fair. • Other ## o G Line (Metro Transit)  Construction 2026-2028, start date TBD. ## o Private Utilities  Xcel is inspecting and replacing poles around town throughout the year - no closures currently anticipated.  Xcel is undergrounding overhead lines in seven small areas in Roseville where damage to lines is reoccurring and problematic - no closures currently anticipated.  Fiber projects are underway in various locations around Roseville and change weekly. ## Engineering Updates: • Summer internships are coming to an end. Lots of side projects were accomplished thanks to our awesome interns! • We will receive an update on the Ramsey County’s proposed Cost Participation Policy in early September. • The City was successful in getting 11 new Be Active Be Green benches from Ramsey County Active Communities. Benches will be received late fall after Council approval of the agreement. ## Environmental & Sustainability Updates: • The Climate Equity Action Plan adoption will be celebrated at an upcoming launch event on ## Thursday, September 10, from 6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. at Showtime Studio and Coffee. • Staff has been collaborating with Ramsey County on multiple sustainability project ideas, including community gardens and food security, future swap events, and chloride reduction programs. • Planning for the second annual clothing swap is underway. Donations will be accepted from August 17 thru 25 at City Hall, and the swap will be held August 27 and 28 from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. each day at the Rose Room in the skating center. ## Maintenance Updates: • Street and Storm o Flared End Storm structure maintenance. o Streets patching problem areas. o ROW mowing. o Flex Sealing catch basins begin in July. o Annual crack sealing to begin at the end of July. o Assist Utilities with water valve replacements. o Ongoing sign maintenance. o Curb and Sidewalk concrete replacements. ## • Water and Sanitary Sewer o Continued inspections for water service line inventory. Page 5 of 47 ## PWET Communications Memo Page 4 o Continued locates, weekly lift station inspections/repairs, collection of water samples. o Responded to and repair water main breaks, water gate valves and sewer backups. o Valley Rich replaced (2) 12” valves at County Road C and Western Avenue. 8” Valve to be replaced August 24, 2026. o Repaired /replaced 6” Valve on Matilda Street on August 19, 2026. ## Council Updates: Below is a highlight of items recently presented to and/or acted on by the City Council. More information can be found in the agenda packets and minutes for the referenced Council meetings: o August 10 ##  Approved: Youth Commissioner Reappointments o August 14 – special meeting ##  Approved: Primary Election Results o August 24 - planned ##  Receive: Proposed Budget from City Manager Page 6 of 47 0700100020003000 ## Feet ## AllProjects2026 ## Lake Josephine ## Park ## Lake ## McCarrons ## County Park ## Ramsey County ## Open Space (Ramsey County) ## Lake Josephine ## Beach Park ## Park ## Lake ## Langton ## Sandcastle ## Park ## Lake ## Park ## Oasis ## Central ## Park ## Acorn ## Park ## Central ## Park ## Central ## Park ## Park ## Villa ## Park ## Keya ## Park ## Park ## Tamarack ## Park ## Reservoir Woods ## Reservoir Woods ## Rosebrook ## Langton ## Park ## Park ## Autumn ## Grove ## Park ## Park ## Cottontail ## Veterans ## Park ## Howard ## Johnson ## Park ## Willow Pond ## Cedarholm ## Golf Course ## Evergreen ## Park ## Keller ## Mayflower ## Park ## Lexington ## Park ## Bruce ## Russell ## Park ## Pioneer ## Park ## Concordia ## Park ## Materion ## Park ## Central ## Park North ## Owasso ## Ballfields ## Valley ## Park ## Owasso ## Hills ## Park ## Ladyslipper ## Park ## Mapleview ## Park ## Woodhill ## Park ## Applewood ## Park ## Applewood ## Overlook ## Memorial ## Park ## Midland ## Gardens ## Park ## Unity ## Park ## Sunset ## Park ## Lake ## Josephine ## Lake ## Owasso ## McCarrons ## Lake ## Lake ## Bennett ## Pond ## Willow ## Zimmerman ## Lake ## Oasis Pond ## Lake ## Johanna ## Lake ## Langton ## Walsh ## Lake ## BRENNER ## ST ## LYDIA ## AVE ## LYDIA ## CT ## P ## A ## T ## T ## O ## N ## RD ## HIGHCREST ## RD ## M ## I ## L ## L ## W ## O ## O ## D ## ST ## BRENNER ## CT ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## STANBRIDGE ## ST ## MANSON ## ST ## MAPLE ## LN ## OLD ## HIGHWAY 8 ## TROSETH ## RD ## COUNTY HIGHWAY 88 ## COUNTY ## ROAD D ## RD ## PARTRIDGE ## ROAD C2 ## CENTRE ## POINTE ## DR ## AVE ## INTERSTATE 35W ## ROAD C ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## CLEVELAND ## COUNTY ## COUNTY ## PATTON ## RD ## COUNTY ## ROAD D ## WILDER ## ST ## MOUNT ## RD ## RIDGE ## EVELYN ## ST ## BRENNER ## AVE ## PRIOR ## CIR ## ST ## ARTHUR ## DR ## AVE ## MILDRED ## ST ## S ## H ## O ## R ## E ## W ## O ## O ## D ## AVE ## BRENNER ## LYDIA ## ARTHUR ## PL ## MILDRED ## DR ## STANBRIDGE ## MILLWOOD ## MAPLE ## ST ## WHEELER ## WHEELER ## SHORE ## CURV ## WOOD ## LN ## LN ## ST ## ALDINE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## L ## I ## N ## C ## O ## L ## N ## DR ## RD C2 ## COUNTY ## AVE ## COUNTY ## RD C2 ## RD C2 ## COUNTY ## CENTENNIAL ## DR ## DR ## TERRACE ## LINCOLN ## DR ## SNELLING ## FAIRVIEW ## ST ## ARTHUR ## ROAD C ## RD C2 ## COUNTY ## PRIOR ## AVE ## COUNTY ## ASBURY ## RIDGEWOOD ## ST ## RD ## GLEN HILL ## RD ## AVE ## AVE ## WOODLYNN ## CLARMAR ## BRENNER ## AVE ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST ## AVE ## DR ## AVE ## LYDIA ## ASBURY ## ARONA ## SIMPSON ## PASCAL ## AVE ## WOOD ## MILL ## ST ## ST ## ALBERT ## ALBERT ## SHELDON ## ST ## JOSEPHINE ## E SNELLING ## COUNTY ## RD C2 ## RD ## AVE ## MERRILL ## ST ## BELAIR ## CIR ## ST ## FERNWOOD ## LEXINGTON ## RD C2 ## DR ## DR ## TERRACE ## ROAD C ## TERRACE ## DR ## AVE ## DR ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST ## GRIGGS ## ST ## CIV ## I ## C ## C ## E ## N ## T ## E ## R ## DR ## LEXINGTON ## HAMLINE ## AVE ## JUDITH ## RD ## RAMBLER ## PRIMROSE ## CURV ## TALISMAN ## C ## U ## R ## V ## SHELDON ## ST ## JUDITH ## WOODHILL ## HURON ## FERN ## MERRILL ## DELL ## WOOD ## WOOD ## COUNTY ## E SNELLING ## DR ## ST ## AVE ## WHEATON ## HEINEL ## DR ## CIR ## HEINEL ## DR ## TERRACE ## ST ## DALE ## ST. ## ALBANS ## ST ## IONA ## LN ## HEINEL ## S OWASSO ## ROAD C ## AVE ## ST ## CHURCHILL ## OXFORD ## ST ## AGLEN ## AVE ## AVE ## LAKEVIEW ## AVE ## JUDITH ## WOODHILL ## COUNTY ## COUNTY ## ST ## DR ## KENT ## BLVD ## SANDY HOOK ## DR ## RD ## SANDY HOOK ## DR ## LITTLE BAY ## TURNSTONE CT (Private) ## S OWASSO ## BLVD ## LYNN AVE ## WOOD- ## HI ## G ## H ## P ## OIN ## T ## E ## CURV ## OWASSO ## HILLS ## DR ## N ## H ## I ## L ## L ## S ## C ## O ## U ## R ## T ## E ## W ## HILLSVIEW ## HILLSVIEW ## E ## ST ## MARION ## ST ## G ## A ## L ## T ## I ## E ## R ## ST ## M ## A ## T ## I ## L ## D ## A ## ST ## MAPLE ## LN ## RD C2 ## AVE ## DR ## LN ## IONA ## CIR ## IRENE ## CIR ## RAMBLER ## CT ## TERRACE ## DR ## JUDITH ## AVE ## CENTENNIAL ## DR ## WESTERN ## AVE ## ROAD C ## AVE ## VIRGINIA ## ST ## FARRINGTON ## ST ## MATILDA ## ST ## GALTIER ## ST ## MARION ## ST ## WOODBRIDGE ## OAKCREST ## AVE ## LN ## OAKCREST ## BROOKS ## CIR ## ROSE PL ## COHANSEY ## CIR ## AVE ## AVE ## MATILDA ## ST ## GALTIER ## ST ## RD B2 ## ST ## WEWERS ## RD ## CIR ## GALTIER ## ST ## MARION ## ST ## WOODBRIDGE ## ST ## WESTERN ## AVE ## AVE ## TOP HILL ## CIR ## DR ## SOUTHHILL ## ST ## SANDHURST ## RICE ## AVE ## HAND ## AVE ## AUERBACH ## MATILDA ## DR ## CENTENNIAL ## PASCAL ## PASCAL ## ST ## ST ## COUNTY ## COUNTY ## ROAD D ## CHURCHILL ## CHATSWORTH ## ST ## ST ## WOODLYNN ## BRENNER ## AVE ## LYDIA ## MILLWOOD ## ST ## OXFORD ## LYDIA ## DR ## DR ## LYDIA ## VICTORIA ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## ST ## MILTON ## ST ## BRENNER ## AVE ## MILLWOOD ## AVE ## ST ## AVON ## W OWASSO ## BLVD ## RD C2 ## ORCHARD ## LN ## CIR ## STANBRIDGE ## HIGH- ## COURTE ## MAPLE LANE ## CT ## COUNTY ## FARRINGTON ## MILLWOOD ## ST ## WESTERN ## AVE ## BLVD ## S ## O ## W ## A ## S ## S ## O ## WOODLYNN ## AVE ## ST ## WOODBRIDGE ## NORTHVIEW ## ST ## RICE ## LN ## IONA ## ST ## RICE ## CT ## T ## E ## R ## R ## A ## C ## E ## H ## I ## L ## L ## S ## C ## O ## U ## R ## T ## E ## S ## COUNTY ## WOODHILL ## IONA ## MACKUBIN ## ST ## KENT ## ST ## ST ## MACKUBIN ## ST ## DALE ## AVE ## AVE ## SEXTANT ## COUNTY ## AVE ## ST ## IRENE ## ST ## IRENE ## ST ## SEXTANT ## AVE ## CT ## IRENE ## CIR ## VIRGINIA ## CIR ## FARRINGTON ## MATILDA ## BROOKS ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## ST ## ROAD B ## ST ## MINNESOTA ## LOVELL ## LOVELL ## AVE ## GRAND- ## VIEW ## COHANSEY ## S ## A ## N ## D ## H ## U ## R ## S ## T ## DR ## BLVD ## COUNTY ## VICTORIA ## SEXTANT ## AVE ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## BROOKS ## TRANSIT ## ST ## BLVD ## ST ## ALBEMARLE ## ST ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## WOODBRIDGE ## ST ## MCCARRON ## ST ## AVE ## WESTERN ## AVE ## FARRINGTON ## ST ## AVE ## ROMA ## AVE ## DIONNE ## GALTIER ## GRANDVIEW ## AVE ## MINNESOTA ## AVE ## W ## O ## O ## D ## B ## R ## I ## D ## G ## E ## S ## T ## CIR ## CAPITOL ## MARION ## VIEW ## VIEW ## CAPITOL ## VIEW ## CAPITOL ## CIR ## ST ## DR ## B ## O ## S ## S ## A ## R ## D ## ST ## IRENE ## AVE ## OXFORD ## CHURCHILL ## AGLEN ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST ## COUNTY ## ROSE ## OAKCREST ## FISK ## ST ## GROTTO ## ST ## AVE ## RD B2 ## PL ## AVE ## ST ## ALADDIN ## CT ## R ## O ## S ## E ## T ## O ## W ## N ## DR ## OVERLOOK ## ST ## ST ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## PL ## NANCY ## AVE ## VICTORIA ## LOVELL ## GRANDVIEW ## COPE ## GROT ## ST. ## ALBA ## NS ## TO ## ST ## ST ## ST ## NANCY ## PL ## AVE ## SANDHURST ## MILTON ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## SANDHURST ## DR ## ROAD B ## ST ## GROTTO ## ST ## SHERREN ## ST ## OXFORD ## GRANDVIEW ## ST ## ST ## LOVELL ## LOVELL LN (Private) ## SHERREN ## COUNTY ## AVE ## CURV ## SNELLING ## ROSE ## PL ## PASCAL ## ST ## ST ## S ## I ## M ## P ## S ## O ## N ## AVE ## BROOKS ## AVE ## TRANSIT ## ST ## A ## R ## O ## N ## A ## SEXTANT ## AVE ## AVE ## SEXTANT ## ST ## HOLTON ## ST ## ALBERT ## ST ## SHELDON ## COUNTY ## OAKCREST ## ROSE ## PL ## WILLOW ## CIR ## DE ## L ## L ## W ## O ## O ## D ## CIR ## CHRISTY ## RD B2 ## AVE ## WILLOW ## BROOKS ## AVE ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## SEXTANT ## AVE ## LN ## PL ## ROSE ## ST ## DUNLAP ## ST ## ST ## F ## E ## R ## N ## W ## O ## O ## D ## DUNLAP ## ST ## AVE ## HAMLINE ## COLONIAL ## DR (Private) ## ST ## ALBERT ## ST ## DR ## SANDHURST ## AVE ## ST ## DELLWOOD ## DELLWOOD ## ST ## MERRILL ## ST ## ROAD B ## ST ## FERNWOOD ## SHERREN ## ST ## RD ## LAURIE ## DR ## SANDHURST ## LEXINGTON ## AVE ## AVE ## COMMERCE ## COUNTY ## ST ## PASCAL ## OAKCREST ## AVE ## AVE ## ROSE ## ROSE ## AVE ## ELDRIDGE ## ST ## ST ## SAMUEL (Private) ## LN ## S RIDGEWOOD ## N RIDGEWOOD ## LN ## LN ## MID OAKS ## MID OAKS ## RD ## AVE ## BURKE ## ELDRIDGE ## BELMONT ## RYAN ## SHRYER ## SKILLMAN ## PL ## OAKCREST ## BEACON ## ST ## WHEELER ## AVE ## ST ## HERSCHEL ## RD B2 ## COUNTY ## CLEVELAND ## C ## LE ## VE ## L ## A ## N ## D ## A ## V ## E ## AVE ## COUNTY ## AVE ## AVE ## PL ## AVE ## ST ## ALDINE ## ST ## CHARLOTTE ## ST ## FRY ## SNELLING ## RD B2 ## PERIMETER ## DR ## FAIRVIEW ## N GLUEK LN ## S GLUEK LN ## LN ## ROAD B ## AVE ## HERSCHEL ## RD ## MIDLOTHIAN ## RD ## HADDINGTON ## RD ## LAURIE ## N HIGHWAY 36 SERVICE DR ## S HIGHWAY 36 ## SERVICE DR ## PRIOR ## F ## E ## R ## R ## I ## S ## FERRIS LN ## G ## L ## U ## E ## K ## COUNTY ## WEST ## WALNUT ## ST ## ROSE ## PL ## TERMINAL ## ST ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## RD ## RD ## TERMINAL ## ST ## ST. CROIX ## ST. CROIX ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST. STEPHEN ## ST ## FULHAM ## LAURIE ## RD ## M ## A ## R ## I ## O ## N ## RD ## ACORN ## RD ## N HIGHWAY 36 SERVICE DR ## S HIGHWAY 36 SERVICE DR ## WALNUT ## INTERSTATE ## 35W ## EUSTIS ## ST (Private) ## FULHAM ## COUNTY ## FAIRWAYS ## LN ## FULHAM ## ST ## LAKE ST ## MIDLAND ## HILLS ## RD ## ROAD B ## N ROSEWOOD ## LN ## LN ## S ROSEWOOD ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## DRAPER ## HYTHE ## DR ## CIR ## ST ## ROSELAWN ## AVE ## CLEVELAND ## AVE ## AVE ## PRIOR ## SHARONDALE ## AVE ## AVE ## ELDRIDGE ## WILDER ST ## ELDRIDGE ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## EVERGREEN ## CT ## AVE ## AVE ## SHRYER ## RYAN ## L ## O ## R ## E ## N ## RD ## A ## U ## T ## U ## M ## N ## P ## L ## ROSELAWN ## TATUM ## ST ## DR ## DRAPER ## FAIRVIEW ## BEACON ## HERSCHEL ## WHEELER ## ST ## ST ## ST ## SHRYER ## RYAN ## ELDRIDGE ## SKILLMAN ## ALDINE ## ST ## AVE ## AVE ## SNELLING ## AVE ## AVE ## FRY ## MIDLOTHIAN ## RD ## ROSELAWN ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## LN ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## ASBURY ## ST ## ST ## ARONA ## ST ## SIMPSON ## ST ## PASCAL ## SHRYER ## ELDRIDGE ## BURKE ## RYAN ## DRAPER ## ROSELAWN ## DELL ## WOOD ## AVE ## AVE ## HAMLINE ## LN ## SKILLMAN ## BELMONT ## AVE ## ST ## DELLWOOD ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## WOOD ## FERN ## ST ## AVE ## LINDY ## KARYL ## PL ## LEXINGTON ## AVE ## AVE ## HAMLINE ## LARPENTEUR ## GARDEN ## AVE ## LEXINGTON ## AUTUMN ## ST ## SUMMER ## ST ## RUGGLES ## ST ## ST ## RUGGLES ## AVE ## HURON ## MERRILL ## DELLWOOD ## AVE ## AVE ## ROMA ## FERNWOOD ## ST ## DUNLAP ## LINDY ## AVE ## DIONNE ## ST ## AVE ## AVE ## BURKE ## PARKER ## SHRYER ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## DRAPER ## HARRIET LN (Private) ## OXFORD ## ST ## ST ## CHATSWORTH ## VICTORIA ## AVE ## ROSELAWN ## PARKER ## AVE ## AVON ## ALAMEDA ## ST ## ST ## AVE ## E ## L ## D ## R ## ID ## G ## E ## LN ## BELMONT ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## SHRYER ## DALE ## VICTORIA ## AVE ## RD ## ST ## ALAMEDA ## STUBER ## ROMA ## ST ## ST. ALBANS ## AVE ## RIDGE ## EMERALD ## CT ## PINEVIEW ## DR ## ALTA VISTA ## CT ## DALE ## DALE ## ST ## LARPENTEUR ## ST ## RUGGLES ## ST ## ROMA ## AVE ## DIONNE ## ST ## CHATSWORTH ## ST ## ST ## ST ## OXFORD ## AGLEN ## C ## O ## H ## A ## N ## SE ## Y ## SHRYER ## AVE ## AVE ## MOUNDSVIEW ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## ELDRIDGE ## C ## R ## E ## S ## C ## E ## N ## T ## LN ## COHANSEY ## BLVD ## ST ## IRENE ## WESTERN ## HAND ## AVE ## AVE ## FARRINGTON ## BURKE ## BLVD ## N MCCARRONS ## DR ## N MCCARRONS ## ELMER ## ST ## GIES- ## MANN ## AVE ## ST ## WILLIAM ## ST ## MARION ## CT ## ALBEMARLE ## WILLIAM ## ST ## BLVD ## CT ## WOODBRIDGE ## MARION ## ST ## RICE ## PL ## WAGENER ## SHADY ## AVE ## BEACH ## CENTER ## ST ## HILLTOP ## AVE ## GLENWOOD ## AVE ## WAGNER ## ST ## AVE ## KENT ## ST ## AVE ## ROSELAWN ## BAYVIEW ## AVON ## ST ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## ROSEGATE ## R ## O ## S ## E ## G ## A ## T ## E ## DR ## STATE HIGHWAY 280 ## ROSE- ## DALE ## WEST- ## WOOD ## LYDIA ## AVE ## W SNELLING ## DR ## W SNELLING ## DR ## ROSE VISTA ## CT (Private) ## FERNWOOD ## CT ## FERN- ## WOOD ## ST ## DUNLAP ## ST ## CHATS- ## WORTH ## CHATS- ## WORTH ## F ## A ## R ## R ## I ## N ## G ## T ## O ## N ## CT ## COHAN- ## SEY CIR ## AVE ## WOOD- ## BRIDGE ## S HIGHWAY 36 ## SERVICE DR ## FARRING- ## TON ## KENT ## ST ## CHANDLER ## AVE (Private) (Private) ## SAND- ## HURST ## CIR (Private) (Private) ## LN (Private) ## MIDLAND ## VIEW CT ## ST ## ARONA ## CT ## APPLEWOOD ## TERRACE ## DR ## NATURE ## VIEW CT (Priv) ## E SNELLING ## SVC DR ## C ## L ## E ## V ## E ## L ## A ## N ## D ## S ## E ## R ## V ## I ## C ## E ## D ## R ## S COUNTY C SERVICE DR ## CHATS- ## WORTH ## CT ## W ## O ## O ## D ## R ## U ## F ## F ## S ## M ## C ## C ## A ## R ## R ## O ## N ## S ## RESERVOIR ## WOODS CIR ## AMERICAN ST ## MOUNT RIDGE RD ## IONA LN ## TWIN ## L ## A ## N ## G ## T ## O ## N LAKE ## MAPLE LN ## DUNLAP ## ST ## DUNLAP ## CIR (Private) ## MILTON ## CT ## A ## S ## B ## U ## R ## Y ## S ## T ## PKWY ## DR ## TWIN LAKES ## PKWY ## LAKES ## MCCARRONS PL (Priv) ## LEXINGTON (Priv) ## HERSCHEL ST (Priv) ## PL ## LAURIE CT (Priv) ## Lake Josephine ## Park ## Lake ## McCarrons ## County Park ## Ramsey County ## Open Space (Ramsey County) ## Lake Josephine ## Beach Park ## Park ## Lake ## Langton ## Sandcastle ## Park ## Lake ## Park ## Oasis ## Central ## Park ## Acorn ## Park ## Central ## Park ## Central ## Park ## Park ## Villa ## Park ## Keya ## Park ## Park ## Tamarack ## Park ## Reservoir Woods ## Reservoir Woods ## Rosebrook ## Langton ## Park ## Park ## Autumn ## Grove ## Park ## Park ## Cottontail ## Veterans ## Park ## Howard ## Johnson ## Park ## Willow Pond ## Cedarholm ## Golf Course ## Evergreen ## Park ## Keller ## Mayflower ## Park ## Lexington ## Park ## Bruce ## Russell ## Park ## Pioneer ## Park ## Concordia ## Park ## Materion ## Park ## Central ## Park North ## Owasso ## Ballfields ## Valley ## Park ## Owasso ## Hills ## Park ## Ladyslipper ## Park ## Mapleview ## Park ## Woodhill ## Park ## Applewood ## Park ## Applewood ## Overlook ## Memorial ## Park ## Midland ## Gardens ## Park ## Unity ## Park ## Sunset ## Park ## Lake ## Josephine ## Lake ## Owasso ## McCarrons ## Lake ## Lake ## Bennett ## Pond ## Willow ## Zimmerman ## Lake ## Oasis Pond ## Lake ## Johanna ## Lake ## Langton ## Walsh ## Lake ## BRENNER ## ST ## LYDIA ## AVE ## LYDIA ## CT ## P ## A ## T ## T ## O ## N ## RD ## HIGHCREST ## RD ## M ## I ## L ## L ## W ## O ## O ## D ## ST ## BRENNER ## CT ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## STANBRIDGE ## ST ## MANSON ## ST ## MAPLE ## LN ## OLD ## HIGHWAY 8 ## TROSETH ## RD ## COUNTY HIGHWAY 88 ## COUNTY ## ROAD D ## RD ## PARTRIDGE ## ROAD C2 ## CENTRE ## POINTE ## DR ## AVE ## INTERSTATE 35W ## ROAD C ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## CLEVELAND ## COUNTY ## COUNTY ## PATTON ## RD ## COUNTY ## ROAD D ## WILDER ## ST ## MOUNT ## RD ## RIDGE ## EVELYN ## ST ## BRENNER ## AVE ## PRIOR ## CIR ## ST ## ARTHUR ## DR ## AVE ## MILDRED ## ST ## S ## H ## O ## R ## E ## W ## O ## O ## D ## AVE ## BRENNER ## LYDIA ## ARTHUR ## PL ## MILDRED ## DR ## STANBRIDGE ## MILLWOOD ## MAPLE ## ST ## WHEELER ## WHEELER ## SHORE ## CURV ## WOOD ## LN ## LN ## ST ## ALDINE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## L ## I ## N ## C ## O ## L ## N ## DR ## RD C2 ## COUNTY ## AVE ## COUNTY ## RD C2 ## RD C2 ## COUNTY ## CENTENNIAL ## DR ## DR ## TERRACE ## LINCOLN ## DR ## SNELLING ## FAIRVIEW ## ST ## ARTHUR ## ROAD C ## RD C2 ## COUNTY ## PRIOR ## AVE ## COUNTY ## ASBURY ## RIDGEWOOD ## ST ## RD ## GLEN HILL ## RD ## AVE ## AVE ## WOODLYNN ## CLARMAR ## BRENNER ## AVE ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST ## AVE ## DR ## AVE ## LYDIA ## ASBURY ## ARONA ## SIMPSON ## PASCAL ## AVE ## WOOD ## MILL ## ST ## ST ## ALBERT ## ALBERT ## SHELDON ## ST ## JOSEPHINE ## E SNELLING ## COUNTY ## RD C2 ## RD ## AVE ## MERRILL ## ST ## BELAIR ## CIR ## ST ## FERNWOOD ## LEXINGTON ## RD C2 ## DR ## DR ## TERRACE ## ROAD C ## TERRACE ## DR ## AVE ## DR ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST ## GRIGGS ## ST ## CIV ## I ## C ## C ## E ## N ## T ## E ## R ## DR ## LEXINGTON ## HAMLINE ## AVE ## JUDITH ## RD ## RAMBLER ## PRIMROSE ## CURV ## TALISMAN ## C ## U ## R ## V ## SHELDON ## ST ## JUDITH ## WOODHILL ## HURON ## FERN ## MERRILL ## DELL ## WOOD ## WOOD ## COUNTY ## E SNELLING ## DR ## ST ## AVE ## WHEATON ## HEINEL ## DR ## CIR ## HEINEL ## DR ## TERRACE ## ST ## DALE ## ST. ## ALBANS ## ST ## IONA ## LN ## HEINEL ## S OWASSO ## ROAD C ## AVE ## ST ## CHURCHILL ## OXFORD ## ST ## AGLEN ## AVE ## AVE ## LAKEVIEW ## AVE ## JUDITH ## WOODHILL ## COUNTY ## COUNTY ## ST ## DR ## KENT ## BLVD ## SANDY HOOK ## DR ## RD ## SANDY HOOK ## DR ## LITTLE BAY ## TURNSTONE CT (Private) ## S OWASSO ## BLVD ## LYNN AVE ## WOOD- ## HI ## G ## H ## P ## OIN ## T ## E ## CURV ## OWASSO ## HILLS ## DR ## N ## H ## I ## L ## L ## S ## C ## O ## U ## R ## T ## E ## W ## HILLSVIEW ## HILLSVIEW ## E ## ST ## MARION ## ST ## G ## A ## L ## T ## I ## E ## R ## ST ## M ## A ## T ## I ## L ## D ## A ## ST ## MAPLE ## LN ## RD C2 ## AVE ## DR ## LN ## IONA ## CIR ## IRENE ## CIR ## RAMBLER ## CT ## TERRACE ## DR ## JUDITH ## AVE ## CENTENNIAL ## DR ## WESTERN ## AVE ## ROAD C ## AVE ## VIRGINIA ## ST ## FARRINGTON ## ST ## MATILDA ## ST ## GALTIER ## ST ## MARION ## ST ## WOODBRIDGE ## OAKCREST ## AVE ## LN ## OAKCREST ## BROOKS ## CIR ## ROSE PL ## COHANSEY ## CIR ## AVE ## AVE ## MATILDA ## ST ## GALTIER ## ST ## RD B2 ## ST ## WEWERS ## RD ## CIR ## GALTIER ## ST ## MARION ## ST ## WOODBRIDGE ## ST ## WESTERN ## AVE ## AVE ## TOP HILL ## CIR ## DR ## SOUTHHILL ## ST ## SANDHURST ## RICE ## AVE ## HAND ## AVE ## AUERBACH ## MATILDA ## DR ## CENTENNIAL ## PASCAL ## PASCAL ## ST ## ST ## COUNTY ## COUNTY ## ROAD D ## CHURCHILL ## CHATSWORTH ## ST ## ST ## WOODLYNN ## BRENNER ## AVE ## LYDIA ## MILLWOOD ## ST ## OXFORD ## LYDIA ## DR ## DR ## LYDIA ## VICTORIA ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## ST ## MILTON ## ST ## BRENNER ## AVE ## MILLWOOD ## AVE ## ST ## AVON ## W OWASSO ## BLVD ## RD C2 ## ORCHARD ## LN ## CIR ## STANBRIDGE ## HIGH- ## COURTE ## MAPLE LANE ## CT ## COUNTY ## FARRINGTON ## MILLWOOD ## ST ## WESTERN ## AVE ## BLVD ## S ## O ## W ## A ## S ## S ## O ## WOODLYNN ## AVE ## ST ## WOODBRIDGE ## NORTHVIEW ## ST ## RICE ## LN ## IONA ## ST ## RICE ## CT ## T ## E ## R ## R ## A ## C ## E ## H ## I ## L ## L ## S ## C ## O ## U ## R ## T ## E ## S ## COUNTY ## WOODHILL ## IONA ## MACKUBIN ## ST ## KENT ## ST ## ST ## MACKUBIN ## ST ## DALE ## AVE ## AVE ## SEXTANT ## COUNTY ## AVE ## ST ## IRENE ## ST ## IRENE ## ST ## SEXTANT ## AVE ## CT ## IRENE ## CIR ## VIRGINIA ## CIR ## FARRINGTON ## MATILDA ## BROOKS ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## ST ## ROAD B ## ST ## MINNESOTA ## LOVELL ## LOVELL ## AVE ## GRAND- ## VIEW ## COHANSEY ## S ## A ## N ## D ## H ## U ## R ## S ## T ## DR ## BLVD ## COUNTY ## VICTORIA ## SEXTANT ## AVE ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## BROOKS ## TRANSIT ## ST ## BLVD ## ST ## ALBEMARLE ## ST ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## WOODBRIDGE ## ST ## MCCARRON ## ST ## AVE ## WESTERN ## AVE ## FARRINGTON ## ST ## AVE ## ROMA ## AVE ## DIONNE ## GALTIER ## GRANDVIEW ## AVE ## MINNESOTA ## AVE ## W ## O ## O ## D ## B ## R ## I ## D ## G ## E ## S ## T ## CIR ## CAPITOL ## MARION ## VIEW ## VIEW ## CAPITOL ## VIEW ## CAPITOL ## CIR ## ST ## DR ## B ## O ## S ## S ## A ## R ## D ## ST ## IRENE ## AVE ## OXFORD ## CHURCHILL ## AGLEN ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST ## COUNTY ## ROSE ## OAKCREST ## FISK ## ST ## GROTTO ## ST ## AVE ## RD B2 ## PL ## AVE ## ST ## ALADDIN ## CT ## R ## O ## S ## E ## T ## O ## W ## N ## DR ## OVERLOOK ## ST ## ST ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## PL ## NANCY ## AVE ## VICTORIA ## LOVELL ## GRANDVIEW ## COPE ## GROT ## ST. ## ALBA ## NS ## TO ## ST ## ST ## ST ## NANCY ## PL ## AVE ## SANDHURST ## MILTON ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## SANDHURST ## DR ## ROAD B ## ST ## GROTTO ## ST ## SHERREN ## ST ## OXFORD ## GRANDVIEW ## ST ## ST ## LOVELL ## LOVELL LN (Private) ## SHERREN ## COUNTY ## AVE ## CURV ## SNELLING ## ROSE ## PL ## PASCAL ## ST ## ST ## S ## I ## M ## P ## S ## O ## N ## AVE ## BROOKS ## AVE ## TRANSIT ## ST ## A ## R ## O ## N ## A ## SEXTANT ## AVE ## AVE ## SEXTANT ## ST ## HOLTON ## ST ## ALBERT ## ST ## SHELDON ## COUNTY ## OAKCREST ## ROSE ## PL ## WILLOW ## CIR ## DE ## L ## L ## W ## O ## O ## D ## CIR ## CHRISTY ## RD B2 ## AVE ## WILLOW ## BROOKS ## AVE ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## SEXTANT ## AVE ## LN ## PL ## ROSE ## ST ## DUNLAP ## ST ## ST ## F ## E ## R ## N ## W ## O ## O ## D ## DUNLAP ## ST ## AVE ## HAMLINE ## COLONIAL ## DR (Private) ## ST ## ALBERT ## ST ## DR ## SANDHURST ## AVE ## ST ## DELLWOOD ## DELLWOOD ## ST ## MERRILL ## ST ## ROAD B ## ST ## FERNWOOD ## SHERREN ## ST ## RD ## LAURIE ## DR ## SANDHURST ## LEXINGTON ## AVE ## AVE ## COMMERCE ## COUNTY ## ST ## PASCAL ## OAKCREST ## AVE ## AVE ## ROSE ## ROSE ## AVE ## ELDRIDGE ## ST ## ST ## SAMUEL (Private) ## LN ## S RIDGEWOOD ## N RIDGEWOOD ## LN ## LN ## MID OAKS ## MID OAKS ## RD ## AVE ## BURKE ## ELDRIDGE ## BELMONT ## RYAN ## SHRYER ## SKILLMAN ## PL ## OAKCREST ## BEACON ## ST ## WHEELER ## AVE ## ST ## HERSCHEL ## RD B2 ## COUNTY ## CLEVELAND ## C ## LE ## VE ## L ## A ## N ## D ## A ## V ## E ## AVE ## COUNTY ## AVE ## AVE ## PL ## AVE ## ST ## ALDINE ## ST ## CHARLOTTE ## ST ## FRY ## SNELLING ## RD B2 ## PERIMETER ## DR ## FAIRVIEW ## N GLUEK LN ## S GLUEK LN ## LN ## ROAD B ## AVE ## HERSCHEL ## RD ## MIDLOTHIAN ## RD ## HADDINGTON ## RD ## LAURIE ## N HIGHWAY 36 SERVICE DR ## S HIGHWAY 36 ## SERVICE DR ## PRIOR ## F ## E ## R ## R ## I ## S ## FERRIS LN ## G ## L ## U ## E ## K ## COUNTY ## WEST ## WALNUT ## ST ## ROSE ## PL ## TERMINAL ## ST ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## RD ## RD ## TERMINAL ## ST ## ST. CROIX ## ST. CROIX ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST. STEPHEN ## ST ## FULHAM ## LAURIE ## RD ## M ## A ## R ## I ## O ## N ## RD ## ACORN ## RD ## N HIGHWAY 36 SERVICE DR ## S HIGHWAY 36 SERVICE DR ## WALNUT ## INTERSTATE ## 35W ## EUSTIS ## ST (Private) ## FULHAM ## COUNTY ## FAIRWAYS ## LN ## FULHAM ## ST ## LAKE ST ## MIDLAND ## HILLS ## RD ## ROAD B ## N ROSEWOOD ## LN ## LN ## S ROSEWOOD ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## DRAPER ## HYTHE ## DR ## CIR ## ST ## ROSELAWN ## AVE ## CLEVELAND ## AVE ## AVE ## PRIOR ## SHARONDALE ## AVE ## AVE ## ELDRIDGE ## WILDER ST ## ELDRIDGE ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## EVERGREEN ## CT ## AVE ## AVE ## SHRYER ## RYAN ## L ## O ## R ## E ## N ## RD ## A ## U ## T ## U ## M ## N ## P ## L ## ROSELAWN ## TATUM ## ST ## DR ## DRAPER ## FAIRVIEW ## BEACON ## HERSCHEL ## WHEELER ## ST ## ST ## ST ## SHRYER ## RYAN ## ELDRIDGE ## SKILLMAN ## ALDINE ## ST ## AVE ## AVE ## SNELLING ## AVE ## AVE ## FRY ## MIDLOTHIAN ## RD ## ROSELAWN ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## LN ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## ASBURY ## ST ## ST ## ARONA ## ST ## SIMPSON ## ST ## PASCAL ## SHRYER ## ELDRIDGE ## BURKE ## RYAN ## DRAPER ## ROSELAWN ## DELL ## WOOD ## AVE ## AVE ## HAMLINE ## LN ## SKILLMAN ## BELMONT ## AVE ## ST ## DELLWOOD ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## WOOD ## FERN ## ST ## AVE ## LINDY ## KARYL ## PL ## LEXINGTON ## AVE ## AVE ## HAMLINE ## LARPENTEUR ## GARDEN ## AVE ## LEXINGTON ## AUTUMN ## ST ## SUMMER ## ST ## RUGGLES ## ST ## ST ## RUGGLES ## AVE ## HURON ## MERRILL ## DELLWOOD ## AVE ## AVE ## ROMA ## FERNWOOD ## ST ## DUNLAP ## LINDY ## AVE ## DIONNE ## ST ## AVE ## AVE ## BURKE ## PARKER ## SHRYER ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## DRAPER ## HARRIET LN (Private) ## OXFORD ## ST ## ST ## CHATSWORTH ## VICTORIA ## AVE ## ROSELAWN ## PARKER ## AVE ## AVON ## ALAMEDA ## ST ## ST ## AVE ## E ## L ## D ## R ## ID ## G ## E ## LN ## BELMONT ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## SHRYER ## DALE ## VICTORIA ## AVE ## RD ## ST ## ALAMEDA ## STUBER ## ROMA ## ST ## ST. ALBANS ## AVE ## RIDGE ## EMERALD ## CT ## PINEVIEW ## DR ## ALTA VISTA ## CT ## DALE ## DALE ## ST ## LARPENTEUR ## ST ## RUGGLES ## ST ## ROMA ## AVE ## DIONNE ## ST ## CHATSWORTH ## ST ## ST ## ST ## OXFORD ## AGLEN ## C ## O ## H ## A ## N ## SE ## Y ## SHRYER ## AVE ## AVE ## MOUNDSVIEW ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## ELDRIDGE ## C ## R ## E ## S ## C ## E ## N ## T ## LN ## COHANSEY ## BLVD ## ST ## IRENE ## WESTERN ## HAND ## AVE ## AVE ## FARRINGTON ## BURKE ## BLVD ## N MCCARRONS ## DR ## N MCCARRONS ## ELMER ## ST ## GIES- ## MANN ## AVE ## ST ## WILLIAM ## ST ## MARION ## CT ## ALBEMARLE ## WILLIAM ## ST ## BLVD ## CT ## WOODBRIDGE ## MARION ## ST ## RICE ## PL ## WAGENER ## SHADY ## AVE ## BEACH ## CENTER ## ST ## HILLTOP ## AVE ## GLENWOOD ## AVE ## WAGNER ## ST ## AVE ## KENT ## ST ## AVE ## ROSELAWN ## BAYVIEW ## AVON ## ST ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## ROSEGATE ## R ## O ## S ## E ## G ## A ## T ## E ## DR ## STATE HIGHWAY 280 ## ROSE- ## DALE ## WEST- ## WOOD ## LYDIA ## AVE ## W SNELLING ## DR ## W SNELLING ## DR ## ROSE VISTA ## CT (Private) ## FERNWOOD ## CT ## FERN- ## WOOD ## ST ## DUNLAP ## ST ## CHATS- ## WORTH ## CHATS- ## WORTH ## F ## A ## R ## R ## I ## N ## G ## T ## O ## N ## CT ## COHAN- ## SEY CIR ## AVE ## WOOD- ## BRIDGE ## S HIGHWAY 36 ## SERVICE DR ## FARRING- ## TON ## KENT ## ST ## CHANDLER ## AVE (Private) (Private) ## SAND- ## HURST ## CIR (Private) (Private) ## LN (Private) ## MIDLAND ## VIEW CT ## ST ## ARONA ## CT ## APPLEWOOD ## TERRACE ## DR ## NATURE ## VIEW CT (Priv) ## E SNELLING ## SVC DR ## C ## L ## E ## V ## E ## L ## A ## N ## D ## S ## E ## R ## V ## I ## C ## E ## D ## R ## S COUNTY C SERVICE DR ## CHATS- ## WORTH ## CT ## W ## O ## O ## D ## R ## U ## F ## F ## S ## M ## C ## C ## A ## R ## R ## O ## N ## S ## RESERVOIR ## WOODS CIR ## AMERICAN ST ## MOUNT RIDGE RD ## IONA LN ## TWIN ## L ## A ## N ## G ## T ## O ## N LAKE ## MAPLE LN ## DUNLAP ## ST ## DUNLAP ## CIR (Private) ## MILTON ## CT ## A ## S ## B ## U ## R ## Y ## S ## T ## PKWY ## DR ## TWIN LAKES ## PKWY ## LAKES ## MCCARRONS PL (Priv) ## LEXINGTON (Priv) ## HERSCHEL ST (Priv) ## PL ## LAURIE CT (Priv) ## D ## D ## D ## DDDD ## D ## D ## D ## DD ## D ## D ## D ## D ## D ## DDDD ## DDD ## DDDD ## D ## D ## D ## D ## D ## D ## D ## D ## D ## D ' ­ ' ­ ' ­ ' ­ ! ( ! ( " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) " ) ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ## L ## Prepared by: Engineering Department 6/11/2026 ## 2026 All Projects ## MnDOT Roadway ## Ramsey County Roadway ## City Roadway Reclaim ## DDD ## City Roadway Mill & Overlay ## Pathway Construction ## Pathway Maintenance ## Watermain Project ## Storm Project ' ­ ## Sanitary Pipe Lining (TBD) ## Sanitary Project and Lift Station Project ## Signal Project ! ( ## Intersection Streetlight Installation " ) ## Non-Metered Streetlight Replacement ! ( ## Booster Station ProjectCity Campus Project ## Storm Pump Project ## New Streetlight Installation ## GIS Data: The maps provided by the City of Roseville are compilations of records, information and data from various sources, and they are to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant or guarantee that the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data or maps are complete, current, or accurate. The data is offered “as is” and the City of Roseville does not represent that the GIS data can be used or is accurate for legal, navigational, or any purposes requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 466.03, Subdivision 21, the City of Roseville disclaims any liability for claims based on alleged or actual inaccuracies in the GIS data or maps. For more information, please contact 651-792-7044. ## Data Sources ## * Ramsey County GIS (4/26/2026) ## * City of Roseville Engineering Department Attachment 2 Page 7 of 47 ## Lake ## Josephine ## Lake ## Owasso ## McCarrons ## Lake ## Lake ## Bennett ## Pond ## Willow ## Zimmerman ## Lake ## Oasis Pond ## Lake ## Johanna ## Lake ## Langton ## Walsh ## Lake ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Arden Hills ## Falcon ## Heights ## Lauderdale ## Little Canada ## Maplewood ## New Brighton ## St. Anthony ## St. Paul ## Shoreview ## Minneapolis ## Rosedale Center (multiple, see reverse) ## MnDOT ## Waters ## Edge New home New home ## New Home New home New home ## Von Maur ramp ## Presbyterian ## Homes New home New home ## Hamline ## Automotive ## Ding ## Tea ## Eaglecrest ## Twin Lakes ## Buildings ## A & B ## FedEx ## Old Dutch ## Blastoff ## Play Park ## Pottery Barn ## Omni Health ## Former Dept of Education ## Pace ## Analytical ## King of Kings ## Lutheran Church ## Shell building ## Arby's ## Hand in Hand ## Montessori New home New home New home ## Whispering Pines ## Assisted Living ## T-Mobile New home ## Rosebrook ## Park ## Pepperl and Fuchs ## AbleNet ## MN Institute for Pain ## Management ## Lake ## Josephine ## Lake ## Owasso ## McCarrons ## Lake ## Lake ## Bennett ## Pond ## Willow ## Zimmerman ## Lake ## Oasis Pond ## Lake ## Johanna ## Lake ## Langton ## Walsh ## Lake ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Æ ## Arden Hills ## Falcon ## Heights ## Lauderdale ## Little Canada ## Maplewood ## New Brighton ## St. Anthony ## St. Paul ## Shoreview ## Minneapolis ## Rosedale Center (multiple, see reverse) ## MnDOT ## Waters ## Edge New home New home ## New Home New home New home ## Von Maur ramp ## Presbyterian ## Homes New home New home ## Hamline ## Automotive ## Ding ## Tea ## Eaglecrest ## Twin Lakes ## Buildings ## A & B ## FedEx ## Old Dutch ## Blastoff ## Play Park ## Pottery Barn ## Omni Health ## Former Dept of Education ## Pace ## Analytical ## King of Kings ## Lutheran Church ## Shell building ## Arby's ## Hand in Hand ## Montessori New home New home New home ## Whispering Pines ## Assisted Living ## T-Mobile New home ## Rosebrook ## Park ## Pepperl and Fuchs ## AbleNet ## MN Institute for Pain ## Management Prepared by: ## Community Development Department August 7, 2026 ## Sources ## Ramsey County GIS (7/20/2026) ## Community Development Department 0 1,0002,0003,000 ## Feet ## L ## See Reverse For Project Details ## Æ ## Residential ## Æ ## Retail ## Æ ## Office / Non-Retail ## Æ ## Industrial ## Æ ## Public / Institutional ## Development Projects: August 2026 Attachment 3 Page 8 of 47 ## ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT ## UPDATED: 7/24/2026 ## Project Name Address Project Description Applicant/Owner Information Starting ## RESIDENTIAL Residential New Construction 2164 Eustis St New single family home Mike Torkelson Development Winter 2024 Residential New Construction 2976 West Owasso Blvd New single family home TJB Homes Winter 2026 Residential New Construction 2050 Eldridge Ave New single family home Lee Homes Winter 2026 Residential New Construction 649 Heinel Dr New single family home Croix Custom Homes Summer 2025 Residential New Construction 595 Heinel Dr New single family home Lee Homes Winter 2026 Residential New Construction 1928 South Gluek Ln New two family dwelling Cara Builders Spring 2025 Residential New Construction 560 Ryan Ave New single family home Structural Buildings of MN Summer 2025 Residential New Construction 615 Roselawn Ave New single family home Bristol Built LLC Summer 2026 Residential New Construction 2380 Laurie Ct New single family home Creative Custom Homebuilders LLC Summer 2026 Residential New Construction 2137 Fairways Ln New single family home Vivid Homes Summer 2026 Residential New Construction 987 Brenner Ave New single family home Cara Builders LLC Summer 2026 ## RETAIL Abercrombie & Fitch 1595 Highway 36 #400 Interior Alteration GGC National Contractors Spring 2026 Pottery Barn 1595 Highway 36 #1600 New façade and interior alteration McGough Construction (In plan review) Spring 2026 Apple Store 1595 Highway 36 #130 Shell space for new breakroom P.R.M. Contracting Summer 2025 Blastoff Play Park 2325 Prior Ave Indoor playground, arcade, restaurant and bar Chan Consulting LLC Spring 2026 Vacant Tenant 1595 Highway 36 #170 Tenant Remodel P.R.M. Contracting Fall 2025 Ding Tea 2401 Fairview Ave Interior Alteration Tran Construction and Remodeling Fall 2025 Twin Lakes Building A 2033 Twin Lakes Pkwy New Construction Shell Building Sherburne Slater Construction (In plan review) Fall 2025 Twin Lakes Building B 2037 Twin Lakes Pkwy New Construction Shell Building Sherburne Slater Construction (In plan review) Spring 2026 Von Maur Ramp 1595 Highway 36 Ramp Repair Cy-Con Inc Fall 2025 Arby’s 2105 Snelling Ave Interior Alteration Pro Services Construction Spring 2026 Hammermade 1595 Highway 36 #725 Interior Remodel Nielsen Construction Services Summer 2026 T-Mobile 1745 County Road B2 Interior Remodel Lakeview Construction LLC Spring 2026 ## NON- ## RETAIL/OFFICE MnDOT Waters Edge 1500 County Road B2 Mechanical upgrades Versacon Inc Fall 2023 ## Eaglecrest 2945 Lincoln Dr Interior Alteration MRI, Inc Spring 2026 Pace Analytical 2665 Long Lake Rd Interior Alteration Robert Carr and Associates Spring2026 Hamline Automotive 2150 Hamline Ave Addition Sherburne Slater Construction Spring 2026 Former Dept of Education building 1500 Highway 36 Full demolition JE Dunn Construction Spring 2026 Old Dutch 2375 Terminal Rd Solar panels Blue Horizon Energy Spring 2026 Omni Health 1970 Oakcrest Ave Interior Alteration – Mental Health Clinic Fixed Assets, Inc Spring 2026 FedEx 2323 Terminal Rd Full demolition Veit and Companies Spring 2026 Shell Building 2700 Snelling Ave New Construction (In Plan Review) TBD Summer 2026 King of Kings Lutheran Church 2330 Dale St Interior Alteration, add fire sprinkler system Maertens-Brenny Construction Co. Summer 2026 Presbyterian Homes & Services 2925 Lincoln Dr Interior Remodel Maintenance Repairs & Installations Fall 2025 Hand in Hand Montessori 211 North McCarrons Blvd Interior Remodel Vanguard Builders Inc Summer 2026 Whispering Pines Assisted Living 2891 Merrill St Assisted Living Conversion and Renovation Aspire Builders Inc Summer 2026 Pepperl and Fuchs 2699 Patton Rd Interior Build Out Klodt Inc Summer 2026 Rosebrook Park 2590 Fry St Remove Pool & Alterations for Splashpad New Look Contracting Summer 2026 Xcel Energy 3115 Centre Pointe Dr Interior Remodel Xcel Energy Spring 2026 Abelnet 2625 Patton Rd Minor Interior Remodel Montgomery Brinkman LLC Summer 2026 MN Institute for Pain Management 2780 Snelling Ave Tenant Improvement Montgomery Brinkman LLC Summer 2026 Page 9 of 47 ## Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission ## Agenda Item DATE: August 25, 2026 ITEM: 4.b. ## ITEM DESCRIPTION: Metro Transit Update ## Background Representatives from Metro Transit will give an update about Metro Transit Operations. The update will focus on updates to the Rosedale Transit Center. George Serumgard will present on behalf of Metro Transit. ## Recommendation Receive presentation from Metro Transit. ## Attachments ## None Page 10 of 47 ## Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission ## Agenda Item DATE: August 25, 2026 ITEM: 4.c. ## ITEM DESCRIPTION: Streetlight Policy/Assessment Policy ## Background At the July 28, 2026 meeting, the Commission discussed the Streetlight Policy. Staff will provide updates made to the policy based on feedback at the last meeting. Attachment 1 is the existing Streetlight Policy and Attachment 2 is a draft update to the policy, for discussion. Updates to the Streetlight Policy could impact the Assessment Policy. The current Assessment Policy was last updated in 2012. In addition to any changes to the streetlight assessments, staff would like to review the Assessment Policy as a whole as it has been 14 years since the last upgrade. Attachment 3 is the existing Assessment Policy and Attachment 4 is a draft update to the policy, for discussion. Staff would like the commission to provide feedback on both policies. Based on feedback, we will update both policies, review them with the City Attorney, and bring back both policies for final recommendations from PWETC in September. We will then forward these recommendations to Council sometime in October. ## Recommendation Provide feedback on both policies. ## Attachments ## 1. Existing Streetlight Policy ## 2. Draft Update to the Streetlight Policy ## 3. Existing Assessment Policy ## 4. Draft Update to the Assessment Policy Page 11 of 47 ## Final October 13, 2025 Page 1 of 5 ## City of Roseville March 2024 ## Streetlight Policy ## City of Roseville ## Streetlight Policy October 13, 2025 ## I.Pu rpose and Need for Policy The installation of streetlights provides a safer environment for the community in regard to traffic and pedestrian safety. Due to limited funds and varying viewpoints of individual property owners, as to the desirability of such installations, the City has established this policy to define its streetlighting program. ## II.Policy Statement The City shall adopt and utilize the following standard policy for the installation, maintenance, and funding of streetlighting. It is important to establish a consistent, equitable approach, relating to the method of selecting the locations for streetlights, to insure fair and reasonable treatment for property owners. Streetlighting in all areas of the City shall follow the requirements detailed below. ## III.Co nditions •All new lights installed shall be full cutoff lights. •All new streetlighting must be consistent with the adopted City standards. •Variations to the City standard streetlight types will be allowed only by City Council action. Extra costs associated with variations to the City standard, both installation and ongoing operation and maintenance costs, will be the responsibility of the benefiting properties. •All streetlighting designs shall consider industry standards, safety, uniformity, lighting intensity and cost. •Qualifying requests for streetlights may be scheduled for installation in a subsequent year if the City determines sufficient funds are not available in the current City budget. •On projects where pedestrian level lighting is installed, a continuous level of light should be maintained for the design. Spacing would be determined applying engineering standards. Spacing typically results in poles every 90 to 120 feet. ## IV.S treetlight Districts To develop a rational approach to streetlight installation, the City Council in 1957, established a policy to install streetlights at no assessment to ensure that the lights would be installed where most needed and wanted. Since the need for lighting varies by adjacent use, different standards will apply as follows. ## A.Standard District oThis standard be used for all areas in the City unless they are defined as Commercial, City Special or Enhanced districts as shown in Appendix A, oProcedure Attachment 1 Page 12 of 47 ## Final October 13, 2025 Page 2 of 5 ## City of Roseville March 2024 ## Streetlight Policy  If the following conditions are met, the City will install streetlights at the following locations: • The location is at the intersection of two streets, OR • The location is at the end of a cul-de-sac, OR • The location is on a severe curve, either vertically or horizontally, ## OR • The location is at a marked pedestrian crosswalk.  Illuminance Target: illuminance ranges from 0.3 – 0.6 foot-candles.  City staff will notify property owners within 300 feet of the new light location where lighting will be installed at least three weeks prior to the installation of the light.  Mid-block lights are desirable and should be considered for placement if the spacing between existing lights is greater than 600 feet. If the above conditions are met, an individual property owner may circulate a petition in the neighborhood to determine if the light is desired (particularly by those property owners directly adjacent to the proposed light). If 60% consensus is built with property owners within 150 feet of the proposed light, the City staff will work with the electric utility company to install the light. ## o Streetlight Design ##  Streetlight Type: LED Cobrahead Cutoff ##  Pole Type: • Wooden if available • Fiberglass or aluminum if a pole needs to be installed. o Funding  The City will fund installation and maintenance of lights within the Standard District. ## B. Business District o This standard will be applied to all areas identified as Business Districts as shown ## in Appendix A o Procedure  Property owners that would like street segments to be added to the ## Business Lighting District shall petition the City Council. The Council will determine if the street will be added to the Business District. • Over 60% of benefitting property owners shall petition the City to be considered. • Only streets that are non-single family residential will be considered. ## o Streetlight Design ##  Streetlight Type: LED Cobrahead Cutoff ##  Pole Type: • Wooden if available • Fiberglass or aluminum if a pole needs to be installed. Page 13 of 47 ## Final October 13, 2025 Page 3 of 5 ## City of Roseville March 2024 ## Streetlight Policy  This lighting would be a brighter, higher quality of lighting. Lights would be designed per engineering standards typically resulting in poles every 250-300 feet. As a minimum standard, all intersections, marked crosswalks, and horizontal and vertical curves would have streetlights. o Funding  Initial costs to install lighting to Business District standards will be assessed to adjacent property owners.  Maintenance and future replacement costs will be paid by the City. ## C. City Special District o City Special Districts are as shown in Appendix A. o This type of lighting will be for special areas as determined by the City Council.  This type of lighting may include streetlighting or pedestrian level lighting or decorative style lighting.  The lighting standards for each Special District shall be designed for the specific purpose and need of the district. o Funding  The City will fund installation and maintenance of lights within the City Special District. ## D. Enhanced District o When property owners want a different location, design, or number of requested lights above the Standard Streetlight district standards, property owners may request that the City undertake an Enhanced District project. o Procedure  When a request for an Enhanced District project is received, City staff, working with property owners, will determine the boundaries of the project. Requests for streetlighting can be initiated through a petition process that includes signatures representing at least 60% of the property in the project area. ##  Petition Process • Upon receipt of a petition signed by the owners of sixty percent (60%) of the property area within the proposed project limits, City staff will prepare a preliminary report detailing the streetlight types, location, costs, and proposed assessments. • The City Council will be asked to call and hold a public hearing pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031. • If the project goes to the public hearing, but is not ordered forward, subsequent petitions will not be undertaken for the same project area or any part of the project area for a two (2) year period beginning on the hearing date. The exception to this requirement would be if the City initiates a street reconstruction project in the area. o Funding  The additional costs of an Enhanced Distr ict project shall be assessed to the benefiting property owners according to City Assessment Policy. All Page 14 of 47 ## Final October 13, 2025 Page 4 of 5 ## City of Roseville March 2024 ## Streetlight Policy properties within 150 feet (Street frontage) of each light shall be considered for assessment. City staff shall determine the number and locations of lights that could have been installed under the Standard District section of this policy. The maintenance cost for these lights will be deducted from the overall project cost.  A summary of the assessable cost shall be as follows: • Cost of installation of enhanced streetlights plus Cost of Operation, Maintenance (pro-rated for 25 years) plus Administrative costs minus “Standard District” maintenance cost (if applicable) = total assessable cost.  Xcel energy provides a 25-year warranty for the streetlights that they install. This is included in the City’s monthly charge. At the end of this period the City will evaluate the maintenance needs for the “enhanced” areas. A reconstruction project will be considered where the new operation and maintenance costs for the next 25 years will be proposed to be assessed to the benefiting properties. ## V. Development/ Redevelopment Streetlights The Developer of any proposed subdivision or redevelopment area, whether residential, business or other may elect to install streetlights as a part of their overall development plans. Approval and implementation shall conform to this policy. Developers shall meet the Streetlight Standard District criteria unless they apply to meet other district criteria. Installation of public streetlights shall be included as part of the development agreement. ## A. Procedure o The developer shall submit a streetlighting plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. o For new residential subdivisions and business areas, the developer shall pay the operation and maintenance costs to the electric utility company until the City accepts the streetlighting system. o Acceptance of the new streetlights must be requested in writing by the developer, along with a certification from the electric utility company that it was installed according to their specifications. ## B. Funding o The costs for installation, operation, and maintenance of streetlights in developments will be paid for by the developer according to the provisions set forth in this Policy. o The operation and maintenance costs for an Enhanced District project in new developments shall be paid for by the new development in perpetuity. These costs shall be determined and included in the Development Contract. The costs shall either be paid up front by the developer or assessed to the property owners. The total cost shall be the “enhanced” operation and maintenance cost minus the City’s Standard District contribution. The City’s basic Page 15 of 47 ## Final October 13, 2025 Page 5 of 5 ## City of Roseville March 2024 ## Streetlight Policy contribution shall be determined based on the procedure outlined in section IV.A. of this policy. ## VI. Authority It is implemented through the provision in each year’s budget to pay for the cost of power and maintenance of the existing system and funds for additional new lights. The Public Works Department shall be responsible for the implementation of this policy. Page 16 of 47 0700100020003000 ## Feet ## DISCLAIMER: This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 651-792-7075. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. ## StreetlightDistricts ## Lake Josephine ## Park ## Lake ## McCarrons ## County Park ## Ramsey County ## Open Space (Ramsey County) ## Lake Josephine ## Beach Park ## Park ## Lake ## Langton ## Sandcastle ## Park ## Lake ## Park ## Oasis ## Central ## Park ## Acorn ## Park ## Central ## Park ## Central ## Park ## Park ## Villa ## Park ## Keya ## Park ## Park ## Tamarack ## Park ## Reservoir Woods ## Reservoir Woods ## Rosebrook ## Langton ## Park ## Park ## Autumn ## Grove ## Park ## Park ## Cottontail ## Veterans ## Park ## Howard ## Johnson ## Park ## Willow Pond ## Cedarholm ## Golf Course ## Evergreen ## Park ## Keller ## Mayflower ## Park ## Lexington ## Park ## Bruce ## Russell ## Park ## Pioneer ## Park ## Concordia ## Park ## Materion ## Park ## Central ## Park North ## Owasso ## Ballfields ## Valley ## Park ## Owasso ## Hills ## Park ## Ladyslipper ## Park ## Mapleview ## Park ## Woodhill ## Park ## Applewood ## Park ## Applewood ## Overlook ## Memorial ## Park ## Midland ## Gardens ## Park ## Unity ## Park ## Lake ## Josephine ## Lake ## Owasso ## McCarrons ## Lake ## Lake ## Bennett ## Pond ## Willow ## Zimmerman ## Lake ## Oasis Pond ## Lake ## Johanna ## Lake ## Langton ## Walsh ## Lake ## BRENNER ## ST ## LYDIA ## AVE ## LYDIA ## CT ## PATT ## ON ## RD ## HIGHCREST ## RD ## MILLW ## OOD ## ST ## BRENNER ## CT ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## STANBRIDGE ## ST ## MANSON ## ST ## MAPLE ## LN ## OLD ## HIGHWAY 8 ## TROSETH ## RD ## COUNTY HIGHWAY 88 ## COUNTY ## ROAD D ## RD ## PARTRIDGEROAD C2 ## CENTRE ## POINTE ## DR ## AVE ## INTERSTATE 35W ## ROAD C ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## CLEVELAND ## COUNTY ## COUNTY ## PATTON ## RD ## COUNTY ## ROAD D ## WILDER ## ST ## MOUNT ## RD ## RIDGE ## EVELYN ## ST ## BRENNER ## AVE ## PRIOR ## CIR ## ST ## ARTHUR ## DR ## AVE ## MILDRED ## ST ## SH ## OREW ## OOD ## AVE ## BRENNER ## LYDIA ## ARTHUR ## PL ## MILDRED ## DR ## STANBRIDGE ## MILLWOOD ## MAPLE ## ST ## WHEELER ## WHEELER ## SHORE ## CURV ## WOOD ## LN ## LN ## ST ## ALDINE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## LI ## NC ## OLN ## DR ## RD C2 ## COUNTY ## AVE ## COUNTY ## RD C2 ## RD C2 ## COUNTY ## CENTENNIAL ## DR ## DR ## TERRACE ## LINCOLN ## DR ## SNELLING ## FAIRVIEW ## ST ## ARTHUR ## ROAD C ## RD C2 ## COUNTY ## PRIOR ## AVE ## COUNTY ## ASBURY ## RIDGEWOOD ## ST ## RD ## GLEN HILL ## RD ## AVE ## AVE ## WOODLYNN ## CLARMAR ## BRENNER ## AVE ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST ## AVE ## DR ## AVE ## LYDIA ## ASBURY ## ARONA ## SIMPSON ## PASCAL ## AVE ## WOOD ## MILL ## ST ## ST ## ALBERT ## ALBERT ## SHELDON ## ST ## JOSEPHINE ## E SNELLING ## COUNTY ## RD C2 ## RD ## AVE ## MERRILL ## ST ## BELAIR ## CIR ## ST ## FERNWOOD ## LEXINGTON ## RD C2 ## DR ## DR ## TERRACE ## ROAD C ## TERRACE ## DR ## AVE ## DR ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST ## GRIGGS ## ST ## CIVIC CE ## NTER DR ## LEXINGTON ## HAMLINE ## AVE ## JUDITH ## RD ## RAMBLER ## PRIMROSE ## CURV ## TALISMAN ## CUR ## V ## SHELDON ## ST ## JUDITH ## WOODHILL ## HURON ## FERN ## MERRILL ## DELL ## WOOD ## WOOD ## COUNTY ## E SNELLING ## DR ## ST ## AVEWHEATON ## HEINEL ## DR ## CIR ## HEINEL ## DR ## TERRACE ## ST ## DALE ## ST. ## ALBANS ## ST ## IONA ## LN ## HEINEL ## S OWASSO ## ROAD C ## AVE ## ST ## CHURCHILL ## OXFORD ## ST ## AGLEN ## AVE ## AVE ## LAKEVIEW ## AVE ## JUDITH ## WOODHILL ## COUNTY ## COUNTY ## ST ## DR ## KENT ## BLVD ## SANDY HOOK ## DR ## RD ## SANDY HOOK ## DR ## LITTLE BAY ## TURNSTONE CT (Private) ## S OWASSO ## BLVD ## LYNN AVE ## WOOD- ## HIGH ## POINTE ## CURV ## OWASSO ## HILLS ## DR ## N ## HILLSC ## OURTE ## W ## HILLSVIEW ## HILLSVIEW ## E ## ST ## MARION ## ST ## GALTIE ## R ## ST ## MAT ## ILD ## A ## ST ## MAPLE ## LN ## RD C2 ## AVE ## DR ## LN ## IONA ## CIR ## IRENE ## CIR ## RAMBLER ## CT ## TERRACE ## DR ## JUDITH ## AVE ## CENTENNIAL ## DR ## WESTERN ## AVE ## ROAD C ## AVE ## VIRGINIA ## ST ## FARRINGTON ## ST ## MATILDA ## ST ## GALTIER ## ST ## MARION ## ST ## WOODBRIDGE ## OAKCREST ## AVE ## LN ## OAKCREST ## BROOKS ## CIR ## ROSE PL ## COHANSEY ## CIR ## AVE ## AVE ## MATILDA ## ST ## GALTIER ## ST ## RD B2 ## ST ## WEWERS ## RD ## CIR ## GALTIER ## ST ## MARION ## ST ## WOODBRIDGE ## ST ## WESTERN ## AVE ## AVE ## TOP HILL ## CIR ## DR ## SOUTHHILL ## ST ## SANDHURST ## RICE ## AVE ## HAND ## AVE ## AUERBACH ## MATILDA ## DR ## CENTENNIAL ## PASCAL ## PASCAL ## ST ## ST ## COUNTY ## COUNTY ## ROAD D ## CHURCHILL ## CHATSWORTH ## ST ## ST ## WOODLYNN ## BRENNER ## AVE ## LYDIA ## MILLWOOD ## ST ## OXFORD ## LYDIA ## DR ## DR ## LYDIA ## VICTORIA ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## ST ## MILTON ## ST ## BRENNER ## AVE ## MILLWOOD ## AVE ## ST ## AVON ## W OWASSO ## BLVD ## RD C2 ## ORCHARD ## LN ## CIR ## STANBRIDGE ## HIGH- ## COURTE ## MAPLE LANE ## CT ## COUNTY ## FARRINGTON ## MILLWOOD ## ST ## WESTERN ## AVE ## BLVD ## S OW ## ASSO ## WOODLYNN ## AVE ## ST ## WOODBRIDGE ## NORTHVIEW ## ST ## RICE ## LN ## IONA ## ST ## RICE ## CT ## TERR ## ACE ## HILL ## SCO ## URTE ## S ## COUNTY ## WOODHILL ## IONA ## MACKUBIN ## ST ## KENT ## ST ## ST ## MACKUBIN ## ST ## DALE ## AVE ## AVE ## SEXTANT ## COUNTY ## AVE ## ST ## IRENE ## ST ## IRENE ## ST ## SEXTANT ## AVE ## CT ## IRENE ## CIR ## VIRGINIA ## CIR ## FARRINGTON ## MATILDA ## BROOKS ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## ST ## ROAD B ## ST ## MINNESOTA ## LOVELL ## LOVELL ## AVE ## GRAND- ## VIEW ## COHANSEY ## SAN ## DHU ## RST ## DR ## BLVD ## COUNTY ## VICTORIA ## SEXTANTAVE ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## BROOKS ## TRANSIT ## ST ## BLVD ## ST ## ALBEMARLE ## ST ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## WOODBRIDGE ## ST ## MCCARRON ## ST ## AVE ## WESTERN ## AVE ## FARRINGTON ## ST ## AVE ## ROMA ## AVE ## DIONNE ## GALTIER ## GRANDVIEW ## AVE ## MINNESOTA ## AVE ## WOODB ## RID ## GE ## S ## T ## CIR ## CAPITOL ## MARION ## VIEW ## VIEW ## CAPITOL ## VIEW ## CAPITOL ## CIR ## ST ## DR ## BOSS ## AR ## D ## ST ## IRENE ## AVE ## OXFORD ## CHURCHILL ## AGLEN ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST ## COUNTY ## ROSE ## OAKCREST ## FISK ## ST ## GROTTO ## ST ## LOVELL LN N ## AVE ## RD B2 ## PL ## AVE ## ST ## ALADDIN ## CT ## ROSE ## TOWN ## DR ## OVERLOOK ## ST ## ST ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## PL ## NANCY ## AVE ## VICTORIA ## LOVELL ## GRANDVIEW ## COPE ## GROT ## ST. ## ALBA ## NS ## TO ## ST ## ST ## ST ## NANCY ## PL ## AVE ## SANDHURST ## MILTON ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## SANDHURST ## DR ## ROAD B ## ST ## GROTTO ## ST ## SHERREN ## ST ## OXFORD ## GRANDVIEW ## ST ## ST ## LOVELL ## LOVELL LN S ## LOVELL LN (Private) ## SHERREN ## COUNTY ## AVE ## CURV ## SNELLING ## ROSE ## PL ## PASCAL ## ST ## ST ## SIMP ## S ## ON ## AVE ## BROOKS ## AVE ## TRANSIT ## ST ## ARO ## NA ## SEXTANT ## AVE ## AVE ## SEXTANT ## ST ## HOLTON ## ST ## ALBERT ## ST ## SHELDON ## COUNTY ## OAKCREST ## ROSE ## PL ## WILLOW ## CIR ## DELLW ## OOD ## CIR ## CHRISTY ## RD B2 ## AVE ## WILLOW ## BROOKS ## AVE ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## SEXTANT ## AVE ## LN ## PL ## ROSE ## ST ## DUNLAP ## ST ## ST ## FERN ## WOOD ## DUNLAP ## ST ## AVE ## HAMLINE ## COLONIALDR (Private) ## ST ## ALBERT ## ST ## DR ## SANDHURST ## AVE ## ST ## DELLWOOD ## DELLWOOD ## ST ## MERRILL ## ST ## ROAD B ## ST ## FERNWOOD ## SHERREN ## ST ## RD ## LAURIE ## DR ## SANDHURST ## LEXINGTON ## AVE ## AVE ## COMMERCE ## COUNTY ## ST ## PASCAL ## OAKCREST ## AVE ## AVE ## ROSE ## ROSE ## AVE ## ELDRIDGE ## ST ## ST ## SAMUEL (Private) ## LN ## S RIDGEWOOD ## N RIDGEWOOD ## LN ## LN ## MID OAKS ## MID OAKS ## RD ## AVE ## BURKE ## ELDRIDGE ## BELMONT ## RYAN ## SHRYER ## SKILLMAN ## PL ## OAKCREST ## BEACON ## ST ## WHEELER ## AVE ## ST ## HERSCHEL ## RD B2 ## COUNTY ## CLEVELAND ## CLEVELA ## ND ## AVE ## AVE ## COUNTY ## AVE ## AVE ## PL ## AVE ## ST ## ALDINE ## ST ## CHARLOTTE ## ST ## FRY ## SNELLING ## RD B2 ## PERIMETER ## DR ## FAIRVIEW ## N GLUEK LN ## S GLUEK LN ## LN ## ROAD B ## AVE ## HERSCHEL ## RD ## MIDLOTHIAN ## RDHADDINGTON ## RD ## LAURIE ## N HIGHWAY 36 SERVICE DR ## S HIGHWAY 36 ## SERVICE DR ## PRIOR ## FERRIS ## FERRIS LN ## GLU ## EK ## COUNTY ## WEST ## WALNUT ## ST ## ROSE ## PL ## TERMINAL ## ST ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## RD ## RD ## TERMINAL ## ST ## ST. CROIX ## ST. CROIX ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST. STEPHEN ## ST ## FULHAM ## LAURIE ## RD ## MARIO ## N ## RD ## ACORN ## RD ## N HIGHWAY 36 SERVICE DR ## S HIGHWAY 36 SERVICE DR ## WALNUT ## INTERSTATE ## 35W ## EUSTIS ## ST (Private) ## FULHAM ## COUNTY ## FAIRWAYS ## LN ## FULHAM ## ST ## LAKE ST ## MIDLAND ## HILLS ## RD ## ROAD B ## N ROSEWOOD ## LN ## LN ## S ROSEWOOD ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## DRAPER ## HYTHE ## DR ## CIR ## ST ## ROSELAWN ## AVE ## CLEVELAND ## AVE ## AVE ## PRIOR ## SHARONDALE ## AVE ## AVE ## ELDRIDGE ## WILDER ST ## ELDRIDGE ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## EVERGREEN ## CT ## AVE ## AVE ## SHRYER ## RYAN ## LO ## RE ## N ## RD ## AUT ## U ## MN ## PL ## ROSELAWN ## TATUM ## ST ## DR ## DRAPER ## FAIRVIEW ## BEACON ## HERSCHEL ## WHEELER ## ST ## ST ## ST ## SHRYER ## RYAN ## ELDRIDGE ## SKILLMAN ## ALDINE ## ST ## AVE ## AVE ## SNELLING ## AVE ## AVE ## FRY ## MIDLOTHIAN ## RD ## ROSELAWN ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## LN ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## ASBURY ## ST ## ST ## ARONA ## ST ## SIMPSON ## ST ## PASCAL ## SHRYER ## ELDRIDGE ## BURKE ## RYAN ## DRAPER ## ROSELAWN ## DELL ## WOOD ## AVE ## AVE ## HAMLINE ## LN ## SKILLMAN ## BELMONT ## AVE ## ST ## DELLWOOD ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## WOOD ## FERN ## ST ## AVE ## LINDY ## KARYL ## PL ## LEXINGTON ## AVE ## AVE ## HAMLINE ## LARPENTEUR ## GARDEN ## AVE ## LEXINGTON ## AUTUMN ## ST ## SUMMER ## ST ## RUGGLES ## ST ## ST ## RUGGLES ## AVE ## HURON ## MERRILL ## DELLWOOD ## AVE ## AVE ## ROMA ## FERNWOOD ## ST ## DUNLAP ## LINDY ## AVE ## DIONNE ## ST ## AVE ## AVE ## BURKE ## PARKER ## SHRYER ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## DRAPER ## HARRIET LN (Private) ## OXFORD ## ST ## ST ## CHATSWORTH ## VICTORIA ## AVE ## ROSELAWN ## PARKER ## AVE ## AVON ## ALAMEDA ## ST ## ST ## AVE ## ELDRIDGE ## LN ## BELMONT ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## SHRYER ## DALE ## VICTORIA ## AVE ## RD ## ST ## ALAMEDA ## STUBER ## ROMA ## ST ## ST. ALBANS ## AVE ## RIDGE ## EMERALD ## CT ## PINEVIEW ## DR ## ALTA VISTA ## CT ## DALE ## DALE ## ST ## LARPENTEUR ## ST ## RUGGLES ## ST ## ROMA ## AVE ## DIONNE ## ST ## CHATSWORTH ## ST ## ST ## ST ## OXFORD ## AGLEN ## COH ## ANSEY ## SHRYER ## AVE ## AVE ## MOUNDSVIEW ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## ELDRIDGE ## CRE ## SC ## ENT ## LN ## COHANSEY ## BLVD ## ST ## IRENE ## WESTERN ## HAND ## AVE ## AVE ## FARRINGTON ## BURKE ## BLVD ## N MCCARRONS ## DR ## N MCCARRONS ## ELMER ## ST ## GIES- ## MANN ## AVE ## ST ## WILLIAM ## ST ## MARION ## CT ## ALBEMARLE ## WILLIAM ## ST ## BLVD ## CT ## WOODBRIDGE ## MARION ## ST ## RICE ## PL ## WAGENER ## SHADY ## AVE ## BEACH ## CENTER ## ST ## HILLTOP ## AVE ## GLENWOOD ## AVE ## WAGNER ## ST ## AVE ## KENT ## ST ## AVE ## ROSELAWN ## BAYVIEW ## AVON ## ST ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## ROSEGATE ## ROSEG ## ATE ## DR ## STATE HIGHWAY 280 ## ROSE- ## DALE ## WEST- ## WOOD ## LYDIA ## AVE ## W SNELLING ## DR ## W SNELLING ## DR ## ROSE VISTA ## CT (Private) ## FERNWOOD ## CT ## FERN- ## WOOD ## ST ## DUNLAP ## ST ## CHATS- ## WORTH ## CHATS- ## WORTH ## FARRING ## TON CT ## COHAN- ## SEY CIR ## AVE ## WOOD- ## BRIDGE ## S HIGHWAY 36 ## SERVICE DR ## FARRING- ## TON ## KENT ## ST ## CHANDLER ## AVE (Private) (Private) ## SAND- ## HURST ## CIR (Private) (Private) ## LN (Private) ## MIDLAND ## VIEW CT ## ST ## ARONA ## CT ## APPLEWOOD ## TERRACE ## DR ## NATURE ## VIEW CT (Priv) ## E SNELLING ## SVC DR ## CLEVE ## LAND S ## ERVIC ## E DR ## S COUNTY C SERVICE DR ## CHATS- ## WORTH ## CT ## WOOD ## RUFF ## S MCCA ## RRONS ## RESERVOIR ## WOODS CIR ## AMERICAN ST ## MOUNT RIDGE RD ## IONA LN ## TWIN ## LAN ## GT ## ON LAKE ## MAPLE LN ## DUNLAP ## ST ## DUNLAP ## CIR (Private) ## MILTON ## CT ## ASBUR ## Y ST ## PKWY ## DR ## TWIN LAKES ## PKWY ## LAKES ## MCCARRONS PL (Priv) ## LEXINGTON (Priv) ## HERSCHEL ST (Priv) ## PL ## LAURIE CT (Priv) ## Lake Josephine ## Park ## Lake ## McCarrons ## County Park ## Ramsey County ## Open Space (Ramsey County) ## Lake Josephine ## Beach Park ## Park ## Lake ## Langton ## Sandcastle ## Park ## Lake ## Park ## Oasis ## Central ## Park ## Acorn ## Park ## Central ## Park ## Central ## Park ## Park ## Villa ## Park ## Keya ## Park ## Park ## Tamarack ## Park ## Reservoir Woods ## Reservoir Woods ## Rosebrook ## Langton ## Park ## Park ## Autumn ## Grove ## Park ## Park ## Cottontail ## Veterans ## Park ## Howard ## Johnson ## Park ## Willow Pond ## Cedarholm ## Golf Course ## Evergreen ## Park ## Keller ## Mayflower ## Park ## Lexington ## Park ## Bruce ## Russell ## Park ## Pioneer ## Park ## Concordia ## Park ## Materion ## Park ## Central ## Park North ## Owasso ## Ballfields ## Valley ## Park ## Owasso ## Hills ## Park ## Ladyslipper ## Park ## Mapleview ## Park ## Woodhill ## Park ## Applewood ## Park ## Applewood ## Overlook ## Memorial ## Park ## Midland ## Gardens ## Park ## Unity ## Park ## Lake ## Josephine ## Lake ## Owasso ## McCarrons ## Lake ## Lake ## Bennett ## Pond ## Willow ## Zimmerman ## Lake ## Oasis Pond ## Lake ## Johanna ## Lake ## Langton ## Walsh ## Lake ## BRENNER ## ST ## LYDIA ## AVE ## LYDIA ## CT ## PATT ## ON ## RD ## HIGHCREST ## RD ## MILLW ## OOD ## ST ## BRENNER ## CT ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## STANBRIDGE ## ST ## MANSON ## ST ## MAPLE ## LN ## OLD ## HIGHWAY 8 ## TROSETH ## RD ## COUNTY HIGHWAY 88 ## COUNTY ## ROAD D ## RD ## PARTRIDGEROAD C2 ## CENTRE ## POINTE ## DR ## AVE ## INTERSTATE 35W ## ROAD C ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## CLEVELAND ## COUNTY ## COUNTY ## PATTON ## RD ## COUNTY ## ROAD D ## WILDER ## ST ## MOUNT ## RD ## RIDGE ## EVELYN ## ST ## BRENNER ## AVE ## PRIOR ## CIR ## ST ## ARTHUR ## DR ## AVE ## MILDRED ## ST ## SH ## OREW ## OOD ## AVE ## BRENNER ## LYDIA ## ARTHUR ## PL ## MILDRED ## DR ## STANBRIDGE ## MILLWOOD ## MAPLE ## ST ## WHEELER ## WHEELER ## SHORE ## CURV ## WOOD ## LN ## LN ## ST ## ALDINE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## LI ## NC ## OLN ## DR ## RD C2 ## COUNTY ## AVE ## COUNTY ## RD C2 ## RD C2 ## COUNTY ## CENTENNIAL ## DR ## DR ## TERRACE ## LINCOLN ## DR ## SNELLING ## FAIRVIEW ## ST ## ARTHUR ## ROAD C ## RD C2 ## COUNTY ## PRIOR ## AVE ## COUNTY ## ASBURY ## RIDGEWOOD ## ST ## RD ## GLEN HILL ## RD ## AVE ## AVE ## WOODLYNN ## CLARMAR ## BRENNER ## AVE ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST ## AVE ## DR ## AVE ## LYDIA ## ASBURY ## ARONA ## SIMPSON ## PASCAL ## AVE ## WOOD ## MILL ## ST ## ST ## ALBERT ## ALBERT ## SHELDON ## ST ## JOSEPHINE ## E SNELLING ## COUNTY ## RD C2 ## RD ## AVE ## MERRILL ## ST ## BELAIR ## CIR ## ST ## FERNWOOD ## LEXINGTON ## RD C2 ## DR ## DR ## TERRACE ## ROAD C ## TERRACE ## DR ## AVE ## DR ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST ## GRIGGS ## ST ## CIVIC CE ## NTER DR ## LEXINGTON ## HAMLINE ## AVE ## JUDITH ## RD ## RAMBLER ## PRIMROSE ## CURV ## TALISMAN ## CUR ## V ## SHELDON ## ST ## JUDITH ## WOODHILL ## HURON ## FERN ## MERRILL ## DELL ## WOOD ## WOOD ## COUNTY ## E SNELLING ## DR ## ST ## AVEWHEATON ## HEINEL ## DR ## CIR ## HEINEL ## DR ## TERRACE ## ST ## DALE ## ST. ## ALBANS ## ST ## IONA ## LN ## HEINEL ## S OWASSO ## ROAD C ## AVE ## ST ## CHURCHILL ## OXFORD ## ST ## AGLEN ## AVE ## AVE ## LAKEVIEW ## AVE ## JUDITH ## WOODHILL ## COUNTY ## COUNTY ## ST ## DR ## KENT ## BLVD ## SANDY HOOK ## DR ## RD ## SANDY HOOK ## DR ## LITTLE BAY ## TURNSTONE CT (Private) ## S OWASSO ## BLVD ## LYNN AVE ## WOOD- ## HIGH ## POINTE ## CURV ## OWASSO ## HILLS ## DR ## N ## HILLSC ## OURTE ## W ## HILLSVIEW ## HILLSVIEW ## E ## ST ## MARION ## ST ## GALTIE ## R ## ST ## MAT ## ILD ## A ## ST ## MAPLE ## LN ## RD C2 ## AVE ## DR ## LN ## IONA ## CIR ## IRENE ## CIR ## RAMBLER ## CT ## TERRACE ## DR ## JUDITH ## AVE ## CENTENNIAL ## DR ## WESTERN ## AVE ## ROAD C ## AVE ## VIRGINIA ## ST ## FARRINGTON ## ST ## MATILDA ## ST ## GALTIER ## ST ## MARION ## ST ## WOODBRIDGE ## OAKCREST ## AVE ## LN ## OAKCREST ## BROOKS ## CIR ## ROSE PL ## COHANSEY ## CIR ## AVE ## AVE ## MATILDA ## ST ## GALTIER ## ST ## RD B2 ## ST ## WEWERS ## RD ## CIR ## GALTIER ## ST ## MARION ## ST ## WOODBRIDGE ## ST ## WESTERN ## AVE ## AVE ## TOP HILL ## CIR ## DR ## SOUTHHILL ## ST ## SANDHURST ## RICE ## AVE ## HAND ## AVE ## AUERBACH ## MATILDA ## DR ## CENTENNIAL ## PASCAL ## PASCAL ## ST ## ST ## COUNTY ## COUNTY ## ROAD D ## CHURCHILL ## CHATSWORTH ## ST ## ST ## WOODLYNN ## BRENNER ## AVE ## LYDIA ## MILLWOOD ## ST ## OXFORD ## LYDIA ## DR ## DR ## LYDIA ## VICTORIA ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## ST ## MILTON ## ST ## BRENNER ## AVE ## MILLWOOD ## AVE ## ST ## AVON ## W OWASSO ## BLVD ## RD C2 ## ORCHARD ## LN ## CIR ## STANBRIDGE ## HIGH- ## COURTE ## MAPLE LANE ## CT ## COUNTY ## FARRINGTON ## MILLWOOD ## ST ## WESTERN ## AVE ## BLVD ## S OW ## ASSO ## WOODLYNN ## AVE ## ST ## WOODBRIDGE ## NORTHVIEW ## ST ## RICE ## LN ## IONA ## ST ## RICE ## CT ## TERR ## ACE ## HILL ## SCO ## URTE ## S ## COUNTY ## WOODHILL ## IONA ## MACKUBIN ## ST ## KENT ## ST ## ST ## MACKUBIN ## ST ## DALE ## AVE ## AVE ## SEXTANT ## COUNTY ## AVE ## ST ## IRENE ## ST ## IRENE ## ST ## SEXTANT ## AVE ## CT ## IRENE ## CIR ## VIRGINIA ## CIR ## FARRINGTON ## MATILDA ## BROOKS ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## ST ## ROAD B ## ST ## MINNESOTA ## LOVELL ## LOVELL ## AVE ## GRAND- ## VIEW ## COHANSEY ## SAN ## DHU ## RST ## DR ## BLVD ## COUNTY ## VICTORIA ## SEXTANTAVE ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## BROOKS ## TRANSIT ## ST ## BLVD ## ST ## ALBEMARLE ## ST ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## WOODBRIDGE ## ST ## MCCARRON ## ST ## AVE ## WESTERN ## AVE ## FARRINGTON ## ST ## AVE ## ROMA ## AVE ## DIONNE ## GALTIER ## GRANDVIEW ## AVE ## MINNESOTA ## AVE ## WOODB ## RID ## GE ## S ## T ## CIR ## CAPITOL ## MARION ## VIEW ## VIEW ## CAPITOL ## VIEW ## CAPITOL ## CIR ## ST ## DR ## BOSS ## AR ## D ## ST ## IRENE ## AVE ## OXFORD ## CHURCHILL ## AGLEN ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST ## COUNTY ## ROSE ## OAKCREST ## FISK ## ST ## GROTTO ## ST ## LOVELL LN N ## AVE ## RD B2 ## PL ## AVE ## ST ## ALADDIN ## CT ## ROSE ## TOWN ## DR ## OVERLOOK ## ST ## ST ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## PL ## NANCY ## AVE ## VICTORIA ## LOVELL ## GRANDVIEW ## COPE ## GROT ## ST. ## ALBA ## NS ## TO ## ST ## ST ## ST ## NANCY ## PL ## AVE ## SANDHURST ## MILTON ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## SANDHURST ## DR ## ROAD B ## ST ## GROTTO ## ST ## SHERREN ## ST ## OXFORD ## GRANDVIEW ## ST ## ST ## LOVELL ## LOVELL LN S ## LOVELL LN (Private) ## SHERREN ## COUNTY ## AVE ## CURV ## SNELLING ## ROSE ## PL ## PASCAL ## ST ## ST ## SIMP ## S ## ON ## AVE ## BROOKS ## AVE ## TRANSIT ## ST ## ARO ## NA ## SEXTANT ## AVE ## AVE ## SEXTANT ## ST ## HOLTON ## ST ## ALBERT ## ST ## SHELDON ## COUNTY ## OAKCREST ## ROSE ## PL ## WILLOW ## CIR ## DELLW ## OOD ## CIR ## CHRISTY ## RD B2 ## AVE ## WILLOW ## BROOKS ## AVE ## TRANSIT ## AVE ## SEXTANT ## AVE ## LN ## PL ## ROSE ## ST ## DUNLAP ## ST ## ST ## FERN ## WOOD ## DUNLAP ## ST ## AVE ## HAMLINE ## COLONIALDR (Private) ## ST ## ALBERT ## ST ## DR ## SANDHURST ## AVE ## ST ## DELLWOOD ## DELLWOOD ## ST ## MERRILL ## ST ## ROAD B ## ST ## FERNWOOD ## SHERREN ## ST ## RD ## LAURIE ## DR ## SANDHURST ## LEXINGTON ## AVE ## AVE ## COMMERCE ## COUNTY ## ST ## PASCAL ## OAKCREST ## AVE ## AVE ## ROSE ## ROSE ## AVE ## ELDRIDGE ## ST ## ST ## SAMUEL (Private) ## LN ## S RIDGEWOOD ## N RIDGEWOOD ## LN ## LN ## MID OAKS ## MID OAKS ## RD ## AVE ## BURKE ## ELDRIDGE ## BELMONT ## RYAN ## SHRYER ## SKILLMAN ## PL ## OAKCREST ## BEACON ## ST ## WHEELER ## AVE ## ST ## HERSCHEL ## RD B2 ## COUNTY ## CLEVELAND ## CLEVELA ## ND ## AVE ## AVE ## COUNTY ## AVE ## AVE ## PL ## AVE ## ST ## ALDINE ## ST ## CHARLOTTE ## ST ## FRY ## SNELLING ## RD B2 ## PERIMETER ## DR ## FAIRVIEW ## N GLUEK LN ## S GLUEK LN ## LN ## ROAD B ## AVE ## HERSCHEL ## RD ## MIDLOTHIAN ## RDHADDINGTON ## RD ## LAURIE ## N HIGHWAY 36 SERVICE DR ## S HIGHWAY 36 ## SERVICE DR ## PRIOR ## FERRIS ## FERRIS LN ## GLU ## EK ## COUNTY ## WEST ## WALNUT ## ST ## ROSE ## PL ## TERMINAL ## ST ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## RD ## RD ## TERMINAL ## ST ## ST. CROIX ## ST. CROIX ## ST ## ST ## ST ## ST. STEPHEN ## ST ## FULHAM ## LAURIE ## RD ## MARIO ## N ## RD ## ACORN ## RD ## N HIGHWAY 36 SERVICE DR ## S HIGHWAY 36 SERVICE DR ## WALNUT ## INTERSTATE ## 35W ## EUSTIS ## ST (Private) ## FULHAM ## COUNTY ## FAIRWAYS ## LN ## FULHAM ## ST ## LAKE ST ## MIDLAND ## HILLS ## RD ## ROAD B ## N ROSEWOOD ## LN ## LN ## S ROSEWOOD ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## DRAPER ## HYTHE ## DR ## CIR ## ST ## ROSELAWN ## AVE ## CLEVELAND ## AVE ## AVE ## PRIOR ## SHARONDALE ## AVE ## AVE ## ELDRIDGE ## WILDER ST ## ELDRIDGE ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## EVERGREEN ## CT ## AVE ## AVE ## SHRYER ## RYAN ## LO ## RE ## N ## RD ## AUT ## U ## MN ## PL ## ROSELAWN ## TATUM ## ST ## DR ## DRAPER ## FAIRVIEW ## BEACON ## HERSCHEL ## WHEELER ## ST ## ST ## ST ## SHRYER ## RYAN ## ELDRIDGE ## SKILLMAN ## ALDINE ## ST ## AVE ## AVE ## SNELLING ## AVE ## AVE ## FRY ## MIDLOTHIAN ## RD ## ROSELAWN ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## LN ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## ASBURY ## ST ## ST ## ARONA ## ST ## SIMPSON ## ST ## PASCAL ## SHRYER ## ELDRIDGE ## BURKE ## RYAN ## DRAPER ## ROSELAWN ## DELL ## WOOD ## AVE ## AVE ## HAMLINE ## LN ## SKILLMAN ## BELMONT ## AVE ## ST ## DELLWOOD ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## AVE ## WOOD ## FERN ## ST ## AVE ## LINDY ## KARYL ## PL ## LEXINGTON ## AVE ## AVE ## HAMLINE ## LARPENTEUR ## GARDEN ## AVE ## LEXINGTON ## AUTUMN ## ST ## SUMMER ## ST ## RUGGLES ## ST ## ST ## RUGGLES ## AVE ## HURON ## MERRILL ## DELLWOOD ## AVE ## AVE ## ROMA ## FERNWOOD ## ST ## DUNLAP ## LINDY ## AVE ## DIONNE ## ST ## AVE ## AVE ## BURKE ## PARKER ## SHRYER ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## DRAPER ## HARRIET LN (Private) ## OXFORD ## ST ## ST ## CHATSWORTH ## VICTORIA ## AVE ## ROSELAWN ## PARKER ## AVE ## AVON ## ALAMEDA ## ST ## ST ## AVE ## ELDRIDGE ## LN ## BELMONT ## AVE ## SKILLMAN ## AVE ## SHRYER ## DALE ## VICTORIA ## AVE ## RD ## ST ## ALAMEDA ## STUBER ## ROMA ## ST ## ST. ALBANS ## AVE ## RIDGE ## EMERALD ## CT ## PINEVIEW ## DR ## ALTA VISTA ## CT ## DALE ## DALE ## ST ## LARPENTEUR ## ST ## RUGGLES ## ST ## ROMA ## AVE ## DIONNE ## ST ## CHATSWORTH ## ST ## ST ## ST ## OXFORD ## AGLEN ## COH ## ANSEY ## SHRYER ## AVE ## AVE ## MOUNDSVIEW ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## RYAN ## AVE ## ELDRIDGE ## CRE ## SC ## ENT ## LN ## COHANSEY ## BLVD ## ST ## IRENE ## WESTERN ## HAND ## AVE ## AVE ## FARRINGTON ## BURKE ## BLVD ## N MCCARRONS ## DR ## N MCCARRONS ## ELMER ## ST ## GIES- ## MANN ## AVE ## ST ## WILLIAM ## ST ## MARION ## CT ## ALBEMARLE ## WILLIAM ## ST ## BLVD ## CT ## WOODBRIDGE ## MARION ## ST ## RICE ## PL ## WAGENER ## SHADY ## AVE ## BEACH ## CENTER ## ST ## HILLTOP ## AVE ## GLENWOOD ## AVE ## WAGNER ## ST ## AVE ## KENT ## ST ## AVE ## ROSELAWN ## BAYVIEW ## AVON ## ST ## LONG ## LAKE ## RD ## ROSEGATE ## ROSEG ## ATE ## DR ## STATE HIGHWAY 280 ## ROSE- ## DALE ## WEST- ## WOOD ## LYDIA ## AVE ## W SNELLING ## DR ## W SNELLING ## DR ## ROSE VISTA ## CT (Private) ## FERNWOOD ## CT ## FERN- ## WOOD ## ST ## DUNLAP ## ST ## CHATS- ## WORTH ## CHATS- ## WORTH ## FARRING ## TON CT ## COHAN- ## SEY CIR ## AVE ## WOOD- ## BRIDGE ## S HIGHWAY 36 ## SERVICE DR ## FARRING- ## TON ## KENT ## ST ## CHANDLER ## AVE (Private) (Private) ## SAND- ## HURST ## CIR (Private) (Private) ## LN (Private) ## MIDLAND ## VIEW CT ## ST ## ARONA ## CT ## APPLEWOOD ## TERRACE ## DR ## NATURE ## VIEW CT (Priv) ## E SNELLING ## SVC DR ## CLEVE ## LAND S ## ERVIC ## E DR ## S COUNTY C SERVICE DR ## CHATS- ## WORTH ## CT ## WOOD ## RUFF ## S MCCA ## RRONS ## RESERVOIR ## WOODS CIR ## AMERICAN ST ## MOUNT RIDGE RD ## IONA LN ## TWIN ## LAN ## GT ## ON LAKE ## MAPLE LN ## DUNLAP ## ST ## DUNLAP ## CIR (Private) ## MILTON ## CT ## ASBUR ## Y ST ## PKWY ## DR ## TWIN LAKES ## PKWY ## LAKES ## MCCARRONS PL (Priv) ## LEXINGTON (Priv) ## HERSCHEL ST (Priv) ## PL ## LAURIE CT (Priv) ## L ## Data Sources ## * Ramsey County GIS (1/04/2024) ## * City of Roseville Community Development ## * City of Roseville Finance Department ## Prepared by: Engineering Department 1/30/2024 ## Streetl ight Districts ## Residential (Manufactured Housing Park; ## Common Ar ## eas; Single Family Attached; Single ## Family Detached; Multi Family) ## Commercial (Business/Retail; Heavy ## I ## ndustrial; Institutional; Light Industrial; ## Office) ## City Special District ## Business District ## Enhanced District Page 17 of 47 Page 1 of 6 ## City of Roseville DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION 8/20/2026March 2024 ## Streetlight Policy ## City of Roseville ## Streetlight Policy October 13, 2025 DRAFT August 20, 2026 ## I.Purpose and Need for Policy The installation of streetlights provides a safer environment for the community in regard to traffic and pedestrian safety. Due to limited funds and varying viewpoints of individual property owners, as to the desirability of such installations, the City has established this policy to define its streetlighting program. The policy aims to find a balance between minimal lighting requirement for safety of the public and dark sky efforts. ## I ## I. Policy Statement The City shall adopt and utilize the following standard policy for the installation, maintenance, and funding of streetlighting. It is important to establish a consistent, equitable approach, relating to the method of selecting the locations for streetlights, to insure fair and reasonable treatment for property owners. Streetlighting in all areas of the City shall follow the requirements detailed below. ## III. Conditions •All new lights installed shall be full cutoff lights. •All new streetlighting must be consistent with the adopted City Ordinances, Design standardsStandards, and this Policy. •Variations to the City standard streetlight types will be allowed only by City Council action. Extra costs associated with variations to the City standard, both installation and ongoing operation and maintenance costs, will be the responsibility of the benefiting properties. •All streetlighting designs shall consider industry standards, safety, uniformity, lighting intensity and cost. •Qualifying requests for streetlights may be scheduled for installation in a subsequent year if the City determines sufficient funds are not available in the current City budget. •On projects where pedestrian level lighting is installed, a continuous level of light should be maintained for the design. Spacing would be determined applying engineering standards. Spacing typically results in poles every 90 to 120 feet. ## IV. Streetlight Districts To develop a rational approach to streetlight installation, the City Council in 1957, established a policy to install streetlights at no assessment to ensure that the lights would be installed where most needed and wanted and wanted. Since the need for lighting varies by adjacent use, different standards will apply as follows. ## A. Standard District oThis standard be used for all areas in the City unle ss they are defined as Commercial, City Special or Enhanced districts as shown in Appendix A. Attachment 2 Page 18 of 47 Page 2 of 6 ## City of Roseville ## DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION 8/20/2026March 2024 ## Streetlight Policy o The locations and illuminance target for this district shall be the minimum for all lighting districts., o Procedure  If the following conditions are met, the City will install streetlights at the following locations:locations identified below. • The location is at the intersection of two streets, OR • The location is at the end of a cul-de-sac, OR • The location is on a severe curve, either vertically or horizontally, OR • The location is at a marked pedestrian crosswalk.  Illuminance Target: illuminance ranges from 0.3 – 0.6 foot-candles.  City staff will notify property owners within 300 feet of the new light location where lighting will be installed at least three weeks prior to the installation of the light.  Mid-block lights are desirable and should be considered for placement if the spacing between existing lights is greater than 600 feet. If the above conditions are met, an individual property owner may circulate a petition in the neighborhood to determine if the light is desired (particularly by those property owners directly adjacent to the proposed light). If 60% consensus is built with property owners within 150 feet of the proposed light, the City staff will work with the electric utility company to install the light. ## o Streetlight Design ##  Streetlight Type: LED Cobra head Cutoff ##  Pole Type: • Wooden if available • Fiberglass or aluminum if a pole needs to be installed.  Locations: • at the intersection of two streets, OR • at the end of a cul-de-sac, OR • on a severe curve, either vertically or horizontally, OR • at a marked pedestrian crosswalk.  Illuminance Target: between 0.3 – 0.6 foot-candles. Mid-block lights are desirable and should be considered for placement if the spacing between existing lights is greater than 600 feet. If the above conditions are met, a n individual property owner may submit a petition to the City Engineer with signatures representing at least 60% of the property owners circulate a petition in the neighborhood to determine if the light is desired (particularly by those property owners directly adjacent to the proposed light). If 60% consensus is built with property owners within 150 feet of the proposed light. If a valid petition is received, the City staff will have the light installedwork with the electric utility company to install the light. • o Funding  The City will fund installation and maintenance of lights within the Standard District. Page 19 of 47 Page 3 of 6 ## City of Roseville ## DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION 8/20/2026March 2024 ## Streetlight Policy  Lights are typically owned and maintained by Xcel who charges the city a monthly flat rate per light. ## B. Business District o This standard will be applied to all areas identified as Business Districts as shown ## in Appendix A o Procedure  Property owners that would like street segments established as a to be added to the Business Lighting District shall petition the City Council. The Council will determine if the street will be added to theas a Business District. • The petition must include signatures representing at least 60% of the property owners abutting the right-of-way in the project area. City staff can work with property owners to determine the project area.Over 60% of benefitting property owners shall petition the City to be considered. • If on a street bordering another city, only the Roseville parcels will be used to determine 60%. • Only streets that are non-single family residential will be considered. ## o Streetlight Design  This type of lighting may include street and/or pedestrian level lighting or decorative style lighting. ##  Streetlight Type: LED Cobrahead Cutoff ##  Pole Type: • Wooden if available • Fiberglass or aluminum if a pole needs to be installed.  This lighting would be a brighter, higher quality of lighting. Lights would be designed per engineering standards typically resulting in poles every 250-300 feet. As a minimum standard, all intersections, marked crosswalks, and horizontal and vertical curves would have streetlights. o Funding  Initial costs to install lighting to Business District standards will be assessed to adjacent property owners.  Maintenance and future replacement costs will be paid by the City.  Lights are typically installed and maintained by Xcel who leases them to the City for 25 years after which they become City owned or replaced and a new 25-year lease started. ## C. City Special District o City Special Districts are as shown in Appendix A. o This type of lighting will be for special areas as determined by the City Council.  This type of lighting may include street lighting and/or pedestrian level lighting or decorative style lighting.  The lighting standards for each Special District shall be designed for the specific purpose and needs of the district. o Funding Page 20 of 47 Page 4 of 6 ## City of Roseville ## DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION 8/20/2026March 2024 ## Streetlight Policy  The City will fund installation and maintenance of lights within the City Special District. ## D. Enhanced District o When If property owners want a different location, design, or number of requested lights above the Standard Streetlight Ddistrict standards, property ownersthey may request that the City establish an Enhanced District and undertake an Enhanced District streetlight project. o Procedure  When a request for an Enhanced District project is received, City staff, working with property owners, will determine the boundaries of the project. Requests for streetlighting can be initiated through a petition to City Council. petition process that includes signatures representing at least 60% of the property in the project area. ##  Petition Process • The petition must include signatures representing at least 60% of the property owners abutting the right-of-way in the project area. City staff can work with property owners to determine the project area. If on a street bordering another city, only the Roseville parcels will be used to determine 60%. • Upon receipt of a valid petition signed by the owners of sixty percent (60%) of the property area within the proposed project limits, City staff will prepare a preliminary Feasibility Rreport detailing the streetlight types, location, costs, and proposed assessments. • The City Council will be asked to call and hold a public hearing pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031 to determine if a streetlight project will occur.. • If the project goes to the public hearing, but is not ordered forwardapproved, subsequent new petitions will not be undertaken for the same project area or any part of the project area for a two (2) year period beginning on the hearing date. The exception to this requirement would be if the City initiates a street reconstruction project in the area. o Funding  The additional costs of an Enhanced District project shall be assessed to the benefiting property owners according to City Assessment Policy. ## All properties within 150 feet (Street frontage) of each light shall be considered for assessment. City staff shall determine the number and locations of lights that could have been installed under the Standard District section of this policy. The maintenance cost for these lights will be deducted from the overall project cost. • A summary of the assessable cost shall be as follows: • Cost of installation of enhanced streetlights plus Cost of Operation & , Maintenance (pro-rated for 25 years) plus Administrative costs minus “Standard District” maintenance cost (if applicable) = total assessable cost. Page 21 of 47 Page 5 of 6 ## City of Roseville ## DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION 8/20/2026March 2024 ## Streetlight Policy • Note that costs for the enhancements above the cost of standard lights may not exceed the assessable special benefit dollar amount.  Xcel energy provides a 25-year warrantyoperation and maintenance for the streetlights that they install for 25-years by leasing the lights to the City. This cost is included in one time installation fee from Xcel. • the City’s monthly charge. At the end of this 25-year lease period the lights become City owned and a period the City will evaluate the maintenance needs for the “enhanced” areas. A reconstruction project will be considered where the new installation, operation, and maintenance costs for the next 25- years will be proposed to be assessed to the benefiting properties. • If a reconstruction project is not approved by City Council at the assessment hearing, the existing lights will be removed, the area will return to a Standard District, and the new lighting will be installed to Standard District light standards. ## V. Development/ Redevelopment Streetlights The Developer of any proposed subdivision or redevelopment area, regardless of zoning, whether residential, business or other may elect to install streetlights as a part of their overall development plans. Approval and implementation shall conform to this policy. Developers shall meet the Streetlight Standard District criteria unless they apply to meet other district criteria. Approval and implementation shall conform to this pPolicy. Installation of public streetlights shall be included as part of the development agreement. ## A. Procedure o The developer shall submit a streetlighting plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. o Installation of any streetlights installed in the right-of-way shall be included as part of the Development Agreement approved by City Council. o If the proposed lighting is part of a lease from Xcel, the City Engineer must be included in communications with Xcel regarding the lighting.For new residential subdivisions and business areas, the developer shall pay the operation and maintenance costs to the electric utility company until the City accepts the streetlighting system. o Acceptance of the new streetlights lighting must be requested by the developer in writing. The request must be submitted to the City Engineer and include in writing by the developer, along with a certification from the electric utility company that it was installed according to their plan and specifications. ## B. Funding o The costs for initial installation will be paid by the developer regardless of district. If establishing a Business or Enhanced District that results in decorative lights leased to the City, the initial installation costs shall include the operation, and maintenance costs for the duration of the lease.of streetlights in developments will be paid for by the developer according to the provisions set forth in this Policy. Page 22 of 47 Page 6 of 6 ## City of Roseville ## DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION 8/20/2026March 2024 ## Streetlight Policy o The operation and maintenance costs for an Enhanced District project in new developments shall be paid for by the new development in perpetuity. These costs shall be determined and included in the Development Contract. The costs shall either be paid up front by the developer or assessed to the property owners. The total cost shall be the “enhanced” operation and maintenance cost minus the City’s Standard District contribution. The City’s basic contribution shall be determined based on the procedure outlined in section IV.A. of this policy. ## VI. Homeowner’s Association Streetlights A legally established Homeowner’s Association (HOA) may request that the City establish an Enhanced District and undertake a streetlight project within the HOA’s boundary. ## A. Procedure o Request is initiated by the HOA’s submittal of a petition to City Council that includes signatures representing at least 60% of the HOA’s property owners. o City Staff work with the HOA and Xcel to establish a lighting plan and cost estimate. o The project, and any associated agreements or donations, are presented to City Council for approval. o If approved, HOA pays City for the full cost and City Staff authorize Xcel to proceed with installation. o After the lease expiration, the process resorts back to the Enhanced District as noted in section ____. ## B. Funding o The HOA will be responsible for funding the cost difference from the Standard to Enhanced District lighting as noted in section ___. o The funds must be paid in advance of the start of construction and can be:  via agreement with the City OR  via a donation with conditions that is accepted by City Council. ## VI.VII. Authority It is implemented through the provision in each year’s budget to pay for the cost of power and maintenance of the existing system and funds for additional new lights. The Public Works Department shall be responsible for the implementation of this policy. Page 23 of 47 ## City of Roseville ## SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY ## ADOPTED DECEMBER 12, 2012 The purpose of this policy is to be used as a guide by the City of Roseville when preparing 1 assessment rolls, so as to assure uniform and consistent treatment of affected properties. It is the 2 general policy of the City of Roseville to assess all affected properties according to this policy 3 without regard to funding source. 4 Special assessments are a charge imposed on properties for a particular improvement that 5 benefits the owners of those selected properties. The authority to use special assessments 6 originates in the state constitution which allows the state legislature to give cities and other 7 governmental units the authority “to levy and collect assessments for local improvements upon 8 property benefited thereby.” The legislature confers that authority to cities in Minnesota Statutes 9 Chapter 429. 10 1.Special Benefit Test: The proposed assessment shall be equivalent or less than the11 anticipated increase in market value for properties being assessed. Appraisals shall be12 completed to determine the influence of an improvement project on the value of the13 properties proposing to be assessed.14 2.Determining Assessable Frontage: Unless otherwise noted in this document, all15 assessments shall be calculated using property front footage on the segment of the16 infrastructure included in the improvement project. The assessment rate shall be17 determined by dividing the total project cost by the total assessable frontage. The18 following formulas shall apply for calculating the total assessable frontage for the19 improvement project.20 (a)The assessable frontage shall be 100% of the short side of the lot.21 (b)Corner and Multiple Frontage LDR1 and LDR2 lots: All corner and multiple22 frontage LDR1 and LDR2 parcels shall be considered as having 10% of the long23 side as being assessable footage unless such parcels could be split or subdivided. 24 This is in addition to the short side frontage.25 (c)Corner and Multiple Frontage Lots (other zoning): All corner and multiple26 frontage lots for other property zoning shall be calculated at 10% for the first 15027 feet of the long side and then 100% for any additional footage. This is in addition28 to the short side frontage. 29 (d)Odd Lot Formula (all zoning): The odd lot formula shall apply for odd and30 irregularly shaped lots, which have rear widths that vary by more than 25% in31 comparison with the front width. The lot will be assumed to have a depth equal to32 one-half the sum of the two sides and said depth will be divided into the area of33 the lot to determine the assessable frontage.34 (e)Lots with more than 4 sides: All lots of more than four sides will be geometrically35 converted to a four-sided lot of equal area, then the odd-lot formula as described36 in (d ) will be used to determine the assessable frontage. Where this is not37 practical, the assessable frontage will be determined by assuming the lot to have38 an assessable frontage equal to those of the typical rectangular lots near it which39 are comparable in overall area and nature. 40 (f)Private Driveway: If a public improvement takes place along a public street with41 a private driveway that serves more than one property owner, all properties with42 access to the public street via the private driveway will be assessed. The frontage43 Attachment 3 Page 24 of 47 ## Assessment Policy Summary Page 2 of 5 Adopted 12/10/12 of the private property (or properties) directly adjacent to the roadway will be 1 used to determine the assessable frontage. This assessable frontage will be 2 proportionately shared among all properties with direct access to the private 3 driveway. 4 (g) City Property: If there is a City owned property adjacent to the public 5 improvement, the frontage of the City property will be added to the assessable 6 frontage and used to calculate the assessment rate. The City assessment will 7 become a city project cost. 8 (h) County Open Space Property: If there is Ramsey County Open Space adjacent to 9 the public improvement, the frontage will be added to the assessable frontage and 10 used to calculate the assessment rate. Assessments for public improvements 11 benefiting the Ramsey County open space properties shall be deferred as long as 12 the property remains as public open space. Recreational developments within the 13 property may include public access areas, trails, and other support facilities for 14 passive recreation, nature appreciation and outdoor recreation without affecting 15 the deferral. Such deferral will be made with the following conditions: 16  Interest will accrue on the deferred assessment. 17  In recognition of this deferral, Ramsey County will cooperate with the City of 18 Roseville by granting easements to the City for storm water drainage, utilities, 19 and local trails, and undertake, at its expense, improvements to the open space 20 that are mutually beneficial and agreed upon by the City and County at the time 21 of deferral. 22  The extent of such improvements shall take into consideration the amount of the 23 deferred assessment. 24 ## 3. Pathway Construction Projects: 25 (a) There shall be no assessments for the construction of off road pathways that are 26 included as priority segments in the City’s Pathway Master Plan. Except in the 27 case of petition or development projects. 28 4. Roadway New Construction Projects: For all new public roadway construction, where no 29 roadway exists, the properties abutting the new road shall be assessed for 100% of the 30 cost. 31 5. Roadway Reconstruction Projects: The following is the assessment policy for all 32 roadway reconstruction projects in the City of Roseville. 33 (a) Property zoned LDR1 and LDR2 shall be assessed up to 25% of the project cost 34 for a 7-ton, 32-foot wide pavement with concrete curb and gutter and required 35 drainage. 36 (b) All other property zoning shall be assessed up to 50% of the project cost. 37 ## (c) Municipal State Aid Roadways: 38  Property zoned LDR1 and LDR2 shall be assessed up to 25% of the cost of 39 a 7-ton, 32-foot wide pavement with concrete curb and gutter and required 40 drainage, even if the width or strength is greater. 41  All other property zoning shall be assessed up to 50% of the project costs. 42 ## (d) Ramsey County or Minnesota Department of Transportation Roadways: 43 Page 25 of 47 ## Assessment Policy Summary Page 3 of 5 Adopted 12/10/12 The amount of special assessments collected on a Ramsey County or MnDOT 1 roadway projects will be equal to or less than the total City cost share of the 2 improvement. 3 (e) All property accessing a private driveway that serves as a leg of an intersection 4 signal system shall be assessed 100% of the proportionate share of the signal 5 system cost. 6 6. Regional Improvement Projects: Projects that benefit more than just the properties 7 abutting the project may be assessed to all properties within the Benefited Area. 8 Regional Improvement Projects can include arterial roads, bridges, collector roads, 9 highway interchanges, intersections, or noise walls. 10 7. Traffic Management Program Projects: Assessments for Traffic Management Program 11 projects shall be assessed to all properties within the Benefited Area. The Benefited Area 12 would be determined on a project- by- project basis as a part of the Feasibility Report. 13 See TMP for details. 14 ## 8. Sanitary Sewer Projects: 15 (a) Properties currently connected to public sanitary sewer will not be assessed for 16 reconstruction or major maintenance projects. Except in the case of subd. (d) 17 below. 18 (b) New construction shall be assessed 100% of the project cost based on a front 19 footage basis for all zoning. 20 (c) Any sanitary sewer main in excess of 8 inches in diameter will normally be 21 considered oversized. When oversizing is done to increase the capacity of the 22 City’s system, the added cost for oversizing shall be subtracted from the total cost 23 of the improvement. The result of said subtraction will be the cost to be assessed. 24 (d) New development property, or property which has altered its land use within the 25 past three years, shall be assessed at 100% of the city’s expense for the 26 improvement. 27 (e) Sewer services shall be assessed on a per service basis at 100% of the city’s 28 expense for such services. 29 ## 9. Storm Sewer Projects: 30 (a) There shall be no assessments for storm sewer projects not associated with 31 roadway projects. Except in the case of petition or development projects. 32 10. Watermain Projects: 33 (a) Properties currently connected to public watermain will not be assessed for 34 reconstruction or major maintenance projects. Except in the case of subd. (d) 35 below. 36 (b) New construction shall be assessed 100% of the project cost based on a front 37 footage basis for all zoning. 38 (c) Any water mains in excess of 8 inches in diameter will normally be considered 39 oversized. When oversizing is done to increase the capacity of the City’s system, 40 the added cost for oversizing shall be subtracted from the total cost of the 41 improvement. 42 Page 26 of 47 ## Assessment Policy Summary Page 4 of 5 Adopted 12/10/12 (d) New development property, or property which has altered its land use within the 1 past three years, shall be assessed at 100% of the city’s expense for the 2 improvement. 3 (e) Water services shall be assessed on a per service basis at 100% of the city’s 4 expense for such services. 5 ## 11. Streetlight Installation Projects: 6 (a) Shall be assessed on a front footage basis and as follows: 7 (b) All properties within 150 feet (street frontage) of each light shall be considered 8 for assessment. 9 (c) City staff shall determine the number and locations of lights that could have been 10 installed under the “standard street light” section of the City’s Street light policy. 11 The maintenance cost for these lights will be deducted from the overall project 12 cost. 13 (d) 100% of the additional costs for an “enhanced street light” project shall be 14 specially assessed. The additional costs for an “enhanced street light” project 15 shall include; cost of installation of enhanced streetlights, cost of operation & 16 maintenance (pro-rated for 25 years), administrative costs, minus “standard street 17 light” maintenance cost (if applicable) 18 (e) At the end of 25 years, the City will evaluate the maintenance needs for the 19 “enhanced street light” areas. A reconstruction project will be considered where 20 the new operation and maintenance costs for the next 25 years will be proposed to 21 be assessed to the benefiting properties. 22 (f) In new development and redevelopments, the operation and maintenance costs for 23 an “enhanced street light” installation shall be paid for by the property owners in 24 the new development in perpetuity. These costs shall either be paid for up front 25 by the developer or assessed to the property owners. The total cost shall be the 26 “enhanced street light” operation and maintenance cost minus the City’s “standard 27 street light” contribution. The City’s basic contribution shall be determined based 28 on the procedure outlined in section IV. B. of the City Street Light policy. 29 12. Definitions 30 (a) Assessable frontage: Property frontage on a segment of infrastructure scheduled 31 for improvement. If a parcel is a corner lot or has multiple street frontages, the 32 parcel frontage shall only be calculated for the side abutting the infrastructure 33 scheduled for improvements. 34 (b) Benefited Area: The properties expected to receive positive impacts from the 35 proposed public improvement and which are subject to assessment for the cost of 36 construction. The Benefited Area is determined on a project- by- project basis. 37 (c) Enhanced Street Light: When the location, design, or spacing for requested lights 38 does not meet the “Standard Street Light” qualifying conditions, property owners 39 may request that the City undertake an “Enhanced Street Lighting” project. 40 (d) Long side: On a corner lot or multiple frontage lot, the frontage of a property that 41 is longest. 42 (e) Private Driveway: A driveway or road that serves as a primary access for one or 43 more property owners that is not maintained by the City of Roseville, MnDOT or 44 ## Ramsey County. 45 Page 27 of 47 ## Assessment Policy Summary Page 5 of 5 Adopted 12/10/12 (f) Required Drainage: Drainage improvements necessary because of an 1 improvement project. This can be the result of meeting City, watershed or 2 wetland requirements. Includes rate control, water quality treatment, infiltration, 3 and wetland mitigation. 4 (g) Roadway Reconstruction Project: This type of project involves removing and 5 replacing the existing roadway bituminous, more than 50% of the concrete curb, 6 the base materials, and oftentimes performing utility work (water, sewer, etc.) at 7 the same time. 8 (h) Roadway Maintenance Project: Performing a Reclaim and Overlay, Mill and 9 Overlay, or sealcoating of city streets. 10 (i) Short side: On a corner lot or multiple frontage lot, the frontage of a property that 11 is shortest. 12 (j) Standard Street Light: street light installation that meets the location, design and 13 spacing of the City street light policy qualifying conditions described in section 14 ## IV. B. of the City Street Light policy. 15 (k) Total Project Cost: Project costs include actual construction cost plus all 16 associated overhead costs. The total cost of the associated overhead for a public 17 improvement project would typically include city administration, engineering, 18 fiscal, legal, capital interest, right of way acquisition and contingencies. 19 Page 28 of 47 ## City of Roseville ## SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY ## ADOPTED DECEMBER 12, 2012 ## DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION August 18, 2026 ## T he purpose of this policy is to be used as a guide by the City of Roseville when preparing 1 assessment rolls, so as to assure uniform and consistent treatment of affected properties. It is the 2 general policy of the City of Roseville to assess all affected properties according to this policy 3 without regard to funding source. 4 Special assessments are a charge imposed on properties for a particular improvement that 5 benefits the owners of those selected properties. The authority to use special assessments 6 originates in the state constitution which allows the state legislature to give cities and other 7 governmental units the authority “to levy and collect assessments for local improvements upon 8 property benefited thereby.” The legislature confers that authority to cities in Minnesota Statutes 9 Chapter 429. 10 ## 1.D efinitions11 (a) Assessable frontage: Property frontage on a segment of infrastructure scheduled12 for improvement. If a parcel is a corner lot or has multiple street frontages, the13 parcel frontage shall only be calculated for the side abutting the infrastructure14 scheduled for improvements.15 (b) Benefited Area: The properties expected to receive positive impacts from the16 proposed public improvement and which are subject to assessment for the cost of17 construction. The Benefited Area is determined on a project- by- project basis.18 (c) Enhanced DistrictStreetlight: Streetlights in the right-of-way that exceed the19 When the location, design, or spacing of for requested lights does not meet the20 “Standard StreetlightDistrict” standards. qualifying conditions, property owners21 may request that the City undertake an “Enhanced Street Lighting” project.See22 Streetlight Policy for more details.23 (d) Long side: On a corner lot or multiple frontage lot, the frontage of a property that24 is longest.25 (e) Private Driveway: A driveway or road that serves as a primary access for one or26 more property owners that is not maintained by the City of Roseville, MnDOT or27 ## Ramsey County.28 (f)Required Drainage: Drainage improvements necessary because of an29 improvement project. This can be the result of meeting City, watershed or30 wetland requirements. Includes rate control, water quality treatment, infiltration,31 and wetland mitigation.32 (g) Roadway Reconstruction Project: This type of project involves removing and33 replacing the existing roadway bituminous, more than 50% of the concrete curb,34 the base materials, and oftentimes performing utility work (water, sewer, etc.) at35 the same time.36 (h) Roadway Maintenance Project: Performing a Reclaim and Overlay, Mill and37 Overlay, or sealcoating of city streets.38 (i)Short side: On a corner lot or multiple frontage lot, the frontage of a property that39 is shortest.40 Attachment 4 Page 29 of 47 ## Assessment Policy Summary Page 2 of 6 Adopted 12/10/12 ## DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION August 18, 2026 (j) Standard StreetlightDistrict: street light installation that meets the location and 1 design standards, design and spacing of the City street lightStreetlight P policy. 2 qualifying conditions described in section IV. B. of the City Street Light policy. 3 (k) Total Project Cost: Project costs include actual construction cost plus all 4 associated overhead costs. The total cost of the associated overhead for a public 5 improvement project would typically include city administration, engineering, 6 fiscal, legal, capital interest, right of way acquisition and contingencies. 7 2. Special Benefit Test: The proposed assessment shall be equivalent or less than the 8 anticipated increase in market value for properties being assessed. Appraisals shall be 9 completed to determine the influence of an improvement project on the value of the 10 properties proposing to be assessed. 11 3. Methods for Assessment Calculation: A Feasibility Report shall be completed and 12 brought to City Council for each proposed assessment. In each report, City Staff shall 13 proposed a methos for calculating the assessments in an fair and equitable manner for 14 City Council to review. Methods include front footage, square footage or by parcel. 15 1. Unless otherwise noted in this Police, the assessment rate shall be determined by 16 dividing the total project cost by the total project frontage. 17 3.2. Determining AssessableAssessable Frontage: Unless otherwise noted in this 18 document, all assessments shall be calculated using property front footage on the 19 segment of the infrastructure included in the improvement project. The 20 assessment rate shall be determined by dividing the total project cost by the total 21 assessable frontage. The following formulas shall apply for calculating the total 22 assessable front frontage for the improvement project. 23 (a) The assessable frontage shall be 100% of the short side of the lot. 24 (b) Corner and Multiple Frontage LDR1 and LDR2 lots: All corner and 25 multiple frontage LDR1 and LDR2 parcels shall be considered as having 26 10% of the long side as being assessable footage unless such parcels could 27 be split or subdivided. This is in addition to the short side frontage. 28 (c) Corner and Multiple Frontage Lots (other zoning): All corner and 29 multiple frontage lots for other property zoning shall be calculated at 10% 30 for the first 150 feet of the long side and then 100% for any additional 31 footage. This is in addition to the short side frontage. 32 (d) Odd Lot Formula (all zoning): The odd lot formula shall apply for odd 33 and irregularly shaped lots, which have rear widths that vary by more than 34 25% in comparison with the front width. The lot will be assumed to have 35 a depth equal to one-half the sum of the two sides and said depth will be 36 divided into the area of the lot to determine the assessable frontage. 37 (e) Lots with more than 4 sides: All lots of more than four sides will be 38 geometrically converted to a four-sided lot of equal area, then the odd-lot 39 formula as described in (d) will be used to determine the assessable 40 frontage. Where this is not practical, the assessable frontage will be 41 determined by assuming the lot to have an assessable frontage equal to 42 those of the typical rectangular lots near it which are comparable in overall 43 area and nature. 44 (f) Private Driveway: If a public improvement takes place along a public 45 street with a private driveway that serves more than one property owner, 46 Page 30 of 47 ## Assessment Policy Summary Page 3 of 6 Adopted 12/10/12 ## DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION August 18, 2026 all properties with access to the public street via the private driveway will 1 be assessed. The frontage of the private property (or properties) directly 2 adjacent to the roadway will be used to determine the assessable frontage. 3 This assessable frontage will be proportionately shared among all 4 properties with direct access to the private driveway. 5 (g) City Property: If there is a City owned property adjacent to the public 6 improvement, the frontage of the City property will be added to the 7 assessable frontage and used to calculate the assessment rate. The City 8 assessment will become a city project cost. 9 (h) County Open Space Property: If there is Ramsey County Open Space 10 adjacent to the public improvement, the frontage will be added to the 11 assessable frontage and used to calculate the assessment rate. 12 Assessments for public improvements benefiting the Ramsey County open 13 space properties shall be deferred as long as the property remains as public 14 open space. Recreational developments within the property may include 15 public access areas, trails, and other support facilities for passive 16 recreation, nature appreciation and outdoor recreation without affecting 17 the deferral. Such deferral will be made with the following conditions: 18 • Interest will accrue on the deferred assessment. 19 • In recognition of this deferral, Ramsey County will cooperate with the 20 City of Roseville by granting easements to the City for storm water 21 drainage, utilities, and local trails, and undertake, at its expense, 22 improvements to the open space that are mutually beneficial and 23 agreed upon by the City and County at the time of deferral. 24 • The extent of such improvements shall take into consideration the 25 amount of the deferred assessment. 26 3. Types of Assessment by Project Type 27 ## 4. Pathway Construction Projects: 28 (a) There shall be no assessments for the construction of off road pathways 29 that are included as priority segments in the City’s Pathway Master Plan. 30 Except in the case of petition or development projects. 31 5. Roadway New Construction Projects: For all new public roadway construction, 32 where no roadway exists, the properties abutting the new road shall be assessed 33 for 100% of the cost. 34 6. Roadway Reconstruction Projects: The following is the assessment policy for all 35 roadway reconstruction projects in the City of Roseville. 36 (a) Property zoned LDR1 and LDR2 shall be assessed up to 25% of the 37 project cost for a 7-ton, 32-foot wide pavement street with concrete curb 38 and gutter and required drainage. 39 (b) All other property zoning shall be assessed up to 50% of the project cost 40 for a 7-ton, 32-foot wide pavement with concrete curb and gutter. 41 ## (c) Municipal State Aid Roadways: 42 Page 31 of 47 ## Assessment Policy Summary Page 4 of 6 Adopted 12/10/12 ## DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION August 18, 2026 • Property zoned LDR1 and LDR2 shall be assessed up to 25% of the cost of 1 a 7-ton, 32-foot wide pavement with concrete curb and gutter and required 2 drainage, even if the width or strength is greater. 3 • All other property zoning shall be assessed up to 50% of the project costs. 4 ## (d)(c) Ramsey County or Minnesota Department of Transportation Roadways: 5 The amount of special assessments collected on a Ramsey County or MnDOT 6 roadway projects will be equal to or less than the total City cost share of the 7 improvement. 8 (e)(d) All property accessing a private driveway that serves as a leg of an 9 intersection signal system shall be assessed 100% of the proportionate 10 share of the signal system cost. 11 7. Regional Improvement Projects: Projects that benefit more than just the 12 properties abutting the project may be assessed to all properties within the 13 Benefited Area. Regional Improvement Projects can include arterial roads, 14 bridges, collector roads, highway interchanges, intersections, or noise walls. 15 8. Traffic Management Program Projects: Assessments for Traffic Management 16 Program (TMP) projects shall be assessed to all properties within the Benefited 17 Area. The Benefited Area would be determined on a project- by- project basis as 18 a part of the Feasibility Report. See TMP for details. 19 ## 9. Sanitary Sewer Projects: 20 (a) Properties currently connected to public sanitary sewer will not be 21 assessed for reconstruction or major maintenance projects. Except in the 22 case of subd. (d) below. 23 (b) New construction shall be assessed 100% of the project cost based on a 24 front footage basis for all zoning. 25 (c) Any sanitary sewer main in excess of 8 inches in diameter will normally 26 be considered oversized. When oversizing is done to increase the capacity 27 of the City’s system, the added cost for oversizing shall be subtracted from 28 the total cost of the improvement. The result of said subtraction will be 29 the cost to be assessed. 30 (d) New development property, or property which has altered its land use 31 within the past three years, shall be assessed at 100% of the city’s expense 32 for the improvement. 33 (e) Sewer services shall be assessed on a per service basis at 100% of the 34 city’s expense for such services. 35 ## 10. Storm Sewer Projects: 36 (a) There shall be no assessments for storm sewer projects not associated with 37 roadway projects. Except in the case of petition or development projects. 38 11. Watermain Projects: 39 (a) Properties currently connected to public watermain will not be assessed 40 for reconstruction or major maintenance projects. Except in the case of 41 subd. (d) below. 42 (b) New construction shall be assessed 100% of the project cost based on a 43 front footage basis for all zoning. 44 Page 32 of 47 ## Assessment Policy Summary Page 5 of 6 Adopted 12/10/12 ## DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION August 18, 2026 (c) Any water mains in excess of 8 inches in diameter will normally be 1 considered oversized. When oversizing is done to increase the capacity of 2 the City’s system, the added cost for oversizing shall be subtracted from 3 the total cost of the improvement. 4 (d) New development property, or property which has altered its land use 5 within the past three years, shall be assessed at 100% of the city’s expense 6 for the improvement. 7 (e) Water services shall be assessed on a per service basis at 100% of the 8 city’s expense for such services. 9 ## 12. Streetlight Installation Projects: 10 (a) Any assessable costs, as defined by the City’s Streelight Policy, shall be 11 assessed to the Benefited Area, as determined on a project-by-project basis 12 as a part of the Feasibility Report, in accordance with this Policy. See 13 TMPStreetlight Policy for details. 14 (a) Shall be assessed on a front footage basis and as follows: 15 (b) All properties within 150 feet (street frontage) of each light shall be 16 considered for assessment. 17 (c) City staff shall determine the number and locations of lights that could 18 have been installed under the “standard street light” section of the City’s 19 Street light policy. The installation and maintenance cost for these lights 20 will be deducted from the overall project cost. 21 (d) 100% of the additional costs for an “enhanced street light” project shall be 22 specially assessed. The additional costs for an “enhanced street light” 23 project shall include; cost of installation of enhanced streetlights, cost of 24 operation & maintenance (pro-rated for 25 years), administrative costs, 25 minus “standard street light” maintenance cost (if applicable) 26 (e) At the end of 25 years, the City will evaluate the maintenance 27 needs for the “enhanced street light” areas. A reconstruction 28 project will be considered where the new operation and 29 maintenance costs for the next 25 years will be proposed to be 30 assessed to the benefiting properties. 31 (f) In new development and redevelopments, the operation and 32 maintenance costs for an “enhanced street light” installation shall 33 be paid for by the property owners in the new development in 34 perpetuity. These costs shall either be paid for up front by the 35 developer or assessed to the property owners. The total cost shall 36 be the “enhanced street light” operation and maintenance cost 37 minus the City’s “standard street light” contribution. The City’s 38 basic contribution shall be determined based on the procedure 39 outlined in section IV. B. of the City Street Light policy. 40 ## 1. Definitions MOVED TO START 41 (a) Assessable frontage: Property frontage on a segment of infrastructure 42 scheduled for improvement. If a parcel is a corner lot or has multiple 43 street frontages, the parcel frontage shall only be calculated for the side 44 abutting the infrastructure scheduled for improvements. 45 Page 33 of 47 ## Assessment Policy Summary Page 6 of 6 Adopted 12/10/12 ## DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION August 18, 2026 (b) Benefited Area: The properties expected to receive positive impacts from 1 the proposed public improvement and which are subject to assessment for 2 the cost of construction. The Benefited Area is determined on a project- 3 by- project basis. 4 (c) Enhanced Street Light: When the location, design, or spacing for 5 requested lights does not meet the “Standard Street Light” qualifying 6 conditions, property owners may request that the City undertake an 7 “Enhanced Street Lighting” project. 8 (d) Long side: On a corner lot or multiple frontage lot, the frontage of a 9 property that is longest. 10 (e) Private Driveway: A driveway or road that serves as a primary access for 11 one or more property owners that is not maintained by the City of 12 ## Roseville, MnDOT or Ramsey County. 13 (f) Required Drainage: Drainage improvements necessary because of an 14 improvement project. This can be the result of meeting City, watershed or 15 wetland requirements. Includes rate control, water quality treatment, 16 infiltration, and wetland mitigation. 17 (g) Roadway Reconstruction Project: This type of project involves removing 18 and replacing the existing roadway bituminous, more than 50% of the 19 concrete curb, the base materials, and oftentimes performing utility work 20 (water, sewer, etc.) at the same time. 21 (h) Roadway Maintenance Project: Performing a Reclaim and Overlay, Mill 22 and Overlay, or sealcoating of city streets. 23 (i) Short side: On a corner lot or multiple frontage lot, the frontage of a 24 property that is shortest. 25 (j) Standard Street Light: street light installation that meets the location, 26 design and spacing of the City street light policy qualifying conditions 27 described in section IV. B. of the City Street Light policy. 28 (k)(b) Total Project Cost: Project costs include actual construction cost plus all 29 associated overhead costs. The total cost of the associated overhead for a 30 public improvement project would typically include city administration, 31 engineering, fiscal, legal, capital interest, right of way acquisition and 32 contingencies. 33 Page 34 of 47 ## Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission ## Agenda Item DATE: August 25, 2026 ITEM: 4.d. ## ITEM DESCRIPTION: City Council Joint Meeting Review ## Background The PWETC held a joint meeting with the City Council at the July 20 City Council meeting. There was conversation between the Commission and City Council about upcoming topics that the Commission may take up in the next calendar year. The Commission and staff will review the topics and comments from the City Council and use that discussion to guide the creation of a preliminary schedule of topics for the next calendar year. ## Recommendation Review joint meeting with the City Council. ## Attachments 1. Request for Council Action (RCA) for the July 20 Joint Meeting Page 35 of 47 ## RE ## QUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date : July 20, 2026 ## Item No.: ## Department Approval City Manager Approval ## Item Description: Public Works, Environment, and Transportation Commission Joint Meeting with the City Council Page 1 of 2 ## BACKGROUND 1 Each year, the Public Works, Environment, and Transportation Commission meets with the City 2 Council to review activities and accomplishments, and to discuss the upcoming year’s work plan and 3 other potential issues to consider. The following are activities over the past year and issues the 4 Commission tentatively will have on future agendas in the next year. Additionally, the Commission 5 plans to share their thoughts on the value of being part of the commission and their experiences as 6 commission members. 7 Activities and accomplishments: 8 ## •Engineering Intern Presentations9 ## •City Campus Master Plan Update10 ## •Joint Council Recap11 ## •Municipal State-Aid Street (MSAS) Safety Plan12 ## •Pathway Master Plan Update Discussion13 ## •Consider Closure of Roseville Leaf Recycling Center14 ## •Bike Plan Discussion15 ## •City Campus Project – Appoint Committee Member16 ## •City Code Update – Chapter 802.17 Obstructions17 ## •Climate Equity Action Plan18 ## •2026 Proposed Utility Rates19 ## •2026 Public Works Work Plan20 ## •Pathway Master Plan Segments21 ## •Keya Park/Pascal Layout Recommendations22 ## •Noise Ordinance Recommendations23 •Snow & Ice Control Policy for Streets and Parking Lots Recommendations24 ## •Maintenance Operations Center Update25 ## •Climate Equity Action Plan Update26 ## •2026 Sustainability Update27 ## •Maintenance Operations Center Update28 ## •Civic Campus Project Update29 ## •Pathway Master Plan30 ## •Approve Bike Plan31 ## •Pathway Master Plan - Continued Segment Review32 •WM Recycling Update 2026-202733 Attachment 1 Page 36 of 47 Page 2 of 2 ## • Cart Rollout Update 34 • 2025 MS4 Annual Meeting 35 ## • Leaf Site Future 36 ## • Climate Equity Action Plan 37 • Prep for Joint Council meeting 38 Work Plan items for the upcoming year: 39 o Pavement management and future funding 40 ## o Pathway Master Plan Updates 41 o Assessment Policy 42 Questions or Concerns for the City Council: This year, Chair Ficek worked with the commission 43 members to summarize their activities over the last year and asked each commissioner two 44 questions: 45 1. What you felt most connected to or appreciated with being on the Commission, and 46 2. Are there any areas you would like feedback on from the Council, or are there specific issues you 47 would like them to address? 48 The commission would like the council's feedback on which of the following topics to pursue 49 further: 50 1. Organized Collection 51 2. Speed Limits 52 ## POLICY OBJECTIVES 53 Per City Code 201.07.B - At least once a year, each Commission shall meet with the City Council to 54 report on the previous year’s work and to discuss work plans and pending issues for the upcoming 55 year. 56 ## EQUITY IMPACT SUMMARY 57 There are no equity impacts associated with this joint meeting. 58 ## BUDGET IMPLICATIONS 59 There are no budget impacts. 60 ## STAFF RECOMMENDATION 61 Staff recommends the City Council hold the joint meeting and provide feedback. 62 ## REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION 63 Hold joint meeting and provide feedback. 64 ## Prepared by: Jesse Freihammer, Public Works Director ## Attachments: None Page 37 of 47 ## Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission ## Agenda Item DATE: August 25, 2026 ITEM: 5.a. ## ITEM DESCRIPTION: Commission Direction on Member Initiated Agenda Items ## Background ## Suggested Items: • September 22 ## o AARP Active Living Certification ## o Lighting Policy Recommendation ## o Assessment Policy Recommendation o • October 27 ## o Utility Rates ## o Pathway Master Plan o • November 24 ## o 2027 Public Works Work Plan ## Looking Ahead: • Future ## o MnDOT Safe Systems Approach ## o Speed Limits ## o Organized Collection ## o Pavement Funding ## Recommendation Approve future agenda. ## Attachments ## None Page 38 of 47 ## Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission ## Agenda Item DATE: August 25, 2026 ITEM: 6.a. ## ITEM DESCRIPTION: Approve July Minutes ## Background Attached are the minutes from the July 28, 2026 meeting. ## Recommendation Motion approving the minutes of July 28, 2026, subject to any necessary corrections or revision. ## Attachments ## 1. Draft July Minutes Page 39 of 47 ## Page 1 of 8 ## Roseville Public Works, Environment ## and Transportation Commission ## Meeting Minutes Tuesday, July 28, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. ## City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive ## Roseville, Minnesota 55113 1. ## Introduction / Roll Call 1 Vice Chair Hodder called the meeting to order at approximately 6:30 p.m. and at 2 his request, Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Jennifer Lowry called 3 the roll. 4 5 Present: Chair Bryant Ficek, Vice Chair Edwin Hodder, and Members 6 Daniel Fergus, Allison Luongo, Luke Sandstrom, and Charles 7 Tedder 8 9 ## Youth Commissioners: 10 11 ## Absent: Member Katie Brokaw Palalay and Alexis Jendro (Excused) 12 13 ## Staff Present: Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Jennifer Lowry 14 15 2.Approve Agenda16 17 ## Motion18 Member Luongo moved, Member Fergus seconded, approval of the July 28,19 2026 Agenda as presented.20 21 Ayes: 622 Nays: 023 Motion carried.24 25 3.Public Comments26 No one wished to address the commission.27 28 Vice Chair Hodder did inquire about a recent news report describing cyberattacks29 that had affected several municipal water systems throughout the region. He asked30 whether Roseville had been impacted or whether staff had received any information31 regarding the incident.32 33 Attachment 1 Page 40 of 47 Page 2 of 8 Ms. Lowry responded that they had not heard of any impacts involving Roseville 34 but would follow up with neighboring agencies, including St. Paul, to determine 35 whether any local systems had been involved. 36 37 4. Business Items 38 a. Communication Items 39 Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Lowry provided a brief review 40 and update on projects and maintenance activities listed in the staff report 41 dated July 23, 2026. 42 43 Chair Ficek asked how residents receive notification when emergency water 44 main repairs or roadway work temporarily affect neighborhoods. 45 46 Ms. Lowry explained that construction projects require contractors to post 47 advance-notice signs about seven days before work and notify residents of 48 access restrictions. Emergency repairs usually involve direct notification to 49 impacted households due to brief water service interruptions. The City also 50 distributes notifications to emergency responders, law enforcement, the 51 Postal Service, school transportation, and other agencies via an established 52 email system. 53 54 b. Streetlight Policy 55 Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Lowry provided a brief 56 presentation of the streetlight policy and some questions staff sought direction 57 on regarding the implementation of, or potential changes to, the existing 58 ## Streetlight Policy. 59 60 Member Tedder asked whether all three proposed lighting options satisfied 61 current dark-sky requirements. 62 63 Ms. Lowry responded that all of the proposed fixtures utilized LED 64 technology with cutoff lighting to reduce light spillover. However, she 65 indicated staff was still confirming whether every fixture met formal 66 DarkSky certification requirements. She added that lighting could also be 67 adjusted to better shield neighboring properties regardless of the certification 68 status of an individual fixture. 69 70 ## Public Hearing 71 72 Vice Chair Hodder opened the public hearing and asked anyone wishing to 73 speak to come forward, state their name and address for the record, and limit 74 comments to approximately three minutes. 75 76 Ms. Jean Peterson, 600 Terrace Court, representing one of the Owasso Hills 77 homeowners associations, addressed the commission and explained that her 78 association had already submitted a petition about the decorative streetlights. 79 Page 41 of 47 Page 3 of 8 She asked whether residents who signed the petition would remain 80 committed if the City's final proposal differed significantly from what 81 homeowners had originally anticipated. 82 83 Ms. Peterson stated that she believed homeowners requesting enhanced 84 decorative lighting should expect to pay the additional cost of those 85 improvements. Still, she wanted residents to understand their obligations 86 before the process moved forward fully. 87 88 Mr. Todd Larson, 2920 Hillsview East, questioned the staff's estimated 89 replacement costs. He encouraged the city to investigate whether competitive 90 bidding or requests for proposals could reduce project costs rather than 91 relying solely on Xcel Energy's estimates. He also asked whether the existing 92 decorative fixtures could be refurbished rather than completely replaced, 93 noting that many appeared structurally sound. Based on the preliminary 94 estimates, he calculated that replacement costs approached $10,000 per 95 fixture and believed additional analysis was warranted before making a final 96 decision. 97 98 Ms. Alici a House, 542 Owasso Hills Drive, explained that Owasso Hills 99 residents were not requesting additional streetlights or a higher level of 100 service. Rather, they hoped to preserve a defining neighborhood feature that 101 had existed since the subdivision's development. She stated that many 102 homeowners believed the original installation costs had already been paid 103 under the developer's agreement and questioned whether residents should 104 again be assessed to replace the same lighting system twenty-five years later. 105 106 Ms. House also encouraged the City to partner with Xcel Energy to identify 107 longer-term replacement strategies that would reduce future costs, preserve 108 the neighborhood's appearance, and protect property values. 109 110 Mr. Christer Cedarberg, 534 Owasso Hills Drive, an original homeowner in 111 the development, explained that decorative streetlighting was one of the 112 features that attracted him to the neighborhood. After reviewing the 113 homeowners association governing documents, he found detailed provisions 114 on landscaping and common areas but no language assigning long-term 115 responsibility for replacing the decorative lighting after the Xcel Energy 116 lease expired. He suggested that the City replace the existing system without 117 assessing current homeowners and then ensure that future development 118 agreements clearly identify maintenance and replacement responsibilities so 119 future property owners fully understand those obligations. 120 121 Mr. David Trapp, 2990 Highcourte, explained that the neighborhood is 122 divided among multiple homeowners associations and noted that only three 123 streetlights in his area would be replaced. He emphasized the importance of 124 maintaining both the neighborhood's appearance and public safety. Mr. Trapp 125 Page 42 of 47 Page 4 of 8 expressed concern that if some HOAs selected enhanced lighting. In contrast, 126 others chose standard lighting, it could create an inconsistent appearance 127 across the community and raise questions about how associated costs would 128 be distributed. He encouraged the HOAs to work together to reach a 129 coordinated decision. 130 131 Vice Chair Hodder closed the public hearing and returned the matter to the 132 commission for further discussion and consideration. 133 134 The commission generally agreed that the Owasso Hills project highlighted 135 an issue that had not been fully contemplated when the City's updated 136 Streetlight Policy was adopted. The discussion focused on balancing 137 neighborhood expectations, public safety, long-term maintenance 138 responsibilities, and equitable treatment of taxpayers throughout the city. 139 140 Member Tedder asked whether the petition requirement and the assessment 141 process should be treated as two separate policy decisions. 142 143 Ms. Lowry said the commission could recommend letting an existing 144 enhanced neighborhood keep decorative lighting and decide whether 145 homeowners should pay for the extra cost through assessments. She 146 explained staff presented those issues separately because multiple policy 147 options were still available. 148 149 Member Fergus asked whether the estimated homeowner assessment 150 represented a recurring expense or a one-time obligation. 151 152 Ms. Lowry said the assessment was a one-time fee for the twenty-five-year 153 lease, not annual. She noted the City might revisit this at the next lease 154 expiration unless a new long-term policy is adopted. She also said that since 155 Owasso Hills has four homeowners associations, each could independently 156 decide on enhanced lighting. 157 158 Member Luongo questioned how the original enhanced lighting districts had 159 been established and why existing development documents did not address 160 long-term replacement responsibilities. 161 162 Ms. Lowry said staff reviewed development records and found no 163 responsibility clauses after the Xcel Energy lease ended. She noted future 164 projects will likely include detailed agreements, as City policies on public 165 infrastructure are now clearer than during the original subdivision. 166 167 The commission also discussed maintenance responsibilities associated with 168 decorative lighting. 169 170 Page 43 of 47 Page 5 of 8 Ms. Lowry explained that replacing the Owasso Hills system via a new Xcel 171 Energy lease would grant twenty-five years of maintenance from Xcel 172 Energy. Conversely, decorative systems owned by the City require Public 173 Works staff to find replacement fixtures and coordinate repairs themselves, 174 which becomes harder as fixtures become obsolete. She noted that obtaining 175 replacement parts is often a challenge as lighting technology advances. 176 177 The commission reviewed the City's assessment policy and the concept of 178 "special benefit." 179 180 Ms. Lowry explained assessments are linked to the property, not the 181 homeowner, and Roseville provides deferral programs for qualifying owners, 182 including seniors, veterans, and disabled residents, allowing deferred 183 payments until sale or transfer. 184 185 The commission next considered whether enhanced lighting districts should 186 be subject to maximum spacing requirements similar to those applied under 187 the City's standard streetlight policy. 188 189 Member Tedder observed that the standard policy generally evaluates 190 whether mid-block lighting is warranted when spacing between intersections 191 exceeds approximately 600 feet. 192 193 Ms. Lowry explained that no comparable spacing standards currently exist 194 for enhanced lighting districts and that staff was seeking guidance on whether 195 such standards should be incorporated into future policy revisions. 196 197 Several commissioners expressed concern that eliminating assessments for 198 decorative lighting could establish a precedent encouraging similar requests 199 throughout Roseville. Members observed that decorative lighting provides 200 aesthetic benefits that many neighborhoods might desire if the City absorbed 201 the additional costs entirely. 202 203 Ms. Lowry acknowledged the possibility but noted neighborhood preferences 204 differ. Some residents want more lighting for safety, others prefer darker 205 streets. She said the City's policy should balance neighborhood preferences 206 with citywide equity and fiscal responsibility. 207 208 The commission generally recognized that Owasso Hills represented a 209 unique situation because decorative lighting had been an established feature 210 of the neighborhood since its original development. Members distinguished 211 between preserving an existing neighborhood characteristic and creating 212 entirely new enhanced lighting districts. The commission indicated that 213 future policy revisions should recognize that distinction while remaining 214 flexible enough to provide consistent guidance for similar situations that may 215 arise in the future. 216 Page 44 of 47 Page 6 of 8 217 The commission generally recommended that the revised policy clearly defines 218 when streetlight improvements would be considered a citywide public benefit 219 and when the associated costs would be assigned to benefiting property owners 220 through an assessment. 221 222 The commission also encouraged staff to develop a more consistent and 223 transparent process for evaluating requests for enhanced lighting, including 224 consideration of safety, neighborhood character, lighting uniformity, 225 maintenance responsibilities, and long-term replacement costs. 226 227 The commission further recommended that staff review how costs would be 228 allocated when a lighting project affected multiple neighborhoods, homeowner 229 associations, or property types, particularly when those groups did not agree on 230 the preferred lighting style or level of improvement. 231 232 The commission emphasized the importance of avoiding inconsistent lighting 233 designs within the same general area and encouraged coordination among 234 affected homeowner associations before a project moved forward. They also 235 recommended that residents receive clear information regarding available 236 lighting options, estimated costs, assessment procedures, and the potential 237 consequences if portions of a neighborhood selected different lighting 238 standards. 239 240 Ms. Lowry indicated that the commission’s comments would be used to refine 241 the proposed Streetlight Policy revisions. Staff would also coordinate the policy 242 changes with the City’s broader assessment policy review to ensure that the two 243 policies used consistent standards for determining public benefit, private 244 benefit, eligibility, and cost responsibility. Updated policy language and 245 recommendations would be returned to the commission for additional review 246 before the matter was presented to the City Council for formal consideration 247 and possible adoption. 248 249 c. Intern Presentations 250 This item was postponed to a future meeting. 251 252 ## d. City Council Joint Meeting Review 253 This item was postponed to a future meeting. 254 255 ## e. Pathway Master Plan Segment Review 256 This item was postponed to a future meeting. 257 258 ## f. Future Agenda Items 259 Ms. Lowry reviewed the commission's upcoming work plan and future agenda 260 items. She explained that staff intended to return in August with a Metro 261 Transit update, including information on the Roseville Transit Center, Metro's 262 Page 45 of 47 Page 7 of 8 microtransit program, the City's assessment policy (covering alleys, 263 streetlights, traffic signals), and a summary of Streetlight Policy discussions. 264 The City's sustainability intern was also scheduled to present on summer 265 projects. 266 267 Ms. Lowry stated that work on the Pathway Master Plan would stay flexible, 268 allowing staff to postpone it if other policy issues needed attention, without 269 affecting other projects. 270 271 The commission also agreed that the work from the recent Joint City Council 272 meeting required more time, as councilmembers had listed many topics for 273 future review. 274 275 Vice Chair Hodder suggested organizing the Joint City Council follow-up into 276 a more structured work plan before bringing the topics back to the 277 commission. 278 279 The commission agreed that presenting the topics in a "yes or no" format 280 would help streamline future discussions and assist the commission in 281 establishing priorities for the coming year. 282 283 The commission expressed consensus with staff's proposed work plan and 284 agreed to continue refining priorities as additional projects progressed. 285 286 ## 5. Commission Direction on Member-Initiated Agenda Items 287 288 6. Approval of May 19, 2026, and June 23, 2026, Meeting Minutes 289 Comments and corrections to draft minutes had been submitted by PWETC 290 commissioners prior to tonight’s meeting, and those revisions were incorporated 291 into the draft presented in meeting materials. 292 293 Motion 294 Member Ficek moved, Member Sandstrom seconded, approval of the May 19, 295 2026, meeting minutes as presented. 296 297 Ayes: 6 298 Nays: 0 299 Motion carried. 300 301 Motion 302 Member Tedder moved, Member Fergus seconded, approval of the June 23, 303 2026, meeting minutes as presented. 304 305 Ayes: 5 306 Nays: 0 307 Abstain: 1 (Luongo) 308 Page 46 of 47 Page 8 of 8 Motion carried. 309 310 311 312 7. Adjourn 313 314 Motion 315 Member Tedder moved, Member Luongo seconded, adjournment of the 316 meeting at approximately 8:43 p.m. 317 318 Ayes: 6 319 Nays: 0 320 Motion carried. 321 Page 47 of 47