St. Paul City Council — Transcript
Wednesday, August 26, 2026
Story
St. Paul hears concerns about police surveillance technology
Votes (1)
Public Hearing: Police Surveillance Technology and Data Privacy
Dissent: None
Moved by Council President Ner [59:21]
The public hearing focused on widespread concerns about the deployment and use of surveillance technologies such as Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) (e.g., Flock), AI-powered drones (e.g., SkyO), and data aggregation systems (e.g., Axon). Key themes included allegations of constitutional violations, especially regarding the Fourth Amendment and Minnesota's ALPR statute (13.824), and potential misuse by law enforcement for purposes like stalking, targeting protesters, and aiding immigration enforcement (e.g., Metro Surge). Speakers highlighted the inaccuracies and biases inherent in AI-driven systems and criticized the lack of transparency surrounding city contracts with these technology providers. Many also raised ethical concerns, linking the companies' operations to human rights abuses in international conflicts, particularly in Palestine. Calls for the City Council to cancel existing contracts and ban future AI-powered mass surveillance were numerous.
Notable Quotes (6)
Minnesota statute 13824 has been on the books for over a decade and was a result of two years of negotiations between law enforcement and a a broad group of stakeholders from across the political spectrum... the statute would prohibit the creation of a statewide repository of ALPR data. Two, the statute would only allow ALPR use related to active criminal investigations.
Are we putting intent first or are we simply implementing things like AI powered cameras in our communities because they're a shiny new tool. Let's take the time to articulate our intent and understand our limitations under the law.
What is emerging is a vast interconnected network of cameras on every intersection, every squad car, every officer, every drone that tracks everyone's movements all the time. Our city is looking less and less like a free society and more and more like an open air prison.
This is technology made for abuse. It's actually amazing just how many officers have been publicly caught and arrested abusing it to stalk people and act as predators themselves. Among the people victimized by flock cameras are constitutional observers and everyone who exercises their constitutional rights resisting ICE.
We have declared ourselves a sanctuary city and this winter we proved exactly how strongly we felt about sanctuary for our immigrant neighbors... It's well known that Flock and other AI powered mass surveillance systems are easily accessed by ICE for immigration enforcement... Essentially, we'll become a sanctuary city in name only if we use these systems.
Any machine that falls under the category of AI is not designed for accuracy. A camera with software that analyzes images for the police must compress that image into a numerical best guess of what it contains and then compare that best guess with other best guesses extracted from images of crime data... If your goal is to be able to point to something that is definitionally impossible to understand and avoid accountability by outsourcing your reasoning to a guessing machine, then yes, these AI machines are exactly what you're looking for. But if your goal is safety, true safety, then I must inform you that this is fundamentally not the solution, and it never will be.
Ordinances & Resolutions (12)
Public comment on police surveillance technology and data privacy.
State statute regulating Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) in Minnesota.
ACLU model bill for Community Control Over Police Surveillance.
Constitutional amendment cited regarding privacy rights and warrantless searches.
Supreme Court case cited regarding reasonable expectation of privacy.
Supreme Court case cited regarding warrantless searches of cell phone data.
Previous resolution passed by City Council regarding Flock cameras.
Anticipated future legislation regarding Flock cameras.
Previous resolution passed by St. Paul City Council related to Palestine.
State statutes with exceptions for drone use, particularly in public events.
Document mentioned by a speaker.
Body before which a speaker testified.