COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL August 19, 2026 12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 55016 COUNCIL CHAMBER - 7:00 PM 1 Call to Order 2 Pledge of Allegiance 3 Roll Call 4 Open Forum 5 Adoption of Agenda 6 Presentations A Public Safety Swearing-in Ceremony Staff Recommendation: Appoint Brad Petersen as Public Safety Director and Chief Law Enforcement Officer at Non-Represented Pay Plan Grade X02, Step 5. City Administrator Levitt will administer the Oath of Office. B Recognition of Reserve Officer - Matt Jordan Staff Recommendation: Recognize Matt Jordan’s retirement by presenting him with a badge and certificate of appreciation. 7 Consent Agenda A City Council Special Meeting Minutes (2026-06-17) Staff Recommendation: Approve the June 17, 2026, City Council Special Meeting Minutes. B City Council Special (Budget) Meeting Minutes (2026-07-22) Staff Recommendation: Approve the July 22, 2026, City Council Special (Budget) Meeting Minutes. C Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation Meeting Minutes (2026-04-14) Staff Recommendation: Approve the April 14, 2026, Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation (ACHP) meeting minutes. D Planning Commission Appointment - Koerner Staff Recommendation: Appoint Pete Koerner to the Planning Commission with a term ending on February 28, 2027. E Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Appointment (Kemper-Youth Seat) Staff Recommendation: Appoint Kasen Kemper to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. F Rental License Approvals Staff Recommendation: Approve the issuance of rental licenses to the properties listed in the attached table. G Accept 2nd Quarter 2026 Donations Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution 2026-117 accepting the 2nd Quarter Donations. H 2027-2028 Cottage Grove Police Officers Labor Contract Staff Recommendation: Approve the 2027 - 2028 labor contract with the Police Officers Union. All wage and benefits costs have been budgeted for in the 2027 budget. 1 I 2027-2028 Cottage Grove/LELS Sergeants Contract Staff Recommendation: Approve the 2027 - 2028 labor contract with the Sergeants Union. All wage and benefits costs have been budgeted for in the 2027 budget. J Mississippi Dunes Tree Planting Contract Staff Recommendation: Adopt resolution 2026-114 awarding the Mississippi Dunes Tree Planting Contract to Wilson’s Nursery in total amount of $31,965 and authorize the service agreement between Wilson’s Nursery and the City of Cottage Grove. K Kingston Park Site Power Update Project Final Payment Staff Recommendation: Authorize resolution 2026-115 approving final payment to Killmer Electric Company, Inc. in the amount of $10,335.19 for the Kingston Park Site Power Upgrade Project. L 2-acre property purchase - WAG Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 2026-118 to approve buying 2.0 acres from WAG in the amount of $78,408.00 (Parcel ID: 21.027.21.43.0005). M Lehigh Culvert Replacement Project Staff Recommendation: Authorize resolution 2026-116 awarding the Lehigh Culvert Replacement Project to Dynamic Earth & Civil LLC in the amount of $37,800 and authorize the service agreement between Dynamic Earth & Civil LLC and the City of Cottage Grove. N Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) - State Grant Agreement Staff Recommendation: Approve the State of Minnesota Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance and IIJA Discretionary Match Grant Agreement related to the Safe Streets and Roads for All project. O Lochridge Second Addition – Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution 2026-119 approving the Final Plat for Lochridge Second Addition, subject to minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. 2) Approve the Lochridge Development Agreement with Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC and DRP Odin 16, LLC, subject to minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. 3) Adopt Resolution 2026-120 approving the Lochridge Second Addition Development Plans dated July 14, 2026, prepared by Alliant Engineering Inc., subject to final approval by the City Engineer in writing. P Lateral Water Line Execution and Quote Award - 9998 90th St Water Service (Christ the Lord Evangelical Lutheran Church) Staff Recommendation: Approve the Agreement to Construct Lateral Water Line between the City and Christ the Lord Lutheran Church and adopt Resolution 2026-122 awarding the 9998 90th Street Water Service work to Burschville Construction, Inc. in the amount of $91,450.00. 8 Approve Disbursements A Approve Disbursements Staff Recommendation: Approve disbursements from 07-31-2026 through 08-13-2026 in the amount of $3,858,069.27. 9 Public Hearings 10 Bid Awards 11 Regular Agenda 12 Council Comments and Requests 13 Workshops - Open to Public 14 Workshops - Closed to Public 15 Adjournment 2 City Council Action Request 6.A. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title Public Safety Swearing-in Ceremony Staff Recommendation Appoint Brad Petersen as Public Safety Director and Chief Law Enforcement Officer at Non-Represented Pay Plan Grade X02, Step 5. City Administrator Levitt will administer the Oath of Office. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Memo - 20260811 PS Dir CLEO Appointment 1 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Joe Fischbach, Human Resources Manager Date: August 11, 2026 Subject: Oath Of Office and Public Safety Director and CLEO Appointment Memo Background As the City Council is aware, Pete Koerner retired from active duty as Public Safety Director on April 2, 2026, at which time the Council appointed Brad Petersen as Acting Public Safety Director and Chief Law Enforcement Officer. Staff now recommends that the City Council formally appoint Mr. Petersen to the permanent position. Since assuming the acting role, Mr. Petersen has consistently exceeded expectations and demonstrated exceptional leadership. Recommendation Effective August 19, 2026, staff recommends appointing Brad Petersen as Public Safety Director and Chief Law Enforcement Officer at Non-Represented Pay Plan Grade X02, Step 5. City Administrator Levitt will administer the Oath of Office. City Council Action Request 6.B. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Administration Agenda Category Presentation Title Recognition of Reserve Officer - Matt Jordan Staff Recommendation Recognize Matt Jordan’s retirement by presenting him with a badge and certificate of appreciation. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Council Memo-Matt Jordan Retirement 1 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Brad Petersen, Interim Director of Public Safety Date: August 13, 2026 Subject: Reserve Officer Matt Jordan Retirement INTRODUCTION Since the mid-1960s, the Reserve Officer Program has been a vital component of the Cottage Grove Police Department (CGPD). Reserve Officers, who are volunteer non-sworn personnel, play important roles in our success. They patrol our neighborhoods, parks, and businesses to deter crime; perform traffic control; provide transport services; participate in community engagement events; and do many more tasks in support of CGPD’s mission. Reserve Officers volunteer hundreds of hours annually in support of our community. Their dedicated service warrants recognition. One of the finest and long-standing Reserve Officers, Matt Jordan, retired after 13 years of service. His career as a CGPD Reserve Officer has been distinguished by professionalism, dedicated and selfless service, and genuine regard for our community and public safety team. On behalf of CGPD and the City of Cottage Grove, I ask Council to join me in recognizing and appreciating Matt for his years of service. Matt will be presented with his badge and a certificate of appreciation. RECOMMENDATION Recognize Matt Jordan’s retirement by presenting him with a badge and certificate of appreciation. City Council Action Request 7.A. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title City Council Special Meeting Minutes (2026-06-17) Staff Recommendation Approve the June 17, 2026, City Council Special Meeting Minutes. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. 2026-06-17 City Council Special Meeting 1 COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL June 17, 2026 12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 TRAINING ROOM - 5:45 P.M 1. CALL TO ORDER The City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, held a Special Meeting on June 17, 2026, at Cottage Grove City Hall, 12800 Ravine Parkway South. Mayor Bailey called the meeting to order. 2. AGENDA A. Washington County Project Updates Staff Recommendation: Receive project updates and provide feedback to Washington County. Mayor Bailey said we’re going to receive project updates from Washington County, and I believe the two projects that we’re going to be talking about are County State Aid Highway 20, or Jamaica Avenue, and then also 100th Street. Wayne Sandberg introduced himself as the Public Works Director for Washington County, and said this is Kevin Peterson, the Design Engineer. Well thanks, Mayor, Members of Council, Good Evening. As noted, I’m Kevin Peterson, and I’m joined tonight by Washington County Public Works Director Wayne Sandberg, and soon here Commissioner Karla Bigham. As noted, tonight we’re going to plan an update on County Highway 20, or Jamaica, and County Road 19A. So, we’re going to start with County Highway 20, and here’s what we’ll be running through: • Give an update on the project • Discuss the project schedule • Review the traffic modeling and four-lane analysis • Discuss project alternatives that are under consideration as we speak • Review next steps Of course, we’ll be available for any questions, both now and at the end, so feel free to jump in. So, this project will take place along County Highway 20 from County Highway 22, or 70th Street, to Military Road, which is coincidentally, a continuation of County Highway 20. Both of these projects are located in Cottage Grove, with a small piece on the north side within the City of Woodbury. This section of highway was actually transferred from Cottage Grove to the County in 2018 as part of a transfer that gave the City the Military Road alignment, which has now been turned into a multiuse trail that connects into County Highway 19 to the east. From our perspective, this corridor is suffering from aging pavement, its really seen just a lot of development around it, and is fully ready for a major reconstruction. Project Schedule You’ll see that we’re just in the early phases of that preliminary design and public outreach. We’re obviously not in Spring of 2027, so like I noted, we’re in the midst of the alternatives analysis phase as a part of that preliminary design work. Looking ahead, final design and any Right-of-Way acquisition is planned to take place in 2027, with construction planned for 2028. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE  12800 Ravine Parkway  Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 www.cottagegrovemn.gov  651-458-2800  Fax 651-458-2897  Equal Opportunity Employer City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 Page 2 of 16 So, we understand there are questions about whether this corridor should be reconstructed as two lanes or four. As background from our perspective, choosing the right number of lanes is not a decision we take lightly. • Too few lanes can lead to: Backups, delays, and traffic seeking alternate routes on neighborhood streets. • Too many lanes come with tradeoffs as well: More Right-of-Way impacts or even dedication that may limit development in the future, higher construction and long-term maintenance costs, more salt usage, higher stormwater impacts, just physically longer pedestrian crossings, higher speeds, and also blocked visibility. We’ve also learned through experience that lane capacity is only one piece of the picture. Good access spacing, which this corridor benefits from thanks to strong City planning, also allows for a two-lane roadway to perform more efficiently and safely than corridors with frequent driveways or intersections regardless of the number of lanes. Traffic Modeling and Four-Lane Analysis That said, I guess just understanding the future of this corridor really became critical on this project, so we actually asked our traffic engineering consultant to do a deeper dive into five different modeling scenarios here. We’re just getting a draft of this, so this is pretty hot off the press, and we’re still diving into the details, but given the profile of this project and the timing tonight, we wanted to dive into some of this information. The first modeling analysis they did is really a standard analysis, it is this whole development, including Lochridge, McHattie, and then the development north, in the City of Woodbury, we’re calling it the south of Dale Master Plan. Assuming that whole development, this baseline analysis, as you’ll see in blue, assumes the connection to Pioneer Drive to the south. And then we added on a pretty conservative 3.2% background growth rate, just on top of all of that, and then we projected that out to 2045. As I noted, we did want to do a few more layers of conservative analysis, so we also looked at what we call a long-term horizon analysis. So, this was kind of doing that backwards. We took everything I just noted, the connection, the development, the 3.2%, and we actually had them project that forward to when we think a four lane would be needed based on that rough 10,000 ADT shown in the previous slide. The result of that is we’re actually 2069, so well beyond the service life of a County Highway like this. The County Highway 20 primary corridor was the next scenario that that team ran, it was again assumed that same background growth as the baseline 2045 scenario, including that Pioneer Drive connection and development. However, the trip distribution for the south of Dale development in Woodbury was adjusted to show 100% of those trips going down to County Highway 20, which is an incredibly conservative assumption, especially just given Military Road and even opportunities to the north, like Bailey Road. This roadway, under this analysis, still did not exceed that 10,000 ADT four-lane threshold. Commissioner Bigham said I just want to interject one thing: I talked to Steve Morris, and I asked him when is that other wing of Pioneer, off the roundabout, going in, and he alerted me that land has now been taken off because the farmers want more time. He said it is, at a minimum, six-to-eight years where it will still be farmed. So, they will not be doing that development for a minimum of six-to-eight years. Council Member Thiede asked now, when that does get put in, is it planned to be four lanes? Is Pioneer above that four lane right now? Commissioner Bigham replied Pioneer is off at the T; so, you have Military and you have Jamaica, and Pioneer is up here. Council Member Thiede said I know, but I’m trying to remember where it is finished off to in Woodbury, is it four lanes right now? Kevin replied it’s one lane in each direction. Council Member Thiede said if it were going to be made, that’ll still probably be just a two-lane coming down unless there was significant evidence? Commissioner Bigham replied that also would be a question for Woodbury because Woodbury would have that, but I would agree with you, I would assume it’s a two lane, but Woodbury would have that ultimate decision. Council Member Thiede said okay, thanks. City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 Page 3 of 16 Kevin replied yeah, and to that point, the Pioneer Drive piece, of course that is in, its relatively new, in the past five years. Mayor Bailey said just a real quick question, too, is in the study that they did, in this area pretty much everything now in Cottage Grove in this end is fully developed, with the exception of the middle parcel there, which is the Kemp property. When you did the traffic studies, did they put the Kemp property in that number? Kevin replied it’s in there, but it would probably empty out, it would have to be into a Jamaica lot. Mayor Bailey said they would have to move the Ravine Parkway to do that. Council Member Olsen said yeah, we have the road going through there, didn’t we? Kevin said yeah, we did assume that connection, but Mayor, I will check to see if they included that actual development. I have the study here, so we can review it in detail. I don't know offhand because it does not show up on the map there, so it’s a vacant lot. But to your point, we did assume that Ravine would be connected over to the west, too, and we’ll kind of come back to that, too, as we get into some of the highway details here. Kevin said jumping back in, the Pioneer Drive high-growth analysis assumed all that same background, full development, Pioneer Drive connection, but what we did on that one is they assumed the Pioneer Drive extension was amplified; this is kind of backwards again, too, but until a four-lane threshold was reached, so, to do that we actually had to project that up 71.9% annually from what it normally would be. So, it’s kind of another way to back in when we would need that four lane as a gut check, and that 71% growth rate really was higher than anything we would ever expect to see. Then the final scenario, we just ran in what would be a high-density housing scenario. So, assuming high density in that full buildout area in Woodbury, to meet that four-lane threshold, we found that that density would have to increase by 288%; so, far beyond what we’ve seen in any of the Master Planning efforts. Based on that high level, preliminary, conservative traffic-engineering analysis, really none of those five scenarios got us into that four-lane need. So, here’s kind of what that looks like, as far as kind of graphically. From a planning perspective, again, it’s not a be all and end all, but then 10,000 to 13,000 ADT is just really where we would start talking about a four lane. You’ll see on the graphics there, we’re really not close to that. That lower blue bar is actually showing vehicles per lane per hour, which is a whole more-detailed way to look at lane capacity, that’s actually how the memo looked at it, but we wanted to make it a little bit simpler and just base it on ADT. So, again, given the information that we have, we are really confident in that two-lane design. I’ll just close by saying that we have two-lane corridors all over the County, they’re effectively handling over 15,000 cars a day, one of which is actually near the Stillwater High School. So, high schools, as we know from our experience, are also really peaky highways, and that roadway does back up, it certainly is ready for that four lane, but we have seen two-lane corridors, with even worse access spacing than this one, effectively handle many, many cars a day into that 15,000 car a day range. Council Member Olsen said one note on that, there was at one time some dialogue about the Kemp property potentially being purchased by the School District. Have you heard anything more on whether or not it will take place? Kevin replied yeah, I mean, and from our perspective, just looking at the area, it sure looks like it’s set up for residential development, so that’s how I’m expecting it to stabilize. Mayor Bailey asked was there any talk of what kind of, like a high school or a middle school? Or is there a need for a high school in this area? Council Member Olsen replied well, I think they were thinking about elementary schools maybe coming together, you know Woodbury to the south and Cottage Grove to the north, and looking for some additional property. Again, I don't know any more about whether or not there’s been any further conversation about taking that any further. I know the School District still has an interest in property, but where I’m not totally sure. I was told about that a long time ago, about the Kemp property. Mayor Bailey said well, part of that is the school would be on the border, literally, and it was going to be an elementary. City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 Page 4 of 16 Commissioner Bigham asked is this your final slide, Kevin? Kevin replied I have many more slides on the project, but this is it for our four-lane modeling analysis. Commissioner Bigham said so, I was at the public Open House, the same with Paul, and I only missed ten minutes on the front end and ten minutes on the back end, and I think the only person that asked about why aren’t we doing a four lane was Ken. No one else had any, correct me if I’m wrong, but they also wanted curb, gutter, and they were very interested in the path, that is right by the development where Woolery lives, for safe crossing on the lower end of the development. Council Member Olsen said I’ve heard that a lot, too. Commissioner Bigham said and then the intersection that has the stop on the upper end, those were the comments that I heard. Overwhelmingly, there was one alternative that they liked except for one guy, who was very vocal about leaving everything natural and no curb, gutter, no nothing, because of maintenance, and that’s all he kept saying no, it’ll be cheaper to do maintenance. I think he talked your ear off a little bit, too. So, anyway, that’s really the feedback that we received at that Open House. Kevin said thank you for setting me up, I will get into some more details on that. So, in addition to the quantity of land, the team also looked at several intersection configurations throughout the corridor. The layout shared with the public at that Open House included an all-way stop at Ravine Parkway and then a roundabout at that future Pioneer Drive extension. What you’ll see here, actually going north, we have worked with Woodbury on that quite a bit, so north is kind of a right; that does show two lanes or one lane coming into the roundabout and one lane going out. So, that is a typical section that was provided by the City of Woodbury to match it with the roundabout. We do expect to construct the Ravine Parkway intersection to be signal ready when we rebuild it in 2028, and of course we’ll continue to monitor it. It’s likely that when Ravine Parkway connects to the west, we’ll be prepared to move on that signal. Council Member Olsen said but we definitely need to do a four-way stop in the development. Kevin replied we will, yeah, right now. And actually, diving into more details on that, your staff actually has a resolution to support putting an all-way stop in, even this summer, just given some of the growth. Council Member Olsen said that would be a really smart move. Kevin replied oh, thanks, yeah. But again, right now we’re looking at an all-way stop there, but we’re going to track things hard for a stoplight, and we do expect that when things connect to the west, we’ll definitely be ready to mobilize on that. Administrator Levitt said so, Kevin, just to be clear, the intersection will be designed for signal in the future. Kevin replied we may, yep. Yeah, and either way, Administrator, we will build it to be ready for a signal, that’s a baseline assumption. So, if that signal goes in in ’28 with the project, or even the next year, it’ll be set up for that. Commissioner Bigham said we got you. Mayor Bailey asked well, would there be a reason if you wanted to do a roundabout there? I shouldn’t be asking. Kevin replied no, it’s a great question, Mayor. It’s actually more related to the balancing of traffic. Ravine Parkway actually has quite a bit of traffic coming from that east leg, and if we were to do a roundabout, that east leg wanted to move south and would just take over the whole roundabout; so, we couldn’t get that north-south traffic through. So, that all-way stop or that signal does a better job of handling those unbalanced volumes. Commissioner Bigham said and I don’t want to bring this down a rabbit hole, but one thing, and this is a question that I just thought of, so I’m asking it just because it popped into my head: 19 and I know we’re going to talk a little bit about it, you know, probably in the early mid-2020s or 30s is going to be redone. Now we’re going to have Radio next year from Military to Bailey, like Ravine is going to have a boatload more traffic even than it has now to accommodate over the next two, and then this will be ’28. So, if you think about it, the next almost three, two-to-three years, and then a quick break, and then it’ll start back up again with having 19 stopped or at least under construction. Did we consider all of that in the timing for the four-way stop versus light? Kevin replied we did, yeah, and that’s, I mean, that’s obviously not our priority is to just dump more traffic on Ravine, just allowing those drivers. Right now, that operates as a stop sign on Ravine, of course, which can lead to some pretty big delays. City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 Page 5 of 16 Commissioner Bigham asked so can we, no pun intended, can we stop and pivot like in the middle of some construction projects and erect the lights and everything and turn it from a stop to a light? Kevin replied we can look at that; that would be harder, I think we’d get a little bit beat up just knowing that we have a major construction project the next year, but if delays are too big, we can make it work. Commissioner Bigham said yeah, the Mayor and I are getting beat up right now for having two of the major thorough ways shut down and from MnDOT’s problem, but I’m just trying to think of what could we learn from what we’re going through in this moment. I think if I’m reading into what Administrator Levitt is saying, is if we’re ready to go, then why not do it? And we’re anticipating the construction of the next three years with a break, and then in a couple years, 19 would be expanded. Administrator Levitt said and just looking at the adjacent growth. You know, we already have the plat on the east side, you know the west side’s going to come in probably with another two-to-three additions by the time this is built. And, so, you’ve kind of already got the households that are going to be using it right away and kind of create that additional traffic on Ravine Parkway legs, and then if you do have the construction that you’re talking about, you’re going to get that north-south pressure. Kevin said and your residents are going to say; Commissioner Bigham said what the hell? Kevin said yeah, why didn’t you just do it right now? Commissioner Bigham said right, just do this from the beginning, you delayed it a year or two, and you could’ve had this open. But Wayne is the money guy, I don’t know all of his projects, and Ravine is yours, I get that part. Wayne replied we can look at it. I think we’re certainly open to putting it in if it makes sense; we don’t want to have to come back a year later. The only thing we’ve got to be mindful of, and you’ve mentioned it already, if it doesn’t meet warrants and we can’t show that it’s going to meet them real close to the project, we will not be able to spend State Aid dollars on the stoplights. Commissioner Bigham said correct. Wayne said so, we have to look at that, but if we think that there’s aggressive enough growth, it’s like Kevin said, we’re going to keep an eye on it through the design. If we can show MnDOT and State Aid that this makes sense, we’re all in on putting it in with the project. Commissioner Bigham said and that’s why they’re national award-winning engineers. Council Member Thiede asked we don’t think that Ravine will have more traffic than 70th Street, right? So, apparently that roundabout at 70th and Jamaica is more balanced than what you projected this to be? Commissioner Bigham replied probably. Council Member Thiede said and I suppose in terms of our development there on 65th, have we been able in our traffic studies to be able to determine if people coming out of there that go essentially to 70th to go east to possibly 19? Council Member Olsen asked are you talking about the new McHattie development? Council Member Thiede replied no. Mayor Bailey said he’s all the way over to Hinton. Council Member Thiede asked what is it? Calarosa. So, coming out of there, you know, because if they’re only going to 19, they’re going to be jumping on Ravine Parkway now instead of going over to 70th. I don't know, I’m just curious. Commissioner Bigham said yeah, or Military. Wayne said but I can see what you’re saying, instead of going all the way down to 70th, they’ll shoot over on Ravine over to 19. Mayor Bailey said now mind you, until, it’s good for the future, but Kemps have to sell before that would go all the way through. And to be honest with you, when the road goes through, I do actually think there’s going to be higher traffic. Commissioner Bigham replied no, I agree, and that’s how like my parents would get to my house. Council Member Olsen said I was just going to ask how are Mom and Dad Bigham going to go? Yeah. Kevin said well, now with all this data, Council Member, we’re keeping a close eye on 22 also, 70th Street, right? We have a study in our CIP, I don’t think it’s next year, the year after, but we’re seeing a lot of growth over there, too. City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 Page 6 of 16 Mayor Bailey said all right, so, on this one, you’ve got the roundabout there, that’s Pioneer that goes to the right, and we won’t have anything going to the left because that’s development, and the topography’s a little high. Kevin replied that’s my understanding. You know, if that were to change, it’ll be set up to tie into it, it won’t be easy, but yeah, that’s our understanding. And that kind of hatch on the bottom left, that’s that old Military connection, so that would be severed. So, really, as you’re coming up call it Jamaica or County Highway, then you’ll bend to the left and follow Military Road in the northwest. Council Member Thiede said so, I mean, it could be possible that if Woodbury puts in a development right there, it’s kind of unfortunately coming down into a slice, right, and then it goes to the east with Military. I suppose that’d be an appropriate place instead of putting another entry on Military to put something on that roundabout to go into a neighborhood right there, possibly. Kevin replied possibly, yeah, you’re thinking maybe another leg onto that roundabout? Paul said well, I think, and keep in mind that north is almost, can you show with your mouse which way is north? Kevin replied north is straight to the right, actually, but Pioneer Drive bends to the right to go straight north, so I don't know if it shows up. You can kind of see it there, of course turned the right way, so in hindsight, I should’ve turned that graphic. Council Member Thiede said and I don't know, you’ve got something marked in blue. Kevin replied the area marked in blue is our Lochridge development. Council Member Thiede said and then the other part, in Woodbury, is marked in blue there, south of Military Road, what is that? Kevin replied that’s definitely Pioneer. Council Member Thiede said no, no, no, no, I’m talking about that, kind of the little wider piece. Kevin asked up by Dale Road? Council Member Thiede said no. Commissioner Bigham said the orange is the McHattie. Council Member Thiede said if you look where it says Military Road right there, just below that, that little blue enclosed area. Is that enclosed for some reason? Kevin replied that’s part of the City of Woodbury’s South of Dale Master Plan, so it’s a new development. Council Member Thiede said and it didn’t include the other little, obviously, that property there, that little cone that goes to the roundabout, which is or is not part of any other plan, apparently. Commissioner Bigham said it looks like two smaller residential properties. Council Member Thiede said anyway, I think it’s maybe somewhat immaterial, I’m just kind of had some thoughts, right? Kevin said yeah, I appreciate that. And, you know, just knowing how the County manages access, too, we want to be deliberate about things like that. Mayor Bailey asked so, Jennifer, are you thinking from this resolution standpoint that sooner than even the development goes in there, we’ll have this four-way stop? Administrator Levitt replied yes, right now, as part of the Developer Agreement with Lochridge, we had to ask them to build the turn lanes, but if you were to build the turn lanes, we’d be ripping them out in 2028; so, we’re asking the developer to not build the turn lanes, and we’ll take the cash so that we can put it towards the project in 2028. So, we would be bringing a resolution for an all-way stop and then the Developer Agreement, but obviously, residents are going to experience something very different in the interim. Kevin said yeah, and then playing that out, if the City supports that all-way stop resolution, we’ll do the same thing on our end to bring it to the County Board and get that installed this summer. So, that’ll be relatively quickly. Council Member Olsen said so, back to the question about State Aid dollars for stoplights. Is that based entirely on the modeling that we do? Paul replied, well, there are two ways you can do it. One is if existing traffic volumes meet the thresholds to justify a stoplight, that’s not the case, so then you pivot to trying to show your modeling is going to come in the near future; and I don't know if they have a set number of years, I think we’ve been trying to say within five years or so, so that might be our angle here if we want to go down that route. Council Member Olsen said and that’s why I asked the question because I think that provides us with a little wiggle room, yeah, okay. Paul said because my understanding is right now, we don’t even meet with that five years, kind of given some of the delays with that Pioneer Drive to the north, but I think if it becomes a priority, we can. City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 Page 7 of 16 Council Member Olsen said well, and parcels moving is a big point about what happens when some of these other projects come online, and how does that then divert the traffic flow? I think that’s a critical piece of the conversation. Paul said and in our favor, too, is it’s clearly we have a significant amount of development happening all around us, it’s not like we’re in an already-developed area. So, I think we can make a good argument if that’s where we end up going. Council Member Olsen said yeah, that’s what I was thinking. Kevin said good, thank you, I appreciate the discussion. Kevin said all right, Commissioner Bigham alluded to this, but we also looked at, you know we kind of call these corridor typical sections. So, we actually looked at four types, here’s two of them, they really fit into two separate buckets: This is what we’re calling that Parkway style, so the biggest difference between the Parkway style and what we’ll show on the next page is this Parkway style does have that curb and gutter in the middle, and then that concrete median. You’ll see the difference between these two, it’s pretty subtle, but the bottom one, that two- lane rural does not include that curb and gutter on the outside. What you’ll see on all four of these options is they all include a separated, shared-use path, they’ll all include stormwater features. They’ll all include turn lanes at key intersections, and they’ll all be set up for that future signal and ready for that all-way stop, and then merge well into that roundabout. While all four options are really supported, we’re still taking feedback, but from our perspective, the option that omits that curb on the outside is really more scalable for that future if that four lane were needed. It’s also maybe just a more responsible way to put dollars now, we would save money on that curb and gutter, we would save money on that storm sewer that could beneath that curb and gutter. We could also use that ditch space for stormwater treatment. So, we’re still vetting out or reacting to the public comment, but from a technical standpoint, the Project Team really feels like there are some benefits to not putting that curb and gutter on the outside. Council Member Olsen said and the idea there is because if you needed to then expand the roadway at a future date, you don’t have to tear that out, right? Kevin replied exactly right, yep, and the road would really function the same way, essentially, you’d still have shoulder with that curb and gutter option, we have that here now. So, but that’s it, again the Project Team is comfortable with all four of these, so I’m just kind of sharing some technical data with you here. And then here’s what we’re seeing on kind of those classic County Highway Road alternatives; instead of that concrete median, it would be more of a striped median, it wouldn’t have that curb and gutter, but it would still have those center left-turn lanes, those right-turn lanes at key intersections. You’ll see that boulevard and then the shared-use path on both of these options, too. Paul said this will feel more like 70th between Jamaica and 19 because today it’s a wide sea of pavement with lines that direct you, basically. Mayor Bailey said you were commenting about the, I’m actually more in favor of the finished product, I’ll just say it, so it would be whatever that first one was, and the reason I’m saying that is that the rest of Jamaica is that way. And even if, and I get it, if you guys want in the future, and I’ve been the one that talked about, I just don’t like it when roads kind of go small, large, small, large, it just drives me nuts. And the only reason we put the single lane in there was because we didn’t want to spend the extra dollars, years ago, to tear up the road again because of all the construction that was going on there. So, I saw that kind of in the back of my mind, but you convinced me that the timing is right, but even if we’re talking to 2069 or 2068, whatever you said, I would much prefer to see a finished product because it’s all going to be developed, it’s all going to be neighborhood specific, and having just the ditches there is. Commissioner Bigham said it’s consistent, A is consistent with the rest of and what will be into Woodbury when they develop. So, I agree, and that’s what the people said. Mayor Bailey asked because Pioneer is that way, isn’t it? Commissioner Bigham said yep, for sure. Mayor Bailey said and I guess on the part that they have another neighborhood, so. Commissioner Bigham said and that’s what the Open House was saying, too, they overwhelmingly wanted A. City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 Page 8 of 16 Mayor Bailey said and I definitely think to your point of having the median is important because whatever you’re planning to do with pedestrian crossing abilities, that gives them a safe haven in the middle, so to speak, the crosswalks or whatever. Council Member Olsen said and I wasn’t advocating for either one, I was simply trying to understand why we wouldn’t do the curb and gutter on both sides, and if the idea behind that is we may have to expand to a four-way roadway within a reasonable timeframe, then maybe that makes sense; but like you said, if it’s going to be an extended timeframe, then absolutely I think A is the better option because it is going to, from aesthetics and just kind of a clean look to it, I think it makes more sense. Administrator Levitt said when we put the subdivision in where Craig Woolery lives, in Michael’s Pointe, the big issue had been lighting the pathway. So, did you guys get feedback from residents on lighting at all? You know, because we obviously have that one section of pedestrian-scale lighting from 70th into the subdivision, and I was just wondering if that ever came up. Commissioner Bigham replied I don't know if they asked about that at the Open House that I recall, that’s a good point. Lighting is becoming more and more of a conversation because I’m getting, and I haven’t told Wayne yet, but everybody’s worried about the path right here that we’re redoing, that there’s no light, and people are going to be coming out of cornfields, I don't know, and it’s dark. I reminded them there will be homes there in a few years, but the lighting part of it on that path, I don't know if that’s ours or the City’s responsibility. Wayne replied yeah, when we get through the, pick up referral alternative, then we shift into the detail design, and that’s where we get into the landscaping. Like, for example, do you want landscaping in the middle of the median, outside? That scaled lighting, not intersection lighting, but like if you have pedestrian lighting, would be part of that landscape budget, and that’s where we put in 3% of the project cost to match the City’s 3%, and then that’d be part of your landscaping budget if you chose to do the lighting with that. Commissioner Bigham said people are becoming more vocal about wanting lights. Mayor Bailey said yeah, I would tell you that I was an advocate for lighting at Hardwood. Council Member Olsen said and it made a world of difference. Mayor Bailey said and the number of people that walk it is quite substantial, so I could see these trails or along the sides being very much used in the winters. Kevin asked does the City have like a standard like streetlighting pole that you’ve settled in on, or is it unique and different for each? Council Member Olsen replied yeah, we do. Kevin said okay, that will be helpful as we get into it. Council Member Olsen asked, Jennifer, you mentioned another street where that lighting was successful, do you remember what that was? Administrator Levitt replied it’s just right now it’s installed at the Dodge Nature Center property, at 70th and I’m drawing a blank, is it 67th? We have pedestrian lighting there because there was a big issue when that residential subdivision went in, they wanted the connectivity, but there was no lighting on that rural section. So, it’s a complete anomaly, really, in our system, but if you continue down Jamaica, then you get to it. Mayor Bailey said I think it’ll make a nice tie-in to the Ravine Parkway, also with that park that’s going to be there. I think it’ll get better usage. Council Member Olsen replied oh, absolutely, for sure. Well, people feel safer. Kevin said that’s good feedback, and I’ll just add, too, that we would do a highway-style lighting on roundabouts and intersections, too; so, it’s definitely not that pedestrian scale, but it will be lit for safety purposes. Mayor Bailey said now I see on that picture, that’s the Ravine Parkway. We obviously have the other street that’s to the south from there that goes into that development, we all say where Woolery lives. Is the intent not to have stop signs there, right? Nothing there except for stopping coming out of that development, correct? Kevin replied Mayor, correct. Mayor Bailey said okay, and then are we going to do turn lanes in there? I thought I saw something in the packet, so there will be turn lanes going into and out of? City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 Page 9 of 16 Kevin replied yep, full turn lanes, and I’m pretty sure there are turn lanes there now, but either way, we would have left- and right-turn lanes, and then even going, I think it’s southbound, left into the church, there’s not a turn lane now, but we’re proposing to add one. Council Member Olsen said and there was a conversation at one time about some kind of pedestrian crossing at that intersection is the intent, since we’re going to do it up here, that we just? Commissioner Bigham replied I think that’s going to be done on the 70th Street study next year, or is that 2028? Kevin replied it’s 2028. Council Member, are you referring to Jamaica Avenue, or? Council Member Olsen replied no, I was talking the intersection by Michael’s Pointe. Commissioner Bigham said oh, I thought he was talking about by the church. Mayor Bailey said so, what I was just talking about. Council Member Olsen said so when we saw, there was a plan a couple years ago, when we saw the turn lanes going in to discuss speed and pedestrian crossing, but it looks like the pedestrian crossing piece is being dealt with up here, on the left, is that correct? Kevin replied Council Member, it’s actually both. So, we installed, we call it a mid-block crossing between the two intersections, this one and the one to the south. If we were to put in that median, we would likely perpetuate that crossing, but we’re not in the detail, it’s all kind of connected, right? If we do stop signs here, we’d want people crossing here, even with that signal, so we’re going to kind of. Council Member Olsen said all I remember is there’s a MnDOT attorney who lives in that neighborhood, who has reached out to me more than once and is pretty persistent about asking those questions. Administrator Levitt said and I think just for clarification, when Lochridge came in, the residents on 67th Street Court were complaining because they felt like people were kind of riding down to there because there isn’t that right-turn lane into the development. And, so, we were saying in 2028, that right-turn lane into the development would be there without a rear-end situation. And, so, there’s a left turn, but not that right turn into the subdivision, and that was the issue. Council Member Olsen replied yep, thank you. Kevin said all right, I think this is my last slide on this one. So, we’re just looking ahead. The Project Management Team, which includes City staff, we reviewed feedback from the Open House, and I appreciate all the comments tonight, too, and then determine the recommended alternative. After that, we’ll be back here, actually, asking the City Council to formally support that, that’s a big step in our process. MnDOT calls that Municipal Consent, we call it Conditional Support. So, that will really allow us to move into that Final Design and Right-of-Way Acquisition phase. We just want to leave you with please submit any feedback on this project or any to your City staff. We have a Project Team that meets monthly to talk specifically on this project; Paul and I talk a few times a week just on general other issues and things, so, please, any feedback you have and want to get to our Project Team, we’d love to see that go through City staff. So, it’s a great way to get good information to us. Council Member Thiede said just a note on the center median, I guess, you know, making it grass is going to cost money; were we planning on Xero-scaping it or was there going to be grass? Kevin replied we defer it to the City, really, on that. You know, if we had a choice, we would put in concrete, and you don’t have to maintain it, it’s easy, we don’t have our crews stopping there to mow or to spray, but a lot of our city partners choose to put landscaping in there of any type that they can maintain and own. Mayor Bailey said what I might suggest, Dave, is let’s see how 80th Street comes out because that’s exactly what we’re doing there, we’re going to do more of a hardscaping there. Zac has shared some of the info, so I’m kind of waiting to see how that all looks, but I don’t want it to feel like it’s all just concrete and asphalt, but at the same time, there is a cost. Commissioner Bigham said so, the boulevard on the side would have grass, though, so it might offset that look of too much cement and concrete. Kevin asked are you doing like colored concrete in the first stage? Mayor Bailey replied yeah, you can see some of that right now down by Jamaica when we did that development down there, it looks nice. Council Member Olsen said and I think from a financial perspective, it’s a no brainer. City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 Page 10 of 16 Mayor Bailey said yeah, about 15 years ago, Woodbury really started to put in a ton of elaborate landscaping and medians. They’ve now gone a complete 180, they’ve yanked all of it out, they’ve let it grow pretty wild, and so we’re struggling now to figure out how we’re going to keep these medians without looking like complete weed zones. Commissioner Bigham replied well, when you have all that money and all those projects, Wayne. Wayne replied yeah, it is something to be thoughtful about. Mayor Bailey said yeah, and we have all the development happening so we have all the money, and they don’t have any money. Commissioner Bigham said well, that is true, but Woodbury has far more projects, contrary to what my colleague from Woodbury says. Administrator Levitt said just to be clear, when you say Right-of-Way acquisition, I mean, basically, we have all the plats with the dedicated, we’re not anticipating there’s any real Right-of-Way other than maybe for a sliver in Woodbury, at Pioneer Drive. Is that what you’re referring to? Kevin replied that’s what we’re anticipating, yes. We’re not into the stormwater drainage piece, but I understand the City has gathered some credits from development, so yeah, it should be a minor amount of Right- of-Way issue. Mayor Bailey asked have you been down Jamaica recently? Did you see those monster stormwater things they’ve got built in? Holy cow! That’s the deepest I think I’ve seen. And even the one on the corner where they did McHattie’s, when I drove by there since they started doing it, I’m like holy cow, does that? Commissioner Bigham said yeah, my parents are freaking out; Mayor Bailey said that’s a big change. Commissioner Bigham said they said they’d leave in the morning and come back at night, and there’s like a bunch of stuff done. Mayor Bailey said it is amazing. Kevin said well, that’s it for County Highway 20. I’ll be happy to stand for any more questions, or else we can get right into County Road 19A. Council Member Olsen asked at what point in the process do you do that traffic modeling for that four-way intersection? Kevin replied Council Member, I think we’re going to look into that now, based on feedback here tonight. I don’t see much reason to wait. Mayor Bailey said yeah, let’s do it. Kevin said yeah, that’s good feedback. Council Member Olsen replied all right, perfect. Kevin said all right, so, I’m excited to provide an update on County Road 19A/100th Street Commissioner Bigham said hang on one second. Round of applause for everybody who helped get the $9.6 million. Everyone applauded. All right, here we go, there we go. Kevin said all right, perfect. Thanks, Commissioner. Kevin said well, maybe continuing the theme of Paul and I talking a few times daily here, the Project Team has made a ton of progress on this project. We are actually here at a final recommended layout for that corridor, which is what we show on the screen. This is just a really big milestone for us, and I guess I just can’t emphasize enough how challenging this effort has been to get us here. You know, it’s hard to tell on this layout, but the amount of utilities paralleling and crossing that railroad corridor, we’re actually proposing two bridges to help with some of those challenges. So, it’s just a really, really tricky spot, but we’re really happy with the way things are at right now. Council Member Thiede asked well, with one being just a utility or being, what are you talking about, where does the bridge start? Council Member Olsen asked it is sort of a temporary bridge first? Kevin replied we wouldn’t have to do a temporary bridge, we would do permanent bridges, but part of the challenge was there’s cement console trunk sewer lines under here, there’s a high profile gas main under here, and then once you just factor in that height, we need to get up and over that railroad. City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 Page 11 of 16 Council Member Thiede asked so it that what that blue is there, that’s above the orange, the picture of the bridge? Kevin replied the blue is actually a City watermain that will be bored under the railroad as part of this project. Council Member Thiede said when you’re talking about two bridges, where? I don’t see a visual. Kevin replied the orange there, yeah, those orange blobs or rectangles, those are the bridges. Council Member Thiede said so, you’re just saying there are two bridges. Commissioner Bigham replied there are two separate bridges, and Kevin confirmed that. Mayor Bailey asked next to each other? Kevin said yep, very close to each other, but two separate. Mayor Bailey asked are you thinking one direction this way, one direction that way kind of thing, or what are you? Kevin replied no, there are two paired bridges that are right next to each other. Yeah, it’s a really unique design, and part of that is, the railroad has higher standards on how high you have to be over it. Once we did the math, when the bridge gets so long, your beams of course get deeper, which means your bridge has to get taller and much more expensive. So, it was actually quite a bit cheaper to build the two bridges when all things were considered because we could lower that debt and those beams got more manageable. So, it’s a unique design. But as Commissioner noted, we’re also really excited about the $9.6 million secured through the Bonding Bill, so we appreciate everyone’s hard work on that. Of course, it’s not the full $22.5 million that we were asking for, but it’s definitely a step in the right direction. Kevin said looking ahead here, Washington County Public Works is actually preparing to recommend a County Board approval of, it’s all in the contract for Final Engineering. We’re teeing that up for July here, we’re hoping to get it in on July 7, actually, at that meeting. So, stay tuned for that. And once that actually gets in, that’ll put the County’s investment in this project up to $3.7 million to date. So, we’ve put a lot of time, energy, and money into getting this project to this point. Looking ahead, we’ve got a lot of work to do. We’ve got several significant critical path items and many unknowns for the Project Team to tackle. Right-of-Way acquisition, being led by City staff, is just getting underway, and we’re not able to really put a project out to bid until that Right-of-Way is in hand, due to the Federal funding that we’ve secured. Coordination with the railroad will continue. We have submitted preliminary bridge plans to MnDOT, so that’s the first step in that railroad coordination process, we’ve also met with them a few times and will continue working with them. We’re considering adding some City stormwater basin excavation into this contracting project, and of course, the limits of that City frontage road are still being discussed. So, there’s a lot to figure out, and right now, we’re still pushing hard to get this thing bid in 2027, and we’re predicting a 2027-to-2029 construction schedule right now, but again, we’ve got many critical path items ahead of us that we’re pushing really hard on. So, that said, we just look forward to continuing to work together and keeping this project rolling and getting built. Commissioner Bigham asked so, it’s a two-year construction project? Kevin replied yep. We’re hoping to start construction in 2027, that may allow us to get out of the ground and maybe do the bridge work through the winter, when some of that above-ground work can be done, but just the amount of grading and roadway and stormwater and drainage and City utility, the construction is pretty immense on this one. Council Member Olsen asked how are the coordination conversations going with the railroad? I know they can be somewhat sticky. Kevin replied they’re going as well as can be expected. I think getting the plan is going to help a lot, right? Getting those bridge plans reviewed and approved; they won’t even talk to us until we have those Final Bridge Plans, which is pretty unique, that’s not a normal way we approach projects. Council Member Olsen said hence the somewhat sticky comment. Railroads have a lot of power, so. Kevin replied the good news here is we’re going over them and under them, which maybe sounds like bad news, but at least we’re not crossing at grade, they really don’t like those at-grade crossings. So, we’re hoping that will help, but I’ll be honest, we haven’t had much luck with the railroad in recent history, so. City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 Page 12 of 16 Commissioner Bigham said there’s a project in Oak Park Heights that started in 2015, and it still was not completed until two years ago, at the end of two years of my second stint back. So, I had a five-year break, and that’s how long it took. Council Member Olsen said that’s what makes me nervous about it. Commissioner Bigham said yeah, but that was at grade. Kevin said I will add, Council Member, we have one of the best railroad teams on this project, TKDA, I don't know if that’s a firm you’ve heard of, but they contract with the railroad for a lot of work, and we have a team on this project that has done railroad-crossing projects across the State and country. So, we think it’ll be great, we have the best team in the State working on this right now and have been for the past year, through this preliminary phase. So, they’re engaged, they’re actually ready to hit the ground running when that contract gets approved, and we’re still spending the last few dollars on that preliminary contract, so we’re still bouncing things off them as we speak. Council Member Olsen said thank you, I appreciate that. Mayor Bailey said I know initially, when we kind of did the Memo of Understanding between the City and the County, I think the original number was we were going to bid in December of this year. What’s changed in that process? Kevin replied I think a lot has changed. You know, we lost about a year just kind of waiting, the County and City stepped up to fund that design contract. Some of the City utilities going under that railroad are going to add some complications, and that kind of led to some of the design challenges that held us back. It’s just part of the process to get here. Mayor Bailey said the reason I’m asking is it says bidding in 2027, not any date if you will, what ends up happening is we don’t have a month of blah, it’s all of a sudden December of 2027 vs. January of 2027; do you follow what I’m saying? Kevin replied I do. Mayor Bailey said and I do know, because we’ve heard it from multiple developers and users that want to be in this stretch, but they’re waiting for us, and when I say us, the City and you guys, right? And, so, the longer we delay, the less likely or the more challenging it’d be to get some of these businesses in the ground. So, that’s why I’m asking, and I know we’ve got our piece that we’ve got to deal with, like with Langdon, that extension road that you’re talking about. I just wanted to better understand, you know, like the environmental stuff that still needs to be done, the bidding, and all that kind of stuff. Council Member Thiede asked so what is the most danger to the critical path on this, the railroad stuff, or? Mayor Bailey replied there’s three things that were challenging in this project: 1) You kind of mentioned it, we lost about a year because there was a lot of unknowns with funding, and so we couldn’t continue to move forward, as we didn’t have the dollars to do it. We kept it going as best as we could, but we lost about a year there. 2) The railroad coordination is a total unknown. Even if I gave you a date today, it’s really not in our hands until we can get more dialed in and have them get our plans in front of the railroad and see how they react to it. 3) Right-of- Way Acquisition: Emily, you also said the City would have Right-of-Way in hand by December of last year. We cannot go into bid under the Federal process until we have a Right-of-Way certificate. So, that’s a critical path, we’ve got to get the Right-of-Way secured. There’s pieces that you guys agreed to get, there’s pieces we know we have to buy as well. So, those are the three main components of what’s going to ultimately decide when we go out to bid. And, right now, sitting here, I don't know if we could promise a date. We have to kind of figure it out. Administrator Levitt said we couldn’t go with the Right-of-Way until the Final Design was agreed upon. So, literally, until this month, we couldn’t start right away. Commissioner Bigham asked whose Right-of-Way are we; is it 3M, I mean, like whose? Mayor Bailey replied anybody along that, but 3M is the main one. Commissioner Bigham replied okay. Kevin replied 3M is the main one on the Right-of-Way, yeah. Most of this land is owned by 3M. We are starting to work with developing a plat that will work with 3M to hopefully dedicate the land here and set them up to then City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 Page 13 of 16 plat the land for development and so forth. So, that process is starting, we have some concepts that I should see within the next couple days here, and hopefully, in the next week or two, we can start having some preliminary conversations with 3M on what that platting process looks like. Mayor Bailey asked have they seen any of this yet? Kevin replied yes. In fact, I thought they’ve been fairly involved with this, and we’ve even had quite a few conversations with 3M, even to get to this point. Administrator Levitt said we meet with them once a month, and so they’ve gotten all the iterations, but we couldn’t do the platting until we had a final Right-of-Way actually nailed down to actually know what we have for permanent easement and platting. Mayor Bailey said so, we have that now, that’s what you’re talking about? Wayne replied that was what you saw, yeah, with the exception of that Langdon property. I think from the security aspect, we really can’t let all the traffic going down to the 3M gate. Mayor Bailey said well, and they’re going to be the big player. Wayne said I guess they’re the developer on it, too. Kevin said and, Mayor, just to conceptualize, like Wayne said, we’d love to show you a year or a month, but there’s just too many unknowns right now. What I can tell you is the teams will be ready to go when the agenda is approved. It’s a $2 million consultant contract, and this will be full speed ahead, so. We’re doing everything that we can, but right now, given what we know and don’t know, it’s just too hard to compute actual dates right now. Mayor Bailey asked can we make sure that from out standpoint, I’m sure with Karla on hers, can we keep in touch as this goes forward? Just as an example for you guys, a while back there was a situation with 3M on storage trucks, and we asked for monthly updates on where were you at with getting those contaminated trucks off their site, and they were really good about keeping us up to date and so on. The only reason I say it, I know it’s a horrible, I’m not talking about you guys, but my point is it would be nice to kind of get frequent updates now so that we kind of understand; because this is going to be, obviously it’s a big deal for you guys, and we do appreciate the partnership, but it’s definitely going to be something huge for the County, but for Cottage Grove when it comes to the type of development and opening up Langdon, in our case. I mean, we literally even, when we were just out in Vegas, had a big commercial end user that said, yeah, I want that spot there, and I can bring these with me, and it’s like wow. Kevin said well, a similar story. We have a Project Team that meets monthly, and that includes City staff. Paul will set you up with what you need, or feel free to reach out. Mayor Bailey said if there’s something that’s screwing things up one way or the other, let’s figure it out, so that we’re all on the same page, and we can get it done sooner than later. Kevin said yeah, I think, Mayor, if there’s any railroad contacts or push that you can lean on, we would take that, but we just haven’t even gotten to a point yet where we can start having detailed discussions, so. Yeah, we will absolutely commit to that. Mayor Bailey asked so, you’re about to go to the, you guys, then, on the Board for approval for the? Commissioner Bigham replied for the engineering contract, Final Engineering Contract, the first meeting in July, so right after the Fourth, we’ll do that. And then that will get the Final Engineering and things, that’ll more than likely be a 4-to-1 vote, but that’s okay, it’ll still pass. Mayor Bailey asked what do you have to do environmentally yet? I’m just curious. Kevin replied yeah, because of the Federal funding, we have to do an environmental document, a CATX EAW. It’s already started, and then the team is planning to submit that draft in December to keep us on schedule for any 2027 instructions. I don’t want to say it’s a standard thing, but it’s a pretty standard environmental process. Mayor Bailey said yes, so, it isn’t something that would stop it though, per se? Kevin replied no, but it’s similar, we just don’t know what we don’t know yet. There is a public process. We know there’s an eagle’s nest out there, so I can’t even. Mayor Bailey said there are some wetland impacts. Kevin said there are wetland impacts, so it’s just another thing we don’t want to rush, we want to do it right, but we also want to meet that schedule. Our team has already, through that consultant contract, has not yet approved, City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 Page 14 of 16 committed to getting that draft submitted in December, which is actually a pretty big deadline from a bidding standpoint in 2027. So, we’re already starting those wheels in motion, but it is still a process. Mayor Bailey said and so on the fund side of this, I’m assuming when we finally say this is the date we’re going to break ground, that we’re going to have one heck of a gathering with our Federal, or the State? Commissioner Bigham replied with the State, we’ll have a big old party. So, if we could try to not make it in February or March. Mayor Bailey said well no, I was hoping it would be sooner but whatever. Paul asked you want a groundbreaking, or a ribbon cutting, or both? Mayor Bailey replied well, I think both, but I think groundbreaking for sure. I mean everybody that’s provided help for funding, I think we need to invite. Commissioner Bigham agreed. Mayor Bailey said now, whether they’ll all come, I doubt, but it will be after elections, obviously, so there could be some changes, and maybe somebody who has helped us or might help us get money might become a governor or a senator, you know? We still have a Bill Grant app in, right? We haven’t heard anything on that? Kevin replied no, Bill grant announcements, I believe are end of the month. Commissioner Bigham said and then we still have the congressional-directed funding, so. Mayor Bailey said and you weren’t in here, they were asking if we were going to the fly-in, and I said yes. Commissioner Bigham said yeah. Mayor Bailey said but there is a feeling out there that there’s going to be some money available because, depending on who’s going to be, so we might be able to get some of this extra money that will help finish up this circle. Paul said right. If you can frame it as a separate project from this or an add-on, not the same project, that’s the feel that we’ve gotten is that we’ve asked for this same project multiple times. Commissioner Bigham said and obviously, who’s going with you, Ryan? Mayor Bailey replied Ryan. Commissioner Bigham asked and then you two are both going with us at the fly-in? That was confirmed. Commissioner Bigham said maybe between the two of us we could call Madeleine from Angie’s office and talk to her, and then maybe obviously do some talking points and document for the meetings that we have with people to reflect kind of what Wayne was saying, is like this is a supplemental project to it. Mayor Bailey said we probably could put something together on our side on that. Commissioner Bigham said I don’t want to throw like a loop into this, but is there any discussion, maybe not tonight, but food for thought to approach MnDOT about replacing the Innovation bridge during this time? Paul replied I’ve been talking with MnDOT on that, and they don’t see it in the next ten years or more. Commissioner Bigham said I know that’s what Adam said, but something tells me if there’s, I mean, there’s at least three times it’s been hit, and that has been within the last 12 years. So, I’ve got to believe that if it gets hit one more time, then we have reason to believe it probably will. Statistics don’t have anything to do with it. They probably would want to, we’ve been lucky that there hasn’t been a fatality as a result of hitting that bridge; but every time its down for a minimum of a week or so, and so I’m just wondering if it isn’t worth at some point, and I think we’re going to be having a meeting with MnDOT about Highway 61, 70th, and just the corridor. Mayor Bailey said the reasoning they had, when we brought it up to Connie, even last week, we got the same reaction Paul got, they said its not on their radar, its not a priority for them, they have no plan to replace that bridge. Commissioner Bigham said nothing on Highway 61 is a priority for MnDOT, and it’s unfortunate. Mayor Bailey said I think it’s interesting, too, because the director that’s there at the meetings always tells us how many fatalities there have been across the State, and it hasn’t been (knocks on wood) that many, but proportionately, the deaths on Highway 61 are high. Commissioner Bigham said yes, if you look at the amount of traffic vs. the fatalities, it’s high, and it’s because it’s out of, there’s just too much congestion for the design of it. And the other thing I’ll say and I know I don’t like bringing up Kwik Trips, because everybody asks you when they’re opening, but that location down on Manning and Highway 61 is not a good location, and it’s not because of you guys, it’s because of MnDOT. And like they really handicapped, without having a vision, their options to fix that area there; and I’m not an engineer, but it’s from somebody who’s lived here for 47 years, you can pretty much see the traffic and the design and the growth, and who the hell knows what’s going to happen down on Gene Smallidge’s farm, and, I mean, if that happens. City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 Page 15 of 16 Council Member Olsen said and there’s a golf course down there, too. Mayor Bailey said I guess my question for you, then, when you guys were meeting with them on Highway 61, is that something we’re part of or should we be a part of? Wayne replied this was a meeting with just Washington County, we had a list of things that we wanted to talk to them about. Mayor Bailey said okay, other than Highway 61? Paul replied yeah. One of the things we did ask them, though, was about the Innovation bridge, but also, in general, where’s the vision for Highway 61? We have no vision, right? So, where everyone’s reacting constantly, the road has become very unsafe, it doesn’t feel safe to drive it, and we said that’s something you guys have to figure out and come back to us with. Commissioner Bigham said yeah, I think Wayne’s going to be emailing Cottage Grove, Newport, and St. Paul Park, and probably Rick Hansen, I forgot to add that, about 70th; and then I think based on my conversations with all three mayors, I think having like a coordinated concern about the corridor is important, so that they will go ahead and. Mayor Bailey said I think it’s interesting, so I’ll just, Jennifer doesn’t even know this yet, because I was just going through my emails before coming to the meeting tonight, some of the answers that I haven’t gotten to, and I have three separate emails in there from homeowners in the area, on East Point Douglas there, asking if we’re ever considering a sound wall. Council Member Olsen said yeah, I have one of those, too. Council Member Thiede asked at what point? Council Member Olsen replied now. Commissioner Bigham said and they’ve always asked for that. Mayor Bailey said oh, just where the homes are. So, like basically where the apartments are coming down to like where that auto dealership is on East Point Douglas Road. Council Member Thiede said okay. Commissioner Bigham said yeah, they’ve asked for that for years, and MnDOT never will do anything. Mayor Bailey said well, we were on the list, they were going to do it, we qualified for it, but we did a survey of the neighbors in that area and it was not. Council Member Thiede said that’s the same one that we looked at before, and the issues with the lights across the. Mayor Bailey said now I think with the traffic and all the stuff that you were just talking about on Highway 61, I totally agree with you. Things have changed, and that might be something we’re going to need to take a look at, because we were on the priority list with them, but I know there’s a City cost in that, too, am I correct? Kevin replied yes. Mayor Bailey said so that’s why we just said, well, at the time, we couldn’t get a consensus from the neighbors, and we weren’t going to spend the extra money without. Commissioner Bigham said maybe we could get something for late July or early August with them, and we can always have you in on the phone or something, too, listening in, if you can’t make it in person. Mayor Bailey said we’ll figure it out. Commissioner Bigham said or have your staff there, but I do think having like all the mayors, myself, and engineer staff saying we can’t ignore this any longer, and you’re going to have to at least put together some sort of vision; and this stemmed from the Manning fight, right, but we’re doing Bailey this year and Manning, 70th and Manning next year, and then we get to Highway 61 and it’s like what are you doing there now? We don’t have any plan for Highway 61, and we don’t even know how to fix it; “Great guys, thanks, appreciate that,” that was their answer to me at the Open House here for 80th Street. Mayor Bailey said all right. Anything else? Wayne said a little brief note, we’re having some mold issues at the library. Council Member Thiede asked we do? Wayne replied yes, well, we did some destructive testing on the predesign, and everything came back good, so we salvaged all those walls, right? That was a big cost savings. They started tearing down the ones that they were going to remove and they found mold. In all the years we ran that library, we never had any moisture concerns, City Council Special Meeting Minutes June 17, 2026 Page 16 of 16 never any indication, but between the wall system developed in the ‘80s, it was quite moldy back there. So, we brought that firm back and they reassessed, and they said you can maybe salvage, you know, 20 feet of it, but the rest they recommend complete removal. So, we’ve got a workshop with the Board next week to go over the Change Order, there’ll be a $1.2 million Change Order. The good news is the bids came in $2 million below, so we have the money in the budget, we never gave that money up. It’s going to change the look of the building, too, because we would tear all of that external wall down and probably not replace it with the same brick. So, I think that’s part of the conversation is what is it going to look like? And we’re going to work with your team, Emily, and your team there to make sure it’s done right. Administrator Levitt asked how much will that slow the progress down? I mean, are you going to lose funding? Wayne replied it might, I think we’re pushing to make a decision quickly here so we can keep as close on schedule as possible. Demolition shouldn’t be a big issue, I think the bigger question is what are we going to replace it with? The team has got some recommendations, so the architect’s on board with some recommendations. Commissioner Bigham said and the external stuff, the City, you guys approved the external stuff, right, don’t they? Wayne replied yeah, yep. Mayor Bailey said all right, thanks, guys. We needed to know what we’re doing. Council Member Olsen said thank you. 3. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:56 p.m. Minutes prepared by Judy Graf and reviewed by Tamara Anderson, City Clerk City Council Action Request 7.B. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title City Council Special (Budget) Meeting Minutes (2026-07-22) Staff Recommendation Approve the July 22, 2026, City Council Special (Budget) Meeting Minutes. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. 2026-07-22 City Council Special Meeting (Budget) 1 COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING July 22, 2026 12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 TRAINING ROOM - 5:30 P.M 1. CALL TO ORDER The City Council Special Meeting Budget Workshop was called to order at 5:30 PM by Mayor Bailey in the Training Room. • Purpose: To review departmental operational budgets, key financial risk factors, and capital improvement projections for the proposed Fiscal Year 2027 Budget. • Next Steps: Additional budget discussions scheduled for July 29, 2026; preliminary tax levy adoption set for September 2, 2026; final budget and levy public hearing set for December 2, 2026. 2. ROLL CALL Tammy Anderson, City Clerk, took the roll: Mayor Bailey; Council Member Clausen; Council Member Garza; Council Member Olsen; Council Member Thiede, all present. 3. 2027 BUDGET OVERVIEW & STRATEGIC BALANCING Staff presented the overall strategy to maintain the preliminary tax levy increase at the Council’s 9.6% target. To achieve this baseline, several cost-mitigation strategies (“budget levers”) were implemented: • Insurance Offsets: Savings within the Workers’ Compensation fund were applied to absorb an estimated 24% market rate increase in general property, casualty, and health insurance. • Dorm Renovation Funding: Renovation of the Central Fire Station dorms (estimated at $375,000) is proposed to be funded using funds in the Future Projects Fund related to the HERO Center, avoiding new debt or levy impact. • Fund Shifts: Replacement of garbage cans with refuse carts in the public parks was shifted from the General Fund to the Park Improvement Fund. • Position & Vacancy Management: o Recruitment for the full-time HR Director position was formally deferred to 2028. o A Police Officer vacancy will be held open for 8 months in 2027 to help absorb regional EMS operational shortfalls. • Revenue & Transfer Adjustments: Reallocated GIS developer revenues to the General Fund, utilized available debt service balances, increased Franchise Fee fund allocations to engineering by 2%, and applied an updated fee schedule across building, licensing, and recreation (generating +$66,000). 4. CRITICAL FINANCIAL RISKS & LIABILITIES Staff provided an in-depth review of four primary financial headwinds facing the city: 1. Ice Arena Cash Deficit ($472,000): The deficit cash balance was driven by past debt, pandemic closures, and mechanical failures in the refrigeration system. Staff recommended using one-time cash through 2026–2028 and establishing a dedicated capital levy in 2028 to restore long-term stability. 2. EMS Operational Revenue Shortfall ($400,000): Resulting from structural shifts in service area arrangements. Operational adjustments are expected to bridge this gap, with full revenue stabilization anticipated within 3 years. 3. MPCA / Attorney General Land Acquisition Repayment ($1.4 Million): State agencies requested repayment regarding past land acquisitions tied to 3M settlement funds. Staff and legal counsel are negotiating a long-term repayment schedule to avoid a significant property tax levy impact. City Council Meeting Minutes July 22, 2026 Page 2 of 3 4. Collective Bargaining Exposure : Four union contracts remain under active negotiation, representing an unbudgeted liability across affected departments. • General Fund Reserve: The estimated General Fund balance sits at 46.85%, remaining within the City’s target policy range of 45%–55%. 5. DEPARTMENTAL PRESENTATIONS & POLICY DISCUSSIONS During the budget workshop, department heads presented their operational priorities, cost pressures, and proposed budget adjustments to align with the city's 9.6% levy target. Community Development highlighted steady single-family housing growth and a robust 418-unit multi-family pipeline, proposing a revenue- neutral transition for code enforcement and reviewing EAB management options. Public Works addressed inflationary pressures across asphalt, utilities, and maintenance while demonstrating cost savings through winter salt precision spreaders. Additionally, staff outlined strategies for enterprise operations, including golf course self-sufficiency and a phased financial stabilization plan for the Ice Arena—alongside fee schedule updates, and scheduled capital equipment replacements. A. Community Development Schmitz presented updates on local development activity and core departmental priorities, noting steady single-family housing growth alongside an expanding multi-family pipeline. The presentation detailed operational adjustments, including a revenue-neutral proposal to transition seasonal code enforcement to full-time status, as well as an overview of regional Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) management strategies and local policy considerations. • Growth Projections: Single-family residential growth remains steady at 250 units/year. Multi-family development pipeline includes 418 units planned for 2027–2028 (including Yellow Tree and Roers projects). • Code Enforcement: Proposed transitioning the seasonal Code Enforcement Officer to full- time, offset entirely by rental licensing revenue (net-zero levy impact). • Emerald Ash Borer (EAB): Staff clarified that private-property tree removal subsidies are not funded in the 9.6% baseline budget. Council discussed potential special assessment loan programs as a future option. B. Public Works & Infrastructure Public Works outlined significant market-driven inflationary pressures across utilities, asphalt, facility maintenance, and contracted services. Despite these budget challenges, staff highlighted proactive cost-containment measures—such as salt-reduction technologies in winter operations—alongside targeted budget requests for facility upkeep, stenciling, engineering software, and stormwater management. • Operational Cost Drivers: High inflation reported across contractual services, utilities (+4.3%), facility maintenance (+9.5%), and asphalt pricing (+7%). • Winter Operations Efficiency: Despite a $40,700 price hike in bulk salt contracts, the installation of precision spreaders across all 14 plow trucks successfully reduced total salt consumption by an estimated 20%. • Key Budget Requests: o $21,000 for City Hall garage ceiling deep cleaning. o $9,800 for firefighter dorm mattress replacements at Central Fire. o $35,190 for street stencil replacements (funded via internal 2026 savings or contingency). o Stormwater Fund: Proposed 6% rate increase and a 6-month seasonal staff position for catch-basin maintenance. C. Parks, Recreation, Ice Arena & River Oaks Staff reviewed operational strategies within Parks and Recreation designed to relieve pressure on the General Fund while updating revenue streams. Discussions focused on shifting specific park replacement expenses (garbage carts) to the Park Improvement Fund, as well as adjusting the broader city fee schedule for recreation programs and facility usage to support fiscal targets. The council received a detailed report on the Ice Arena’s financial standing, focusing on the root causes of its City Council Meeting Minutes July 22, 2026 Page 3 of 3 current operating deficit. Staff presented a phased, multi-year recovery plan to stabilize the facility's cash position through internal fund transfers before transitioning to a long-term capital funding model. Staff presented an operational review of River Oaks Golf Course, focusing on its enterprise performance, course maintenance schedules, and facility operations. The presentation highlighted strategies to ensure clubhouse and concession self-sufficiency while maintaining the course’s long- term capital assets in line with the Business Plan and financial objectives. • Parks Improvement Fund Shift: Shifted the replacement of the garbage cans to refuse carts from the General Fund and into the Park Improvement Fund to relieve operational pressure on the property tax levy. • Recreation Fee Structure: Reviewed proposed updates to recreational programming, user fees, and facility rentals designed to generate additional revenue (7.97% increase over the 2026 budget). • Ice Arena Operations: Reviewed operational challenges associated with the approximate $470,000 cash deficit caused by historical debt, pandemic closures, and refrigeration repairs. Staff presented a phased recovery approach utilizing internal fund balance transfers through 2026–2028, leading into a dedicated capital levy implementation in 2028. • River Oaks Golf Course Operations: o Reviewed the enterprise fund performance, operational strategy, and capital improvement needs for the River Oaks Golf Course. o Evaluated course maintenance budgets, clubhouse/concession operations, and long-term capital needs to ensure self-sufficiency and align enterprise operations with overall city financial targets. D. Equipment Replacement Fund Staff reviewed the multi-year schedule for fleet vehicles and heavy equipment replacements. The presentation emphasized maintaining long-term replacement cycles through internal service funds without creating additional demands on the General Fund tax levy. • Fleet & Capital Purchases: Reviewed scheduled vehicle and equipment replacements across public safety, public works, and parks departments. • Funding Strategy: Equipment purchases will be funded with the existing Equipment Replacement Fund balances and current property tax levy, aligning with the city’s long-term Financial Management. 6. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) & DEBT SERVICE Staff presented an overview of the multi-year Capital Improvement Program, outlining major infrastructure investments, planned debt issuance, and strategic project timing. The discussion focused on balancing critical road and park developments in 2027 while managing long-term debt capacity and intergovernmental commitments for 2028 and beyond. • 2027 Planned Bond Issuance ($10 Million Total): Major projects include East Point Douglas Road pavement management ($4.8M), Dunes Park development ($2.8M), and initial engineering for the 100th Street corridor. • 2028 CIP Outlook: Local pavement management funding will be reduced to $1.0M in 2028 due to a $3.0M local commitment toward the Jamaica Avenue project (70th St to Military Rd) in partnership with Washington County. 7. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Bailey asked for a motion to adjourn the meeting. Motion made by Councilmember Olsen, seconded by Councilmember Clausen, to adjourn the City Council Workshop at 9:31 PM. Motion carried unanimously. Minutes prepared by Tamara Anderson, City Clerk. City Council Action Request 7.C. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Community Development Agenda Category Action Item Title Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation Meeting Minutes (2026-04-14) Staff Recommendation Approve the April 14, 2026, Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation (ACHP) meeting minutes. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. 4A. April Minutes 1 MINUTES CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION April 14, 2026 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Historic Preserva- tion was duly held at the Cottage Grove City Hall, 12800 Ravine Parkway South, Cottage Grove, Minnesota, on the 14th day of April 2026. CALL TO ORDER Acting Chair Marie Sumstine called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Tony Brinkman, Cindy Yff, Linda Johnston, Marie Sumstine, Joseph Mc Dermott, Mary Doheny MEMBERS ABSENT: Jacob Grundhauser OTHERS PRESENT: Max Erickson, Planner; Council Member Dave Thiede APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Motion made by Brinkman to approve the agenda with no changes. Johnston seconded. The motion passed unanimously 6-to-0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion made by Marie Sumstine to approve the minutes with no changes. Yff seconded. The motion passed unanimously 6-to-0. OPEN FORUM Erickson introduced the two new committee members, Joseph McDermott and Mary Doheny. Each member introduced themselves to the new members. ACTION ITEMS New Chair Designation for the ACHP Max Erickson (Planner) presented and explained the expiration of Herb Reckinger’s position from the Committee. It was explained that the chair be assigned as a replacement for Herb Reckinger. It was discussed that a chair be voted for and a vice chair be assigned as well. A motion was made by Marie Sumstine to elect Tony Brinkman to be chair, which was seconded by Linda Johnston. The motion passed unanimously 6-to-0. Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation Minutes April 14, 2026 Page 2 of 3 Historic Preservationist of the Year Max Erickson (Planner) presented a brief introduction for this item. The process for nominating people for Historic Preservationist of the Year was open to the public as an online submittal. There was no one that was nominated, and staff provided a recommendation of Jake Jones with Medicinewood LLC. Erickson explained that Jake Jones is working on several historic properties within Cottage Grove including the Ferber House and under an agreement with the City for the Old Town Hall. Discussion was had between the committee. Members agreed quickly that Jake would be a good fit. A motion was made by Marie Sumstine to recommend Jake Jones for the Preservationist of the Year, which was seconded by Linda Johnston. The motion passed 6-0. DISCUSSION ITEMS Cottage Grove Historic Webpage Planner Max Erickson discussed the idea of updating the City’s webpage for historic preservation. Several options were presented, which included examples from other cities on what they do for their preservation website. It was suggested to create individual pages for each resource or a mapping source for existing registered and priority historic sites in Cottage Grove. Ideas were shared including adding a page for who lived in Cottage Grove and why they were important. This could also include adding a timeline or history of Cottage Grove with people or places. It was discussed that we could add forms that are used for nominating places for the historic register. It was discussed that there can be a spot for public input. First step would be to create the framework for the site and then implement more robust ideas later once it is well established. The Committee gave approval to move forward with the tentative plan as discussed. PROJECT UPDATES – VERBAL UPDATES Old Town Hall Update Erickson gave an update for Mr. Jones who has agreed to conduct a complete evaluation of the building, outline aspects of the structure that contribute to the historic integrity, and provide a plan for repairing the structure. Photos were shared with what Jake Jones has discovered in the Old Town Hall. He found old writing in the walls, came across the old crawlspace location, and indicated that there was some fire damage that may have been the original spot where the wood stove sat. Cedarhurst Update Erickson gave an update for the Cedarhurst Mansion construction. A slide show was presented indicating the current state of construction. Marie Sumstine asked if the Cedarhurst owners will replant roses in the rose garden. Councilmember Thiede indicated that they would include roses for the rose garden. Erickson explained that they are following a set of standards for repairing the building. Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation Minutes April 14, 2026 Page 3 of 3 Linda Johnston asked if the Gardener’s Cottage will be used. Erickson indicated the Cottage will be used as a staff location more than a venue spot. Ross Property Update Erickson gave an update for the Ross Property. It was indicated that documentation was taken of the site and photos were available upon request. A slideshow was presented of some of the core photos. Committee Members asked if there was any chance more investigation could be done before they demolish the house. Staff would look into this. Committee members asked if there was a chance to visit the house prior to demolishing it or saving any parts of the building. Staff said they would look into this for liability. HISTORIC INQUIRIES, ARTICLES, AND RESEARCH INFORMATION There were none. COUNCIL LIAISON COMMENTS Thiede discussed Strawberry Fest and shared a video describing Strawberry Fest in the past. A quilt from an older Strawberry Fest was shared with the Committee. COMMITTEE COMMENTS Tony Brinkman asked for an update on terms and expiration dates for current Committee Members. Marie Sumstine asked if there was going to be a historic neighborhood in Old Cottage Grove. Thiede mentioned that there was a thought to get this put in, but the idea did not get too far. Staff will investigate. Discussion was had about what could be done for these homes individually. We should reach out to property owners where development is creeping up to get their properties registered. Further discussion was had about other buildings near past projects and about City Parks. STAFF COMMENTS There were none. ADJOURNMENT Meeting was adjourned at 7:32 PM. City Council Action Request 7.D. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title Planning Commission Appointment - Koerner Staff Recommendation Appoint Pete Koerner to the Planning Commission with a term ending on February 28, 2027. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Memo - Planning Commision Appointment (Koerner) 1 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk Date: August 10, 2026 Subject: Planning Commission Appointment - Koerner Discussion Councilmember Olsen, serving as the Council Liaison for the Planning Commission for 2026, interviewed Pete Koerner for a vacant seat on the Planning Commission and recommends his appointment. Because this appointment occurs mid-year, Minnesota Statute § 462.354 allows local rules to govern the vacancy. Under Cottage Grove City Ordinance (Section 2-1-2), filling an unexpired partial term of less than one year does not count toward standard term limits. Mr. Koerner will finish this year ending on February 28, 2027, and then be eligible for a maximum of four full 2- year terms per city policy. Mr. Koerner brings a vital public safety perspective to local development initiatives from his 30- year career with the Cottage Grove public safety department where he recently retired as the Police Chief. He will work to ensure that future infrastructure, commercial and industrial areas, and residential neighborhoods are designed to deter crime, continuing to bridge the gap between city planning and public safety and will foster a more cohesive community. Recommendation Appoint Pete Koerner to the Planning Commission with a term ending on February 28, 2027. . City Council Action Request 7.E. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Parks and Recreation Agenda Category Action Item Title Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Appointment (Kemper-Youth Seat) Staff Recommendation Appoint Kasen Kemper to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. Budget Implication Attachments 1. Appointments Memo 1 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Zac Dockter, Parks and Recreation Director CC: Dave Thiede, Councilman Adam Larson, PRNR Commission Chair Susie Brown, PRNR Vice-Chair Date: August 7, 2026 Subject: Appointment to Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Councilman Thiede and Commission Vice-Chair Brown are recommending Kasen Kemper be appointed to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission effective August 19, 2026. This appointment would fill a current youth seat vacancy. Kasen is a lifelong resident and a senior at Park High School. Throughout his youth, he enjoyed using the parks to play, volunteer and is currently a staff member for the supervised summer playground program. He has also worked concessions at the Ice Arena for a few years. As stated in his application, Kasen hopes he will have a voice in the Mississippi Dunes planning and help increase awareness of all the park amenities there are in town. Recommendation Appoint Kasen Kemper to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. City Council Action Request 7.F. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Community Development Agenda Category Action Item Title Rental License Approvals Staff Recommendation Approve the issuance of rental licenses to the properties listed in the attached table. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Rental License Approvals CC Memo 2. Rental License Approvals Table 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator FROM: Samantha Drewry, Code Enforcement Officer DATE: August 11, 2026 RE: Rental License Approvals Background/Discussion Rental licenses are required for nonowner-occupied residential properties (City Code Title 9-13, Property Maintenance, and Title 9-14, Rental Licensing) and are issued on a biennial basis. The licensing process includes submittal of the rental license application, payment of the rental license fee, and public criminal history report. Rental inspections are conducted on all rental properties as part of the licensing process. Once all information has been submitted and the inspection satisfactorily completed, the Council must approve the license prior to it being issued. The properties listed in the attached table have completed the licensing process and are ready to have their licenses issued following Council approval. Recommendation Approve the issuance of rental licenses to the properties listed in the attached table. RENTAL LICENSES - CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL - AUGUST 19, 2026 RENTAL LICENSE PROPERTY NUMBER STREET # PROPERTY STREET NAME PROPERTY OWNER RENT-003184 9684 65th St S Tesfaye, Daniel RENT-003207 8535 Inman Ave S Dalton Jorgensen RENT-003267 6420 Genevieve Trl S Brett D. VerMulm RENT-003272 9200 Indian Blvd S Alec McCabe RENT-003274 8863 Ironwood Ave S Christy Kunert City Council Action Request 7.G. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Finance Agenda Category Resolution Title Accept 2nd Quarter 2026 Donations Staff Recommendation Approve Resolution 2026-117 accepting the 2nd Quarter Donations. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Resolution 2026-117 - 2nd Quarter 2026 Donations 1 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-117 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATIONS RECEIVED IN THE 2nd Quarter 2026 WHEREAS, the businesses and individuals listed below have made donations to the City of Cottage Grove between April 1, 2026 and June 30, 2026; and Received From Purpose Amount Public safety & EMS community event Marathon Petroleum Company LP support $5,000 Marathon Petroleum Company LP Confined space rescue equipment 7,500 Ayoka Adeyinka Bench in memory of Michael Ogunfolami 2,500 Johnny Pops Donation of cooler & popsicles-Nite to Unite 250 WHEREAS, the City of Cottage Grove gratefully accepts these donations and recommends that they be used for the purposes intended by the donors; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that the donations received in the second quarter of the 2026 fiscal year, listed in this resolution, and totaling $15,250 be accepted on behalf of the city operations that they were designated to support, with the sincere thanks of the City Council. Passed this 19th day of August 2026. __________________________ Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Tamara Anderson, City Clerk City Council Action Request 7.H. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title 2027-2028 Cottage Grove Police Officers Labor Contract Staff Recommendation Approve the 2027 - 2028 labor contract with the Police Officers Union. All wage and benefits costs have been budgeted for in the 2027 budget. Budget Implication Included in the 2027 Budget. Attachments 1. Memo - police officer contract 2. 27-28 PO Contract- Union Signed 1 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Joe Fischbach, HR Manager Date: August 5, 2026 Subject: 2027 - 2028 Police Officers Labor Contract Introduction The City and the Police Officers labor union have tentatively agreed to 2027 - 2028 labor agreement, subject to City Council approval. Background Management staff and representatives of the labor union met on four occasions and were successful in reaching a two-year tentative agreement for 2027 - 2028, subject to City Council approval. Wages The contract calls for a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) of 3.5% in each of the two years. A field training officer (FTO) will get 1.25 hours of overtime for each shift they work with a trainee. This is an increase from 1 hour of overtime. A Senior Officer pay differential of 3% has been added to the contract as a pilot program. Up to 4 Officers, two per night crew, are eligible for this pay during the work hours of 7:30 PM and 6:00 AM. The Officers must be specifically selected by the Public Safety Director and meet the requirements of the Senior Officer policy. Short-term Disability Language was added to the contract, so the short-term disability policy coordinates with the new MN Paid Leave law. Uniform Allowance The annual uniform allowance will increase 3.0% per year for each employee. Other Provisions Attorney Susan Hansen is assisting the City with negotiations this year. This is her first year working with the City. As such, she recommended several updates to provisions in the labor contract that both sides agreed to. They include Employer Authority, Employee Rights – Grievance Procedure, Discipline, MN Paid Leave, ESST and Benefits. Recommendation Staff is recommending Council approve the 2027 - 2028 labor contract with the Police Officers union. All wage and benefits costs have been budgeted for in the 2027 budget. LABOR AGREEMENT CIT Y OF COTTAGE GROVE Cottage ■ Grove vtosper1ty M t ¾ere Pride an6 AND LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. Representing: PEACE OFFICERS JANUARY 1, 2027 - DECEMBER 31, 2028 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Provision Paae I Purpose of Agreement 2 II Recognition 2 Ill Definitions 2 IV Employer Security 3 V Employ er Authority 4 VI Union Security 4 VII Employee Rights - Grievance Procedure 4 VIII Savings Clause 7 IX Constitutional Protection 7 X Seniority 7 XI Discipline 8 XII Work Schedules 9 XIII Overtime Pay 10 XIV CourtTime 10 xv Call Back 11 XVI Standby 11 XVII Legal Defense 11 XVIII Job Posting 11 XIX Probationary Periods 11 xx Uniforms/P.O.S.T. License 12 XXI Holidays 13 XXII Annual Leave 13 XXIII Bereavement Leave 15 XXIV Short-Term Disability Benefits 15 XXV Jury Duty 17 XXVI Injury on Duty Policy 17 XXVII Advanced Resignation Policy 17 XXVIII Paid Parental Leave Policy 17 XXIX Recognition Awards 18 XXX Vehicle Use Policy 18 XXXI Duration 18 APPENDIX A Wage Schedule 19 APPENDIX B Insurance 21 1 LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. 2027 - 2028 ARTICLE I. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT is entered into as of August 19, 2026, between the CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA, hereinafter called the EMPLOYER, and the LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC., Local 571, hereinafter called the UNION. The intent and purpose of this Agreement is to: 1.1 Establish hours, wages and other conditions of employment. 1.2 Establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning interpretation and/or application of this Agreement. 1.3 Specify the full and complete understanding of the parties. 1.4 Place in written form by Agreement, the terms and conditions of employment which will be in effect for the duration of this Agreement as specified in Article XXXI. ARTICLE II. RECOGNITION 2.1 The EMPLOYER recognizes LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC., as the exclusive representative as certified by the Bureau of Mediation Services, Case No. 25PTR0202 as said unit: All peace officers subject to licensure employed by the City of Cottage Grove Police Department, Cottage Grove, Minnesota, who are public employees within the meaning of Minn. Stat. 179.03, subd. 14, excluding supervisory and confidential employees. 2.2 In the event the EMPLOYER and the UNION are unable to agree as to the inclusion or exclusion of a new or modified job position, the issue shall be submitted to the Bureau of Mediation Services for determination. ARTICLE Ill. DEFINITIONS 3.1 UNION: LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC., Local 571. 3.2 UNION MEMBER: A member of LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC., Local 571 2 3.3 EMPLOYEE: An employee whose classification is within the exclusively recognized bargaining unit. 3.4 PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEE: Any employee who is working in a position for the initial twelve-month period of employment. 3.5 REGULAR EMPLOYEE: An employee whose position with the City is for an ongoing (non-temporary) period and who has successfully completed the probationary period. 3.6 DEPARTMENT: Police Department of Cottage Grove 3.7 EMPLOYER:The City of Cottage Grove 3.8 DEPARTMENT HEAD: The Public Safety Director forthe EMPLOYER - appointed authority also known as the Police Chief 3.9 OVERTIME: Work performed at the express authority of the EMPLOYER in excess of the employee's scheduled shift. 3.10 SCHEDULED SHIFT: A consecutive work period including rest periods and a lunch break. The EMPLOYER shall establish the EMPLOYEE'S schedule for the upcoming calendar year and make it available to the EMPLOYEE no later than December 15th of the preceding year. 3.11 SHIFT CHANGE: A normal change in work schedule in a twenty-four (24) hour period with eight (8) hours between shifts. 3.12 REST BREAK: A period during the scheduled shift during which the employee remains on continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties. 3.13 LUNCH BREAK: A period during the scheduled shift during which the employee remains on continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties. 3.14 SENIORIT Y: Length of continuous service with the bargaining unit. 3.15 SEVERANCE PAY: Payment made to employees upon termination of employment. ARTICLE IV. EMPLOYER SECURIT Y 4.1 The UNION agrees that during the life of this Agreement, the Union and bargaining unit employees it will not cause, encourage, participate in, or support any strike, slowdown or other interruption of or interference with the normal functions of the EMPLOYER. 3 ARTICLE V. EMPLOYER AUTHORITY 5.1 The EMPLOYER retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all manpower, facilities, and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organizational structure; to select, direct and determine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules; and to perform any inherent managerial function not specifically limited by this Agreement. Any terms and conditions of employment not specifically established or modified by this Agreement shall remain solely within the discretion of the EMPLOYER to modify, establish or eliminate. All employees covered by this Agreement shall recognize the prerogative of the City to operate and manage its affairs in all respects in accordance with existing and future laws and regulations of appropriate authorities including, but not limited to, personnel policy and work rules. Any prerogative and authority which the City has not officially abridged, delegated or modified by this Agreement is retained by the City. ARTICLE VI. UNION SECURITY 6.1 The EMPLOYER shall deduct from the wages of employees who authorize such a deduction in writing, an amount necessary to cover monthly union dues. Such monies shall be remitted as directed by Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. 6.2 The UNION shall designate employees from the bargaining unit to act as a steward and an alternate and shall inform the EMPLOYER in writing of such choice and changes in steward and/or alternate. 6.3 The EMPLOYER shall make space available on the employee bulletin board for posting union notice(s) and announcement(s). 6.4 Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. agrees to indemnify and hold the EMPLOYER harmless against any and all claims, suits, orders or judgments brought or issued against the City as a result of any action taken or not taken of the City under the provisions of Article VI, Section 1. ARTICLE VII. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 7 .1 Definition of a Grievance - A grievance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or application of the specific terms and conditions of this Agreement. 7.2 Union Representatives - The EMPLOYER will recognize representatives designated by the UNION as the Grievance representatives of the bargaining unit having the duties and responsibilities established by this Article. The UNION shall 4 notify the EMPLOYER in writing of the names of such UNION representatives and of their successors, when so designated. 7.3 Processing of a Grievance - The processing of grievances, as hereinafter provided, is limited by the job duties and responsibilities of the employees and shall, therefore, be accomplished during normal working hours only, when consistent with such employee duties and responsibilities. The aggrieved employee shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time without loss in pay when a grievance is investigated and presented to the City during normal working hours, provided that the employee has notified and received the approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work programs of the City. 7.4 Procedures - A grievance as defined by Article 7.1 shall be resolved in conformance with the following procedures: Step 1 An employee claiming a violation concerning the interpretation or application of this Agreement shall within twenty-one (21) calendar days after such alleged violation has occurred, present such grievance to the Captain for the division. The Captain will discuss and give an answer to such Step 1 grievance to the employee and the Union within ten (10) calendar days afterreceipt. A grievance not resolved in Step 1 and appealed to Step 2 shall be placed in writing, setting forththe nature of the grievance, the facts on which it is based, the provisions of this Agreement allegedly violated, and the remedy requested and shall be appealed to Step 2 within ten (10) calendar days after the Captain's final answer in Step 1. Any grievance not appealed in writing in Step 2 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. This step shall be omitted if the Department Head is also the immediate supervisor. Step 2 If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the employee and discussed with the Director of Public Safety. The Director of Public Safety shall give the Union the City's Step 2 answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 2 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 2 may be appealed to Step 3 within ten (10) calendar days following the final Step 2 answer. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 3 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 3 If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the Union and discussed with the City Administrator or designee. The City Administrator or designee shall give the Union the City's answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 3 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 3 may be appealed to Step 4 within ten (10) calendar days following the City Administrator or designee's final answer in Step 3. Any 5 grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 4 A grievance unresolved in Step 3 and appealed to Step 4 shall be submitted to arbitration, subject to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations Action of 1971, as amended. For grievance matters involving written disciplinary action, discharge, or termination, the assignment of an arbitrator shall be consistent with Minnesota Statute 626.892. For all other grievances the selection of an arbitrator shall be made in accordance with the "Rules Governing the Arbitration of Grievances" as established by the Bureau of Mediation Services. The selection of an arbitrator shall be made in accordance with the "Rules Governing the Arbitration of Grievances", as established by the State Bureau of Mediation Services. 7.5 Arbitrator's Authority A. The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, modify, nullify, ignore, add to, or subtract from the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The arbitrator shall consider and decide only the specific issue(s) submitted in writing by the City and the Union and shall have no authority to make a decision on any other issue(s) not so submitted. B. The arbitrator shall be without power to make decisions contrary to or inconsistent with, or modifying or varying in any way, the application of laws, rules or regulations having the force and effect of law. The arbitrator's decision shall be submitted in writing within thirty (30) days following close of the hearing or the submission of briefs by the parties, whichever be later, unless the parties agree to an extension. The decision shall be binding on both the City and the Union and shall be based solely on the arbitrator's interpretation or application of the express terms of this Agreement and to the facts of the grievance presented. C. The fees and expenses for this arbitrator's services and proceedings shall be borne equally by the City and the UNION, provided that each party shall be responsible for compensating its own representatives and witnesses. If either party desires a verbatim record of the proceedings, it may cause such a record to be made, providing it pays for the record and provides the arbitrator with a copy at no cost to the arbitrator. If both parties desire a verbatim record of the proceedings, the cost shall be shared equally. 7 .6 Waiver - If a grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it shall be considered waived. If a grievance is not appealed to the next step within the specified time limit or any agreed extension thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis of the City's last answer. If the City does not answer a grievance or an appeal thereof within the specified time limits, the Union may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that step and immediately appeal the grievance to the next step. The time limit in each step may be extended by mutual agreement of the City and the Union. 6 Election of Remedies. In the event more than one procedure is available for resolution of a grievance arising under this Agreement, the aggrieved employee(s) shall be limited to one procedure through which remedy may be sought. If as a result of the written Employer response in Step 3, the grievance remains unresolved, and if the grievance involves the suspension, demotion, or discharge of an employee who has completed the required probationary period, the grievance may be appealed either to arbitration pursuant to Step 4 of this Article or a procedure including but not limited to fair employment or veterans preference. If appealed to any procedure other than arbitration pursuant to Step 4 of this Article, the grievance is not subject to the arbitration procedure as provided in this Article. An employee pursuing a remedy pursuant to a statute under the jurisdiction of the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is not precluded from also pursuing an appeal under the grievance procedure of this Agreement. If a court of competent jurisdiction rules contrary to the ruling in EEOC v. Board of Governorsof State Colleges and Universities, 957 F.2d 424 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 506 U.S. 906, 113 S. Ct. 299 (1992), or if Board of Governors is judicially or legislatively overruled, this paragraph shall be immediately null and void and shall be deleted from this Agreement. ARTICLE VIII. SAVINGS CLAUSE 8.1 The Agreement is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Minnesota, and the EMPLOYER. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction, from whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provisions shall be voided. All other provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provisions may be renegotiated at the request of either party. ARTICLE IX. CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION 9.1 Employees shall have the rights granted to all citizens by the United States and Minnesota State Constitutions. ARTICLE X. SENIORITY 10.1 A policy of seniority based on total service within the bargaining unit shall be formulated that will give regular employees with longer period of service an opportunity for promotion and also to provide employment security, provided the employee is qualified. 10.2 There shall be a seniority list established which shall be based on total continuous service within the police officers' bargaining unit. 7 10.3 In the event of layoff, the reduction of the work force will be accomplished on the basis of seniority. Employees shall be recalled from layoff on the same basis of seniority. No new employee shall be. hired until the layofflist has been exhausted. Employees laid offwill have an opportunity to return to work within two years from their layoffdate. Employees recalled shall report to work within two weeks after notice was sent to their last known address. Failure to report as stated above, employee forfeits their recall right. 10.4 Employees hired before January 1, 2010; Vacation periods shall be selected on the basis of SENIORITY of total service within the DEPARTMENT, whether employment was full or part time, until December 15th of the previous year for the months January through June 30th . The City has until December 30th to approve or deny such requests. Vacation periods shall be selected on the basis of SENIORITY of total service within the DEPARTMENT, whether employment was full or part time, until March 15th for the months July 1st through December 31st. The City has until March 30th to approve or deny such requests. The City has ten (10) day to approve or deny all other time offrequests. Employees hired after January 1, 201O; Vacation periods shall be selected on the basis of SENIORITY within the bargaining unit until December 15th of the previous year for the months of January through June 30th . The City has until December 30th to approve or deny such requests. Vacation periods shall be selected on the basis of SENIORITY within the bargaining unit until March 15th for the months of July 1st through December 31st. The City has until March 30th to approve or deny such requests. The City has ten (10) day to approve or deny all other time offrequests. 10.5 Any employee exercising rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act will accrue seniority during the term of such leave. ARTICLE XI. DISCIPLINE 11.1 The City will discipline employees for just cause only. Discipline will be in the form of: A. Oral reprimand; B. Written reprimand; 8 C. Suspension; D. Demotion; E. Discharge. 11.2 Suspension, demotion and discharge will be in written form. 11.3 Written reprimands, notices of suspension or a demotion shall become part of the employee's personnel file and shall be read and acknowledged by the employee. An employee will receive copies of reprimands, suspensions, demotions, and discharges. 11.4 Employees may examine their own individual personnel record at reasonable times, under the direct supervision of the City. 11.5 Grievances pertaining to this Article shall be initiated by the Union in Step 2 of the grievance procedure, under Article VII. 11.6 Discharges shall be preceded by a 5-day unpaid suspension. 11. 7 Employees shall not be questioned concerning an investigation of disciplinary action unless the employee has been given an opportunity to have a UN ION representative present at such questioning. ARTICLE XII. WORK SCHEDULES 12.1 The sole authority to establish and revise work schedules is that of the EMPLOYER. The normal work week shall be an averaged forty (40) hours. The work year will be 2080 hours. At the beginning of each year, each employee's work schedule commitment will be credited for 96 hours for holidays, leaving a work schedule commitment of 1984 hours. In no case shall an employee work more than 2080 hours in any one calendar year at straight time (paid work time, compensatory time, annual leave time, ninety-six (96) hours holiday time, and training time will be credited toward 2080 hours.) 12.2 The City will give five (5) calendar days' advanced written or oral notice to the employees affected by the establishment of workdays different from the employee's regular work schedule. Written notice shall not be given on days off. 12.3 The City may change the schedule of an employee with less than five (5) calendar days' advanced notice, after exhausting all other avenues of filling that shift prior to the schedule change. In the event that work is required because of an emergency situation, such as, but not limited to, fire, flood, snow, sleet, civil unrest or breakdown of municipal equipment or facilities, no advance notice need be given. An employee working other than the normal workday shall not normally be scheduled to work more than the regular patrol shift; however, each employee has 9 an obligation to work overtime or callbacks, if requested, unless unusual circumstances prevent them from so working. 12.4 An employee who is scheduled to work during changes in daylight savings time shall account for the time change as follows: Employees working one hour longer than their normal shift shall receive one (1) hour pay at one and one-half (1 ½) time the employee's base pay rate. Employees working one hour less than their normal shift shall submit a time off request that deducts one (1) hour from their Annual Leave or comp time bank. ARTICLE XIII. OVERTIME PAY 13.1 Employees will be compensated at one and one-half (1-1 /2) times the employee's regular rate of pay for hours worked in excess of the employee's regularly scheduled shift. Changes of shifts do not qualify an employee for overtime under this Article. 13.2 Overtime will be distributed as equally as practicable. The parties recognize that special circumstances exist-that officers in different classifications or assignments may have more or less opportunity for overtime pay. 13.3 For the purpose of computing overtime compensation, overtime hours worked shall not be pyramided, compounded, or paid twice for the same hours worked. 13.4 An Employee may request that each hour of time eligible for overtime under this Article, in lieu of payment, be accumulated as compensatory time at the rate of 1 ½ hours for each eligible hour, provided that the maximum compensatory hour balance for each Employee shall at no time exceed 80 hours. All compensatory time shall be taken at the discretion of the Department Head. A supervisor may authorize the taking of up to two scheduled shifts at the discretion of the Chief or a designated supervisor. 13.5 State and federal grants stipulating that overtime will be paid in wages rather than compensatory time shall be paid in overtime and not compensatory time. ARTICLE XIV. COURT TIME 14. 1 An employee who is required to appear in court during their scheduled off duty time shall receive a minimum of three (3) hours pay at one and one-half (1 ½) times the employee's base pay rate. 14.2 An employee who is required to appear in court and the court appearance is canceled less than twenty-four (24) hours before the employee's scheduled appearance shall be entitled to overtime pay as provided in Section 14.1. 10 ARTICLE XV. CALL BACK 15.1 An employee called in for work at a time other than their normal scheduled shift will be compensated for a minimum of three (3) hours pay at one and one half (1- 1 /2) times the employee's base pay rate. ARTICLE XVI. STANDBY 16.1 Employees required by the EMPLOYER to standby shall be paid for such standby time at the rate of one hour's pay for each hour on standby. ARTICLE XVII. LEGAL DEFENSE 17.1 The EMPLOYER shall carry and pay for $500,000 of insurance covering employees for claims made against them for (1) negligent operation of a City vehicle; (2) false arrest; (3) false imprisonment or detention; and (4) malicious prosecution. No employee will be covered for personal injury arising out of the willful violation of a penal statute ordinance committed by or with the knowledge or consent of any employee. 17.2 Any employee who is charged with a trafficviolation, ordinance violation or criminal offense arising from acts performed within the scope of their employment, when such act is performed in good faith and/or under direct order of their supervisor, shall be reimbursed for reasonable attorney's fees and court costs actually incurred by such employee in defending against such charge. ARTICLE XVIII. JOB POSTING 18.1 Regular non-supervisory job vacancies shall be filled on the concept of promotion from within, provided that applicants: A. have the necessary qualifications to meet the standards of the vacant job; and B. have the ability to perform the duties and responsibilities of the vacant job. 18.2 The City has the final decision in the selection of employees to fill posted jobs, based on qualifications, abilities and experience. 18.3 Job vacancies will be posted for fourteen (14) calendar days so that interested employees can be considered for such vacancies. 18.4 Assignment to investigations will be made at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. The Director may renew or terminate this assignment based upon the job performance of the employee while assigned in this capacity. ARTICLE XIX. PROBATIONARY PERIODS 11 19.1 All newly hired or rehired employees will serve a twelve (12) month probationary period. The probationary period may be extended for an additional three (3) months upon written notice, stating the reason for the extension by the EMPLOYER to the Union, with written consent of the Union to the EMPLOYER. 19.2 All employees will serve a twelve (12) month probationary period in any job classification in which the employee has not previously served a probationary period. 19.3 At any time during the probationary period, a newly hired or rehired employee may be terminated at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. 19.4 At any time during the probationary period a promoted or reassigned employee may be demoted or reassigned to the employee's previous position at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. ART ICLE XX. UNIFORMS/P.O.S.T. LICENSE 20.1 The EMPLOYER agrees to pay $1,138 in 2027 and $1,172 in 2028 as uniform allowance, maintenance, upkeep and repair for all bargaining unit employees listed in this Agreement. Said style and color of uniforms are to be selected by the Police Chief. The EMPLOYER shall provide the required uniform allowance on a debit card. The balance on the card shall not exceed $1,950. The debit card shall be set up in such a way to allow the employees to remove funds via an ATM machine. The EMPLOYER will comply with applicable state law regarding provision of personal body armor. 20.2 Any purchases made and/or cash withdrawn from an ATM within 60 calendar days prior to an employee's voluntary resignation or retirement on the uniform debit card will require reimbursement to the City for said purchases and withdrawals. The Employer may grant a waiver of this provision for replacement or repair of material damaged in the line of duty, or at the employer's discretion. 20.3 Upon commencing employment, newly hired employees shall receive an initial issue of necessary uniform items. New employees will not receive the uniform allowance until one year following the date of hire. The uniform allowance will be prorated. The month an employee passes their probationary period will not count towards the prorated allowance. 20.4 Initial Issue Payback - a) If employee fails to complete the probationary period they must reimburse the City for initial issue costs not recoverable to the City. b) If an employee voluntarily resigns within their probationary period, they will be required to reimburse the City of Cottage Grove for the costs of the initial provision of uniforms and equipment. c) This language does not apply when resignation is due to performance issues. 12 20.5 The EMPLOYER will pay the full cost of each sworn officer's P.O.S.T. license, including initial and renewal fees. 20.6 Employees participating in SWAT will receive an additional $250.00 per year deposited on their debit card as per 20.1. Employees participating in Mobile Field Force will receive an additional $200.00 per year deposited on their debit card as per 20.1. Employees will only receive one allocation per year. The employee will not receive the $250 or $200 in the calendar year in which they are selected for SWAT or Mobile Field Force. ARTICLE XXI. HOLIDAYS 21.1 In lieu of having the holiday off with pay or receiving premium pay for a working holiday, each employee will receive 60 hours of pay at their regular rate of pay with the first check in June of each year. Each employee shall receive another 60 hours of pay at their regular rate of pay with the first paycheck in December of each year. 21.2 Employees who start or leave employment during the year shall have this holiday compensation in Article 21.1 prorated at 10 hours of regular pay per complete month of employment. 21.3 Floating Holiday - To be scheduled with the permIssIon of the employee's supervisor during the calendar year. The Floating Holiday does not carry over into the next calendar year or have cash value at separation. The Floating Holiday will cover the employee's whole, regularly scheduled shift. To receive the floating holiday, a new employee must start working before July 1st. ARTICLE XXII. ANNUAL LEAVE 22.1 Each full-time employee shall earn annual leave at a monthly rate which will total the following amount of annual leave: 0 through 4 years City employment 152 hours per year 5 through 9 years City employment 176 hours per year 10 through 14 years City employment 200 hours per year 15 through 19 years City employment 232 hours per year 20+ years City employment 248 hours per year Employees currently earning 192 hours/year of Annual Leave will stay at the accrual rate until they reach 1 O years of service. At the start of employment, employees shall be credited with at least forty (40) hours of annual leave that they can use before it is earned. Annual leave shall be accrued at the accrual rates as the employee works, and the total number of earned annual leave hours shall be provided to the employee each pay period. If an employee fails 13 to make it to one year of employment, the 40 hours of Annual Leave will not be paid out. 22.2 Except in the case of injury or illness, annual leave may only be taken upon approval of the employee's supervisor, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 22.3 Annual leave earned shall be accrued and the total number of earned annual leave hours shall be provided to the employee each pay period. Annual leave with pay may not be taken unless it has been earned. Except in the case of injury or illness, no employee shall be allowed to take more than 160 consecutive hours of annual leave at one time. 22.4 Employees who terminate employment with the City and have annual leave time remaining shall be paid for their accrued annual leave, except for probationary employees who have not achieved regular status employment. 22.5 An employee who uses annual leave for illness or injury may be required to present evidence that they are again able to perform the duties of their employment. 22.6 Annual leave must be taken in increments of no less than one-half (1/2) hour. 22.7 No employee may carry over more than 280 hours of accumulated annual leave from one year to the next. In the event that an employee has in excess of 280 accumulated hours of annual leave after completion of the last full pay period in the calendar year, the employee's accrued annual leave shall be reduced to 280 hours. 22.8 Once per year, on either the first pay period after April 1 or the first pay period after October 1, any employee who has completed at least seven (7) years of service with the City may exchange up to twenty-four (24) hours of accumulated annual leave for payment equal to twenty-four (24) hours of pay at their current rate. Any employee who has completed at least fifteen (15) years of service with the City may exchange up to forty (40) hours accumulated annual leave for payment equal to forty (40) hours of pay at their existing rate. 22.9 MN Paid Leave. Effective January 1, 2026, the Employer and employee will split the premiums for the Minnesota Paid Family and Medical Leave, or an alternative private plan, on a 50/50 basis with the employee share payable through payroll deductions pursuant to Minnesota Statute §2688.14. 22.1 O Employees will receive the same benefits as the non-represented employee group regarding the Earned Safe and Sick Time (ESST) Policy in the Personnel Policy, as approved by the City Council. The documentation provisions referenced in the Earned Sick and Safe Time Act, Minn. Stat. 181.9447, subd. 3, shall not apply to 14 paid leave available to an employee for absences from work in excess of the minimum amount required by ESST. Employees are not eligible to utilize leave for the purposes listed under the Earned Sick and Safe Time Act, Minn. Stat. 181.9447, subd. 1, clause (4), if the employee's preassigned or foreseeable work duties during a public emergency or weather event would require the employee to respond to such an emergency or event unless authorized by the Department Head or designee. ARTICLE XXIII. BEREAVEMENT LEAVE 23.1 Each full-time employee may request up to three (3) shifts of bereavement leave in the event of a death in the immediate family. Immediate family is defined as: spouse, parent (including stepparent or legal guardian), child (including stepchild/foster child), sibling (including stepsibling), grandparent, grandchild, parent-in-law, brother/sister-in-law, and son/daughter-in-law. The City Administrator or designee will be responsible for approving or denying requests for bereavement leave. Bereavement leave shall not be charged against an Employee's leave balance. ARTICLE XXIV. SHORT-TERM DISABILITY BENEFITS 24.1 Short-term disability benefits shall be paid to such an employee who shall have missed one-hundred sixty (160) consecutive working hours of employment due to illness or injury. 24.2 The amount of the short-term disability benefit payable shall be the difference between the employee's regular rate of pay, in effect at the time of the injury or illness, unless otherwise approved by the City Administrator or their designee and any payment(s) the employee receives or anticipates receiving in the nature of wage loss replacement whether it be from MN Paid Leave, Long-term Disability, Personal Short-term Disability, workers compensation, PERA disability, OASDI, personal injury protection, or any other source, payable from the 161 st working hour following the employee's initial absence from work due to injury or illness and continuing for a maximum of 720 working hours. The intent of this benefit is to make employees whole for qualifying illnesses and/or injuries. Any other payments made to the employee because of the injury and/or illness must be disclosed to the City in order to coordinate the benefit. 24.3 Any employee receiving payments under the short-term disability benefit plan shall not accrue annual leave during the period of time of disability. In order to qualify for short-term disability benefit, the employee shall submit medical documentation from a physician certifying that the first 160 consecutive working hours of the employee's absence was due to injury or illness. 15 24.4 In order to continue receiving short-term disability benefits, an employee must submit medical documentation substantiating the disability for the duration of the disability at the City's request from a physician certifying that the absence from work is due to injury or illness. 24.5 The employee shall further provide the City a release of medical information authorizing the City or its agents access to the employee's medical records relevant to the specific injury or illness in question for the purpose of sustaining disability. 24.6 The employee shall, if required or requested, submit to an examination at the City's expense by a physician designated by the City in order to verify the injury or illness claimed by the employee. 24. 7 Before qualifying for short-term disability benefits, an employee must complete all required City forms. In order to continue to receive short-term disability benefits, all required City forms must remain in effect for the duration of the disability. 24.8 Each new event which results in short-term disability benefits shall be preceded by a new waiting period of 160 consecutive working hours. Each new event shall be subject to the provisions of the Article. 24.9 If an employee returns to work on a part time basis during the 720 working hour benefit period, each hour in which the employee works will not count toward the 720 working hour benefit period. 24.10 Effective May 21, 2012, a short-term disability bank (Bank) will be established. This Bank will assist an employee get through the 160-hour waiting period before short­ term disability benefits start. The hour requirement will be offset by any payments made under the MN Paid Leave program. The maximum number of hours in each employee's Bank will be 80 hours. Each new and current employee will start with 25 hours in their Bank. Each employee will accrue 1 hour into their Bank per pay period, up to the 80-hour maximum. Employees must reach the 160-hour waiting period to receive this benefit, no exceptions. This benefit will be paid retrospectively. Once the employee qualifies for short-term disability benefits, all accrued Bank hours will be used to replace unpaid (if any), Annual Leave and Compensatory time hours an employee used to get through the 160-hour waiting period. Bank hours will always replace any unpaid hours first. Bank hours are not transferable to another employee. Bank hours will not be paid out when an employee leaves City employment. In order to receive this benefit, the employee must comply with the provisions of Articles 24.1 through 24.9. 16 ARTICLE XXV. JURY DUTY 25.1 An employee who serves on jury duty shall be entitled to receive their usual compensation for those hours missed from work resulting from actual jury service, subject to a deduction in the amount of compensation received for such jury duty. 25.2 Employees assigned to jury duty will be responsible for their normal scheduled shift hours of work, reduced by the amount of time served on jury duty. An employee required to report for jury duty will be assigned to the day shift. If the employee is excused from jury duty, they must return to work and complete the scheduled shift. ARTICLE XXVI. INJURY ON DUTY POLICY 26.1 Employees injured while on duty and approved for Workers' Compensation benefits shall be paid their regular rate of pay for a period not to exceed sixty (60) working days, beginning with the first (1st) working day after such injury. All Workers' Compensation benefits paid during this period will be either assigned to the City or be deducted from the employee's regular rate of pay. Also, during this period, no time shall be charged against the employee's annual leave or other accumulated benefits. On duty shall mean all work assigned by and paid for by the City. 26.2 The City agrees to pay a reasonable replacement cost for an employee's glasses, hearing aid, or any other type of prosthetic device broken while in the performance of duties. ARTICLE XXVII. ADVANCED RESIGNATION POLICY 27 .1 Employees will receive the same benefits as the non-represented employee group regarding the Advanced Resignation Policy in the Personnel Policy, as it may be amended from time to time in the City's discretion. ARTICLE XXVIII. PAID PARENTAL LEAVE POLICY 28.1 Employees will receive the same benefits as the non-represented employee group regarding the Paid Parental Leave Policy in the Personnel Policy, as it may be amended from time to time in the City's discretion. 17 APPENDIX A WAGE SCHEDULE PoliceOfficer Step start 6 months 12 months 18 months 24months 30months 36months 5 Years 7Years 9Years 73% 75% 78% 81% 83% 85% 91% 94% 97% 100% 2027- 3.5% Hourly $44.74 $45.97 $47.81 $49.65 $50.87 $52.10 $55.78 $57.62 $59.45 $61.29 COLA rate 2028- 3.5% Hourly $46.31 $47.58 $49.48 $51.38 $52.65 $53.92 $57.73 $59.63 $61.53 $63.44 COLA rate The City maintains the right to start a new employee at any step it deems appropriate. The City and Union agree to use Minneapolis/St. Paul metro area cities with populations between 25,000 and 65,000 for wage comparisons in the subsequent labor contract. The parties further agree to use Lakeville even if their population is over 65,000. The parties will use the latest Met Council population estimates available as of the first negotiating session. Cities that contract out their police services will not be included in the comparison. 1. Employee(s) expressly authorized by the EMPLOYER to perform full-time detective duties shall receive a differential of five percent (5%) above their hourly rate. 2. Employee(s) expressly authorized by the EMPLOYER to perform as a full-time K­ g officershall receive a differential of five percent (5%) above their hourly rate. 3. Employees will only be eligible for one, five percent (5%) differential. 4. Both parties acknowledge that employees who are certified paramedics are retired as primary response paramedics. If the employee wants to keep their paramedic certification, the City will continue to pay for their training and certification. 5. A promoted employee will start at the beginning salary for the position they were promoted to except if the promoted employee is earning more than the beginning salary of the position they are promoted to, they will advance to the next highest pay grade for that position and remain in that pay grade for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of promotion. 6. All Employees assigned as a Field Training Officer (FTO) will be compensated at a rate of one and one quarter (1.25) hours of overtime for each shiftworked as an FTO. The one and one quarter (1.25) hours of overtime would be in addition to hours worked during that shift. All FTO hours will be paid out and cannot be earned as compensatory time. 19 The following Senior Patrol Officer night shift differentialshall be on a pilot program basis for the 2027-2028 contract duration: A Patrol Officer who has bid the night shift with a minimum of 3 years of cumulative sworn law enforcement experience with the completion of the probation period with the Cottage Grove Police Department, who meets the eligibility requirements in Department policy, as determined by the Chief, shall be eligible for a 3.0% senior patrol officer shift differential for hours worked between 1930 and 0600 during regularly scheduled shifts to perform senior patrol officer night shift duties. In no event shall there be more than two employees per shift eligible for said differential. 20 APPENDIX B Insurance 1. The EMPLOYER shall pay a maximum contribution per month per employee. The contribution may be used toward the premium for group medical coverage. 2027-2028 Health Insurance Employer Contribution HSA Plan Single- 100% of premium Single + One- 70% of premium Single + Children- 70% of premium Family- 70% of premium HSA Elect Plan Single- 100% of premium Single + One- 70% of premium Single + Children- 70% of premium Family- 70% of premium All new employees must enroll in a minimum of single medical coverage. The City will reconvene the Insurance Committee if significant changes to the health insurance plan design are anticipated. 2. The EMPLOYER agrees to pay the premium for a Twenty Thousand Dollar ($20,000) life insurance policy on each employee. 3. The City shall contribute up to $29.00 per month per employee for a long-term disability policy. This policy will be a taxable benefit to the employee and will be reflected as such on their paycheck. 4. A reduction in the aggregate value of benefits shall be negotiated by the Union and the City. 5. Each employee shall contribute 2% of their gross salary through payroll deduction to an individual Health Care Savings Plan. 21 City Council Action Request 7.I. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title 2027-2028 Cottage Grove/LELS Sergeants Contract Staff Recommendation Approve the 2027 - 2028 labor contract with the Sergeants Union. All wage and benefits costs have been budgeted for in the 2027 budget. Budget Implication Included in the Budget Attachments 1. Memo - 20260807 Sergeants Contract 2. Contract - 2027-2028 LELS Sergeants Final 1 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Joe Fischbach, HR Manager Date: August 7, 2026 Subject: 2027 - 2028 Sergeants Labor Contract Introduction The City and the Sergeants labor union have tentatively agreed to 2027 - 2028 labor agreement, subject to City Council approval. Background Management staff and representatives of the labor union met on two occasions and were successful in reaching a two-year tentative agreement for 2027 - 2028, subject to City Council approval. Wages The contract calls for a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) of 3.5% in each of the two years. The external comparable wage data calls for a 1.5% market adjustment and is implemented into the wage scale for 2027. A 1% 7-year wage step is added to the wage scale starting July 1, 2028. Short-term Disability Language was updated to reflect that the Sergeants will receive the same benefits as non- represented employees as detailed in the Personnel Policy. Uniform Allowance The annual uniform allowance will increase 3.0% per year for each employee. Language is also added to give Sergeants assigned to SWAT an extra $250 per year and Sergeants assigned to Mobile Field Force an extra $200 per year. This reflects the same amounts the Police Officers received in their 2025-2026 contract. Other Provisions Attorney Susan Hansen is assisting the City with negotiations this year. This is her first year working with the City. As such, she recommended several updates to provisions in the labor contract that both sides agreed to. They include Employer Authority, Employee Rights – Grievance Procedure, Discipline, MN Paid Leave, ESST, Benefits, adding a complete agreement clause and removing the tuition reimbursement appendix. Recommendation Staff is recommending Council approve the 2027 - 2028 labor contract with the Sergeants union. All wage and benefits costs have been budgeted for in the 2027 budget. LABOR AGREEMENT CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. EMPLOYEE'S UNION, LOCAL NO. 138 FOR POLICE SERGEANTS JANUARY 1, 2027 - DECEMBER 31, 2028 TABLE OF CONTENTS Article Page I. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT 3 II RECOGNITION 3 III. DEFINITIONS 4 IV. EMPLOYER SECURITY 5 V. EMPLOYER AUTHORITY 5 VI. UNION SECURITY 5 VII. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 5 VIII. SAVINGS CLAUSE 8 IX. CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION 8 X. SENIORITY 9 XI. DISCIPLINE 9 XII. WORK SCHEDULES 10 XIII. COURT TIME 10 XIV. LEGAL DEFENSE 10 XV. JOB POSTING 11 XVI. PROBATIONARY PERIODS 11 XVII. ANNUAL LEAVE 11 XVIIB. BEREAVEMENT LEAVE 13 XVIII. UNIFORMS & P.O.S.T. License 13 XIX. HOLIDAYS 14 XX. WAGES 14 XXI. INSURANCE 16 XXII. JURY DUTY 17 XXIII. INJURY ON DUTY POLICY 17 XXIV. OVERTIME 17 XXV. ADVANCED RESIGNATION POLICY 18 XXVI. PAID PARENTAL LEAVE POLICY 18 XXVII. RECOGNITION AWARDS 18 XXVIII. VEHICLE USE POLICY 18 XXIX. COMPLETE AGREEMENT 18 XXX. DURATION 19 AP. A PROMOTED POLICE OFFICER MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT 20 AP. B INSURANCE 21 Page 2 LABOR AGREEMENT CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. EMPLOYEE'S UNION, LOCAL NO. 138 FOR POLICE SERGEANTS 2027 - 2028 ARTICLE I. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT is entered into as of January 1, 2027, between the CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA, hereinafter called the EMPLOYER, and the LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. EMPLOYEE'S UNION, LOCAL NO. 138, hereinafter called the UNION. The intent and purpose of this Agreement is to: 1.1 Establish hours, wages and other conditions of employment. 1.2 Establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning interpretation and/or application of this Agreement. 1.3 Specify the full and complete understanding of the parties. 1.4 Place in written form by Agreement, the terms and conditions of employment which will be in effect for the duration of this Agreement as specified in Article XXX. ARTICLE II. RECOGNITION 2.1 The Employer recognizes the following described permanent employees as an exclusive bargaining unit of employees under Minnesota Statutes Section 179.71, Subdivision 3, and the Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., as the exclusive representative of said unit: A. Police Sergeants 2.2 In the event the Employer and the Union are unable to agree as to the inclusion or exclusion of a new modified job position, the issue shall be submitted to the Bureau of Mediation Services for determination. Page 3 ARTICLE III. DEFINITIONS 3.1 Union: Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Employee's Union, Local No. 138 3.2 Union Member: A member of Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. Employees Union, Local No. 138 3.3 Employee: A member of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit 3.4 Department: Police Department of the City of Cottage Grove 3.5 Employer: The City of Cottage Grove 3.6 Department Head: The Public Safety Director for the employer-appointed authority 3.7 Base Pay Rate: The employee's hourly pay rate 3.8 Scheduled Shift: A consecutive work period including rest periods and lunch breaks 3.9 Shift Change: A normal change in work schedule in a twenty-four (24) hour period with eight (8) hours between shifts 3.10 Rest Break: A period during the scheduled shift during which the employee remains on continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties 3.11 Lunch Break: A period during the scheduled shift during which the employee remains on continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties 3.12 Seniority: Length of continuous service with the department as a Sergeant 3.13 Severance Pay: Payment made to employees upon termination of employment 3.14 Overtime: Work performed at the express authority of the Employer in excess of the employee’s scheduled shift. Page 4 ARTICLE IV. EMPLOYER SECURITY 4.1 The Union agrees that during the life of this Agreement, the Union and bargaining unit members will not cause, encourage, participate in or support any strike, slowdown or other interruption of or interference with the normal functions of the employer. ARTICLE V. EMPLOYER AUTHORITY 5.1 The EMPLOYER retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all manpower, facilities, and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organizational structure; to select, direct and determine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules; and to perform any inherent managerial function not specifically limited by this Agreement. Any terms and conditions of employment not specifically established or modified by this Agreement shall remain solely within the discretion of the EMPLOYER to modify, establish or eliminate. All employees covered by this Agreement shall recognize the prerogative of the City to operate and manage its affairs in all respects in accordance with existing and future laws and regulations of appropriate authorities including, but not limited to, personnel policy and work rules. Any prerogative and authority which the City has not officially abridged, delegated or modified by this Agreement is retained by the City. ARTICLE VI. UNION SECURITY 6.1 The Employer shall deduct from the wages of employees who authorize such a deduction in writing, an amount necessary to cover monthly Union dues. Such monies shall be remitted as directed by the Union. 6.2 The Union shall designate employees from the bargaining unit to act as a steward and an alternate and shall inform the Employer in writing of such choice and changes in steward and/or alternate. 6.3 The Employer shall make space available on the employee bulletin board for posting Union notice(s) and announcement(s). 6.4 The Union agrees to indemnify and hold the Employer harmless against any and all claims, suits, orders or judgments brought or issued against the City as a result of any action taken or not taken of the City under the provisions of Article VI. ARTICLE VII. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES 7.1 Definition of a Grievance: A grievance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or application of the specific terms and conditions of this Page 5 Agreement and the policies and/or the rules and regulations of the Police Department. 7.2 Union Representative: The Employer will recognize representatives designated by the Union as the grievance representatives of the bargaining unit having the duties and responsibilities established by this Article. The Union shall notify the Employer in writing of the names of such Union representatives and of their successors, when so designated. 7.3 Processing of a Grievance: The processing of grievances, as hereinafter provided, is limited by the job duties and responsibilities of the employees and shall, therefore, be accomplished during normal working hours only, when consistent with such employee duties and responsibilities. The aggrieved employee shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time without loss in pay when a grievance is investigated and presented to the City during normal working hours, provided that the employee has notified and received the approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work programs of the City. 7.4 Procedures: A grievance, as defined by Article 7.1, shall be resolved in conformance with the following procedures: Step 1. An employee claiming a violation concerning the interpretation or application of this Agreement shall within ten (10) calendar days after such alleged violation has occurred, present such grievance to the Deputy Director for the division, as designated by the City. The Deputy Director for the division will discuss and give an answer to such Step 1 grievance within ten (10) calendar days after receipt. A grievance not resolved in Step 1 and appealed to Step 2 shall be placed in writing, setting forth the nature of the grievance, the facts on which it is based, the provisions of this Agreement allegedly violated, and the remedy requested and shall be appealed to Step 2 within ten (10) calendar days after the Deputy Director’s final answer in Step 1. Any grievance not appealed in writing in Step 2 by the employee within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. This step shall be omitted if the Department Head is also the immediate supervisor. Step 2. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the employee and discussed with the Director of Public Safety. The Director of Public Safety shall give the employee the City's Step 2 answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 2 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 2 may be appealed to Step 3 within ten (10) calendar days following the Director of Public Safety’s final Step 2 answer. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Page 6 Step 3 by the employee within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 3. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the employee and discussed with the City Administrator or designee. The City Administrator or designee shall give the employee the City's answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 3 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 3 may be appealed to Step 4 within ten (10) calendar days following the City Administrator or designee’s final answer in Step 3. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the employee within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 4. A grievance unresolved in Step 3 and appealed in Step 4 shall be submitted to arbitration, subject to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971, as amended. The selection of an arbitrator shall be made in accordance with the "Rules Governing the Arbitration of Grievances", as established by the Public Employment Relations Board. For grievance matters involving written disciplinary action, discharge, or termination, the assignment of an arbitrator shall be consistent with Minnesota Statute 626.892. 7.5 Arbitrator's Authority: A. The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, modify, nullify, ignore, add to, or subtract from, the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The arbitrator shall consider and decide only the specific issue(s) submitted in writing by the City and the employee, and shall have no authority to make a decision on any other issue(s) not so submitted. B. The arbitrator shall be without power to make decisions contrary to or inconsistent with, or modifying or varying in any way, the application of laws, rules or regulations having the force and effect of law. The arbitrator's decision shall be submitted in writing within thirty (30) days following close of the hearing or the submission of briefs by the parties, whichever be later, unless the parties agree to an extension. The decision shall be binding on both the City and the employee and shall be based solely on the arbitrator's interpretation or application of the express terms of this Agreement and to the facts of the grievance presented. C. The fees and expenses for this arbitrator's services and proceedings shall be borne equally by the City and the Union, provided that each party shall be responsible for compensating its own representatives and witnesses. If either party desires a verbatim record of the proceedings, it may cause such a Page 7 record to be made, providing it pays for the record. If both parties desire a verbatim record of the proceedings, the cost shall be shared equally. 7.6 Waiver: If a grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it shall be considered waived. If a grievance is not appealed to the next step within the specified time limit or any agreed extension thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis of the City's last answer. If the City does not answer a grievance or an appeal thereof within the specified time limits, the employee may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that step and immediately appeal the grievance to the next step. The time limit in each step may be extended by mutual agreement of the City and the employee. Election of Remedies. In the event more than one procedure is available for resolution of a grievance arising under this Agreement, the aggrieved employee(s) shall be limited to one procedure through which remedy may be sought. If as a result of the written Employer response in Step 3, the grievance remains unresolved, and if the grievance involves the suspension, demotion, or discharge of an employee who has completed the required probationary period, the grievance may be appealed either to arbitration pursuant to Step 4 of this Article or a procedure including but not limited to fair employment or veterans preference. If appealed to any procedure other than arbitration pursuant to Step 4 of this Article, the grievance is not subject to the arbitration procedure as provided in this Article. An employee pursuing a remedy pursuant to a statute under the jurisdiction of the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is not precluded from also pursuing an appeal under the grievance procedure of this Agreement. If a court of competent jurisdiction rules contrary to the ruling in EEOC v. Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities, 957 F.2d 424 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 506 U.S. 906, 113 S. Ct. 299 (1992), or if Board of Governors is judicially or legislatively overruled, this paragraph shall be immediately null and void and shall be deleted from this Agreement. ARTICLE VIII. SAVINGS CLAUSE 8.1 This Agreement is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Minnesota, and the employer. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction, from whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provision shall be voided. All other provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provision may be renegotiated at the request of either party. ARTICLE IX. CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION 9.1 Employees shall have the rights granted to all citizens by the United States and Minnesota State Constitutions. Page 8 ARTICLE X. SENIORITY 10.1 A policy of seniority within the department shall be formulated that will give regular employees with a longer period of service an opportunity for promotion and also to provide employment security, provided the employee is qualified. 10.2 There shall be a seniority list established which shall include an employee's original date of hire or transfer into the department. 10.3 In the event of layoff, the reduction of the work force will be accomplished on the basis of seniority. Employees shall be recalled from layoff on the same basis of seniority. No new employee shall be hired until the layoff list has been exhausted. Employees laid off will have an opportunity to return to work within two years from their layoff date. Employees recalled shall report to work within two weeks after notice was sent to their last known address. Failure to report as stated above, employee forfeits his/her recall right. 10.4 Vacation requests for the months of January through June should be submitted by December 15th of the previous year. Vacation requests for the months of July through December should be submitted by March 15th. The Department should approve or deny vacation requests by December 25th and March 25th allowing 10 days to process requests. Vacation requests should be granted on the basis of seniority within the department as a full-time, licensed police officer. If all sergeants within the patrol or investigative units have requested vacation for the same day(s), the sergeant with the least seniority within the bargaining unit should be denied leave in order to meet the supervisory needs of the department. ARTICLE XI. DISCIPLINE 11.1 The City will discipline employees for just cause only. Discipline will be in the form of: A. Oral reprimand B. Written reprimand C. Suspension D. Demotion E. Discharge 11.2 Suspension, demotion and discharge will be in written form. 11.3 Written reprimands, notices of suspension and notices of discharge shall become part of the employee's personnel file and shall be read and acknowledged by the employee. An employee will receive copies of reprimands and/or notices. Page 9 11.4 Employees may examine their own individual personnel records at reasonable times, under the direction supervision of the office of Administration. 11.5 Discharge will be preceded by a five (5) day suspension without pay. 11.6 Grievances pertaining to this article shall be initiated by the employee in Step 1 of the grievance procedure, under Article VII. 11.7 Employees shall not be questioned concerning an investigation of disciplinary action unless the employee has been given an opportunity to have a Union representative present at such questioning. ARTICLE XII. WORK SCHEDULES 12.1 The sole authority to establish and revise work schedules is that of the EMPLOYER. The normal work week shall be an averaged forty (40) hours. The work year will be 2080 hours. At the beginning of each year, each sergeant will be credited for 96 hours for holidays, leaving a work schedule commitment of 1984 hours. If a sergeant leaves the department during the year this time will be prorated. In no case shall an employee work more than 2080 hours in any one calendar year at straight time (paid work time, compensatory time, annual leave time, ninety-six (96) hours holiday time, and training time will be credited toward 2080 hours.) 12.2 An employee who is scheduled to work during changes in daylight savings time shall account for the time as follows: Employees working one hour longer than their normal shift shall receive one (1) hour pay at one and one-half (1 ½ ) times their base pay rate. Employees working one hour less than their normal shift shall submit a time off slip that deducts one (1) hour towards their yearly 2080 balance. ARTICLE XIII. COURT TIME 13.1 An employee who is required to appear in court during his/her scheduled off duty time shall receive a minimum of three (3) hours pay at one and one-half (1½) times the employee's base pay rate. 13.2 An employee who is required to appear in court and the court appearance is canceled less than twenty-four (24) hours before the employee's scheduled appearance shall be entitled to overtime pay as provided in Section 13.1. ARTICLE XIV. LEGAL DEFENSE 14.1 The Employer shall carry and pay for $500,000 of insurance covering employees for claims made against them for (1) negligent operation of a City vehicle; (2) false arrest; (3) false imprisonment or detention; and (4) malicious prosecution. No employee will be covered for personal injury arising out of the willful violation of a Page 10 penal statute ordinance committed by or with the knowledge or consent of any employee. 14.2 Any employee who is charged with a traffic violation, ordinance violation or criminal offense arising from acts performed within the scope of his/her employment, when such act is performed in good faith and/or under direct order of his/her supervisor, shall be reimbursed for reasonable attorney's fees and court costs actually incurred by such employee in defending against such charge. ARTICLE XV. JOB POSTING 15.1 Regular job vacancies shall be filled on the concept of promotion from within, provided that applicants: A. have the necessary qualifications to meet the standards of the vacant job; and B. have the ability to perform the duties and responsibilities of the vacant job. 15.2 The City has the final decision in the selection of employees to fill posted jobs, based on qualifications, abilities and experience. 15.3 Job vacancies will be posted for fourteen (14) calendar days so that interested employees can be considered for such vacancies. ARTICLE XVI. PROBATIONARY PERIODS 16.1 All newly hired or rehired employees will serve a twelve (12) month probationary period. 16.2 All employees will serve a twelve (12) month probationary period in any job classification, in which the employee has not previously served a probationary period. 16.3 At any time during the probationary period, a newly hired or rehired employee may be terminated at the sole discretion of the City. This section applies only to newly hired or rehired employees, and not to any employee who had previously been employed by the City in a different classification. 16.4 At any time during the probationary period, a promoted or reassigned employee may be demoted or reassigned to the employee's previous position at the sole discretion of the City. ARTICLE XVII. ANNUAL LEAVE Page 11 17.1 Each regular, full-time City employee shall earn annual leave at a bi-weekly rate which will total the following amount of annual leave: 0 through 4 years City (or equivalent) employment 160 hours per year 5 through 9 years City (or equivalent) employment 184 hours per year 10 through 14 years City (or equivalent) employment 208 hours per year 15 through 19 years City (or equivalent) employment 240 hours per year 20+ years City (or equivalent) employment 256 hours per year At the start of employment, employees shall be credited with at least forty (40) hours of annual leave that they can use before it is earned. Annual leave shall be accrued at the accrual rates as the employee works, and the total number of earned annual leave hours shall be provided to the employee each pay period. If an employee fails to make it to one year of employment, the 40 hours of Annual Leave will not be paid out. Employees currently earning 192 hours/year of Annual Leave will stay at the accrual rate until they reach 10 years of service. Each regular, part-time employee shall receive annual leave in proportion to the number of hours he/she works per pay period, in accordance with the above schedule. 17.2 Except in the case of injury or illness, annual leave may only be taken upon approval of the employee's supervisor, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Such approval shall consider City service needs. 17.3 Annual leave earned shall be accrued and the total number of earned annual leave hours shall be provided to the employee each pay period. Annual leave with pay may not be taken unless it has been earned. Except in the case of injury or illness, no employee shall be allowed to take more than 160 consecutive hours of annual leave at one time. 17.4 Employees who terminate employment with the City and have annual leave time remaining shall be paid for their accrued annual leave, provided they have completed at least one thousand forty (1,040) hours of employment. 17.5 An employee who uses annual leave for illness or injury may be required to present evidence that he/she is again able to perform all the duties of his/her job description. 17.6 Annual leave must be taken in increments of no less than one-half (1/2) hour. Except as provided for employees converting to annual leave, no employee may carry over more than two hundred eighty (280) hours of accumulated annual leave from one year to the next. In the event that an employee has in excess of two hundred eighty (280) accumulated hours of annual leave after December 31 of any year, the employee's accrued annual leave shall be reduced to two hundred eighty (280) hours. Page 12 17.7 Once per year, on either the first pay period after April 1 or the first pay period after October 1, any employee who has completed at least seven (7) years of service with the City may exchange up to twenty-four (24) hours of accumulated annual leave for payment equal to twenty-four (24) hours of pay at his/her current rate. Any employee who has completed at least fifteen (15) years of service with the City may exchange up to forty (40) hours accumulated annual leave for payment equal to forty (40) hours of pay at his/her existing rate. 17.8 MN Paid Leave. Effective January 1, 2026, the Employer and employee will split the premiums for the Minnesota Paid Family and Medical Leave, or an alternative private plan, on a 50/50 basis with the employee share payable through payroll deductions pursuant to Minnesota Statute §268B.14. 17.9 Employees will receive the same benefits as the non-represented employee group regarding the Earned Safe and Sick Time (ESST) Policy in the Personnel Policy, as approved by the City Council. Employees are not eligible to utilize leave for the purposes listed under the Earned Sick and Safe Time Act, Minn. Stat. 181.9447, subd. 1, clause (4), if the employee’s preassigned or foreseeable work duties during a public emergency or weather event would require the employee to respond to such an emergency or event unless authorized by the Chief or designee. 17.10 The documentation provisions referenced in the Earned Sick and Safe Time Act, Minn. Stat. 181.9447, subd. 3, shall not apply to paid leave available to an employee for absences from work in excess of the minimum amount required by ESST. ARTICLE XVIIB. BEREAVEMENT LEAVE 17B.1 Each full-time employee may request up to three (3) shifts of bereavement leave in the event of a death in the immediate family. Immediate family is defined as: spouse, parent (including stepparent or legal guardian), child (including stepchild/foster child), sibling (including stepsibling), grandparent, grandchild, parent-in-law, brother/sister-in-law, and son/daughter-in-law. The City Administrator or designee will be responsible for approving or denying requests for bereavement leave. Bereavement leave shall not be charged against an Employee’s leave balance. ARTICLE XVIII. UNIFORMS & P.O.S.T. LICENSE 18.1 Effective January 1, 2027, The Employer agrees to pay $1,138.00 in 2027 and $1,172 in 2028 as uniform allowance and uniform repair for all employees listed in the Agreement. The allowance shall be on a debit card on January 1. The debit card shall be set up in such a way to allow the EMPLOYEE to remove funds via an ATM machine. Said style and color of uniforms are to be selected by the Director of Public Safety of the City of Cottage Grove. Page 13 18.2 Any purchases made and/or cash withdrawn from the debit card within sixty (60) calendar days prior to an employee's separation from employment will require reimbursement to the Employer for said purchases and withdrawals. The Employer may grant a waiver of this provision if the funds were used for the replacement or repair of material damaged in the line of duty, or for other reasons at the Employer's discretion. 18.3 The EMPLOYER will pay the full costs of each sworn officer's P.O.S.T. license, including initial and renewal fees. 18.4 Damaged Uniform Replacement: Any uniform item that a Sergeant is responsible for purchasing with the Sergeant's uniform allowance that is substantially damaged or destroyed in the line-of-duty as the result of a lawful and procedurally correct action taken by the Sergeant will be replaced at the department's expense. This provision is not intended to include those items damaged or destroyed as a result of the Sergeant's inattentiveness or negligence, or those items no longer useful as a result of normal wear and tear. 18.5 Employees participating in SWAT will receive an additional $250.00 per year deposited on their debit card as per 18.1. Employees participating in Mobile Field Force will receive an additional $200 per year deposited on their debit card as per 18.1. Employees will only receive one allocation per year. The employee will not receive the $250 or $200 in the calendar year in which they are selected for SWAT or Mobile Field Force. ARTICLE XIX. HOLIDAYS 19.1 In lieu of holidays off, each employee will receive 60 hours of pay at his or her regular rate of pay with the first paycheck in June of each year. Each employee shall receive another 60 hours of pay at his or her regular rate of pay with the first paycheck in December of each year. 19.2 Employees who start or leave employment during the year shall have this holiday compensation prorated at 10 hours of regular pay per complete month of employment. 19.3 Floating Holiday – To be scheduled with the permission of the employee’s supervisor during the calendar year. The Floating Holiday does not carry over into the next calendar year or have cash value at separation. The Floating Holiday will cover the Sergeant’s whole, regularly scheduled shift. Provided on a pro rata basis based on actual completed months worked. ARTICLE XX. WAGES 20.1 Wage Schedule Page 14 The 2027 wages include a 1.5% market adjustment and a 3.5% cost-of-living-adjustment. The 2028 wages include a 3.5% cost-of-living-adjustment. start 6 months 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 7 years Sergeants Step ABCDEFGH 1/1/2027- 3.5% COLA $ 58.26 $ 61.03 $ 63.14 $ 65.25 $ 67.29 $ 70.06 $ 72.83 & 1.5% Market Adjustment 1/1/2028- 3.5% COLA $ 60.30 $ 63.16 $ 65.35 $ 67.54 $ 69.65 $ 72.51 $ 75.38 7/1/2028 $ 60.30 $ 63.16 $ 65.35 $ 67.54 $ 69.65 $ 72.51 $ 75.38 $ 76.13 Both parties acknowledge that Sergeants who are certified paramedics are retired as primary response paramedics. If the employee wants to keep his/her paramedic certification, the City will continue to pay for their training and certification. Intentionally left blank Page 15 ARTICLE XXI. INSURANCE 21.1 The EMPLOYER shall pay a maximum contribution per month per employee. The contribution may be used toward the premium for group medical coverage. 2027 - 2028 Employer Contribution HSA Plan Single- 100% of premium Single + One- 70% of premium Single + Children- 70% of premium Family- 70% of premium HSA Elect Plan Single- 100% of premium Single + One- 70% of premium Single + Children- 70% of premium Family- 70% of premium All new employees must enroll in a minimum of single medical coverage. The City will reconvene the Insurance Committee if significant changes to the health insurance plan design are anticipated. 21.2 The City shall pay the premium for a Twenty Thousand Dollar ($20,000) life insurance policy on each employee. 21.3 The City shall contribute up to $29.00 per month per employee for a long-term disability policy. This policy will be a taxable benefit to the employee and will be reflected as such on his/her paycheck. 21.4 Employees will receive the same benefits as the non-represented employee group regarding Short Term Disability Benefits in the Personnel Policy, as approved by the City Council. 21.5 Bargaining unit employees will contribute two percent (2%) of their bi-weekly pay per pay period into the Minnesota State Retirement System (MSRS) Post-employment Health Care Savings Plan (HCSP) and will deposit 100% of any unused Annual Leave into the plan upon separation from employment. As of December 31st , if a bargaining unit employee has 280 or more hours in their Annual Leave bank, 20 hours of pay will be put in to their HCSP and deducted from their Annual Leave bank. Page 16 ARTICLE XXII. JURY DUTY 22.1 An employee who serves on jury duty shall be entitled to receive his/her usual compensation for those hours missed from work resulting from actual jury service, subject to a deduction in the amount of compensation received for such jury duty. 22.2 Employees assigned to jury duty will be responsible for their normal hours of work in their scheduled shift, reduced by the amount of time served on jury duty. An employee required to report for jury duty will be assigned to the dayshift. If the employee is excused from the jury duty, he/she must return to work and complete the scheduled shift. ARTICLE XXIII. INJURY ON DUTY POLICY 23.1 Employees injured while on duty and approved for Workers’ Compensation benefits shall be paid his/her regular base rate of pay for a period not to exceed sixty (60) working days, beginning with the first working day after such injury. All workers’ compensation benefits paid during this period will be either assigned to the City or be deducted from the employee's regular rate of pay. Also, during this period, no time shall be charged against the employee's annual leave, or other accumulated benefits. "On duty" shall mean all work assigned by and paid for by the City. 23.2 The City agrees to pay for an employee's eyeglasses, hearing aid, or any other type of prosthetic device broken while on duty. ARTICLE XXIV. OVERTIME 24.1 An employee called back to work at a time other than his/her normal scheduled work schedule, will be compensated for such hours worked a minimum of three (3) hours pay at time and one-half the employee's base rate of pay. This shall not include monthly staff meetings which will remain at two (2) hours unless the duration of the meeting exceeds two hours. 24.2 Employees will be compensated at one and one-half (1 1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate for hours worked in excess of the employee's regularly scheduled shift. Change of shift does not qualify an employee for overtime under this Article. 24.3 For the purpose of computing overtime compensation, overtime hours worked shall not be pyramided, compounded, or paid twice for the same hours worked. Page 17 24.4 The Employee has the discretion to earn compensatory time in lieu of overtime unless the hours worked are associated with a 3rd party payor or a grant, which shall be computed at time and one-half. All compensatory time shall be taken at the discretion of the Department Head. The maximum compensatory hour balance for each Employee shall at no time exceed 80 hours. 24.5 Any staff meeting scheduled by the Public Safety Director or his/her designee not cancelled with at least forty-eight (48) hours notice shall result in overtime as detailed in article 24.1. Meetings cancelled because of Acts of God or public safety emergencies will not result in overtime pay. ARTICLE XXV. ADVANCED RESIGNATION POLICY 25.1 Employees will receive the same benefits as the non-represented employee group regarding the Advanced Resignation Policy in the Personnel Policy, as it may be amended from time to time in the City’s discretion. ARTICLE XXVI. PAID PARENTAL LEAVE POLICY 26.1 Employees will receive the same benefits as the non-represented employee group regarding the Paid Parental Leave Policy in the Personnel Policy, as it may be amended from time to time in the City’s discretion. ARTICLE XXVII. RECOGNITION AWARDS 27.1 Employees will receive service recognition payments and awards as detailed in the Public Purpose Policy, as approved by the City Council. ARTICLE XXVIII. VEHICLE USE POLICY 28.1 Members of the bargaining unit will be covered by the Vehicle Use Policy in the Cottage Grove Police Department Policy Manual as it may be amended from time to time in the City’s discretion. ARTICLE XXIX. COMPLETE AGREEMENT 29.1 Any and all prior agreements, resolutions, practices, policies, rules and regulations regarding terms and conditions of employment, to the extent inconsistent with the provisions of this AGREEMENT, are hereby superseded. 29.2 The parties mutually acknowledge that during the negotiations which resulted in the AGREEMENT, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any terms or condition of employment not removed by law from bargaining. All agreements and understandings arrived at by the parties are set forth in writing in this AGREEMENT for the stipulated duration of this AGREEMENT. Page 18 APPENDIX B Page 21 City Council Action Request 7.J. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Public Works Agenda Category Action Item Title Mississippi Dunes Tree Planting Contract Staff Recommendation Adopt resolution 2026-114 awarding the Mississippi Dunes Tree Planting Contract to Wilson’s Nursery in total amount of $31,965 and authorize the service agreement between Wilson’s Nursery and the City of Cottage Grove. Budget Implication $31,965.00 from Future Projects Fund. This cost will be reimbursed through the Development Agreement for the Talcott Glen Final Plat. Attachments 1. Talcott Glen Privacy Trees Memo 2. Resolution_MississippiDunesEstates_2026 3. Agreement for Contractor Services _MississippiDunesEstates_2026 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator FROM: Max Erickson, Planner Gavin Hochstetler, Management Analyst DATE: August 10, 2026 RE: Mississippi Dunes Estates – Buffer Plantings Proposal Request for execution of a professional service agreement to install buffer trees within private property located on lots 5 through 12, Block 3 in Mississippi Dunes Estates 2nd Addition. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Mississippi Dunes 2nd Addition - Buffer Tree Plantings August 19, 2026 Page 2 of 6 Background Lennar received Preliminary Plat approval March 18, 2026, for a Plat called Talcott Glen to include 177 single family lots. The Preliminary Plat was approved for a parcel of land approximately 69.5 acres in size generally located west of 95th Street and Mississippi Dunes Boulevard. As part of development, it is necessary to extend 95th Street westward to provide primary access to the development. The 95th Street right-of-way was deeded to the city as part of the Summer’s Landing 5th Addition plat in 2021 for the purpose of the future extension of 95th Street. This extension is listed as a future road in the 2040 comprehensive plan and has been anticipated to be constructed at time of proposed development of the parcel to the west of the Summers Landing development. The current alignment of 95th Street right-of-way is based on a scoping study conducted in 2005. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the options to serve further development west of Mississippi Dunes Boulevard and potential extension to the west over the BNSF Railroad track. Three options were considered within the study as generally shown below. All options would have required either the dedication of right-of-way and/or development to trigger the construction of the 95th Street between Mississippi Dunes Boulevard and the railroad. 2005 Scoping Study Options At about the same time as the 95th Street analysis was occurring the Mississippi Dunes Estates 2nd Addition (west side of Mississippi Dunes Boulevard) was approved. The development agreement for Mississippi Dunes Estates 2nd Addition required that Lots 5 through 12, Block 3 (properties which border the future westward extension of 95th Street) were to be restricted from being built until 95th Street alignment was determined and constructed between Mississippi Dunes Boulevard and the western property boundary. This was done to give the city time to determine the final alignment and ensure that grading would not impact these lots. Following the evaluation of the 95th Street Scoping Study it was determined that future development would be needed to drive the alignment and construction of 95th Street west of Mississippi Dunes Boulevard. As Lots 5 through 12 remained undeveloped, the Developer of Mississippi Dunes Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Mississippi Dunes 2nd Addition - Buffer Tree Plantings August 19, 2026 Page 3 of 6 Estates 2nd Addition approached the city regarding the removal of the building restriction placed on these lots. In 2009, a temporary construction easement was established over those lots allowing for them to be built on while also preserving areas for grading at such time 95th Street were to be constructed to the west. Unlike Mississippi Dunes 1st addition, additional private buffering trees were not planted on the 2nd addition lots adjacent to the future 95th roadway at the time of development. It was determined that privacy trees planted within potential construction grading limits would be compromised at the time of construction of 95th Street and any buffer trees required on these lots were left unplanted. Lots 5-12 Block 3 of Mississippi Dunes Estates 2nd Addition As a courtesy for the buffer trees that were not installed at the time of the development, the city has worked with these property owners to provide buffer plantings similar to those planted within private lots in the Mississippi Dunes Development to the east south of the existing 95th Street. Considerations A drainage and utility easement exists across lots 8 through 11 which will require trees to be at least 10ft from the storm sewer pipe. This provides limits in planting in the rear yards, and an appropriate species has been proposed to compensate for tighter growing boundaries that are restricted by the storm sewer pipe and easement location. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Mississippi Dunes 2nd Addition - Buffer Tree Plantings August 19, 2026 Page 4 of 6 Drainage and Utility Easement for Storm Pipe Existing Storm Pipe The drainage and utility easement on the easterly lots and the construction easement on the westerly lots will allow for permitted access for planting. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Mississippi Dunes 2nd Addition - Buffer Tree Plantings August 19, 2026 Page 5 of 6 Temporary Construction Easement Location The city met with property owners to discuss their desired species to be planted. A landscape plan was completed and approved by the city and the property owners. Landscape Plan for Lots 5-12 The final landscape plan was provided to two contractors for quotes. Each quote pricing included purchasing and labor for installing trees with known obstacles (fencing, pools, irrigation etc.) on each property. The tree locations will be staked prior to installation and property owners are required to move irrigation as needed. Each quote utilizes the standard period of a 1-year warranty for the survivability of trees planted. The following quotations were received: Hoffman & McNamara Nursery and Landscape $54,708.00 Wilson’s Nursery $31,965.00 Budget Implications The estimated cost to install these trees is $31,965.00 which will come out of the Future Projects Fund. This cost will be reimbursed through the Development Agreement for the Talcott Glen Final Plat. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Mississippi Dunes 2nd Addition - Buffer Tree Plantings August 19, 2026 Page 6 of 6 Recommendation Adopt resolution 2026-114 awarding the Mississippi Dunes Tree Planting Contract to Wilson’s Nursery in total amount of $31,965 and authorize the service agreement between Wilson’s Nursery and the City of Cottage Grove. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-114 RESOLUTION AWARDING THE MISSISSIPPI DUNES TREE PLANTING CONTRACT TO WILSON’S NURSERY IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $31,965 WHEREAS, quotes were requested to provide the necessary work for the Mississippi Dunes Tree Planting Contract according to City standards; and WHEREAS, two firms submitted quotes; and WHEREAS, it appears that Wilson’s Nursery provided the lowest responsible quote; and WHEREAS, it is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the quote be awarded to Wilson’s Nursery. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that the Mississippi Dunes Tree Contract be awarded to Wilson’s Nursery for $31,965. Passed this 19th day of August 2026. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk City Council Action Request 7.K. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Agenda Category Action Item Title Kingston Park Site Power Update Project Final Payment Staff Recommendation Authorize resolution 2026-115 approving final payment to Killmer Electric Company, Inc. in the amount of $10,335.19 for the Kingston Park Site Power Upgrade Project. Budget Implication $10,335.19 Park Improvement Funds Attachments 1. Memo - Final Payment 2. Resolution 3. Lien Waiver 4. Warranty Bond 1 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Zac Dockter, Parks and Recreation Director Date: August 5, 2026 Subject: Kingston Park Site Power Upgrade Project Final Payment Introduction/Background Killmer Electric Company, Inc. is the contractor for the Kingston Park Site Power Upgrade Project. The original contract sum was $152,345.00. A credit of $18,791.20 is being applied to the contract to deduct expenses related to labor and material reductions. With that credit, the current contract sum is $133,553.80 with $123,218.61 having been paid to date. Killmer Electric Company, Inc.’s work has been completed satisfactorily on this project and has supplied the appropriate contract closeout documentation. Staff is recommending final payment for the amount of $10,335.19. Staff Recommendation Authorize resolution 2026-115 approving final payment to Killmer Electric Company, Inc. in the amount of $10,335.19 for the Kingston Park Site Power Upgrade Project. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-115 RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT TO KILLMER ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,335.19 FOR CONTRACTED ELECTRICAL WORK AT THE KINGSTON PARK SITE POWER UPGRADE PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Cottage Grove contracted Killmer Electric Company, Inc. for electrical work for the Kingston Park Site Power Upgrade Project in the amount of $152,345.00; and WHEREAS, a credit of $18,791.20 brings the total contract sum to $133,553.80; and WHEREAS, the City has made previous contract payments to Killmer Electric Company, Inc. in the amount of $123,218.61; and WHEREAS, Killmer Electrical Company, Inc.’s work is completed satisfactorily in accordance to the contract and has supplied the appropriate contract closeout documentation. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that the City of Cottage Grove approves final payment to Killmer Electric Company, Inc. in the amount of $10,335.19 for contracted electrical work at the Kingston Park Site Power Upgrade Project. Passed this 19th day of August 2026. __________________________ Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Tamara Anderson, City Clerk City Council Action Request 7.L. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Economic Development Agenda Category Resolution Title 2-acre property purchase - WAG Staff Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2026-118 to approve buying 2.0 acres from WAG in the amount of $78,408.00 (Parcel ID: 21.027.21.43.0005). Budget Implication Water Fund - $78,408.00 Attachments 1. WAG - CG Council 2 acre acquisition Memo_8-19-2026 2. Resolution 2026-118 3. WAG-CG Purchase Agreement - Lot 2, Bl 1 - 7-31-26_partial sign 1 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Nate Carlson, Economic Development Manager Date: August 19, 2026 Subject: Acquisition of property - WAG Background/ Discussion The Cottage Grove EDA approved a purchase agreement with Tradehome Shoes on April 14, 2026 for the purchase of approximately 13.1 acres of land at the intersection Jamaica Avenue S and 97th Street S. The vacant land is zoned I1 and project details for Tradehome Shoes are in development. Tradehome Shoes currently occupies an adjacent building at 8300 97th Street South. The map below shows the location of the property to be purchased. The land within the parcel is owned by Glendenning Farms, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership, WAG Farms, Inc., a Minnesota corporation and Joan Glendenning Kennedy Family Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership (individually and collectively “WAG”). Historically, all land in the Business Park has been sold to the EDA and then sold to end user, allowing for cost recovery to make the site pad ready. A second parcel (outlined in green and blue) is also owned by WAG. However, this site is not completely developable. This property would be better serviced for drainage needs of the City. The EDA will purchase the 13.1 acres site will be sold to Tradehome Shoes (THS Overtime, LLC), and the second 2.0 acres site will be retained by the City for drainage purposes. The agreed upon price is $0.90 per square foot with a total acquisition cost to the City of $78,408. The water fund will be the funding source for the acquisition. Closing is anticipated to occur on October 31, 2026, which is when the closing is anticipated for the Tradehome Shoes transaction. 13.1 Acres 2.0 Acres Recommendation 1. Adopt Resolution 2026-118 approving the purchase agreement and purchase of 2.0 acres from WAG with PID: 21.027.21.43.0005 at the purchase price of $78,408.00. Attachments Resolution 2026-118 Purchase Agreement CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2026-118 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY FROM GLENDENNING FARMS, L.P., WAG FARMS, INC. AND JOAN GLENDENNING KENNEDY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, the City of Cottage Grove (“City”) desires to purchase approximately 2 acres of property, legally described as: Lot 2, Block 1, Lake Flora Second Addition Abstract Property (“Property”). from Glendenning Farms, L.P., WAG Farms, Inc. and Joan Glendenning Kennedy Family Limited Partnership (“WAG”), pursuant to a Purchase Agreement by and between WAG and City (“WAG Purchase Agreement”), for public use; and WHEREAS, the WAG Purchase Agreement describes and articulates the purchase of the Property from WAG and WAG agrees to accept the terms of the sale. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove as follows: 1. The City approves the WAG Purchase Agreement, subject to minor modification as approved by the City Attorney, and the appropriate officials are authorized to take such action as to effectuate its execution and implementation. Adopted this 19 th day of August, 2026. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of August 19, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between Glendenning Farms, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership, Joan Glendenning Kennedy Family Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, and WAG Farms, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (individually and collectively “Seller”), and the City of Cottage Grove, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”). RECITALS A. Seller is the fee owner of approximately 2.0 acres of unimproved real property, located in the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota, depicted and legally described on Exhibit A (the “Property”), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. B. City desires to purchase the Property from Seller, and Seller desires to sell the same to City, all on the terms and conditions of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, Seller and City agree as follows: 1. Sale. 1.1. Sale. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Agreement, Seller shall sell to City, and City shall purchase from Seller, the Property. 1.2. Purchase Price. The purchase price to be paid by the City to WAG for the Property shall be Zero Dollars and 90/100 ($0.90) multiplied by approximately 87,120 square feet (as determined by the Survey) (the “Purchase Price”). There shall be no setoff to the Purchase Price for a loss of square footage of the Property caused by wetland dedication, easement or roadway dedication or the like which may cause a portion of the Property to become unusable for the Proposed Use as herein defined. The approximate Purchase Price of Seventy-Eight thousand Four Hundred Eight and No/100 Dollars ($78,408.00) shall be paid on the Closing Date (as defined in Section 6), subject to those adjustments, prorations and credits described in this Agreement, in certified funds or by wire transfer pursuant to instructions from WAG or Title. The Closing will occur at DCA Title, 750 Main Street, Suite 208, Mendota Heights, MN, 55118 (“Title”), unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. 2. Available Surveys, Tests, and Reports. Within five (5) days of the Effective Date, Seller shall cause to be delivered to City to the extent same are in the possession and control of Seller: (a) copies of any surveys, soil tests and environmental reports previously conducted on the Property; (b) copies of leases associated with the Property, (c) copies of existing title work for the Property (the “Due Diligence Materials”). Seller makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the Due Diligence Materials. City acknowledges that the sale of the Property is “AS-IS”, “WHERE IS,” and “WITH ALL FAULTS”, and that it is the obligation of City to conduct and complete its due diligence 1 and investigations relating to the Property. 3. City’s Investigations. For a period up to the Closing Date, Seller shall allow City and City’s agents access to the Property without charge and at all times for the purpose of City’s investigation and testing of the Property, including surveying and testing of soil and groundwater (“City’s Investigations”); provided, however, City shall not perform any invasive testing unless (a) Seller gives its prior approval of City’s consultant that will perform the testing, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, and (b) City gives Seller reasonable prior notice of such testing. City shall pay all costs and expenses of the City’s Investigations and shall indemnify and hold Seller and the Property harmless from all costs and liabilities, including but not limited to mechanics’ liens, relating to activities on the Property related to City’s Investigations, however, City shall not be responsible for liens, liability, loss, expense or costs arising out of the discovery or presence of Hazardous Substances (as such term is defined in Section 9.1.8) on the Property or otherwise arising out of Seller’s noncompliance with any Environmental Law (as such term is defined in Section 9.1.8) or other law or regulation. Seller shall have the right to accompany City during any of City’s Investigations of the Property. If requested by Seller, City shall provide to Seller copies of all third-party, non-confidential written test results and reports conducted as part of City’s Investigations. City shall pay all of the costs and expenses associated with City’s Investigations, to cause to be released any lien on the Property arising as a result of City’s Investigations and to repair and restore, at City’s expense, any damage to the Property caused by City’s Investigations. The indemnification obligations set forth herein shall survive termination or cancellation of this Agreement. 4. Insurance; Risk of Loss. Seller assumes all risk of destruction, loss, or damage to the Property prior to the Closing Date. If, prior to the Closing Date, all or any portion of the Property or access thereto is condemned, taken by eminent domain, or damaged by cause of any nature, or the Property is rendered untenantable, Seller shall immediately give City notice of such condemnation, taking, or damage. After receipt of notice of such condemnation, taking or damage (from Seller or otherwise), City shall have the option (to be exercised within thirty (30) days after Seller’s written notice) either (a) to require Seller to (i) convey the Property at Closing (as defined in Section 6) to City in its damaged condition, upon and subject to all of the other terms and conditions of this Agreement without reduction of the Purchase Price, (ii) assign to City at Closing all of Seller’s right, title and interest in and to any claims Seller may have to insurance proceeds, condemnation awards and/or any causes of action with respect to such condemnation or taking of or damage to the Property or access thereto, and (iii) pay to City at Closing by certified or official bank check all payments made prior to the Closing Date under such insurance policies or by such condemning authorities, or (b) to terminate this Agreement by giving notice of such termination to Seller, whereupon this Agreement shall be terminated, any amount previously paid by City to Seller shall be refunded to City and thereafter neither party shall have any further obligations or liabilities to the other. If the right to terminate this Agreement is not exercised within such thirty (30) day period, such right shall be deemed to have been waived. Seller shall not designate counsel, appear in, or otherwise act with respect to the condemnation proceedings without City’s prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 2 5. Contingencies. 5.1. City’s Contingencies. 5.1.1. Unless waived by City in writing, City’s obligation to proceed to Closing shall be subject to (a) performance by Seller of its obligations hereunder, (b) the continued accuracy of Seller’s representations and warranties provided in Section 9.1, and (c) City’s satisfaction, in City’s sole discretion, as to the contingencies described in this Section 5.1: 5.1.1.1. On or before the Closing Date, City shall have determined, in its sole discretion, that it is satisfied with (a) the results of and matters disclosed by City’s Investigations, physical inspection, surveys, soil tests, engineering inspections, hazardous substance and environmental reviews of the Property, and all other inspections and due diligence regarding the Property, including any association rules or regulations applicable to any of the Property or any Due Diligence Materials. If City has not terminated this Agreement on or before the Closing Date, the contingency set forth in this paragraph shall be deemed waived. 5.1.1.2. On or before the Closing Date, City shall have received from Title an irrevocable commitment to issue a title insurance policy for the Property in a form and substance satisfactory to City in City’s sole discretion, not disclosing any encumbrance not acceptable to City in City’s sole discretion. If City has not terminated this Agreement on or before the Closing Date, the contingency set forth in this paragraph shall be deemed waived. 5.1.1.3. On or before the Closing Date, City may obtain, at its own expense, a Survey for the Property certified to City and Title. 5.1.1.4. On or before the Closing Date, Seller shall have obtained releases of the Property from any and all mortgages or other monetary liens affecting any of the Property. 5.1.1.5. On or before the Closing Date, Seller shall have obtained all valid, necessary and sufficient waivers, assignments, subordinations, non-disturbance, attornments, approvals, authorizations, estoppel certificates and consents of each and every party whose waiver, subordination, non-disturbance, attornment, approval, authorization, estoppel certificate or consent shall be required to transfer the Property and consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 5.1.1.6. On or before the Closing Date, Seller shall execute an assignment 3 and assumption of surviving contracts, permits and licenses, warranties, and intangible property conveying to City with warranties the surviving contracts, permits and licenses, warranties and intangible property, free and clear of all encumbrances, together with the consent of all parties having the right to consent to such assignment, if necessary. 5.1.1.7. On or before the Closing Date, Seller shall execute a Bring-Down Certificate certifying that all of the warranties and representations made by Seller in this Agreement remain true as of the date of closing. 5.1.1.8. On or before the Closing Date, the termination or elimination of any and all option to purchase rights, Rights of First Refusal, or Rights of First Offer related to the Property to the satisfaction of the City. 5.1.1.9. On or before Closing Date, Tradehome Shoe Stores, Inc. (“Tradehome”) has closed on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Lake Flora Second Addition, contemplated in that certain Purchase Agreement dated April 14, 2026, by and between the Cottage Grove Economic Development Authority and Tradehome. The foregoing contingencies are for City’s sole and exclusive benefit and one (1) or more may be waived in writing by City in its sole discretion, or by the passage of time as set forth hereinabove. Seller shall reasonably cooperate with City’s efforts to satisfy such contingencies, at no out of pocket cost to Seller or assumption of any obligation or liability by City. City shall bear all cost and expense of satisfying City’s contingencies. If any of the foregoing contingencies have not been satisfied on or before the applicable date, then this Agreement may be terminated, at City’s option, by written notice from City to Seller. If City terminates this Agreement as a result of a failure of a City contingency prior to the applicable date, neither Seller nor the City shall be liable to the other for any further obligations under this Agreement (except for such obligations as survive termination of this Agreement). Such written notice must be given on or before the applicable date set forth herein above for such contingency, or City’s right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to such contingency shall be waived. Upon termination, neither party shall have any further rights or obligations against the other regarding this Agreement or the Property, except for such obligations that survive termination of this Agreement. 5.1.2. If City elects not to exercise any of the contingencies set out herein, such election may not be construed as limiting any representations or obligations of Seller set out in this Agreement. Further, City shall not be deemed to have waived any of the foregoing contingencies on account of its execution 4 of this Agreement. 5.2. Seller’s Contingencies. Seller’s obligation to proceed to Closing shall be subject to the satisfaction, on or prior to the Closing Date, of each of the following conditions: 5.2.1. City shall have performed and satisfied all agreements, covenants and conditions required pursuant to this Agreement to be performed and satisfied by or prior to the Closing Date. 5.2.2. All representations and warranties of City contained in this Agreement shall be accurate as of the Closing Date. 5.2.3. There shall be no uncured default by City of any of its obligations under this Agreement as of the Closing Date, not otherwise waived by Seller. If any contingency contained in this Section 5.2 has not been satisfied on or before the date described herein, and if no date is specified, then the Closing Date, then this Agreement may be terminated by written notice from Seller to City. If termination occurs all documents deposited by City shall be immediately returned to City, and all documents deposited by Seller shall be immediately returned to Seller and neither party will have any further rights or obligations with respect to this Agreement or the Property, except for such obligations that survive termination of this Agreement. All the contingencies in this Section 5.2 are specifically for the benefit of Seller, and Seller shall have the right to waive any contingency in this Section 5.2 by written notice to City. 6. Closing. The Closing of the purchase and sale contemplated by this Agreement (“Closing”) shall occur on or before October 31, 2026 (“Closing Date”). Seller agrees to deliver legal and actual possession of the Property to City on the Closing Date. 6.1. Seller’s Closing Documents and Deliveries. On the Closing Date, Seller shall execute and/or deliver, as applicable, to City the following: 6.1.1. Deed. A warranty deed, with state deed tax paid, conveying title to the Property to City, free and clear of all encumbrances, except the Permitted Encumbrances (the “Deed”). 6.1.2. Assignment and Assumption of Contracts, Permits and Licenses. Seller shall execute an assignment and assumption of surviving contracts, permits and licenses, warranties, and intangible property conveying to City with warranties the surviving contracts, permits and licenses, warranties and intangible property, free and clear of all encumbrances, together with the consent of all parties having the right to consent to such assignment, if necessary. 5 6.1.3. FIRPTA Affidavit. An affidavit of Seller certifying that Seller is not a “foreign person”, “foreign partnership”, foreign trust”, “foreign estate” or “disregarded entity” as those terms are defined in Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 6.1.4. Seller’s Affidavit. A standard owner’s affidavit (ALTA form) from Seller which may be reasonably required by Title to issue an owner’s policy of title insurance with respect to the Property with the so-called “standard exceptions” deleted. 6.1.5. Bring-Down Certificate. A certificate dated as of the Closing Date, signed by an authorized officer of Seller, certifying that the representations and warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement are true as of the Closing Date (“Bring-Down Certificate”). 6.1.6. Settlement Statement. A settlement statement with respect to this transaction. 6.1.7. General Deliveries. All other documents reasonably determined by Title to be necessary to transfer the Property to City and to evidence that Seller (a) has satisfied all indebtedness with respect thereto, (b) has obtained such termination statements or releases from such secured creditors as may be necessary to ensure that the Property is subject to no liens or encumbrances, (c) has obtained all consents from third parties necessary to effect the terms of this Agreement, including, without limitation, the consents of all parties holding an interest in the Property, (d) has provided such other documents as are reasonably determined by Title to be necessary to issue policies of title insurance to City with respect to the Property with the so-called “standard exceptions” deleted, and (e) has duly authorized the transactions contemplated hereby. 6.2. City Closing Documents and Deliveries. On the Closing Date, City shall execute and/or deliver, as applicable, to Seller the following: 6.2.1. Payment of Purchase Price. The Purchase Price, in accordance with the terms of Section 1.2. 6.2.2. FIRPTA Affidavit. An affidavit of City certifying that City is not a “foreign person,” “foreign partnership,” foreign trust,” “foreign estate,” or a “disregarded entity” as those terms are defined in Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 6.2.3. City’s Affidavit. A standard owner’s affidavit (ALTA form) from City which may be reasonably required by Title to issue an owner’s policy of title insurance with respect to the Property with the so-called “standard exceptions” deleted. 6 6.2.4. Bring-Down Certificate. A certificate dated as of the Closing Date, signed by an authorized officer of City, certifying that the representations and warranties of City contained in this Agreement are true as of the Closing Date. 6.2.5. Settlement Statement. A settlement statement with respect to this transaction. 6.2.6. General Deliveries. All other documents reasonably determined by Title to be necessary to evidence that City has duly authorized the transactions contemplated hereby and evidence the authority of City to enter into and perform this Agreement and the documents and instruments required to be executed and delivered by City pursuant to this Agreement, or may be required of City under applicable law, including any purchaser’s affidavits or revenue or tax certificates or statements. 7. Prorations. Seller and City agree to the following prorations and allocation of costs regarding this Agreement: 7.1. Title Evidence, Survey and Closing Fee. Seller will pay all costs of the Commitment with respect to the Property. City will pay all costs of the Survey, if any, and all premiums for any title insurance policy it desires with respect to the Property. City and Seller shall each pay one half (1/2) of any reasonable closing fee or charge imposed by Title. 7.2. Transfer Taxes. Seller shall pay all state deed tax and conservation fee regarding the Deed. 7.3. Recording Costs. Seller will pay the cost of recording all documents necessary to place record title to the Property in Seller including, but not limited to, costs of recording any documents necessary to cure any Objections, as hereinafter defined. Seller will pay all costs to prepare the Deed. City will pay all recording costs with respect to the recording of the Deed and Plat. 7.4. Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments. General real estate taxes applicable to any of the Property due and payable in the year of Closing shall be prorated between Seller and City on a daily basis as of 12:00 a.m. CT on the Closing Date based upon a calendar fiscal year, with Seller paying those allocable to the period prior to the Closing Date and City being responsible for those allocable to the Closing Date and subsequent thereto. Except as set forth herein with regard to special assessments associated with City’s development of the Property, Seller shall pay in full all special assessments (and charges in the nature of or in lieu of such assessments) levied, pending, postponed or deferred with respect to any of the Property as of the Closing Date. City shall be responsible for any special assessments that are levied or become pending against the Property after the 7 Closing Date. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, in the event that there are special assessments levied against the Property after the Effective Date, which special assessment relate to City’s development of the Property, such special assessments shall be assumed by City at Closing. 7.5. Attorneys’ Fees. Seller and City shall each pay its own attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with this transaction. 7.6. Survival. The obligations set forth in this Section 7 survive the Closing. 8. Title Examination. Within a reasonable time following the Effective Date, City shall obtain the following: (i) a commitment for an owner’s title insurance policy (ALTA Form 2006) issued by Title for the Property, and copies of all encumbrances described in the commitment (“Commitment”); and, if it desires, (ii) an ALTA-certified survey bearing the legal description of the Property, and showing the area, dimensions and location of the Property (“Survey”) (the Survey together with the Commitment shall be known as the “Title Evidence”). 8.1. City’s Objections. Within twenty (20) calendar days after City’s receipt of the last of the Title Evidence, City may make written objections (“Objections”) to the form or content of the Title Evidence. The Objections may include without limitation, any easements, restrictions or other matters which may interfere with City’s intended use of the Property or matters which may be revealed by the Survey. Any matters reflected on the Commitment which are not objected to by City within such time period shall be deemed to be permitted encumbrances (“Permitted Encumbrances”). City shall have the renewed right to object to the Commitment as the same may be revised or endorsed from time to time. 8.2. Seller’s Cure. Seller shall be allowed twenty (20) calendar days after the receipt of City’s Objections to cure the same but shall have no obligation to do so. If such cure is not completed within said period, or if Seller elects not to cure such Objections, City shall have the option to do any of the following: 8.2.1. Terminate this Agreement with respect to all of the Property. 8.2.2. Waive one (1) or more of its Objections and proceed to Closing. If City so terminates this Agreement, neither Seller nor City shall be liable to the other for any further obligations under this Agreement and any amount previously paid by City to Seller shall be refunded to City. 9. Warranties and Representations. 9.1. By Seller. Seller warrants and represents the following to City, and acknowledges that City has relied on such representations and warranties in agreeing to enter into this Agreement: 8 9.1.1. Glendenning Farms, L.P. is a limited partnership, Joan Glendenning Kennedy Family Limited Partnership is a limited partnership and WAG Farms, Inc. is a corporation, and all are duly organized and in good standing under the laws of the state of Minnesota and is not in violation of any provisions of its company documents or its operating agreement. 9.1.2. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of Seller enforceable in accordance with its terms. Seller has the requisite power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement and the documents and instruments required to be executed and delivered by Seller pursuant hereto. This Agreement and the documents and instruments required to be executed and delivered by Seller pursuant hereto have each been duly authorized by Seller and such execution, delivery and performance does and will not conflict with or result in a violation of any judgment or order. 9.1.3. The execution, delivery and performance by Seller of this Agreement will not (a) violate any provision of any law, statute, rule or regulation or any order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree, determination or award of any court, governmental agency or arbitrator presently in effect having applicability to Seller, or (b) result in a breach of or constitute a default under any indenture, loan or credit agreement or any other agreement, lease or instrument to which Seller is a party or by which it or any of its properties may be bound. 9.1.4. To Seller’s knowledge, except as contemplated herein, no order, consent, approval, license, authorization or validation of, or filing, recording or registration with, or exemption by, any governmental or public body or authority, or any other entity, is required on the part of Seller to authorize, or is required in connection with, the execution, delivery and performance of, or the legality, validity, binding effect or enforceability of, this Agreement. 9.1.5. To Seller’s knowledge, there are no actions, suits or proceedings pending or threatened against or affecting Seller or the Property, before any court or arbitrator, or any governmental department, board, agency or other instrumentality which in any of the foregoing (a) challenges the legality, validity or enforceability of this Agreement, or (b) if determined adversely to Seller, would have a material adverse effect on the ability of Seller to perform its obligations under this Agreement. 9.1.6. To Seller’s knowledge, there are no wells or sewage treatment systems located on any portion of the Property. To Seller’s knowledge, there has been no methamphetamine production on or about any portion of the Property. To Seller’s knowledge, the sewage generated by the Property, 9 if any, goes to a facility permitted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and there is no “individual sewage treatment system” (as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 115.55, Subd. 1(g)) located on the Property. 9.1.7. Seller is not a “foreign person,” “foreign corporation,” “foreign trust,” “foreign estate” or “disregarded entity” as those terms are defined in Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code. 9.1.8. To Seller’s knowledge, except as may be disclosed as part of the Due Diligence Materials, (i) no condition exists on the Property that may support a claim or cause of action under any Environmental Law (as defined below) and there are no Hazardous Substances (as defined below) on the Property, (ii) there has been no release, spill, leak or other contamination or otherwise onto the Property, and (iii) there are no restrictions, clean ups or remediation plans regarding the Property. To Seller’s knowledge, except as may be disclosed as part of the Due Diligence Materials, there is no buried waste or debris on any portion of the Property. “Environmental Law” shall mean (a) the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. § 9601-9657, as amended, or any similar state law or local ordinance, (b) the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 6901, et seq., (c) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., (d) the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seq., (e) the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., (f) the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300(f) et seq., (g) any law or regulation governing aboveground or underground storage tanks, (h) any other federal, state, county, municipal, local or other statute, law, ordinance or regulation, including, without limitation, the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act, Minn. Stat. § 115B.01, et seq., (i) all rules or regulations promulgated under any of the foregoing, and (j) any amendments of the foregoing. “Hazardous Substances” shall mean polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof, petroleum products, heating oil, natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas or synthetic gas usable for fuel, and shall include, without limitation, substances defined as “hazardous substances,” “toxic substances,” “hazardous waste,” “pollutants or contaminants” or similar substances under any Environmental Law. 9.1.9. There are no unrecorded contracts of any nature or type relating to, affecting or serving the Property, to which the Seller is a party. 9.1.10. There will be no indebtedness attributable to the Property which will remain unpaid after the Closing Date. The representations, warranties and other provisions of this Section 9.1 shall survive Closing for a period of one (1) year from the Closing Date; provided, 10 however that Seller shall have no liability with respect to a breach of the representations and warranties set forth in this Agreement if City has actual knowledge of Seller’s breach thereof prior to Closing and City consummates the acquisition of the Property as provided herein. City acknowledges and agrees that, except as expressly specified in this Section 9 of this Agreement, Seller has not made, and Seller hereby specifically disclaims, any representation, warranty or covenant of any kind, oral or written, expressed or implied, or rising by operation of law, with respect to the Property, including but not limited to, any warranties or representations as to the habitability, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title, zoning, tax consequences, physical or environmental condition, utilities, valuation, governmental approvals, the compliance of the Property with governmental laws, the truth, accuracy or completeness of any information provided by or on behalf of Seller to City, or any other matter or item regarding the Property. City agrees to accept the Property and acknowledges that the sale of the Property as provided for herein is made by Seller on an “AS IS,” “WHERE IS,” and “WITH ALL FAULTS” basis. The limitations set forth in this paragraph shall survive the Closing and shall not merge in the deed. 9.2. By City. City warrants and represents the following to Seller, and acknowledges that Seller has relied on such representations and warranties in agreeing to enter into this Agreement: 9.2.1. City has all requisite authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform all of its obligations under this Agreement. 9.2.2. The execution, delivery and performance by City of this Agreement will not (a) violate any provision of any law, statute, rule or regulation or any order, writ, judgment, injunction, decree, determination or award of any court, governmental agency or arbitrator presently in effect having applicability to City, (b) violate or contravene any provision of the articles of incorporation or bylaws of City, or (c) result in a breach of or constitute a default under any indenture, loan or credit agreement or any other agreement, lease or instrument to which City is a party or by which it or any of its properties may be bound. The representations, warranties and other provisions of this Section 9.2 shall survive Closing; provided, however, City shall have no liability with respect to any breach of a particular representation or warranty if Seller shall fail to notify City in writing of such breach within one (1) year after the Closing Date. 10. Additional Obligations of Seller. 10.1. Licenses and Permits. Seller shall transfer to City all transferable rights, if any, in any permits or licenses held by Seller with respect to the Property. 11 10.2. Condition of Property at Closing. On the Closing Date, Seller shall deliver to City exclusive vacant possession of the Property, as-is and where is, and shall have no obligation to remove or cause to be removed any personal Property, building material, or any other items incidentally located upon, at, or within the Property. 10.3. Further Assurances. From and after the Closing Date, Seller agrees to execute, acknowledge and deliver to City such other documents or instruments of transfer or conveyance as may be reasonably required to carry out its obligations pursuant to this Agreement. 10.4. Non-Assumption of Contracts or Other Obligations. The parties understand and agree that City is only acquiring certain of Seller’s real Property assets and that this Agreement and any related agreements shall not be construed to be in any manner whatsoever an assumption by City of any agreements, indebtedness, obligations or liabilities of Seller which are owing with respect to the operation of the Property prior to the Closing Date. 10.5. Mortgages. On or before the Closing Date, Seller shall satisfy all mortgage and/or lien indebtedness with respect to all or any portion of the Property and shall obtain recordable releases of the Property from any and all such mortgages or other liens affecting all or any portion of the Property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Seller shall not be obligated to satisfy any liens that result from the City’s Investigations. 10.6 Marketing. At all times prior to the Closing Date, Seller shall not negotiate in any manner for the sale or transfer of the Property with any third party. 11. Broker. It is acknowledged that there is not a broker for either party. 12. Notice. Any notice to be given by one party hereto shall be personally delivered (including messenger delivery) or be sent by registered or certified mail, or by a nationally recognized overnight courier which issues a receipt, in each case postage prepaid, to the other party at the addresses in this Section (or to such other address as may be designated by notice given pursuant to this Section), and shall be deemed given upon personal delivery, three (3) days after the date postmarked or one (1) business day after delivery to such overnight courier. If to City: City of Cottage Grove Attn: Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 with a copy to: Korine L. Land LeVander, Gillen & Miller, P.A. 1305 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300 Eagan, MN 55121 If to Seller: Glendenning Farms, L.P. and 12 WAG Farms, Inc. 1941 Ford Parkway #304 St. Paul, MN 55116 Attn: William G. Glendenning Joan Glendenning Kennedy Family Limited Partnership 7437 Queensland Lane North Maple Grove, MN. 55311 Attn: William S. Kennedy, Jr. 13. Default; Remedies. If either Seller or City fails to perform any of their respective obligations under this Agreement in accordance with its terms, and such failing party does not cure such failure within thirty (30) days after written notice thereof from the other party (provided that no notice or cure period shall be required for obligations to be performed at Closing), then the other party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving the failing party written notice of such election. In the case of any default by City, Seller’s sole and exclusive remedy shall be termination of this Agreement as provided above. City shall also have the right to specifically enforce this Agreement. In any action or proceeding to enforce this Agreement or any term hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees. 14. Cumulative Rights. No right or remedy conferred or reserved to Seller or City is intended to be exclusive of any other right or remedy herein or by law provided, but each shall be cumulative in and in addition to every other right or remedy existing at law, in equity or by statute, now or hereafter. 15. Entire Agreement; Modification. This written Agreement constitutes the complete agreement between the parties with respect to this transaction and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements between the parties regarding this transaction. There are no verbal agreements that change this Agreement and no waiver of any of its terms will be effective unless in a writing executed by the parties. 16. Binding Effect; Survival. This Agreement binds and benefits the parties and their respective successors and assigns. All representations and warranties, and indemnification obligations of the parties hereto shall survive the Closing. 17. City’s Assignment. Following the occurrence of the Closing Date, City may assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Seller (but with written notice to Seller). No assignment shall relieve City from its obligations under this Agreement. 18. Governing Law. The provisions of this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Any legal action related to this Agreement shall be venued in Washington County District Court. 19. Rules of Interpretation. The words “herein” and “hereof” and words of similar import, without reference to any particular section or subdivision, refer to this Agreement as a whole rather than any particular section or subdivision hereof. References herein to any 13 particular section or subdivision hereof are to the section or subdivision of this Agreement as originally executed. 20. Titles of Sections. Any titles of the sections, or any subsections, of the Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions. 21. Counterparts; Facsimiles. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, and all of the signatures to this Agreement taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement, and any of the parties hereto may execute such agreement by signing any such counterpart. Facsimile or “PDF” signatures on this Agreement shall be treated as originals. 22. Represented by Counsel. Each party confirms that it has had the opportunity to be represented and advised by counsel in this transaction. 23. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. [remainder of page intentionally left blank] 14 IN AGREEMENT, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands as of the date hereinbefore first written. CITY: CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE By: __________________________ Myron Bailey Its: Mayor By: __________________________ Tamara Anderson Its: City Clerk 15 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Real property located in Washington County, Minnesota, to be platted and legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 1, Lake Flora Second Addition PID: 21.027.21.43.0005 Abstract Property A-1 City Council Action Request 7.M. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Public Works Agenda Category Action Item Title Lehigh Culvert Replacement Project Staff Recommendation Authorize resolution 2026-116 awarding the Lehigh Culvert Replacement Project to Dynamic Earth & Civil LLC in the amount of $37,800 and authorize the service agreement between Dynamic Earth & Civil LLC and the City of Cottage Grove. Budget Implication $37,800 from Stormwater Budget. Attachments 1. Council Memo-Lehigh Culvert 2. Resolution_Lehigh Road South Culvert Replacement 3. Service Agreement_Lehigh Road South Culver Replacement 1 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Gavin Hochstetler, Management Analyst CC: Ryan Burfeind, Public Works Director Date: August 19, 2026 Subject: Lehigh Road South Culvert Replacement Project Introduction/Background The Public Works Department has identified culverts on Lehigh Road South that have deteriorated to the point where they are no longer considered usable for continued service. The existing culverts have experienced significant degradation over time, resulting in concerns regarding their structural integrity. As a result of the culvert failures, voids have developed beneath the existing roadway, creating sinkholes within the existing road surface. These sinkholes present an ongoing concern for roadway stability and public safety. Continued deterioration of the culverts and the resulting voids beneath the roadway increase the potential for additional roadway settlement and eventual failure. City staff solicited quotes from two reputable contractors with experience in culvert replacement. The following quotations were received: Dynamic Earth & Civil LLC $37,800 Valley-Rich Co., INC. $39,450 Budget Implications The estimated cost to replace the culverts on Lehigh Road South is $37,800, which will be covered by the Stormwater Budget. Staff Recommendation Authorize resolution 2026-116 awarding the Lehigh Culvert Replacement Project to Dynamic Earth & Civil LLC in the amount of $37,800 and authorize the service agreement between Dynamic Earth & Civil LLC and the City of Cottage Grove. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-116 RESOLUTION AWARDING THE LEHIGH ROAD SOUTH CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT TO DYNAMIC EARTH & CIVIL LLC IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $37,800 WHEREAS, quotes were requested to provide the necessary work for the Lehigh Road South Culvert Replacement Project according to City standards; and WHEREAS, two firms submitted quotes; and WHEREAS, it appears that Dynamic Earth & Civil LLC provided the lowest responsible quote; and WHEREAS, it is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the quote be awarded to Dynamic Earth & Civil LLC . NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that Lehigh Road South Culvert Replacement Project be awarded to Dynamic Earth & Civil LLC for $37,800. Passed this 19th day of August 2026. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk EXHIBIT A City Council Action Request 7.N. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Engineering Agenda Category Action Item Title Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) - State Grant Agreement Staff Recommendation Approve the State of Minnesota Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance and IIJA Discretionary Match Grant Agreement related to the Safe Streets and Roads for All project. Budget Implication 20% match fully covered through the State of Minnesota's Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Attachments 1. State Grant Agreement MEMO SS4A 2026 2. State Grant Agreement RESOLUTION SS4A 2026 3. 180-589-001IIJAMatchAgreeCOMPLETE 1 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Genevieve Tester, EIT, Graduate Engineer Date: August 10, 2026 Re: Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) – State Grant Agreement Background & Discussion On May 6, 2026, the City Council executed the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) federal grant agreement. Cottage Grove was awarded $352,000 in federal funding. The required 20% local match of $88,000 has been fully covered through the State of Minnesota’s Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) Matching Grant. This results in a total project budget of $440,000, which will be used by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. to complete the work in accordance with SS4A program guidelines. The City Council executed the agreement with Stantec at its July 15, 2026 meeting. Recommendation Execute the State of Minnesota Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance and IIJA Discretionary Match Grant Agreement related to the Safe Streets and Roads for All project. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-121 RESOLUTION APPROVING STATE FUNDED PROGRAM FOR IIJA DISCRETIONARY GRANT ASSISTANCE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SP NO. 180-589-001 WHEREAS, the City of Cottage Grove (“City”) has applied to the Commissioner of Transportation for a grant from the State Program for IIJA Assistance; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation has given notice that funding for this project is available; and WHEREAS, the amount of the grant has been determined to be $88,000.00 by reason of the lowest responsible bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that: 1. The City Council agrees to the terms and conditions of the grant consistent with Minnesota Laws 2023, Chapter 68, Article 1, Section 2, Subdivision 5(a), and will pay any additional amount by which the cost exceeds the estimate and will return any amount appropriated for the project but not required; and 2. The proper City officers are authorized to execute a grant agreement and any amendments thereto with the Commissioner of Transportation concerning the above-referenced grant. Passed this 19th day of August, 2026. __________________________ Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Tamara Anderson, City Clerk MnDOT Agreement No. 1058258 SP No. 180-589-001 STATE OF MINNESOTA FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION GRANTS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND IIJA DISCRETIONARY MATCH GRANT AGREEMENT This Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”) is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Transportation ("State"), and ("Grantee"): Public Entity (Grantee) name, address and contact person: City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Contact: Paul Sponholz RECITALS 1. General Funds were appropriated to provide grants for technical assistance to a requesting local unit of government that seeks to submit an application for a federal discretionary grant for a transportation-related purpose in Minnesota Laws 2023, Chapter 68, Article 1, Section 2, Subdivision 5(a). 2. General Funds were appropriated to make state funded grants to a federal grant recipient in Minnesota Laws 2023, Chapter 68, Article 1, Section 2, Subdivision 5(a). 3. Grantee has been awarded Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match funds in session law as noted above. 4. Grantee represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this Agreement to the satisfaction of State. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, Subd. 1, Grantee agrees that administrative costs must be necessary and reasonable as a condition of this Agreement. AGREEMENT TERMS 1 Term of Agreement, Survival of Terms, and Incorporation of Exhibits Effective Date. This agreement will be effective on the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minn. Stat.§16B.98, Subd. 5. As required by Minn.Stat.§16B.98 Subd. 7, no payments will be made to Grantee until this agreement is fully executed. Grantee must not begin work under this agreement until this agreement is fully executed and Grantee has been notified by the State’s Authorized Representative to begin the work. Expiration Date. This agreement will expire on December 31, 2029, or when all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. Survival of Terms. All clauses which impose obligations continuing in their nature and which must survive in order to give effect to their meaning will survive the expiration or termination of this agreement, including, without limitation, the following clauses: 8. Liability; 9. State Audits; 10. Government Data Practices; 11. Workers Compensation; 12. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and 14. Data Disclosure. Exhibits. Exhibit A: Sources and Uses of Funds Schedule; Exhibit B: Grant Application; and Exhibit C: Grantee Resolution Approving Grant Agreement are attached and incorporated into this agreement. 2 Grantee’s Duties Grantee will conduct activities in accordance with its grant application, or in the case of legislatively selected projects, in accordance with the enabling session law. Collectively, activities set forth in the grant project application and/or the enabling session law will be referred to as the “Project”. See Exhibit B. Grantee will comply with all required grants management policies and procedures set forth through Minn.Stat.§16B.97, Subd. 4 (a) (1). Asset Monitoring. If Grantee uses funds obtained by this agreement to acquire a capital asset, the Grantee is required to use that asset for a public purpose for the normal useful life of the asset. Grantee may not sell or change the purpose of use for the capital asset(s) obtained with grant funds under this agreement without the prior written consent of the State and an agreement executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this agreement, or their successors in office. 1 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) MnDOT Agreement No. 1058258 SP No. 180-589-001 3 Time Grantee must comply with all the time requirements described in this Agreement. In the performance of this grant Agreement, time is of the essence. 4 Consideration and Payment Consideration. State will pay for all services performed by Grantee under this Agreement as follows: 4.1.1 Compensation. Grantee will be reimbursed for actual, incurred costs that are eligible under Minn. Stat. § 174.38. Grantee shall use this grant solely to reimburse itself for expenditures it has already made to pay for the costs of one or more of the activities listed under section 2.1. 4.1.2 Sources and Uses of Funds. Grantee represents to State that the Sources and Uses of Funds Schedule attached as Exhibit A accurately shows the total cost of the Project and all of the funds that are available for the completion of the Project. Grantee agrees that it will pay for any costs that are ineligible for reimbursement and for any amount by which the costs exceed State’s total obligation in section 4.1.3. Grantee will return to State any amount appropriated but not required. 4.1.3 Total Obligation. The total obligation of State for all compensation and reimbursements to Grantee under this Agreement will not exceed $88,000.00. Payment 4.2.1 Invoices. Grantee will submit state aid pay requests for reimbursements requested under this Agreement. State will promptly pay Grantee after Grantee presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. 4.2.2 All Invoices Subject to Audit. All invoices are subject to audit, at State’s discretion. 4.2.3 State’s Payment Requirements. State will promptly pay all valid obligations under this Agreement as required by Minn. Stat. § 16A.124. State will make undisputed payments no later than thirty (30) days after receiving Grantee’s invoices and progress reports for services performed. If an invoice is incorrect, defective or otherwise improper, State will notify Grantee within ten (10) days of discovering the error. After State receives the corrected invoice, State will pay Grantee within thirty (30) days of receipt of such invoice. 4.2.4 Grant Monitoring Visit and Financial Reconciliation. During the period of performance, State will make at least annual monitoring visits and conduct annual financial reconciliations of Grantee’s expenditures. 4.2.4.1 State’s Authorized Representative will notify Grantee’s Authorized Representative where and when any monitoring visit and financial reconciliation will take place, which State employees and/or contractors will participate, and which Grantee staff members should be present. Grantee will be provided with at least seven (7) calendar days of notice prior to any monitoring visit or financial reconciliation. 4.2.4.2 Following a monitoring visit or financial reconciliation, Grantee will take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies identified by State. 4.2.4.3 At least one monitoring visit and one financial reconciliation must be completed prior to final payment being made to Grantee. 4.2.5 Unexpended Funds. Grantee must promptly return to State at grant closeout any unexpended funds that have not been accounted for in a financial report submitted to State. 4.2.6 Closeout. State will determine, at its sole discretion, whether a closeout audit is required prior to final payment approval. If a closeout audit is required, final payment will be held until the audit has been completed. Monitoring of any capital assets acquired with grant funds will continue following grant closeout. Contracting and Bidding Requirements. If Grantee is a municipality as defined by Minn. Stat. § 471.345, Subd. 1, then Grantee shall comply with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 471.345 for all procurement under this Agreement. 5 Conditions of Payment All services provided by Grantee under this Agreement must be performed to State’s satisfaction, as determined at the sole discretion of State’s Authorized Representative and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. Grantee will not receive payment for work found by State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal, state, or local law. 6 Authorized Representatives 2 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) MnDOT Agreement No. 1058258 SP No. 180-589-001 State's Authorized Representative is: Marc Briese, Programs Manager, MnDOT State Aid Office 395 John Ireland Boulevard, MS 500 St. Paul, MN 55155 Office: 651-366-3802 marc.briese@state.mn.us or his/her successor. State’s Authorized Representative has the responsibility to monitor Grantee’s performance and the authority to accept the services provided under this agreement. If the services are satisfactory, State's Authorized Representative will certify acceptance on each invoice submitted for payment. Grantee’s Authorized Representative is: Paul Sponholz, City Engineer, 12800 Ravine Parkway Cottage Grove, MN 55016 651-458-2848 psponholz@cottagegrovemn.gov If Grantee’s Authorized Representative changes at any time during this Agreement, Grantee will immediately notify State. 7 Assignment Amendments, Waiver, and Grant Agreement Complete Assignment. Grantee may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of State and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this Agreement, or their successors in office. Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original agreement, or their successors in office. Waiver. If State fails to enforce any provision of this Agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or State’s right to subsequently enforce it. Grant Agreement Complete. This Agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between State and Grantee. No other understanding regarding this Agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. 7.5 Electronic Records and Signatures. The parties agree to contract by electronic means. This includes using electronic signatures and converting original documents to electronic records. 7.6 Certification. By signing this Agreement, Grantee certifies that it is not suspended or debarred from receiving federal or state awards. 8 Liability Grantee and State agree that each will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law, and neither shall be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. The liability of State is governed by the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 3.736. If Grantee is a “municipality” as that term is used in Minn. Stat. Chapter 466, then the liability of Grantee is governed by the provisions of Chapter 466. Grantee’s liability hereunder shall not be limited to the extent of insurance carried by or provided by Grantee, or subject to any exclusion from coverage in any insurance policy. 9 State Audits Under Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, Subd.8, the Grantee’s books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of Grantee, or other party relevant to this Agreement or transaction, are subject to examination by State and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, the Attorney General, as appropriate, for a minimum of six (6) years from the end of 3 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) MnDOT Agreement No. 1058258 SP No. 180-589-001 this Agreement, receipt and approval of all final reports, or the required period of time to satisfy all state and program retention requirements, whichever is later. Grantee will take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies identified by an audit. 10 Government Date Practices Grantee and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by State under this Agreement, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Grantee under this agreement. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either Grantee or State. 11 Workers’ Compensation Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. § 176.181, Subd. 2, pertaining to workers’ compensation insurance coverage. Grantee’s employees and agents will not be considered State employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees are in no way State’s obligation or responsibility. 12 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue Minnesota law, without regard to its choice-of-law provisions, governs this Agreement. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this Agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 13 Termination; Suspension Termination by the State. State may terminate this Agreement with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Grantee. Upon termination, Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. If funding is canceled, withdrawn, or terminated, State may suspend its performance until funding is restored. Suspension of performance does not release State from its obligations under the agreement. Termination for Cause. State may immediately terminate this grant Agreement if State finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement, that reasonable progress has not been made, that fraudulent or wasteful activity has occurred, that Grantee has been convicted of a criminal offense relating to a state grant agreement, or that the purposes for which the funds were granted have not been or will not be fulfilled. State may take action to protect the interests of the State of Minnesota, including the refusal to disburse additional funds and requiring the return of all or part of the funds already disbursed. Termination for Insufficient Funding. State may immediately terminate this Agreement if: 13.3.1 It does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature; or 13.3.2 If funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination must be by written or fax notice to Grantee. State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However, Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. State will not be assessed any penalty if the Agreement is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. State will provide the Grantee notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of State’s receiving that notice. Suspension. State may immediately suspend this Agreement in the event of a total or partial government shutdown due to the failure to have an approved budget by the legal deadline. Work performed by Grantee during a period of suspension will be deemed unauthorized and undertaken at risk of non-payment. 14 Data Disclosure Under Minn. Stat. § 270C.65, Subd. 3, and other applicable law, Grantee consents to disclosure of its social security number, federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring Grantee to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any. 15 Fund Use Prohibited. Grantee will not utilize any funds received pursuant to this Agreement to compensate, either 4 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) MnDOT Agreement No. 1058258 SP No. 180-589-001 directly or indirectly, any contractor, corporation, partnership, or business, however organized, which is disqualified or debarred from entering into or receiving a State contract. This restriction applies regardless of whether the disqualified or debarred party acts in the capacity of a general contractor, a subcontractor, or as an equipment or material supplier. This restriction does not prevent Grantee from utilizing these funds to pay any party who might be disqualified or debarred after Grantee’s contract award on this Project. 16 Discrimination Prohibited by Minnesota Statutes § 181.59. Grantee will comply with the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 181.59 which requires that every contract for or on behalf of the State of Minnesota, or any county, city, town, township, school, school district or any other district in the state, for materials, supplies or construction will contain provisions by which Contractor agrees: 1) That, in the hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work under any contract, or any subcontract, no Contractor, material supplier or vendor, will, by reason of race, creed or color, discriminate against the person or persons who are citizens of the United States or resident aliens who are qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates; 2) That no Contractor, material supplier, or vendor, will, in any manner, discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employment of any person or persons identified in clause 1 of this section, or on being hired, prevent or conspire to prevent, the person or persons from the performance of work under any contract on account of race, creed or color; 3) That a violation of this section is a misdemeanor; and 4) That this contract may be canceled or terminated by the state of Minnesota, or any county, city, town, township, school, school district or any other person authorized to grant contracts for employment, and all money due, or to become due under the contract, may be forfeited for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms or conditions of this Agreement. 17 Limitation. Under this Agreement, State is only responsible for receiving and disbursing funds. Nothing in this Agreement will be construed to make State a principal, co-principal, partner, or joint venturer with respect to the Project(s) covered herein. State may provide technical advice and assistance as requested by Grantee, however, Grantee will remain responsible for providing direction to its contractors and consultants and for administering its contracts with such entities. Grantee’s consultants and contractors are not intended to be third party beneficiaries of this Agreement. 18 Additional Provisions Prevailing Wages. Grantee agrees to comply with all of the applicable provisions contained in Minn. Stat. Chapter 177, and specifically those provisions contained in Minn. Stat. § 177.41 through 177.435 as they may be amended or replaced from time to time with respect to the Project. By agreeing to this provision, Grantee is not acknowledging or agreeing that the cited provisions apply to the Project. E-Verification. Grantee agrees and acknowledges that it is aware of Minn. Stat. § 16C.075 regarding e-verification of employment of all newly hired employees to confirm that such employees are legally entitled to work in the United States, and that it will, if and when applicable, fully comply with such order. Telecommunications Certification. If federal funds are included in Exhibit A, by signing this Agreement, Grantee certifies that, consistent with Section 889 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Pub. L. 115-232 (Aug. 13, 2018), Grantee does not and will not use any equipment, system, or service that uses “covered telecommunications equipment or services” (as that term is defined in Section 889 of the Act) as a substantial or essential component of any system or as critical technology as part of any system. Grantee will include this certification as a flow down clause in any contract related to this Agreement. Title VI/Non-discrimination Assurances. Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable US DOT Standard Title VI/Non-Discrimination Assurances contained in DOT Order No. 1050.2A, and in particular Appendices A and E, which can be found at: https://edocs-public.dot.state.mn.us/edocs_public/DMResultSet/download?docId=11149035. If federal funds are included in Exhibit A, Grantee will ensure the appendices and solicitation language within the assurances are inserted into contracts as required. State may conduct a review of the Grantee’s compliance with this provision. Grantee must cooperate with State throughout the review process by supplying all requested information and documentation to State, making Grantee staff and officials available for meetings as requested, and correcting any areas of non- compliance as determined by State. 5 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) MnDOT Agreement No. 1058258 SP No. 180-589-001 Use, Maintenance, Repair and Alterations. The Grantee shall not, without the written consent of the State and the Commissioner, (i) permit or allow the use of any of the property improved with these grants funds (the “Real Property”) for any purpose other than in conjunction with or for the operation of a county highway, county state-aid highway, town road, or city street and for other uses customarily associated therewith, such as trails and utility corridors, (ii) substantially alter any of the Real Property except such alterations as may be required by laws, ordinances or regulations, or such other alterations as may improve the Real Property by increasing its value or which improve its ability to be used for the purposes set forth in section (i), (iii) take any action which would unduly impair or depreciate the value of the Real Property, (iv) abandon the Real Property, or (v) commit or permit any act to be done in or on the Real Property in violation of any law, ordinance or regulation. If Grantee fails to maintain the Real Property in accordance with this Section, State may perform whatever acts and expend whatever funds necessary to so maintain the Real Property, and Grantee irrevocably authorizes State to enter upon the Real Property to perform such acts as may be necessary to so maintain the Real Property. Any actions taken or funds expended by State shall be at its sole discretion, and nothing contained herein shall require State to take any action or incur any expense and State shall not be responsible, or liable to Grantee or any other entity, for any such acts that are performed in good faith and not in a negligent manner. Any funds expended by State pursuant to this Section shall be due and payable on demand by State and will bear interest from the date of payment by State at a rate equal to the lesser of the maximum interest rate allowed by law or 18% per year based upon a 365-day year. Grant Administrator and Organizational Leadership Contact Information. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, Subd. 5(d), if grantee has a website, the names and contact information for the grant administrator(s) and organization’s leadership must be clearly published. [The remainder of this page has intentionally been left blank.] 6 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) MnDOT Agreement No. 1058258 SP No. 180-589-001 GRANTEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have Approval and Certifying Encumbrance as required by executed the grant agreement on behalf of the Grantee as Minnesota Statutes § 16A.15 and 16C.05 required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. By: By: __________________________________ Title: State Aid Programs Manager (with delegated authority) Date: Date: ________________________________ By: Title: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT MANAGEMENT Date: By: By: Date: Title: Date: 7 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) MnDOT Agreement No. 1058258 SP No. 180-589-001 EXHIBIT A SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS SCHEDULE SOURCES OF FUNDS USES OF FUNDS Entity Supplying Funds Amount Expenses Amount State Funds: Items Paid for with 2023 State IIJA Match Funds $88,000.00 State IIJA Match Funds: Grant (SAAS Acct 426) Engineering $88,000.00 Other: Subtotal $88,000.00 Subtotal $88,000.00 Public Entity Funds: Items paid for with Non- Matching Funds General Fund Grant Funds: Other: Engineering $351,942.00 Federal Funds $351,942.00 (SS4A planning grant) Subtotal $351,942.00 Subtotal 351,942.00 TOTAL FUNDS $439,942.00 = TOTAL PROJECT $439,942.00 COSTS 8 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) MnDOT Agreement No. 1058258 SP No. 180-589-001 EXHIBIT B GRANT APPLICATION Attach the grant application for the project 9 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) Form Name: IIJA-match-application Submission Time: September 5, 2024 4:20 pm Browser: Chrome 116.0.0.0 / Windows IP Address: 38.140.144.226 Unique ID: 1262536602 I certify that I meet the eligibility Yes requirements. Entity Legal Name City of Cottage Grove Mailing address 8635 West Point Douglas Road S Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Type of applicant Local government Authorized representative Name Ryan Burfeind Title Public Works Director Phone number (651) 458-2899 Email address rburfeind@cottagegrovemn.gov Program contact Name Paul Teicher Title Office of Policy Development, Strategic Planning and Performance Phone number (202) 366-4114 Email address SS4A@dot.gov Program/project information Transportation mode Local roadway Program/project title SS4A Brief program/project description Planning dollars for development of a city wide Safety Action Plan Program/project location Cottage Grove Congressional district of 2 program/project Estimated start date Feb 03, 2025 Estimated end date Feb 27, 2026Federal award information Name of federal awarding agency/office U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary (OST) Name of OST grant program Safe Streets and Roads for All Category Safety Assistance Listing Number (ALN) 20.939 Federal Funding Opportunity Number DOT-SS4A-FY24-01 Date of notice of award Sep 05, 2024 Federal application information Amount of federal funds requested 352000.00 Amount of federal funds awarded 352000.00 Total project cost (as proposed on 440000.00 application) Match requirement percentage for the 20% federal program Upload PDF of SF-424 from application https://mndotforms.formstack.com/admin/download/file/16871604103 Upload Notice of Award https://mndotforms.formstack.com/admin/download/file/16871604104 letter/confirmation from federal awarding agency Additional comments MnDOT Agreement No. 1058258 SP No. 180-589-001 EXHIBIT C GRANTEE RESOLUTION APPROVING GRANT AGREEMENT 10 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) MnDOT Agreement No. 1058258 SP No. 180-589-001 RESOLUTION State Funded Program for IIJA Discretionary Grant Assistance Terms and Conditions SP No. 180-589-001 Date WHEREAS, the City of Cottage Grove has applied to the Commissioner of Transportation for a grant from the State Program for IIJA Assistance; and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation has given notice that funding for this project is available; and WHEREAS, the amount of the grant has been determined to be $88,000.00 by reason of the lowest responsible bid; NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City of Cottage Grove does hereby agree to the terms and conditions of the grant consistent with Minnesota Laws 2023, Chapter 68, Article 1, Section 2, Subdivision 5(a), and will pay any additional amount by which the cost exceeds the estimate and will return any amount appropriated for the project but not required. The proper City officers are authorized to execute a grant agreement and any amendments thereto with the Commissioner of Transportation concerning the above-referenced grant. Signatures 11 CM State Aid Federal Transportation Grants Technical Assistance or IIJA Discretionary Grant Match Grant Agreement (Rev. August 2025) City Council Action Request 7.O. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Community Development Agenda Category Action Item Title Lochridge Second Addition – Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans Staff Recommendation 1) Adopt Resolution 2026-119 approving the Final Plat for Lochridge Second Addition, subject to minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. 2) Approve the Lochridge Development Agreement with Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC and DRP Odin 16, LLC, subject to minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. 3) Adopt Resolution 2026-120 approving the Lochridge Second Addition Development Plans dated July 14, 2026, prepared by Alliant Engineering Inc., subject to final approval by the City Engineer in writing. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Lochridge 2nd CC Memo 2. Lochridge 2nd Resolution 2026-119 Final Plat 3. Lochridge 2nd Final Plat 4. Lochridge 2nd Development Agreement 5. Lochridge 2nd Resolution 2026-120 Approve Plans & Specs 6. Lochridge 2nd Plans & Specs 7. Lochridge 2nd Engineer Plan Review 2026-07-10 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator FROM: Samantha Pierret, Senior Planner DATE: August 11, 2026 RE: Lochridge Second Addition – Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans Proposal The City Council is requested to take the following actions: 1. Adopt the Resolution approving the Final Plat for Lochridge Second Addition. 2. Approve the Lochridge Development Agreement with Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC and DRP Odin 16, LLC, subject to minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. 3. Adopt the Resolution approving the Lochridge Second Addition Development Plans dated July 14, 2026, prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc., subject to final approval by the City Engineer in writing. Location Map Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Lochridge Second Addition - Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans August 11, 2026 Page 2 of 4 1. Final Plat Background The Lochridge Development is located south of the Woodbury border, west of Jamaica Avenue and north of the Waters at Michael’s Pointe development. The preliminary plat consisted of 99 single family lots and 84 townhome lots on approximately 72 acres. The City Council approved the preliminary plat and zoning amendment for Pulte Homes of Minnesota on February 19, 2025. Lochridge Preliminary Plat On May, 21, 2025, the City Council approved the Lochridge final plat, which consisted of 54 single family lots and 48 townhome lots. The first addition included construction of the segment of Ravine Parkway within the subdivision and dedication of an outlot for a future park (to be called Peterson Park). Additionally, a trail corridor was included in the preliminary plat around Lake Robert. The developer will construct the entirety of the trail. The trail segment on the north side of the lake will be funded by the developer while the costs for the trail segment on the south side of the lake will be funded by the City. This cost share structure was included in the Lochridge 1st Addition Development Agreement. The trail will be constructed as part of a future addition of the Lochridge development as trail location is finalized. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Lochridge Second Addition - Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans August 11, 2026 Page 3 of 4 Final Plat Review The Lochridge Second Addition final plat includes the last 36 townhome lots of the 84 approved in the preliminary plat in eight blocks of building groups with either 4 or 6 units per group. The final plat also contains 3 outlots. Outlots A and B will be owned and maintained by the Homeowner’s Association and Outlot C will be reserved for future development. The final plat is in conformance with all other conditions of the preliminary plat as approved by the City Council and as stipulated in Resolution 2025-020. The Lochridge Second Addition final plat development area is shown below and the final plat in its entirety is attached. Lochridge Phasing 2. Development Agreement The Developer has signed the development agreement, which is attached for review. 3. Development Plan Review The City Engineer has reviewed the development plans dated July 14, 2026, by the developer’s consulting engineer, Alliant Engineering, Inc., and is recommending approval of those plans (e.g., construction plans, drawings, specifications, surveys) subject to the comments in the July 10, 2026, review memorandum and any subsequent memorandums from Bolton & Menk, or as mod- ified and approved by the City Engineer in writing. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Lochridge Second Addition - Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans August 11, 2026 Page 4 of 4 Recommendation The City Council is recommended to take the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution 2026-119 approving the Final Plat for Lochridge Second Addition, subject to minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. 2. Approve the Lochridge Development Agreement with Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC and DRP Odin 16, LLC, subject to minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. 3. Adopt Resolution 2026-120 approving the Lochridge Second Addition Development Plans dated July 14, 2026, prepared by Alliant Engineering Inc., subject to final approval by the City Engineer in writing. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-119 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT NAMED LOCHRIDGE SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC and DRP Odin 16, LLC have applied for a final plat to develop a residential subdivision named Lochridge Second Addition. This subdivision plat consists of 36 townhome units attached in groups of four or six units located on the 18.89-acre property legally described as: Outlot J, LOCHRIDGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Washington County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held the public hearing for the preliminary plat and a zoning amendment to change the zoning from AG-2, Agriculture, to R-4, Transitional Residential, for the proposed Lochridge subdivision on January 27, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently accepted the Planning Commission's recommen- dations and approved the preliminary plat (Resolution No. 2025-020), and the zoning amendment (Ordinance No. 1093) on February 19, 2025; and WHEREAS, City staff found the Lochridge Second Addition final plat substantially consistent with the approved preliminary plat plan; and WHEREAS, the Developer, Property Owner, and City have entered into a development agreement for the Subdivision (“Development Agreement”). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, hereby approves the final plat for a residential subdivision plat named “Lochridge Second Addition.” This plat consists of 36 townhome units attached in groups of four and six units, located on the property legally described above. Approval of this final plat is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Developer and builders must comply with all City ordinances and policies. 2. The Developer must abide by the conditions stipulated in Resolution No. 2025-020, which approved the Lochridge preliminary plat, except as hereafter modified. 3. All utility, drainage, and development construction must conform to the development plans and specifications dated July 14, 2026, prepared by the developer’s consulting engineer, Alliant Engineering, Inc. and are subject to the comments in the July 10, 2026, review memorandum and any subsequent memorandums from Bolton and Menk, or as modified and approved by the City Engineer in writing. 4. The Developer may start rough grading of the lots before the plat is filed, if a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Construction Storm Water Permit has been issued and the City has been furnished with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the minimum amount specified in the approved development agreement. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota City Council Resolution 2026-119 Page 2 of 3 5. Development of this project must comply with the grading and erosion control plans as approved by the City Engineer. After the site is rough graded, but before any utility construction commences or building permits are issued, the erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if it is determined that the methods implemented are insufficient to properly control erosion. 6. The City will supply the street light poles and luminaries. The Developer will pay the City for street light poles and street light luminaries. 7. The final plat must be recorded with the Washington County Recorder’s Office before any building permit can be issued. 8. The builder for each lot shall post a letter of credit or cash escrow to the City for the estimated cost of the required sod and final as-built survey on each lot. 9. Before final financial guarantees are released, a certificate signed by a registered en- gineer must be provided. This certificate will state that all final lot and building grades are in conformance to the grading and drainage development plan(s) approved by the City Engineer. 10. Residential lots designated to have a boundary marker(s) must have the marker(s) installed before a Certificate of Occupancy can be issued for the house on that partic- ular residential lot. For lots constructed between October 2 and June 30, a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy can be issued, and the escrow retained until installation of the markers is confirmed. 11. The Developer is responsible for the cost and installation of the required park and open space boundary markers. 12. Prior to the release of the final plat, a final landscaping plan shall be approved in writing by planning staff. 13. All mailboxes and location of mailboxes must comply with the U.S. Post Office guide- lines and regulations. Mailboxes placed at the curb shall all be the same design and color. 14. Development shall align with city’s planned interim conditions and fully developed 100- year high water level of Lake Robert as approved by the City Engineer. Passed this 19th day of August 2026. Myron Bailey, Mayor City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota City Council Resolution 2026-119 Page 3 of 3 Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk LOCHRIDGE SECOND ADDITION KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: That DRP ODIN 16, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property situated in the County of Washington, State of Minnesota to wit: SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE OUTLOT J, LOCHRIDGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Washington County, Minnesota. I Daniel Ekrem, Licensed Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that I have surveyed or directly supervised the survey of the property described on the plat; and prepared this plat or directly supervised the preparation of this plat; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as LOCHRIDGE SECOND ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public ways and the drainage and utility easements as created designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been correctly set or that all monuments indicated on this plat will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet by this plat. lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this surveyor's certification are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. In witness whereof said DRP ODIN 16, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this _______ day of ___________________, 20______. Dated this _______ day of ___________________, 20______ Signed: DRP ODIN 16, LLC ________________________________________________________ By: ________________________________________________________ Daniel Ekrem, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 57366 STATE OF ___________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ___________________ COUNTY OF ___________________ This instrument was acknowledged before me on this _______ day of ___________________, 20______, by _______________________ of DRP ODIN 16, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company. This instrument was acknowledged before me on this _______ day of ___________________, 20______, by Daniel Ekrem, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 57366. ________________________________________________________(Signature) ________________________________________________________(Signature) ________________________________________________________(Print) ________________________________________________________(Print) Notary Public, _________________ County, __________________ Notary Public, _________________ County, Minnesota My Commission Expires __________________________________. My Commission Expires __________________________. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA This plat was approved by the City Council of Cottage Grove, Minnesota this _______ day of ___________________, 20______, and hereby certifies compliance with all the requirements as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. Signed: ________________________________________________________ By: ________________________________________________________ Mayor Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR Pursuant to Chapter 820, Laws of Minnesota, 1971, and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this _______ day of ___________________, 20______. By:________________________________________________________ By: ________________________________________________________ Washington County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9 and Section 272.12, taxes payable in the year 20______, on real estate hereinbefore described, have been paid; and there are no delinquent taxes, and transfer has been entered on this _______ day of ___________________, 20______. By:________________________________________________________ By: ________________________________________________________ Washington County Auditor/Treasurer Deputy COUNTY RECORDER Document Number ________________________________________ I hereby certify that this instrument was recorded in the Office of the County Recorder for record on this _______ day of ___________________, 20______ at ______ o'clock ___.M. and was duly recorded in Washington County Records. By:________________________________________________________ By: ________________________________________________________ Washington County Recorder Deputy www.alliant-inc.com Sheet 1 of 3 Sheets MILITARY ROAD SITE JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH LOCHRIDGE SECOND ADDITION NW 1/4 NE 1/4 N SW 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC.4, T.27, R21 DETAIL A VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE THE NORTH LINE OF OUTLOT J, LOCHRIDGE N IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF S 89°57 '30 " WEST S34°02'03"E S89°57'30"W 825.03 N89°57'30"E 494.79 824.23 118.76 R = 1 Δ L 3 = = 0 LEGEND 3 7 .6 4 9 7 Denotes 1/2 inch x 18 inch iron pipe monument set ° .37 48 marked by license no. 57366, unless otherwise ' 00 " R shown. = 3 L= 4 Denotes monument found 1/2 inch iron pipe, Δ= 2 5 OUTLOT C 4 4 . 0 unless otherwise shown. 0 5 0 ° 4 .3 4 0 Washington Co. cast iron monument unless '1 5 " otherwise shown. S28°11'12"W 467.02 R Δ L = = = 9 1 2 3 4 SEE INSET ON SHEET 3 0F 3 2 ° 8 4 3 . . 3 2 0 3 ' 9 2 1 N61°48'48"W " 40.16 N60°57'51"W 351.44 R=180.00 L=27.87 Δ=8°52'22" C.Brg=S66°14'59"E W C=27.85 " 7 " N5°47'06"W 0 1 4 ' N19°18'50"E 139.01 9 0 4 2 2 ' 79.23 . 0 5 4 . . 2 3 135.12 ° 0 3 4 4 7 N0°59'11"E ° 4 0 S88°52'58"E 244.11 1 S 3 1 6 = = 1 = = C = g L R r S0°04'05"W Δ B 62.40 . C 129.68 N88°59'05"W 231.34 N7°02'12"W R=545.00 S88°59'05"E L=39.13 123.52 Δ=4°06'48" C.Brg=N1°02'29"W 130.67 C=39.12 S0°59'11"W S0°59'11"W 1157.76 N1°00'55"E 17.06 OUTLOT C N21°13'53"E 10.11 S0°59'11"W 352.50 S89°00'49"E S89°00'49"E 130.00 135.00 S81°53'19"E 60.46 N SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 100 FEET www.alliant-inc.com Sheet 2 of 3 Sheets MILITARY ROAD SITE JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH DETAIL B NW 1/4 NE 1/4 N NOT TO SCALE LOCHRIDGE SECOND ADDITION N SW 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC.4, T.27, R21 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE S34°02'03"E DETAIL C DETAIL F 118.76 NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE THE NORTH LINE OF OUTLOT J, LOCHRIDGE IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF S 89°57 '30 " WEST R = Δ L 1 = 3 = 7 0 3 9 .6 4 . 7 ° 37 48 OUTLOT B ' 0 4 8 0" N N LEGEND N83°51'42"E 151.66 Denotes 1/2 inch x 18 inch iron pipe monument set R marked by license no. 57366, unless otherwise = N80°54'21"E 76.50 L 3 shown. 4 103.66 S9°05'39"E Δ = 4 407.02 = 2 5 4 4 .0 0 5 0 Denotes monument found 1/2 inch iron pipe, OUTLOT B ° 4 .3 4 0 '1 unless otherwise shown. 5 1 OUTLOT B " S28°11'12"W 467.02 S6°08'18"E 76.50 S6°08'18"E N88°59'05"W 231.34 S80°37'43"E 103.66 27.83 24.00 N83°51'42"E 151.66 27.83 24.00 24.00 24.00 27.83 24.00 24.00 1 5 27.83 4 2 3 5 6 S9°22'17"W 76.50 4 S49°10'54"E 103.66 3 4 24.00 2 76.50 S6°08'15"E S9°22'21"W 76.50 1 76.50 N6°08'18"W S9°22'17"W 76.50 S6°08'15"E 76.50 S6°08'15"E 27.83 S9°22'21"W 76.50 S6°08'18"E 76.50 S6°08'18"E 1 24.00 N6°08'18"W 76.50 N6°08'18"W 24.00 N9°22'17"E 76.50 S6°08'15"E 76.50 S6°08'15"E S6°08'18"E 76.50 S6°08'18"E 27.83 24.00 DETAIL D DETAIL G 24.00 27.83 S40°49'06"W 76.50 S80°37'43"E 103.66 24.00 24.00 40.16 24.00 2 27.83 NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE 27.83 27.83 6 N83°51'42"E 151.66 L S40°49'09"W 76.50 3 30.00S61°48'48"E =7 R 9.80 88.08 Δ Δ L 24.00 L =3 = = 8°0 Δ 26 = 40.16 6'14" =8 5 = 4 .3 S49°10'54"E 103.66S40°49'06"W 76.50 1 9 °2 9 4 2 6 8 24.00 3 4 '3 2 2 ° 8 R " 4 30.00 =1 S40°49'09"W 76.50 3 . 50 . 3 .00 N80°04'58"E 88.08 2 0 L 3 4 =99 R ' .7 " = N40°49'06"E 76.50 27.83 9 6 Δ=38°06'14 15 2 0. N61°48'48"W 00 1 L " 40.16 62ND STREET S =2 21 S71°56'48"W1 76.50 N N .1 N40°49'06"E 76.50 6 S18°03'12"E 103.66 Δ 24.00 = 88.08 8 L 4 L Δ =1 ° R=180.00 =91.83 27.83 = 7 2 2 S49°10'54"E 103.66 OUTLOT B S80°52'52"W 103.66 8 6. 8 Δ 4 =2 24.00 ° 9 '3 S71°56'52"W 76.50 L=27.87 9°13' 2 3 24.00 53" 24.00 8 2 24.00 N7°47'04"W 29.29 N7°47'04"W OUTLOT A S18°03'12"E 103.66 '3 " Δ=8°52'22" N88°52'58"W 103.66 27.83 2 " 7 C.Brg=S66°14'59"E 24.00 24.00 27.83 3 C=27.85 S71°56'48"W 76.50 S71°56'48"W 76.50 24.00 4 27.83 2 3 IVYWOOD AVENUE S S15°26'30"E 1 17.11 S71°56'52"W4 76.50 N9°07'08"W 76.50 N9°07'08"W 27.83 17.11 N9°07'04"W 76.50 N9°07'04"W 1 2 3 76.50 N9°07'08"W N88°52'58"W 103.66 S18°03'12"E 103.66 4 OUTLOT A 17.11 S9°07'08"E 76.50 S9°07'08"E N9°07'04"W 76.50 N9°07'04"W 2 27.83 1 N71°56'48"E 76.50 N19°18'50"E 139.01 S1°07'02"W 76.50 24.00 N1°07'05"E 76.50 N1°07'05"E 76.50 N1°07'02"E 76.50 N1°07'02"E 76.50 24.00 3 27.83 S80°52'52"W 103.66 " 27.83 24.00 W 24.00 1 S80°54'21"W 76.50 1 27.83 1 " 3 27.83 S80°57'45"W 76.50 ' 3 Δ 3 7 N88°52'58"W 103.66 27.83 76.50 6 L = " 7 3 = 0 ° 1 27.83 4 1 1 ' S1°07'02"W 2 2 27.83 3 9 0 4 1 ° 2 2 4 4 N80°57'49"E 76.50 ' . = 5 0 " 5 . 2 S80°54'25"W 76.50 4 Δ . 8 . 6 2 3 24.00 6 ' 0 5 ° 3 1 0 3 4 24.00 3 4 5 ' 7 7 4 S88°52'58"E 244.11 0 ° 0 . " 4 0 . 1 24.00 2 7 S 6 3 1 = 24.00 ° 1 6 N80°57'49"E 76.50 2 1 2 = 1 = 1 3 = S9°05'39"E 103.66 S9°05'39"E = 1 S80°54'21"W 76.50 C = 24.00 = g L = L L R 24.00 4 r Δ Δ 0 1 24.00 B 0 . . 24.00 N80°57'45"E 76.50 5 7 S80°54'25"W 76.50 4 C 5 DETAIL E 27.83 24.00 = 3 S9°05'39"E 103.66 S9°05'39"E NOT TO SCALE R 24.00 S80°57'45"W 76.50 151.66 N9°02'15"W 30.07 30.07 N80°54'21"E 76.50 24.00 2 171.20 N9°02'15"W 151.66 N9°02'15"W 1 24.00 N80°57'49"E 76.50 N88°59'05"W 231.34 N7°02'12"W 129.68 N7°02'12"W 27.83 1 1 N N80°57'45"E 76.50 R=545.00 N N80°57'45"E 76.50 L=39.13 N9°02'15"W 151.66 N9°02'15"W S88°59'05"E 123.52 Δ=4°06'48" C.Brg=N1°02'29"W N80°57'45"E 76.50 C=39.12 OUTLOT A N1°00'55"E 17.06 SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 50 FEET www.alliant-inc.com Sheet 3 of 3 Sheets DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE PLAT OF LOCHRIDGE SECOND ADDITION BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE AND PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLC AND DRP ODIN 16, LLC THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on the day of , 2026, by and between the City of Cottage Grove, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (“CITY”), DRP Odin 16, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, (“OWNER”) and Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, (“DEVELOPER”). RECITALS: WHEREAS, DRP Odin 16, LLC is the fee simple owner of the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY, as identified on the FINAL PLAT; and WHEREAS, in pursuant of the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, the DEVELOPER and OWNER applied to the CITY for approval of the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and FINAL PLAT of Lochridge Second Addition, which is consistent with the PRELIMINARY PLAT; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with the granting of these approvals, the CITY requires the installation and/or availability of public utilities (sewer and water), public streets, storm sewer pipes, ponds, street lighting and other facilities; and WHEREAS, under authority granted to it, including Minnesota Statutes Chapters 412, 429, and 462, the COUNCIL is approving the FINAL PLAT of Lochridge Second Addition and DEVELOPMENT PLANS on the following conditions: 1. That the DEVELOPER and OWNER enter into this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, which contract defines the work which the DEVELOPER undertakes to complete; and 2. The DEVELOPER shall provide an irrevocable letter of credit and cash deposits in the amounts and with conditions satisfactory to the CITY, providing for assurance of payment for the actual construction and installation of the improvements in the DEVELOPMENT PLANS, as specified and required by the CITY. WHEREAS, the DEVELOPMENT PLANS were prepared by a registered professional engineer and have been submitted to and approved by the CITY ENGINEER. NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the terms and conditions of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT and in reliance upon the representations, warranties and covenants of the parties herein contained, the CITY, OWNER and DEVELOPER agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS 1.1. TERMS. The following terms, unless elsewhere defined specifically in the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, shall have the following meanings as set forth below. 1.2. BUILDER. “BUILDER” means an entity that will be constructing a residence on a lot in the FINAL PLAT. 2 1.3. CITY. “CITY” means the City of Cottage Grove, a Minnesota municipal corporation. 1.4. CITY ENGINEER. “CITY ENGINEER” means the City Engineer of the City of Cottage Grove or delegatees. 1.5. CITY WARRANTIES. “CITY WARRANTIES” means all CITY WARRANTIES identified in Article 12 of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 1.6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. “COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR” means the Community Development Director of the City of Cottage Grove or delegatees. 1.7. COUNCIL. “COUNCIL” means the Council of the City of Cottage Grove. 1.8. COUNTY. “COUNTY” means Washington County, Minnesota. 1.9. DEVELOPER. “DEVELOPER” means Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company. 1.10. DEVELOPER DEFAULT. “DEVELOPER DEFAULT” means and includes, jointly and severally, any of the following or any combination thereof: a) failure by the DEVELOPER to timely pay the CITY any money required to be paid under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; b) failure by the DEVELOPER to timely construct the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS according to the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and the CITY standards and specifications; c) failure by the DEVELOPER to observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; d) breach of the DEVELOPER WARRANTIES. 1.11. DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. “DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS” means and includes, individually and collectively, all the improvements identified in Article 4 of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 1.12. DEVELOPER WARRANTIES. “DEVELOPER WARRANTIES” means all DEVELOPER WARRANTIES identified in Article 10 of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 1.13. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. “DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT” means this instant agreement by and among the CITY, OWNER and DEVELOPER. 1.14. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. “DEVELOPMENT PLANS” means all street infrastructure, utility and grading plans, drawings, specifications, and surveys, dated July 14, 2026, 3 prepared by Alliant Engineering, or as may be updated and approved by the CITY ENGINEER, hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 1.15. DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. “DEVELOPMENT PROJECT” means a residential development to be known as Lochridge Second Addition that will be constructed on the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY that is substantially in conformance with the FINAL PLAT. 1.16. DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY. “DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY” means that real property legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto, upon which the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT will be constructed. 1.17. FINAL ACCEPTANCE. “FINAL ACCEPTANCE” means all conditions of a DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS have been completed and approved by the CITY ENGINEER or COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. 1.18. FINAL PLAT. “FINAL PLAT” means the FINAL PLAT, approved by the COUNCIL on August 19, 2026, attached hereto as Exhibit B. 1.19. FORCE MAJEURE. “FORCE MAJEURE” means acts of God, including, but not limited to floods, ice storms, blizzards, tornadoes, landslides, lightning and earthquakes (but not including reasonably anticipated weather conditions for the geographic area), riots, global pandemics, insurrections, war or civil disorder affecting the performance of work, blockades, power or other utility failures, and fires or explosions or District or Federal Court orders that prevent DEVELOPER from performing its obligations under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 1.20. FORMAL NOTICE. “FORMAL NOTICE” means notices given by one party to the other if in writing and if and when delivered or tendered either in person or by depositing it in the United States mail in a sealed envelope, by certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage and postal charges prepaid, addressed as follows: If to CITY: City of Cottage Grove Attn: City Administrator 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 jlevitt@cottagegrovemn.gov If to DEVELOPER: Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC Attn: David Von Ruden 1650 W 82nd Street STE 300 Bloomington, MN 55431 David.vonruden@pulte.com 4 If to OWNER: DRP Odin 16, LLC c/o DW Partners Attn: Ethan Baer 520 Madison Avenue, 21st Floor New York, NY 10022 Ethan.baer@domainrealestatepartners.com or to such other address as the party addressed shall have previously designated by notice given in accordance with this Section. Notices shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally on the party to whom notice is to be given, or on the third day after mailing if mailed as provided above, provided, that a notice not given as above shall, if it is in writing, be deemed given if and when actually received by a party. 1.21. INDIRECT COSTS. “INDIRECT COSTS” means the costs related to: a) Finance, administration and legal costs; and b) Engineering services performed by CITY Staff; and c) Testing and Right of Way services; and d) Consulting engineering services. 1.22. ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS. “ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS” means and includes, individually and collectively, all the improvements identified on Exhibit C and in Article 3. 1.23. OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES. “OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES” means and includes, individually and collectively, the following: a) Minnesota Department of Transportation b) Washington County c) Washington County Highway Department d) South Washington Watershed District e) Minnesota Department of Health f) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency g) Metropolitan Council h) Minnesota Department of Natural Resources i) Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 5 j) Any other regulatory or governmental agency or entity affected by or having jurisdiction over the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. 1.24. OWNER. “OWNER” means DRP Odin 16, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that will own the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1.25. OWNER DEFAULT. “OWNER DEFAULT” means and includes, jointly and severally, any of the following or any combination thereof: a) failure by the OWNER to timely pay the CITY any levied assessments required to be paid under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; b) failure by the OWNER to observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; c) breach of the OWNER WARRANTIES. 1.26. OWNER WARRANTIES. “OWNER WARRANTIES” means all OWNER WARRANTIES identified in Article 11 of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 1.27. PRELIMINARY PLAT. “PRELIMINARY PLAT” means the preliminary plat approved by the COUNCIL. 1.28. PRIOR EASEMENT HOLDERS. “PRIOR EASEMENT HOLDERS” means and includes, jointly and severally, all holders of any easements or other property interests which existed prior to the grant or dedication of any public easements transferred by the FINAL PLAT or transferred pursuant to this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 1.29. UTILITY COMPANIES. “UTILITY COMPANIES” means and includes, jointly and severally, the following: a) Utility companies, including electric, gas and cable; b) Pipeline companies. ARTICLE 2 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL 2.1. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. The COUNCIL approved the FINAL PLAT. All conditions contained in the CITY Council Resolution for the FINAL PLAT shall be considered a condition of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 2.2. RECORDING OF FINAL PLAT. The DEVELOPER shall record the FINAL PLAT and this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT with the COUNTY Recorder. No building permits 6 shall be issued unless the DEVELOPER shows evidence to the CITY that the FINAL PLAT and this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT have been recorded with the COUNTY Recorder and the CITY has received the financial obligations required in Article 15. ARTICLE 3 ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS 3.1. ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS. The DEVELOPER shall construct and install, at its own cost, all ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS identified and depicted on Exhibit C in accordance with industry standards for making public improvements. 3.2. AREA CHARGES. The CITY imposes Area Charges for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer impacts to all new developments pursuant to City Code Section 8-1-3 C.3 and the Fee Schedule. Such Area Charges are identified on Exhibit G. ARTICLE 4 DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS 4.1. DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. The DEVELOPER shall install, at its own cost, the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS in accordance with the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and in accordance with the approvals of the CITY Council, and all ordinances and PRELIMINARY and FINAL PLAT resolutions of the CITY or any amendments thereto and any Miscellaneous Requirements on Exhibit D, attached hereto. 4.2. GROUND MATERIAL. The DEVELOPER shall ensure that adequate and suitable ground material shall exist in the areas of public street and utility improvements and shall guarantee the removal, replacement or repair of substandard or unstable material through the warranty period. The cost of said removal, replacement or repair is the responsibility of the DEVELOPER. 4.3. GRADING/DRAINAGE PLAN, EASEMENTS AND HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. a) The DEVELOPER shall construct drainage facilities adequate to serve the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT in accordance with the DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The DEVELOPER agrees to grant to the CITY all necessary outlots and temporary or permanent easements for the preservation and maintenance of the drainage system, for drainage basins and for utility service and for utility looping. The DEVELOPER shall enter into any easement agreements and stormwater management agreements with the CITY on property owned by the DEVELOPER that are deemed necessary to fulfill the obligations of this Section. The grading and drainage plan shall include lot and building elevations, drainage swales to be seeded and blanketed, storm sewer, catch basins, erosion control structures and ponding areas necessary to conform to the overall CITY storm sewer plan. The grading of the site shall be completed in conformance with the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and the approved grading permit, subject only to such design criteria and engineering design and construction specifications as are used in the DEVELOPMENT PLANS, unless otherwise agreed to by the DEVELOPER and CITY ENGINEER. 7 b) The DEVELOPER shall dedicate drainage and utility easements as shown on the FINAL PLAT. Additional utility and drainage easements may be granted by an acceptable document as approved by the CITY with mutual consent between the CITY and DEVELOPER. Unless previously agreed to in writing by the CITY and the DEVELOPER, the DEVELOPER shall provide the CITY an as-built survey of the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY in PDF and AUTOCAD format after the final rough grading is complete for review and approval prior to development utility installation. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to a BUILDER for any dwelling unit constructed on a lot within the subdivision, a Certificate of Compliance by a land surveyor must be submitted to the CITY by the BUILDER reflecting conformance with the approved grading plan and confirming that the lot corner monuments are installed. c) Building construction and general construction activities are limited to Monday through Friday between the hours 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM and on Saturday between the hours of 9:00 AM and 7:00 PM. Site grading/excavation and street and utility construction activities are limited to Monday through Friday between the hours 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM and on Saturday between the hours of 9:00 AM and 7:00 PM. Building construction and construction activities are not allowed on City-observed holidays, unless agreed to in advance by the CITY ENGINEER. 4.4. GRADING OF PUBLIC STREETS. The DEVELOPER must grade the areas within the FINAL PLAT and additional areas as identified in the grading plans, in order to be able to convey and treat water from the FINAL PLAT. Grading of all public streets, boulevards, driveways and other public lands, if any, and other lands shown in the approved grading plan and as secured by the LOC required in Exhibit F shall be done in accordance with the grading plan provided to and approved by the CITY. If the DEVELOPER does not perform the work required by this paragraph, the CITY will complete all work required of the DEVELOPER. 4.5. INTERIM BITUMINOUS STREET. The DEVELOPER will construct a bituminous wedge for the roadways within the FINAL PLAT. The bituminous wedge will be removed, and final wear course installed once 90% of the residences have final Certificates of Occupancy or after two (2) years. At the end of two (2) years from the day the bituminous wedge is installed, even if 90% of the homes do not have Certificates of Occupancy, the DEVELOPER will remove the wedge and place the wear course pavement. The DEVELOPER is responsible for the replacement of any damaged sidewalk or curb (this obligation does not preclude DEVELOPER and BUILDER(s) from making agreement for reimbursement of replacement obligations from BUILDER(s) to DEVELOPER). The BUILDER will be responsible to preserve and protect the public roadway and any sidewalk/trail. 4.6. PUBLIC STREET MAINTENANCE. The DEVELOPER is responsible for all maintenance, upkeep and repair of all public streets contained within the FINAL PLAT and DEVELOPMENT PLANS from initiation of construction through final acceptance by the CITY. 4.7. STREET SWEEPING. The DEVELOPER is responsible for the removal of all construction debris and earth materials within the public right-of-way typically resulting from new home construction activities. The CITY will inspect the roadways to ensure the DEVELOPER is 8 keeping all public roadway surfaces clean. If any portion of a public roadway surface is found in an unacceptable condition, the CITY will have appropriate equipment dispatched to the site and all costs associated with the clean-up effort will be billed to the DEVELOPER. DEVELOPER may assign this responsibility to the BUILDERS. 4.8. STREET SIGNS. The CITY shall manufacture and install street identification signs and non-mechanical and non-electrical traffic control signs. The DEVELOPER shall be financially responsible for these costs. Street signs will be in conformance with the names as indicated on the FINAL PLAT and pursuant to CITY standards. The actual number and location of signs to be installed shall be determined by the CITY. 4.9. SOD AND CURB BOX. The DEVELOPER agrees that the BUILDER must pay for and install cultured sod from the street curb to the rear lot line(s) of each lot in the entire FINAL PLAT and curb box shall be installed in working condition. For a lot where a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy is issued between October 2 and June 30 of the following year, completion of the work described in this paragraph shall be completed by the BUILDER by July 15; for a lot where a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy is issued between July 1 and October 1, completion of the work described in this paragraph shall be completed by the BUILDER by October 15. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, it is agreed that in lieu of the BUILDER installing sod on each lot, the BUILDER may provide to a lot owner a certificate that entitles the lot owner to have sod delivered to that lot at the owner’s request for installation by the lot owner. 4.10. BOULEVARD AND AREA RESTORATION. All boulevards shall be permanently sodded within 30 days of final grading, with the exception of those boulevards directly adjacent to buildable lots. These boulevards may be temporarily seeded until the lot is final graded, and then sod shall be installed. The DEVELOPER shall restore all other areas disturbed by the development grading operation in accordance with the approved erosion control plan, over the entire FINAL PLAT. Upon request of the CITY ENGINEER, the DEVELOPER shall remove the silt fences once the vegetation on the surrounding area has reached 70% coverage. 4.11. LOT CORNER MONUMENTS. The DEVELOPER shall install all subdivision lot corner monumentation within one year from the date of recording the FINAL PLAT. At the end of the one-year period from recording of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, the DEVELOPER shall submit to CITY ENGINEER written verification by a registered land surveyor that the required monuments have been installed throughout the FINAL PLAT. 4.12. [Intentionally blank] 4.13. STREET MAINTENANCE, RESTORATION, ACCESS AND REPAIR DURING CONSTRUCTION. The DEVELOPER or BUILDER shall clear, on a daily basis, any soil, earth or construction debris from the surrounding streets and lands within or adjacent to the FINAL PLAT resulting from the grading or building on the land within the FINAL PLAT by the DEVELOPER or their agents, and shall restore to the CITY’S specifications any gravel base contaminated by mixing construction or excavation debris, or earth in it, and repair to the CITY’S specifications any damage to bituminous surfacing resulting from the use of construction equipment. 9 Furthermore, the DEVELOPER shall maintain reasonable access to any occupied buildings within the FINAL PLAT, including necessary street maintenance such as grading, graveling, patching and snow removal prior to permanent street surfacing. The DEVELOPER agrees to perform and assume all responsibilities relating to snow removal and ice control, if the streets have not been accepted for winter maintenance as determined by the CITY ENGINEER by October 15, or later if approved by the CITY’S Public Works Director. CITY will consider the following factors when considering acceptance for winter maintenance: the status of installation of curb, pavement and wedge. Completion of the work described in this section shall be completed within fifteen (15) days after notice by the CITY to the DEVELOPER that repair or restoration is required. 4.14. OCCUPANCY AND ACCESS. a) No building permit for any lot shall be issued until the DEVELOPER has constructed a temporary access consisting of a bituminous surface base and wedge that is acceptable in design by the CITY and the conditions on Exhibit D have been followed. Special consideration may be given for two model home building permits if approved by the CITY’S Building Official and Fire Marshal as follows: i. One model home permit may be issued prior to roadway Class V gravel base and utilities being installed; and ii. One additional model home building permit may be issued after Class V gravel base and utilities and storm pipes have been installed to serve the lots for the model homes as long as the “Out of Service” hydrant tags have been installed on all out of service hydrants. b) A Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for any home may be issued in accordance with the following: i. The DEVELOPER has constructed a temporary bituminous roadway that is acceptable in design and approved by the CITY; ii. Water and sanitary sewer improvements are installed, tested, televised, reviewed and available for use as described in Exhibit D, Section 2(d). Hydrant tags must also be removed; iii. The Residential Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Fee is paid, pursuant to the CITY’S Fee Table; iv. If requested from July 1 through October 1, townhomes and other connected units with shared walls may be issued a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy without an approved Lot As Built for all connected units except for the “Final Unit.” The “Final Unit” within a group of connected units may only be issued a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy after the Lot As Built has been approved by the CITY ENGINEER. Furthermore, the DEVELOPER is responsible for the construction and cost of constructing any necessary temporary bituminous roadway before the public roadway is constructed and shall 10 maintain reasonable access to any occupied home or homes, including necessary street maintenance prior to permanent street improvements that are accepted by the CITY. 4.15. DRIVEWAYS. Upon building a residence on a lot, the BUILDER shall construct a concrete or bituminous surface driveway for the lot in accord with CITY approved standards. For a lot for which a Certificate of Occupancy is issued between October 2 and June 30 of the following year, completion of the work described in this paragraph must be completed by July 15; for a lot for which a Certificate of Occupancy is issued between July 1 and October 1, completion of the work described in this paragraph shall be completed by October 15. 4.16. VEGETATION. The DEVELOPER shall comply with CITY ordinances and policies related to preservation of vegetation and trees and specifically shall exercise reasonable efforts in residential areas to save mature, non-diseased trees and vegetation on the subject land which do not have to be removed for reasonable installation of buildings, streets, utilities or drainage improvements, construction activities related thereto, or site grading. Prior to any excavation, the DEVELOPER shall install tree protection around all trees that are to be saved as shown in the approved DEVELOPMENT PLANS prior to any excavation. All diseased trees shall be removed according to CITY ordinance requirements. 4.17. LANDSCAPING. The DEVELOPER is responsible for installing all landscaping improvements as shown on the approved landscape plan and pursuant to City Code. Landscaping for individual lots shall be installed during the construction of each lot. 4.18. EROSION CONTROL. The DEVELOPER shall provide and follow a plan for erosion control and pond maintenance in accord with the Best Management Practices (BMP) as delineated in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency online Minnesota Stormwater Manual and the grading permit from the CITY. Such plan shall be detailed on the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and shall be subject to approval of the CITY ENGINEER. The DEVELOPER shall install and maintain such erosion control structures as appear necessary under the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and as required in Exhibit F. The DEVELOPER shall be responsible for all damage caused as the result of grading and excavation within the FINAL PLAT including, but not limited to, restoration of existing control structures and clean-up of public right-of-way, until all lots are final graded, and improvements are completed. As a portion of the erosion control plan, the DEVELOPER shall seed or sod any disturbed areas in accordance with the DEVELOPMENT PLANS. After the site is rough graded, the DEVELOPER must provide erosion control devices as detailed on the DEVELOPMENT PLANS or as reasonably required by CITY. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the DEVELOPER does not provide erosion control, the CITY may, after a twenty-four (24) hour notice, take appropriate action to control erosion. The CITY may, without notice draw upon any posted financial guarantee to pay costs incurred by the CITY in controlling erosion within the FINAL PLAT, or at the CITY’S option, assess the additional costs incurred as part of the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS on the relevant portion of DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY. 4.19. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITY. It is agreed that DEVELOPER may transfer its responsibility for sod installation, Street Sweeping, Street Signs, Street Maintenance, Restoration, Access and Repair, Landscaping, and Erosion Control provided DEVELOPER ultimately remains liable for the performance or nonperformance thereof and it is 11 understood and agreed that upon transfer of the NPDES permit to the BUILDER or buyer of an individual lot, all processes involving the required NPDES permit transfer process shall be followed and completed and all responsibilities thereafter assumed under the said NPDES permit specific to the subject lot shall be the BUILDER’S or buyer’s responsibility and not DEVELOPER’S responsibility. BUILDER shall restore any vegetation disturbed on adjacent outlots using correct seeding or other appropriate vegetation, as approved by the CITY. 4.20. WEED/GRASS MAINTENANCE. During the term of this AGREEMENT, the DEVELOPER must not allow or permit within the FINAL PLAT, any weeds, grass, brush, or other rank vegetation to a height greater than eight (8) inches, or permit any accumulation of dead weeds, grass or brush until FINAL ACCEPTANCE. However, in CITY outlots, native plants are allowed pursuant to CITY Code Section 4-3-1(B)(2)(L). In the event the DEVELOPER fails to comply with this provision, the CITY may give the DEVELOPER notice to cut or remove material in violation of this paragraph. All costs of cutting or removing incurred by the CITY must be paid by DEVELOPER or assessed against the property that is in violation. The DEVELOPER shall maintain all CITY Outlots until acceptance in writing by CITY. ARTICLE 5 PARK CONTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS 5.1. PARK DEDICATION. Park Dedication Fees were satisfied in the Lochridge Plat by the deeding of Outlot A, Lochridge, and Outlots A and B, Waters at Michaels Pointe to the CITY. No additional Park Dedication Fees are required. ARTICLE 6 PERMITS, LICENSES AND OTHER APPROVALS 6.1. PERMITS. The DEVELOPER shall obtain all necessary approvals, permits and licenses from the CITY, the OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES and the UTILITY COMPANIES, as identified on Exhibit E, attached hereto. Major design requirements of any such entities shall be determined prior to completion and incorporated into the DEVELOPMENT PLANS. All costs incurred to obtain said approvals, permits and licenses, and all fines or penalties levied by any agency due to the failure of the DEVELOPER to obtain or comply with conditions of such approvals, permits and licenses, shall be paid by the DEVELOPER. The DEVELOPER shall defend and hold the CITY harmless from any action initiated by the OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES and the UTILITY COMPANIES resulting from such failures of the DEVELOPER. City will work with DEVELOPER to have UTILITY COMPANIES relocate their utilities. ARTICLE 7 OTHER DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 7.1. MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS. Any additional requirements to approval of the FINAL PLAT and DEVELOPMENT PLANS as specified by the COUNCIL are incorporated herein. 7.2. HOMEOWNER’S ASSOCIATION. DEVELOPER shall create a Homeowner’s Association (“HOA”) within 180 days of the Effective Date of this DEVELOPMENT 12 AGREEMENT that governs the rights and responsibilities of HOA for ownership and maintenance of the maintenance of Outlots A and B, Lochridge Second Addition. 7.3. LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO JAMAICA AVENUE AND MILITARY ROAD. DEVELOPER is proposing to install landscaping in rear yards adjacent to Jamaica Avenue on or around Outlot B, Lochridge Second Addition and Blocks 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, Lochridge Second Addition. With the anticipated reconstruction of Jamaica Avenue in the near future, CITY agrees that the landscaping in the rear yards adjacent to Jamaica Avenue and Military Road in or around the lots identified herein, shall not be installed as part of this DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, but shall be installed by October 31, 2028. ARTICLE 8 WARRANTY PERIOD 8.1. WARRANTY PERIOD. Upon FINAL ACCEPTANCE, CITY ENGINEER or COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, as deemed appropriate depending on the type of DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS, will provide written notice to DEVELOPER each relevant warranty period. 8.2. WARRANTY ON PROPER WORK AND MATERIALS. DEVELOPER warrants all work required to be performed by it under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT against defective material and faulty workmanship after FINAL ACCEPTANCE for the period of time as stated below: a) Landscaping, which includes all trees, grass, and sod in boulevards not adjacent to a buildable lot, outlots, parks and open space, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality and disease free for a period of one (1) year after planting. Any replacements shall be similarly warranted for one year after planting. b) Streets, sidewalks, trails, lighting and utilities shall be warranted for a period of two (2) years and begins after acceptance by the CITY. The warranty shall include the obligation of the DEVELOPER to repair and correct any damage to or deficiency in such improvements during the warranty period. ARTICLE 9 RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS 9.1. DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS, ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS COSTS. The DEVELOPER shall pay for the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS, and ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS; that is, all costs of persons doing work or furnishing skills, tools, machinery or materials, or insurance premiums or equipment or supplies and all just claims for the same; and the CITY shall be under no obligation to pay the contractor or any subcontractor any sum whatsoever on account thereof, whether or not the CITY shall have approved the contract or subcontract. The DEVELOPER is responsible for contracting and paying for the street and utility testing costs. The CITY’S designated inspector on the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT will coordinate the street and 13 utility testing activities. All testing reports shall be sent to the CITY with a copy to the DEVELOPER. If deductions are owed on the street and utility construction pursuant to the MNDOT standards for construction, then these deductions will be paid by the DEVELOPER to CITY within thirty (30) days after the DEVELOPER receives notices of such deductions. 9.2. ENFORCEMENT COSTS. The DEVELOPER shall pay the CITY for the costs incurred in the enforcement of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, including engineering costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees. 9.3. TIME OF PAYMENT. The DEVELOPER shall pay all bills from the CITY within thirty (30) days after billing. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. ARTICLE 10 DEVELOPER WARRANTIES 10.1. STATEMENT OF DEVELOPER WARRANTIES. The DEVELOPER hereby warrants and represents the following: a) AUTHORITY. i. DEVELOPER has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, and no approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with the authority of DEVELOPER to enter into and perform its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. ii. DEVELOPER is fee title owner and developer of the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY, and has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, and no approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with the authority of DEVELOPER to enter into and perform its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. b) NO DEFAULT. The DEVELOPER is not in default under any lease, contract or agreement to which they are a party or by which they are bound which would affect performance under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. DEVELOPER is not a party to or bound by any mortgage, lien, lease, agreement, instrument, order, judgment or decree which would prohibit the execution or performance of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT by DEVELOPER or prohibit any of the transactions provided for in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. c) PRESENT COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. The DEVELOPER has complied with and is not in violation of applicable federal, state or local statutes, laws, and regulations including, without limitation, permits and licenses and any applicable zoning, 14 environmental or other law, ordinance or regulation affecting the FINAL PLAT and the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS; and DEVELOPER is not aware of any pending or threatened claim of any such violation. d) CONTINUING COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. The DEVELOPER will comply with all applicable federal, state and local statutes, laws and regulations including, without limitation, permits and licenses and any applicable zoning, environmental or other law, ordinance or regulation affecting the FINAL PLAT and the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. e) NO LITIGATION. There is no suit, action, arbitration or legal, administrative or other proceeding or governmental investigation pending, or threatened against or affecting DEVELOPER or the FINAL PLAT or the DEVELOPMENT PLANS or the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. DEVELOPER is not in default with respect to any order, writ, injunction or decree of any federal, state, local or foreign court, department, agency or instrumentality. f) FULL DISCLOSURE. None of the representations and warranties made by the DEVELOPER or made in any exhibit hereto or memorandum or writing furnished or to be furnished by the DEVELOPER or on its behalf intentionally contains or will contain any untrue statement of material fact or intentionally omit any material fact the omission of which would be misleading. Any unintentional untrue statements or omissions shall be corrected or cured within thirty (30) days after the DEVELOPER receives FORMAL NOTICE or obtains knowledge of such error, unless an extension is granted by the CITY. g) PLAT COMPLIANCE. The FINAL PLAT and the DEVELOPMENT PLANS comply with all CITY, COUNTY, metropolitan, state and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to, subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances and environmental regulations. h) OBTAINING PERMITS. The DEVELOPER shall obtain in a timely manner and pay for all required permits, licenses and approvals, and shall meet, in a timely manner, all requirements of all applicable, local, state and federal laws and regulations which must be obtained or met before the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS may be lawfully constructed. A list of the CITY permits, licenses, and approvals required is identified on Exhibit E. ARTICLE 11 OWNER WARRANTIES 11.1 STATEMENT OF OWNER WARRANTIES. The OWNER hereby warrants and represents as follows: a) AUTHORITY. OWNER is the fee simple OWNER of DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY and has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, and no approvals 15 or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with the authority of OWNER to enter into and perform its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, and no approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with the authority of OWNER to enter into and perform its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. b) NO DEFAULT. OWNER is not in default under any lease, contract or agreement to which it is a party of by which it is bound which affect performance under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. OWNER is not a party to or bound by any mortgage, lien, lease, agreement, instrument, order, judgment or decree which would prohibit the execution or performance of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT by OWNER or prohibit any of the transactions provided for in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. c) NO LITIGATION. There is no suit, action, arbitration or legal, administrative or other proceeding or governmental investigation pending, or threatened against or affecting OWNER. d) FULL DISCLOSURE. None of the representations and warranties made by OWNER or made in any exhibit hereto or memorandum or writing furnished or to be furnished by OWNER or on its behalf contains or will contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit any material fact the omission of which would be misleading. ARTICLE 12 CITY WARRANTIES 12.1. STATEMENT OF CITY WARRANTIES. The CITY hereby warrants and represents as follows: a) ORGANIZATION. CITY is a municipal corporation duly incorporated and validly existing in good standing under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARTICLE 13 INDEMNIFICATION OF CITY 13.1. INDEMNIFICATION OF CITY. Provided the CITY is not in DEFAULT under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT with respect to the particular matter causing the claim, loss or damage, the DEVELOPER shall indemnify, defend and hold the CITY, its COUNCIL, agents, employees, attorneys and representatives harmless against and in respect of any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, proceedings, losses, costs, expenses, obligations, liabilities, damages, recoveries, and deficiencies, including interest, penalties and attorneys’ fees, that the CITY incurs or suffers, which arise out of, result from or relate to: a) breach by the DEVELOPER of the DEVELOPER WARRANTIES; b) failure of the DEVELOPER to timely construct the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS 16 according to the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and the CITY ordinances, standards and specifications; c) failure by the DEVELOPER or OWNER to observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; d) failure by the DEVELOPER to pay contractors, subcontractors, laborers, or materialmen; e) failure by the DEVELOPER to pay for materials; f) approval by the CITY of the FINAL PLAT; g) approval by the CITY of the DEVELOPMENT PLANS; h) failure to obtain the necessary permits and authorizations to construct the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS; i) construction of the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS; j) delays in construction of the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS; k) payment by DEVELOPER or OWNER for any required costs or assessments; l) all costs and liabilities arising because building permits were issued prior to the completion and acceptance of the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. 13.2. NOTICE. Within a reasonable period of time after the CITY’S receipt of actual notice of any matter giving rise to a right of payment against the CITY pursuant to Section 13.1, the CITY shall give the FORMAL NOTICE in reasonable detail to the DEVELOPER and OWNER. The DEVELOPER and OWNER shall not be obligated to make any payment to the CITY for any such claim until the passage of thirty (30) days from the date of its receipt of FORMAL NOTICE from the CITY, during which time the DEVELOPER and OWNER shall have the right to cure or remedy the event leading to such claim. 13.3. DEFENSE OF CLAIM. Provided the CITY is not in DEFAULT under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT with respect to the particular matter causing the claim or demand, with respect to claims or demands asserted against the CITY by a third party of the nature covered by Section 13.1, and provided that the CITY gives FORMAL NOTICE thereof, the DEVELOPER and OWNER will, at its sole expense, provide for the defense thereof with counsel of its own selection but approved by the CITY; the DEVELOPER and OWNER will pay all costs and expenses including attorneys’ fees incurred in so defending against such claims, provided that the CITY shall at all times also have the right to fully participate in the defense at the CITY’S expense. If the DEVELOPER and OWNER fail to defend, the CITY shall have the right, but not the obligation, to undertake the defense of, and to compromise or settle the claim or other matter, for the account of and at the risk of 17 the DEVELOPER and OWNER. ARTICLE 14 CITY REMEDIES UPON DEVELOPER DEFAULT 14.1. CITY REMEDIES. If a DEVELOPER DEFAULT occurs, that is not caused by FORCE MAJEURE, the CITY shall give the defaulting DEVELOPER FORMAL NOTICE of the DEVELOPER DEFAULT, and the DEVELOPER shall have thirty (30) days to cure the DEVELOPER DEFAULT. If the DEVELOPER, after FORMAL NOTICE to it by the CITY, does not cure the DEVELOPER DEFAULT, then the CITY may avail itself of any remedy afforded by law and any of the following remedies: a) the CITY may specifically enforce this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; b) the CITY may suspend any work, improvement or obligation to be performed by the CITY; c) the CITY may collect on the respective irrevocable letter of credit (“LOC”) or cash deposit pursuant to Article 15 hereof, of the DEVELOPER in default; d) the CITY may suspend or deny building and occupancy permits for buildings within the FINAL PLAT for the defaulting DEVELOPER; e) the CITY may, at its sole option, perform the work or improvements to be performed by the defaulting DEVELOPER, in which case the defaulting DEVELOPER shall within thirty (30) days after written billing by the CITY reimburse the CITY for any costs and expenses incurred by the CITY. In the alternative, the CITY may in whole or in part, specially assess any of the costs and expenses incurred by the CITY; and the DEVELOPER and OWNER hereby waive any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation and construction of the work and improvements and the special assessment resulting therefrom, including, but not limited to, notice and hearing requirement and any claim that the special assessments exceed benefit to the FINAL PLAT. The DEVELOPER and OWNER hereby waive any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 14.2. NO ADDITIONAL WAIVER IMPLIED BY ONE WAIVER. In the event any agreement contained in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is breached by the DEVELOPER or OWNER and thereafter waived in writing by the CITY, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. All waivers by the CITY must be in writing. 14.3. NO REMEDY EXCLUSIVE. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to the CITY shall be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and 18 as often as may be deemed expedient. In order to entitle the CITY to exercise any remedy reserved to it, it shall not be necessary to give notice, other than the FORMAL NOTICE. 14.4. EMERGENCY. Notwithstanding the requirement contained in Section 14.1 hereof relating to FORMAL NOTICE in case of a DEVELOPER DEFAULT and notwithstanding the requirement contained in Section 14.1 hereof relating to giving the DEVELOPER and OWNER a right to cure the DEVELOPER DEFAULT, in the event of an emergency as determined by the CITY ENGINEER, resulting from the DEVELOPER DEFAULT, the CITY may perform the work or improvement to be performed by the DEVELOPER without giving any notice or FORMAL NOTICE to the defaulting DEVELOPER and without giving the defaulting DEVELOPER the right to cure the DEVELOPER DEFAULT. In such case, the defaulting DEVELOPER shall within thirty (30) days after written billing by the CITY reimburse the CITY for any and all costs incurred by the CITY. In the alternative, the CITY may, in whole or in part, specially assess the costs and expenses incurred by the CITY against the relevant portion of DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY; and the defaulting DEVELOPER and OWNER hereby waive any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation and construction of the work and improvements and the special assessments resulting therefrom, including, but not limited to, notice and hearing requirements and any claim that the special assessments exceed benefit to the FINAL PLAT. The DEVELOPER and OWNER hereby waive any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. ARTICLE 15 FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS 15.1. DEVELOPER’S LETTER OF CREDIT AMOUNT. Prior to release of the FINAL PLAT for recording, the DEVELOPER shall deposit with the CITY an irrevocable LOC for the respective amounts required in Exhibits C and F. In lieu of an irrevocable LOC, DEVELOPER may deposit cash or other security acceptable to CITY. All cost estimates shall be acceptable to the CITY ENGINEER. The bank and form of the irrevocable LOC shall be subject to approval by the CITY Finance Director and shall continue to be in full force and effect until released by the CITY. The irrevocable LOC shall have auto-renewal terms. The irrevocable LOC shall secure compliance by the DEVELOPER with the terms of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. The CITY may draw down on the irrevocable LOC or cash deposit, without any further notice than that provided in Section 14.1 relating to a DEVELOPER DEFAULT, or for any of the following reasons: a) at DEVELOPER’S written request; or b) upon the CITY receiving notice that the irrevocable LOC will be allowed to lapse prior to two (2) years after acceptance by the CITY. The CITY shall use the respective LOC proceeds or cash escrows deposited by the DEVELOPER as identified on Exhibit C to reimburse the CITY for its costs and to cause the ON-SITE IMPROVEMEMENTS to be constructed by the DEVELOPER, to the extent practicable; and shall use the LOC proceeds and cash escrows on Exhibits F and G to reimburse the CITY for its costs and to cause the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS identified on Exhibits F and G, to be constructed by the DEVELOPER to the extent practicable; if the CITY ENGINEER determines that such 19 DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS and ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS have been constructed and after retaining the appropriate percentage of the proceeds for later distribution pursuant to Section 15.2, the remaining proceeds shall be distributed to the DEVELOPER. At DEVELOPER’S request and CITY’S written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, in lieu of using the LOC proceeds or cash escrows, the CITY and DEVELOPER may enter into a deferred assessment waiver agreement for a portion or all of the CITY’S reimbursement costs. With CITY approval, the respective LOC may be reduced pursuant to Section 15.2 from time to time as financial obligations are paid. 15.2. LOC RELEASE AND CASH ESCROW INCREASE. The DEVELOPER may request that the LOC or cash deposits required by the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT be reduced for ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS at the following milestones: a) LOC or Cash Escrow Reductions. The DEVELOPER may request LOC or cash escrow deposits be reduced at the following milestones and in such amounts that are commensurate with the amount of work that has been completed to date, but subject to the limitations for retainage amounts needed during the warranty period, as described below: i. Three (3) ON-SITE IMPROVEMENT reductions at least two (2) months apart. ii. One (1) landscaping reduction. b) LOC or Cash Escrow Release. Upon FINAL ACCEPTANCE by the CITY ENGINEER or COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR of each portion of the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS and upon commencement of the warranty periods, the LOC or cash escrows will be released as follows: i. Landscaping will be reduced by 50% and the balance will be retained through the warranty period. ii. Streets will be reduced by 75% and the balance will be retained through the warranty period. iii. ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS will be reduced by 75% and the balance will be retained through the warranty period. Following the expiration of the warranty periods, all LOC and cash escrows will be released. If it is determined by the CITY that the DEVELOPMENT PLANS were not strictly adhered to, or that work was done without CITY inspection, the CITY may require, as a condition of acceptance, that the relevant DEVELOPER posts an irrevocable LOC, or cash deposit equal to 125% of the estimated amount necessary to correct the deficiency or to protect against deficiencies arising therefrom. In the event that work, which is concealed, was done without permitting CITY inspection, then the CITY may, in the alternative, require the concealed condition to be exposed for inspection purposes. LOC reductions will be processed within 30 days of DEVELOPER’S request. 20 15.3. DEVELOPER’S CASH FEES AND CASH ESCROW REQUIREMENTS. Prior to the FINAL PLAT being released for recording, the DEVELOPER shall deposit cash and cash escrows with the CITY for those items and in the amounts required in Exhibit G, as allocated to each. DEVELOPER shall be responsible for all fees related to the purpose of the cash escrow. If the cash escrow deposit is depleted to 50%, DEVELOPER shall be required to replenish the cash escrow deposit to 100% within 30 days’ notice by the CITY. 15.4. BUILDER’S CASH FEES AND CASH ESCROW REQUIREMENTS. DEVELOPER shall notify each BUILDER that certain building permit fees and an escrow shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for each lot for those items and in the amount stated on Exhibit H, attached hereto. If the DEVELOPER is the only BUILDER pulling building permits, the CITY, in its sole discretion, may accept an irrevocable LOC from the DEVELOPER for each lot, in an amount equal to or exceeding the total amount of cash escrow requirement that would otherwise be required under this paragraph. ARTICLE 16 MISCELLANEOUS 16.1. CITY’S DUTIES. The terms of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall not be considered an affirmative duty upon the CITY to complete any DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. 16.2. NO MODIFICATIONS TO DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. All work with respect to the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT to be constructed or provided by DEVELOPER on the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY shall be in substantial conformity with the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and the DEVELOPER will not materially modify the size or exterior appearance of the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT without the consent of the CITY, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 16.3. NO THIRD-PARTY RECOURSE. Third parties shall have no recourse against the CITY under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 16.4. VALIDITY. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 16.5. RECORDING. The DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT and PLAT shall be recorded with the COUNTY Recorder and the DEVELOPER and OWNER shall provide and execute any and all documents necessary to implement the recording. 16.6. BINDING AGREEMENT. The parties mutually recognize and agree that all terms and conditions of this recordable DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall run with the land in the FINAL PLAT and shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the DEVELOPER and OWNER. This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall also run with and be binding upon any after acquired interest of the DEVELOPER and OWNER in the land made the subject of the FINAL PLAT. 16.7. CONTRACT ASSIGNMENT. The DEVELOPER may not assign this 21 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT without the prior written consent of the COUNCIL, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. In such case, the third-party buyer will be required to accept and assume all contractual and financial responsibilities provided in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. Upon satisfaction of such requirements by such third-party buyer, the DEVELOPER’S obligations hereunder shall terminate. Absent approval of the Council, the DEVELOPER’S obligations hereunder shall continue in full force and effect, even if the DEVELOPER sell one or more lots, the entire PLAT, or any part of it. 16.8. AMENDMENT AND WAIVER. The parties hereto may by mutual written agreement amend this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT in any respect. Any party hereto may extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations of another, waive any inaccuracies in representations by another contained in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT or in any document delivered pursuant hereto which inaccuracies would otherwise constitute a breach of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, waive compliance by another with any of the covenants contained in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, waive performance of any obligations by the other or waive the fulfillment of any condition that is precedent to the performance by the party so waiving of any of its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. Any agreement on the part of any party for any such amendment, extension or waiver must be in writing. No waiver of any of the provisions of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provisions, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. 16.9. GOVERNING LAW. This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 16.10. COUNTERPARTS. This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. 16.11. HEADINGS. The subject headings of the paragraphs and subparagraphs of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT are included for purposes of convenience only and shall not affect the construction of interpretation of any of its provisions. 16.12. INCONSISTENCY. If the DEVELOPMENT PLANS are inconsistent with the words of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT or if the obligations imposed hereunder upon the DEVELOPER are inconsistent, then that provision or term which imposes a greater and more demanding obligation on the DEVELOPER shall prevail. 16.13. ACCESS. The DEVELOPER hereby grants to the CITY, its agents, employees, officers, and contractors a license and right of entry to enter the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the CITY during the installation of DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS and ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 22 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE By: Myron Bailey Its Mayor By: Tamara Anderson Its City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) On this day of , 2026, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Myron Bailey and Tamara Anderson to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Cottage Grove, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the said instrument was signed on behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and City Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. Notary Public 23 EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY Real property situated in the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, legally described as: Lots 1-6, Block 1 Lots 1-4, Block 2 Lots 1-4, Block 3 Lots 1-6, Block 4 Lots 1-4, Block 5 Lots 1-4, Block 6 Lots 1-4, Block 7 Lots 1-4, Block 8 Outlots A-C All in Lochridge Second Addition A-1 EXHIBIT B FINAL PLAT B-1 EXHIBIT B FINAL PLAT CONT. B-2 EXHIBIT B FINAL PLAT CONT. B-3 EXHIBIT C ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS Site Improvement LOC Estimated Construction Cost Sanitary Sewer $ 147,581.30 Watermain $ 214,234.64 Storm Sewer $ 94,937.10 Streets $ 170,284.46 Street Lighting $ 16,877.00 Subtotal: $ 643,914.50 LOC (125%) $ 804,893.13 Final Streets Construction Cost $ 36,837.54 Final Streets LOC (130%): $ 47,888.80 Record Plan (2%) $ 12,878.00 Total Site Improvement LOC: $ 865,659.93 C-1 EXHIBIT D MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE CITY 1) CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED BEFORE CITY RELEASES THE FINAL PLAT TO BE RECORDED. a) Letter of Credit. The DEVELOPER must provide the LOC required in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. b) All Cash Deposits. The DEVELOPER must pay all cash deposits required in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. c) Planning Fees. The DEVELOPER must pay the CITY all planning, engineering review and legal fees that have been incurred up to the date of approval of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. d) Temporary Cul De Sac Easement. A signed Temporary Easement for Cul De Sac on Outlot C. e) Warranty Deed to HOA. A signed Warranty Deed to the HOA for Outlots A and B, Lochridge Second Addition. 2) BUILDING PERMITS. Except as provided in Section 4.14, no building permits may be issued until: a) All the conditions in Paragraph 1 of this Exhibit D have been met; b) All storm water ponds and associated drainage features within the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY, including storm sewer and drainage swales have been installed and approved by the CITY ENGINEER; c) All sanitary sewer and water main, within the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY, including services, have been installed, tested, televised as necessary, and reviewed and approved by the CITY ENGINEER and are available for use; d) DEVELOPER has constructed a temporary bituminous roadway for Ivywood Avenue and 62nd Street and for each building permit requested by the DEVELOPER there is a temporary bituminous roadway to the lots for which building permits are being requested that is acceptable in design and approved by the CITY ENGINEER. e) DEVELOPER has provided CITY with HOA documents identifying Outlots A and B, Lochridge Second Addition as HOA common elements requiring the HOA’s responsibility for maintenance. D-1 f) The documents below have been recorded in the following order: • Final Plat • Development Agreement • Warranty Deed to the HOA for Outlots A and B, Lochridge Second Addition 3) CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, all the following conditions must be satisfied: a) All the conditions listed in Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Exhibit D must be satisfied. b) Lot as-built surveys have been approved by the CITY. c) All trees and shrubs required in Section 4.17 have been planted, except for the landscaping along Jamaica and Military specifically identified in Section 7.3. d) All sod has been installed. 4) SUBDIVISION EROSION CONTROL. The DEVELOPER is responsible for erosion control throughout the FINAL PLAT pursuant to the NPDES permit until all lots in the FINAL PLAT are built upon and until turf is established in each of the individual lots in the FINAL PLAT. 5) CLEAN UP OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS ON STREETS AND ADJOINING PROPERTY. The escrow amount stated on Exhibit F shall include an appropriate amount as determined by the Director of Public Works to ensure that the DEVELOPER remove any construction debris from streets adjoining the FINAL PLAT and from private properties that adjoin the FINAL PLAT. During the construction of the residences and other improvements within the FINAL PLAT, the DEVELOPER is responsible for removing any construction debris (including roofing materials, paper wrappings, construction material and other waste products resulting from construction) that may be blown from the construction site into adjoining private properties or into CITY streets or that may fall from delivery trucks onto adjoining private properties or CITY streets. Further, during construction, the DEVELOPER must clear the CITY streets of any dirt or other earthen material that may fall onto the CITY streets from the delivery trucks that are being used in the excavation and grading of the site. 6) MAILBOXES. The DEVELOPER is responsible for the placement of a mailbox for all the lots within the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT and must comply with the United States Postal Service’s mailbox design and placement requirements. The mailboxes must all be of similar design and color within the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. 7) SIDEWALK SNOW REMOVAL AND TRAIL MAINTENANCE. The CITY shall provide snow removal of transportation trails and sidewalks. If the CITY does not provide snow removal on a trail or sidewalk within the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, the property owner abutting the trail or sidewalk must remove the snow and/or ice. D-2 EXHIBIT E PERMITS, LICENSES AND OTHER APPROVALS 1. Any licenses or permits required by the Minnesota Department of Health. 2. NPDES Permit from the MPCA. 3. Right of Way Permit from the CITY. 4. Grading Permit from the CITY. 5. Any contractor licenses from the CITY or the State of Minnesota. 6. Building Permits from the CITY. 7. Electrical Permits from the CITY. 8. South Washington Watershed Permit. 9. Utility permits that may be required from the CITY, State of Minnesota or any utility company. 10. Other permits or licenses as may be required for the construction of the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. 11. Right of Way Permit from Washington County. 12. Wetland Permit from the Department of Natural Resource. E-1 EXHIBIT F DEVELOPER’S LETTER OF CREDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPING ITEMS LANDSCAPING Landscape LOC Total Landscaping Estimate $ 25,088.00 Total LOC (150%): $ 37,632.00 F-1 EXHIBIT G DEVELOPER’S CASH REQUIREMENTS AND INDIRECT COST CASH PAYMENTS City Fees Unit Qty Unit Cost Total City Supplied Poles & Luminaires (LGT-8) EA 2 $ 5,457.00 $ 10,914.00 Street Light Utility Surcharge EA 36 $ 163.92 $ 5,901.12 Park and Open Space Markers1 EA - $ 175.00 $ - Park Dedication Fees2 LOT 36 $ - $ - Phosphorus Mitigation Fee3 LB - $ - $ - East Ravine AUAR Charge4 AC - $ 120.00 $ - 2% Engineering Fee LS 1 $ 13,615.04 $ 13,615.04 Total Fees $ 30,430.16 1 No new markers required for 2nd Addition 2 Park Dedication satisfied through dedication and Waters at Michael's Pointe credit 3 Phosphorus reduction satisfied through design. No Mitigation Fees required 4 Paid with 1st Addition G-2 EXHIBIT G (CONT.) CASH ESCROW Engineering Escrow Total Plan Review $ 20,422.56 Inspection $ 40,845.12 Total Escrow: $ 61,267.68 AREA CHARGES Area Charges Cost/Acre Acres Total Sanitary Area Charge - Upper Ravine $ 9,970.00 5.86 $ 58,424.20 Water Area Charge - Remainder of City $ 6,810.00 5.86 $ 39,906.60 Storm Area Charge - Upper Ravine - Multi Family $ 6,870.00 5.86 $ 40,258.20 Total Area Charges: $ 138,589.00 *Ponding HWLs were omitted from Area Charge Calculations G-2 EXHIBIT H BUILDER’S ESCROW REQUIREMENTS AND CASH REQUIREMENTS ESCROW Builder Escrow Per Lot Yard & Boulevard Sod $ 1,700.00 Curb Box Escrow $ 500.00 Administrative Escrow $ 565.00 Property As-built Survey & Corner Replacement $ 1,000.00 Total Escrow: $ 3,765.00 CASH REQUIREMENTS Building Permit Fees Per Lot Sod Inspection Fee $ 165.00 Curb Stop Inspection Fee $ 170.00 Grading As-built Review Fee $ 39.00 Right-of-way Permit Fee $ 50.00 Total Cash Added to Building Permit: $ 424.00 H-1 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-120 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR LOCHRIDGE SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC and DRP Odin 16, LLC have applied for a final plat to develop a residential subdivision named Lochridge Second Addition. This subdivision plat consists of a total of 36 townhome units attached in groups of four and six units and is located on the 18.89-acre property legally described as: Outlot J, LOCHRIDGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Washington County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Developer will utilize the approved plans and specifications dated July 14, 2026, as prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc. to construct the public improvements within the subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Developer will install the public improvements within the subdivision in accordance with current City ordinances and policies; and WHEREAS, a development agreement and financial sureties are required for the development of this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council for the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, hereby approves the Lochridge Second Addition construction plans and specifications dated July 14, 2026, as prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer and builders must comply with all City ordinances and policies. 2. The developer and builders must comply with the review comments found in the July 10, 2026 memorandum and any subsequential memorandum from Bolton and Menk. 3. Modifications to final construction plans and specifications shall be approved in writing by the City Engineer. Passed this 19th day of August 2026. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk Lochridge Second Addition PROJECT www.alliant-inc.com LOCATION Cottage Grove, Minnesota N MILITARY ROAD PHASE LIMITS (PUBLIC) (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT C OUTLOTOUTLOT B J VICINITY MAP BLOCK 5 BLOCK 4 1 2 Scale: 1"=4000' 5 6 3 4 2 3 4 1 1 BLOCK 6 62ND STREET S 2 3 4 CONTACT LIST OUTLOT C 1 BLOCK 7 2 3 3 4 DEVELOPER ENGINEER 2 1 4 1 2 3 4 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 3 18 17 1 PULTE GROUP Ben Palazzolo OUTLOT A 6 BLOCK 8 16 2 5 3 1650 W. 82nd Street, Suite 300 License No. 61668 15 4 4 3 BLOCK 1 BLOCK Email: bpalazzolo@alliant-inc.com 2 Bloomington, MN 55431 14 1 1 2 BLOCK 8 BLOCK Email: David.VonRuden@Pulte.com 3 1 6 13 4 5 Contact: David Von Ruden (PUBLIC) 5 SURVEYOR 4 2 6 12 3 BLOCK 7 Dan Ekrem 2 1 3 1 2 11 BLOCK 4 License No. 57366 BLOCK 9 BLOCK OUTLOT D CONSULTANT OUTLOT E 3 OUTLOT F 4 IVYWOOD AVENUE S BLOCK 3 OUTLOT C 4 4 3 63RD STREET S 10 Alliant Engineering, Inc. Email: dekrem@alliant-inc.com 5 2 JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH BLOCK 6 6 5 1 9 Marquette Avenue South, Suite 700 1 BLOCK 10 BLOCK 6 Minneapolis, MN 55402 6 2 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 8 5 3 4 4 Phone: 612.758.3080 7 John Gronhovd Minnesota 3 7 BLOCK 5 , 2 1 Fax: 612.758.3099 BLOCK 11 BLOCK License No. 59233 1 8 2 BLOCK 4 6 3 Email: jgronhovd@alliant-inc.com 5 4 4 22 9 4 3 2 1 3 1 12 BLOCK 21 10 2 63RD STREET S 3 11 4 2 20 Cottage Grove Cover Sheet Final Plat Submittal 12 Lochridge Second Addition 13 1 14 13 BLOCK ISLE AVENUE S BLOCK 2 15 1 2 19 BLOCK 3 16 OUTLOT H 17 3 18 4 BLOCK 3 OUTLOT C 1 IVYWOOD AVENUE S 14 BLOCK 2 OUTLOT G 3 RAVINE PARKWAY 4 OUTLOT I CANT' UNDER PATIO PLAN SUBMISSION/REVISION MATRIX GARNER DECK ( GARAGE 3 STALL 3 ) 1 RAVINE PARKWAY RAVINE PKWY SOUTH ) BLOCK 1 3 STALL ( GARAGE OUTLOT B (PUBLIC) OUTLOT I GARNER2 ) 3 STALL ( GARAGE CANT' UNDER PATIO 3 DECK GARNER 2026-06-222026-07-14 CANT' # SHEET DESCRIPTION UNDER PATIO DECK 1 Cover Sheet X X CANT' UNDER PATIO DECK GARNER ISLE AVENUE S GARAGE ( 3 STALL 4 ) 2-4 City Details X X CANT' UNDER (PUBLIC) PATIO DECK 5-6 Existing Conditions Plan X X GARNER GARAGE ( 3 STALL 5 ) PARK 7-8 Site Plan X X (BY OTHERS) CANT' UNDER PATIO DECK GARNER 9-10 Grading And Drainage Plan X X GARAGE ( 3 STALL 6 ) OUTLOT A 11-12 Erosion & Sediment Control Plan X X CANT' UNDER PATIO DECK GARNER Vertical Erosion And Sediment Control Plan X X GARAGE ( 3 STALL 7 13 ) 14 Erosion & Sediment Control Notes & Details X X JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH CANT' City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION UNDER PATIO GARNER DECK ( GARAGE 3 STALL 3 ) 8 15 Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Plan X X ) Utility Plan And Profiles X X ( 3 STALL 16 GARAGE ( ) 3 STALL GARAGE BLOCK 1 GARNER9 GARNER10 17 Storm Sewer Plan X X CANT' CANT' UNDER PATIO UNDER PATIO DECK DECK AKA 18 Street And Storm Sewer Plan & Profiles X X 'WETLAND 1' DATE 6-22-2026 19 Signage Plan X X 7-14-2026 OUTLOT B 20 Lighting Plan X X 21-22 Landscaping Plan X X CERTIFICATION LAKE ROBERT 23 Landscape Notes And Schedule X X I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report MN DNR 82-83(W) NWL:920.50 EXISTING HWL:925.82 was prepared by me or under my direct supervision INTERIM HWL:925.17 DEVELOPED HWL:924.93 and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Civil Engineer under the laws of the 8:20:11 AM State of Minnesota. at July 14, 2026 on Ben Palazzolo 7-14-2026 61668 Date License no. Ben Palazzolo NOTE: QA/QC CHECK - HORIZONTAL DATUM IS NAD 83 Plotted By: ---- - VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD 88. By Date JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH - CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE STANDARD N SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR PROJECT TEAM DATA 67TH STREET BAY SOUTH (PUBLIC) Designed By: BJP (PUBLIC) STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION, 67TH STREET BAY SOUTH DATED 2026 SHALL GOVERN ALL Drafted By: BJP (PUBLIC) IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROJECT Project No.: 4000367-00 Know what's below. 0 100 200 400 Call before you dig. x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\COVER.dwg R 1 Dial 811 SCALE IN FEET Sheet 1 of 23 File Location: www.alliant-inc.com ALLIANT MODIFIED/NOTED Minnesota , Cottage Grove City Details Final Plat Submittal Lochridge Second Addition SANITARY SEWER SERVICE INVERT ELEVATION PROVIDED ON ON PLANS City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional 8:20:29 AM Civil Engineer under the laws of the at State of Minnesota. July 14, 2026 on Ben Palazzolo 7-14-2026 61668 Ben Palazzolo Date License no. QA/QC CHECK Plotted By: ---- By Date PROJECT TEAM DATA Designed By: BJP Drafted By: BJP Project No.: 4000367-00 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R 2 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\City Details.dwg Dial 811 Sheet 2 of 23 File Location: ALLIANT MODIFIED/NOTED ALLIANT MODIFIED/NOTED SHOULDER 2% MIN, 1:6 MAX www.alliant-inc.com SHOULDER 2% MIN, 1:6 MAX NOTE: INTEND TO USE APPROPRIATE ONSITE MATERIAL FOR ROAD BASE (BELOW CLASS 5) 3. NO BEDROCK IS ALLOWED WITHIN 1 FOOT OF CLASS 5 BOTTOM. IN AREAS OF BEDROCK, 1 FT MINIMUM SELECT GRANULAR MUST BE PLACED ABOVE BEDROCK Minnesota , Cottage Grove City Details (2) Final Plat Submittal Lochridge Second Addition City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional 8:20:31 AM Civil Engineer under the laws of the at State of Minnesota. July 14, 2026 on Ben Palazzolo 7-14-2026 61668 Ben Palazzolo Date License no. QA/QC CHECK Plotted By: ---- By Date PROJECT TEAM DATA Designed By: BJP Drafted By: BJP Project No.: 4000367-00 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 3 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\City Details.dwg Sheet 3 of 23 File Location: R Know what's below. what's Know Call beforeyoudig. Dial 811 Project No.: Drafted By: Designed By: Date By Ben Palazzolo 7-14-2026 ---- I herebycertifythatthisplan,specification,orreport was preparedbymeorundermydirectsupervision DATE DESCRIPTION Sheet and thatIamadulyLicensedProfessional 6-22-2026 City Submittal Lochridge Second Addition PROJECT TEAMDATA Civil Engineer 7-14-2026 City Submittal CERTIFICATION QA/QC CHECK www.alliant-inc.com State of BJP BJP 4000367-00 Cottage Grove, Minnesota 4 4 underthelawsof of Minnesota Date License no. 61668 23 . Final Plat Submittal City Details (3) File Location: x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\City Details.dwg Plotted By: Ben Palazzolo on July 14, 2026 at 8:20:34 AM NOTES: VIEW A DRY BASIN 1 MILITARY ROAD BOTTOM:942.5 INTERIM HWL:948.26 FINAL HWL:950.57 (PUBLIC) (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT J 18 17 16 15 14 1 2 BLOCK 8 BLOCK 3 1 6 13 4 5 (PUBLIC) 5 4 2 6 12 3 POND 1 BLOCK 7 NWL:926.00 2 INTERIM HWL:936.61 1 FINAL HWL:936.95 3 1 2 11 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 9 BLOCK OUTLOT D OUTLOT E 3 OUTLOT F 4 IVYWOOD AVENUE S BLOCK 3 4 4 3 63RD STREET S 10 5 2 JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH BLOCK 6 6 5 1 9 1 BLOCK 10 BLOCK 6 6 2 8 5 3 4 7 4 3 7 BLOCK 5 2 1 BLOCK 11 BLOCK 8 1 BLOCK 4 2 6 3 5 4 4 22 9 4 3 2 1 3 1 12 BLOCK 21 10 2 63RD STREET S 3 11 4 2 20 POND 2 12 13 1 14 13 BLOCK NWL:925.00 ISLE AVENUE S DRY BASIN 2 INTERIM HWL:932.27 BLOCK 2 15 FINAL HWL:932.02 BOTTOM:931.0 2 1 BLOCK 3 19 INTERIM HWL:935.34 FINAL HWL:935.02 16 OUTLOT H 17 3 18 4 BLOCK 3 OUTLOT C 1 IVYWOOD AVENUE S 14 BLOCK 8:1 TAPER 2 OUTLOT G RAVINE PARKWAY 3 8:1 TAPER 4 LEGEND: OUTLOT I DRY BASIN 3 >> BOTTOM:924.00 WL INTERIM HWL:931.73 FINAL HWL:928.44 | 1 RAVINE PARKWAY RAVINE PKWY 5:1 TAPER SOUTH BLOCK 1 8:1 TAPER OUTLOT B 8:1 TAPER (PUBLIC) OUTLOT I 2 POND 3 TRAIL A ISLE AVENUE S NWL:922.00 INTERIM HWL:928.89 FINAL HWL:927.56 3 4 TRAIL C (PUBLIC) 5 TRAIL A PARK (BY OTHERS) 6 OUTLOT A 7 JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH 8 BLOCK 1 9 10 AKA 'WETLAND 1' OUTLOT B TRAIL A LAKE ROBERT MN DNR 82-83(W) NWL:920.50 TRAIL C EXISTING HWL:925.82 INTERIM HWL:925.17 DEVELOPED HWL:924.93 WETLAND B RESEEDING, SEE INSET ON SHEET 69 TRAIL A R Know what'sbelow. Call before you dig. you before Call Dial 811 JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH 67TH STREET BAY SOUTH (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) 67TH STREET BAY SOUTH (PUBLIC) 0 TRAIL A SCALE INFEET N TRAIL B 60 120 240 Project No.: Drafted By: Designed By: Date By Ben Palazzolo 7-14-2026 ---- I herebycertifythatthisplan,specification,orreport was preparedbymeorundermydirectsupervision DATE DESCRIPTION Sheet and thatIamadulyLicensedProfessional 6-22-2026 City Submittal Lochridge Second Addition PROJECT TEAMDATA Civil Engineer 7-14-2026 City Submittal CERTIFICATION QA/QC CHECK www.alliant-inc.com State of BJP BJP 4000367-00 Cottage Grove, Minnesota 5 5 underthelawsof of Minnesota Date License no. 61668 23 . Final Plat Submittal Existing Conditions Plan File Location: x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\DEMO.dwg Plotted By: Ben Palazzolo on July 14, 2026 at 8:21:08 AM 962 VIEW A 974 www.alliant-inc.com S89°57'30"W 962.89 974 956 DRY BASIN 1 972 MILITARY ROAD BOTTOM:942.5 INTERIM HWL:948.26 972 FINAL HWL:950.57 954 S54°00'18"E 581.64 970 (PUBLIC) 964 952 (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT J 968 960 950 970 960 950 948 Minnesota , Cottage Grove Final Plat Submittal Existing Conditions Plan - View A Lochridge Second Addition 8 " 8 0 .7 5 0 4 . ' 7 0 4 4 9 0 950 946 REMOVE, SALVAGE, AND = 2 ° = 5 R 3 952 RELOCATE BARRICADE AND L = SIGNAGE (SEE SHEET 19) Δ 18 17 960 16 REMOVE TEMPORARY 966 15 CUL-DE-SAC AND VACATE TEMPORARY EASEMENT 944 966 958 City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION 970 14 1 DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 2 BLOCK 8 BLOCK CERTIFICATION 3 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report 6 1 942 was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional 4 13 Civil Engineer under the laws of the 8:21:11 AM at 5 State of Minnesota. 950 (PUBLIC) 5 944 July 14, 2026 4 940 on Ben Palazzolo 2 6 12 3 7-14-2026 61668 Date License no. Ben Palazzolo POND 1 BLOCK 7 NWL:926.00 2 QA/QC CHECK 968 INTERIM HWL:936.61 1 FINAL HWL:936.95 ---- Plotted By: N By Date 3 1 2 966 11 BLOCK 4 PROJECT TEAM DATA BLOCK 9 BLOCK OUTLOT D Designed By: BJP 3 Drafted By: BJP 964 OUTLOT E OUTLOT F 4 Project No.: 4000367-00 N0°59'11"E 2408.16 IVYWOOD AVENUE S N1°01'08"E 1740.00 BLOCK 3 4 962 4 3 63RD STREET S 10 Know what's below. 5 0 30 60 120 960 Call before you948 dig. R 2 Dial 811 JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH BLOCK 6 REMOVE TREES SCALE IN FEET 6 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\DEMO.dwg 958 6 944 5 1 942 956 9 Sheet 6 of 23 File Location: 940 www.alliant-inc.com (PUBLIC) JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH (PUBLIC) SOUTH VIEW A RAVINE PKWY (PUBLIC) JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH AVENUE JAMAICA (PUBLIC) JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH AVENUE JAMAICA (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT D OUTLOT C POND 2 (PUBLIC) BLOCK 8 BLOCK 9 BLOCK 8 BLOCK 10 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 PARK 2 3 2 OUTLOT A (PUBLIC) 1 3 4 4 BLOCK 11 BLOCK3 7 1 (BY OTHERS) 2 2 1 3 4 67TH STREET BAY SOUTH BLOCK 12 BLOCK 13 4 1 BLOCK 14 IVYWOOD AVENUE S 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 (PUBLIC) MILITARY ROAD 1 SOUTH BAY STREET 67TH 3 2 3 BLOCK2 6 4 1 1 4 3 2 1 6 5 2 4 3 2 1 3 4 6 5 BLOCK 6 BLOCK 6 BLOCK 7 BLOCK 4 5 BLOCK 1 BLOCK IVYWOOD AVENUE S 4 3 3 2 BLOCK 5 BLOCK OUTLOT G 1 2 OUTLOT F BLOCK 5 4 1 1 18 3 OUTLOT J 2 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 6 2 1 17 OUTLOT B 5 OUTLOT B 4 OUTLOT E 3 4 3 16 3 BLOCK 4 BLOCK POND 1 BLOCK 3 2 BLOCK 4 2 4 BLOCK 3 1 OUTLOT A 15 1 62ND STREET S LAKE ROBERT 63RD STREET S 5 MN DNR 82-83(W) 14 BLOCK 4 BLOCK NWL:920.50 EXISTING HWL:925.82 RAVINE PARKWAY INTERIM HWL:925.17 13 Minnesota 13 DEVELOPED HWL:924.93 6 12 14 9 , 8 11 7 10 OUTLOT C 15 12 POND 3 AKA 63RD STREET S 16 11 'WETLAND 1' Cottage Grove Site Plan Final Plat Submittal Lochridge Second Addition 10 17 1 2 3 9 4 5 6 7 8 OUTLOT C 18 3 BLOCK DRY BASIN 2 OUTLOT H BLOCK 3 BLOCK BLOCK 1 BLOCK DECK PATIO UNDER CANT' GARNER 22 21 20 19 1 BLOCK 1 BLOCK GARAGE (3 STALL ) DECK DECK PATIO UNDER DECK PATIO UNDER PATIO UNDER CANT' CANT' 2 CANT' GARNER ) GARAGE 3 STALL 3 ( GARNER GARNER 7 DECK ISLE AVENUE S 8 PATIO UNDER DECK DECK GARAGE (3 STALL) PATIO UNDER PATIO CANT' UNDER GARAGE ( 3 STALL ) DECK CANT' CANT' PATIO UNDER GARNER 3 CANT' GARNER GARNER ) GARNER GARAGE 3 STALL 3 ( 4 5 6 DRY S AVENUE ISLE GARAGE (3 STALL) ) 3 STALL 3 GARAGE 9 DECK ( GARAGE GARAGE PATIO (3 STALL) UNDER (3 STALL) GARNER BASIN 1 CANT' 4 3 2 1 BLOCK 2 BLOCK DRY ) ISLE AVENUE S 3 STALL ( GARAGE OUTLOT C OUTLOT 10 BASIN 3 GARNER PATIO DECK UNDER CANT' City Submittal City Submittal OUTLOT I DESCRIPTION DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 SITE PLAN LOT DATA: SITE NOTES: LEGEND: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision TYPICAL 24' WIDE TOWNHOME LOT DETAIL and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Civil Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 8:21:32 AM at July 14, 2026 (INSET A) Ben Palazzolo on 7-14-2026 61668 Date License no. Ben Palazzolo QA/QC CHECK ---- Plotted By: By Date TYPICAL STREET SECTION PROJECT TEAM DATA Designed By: BJP Drafted By: BJP 0 60 120 240 Project No.: 4000367-00 N SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. SITE PLAN OUTLOT DATA: Call before you dig. R 7 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\SITE.dwg Dial 811 Sheet 7 of 23 File Location: VIEW A www.alliant-inc.com DRY BASIN 1 MILITARY ROAD BOTTOM:942.5 INTERIM HWL:948.26 FINAL HWL:950.57 (PUBLIC) (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT C OUTLOTOUTLOT B J BLOCK 5 BLOCK 4 1 2 5 6 3 4 2 3 4 1 1 BLOCK 6 2 3 Minnesota 4 , OUTLOT C 62ND STREET S 1 BLOCK 7 Cottage Grove Site Plan - View A Final Plat Submittal Lochridge Second Addition 2 3 4 2 3 1 4 1 2 3 4 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 3 18 17 1 OUTLOT A 6 BLOCK 8 16 2 5 3 4 15 IVYWOOD AVENUE S 4 3 BLOCK 1 BLOCK City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION 2 1 14 1 DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 2 BLOCK 8 BLOCK CERTIFICATION 3 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report 6 was prepared by me or under my direct supervision 1 and that I am a duly Licensed Professional 4 Civil Engineer under the laws of the 13 8:21:34 AM 5 State of Minnesota. at (PUBLIC) 5 4 July 14, 2026 Ben Palazzolo on 2 6 7-14-2026 61668 12 3 Date License no. BLOCK 7 POND 1 Ben Palazzolo NWL:926.00 2 QA/QC CHECK INTERIM HWL:936.61 1 FINAL HWL:936.95 ---- Plotted By: By Date 63RD STREET S S STREET 63RD 3 1 2 11 BLOCK 4 N PROJECT TEAM DATA BLOCK 9 BLOCK OUTLOT D Designed By: BJP OUTLOT E 3 Drafted By: BJP OUTLOT F 4 Project No.: 4000367-00 BLOCK 3 OUTLOT C 4 4 10 3 5 Know what's below. 2 Call before you dig. 0 JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH 25 50 100 BLOCK 6 R 8 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\SITE.dwg 6 Dial 811 5 1 SCALE IN FEET 9 Sheet 8 of 23 File Location: www.alliant-inc.com (PUBLIC) JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH (PUBLIC) SOUTH VIEW A RAVINE PKWY (PUBLIC) JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH AVENUE JAMAICA (PUBLIC) JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH AVENUE JAMAICA VIEW D (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT D OUTLOT C POND 2 (PUBLIC) BLOCK 8 BLOCK 9 BLOCK 8 BLOCK 10 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 PARK 2 3 2 OUTLOT A (PUBLIC) 1 3 4 BLOCK 7 4 BLOCK 11 3 1 (BY OTHERS) 2 2 1 3 4 67TH STREET BAY SOUTH BLOCK 12 BLOCK 13 4 1 2 BLOCK 14 IVYWOOD AVENUE S 3 4 1 2 3 4 (PUBLIC) MILITARY ROAD 1 SOUTH BAY STREET 67TH 3 2 RAVINE PARKWAY 3 BLOCK2 6 4 1 1 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 2 3 2 1 3 4 6 5 BLOCK 6 BLOCK 6 IVYWOOD AVENUE S BLOCK 7 BLOCK 4 5 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 4 3 3 2 BLOCK 5 BLOCK OUTLOT G 1 2 OUTLOT F BLOCK 5 4 1 1 18 3 OUTLOT J 2 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 6 2 1 17 OUTLOT B 5 OUTLOT B 4 OUTLOT E 3 4 3 16 3 BLOCK 4 BLOCK POND 1 BLOCK 3 2 BLOCK 4 2 4 BLOCK 3 1 OUTLOT A 63RD STREET S 15 1 LAKE ROBERT 5 MN DNR 82-83(W) Minnesota 14 BLOCK 4 BLOCK NWL:920.50 , 62ND STREET S EXISTING HWL:925.82 INTERIM HWL:925.17 13 RAVINE PARKWAY 13 DEVELOPED HWL:924.93 6 12 14 9 8 7 11 10 OUTLOT C 15 12 POND 3 AKA Cottage Grove Grading And Drainage Plan Final Plat Submittal Lochridge Second Addition 63RD STREET S 16 11 'WETLAND 1' 10 17 1 2 3 9 4 5 6 7 8 OUTLOT C 18 3 BLOCK DRY BASIN 2 OUTLOT H BLOCK 3 BLOCK BLOCK 1 BLOCK DECK PATIO UNDER 63RD STREET S S STREET 63RD CANT' GARNER 22 21 20 19 1 BLOCK 1 BLOCK GARAGE (3 STALL ) DECK DECK PATIO UNDER DECK PATIO UNDER PATIO UNDER CANT' CANT' 2 CANT' GARNER ) GARAGE 3 STALL 3 ( GARNER GARNER ISLE AVENUE S 7 DECK ISLE AVENUE S 8 PATIO UNDER DECK DECK GARAGE (3 STALL) PATIO UNDER PATIO CANT' UNDER GARAGE (3 STALL ) DECK CANT' CANT' PATIO UNDER GARNER 3 CANT' GARNER GARNER ) GARNER GARAGE 3 STALL 3 ( 4 5 DRY 6 GARAGE (3 STALL) ) 3 STALL 3 GARAGE 9 DECK ( GARAGE GARAGE PATIO (3 STALL) UNDER (3 STALL) GARNER BASIN 1 CANT' 4 3 2 1 ISLE AVENUE S AVENUE ISLE BLOCK 2 BLOCK DRY ) ISLE AVENUE S 3 STALL ( GARAGE OUTLOT C OUTLOT City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION 10 BASIN 3 GARNER PATIO DECK UNDER CANT' OUTLOT I DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report GRADING NOTES: RETAINING WALL NOTES: GRADING LEGEND: was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Civil Engineer under the laws of the 8:22:03 AM State of Minnesota. at July 14, 2026 on Ben Palazzolo 7-14-2026 61668 Date License no. Ben Palazzolo QA/QC CHECK ---- Plotted By: By Date PROJECT TEAM DATA Designed By: BJP Drafted By: BJP Project No.: 4000367-00 N Know what's below. Call before you dig. 0 60 120 240 R 9 Dial 811 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\GRADING.dwg SCALE IN FEET Sheet 9 of 23 File Location: 962 974 N www.alliant-inc.com 974 956 DRY BASIN 1 972 MILITARY ROAD 0 25 50 100 BOTTOM:942.5 INTERIM HWL:948.26 972 FINAL HWL:950.57 SCALE IN FEET 954 970 Know what's below. Call before you dig. R Dial 811 958 (PUBLIC) 964 952 (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT C OUTLOTOUTLOT B J 968 960 950 BLOCK 5 1 BLOCK 4 2 3 970 5 6 4 960 2 3 4 950 1 1 BLOCK 6 948 2 3 Minnesota 62ND STREET S 4 , OUTLOT C 1 BLOCK 7 Cottage Grove Grading And Drainage Plan - View A Final Plat Submittal Lochridge Second Addition 2 3 3 4 950 946 2 1 4 952 1 2 3 4 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 3 TOWNHOME HOLD DOWN DETAILS 18 17 1 OUTLOT A 6 BLOCK 8 960 16 2 5 3 966 15 4 944 4 966 3 958 BLOCK 1 BLOCK City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION 63RD STREET S 2 970 1 14 1 DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 2 BLOCK 8 BLOCK CERTIFICATION 3 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report 6 942 was prepared by me or under my direct supervision 1 and that I am a duly Licensed 4 13 Civil Engineer under the laws of the 8:22:09 AM at 5 State of Minnesota. 950 (PUBLIC) 5 944 July 14, 2026 4 940 on Ben Palazzolo BEDROCK SUBCUT DETAILS 2 6 7-14-2026 61668 3 12 IVYWOOD AVENUE S Date License no. Ben Palazzolo POND 1 BLOCK 7 NWL:926.00 2 QA/QC CHECK 968 INTERIM HWL:936.61 1 FINAL HWL:936.95 ---- Plotted By: ISLE AVENUE S By Date 63RD STREET S 3 1 2 966 11 BLOCK 4 PROJECT TEAM DATA BLOCK 9 BLOCK OUTLOT D Designed By: BJP 3 Drafted By: BJP 964 OUTLOT E OUTLOT F 4 Project No.: 4000367-00 BLOCK 3 OUTLOT C 4 962 4 10 3 960 5 948 2 JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH BLOCK 6 10 958 6 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\GRADING.dwg SLAB ON GRADE PAD 944 5 1 942 956 9 Sheet 10 of 23 940 File Location: www.alliant-inc.com (PUBLIC) JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH (PUBLIC) SOUTH VIEW A RAVINE PKWY (PUBLIC) JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH AVENUE JAMAICA (PUBLIC) JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH AVENUE JAMAICA VIEW D (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT D OUTLOT C (PUBLIC) BLOCK 8 BLOCK 9 BLOCK 8 BLOCK 10 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 PARK 2 3 2 OUTLOT A (PUBLIC) 1 3 4 BLOCK 7 4 BLOCK 11 3 1 (BY OTHERS) 2 2 1 3 4 67TH STREET BAY SOUTH BLOCK 12 BLOCK 13 4 1 2 BLOCK 14 IVYWOOD AVENUE S 3 4 1 2 3 4 (PUBLIC) MILITARY ROAD 1 SOUTH BAY STREET 67TH 3 2 3 BLOCK2 6 4 1 RAVINE PARKWAY ~DND~ 1 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 2 3 2 1 3 4 6 5 BLOCK 6 BLOCK 6 IVYWOOD AVENUE S BLOCK 7 BLOCK 4 5 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 4 3 3 2 BLOCK 5 BLOCK OUTLOT G 1 2 OUTLOT F BLOCK 5 4 1 1 18 3 OUTLOT J 2 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 6 2 1 17 OUTLOT B 5 OUTLOT B 4 OUTLOT E 3 4 3 16 3 BLOCK 4 BLOCK BLOCK 3 2 BLOCK 4 2 4 BLOCK 3 1 OUTLOT A 63RD STREET S 15 1 LAKE ROBERT 5 MN DNR 82-83(W) Minnesota 14 ~DND~ BLOCK 4 BLOCK NWL:920.50 , 62ND STREET S EXISTING HWL:925.82 INTERIM HWL:925.17 13 RAVINE PARKWAY 13 DEVELOPED HWL:924.93 6 12 14 9 8 7 11 10 OUTLOT C 15 12 AKA Cottage Grove Final Plat Submittal Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Lochridge Second Addition 63RD STREET S 16 11 'WETLAND 1' 10 17 1 2 3 9 4 5 6 7 8 OUTLOT C 18 3 BLOCK OUTLOT H BLOCK 3 BLOCK ~DND~ ~DND~ BLOCK 1 BLOCK DECK PATIO UNDER CANT' GARNER 22 21 20 19 1 BLOCK 1 BLOCK GARAGE (3 STALL ) DECK DECK PATIO UNDER PATIO DECK UNDER PATIO UNDER CANT' CANT' 2 CANT' GARNER ) GARAGE 3 STALL 3 ( GARNER GARNER ISLE AVENUE S 7 DECK ISLE AVENUE S 8 PATIO UNDER DECK DECK GARAGE (3 STALL) PATIO UNDER PATIO CANT' UNDER GARAGE (3 STALL ) DECK CANT' CANT' PATIO UNDER GARNER 3 CANT' GARNER GARNER ) GARNER GARAGE 3 STALL 3 ( 4 5 6 GARAGE (3 STALL) ) 9 DECK 3 STALL 3 GARAGE GARAGE ( GARAGE PATIO (3 STALL) UNDER (3 STALL) GARNER CANT' 4 3 2 1 BLOCK 2 BLOCK ~DND~ ) ISLE AVENUE S 3 STALL ( GARAGE OUTLOT C OUTLOT City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION 10 GARNER PATIO DECK UNDER CANT' OUTLOT I DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report 8:22:34 AM was prepared by me or under my direct supervision at and that I am a duly Licensed LEGEND: NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: EROSION CONTROL Civil Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. RESPONSIBLE PARTY: July 14, 2026 DND on Ben Palazzolo Ben Palazzolo 7-14-2026 61668 SITE IMPERVIOUS DATA Date License no. Plotted By: 1 MILE QA/QC CHECK ---- By Date PROJECT TEAM DATA Know what's below. Designed By: BJP Call before you dig. R Drafted By: BJP Dial 811 SWPPP BMP QUANTITIES*: Project No.: 4000367-00 NOTES: N 0 60 120 240 11 VICINITY MAP x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\EROSION CONTROL.dwg SCALE IN FEET NOT TO SCALE Sheet 11 of 23 File Location: 962 VIEW A 974 www.alliant-inc.com 974 956 972 MILITARY ROAD BOTTOM:942.5 INTERIM HWL:948.26 972 FINAL HWL:950.57 954 970 (PUBLIC) 964 952 (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT C OUTLOTOUTLOT B J 968 960 950 BLOCK 5 1 BLOCK 4 2 3 970 5 6 4 960 2 3 4 950 1 1 BLOCK 6 948 2 3 Minnesota 62ND STREET S 4 , OUTLOT C 1 BLOCK 7 Cottage Grove Final Plat Submittal Erosion & Sediment Control Plan - View A Lochridge Second Addition 2 3 3 4 950 946 2 1 4 952 1 2 3 4 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 3 18 17 1 OUTLOT A 6 BLOCK 8 960 16 2 5 3 966 15 4 944 4 966 3 958 BLOCK 1 BLOCK City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION 2 970 1 14 1 DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 2 BLOCK 8 BLOCK CERTIFICATION 3 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report 8:22:36 AM 6 942 was prepared by me or under my direct supervision at 1 and that I am a duly Licensed 13 4 Civil Engineer under the laws of the 5 State of Minnesota. 950 July 14, 2026 (PUBLIC) on 5 944 4 940 Ben Palazzolo Ben Palazzolo 2 6 7-14-2026 61668 3 12 IVYWOOD AVENUES Date License no. BLOCK 7 Plotted By: NWL:926.00 2 QA/QC CHECK 968 INTERIM HWL:936.61 1 FINAL HWL:936.95 ---- ISLE AVENUES By Date 63RD STREETS 3 1 2 966 11 BLOCK 4 N PROJECT TEAM DATA BLOCK 9 BLOCK OUTLOT D Designed By: BJP 3 Drafted By: BJP 964 OUTLOT E OUTLOT F 4 Project No.: 4000367-00 BLOCK 3 OUTLOT C 4 962 4 10 3 960 5 Know what's948 below. 2 Call before you dig. 0 JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH 25 50 100 BLOCK 6 R 12 958 6 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\EROSION CONTROL.dwg 944 Dial 811 5 1 942 SCALE IN FEET 956 9 Sheet 12 of 23 940 File Location: 962 VIEW A 974 www.alliant-inc.com 974 956 972 MILITARY ROAD BOTTOM:942.5 INTERIM HWL:948.26 972 FINAL HWL:950.57 954 970 (PUBLIC) 964 952 (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT C OUTLOTOUTLOT B J 968 960 950 BLOCK 5 1 BLOCK 4 2 3 970 5 6 4 960 2 3 4 950 1 1 BLOCK 6 948 2 3 Minnesota 62ND STREET S 4 , OUTLOT C 1 BLOCK 7 Vertical Erosion And Cottage Grove Sediment Control Plan Final Plat Submittal Lochridge Second Addition 2 3 3 4 950 946 2 1 4 952 1 2 3 4 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 3 18 17 1 OUTLOT A 6 BLOCK 8 960 16 2 5 3 966 15 4 944 4 966 3 958 BLOCK 1 BLOCK City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION 2 970 1 14 1 DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 2 BLOCK 8 BLOCK CERTIFICATION 3 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report 8:22:39 AM 6 942 was prepared by me or under my direct supervision at 1 and that I am a duly Licensed LEGEND: 4 NOTES: 13 Civil Engineer under the laws of the 5 State of Minnesota. 950 July 14, 2026 (PUBLIC) on 5 944 4 940 Ben Palazzolo Ben Palazzolo 2 6 7-14-2026 61668 3 12 IVYWOOD AVENUES Date License no. BLOCK 7 Plotted By: NWL:926.00 2 QA/QC CHECK 968 INTERIM HWL:936.61 1 FINAL HWL:936.95 ---- ISLE AVENUES By Date 63RD STREETS 3 1 2 966 11 BLOCK 4 N PROJECT TEAM DATA BLOCK 9 BLOCK OUTLOT D Designed By: BJP 3 Drafted By: BJP 964 OUTLOT E OUTLOT F 4 Project No.: 4000367-00 BLOCK 3 OUTLOT C 4 962 4 10 3 960 5 Know what's948 below. 2 Call before you dig. 0 JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH 25 50 100 BLOCK 6 R 13 958 6 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\EROSION CONTROL.dwg 944 Dial 811 5 1 942 SCALE IN FEET 956 9 Sheet 13 of 23 940 File Location: EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: EROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE: 1. NO LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY SHALL OCCUR UNTIL A GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED FROM THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE AND THE 1. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOLITION, SILT FENCE AND FILTERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN TO INTERCEPT RUNOFF. WATERSHED DISTRICT. UNLESS EXPRESSLY EXTENDED BY A PERMIT, THE HOURS OF OPERATION SHALL BE LIMITED TO 7:00 AM TO 7:00 PM MONDAY-FRIDAY AND 9:00AM TO 7:00 PM SATURDAY. 2. ALL EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATIONS SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD CONDITION BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL THE SITE HAS BEEN RE-VEGETATED. CONTRACTOR MAY REMOVE NECESSARY SILT FENCING/FILTERS TO CONSTRUCT ROADWAYS, WHILE www.alliant-inc.com 2. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) REFER TO EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES DEFINED IN THE MPCA PROTECTING MAINTAINING ADEQUATE EROSION CONTROL IN ADJACENT AREA. WATER QUALITY IN URBAN AREAS AND THE MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING HANDBOOK. 3. SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED AND PRESERVED TO ALLOW FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF 6" OF TOPSOIL FOR DISTURBED 3. ALL BMP'S SELECTED SHALL BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE TIME OF YEAR, SITE CONDITIONS, AND ESTIMATED DURATION OF USE. AREAS TO BE RE-VEGETATED. COMPACTION MUST BE MINIMIZED DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. 4. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED PLANS 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE SITE GRADING, UTILITY INSTALLATION AND PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION SO THAT THE GENERAL SITE SHALL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. CAN BE MULCHED AND RE-SEEDED SOON AFTER DISTURBANCE. AREAS THAT WILL NOT BE SUBJECT TO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHALL BE SEEDED (MnDOT MIX 190 @ 100#/AC AND MULCHED OR SODDED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF BEING DISTURBED. 5. A COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS INDICATED ON THIS EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND ANY ADDITIONAL 6. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO REQUIRED BASED ON MEANS, METHODS AND SEQUENCES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION. NO DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE DISTURBED LIMITS. 7. WHEREVER POSSIBLE, PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES, GRASS AND OTHER VEGETATIVE COVER TO HELP FILTER RUNOFF. 8. ESTABLISH A PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOILS WHERE LAND IS COMING OUT OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION. PLANT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH DENSE GRASS FILTER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND TO MINIMIZE WEED GROWTH. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: 9. ALL TREES NOT LISTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED. DO NOT OPERATE EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE DRIPLINE, ROOT ZONES OR 1. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MINIMIZE SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS WITHIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE AREAS. AND STORM SEWER INLETS. 10. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES (BMP'S) SHALL BE INSTALLED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO LAND DISTURBANCE 2. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERMITERS BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND ACTIVITIES AND THEY SHALL BE SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. THESE PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. HAS PASSED. 3. THE TIMING OF THE INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES 11. SILT FENCE IS REQUIRED AT DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER OF DISTURBED AREAS AND STOCKPILES. PROTECT WETLANDS, SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES. ANY SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY MUST BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS WATERCOURSES AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES FROM SEDIMENTATION AND STORMWATER RUNOFF. POSSIBLE AND THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. HOWEVER, SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. 12. THE BMP'S SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND UNEXPECTED OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE, THE PERMITTEE/CONTRACTOR SHALL ANTICIPATE THAT MORE 4. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL BMP'S WILL BE NECESSARY TO ENSURE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ON THE SITE. DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, IT IS FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE/CONTRACTOR TO ADDRESS ANY NEW CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND/OR CLIMATIC EVENTS AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BMP'S OVER AND ABOVE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ON 5. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCES OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AND CANNOT BE PLACED IN THE PLANS, AS MAY BE NEEDED TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE PROTECTION OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES. SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORM WATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUITS AND DITCHES. 13. THE BMP'S SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE PERMITTEE/CONTRACTOR AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THEIR CONTINUED 6. SITE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES WILL BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EACH FUNCTIONING. SILT FENCES CLEANED OR REPLACED AT SEDIMENT BUILDUP OF 1/2 OF THE FENCE HEIGHT. ENTRANCE. 14. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL OCCUR IN INCREMENTS OF WORKABLE SIZE SUCH THAT ADEQUATE BMP CONTROL CAN BE PROVIDED 7. STREET SWEEPING SHALL BE USED IN ADDITION TO ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES IF ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ALONE IS NOT THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. THE SMALLEST PRACTICAL AREA SHALL BE EXPOSED OR OTHERWISE DISTURBED AT ANY ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO THE STREET. ONE TIME. 8. ALL SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND DELTAS MUST BE REMOVED FROM SURFACE WATERS AND THE REMOVAL AREAS RESTABILIZED WITHIN 15. OPERATE TRACK EQUIPMENT (DOZER) UP AND DOWN EXPOSED SOIL SLOPES ON FINAL PASS, LEAVING TRACK GROOVES PERPENDICULAR SEVEN DAYS TO THE SLOPE. DO NOT BACK-BLADE. LEAVE A SURFACE ROUGH TO MINIMIZE EROSION. 16. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STABILIZED FROM EROSION WITHIN 7 DAYS OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AMENDMENT: GRADING IN THAT AREA. TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH SHALL COVER ALL EXPOSED SOILS IF GRADING COMPLETION IS DELAYED 1. SWPPP AMENDMENTS SHALL BE MADE ACCORDING TO THE CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT. LONGER THAN 7 DAYS. PERMANENT SEED AND MULCH OR SOD IS REQUIRED WITHIN 3 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING. 2. PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP WITHIN 7 DAYS TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN 17. GENERAL TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT MIX 190 @ 100 LBS. PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUAL. PERMANENT SEED SHALL BE MNDOT DESIGN, CONSTRUCITON, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER, OR SEASONAL CONDITION HAVING A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE MIX 270 @ 120 LBS. PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUAL. (PLANTING DATES PER SPEC 2575) MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 1 (CLEAN OAT DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER. STRAW) @ 2 TONS PER ACRE AND DISK ANCHORED IN PLACE OR APPROVED EQUAL. FERTILIZER SHALL BE 80-80-80 NPK PER ACRE (UNLESS P RESTRICTIONS APPLY) AND INCORPORATED INTO THE SEED BED. 3. PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP WITHIN 7 DAYS TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS WHENEVER INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BY THE SITE OWNER OR OPERATOR, USEPA OR MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE IN ELIMINATING 18. POND, BASIN AND WETLAND AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LANDSCAPE PLAN. OR SIGNIFICALTY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTATNTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER OR THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE OBJECTIVES OF USEPA APPROVED 19. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FINAL TMDL. SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. 20. AN ALTERNATE EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR LAND DISTURBANCES ON EACH LOT AS PART OF ANY Minnesota FUTURE BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURES AND DRIVEWAYS. , 21. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ITEMS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA CSW PERMIT (MN R100001) FINAL STABILIZATION: 22. SWPPP BINDER BUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE, OR ANOTHER OWNER/OPERATOR (PERMITTEE) HAS ASSUMED CONTROL OF ALL 23. OBSERVE ANY DISCHARGE THAT OCCURS DURING THE INSPECTION. DISCHARGE SHOULD BE DESCRIBED AND PHOTOGRAPHED. AREAS OF THE SITE THAT HAVE NOT UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION. FINAL STABILIZATION CAN BE ACHIEVED IN THE FOLLOWING WAY: Cottage Grove Final Plat Submittal Erosion & Sediment Control Notes Details ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AT THE SITE HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND ALL SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL Lochridge Second Addition VEGETATIVE COVER WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OVER THE ENTIRE PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA, OR OTHER EQUIVALENTMEANS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SOIL FAILURE UNDER EROSIVE CONDITIONS AND; EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: A. ALL DRAINAGE DITCHES, CONSTRUCTED TO DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, MUST BE STABILIZED TO 1. INSPECT SILT FENCES IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. IMMEDIATELY REPAIR PRECLUDE EROSION; FAILED OR FAILING SILT FENCE. B. ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC, AND STRUCTURAL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS (SUCH AS SILT FENCE) MUST BE 2. REPLACEMENT - FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY WHEN IT DECOMPOSES OR BECOMES INEFFECTIVE BEFORE THE BARRIER IS NO REMOVED AS PART OF THE SITE FINAL STABILIZATION; AND LONGER NECESSARY. C. THE CONTRACTORS MUST CLEAN OUT ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES AND FROM TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS THAT ARE TO 3. SEDIMENT REMOVAL - SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BASINS. SEDIMENT MUST BE STABILIZED TO PREVENT IT FROM BEING WASHED REACH APPROXIMATELY ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. ANY SEDIMENT REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR BACK INTO THE BASIN, CONVEYANCES OR DRAINAGE WAYS DISCHARGING OFF-SITE OR TO SURFACE WATERS. THE CLEAN OUT OF FILTER FABRIC IS NO LONGER REQUIRED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED, AND SEEDED WITH THE PERMANENT BASINS MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO RETURN THE BASIN TO DESIGN CAPACITY. APPROPRIATE SEED MIX, OR SODDED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 4. REMOVAL OF SILT FENCE - SILT FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE, BUT NOT BEFORE THE UPWARD SLOPING AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. IF THE UPWARD SLOPING AREA IS TO BE EXPOSED LONGER THAN SIX (6) MONTHS, THAT AREA SHALL BE COVERED WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION WHEN FIRST EXPOSED. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES: 5. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON THE SITE: AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. 1. SOLID WASTE: COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION 6. ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE RECORDED IN WRITING AND THESE RECORDS MUST AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA DISPOSAL BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP RECORDS OF EACH INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY SHALL INCLUDE: REQUIREMENTS. 6.1. DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL: OIL, GASOLINE, PAINT AND ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY 6.2. NAME OF PERSON(S) CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO 6.3. FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS; PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. City Submittal City Submittal 6.4. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVIES.) DESCRIPTION 1 6.5. DATE AND AMOUNT OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 2 INCH (0.5 INCHES) IN 24 HOURS: 3. CONCRETE WASHOUT IS DONE TRUCK BY TRUCK WITH A MOBILE WASHOUT SYSTEM PROVIDED AND COMPLETED BY THE CONCRETE 6.6. DOCUMENTS OF CHANGES MADE TO THE SWPPP AS REQUIRED IN PART III.A.4. CONTRACTOR. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. 7. WHERE PARTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE HAVE UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION, BUT WORK REMAINS ON OTHER PARTS OF SITE, 4. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. INSPECTIONS OF THE STABILIZED AREAS MAY BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH. WHERE WORK HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE MUST TAKE PLACE AS SOON AS RUNOFF OCCURS AT THE SITE OR DATE 6-22-2026 5. STREET SWEEPING IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 1 x PER WEEK OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER. 7-14-2026 PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING: CERTIFICATION MASS GRADING PHASE: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report 8:22:46 AM at 1. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. SEDIMENT BARRIERS was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional 2. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 1. SILT FENCE (MnDOT 3886) BERM STABILIZED WITH MnDOT I. PLAN VIEW 3885 CATEGORY 3 EROSION Civil Engineer under the laws of the 3. INSTALL THE PRE-GRADING SILT FENCES AND INLET PROTECTION BMPs ON THE SITE. 2. CURB LOG CONTROL BLANKET PIPE ACTIVE SWPPP LEGEND State of Minnesota. 4. CONSTRUCT ALL PRE-GRADING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL BMPs. July 14, 2026 3. ROCK WEEPER STANDPIPE & ROCK ANTI-SEEPAGE COLLAR on 5. COMPLETE MASS GRADING AND INSTALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR NOTES: INLET PROTECTION DEVICES BASIN USED FOR 10 ACRES PIPE 6. CONSTRUCT POST-GRADING SILT FENCE ON THE SITE. A A DRAINAGE AREA OR MORE. OUTLET MULCH BERM 1. WIMCO (MnDOT TYPE A & C) DESIGN RUNOFF VOLUME IS FROM A 2-YR, 24-HR STORM W NOTE: 2. INFRASAFE STORM DRAIN/CULVERT PER ACRE DRAINED TO THE CL DRAINAGE WAY INFILTRATION BASINS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN AN ORDER WHERE THEY ARE TO BE PROTECTED FIBER ROLLS / MULCH SOCKS 3. SILT SACK (MnDOT TYPE A) BASIN. BASIN VOLUME MUST Ben Palazzolo Ben Palazzolo BE A MIN. OF 1800 CUBIC 3 3 FEET/ACRE. I. CROSS SECTION FROM SILTATION AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT. OVERFLOW SILT FENCE 4. DANDY BAG (MnDOT TYPE B) SEE PLANS/SPECIFICATIONS 1 1 7-14-2026 61668 ANTI-TRACKING CONTROL FOR BASIN DIMENSIONS AND PIPE SIZE AND SLOPE. L = VARIABLE 6' MIN. Date License no. TEMPORARY MULCH COVER Plotted By: STREET & UTILITY PHASE: 10' MIN. 1. 2" CRUSHED CLEAR ROCK (LAND DEVELOPMENT) EMERGENCY OVERFLOW- 1. INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, CURBS AND GUTTERS. MnDOT 3601 CLASS II RIP RAP LINE BOTTOM OF CHANNEL W/ CAT. TEMPORARY HYDROMULCH TEMPORARY SEED MIX OVER MnDOT 3733 TYPE III 2. INSTALL RIP RAP AROUND OUTLET STRUCTURES. II. SECTION A-A 6" BELOW 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET QA/QC CHECK 1. MnDOT-100 10-YR STORM GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 3. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AROUND ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ---- (OATS 20-120 DAY STABILIZATION) INLET OUTLET- MnDOT 4. PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING. STANDPIPE 3601CLASS II RIP RAP ROCK DRIVEWAY / ROCK PADS 3 OVER MnDOT 3733 By Date 5. PAVE SITE. 2. MnDOT-150 (1-2 YEAR STABILIZATION) 1 TYPE III GEOTEXTILE II. PROFILE VIEW PIPE 6. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. FABRIC INLET PROTECTION DEVICES PERMANENT SEED MIX/STABILIZATION ROCK CHECK 7. INSTALL POST STREET AND UTILITY SILT FENCE. ANTISEEPAGE COLLAR (TYP.) INLET PROJECT TEAM DATA 1. MnDOT 270 (RESIDENTIAL TURF) 100' MAX. 8. INSTALL PRIVATE UTILITIES STANDPIPE 3 Designed By: BJP PAVEMENT (DRIVEWAY/ROADS) III. BASIN STANDPIPE AND EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 2% MIN. 3:1 MAX 9. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (ONLY IF SITE IS STABILIZED), 2. SOD 1 SOD EMERGENCY OVERFLOW Drafted By: BJP IF REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT. STABILIZATION BMP'S MONOFILAMENT GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PER MNDOT TABLE 3886-1 STOCKPILES 1. STRAW/HAY MnDOT TYPE 1 MULCH 1 Project No.: 4000367-00 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES: (MACHINE SLICED) PERFORATED 2 STANDPIPE 2. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MnDOT CAT. 3 Z MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ALLOWED: 1"-2" DIAM. ROCK, 3. HYDROMULCH MnDOT TYPE 5 1 D CONE EQUAL TO 3 Z 6' MIN. 4. TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT SC 250 NORTH AMERICAN 3 10' MIN. SINGLE FAMILY LOTS = 50% MAX. PER LOT 4" HOLES SPACED GREEN OR EQUAL MnDOT CAT 6 NOTE: 8" TO 10" ON CENTER ATTACHED DWELLINGS = 40% OF TOTAL AREA PIPE MATERIAL SHOULD BE RIGID D = DIAMETER OF STANDPIPE Know what's below. GRADING ACTIVITY EQUAL TO DIAMETER OF PIPE 1. CONCRETE WASHOUT IS DONE TRUCK BY TRUCK Call before you dig. NOTE: CONTRACTOR, GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR SWPPP INSPECTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE AS GRADING PROGRESSES WITH A MOBILE WASHOUT SYSTEM PROVIDED AND x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\EROSION NOTES.dwg R TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN 14 TEMPORARY DEWATERING CHANNEL Dial 811 COMPLETED BY THE CONCRETE CONTRACTOR. STANDPIPE OUTLET Sheet 14 of 23 File Location: LEGEND: S D MILITARY ROAD OUTLOT B OUTLOT J (PUBLIC) (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT C BLOCK 5 BLOCK 4 1 2 5 6 3 4 2 3 4 1 1 BLOCK 6 2 3 4 OUTLOT C 1 BLOCK 7 2 3 UTILITY NOTES: 4 2 3 1 4 1 2 3 4 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 3 18 17 1 16 6 BLOCK 8 OUTLOT A 2 5 3 15 4 4 3 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2 14 1 1 2 BLOCK 8 BLOCK 3 6 1 F OUTLOT 13 4 OUTLOT E OUTLOT D 5 (PUBLIC) 5 4 2 6 3 12 IVYWOOD AVENUES BLOCK 7 2 1 63RD STREETS 3 1 2 11 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 9 BLOCK 3 4 BLOCK 3 OUTLOT C 4 4 10 3 5 2 JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH BLOCK 6 6 5 1 9 1 BLOCK 10 BLOCK 6 6 2 8 5 3 4 7 4 3 7 BLOCK 5 2 1 BLOCK 11 BLOCK 8 1 BLOCK 4 2 6 3 5 4 4 22 9 4 3 OUTLOT C 2 1 3 1 12 BLOCK 21 10 2 63RD STREET S 3 ISLE AVENUES 11 4 2 20 12 OUTLOT H 13 1 14 13 BLOCK BLOCK 2 15 2 1 19 BLOCK 3 16 17 3 18 4 IVYWOOD AVENUE S S AVENUE IVYWOOD BLOCK 3 1 BLOCK 14 BLOCK 2 3 RAVINE PARKWAY G OUTLOT 4 CANT' UNDER PATIO GARNER DECK ( GARAGE 3 STALL 3 ) 1 RAVINE PKWY SOUTH ) BLOCK 1 (3 STALL GARAGE RAVINE PARKWAY (PUBLIC) GARNER2 OUTLOT I ) (3 STALL GARAGE CANT' UNDER PATIO 3 DECK GARNER CANT' UNDER PATIO DECK (BY OTHERS) CANT' UNDER PATIO DECK GARNER PARK GARAGE ( 3 STALL 4 ) CANT' UNDER (PUBLIC) PATIO DECK GARNER GARAGE ( 3 STALL 5 ) ISLE AVENUES CANT' UNDER PATIO DECK OUTLOT A GARNER GARAGE ( 3 STALL 6 ) CANT' UNDER PATIO DECK GARNER GARAGE ( 3 STALL 3 7 ) MN DNR82-83(W) JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH CANT' LAKE ROBERT UNDER PATIO GARNER DECK 'WETLAND 1' ( GARAGE 3 STALL 3 DEVELOPED HWL:924.93 ) 8 EXISTING HWL:925.82 INTERIM HWL:925.17 OUTLOT B ) (3 STALL GARAGE NWL:920.50 (3 STALL) GARAGE BLOCK 1 AKA GARNER9 GARNER10 CANT' CANT' UNDER PATIO UNDER PATIO DECK DECK (PUBLIC) JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH R Know what'sbelow. Call before you dig. you before Call JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH Dial 811 67TH STREET BAY SOUTH (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) 67TH STREET BAY SOUTH 0 (PUBLIC) SCALE IN FEET N 60 120 240 Project No.: Drafted By: Designed By: Date By Ben Palazzolo 7-14-2026 ---- I herebycertifythatthisplan,specification,orreport was preparedbymeorundermydirectsupervision DATE DESCRIPTION Sheet 6-22-2026 City Submittal Lochridge Second Addition PROJECT TEAMDATA Civil Engineer 7-14-2026 City Submittal and thatIamadulyLicensed CERTIFICATION QA/QC CHECK www.alliant-inc.com State of BJP BJP 4000367-00 15 Cottage Grove, Minnesota 15 underthelawsof of Minnesota Date License no. 61668 23 . Final Plat Submittal Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Plan File Location: x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\SAN-WM.dwg Plotted By: Ben Palazzolo on July 14, 2026 at 8:23:01 AM (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT C NOTES: BLOCK 5 www.alliant-inc.com BLOCK 4 1 2 5 6 3 4 2 3 4 1 1 BLOCK 6 2 3 4 OUTLOT C 62ND STREET S 1 BLOCK 7 2 LEGEND: 3 4 2 3 1 4 1 2 3 4 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 3 18 17 1 OUTLOT A 6 BLOCK 8 16 2 5 3 15 4 4 3 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2 63RD STREET S 14 1 1 2 Minnesota , BLOCK 8 BLOCK 3 1 6 13 Cottage Grove Final Plat Submittal Utility Plan And Profiles IVYWOOD AVENUE S Lochridge Second Addition City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed 8:23:25 AM Civil Engineer under the laws of the at State of Minnesota. July 14, 2026 on Ben Palazzolo 7-14-2026 61668 Ben Palazzolo Date License no. QA/QC CHECK Plotted By: ---- By Date N PROJECT TEAM DATA Designed By: BJP Drafted By: BJP Project No.: 4000367-00 Know what's below. 0 25 50 100 Call before you dig. R Dial 811 16 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\PROFILE U1.dwg SCALE IN FEET Sheet 16 of 23 File Location: www.alliant-inc.com (PUBLIC) JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH (PUBLIC) SOUTH RAVINE PKWY (PUBLIC) JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH AVENUE JAMAICA (PUBLIC) JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH AVENUE JAMAICA (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT D OUTLOT C POND 2 (PUBLIC) BLOCK 8 BLOCK 9 BLOCK 8 BLOCK 10 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 PARK 2 3 2 OUTLOT A (PUBLIC) 1 3 4 BLOCK 7 4 BLOCK 11 3 1 (BY OTHERS) 2 2 1 3 4 67TH STREET BAY SOUTH BLOCK 12 BLOCK 13 4 1 2 BLOCK 14 IVYWOOD AVENUE S 3 4 1 2 3 4 (PUBLIC) MILITARY ROAD 1 SOUTH BAY STREET 67TH 3 2 RAVINE PARKWAY 3 BLOCK2 6 4 1 1 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 2 3 2 1 3 4 6 5 BLOCK 6 BLOCK 6 IVYWOOD AVENUE S BLOCK 7 BLOCK 4 5 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 4 3 3 2 BLOCK 5 BLOCK OUTLOT G 1 2 OUTLOT F BLOCK 5 4 1 1 18 3 OUTLOT J 2 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 6 2 1 17 OUTLOT B 5 OUTLOT B 4 OUTLOT E 3 4 3 16 3 BLOCK 4 BLOCK POND 1 BLOCK 3 2 BLOCK 4 2 4 BLOCK 3 1 OUTLOT A 63RD STREET S 15 1 62ND STREET S LAKE ROBERT 5 MN DNR 82-83(W) Minnesota 14 BLOCK 4 BLOCK NWL:920.50 , EXISTING HWL:925.82 INTERIM HWL:925.17 13 13 RAVINE PARKWAY DEVELOPED HWL:924.93 6 12 14 9 8 7 11 10 OUTLOT C 15 12 POND 3 AKA Cottage Grove Storm Sewer Plan Final Plat Submittal Lochridge Second Addition 63RD STREET S 16 11 'WETLAND 1' 10 17 1 2 3 9 4 5 6 7 8 OUTLOT C 18 3 BLOCK DRY BASIN 2 OUTLOT H BLOCK 3 BLOCK BLOCK 1 BLOCK DECK PATIO UNDER CANT' GARNER 22 21 20 19 1 BLOCK 1 BLOCK GARAGE (3 STALL ) DECK DECK PATIO UNDER DECK PATIO UNDER PATIO UNDER CANT' CANT' 2 CANT' GARNER ) GARAGE 3 STALL 3 ( GARNER GARNER 7 DECK ISLE AVENUE S 8 PATIO UNDER DECK DECK GARAGE (3 STALL) PATIO UNDER PATIO CANT' UNDER GARAGE (3 STALL ) DECK CANT' CANT' PATIO UNDER GARNER 3 CANT' GARNER GARNER ) GARNER GARAGE 3 STALL 3 ( 4 5 DRY 6 GARAGE (3 STALL) ) 3 STALL 3 GARAGE 9 DECK ( GARAGE GARAGE PATIO (3 STALL) UNDER (3 STALL) GARNER BASIN 1 CANT' 4 3 2 1 BLOCK 2 BLOCK DRY ) ISLE AVENUE S 3 STALL ( GARAGE OUTLOT C OUTLOT City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION 10 BASIN 3 GARNER PATIO DECK UNDER CANT' OUTLOT I DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision 8:23:40 AM and that I am a duly Licensed at LEGEND: UTILITY NOTES: Civil Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. July 14, 2026 on Ben Palazzolo 7-14-2026 61668 Ben Palazzolo Date License no. QA/QC CHECK Plotted By: ---- By Date PROJECT TEAM DATA Designed By: BJP Drafted By: BJP, DMS D Project No.: 4000367-00 S N Know what's below. Call before you dig. 0 60 120 240 R 17 Dial 811 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\STORM SEWER.dwg SCALE IN FEET Sheet 17 of 23 File Location: (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT C GENERAL NOTES: BLOCK 5 www.alliant-inc.com BLOCK 4 1 2 5 6 3 4 2 3 4 1 1 BLOCK 6 2 3 N 4 OUTLOT C 62ND STREET S 1 BLOCK 7 Know what's below. 0 25 50 100 2 Call before you dig. R Dial 811 3 SCALE IN FEET 4 2 3 1 4 1 2 3 4 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 3 18 17 1 OUTLOT A 6 BLOCK 8 16 2 5 3 15 4 4 3 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2 14 1 1 2 Minnesota , BLOCK 8 BLOCK 3 1 6 13 IVYWOOD AVENUE S Cottage Grove Street And Storm Sewer Plan & Profiles Final Plat Submittal Lochridge Second Addition CB-409-CBMH 404 City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed 8:24:05 AM Civil Engineer under the laws of the at State of Minnesota. July 14, 2026 on Ben Palazzolo 7-14-2026 61668 Ben Palazzolo Date License no. QA/QC CHECK Plotted By: ---- By Date PROJECT TEAM DATA Designed By: BJP Drafted By: BJP Project No.: 4000367-00 18 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\PROFILE - S1.dwg Sheet 18 of 23 Road C PROFILE CB 409 - CBMH 404 PROFILE File Location: www.alliant-inc.com MILITARY ROAD (PUBLIC) (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT C OUTLOTOUTLOT B J INSTALL SALVAGED INSTALL SALVAGED FUTURE ROAD TEMPORARY EXTENSION SIGN PER BARRICADES (3 EA) DETAIL STR-31 PER DETAIL STR-32 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 4 1 2 6 3 4 3 4 5 1 2 BLOCK 6 TEMPORARY 1 CUL-DE-SAC EASEMENT 2 ISLE AVENUE S 3 4 OUTLOT C 62ND STREET S 62ND STREET S 1 BLOCK 7 Minnesota IVYWOOD AVENUE S 2 , 3 4 2 3 REMOVE AND SALVAGE 1 TEMPORARY BARRICADES (3 4 1 EA) PER DETAIL STR-32 2 Cottage Grove 3 4 Signage Plan Final Plat Submittal BLOCK 2 Lochridge Second Addition BLOCK 3 REMOVE AND SALVAGE FUTURE ROAD EXTENSION 18 17 1 SIGN PER DETAIL STR-31 OUTLOT A 6 BLOCK 8 16 2 5 EXISTING OPEN SPACE MARKERS 3 IVYWOOD AVENUE S 15 4 4 3 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2 ROAD D 1 63RD STREET S 14 1 2 BLOCK 8 BLOCK City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION 3 1 6 4 13 5 DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 (PUBLIC) CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional BLOCK 7 Civil Engineer under the laws of the 8:24:17 AM State of Minnesota. at July 14, 2026 Ben Palazzolo on 7-14-2026 61668 Date License no. Ben Palazzolo QA/QC CHECK ---- Plotted By: SIGN SCHEDULE By Date N PROJECT TEAM DATA Designed By: BJP Drafted By: BJP Project No.: 4000367-00 Know what's below. Call before you dig. 0 25 50 100 R 19 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\SIGN.dwg Dial 811 SCALE IN FEET Sheet 19 of 23 File Location: (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) NOTES: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL NEW CONDUIT SHALL BE 1.5" NMC SCHEDULE 40. BLOCK 5 2. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDUCTORS SHALL BE COPPER 240VAC CIRCUITS. BLOCK 4 1 2 6 3 2-1/C #6 AND 1-1/C#6 CONDUCTOR. DUAL LUMINARIES SHALL POSSES 4 #6 CONDUCTORS. 4 5 4 1 2 3 3. THIS PLAN SPECIFIES CONDUIT SIZE, TYPE AND GENERAL LOCATION. THE EXACT 1 BLOCK 6 www.alliant-inc.com LOCATION WILL BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. 62ND STREET S 2 4. LIGHTING UNITS ARE TYPICALLY SET BACK 36" BEHIND THE BACK-OF-CURB TO CENTER OF FOUNDATION. 3 5. ADDITIONAL LOCATIONS OF CONDUIT AND WIRING NOT IDENTIFIED MAY BE REQUIRED 4 AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ADDITIONAL CONDUIT AND WIRING ADDED TO THE CONTRACT WILL BE PAID FOR AT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE REGARDLESS OF OUTLOT C QUANTITY ADDED AND METHOD OF PLACEMENT REQUIRED. 1 6. ALL CONDUIT SHALL BE TRENCHED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. BLOCK 7 7. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE CONNECTION OF THE 2 POWER FOR THE LIGHTING SYSTEM WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY 8. HAND HOLES TO BE INSTALLED PER STANDARD DETAIL LGT-1. 3 4 9. SOURCE OF POWER SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 15' OF CABINET BOXES 2 3 1 4 1 2 3 4 BLOCK 2 LEGEND: BLOCK 3 18 17 1 OUTLOT A 6 BLOCK 8 16 2 5 3 15 4 4 3 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2 14 1 1 2 BLOCK 8 BLOCK 3 1 6 4 Minnesota 13 , 5 5 4 2 6 3 IVYWOOD AVENUE S 12 Cottage Grove Final Plat Submittal Lochridge Second Addition Lighting Plan BLOCK 7 NWL:926.00 2 INTERIM HWL:936.61 1 FINAL HWL:936.95 63RD STREET S 3 1 2 11 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 9 BLOCK OUTLOT D OUTLOT E 3 OUTLOT F 4 4 4 10 3 5 2 BLOCK 6 6 5 1 CIRCUIT DIAGRAM 9 1 City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION BLOCK 10 BLOCK 6 6 2 8 5 DATE 3 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 4 CERTIFICATION 4 7 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report 7 3 was prepared by me or under my direct supervision BLOCK 5 and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Civil Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 8:24:31 AM 2 at 1 BLOCK 11 BLOCK 8 1 July 14, 2026 2 BLOCK 4 Ben Palazzolo on 7-14-2026 61668 6 3 Date License no. N Ben Palazzolo QA/QC CHECK 5 4 ---- Plotted By: 9 4 By Date 3 PROJECT TEAM DATA Designed By: BJP 2 1 Drafted By: BJP 1 12 BLOCK Project No.: 4000367-00 0 25 50 100 10 2 63RD STREET S SCALE IN FEET 3 Know what's below. x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\LITE.dwg 4 Call before you dig. 20 11 R Dial 811 12 Sheet 20 of 23 File Location: www.alliant-inc.com VIEW A TRAIL C TRAIL TRAIL C TRAIL BLOCK 8 3 4 PARK 1 2 4 BLOCK3 7 2 (BY OTHERS) 1 4 S AVENUE IVYWOOD 3 BLOCK2 6 A TRAIL RAVINE PARKWAY 1 1 2 IVYWOOD AVENUE S S AVENUE IVYWOOD 3 4 5 4 6 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 3 2 BLOCK 5 4 1 3 TRAIL A 2 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 6 1 OUTLOT B 5 4 TRAIL A 4 3 3 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 63RD STREET S 2 2 BLOCK 3 1 OUTLOT A 62ND STREET S 1 RAVINE PARKWAY TRAIL B OUTLOT C Minnesota , 63RD STREET S S STREET 63RD TRAIL A TRAIL OUTLOT C Cottage Grove Final Plat Submittal Lochridge Second Addition Landscaping Plan DECK PATIO UNDER 63RD STREET S S STREET 63RD CANT' GARNER GARAGE ( 3 STALL ) DECK DECK PATIO UNDER DECK PATIO UNDER PATIO UNDER CANT' CANT' CANT' ISLE AVENUE S S AVENUE ISLE GARNER ) GARAGE 3 STALL 3 ( GARNER ISLE AVENUE S S AVENUE ISLE GARNER ISLE AVENUE S S AVENUE ISLE DECK PATIO UNDER DECK DECK GARAGE (3 STALL) PATIO UNDER PATIO CANT' UNDER GARAGE (3 STALL ) A TRAIL DECK CANT' CANT' PATIO UNDER GARNER CANT' GARNER GARNER ) GARNER GARAGE 3 STALL 3 ( GARAGE (3 STALL) ) DECK 3 STALL 3 GARAGE ( GARAGE GARAGE PATIO (3 STALL) UNDER (3 STALL) GARNER ROAD D CANT' ISLE AVENUE S S AVENUE ISLE ) 3 STALL ( GARAGE OUTLOT C OUTLOT GARNER PATIO DECK UNDER CANT' City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed 8:24:58 AM Landscape Architect under the laws of the at State of Minnesota. July 14, 2026 on LEGEND John Gronhovd 7-14-2026 59233 Ben Palazzolo Date License no. QA/QC CHECK Plotted By: By Date N PROJECT TEAM DATA Designed By: JG R Drafted By: SRM Project No.: 4000367-00 Know what's below. Call before you dig. Dial 811 0 60 120 240 21 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\LANDSCAPE.dwg SCALE IN FEET Sheet 21 of 23 File Location: LEGEND www.alliant-inc.com 3 - AP1 1 - RB1 MILITARY ROAD 5 - BF1 2 - SW1 3 - NS1 (PUBLIC) 5 - AP1 (COUNTY ROAD NO. 20) OUTLOT C OUTLOT B SURFACE BEDROCK 1 - NF1 3 - AP1 BLOCK 5 1 - AE1 2 - AP1 1 BLOCK 4 2 2 - RB1 5 6 3 4 2 3 4 1 1 BLOCK 6 5 - BF1 2 ISLE AVENUE S 1 - AE1 3 1 - HL1 1 - SW1 Minnesota 1 - HL1 4 , 3 - NS1 OUTLOT C 62ND STREET S 1 1 - NF1 BLOCK 7 1 - NS1 1 - AE1 Cottage Grove Final Plat Submittal 1 - HL1 Lochridge Second Addition Landscaping Plan - View A 2 1 - HL1 5 - AP1 2 - RB1 3 3 4 2 1 - RB1 1 1 - NS1 4 1 - SW1 1 2 3 4 BLOCK 2 1 - BM1 1 - BF1 BLOCK 3 1 - AE1 3 - BF1 1 - HL1 1 2 - SW1 1 - NS1 1 - BF1 6 BLOCK 8 1 - BM1 OUTLOT1 - BM1 A 1 - RB1 2 5 3 1 - HL1 4 5 - NS1 1 - AP1 4 3 1 - NF1 1 - NF1 BLOCK 1 BLOCK City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION 2 ROAD D 1 - RB1 63RD STREET S 1 - HL1 1 DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed 8:25:03 AM Landscape Architect under the laws of the at State of Minnesota. (PUBLIC) July 14, 2026 on John Gronhovd 7-14-2026 59233 Ben Palazzolo Date License no. QA/QC CHECK Plotted By: By Date PROJECT TEAM DATA N Designed By: JG R Drafted By: SRM Project No.: 4000367-00 IVYWOOD AVENUE S OUTLOT C Know what's below. 63RD STREET S Call before you dig. Dial 811 0 25 50 JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH 100 22 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\LANDSCAPE.dwg SCALE IN FEET ISLE AVENUE S Sheet 22 of 23 File Location: PHASE 2 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: LANDSCAPE NOTES: LANDSCAPE DETAILS: www.alliant-inc.com ’ SEED NOTES DEVELOPMENT TREE SCHEDULE: Minnesota SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL , 1 2 NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE Cottage Grove Final Plat Submittal Lochridge Second Addition Landscape Notes And Schedule 3 MULCH AT SIDEWALK DETAIL 4 MULCH AT SOD DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL 4 & 6 UNIT TOWNHOME LANDSCAPE: TOWNHOME LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE: City Submittal City Submittal DESCRIPTION DATE 6-22-2026 7-14-2026 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed 8:25:04 AM Landscape Architect under the laws of the at State of Minnesota. July 14, 2026 on John Gronhovd 7-14-2026 59233 Ben Palazzolo Date License no. QA/QC CHECK Plotted By: By Date PROJECT TEAM DATA Designed By: JG Drafted By: SRM Project No.: 4000367-00 4 UNIT TYPICAL 6 UNIT TYPICAL 23 x:\4000367-00\001\40 Design\03 Sheets - Phase 2\LANDSCAPE.dwg Sheet 23 of 23 File Location: MEMORANDUM Date: 07/10/2026 To: Paul Sponholz, PE From: Andrew Olson, PE Mike Boex, PE Subject: Lochridge 2nd Addition Plan Review City of Cottage Grove, MN Project No.: 26X.144610.000 This memo summarizes the review of the plat, easement, and street & utility documents submitted by Alliant Professional Services Inc., dated 06/22/26 (received 06/23/26). Plat Comments: Sheet 1: 1. The owner name for the Outlot J of the 1st Addition (DRP ODIN 16 LLC) does not match the owner name listed on the plat (Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC). Easement Comments: 2. The easement states “cul-du-sac” instead of “cul-de-sac”. 3. Revise to the correct spelling of Cottage Grove in the title block. Street and Utility Comments: Sheet 7: 4. Remove Inset A from the typical section or update to match STR-1. 5. 62nd Street is labeled 63rd Street just past the cul-de-sac. Please ensure 62nd Street is labeled after the bend of the road on all plan sheets as some only list Ivywood Avenue. Sheet 10: 6. Add the grading for the temporary cul-de-sac on 62nd Street. Sheet 16: 7. Revise the service table to reflect a 3’ minimum riser height. 8. Note if there will be another irrigation service within this section of roadway. 9. Add a note similar to the 1st Addition plans that watermain stubs shall be constructed per city detail STR-8 and curb boxes that fall within driveways or temporary pavement shall be protected by a casting per SER-11. a. The blow off also should extend 10’ beyond the end of the temporary cul-de-sac. H:\COTT\26X144610000\1_Corres\C_To Others\Alliant\2026-07-10\144610 Plan Review 2026-07-10.docx Lochridge 2nd Addition Review Page: 2 Sheet 18: 10. Confirm whether CB 503 is a 48” diameter catch basin manhole or a 2’x3’ catch basin and update the structure and casting schedule accordingly. Sheet 19: 11. Show the temporary cul-de-sac easement for reference. 12. Add a street name sign where Ivywood Avenue switches to 62nd Street. Sheet 20: 13. Label the conduit and wire between lights L1 and L2. 14. Note that there shall be a pull string installed from light L2 to the stub short of the temporary cul-de-sac. 15. Show the source of power and cabinet location on the plans for reference. City Council Action Request 7.P. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Engineering Agenda Category Action Item Title Lateral Water Line Execution and Quote Award - 9998 90th St Water Service (Christ the Lord Evangelical Lutheran Church) Staff Recommendation Approve the Agreement to Construct Lateral Water Line between the City and Christ the Lord Lutheran Church and adopt Resolution 2026-122 awarding the 9998 90th Street Water Service work to Burschville Construction, Inc. in the amount of $91,450.00. Budget Implication $91,450.00 - fully funded by MPCA 3M Settlement Grant and property owner. Attachments 1. Memo - Christ the Lord Quote Award 2. Resolution - Christ the Lord Quote Award Resolution 3. Agreement - Lateral Water Line- Church 8-6-26 4. Quote-Christ the Lord Church-Burschville 1 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Paul Sponholz, PE, City Engineer Date: August 13, 2026 Re: 9998 90th Street Water Service – Agreement to Construct Lateral Water Line Execution and Quote Award Background The property located at 9998 90th Street South (Christ the Lord Evangelical Lutheran Church) is being served by a private well that tests over the health-based values for PFAS. In 2005, a city water main was installed adjacent to this property as part of the Ravine Parkway, 90th Street South and Keats Avenue Utility and Street Project. At this time the property owner would like to connect the church to city water for both domestic service and future fire protection (to accommodate future expansion of their building). The work associated with the domestic service connection would be fully funded through an existing MPCA 3M Settlement grant that was executed with the City on October 6, 2025 for “City of Cottage Grove-3M Water Connections”. This grant is intended to facilitate one-off connections for properties with wells over the PFAS limits, which is the case with the Christ the Lord Lutheran Church. This grant will only fund the domestic service. Costs for the fire protection service will need to be funded by the church. Since the grant is between the City and the MPCA, the City will hold/administer the contract for the work, coordinate the funding with the MPCA for the domestic service and receive reimbursement from the church for the fire protection water line. The sealing of the existing well will be accomplished under a separate grant administered by Washington County. Discussion Agreement to Construct Lateral Water Line The project will provide both a domestic and fire service line to the church’s existing building. The domestic line is a 2” service line; the fire service is a 6” line. The City has received three quotes for this work. The quotes include the installation of both lines to the church; however, as indicated above, the MPCA Grant will not fund the construction of the fire service line. The attached agreement has been prepared by the city attorney, which sets forth the terms for the reimbursement of the fire service line costs from the church to the City. The City will be reimbursed fully for this work through the MPCA grant and Christ the Lord Lutheran Church. The related water connection fees for the domestic service line will also be funded by the 3M Settlement grant funds. Honorable Mayor and City Council, Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator 9998 90th Street Water Service August 13, 2026 Page 2 of 2 Water Service Quote Award The City of Cottage Grove received quotes from three companies for the proposed water service work. Following is a summary of the quotes submitted. The low quote is attached. Contractor Quoted Amount Low Burschville Construction, Inc. $91,450.00 Miller Excavating, Inc. $94,612.61 Meyer Contracting $181,735.39 The low quote for the project was provided by Burschville Construction, Inc. in the amount of $91,450.00. Recommendation Approve the Agreement to Construct Lateral Water Line between the City and Christ the Lord Lutheran Church and adopt Resolution 2026-122 awarding the 9998 90th Street Water Service work to Burschville Construction, Inc. in the amount of $91,450.00. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-122 RESOLUTION AWARDING CHRIST THE LORD LUTHERAN CHURCH (9998 90th STREET) WATER SERVICE PROJECT TO BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $91,450.00 WHEREAS, quotes were requested to provide the necessary work for the 9998 90th Street Water Service Project; and WHEREAS, three contractors submitted quotes; and WHEREAS, Burschville Construction, Inc. provided the lowest accepted quote; and WHEREAS, it is the recommendation of the City Engineer that the quote be awarded to Burschville Construction, Inc. in the amount $91,450.00. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that the 9998 90th Street Water Service Project be awarded to Burschville Construction, Inc. in the amount of $91,450.00. The appropriate officials are hereby authorized to sign all necessary documents to effectuate these actions. Passed this 19th day of August 2026. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk City Council Action Request 8.A. Meeting Date 8/19/2026 Department Finance Agenda Category Action Item Title Approve Disbursements Staff Recommendation Approve disbursements from 07-31-2026 through 08-13-2026 in the amount of $3,858,069.27. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Expense Approval Report 8-19-2026 Council Meeting 2. Payroll Check Register 8-19-2026 Council Meeting 1