When the hell is somebody going to look at my house with 60 people making noise like they're at a football game and say, 'This is the house I want. My house is unsellable.'

The staff report discusses the fact that the tested noise decibel levels were in compliance with the noise ordinance. But the issue is not the decibel level. It's not the level of the sound. It's the constancy of it.

So our parks master plan was actually completed after the installation of our pickleball courts. So that recommendation in our parks master plan comes from the national park and rec association. So that wasn't a part of a of our previous recreation room plan.

I'm in favor. I think I think low hanging fruit is a good way to put it. The as far as the time. I've long thought that pick um that Pebbles um time. There's only a couple other parks, maybe one other park that has that time past sunrise and sunset. I know that's probably not sufficient to some of the folks here, but it's at least in line with the rest of our parks, a sunlight, sunrise to sunset. That seems to make a lot of sense.

This structure here alone uh offers, you know, uh it can hold up to like 60some kids at one time. So, it does offer um almost a playground in itself, right?

I like options three and four. four is only 11,000 more for parts, but um about 17,000 more for install. Um I I think it I don't know. It seems like it's worth the money to go to option four.

I think um I think no matter which park we pick, little kids are and everyone's basically going to use it and try it out. I think really for the teenage thing, I do think that the physical equipment is definitely it's going to attract them because they're going to be like, 'Oh, I can definitely do more pulp in here or something like that, ego, whatever.' But I don't think it can really retain people at the park very long. I think after a baseball game, kids might go over and be like, 'Let's play on this pull-up bar for some time.' But then after a while, I think what you were saying earlier about how like the building's taller, so it kind of like it's got like the sparkly aspect to it. I think that'd be better for like retaining older people at the park. Like there's almost like a challenge to the park with the height.

Again, this conversation comes up as more of a why, right? And the selling of this position to city council that it is needed, right? And again, the why why the parks commission is recommending this.

This is nothing against you, Adam, but but I think parks would be a full-time job in order to to do a job of the city our size at this time. You know, we can't expect you to do all this stuff with the amount of time you have allowed allotted to the parks. I think it's it's really important that this position is um made and filled in short order.

I think one thing that's not captured in here um in the summary list like is that selling it part. I think we've had discussions as a commission um that one thing that you know we all see as important is to think about the sustainability of the funding for parks and various maintenance and things like that particularly as um parks dedication fees might you know they're not going to go on forever.