Lake Elmo City Council — Transcript
Tuesday, June 9, 2026
Legislative Update and Future Lobbying Services
Parks Position, Programming, and Middle School Sports Funding
Mayor and Council Member Compensation Review
Votes (3)
Legislative Update and Lobbying Services for 2027 Session
Dissent: None
Moved by Not specified, but consensus reached by Mayor and Council · Seconded by Not specified, but consensus reached by Mayor and Council
Margaret Vessel provided a detailed legislative update, covering state political dynamics, the passage of a bonding bill critical to Lake Elmo, and the status of the water supply exemption bill. The discussion highlighted the ongoing challenges with the White Bear Lake lawsuit and the DNR's interpretation of legislative language ('may' vs. 'shall'). The Council then deliberated on the need to budget for a lobbyist for the upcoming 2027 session, citing the complexity of legislative work and the benefits of continuous representation, particularly with Len Hoffman Public Affairs due to their existing relationship with Washington County.
Parks Master Plan Implementation, Programming & Middle School Sports Funding
Dissent: Council Member Matt voiced strong opposition to the city directly funding middle school sports with new tax dollars.
Moved by Not specified, but consensus reached by Mayor and Council · Seconded by Not specified, but consensus reached by Mayor and Council
The Council reviewed priorities from the Parks Master Plan. A key proposal from Annette Solomon, Executive Director of Community Education, involved a Joint Powers Agreement to use city park facilities for programming without direct financial cost to the city for programming delivery, covering operations via program fees. The Council expressed support for exploring this partnership as an alternative to hiring a dedicated parks staff position. A separate but related discussion covered the school district's budget cuts leading to higher middle school sports fees, and Annette requested city financial contributions to keep sports accessible. While some council members were supportive, others voiced concerns about using city tax dollars for school district programs, deferring the decision to future budget discussions.
Mayor and Council Member Compensation Review
Dissent: None
Moved by Not specified, but consensus reached by Mayor and Council · Seconded by Not specified, but consensus reached by Mayor and Council
The Mayor initiated a discussion about increasing the stipends for elected officials, emphasizing that compensation had not changed since 2012, leading to a significant loss in real value due to inflation. Data comparing Lake Elmo's compensation to other cities, along with inflation adjustments and the municipal cost index, was presented. Council members acknowledged the substantial workload, especially given the city's growth, and the importance of fair compensation to attract diverse candidates. There was consensus to propose an increase, with specific numbers discussed.
Notable Quotes (9)
I'm happy to report that it actually went better than I anticipated. um in that they were actually able to accomplish a few things. There weren't supplemental budgets in every issue area. Uh but the issues that they did tackle were kind of the pressing ones and in particular um as it relates to Lake Elmo, they were able to pass a bonding bill, a capital investment bill, and that was really kind of the in my mind the number one priority of what the legislative session was to accomplish.
My suggestion would be to kind of have some meetings in the interimm here as we kind of move forward and start talking about, you know, what what what the options are. Uh, if not our legislation, then then what might be acceptable. And I think we got I at least I heard uh Representative Fischer's commitment to trying to Well, not only to meet with us, but to try to figure out some solution potentially.
I think having having that foot in the door um is important. You know, obviously I want to talk about how much we're looking to do for it and be have a clear plan and clear direction. Um but yeah, I I am in favor of continuing to put that into the budget.
Really what community education can provide is we can come in with we already have the structure, the registration system, the staff, all of the things that can design and deliver the programming. What we would need is an agreement so that we could use your facilities. So it would be a joint powers agreement, right? and that in order to keep that cost down for your community, we would ask that it would we would use those facilities at no additional cost.
I think partnerships such as this are the way to go for the short and medium term.
I love sports. I absolutely love the idea of this. I would personally be happy to contribute my own funds to something like this. I don't feel comfortable asking the city to pay for it.
I did ask to bring this uh forward uh and it has to be done in an election year because I think uh anybody that says they haven't had a an increase in stipen salary, whatever you want to call it, for 13 years would be out of their mind.
I think those are all good points. I guess honestly coming in I was kind of thinking I I don't really have a concern if this goes up or not simply because of right I don't think this should be something that you do for the financial side of it and I don't think anybody is because of you know where it's at obviously I'm always amazed at the number of people that say oh you're the mayor of Lake Elmo and then uh then they find out that that's not my only gig.
I I do think a change has to happen and I don't there is no perfect number. Like there there's no way to say here's what it shall be and that's a perfect number. I mean I wrote down Monaceel and Rogers and technically you average those two out. It's 8,200 for mayor and 7,000 for council. It's defensible. It doesn't mean it's right or wrong. It's defensible.
Ordinances & Resolutions (13)
Report by Len Hoffman Public Affairs detailing legislative session outcomes and Lake Elmo's priorities.
Bill passed in the legislative session, identified as Lake Elmo's number one priority.
Indicated a better-than-expected budget for 2026, but a deficit for 2027/2028.
Bill that saves the county and city funding.
Bill addressing a significant water issue for Lake Elmo, related to the White Bear Lake lawsuit.
Bill mentioned in the legislative update.
Legal context for the city's water reuse and legislative efforts to supersede the court order.
City plan last updated in 2009, new one presented in 2024, guiding park development and priorities.
Proposed agreement with Community Education to use city facilities for programming.
Governs council compensation, requiring an ordinance change for adjustments.
Used as an inflation metric for adjusting council compensation.
Suggested as a more relevant index for government cost increases for council compensation.
Grant opportunity for trail connections.