--- ## author: Linnea Graffunder-Bartels date: D:20260705082727-05'00' --- ## AGENDA ## Planning Commission The next regular Planning Commission meeting will be held August 6, 2026 @ 7 PM at the Oakdale Discovery Center. ## REGULAR MEETING July 9, 2026 ## 7:00 PM ## Oakdale Discovery Center ## 1. CALL TO ORDER ## 2. CALL OF ROLL ## 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ## 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA ## 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ## 6. OPEN FORUM ## 7. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW ## a. OLD BUSINESS i. Continuation of Public Hearing – Oakdale Marketplace Planned Unit Development ## Plan Amendment ## b. NEW BUSINESS i. Public Hearing – Marty, 7582 25 th Street North – Conditional Use Permit for an ## Oversized Accessory Building ii. Public Hearing – Ninety Four Exchange, 7049 4 th ## Street North – Comprehensive ## Plan Amendment, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan ## 8. OTHER ## a. Staff Liaison Update(s)* ## b. Commissioner Update(s)* ## c. Council Liaison Update(s)* ## 9. ADJOURNMENT *Items marked with an asterisk have no accompanying materials. ## PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO 1 ## To: Oakdale Planning Commission ## Meeting Date: July 9, 2026 ## Request(s): Oakdale Marketplace Planned Unit Development Plan Amendment ## Prepared/Presented: Luke McClanahan, Planning Manager ## BACKGROUND On November 26, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 937, an amendment to the Oakdale Marketplace Planned Unit Development (PUD) allowing commercial retail and residential uses on certain property located within the PUD area. The PUD area is shown on the location map below. Also on November 26, 2024, the City Council approved Resolution 2024-89 amending the 2005 Oakdale Marketplace PUD Plan. One of those changes redesignated the portion of the PUD property located at the southeast quadrant of 34 th Street North and Market Place North from retail to restaurant or fast casual dining in connection with a multi-tenant commercial use. The property owner objected to the change. ## Location Map - Oakdale Marketplace The 2005 PUD Agreement pertaining to the Oakdale Marketplace Planned Unit Development contained a provision by which the City agreed that it would not change the land use regulations relating to the PUD without the property owner’s consent. The property owner and the City disagreed over whether that provision in the 2005 PUD Agreement was enforceable. The matter went to court and the trial court ruled in the City’s favor. That ruling, however, was later reversed by the Court of Appeals. 2 As a result of the Court of Appeals’ decision, the PUD plan needs to be amended so that any retail use allowed in the B-1 Commercial District (formerly referred to as the C-2 Community Commercial District) would be permitted on the site located at the southeast quadrant of 34 th ## Street North and Market Place North. The amendment would supersede the provision in Resolution 2024-89 that requires a restaurant or fast casual dining use at that site. ## ROLE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION The role of the Planning Commission is to review the proposed ordinance and resolution, continue the public hearing (which was tabled at the June 4, 2026, Planning Commission meeting), and provide a recommendation to the City Council. ## RECOMMENDATION Staff have determined that the proposed ordinance and resolution amending the Oakdale Marketplace PUD, and PUD Plan, are appropriate and consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommend approval of the ordinance and resolution. ## MOTION Motion to recommend approval of an ordinance amending the Oakdale Marketplace Planned Unit Development. Motion to recommend approval of a resolution amending the Oakdale Marketplace Planned Unit Development Plan. ## Attachment: ## Ordinance Amending the Oakdale Marketplace Planned Unit Development ## Resolution Amending the Oakdale Marketplace Planned Unit Development Plan ## City of Oakdale ## ORDINANCE NO. ___ ## AMENDING THE OAKDALE MARKETPLACE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ## AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 937 WHEREAS, on July 13, 2004, the Oakdale City Council adopted Ordinance No. 634 rezoning property for Oakdale Marketplace from Industrial-Office to Planned Unit Development ("Oakdale Marketplace PUD"); and ## WHEREAS, on May 10, 2005, the Oakdale City Council adopted Ordinance No. 648 amending the Oakdale Marketplace PUD to enable the development of a big box retail establishment; and ## WHEREAS, on June 2005, the City of Oakdale, Oakdale Marketplace, LLC, and Patrick Raleigh entered into a PUD Agreement ("PUD Agreement") for the Oakdale Marketplace PUD; and WHEREAS, the PUD Agreement stated that, except as otherwise provided for in the PUD Agreement, the allowable uses in the Oakdale Marketplace PUD would be governed by the C-2 ## Community Commercial Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on May 27, 2008, the Oakdale City Council adopted Ordinance No. 710 amending the City's Zoning Code and the Oakdale Marketplace PUD to allow for the establishment of an Entertainment Center on a parcel of land in the Oakdale Marketplace PUD; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2022, the Oakdale City Council adopted Ordinance No. 886 amending the Oakdale Marketplace PUD to allow a multifamily use on a portion of the Oakdale ## Marketplace PUD; and ## WHEREAS, on November 26, 2024, the Oakdale City Council adopted Ordinance No. 937 amending the Oakdale Marketplace PUD to allow commercial retail uses and to allow residential used on certain property in the Oakdale Marketplace PUD; and ## WHEREAS, the City and Oakdale Marketplace, LLC agree to further amend the Oakdale Marketplace PUD to allow, in addition to the uses allowed under the existing B-1 Commercial District and under the previously existing C-2 Community Commercial District, Commercial Retail uses and residential uses on certain property located in the Oakdale Marketplace PUD. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, that the City Council of the City of Oakdale as follows; ## Section 1. In addition to the uses allowed under the existing B-1 Commercial District, the previously existing C-2 Community Commercial District, and in the PUD Agreement, the following use is a permitted use in the Oakdale Marketplace PUD: Commercial Retail: An establishment engaged in selling goods or merchandise to the general public for personal or household consumption and rendering services incidental to the sale of such goods. Section 2. The Oakdale Marketplace PUD is further amended to allow residential uses on certain property described in Resolution 2026-__. Section 3. Ordinance No. 937 is repealed. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its adoption and publication, as provided by law. ## Voting For: ## Voting Against: Adopted this ___ day of July, 2026 by the Oakdale City Council. ________________________ ## Kevin Zabel Mayor ## Attest: ________________________ ## Sara Ludwig, City Clerk Posted: __________ Published: _________ 1 ## City of Oakdale ## RESOLUTION 2026-__ ## AMENDING THE 2005 OAKDALE MARKETPLACE PLANNED UNIT ## DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ESTABLISH ADDITIONAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND ## TO ESTABLISH ADDITIONAL SITE PLAN OPTIONS AND RESCINDING ## RESOLUTION 2024-89 WHEREAS, on July 13, 2004, the Oakdale City Council adopted Ordinance No. 634 rezoning property for Oakdale Marketplace from Industrial-Office to Planned Unit Development ("Oakdale ## Marketplace PUD"); and WHEREAS, the current legal descriptions for the parcels of land in the Oakdale Marketplace PUD are attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 634 also approved the PUD Plan, which was subsequently modified in April, 2005 ("2005 PUD Plan") for the Oakdale Marketplace PUD, and which is attached as ## Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, on August 10, 2004, the Oakdale City Council adopted Resolution No. 2004-102 approving a Final Plat for "Oakdale Marketplace"; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 2005, the Oakdale City Council adopted Ordinance No. 648 amending the Oakdale Marketplace PUD to enable the development of a big box retail establishment; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2005, the City of Oakdale, Oakdale Marketplace, LLC, and Patrick Raleigh entered into a PUD Agreement ("PUD Agreement") for Oakdale Marketplace PUD; and WHEREAS, the PUD Agreement stated that, except as otherwise provided for in the PUD Agreement, the allowable uses in the Oakdale Marketplace PUD would be governed by the C-2 ## Community Commercial Zoning District, and WHEREAS, on May 27, 2008, the Oakdale City Council adopted Ordinance No. 710 amending the City's Zoning Code and the 2005 PUD Plan to allow for the establishment of an Entertainment Center on Oakdale Marketplace, Outlots D and F, which the 2005 PUD Plan designated for use as a 3-floor hotel and a commercial service building; and WHEREAS, on May 26, 2015, the Oakdale City Council adopted Resolution No. 2015-43 amending the 2005 PUD Plan to allow for a new convenience store, motor fuel station, and car wash on Outlot A of Oakdale Marketplace at a location and in a configuration that differed from the 2005 PUD Plan; and WHEREAS, on June 23, 2020, the Oakdale City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-60 amending the 2005 PUD Plan to allow for a portion of Outlot A of Oakdale Marketplace to be used as an auto parts store, rather than as a restaurant as depicted in the 2005 PUD Plan; and 2 WHEREAS, on October 11, 2022, the Oakdale City Council adopted Ordinance No. 886 amending Ordinance No. 634 to allow a multifamily use on a portion of the Oakdale Marketplace PUD, rather than as a restaurant building and two retail buildings, as depicted in the 2005 PUD plan; and WHEREAS, because of the numerous changes in the uses initially contemplated in the 2005 PUD Plan, on October 24, 2023, the City Council directed City staff to conduct a study of the current land uses and market conditions to determine whether any changes should be made to the 2005 ## PUD Plan; and WHEREAS, the City retained a consultant to assist the City in conducting the study; and WHEREAS, the consultant issued a report dated February 16, 2024; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the consultant's report on February 27, 2024 and March 12, 2024; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 926 establishing a temporary moratorium on development in the Oakdale Marketplace and Oakdale Station Planned ## Unit Developments; and WHEREAS, on November 26, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-89 amending the ## 2005 Oakdale Marketplace Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Oakdale Marketplace, LLC agree to further amend the 2005 PUD Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Oakdale as follows: 1. The 2005 PUD Plan with respect to Lot 1, Block 2, Oakdale Marketplace is amended to allow the uses and the configuration of buildings as set forth in Exhibit C to this Resolution. 2. The 2005 PUD Plan with respect to Outlot C, Oakdale Marketplace is amended to add the uses as set forth in Exhibit D to this Resolution, in addition to the uses allowed under the existing B-1 Commercial District and under the previously existing C-2 Community Commercial District. 3. The 2005 PUD Plan with respect to the portion of Outlot A, Oakdale Marketplace Third Addition lying north of 33 rd Street North is amended as follows: • To allow for development of a single building of any size between 8,000 square feet and 14,850 (size currently shown on 2005 PUD Plan) to be constructed anywhere within the footprint of the existing building configuration shown on the 2005 PUD Plan or as Option 1 in Exhibit E, provided that the parking layout shown in Exhibit E may be deviated from as needed to accommodate the building being constructed. 3 • To allow the uses allowed under the previously existing C-2 Community Commercial District. • To allow the uses allowed under the existing B-1 Commercial District. • To add that the uses allowed include a Restaurant, with or without drive- through food services. • In alternative to the single building development allowed above, to allow for development of two buildings consistent with the configuration set forth as Option 2 in Exhibit E. The two buildings constructed may be equal to or less than the size of the building area set forth in Exhibit E provided that they are within the footprint of the configuration set forth in Exhibit E, and the parking layout shown in Exhibit E may be deviated from as needed to accommodate the buildings being constructed. Allowed uses within the two buildings are the uses allowed above. Such a two building development shall only be subject to site plan and subdivision review and approval, and not any additional PUD amendment. If two buildings are developed, it is anticipated that the portion of Outlot A lying north of 33 rd ## Street North would be developed into two separately subdivided parcels. • To allow for a parking layout that deviates from the 2005 PUD Plan as needed to accommodate the building or buildings, provided that the number of parking spaces are sufficient to meet City requirements. • Neither the existing B-1 Commercial District setbacks nor previously existing C-2 Community Commercial District setbacks apply. As a result: o Adjacent residential zone setbacks do not apply. o If developed as a two building development under Option 2 in Exhibit E, no parking setbacks apply to the boundary line between the two subdivided parcels created as part of this development. The building areas and parking curb line shown on Options 1 and 2 in Exhibit E are not drawn to scale but they appear to meet all setback requirements. 4. The 2005 PUD Plan with respect to the portion of Outlot A, Oakdale Marketplace Third Addition lying south of 33 rd Street North is amended to add the uses and additional signage language as set forth in Exhibit F to this Resolution, in addition to the uses allowed under the existing B-1 Commercial District and under the previously existing C-2 Community Commercial District. 5. The 2005 PUD Plan with respect to Lot 1, Block 1, Oakdale Marketplace is amended to allow the uses and the configuration of buildings as set forth in Exhibit G to this Resolution. 6. Except with respect to the following parcels Outlot C, Oakdale Marketplace, the portion of Outlot A, Oakdale Marketplace Third Addition lying north of 33 rd ## Street North and the portion of Outlot A, Oakdale Marketplace Third Additional lying south of 33 rd Street North, the additional design standards set forth in Exhibit H to this Resolution are approved. 7. Resolution 2024-89 is rescinded. 4 ## Voting in Favor: ## Voting Against: Resolution duty seconded and passed this ____ day of July, 2026. __________________________ ## Kevin Zabel, Mayor ## Attest: _________________________ ## Sara Ludwig, City Clerk ## Exhibit A ## Legal Descriptions ## Lot 1, Block 1, Oakdale Marketplace ## Outlot A, Oakdale Marketplace ## Outlot C, Oakdale Marketplace ## Outlot E, Oakdale Marketplace ## Lot 1, Block 2, Oakdale Marketplace ## Lot 1, Block 3, Oakdale Marketplace ## Lot 1, Block 1, Oakdale Marketplace Second Addition ## Lot 1, Block 1, Oakdale Marketplace Third Addition ## Outlot A, Oakdale Marketplace Third Addition ## Lot 1, Block 1, Oakdale Marketplace Fourth Addition ## Outlot A, Oakdale Marketplace ## Lot 1, Block 1, Oakdale Marketplace Fifth Addition ## Lot 1, Block 1, Oakdale Marketplace Sixth Addition 5 ## Exhibit B ## 2005 Oakdale Marketplace PUD Plan 6 ## Exhibit C Tract 1: The existing use is commercial storage consisting of both interior and exterior storage. Site development can remain as-is but cannot be expanded or may be redeveloped into a commercial retail, commercial service, brew pub, brewery taproom, microdistillery, or residential use subject to site plan review and approval. The maximum residential density permitted is medium density residential (4-12 dwelling units per acre) on the site. Option 1 Option 2 7 ## Exhibit D Outlot C, Oakdale Marketplace: In addition to the uses allowed under the existing B-1 Commercial District and under the previously existing C-2 Community Commercial District, the site may also be developed as commercial retail, commercial service, brew pub, brewery taproom, microdistillery, a Restaurant or a Convenience-Food Restaurant, or residential use subject to existing 2005 PUD site plan review and approval. Residential site density permitted is medium density (4-12 dwelling units per acre) due to the smaller size (1.5 acres) of the site. Direct access from 32 nd Street North for individual residential lots or buildings is prohibited. 8 ## Exhibit E The portion of Outlot A, Oakdale Marketplace Third Addition lying north of 33 rd ## Street: In addition to all uses allowed under the previously existing C-2 Community Commercial District and under the existing B-1 Commercial District, the allowed uses include a restaurant, with or without drive-through food services. Option 1 9 Option 2 10 ## Exhibit F The portion of Outlot A, Oakdale Marketplace Third Addition lying south of 33 rd ## Street North: In addition to the uses allowed under the existing B-1 Commercial District and under the previously existing C-2 Community Commercial District, the site may also be developed as a multi-tenant commercial retail, commercial service, brew pub, brewery taproom, microdistillery, and Restaurant or Convenience-Food Restaurant with or without drive-through food service, subject to existing 2005 PUD site plan review and approval. Site development may include more than one building on the site subject to existing 2005 PUD site plan review and approval. The City will consider a mixed-use development.. High density residential is permitted for the mixed- use development (8-30 dwelling units per acre). The City will consider additional wayfinding signage within the PUD, subject to review and approval of a wayfinding signage plan. Additional signage flexibility within the Oakdale Marketplace Planned Unit Development may be allowed with City Council approval, subject to the following criteria. In addition to signage allowed in accordance with the City's signage regulations (City of Oakdale Code of Ordinances, Chapter 25, Articles 19), two double-sided freestanding signs may be permitted at the following intersections provided that each sign does not exceed 16 square feet per side. 1. Market Place North and 32 nd ## Street North 2. Market Place North and 33 rd ## Street North 11 ## Exhibit G Traft 5: The site is designated for commercial retail, commercial service, brew, pub, brewery taproom, microdistillery, or Restaurants or Convenience-Food Restaurants with or without drive- through food services, subject to site plan review and approval. The site may be developed with one building or two smaller buildings, subject to site plan approval. Option 1 Option 2 12 ## Exhibit H Additional standards for the Oakdale Marketplace Planned Unit Development, except with respect to the following parcels Outlot C, Oakdale Marketplace, the portion of Outlot A, Oakdale Marketplace Third Addition lying north of 33 rd ## Street North and the portion of Outlot A, Oakdale Marketplace Third Additional lying south of 33 rd Street North.. The City will consider additional wayfinding signage within the PUD, subject to review and approval of a wayfinding signage plan. Additional signage flexibility within the Oakdale Marketplace Planned Unit Development may be allowed with City Council approval, subject to the following criteria. Each new development within the Oakdale Marketplace PUD shall include multi-sided architecture by utilizing consistent façade materials and designs on all building elevations and shall provide enhanced materials and design for properties fronting along any street and on the elevation provided public access to the structure. The building elevation containing the primary public access will be considered the building front, along with any frontage adjacent to the streets. Structures with more than one frontage as defined above must have signage on both fronts to define entrances. Residential development within the Oakdale Marketplace PUD shall be subject to a Sewer Availability Charge surcharge for residential units that will increase flow to the lift station above the amount in the Comprehensive Plan to cover the cost of increased flow to the lift station at the corner of Ideal Avenue N and Stillwater Boulevard N. The developer(s) shall install sidewalk and trail facilities with any new development or redevelopment to complete the internal pedestrian infrastructure system in accordance with the adopted City of Oakdale Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. The pedestrian gaps to be completed include parcel ID 1702921430051 (Outlot C, Oakdale Marketplace). Any new development south of 32 nd Street will require additional landscape screening, to the satisfaction of the City Council. ## PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT 1 ## To: Oakdale Planning Commission ## Meeting Date: July 9, 2026 ## Applicant: Cesar Castillo, with consent from William and Kellie Marty Location: 7582 25 th ## Street North ## Request(s): Conditional Use Permit for an Oversized Accessory Building (Garage) ## Prepared/Presented: Connor Zielinski, Community Development Intern ## INTRODUCTION Cesar Castillo, the applicant, with consent from the property owners William and Kellie Marty, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for an oversized accessory building (garage) at 7582 25 th Street North. The accessory building (garage) is planned to be 400 square feet in size. The maximum square footage allowed for an accessory building on this site, per applicable zoning requirements, is 200 square feet. Larger accessory buildings are permitted through the CUP process. There is an existing, attached garage on the property. The applicant does not intend to extend the existing driveway to the proposed structure. The second garage is requested for recreational vehicle storage. ## Location Map – Cronk Conditional Use Permit ## COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION The subject property is guided Low Density Residential per the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2 ## ZONING DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS The subject property is zoned R-2 (Low Density Residential). In accordance with Sec. 25-09-201 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance, accessory buildings are allowed to be up to 200 square feet, and may exceed 200 square feet through the Conditional Use Permit process. The designations of the surrounding property are displayed in the table below: ## Orientation Comprehensive Plan Zoning District Existing Use North Low Density Residential R-2 Low Density Residential Single Family Residential South Low Density Residential R-2 Low Density Residential Single Family Residential East Low Density Residential R-2 Low Density Residential Single Family Residential West Low Density Residential R-2 Low Density Residential Single Family Residential ## ANALYSIS The zoning ordinance states the following (Sec. 25-03-301(a)): A conditional use is a permitted use that is allowed only when it is shown that the use meets certain general and specific standards related to the proposed conditional use. All conditional uses must meet seven (7) general criteria in order for a permit to be approved. This allows the City to review the potential impact(s) the use may have and ensure that the use is consistent with the vision for the area in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. In addition, some conditional uses have specific criteria that must be met which are intended to address potential issues that may arise associated with that type of use. If an application meets all of the criteria in the ordinance, then a conditional use permit shall be granted. General Criterial for Granting a Conditional Use Permit. The general criteria for granting a conditional use permit (applicable to all conditional use permit requests) is listed in Section 25-03-302(c) of the Zoning Code. The conditional use is evaluated according to the following criteria: (1) The conditional use will be in conformity with the City’s comprehensive plan and with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of this article. • The use is in conformity with the City’s Comprehensive Plan as the property is guided low density residential and oversized accessory buildings are permitted in residential zoning districts, provided certain conditions are met. If the applicant obtains approval for this CUP request, and subsequently obtains a building permit, the proposed use would be compliant. This condition is met. (2) The conditional use shall be located, designated, maintained and operated to be compatible with the existing or intended character of that zoning district in which it is located. • The accessory building is located in a residential area where similar accessory buildings are present on other nearby properties. As stated in the applicant’s narrative, the accessory building will be used for recreational vehicle storage. Approval of this request should not alter the residential character of the area. This condition is met. 3 (3) The use shall not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses due to noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, vibration, general unsightliness or other nuisances. • If this CUP request is approved, the accessory building will need to meet setback requirements and must be kept out of easement areas. The applicant’s initial site plan appears to meet setback requirements (setbacks will be verified at time of building permit review). The proposed use, garage for recreational vehicle storage, is not anticipated to generate any nuisance conditions. This condition is met. (4) The use shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause inconveniences to the adjoining properties. • The building would be situated in the rear yard of the property and will not affect any traffic congestion or parking needs. This condition is met. (5) The use shall be served adequately by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection and utilities. • The property is adequately served by public services, and the accessory building will not require additional services beyond those that can be provided by existing utilities. This condition is met. (6) The use shall not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and shall not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the city. • The accessory building should not create any additional requirements at public cost. This condition is met. (7) The use shall preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design and cause minimal adverse environmental effects. • The property in question is 0.23 acres in size, and the accessory building will not impact any natural features on the site and is not anticipated to cause any adverse environmental effects. The property would still be compliant with the R-2 District’s maximum impervious surface limit of 45% if the garage was built as proposed. This condition is met. Specific Conditional Use Permit Criteria for Private Garages and Accessory Buildings Exceeding the Size Requirements. The specific criteria for granting a conditional use permit for an oversized accessory building is listed in Section 25-09-201(d)(3) of the Zoning Code; staff evaluation of the application follows the citations: (A) The parcel of land where the private garage or accessory building is to be located may not be subdivided as long as the private garage or accessory building is on the property. • A condition of approval, to address this requirement, has been added to the accompanying resolution for the Conditional Use Permit. (B) The private garage or accessory building must not be of a pole building type construction (defined as a structure that utilizes treated lumber buried in the ground that serves as the building foundation). • The proposed building is not classified as a pole building type construction. This condition is met. (C) The private garage or accessory building must not have a door or other access opening exceeding ten (10) feet in height. 4 • The accessory building’s door is planned to be approximately seven (7) feet in height. This condition is met. (D) The private garage or accessory building must not be used for commercial or industrial activities, except as allowed by the regulations governing home occupations. • In the applicant’s narrative, it is noted that the accessory building will be used for residential related purposes. No commercial or industrial activities are proposed to occur in the building. This condition is met. (E) The private garage or accessory building shall not exceed 1,500 square feet in size. • The accessory building is proposed to be up to 400 square feet in size. This condition is met. (F) The private garage or accessory building shall not exceed 25 feet in height. • The accessory building is proposed to be approximately 12.5 feet tall. This condition is met. (G) Parcels of land containing single-unit dwellings must not have more than one additional private garage or accessory building exceeding two-hundred (200) square feet in size. • This application is the applicant’s first request for an oversized accessory building or additional garage. This condition is met. ## 60-DAY RULE ## Application Deemed Complete: June 12, 2026 60-Day Review Deadline: August 11, 2026 ## Extension Granted To: N/A ## Planning Commission Meeting: July 9, 2026 ## Expected City Council Action: July 28, 2026 ## ROLE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION The role of the Planning Commission is to hold a public hearing and review the Conditional Use Permit request as it relates to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements and provide a recommendation to the City Council. ## RECOMMENDATION Staff have determined that the request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the oversized accessory building has met the review criteria. Staff recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit with conditions listed in the draft resolution. ## MOTION Motion to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for an oversized accessory building at 7582 25 th Street North. ## Attachments ## Development Checklist ## Applicant’s Narrative ## Applicant’s Site Plan ## Draft Resolution City of Oakdale ● 1584 Hadley Avenue N, Oakdale, MN 55128 www.oakdalemn.gov ● 651-739-5086 ## Development Checklist 7582 25 th ## Street North - Conditional Use Permit ## Project name Marty Conditional Use Permit ## Proposed use Oversized Accessory Building (Garage) Existing site conditions Residential property Site access Existing access off 25 th ## Street North ## Zoning R-2 (Low Density Residential) ## Comprehensive Plan guidance Low Density Residential ## Is a Comprehensive Plan amendment required? ## No Any Zoning approvals anticipated? None beyond the CUP request ## Any Subdivision approvals anticipated? No ## Potential deviations from City Code (if a PUD)? No ## Any Variances requested? No Any financial incentives from the City being requested by the developer? ## No Has the developer met with the City’s Development Review Committee? No, but the application was reviewed by the DRC on Wednesday, June 17, 2026 Has the developer submitted a formal application? ## Yes Any anticipated environmental impacts? None Has the developer met with the Planning Commission? The request will be heard as a public hearing item on July 9, 2026, by the Planning Commission Other jurisdiction approvals required None identified ## To Whom it May Concern, Yes, we at 7582 25th N, Oakdale, MN would like to consent to build a 20x20 garage in the back yard to be used as storage for recreational vehicles to keep them safe, secure and dry! We are asking for permission for the conditional use permit at our meeting with planning commission very well! ## Sincerely, ## William Marty ## Kellie J Marty 1 ## CITY OF OAKDALE ## RESOLUTION NO. 2026-xx ## A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN OVERSIZED ACCESSORY ## BUILDING (SECOND PRIVATE GARAGE) AT 7582 25 ## TH ## STREET NORTH SUBJECT TO ## CONDITIONS. At a meeting of the City Council of the City of Oakdale held on Tuesday, July 28, 2026, at the Oakdale Discovery Center, 4444 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota, with the following members present: Mayor Kevin Zabel; Councilmembers Kari Moore, Andy Morcomb, Gary Severson, and Katie Wrich, and the following members absent: None, the Oakdale City Council resolved: WHEREAS, William and Kelly Marty have requested a Conditional Use Permit for an oversized accessory building (second private garage), and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R-2 and contains an existing single-family dwelling and an attached private garage, and an oversized accessory building may be allowed via Conditional ## Use Permit, and WHEREAS, the proposal for an oversized accessory building meets the general and specific criteria for a Conditional Use Permit and complies with the Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Oakdale hereby approves the Conditional Use Permit for an oversized accessory building (second private garage) at 7582 25 th Street North (Legal Description: Lot 4, Block 3, Hillvale Second Addition, Washington County, Minnesota) subject to the following conditions: 1. The structure shall be set back at least five (5) feet from rear and side property lines and kept out of easement areas. 2. The structure shall not exceed 400 square feet. 3. The structure shall not exceed 25 feet in height. 4. The structure shall not be used as a dwelling unit. 5. Garage doors shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height. 6. A building permit must be obtained for the use. 7. No commercial activities shall occur within the structure. ## Voting in Favor: Mayor Zabel; Councilmembers Moore, Morcomb, ## Severson, and Wrich ## Voting Against: None Resolution duly seconded and passed this 28 th day of July, 2026. 2 _____________________________ ## Kevin Zabel, Mayor ______________________________ ## Sara Ludwig, City Clerk ## PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT ## To: Oakdale Planning Commission ## Meeting Date: July 9, 2026 ## Applicant: Capital Partners Location: 7049 4 th ## Street North ## Request(s): Ninety Four Exchange – Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Plat, ## and Site Plan ## Prepared/Presented: Luke McClanahan, Planning Manager ## LOCATION & REQUEST DETAILS Capital Partners, the developer and property owner, proposes constructing two large-scale, light industrial buildings at the property addressed 7049 4 th Street North. One building is approximately 100,000 square feet, and the other is approximately 90,000 square feet. Two other areas on the property are identified for future development opportunities. The subject property consists of parcels 3202921320001, 3202921330002, 3202921320003, and 3202921330001. The parcels are zoned B-2 Business Campus District. The entirety of the site is approximately 36 acres. Currently the site contains a legal non-conforming billboard in the northeast corner of the site but is otherwise vacant (the billboard must be removed when the eastern portion of the site develops). It also contains overlapping wetland and mapped floodplain (approximately 5 acres), significant grade changes, and numerous trees. ## Location Map – Ninety Four Exchange At the April 14, 2026, City Council Workshop meeting, the developer presented a concept plan for the two industrial buildings. The project received general support from the City Council. It is worth noting that the developer’s plan generally aligns with the City’s preferred redevelopment concept plan for the property, which was prepared by the City in August 2025. ## COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION AND PROPOSED AMENDMENT According to the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the property is guided as Office/Limited Business. Allowed uses in this category include offices, research centers, medical clinics, government buildings, hotels, and class one restaurants. To enable light industrial use, the developer is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) to re-guide a portion of the subject property, shown in the map below, to the Industrial/Office category (the adjacent property to the north is guided Industrial/Office). To fulfill the intent of the B-2 zoning district of the site, which is noted in the zoning section of this memo, and to create an intentional transition area that utilizes high visibility of the interstate frontages for future commercial use, the remainder of the property must maintain its land use guidance as Office/Limited Business. ## Area to be Re-Guided – Ninety Four Exchange In accordance with State Statute and the Metropolitan Council’s guidelines, the CPA request requires additional review by overlapping and nearby jurisdictions that would be affected by the change. This process is referred to as the “affected jurisdictions review”. Staff have forwarded the CPA request to the affected jurisdictions (Watershed District, DNR, MnDOT, and Metro Transit) and review comments remain pending. If the CPA is approved by the City Council and the affected jurisdictions review is complete, the request will be forwarded to the Metropolitan Council for subsequent review and final approval. The Metropolitan Council will have 60 days, with a possible extension of 60 additional days, to review the request. ## ZONING DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS The subject property is currently zoned B-2 – Business Campus District. The stated intent of the B-2 zoning district is to “...provide for the integration of office, light industrial, and commercial uses in order to create high concentrations of employment centers on large sites, including offices, research and development, office-showroom, medical, government, lodging, and associated commercial uses with a focus on quality site design.” On January 27, 2026, the City Council approved an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance that included allowing Light Manufacturing as a principal use in the B-2 zoning district. The amendment also requires industrial uses in the B-2 zoning district to adhere to higher exterior building material standards (i.e., minimum of 70% Class 1 materials such as brick, stone, and/or glass). The designations of the surrounding properties are displayed in the table below: ## Orientation Comprehensive Plan Zoning District Existing Use ## North Industrial/Office B-3 Light Industrial Industria, Office ## South Right-of-Way Not applicable Interstate ## East Right-of-Way Not applicable Interstate ## West Semi Public, Low Density ## Residential ## B-2 Business Campus, R-3 Medium ## Density Residential ## Institutional, Residential ## PRELIMINARY PLAT ANALYSIS (1) Lots: The property consists of four existing parcels that will be re-platted. Proposed Lot 1, approximately 16 acres, will contain the two industrial buildings. The plat also shows three outlots for future development. However, the three outlots should be consolidated into one and should encompass the entirety of the wetland and buffer areas. At time of future development phasing, the outlot would be re-platted into buildable lots and the wetland area must be placed on its own outlot to be conveyed to the City. • The developer must update the plat to show a combined outlot that includes all wetland and buffer areas. (2) Access, Streets, and Pedestrian Ways: The developer updated their plans to include a new access via 4 th Street North, in addition to the proposed access via Hadley Avenue North. The two accesses are needed to provide adequate vehicle circulation, and the access off 4 th ## Street North will accommodate future development to the east of the industrial buildings. The internal roads will be private streets. The developer commissioned a traffic review for the use, which was prepared by Transportation Collaborative & Consultants, LLC. The recommendations from the traffic review memo include 1) modifying striping along Helmo Avenue North at the site access to “delineate the ability to utilize the existing bus-lane for a right-turn lane”, 2) modifying the traffic signal and roadway infrastructure at the intersection of 4 th ## Street North and Hale Avenue North to add a forth leg, and 3) review vehicle maneuverability and multimodal infrastructure for safety and efficiency. • The developer must cover the cost for traffic signal improvements at 4 th ## Street North and Hale Avenue North deemed necessary by the City Engineer. The civil plans show sidewalks throughout Lot 1 providing pedestrian circulation between the two industrial buildings and connection to Hadley Avenue North where an existing trail runs along the west side of the road. • The developer must cover the cost for pedestrian improvements at the intersection of 4 th Street North and Hale Avenue North deemed necessary by the City Engineer. (3) Easements: The City’s subdivision/plat regulations require easements for utilities and drainage purposes, as well as stormwater management infrastructure, including underground storage systems. In addition, an easement must be added and recorded with Washington County that mutually benefits all properties for access over private roads. • The developer must update the plat to include the required easements. (4) Wetlands/Stormwater Ponds: There are several acres of wetland located approximately in the center of the property. Impacts to small portions of the wetland, and associated mitigation are proposed in order to accommodate the development. Given the size of the development, on-site stormwater management provisions must be provided to manage runoff. The plans show a proposed stormwater basin located along the west side of proposed Lot 1, running along Hadley Avenue North. In addition, there will be an underground stormwater system located between the two industrial buildings. The existing stormwater ponds along Hadley Avenue North were built specifically to serve the Metropolitan Council’s Gold Line and cannot be used for private development. • The developer will need to work with the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District and the City Engineer regarding authorized impacts to the wetland area and to ensure proper stormwater management provisions are installed. (5) Other Regulatory Reviews. As mentioned, the developer will need to obtain approval from the Watershed District for stormwater management provisions and for wetland impacts/mitigation. Due to the property being located adjacent to Interstates 94 and 694, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is required to review the plat and site plan. Review comments from MnDOT remain pending. (6) Park Dedication. As part of the platting/subdivision process, the developer must comply with the City’s park dedication regulations, which is based on acreage for commercial and industrial property. Given that there are no planned public parks to be built within the subject property, it will be required that the developer provide a park dedication fee in accordance with the City’s adopted fee schedule. The details of the park dedication payment, and any potential breakdown based on future phases of development, will be finalized at time of final platting. • At time of Final Plat approval and the entitlements process, the developer must satisfy park dedication requirements consistent with the City’s adopted Fee Schedule. ## SITE PLAN ANALYSIS Site Plan review considers the relationship between the plan elements and conditions both on and off the property to ensure conformance of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and design standards. (1) Building Height, Setbacks, and Minimum Lot Size: Buildings in the B-2 district are limited to 40 feet in height (buildings may exceed 40 feet if their design conforms to Minnesota State Building Code, Section 1306). The elevations show that the average building height is approximately 36 feet, which satisfies the height standards. Setback requirements for the B-2 district are 30 feet for the front and corner yards and 20 feet for the interior side and rear yards. The site plan and preliminary plat show that the setbacks are adequately met. Impervious surface coverage for the B-2 district cannot exceed 90%. This requirement is met as impervious surface on Lot 1 is shown on the plans as being approximately 71%. (2) Parking: Minimum parking requirements for manufacturing use, per the City’s Zoning Ordinance, are 1 space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Based on the size of the two buildings, approximately 192,600 gross square feet combined, 192 parking spaces are required. The site plan shows that 192 parking spaces are provided. “Proof of parking”, which involves setting aside area for future parking spaces and building them only if needed, is shown for 26 additional spaces. (3) Exterior Building Materials and Design: Industrial buildings in the B-2 zoning district must adhere to higher exterior building material standards (i.e., minimum of 70% Class materials such as brick, stone, or glass). Sample elevations provided show the building consisting of a variety of exterior building materials such as brick veneer, precast, glass, and metal accent panels. • Although sample elevations were provided, the developer must also provide additional information on the exterior building materials to demonstrate compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. The industrial buildings must be fully compliant with Building and Fire Code. As such, the building must be properly outfitted with fire suppression systems. Hydrant locations and fire department connections must also be identified in the developer’s civil plans. • The developer must comply with Building and Fire Code requirements. (4) Tree Preservation and Landscaping Plan: The developer provided a tree preservation plan in accordance with the City’s Zoning Ordinance. Under the Ordinance, 25% of trees that meet the City’s definition of “significant tree” can be removed without prompting tree replacement requirements. Based on the developer’s tree mitigation data provided, 2,282inches of significant trees are proposed to be removed beyond the allowed 25%. The developer’s landscaping plan shows that 98 inches of significant tree replacement will be planted as part of their landscaping plan. As a result, 2,184inches of tree replacement must be covered via fee in-lieu, which is $187.50 per caliper inch – per the City’s adopted 2026 Fee Schedule. • The developer must provide tree replacement fee in lieu, in the amount of $409,455.47. A preliminary landscaping plan was submitted as part of the Site Plan application. As required by the City’s Zoning Ordinance, one tree per 1,000 square feet of green space must be planted. As such, 60 trees are required to be planted on site. The applicant’s landscaping plan shows that 80 trees will be planted, thereby satisfying the requirement. In addition, requirements are met for the minimum number of overstory trees along the boulevard areas, minimum plant size, and species type. (5) Screening of Utilities and Trash Enclosures. As required by the Zoning Ordinance, rooftop and ground mechanical equipment must be screened from view with materials that are compatible and comparable to that of the principal structure. Alternatively, ground level mechanical equipment may be screened by opaque landscaping or a screen wall. • The developer must provide additional information that shows all proposed rooftop and ground mechanical equipment and methods of screening. The Zoning Ordinance requires trash enclosures to be located within the principal structure, or within an accessory structure, and screened from eye level view from public streets and adjacent residential properties. Trash enclosures in industrial areas are not required to have an overhead door or roof structure if they meet certain requirements. • The developer must provide additional information that shows trash enclosures. (6) Site Lighting: All light fixtures must be under the 30-foot requirement for maximum height to the illumination source. As required by the Ordinance, site lighting cannot exceed 0.5 foot- candles at any property line, and light fixtures cannot exceed 30 feet in height. • The developer must provide a photometric plan that complies with the Ordinance requirements. (7) Signage: The applicant will need to obtain a permit for proposed signage. All signage must conform to the City’s sign regulations. (8) Grading and Utilities: The applicant submitted plans for grading, sewer, water, and other utilities. As noted, the plans show a proposed stormwater basin located along the west side of proposed Lot 1, running along Hadley Avenue North. In addition, there will be an underground stormwater system located between the two industrial buildings. • The applicant will need to work with the Watershed District on stormwater provisions and obtain necessary approvals/permits. • The developer will need to obtain approval from the City Engineer for their site civil plans. As part of the recently completed Gold Line project, an eight-inch sanitary sewer line was extended along Hudson Blvd N to serve the subject property in anticipation of development. The new sanitary sewer line extension terminates near the stormwater basin where Hudson Blvd N and Hadley Ave N merge. There is a $215,000 sewer connection charge that must be paid by the developer as part of the development and entitlements process. The City’s Subdivision Code requires that costs to extend utilities be paid at the sole expense of the applicant. In addition, City and Met Council Sewer Availability Charges (SAC), and City Water Availability Charges (WAC), must also be paid by the developer at time of building permit, which will be based upon anticipated usage. • The developer must pay for the sewer connection charge, along with the WAC and SAC fees. (9) Environmental Review: A phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the property was completed in October 2024 for a previous development proposal. Besides verification of wetland boundaries, the ESA did not recommend further environmental investigation of the property. However, the ESA recommended that a construction contingency plan be created if contamination is later discovered related to an oil tank that existed when the property was a farmstead. (1) Other Regulatory Review: The applicant will need to work with the applicable Watershed District to satisfy stormwater management provisions and wetland standards. Review comments for the site plan and plat remain pending by MnDOT. ## FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS The applicant has not requested financial assistance from the City for this development. As required by the City’s Ordinance, the developer is responsible for installing all infrastructure that will serve the development. The developer will also be responsible for the sewer connection charge and any signal and pedestrian improvements at the intersection of 4 th Street North and Hale Avenue North. ## 60-DAY RULE ## Application Deemed Complete: June 2, 2026 60-Day Review Deadline: August 1, 2026 ## Extension Granted To: N/A ## Planning Commission Meeting: July 9, 2026 ## Expected City Council Action: July 28, 2026 ## ROLE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION The role of the Planning Commission is to hold a public hearing, review the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan in conformance to the Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision Ordinance, and Zoning Ordinance, and provide a recommendation to the City Council. The purpose of the public hearing is to gather additional information from affected parties for the Planning Commission’s consideration. While this information may help inform the Commission’s recommendation, the recommendation must be based on the City’s adopted policies and ordinances to ensure valid findings of fact. ## RECOMMENDATION Staff have determined that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan do not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and are consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance, provided that certain conditions are met. Staff recommend approval of this request with the conditions listed in the draft resolutions. ## MOTION Motion to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Ninety Four Exchange. Motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat for Ninety Four Exchange. Motion to recommend approval of the Site Plan for Ninety Four Exchange. ## Attachments ## Development Checklist ## Developer’s Narrative ## Preliminary Plat ## Site Plan ## Colored Site Plan ## Landscaping Plan ## Renderings/Elevations ## Draft Comprehensive Plan Amendment Resolution ## Draft Plat Resolution ## Draft Site Plan Resolution City of Oakdale ● 1584 Hadley Avenue N, Oakdale, MN 55128 www.oakdalemn.gov ● 651-739-5086 ## Development Checklist ## City of Oakdale 7049 4 th ## Street North ## Ninety Four Exchange ## Project name Ninety Four Exchange Proposed use Light industrial Existing site conditions Vacant; environmental features Site access Two proposed accesses: one off Hadley Ave N and one off 4 th ## St N ## Zoning B-2 Business Campus District ## Comprehensive Plan guidance Office/Limited Business Is a Comprehensive Plan amendment required? Yes, for a portion of the site Any Zoning approvals anticipated? Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Site Plan approval ## Any Subdivision approvals anticipated? Yes ## Potential deviations from City Code (if a PUD)? No ## Any Variances requested? No Any financial incentives from the City being requested by the developer? ## No Will developer seek 4d status? No Has the developer met with the City’s Development Review Committee? The request was reviewed by the DRC on April 1, 2026 and July 1, 2026 Has the developer submitted a formal application? ## Yes Any anticipated environmental impacts? Runoff from the use must be addressed through stormwater management provisions. Tree replacement requirements must be met. Wetland and floodplain areas must be properly protected. Has the developer met with the Planning Commission? The request will be heard by the Planning Commission on July 9, 2026. ## Other jurisdiction approvals required? Yes, the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District for stormwater management provisions and wetland regulations and the Metropolitan Council for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 1 June 1, 2026 ## Luke McClanahan – City Planner ## Members of the City Council and Planning Commission ## City of Oakdale ## 1584 Hadley Avenue N ## Oakdale, MN 55128 ## Re: NINETY FOUR EXCHANGE ## Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan ## Mr. McClanahan and Members of the City Council/Planning Commission: Capital Partners is pleased to present this request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Plat and Site Plan for the proposed Ninety Four Exchange project located in the northwest quadrant of Interstate Highway 94 and 694. Who is Capital Partners? Capital Partners is a Twin Cities based real estate investment, development, and management company with over $1.8 billion in value of industrial real estate under ownership and management in the Twin Cities, Milwaukee, Indianapolis, and Southwest Florida. The firm is built on the strength of our partnerships and unique position within the market. With our equity partners, local industry relationships, and ability to attract and retain great tenants, along with our hands on approach, we are one of the fastest growing industrial real estate companies in Minnesota. We actively and aggressively seek out investment and development opportunities in the Twin Cities with the best potential and use our integrated platform to operate at maximum efficiency. In addition to our portfolio of 17.5 million square feet of industrial assets, we are currently under contract on land positions to develop approximately one million square feet of state of the art industrial buildings, including the proposed Ninety Four Exchange. The Ninety Four Exchange project will be a major investment to bring jobs and modern facilities to better serve our valued tenants and area businesses. ## Request Capital Partners is seeking approval for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide a portion of the property to Industrial/Office to enable the proposed light industrial use. Approval of the Preliminary Plat is also requested to subdivide the property for the proposed development. Lastly, a Site Plan approval is requested to ensure the proposed project as designed meets the city requirements and goals for the site. ## Ninety Four Exchange – Oakdale, MN June 1, 2026 ## Capital Parnters 2 2 ## Overview  Land Area: 39.54 acres ##  Existing Land Use: Office/Limited Business ##  Proposed Land Use: Industrial/Office ##  Existing Zoning: B-2 Business Campus District ##  Proposed Zoning: B-2 Business Campus District  Lots: 1 Lot, 3 Outlots  Access: One access to Hadley Avenue N with future access to 4 th ## Street N  Utilities: Public sewer and water available to site  Purpose: Project will fulfil unmet demand for light industrial tenants ## Lots Lot 1, Block 1: Lot for proposed Ninety Four Exchange Outlot A: Future development parcel in northeast corner of site Outlot B: Future development parcel in southeast portion of site Outlot C: Future development parcel in southwest portion of site ## Ninety Four Exchange The proposed Ninety Four Exchange developed by Capital Partners includes two light industrial buildings totaling 192,600 gross square feet of rentable space. The building’s clear height is 28’ and is 180’ deep. Structural bays are 50’ wide by 60’ deep, facilitating efficient layout of numerous business uses. The buildings will be constructed of architectural insulated precast concrete wall panels, along with a steel-framed roof structure. Exterior materials will include glass storefront window systems, brick faced precast concrete, painted precast concrete, and metal panel accents. Parking is provided at a rate sufficient to support a variety of office, assembly, manufacturing, and warehouse uses. The truck docks are configured to support multiple building tenants and can be configured for a mix of car parking and truck access if more parking is required for an individual user. Landscaping will include overstory trees and the use of coniferous trees to shield truck docks from view to the north and south. Foundation plantings will include shrubs and flowers, and a surface stormwater pond will further enhance the overall appearance of the development. The proposed site is compliant with code maximum impervious (90%), providing 29% open space (43% if the wetland area is included). However, even exceeding the open space requirement, there is not an opportunity to plant the number of trees required by code. If section 25-10-602(a)(2) of the city’s zoning ordinance were interpreted to require 1 tree per 1,000 SF of open space (excluding buildings and paved areas), the required number of trees (including required boulevard trees) would be 80 total. This is an appropriate number for the ## Ninety Four Exchange – Oakdale, MN June 1, 2026 ## Capital Parnters 3 3 available planting area in order for the trees to thrive. We believe this interpretation meets the intent of code in aligning the required trees with the required open space. Industrial buildings of this sort are in high demand as they provide an attractive, efficient, sustainable, and highly flexible setting for a broad range of business tenants ranging from office/manufacturing, assembly, and fulfillment to sophisticated medical device or electronics product development operations. The buildings are purposefully flexible enough to house a variety of users, and to provide companies with the opportunity to configure, reconfigure, and expand or contract their real estate footprint as market and business conditions change over time. The economies inherent in constructing the buildings from durable, sustainable, and economical materials is reflected in rental rates, making Ninety Four Exchange an attractive option for growing businesses hoping to make Oakdale their home. ## Environment Considerations The project does not meet the mandatory threshold requirements for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). However, based on feedback from city council at the concept plan review workshop in April, a general discussion of environmental considerations is presented below. While not intended to be comprehensive, the discussion below is based on pertinent categories from the actual Environmental Review Worksheet published by the Environmental Quality Board. ## Climate Adaptation and Resilience Based on information from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources website, Minnesota’s climate is changing rapidly and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Temperatures are increasing, especially in the winter, and large, more frequent extreme precipitation events are occurring. The project will not have a noticeable effect on the climate. ## Geology, Soils and Topography/Land Forms Based on information from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and a geotechnical evaluation report prepared by Braun Intertec, the proposed site is not located in any susceptible geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst conditions. Based on the geotechnical evaluation report, the site has approximately 1-foot of topsoil over alluvial soils consisting of clay and silty sand over glacial deposits consisting of sand and silty sand. Perched groundwater was observed in five borings at varying elevations. Braun anticipates hydrostatic groundwater levels to be deeper than the depth of the borings performed on the project. See geotechnical report for additional information. The site has a significant amount of elevation change, with elevations ranging from 1065 in the northeast corner, down to about 1004 in the large wetland in the middle of the site. The site will require significant mass grading to allow for efficient development of the site. A stormwater pollution prevention plan will be prepared that will govern the mass grading of the site and ensure that erosion and sediment discharge are controlled at the site. ## Water Resources ## Ninety Four Exchange – Oakdale, MN June 1, 2026 ## Capital Parnters 4 4 There are four wetlands located on the property varying in size from 0.08 acres to 6.05 acres. Wetland 2 and 3 are small wetlands in the north central portion of the site. Wetland 4 (DNR Wetland 82042900) is a large, 6.05 acre wetland in the central portion of the site that collects the majority of the stormwater from the site. Wetland 5 is located in the southern portion of the site. Wetlands 2, 3, and 5 and proposed to be filled as part of the project. See Wetland Permit application for detailed information on the wetlands and proposed impacts. Battle Creek is located approximately 3,500 feet southwest of the site and is listed as an impaired water. There are no other impaired waters within one mile of the site. Stormwater from the site will be collected in storm sewer and routed to surface infiltration/filtration basins and underground treatment systems. The stormwater treatment practices will discharge Wetland 4. See stormwater management plan for detailed information. The city has municipal sanitary sewer and water available to the site. The proposed project will hook up to the municipal utilities that were designed to serve this property. No groundwater appropriations are proposed for the site. ## Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes According to a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment prepared by Braun Intertec, a former farmstead in the northwest corner of the site reportedly contained an oil tank. The tank was reportedly removed, but it is unknown whether it was aboveground or underground, exactly where it was located, or when it was removed. Braun Intertec recommended that any contamination encountered during construction be properly addressed. The Phase I ESA also noted that the site lies within the East Metro PFAS Superfund site, where groundwater is affected by PFAS compounds. Because the project will use municipal water and will not rely on onsite groundwater, no additional evaluation is required. ## Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources Our environmental consultant, Kjolhaug Environmental Services reviewed a licensed copy of the Natural Resources Inventory System (NHIS) to assess if any state protected species are known to occur within a 1-mile radius of the project area. One record of a state threatened turtle species is catalogued more than 4,000 feet northwest of the site. There are no rare natural communities on site. ## Noise Noise is inherent in the construction industry. Grading construction will begin in the summer of 2026 and will take approximately two months to complete. Building construction will being in the spring of 2027 and will take approximately seven months to complete. In total, construction will occur during approximately 9 months. There is one residential neighborhood located northwest of the property that is within earshot of the project. Noise impacts will be temporary and restricted to the construction period. The project is in a commercial/industrial area, where ## Ninety Four Exchange – Oakdale, MN June 1, 2026 ## Capital Parnters 5 5 ambient noise levels are already elevated due to traffic and industrial operations. To mitigate noise impacts, activities will be restricted to daytime hours, equipment will have proper mufflers and will be in good working condition, and stationery equipment will be located away from the residential neighborhood. Every attempt will be made to complete the project as efficiently as possible to limit the duration of construction and noise during construction. Once the project is complete, there will be no discernable noise from the site. The project will conform to all state and local noise standards. ## Transportation A traffic study was completed by SEH in February of 2019 for the Gold Line BRT project. This traffic study assumed that the proposed property would be developed as office/limited business. Capital Partners hired Transportation Collaborative & Consultants to complete a traffic analysis to review land use, access scenarios, and trip generation and to determine how the proposed project will compare to the assumptions made in the SEH traffic study. TCC traffic analysis found that the proposed development plan for the subject property will result in equal or less traffic than what was assumed in the SEH traffic study. Because the adjacent roadways were designed assuming full development of the subject property, not additional improvements to Hadley Avenue and 4 th Street are required for the project. See the TCC traffic analysis for detailed information. ## Schedule Grading is scheduled to commence in the summer of 2026. Earthwork is anticipated to begin in the summer of 2026, with building construction starting in the spring of 2027. It is our intention to have both buildings ready for occupancy in the fall of 2027. ## Closing We are excited to partner with the City of Oakdale to bring this development to the community. Your guidance and feedback are welcomed. If you have any questions or require further information, please contact me. ## Respectfully, ## Joseph Radach PE ## Capital Partners ## 5201 Eden Avenue, Suite 50 ## Edina, MN 55436 ## cc: Peter Mork – Capital Partners ## X ## X ## X ## X ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I  ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I ## I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## E ## V ## V ## V ## V ## T ## T ## D ## D ## V ## D ## E ## T ## D ## E ## D ## NO PARKING ## NO PARKING ## NO PARKING ## NO PARKING ## NO PARKING o o o o o o o o o o o ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## WBF ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## BSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL ## PSL 180' 91.5' 180' 15' 24' 18' 24' 18' 9' ## TYP 9' ## TYP 18'24' 18' 30' ## 10' TO ## BOC ## 5' TO ## BOC 18' 24' 18' 10.67' 9' ## TYP 9' ## TYP 9' ## TYP 60 45 35 52 17 24 ## PROPOSED ## BUILDING #1 ## 102,600 SF ## PROPOSED ## BUILDING #2 ## 90,000 SF 570' 180' 500' 180' ## A ## A ## A ## A ## B ## B ## B ## B ## B ## B ## D ## B ## E ## E ## 4TH STREET N ## HADLEY AVE N ## EX WETLAND 4 ## EX POND 20' 12' 12' 50' 50' 16 9' ## TYP 15' 30' ## R100' ## R100' ## R230' ## R30' ## R30' ## C ## C ## C ## C ## C 60' 60' 60' ## F ## F ## F ## POND 3P ## UNDERGROUND ## POND 41P ## LOT 1 ## BLOCK 1 ## ELECTRICAL ## TRANSMISSION ## EASEMENT 190' ## G ## WALL HEIGHT = 16' ## PROJECT NO. 24416 ## CAD FILE 05/29/2026 ## DATE ## REVISIONS ## DRAWN BY ## Date: Reg.No. ## 2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100 ## BURNSVILLE, MN 55306 ## PHONE: 952-890-6044 bbusselman @mnhill.com www.mnhill.com I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ## PRELIMINARY ## OAKDALE, MINNESOTA ## NINETY FOUR EXCHANGE ## CAPITAL PARTNERS ## FOR ## 5201 EDEN AVENUE, SUITE 50, EDINA, MN 55436 F:\_Civil 3D Projects\24416\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24416PAV.dwg - 6/25/2026 01:27PM ## 24416PAV ## C601 ## JSO Know what'sbelow. before you dig. ## Call ## R ## SCALE IN FEET 050100 ## SITE PLAN ## LEGEND ## PROPOSED CONCRETE ## PROPOSED BITUMINOUS SURFACE ## PROPOSED SEDIMENT BASIN ## PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN ## PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER ## OHPOHP ## XXXX ## EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ## EXISTING LIGHT POLE ## EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE ## EXISTING CURB & GUTTER ## EXISTING FENCE ## EXISTING ASPHALT ## EXISTING CONCRETE ## EXISTING TV PEDESTAL ## TV ## T ## EXISTING SIGN ## 5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK ## KEY NOTES ## A ## B ## C 20 ## NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PER ROW ## CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON ## D ## PARKING SETBACK LINE ## PSLPSLPSL ## BUILDING SETBACK LINE ## BSLBSLBSL ## OUTDOOR PATIO/SEATING AREA ## E ## B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER ## CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP ## PROPOSED LIGHT POLE ## EXISTING WETLAND ## EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER BOX > ## I ## EXISTING STORM SEWER ## EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ## EXISTING WATERMAIN > ## I ## S ## EXISTING POWER POLE ## EEE ## EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ## UFOUFOUFO ## EXISTING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC ## EXISTING WETLAND EDGE ## EXISTING ELECTRIC OUTLET POST ## EXISTING GUY WIRE ## EXISTING HANDHOLE ## EXISTING MANHOLE (ELECTRIC) ## E ## E ## DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY ## GROSS PROPERTY AREA39.53 ACRES/ 1,722,085 SF ## NET PROJECT AREA (EXCLUDES R-O-W)34.25 ACRES/ 1,491,806 SF ## EXISTING ZONINGB-2 ## PROPOSED ZONINGB-2 ## BUILDINGS ## GROSS FLOOR AREA192,600 SF ## PARKING ## PARKING SPACES REQUIRED PER CITY1 SPACE PER 1,000 SF ## PROPOSED PARKING REQUIRED192,600 SF / 1,000 SF = 192 SPACES ## PARKING SPACES PROVIDED192 SPACES ## ADA SPACES REQUIRED6 SPACES ## ADA SPACES PROVIDED6 SPACES ## PROOF OF PARKING SPACES SHOWN58 SPACES ## SETBACKS ## BUILDING SETBACK (FRONT/CORNER)30 FEET ## BUILDING SETBACK (SIDE/REAR)20 FEET ## BUILDING SETBACK (SITE PERIMETER)50 FEET ## PARKING SETBACK 5 FEET ## IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE (LOT 1, BLOCK 1) ## PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA9.35 ACRES ## PERCENT IMPERVIOUS57% ## WETLAND AREA3.04 ACRES ## PERCENT IMPERVIOUS EXCLUDING WETLAND71% ## CODE MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS90% ## RETAINING WALL ## F ## GUARD RAIL ## G κd,^dZdE ,>zsE ,/',tzςεκ ,/',tzεκ td>E^ dDWKZZzdZE^WKZdd/KE^DEd y/^d/E'/>>KZ h/>/E'ϭ ϭΘϬΖyρϳϬΖ h/>/E'Ϯ ϭΘϬΖyρϬϬΖ &hdhZ s>KWDEd &hdhZ s>KWDEd ## ϮρΖͲϬΗtd>E^ ^d< ## WZKWZdz>/E Z/E'^DEd dDWKZZzdZE^WKZdd/KE^DEd Z/E'^DEd ## Z/E' ^DEd ## ΕϭϭϮWZ</E'^W^ ## ΕϭϬςWZ</E'^W^ ## WZKWZdz>/E ## KhdKKZWd/Kͬ^d/E'Z ## KhdKKZWd/Kͬ^d/E'Z y/^d/E' ^dKZDͲ tdZ ## WKE ## D E S I G N G R O U P Autodesk Docs://11639-26049 Capital Partners - OakdaleIndustrial/11639-26049_Capital Partners - Oakdale_Site_R25.rvt !©XÂn©¬Âz0¬ ́يٴ†k(n0 ́XÂ0܉ ́XÂ0©nz ## K<>͕DEͮϬϯͬϮκͬϮςͮϭϭςϯεͲϮςϬκε ϭΗсΘϬΖͲϬΗ ^/dW>E ## EKZd, ## D ''  d  ## DDD ' ## EE  ## Ed  ## DE ## E ## D '' ## E d  ''  d '' ## DD '  ''''''' ## DDD '  d  ' ## E  ''''''''''''''' ## ZZZZZZZ  ''''  ''''' ## Z/E ## EE' ''' '  ''''  '''  ''''  '  ''''  ''''' ## ZZ/  '''''''''  ## ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ  ## D ## ZZZZZZZ     ## Z  ## ZZZ  ^ ## Z ## ZZZZ     ## Z ## ZZZZ   ## Z ## ZZZZ  ## ZZZZZ  ## ZZZZZ   ## Z  ## ZZZ  ## EdEd d ## PROPOSED BUILDING ## PROPOSED BUILDING ## PAVING PER ## CIVIL PLANS 50' 50' 50' ## FOUNDATION PLANTINGS,REFER TO ENLARGEMENT ## ON SHEET L104 ## FUTURE PARKING ## FUTURE PARKING ## FUTURE PARKING ## (+/-) 15' HILLSIDE WITH EVERGREEN TREES ## SCREENS LOADING AREAS FROM 4TH ## STREET NORTH. ENSURE HILLSIDE TREES ## ARE PLANTED LEVEL, SUPPORTED BY A ## PLATEAU OF SOIL, NOT AT AN ANGLE. ## OVERHEAD ## POWER LINES ## OVERHEAD ## POWER LINES 50' ## 5' WIDE TURFSOD MOW STRIP ## 5' WIDE TURF SOD MOW ## STRIP FROM FACE OF ## WALL TO BACK OF CURB ## TURF SOD ## 24" ROCK MULCH ## MAINTENANCE EDGE,MULCH & EDGER PER NOTES ## 24" ROCK MULCH ## MAINTENANCE EDGE,MULCH & EDGER PER NOTES ## ORNAMENTAL ## TREES, TYPICAL ## 24" ROCK MULCH ## MAINTENANCE EDGE,MULCH & EDGER PER NOTES ## 24" ROCK MULCH ## MAINTENANCE EDGE,MULCH & EDGER PER NOTES ## 5' WIDE TURFSOD MOW STRIP ## 5' WIDE TURFSOD MOW STRIP ## ROCK MULCH FROMFACE OF WALL TO ## BACK OF CURB ## NATIVE SEED FROM ## BACK OF WALL TO ## DISTURBED LIMITS,FIELD VERIFY ## NATIVE SEED ## PER SCHEDULE ## TURF SOD ## SIDEWALK PER CIVIL PLANS ## TURF SOD ## WALL PER ## CIVIL PLANS ## WALL PER ## CIVIL PLANS ## WALL PER ## CIVIL PLANS ## WALL PER ## CIVIL PLANS ## 5' WIDE TURF SOD MOWSTRIP FROM FACE OF ## WALL TO BACK OF CURB ## BASIN PER CIVIL ## PLANS ## BASIN BOTTOM ## TREATMENT PER ## CIVIL PLANS ## NATIVE SEED ONBASIN SIDE SLOPESPER SCHEDULE ## NATIVE SEED ONBASIN SIDE SLOPESPER SCHEDULE ## BASIN PER CIVIL ## PLANS ## BASIN BOTTOM ## TREATMENT PER ## CIVIL PLANS ## NATIVE SEED ## PER SCHEDULE ## NATIVE SEED ## PER SCHEDULE ## NATIVE SEED ## PER SCHEDULE ## FOUNDATION PLANTINGS,REFER TO ENLARGEMENT ## ON SHEET L104 ## FOUNDATION PLANTINGS, ## REFER TO ENLARGEMENT ## ON SHEET L104 ## FOUNDATION PLANTINGS, ## REFER TO ENLARGEMENT ## ON SHEET L104 ## PARKING LOT ## SCREENING SHRUBS,SET BACK FROM CURB ## TO MAINTAIN A 24"VEHICLE OVERHANG ## AREA WHEN SHRUBSARE AT MATURE SIZEAS SHOWN ## PARKING LOT ## SCREENING SHRUBS,SET BACK FROM CURB ## TO MAINTAIN A 24"VEHICLE OVERHANG ## AREA WHEN SHRUBSARE AT MATURE SIZEAS SHOWN ## ROCK MULCH &EDGER PER NOTESROCK MULCH &EDGER PER NOTES ## PAVING PER ## CIVIL PLANS ## PAVING PER ## CIVIL PLANS ## PAVING PER ## CIVIL PLANS ## PAVING PER ## CIVIL PLANS ## PAVING PER ## CIVIL PLANS ## EXISTING POND ## EXISTING LANDSCAPE ## TO REMAIN ## EXISTING LANDSCAPE ## TO REMAIN ## 4TH STREET NORTH ## P ## WOOD MULCH ## BENEATH ## CONIFEROUS ## TREES. WOOD ## MULCH PER NOTES ## WOOD MULCH ## BENEATH ## CONIFEROUS ## TREES. WOOD ## MULCH PER NOTES ## EDGERPER NOTES ## NATIVE SEED ## PER SCHEDULE ## ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION ## BEYOND THE WETLANDBUFFER LINE BY OTHERS ## SIDEWALK PER CIVIL PLANS ## NATIVE SEED FROMBACK OF WALL TO ## WETLAND BUFFER LINE ## NATIVE SEED FROMBACK OF WALL TO ## WETLAND BUFFER LINE ## TURF SOD ## 5' WIDE TURF SOD MOWSTRIP FROM FACE OF ## WALL TO BACK OF CURB ## TURF SOD ## ROCK MULCHPER NOTES ## EASEMENT ## SNOW STORAGE AREA ## SNOW STORAGE AREA ## SNOW STORAGE AREA ## MATCH LINE - SHEET L101MATCH LINE - SHEET L103 ## MATCH LINE - SHEET L101MATCH LINE - SHEET L103 ## MATCH LINE - SHEET L102 ## MATCH LINE - SHEET L101 ## MATCH LINE - SHEET L102 ## MATCH LINE - SHEET L101 ## MATCH LINE - SHEET L102 ## MATCH LINE - SHEET L101 ## EXIS ## T ## EXISTING WOODED AREA ## EXISTING WETLAND ## NATIVE SEED TODISTURBED LIMITS, ## FIELD VERIFY ## NATIVE SEED TODISTURBED LIMITS,FIELD VERIFY ## COLUMNAR DECIDUOUS ## TREE, TYPICAL ## COLUMNAR DECIDUOUS ## TREE, TYPICAL ## COLUMNAR DECIDUOUS ## TREE, TYPICAL ## COLUMNAR DECIDUOUS ## TREE, TYPICAL ## ORNAMENTAL ## TREE, TYPICAL ## DECIDUOUS ## OVERSTORY ## TREE, TYP. ## DECIDUOUS ## OVERSTORY ## TREE, TYP. ## DECIDUOUS ## OVERSTORY ## TREE, TYP. ## EASEMENT ## CIVIL WORK ## LIMIT LINE ## CIVIL WORK ## LIMIT LINE ## LANDSCAPE PLAN - AREA 'A': ## L101 ## LANDSCAPE PLAN - AREA 'A' ## SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 1 inch = 40 feet ## HL ## PROJECT NO. 24416 ## CAD FILE 05/29/2026 ## DATE ## REVISIONS ## DRAWN BY ## 2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100 ## BURNSVILLE, MN 55306 ## PHONE: 952-890-6044 bbusselman@mnhill.com www.mnhill.com ## OAKDALE, MINNESOTA ## NINETY FOUR EXCHANGE ## CAPITAL PARTNERS ## FOR ## 5201 EDEN AVENUE, SUITE 50, EDINA, MN 55436 ## DESIGN GROUP ## 475 Cleveland Ave. N, Suite 101A ## St. Paul, MN 55104 Phone: (651) 788-9018 www.calyxdesigngroup.com ## Landscape Architecture | Planning ## LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANT: ## Date: Reg.No. ## BENJAMIN D. HARTBERG, PLA #48084 ## XX/XX/XXXX I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ## PRELIMINARY ## Proposed Turf Sod, See Notes ## LANDSCAPE MATERIAL LEGEND: ## Proposed Landscape Edging, See Notes ## Proposed Native Seed, See Scehdule ## Proposed Rock Mulch, See Notes ## Existing Tree to Remain ## D E S I G N G R O U P Autodesk Docs://11639-26049 Capital Partners - OakdaleIndustrial/11639-26049_Capital Partners - Oakdale_Site_R25.rvt !©XÂn©¬Âz0¬ ́يٴ†k(n0 ́XÂ0܉ ## NW PERSPECTIVE RENDERING ## K<>͕DEͮϬϯͬϮϬͬϮςͮϭϭςϯεͲϮςϬκε ## D E S I G N G R O U P Autodesk Docs://11639-26049 Capital Partners - OakdaleIndustrial/11639-26049_Capital Partners - Oakdale_Site_R25.rvt !©XÂn©¬Âz0¬ ́يٴ†k(n0 ́XÂ0܉ ## NW PERSPECTIVE RENDERING ## K<>͕DEͮϬϯͬϮϬͬϮςͮϭϭςϯεͲϮςϬκε ## D E S I G N G R O U P Autodesk Docs://11639-26049 Capital Partners - OakdaleIndustrial/11639-26049_Capital Partners - Building 1_R25.rvt !©XÂn©¬Âz0¬ ́يٴ ÉXn(XzJנ܉ ÉXn(XzJנ0n0áÂX†z ́ ## K<>͕DEͮϬϯͬϮκͬϮςͮϭϭςϯεͲϮςϬκε ϭͬϭςΗсϭΖͲϬΗ h/>/E'ϭ^d>sd/KEϭͬϭςΗсϭΖͲϬΗh/>/E'ϭEKZd,>sd/KEϭͬϭςΗсϭΖͲϬΗh/>/E'ϭ^Khd,>sd/KEϭͬϭςΗсϭΖͲϬΗh/>/E'ϭt^d>sd/KE ## W/EdWZ^d/E&/>>WE> >^^ϭ>/',d'Zz>EZ/< >^^ϭDE'E^/ZKE^WKdZ/< >^^ϭDE'E^/ZKE^WKdZ/< ><W/EdWZ^d/E&/>>WE> >^^ϭ>/',d'Zz>EZ/< >^^ϭ>/',d'Zz>EZ/< >^^ϭ>/',d'Zz>EZ/< ## WZ&/E/^,Dd>EKWz ## W/EdWZ^dWE>^ >hD/EhD^dKZ&ZKEd^z^dD ## WZ&/E/^,Dd>EKWz >^^ϭ'>t,/dZ/< εΖyϭϬΖK<KKZ ϭϬΖyϭκΖZ/sͲ/EKKZ >hW/EdWZ^d/E&/>>WE>>hDWE>^ dKWK&&/E͗κϮΖͲϬΗdKWK&,/',WZ^d͗ϯΘΖͲϬΗdKWK&D/>WZ^d͗ϯςΖͲϬΗdKWK&>KtWZ^d͗ϯκΖͲϬΗ '>t,/dZ/<sϭ DE'E^/ZKE^WKd ## Z/< >/',d'Zz>EZ/< ## D E S I G N G R O U P Autodesk Docs://11639-26049 Capital Partners - OakdaleIndustrial/11639-26049_Capital Partners -Building 2_R25.rvt !©XÂn©¬Âz0¬ ́يٴ†k(n0 ́XÂ0܉ ÉXn(XzJס0n0áÂX†z ́ ## K<>͕DEͮϬϯͬϮκͬϮςͮϭϭςϯεͲϮςϬκε ϭͬϭςΗсϭΖͲϬΗ h/>/E'Ϯ^d>sd/KEϭͬϭςΗсϭΖͲϬΗh/>/E'ϮEKZd,>sd/KEϭͬϭςΗсϭΖͲϬΗh/>/E'Ϯ^Khd,>sd/KEϭͬϭςΗсϭΖͲϬΗh/>/E'Ϯt^d>sd/KE ## W/EdWZ^d/E&/>>WE> >^^ϭ>/',d'Zz>EZ/< >^^ϭDE'E^/ZKE^WKdZ/< >^^ϭDE'E^/ZKE^WKdZ/< ## W/EdWZ^d/E&/>>WE> >^^ϭ>/',d'Zz>EZ/< >^^ϭ>/',d'Zz>EZ/< >^^ϭ>/',d'Zz>EZ/< ## WZ&/E/^,Dd>EKWz ## W/EdWZ^dWE>^ >hD/EhD^dKZ&ZKEd^z^dD εΖyϭϬΖK<KKZ ϭϬΖyϭκΖZ/sͲ/EKKZ >^^ϭ'>t,/dZ/<>hDWE>^>hW/EdWZ^d/E&/>>WE> dKWK&&/E͗κϮΖͲϬΗ dKWK&,/',WZ^d͗ϯΘΖͲϬΗ dKWK&D/>WZ^d͗ϯςΖͲϬΗ dKWK&>KtWZ^d͗ϯκΖͲϬΗ ϭϮΖyϭϮΖ'>^^KsZ,KKZ '>t,/dZ/<sϭ DE'E^/ZKE^WKd ## Z/< >/',d'Zz>EZ/< ## CITY OF OAKDALE ## RESOLUTION NO. 2026-xx ## A RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR CERTAIN ## PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 7049 4 ## TH ## STREET NORTH AND AUTHORIZING CITY STAFF TO ## SUBMIT THE AMENDMENT TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL At a meeting of the City Council of the City of Oakdale held on Tuesday, July 28, 2026, at the Oakdale Discovery Center, 4444 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota, with the following members present: Mayor Kevin Zabel; Councilmembers Kari Moore, Andy Morcomb, Gary Severson, and Katie Wrich, and the following members absent: None, the Oakdale City Council resolved: WHEREAS, Capital Partners proposes an amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the City of Oakdale 2040 Comprehensive Plan to change a portion of the property addressed 7049 4 th Street North (legal description: Lot 1, Block 1, Ninety Four Exchange) from Office/Limited ## Business to Industrial Office, and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment request is compatible with the uses of the surrounding area, and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment request is consistent with the City’s land use goals and the recommendations of the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, the City has determined that appropriate infrastructure exists to support the change in guidance, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the amendment, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Oakdale hereby approves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for certain property located at 7049 4 th ## Street North (legal description: Lot 1, Block 1, Ninety Four Exchange), changing the future land use from Office/Limited Business to Industrial Office, and authorizes staff to submit the amendment to the Metropolitan Council. ## Voting in Favor: Mayor Zabel; Councilmembers Moore, Morcomb, ## Severson, and Wrich ## Voting Against: None Resolution duly seconded and passed this 28 th day of July 2026. _____________________________ ## Kevin Zabel, Mayor ______________________________ ## Sara Ludwig, City Clerk ## CITY OF OAKDALE ## RESOLUTION NO. 2026-xx ## A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR NINETY FOR EXCHANGE SUBJECT ## TO CONDITIONS. At a meeting of the City Council of the City of Oakdale held on Tuesday, July 28, 2026, at the Oakdale Discovery Center, 4444 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota, with the following members present: Mayor Kevin Zabel; Councilmembers Kari Moore, Andy Morcomb, Gary Severson, and Katie Wrich, and the following members absent: None, the Oakdale City Council resolved: WHEREAS, Capital Partners requests Preliminary Plat approval of Ninety Four Exchange, and WHEREAS, the Preliminary Plat sets forth design standards for the property to be developed for two industrial buildings and associated infrastructure, and WHEREAS, the Preliminary Plat is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and meet Subdivision Ordinance standards, and WHEREAS, the lots shall be developed consistent with the B-2 zoning district and associated ## Preliminary Plat, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Oakdale hereby approves the Preliminary Plat for Ninety Four Exchange at 7049 4 th ## Street North (Legal Description Attached as Exhibit A) subject to the developer satisfying the following conditions: 1. Approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment re-guiding a portion of the site from Office/Limited Business to Industrial/Office. 2. Execution of a Development Agreement between the Developer and the City. 3. Approval of the site civil construction plans by the City Engineer. 4. Update the plat to consolidate the outlots into one outlot, which must also include the wetland and buffer areas. 5. Include drainage and utility easements on the plat, as required by the City’s Subdivision Ordinance and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. Recording of an access easement over private roads. 7. Cover the cost for traffic signal improvements and pedestrian improvements at the intersection of 4 th Street North and Hale Avenue North deemed necessary by the City Engineer. 8. The accesses off 4 th Street North and Hadley Avenue North must be built as part of this phase of development. 9. Satisfaction of park dedication requirements prior to recording the final plat. 10. Satisfaction of tree replacement requirements prior to recording the final plat. 11. Pay the sewer connection charge, in the amount of $215,000, prior to recording the final plat. 12. Permits and approvals must be obtained from all applicable outside government agencies and proof of approvals must be provided to the City. ## Voting in Favor: Mayor Zabel; Councilmembers Moore, Morcomb, ## Severson, and Wrich ## Voting Against: None Resolution duly seconded and passed this 28 th day of July 2026. _____________________________ ## Kevin Zabel, Mayor ______________________________ ## Sara Ludwig, City Clerk ## Exhibit A – Legal Description ## Parcel A: The South Ten (10) acres of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW¼ of SW¼) and the North Six (6) acres of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW¼ of SW¼) all in Section Thirty-two (32), Township Twenty-nine (29), Range Twenty-one (21), together with that part of the East Half (E ½) of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼ of Section Thirty-Two (32), Township Twenty-nine (29), Range Twenty-one (21) tying West of Highway 1-694 and between the North and South lines of the above described property extended Easterly. ## Parcel B: All that part of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) of Section Thirty-Two (32), Township Twenty- nine (29), Range Twenty-one (21), lying west of the Interstate Highway 1-694, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said SW¼; thence northerly along the west line of said SW¼ a distance of 669.5 feet; thence in an easterly direction to a point distant 1126.38 feet from the east llne of said SW¼ and distant 663.8 feet from the south line of said SW¼; thence in a southerly direction to a point on the south line of said SW ¼ distant 1126.38 feet from the SE corner of said SW ¼; thence along the south line of said SW ¼ to the SW corner of said SW ¼, being the point of beginning, except portions thereof taken for streets or highways. ## Parcel C: All of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼ of SW ¼) of Section Thirty-two, Township Twenty-nine (29), Range Twenty-one {21), lying west of Interstate Highway 1·694, except portions thereof taken for streets or highway and except the following two tracts: (1) The North six (6) acres of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW¼ of the SW¼) of said Section Thirty-two (32); (2) All that part of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) of said Section Thirty-two (32) described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter (SW¼); thence north along the west line of said Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) a distance of Six Hundred Sixty-Nine and Five tenths (669.5) feet; thence in an easterly direction to a point on the east line of said Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) distance Six Hundred Fifty-Nine and Fifty-two Hundredths (659.52) feet north of the Southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter (SW ¼), thence South along the east line of said Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) to the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter (SW¼); thence west along the south line of Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) to the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) being the point of beginning. ## Abstract Property ## CITY OF OAKDALE ## RESOLUTION NO. 2026-xx ## A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SITE PLAN FOR NINETY FOUR EXCHANGE SUBJECT TO ## CONDITIONS. At a meeting of the City Council of the City of Oakdale held on Tuesday, July 28, 2026, at the Oakdale Discovery Center, 4444 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota, with the following members present: Mayor Kevin Zabel; Councilmembers Kari Moore, Andy Morcomb, Gary Severson, and Katie Wrich, and the following members absent: None, the Oakdale City Council resolved: WHEREAS, Capital Partners requests Site Plan approval of Ninety Four Exchange, and WHEREAS, the Site Plan set forth design standards for the property to be developed for two industrial buildings and associated infrastructure, and WHEREAS, the Site Plan is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and meet Zoning Ordinance standards, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the request, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Oakdale hereby approves the Site Plan for Ninety Four Exchange at 7049 4 th ## Street North (Legal Description Attached as Exhibit A) subject to the developer satisfying the following conditions: 1. Approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment re-guiding a portion of the site from Office/Limited Business to Industrial/Office. 2. Execution of a Development Agreement between the Developer and the City. 3. Approval of the site civil construction plans by the City Engineer. 4. Cover the cost for traffic signal improvements and pedestrian improvements at the intersection of 4 th Street North and Hale Avenue North deemed necessary by the City Engineer. 5. Satisfaction of tree replacement requirements prior to recording the final plat. 6. Pay the sewer connection charge, in the amount of $215,000, prior to recording the final plat. 7. Submit a photometric plan that complies with the City’s site lighting requirements. 8. Adhere to the exterior building materials requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 9. Provide details on rooftop and ground mechanical equipment, trash enclosures, and methods of screening. 10. Permits and approvals must be obtained from all applicable outside government agencies and proof of approvals must be provided to the City. ## Voting in Favor: Mayor Zabel; Councilmembers Moore, Morcomb, ## Severson, and Wrich ## Voting Against: None Resolution duly seconded and passed this 28 th day of July 2026. _____________________________ ## Kevin Zabel, Mayor ______________________________ ## Sara Ludwig, City Clerk ## Exhibit A – Legal Description ## Parcel A: The South Ten (10) acres of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW¼ of SW¼) and the North Six (6) acres of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW¼ of SW¼) all in Section Thirty-two (32), Township Twenty-nine (29), Range Twenty-one (21), together with that part of the East Half (E ½) of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼ of Section Thirty-Two (32), Township Twenty-nine (29), Range Twenty-one (21) tying West of Highway 1-694 and between the North and South lines of the above described property extended Easterly. ## Parcel B: All that part of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) of Section Thirty-Two (32), Township Twenty- nine (29), Range Twenty-one (21), lying west of the Interstate Highway 1-694, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said SW¼; thence northerly along the west line of said SW¼ a distance of 669.5 feet; thence in an easterly direction to a point distant 1126.38 feet from the east llne of said SW¼ and distant 663.8 feet from the south line of said SW¼; thence in a southerly direction to a point on the south line of said SW ¼ distant 1126.38 feet from the SE corner of said SW ¼; thence along the south line of said SW ¼ to the SW corner of said SW ¼, being the point of beginning, except portions thereof taken for streets or highways. ## Parcel C: All of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼ of SW ¼) of Section Thirty-two, Township Twenty-nine (29), Range Twenty-one {21), lying west of Interstate Highway 1·694, except portions thereof taken for streets or highway and except the following two tracts: (1) The North six (6) acres of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW¼ of the SW¼) of said Section Thirty-two (32); (2) All that part of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) of said Section Thirty-two (32) described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter (SW¼); thence north along the west line of said Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) a distance of Six Hundred Sixty-Nine and Five tenths (669.5) feet; thence in an easterly direction to a point on the east line of said Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) distance Six Hundred Fifty-Nine and Fifty-two Hundredths (659.52) feet north of the Southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter (SW ¼), thence South along the east line of said Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) to the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter (SW¼); thence west along the south line of Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) to the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) being the point of beginning. ## Abstract Property