--- ## author: Davis, Allison date: D:20260416160324-05'00' --- ## City Council Agenda April 22, 2026 | 7:30 PM This City Council meeting is taking place virtually and at the Woodbury City Hall in the Council Chambers. Meetings are recorded by TrueLens Community Media and are broadcast live and replayed on cable channel 799. Meetings are also available on the City of Woodbury’s YouTube channel. Members of the public may attend the meeting in person and may also join the meeting using a computer, tablet, or smartphone and accessing the virtual meeting link at woodburymn.gov/VirtualMeetings. Public comments will be accepted during the meeting both in person and virtually. Virtual questions should be submitted via the online Q&A feature within the virtual meeting link. Questions regarding the meeting will also be taken between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at 651-714-3524 or at council@woodburymn.gov. Questions received after 4:30 p.m. will be responded to in the next three to seven business days. Please note that all agenda times are estimates. 1.Call to Order 2.Pledge to Flag - with Cub Scout Pack 601 3.Roll Call 4.Special Order of Business ## 4A.Proclamation Recognizing Woodbury Resident Mike Madigan's 18-year tenure ## on the South Washington Watershed District Board 4B.Proclamation Recognizing Public Service Recognition Week 26-74 ## 4C.Proclamation Recognizing Volunteer Recognition Week 26-75 5.Open Forum The Open Forum is a portion of the Council meeting where a maximum of three persons will be allowed to address the Council on subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. Persons wishing to speak must complete a sign-up sheet prior to the start of the meeting and give the sign-up sheet to any staff person or may also submit a question or comment virtually via the Q&A chat feature on the right side of the live event screen. Please provide your name and city of residence with your question for the official record. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. The Council will listen attentively to comments but, in most instances, will not respond at the meeting. ## Watch the Live Meeting ## Woodbury City Council Agenda April 22, 2026 | 7:30 PM Typically, replies to the concerns expressed will be made via letter or phone call within a week. 6.Consent Agenda All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion and an affirmative vote by roll call of a majority of the members present. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered a separate subject of discussion by the Council. 6A.Approval of Minutes 1. Approval of City Council Workshop Meeting - April 8, 2026 2. Approval of City Council Meeting - April 8, 2026 ## 6B.Approval of Westwind Fourth Addition; Final Plat and Development Agreement, ## Project No. 33-2026-00605 26-76 Staff recommends approval of Westwind Fourth Addition, Final Plat, Project No. 33-2026-00605. Staff further recommends Council authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to execute the Development Agreement with all approvals subject to the following conditions as listed in Council Letter 26-76. ## 6C.Approval of Washington County 2026 Municipal Recycling Grant Agreement; ## Accepting the Grant; Approving Associated Budget Amendment 26-77 Staff recommends Council adopt RESOLUTION 26-39, a resolution accepting grant funds from Washington County for the 2026 Municipal Recycling Grant and approving the associated budget amendment. ## 6D.Approval of Washington County 2026 Municipal Recycling Incentive Funding ## Grant; Accepting the Grant; Executing the Grant Agreement; Approving ## Associated Budget Amendment 26-78 Staff recommends Council adopt RESOLUTION 26-40, a resolution accepting ## the 2026 Municipal Recycling Incentive Funding Grant from Washington County; executing the grant agreement; and approving the associated budget amendment. ## 6E.Approval of Bailey Development Environmental Assessment Worksheet ## Negative Declaration of Need for an Environmental Impact Statement 26-79 Staff recommends Council adopt RESOLUTION 26-41, a resolution making a Negative Declaration of Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Bailey Development project. 6F.Approval of Authorization to Participate in the Council on Local Results and ## Innovation’s Performance Measurement Program 26-80 ## Woodbury City Council Agenda April 22, 2026 | 7:30 PM Staff recommends Council adopt RESOLUTION 26-42, a resolution authorizing to participate in the Performance Measurement Program established by the State of Minnesota and the Council on Local Results and Innovation. 6G.Approval of 2025 Year End Transfers 26-81 Staff recommends Council adopt RESOLUTION 26-43 a resolution authorizing the transfer of funds between certain funds. 6H.Approval of 2025 Final Budget Adjustments 26-82 Staff recommends Council adopt RESOLUTION 26-44, a resolution approving various 2025 final budget adjustments. 6I.Approval of Budget Carryovers from 2025 to 2026; Authorization for Use of ## Funds 26-83 Staff recommends Council adopt RESOLUTION 26-45, a resolution approving various carryovers to the 2026 budget and authorization for use of funds for the Municipal State Aid Roadway Construction Fund. 6J.Approval of Abstract of Bills The abstract of bills includes payments made from the operating or project budgets for expenses of the city. The expenditures are from all funds of the city. Any purchased contracts requiring signature of the Mayor and City Administrator are hereby approved. Staff recommends approval of the abstract of bills for March 27, 2026 in the amount of $4,718,610.44 and April 3, 2026 in the amount of $1,010,163.83. 7.Public Hearing In order to allow for a full airing of all speaker comments, individual remarks may not exceed 10 minutes each. If a speaker determines that more time is necessary, they are advised to make a request in writing to the Mayor at least three days prior to the hearing. If there are more than three (3) green sheets submitted to make comments at a public hearing, the Mayor may reduce the individual time allotted to each speaker so that all interested parties have the opportunity to provide their comments within the aggregate thirty-minute (30) public comment period of the public hearing process. Remarks or points already made by someone else should not be repeated, unless simply to state that they are “opposed” to, or “favor” the issue. Remarks should be limited to the subject at hand only. Speakers are encouraged to coordinate presentations to the extent possible. Those in attendance at the Public Hearing will refrain from applause, or other expressions of emotion, whether in favor of, or opposition to, any particular application or argument. Inappropriate language, outbursts or criticisms aimed at individuals or groups are not allowed. ## Woodbury City Council Agenda April 22, 2026 | 7:30 PM 7A. Consider Approval of an Amendment to Chapter 9 Franchises, Section 9-6 ## CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp.-Gas Franchise Fee, Schedule A 26-84 ## 1. Open Hearing ## 2. Close Hearing 3. Staff recommends Council adopt ORDINANCE 2077, an ordinance ## amending Chapter 9 Franchises, Section 9-6 CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp.-Gas Franchise Fee, Schedule A. ## 7B.Consider Approval of Special Assessments for 2026 Pavement Rehabilitation ## Project – Woodlane Drive 26-85 ## 1. Open Hearing ## 2. Close Hearing 3. Staff recommends Council adopt RESOLUTION 26-46, a resolution approving the special assessments for the 2026 Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Woodlane Drive. 8.Discussion ## 8A.Consider Approval of Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) ## Pavement Rehabilitation Project; Award Contract; Amend Budget; Consultant Selection for Construction Administration Services (This action is follow-up to ## Item 7B Special Assessments for 2026 Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Woodlane Drive). 26-86 Staff recommends Council adopt RESOLUTION 26-47, a resolution awarding the construction contract to McNamara Contracting in the amount of $5,687,344.06 for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) ## Pavement Rehabilitation Project and authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to sign said contract, amending the 2026 Adopted Annual Budget, and authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to execute a professional engineering services agreement with SEH, Inc., in the amount of $662,900 for construction administration services for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project. 9.Staff Reports 9A.Transportation Report (2nd meeting of the month - May through October) ## 9B.City Administrator Update 10.Adjournment The City of Woodbury is subject to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by public entities. The City is committed to full implementation of the Act to our services, programs, and activities. Information regarding the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act is available from the Administration office at 651- 714-3500. Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 72 hours in advance of an event. Please call the ADA Coordinator at 651-714-3500 (TDD 731-5796) to make arrangements. Proclamation of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota ## Recognizing Woodbury Resident Mike Madigan’s 18-year tenure on the ## South Washington Watershed District Board WHEREAS, Mike Madigan is a resident of the City of Woodbury; and WHEREAS, Mr. Madigan has served as a Manager on the Board of the South Washington Watershed District for 18 years; and ## WHEREAS, through Mr. Madigan’s leadership and service, South Washington Watershed District has fostered and sustained effective working partnerships across southern ## Washington County; and ## WHEREAS, Under Mr. Madigan’s leadership, South Washington Watershed District has made substantial infrastructure investments to protect District resources including the Central Draw Overflow and Glacial Valley Park, Hasenbank and Kargel Parks’ Stormwater Facilities, and Enhanced Street Sweeping, all of which directly benefit the surface water and groundwater in Woodbury; and WHEREAS, Mr. Madigan retired from his tenure on the SWWD Board of Managers on Tuesday, April 14, 2026. NOW, THEREFORE, I, ANNE W. BURT, Mayor of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota, do hereby recognize ## Mike Madigan on his years of service and commitment to preserving and protecting water quality for current and future residents of Woodbury. This Proclamation was adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator this 22nd day of April, 2026. ## Attest:Anne W. Burt, Mayor ## Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator(SEAL) ## 4B ## City of Woodbury, Minnesota ## Office of City Administrator ## Council Letter 26-74 April 22, 2026 ## TO:The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ## FROM:Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator ## SUBJECT:Proclamation Recognizing Public Service Recognition Week ## Summary The month of May contains several annual recognitions for public employees and more specifically, for public safety workers. These recognitions include the following: 1. Public Service Recognition Week: Annually during the first full week of May 2. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Week: Annually during the third full week of May 3. Peace Officers Memorial Day: Annually on May 15 4. Police Week: Annually on the calendar week in which May 15 falls The City of Woodbury joins communities nationally in recognizing individuals who choose public service careers, as well as the special sacrifices of Woodbury Public Safety employees in serving the community. ## Recommendation Staff recommends Council adopt the attached resolution proclaiming the following: May 3 through May 9, 2026 as Public Service Recognition Week May 10 through May 16, 2026 as Police Week ## May 15, 2026 as Peace Officers Memorial Day May 17 through May 23, 2026 as Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Week ## Fiscal Implications There is no budget impact. ## Policy Not applicable. ## Public Process This proclamation is made annually by the Woodbury City Council and the Mayor. ## Council Letter 26-74 April 22, 2026 Page 2 ## Background ## Public Service Recognition Week The City of Woodbury employs 316 full-time, 41 part-time, and multiple seasonal employees. These employees are the administrative assistants, technicians, specialists, planners, inspectors, engineers, public service workers, police officers, firefighters, paramedics and the communications, technology, finance, recreation, managerial and administrative professionals in the City of Woodbury organization. The services these individuals perform are connected to the basic daily activities of the residents and businesses of the City of Woodbury. They ensure Woodbury remains a sustainable and attractive community providing a high quality of life for its residents and positive economic environment for its businesses. The success of the organization is reflected in the positive response towards City services received in the citizen survey. ## Peace Officers Memorial Day & Police Week The first recognition of Police Week and Peace Officers Memorial Day was signed by President Kennedy in 1962 following a joint resolution of Congress. National Police Week pays special recognition to those law enforcement officers who have lost their lives in the line of duty for the safety and protection of others. ## Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Week The first recognition of EMS Week was authorized by President Gerald Ford in 1974 to celebrate EMS practitioners and the important work they do in our nation’s communities. Back then, EMS was a new profession, and EMS practitioners had only just started to be recognized as a critical component of emergency medicine and the public health safety net. A lot has changed since then. EMS is now firmly established as an essential public function and a vital component of the medical care continuum. On any given day, EMS practitioners help save lives by responding to medical emergencies, including heart attack, difficulty breathing, a fall or accident, drowning, cardiac arrest, stroke, drug overdose or acute illness. EMS may provide both basic and advanced medical care at the scene of an emergency and enroute to a hospital. EMS practitioners care for their patients' medical needs and show care and compassion to their patients in their most difficult moments. ## Written By:Jean Schowalter, Senior Human Resources Coordinator ## Approved Through:Jason Posel, Public Safety Director/Police Chief ## Angela Gorall, Deputy City Administrator ## Attachment:Proclamation Proclamation of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota Public Service Recognition Week – May 3 through May 9, 2026 ## Peace Officers Memorial Day – May 15, 2026 National Police Week – May 10 through May 16, 2026 Emergency Medical Services Week – May 17 through May 23, 2026 WHEREAS, the services of City of Woodbury employees are of vital importance to the health, safety, and well-being of the citizens and vitality of the businesses of the City of Woodbury; and WHEREAS, the members of the Woodbury Public Safety Department Police Division play an essential role in working collaboratively with federal, state, county, and other law enforcement agencies to promote safety and safeguard freedoms of Woodbury residents; and WHEREAS, the City of Woodbury acknowledges the sacrifices that Public Safety employees make in serving the community with courage and compassion every day, as well as those officers both locally and nationally who have sustained injuries or lost their lives in the performance of their duties; WHEREAS, emergency medical services is a vital public service and the Woodbury Emergency Medical Services teams use their medical expertise, courage and compassion to provide lifesaving medical care to those in need 24 hours a day, seven days a week. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Anne W. Burt, Mayor of the City of Woodbury, Washington County do hereby proclaim: May 3 through May 9, 2026 to be: PUBLIC SERVICE RECOGNITION WEEK, and May 15, 2025 to be: PEACE OFFICER MEMORIAL DAY, and May 10 through May 16, 2026 to be: POLICE WEEK FURTHERMORE, I do hereby proclaim May 17 through May 23 2026 to be: EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK in Woodbury. I encourage members of the community to observe these designations and express their appreciation to the important services provided by the City of Woodbury personnel. This Proclamation was adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator this 22 th day of April, 2026. ## Attest: ## Anne W. Burt, Mayor ## Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator(SEAL) ## 4C ## City of Woodbury, Minnesota ## Office of City Administrator ## Council Letter 26-75 April 22, 2026 ## To:The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ## From:Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator ## Subject:Proclamation Recognizing Volunteer Recognition Week ## Summary The week of April 19 through April 25, 2026, has been declared Volunteer Recognition Week in Minnesota to honor Minnesota’s volunteers who are making a positive impact on the lives of many. The City of Woodbury will join organizations and communities throughout the state to give special recognition to volunteers. Staff is requesting that the Council approve the attached proclamation declaring April 19 through April 25, 2026, Volunteer Recognition Week in Woodbury. Individual volunteers and organizations will be receiving a card or letter from the Mayor, and individuals will be invited to pick up a small thank you gift from City Hall to recognize their efforts. ## Recommendation In recognition of the efforts of Woodbury volunteers, staff is recommending that the City Council proclaim April 19 through April 25, 2026 as Volunteer Recognition Week. ## Written By:Ann Marie Ertel, Administrative Assistant ## Approved Through:Ashleigh Sullivan, Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk ## Attachments:Proclamation Proclamation of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota ## Volunteer Recognition Week April 19 - April 25, 2026 WHEREAS, volunteerism is an integral part of our great culture and heritage; and WHEREAS, in Woodbury more than 400 volunteers of all ages annually contribute volunteer service; and WHEREAS, volunteers make significant contributions to the quality of life in Woodbury and through their efforts help to ensure a brighter future for our City; and WHEREAS, volunteerism promotes personal, social, and intellectual development of young people and prepares them to become involved and responsible citizens; and WHEREAS, individuals and groups volunteering in Woodbury are making their neighborhoods better places in which to live by providing support to those in need, solving community problems, improving schools, helping people with disabilities, and preserving the environment; and WHEREAS, recognition should be given to our dedicated volunteers who have demonstrated their commitment to the betterment of our community throughout the year. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Anne W. Burt, Mayor of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota, do hereby proclaim April 19 – April 25, 2026, to be ## Volunteer Recognition Week As we continue to face the challenges and opportunities of our society, I call on all citizens of the City to sustain and increase Woodbury's voluntary spirit now and for the future. Together we can serve Woodbury and serve it well. This proclamation was adopted and signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator on this 22 nd day of April, 2026. ## Attest:Anne W. Burt, Mayor ## Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator(SEAL) ## Minutes ## Woodbury City Council Workshop Wednesday, April 8, 2026 ## 6A1 Pursuant to the due call and notice thereof, a workshop meeting was held at Woodbury City Hall, 8301 Valley Creek Road, on the 8th th day of April 2026. Present: Mayor Anne Burt, Councilmembers: Kim Wilson, Steve Morris, and Jennifer Santini. Councilmember Donna Stafford was excused. Others Present: Jeffrey Dahl, City Administrator; Ashleigh Sullivan, Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk; Shelly Schafer, Community Relations Manager, Sam Verdick, Community Relations Technician; additional staff in-person and on-line. Meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. ## Workshop Discussion Items 1A.Closed Session Item Related to Litigation Status, Strategy and Settlement Negotiations Regarding Raymond Lee v. City of ## Woodbury, Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 13D.05, Subd. 3(b) Council entered closed session at 5:30 p.m. and returned to Open Session at 6:29 p.m. ## 1B.Review of Social Media Audit Presentation provided by staff with Council questions, comments, and discussion throughout. Administrator Comments and updates None. ## Mayor and City Council Comments and Commission Liaison Updates Mayor Burt stated she has heard from several residents on the Intrepid Fiber project and requested a future update. ## Adjournment Meeting was adjourned at 7:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, _____________________________________ ## Ashleigh Sullivan, Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk Approved by the Woodbury City Council on April 22, 2026. ## Minutes ## Woodbury City Council Wednesday, April 08, 2026 ## 6A2 Pursuant to the due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting was duly held virtually and at the Woodbury City Hall, 8301 Valley Creek Road, on the 8 th day of April 2026. ## Call to Order Mayor Anne Burt called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m., and she welcomed those attending the meeting both in person and virtually. Mayor Burt explained that members of the public may attend the meeting in person and may also join the meeting using a computer, tablet, or smartphone. She stated public comments will be accepted during the meeting both in person and virtually. Virtual questions should be submitted via the online Q&A feature within the virtual meeting link. Questions regarding the meeting will also be taken between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. via email at council@woodburymn.gov or at 651-714-3524. Questions received after 4:30 p.m. will be responded to in the next three to seven business days. Mayor Burt stated that meetings are recorded through True Lens Community Media and are broadcast live and replayed on cable channel 799. Meetings are also available on the City of Woodbury’s YouTube channel. Members of the public are welcome to join and have an opportunity to speak in person, or can watch virtually. Virtual questions can be submitted online, and the City Clerk will monitor them throughout the meeting. ## Pledge to Flag Audience, staff, and Council pledged allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. ## Roll Call Upon roll call the following were present: Mayor Anne Burt, Councilmembers: Kim Wilson, Steve Morris, and Jennifer Santini. Absent: Donna ## Stafford Others Present: Ashleigh Sullivan, Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk; Kevin Sandstrom, City Attorney; Jeffrey Dahl, City Administrator; Janelle Schmitz, Community Development Director; Jamie Fritts, Housing and Economic Development Coordinator; and Chris Hartzell, Engineering Director. ## Special Order of Business A.Recognition of Felix Johnson, League of Minnesota Cities' Mayor for a Day Essay Contest Winner Mayor Burt introduced fourth grader Felix Johnson and explained that all students are invited to write an essay about being a mayor for the day. She noted that the essay contest is run by the League of Minnesota Cities, and Mr. Johnson won. Mr. Johnson explained that he won the Mayor of the Day essay contest because he wrote about chickens and ducks. He added that his mom and he want to have chickens, but they are not allowed in the City. He mentioned that there would be some rules to allow chickens, such as no roosters, a fence to keep coyotes away, and a maximum of six birds. Mayor Burt mentioned that Mr. Johnson was published in the League of Minnesota Cities magazine and received an award. B.Proclamation Affirming City Values and Action Related to Immigration Enforcement and Opposing a Federal Immigration Detention Center in Woodbury Mayor Burt thanked the community for their passion and for bringing the matter to the Council’s attention and demanding something they find important. The City Council has been working together with staff to be responsive to the concerns. Mayor Burt noted she would be reading a Proclamation affirming the City values and action related to immigration enforcement and opposing a federal immigration detention center in the City. She explained that over the past several months, staff and the Council have been actively working on the issues and providing updates to the community along the way. The Proclamation serves to formally memorialize the efforts and clearly articulate the City’s position. She recognized that many community members were expecting the item to be on the previous agenda. She clarified the process for setting the Council agenda. The City Administrator establishes the Council agenda, and residents are encouraged to use the Open Forum to address the Council on items that are not listed on the agenda. During the Open Forum, the Council does not take immediate action; instead, members take time to consider the information, consult with staff, and determine the appropriate next steps. Following the March 25 th meeting, the Council reviewed the request submitted by residents for further consideration. The Council determined ## City Council Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 08, 2026 Page 2 of 8 that it was important to go on record and to respond to the community’s request. As a result, the Proclamation has been placed on the agenda. She noted that the Proclamation does not include restrictions on the use of municipal property due to legal and practical considerations, which would make implementation difficult to enforce. If the City becomes aware of any unlawful activity or actions that do not align with the City’s values on municipal property, the City has the right to revisit the issue. She stated that the City opposes the use of any buildings or property in Woodbury as a detention center and the City is committed to ensuring Woodbury is a place where everyone feels safe, supported, and included. Councilmember Wilson explained that she was surprised that it was a Proclamation because the Council had decided a while ago not to have Proclamations since the Council was getting many requests. She wondered if it should be a Resolution instead. She added that a Proclamation raises awareness while a Resolution establishes policy or gives a position of the City. City Administrator Jeffrey Dahl explained that staff felt like a Proclamation would be more appropriate due to what the community has gone through in the past few months. He added that it warranted a clarification of where the City is with its position and values. Staff agreed that a Proclamation would utilize a public document to explain what the City’s stance is as a community. Mayor Burt read a Proclamation in full, affirming City values and action related to immigration enforcement and opposing a federal immigration detention center in Woodbury. Mayor Burt opened an opportunity for the Council to share comments. Councilmember Morris thanked Mayor Burt for her leadership and for the relentless efforts of staff, and for purposely providing the community with answers and support. He recognized that some of the efforts made by the City may not feel like enough and expressed his appreciation for the deep levels of passion that the community has. He explained why he has been using the phrase “performative politics” and noted that the Councilmembers are not professional politicians, but instead are community members who chose to serve the community. He expressed appreciation for the Council and the various views they all hold while remaining professional. He noted his personal definition of leadership in his role is to understand a problem and an issue, and work to find a resolution. He added that the Council does not approach issues through a political lens and simply reviews things for what they are and what they believe the best policy or direction is for the community. The Council does not deliberate or act based on political ideology. He expressed his understanding that the community wants the Council to be more visible and chart a path that is stronger in rhetoric. He recognized the desire to have more outspoken elected officials. He explained that the world does not need more politicians angling for more camera time and viral clips. The world does not need false hope and instead needs legitimate debate, discussion, and action. He mentioned that he does not seek attention and will not tell people what they want to hear because it will make people vote for him. He applauded the community for using their voice and requesting more actions from the Council. He added that he would not lie to the community and make false promises or empty hope. He stated he supports the Proclamation and does not want an ICE detention facility in the community. He added that he does not want any government office or official to terrorize a community to create fear and violate people’s rights. He stated he wants all elements of the government to honor the rights that people have, to treat people fairly and humanely, and to enforce the laws with integrity. The City government does not have special authority or jurisdiction to dictate the application of State or federal laws. What the City can do is to implore all government officials to treat the community and those who visit it by honoring the rights of people and to treat everyone with respect. He encourages the community to use their voices and to think about what they are asking and if the person or entity they are asking has the authority or influence necessary to bring the change that is being requested. He encouraged the community to work together to bring real change to the issues. C.Report on April 8, 2026 Workshop Closed Session Item Regarding the Lee Property Negotiation City Attorney Kevin Sandstrom stated the closed session was pursuant to Statute 13d.05 subdivision 3B. The active litigation matter was the Raymond Lee versus the City of Woodbury case, which has been ongoing. He noted that during the process, he received direction from the City Council regarding ongoing settlement discussions and other strategies in the case. If there is a settlement that is reached, it will be brought back to the Council for formal approval. ## Open Forum Catherine Wegener, City resident, stated she attended the Council meeting two weeks ago to show her support for a proposed resolution. During the meeting, she heard concerns regarding the Council’s limited authority to control federal actions in the City. She explained that she is an immigration attorney and over the past year, the federal government has thrown around its weight to strip power and agency away from individuals and municipalities. Rather than focusing on the limitations that the City faces, she asked the Council to reframe their thinking and utilize the power and authority that they have. She noted that the immigration system is not going to be fixed anytime soon, and the City needs to protect the community against the broken system. She thanked the Council for drafting a Proclamation that demonstrates the commitment to educate and communicate with constituents. She added that she hopes that the Council continues to share information and update the community with the Council’s efforts. A Proclamation is not a Resolution and is not enough. She added that the City is up against a ruthless and aggressive federal government. Agents occupied the City, broke laws, violated rights and freedoms, and terrorized residents. She explained that the community needs formal and official action by the Council that carries legal weight. There is nothing in the proposed Resolution that is beyond the City’s authority. By passing the proposed Resolution and taking the outlined actions, the City builds a foundation from which legal recourse can be pursued if the federal government violates it and sends a message in solidarity with many other cities that have adopted similar Resolutions. She stated she is asking for a Resolution because a response to Operation Metro Surge deserves a vote. She explained that as a citizen of a democracy has the responsibility to hold her elected officials accountable. She added that she would like to know which of her Councilmembers would stand up for her and her neighbor the next time federal agents are in town. ## City Council Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 08, 2026 Page 3 of 8 Amy Stedman, City resident, explained why the City Council should have passed a Resolution instead of a Proclamation. A Proclamation is what the Council does for Arbor Day. She added that it is about whether families and residents in the City are safe without wondering if City property is being used against them. The Resolution that the community submitted to the City clearly states that ICE and DHS may not use City-owned property as staging grounds for immigration enforcement. The language is not included in the Proclamation, and the community wants the Council to explain why. She noted the list of what the City has done throughout the process. She explained that what the City has done so far is the bare minimum. Answering questions is not policy, posting FAQs is not protection, and a newsletter column does not stop ICE from using Ojibway Park as a staging ground. Doing the minimum does not mean that the job is finished. Offering a Proclamation in response to a petition does not finish the job. She added that the Parks and Natural Resource Commission unanimously brought up a recommendation to the Council asking for stronger safety protection for young riders on ebikes, and instead, the Council deferred, delayed, and sent to a workshop. A Proclamation affirms values, a Resolution requires a vote. She added that the community wants the Council to vote so that it is on record. The Community deserves to know who is standing up for them and who is not. She noted that the community showed up in January, submitted a petition in March, and it has not been a moment that passes. She asked that the Council take up the Resolution as submitted, with the property restrictions language included, and vote on it. Tori Nathan, City resident, stated she was in support of the proposed Resolution that was presented to the Council regarding immigration and customs enforcement. She noted that there has been a lot of discussion regarding the detention center. She explained that she would like to address the portion of the Proclamation that does not address the use of City property. In summary, the proposed Resolution states that the City shall restrict the use of City-owned, City-leased, or City-controlled property for the purposes of staging, coordinating, or supporting civil immigration enforcement except where clearly required by federal or State law. She added that it is not an unreasonable thing to do, and other cities have done it, such as Chicago and San Francisco. She noted that she has heard that it is not legal to interfere with ICE or DHS’s operation, but it is a gross oversimplification. State and local authorities cannot directly regulate the federal government, but they can stop the federal government from commandeering City property for federal purposes. She stated it was supported in the courts and referenced a 2017 case where the Ninth Circuit Court addressed it in California. The goal is not to have the City illegally obstruct immigration enforcement. The goal is to implement reasonable and meaningful restrictions that would prevent Woodbury from being complicit with ICE’s activities. Allowing ICE to use City-owned properties for enforcement activities endangers residents, and the City can do something about it by passing the proposed Resolution. Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk Ashleigh Sullivan mentioned that there were two online comments. The first comment was from Brian Fruchtman who stated he was jogging on the side of the road due to ice. A Woodbury police officer asked him to stop. He explained that when he did not stop, due to the psychological and physical effects of lowering his pulse, and submitting to harassment, he beat him up. He stated he appeared before the Council and made a police complaint. The police chief called and told him to run on the side and to stop when an officer tells him to. He added that he left a message for the mayor and left another message a month later to contact him to let him know if anything had been done, but he did not receive a phone call back. The administrator accepted responsibility via email for allowing future violence. Woodbury needs to replace the unethical City Councilmembers supporting abuse, including the mayor, police chief, and administrator, unless they want authoritarian violence against law-abiding citizens. Ms. Sullivan noted that the second online comment was from Belinda Reid, who asked how the people requesting the Proclamation were vetted, especially that they are actual residents of Woodbury. She wondered if the Proclamation was representative of all 85,000 residents. ## Consent Agenda ## Item A1. Approval of Council Workshop Minutes— March 25, 2026 2. Approval of Council Minutes – March 25, 2026 Item BTo adopt the following resolutionResolution 26-30 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota authorizing the acceptance of a donation totaling $40,000 from Minnesota Off-Road Cyclists and $55,000 from Woodbury Rotary Club in 2026 and approving the associated budget amendment. Item C1. To adopt the following resolutionResolution 26-31 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota authorizing use of funds and amending the 2026 budget for the CSAH 18 (Bailey Road) and Settlers Ridge Parkway Intersection Improvement Project. 2. To adopt the following resolutionResolution 26-32 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota approving the Cooperative Agreement between the City of Woodbury and Washington County for Construction Cost Share of CSAH 18 (Bailey Road) and Settlers Ridge Parkway Intersection Improvement Project. 3. To adopt the following resolutionResolution 26-33 ## City Council Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 08, 2026 Page 4 of 8 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota approving the Cooperative Agreement between the City of Woodbury and Washington County for Construction Cost Share for the CSAH 18 (Bailey Road) and Settlers Ridge Parkway Intersection Improvement Landscape Project. 4. To adopt the following resolutionResolution 26-34 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota approving the Cooperative Agreement between the City of Woodbury and Washington County for maintenance of the CSAH 18 (Bailey Road) and Settlers Ridge Parkway Intersection Improvement Project. Item DTo adopt the following resolution Resolution 26-35 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota awarding the contract for the 2026 Rejuvenator Project to Corrective Asphalt Materials, LLC., and authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to execute the construction contract. Item ETo adopt the following resolutionResolution 26-36 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota awarding the Seasons Park Corridor Vegetation Restoration and Enhancement Project construction contract to Minnesota Native Landscapes and authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to sign said contract. Item FTo adopt the following resolutionResolution 26-37 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota authorizing acceptance of City of Woodbury Water Treatment Plant and Pipeline Design Project Grant Amendment #3 Contract #223996 from the Minnesota Pollution Control ## Agency Item GTo adopt the following resolutionResolution 26-38 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota approving the following: 1.Creation of the position of Senior Utilities Coordinator and placing the position in Grade 8 of the Woodbury Classification Plan. 2.2. Creation of the position of Recreation Coordinator and placing the position in Grade 4 of the Woodbury Classification Plan. Item HThe abstract of bills includes payments made from the operating or project budgets for expenses of the city. The expenditures are from all funds of the city. Any purchased contracts requiring signature of the mayor and City Administrator is hereby approved. Staff recommends approval of the abstract of bills for March 13, 2026, in the amount of $723,692.91 and March 20, 2026, in the amount of $1,203,997.25. Councilmember Santini moved, seconded by Councilmember Morris, to approve the Consent Agenda items. Voting via voice: Kim Wilson – aye Donna Stafford – absent Steve Morris – aye Jennifer Santini – aye Anne Burt – aye ## Public Hearings A.Consider Approval of the 2026 Draft Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plan, as Required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and a Substantial Amendment to the 2025–2029 Consolidated Plan Addressing Contaminated Site Cleanup as a CDBG Goal for the Current Five-Year Planning Period; Opening of 30-Day Public Comment Period Mayor Burt declared the public hearing open. Housing and Economic Development Manager Jamie Fritts stated the City of Woodbury receives federal funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) via the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and the HOME Investment Partnerships Program ## City Council Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 08, 2026 Page 5 of 8 (HOME). Woodbury accesses CDBG directly from HUD but accesses HOME funds as a sub-recipient member of the Dakota County HOME Consortium. Each year, HUD requires the City to create an Annual Action Plan (AAP) to determine specific investment strategies of the funds on a July-to-June program year basis. Woodbury may invest its allocation of CDBG and HOME in a variety of ways, including projects such as economic development, housing, public facilities, or public services. The City Council adopted a motion on February 25, 2026, identifying affordable housing as well as cleanup of contaminated sites as high priorities for the use of HUD funds. Mr. Fritts noted that recipients of HUD CDBG/HOME funding must adopt an Annual Action Plan (AAP) that prioritizes goals of the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan; define specific investment strategies to achieve goals; and evaluate past performance. Mr. Fritts reviewed the public process. He noted that on February 25, 2026, the City Council made a motion establishing affordable housing and cleanup of contaminated sites as 2026 AAP high funding priorities. On April 8, 2026, there was a public hearing on the draft 2026 AAP and a substantial amendment to the 2025- 2029 Consolidated Plan. The public comment period regarding the 2026 AAP and substantial amendment to the 2025- 2029 Consolidated Plan will be open from April 9, 2026, through May 8, 2026 (pending). On May 13, 2026, the Council will consider the adoption of the 2026 AAP. Mr. Fritts presented the 2026 anticipated resources. The total anticipated CDBG funds are $406,639, and the total anticipated HOME funds are $99,000. He reviewed the proposed PY26 activities. The draft 2026 AAP allocates CDBG funds to the following: $224,000 of the CDBG for a Two Rivers Community Land Trust project to benefit income-eligible homebuyers. $121,639 of CDBG for a City-administered private ash tree removal project to benefit income-eligible homeowners. $56,000 of CDBG for program administration expenditures. Mr. Fritts explained that the Two Rivers Community Land Trust project would include acquiring three single-family homes in Woodbury, rehabilitating and modernizing the homes for resale, reselling the homes to homebuyers earning between 60-80% of the area median income, and that homes would be entered into a trust with a 99-year period of affordability. The Private Ash Tree Removal project would include assisting income-eligible homeowners with ash tree removal. It would cover 100% of the cost for removal with no repayment required. Funds are paid directly to the contractor on behalf of the homeowner. Staff anticipates assisting approximately 50 homeowners. Mr. Fritts mentioned that there are no viable projects that have been identified for the use of HOME Partnership Funds in 2026. The funds have a narrow scope for use, there is a longer timeline to spend the funds, and staff will monitor potential future requests and uses and bring recommendations to the Council. Mr. Fritts stated implementation of the ash tree removal activity requires a substantial amendment to the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan. The amendment would add “Cleanup of Contaminated Sites” as a goal of the current Consolidated Plan. Substantial amendments must follow the same public process as the approval of an AAP. The substantial amendment will be adopted concurrently with the 2026 AAP public process. Mr. Fritts stated that staff recommends the Council to adopt a motion opening a public comment period regarding the draft 2026 Annual Action Plan and the substantial amendment to the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan on April 09, 2026, and closing on May 08, 2026. Mayor Burt invited the representative from Two Rivers Community Land Trust to share more. Executive Director of Two Rivers Community Land Trust, Jamar Smith, explained that Two Rivers Community Land Trust provides permanent affordable housing for low to moderate-income individuals, families, and households earning up to 80% area median income in the County. The goal is to provide a pathway to homeownership for people in Washington County who would not otherwise be able to afford a home in the area. He stated that they currently have 81 homes in trust, and three are in Woodbury. By the end of the year, there will be 13 more homes with funding that they have already secured, and an additional three will be in the County. Mayor Burt asked Mr. Smith where the other funding source was from. Mr. Smith replied that a large amount of the funds comes from the State and the County. Councilmember Santini asked if homeowners pay the Two Rivers trust, or if they get funds from another lender. Mr. Smith replied that the homeowners get a traditional loan. He explained that they have 11 lenders that understand the model and provide secure and conventional loans. Mr. Fritts explained that the City is an entitlement community, and the CDA is an entitlement community, so the funds that they give to Two Rivers cannot be spent in Woodbury because entitlement communities cannot overlap. He added that there are not many Two Rivers Community Land Trust homes in the City because the CDA has been a large partner in Washington County as a whole. In order for Two Rivers Community Land Trust to get a boost from the City, it must come as a CDBG. Mayor Burt asked how long the current three homes have been in the City. Mr. Fritts replied that one has been owned by the same owner for over a decade, one home was acquired in the winter, and he believed the third home was newer. Mayor Burt moved, seconded by Councilmember Morris, to close the public hearing. ## Voting in Favor:Wilson, Morris, Santini, Burt ## City Council Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 08, 2026 Page 6 of 8 ## Absent: Stafford Mayor Burt opened an opportunity for discussion and questions from the Council. Councilmember Santini asked if a homeowner through Two Rivers Communities Land Trust could utilize a loan through the HRA grant program. Mr. Fritts replied that they would be if they met all of the eligibility requirements. Councilmember Wilson asked if people needed to be in a specific area to qualify for the ash tree removal program. Mr. Fritts replied that people do not need to be in a specific area since it is individual people qualifying. Councilmember Santini asked what the plan was to promote the ash tree removal program. She asked if there were areas in the City where ash tree removal was not happening as often. Mr. Fritts replied that staff has discussed how to roll out and promote the project. Councilmember Wilson pointed out that the Council was not approving anything but was opening a 30-day public comment period. Councilmember Morris asked why the item was in front of the Council and not the HRA for the CDBG funding. Mr. Fritts explained that the HRA is a separate entity, and the City is the recipient of the funds. Community Development Director Janelle Schmitz added that the City is the entitlement entity. The CDBG funds have to go to the City and not the HRA. When the HRA had loans, the City would give the money to the HRA in order to do the loans. Councilmember Morris asked if the HRA could use LAHA funds for the Two Rivers Community Land Trust. Mr. Fritts replied that that would be possible. Ms. Schmitz added that under the LAHA fund, there is a category for development assistance, so it would qualify under that. Councilmember Morris mentioned that he assumed modernizing the home would include ensuring the house is code-compliant and that it would qualify for FHA loans. Mr. Smith replied that the homeowners have to secure a conventional loan, and they do not do FHA loans for the properties. He added that modernizing the house includes ensuring that it is safe and energy efficient. He explained that if there are funds left over, they work with the homeowners to modernize the house accordingly. Each house has about $60,000-$70,000 set aside for renovations. Councilmember Santini wondered if funds could be used for rental assistance. Mr. Fritts replied that he has not looked into the home rental assistance process. He mentioned that it would likely include ongoing rental assistance or emergency assistance. He mentioned he would need to look into it more. He mentioned that the Statute says that the City can give funds to agencies that administer social service programs and eviction prevention programs. Councilmember Santini moved, seconded by Councilmember Morris, to open a 30-day public comment period regarding the 2026 Annual Action Plan (AAP) and the substantial amendment to the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan, opening on April 9, 2026, and closing on the end of the day May 8, 2026. Voting via voice: Kim Wilson – aye Donna Stafford – absent Steve Morris – aye Jennifer Santini – aye Anne Burt – aye ## Discussion No items scheduled ## City Administrator’s Report Mr. Dahl mentioned that construction on the public safety building will begin at the end of the month. City Hall will be the public-facing entity for police and fire/EMS. Questions regarding police, fire/EMS can be directed to City Hall. The public works department will handle a lot of storage and staff, and fire, and EMS will be spread out amongst other fire stations. The old County building will house most of the administrative staff. The same level of service will be maintained during construction. Mr. Dahl noted that the Eagle Valley Golf Course is open. He mentioned the Central Park art wall and noted that it was a hidden treasure. There is local art highlighted on the wall. The next Woodbury Green Talks will be on April 9 th at 6:00 p.m. at Central Park. Transportation Report (2nd meeting of the month, April-October) ## City Council Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 08, 2026 Page 7 of 8 Engineering Director Chris Hartzell stated the active projects in the City include the Bailey Road water tower, the water treatment pipeline project, and the Bailey Road and Fairway Drive traffic signal. He mentioned that the Bailey Road water tower project is anticipating raising the top bowl between April 30 and May 15. The final completion and commission will be in January 2027. He reviewed the water treatment plant and pipeline project. He encouraged the community to check out the water treatment plant pipeline project website to receive updates throughout the summer. He highlighted Valley Creek Road from Woodbury Drive to East Woodcrest Drive and Dancing Waters Parkway and explained that it is reduced to one lane in the westbound direction. Bailey Road is closed from Radio Drive to Salem Drive for six weeks. He stated they would not open the full closure of westbound Valley Creek Road until the Bailey Road construction is completed. He added that they anticipate only having one east/west connection closed down at a time. He stated that the Bailey Road and Fairway Drive traffic signal construction began on Monday, April 6 th, and is coordinating with the water treatment plant pipeline closures. The signal is anticipated to be operational in July. Mr. Hartzell reviewed the 2026 construction projects: ## 2025 Roadway Rehabilitation Project – Eastview Road ## 2026 Roadway Rehabilitation Project ## Woodlane Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Project Valley Creek Road Trail Project (Colby Lake Underpass to Dancing Waters Parkway) ## Valley Creek Road and Eagle Creek Lane Traffic Signal ## Bailey Road and Settlers Ridge Parkway Intersection Improvement Project ## Bailey Road and Manning Avenue (TH 95) Intersection Improvement Project ## Bailey Road Trail Project (Woodland Drive to La Lake Park) ## 2026 Pavement Rejuvenator Project Fiber to the Home Mr. Hartzell mentioned that the 2026 Roadway Rehabilitation Project is anticipated to begin in April and be completed in October. There will be a pre-construction open house meeting scheduled for Thursday, April 16 th, for residents to learn more information. The Woodlane Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Project would occur from late May or early June until August or September. There will be multiple phases in the project, and staff will work with the school district. The Valley Creek Road Trail Project will be coordinated with the water treatment plant pipeline project. A new trail will be constructed and connected to the existing trail that goes through the park system. Mayor Burt pointed out that there is a lot of tree removal anticipated going east on Woodbury Drive. She asked if the tree removal was due to a utility easement or a trail. Mr. Hartzell replied that it would be due to both. He added that it is within the City’s right-of-way. He added that they would not be able to replace the trees in the area due to the water pipeline. Mr. Hartzell mentioned that one of the most dangerous intersections in the County is at Valley Creek Road and Eagle Creek Lane, which is why a traffic signal will be installed. The Bailey Road and Settlers Ridge Parkway Intersection Improvement Project is anticipated to begin in May and be completed in August. The intersection will be closed for construction. The Bailey Road and Manning Avenue Intersection Improvement Project will include a new roundabout construction on Bailey Road. There will be a temporary bypass installed during construction to keep traffic flowing. There will be a section of Bailey Road that will be closed. The Bailey Road Trail Project (Woodlane to La Lake Park) is being constructed by the County. The County is considering expanding Bailey Road going west through Newport. He mentioned that the 2026 Rejuvenator Project will make a difference in the pavement condition index score. The anticipated construction schedule for the Intrepid Fiber to Home would be from April 2026 until December 2028. He displayed a photo of the neighborhoods and when they would be served. He noted that they would begin by building a backbone. Mayor Burt mentioned that the map includes a large portion of the metro area and asked if Mr. Hartzell could provide a map of just Woodbury during the next meeting to provide additional clarity. Mr. Hartzell noted that the map is on woodburymn.gov/Fiber. Mayor Burt asked if any homes were serviced yet. Mr. Hartzell replied that they needed to build a backbone, and then they would be able to complete an entire neighborhood in a week. Individual property owners will be able to decide if they would like to connect. He agreed to bring back a clearer map to the Council. He noted that there will not be much impact on communities, but residents will notice the construction crews mobilizing around the City. Mayor Burt asked how homeowners would be communicated to. Mr. Hartzell replied that the providers would follow the City’s communication plan and would hang door hangers with information on how to contact them. He added that staff would include the information on the City’s website. The primary communication would come from the contractors. Mr. Hartzell stated the roadway and trail closure map is included on the website at woodburymn.gov/WaterTreatment. He encouraged the community to sign up for InTouch to receive updates from the City. ## Adjournment Mayor Burt moved, seconded by Councilmember Morris, to adjourn the meeting at 9:06 p.m. ## Voting in Favor:Wilson, Morris, Santini, Burt ## City Council Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 08, 2026 Page 8 of 8 ## Absent: Stafford Respectfully submitted, _________________________________________ ## Ashleigh Sullivan, Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk Approved by the Woodbury City Council on April 22, 2026. ## 6B ## City of Woodbury, Minnesota ## Office of City Administrator ## Council Letter 26-76 April 22, 2026 ## To:The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ## From:Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator ## Subject:Approval of Westwind Fourth Addition; Final Plat and Development Agreement, ## Project No. 33-2026-00605 ## Summary Maplewood Development has requested Final Plat approval for the final phase of the Westwind development. The applicant is requesting to plat 57 single family lots and two outlots. The property is zoned R-4, Urban Residential District and is located at the southwest corner of Dale Road and Pioneer Drive. The necessary public improvements were constructed with the Third Addition with the proposed Development Agreement addressing collection of fees and performance securities. ## Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Westwind Fourth Addition, Final Plat, Project No. 33-2026-00605. Staff further recommends Council authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to execute the Development Agreement with all approvals subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions of Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat approval shall remain in full force and effect. 2. The Final Plat shall include all necessary easements to match the utility plans being prepared by the City’s consultant engineer. 3. The final street names shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Official. 4. To cure the prematurity of the roadway network, the Applicant shall improve Dale Road to a two- lane divided roadway with designs approved by the City Engineer. The Applicant shall either privately construct these improvements or may request a 429 assessment for the City to allow for public construction. The construction shall be memorialized within the Development Agreement. 5. To cure the prematurity of the roadway network, the Applicant shall improve Pioneer Drive to the south boundary of the subdivision with designs approved by the City Engineer. The Applicant shall privately construct these improvements which shall be secured via the Development Agreement. 6. The Developer will be required to grade the future park area, construct all required trails and parking lot improvements, at their cost, with timing, design and specifications approved by the Parks and Recreation Department in writing. 7. Prior to the release of the Final Plat, a Development Agreement shall be executed. 8. The Developer shall be financially responsible for 100 percent of all storm sewer, sanitary sewer ## Council Letter 26-76 April 22, 2026 Page 2 and water main area and connection charges applicable to the property. These charges are identified in the preliminary report prepared for the project and shall be in the Development Agreement. 9. Final Plat approval and release shall be conditional on adherence to all requirements of the city attorney, including, but not necessarily limited to, any express requirements contained in the city attorney’s plat opinion. 10. All permanent easements and rights-of-way (ROW) necessary for existing and proposed street and utility improvements within the plat boundary shall be granted to the City at no cost or paid for by the Developer. 11. All standard front, rear and side yard lot easements shall be shown on the plat. Standard front and rear yard easements are ten (10) feet and side yard easements are five (5) feet. Where public utilities are adjacent to side or rear lot lines, easements shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet wide on each side of the lot line. If the utilities are deeper than ten (10) feet, the easement width for each lot is calculated at a 1:1 depth-to-width ratio from the centerline of the utility. The easement width must then be adjusted to the nearest five-foot increment. If additional easements are not provided, then the layout of the watermain shall be adjusted. 12. The Final Plat shall be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. 13. Park dedication shall be satisfied via a combination of land and cash dedication. Final dedication shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. ## Fiscal Implications All proposed improvements shall be constructed and funded by the Developer. ## Policy ## Chapter 21, Subdivision ## Chapter 24, Zoning ## Public Process ## Preliminary Plat Neighborhood Meeting – November 7, 2022 ## Preliminary Plat Planning Commission – February 6, 2023 ## Preliminary Plat Public Hearing Notice Published – February 12, 2023 ## Preliminary Plat City Council – February 22, 2023 ## Background At the February 22, 2023 meeting, the City Council approved the Westwind residential subdivision. The approval included 248 single family homes, 57 detached townhome/villa homes and 144 attached townhomes on 129.5 acres. This plat represents the final phase of the development. During infrastructure planning discussions related to the opening of Sub-Phase 2C, Council requested visibility on the cumulative number of lots platted on an annual basis to affirm infrastructure capacity. The Westwind project, via the PUD and Preliminary Plat conditions of approval, were capped at platting a maximum of 130 units per year from 2023-2026. ## Council Letter 26-76 April 22, 2026 Page 3 ## Subdivision NamePlatted Lots ## Westwind Fourth (proposed)57 ## 2026 Cumulative Final Plat Totals57 ## Written By:Eric Searles, Assistant Community Development Director/City Planner ## Approved Through:Janelle Schmitz, Community Development Director ## Attachments:1. Location Map 2. 11 x 17 Plans ## Council Letter 26-76 April 22, 2026 Page 4 ## WESTWIND FOURTH ADDITION KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: That SPQR-Siekmeier, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property situated in the County of Washington, State of Minnesota to wit: OUTLOT C and OUTLOT D, WESTWIND THIRD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof Washington County, Minnesota ## AND OUTLOT E, WESTWIND SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof Washington County, Minnesota Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as WESTWIND FOURTH ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public ways and the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said SPQR-Siekmeier, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this _______ day of ___________________, 20______. ## Signed: SPQR-Siekmeier, LLC By: ________________________________________________________ ## Mario J. Cocchiarella, Chief Manager ## STATE OF ___________________ ## COUNTY OF ___________________ This instrument was acknowledged before me on this _______ day of ___________________, 20______, by Mario J. Cocchiarella, Chief Manager of SPQR-Siekmeier, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ________________________________________________________(Signature) ________________________________________________________(Print) ## Notary Public, _________________ County, _________________ My Commission Expires __________________________. ## SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I Daniel Ekrem, Licensed Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that I have surveyed or directly supervised the survey of the property described on the plat; and prepared this plat or directly supervised the preparation of this plat; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been correctly set or that all monuments indicated on this plat will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this surveyor's certification are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this _______ day of ___________________, 20______ ________________________________________________________ ## Daniel Ekrem, Licensed Land Surveyor ## Minnesota License No. 57366 ## STATE OF MINNESOTA ## COUNTY OF ___________________ This instrument was acknowledged before me on this _______ day of ___________________, 20______, by Daniel Ekrem, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 57366. ________________________________________________________(Signature) ________________________________________________________(Print) ## Notary Public, _________________ County, Minnesota My Commission Expires __________________________. ## CITY OF WOODBURY, MINNESOTA This plat was approved by the City Council of Woodbury, Minnesota this _______ day of ___________________, 20______, and hereby certifies compliance with all the requirements as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. Signed: ________________________________________________________ Attest: ________________________________________________________ Mayor City Administrator ## COUNTY SURVEYOR Pursuant to Chapter 820, Laws of Minnesota, 1971, and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this _______ day of ___________________, 20______. By:________________________________________________________ By: ________________________________________________________ ## Washington County Surveyor ## COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9 and Section 272.12, taxes payable in the year 20______, on real estate hereinbefore described, have been paid; and there are no delinquent taxes, and transfer has been entered on this _______ day of ___________________, 20______. By:________________________________________________________ By: ________________________________________________________ Washington County Auditor/Treasurer Deputy ## COUNTY RECORDER ## Document Number ________________________________________ I hereby certify that this instrument was recorded in the Office of the County Recorder for record on this _______ day of ___________________, 20______ at ______ o'clock ___.M. and was duly recorded in Washington County Records. By:________________________________________________________ By: ________________________________________________________ Washington County Recorder Deputy ## R = 1 0 3 0 . 0 0 ## L = 3 3 2 . 7 2 ## Δ = 1 8 ° 3 0 ' 2 9 " ## S89°44'01"W 150.00 ## N00°15'59"W 57.11 ## S74°08'55"W 137.50 ## N72°55'04"E 67.76 ## S00°21'25"E 852.65 ## N89°45'25"E 369.04 ## S88°36'50"E 173.35 166.29 686.36 ## N89°36'42"W 301.33 ## S00°21'46"E 255.02 ## N89°36'42"W 198.02 ## N00°21'46"W 326.79 ## S89°42'18"E 226.44 ## R = 7 8 5 . 0 0 ## L = 3 9 3 . 5 3 ## Δ = 2 8 ° 4 3 ' 2 4 " ## S00°00'56"W 157.56 ## N89°59'04"W 694.41 ## S00°15'59"E 1240.24 ## S89°51'41"E 125.00 ## R=1220.00 L=7.56 =0°21'18" ## C.Brg=N18°03'51"E ## S73°00'25"E 184.87 ## R = 3 7 0 .0 0 ## L = 1 0 7 . 8 3 ## Δ = 1 6 ° 4 1 '5 3 " ## S89°42'18"E 262.15 ## N00°17'42"E 125.00 ## N89°44'01"E 142.83 ## S00°15'59"E 811.73 ## S00°15'59"E 55.32 ## S28°44'20"W 68.44 ## N45°05'51"W 96.87 ## N60°35'27"W 47.55 ## N79°28'02"W 75.70 ## S81°39'22"W 41.82 ## S63°08'36"W 75.86 ## S47°37'47"W 35.65 ## S88°36'06"W 59.90 ## N73°45'42"W 44.27 ## N61°26'19"W 54.94 ## N63°10'13"W 61.73 ## N65°49'27"W 63.70 ## N68°12'50"W 59.42 ## N67°30'56"W 79.99 ## L = 2 3 5 . 0 0 ## Δ = 1 7 ° 0 9 ' 0 9 " ## L = 1 5 8 . 5 3 ## Δ = 1 1 ° 3 4 ' 1 5 " ## S00°15'59"E 266.32 ## N65°29'54"W 137.90 ## N60°54'44"W 60.00 ## S64°25'02"E 110.77 ## S68°10'30"E 132.56 ## OUTLOT C ## S00°21'25"E 145.00 ## S89°38'35"W 6.96 ## R=55.00 ## L=120.88 =125°55'43" ## C.Brg=S89°38'35"W ## S89°38'35"W 79.63 ## S00°21'25"E 115.70 ## S88°55'54"W 56.00 ## S85°42'10"E 56.19 ## S00°21'25"E 25.44 ## S89°38'35"W 72.57 ## S80°21'52"E 70.03 ## S71°43'49"E 68.52 311.93 499.80 ## WESTWIND FOURTH ADDITION ## INSET A-1 ## SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS ## INSET B ## SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 ## SHEETS ## INSET A-2 ## SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS ## OUTLOT E ## N89°36'42"W 301.33 1 1 ## OUTLOT A ## TRADEWINDS DRIVE ## S89°51'41"E 125.00 ## S00°15'59"E 1240.24 ## S00°21'46"E 255.02 ## N89°36'42"W 198.02 ## S89°42'18"E 226.44 ## N00°17'42"E 125.00 ## S89°42'18"E 262.15 ## R = 3 7 0 . 0 0 ## L = 1 0 7 . 8 3 ## Δ = 1 6 ° 4 1 ' 5 3 " ## S73°00'25"E 184.87 ## R=1220.00 L=7.56 =0°21'18" ## C.Brg=N18°03'51"E ## R = 1 0 3 0 . 0 0 ## L = 3 3 2 . 7 2 ## Δ = 1 8 ° 3 0 ' 2 9 " ## S00°15'59"E 266.32 114.95 126.01 ## N89°38'14"E 126.00 ## N89°38'14"E 126.00 ## N89°38'14"E 126.00 ## N85°23'06"W 126.00 ## N82°05'04"W 126.00 ## N78°47'02"W 126.00 ## N75°28'16"W 207.81 ## S71°54'59"E 188.94 ## S78°54'57"E 148.04 ## S82°26'53"E 135.84 ## S85°58'50"E 128.24 ## N89°44'01"E 125.09 ## N89°44'01"E 125.00 ## N89°44'01"E 125.00 ## N84°26'14"W 206.51 ## N81°28'58"W 216.30 ## N78°31'42"W 230.26 ## N75°34'26"W 126.20 ## S12°29'31"W 155.70 ## N00°17'42"E 125.00 ## N00°17'42"E 125.00 ## N00°17'42"E 125.00 ## N89°44'01"E 125.00 ## S75°23'01"E 165.09 ## N88°56'23"W 126.00 ## N87°23'30"W 200.51 ## S00°17'42"W 154.80 519.05 66.12 82.69 75.10 73.26 72.03 72.90 65.00 70.00 65.00 79.09 79.98 65.00 70.00 51.34 124.87 67.15 65.00 65.00 65.00 65.00 65.00 65.00 31.44 20.69 77.77 75.53 75.72 77.08 47.96 56.56 125.74 85.21 70.49 79.98 127.83 ## S00°21'46"E 217.08 ## S00°02'32"E 69.50 ## S02°50'15"W 63.86 ## S06°12'47"W 65.01 ## S09°33'57"W 63.01 ## S14°31'44"W 63.22 87.08 65.00 65.00 ## N00°21'46"W 326.79 ## L = 8 9 . 6 3 ## Δ = 1 3 ° 5 2 ' 4 8 " ## L=6.62 =1°01'28" ## L=11.58 =1°47'37" 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8910 11 1 2 2 ## L = 6 5 . 1 7 ## Δ = 3 ° 3 7 ' 3 1 " ## L = 6 3 . 5 0 ## Δ = 3 ° 3 1 ' 5 6 " ## L = 6 3 . 5 0 ## Δ = 3 ° 3 1 ' 5 6 " ## L = 6 3 . 5 0 ## Δ = 3 ° 3 1 ' 5 6 " ## L = 6 3 . 3 9 ## Δ = 3 ° 3 1 ' 3 4 " ## L=13.66 =0°45'36" ## R = 1 2 5 0 . 0 0 ## L = 3 9 7 . 6 7 ## Δ = 1 8 ° 1 3 ' 4 1 " ## C . ## B r g = ## N 8 ° 4 5 ' 0 5 " ## E ## S00°21'46"E 255.37 30.00 30.00 60.00 60.37 30.37 30.00 ## L = 7 1 . 5 0 ## Δ = 3 ° 2 1 ' 2 9 " ## L = 7 0 . 5 4 ## Δ = 3 ° 1 8 ' 4 6 " ## L = 7 0 . 2 8 ## Δ = 3 ° 1 8 ' 0 2 " ## L = 7 2 . 2 8 ## Δ = 3 ° 2 3 ' 4 0 " ## L = 7 1 . 6 9 ## Δ = 3 ° 2 2 ' 0 1 " ## L=32.30 =1°31'01" ## L = 6 9 . 3 2 ## Δ = 3 ° 0 6 ' 1 1 " ## L = 6 5 . 0 0 ## Δ = 2 ° 5 4 ' 3 5 " ## L = 6 4 . 0 0 ## Δ = 2 ° 5 1 ' 5 4 " ## L = 6 5 . 0 0 ## Δ = 2 ° 5 4 ' 3 5 " ## L = 6 4 . 0 0 ## Δ = 2 ° 5 1 ' 5 4 " ## L = 7 9 . 3 8 ## Δ = 3 ° 3 3 ' 1 1 " 198.38 40.34 65.00 65.00 85.42 ## L=3.37 =0°09'29" ## L=4.19 =0°11'49" ## TRADEWINDS DRIVE 1 2 ## N89°36'42"W 198.02 ## S00°21'46"E 255.02 ## N89°36'42"W 198.38 0.36 ## S00°21'25"E 117.57 ## S00°21'25"E 145.00 ## S89°38'35"W 72.57 ## S85°42'10"E 56.19 ## S00°21'25"E 25.44 ## S88°55'54"W 56.00 ## S00°21'25"E 115.70 ## S89°38'35"W 79.63 ## R=55.00 L=120.88 =125°55'43" ## C.Brg=S89°38'35"W C=97.98 ## S89°38'35"W 6.96 ## S00°21'25"E 140.44 115.00 23.63 56.00 ## L = 7 7 . 3 2 ## Δ = 8 0 ° 3 3 ' 11 " ## L = 4 3 . 5 6 ## Δ = 4 5 ° 2 2 ' 3 2 " 1 4 2 3 ## WESTWIND FOURTH ADDITION ## INSET A-1 ## INSET A-2 ## N60°54'44"W 60.00 ## N00°15'59"W 57.11 63.63 57.78 6 3 ## LONG ## S67°30'55"E 74.74 ## R = 1 2 0 0 . 0 0 ## L = 1 9 8 . 3 8 ## Δ = 9 ° 2 8 ' 1 9 " ## C . ## B r g = ## S 6 4 ° 4 8 ' 1 0 " ## E ## R = 3 0 0 . 0 0 ## L = 2 0 3 . 6 4 ## Δ = 3 8 ° 5 3 ' 3 1 " ## N89°44'00"E 112.67 ## N89°44'01"E 142.83 ## S89°44'01"W 150.00 ## S00°15'59"E 55.32 ## S80°21'52"E 70.03 ## S71°43'49"E 68.52 ## N65°29'54"W 137.90 ## S64°25'02"E 110.77 ## S68°10'30"E 132.56 ## S00°15'59"E 311.93 ## N45°05'51"W 96.87 ## N60°35'27"W 47.55 ## N79°28'02"W 75.70 ## S81°39'22"W 41.82 ## S63°08'36"W 75.86 ## S47°37'47"W 35.65 ## S88°36'06"W 59.90 ## N73°45'42"W 44.27 ## N61°26'19"W 54.94 ## N63°10'13"W 61.73 ## N65°49'27"W 63.70 ## N68°12'50"W 59.42 ## N67°30'56"W 79.99 66.14 66.04 54.95 55.00 53.67 ## R = 7 8 5 . 0 0 ## L = 2 3 5 . 0 0 ## Δ = 1 7 ° 0 9 ' 0 9 " ## C . ## B r g = ## S 2 0 ° 0 9 ' 4 5 " ## W ## S28°44'20"W 68.44 21.55 26.00 21.55 20.27 20.30 77.64 54.92 53.65 53.65 57.75 68.47 69.43 64.11 56.92 55.19 96.77 46.06 57.11 131.16 123.66 ## L = 4 5 . 6 6 ## Δ = 2 ° 1 3 ' 3 4 " ## L = 5 9 . 8 4 ## Δ = 2 ° 5 5 ' 0 5 " ## L = 5 9 . 8 4 ## Δ = 2 ° 5 5 ' 0 5 " ## L=29.34 =1°25'50" ## L=25.41 =4°28'48" ## L = 5 1 . 1 2 ## Δ = 9 ° 0 0 ' 4 7 " ## L = 5 1 . 1 2 ## Δ = 9 ° 0 0 ' 4 6 " ## L=5 1 . 1 2 ## Δ = 9 °0 0 ' 4 6 " ## L = 4 1 . 8 2 ## Δ = 7 ° 2 2 ' 2 4 " ## L=39.09 =37°19'54" ## L=39.53 =37°45'11" ## L=39.54 =37°45'11" ## L=39.54 =37°45'11" ## L=39.54 =37°45'11" ## L=38.77 =37°01'34" ## L = 5 7 . 0 6 ## Δ = 5 4 ° 2 9 ' 2 5 " ## L=2.34 =0°47'21" ## L = 7 8 .7 7 ## Δ = 1 6° 24' 4 1 " ## L = 8 4 . 3 6 ## Δ = 1 7 ° 3 4 ' 3 3 " ## L=23.54 =4°54'17" ## L = 3 8 . 6 6 ## Δ = 1 ° 4 8 ' 2 9 " ## L = 5 5 . 6 2 ## Δ = 2 ° 3 6 ' 0 5 " ## L = 5 7 . 5 9 ## Δ = 2 ° 4 1 ' 3 7 " ## L = 5 0 . 2 0 ## Δ = 2 ° 2 0 ' 5 2 " 8.45 9.65 1.86 0.74 2.25 4.41 13.11 1.62 3.47 15.35 14.44 ## L = 1 3 0 . 9 0 ## Δ = 9 ° 3 3 ' 1 4 " ## L = 5 0 . 0 1 ## Δ = 3 ° 3 9 ' 0 1 " ## L = 5 4 . 0 9 ## Δ = 3 ° 5 6 ' 5 4 " ## L=25.00 =1°49'30" ## L=25.01 =1°49'31" ## N89°44'01"E 142.83 ## S22°29'05"W 121.08 ## S00°09'07"E 120.00 ## S22°39'58"W 121.19 ## S25°35'04"W 122.55 ## S28°30'09"W 121.18 ## S25°27'11"W 121.76 ## S16°26'25"W 126.34 ## S07°25'38"W 141.98 ## S01°35'08"E 160.54 ## S00°16'00"E 120.00 ## S00°16'00"E 120.00 ## S36°46'10"E 164.37 ## S75°05'05"E 126.51 ## N67°09'44"E 134.93 ## N29°24'33"E 120.00 ## N08°20'38"W 120.00 ## N45°22'11"W 121.06 ## N08°10'11"W 130.07 ## N07°27'10"E 130.12 ## N25°01'43"E 130.12 ## N28°13'07"E 130.00 ## N25°31'25"E 130.00 ## N22°49'48"E 130.00 ## N22°29'05"E 130.00 38.19 55.00 ## R=145.00 ## L=22.00 =8°41'32" ## L=18.20 =8°41'32" ## L=23.45 =7°54'11" ## S00°00'00"E 60.00 25.00 35.00 ## N80°08'23"E 60.00 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1819 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 ## OUTLOT B ## POINT ## RIDGE ## R = 6 0 . 0 0 ## L = 2 9 3 . 0 7 ## Δ = 2 7 9 ° 5 1 ' 3 7 " ## C . ## B r g = ## S 4 9 ° 5 5 ' 4 8 " ## E 134.96 45.46 ## LONG POINT RIDGE 12 3 11 0.74 55.00 ## L = 3 9 . 0 9 ## Δ = 3 7 ° 1 9 ' 5 4 " ## N89°44'00"E 111.81 ## WESTWIND FOURTH ADDITION ## INSET B ## 6C ## City of Woodbury, Minnesota ## Office of City Administrator ## Council Letter 26-77 April 22, 2026 ## To:The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ## From:Jeffery J. Dahl, City Administrator ## Subject:Approval of Washington County 2026 Municipal Recycling Grant Agreement; ## Accepting the Grant; Approving Associated Budget Amendment ## Summary Washington County has reviewed and approved the 2026 Municipal Recycling Grant Application submitted by the City for the purpose of further developing a recycling program in Woodbury. Washington County has developed a grant agreement to define the roles and responsibilities of each agency. The City agrees to support efforts to educate the public, fund activities, and projects related to recycling and the County agrees to provide the maximum grant award funding of $90,816 to the City. ## Recommendation Staff recommends Council adopt the attached resolution accepting grant funds from Washington County for the 2026 Municipal Recycling Grant and approving the associated budget amendment. ## Fiscal Implications The City was awarded funds in the amount of $90,816 from the Washington County Recycling Grant. The 2026 Adopted Annual Budget includes funds in the amount of $86,500 in the General Fund – Engineering Division for the City’s recycling program. A budget amendment in the amount of $4,316 is necessary to account for the additional revenue and expenditure. ## Policy This project aligns with AD-ADMFIN-1.11 - Grant Application and Management Policy and Critical Success Factor – Environmental Stewardship. ## Public Process This is the first public process for this item. ## Council Letter 26-77 April 22, 2026 Page 2 ## Background To reduce Washington County’s reliance on solid waste disposal facilities, the County created the Municipal Recycling Grant Program to support residential recycling efforts in individual communities. The grant award amounts are based on a combination of number of households and projects per year. The City currently receives the maximum grant award of $30,000 in base funding to support administrative efforts and $60,816 in project-based funding for a total of $90,816. Project funding may be used to support costs related to promotional efforts, data management, and the purchase of recycling bins for City facilities. Examples of eligible grant projects include: the Green Times newsletter, promotion of the Curbside Recycling Event, outreach and advertisement for the Food Scraps Pick-Up Program, promotion and implementation of the Curbside Mattress Recycling Event; and promotion of County-sponsored initiatives such as document shredding events, reuse opportunities, and programs at the South Environmental Center. ## Written By:Heidi Quinn, Environmental Resources Specialist ## Approved Through:Chris Hartzell, Engineering Director ## Attachments:Resolution Resolution 26-39 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota Accepting Grant Funds from Washington County for the 2026 Municipal Recycling Grant and ## Approving the Associated Budget Amendment WHEREAS, Washington County desires to encourage and provide opportunities for residential recycling to reduce the County’s reliance on solid waste disposal facilities; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared and submitted a grant application to Washington County for the purpose of further developing the recycling program in Woodbury; and WHEREAS, continuing curbside recycling in residential areas will help the City meet its waste reduction and recycling goals and serve as an example of environmental stewardship; and WHEREAS, Washinton County requires that the City of Woodbury enter into an agreement that identifies the terms and conditions of the funding award; and WHEREAS, staff and the City Attorney have reviewed and approved the agreement; and; WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 465.03 requires a City to accept grants by resolution expressing the terms prescribed by the donor in full; and WHEREAS, a resolution from the City Council authorizing the City of Woodbury to accept grants is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota, that application and acceptance of the Grant Agreement for Municipal Recycling Grant Distribution for the City is hereby authorized in accordance with the terms set forth herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota that the following revenue increase be made to the 2026 City Budget: ## Fund / AccountAmount ## General Fund – Local Grants & Aids 101-30-339-00000-433015-000-$ 4,316 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following 2026 expenditure increase be made: ## Fund / Division / AccountAmount ## General Fund – Engineering Division ## Advertising & Promotion 101-30-339-00000-532060-000-$ 4,316 Resolution 26-39 April 22, 2026 Page 2 This Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator on the 22 nd day of April, 2026. ## Attest:Anne W. Burt, Mayor ## Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator(SEAL) ## 6D ## City of Woodbury, Minnesota ## Office of City Administrator ## Council Letter 26-78 April 22, 2026 ## To:The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ## From:Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator ## Subject:Approval of Washington County 2026 Municipal Recycling Incentive Funding Grant; ## Accepting the Grant; Executing the Grant Agreement; Approving Associated Budget ## Amendment ## Summary Washington County has reviewed and approved the 2026 Municipal Recycling Incentive Funding Grant Application submitted by the City for the purpose of implementing recycling collection at Colby Lake Park. Currently there is only trash collection offered at the park and no recycling. This project will install a recycling dumpster with enclosure and seven dual trash and recycling receptacles at the park. The City agrees to support efforts to educate the public related to recycling at Colby Lake Park and the County agrees to provide the maximum incentive grant funding of $35,000 to the City. Washington County has developed an incentive funding grant agreement to help define the roles and responsibilities of each agency. ## Recommendation Staff recommends Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the 2026 Municipal Recycling Incentive Funding Grant from Washington County; executing the grant agreement; and approving the associated budget amendment. ## Fiscal Implications The City has been awarded incentive funding in the amount of $35,000 from the Washington County Incentive Funding Recycling Grant. A budget amendment in the amount of $35,000 is necessary to account for the additional revenue and expenditure in the General Fund. ## Policy This project aligns with AD-ADMFIN-1.11 - Grant Application and Management Policy and Critical Success Factor – Environmental Stewardship. ## Council Letter 26-78 April 22, 2026 Page 2 ## Public Process This is the first public process for this item. ## Background To reduce Washington County’s reliance on solid waste disposal facilities, the County created the Municipal Recycling Grant Program to support residential recycling efforts in individual communities. In addition to the Municipal Recycling Grant, Washington County offers an Incentive Funding Grant for annual projects that exceed the funding of the Municipal Recycling Grant Program. Colby Lake Park is just over 31 acres and is a popular destination for community members with a baseball field, softball field, football field, lacrosse field, pickleball courts, playground and a building shelter that is rented by residents for events. Currently there is only trash collection offered at Colby Lake Park and no recycling. The Incentive Grant Funding from Washington County will be used to build the enclosure for the recycling dumpster and install seven dual trash and recycling receptacles throughout the park. The dual trash and recycling receptacles offer front service deposit, signage, and are made of 97 percent post-consumer recycled milk jugs. ## Written By:Heidi Quinn, Environmental Resources Specialist ## Approved Through:Chris Hartzell, Engineering Director ## Attachments:Resolution Resolution 26-40 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota Accepting the 2026 Municipal Recycling Incentive Funding Grant from Washington County; ## Executing the Grant Agreement; and Approving the Associated Budget Amendment WHEREAS, Washington County desires to encourage and provide opportunities for residential recycling to reduce the County’s reliance on solid waste disposal facilities; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared and submitted a grant application for 2026 Municipal Recycling Incentive Funding Grant to Washington County for the purpose of implementing recycling collection at Colby Lake Park; and WHEREAS, Washington County has reviewed and approved the City of Woodbury’s ## Incentive Funding Grant application; and WHEREAS, Washington County has granted the City of Woodbury funding up to $35,000 to implement recycling collection at Colby Lake Park; and WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 465.03 requires a City to accept grants by resolution expressing the terms prescribed by the donor in full; and WHEREAS, a resolution from the City Council authorizing the City of Woodbury to accept grants is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota as follows: 1. Acceptance of the 2026 Incentive Funding Grant from Washington County of $35,000 is hereby authorized in accordance with the terms set forth herein. 2. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized to execute the above agreement with Washington County. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota that the following revenue increase be made to the 2026 City Budget: ## Fund/AccountAmount ## General Fund – Local Grants & Aids 101-30-339-00000-433015-000$ 35,000 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following 2026 expenditure increase be made: ## Fund/Division/AccountAmount ## General Fund – Engineering Division ## Operating Supplies-Small Equipment 101-30-339-00000-521030-000-$ 35,000 Resolution 26-40 April 22, 2026 Page 2 This Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator this 22 nd day of April, 2026. ## Attest: ## Anne W. Burt, Mayor ## Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator(SEAL) ## 6E ## City of Woodbury, Minnesota ## Office of City Administrator ## Council Letter 26-79 April 22, 2026 ## To:The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ## From:Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator ## Subject:Approval of Bailey Development Environmental Assessment Worksheet Negative ## Declaration of Need for an Environmental Impact Statement ## Summary An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) has been prepared for the proposed Bailey Development project. This project is approximately 184 acres and is located north of Bailey Road and east of the boundary between the City of Maplewood and the City of Woodbury. The EAW examined the potential environmental effects of development of a proposed mixed residential, retail, and business park. The proposed project will construct up to 360 attached residential units, 89,600 square feet of retail, and up to 660,400 square feet of business park (e.g., light industrial, warehousing). Approximately 29 acres of Public/Semi-Public recreational area will also be included in the project area. State and local agencies and residents have had an opportunity to comment on the EAW and staff has responded to all substantive comments received. Projects that meet or exceed the thresholds described in Minnesota State Statute Chapter 4410, part 4410.4300 are required to complete an EAW. The Bailey Development project triggered the need for an EAW under Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) Rules, Subpart 32: Mixed residential and industrial-commercial projects. The EAW is not meant to approve or deny a project but instead act as a source of information to guide other approvals and permitting decisions. Based on the findings from the EAW, this project does not have the potential for significant environmental impacts with appropriate mitigation as outlined in the EAW, and there is no need for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The attached resolution formally approves the following: 1. The EAW was prepared in compliance with the procedures of the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act and Minnesota Rules, Subpart 32: Mixed residential and industrial-commercial projects; 2. The EAW satisfactorily addressed the issues for which existing information could have been reasonably obtained; 3. The Response to Comments, Findings of Fact, and the Record of Decision on the EAW adequately addressed all submitted comments, and will be distributed by staff in accordance with the EQB rules; and 4. The City Council makes a Negative Declaration, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required. ## Council Letter 26-79 April 22, 2026 Page 2 ## Recommendation Staff recommends Council adopt the attached resolution making a Negative Declaration of Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Bailey Development project. ## Fiscal Implications Not applicable ## Policy Not applicable ## Public Process The EAW for the Bailey Development was finalized February 17, 2026 (Bailey Development EAW). Notice of the availability of the EAW for public review was published in the EQB Monitor on February 24, 2026. Copies of the EAW were sent to the required reviewing agencies prior to the publication date. Public notice stating that a copy of the EAW was available for review at Woodbury City Hall and on the City’s website was sent to the Pioneer Press as well as to the City’s InTouch email notification list. The required 30-day comment period ended on March 26, 2026. Comment letters were received from the following seven government agencies the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), Metropolitan ## Council (Met Council), Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Washington Conservation ## District (WCD), Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD), Washington County, and the City of Newport. None of the comments recommended the preparation of an EIS. In addition to the government agencies, the City received 15 emails from the public. A summary of the comments and responses are included in the Response to Comments, Findings of Fact, and Record of Decision document (Response to Comments, Findings of Fact, and Record of Decision). ## Background The Bailey Development project is a proposed mixed residential, retail, and business park on approximately 184 acres in the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota. The project includes the construction of up to 360 attached residential units, 89,600 square feet of retail, and up to 660,400 square feet of business park (e.g., light industrial, warehousing). Approximately 29 acres of Public/Semi-Public recreational area will also be included in the project area. The project will extend Century Avenue (C.S.A.H. 120) from its existing termini at Carver Avenue to Bailey Road. One full-access intersection will be added to Bailey Road at the proposed Century Avenue (C.S.A.H. 120) intersection. The project will include a roadway network, stormwater infrastructure, and the installation of municipal sewer and water systems. The purpose of an EAW is to examine the anticipated environmental impacts of a project and determine if the project will have the potential for significant environmental effects. If it is determined that there is no potential for significant environmental effects, a negative declaration is issued. If it is determined that there is the potential for significant environmental effects, more detailed environmental review in the form of an EIS must be ordered. ## Council Letter 26-79 April 22, 2026 Page 3 After considering the anticipated environmental impacts outlined in the EAW; the required mitigation measures identified in the EAW to address potential traffic impacts; comments received from the reviewing agencies; and the responses to the comments; staff has determined that there is no potential for significant environmental effects associated with development of the Bailey Development project if mitigation measures detailed in the EAW are followed. Project site plans will incorporate the mitigation measures identified in the EAW; therefore, no EIS is necessary. ## Written By:Jenifer McLoughlin, Environmental Resources Manager ## Approved Through:Chris Hartzell, Engineering Director ## Attachment:Resolution Resolution 26-41 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota Making a Negative Declaration of Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Bailey ## Development Project ## WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) Rules, Chapter 4410, part 4410.4300, Subpart 32, the City of Woodbury as the responsible governmental unit completed an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the property identified as Bailey Development; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota EQB Rules, Chapter 4410, Subpart 32: Mixed residential and industrial-commercial projects, the project meets the thresholds for an EAW for mixed residential and industrial-commercial projects; and WHEREAS, an EAW was prepared and copies were distributed to all persons and agencies on the official EQB mailing list prior to February 24, 2026; and WHEREAS, notice of the availability of the EAW for public review for a 30-day comment period was published in the EQB Monitor on February 24, 2026; and WHEREAS, a press release was submitted to announce the availability of the EAW to interested parties; and WHEREAS, the Bailey Development is expected to comply with all the City of Woodbury and review agency standards; and WHEREAS, the 30-day comment period ended on March 26, 2026, at 4:30 p.m., and all comments received have been considered; and WHEREAS, none of the comments received recommended preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or suggested that the project had the potential to cause significant environmental effects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota as follows: Below are the recommended changes: 1.The EAW was prepared in compliance with the procedures of the Minnesota ## Environmental Policy Act and Minnesota Rules, Parts 4410.1000 to 4410.1700 (2015); 2.The EAW satisfactorily addressed the issues for which existing information could have been reasonably obtained; 3.The Response to Comments, Findings of Fact, and the Record of Decision on the EAW adequately addressed all submitted comments, and will be distributed by staff in accordance with the EQB rules; and 4.The City Council makes a Negative Declaration, and an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. Resolution 26-41 April 22, 2026 Page 2 This Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator this 22 nd day of April, 2026. ## Attest:Anne W. Burt, Mayor ## Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator(SEAL) ## 6F ## City of Woodbury, Minnesota ## Office of City Administrator ## Council Letter 26-80 April 22, 2026 ## To:The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ## From:Jeffrey Dahl, City Administrator Subject: Approval of Authorization to Participate in the Council on Local Results and ## Innovation’s Performance Measurement Program ## Summary In 2010, the State of Minnesota established a voluntary performance reporting program for cities and counties and also created the Council on Local Results and Innovation (CLRI). The purpose of the program is to provide cities and counties with incentives to develop, track and report performance data on the critical services. The CLRI was tasked with establishing the set of measures that cities/counties will report to the State in order to meet the requirements for receiving the benefits of the program. The benefits include receiving a reimbursement of $0.14 (fourteen cents) per capita, not to exceed $25,000. From 2011 through 2025, the City participated in the State’s performance reporting program and received a reimbursement of $11,389 for participation in 2025. ## Recommendation Staff recommends Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing to participate in the Performance Measurement Program established by the State of Minnesota and the Council on Local Results and Innovation. ## Fiscal Implications Participation in this program provides the City with a reimbursement of $0.14 per capita on an annual basis, not to exceed $25,000, which would be paid in December. A revenue estimate of $11,000 was budgeted as part of the 2026 Adopted Budget-General Fund. ## Policy ## None ## Public Process This is the third public process for this item. ## Council Letter 26-80 April 22, 2026 Page 2 ## Background In order to participate in the program and receive the benefits, the City Council must formally adopt the set of performance measures on an annual basis (see Standard Measures for Cities). The City of Woodbury has a long-standing performance reporting program and already tracks the minimum number of performance measures required; therefore, the City will not be required to develop any new measures or procedures to participate in this program. In addition, the City will report on the adopted measures to the State Auditor’s Office by their July 1 reporting deadline. Since this is a voluntary program, the City could decide to withdraw its participation in a future year if it no longer agrees with the requirements of the program. At the July 22 Council workshop meeting, Council will be presented the City’s 2025 Performance Measures. ## Written By: Gaonou Vang, Management Analyst ## Approved Through:Angela Gorall, Deputy City Administrator ## Attachments:1. Resolution ## 2. Standard Measures for Cities Resolution 26-42 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota Authorizing to Participate in the Performance Measurement Program Established by the State of ## Minnesota and the Council on Local Results and Innovation WHEREAS, benefits to the City of Woodbury for participation in the Minnesota Council on Local Results and Innovation’s comprehensive performance measurement program are outlined in MS 6.91 and include eligibility for a reimbursement as set by State statute; and WHEREAS, any City participating in the comprehensive performance measurement program is also exempt from levy limits for taxes, if levy limits are in effect; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Woodbury has adopted and implemented at least 10 of the performance measures, as developed by the Council on Local Results and Innovation, and a system to use this information to help plan, budget, manage and evaluate programs and processes for optimal future outcomes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota, will continue to report the results of the performance measures to its citizenry by the end of the year through publication, direct mailing, posting on the City’s website, or through a public hearing at which the budget and levy will be discussed and public input allowed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City of Woodbury will submit to the Office of the State Auditor the actual results of the performance measures adopted by the City. This Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator on the 22 nd day of April, 2026. ## Attest:Anne W. Burt, Mayor ## Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator(SEAL) ## 6G ## City of Woodbury, Minnesota ## Office of City Administrator ## Council Letter 26-81 April 22, 2026 ## To:The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ## From:Jeffrey Dahl, City Administrator ## Subject:Approval of 2025 Year End Transfers ## Summary During the process of closing the financial records for 2025, various operating transfers are necessary between funds. These transfers need to be acted on by the City Council before the proceeds can be transferred to the specific funds. The transfers that are being presented for approval excludes any transfers that were included in the 2025 Adopted Budget or were previously approved by Council in a budget amendment. ## Recommendation Staff recommends Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the transfer of funds between certain funds. ## Fiscal Implications There are sufficient funds in the General Fund for the recommended transfers. ## Policy Woodbury City Code Chapter 2, Sec. 2-312. - Closing, transfer and creation of funds. The City Council shall possess the sole authority to close funds and transfer sums of money between funds. The CFO/Controller is given the authority to create new funds as necessary. ## Public Process Not applicable. ## Background There are four transfers from the General Fund that staff is recommending for approval. Per policy, at year-end the City maintains 30 percent of the following year’s General Fund adopted budget as cash flow and the excess funds are transferred to other funds as designated by the Council. Staff is recommending to increase the unassigned fund balance in the General Fund for operational cash ## Council Letter 26-81 April 22, 2026 Page 2 flow timing needs and maintain the total fund balance at approximately 43 percent of the next year’s General Fund adopted budget. Of the 2025 excess, staff recommends transferring an amount of $4,044,322 to other funds as follows: 1. Transfer of $300,000 to the EMS Fire Fund. The 2025 Adopted General Fund Budget includes an operating transfer-in from the EMS Fire Fund for personnel and EMS associated operating costs. Due to unfilled positions in 2025 and other related expenditures, budget savings were realized, and these funds can be transferred back to the EMS Fire Fund for future needs. 2. Transfer of $2,300,000, the remaining excess of fund balance per policy, to the Capital Improvement Fund. 3. Transfer of $1,304,322 to the Public Safety Expansion Fund for project needs. This recommendation was identified as a funding source at the February 25, 2026, Council meeting approving the Public Safety Expansion project, awarding construction contracts, and budget amendments. 4. Transfer of $140,000, the positive expenditure variance of the Street Lighting Division, to the Street Lighting Utility Fund. Beginning with the 2026 Adopted Budget, the Street Lighting Utility Fund accounts for the expenses previously accounted for in the General Fund - Street Lighting Division. These transfers need to be acted on by the City Council before the proceeds can be transferred to the specific funds presented on the resolution. ## Written By:Lynn Haseleu, Assistant Chief Financial Officer/Budget Manager ## Approved Through:Angela Gorall, Deputy City Administrator ## Attachment:Resolution Resolution 26-43 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota ## Authorizing the Transfer of Funds between Certain Funds WHEREAS, various operating transfers are necessary to account for activity between the funds of the City; and WHEREAS, these transfers need to be acted on by the City Council before the proceeds can be transferred to the specific funds. NOW, THERFORE, BE IT FUTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to authorize the transfer of funds effective December 31, 2025, as follows: ## Transfer From FundTransfer To FundAmount ## General FundEMS Fire Fund$300,000 ## General FundCapital Improvement Fund$2,300,000 ## General FundPublic Safety Expansion Fund$1,304,322 ## General FundStreet Lighting Utility Fund$140,000 ## Total$4,044,322 This Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator this 22 nd day of April, 2026. ## Attest: ## Anne W. Burt, Mayor ## Jeffrey Dahl, City Administrator(SEAL) ## 6H ## City of Woodbury, Minnesota ## Office of City Administrator ## Council Letter 26-82 April 22, 2026 ## To:The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ## From:Jeffrey Dahl, City Administrator ## Subject:Approval of 2025 Final Budget Adjustments ## Summary During the process of closing the financial records for 2025, various budget adjustments are necessary in order to maintain budgetary legal compliance for the annual financial report. The recommended budget adjustments for 2025 are as follows: ## General Fund Adjust the General Fund $500,000 for unexpended divisional operating expenditures. This was adopted as an unallocated reduction to expenditures and must be allocated at year-end to meet budgetary legal compliance. The table below represents the allocation and budget adjustment that is needed: ## Division ## Budget Adjustment ## Increase/(Decrease) Unallocated Expenditures $500,000 ## Mayor and Council$(3,486) Human Resources $(38,634) Administration $(26,299) Information Technology $(25,673) Community Relations $(13,473) Planning $(25,630) ## Inspections$(34,112) Police $(14,588) EMS Fire $(35,689) Emergency Preparedness / Safety $(782) Engineering $(33,852) ## Municipal Buildings$(18,190) ## Public Works Administration$(3,894) Streets $(60,745) Fleet $(8,277) Street Lighting $(56) ## Council Letter 26-82 April 22, 2026 Page 2 Parks and Forestry $(130,097) ## Recreation$(26,523) Adjust the General Fund $350,000 to allocate the budgeted contingency for union contract increases as follows: ## Division ## Budget Adjustment ## Increase/(Decrease) Police $187,800 EMS Fire $74,100 Streets $34,200 Fleet $15,000 Parks and Forestry $38,900 ## Unallocated Contingency$(350,000) Adjust the General Fund – Finance division budget by $26,459 for Salaries-Regular exceeding the budget due to two long-term employee retirement severance pays. Committed fund balance for compensated absences will be used to offset this variance per the Fund Balance Policy CD-FIN-5.4. Adjust the General Fund – Police division budget by $21,382 for unspent Congressionally Directed Funds for the squad/body/room camera replacement project that was originally budgeted in the Capital Improvement Fund. The equipment purchases were completed in 2025 and the remaining budget needs reallocation to the operational budget for the camera subscription services offset by reallocation of the grant funding as well to the General Fund. Adjust the General Fund – Unallocated budget to transfer $300,000 from the General Fund to the EMS Fire Fund. This amount will be funded from the positive expenditure variances in the EMS Fire Division. Adjust the General Fund – Unallocated budget to transfer an additional $2,300,000 from the General Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund. This amount, along with the adopted 2025 budget transfer of $500,000, will be funded from unassigned fund balance and positive revenue and expenditure variances. Adjust the General Fund – Unallocated budget to transfer $1,304,322 from the General Fund to the Public Safety Expansion Fund. This funding source was identified at the February 25, 2026, Council meeting approving the Public Safety Expansion project, construction contracts, and budget amendments. Adjust the General Fund – Unallocated budget to transfer $140,000 from the General Fund to the Street Lighting Utility Fund. This amount is the positive expenditure variance of the Street Lighting Division. Beginning with the 2026 Adopted Budget, the Street Lighting Utility Fund accounts for the expenses previously accounted for in the General Fund-Street Lighting Division. ## Capital Improvement Fund Adjust the Capital Improvement Fund – Decrease budget by $21,382 for unspent Congressionally Directed Funds for the Police small equipment squad/body/room camera replacement project that will be finalized in 2026 in the General Fund-Police division. ## Council Letter 26-82 April 22, 2026 Page 3 ## Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Fund Adjust the HRA Fund by $7,674. The Uncollectible Accounts in 2025 exceeded budget due to a loan account being partially written off during the year (HRA Resolution 25-05 July 30, 2025). Funding is provided by a positive budget variance from Interest Earned. ## Recommendation Staff recommends Council adopt the attached resolution approving various 2025 final budget adjustments. ## Fiscal Implications The various budget adjustments are required for budgetary legal compliance and approve final spending authority. ## Policy CD-FIN-5.1 Purchasing Policy, Adopted April 8, 2020, Resolution No. 20-81: Section VIII, Subsection ## C, Paragraph 3 ## Public Process This is the first public process for this item. ## Background ## Not Applicable ## Written By:Lynn Haseleu, Assistant Chief Financial Officer/Budget Manager ## Approved Through:Angela Gorall, Deputy City Administrator ## Attachment:Resolution Resolution 26-44 Resolution of the City of Woodbury ## Washington County, Minnesota ## Approving Various 2025 Final Budget Adjustments BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to approve the following expenditure increases (decreases) to the 2025 City Budget: ## Fund / Division Amount ## General Fund: Unallocated – Transfer Out to EMS Fire Fund$ 300,000 ## Unallocated – Transfer Out to Capital Improvement Fund2,300,000 ## Unallocated – Transfer Out to Public Safety Expansion Fund1,304,322 ## Unallocated – Transfer Out to Street Lighting Utility Fund140,000 ## Finance Division: ## Salaries-Regular26,459 ## Police Division: ## Technology Support and Services 21,382 ## Unexpended Allocations: ## Unallocated500,000 ## Mayor and Council(3,486) ## Human Resources(38,634) ## Administration(26,299) ## Information Technology(25,673) ## Community Relations(13,473) ## Planning(25,630) ## Inspections(34,112) ## Police(14,588) ## EMS Fire(35,689) ## Emergency Preparedness / Safety(782) ## Engineering(33,852) ## Municipal Buildings(18,190) ## Public Works Administration(3,894) ## Streets(60,745) ## Fleet(8,277) ## Street Lighting(56) ## Parks and Forestry(130,097) ## Recreation(26,523) ## Unallocated Contingency for Union Contract Increases: ## Police187,800 Resolution 26-44 April 22, 2026 Page 2 ## Fund / Division Amount ## General Fund (continued) ## EMS Fire$ 74,100 ## Streets34,200 ## Fleet15,000 ## Parks and Forestry38,900 Unallocated (350,000) ## Total$4,092,163 ## Housing and Redevelopment Authority Fund ## Uncollectible Accts/Over-Short7,674 ## Capital Improvement Fund ## Police - Operating Supplies-Small Equipment(21,382) BE IT RESOLVED that the following 2025 City Budget revenue increases/(decreases) be made: ## Fund Amount ## General Fund: Federal Grants and Aids $ 21,382 ## Use of Fund Balance 4,070,781 ## Total$4,092,163 ## Housing and Redevelopment Authority Fund ## Interest Earned7,674 ## Capital Improvement Fund ## Federal Grants and Aids(21,382) This Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator this 22 nd day of April, 2026. ## Attest:Anne W. Burt, Mayor ## Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator(SEAL) ## 6I ## City of Woodbury, Minnesota ## Office of City Administrator ## Council Letter 26-83 April 22, 2026 ## To:The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ## From:Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator Subject:Approval of Budget Carryovers from 2025 to 2026; Authorization for Use of Funds ## Summary The 2025 adjusted budgets included funds to do several projects or purchases that were not completed or received by the end of 2025. Staff is now recommending to Council that these funds be carried forward to the 2026 budget. Also, with consolidation of all roadway improvement projects into the Street Reconstruction/Maintenance Fund in the 2026 Adopted Budget, projects still in progress in the Municipal State Aid (MSA) Roadway Construction Fund at the end of 2025 require Council authorization for use of funds to appropriate project completion. ## Recommendation Staff recommends Council adopt the attached resolution approving various carryovers to the 2026 budget and authorization for use of funds for the Municipal State Aid Roadway Construction Fund. ## Fiscal Implications Carryovers are generally funded from fund/reserve balance. However, since the appropriation was not expended in 2025, it was automatically transferred to fund/reserve balance at December 31, 2025, in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Funding for 2025 carryovers will come from the use of fund/reserve balance for all requested carryovers except those that have specific funding sources. Sufficient fund balance is also available in the MSA Roadway Construction Fund for authorization for the use of funds to complete roadway projects at the end of 2025. Projects are planned to finalize in 2026 and the MSA Roadway Construction Fund will be closed during final 2026 year end processes. ## Policy It has been the City’s historical practice to carryover funding from the prior year for completion of projects or purchases. ## Council Letter 26-83 April 22, 2026 Page 2 ## Public Process This is the first recommendation to City Council for 2025 carryover requests and authorization for use of funds for the MSA Roadway Construction Fund. ## Background The information below sums the total fund carryover request and funding sources. ## Fund Type/FundFunding SourceAmount ## General FundUse of Fund Balance$1,003,711 ## Grant Revenues$30,382 ## Total General Fund$1,034,093 ## Special Revenue Funds: ## EMS Fire FundUse of Fund Balance$496,900 ## Total Special Revenue Funds$496,900 ## Capital Project Funds: ## Park Dedication FundUse of Fund Balance$684,700 ## Grant Revenues$200,000 ## Parks and Trails Replacement FundUse of Fund Balance$1,988,822 ## Cost Participation Revenues$1,522,678 ## Community Investment FundUse of Fund Balance$1,055,307 ## Grant Revenues$436,588 ## Capital Improvement FundUse of Fund Balance$1,807,783 ## Aids & Grant Revenues$175,580 ## Transfer In Revenues$496,900 ## Tax Abatement Plan I-94 Region FundUse of Fund Balance$184,400 ## Street Reconstruction/Maintenance FundUse of Fund Balance$2,737,396 ## Grant Revenues$536,983 ## Total Capital Project Funds$11,827,137 ## Enterprise Funds: ## Water & Sewer Utility Fund (Operations & ## Capital Budget)Use of Reserves$1,265,627 ## Grant Revenues$162,107 ## Water & Sewer Utility Fund (Water ## Treatment & PFAS Projects)Use of Reserves$15,271,907 ## Grant Revenues$192,116,019 ## Storm Water Utility FundUse of Reserves$654,937 ## Grant Revenues$744,710 ## Street Lighting Utility FundUse of Reserves$37,000 ## Council Letter 26-83 April 22, 2026 Page 3 ## Sports Center FundUse of Reserves$315,000 ## Grant Revenues$4,500 ## Fund Type/FundFunding SourceAmount ## Eagle Valley Golf Course FundUse of Reserves$287,500 ## Total Enterprise Funds$210,859,307 ## 2026 Non-Budgeted Capital Project Fund: ## MSA Roadway Construction FundUse of Fund Balance$1,169,300 ## Written By:Lynn Haseleu, Assistant CFO/Budget Manager ## Approved Through:Angela Gorall, Deputy City Administrator ## Attachment:Resolution Resolution 26-45 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota Approving Various Carryovers to the 2026 Budget and Authorization for Use of Funds for the ## Municipal State Aid Roadway Construction Fund WHEREAS, several approved fund budgets included appropriation for projects or purchases that were not completed or received by the end of 2025. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to approve the following 2025 General Fund budget carryovers: ## DivisionItemAmount ## Human ResourcesProfessional Services/Technology Support & Services$ 40,000 ## AdministrationProfessional Services/Election Services /Organizational Development/Technology Support & Services 85,000 ## Community RelationsProfessional Services46,000 ## PoliceGrant Related Operational Items30,382 ## StreetsOperating Supplies-Snow-Ice Control/Professional Services-Engineering 98,800 ## Fleet ServicesTechnology Support & Services30,000 ## EngineeringProfessional Services26,000 ## PlanningProfessional Services47,900 ## InspectionsOperating Supplies/Technology Support & Services82,800 ## Parks & ForestryOperating Supplies/Professional Services/Private ## Ash Tree Removal Program/Contractual Services 547,211 ## Total$1,034,093 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue adjustments be made: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Use of Fund Balance-General Fund$1,003,711 ## Federal Grants & Aids21,382 ## State Grants & Aids9,000 ## Total$1,034,093 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to approve the following 2025 EMS Fire Fund budget carryovers: ## FundItemAmount ## EMS FireTransfer Out to Capital Improvement Fund$496,900 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue adjustment be made: Resolution 26-45 April 22, 2026 Page 2 ## Revenue Category Amount ## Use of Fund Balance-EMS Fire Fund$496,900 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to approve the following 2025 Park Dedication Fund budget carryovers: ## FundItemAmount ## Park DedicationProjects$884,700 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue adjustments be made: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Use of Fund Balance-Park Dedication Fund$684,700 ## Federal Grants & Aids200,000 ## Total$884,700 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to approve the following 2025 Parks and Trails Replacement Fund budget carryovers: ## FundItemAmount ## Parks and Trails ## Replacement ## Projects $3,511,500 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue adjustments be made: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Use of Fund Balance-Parks and Trails Replacement Fund$1,988,822 ## Local Grants & Aids 1,522,678 ## Total$3,511,500 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to approve the following 2025 Community Investment Fund budget carryovers: ## FundItemAmount ## Community ## Investment ## Central Park Project$1,491,895 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue adjustments be made: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Use of Fund Balance-Community Investment Fund$1,055,307 ## State Grants & Aids436,588 ## Total$1,491,895 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to approve the following 2025 Capital Improvement Fund budget carryovers: Resolution 26-45 April 22, 2026 Page 3 ## FundItemAmount ## Capital ImprovementCapital Improvements$ 745,700 ## Buildings & Structures391,700 ## Machinery & Equipment1,342,863 ## Total$2,480,263 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue adjustments be made: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Use of Fund Balance-Capital Improvement Fund$1,807,783 ## Federal Grants & Aids134,610 ## State Grants & Aids40,970 ## Transfer In-EMS Fire Fund496,900 ## Total$2,480,263 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to approve the following 2025 Tax Abatement I-94 Region Fund budget carryovers: ## FundItemAmount ## Tax Abatement I-94 ## RegionProjects$184,400 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue adjustment be made: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Use of Fund Balance-Tax Abatement I-94 Region Fund$184,400 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to approve the following 2025 Street Reconstruction/Maintenance Fund budget carryover. ## FundItemAmount ## Street ## Reconstruction/ ## Maintenance ## Roadway Rehab/Construction Projects$3,274,379 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue adjustment be made: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Use of Fund Balance-Street Reconstruction/Maintenance Fund$2,737,396 ## Federal Grants & Aids536,692 ## Local Grants & Aids291 ## Total$3,274,379 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to approve the following 2025 Water and Sewer Utility Fund budget carryovers. Resolution 26-45 April 22, 2026 Page 4 ## DivisionItemAmount ## WaterWater Treatment Plant/PFAS Projects$207,387,926 ## Operating Expenses119,300 ## Operating Expenses/Grant Related168,734 ## Meter Replacement Program160,200 ## Capital Outlay Projects716,300 ## SewerCapital Outlay Projects263,200 ## Total$208,815,660 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue adjustments be made: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Use of Reserves-Water & Sewer Utility Fund $16,537,534 ## Federal Grants & Aids/Capital Contributions227,549 ## State Grants & Aids/Capital Contributions192,024,470 ## Local Grants & Aids26,107 ## Total$208,815,660 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to approve the following 2025 Storm Water Utility Fund budget carryover: ## FundItemAmount ## Storm Water UtilityOperating Expenses$138,000 ## Storm Water Maintenance Projects129,100 ## Vegetation Management/Grant Related Projects912,647 ## Capital Outlay Projects219,900 ## Total$1,399,647 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue adjustments be made: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Use of Reserves-Storm Water Utility Fund$654,937 ## Federal Grants & Aids358,679 ## Local Grants & Aids386,031 ## Total$1,399,647 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to approve the following 2025 Street Light Utility Fund budget carryover: ## FundItemAmount ## Street Light UtilityOperating Expenses$37,000 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue adjustments be made: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Use of Reserves-Street Light Utility Fund$37,000 Resolution 26-45 April 22, 2026 Page 5 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to approve the following 2025 Sports Center Fund budget carryover: ## FundItemAmount ## Sports CenterOperating Expenses/Grant Related$ 4,500 ## Capital Projects315,000 ## Total$319,500 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue adjustments be made: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Use of Reserves-Sports Center Fund$315,000 ## State Grants & Aids4,500 ## Total$319,500 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to approve the following 2025 Eagle Valley Golf Course (EVGC) Fund budget carryover: ## FundItemAmount ## EVGCCapital Projects$287,500 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue adjustments be made: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Use of Reserves-EVGC Fund$287,500 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota to authorize the use of the following funds: ## FundAmount ## Municipal State Aid Roadway Construction Fund$1,169,300 This Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator this 22 nd day of April 2026. ## Attest:Anne W. Burt, Mayor ## Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator(SEAL) ## 7A ## City of Woodbury, Minnesota ## Office of City Administrator ## Council Letter 26-84 April 22, 2026 ## To:The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ## From:Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator ## Subject:Consider Approval Amendment to Chapter 9 Franchises, Section 9-6 CenterPoint ## Energy Resources Corp.-Gas Franchise Fee, Schedule A ## Summary In July 2025 the City was contacted with a request from property owners at 3160 Manning Ave. to be exempted from our CenterPoint Energy franchise fee for their grain dryer operation. Due to changes implemented by CenterPoint Energy, their fees would increase from $90/year to approximately over $1,000/year. The grain dryer is only used in the month of October (sometimes in November) to dry field corn according to the property owners. Staff reviewed the details of the request, evaluated legal options, confirmed this is the only such operation in the City, and met with CenterPoint Energy. Consideration of the exemption before Council was delayed due to staff’s need to evaluate the overall financial condition of the Parks & Trails Replacement Fund and franchise fees. Essentially, if an ordinance change was to be considered staff wanted to review that no other changes to fees would be recommended. At the conclusion of such review, as part of our development of the 2027-2031 CIP, staff does not recommend any changes to franchise fees and is therefore recommending to Council consideration of this specific exemption. Property owners have been updated regarding the City’s process since their original request. Staff have worked with CenterPoint Energy on this process, and they have provided their concurrence on proposed changes. Similar exemptions have been provided by other cities due to this change. Due to notification requirements, an amended ordinance would not be effective until August 1, 2026. ## Recommendation Staff recommends Council adopt the ordinance amending Chapter 9 Franchises, Section 9-6 CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp.-Gas Franchise Fee, Schedule A. ## Fiscal Implications Providing this exemption will have a minimal impact on overall franchise fees collected. For 2025, the City collected $81,287 in fees through CenterPoint Energy and $2,409,645 through Xcel Energy. ## Council Letter 26-84 April 22, 2026 Page 2 ## Policy ## 2019-2021 City Council Strategic Initiative, Parks and Trails Replacement Plan ## City Code, Chapter 9, Franchises CenterPoint Energy, Interruptible Agricultural Grain Dryer Sales Service, Docket No. G- ## 008/GR-21-435 ## Public Process This is the first public process for this agenda item. The draft ordinance was posted on the City’s website and an InTouch notice was sent 10 days prior to the Council meeting, per standard procedures. ## Background CenterPoint Energy completed changes to their grain dryer tariff, notifying the City in July 2025. A tariff is just what they call their fee schedule for different classifications of customers. All grain dryers were moved to a new tariff that requires them to be on their system all year, even though they are only using natural gas about two months of the year. Previously they would only be active when they needed to be. However, this meant they’d have to call CenterPoint and they would have to send out a technician to physically unlock their meter for them to use gas. The new tariff allows them to be on their system for the entire year and is beneficial for both grain dryers and CenterPoint. Owners don’t have to worry about planning ahead and calling CenterPoint and they don’t have to send someone out to unlock their meter. Many of CenterPoint Commercial/Industrial customers take service under the CenterPoint Interruptible Large Volume Dual Fuel (LVDF) and Small Volume Dual Fuel (SVDF) tariffs: Large Volume Dual Fuel (LVDF) tariff - $1,250/mo. basic + $18/mo. telemetry charge (plus gas, delivery, etc.) Small Volume Dual Fuel (SVDF) tariff - $80/mo. basic charge + $18/mo. telemetry charge (plus gas, delivery, etc.) Grain dryers previously took service under SVDF and LVDF tariffs but only paid the (above) applicable monthly basic fee + telemetry charge for the months they consumed gas (typically two months), then they were physically locked. For the remaining 10 months they were not active/not consuming gas on the system they paid $0/mo. On February 1, 2023, CenterPoint offered a new agricultural grain dryer tariff and it was determined that all grain dryers must take service under this new tariff. Both CenterPoint and grain dryer customers benefited from the tariff requiring grain dryers be active on the system for all 12 months. Grain dryer customers now will take service under this Interruptible Agricultural Grain Dryer Sales ## Service Tariff: Small Volume – When consuming natural gas = $80/mo. basic chg. + $18/mo. telemetry chg. (typically 2 months) When they consume < 10 therms natural gas = $17/mo. basic chg. + $0 telemetry chg. (typically 10 months). ## Council Letter 26-84 April 22, 2026 Page 3 Large Volume – When consuming natural gas = $1250/mo. + $18/mo. telemetry (again typically 2 months) When they consume <10 therms natural gas $17/mo. basic chg. + $0 telemetry chg. (typically 10 months). Unfortunately, requiring grain dryer accounts to be active all 12 months had the unintended consequence of some grain dryer customers incurring City franchise fees for all 12 months. CenterPoint understood this issue and has been working with cities to exempt grain dryers, if desired. As the City received a direct request from the property owners of a grain dryer operation for an exemption, consideration is being provided to City Council. ## Written By:Angela Gorall, Deputy City Administrator ## Approved Through:Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator ## Attachment:1. Ordinance (red-lined) 2. Ordinance (final) 1 ## CITY OF WOODBURY ## WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA ## ORDINANCE NO. 2077 An Ordinance of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota Amending Chapter 9 Franchises, ## Section 9-6 CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp.-Gas Franchise Fee, Schedule A ## THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODBURY, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA DOES ORDTAIN: The City of Woodbury Municipal Code Chapter 9 - Franchises, Section 9-6 – CenterPoint Energy Resources ## Corp. - Gas Franchise Fee, Schedule A is hereby amended: ## SCHEDULE A ## Franchise Fee Rates: ## Gas Utility The franchise fee shall be in an amount determined by applying the following schedule per customer premise/per month based on metered service to customers within the City: ClassAmount per month Residential$ 1.75 Com-A Less than 1,500 therms/yr$ 10.00 Com/Ind B 1,500 > or < 5,000 therms/yr$100.00 Com/Ind C > 5,000 therms/yr$100.00 ## Small Volume Duel Fuel A < 120,000 therms/yr$ 90.00 SVDF B > 120,000 therms/yr$ 90.00 ## Large Volume Firm & Duel Fuel > 1,999 therms Peak Day$ 55.00 Exemption. Effective August 1, 2026, agricultural grain dryer customers in all customer classifications shall be exempt from payment of this fee. Franchise fees are submitted to the City on a quarterly basis as follows: January – March collections due by April 30. April – June collections due by July 31. July – September collections due by October 31. October – December collections due by January 31. 2 This Ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator this 22 nd day of April, 2026. ## Attest:Anne W. Burt, Mayor ## Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator(SEAL) 1 ## CITY OF WOODBURY ## WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA ## ORDINANCE NO. 2077 An Ordinance of the City of Woodbury, Washington County, Minnesota Amending Chapter 9 Franchises, ## Section 9-6 CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp.-Gas Franchise Fee, Schedule A ## THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODBURY, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA DOES ORDTAIN: The City of Woodbury Municipal Code Chapter 9 - Franchises, Section 9-6 – CenterPoint Energy Resources ## Corp. - Gas Franchise Fee, Schedule A is hereby amended: ## SCHEDULE A ## Franchise Fee Rates: ## Gas Utility The franchise fee shall be in an amount determined by applying the following schedule per customer premise/per month based on metered service to customers within the City: ClassAmount per month Residential$ 1.75 Com-A Less than 1,500 therms/yr$ 10.00 Com/Ind B 1,500 > or < 5,000 therms/yr$100.00 Com/Ind C > 5,000 therms/yr$100.00 ## Small Volume Duel Fuel A < 120,000 therms/yr$ 90.00 SVDF B > 120,000 therms/yr$ 90.00 ## Large Volume Firm & Duel Fuel > 1,999 therms Peak Day$ 55.00 Exemption. Effective August 1, 2026, agricultural grain dryer customers in all customer classifications shall be exempt from payment of this fee. Franchise fees are submitted to the City on a quarterly basis as follows: January – March collections due by April 30. April – June collections due by July 31. July – September collections due by October 31. October – December collections due by January 31. 2 This Ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator this 22 nd day of April, 2026. ## Attest:Anne W. Burt, Mayor ## Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator(SEAL) ## 7B ## City of Woodbury, Minnesota ## Office of City Administrator ## Council Letter 26-85 April 22, 2026 ## To:The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ## From:Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator ## Subject:Consider Approval of Special Assessments for 2026 Pavement Rehabilitation ## Project – Woodlane Drive ## Summary Preliminary reports for the project were prepared which found the project to be necessary, cost effective and feasible and Council ordered the project. ## Recommendation Staff recommends Council adopt the attached resolution approving the special assessments for the 2026 Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Woodlane Drive. ## Fiscal Implications Total cost of the project is $ 7,106,683.00. Funding for the project is as follows: Special Assessments15 years 4.5%$ 797,967.00 ## Intergovernmental Grants-Federal1,000,000.00 ## Parks and Trails Replacement Fund769,684.00 ## Water and Sewer Utility Fund766,296.00 ## Storm Water Utility Fund466,668.00 ## Street Reconstruction/Maintenance Fund 3,306,068.00 ## Total$7,106,683.00 ## Policy The assessment term of 15 years is based on the Roadway Construction and Rehabilitation policy and the estimated net interest rate on the bonds as recommended by the City’s Financial Advisor. Notice of the public hearing on assessments was published in the St. Paul Pioneer Press and mailed to affected property owners as required by State Statue 429. ## Public Process 01/08/25 Council workshop meeting 02/26/25 Authorized preparation of preliminary report ## Council Letter 26–85 April 22, 2026 Page 2 05/01/25 Neighborhood meeting No. 1 – Pre-Public Hearing 06/25/25 Public Improvement Hearing: Approve preliminary report, order project, consultant selection, authorize preparation of plans and specification ## 03/17/26 Neighborhood Meeting No. 2 – Pre-Assessment Hearing 04/03/26 Mailed Notice of Public Hearing on Assessments to all property owners proposed to be assessed 04/05/26 Notice of Public Hearing on Assessments published in St. Paul Pioneer Press 04/22/26 City Council assessment hearing and award of contract ## Background As part of the City’s ongoing pavement management program, roadway rehabilitation projects are performed annually to provide a cost-effective means of extending the life expectancy of the City street system. The scope of the project includes removal and replacement of existing pavement, spot curb replacement, full curb replacement in limited areas to address drainage issues, some trail and pedestrian safety improvements, and storm water improvements. This project is a public improvement and the necessary steps in the Section 429 process have been taken. The notice of special assessment hearing was published and sent to the individual homeowners. The hearing notice contained the notification that stated persons 65 years of age or older or retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability may apply to the City Council for deferment of the assessment. On December 9, 2025, City staff was approached by resident Dean Duffy of 2750 Woodlane Drive to receive improvements with the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project. The proposal involves constructing a water and sanitary service from Woodlane Drive to the adjacent property line. This improvement allows the resident to connect private services to the City’s water and sanitary sewer system due to a failing septic system and private well. Staff reviewed the request and found it possible to include in the project. A petition was signed and delivered to staff on March 25,2026. This property is to be added to the assessment roll for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project. Staff recommends including the property at 2750 Woodlane Drive to the assessment roll. ## Written By:Kolten Espinosa, Engineering Project Coordinator ## Melinda Hampton, Accountant I ## Approved Through:Mike Hejna, Assistant City Engineer ## Attachment:Resolution Resolution 26-46 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota Approving the Special Assessments for the 2026 Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Woodlane Drive WHEREAS, the City desires to perform roadway rehabilitation for the 2026 Roadway ## Rehabilitation Project – Woodlane Drive; and WHEREAS, on June 25, 2025, the City held a public improvement hearing on the 2026 Road Rehabilitation Project – Woodlane Drive and ordered the project; and WHEREAS, the City has followed the necessary steps in the Section 429 process and desires to assess the cost of said improvements to all benefited properties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota as follows: 1.The City Accountant I with the assistance of the City consulting engineer has calculated the amount proper and necessary to be specially assessed for improvements against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land affected thereby upon the basis of benefits, without regard to cash valuation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Annotated, Section 429, and notice has been duly published and mailed, as required by law, that this Council would meet to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, and to amend said proposed assessments as might be necessary, and said proposed assessment roll has at all times since its filing been open for public inspection, and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any to such proposed assessments. 2.This Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented and being fully advised in the premises, finds that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the proposed assessment roll was and is specially benefited by the construction of said improvement in not less than the amount of the assessment set opposite the description of each lot, piece and parcel of land respectively, and that such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein described. 3.The proposed assessment roll is hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper special assessment for all lots, blocks, outlots, pieces and parcels of land for the improvements as follows: A.For Roadway Rehabilitation in the amount of $787,972.00 as spread by Roll No. 7581471 together with interest at the rate of four and five-tenths’ percent (4.50%) per annum accruing on the full amount thereof from time to time unpaid shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon such parcel and all thereof. In the event that the interest rate at the time of bonding has risen above this rate the City of Woodbury has the authority to reassess at a higher rate to meet the debt service obligation. The owners shall be notified by mail of any proposed change in the interest rate, from those contained in the notice of Resolution 26–46 April 22, 2026 Page 2 the original assessment. The total amount of each such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments, extending over a period of fifteen years The first with interest from the date hereof to December 31, 2026, to be payable with the general taxes collectible during the year 2027 and one of each of the remaining installments, together with one year’s interest on that and all other unpaid installments, to be payable with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid. 4.Prior to certification of the assessment roll to the County Auditor, the owner of any lot, piece, parcel or tract of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the whole of such assessment with interest accrued to the date of payment to the Treasurer of the municipality. 5.The City Accountant I shall prepare and transmit to the county auditor a certified duplicate of the assessment roll, with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the county and the county auditor shall thereafter collect said assessments in the manner provided by law. This resolution declares adequacy of petition and ordering the preparation of report WHEREAS, a certain petition requesting an improvement of 2750 Woodlane Drive, Woodbury Minnesota, 55125, PID# 18.028.21.44.0005, (“2750 Woodland Drive”) was provided on March 25, 2026; and WHEREAS, in the petition requesting an improvement of 2750 Woodlane Drive, the owner waived objection to any irregularity with regard to said improvement assessments and any claim that the amount thereof levied against owner’s property is excessive, together with all rights to appeal in the courts and hereby release the City, its officers, agents and employees, from any and all liability related to or arising out of the levying of said assessment; and WHEREAS, said improvement was requested after the Public Improvement Hearing held on June 25, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City desires to assess the cost of said improvements to 2750 Woodlane Drive is included and include to the assessment roll for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road ## to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project; and WHEREAS, a fee of $2,498.75 was received by the property owners of 2750 Woodlane Drive to finance the final design, bidding procedures, and construction services for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution 2025-133 passed by Council June 25, 2025, the Council directed the City Engineer to prepare construction plans and specifications for the Woodlane ## Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation; and WHEREAS, sealed bids were received and tabulated on March 10, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project; and Resolution 26–46 April 22, 2026 Page 3 WHEREAS, the apparent low responsive and responsible bid was received from McNamara Contracting at their total base bid price of $5,687,344.06. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota as follows: 1.A certain petition requesting the improvement filed with the Council March 25, 2026, is hereby declared to be signed by all owners of property affected thereby. This declaration is made in conformity to Minn. Stat. § 429.035. 2.Such improvement petitioned for by the property owners of 2750 Woodland Drive is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted on the 22 nd day of April 2026. 3.The portion of the cost of such improvement petitioned for by the property owners of 2750 Woodland Drive to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $12,493.75 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $9,995.00. 4.Assessments petitioned by the property owners of 2750 Woodland Drive shall be payable in full within 30 days of approval or in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years and shall bear interest at the rate of 4.5% per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. This resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator this 22 nd day of April, 2026. ## Attest: Anne W. Burt, Mayor ## Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator(SEAL) ## 8A ## City of Woodbury, Minnesota ## Office of City Administrator ## Council Letter 26-86 April 22, 2026 ## To:The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ## From:Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator Subject:Consider Approval of Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement ## Rehabilitation Project; Award Contract; Amend Budget; Consultant Selection for ## Construction Administration Services ## Summary In order to provide a safe and efficient transportation system, the City is proposing to convert Woodlane Drive between Newbury Road and Wooddale Drive from a four-lane roadway to a three- lane roadway with two-way center left turn lanes with a combination of roadway rehabilitation and restriping. These types of projects have been shown to reduce crashes, reduce vehicle speeds, and create a more accessible road for all users with no significant impact to vehicle capacity. In 2023, the City was awarded a Highway Safety improvement Program (HSIP) grant which will contribute approximately $1,000,000 to the project. The proposed project includes approximately 2.2 miles of collector roadway along the Woodlane Drive corridor as shown on the attached map. On June 25, 2025, Council held a Public Improvement Hearing for the current project scope, approved the preliminary report, ordered the project, authorized preparation of the plans and specifications, acquisition, and if necessary, condemnation of easements. Bids for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project were opened on March 10, 2026. A total of three responsible bids were received ranging from $5,687,344.06 to $6,254,748.03. The lowest responsible bidder was McNamara Contracting. To proceed with the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project, the Council is requested to hold the assessment hearing, award the construction contract, amend the 2026 Adopted Budget, and approve execution of a Letter of Engagement (LOE) for professional construction administration services with SEH, Inc., in the amount of $662,900. ## Recommendation Staff recommends Council adopt the attached resolution awarding the construction contract to McNamara Contracting in the amount of $5,687,344.06 for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project and authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to sign said contract, amending the 2026 Adopted Annual Budget, and authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to execute a professional engineering services agreement with SEH, Inc., in the ## Council Letter 26-86 April 22, 2026 Page 2 amount of $662,900 for construction administration services for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project. ## Fiscal Implications The City was awarded funds in the amount of $1,000,000 from the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) with a required match of City funds in the amount of $100,000 (10%). The 2026 Adopted Budget includes funds in the amount of $7,440,000 for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project. Sufficient funds are available for the project as shown below: ## Estimated Funding ## Funding Sources 2026 Adopted ## Budget ## Project Costs ## Based on Low ## Based Bid 2026 Budget ## Amendment ## Increase/(Decrease) ## Street ## Reconstruction/Maintenance ## Fund $2,920,000$3,306,068$386,068 ## Special Assessments$1,140,000$797,967$(342,033) ## Intergovernmental Grant - ## Federal $1,000,000$1,000,000$0 ## Parks and Trails ## Replacement Fund $930,000$769,684$(160,316) ## Water and Sewer Utility Fund$1,100,000$766,296$(333,704) ## Storm Water Utility Fund$350,000$466,668$116,668 ## Total$7,440,000$7,106,683$(333,317) Amendments to the 2026 Adopted Annual Budget and authorization to transfer funds are recommended as shown in the table above to adjust for the project costs based on low bid results. ## Policy The Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project follows the procedures set by Minnesota State Statutes regarding competitive bidding and special assessments and State Aid standards. ## Public Process The anticipated project schedule for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project is as follows: ## Corridor Study Open House No. 1July 17, 2024 ## Pop-up Event – Woodbury DaysAugust 23, 2024 ## Corridor Study Open House No. 2October 8, 2024 ## Council Workshop MeetingJanuary 8, 2025 ## Authorize Preparation of Preliminary ReportsFebruary 26, 2025 ## Neighborhood Meeting Open House No. 1May 1, 2025 ## Council Letter 26-86 April 22, 2026 Page 3 ## Approve Preliminary Report, Public Improvement Hearing and Order ## Project; Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications June 11, 2025 June 25, 2025 Open BidsMarch 10, 2026 ## Neighborhood Meeting Open House No. 2March 17, 2026 ## Assessment Hearing, Award Contract, Amend Budget, Consultant ## Selection for Construction Administration Services April 22, 2026 ## Neighborhood Meeting No. 3 – Pre-constructionMay 2026 ## Begin Construction May/June 2026 ## End ConstructionAugust 2026 ## Background The City applied for a federal grant within the Highway Safety improvement Program (HSIP) category along Woodlane Drive, reconfiguring travel lanes from the existing four-lane to a three-lane configuration in 2022. The City has been systematically reconfiguring its four-lane undivided roadways through these restriping projects to improve safety. Poor existing pavement conditions, aging public utilities, inadequate storm sewer infrastructure and rising crash rates have been main drivers for the City to evaluate the needs in the corridor. In 2023, the City was awarded Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant funding for this project to the amount of $1,000,000 for these improvements. On October 23, 2024, the City authorized acceptance of the HSIP grant and execution of agreements with for Woodlane Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Project. ## Written By:Kolten Espinosa, Engineering Project Coordinator ## Approved Through:Tony Kutzke, City Engineer/Assistant Engineering Director ## Chris Hartzell, Engineering Director ## Attachment:Resolution ## Council Letter 26-86 April 22, 2026 Page 4 Resolution 26-47 Resolution of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota Awarding the Construction Contract to McNamara Contracting in the Amount of $5,687,344.06 for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project and Authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to Sign Said Contract, Amending the 2026 Adopted Annual Budget, and Authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to Execute a Professional Engineering Services Agreement with SEH, Inc., in the Amount of $662,900 for Construction Administration Services for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement ## Rehabilitation Project WHEREAS, sealed bids for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project were received and opened on March 10, 2026; and WHEREAS, McNamara Contracting submitted the lowest responsive and responsible bid in the amount of $5,687,344.06; and WHEREAS, by Resolution 2025-133 adopted June 25, 2025, the Council directed preparation of plans and specifications for the project; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared, reviewed, approved, and filed the plans and specifications with the City Clerk in accordance with Minn. Stat. 429.041; and WHEREAS, notice to bidders was properly advertised for the required 21-day period prior to bid opening; and WHEREAS, the City desires to complete roadway rehabilitation and retain engineering consulting services for the project; and WHEREAS, the City has evaluated qualifications and proposals from its municipal engineering pool and determined that SEH, Inc. best meets the City’s needs; and WHEREAS, project funding was included in the 2026 Adopted Budget and will be updated to reflect final costs and contingencies; and WHEREAS, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to McNamara Contracting in the amount of $5,687,344.06 for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project, authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to execute the contract, amending the 2026 Adopted Annual Budget, and authorizing the execution of a professional engineering services agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodbury, ## Washington County, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the bid of McNamara Contracting in the amount of $5,687,344.06 total base bid for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project is the lowest responsive bid. Resolution 26-47 April 22, 2026 Page 2 2. That a contract to perform said work is awarded to McNamara Contracting and that the Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder. 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to return the deposit made for said bids, except the deposit of the successful bidder which shall be retained until a contract has been signed. 4. Authorization is given to enter into a contract with SEH, Inc. for engineering professional consulting services for the Woodlane Drive (Bailey Road to Wooddale Drive) Pavement Rehabilitation Project. 5. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized to execute the above consultant contract. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue increases/(decreases) be made to the 2026 Street Reconstruction/Maintenance Fund Budget: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Special Assessments-New Projects 499-30-339-00000-410010-000-$(342,033) ## Transfer In (Parks and Trails Replacement Fund) 499-00-000-00000-495402-000-$(160,316) ## Transfer In (Water and Sewer Utility Fund) 499-00-000-00000-495601-000-$(333,704) ## Transfer in (Storm Water Utility Fund) 499-00-000-000000-495625-000-$116,668 ## Use of Fund Balance$386,068 $(333,317) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following expenditure decrease be made to the ## 2026 Street Reconstruction/Maintenance Fund Budget: ## Expenditure CategoryAmount ## Street Reconstruction/Maintenance Projects 499-30-339-00000-550015-999-$(333,317) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue decrease be made to the 2026 ## Parks and Trails Replacement Fund Budget: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Use of Fund Balance$(160,316) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following expenditure decrease be made to the ## 2026 Parks and Trails Replacement Fund Budget: ## Expenditure CategoryAmount ## Transfer Out (Street Reconstruction/Maintenance Fund) 402-00-000-00000-570499-000-$(160,316) Resolution 26-47 April 22, 2026 Page 3 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue decrease be made to the 2026 ## Water and Sewer Utility Fund Budget: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Use of Reserves$(333,704) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following expense decrease be made to the 2026 ## Water and Sewer Utility Fund Budget: ## Expenditure CategoryAmount ## Transfer Out (Street Reconstruction/Maintenance Fund) 601-60-675-00000-570499-000- (Water Division)$(166,852) 601-60-685-00000-570499-000- (Sewer Division)$(166,852) $(333,704) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following revenue increase be made to the 2026 ## Storm Water Utility Fund Budget: ## Revenue CategoryAmount ## Use of Reserves$116,668 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following expense increase be made to the 2026 ## Storm Water Utility Fund Budget: ## Expenditure CategoryAmount ## Transfer Out (Street Reconstruction/Maintenance Fund) 625-00-000-00000-570499-000- $116,668 This Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator this 22 nd day of April, 2026. ## Attest:Anne W. Burt, Mayor ## Jeffrey J. Dahl, City Administrator(SEAL)