We've got seven work plan items for the next two years. Three of those seven are continuations of existing programs that we have in place, but I'll walk you through kind of the four net new ones that are worthy of discussion.

The anti idling is actually what triggered our thoughts around the school. So we anybody who's sat by old you or normal day on a school drop off morning. It is around the block and we think that needs to change.

Thanks for including your students. Really empowering for them. And thank you guys for giving us sophomore students. And because we now have people that are more engaged at a younger age and not seniors that are kind of checking out a little bit earlier.

I like that tree recognition campaign. I was really home on the first year. Yeah. People seem to really be. We just got a meeting with a couple of residents. The governor residents here this week and they were really enthusiastic about including the tree canopy.

Certainly not even anything ready for the parking lot. But I think there's growing interest in those and cities are installing one. So we'll bring it up at one of our upcoming meetings and then we can look into it.

Item number one, it's item number one. I think every year I've been a part of the commission, which is going on 10 years. That's just reviewing the land use application. So this occurs as you know during our bi-monthly meetings.

The zoning and subdivision ordinance update. So this is on the heels of the audit that was completed in 2024. And the update will. It's just it's aiming to better align our code with our comp plan.

This came up at our last council meeting when we approve the variance to the parking ordinance for. And I'm just wondering, are we going to try to rework that or get that as an item that is kind of an ASAP thing since we approved a project that is actually. Not compliant with our code.

We do intend to put something together. Staff wise, I was asked to go through planning commission, but we see that as kind of separate from this big process. So we will hope to get you something probably early next year.

One of the things that wouldn't necessarily go on the code, but would be nice to go along with this is kind of a. Check sheet for people to understand. The difference between getting a building permit by the code and applying for a P.D.

At some point in time in that it would be nice to have someone to go to all the different commissions and just, you know, as a planning commissioner say this is how we're looking at it. And staff can do this too. But just to have that face because I remember when I was on the energy and environment commission. We worked on our complex, but we never really got the sense of how it fell into the overall thing.

So for the last two years, we've dodged some serious limitations of local control. Look at the reaction of local control on landings. We've had some really good allies over there in the legislature.

So that's one thing. The second thing is administrative approvals on projects that otherwise comply with the code. So a streamline that process, some way, somehow, you guys have talked about that already.

Three is by right or by mandate the conversion of commercial industrial property to a low multifamily use. And of course, if you don't like it, if it's. By my mandate, my right for a city to be able to maybe.

One of the big problems was over in Kaggill was that we don't have sewer capacity for a multi family. So what do you do in a situation where I think we could argue with the legislature. You can't mandate this because we can't do it. You can't just we don't have the infrastructure to pass.

So those are kind of the things that are hanging fire and it's all coming up in the context of housing affordability. And I think if we can help our group 19 cities lead the way on that idea. I'm really thinking about that.

A little over a year ago, in April of 2024, the federal register published the DOJ's final ruling on this updating its regulations for title two of the act. And that act has specific requirements about how to ensure that our digital content is accessible.

Most, the state has told us, they told us as recently as today at our annual communicators conference, that a ramp up for this usually takes two to three years. We have been working on this this year. So by the time April rolls around, it won't even be a two full years.

So digital accessibility is not just the responsibility of the communications department. It's not the responsibility of the administration department. It's not your responsibility. It's all of our responsibility.

We have thousands, thousands of documents and pages on our websites. Just think of one of your council packets, right? How many pages of attachments are in those? And that's kind of what Ari was getting at. What do we want to continue to include in the council packet because it'll have to be compliant?

If you ever pull up a PDF on your phone, you're not only scrolling up and down, you have to scroll left and right. It's not a good user experience. It would be better for you to have a mobile view that is responsive to the size of your device.

We deal with that every day with our employee population. We have several individuals that are visually impaired, some that are deaf, and we have to provide documentation so that they have access to it. And that does include the ability for them to be able to use a digital device.

I do think it's awesome what you're doing. The only other question I have is do we have data governance process in place because if we don't, we should think about how to structure that so that as your documents change or people have documentation that they want to follow in the process, to be online or what have you, they really ought to have to go someplace that controls.

There's no there's no recommendation from staff on it. We've just observed as you have, you've had a lot of long one minute. But knowing that if someone doesn't feel comfortable coming out at night to come to City Hall and wait to testify. I think it's important they have that option.

I think that then that the public doesn't hear what the person is saying. And so they're not part of the public conversation.

We actually paid for a service that was costing us tens of thousands of dollars a year. And now I am your operator or Lauren is the planning commission operator. So it's just it's just stat time at this point.