Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority Meeting / May 16, 2024
Edina approves grants for French creperie, raises equity concerns
Streamlined Grant Program for Ocreperie (O'Crep) at 44th and France
TIF District Geographic Boundaries and Public Hearing Concerns
5146 Eden Avenue Housing Development RFP Strategy
Commissioner Feedback on Eden Avenue Development Vision
Business Subsidy Policy Update
Tax Increment Financing District Extension Legislation
Edina Chamber of Commerce Innovation Lab Loan Restructuring
Full Document Analysis
Votes (6)
Grant Agreement Approval - O'Crep LLC (Ocreperie Tenant)
Dissent: Commissioner Risser expressed concerns about TIF allocation patterns and the lack of public hearings for unallocated TIF fund decisions, but did not vote against the grant. She stated: 'I um conflicted on this you know I I think um you know on the one hand this is a wonderful project but what I'm concerned about is the way that we have been using Tiff the way we have been using unallocated monies and you know not thinking about the impact to the source where the Tiff Revenue came from.' She indicated uncertainty about whether to abstain or vote negatively but ultimately did not dissent from the recorded vote.
Moved by Commissioner Jackson [~01:35:00] · Seconded by Commissioner Pierce [~01:35:00]
Manager Neindorf presented the streamlined grant agreement for O'Crep LLC to support reoccupancy of the former Caribou Coffee space at 4400 Sunnyside Avenue South. The project involves ADA accessibility improvements (front door, windows, ramp compliance) and energy efficiency upgrades, with an estimated cost of $18,000. Tenant Claire Coras, originally from Brittany, France, explained her passion for authentic crepes and her existing successful partnership with Minneapolis Cider Company. She described unexpected compliance challenges discovered during the permitting process, including SACC (Stormwater Abatement and Capture Charge) obligations of approximately $118,000 and extensive ADA requirements. The grant would cover these improvements and create approximately 6 new jobs. Commissioners discussed the reimbursement structure (businesses must pay contractors first, then submit documentation for reimbursement) and the importance of transparency with public funds. Commissioner Jackson asked about green business recognition opportunities; Manager Neindorf agreed to forward information to grantees. Commissioner Risser expressed concerns about TIF fund allocation patterns favoring Northeast Edina over Southeast Edina (the source of most TIF revenues) but did not vote against the project.
Grant Agreement Approval - Arbor Sunnyside Properties LLC (Landlord/Parking Lot)
Dissent: Commissioner Risser voted against this grant. The transcript records: 'uh motion is approved 4 to one um Grant agreement with Arbor Sunnyside Properties LLC is approved.' Risser's dissent appears to reflect her broader concerns about TIF allocation patterns and geographic equity, as expressed during the O'Crep discussion.
Moved by Commissioner Risser [~01:40:00] · Seconded by Commissioner Pierce [~01:40:00]
Manager Neindorf presented the streamlined grant agreement with Arbor Sunnyside Properties LLC (building owner Steve Young) to fund rear parking lot reconstruction. The project addresses an 8-inch step from the parking lot to the back doors of all tenant spaces, creating accessibility barriers. The estimated cost is approximately $40,000; the HRA grant would cover up to $24,000 (50% of costs). While the parking lot work itself does not directly create jobs, it is necessary infrastructure for the O'Crep tenant's new business. The work must be completed within one year per grant terms but timing has not been finalized. Building owner Steve Young explained that the parking lot reconstruction would benefit all tenants in the building by eliminating the step and improving grading. Commissioner Uland asked clarifying questions about the extent of the work (whether it would address accessibility issues for other tenants like Dick's Barbers and The Running Store). Young confirmed the work would benefit the entire building's rear access.
5146 Eden Avenue Housing Development RFP Strategy - Discussion and Feedback
Dissent: No dissent recorded; this was a discussion item. However, Commissioner Jackson expressed significant concerns about the affordability mix and site design, and Commissioner Pierce expressed low confidence in the project's viability. Chair Risser suggested the city should remain open to alternative uses beyond housing.
Manager Neindorf presented a comprehensive RFP strategy for the former public works site at 5146 Eden Avenue, targeting a mixed-use development with town homes, potential multifamily housing, a full-service restaurant (Jester Concepts), public green space, and shared parking. The RFP will be released by end of May 2024, with developer selection targeted for fall 2024 and project completion in phases during 2026-2027. The proposed affordability mix includes 10% of units at 80% AMI (Area Median Income), 40% at 120% AMI, and 50% at market rate, with long-term affordability protections via limited-equity models. Commissioners provided extensive feedback on multiple aspects: (1) Affordability concerns: Commissioner Jackson strongly opposed 50% market-rate units at million-dollar price points, advocating for greater affordability focus and questioning whether the market-rate component should be included at all. (2) Site design and campus feel: Commissioner Jackson criticized the renderings as 'chunky' and lacking the unified 'campus' feel that would allow flow between green space and housing. She suggested the Planning Commission would not approve the current design. (3) Flexibility and creativity: Chair Risser emphasized that the RFP should not overly constrain developer creativity, referencing past successes (e.g., 49th and A2 Street project) where open-ended RFPs yielded unexpected innovative proposals. (4) Alternative uses: Chair Risser suggested the city should remain open to non-housing uses, such as community gathering spaces (curling rinks, brew pubs, comedy clubs) that might activate the street and generate foot traffic. (5) Affordability depth: Commissioner Agno suggested targeting even deeper affordability (below 60% AMI) and creating mixed-income neighborhoods rather than concentrating affordable units. (6) Price point clarity: Commissioner Pierce emphasized the need to clarify that 'market rate' means median-priced homes (~$660K), not luxury homes (~$1.2M), and suggested developers should be allowed to propose creative alternatives outside the RFP parameters. (7) Housing type flexibility: Commissioner Pierce suggested the city should be open to all-townhouse developments if they meet affordability and design goals, rather than requiring multifamily components. (8) HOA concerns: Commissioner Agno noted that townhouse developments with minimal amenities can still have high HOA fees ($900/month) and expressed interest in exploring HOA-free models. (9) Sustainability and accessibility: Commissioner Agno emphasized the importance of energy efficiency, handicapped accessibility, and smaller architectural footprints. (10) Confidence and timeline: Commissioner Pierce expressed low confidence that the site will be developed given past project failures and suggested the city should be open to alternative uses. Manager Neindorf acknowledged that if the city asks developers to provide community gathering spaces, they will likely request city bonding and operating funding, which Chair Risser firmly opposed due to existing debt obligations (fire stations, Braemar clubhouse, pool updates). No formal vote was taken on this item; it was presented for discussion and feedback to inform the RFP development.
Business Subsidy Policy Update - Information Item
Executive Director announced that the city's 2011 Business Subsidy Policy will be updated to reflect changes in state law and current economic conditions. The policy update will begin with a public hearing at the City Council level, followed by HRA review. Staff will provide definitions of business subsidies and suggested public purposes to guide future decisions. No specific projects are currently planned for subsidy support, but the door remains open for future opportunities. Commissioner Risser requested that the updated policy include clear definitions of what constitutes a business subsidy and the different levels that trigger various requirements, as well as a list of suggested public purposes to help the public understand the scope of potential subsidies.
Tax Increment Financing District Extension Legislation - Information Item
Manager Neindorf reported that both the Minnesota House and Senate have adopted the city's requested language to extend the 70th and France TIF District and 72nd and France #2 TIF District timelines. This special legislation addresses project delays caused by economic changes since the districts' approval 2.5 years ago. The legislation is expected to be signed by the governor and will require subsequent approval from the city council, HRA, school district, and county. Eleven cities statewide are seeking similar TIF timeline extensions, indicating this is a common issue in the current economic environment. The extension will provide flexibility for developments to start and be completed within the extended timeline.
Edina Chamber of Commerce Innovation Lab Loan Restructuring - Information Item
Executive Director provided an update on the HRA's 2022 loan of $610,000 to the Edina Chamber of Commerce for physical improvements to house both the Chamber and the Innovation Lab. The Innovation Lab has not generated sufficient income to service the debt as originally planned, despite some success. The Chamber Board is exploring restructuring the Innovation Lab as a B-Corp (Benefit Corporation) to create additional private-sector income streams and improve financial sustainability. The HRA will need to consider loan restructuring proposals this summer. One payment has been made; a second payment is due in July 2024. Up to $250,000 in loan forgiveness is available if the Chamber meets specified milestones related to job creation and other performance metrics. The city is in good financial position due to a guarantor on the loan balance.
Notable Quotes (21)
We're not just handing out free money right so in this particular case um I met with the owner and the Landlord on a handful of occasions early in the project in the process where they thought they were running they thought they'd have their doors open already and then they ran into hurdles and challenges and more costs unexpected changes that uh were not nowhere on the radar screen that threaten to kill the project um uh there has to be a demonstrated need that without these monies the project cannot move forward and that's you know fundamental to any of our programs.
I created my business because I am passionate about crepes and they're delicious and I think everyone should have them um I when I found this opportunity here in Edina I thought this was going to be a perfect spot for me I love actually the look of the building it really reminds me of home it's an older building and I just really like how none of the space inside is conformed to you know even the angles are all different it's very difficult to build in it but it's really fun to have that charm.
So um two questions one is the reimbursement in these agreements uh is we are reimbursing the business for the cost that they've already incurred right so I I think I misread this when I was reading through it in preparation but that's how that works correct.
So southeast of Dina um to many people we when we refer to Southeast of Dina you look at that Southeastern quadrant um east of 100 South of the cross town in the HRA nomenclature there's the southeast of Redevelopment project area and that's a different Geographic boundary than we often refer to so the South Southeast Adina uh Redevelopment project area has boundaries that include um it stretches all the way west to Cahill includes the 7th and kahill District um meanders up to Grand View gets all the Grand View District goes over to Northeast Adina 50th in France 44th in France 54th in France so the language in in the official documents is not what you might look at at a traditional map.
Many of you know the building and um you know if you probably don't notice um but uh there is a a step um required fired to the backs of almost all the businesses and um you know it's it's a challenge for those who um are need um or challenge people with steps so um when uh of course the building's whole grandfathered in uh but when Bill told me about this unique opportunity to fix the problem uh for all the businesses then I started looking into it and figured out a way to make it work.
The landlord is willing at this time um uh it can't fall into the tenant budget but the landlord is willing to do it go in and repave and regrade that entire parking lot so it's not just Paving for Paving sake but it's getting rid of that 8 in Step again how hard can that be it's not hard it's just expensive and there's no rent increase there's no Revenue increase but with this program we really hope to improve the access to this entire building um focusing on this tenant space because this is where the new jobs are.
My vision for this had been affordable ownership opportunities and having 50% of them priced at market rate you know what we've seen across the street from this site um over on henerson are $ 1.2 million Town Homes $900,000 town homes that is not what I had in mind at all for this and to have 50% of them at looking at million dooll homes is way outside of what my expectations were.
I don't see anything looking even remotely like that getting through the Planning Commission um we talk about um mixed use and it's okay to have horizontal mixed use but having that big bulky building in the middle says this is not mixed use we are putting a barrier up so in the previous plan it had that feeling of you know Confluence was able to go from the park down across even into the housing a sense of green and continuity having those buildings block things off in the middle you don't feel that this is a campus this is not unified it's there's this big wall.
If you give them too many layouts to work off of they might feel constrained so I I'd look and I don't remember what we did on 49 and a Half street in terms of that RFP because we had about a half a dozen responders I remember um and all of them just dealt with that one piece of property on the north side of the street it was these other guys that came along with this idea on the left field that we really Embrace so keep that in mind I will say from having this experience over the last couple years with our Council here I don't even know if we're headed in the right direction anymore because we've got two projects stalled out on France Avenue that are housing related.
So to me there's things that we could probably think about doing again as we kind of reset what to do with this property and if uh we took two you know two-thirds of it or half of it and incorporate Adjusters in a in a brew pub or a micro brewery as part of a city project on our own land um that takes us in a totally different direction so uh but maybe the maybe the smart thing to do is go with your RFP that you work so hard on keep in mind not limiting the creativity of people uh or development companies that come along let them think about the affordability mix and then let's see if we like any of it but keep in the back of our minds that we may want to go a totally different direction.
I um I am also okay with Market um but I'm coming at it from a different perspective um I actually agree with commissioner jackon that we wouldn't want million dooll homes there right um but when I think about Market um I'm thinking median price and so if that is our median home value is 660 I I'm thinking of it that way and so I think when you described it you talked about amenities finishes to kind of manage that cost that's the way I think of it.
I think we need a balance of being more prescriptive of generalities of what we want to see and some specifics like we want ownership um we need to be clear about how we Define that so that we don't get million doll home but we get something that hits the missing middle but then I also think we should um I don't know how to do this but because I think our Paradigm is going to have to shift I'd almost be I'd be happy if um developers said well all right this meets their RFP however here's an idea of something that you might want to consider that um is marketable that maybe hits I don't know 60% or some percent of the things that we're looking for but may be totally different from any other renderings that that you have.
I I for the most part like the the spread of the numbers here um I like having market rate housing as a part of this project whether it be within the town homes and or within whatever might be at a higher scale um and I I also asking for a lot here think it would be good even if we think about the town homes to have one or two depending on the total number that is even below that um so I don't know if 50% or 60% Ami like the right phrasing but you know something that we're building and then selling at cost and Really Trying to minimize that cost um because I I like creating not just 100% affordable housing and really bringing people together um and creating that type of environment where where we have all of those levels.
I do because the second you start thinking about a community Gathering location on this site again mayor I I do get really excited um I know that it's been a really long journey but I just want to say thank you for saying that and I absolutely would be excited about potentially onethird being town homes and then rekindling some of that that idea of community Gathering um and we don't need to pack the site with with just density um if we can get some of these other things that we want.
If we ask them to give us creative ideas to build a community activity space their response would be to ask us for bonding for funding and for operating costs for that space is that what you're asking me to ask for.
That's a hard no for me we've got two fire stations to build and we don't want to I don't want to push the debt capacity um beyond what we've already got planned and we've got Brar clubhouse that needs to be updated we have a pool that needs to be updated so absolutely not I would be against bonding and operating and I I liked when we um brought in a private partner um inest your Concepts um and I'm not willing to take on more bonding for this PR.
Our City attorney reminds us that the city's business subsidy policy uh was written in 2011 and it made great sense in 2011 When It Was Written times have changed laws have changed and it's time to update that so we are in that process um so far the projects we've supported financially have all met exceptions to that policy so that's why we've been able to postpone this update um but do look for an update in the near future.
When we when you're putting this together I know you'll do this but I have to say it anyways make sure to put in definitions of what is a business subsidy and those those different levels and and what triggers it the other thing is is if we can have a list of suggested public purposes so it's not you know uh in uh all encompassing but to give people an idea of what we're talking about and we say public purposes I think that would be very helpful as well.
We extend that timeline for the developments to start and be finished uh and just to put this in context this year a is one of 11 different cities Statewide that is asking for changes like this it's not unusual a lot of other projects are in this boat we wish we weren't but we are but it looks like we might have um flexibility to extend.
The chamber board uh has been talking about how to restructure uh to provide more opportunities more income streams for the Innovation lab from the private sector and one of the strategies is to reform The Innovation lab as a bcorp as a benefit private benefit Corporation so there's some discussion going on about that at the chamber board it looks like it's going to move forward in that regard.
They've made one payment I think the payments are around 45,000 there's a loan forgiveness element to it they qualify I think presently for maybe a $90,000 reduction on the on the loan payback because of the time frame involved.
Ordinances & Resolutions (9)
State legislation-based program created 2021-2022 using $9.6M in unallocated TIF funds; includes three funding mechanisms (Streamlined Grants, Forgivable Loans, Investment Program) for business growth, investment, and job creation.
Streamlined grant agreement (up to $24,000) for ADA accessibility and energy efficiency improvements at 4400 Sunnyside Avenue South; reimbursement-based structure requiring completion within one year.
Streamlined grant agreement (up to $24,000) for rear parking lot reconstruction to eliminate accessibility barriers; covers 50% of approximately $40,000 project cost.
HRA-designated redevelopment area with expanded boundaries (beyond traditional Southeast quadrant) encompassing commercial districts including Southdale, Pentagon Park, and 44th/50th/54th and France corridors.
Forthcoming RFP for mixed-use development of former public works site; targets town homes (10% at 80% AMI, 40% at 120% AMI, 50% market-rate), potential multifamily, full-service restaurant, public green space, and shared parking; release targeted for end of May 2024.
City policy governing business subsidy decisions; scheduled for update to reflect changes in state law and economic conditions; update will include public hearing at City Council level before HRA review.
Special state legislation (adopted by House and Senate) extending timeline for 70th and France TIF District and 72nd and France #2 TIF District to address project delays; requires city council, HRA, school district, and county approval.
HRA loan of $610,000 for physical improvements to Chamber/Innovation Lab facility; includes up to $250,000 in forgiveness upon achievement of specified milestones; restructuring under consideration as Chamber explores B-Corp status.
Community planning document establishing neighborhood preference for existing building scale and aesthetic (1920s-1950s look); informs development standards for the corridor.