one of our requirements for this is that it's someone lives in the building for someone for at least half over half theyear and that's something that could be met... it couldn't be rented out. And one of our requirements within the conditional usepermit is that you can't rent out two of the areas.

I am concerned that it's owned by um St. Hill Property Holding Company's LLC. That is from what I could see that titleowner as well as the taxpayer and it is a company that specializes in managingrental properties. So, I share the concerns of that one comment saying thatthis looks as though it is a prime setup for a corporate retreat center orrental.

this is a family. This is afamily uh primary residence that they will be living in full-time. Uh thereally overall goal of the ADU is for family use uh especially for agingparents uh somewhere that they can have uh uh an accessible uh place to age nearnear their family and grandchildren.

architecturally matches the house, looks very nice. Um,I share some of Commissioner Johnson's concern about uh the ownership, but uh,as has been expressed, the u um that doesn't violate anything in the CUPrequirements. As as Commissioner Banks mentioned, it really checks all the boxes as far as meeting the requirements of the CUP.