Agenda · Meeting Calendar
Meeting CalendarAgendaWednesday, August 12, 2026
Not yet analyzed
Analyze this document to extract topics and generate news stories.
Agenda Text
## Richfield City Council Agenda
August 12, 2026 -- 4:45 PM
## Richfield Municipal Center
## Bartholomew Conference Room
## 6700 Portland Avenue South
1. Call to Order
## 2. Item Discussion
a. Preview the preliminary 2027 Budget and provide long-term financial planning update
as summarized in the Financial Management Plan (FMP). Preview proposed utility rates,
proposed City fees and the proposed 2027 Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) and 2028-
2031 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
3. Adjournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the
City Clerk at 612-861-9739.
Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the Council Chambers Agenda Packet book located by
the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City of Richfield website.
Page 1 of 220
## City Council Meeting 8/12/2026
## Agenda Section: Item Discussion
Agenda Item: 2.a.
## Report Prepared By:
## Steve McDaniel, Budget, Cash, and Debt Manager
## Department Director:
## Mary Bogie, Interim Finance Director
## Item for Consideration:
Preview the preliminary 2027 Budget and provide long-term financial planning
update as summarized in the Financial Management Plan (FMP). Preview
proposed utility rates, proposed City fees and the proposed 2027 Capital
Improvement Budget (CIB) and 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Ehlers will present a new long-term Financial Management Plan (FMP). The FMP is a
multi-year fiscal plan for all tax-supported funds. Tax-supported funds include the City's
## General Fund, Economic Development Authority General Fund, Housing and
## Redevelopment Authority General Fund, Local Option Sales Tax, Communications,
Utility Franchise Fees, Ice Arena, Swimming Pool, Capital Improvements, Parks Capital,
Central Garage, Information Technology, Self Insurance, Building Services, and all Debt
Service Funds. The presentation will include an overview on some of these tax-
supported funds.
Staff will present a high-level overview of the preliminary budget, utility rates and fee
increases in order to seek council feedback in finalizing the proposed 2026 Revised and
2027 Proposed budgets, which will be presented in more detail on August 25.
Staff is also seeking feedback on the proposed 2027 CIB and 2028-2031 CIP. Both the
operating and capital budgets will determine the preliminary levy, which is scheduled to
be considered by City Council on September 22, 2026.
The City must certify its preliminary property tax levy for payable year 2027 to the
County Auditor and set a date for its Truth in Taxation public meeting on or before
September 30, 2026. Once the preliminary levy is approved, it may be further reduced
at a later City Council meeting, but it legally cannot be increased over the preliminary
approved amount.
City Council is scheduled to conduct a Truth in Taxation hearing on December 8, 2026,
and consider the adoption of the final budget and levy on December 8, 2026.
## RECOMMENDED ACTION
## HISTORICAL CONTEXT
Page 2 of 220
## EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
## POLICIES (RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, STATUTES, ETC.)
## CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES
The 2026 Revised and 2027 Proposed budgets are still being developed. City staff will
present the budgets in more detail on August 25, 2026.
## FINANCIAL IMPACT
The 2026 Revised and 2027 Proposed budgets are the financial plan for the City for
funding City services and programs. The FMP is a comprehensive tool that shows the
financial forecast of future tax levies, general fund operations, future debt issuance, and
can show the big picture.
Proposed utility rates and City fees impact the financial operations of the utility funds,
general fund and special revenue funds.
The 2027 CIB and the 2028-2031 CIP is a plan of proposed future capital projects.
## LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
## ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S)
## ATTACHMENTS
1. 08-12-2026 Work Session updated
2. 2027CIB-2028-2031CIP - 08.12.2026 Work Session
## 3. XX-XX DRAFT Bill No. 2026-XX Appendix D
4. 2026-XX-XX Draft Resolution XXXXX Appendix D 2027 License Permit and Misc
Fees - Update 1
5. Ehlers Presentation - Richfield FMP - 8-12-2026 - FINAL (004)
6. FMP Summary Pages - 2026 Financial Management Plan - Richfield MN (003)
Page 3 of 220
## 2027 Budget Preview
Page 4 of 220
## Timetable and Key Events
•August 12, 2026:Tonight – 2027 Budget Preview,
## Financial Management Plan (FMP), Utility Rates &
## City Fees, 2027 CIB/2028-2031 CIP
•August 25, 2026: Budget Work Session-
departments present theirbudgets
•September 22, 2026:Adopt preliminary tax levy
•December 8, 2026:Truth in Taxation meeting
•December 8, 2026:Certify final levy, adopt Budget
## & CIB/CIP
Page 5 of 220
## Budget Update
• Labor force participation continues to remain below
pre-pandemic levels.
• Cost of living increase at3%, average step increase
at 2.75%, and average negotiated contract step
increases3%-5.5%
• Personnel continues tobe approximately 71% ofthe
General Fund budget.
• Debt issues planned for late 2026 funded with local
sales tax. Debt issues planned for 2027 funded with
utilities and property taxes.
• Continued inflationary pressureexpected to persist
into 2027.
Page 6 of 220
## Budget Update
• 2027 Local Government Aid (LGA)increase about
1.59% or a total of $54,694 over 2026.
• 2026 Fiscal Disparity Aid increase about 1.27%or a
total of $61,191 over 2026.
• Licenses and permits revenuefor 2027 is projected
to besimilar to2026revised and less than 2025
actuals.
• Rolling stock/building/tech levy at$2,300,805.
Thisincludes a3.5% increase over2026 for IT and
## Building Services. As mentioned in the FMP
presentation, the Fleet equipment levy is now at
$1,775,457.
• EDA levy at $667,741which is a3.5% increase.
• Proposed levy increase is 4.50%.
Page 7 of 220
## 2027 Proposed Preliminary
## Levy
## General Fund Levy
## Equipment Levy
## EDA Levy
## - Base Levy Total
## Debt Service Levy
- Total 2027 Levy
$26,308,418
$ 2,300,805
$667,741
$29,276,964
$ 3,916,828
$33,193,791
2027 Proposed Levy is $33,193,791 which is an
increase of 4.54% over the 2026 Levy
Page 8 of 220
## Gross Tax Levy History
2027
$33,193,7914.54% increase
2026
$31,749,3806.16% increase
2025
$29,907,5695.45% increase
2024$28,363,1585.89% increase
2023$26,784,9546.60% increase
2022$25,127,4194.98% increase
2021$23,934,6325.50% increase
2020$22,687,4714.90%increase
Page 9 of 220
## 2027 Proposed General Fund
## Budget
## The 2027 proposed General Fund Budget of
$35,837,871 is a:
•2.00% increase from the 2026 adopted budget
•2.65% increase from the 2026 revised budget
Page 10 of 220
## General Fund Revenues
## 2026A2026R2027P
## Taxes25,223,64725,223,64726,308,418
## LicensesandPermits1,130,8501,123,3401,157,740
## Intergovernmental5,766,3685,899,2305,733,988
## Chargesforservices1,830,3001,939,3701,891,465
## Finesandforfeitures220,000225,000225,000
## Miscellaneous129,255113,400185,400
## Transfers833,695387,600335,860
## Total Revenues35,134,11534,911,58735,837,871
Page 11 of 220
## General Fund Expenditures
## 2026A2026R2027P
## Legislative/Executive1,360,7771,308,1961,284,676
## Administrative1,067,1941,037,0661,141,770
## Human Resources360,783412,419562,852
## Finance701,628812,080705,066
## PublicSafety13,642,78813,332,31514,312,605
## Fire6,641,7296,426,7006,846,680
## CommunityDevelopment1,916,1101,884,3501,972,361
## PublicWorks5,949,3406,021,6525,751,837
## RecreationServices2,561,2002,562,1392,871,320
## TransferOut372,250372,250388,704
## 0.44% Paid Family Medical
## Leave
115,00000
40%FundBalanceReserve445,316742,4200
35,134,11534,911,58735,837,871
Page 12 of 220
## General Fund Expenditure
## History
## YearAmountYOYIncrease%Change
202126,530,517--
202227,443,767913,2503.44%
202328,978,1911,534,4245.59%
202431,077,8942,099,7037.25%
202531,872,015794,1212.56%
## 2026R34,911,5873,039,5729.54%
## 2027P35,837,871926,2842.65%
Expenditurereportedis basedofactualsfor2021to2025,revisedbudgetfor2026andproposedbudgetfor2027.
Page 13 of 220
## Staffing Update
## 2026R Proposed Position Additions
## •Recreation Services - Event Coordinator, Oct 2026
## 2027P Proposed Position Additions
## •Recreation Services - Natural Resources Coordinator,
Jan 2027
Page 14 of 220
## Forecast of City Reserves
• Planned Capital Reserves transfers since 2021 to
bringnegative reserves in the Ice Arena and Pool
into the black by 2028.
• The Pool ended positive in 2025at $208,840.
• Reducedtransfersto GF to zero in 2024 (LGA
increase fundedprevious budget gap).
• Budgetingsurplus to fund General Fund40%
reserve requirement in 2026. The General Fund will
be above the 40% reserve requirement in 2027, so
no additional reserve amount is included in the 2027
proposed budget.
• Rolling stock/building/tech levy at$2,300,805.
Thisincludes a3.5% increase over2026 for IT and
Building Services. Fleet portion of the equipment
levy is now at $1,775,457.
Page 15 of 220
## 2027City Fee Update
Page 16 of 220
## Fee Increases – Community
## Development
Reflect cost of doing business:
-Minimum inspection fee increased $65$83.50 (impacts
approx. 200 permits/year; State increased minimum to
$135)
-Exempt Commercial & Residential re-roof from plan
review fee
-House moving fees $65$200 within City limits; $200 or
$83.50/hour outside City limits (whichever is greater), plus
mileage
Page 17 of 220
## Fee Increases – Public
## Safety/Support Services
Reflect cost of doing business:
•3% increase across most business license fees
## New Fee:
•Mobile Food Unit fees
Planning for increase of Wine fee to $2,000 to align with
surrounding cities. Will require a public hearing
Page 18 of 220
## Fee Increases – Public Works
## Water Shut Off/On:Currently $75
Proposing $150 fee for after hours
Erosion Control Permit Fee: Related to approved building permits this fee is
torecover time reviewing, approving, and inspecting erosion control to ensure itis
followingstate requirements.
## Proposed Fee Schedule:
•$40 - Less than ¼ acres
•$250 – ¼ to 1 acres
•$750 – > 1 acres+$1/ (100 SF above an acre)
Page 19 of 220
## Fee Increases – Recreation
## Services
Park Buildings: $5 Increase ($70 weekday, $80 weekends)
## Wood Lake Nature Center:
•Program Rooms (2 hour minimum): $85/hour, Non-Profit $70/hour
•All Rooms Combined (10am – 11pm) : $2200 Non-Profit $1,900
## Add-ons (flat Rate)
•Deck : $120
•Exhibits after hours: $75
•Conference Room(4 hour minimum): $75/hour, Non-Profit $60/hour
•Amphitheaters (4 hours): $85 (M-TH), $95 (F-Su)
•Fire Pit (4 hour minimum): $40/hour, $25 Non-Profit
•Catering Commission: 10% of food and beverage sales
Page 20 of 220
2027Utility Update
Page 21 of 220
## Utility Funds Summary
Page 22 of 220
## Street Light User Fee
•No proposed rate increase for 2027
•$7.21 (Quarter Residential)
•$36.06/acre (Quarter Commercial)
•Electricity and Maintenance
Page 23 of 220
## Utilities (2027 Utility Bill)
Page 24 of 220
## Franchise Fees
## Xcel
## CenterPoint
Total Franchise Fees Revenue of approximately $2,462,155 annually.
No proposed rate increase for 2027
Page 25 of 220
## 2027Capital Improvement Budget
## 2028-2031Capital Improvement Plan
Page 26 of 220
## Capital Budgeting Process
•Preliminary report is prepared by the City Manager and Finance
Director and presented to the Planning Commission.
•The Planning Commission reviews the projects based on the
following consideration:
-The proposed projects conformance to the Comprehensive Plan
•CIB/CIP as recommended by the Planning Commission is returned
to the City Manager and Finance Director and included in the
annual budget.
Page 27 of 220
## 2027 Capital Improvement Budget
## Recreation/Open
Space, $3,235,768 ,
12%
## Right of Way,
$10,038,000 , 38%
## Public Facilities,
$9,375,000 , 36%
## Buildings, Fleets &
## Technology,
$3,733,827 , 14%
## CAPITAL PROJECT TOTALS
## Recreation/Open Space
## Right of Way
## Public Facilities
## Buildings, Fleets &
## Technology
## Total 2027 Capital Improvement Budget $26,382,595
Page 28 of 220
## Total 2027 CIB Funding by Source
## (B) G.O. Bonds-
## Property Tax
16%
## (BSR) Building Special
## Revenue
1%
## (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax
8%
## (BU) G.O. Bonds-
## Utility
6,827,000
26%
## (C) Hennepin County
1%
## (F) Federal Grant
6%
## (FF) Franchise Fees
5%
## (FSR) Fleet Special
## Revenue
7%
## (ISR) Internal Special
## Revenue
0%
## (M) Municipal State
## Aid
9%
## (O) Other Funding
3%
(S) State
8%
## (SR) Special Revenue
2%
## (U) User Fee
8%
## TOTAL BY SOURCE
Total $26,382,595
Page 29 of 220
## Total 2028-2031 Capital Improvement
## Plan Project Totals
## Recreation/Open
Space, $58,315,270 ,
43%
## Right of Way
## Improvements,
$45,808,500 , 33%
Utilities, $12,760,000 ,
9%
## Buildings, Fleets &
## Technology,
$20,404,923 , 15%
## Recreation/Open
## Space
## Right of Way
## Improvements
## Utilities
## Buildings, Fleets &
## Technology
## Total 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Plan $137,288,693
Page 30 of 220
## Total 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Plan
## (B) G.O. Bonds-
## Property Tax
21%
(BSR) Buildings
## Special Revenue
0%
## (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax
38%
## (BU) G.O.
## Bonds-Utility
17%
## (FSR) Fleet Special
## Revenue
6%
## (F) Federal Grant
2%
## (FF) Franchise Fees
3%
(M) Municipal
## State Aid
5%
## (SR) Special Revenue
1%
## (U) User Fee
5%
(S) State
1%
## (X) Xcel Energy
1%
## Total 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Plan $137,288,693
Page 31 of 220
## Purpose:
•Maintain safe, reliable, and efficient public facilities.
•Address aging infrastructure and deferred maintenance.
•Ensure compliance with applicable codes, regulations, and operational standards.
## •City Priority:Sustainable Infrastructure
•Preserve City assets through proactive planning.
•Support long-term, sustainable infrastructure financing.
•Wold Architects and Engineers hired in late 2025 to conduct a comprehensive facilities assessment.
•Priority facilities evaluated included:
•City Hall
•Fire Station #2
•Liquor Stores
## •Public Works Building
•Park and Recreation Buildings
•Staff reviewed and validated consultant recommendations and project priorities with modifications to priorities.
•Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) developed for each department
included in Wold'sFacility Assessment Needs Study.
•Projects incorporated into the City's Financial Master Plan (FMP) to support long-term capital planning.
## Wold’s Facility Assessment Needs Study
Page 32 of 220
Priority 1 (0 -2 years)
## Life Safety IssueAs noted by Fire Marshal/Life Safety Officials
Deterioration ItemFurther deterioration will create higher future repair costs or will damage other areas in the
building
Health IssueRooms with no ventilation or items that do not meet state health code.
Accessibility IssueMust be completed to provide access into the building, to the curriculum within the building,
or to access a restroom.
Hazardous MaterialsItem posing a significant impact on building occupants
Priority 2 (2 -5 years)
Energy Issue Item or system upgrade that results in a payback in 10 years or less
Deterioration ItemMaterial or system that currently functions but will require replacement or maintenance
within 5 years
Health IssueInadequate exhaust and ventilation in lab environments and other areas lacking adequate
ventilation
Accessibility IssueModification required to meet state code guidelines
Hazardous MaterialsRemoval of items affected by other changes occurring in priority 2.
ModernizationModification required to support future modernizations
Priority 3 (6 -10 years)
Energy Issue Item or system upgrade that results in a payback in more than 10 years
Deterioration ItemMaterial or system that currently functions but will require replacement or maintenance
within 6 to 10 years
Health IssueNon-tagged items that do not meet state health code requirements
Hazardous MaterialsRemoval of items affected by other changes occurring in priority 3.
Priority 4 (would like to do within 10 years)
AestheticItem which impacts the visual environment
Hazardous MaterialsRemoval of items affected by other changes occurring in priority 4.
Priority 5 (would like to do after 10 years)
AestheticItem which impacts the visual environment
Hazardous MaterialsRemoval of items affected by other changes occurring in priority 4.
## From Wold: Priority Breakdown
Page 33 of 220
## Total 2027-Beyond 2030 Facility Assessment Needs
## Study
## (B) G.O. Bonds-
## Property Tax
57%
(BSR) Buildings
## Special Revenue
15%
## County Grant (C)
1%
## Other Funding (O)
27%
## Total 2027-Beyond 2030 Wold Facilities Assessment Projects $20,198,554
Page 34 of 220
## Projects for Municipal Building:
## 2028:City Hall Carpet Replacement
2029:Chiller, Boilers, and Pumps
## 2031:Fire Alarm and BAS Control
Beyond 2031:Parking Lot and
## Painting
Financing: The funding sources for
the above projects will include a mix
of Buildings Fund and G.O. Bonds.
## Total CIB/CIP Cost:$8,718,286
## Facilities Assessment
## Building Services
Page 35 of 220
## Facilities Assessment
## Liquor Operations
## Projects:
•Water Intrusion
•Mechanical
•Parking Lots and Concrete
## Work
Financing: The funding sources
for the above projects will all be
funded by the Liquor Fund.
## Total CIB/CIP Cost:$3,780,327
Page 36 of 220
## Projects:
## 2027:Basement Water Intrusion
2029:Roof Replacement
2031:Carpet/Office Remodel
## Beyond 2031:Parking Lot and HVAC
Financing: The funding sources for
the above projects will include a mix
of Buildings Fund and G.O. Bonds.
## Total CIB/CIP Cost:$4,680,000
## Facilities Assessment
## Public Works
Page 37 of 220
## Ice Arena
2027 – 2032: Locker Room Updates
2029: Rink 1 Roof
2029: Dehumidifier Rink 2
## 2031: Heating System
## Park Buildings
2027:Electrical
Other upgrades based on Master Plan
Financing: The funding will be a mix of
liquor store funds, grants, special revenue
funds, long-term capital, and G.O. Bonds
## Total CIB/CIP Cost:$3,019,941
## Facilities Assessment
## Parks and Recreation
Page 38 of 220
## Public Works: Capital Projects
## Nicollet Ave Reconstruction (Henn. Co. & Richfield)
•Estimated Project Cost (post-letting) – $18,952,525
•Estimated City Share – $7,000,000
•Includes $2,000,000 of State bond funds awarded in 2026 legislative session
•Construction 2026 –2027
Page 39 of 220
## Public Works: Capital Projects
## 73rd St/Diagonal Ave Sidewalk
•Portland Ave to Cedar Ave, north side of roadway
•Estimated Project Cost –$1,321,000
•Includes $865,000 instateactive transportationfunding
•2026/2027 Construction
## 64th St Sidewalk Sidewalk
•Lyndale Ave to Portland Ave, south side of roadway
•Estimated Project Cost –$1,310,000
•Includes $854,000 instateactive transportationfunding
•2027 Construction
Page 40 of 220
## Public Works: Capital Projects
## Penn Ave Reconstruction
(Henn. Co. & Richfield)
•Estimated Project Cost –
$32,600,000
•Estimated City Share –
$12,800,000
•Construction 2028 –2029
Page 41 of 220
## Public Works: Capital Projects
## Traffic Signal Replacements (76
th
## Street/77
th
## Street)
•Estimated Project Cost –$2,665,000 over 3 years
•Meridian Crossing (2027), 12
th
## Avenue (2028), Newton Avenue (2029)
Page 42 of 220
## Public Works: Capital Projects
69
th
## Street Reconstruction (Xerxes Avenue to Penn Avenue)
•Estimated Project Cost - $7,690,000
•2028 construction (coordinated with Penn Avenue)
Page 43 of 220
## Public Works: Capital Projects
76
th
## Street/Knox Avenue Roundabout
•Estimated Project Cost – $4,350,000
•Includes $2,687,000 in regional solicitation funding
•2029 Construction
## DRAFT –
## Concept
## Drawing Only
Page 44 of 220
## Emergency Water Interconnect
•Total Project Cost - $5,000,000
•Includes $1,092,000 in Congressional Appropriation funding
•Construction 2027
## Public Works: Capital Projects
•Connection to 48-inch Minneapolis water main
•Alignment under west-side boulevard of 5
th
## Ave
•Tunneled under Hwy 62
•Connection to 18-inch Richfield water main
Page 45 of 220
## Public Works: Capital Projects
## Sanitary Sewer Lining
•Total Project Cost: $900,000
•Construction: Annually
## Water Treatment Plant Elevator
•Total Project Cost: $200,000
•Construction: 2026-2027
## Water Treatment Plant Generator
•Total Project Cost: $2,500,000
•Construction: 2027
Page 46 of 220
## Recreation Services: Capital Projects
## Parks Master Plan
Page 47 of 220
## Recreation Services: Capital Projects
## Veterans Park (Local Sales Tax)
2026
•Ice Arena Lobby - $1.8M
2027
•Trail, Pavilion, Building - $3M
## Park Buildings & Field Lights (Grant)
2027
•Electrical Pannel -$220,000
## Playgrounds
2027
•Adams Hill Park –$150,000
Page 48 of 220
## Recreation Services: Capital Projects
## Outdoor Pool
2026
•Umbrella Canopies – 18,000
•Pump and Boiler Refurbishment - $43,000
2027
•Pool Filter Sand - $62,000
•Shade & Birthday Structures – $100,000
## Ice Arena Improvements
2026
•Rink 1 Locker Room Roof –$79,000
•Rink 1 Flooring – $99,000
2027
•Rink 2 Locker Rooms – $60,000
Page 49 of 220
## Community Center (Local
## Sales Tax)
## Recreation Services: Capital Projects
2027 - 2031
Project estimate: $55M
Page 50 of 220
## CITY OF RICHFIELD
## MINNESOTA
## 2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
## BUDGET AND 2028 - 2031 PLAN
Page 51 of 220
## CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET AND PLAN
## MISSION STATEMENT
The Richfield Capital Improvement Budget and Plan is a comprehensive list of major
improvements necessary to meet the needs of the community over a five-year period. This
list is prepared through compiling the project needs requested by the various city
departments. The Capital Plan sets forth the proposed scheduling and details of specific
projects by year, estimated cost, and a justification or description to those responsible for
making policy decisions regarding expenditures for new facilities. In addition, the Plan
provides information so that individual project requests can be better evaluated against
community needs and the community’s ability to pay for and maintain these facilities in the
succeeding years.
## CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GOALS
The specific goals of the Capital Improvement Plan are:
• To develop a realistic list of capital improvement needs which relates proposed projects
to the City’s capacity to finance such projects.
• To minimize the impact of projects on the residents’ ability to pay.
• To schedule various projects and improvements in a way which allows adequate time to
detailed design and engineering of the projects, preparing environmental statements or
grant applications or exploring alternative methods of financing.
• To provide coordination between City departments, various units of special and general
local government, and public utilities.
• To implement the community’s Comprehensive Plan in an orderly fashion.
• To keep the public involved and informed about needed public improvements and to better
enable the public to schedule private improvements.
## OVERVIEW
Richfield’s Capital Improvement Plan is a process for identifying annual project needs and
priorities for project coordination as well as for financial planning. In addition, the Capital
Improvement process provides for public discussion of short range City improvements.
The Capital Improvement Budget (CIB)/Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects are identified
through discussions of the various City commissions and the City departments. From these
discussions City staff compiles estimated costs, scope and potential funding sources for the
projects.
A preliminary report is then generated by the Finance Director based on these discussions
and presented to a meeting of the Planning Commission.
The Planning Commission then reviews the projects and scheduling based on the following
consideration:
• The proposed project’s conformance to the Comprehensive Plan.
The CIB/CIP, as recommended by the Planning Commission, is then returned to the Finance
Director, and submitted to the City Council as part of the annual budget process. The Council
may delete projects from the Plan or may change the scheduling and priority of the allocation
of funds. In accordance with state statutes, the City Council should refer any new project they
may add to the Capital Improvement Plan to the Planning Commission for review.
Accordingly, the 2026 Revised/2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) reflects
funding for several improvement projects throughout the City. Included are costs for the
Nicollet Avenue Reconstruction, multi-year Pavement Management, multi-year ADA
Page 52 of 220
Improvements, multi-year Bicycle Improvements and multi-year Pedestrian Improvement
projects. The capital spending plan also includes funds for park and recreation and water and
wastewater projects.
The funding for the right of way projects is expected to come from sources such as Federal
and State grants, Municipal State Aid (MSA), street reconstruction bonds, and utility franchise
fees. Funding for other projects included in the CIB will come from intergovernmental
revenues, special revenues, and user fees. The City’s main operating budgets should not be
materially affected by the planned projects as all funding is outside those budgets. The only
possible effect would be on the maintenance of the newly constructed projects. In some cases
the maintenance costs may increase, but in others, it is expected to decrease.
The Capital Improvement Plan, which represents the next four-year period, also contains a
number of significant proposed projects including, several park projects, major street
improvement and reconstruction projects throughout the city, replacement of rolling stock and
technology equipment, and several projects to improve public facilities throughout the City.
## 2027 Capital Improvement Budget Projects
## Recreation Open Space
## Community Center Building Repair - $20,000
Various repair and major maintenance projects to the Community Center building and
surrounding infrastructure that will be identified and prioritized each year by Recreation
Services staff. Items may include HVAC repairs, roof repairs, window and flooring repairs,
and other repairs and replacement of existing capital items. This annual budget will be
discontinued after 2027 in preparation for a new community center building, funded by local
sales tax.
Community Center - $150,000
The Community Center needs a complete rebuild the current building is more than 50 years
old and is falling into disrepair. The new building will be sustainably designed and will be
able to meet the current demands and needs from across the community, including gym
space, a walking track and community spaces. The total project costs are $55 million and
the funding sources are the following: $45 million would come from a local sales tax and
$10 million would come from bonds. The initial 2027 estimated costs of $150,000 is related
to the building design.
## Ice Arena Improvements - $30,000
Ice Arena improvements are funded by the annual General Fund transfer. Improvements to
the arena include HVAC, lobby area, doors, the addition of an elevator, new flooring, and
improvements to locker rooms 5 and 6. A new roof is planned for 2029 and the funding for
this will be G.O. property tax bonds.
## Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance - $55,000
Various projects relating to the upkeep of existing park infrastructure are identified and
prioritized each year by Recreation Services and Public Works Maintenance staff. Projects
include tennis/basketball court replacement, trail resurfacing, roof replacement, parking lot
reconstruction, field renovation and other repair or partial replacement of existing park
capital items. Specific improvement projects and their priorities will be identified through the
Parks Master Plan process.
Page 53 of 220
## Outdoor Pool Improvements - $100,000
Improvements to the Outdoor Pool are funded by the annual General Fund transfer. 2026
projects include replacing umbrella canopies along with refurbishing pumps and boilers.
2027 projects include replacing pool filter sand, and adding shade structures.
## Parks Master Plan - $90,000
Every eight to ten years, the Recreation Services Department updates the Parks Master
Plan, a document within the City’s overall Comprehensive Plan which outlines the overall
philosophy around park management and development, as well as specific park
development plans, and serves as a guiding document for future capital improvement
planning and other operations. The plan was last updated in 2018. Staff will hire a
consultant to help coordinate the update, which will involve an extensive public engagement
process.
## Veterans Park Complex - $2,420,768
Improvements to the park infrastructure, including the Band Shell, the picnic shelter, the
mini-golf facility, trails, green space, marsh, etc.). The improvements being made in 2025-
2028 are funded by local sales tax ($1.9m), special revenue ($500k), and a possible MN
DNR grant ($500k). Projected improvements outlined in the facility assessment are planned
for years beyond 2031 would be funded by general obligation bonds serviced by property
tax.
## Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement - $150,000
Replace the play equipment structure at Adams Hill Park in accordance with the Play
Equipment Replacement Schedule.
## Parks Building Improvements - $220,000
Pending the acceptance of a grant from Hennepin County, the lighting controls and
breakers will be upgraded in 2027 at Christian, Donaldson, Augsburg, and Taft Parks. Then,
looking beyond 2031, general obligation bonds serviced by property taxes would fund the
Renovation of the Christian Park building ($1,500,000) and Donaldson Park Building
($1,500,00).
## Right of Way Improvements
77
th
## Street Pavement Maintenance - $1,100,000
The concrete pavement panels and pavement joints on 77th Street are beginning to fail in
certain areas and will need major maintenance in the near future to avoid full reconstruction.
This work will address the worst areas of pavement failure, primarily east of Portland Ave.
78
th
Street Lighting - $200,000
MnDOT will be adding pedestrian level lighting (paid for by the city) to several trail segments
constructed in Phase 1 of the I-494 project. Due to issues with the way the design-build
contract was written, there are several gaps in the trail network that will not have lighting
constructed, and the City will need to backfill with pedestrian and street lighting. These
areas are 78th Street west of Penn, 78th Street from Pleasant Ave to Nicollet Ave, and 78th
Street from Nicollet Ave to Portland Ave.
Page 54 of 220
## Multi-Year ADA Improvements - $200,000
Staff completed a City-wide inventory of pedestrian ramps and sidewalks in 2023. This
inventory will be used to identify missing or non-compliant ADA infrastructure within the right-
of-way and program ADA infrastructure improvements throughout the City. This may include
sidewalks, trails, curbs, corner pedestrian ramps, crosswalks, and other infrastructure.
## Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements - $40,000
As part of the implementation of the Bicycle Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan,
improvements to bike facilities are made on a regular basis. $40,000 of funds are identified
each year, however actual spending varies from year to year. Any funds not spent remain
available for future use.
## Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements - $40,000
Spot pedestrian improvements, such as refuge islands, RRFBs, and pavement markings will
be constructed where beneficial, as identified in the Pedestrian Master Plan and Safe Routes
to School Plan to achieve the greatest improvement in public safety. $40,000 of funds are
identified each year, however actual spending varies from year to year. Any funds not spent
remain available for future use.
## Multi-Year Nicollet Avenue Reconstruction - $5,740,000
Nicollet Ave Reconstruction from 66th St to 77th St led by Hennepin County. Underground
utilities will be replaced or lined as necessary. The County’s consultant led a robust public
engagement process following Richfield’s public engagement process to guide the roadway
design in 2023 and 2024. Staff are pursuing state bond funding to offset the local costs
currently identified for bonding. This is identified as a 2-year construction project (2026-27).
Early project expenses are paid from existing City resources and will be reimbursed following
the sale of G.O. bonds closer to project construction.
## Multi-Year Pavement Management Program - $755,000
In order to protect the investments made in the City’s roadway infrastructure, an ongoing
pavement management program is needed. The program will address areas of greatest
need throughout the City each year and may include mill and overlay, concrete
replacement, pavement rejuvenation treatments, crack sealing, and other various roadway
improvements.
## Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacement - $900,000
The existing City-owned traffic signals along the 76th St/77th St corridor will be reaching the
ends of their expected life cycles between 2025 and 2035. The signals will need to be
replaced with new signal systems or alternative traffic control measures. The estimated total
cost of signal replacements is $2.67M, with the first signal components being replaced no
earlier than 2027 due to the ongoing 494 project.
69
th
Street Reconstruction - $413,000
The project includes reconstruction of 69th Street between Penn Avenue and Xerxes
Avenue, including narrowing of the roadway to add sidewalk to one side, reconstruction of
retaining walls, lining or replacement of sanitary sewer, and replacement of storm sewer.
The final roadway section will be determined following the City’s public engagement
process.
Page 55 of 220
## Penn Avenue Reconstruction – $300,000
This project consists of the reconstruction of Penn Avenue from Hwy 62 to 75th Street led
by Hennepin County. The project includes the replacement of City utilities, ADA upgrades,
and pedestrian and bicyclist upgrades. The City and County will lead a robust public
engagement process to guide the roadway design. The current estimate is based on the
County’s cost share policy and assumes full utility replacement/rehabilitation.
76
th
and Knox Improvements - $350,000
This project consists of the conversion of the existing signalized intersection at W 76th St
(MSAS 361) and Knox Ave S in the City of Richfield to a roundabout, including
improvements to active transportation facilities that use the intersection. Ultimate design of
the intersection will be determined through the City’s public engagement process.
Permanent right-of-way acquisition and temporary construction easements will be required.
Project was selected for Regional Solicitation in the 2024 cycle, with a FY 2029 construction
date. The Regional Solicitation grant covers 80% of the estimated construction costs and
City is responsible for funding the remaining construction costs and all design and right-of-
way costs.
## Public Facilities
## SCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade - $50,000
The Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system cybersecurity upgrade will
modernize all hardware within the SCADA network that controls the water treatment plant
and other utility systems in Richfield. Much of the existing equipment is outdated (some
components are nearly 20 years old), which increases the risk of failure and makes the
system more vulnerable to cybersecurity threats. Upgrading to new hardware will
significantly improve system reliability and performance, enabling faster response times to
operational changes. In addition, the new equipment will incorporate enhanced security
features designed to better protect critical infrastructure from unauthorized access and
cyberattacks.
## Water Plant Elevator Replacement - $50,000
The elevator at the water treatment plant has reached the end of its useful life cycle. Public
Works staff have been advised by the elevator service company that parts are no longer
available for this elevator and control system, and it has become difficult to service or repair
when the need arises. The elevator is used daily to transport equipment, chemicals,
visitors, and staff from lower to upper levels of the plant. It also satisfies ADA requirements
for the building. This project includes a full replacement of the elevator and controls with
modern technology.
## Water Plant Generator - $2,400,000
The generator at the water treatment plant has reached the point where maintenance and
problem solving are too frequent. In addition, the integrated fuel tank and housing are badly
corroded. Repairing the current unit is not advantageous due to the age, the cost to
implement the needed repairs, and the minimal return on such an investment. There has
also been a shift in the industry and technology for more efficient ways of providing a
generator backup system for a building of this type and power demand. This project will
fund the design, supply of the generator, placement and commissioning, and oversight of
these activities. A study was commissioned in 2024 to ascertain the design needs and
future costs.
Page 56 of 220
## Sanitary Lift Station 6 Rehabilitation - $300,000
Rehabilitation of lift station 6, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and
control equipment, and updated mechanical equipment to include pumps and valves.
Project also will improve concrete slab around wet well to solve drainage issues.
## Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Storm Sewer Collection System - $200,000
The storm sewer collection system was installed in the mid 1950’s and is comprised of
mostly reinforced concrete pipes. A cleaning and inspection program is conducted annually
to determine the condition of the sewer mains and structures. Sewer mains and structures
that are identified as being in poor condition will be replaced or rehabilitated with the means
and methods that are in line with industry standards. The rehabilitation will extend the life of
the mains by up to 75 years.
## Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining - $900,000
The wastewater collection system was installed in the late 1950’s and mainly consists of
Vitrified Clay Pipe (VCP). As these VCP pipes age, tree root intrusion and cracking become
more common. In order to preserve an appropriate level of service to our users and protect
the mill and overlay investment, portions of the wastewater collection system undergo
cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining. Lining consists of placement of a liner in the existing clay
pipe, which is adhered to the pipe wall and cured through the use of steam, hot water, or
ultraviolet light. Once it cools, the liner hardens to a consistency of schedule 40 PVC,
effectively restoring structural integrity. This rehabilitation technique is widely used in the
industry and is done at a fraction of the cost of open cutting a street to replace the line. It is
anticipated that this program will be ongoing until the entire wastewater collection system is
rehabilitated, based upon funding availability.
## Restroom Renovations – WTP Second Floor - $200,000
The restrooms at the water plant date back to the 1960s and remain largely unchanged.
The second-level restrooms, in particular, are in urgent need of renovation to address
outdated conditions and to meet current ADA accessibility standards. This project will
renovate existing water plant restrooms for ADA compliance and modernization.
## Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements - $100,000
The floor of the chlorine storage area in the water treatment plant has experienced severe
spalling and exposure of rebar due to a previous chlorine leak. Impairment has very likely
spread further beyond the spalling that is observable. In order to implement the proper
repairs and restore the structural integrity of the floor, the chlorine storage tanks and day
tank system will need to be relocated and the full extent of the chlorine room floor inspected
and repaired. This project will include the relocation effort along with the requisite concrete
and reinforcing bar repair to the floor.
## Water Plan Personnel Safety Systems Improvements - $125,000
The results of the Water Treatment Plant Condition Assessment conducted in 2022
revealed certain health and safety issues. One of the issues identified was a deficiency with
the design and setup of the eye wash and shower stations. Although the water plant has
the proper stations for our building type, it was discovered that the set up itself is not OSHA
compliant. Public works staff retained a consultant to formulate a design that mitigates
these issues of non-compliance. This project will include the construction of a recirculation
system that satisfies both State and OSHA standards.
Page 57 of 220
## Water System Interconnect - $4,900,000
The water treatment plant was built in 1963 and to date has been a standalone system. If it
were to have a catastrophic failure and unable to produce water, the city is not equipped
with a long-term emergency backup water source. Connecting to another city’s water
system would create the needed level of service redundancy. As part of the DNR’s water
supply plan, they encourage all cities to have an emergency backup water source.
Well #3 Water Service - $50,000
A ¾ inch water service extends out to the Well #3 building at the water plant. The water
service was constructed in a manner that exposes a length of copper to the outside
elements as it traverses from within the plant to the well house. This length of pipe has
burst on several occasions due to the cold weather rendering the well useless. This project
will include the design, construction, and oversight of construction of a water service
extension that is frost protected.
## Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation - $100,000
The Wilson Pond subwatershed is located in the southeast quadrant of the City. This
subwatershed is subject to flooding during heavy rain events. The low-lying nature of the
subwatershed makes it challenging to manage stormwater within the regional pond (Wilson
Pond) system. Public Works staff have updated the stormwater model to reflect current
flood risk conditions based on available data. The results of the model will be used to
explore engineering alternatives to reduce the flood risk to the immediate neighborhoods. A
design will be selected from the alternatives analysis that yields the most benefit.
## Buildings, Fleet and Technology
## Richfield Liquor Cedar Point - $260,560
Excavate & replace perimeter waterproofing below garage to eliminate water intrusion
(199,699.50), Replace damaged concreate sidewalks and calling (56,785.30), add blower
fans to prevent moisture accumulation on cooler doors (4,075.50).
## Multi-Year Fleet Purchases - $1,785,000
The Public Works Garage Division purchases all vehicles used by City Departments to
provide City Services. This project is ongoing in which the Division makes vehicle purchases
every year.
## Public Works Facility Building Improvements - $460,000
A number of building maintenance items that need to be addressed were found in a recent
Facility Study. The building items vary from HVAC component replacement to repairing water
intrusion into the building. This is an ongoing project and maintenance items have been
prioritized by City Staff.
## Public Works Facility Office Area Upgrades - $290,000
The Public Works Department is running out of office space and room for additional staff.
Currently there is not an identified work area for a GIS Analyst that has not been hired and
an identified hire date of June 1, 2026. This project includes adding 2 offices and some
HVAC components. This project will fulfil an immediate space need but does not eliminate
the need for other area upgrades that are needed in the future including new carpet, new
office cube equipment, and HVAC repairs.
Page 58 of 220
## Computer Workstation Replacement - $70,000
Annual replacement of City desktop and laptop computer workstations based on the
established four-year lifecycle replacement schedule to maintain reliable, secure, and
supported technology for City operations. This project also includes funding for additional
computer workstations needed to support departmental growth, operational needs, and
changing staffing requirements across the organization.
## Fire Station 1 Vehicle Exhaust Removal System - $85,000
Fire Station 1 was built with a commercial exhaust detection system that uses the apparatus
bays normal HVAC system to evacuate. The industry standard for fire station apparatus bays
is to have a dedicated ventilation system that activates when trucks are started to capture all
exhaust fumes and diesel particulate. Fire Station 2 was upgraded with a dedicated exhaust
system in 2026 with funding from a federal FEMA Assistance to Firefighter Grant (AFG). An
AFG will be applied for in 2027 to fund the placement of the same dedicated exhaust system
in Fire Station 1. This type of grant requires a 10% match that the city is expected to fund and
will be accounted for in the 2027 proposed budget.
Fire Station 2 Repairs - $306,406
Fire Station 2 was originally built in 1964 and remodeled in 2013. The city just completed a
facilities study that looked at multiple city buildings, one being Fire Station 2. This study
identified many structural, safety, cosmetic and programmatic changes required to protect the
structural asset as well as the employees working and living within it. The study assigned
priorities and costs to each identified need, and this list was reviewed and refined by Interim
Fire Chief Coppa. The estimated repair and replacement costs needed to satisfy the items
identified in the facilities study total $2.454M (2027 costs) over six years. While this addresses
the currently identified needs, it fails to address the lack of essential modern safety features
and needed programmatic spaces that will need to be addressed in the near future. The
current station would need to be replaced with a building costing approximately $7,150,000
in 2027 dollars with a projected cost increase of 5-6% per year after. A policy discussion
needs to determine where the financial priorities lie and whether it makes more sense to pay
for repairs and maintenance to the existing building or consider a new building.
## Richfield Liquor Downtown - $399,535
Excavate & replace perimeter waterproofing below grade to eliminate water infiltration
(321,964.50), Replace damaged sidewalk (31,788.90), replace damaged caulk joint around
entire building perimeter (6,384.95), replace water heater, near end of life (5,434.00), replace
corroded stainless-steel flue for boilers (33,962.50).
## Network Infrastructure Replacement - $77,326
This project provides for the phased replacement of network switches that have reached or
are approaching Cisco end of support status over a three-year cycle. Much of the City’s
network infrastructure replacement schedule had previously been deferred, resulting in aging
equipment with increased risk of failure and cybersecurity concerns. Cisco end of support
means the manufacturer no longer provides security updates, software patches, or technical
support for the equipment. Switches will be replaced in priority order based on their end of
support dates to maintain reliable and secure network infrastructure for City operations and
services.
Page 59 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
## Community Center Building Repair
2a. Total project cost:
$40,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$40,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2019
5. Responsible department:
## Recreation Services
Spent to Date – Through 2025
Varied by year
## 2027 CIP
$20,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$20,000
## 2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$20,000
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
$40,000 $40,000
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve XManage XReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Recreation & Open Space
## Project Summary Form - Community Center Building Repair
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$40,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$40,000 $40,000
8. Brief summary of project: Various repair and major maintenance projects to the Community Center building and surrounding
infrastructure that will be identified and prioritized each year by Recreation Services staff. Items may include HVAC repairs, roof repairs,
window and flooring repairs, and other repair and replacement of existing capital items. This annual budget will be discontinued after 2027 in
preparation for a new community center building, funded by local sales tax.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 60 of 220
% of Total
100%
## Recreation & Open Space
## Project Summary Form - Community Center Building
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$55,000,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$55,000,000 $55,000,000
8. Brief summary of project: The Community Center needs a complete rebuild the current building is more than 50 years old and is falling
into disrepair. The new building will be sustainably designed and will be able to meet the current demands and needs from across the
community, including gym space, a walking track and community spaces. $45 m would come from a local sales tax and $10 m would come
from bonds.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve Manage Replace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
$45,000,000 $45,000,000 82%Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$10,000,000 $10,000,000 18%Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$0
## 2028 CIP
$4,150,000
## 2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$18,000
## 2029 CIP
$6,000,000
Beyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2026
5. Responsible department:
## Recreation Services
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$0
## 2027 CIP
$150,000
## 2030 CIP
$44,682,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Community Center Building
2a. Total project cost:
$55,000,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$55,000,000
3. Years to complete:
5
Page 61 of 220
% of Total
60%
100%
1. Project:
## Arena Improvements
2a. Total project cost:
$2,999,941
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$2,999,941
3. Years to complete:
8
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2025
5. Responsible department:
## Recreation Services
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$0
## 2027 CIP
$30,000
## 2030 CIP
$30,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$0
## 2028 CIP
$30,000
## 2031 CIP
$30,000
## 2026 CIB Revised
$207,941
## 2029 CIP
$1,672,000
Beyond 2031
$1,000,000
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$1,200,000 $1,200,000 40%Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
Other Funding (O)$1,799,941 $1,799,941
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve Manage Replace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Recreation & Open Space
## Project Summary Form - Ice Arena Improvements
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$2,999,941
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$2,999,941 $2,999,941
8. Brief summary of project: Improvements to the arena include a new roof, HVAC, lobby area, doors, the addition of an elevator, new
flooring, and improvements to locker rooms 5 and 6. Improvements to the Ice Arena are funded by the annual General Fund transfer. A new
roof is planned for 2029 and the funding for this will be G.O. property tax bonds.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 62 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Recreation & Open Space
## Project Summary Form - Parks Major Maintenance
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$1,855,000
* Annually Beyond 2031
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$1,855,000 $1,855,000
8. Brief summary of project: Various projects relating to the upkeep of existing park infrastructure are identified and prioritized each year
by Recreation Services and Public Works Maintenance staff. Projects include tennis/basketball court replacement, trail resurfacing, roof
replacement, parking lot reconstruction, field renovation and other repair or partial replacement of existing park capital items. Specific
improvement projects and their priorities will be identified through the Parks Master Plan process.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve XManage XReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
$1,855,000 $1,855,000
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$275,000
## 2028 CIP
$105,000
## 2031 CIP
$355,000
## 2026 CIB Revised
$275,000
## 2029 CIP
$355,000
Beyond 2031 *
$355,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
1999
5. Responsible department:
## Recreation Services
Spent to Date – Through 2025
Varied by year
## 2027 CIP
$55,000
## 2030 CIP
$355,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Parks Major Improvements
2a. Total project cost:
$1,855,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$1,855,000
3. Years to complete:
## Ongoing
Page 63 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
## Outdoor Pool Improvements
2a. Total project cost:
$297,690
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$297,690
3. Years to complete:
2
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2025
5. Responsible department:
## Recreation Services
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$100,000
## 2030 CIP
$0
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$0
## 2028 CIP
$0
## 2031 CIP
$21,270
## 2026 CIB Revised
$18,000
## 2029 CIP
$0
Beyond 2031
$158,420
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
Other Funding (O)$297,690 $297,690
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve Manage Replace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Recreation & Open Space
## Project Summary Form - Outdoor Pool Improvements
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$297,690
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$297,690 $297,690
8. Brief summary of project: Improvements to the Outdoor Pool are funded by the annual General Fund transfer. 2026 projects include
replacing umbrella canopies along with refurbishing pumps and boilers. 2027 projects include replacing pool filter sand, and adding shade
structures.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 64 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
## Parks Master Plan
2a. Total project cost:
$180,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$180,000
3. Years to complete:
2
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2026
5. Responsible department:
## Recreation Services
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$0
## 2027 CIP
$90,000
## 2030 CIP
$0
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$180,000
## 2028 CIP
$0
## 2031 CIP
$0
## 2026 CIB Revised
$90,000
## 2029 CIP
$0
Beyond 2031
$0
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
$180,000 $180,000
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve XManage XReplace/Improve XExpand X
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Recreation & Open Space
## Project Summary Form - Parks Master Plan
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$180,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$180,000 $180,000
8. Brief summary of project: Every eight to ten years, the Recreation Services Department updates the Parks Master Plan, a document
within the City’s overall Comprehensive Plan which outlines the overall philosophy around park management and development, as well as
specific park development plans, and serves as a guiding document for future capital improvement planning and other operations. The plan
was last updated in 2018. Staff will hire a consultant to help coordinate the update, which will involve an extensive public engagement
process.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 65 of 220
% of Total
5%
5%
100%
## Recreation & Open Space
## Project Summary Form - Veterans Park Improvements
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$10,000,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$10,000,000 $8,350,413
8. Brief summary of project: Improvements to the park infrastructure, including the Band Shell, the picnic shelter, the mini-golf facility,
trails, green space, marsh, etc). The improvements being made in 2025-2028 are funded by local sales tax ($1.9m), special revenue ($500k),
and a possible MN DNR grant ($500k). Projected improvements outlined in the facility assessment are planned for years beyond 2031 would
be funded by general obligation bonds serviced by property tax.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No
10. Priority ranking system
## A. Check
one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve Manage Replace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
$500,000 $500,000
Hennepin County (C)State (S)$500,000 $500,000
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
$9,000,000 $7,350,413 90%Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$5,000,000
## 2028 CIP
$250,000
## 2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$5,679,645
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2025
5. Responsible department:
## Recreation Services
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$1,649,587
## 2027 CIP
$2,420,768
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Veterans Park Improvements
2a. Total project cost:
$10,000,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$10,000,000
3. Years to complete:
8
Page 66 of 220
% of Total
1%
46%
100%
## Recreation & Open Space
## Project Summary Form - Wood Lake Nature Center Building
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$26,225,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$26,225,000 $14,175,481
8. Brief summary of project: Wood Lake Nature Center needs a complete re-build as its current building is 50 years old and is falling into
disrepair. The new building will be sustainably designed and will be able to meet the current demands and needs from across the community
and region that are placed on the center. Grants have been secured for the project: $3m from a Federal grant and $12m from a State of
Minnesota bonding grant. The largest remaining segment of funding, $11m, would come from local sales tax, if approved in November 2024
by referendum. The final funding component is from liquor store revenue ($225,000).
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## Preserve Manage Replace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
Federal Grant (F)$3,000,000 $0 11%Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
$225,000 $0
Hennepin County (C)State (S)$12,000,000 $12,000,000
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
$11,000,000 $2,175,481 42%Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$1,000,000
## 2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$14,175,481
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2022
5. Responsible department:
## Recreation Services
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$12,049,519
## 2027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Wood Lake Nature Center Building
2a. Total project cost:
$26,225,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$14,175,481
3. Years to complete:
5
Page 67 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Recreation & Open Space
## Project Summary Form - Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$150,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$150,000 $150,000
8. Brief summary of project: Replace the play equipment structure at Adams Hill Park in accordance with the Play Equipment
Replacement Schedule.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve Manage Replace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
$150,000 $150,000
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Recreation Services
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$150,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement
2a. Total project cost:
$150,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$150,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 68 of 220
% of Total
100%
## Recreation & Open Space
## Project Summary Form - Park Building Improvements
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$220,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$220,000 $220,000
8. Brief summary of project: Pending the acceptance of a grant from Hennepin County, the lighting controls and breakers will be upgraded
in 2027 at Christian, Donaldson, Augsburg, and Taft Parks.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve Manage Replace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)$220,000 $220,000 100%State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$0
## 2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$0
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Recreation Services
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$0
## 2027 CIP
$220,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Park Building Improvements
2a. Total project cost:
$220,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$220,000
3. Years to complete:
8
Page 69 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Recreation & Open Space
## Project Summary Form - Playground Replacement
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$600,000
* Annually Beyond 2031
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$600,000 $600,000
8. Brief summary of project: The Play Equipment Replacement Schedule dictates an annual check of the age and condition of the play
equipment lots around the city to determine the need to completely replace the equipment. Equipment wears and ages differently at different
parks, depending on level of use, sun exposure, quality, and other factors, so age is not the sole determining factor. So, planning years in
advance, it is most prudent to decide exactly which play equipment is in need of replacement closer to the actual project date.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve Manage Replace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
$600,000 $600,000
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP
$120,000
## 2031 CIP
$120,000
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIP
$120,000
Beyond 2031 *
$120,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
1990s
5. Responsible department:
## Recreation Services
Spent to Date – Through 2025
Varies by year
## 2027 CIP2030 CIP
$120,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Playground Replacement
2a. Total project cost:
$600,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$600,000
3. Years to complete:
## Ongoing
Page 70 of 220
% of Total
35%
65%
100%
1. Project:
## 64th Street Sidewalk
2a. Total project cost:
$1,310,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$1,230,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$80,000
## 2027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$165,000
## 2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$1,230,000
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
$456,000 $376,000
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)$854,000 $854,000
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve Expand X
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - 64th Street Sidewalk
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$1,310,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$1,310,000 $1,230,000
8. Brief summary of project: This project will construct a new sidewalk along W 64th St from just east of MSAS 363 (Lyndale Ave) to
CSAH 35 (Portland Ave). The new sidewalk will be separated from the roadway by a boulevard, and new ADA-compliant curb ramps will be
added throughout the corridor. A new ADA-compliant at-grade railroad crossing will be constructed across the Progressive Rail line located
along Pleasant Ave. Minor right-of-way acquisition and temporary construction easements will be required. Sidewalk is programmed to be
constructed on the south side of the street to minimize negative impacts to trees and driveways. Project was awarded Active Transportation
funding through the 2024 Regional Solicitation, with a construction year of FY 2026. Staff are currently working with Progressive Rail and
Canadian Pacific Kansas City to resolve concerns with a new railroad crossing, which may delay construction to 2027.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 71 of 220
% of Total
36%
64%
100%
1. Project:
## 73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal Blvd)
2a. Total project cost:
$1,401,200
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$1,336,200
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$65,000
## 2027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$200,000
## 2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$1,336,200
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
$500,000 $435,000
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)$901,200 $901,200
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - 73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal Blvd)
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$1,401,200
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$1,401,200 $1,336,200
8. Brief summary of project: This project will construct a new sidewalk along E 73rd Street and Diagonal Blvd to MSAS 369 (Cedar Ave
S). Sidewalk location along the north side of the corridor was determined by the City’s public engagement process. New ADA-compliant curb
ramps will be added throughout the corridor. Minor right-of-way acquisitions and temporary construction easements will be required. Project
was awarded Active Transportation funding through the Met Council’s 2024 Regional Solicitation, with a construction year of FY 2026.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 72 of 220
% of Total
31%
69%
100%
1. Project:
## Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk
2a. Total project cost:
$580,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$548,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$32,000
## 2027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$694,500
## 2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$548,000
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
$179,000 $147,000
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)$401,000 $401,000
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand X
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$580,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$580,000 $548,000
8. Brief summary of project: This project will construct approximately 0.25 miles of new sidewalk near Sheridan Hills Elementary School,
including traffic calming and pedestrian safety features at the intersections of 64th/Thomas, 64th/Sheridan, and 64th/Russell. Project was
identified during the 2024 SRTS Design Assistance study and was awarded Safe Routes to School funding through the 2024 Infrastructure
Solicitation, with a construction year of FY 2026.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 73 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form -
## 77th Street Pavement Maintenance
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$1,200,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$1,200,000 $1,200,000
8. Brief summary of project:
The concrete pavement panels and pavement joints on 77th Street are beginning to fail in certain areas and will need major maintenance in the
near future to avoid full reconstruction. This work will address the worst areas of pavement failure, primarily east of Portland Ave.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve XManageReplace/ImproveExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
$1,200,000 $1,200,000
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$100,000
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$1,100,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## 77th Street Pavement Maintenance
2a. Total project cost:
$1,200,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$1,200,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 74 of 220
% of Total
100%
1. Project:
## 78th Street Lighting
2a. Total project cost:
$500,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$500,000
3. Years to complete:
3
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$200,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP
$100,000
## 2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIP
$200,000
Beyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)$500,000 $500,000 100%User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/ImproveExpand X
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - 78th Street Lighting
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$500,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$500,000 $500,000
8. Brief summary of project:
MnDOT will be adding pedestrian level lighting (paid for by the City) to several trail segments constructed in Phase 1 of the I-494 project. Due
to issues with the way the design-build contract was written, there are several gaps in the trail network that will not have lighting constructed,
and the City will need to backfill with pedestrian and street lighting. These areas are 78th Street west of Penn, 78th Street from Pleasant Ave to
Nicollet Ave, and 78th Street from Nicollet Ave to Portland Ave.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 75 of 220
% of Total
100%
1. Project:
## ADA Improvements
2a. Total project cost:
$1,100,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$1,000,000
3. Years to complete:
6
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2024
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$100,000
## 2027 CIP
$200,000
## 2030 CIP
$200,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$200,000
## 2028 CIP
$200,000
## 2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$200,000
## 2029 CIP
$200,000
Beyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)$1,100,000 $1,000,000 100%User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManage XReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - ADA Improvements
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$1,100,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$1,100,000 $1,000,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Staff completed a City-wide inventory of pedestrian ramps and sidewalks in 2023. This inventory will be used to identify missing or non-
compliant ADA infrastructure within the right-of-way and program ADA infrastructure improvements throughout the City. This may include
sidewalks, trails, curbs, corner pedestrian ramps, crosswalks, and other infrastructure.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 76 of 220
% of Total
100%
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form -
## Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$280,000
* Annually Beyond 2031
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$280,000 $280,000
8. Brief summary of project:
As part of the implementation of the Bicycle Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan, improvements to bike facilities are made on a regular
basis. $40,000 of funds are identified each year, however actual spending varies from year to year. Any funds not spent remain available for
future use.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManage XReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)$280,000 $280,000 100%User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$40,000
## 2028 CIP
$40,000
## 2031 CIP
$40,000
## 2026 CIB Revised
$40,000
## 2029 CIP
$40,000
Beyond 2031 *
$40,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2019
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$0
## 2027 CIP
$40,000
## 2030 CIP
$40,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements
2a. Total project cost:
$40,000 annually
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$40,000 annually
3. Years to complete:
## Ongoing
Page 77 of 220
% of Total
100%
1. Project:
## Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements
2a. Total project cost:
$40,000 annually
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$40,000 annually
3. Years to complete:
## Ongoing
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2019
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$40,000
## 2030 CIP
$40,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$40,000
## 2028 CIP
$40,000
## 2031 CIP
$40,000
## 2026 CIB Revised
$40,000
## 2029 CIP
$40,000
Beyond 2031 *
$40,000
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)$280,000 $280,000 100%User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve Manage XReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form -
## Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$280,000
* Annually Beyond 2031
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$280,000 $280,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Spot pedestrian improvements, such as refuge islands, RRFBs, and pavement markings will be constructed where beneficial, as identified in the
Pedestrian Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan to achieve the greatest improvement in public safety. $40,000 of funds are identified
each year, however actual spending varies from year to year. Any funds not spent remain available for future use.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 78 of 220
% of Total
25%
100%
1. Project:
## Nicollet Ave Reconstruction
2a. Total project cost:
$8,000,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$7,860,000
3. Years to complete:
4
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2024
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$140,000
## 2027 CIP
$5,740,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$7,500,000
## 2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$2,120,000
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$5,000,000 $4,860,000 63%Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$1,000,000 $1,000,000 13%Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)$2,000,000 $2,000,000
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form -
## Nicollet Ave Reconstruction
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$8,000,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$8,000,000 $7,860,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Nicollet Ave Reconstruction from 66th St to 77th St led by Hennepin County. Underground utilities will be replaced or lined as necessary. The
County’s consultant led a robust public engagement process following Richfield’s public engagement process to guide the roadway design in
2023 and 2024. Staff are pursuing state bond funding to offset the local costs currently identified for bonding. This is identified as a 2-year
construction project (2026-27). Early project expenses are paid from existing City resources and will be reimbursed following the sale of G.O.
bonds closer to project construction.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 79 of 220
% of Total
100%
1. Project:
## Pavement Management Program
2a. Total project cost:
$4,230,000 over six years
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$4,230,000
3. Years to complete:
## Ongoing
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2019
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$0
## 2027 CIP
$755,000
## 2030 CIP
$845,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$737,000
## 2028 CIP
$795,000
## 2031 CIP
$770,000
## 2026 CIB Revised
$345,000
## 2029 CIP
$720,000
Beyond 2031
Varies annually
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)$4,230,000 $4,230,000 100%User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve XManage Replace/Improve Expand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form -
## Pavement Management Program
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$4,230,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$4,230,000 $4,230,000
8. Brief summary of project:
In order to protect the investments made in the City’s roadway infrastructure, an ongoing pavement management program is needed. The
program will address areas of greatest need throughout the City each year and may include mill and overlay, concrete replacement, pavement
rejuvenation treatments, crack sealing, and other various roadway improvements.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 80 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
## Traffic Signal Replacements
2a. Total project cost:
$2,665,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$2,665,000
3. Years to complete:
3
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$900,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$0
## 2028 CIP
$805,000
## 2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$120,000
## 2029 CIP
$840,000
Beyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
$2,665,000 $2,665,000
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form -
## Traffic Signal Replacements
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$2,665,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$2,665,000 $2,665,000
8. Brief summary of project:
The existing City-owned traffic signals along the 76th St/77th St corridor will be reaching the ends of their expected life-cycles between 2025
and 2035. The signals will need to be replaced with new signal systems or alternative traffic control measures. The estimated total cost of signal
replacements is $2.67M, with the first signal components being replaced no earlier than 2027 due to the ongoing 494 project.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 81 of 220
% of Total
100%
1. Project:
## 69th Street Reconstruction
2a. Total project cost:
$7,690,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$7,690,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$413,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP
$7,000,000
## 2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$277,000
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$3,240,000 $3,240,000 42%Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$4,450,000 $4,450,000 58%Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form -
## 69th Street Reconstruction
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$7,690,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$7,690,000 $7,690,000
8. Brief summary of project:
The project includes reconstruction of 69th Street between Penn Avenue and Xerxes Avenue, including narrowing of the roadway to add
sidewalk to one side, reconstruction of retaining walls, lining or replacement of sanitary sewer, and replacement of storm sewer. The final
roadway section will be determined following the City’s public engagement process.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 82 of 220
% of Total
20%
80%
100%
1. Project:
## 76th Street & I-35W Intersection Improvements
2a. Total project cost:
$750,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$750,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP
$750,000
## 2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
$150,000 $150,000
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)$600,000 $600,000
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve ManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - 76th Street & I-35W Intersection Improvements
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$750,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$750,000 $750,000
8. Brief summary of project:
The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail currently passes through the on and off ramps to I-35W at 76th Street, creating a safety risk for pedestrians
and bicyclists using the trail. This project would modify the interchange ramp terminal designs to create a safer intersection for pedestrians and
bicyclists using the trail. Ultimate design would be done in coordination with MnDOT and via the City’s public engagement process following a
joint study beginning in 2026.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 83 of 220
% of Total
6%
100%
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form -
## Penn Avenue Reconstruction
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$12,800,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$12,800,000 $12,600,000
8. Brief summary of project:
This project consists of the reconstruction of Penn Avenue from Hwy 62 to 75th Street led by Hennepin County. The project includes the
replacement of City utilities, ADA upgrades, and pedestrian and bicyclist upgrades. The City and County will lead a robust public engagement
process to guide the roadway design. The current estimate is based on the County’s cost share policy and assumes full utility
replacement/rehabilitation.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$5,000,000 $5,000,000 39%Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$7,000,000 $7,000,000 55%Municipal State
Aid (M)
$800,000 $600,000
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$300,000
## 2028 CIP
$6,000,000
## 2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$300,000
## 2029 CIP
$6,000,000
Beyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$200,000
## 2027 CIP
$300,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Penn Avenue Reconstruction
2a. Total project cost:
$12,800,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$12,600,000
3. Years to complete:
2
Page 84 of 220
% of Total
100%
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - 76th and Knox Improvements
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$4,350,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$4,350,000 $4,350,000
8. Brief summary of project:
This project consists of the conversion of the existing signalized intersection at W 76th St (MSAS 361) and Knox Ave S in the City of
Richfield to a roundabout, including improvements to active transportation facilities that use the intersection. Ultimate design of the
intersection will be determined through the City’s public engagement process. Permanent right-of-way acquisition and temporary construction
easements will be required. Project was selected for Regional Solicitation in the 2024 cycle, with a FY 2029 construction date. The Regional
Solicitation grant covers 80% of the estimated construction costs and City is responsible for funding the remaining construction costs and all
design and right-of-way costs.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
Federal Grant (F)$2,687,040 $2,687,040 62%Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$1,662,960 $1,662,960 38%Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP
$150,000
## 2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$50,000
## 2029 CIP
$3,800,000
Beyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$350,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
76th and Knox Improvements
2a. Total project cost:
$4,350,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$4,350,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 85 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
68th Street Sidewalk (Lyndale to Portland)
2a. Total project cost:
$1,800,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$1,800,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
$1,625,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIP
$175,000
Beyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)$1,800,000 $1,800,000
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## Preserve ManageReplace/ImproveExpand X
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - 68th Street Sidewalk (Lyndale to Portland)
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$1,800,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$1,800,000 $1,800,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Construction of a sidewalk along 68th St from Lyndale Ave to Nicollet Ave was included in the 2018 Pedestrian Master Plan; the 2023
Active Transportation Action Plan further identified 68th St between Lyndale Ave and Cedar Ave as a Priority Neighborhood Route. This
project programs a sidewalk between Lyndale Ave and Portland Ave to fulfill goals in both plans and better fit current grant funding
opportunities. Project includes narrowing the roadway by reconstructing a curb line, reconstruction of storm sewer, and reconstruction of any
utility conflicts. Project will be advanced if awarded grant funding through Regional Solicitation.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 86 of 220
% of Total
67%
100%
1. Project:
## 73rd Street Pedestrian Bridge
2a. Total project cost:
$7,500,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$7,500,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
$7,500,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$2,500,000 $2,500,000 33%Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)$5,000,000 $5,000,000
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## Preserve ManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form -
## 73rd Street Pedestrian Bridge
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$7,500,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$7,500,000 $7,500,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Replacement of 73rd St pedestrian bridge over I-35W. The existing bridge is not ADA accessible, narrow, and disconnected from the existing
pedestrian and bike network. MnDOT has indicated that funding is available for this project in FY2030. The City will continue to identify and
apply for grant funding opportunities to cover the local costs for this project.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 87 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form -
73rd Street Trail (35W to Lyndale)
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$1,113,500
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$1,113,500 $1,113,500
8. Brief summary of project:
Construction of a 10' bituminous trail from 35W to Lyndale Ave along 73rd Street is included in the Pedestrian Master Plan. Project includes
narrowing the roadway by reconstructing a curb line, reconstruction of storm sewer, and reconstruction of any utility conflicts. Project will be
advanced if awarded grant funding through Regional Solicitation. This project will likely be constructed concurrently with the 73rd St
Pedestrian Bridge.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## Preserve ManageReplace/ImproveExpand X
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)$1,113,500 $1,113,500
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIP
$113,500
Beyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
$1,000,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
73rd Street Trail (35W to Lyndale)
2a. Total project cost:
$1,113,500
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$1,113,500
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 88 of 220
% of Total
18%
100%
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - 76th Street West Reconstruction
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$5,700,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$5,700,000 $5,700,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Reconstruction of 76th Street between Sheridan Avenue and Xerxes Avenue, including intersection control at Upton Avenue, replacement of
City utilities, undergrounding of overhead utilities, retaining wall and sidewalk replacement. The exact design of the roadway will be
determined through a public engagement process. The City will continue pursuing grant funding, however the project will need to be completed
due to deteriorating stormwater utilities, regardless of if grant funding is obtained.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)$1,000,000
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## Preserve ManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
$1,000,000
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$600,000 $600,000 11%Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$4,100,000 $4,100,000 72%Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIP
$700,000
Beyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
$5,000,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## 76th Street West Reconstruction
2a. Total project cost:
$5,700,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$5,700,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 89 of 220
% of Total
30%
100%
1. Project:
## 63rd Street Greenway
2a. Total project cost:
$3,700,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$3,700,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$3,700,000
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
$1,100,000 $1,100,000
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
Federal Grant (F)$2,600,000 $2,600,000 70%Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## Preserve ManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - 63rd Street Greenway
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$3,700,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$3,700,000 $3,700,000
8. Brief summary of project:
This project would create a trail connection on 63rd Street between Taft Park and Veterans Park. Project would include removing thru access on
63rd Street from 11th Ave to Bloomington Ave, creating a linear park while maintaining driveway access for all residents. Ultimate design of
the linear park would be based on a public outreach and engagement process. This project would only be implemented if grant funding can be
secured. Current estimate assumes a grant would cover 80% of construction costs; the City would be responsible for 20% of construction costs
and all of the design/engineering costs.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 90 of 220
% of Total
29%
100%
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form -
## 70th Street Reconstruction
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$4,450,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$4,450,000 $4,450,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Reconstruction of 70th Street between 2nd Avenue and 5th Avenue, including sidewalk, curb, and gutter as well as undergrounding of parallel
utilities. Additionally, reconstruction will replace City utilities, including an 84” storm sewer pipe that will connect to the storm system installed
with the Portland Avenue project. The existing pipe is being monitored for condition, and rate of deterioration may impact the year of
reconstruction. The current conditions have been identified as high risk through the Stormwater Risk Assessment. Design of the roadway will
include a public engagement process.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## Preserve ManageReplace/Improve XExpand X
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$3,150,000 $3,150,000 71%Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
$1,300,000 $1,300,000
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$4,450,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## 70th Street Reconstruction
2a. Total project cost:
$4,450,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$4,450,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 91 of 220
% of Total
100%
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - 76th/77th Street Intersection Control
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$3,600,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$3,600,000 $3,600,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Currently, the intersection of 76th Street and 77th Street—two of the highest volume local roads in Richfield—is an unsignalized “T”
intersection that carries approximately 16,000 vehicles per day. The exact design of the intersection and the intersection control method will be
determined through a technical analysis.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## Preserve ManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$3,600,000 $3,600,000 100%Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$3,600,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## 76th/77th Street Intersection Control
2a. Total project cost:
$3,600,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$3,600,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 92 of 220
% of Total
100%
1. Project:
## 77th Street Reconstruction - Lyndale to Portland
2a. Total project cost:
$25,000,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$25,000,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$25,000,000
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$25,000,000 $25,000,000 100%Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## Preserve ManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
Project Summary Form - 77th Street Reconstruction - Lyndale to Portland
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$25,000,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$25,000,000 $25,000,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Reconstruction of approximately 1 mile of 77th Street between Lyndale Ave and Portland Ave. Project goals would address pedestrian/bicycle
access in the corridor and right-sizing of the roadway to match existing and projected traffic volumes. Ultimate design of the roadway would be
determined through the City’s public engagement process.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 93 of 220
% of Total
100%
1. Project:
## 77th Street Reconstruction - Penn to Lyndale
2a. Total project cost:
$25,000,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$25,000,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$25,000,000
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$25,000,000 $25,000,000 100%Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## Preserve ManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
Project Summary Form - 77th Street Reconstruction - Penn to Lyndale
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$25,000,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$25,000,000 $25,000,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Reconstruction of approximately 1 mile of 76th and 77th Street between Penn Ave and Lyndale Ave. Project goals would address
pedestrian/bicycle access in the corridor and right-sizing of the roadway to match existing and projected traffic volumes. Ultimate design of the
roadway would be determined through the City’s public engagement process.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 94 of 220
% of Total
100%
## Right of Way Improvements
Project Summary Form - 77th Street Reconstruction - Portland to Richfield Parkway
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$10,500,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$10,500,000 $10,500,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Reconstruction of approximately 0.8 miles of 77th Street between Portland Ave and Richfield Parkway. Project goals would address
pedestrian/bicycle access in the corridor, intersection safety at 12th Ave, Chicago Ave, Bloomington Ave, and 14th Ave, and right-sizing of the
roadway to match existing and projected traffic volumes. Ultimate design of the roadway would be determined through the City’s public
engagement process. Project vision is a boulevard design acting as a gateway to the City from MSP Terminal 2 and the Mall of America
through the 77th Street Underpass.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## Preserve ManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$1,000,000 $1,000,000 10%Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$9,500,000 $9,500,000 90%Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$10,500,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## 77th Street Reconstruction - Portland to Richfield Parkway
2a. Total project cost:
$10,500,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$10,500,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 95 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
## Bloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd
2a. Total project cost:
$1,800,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$1,800,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$1,800,000
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
$1,800,000 $1,800,000
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## Preserve ManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - Bloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$1,800,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$1,800,000 $1,800,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Bloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd is identified as a local intersection with a high injury crash rate. Multiple intersections nearby have sharp
angles and difficult sightlines in addition to bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Permanent intervention requires realignment of three
intersections (Bloomington/72nd, Diagonal/72nd, Bloomington/Diagonal). A more detailed cost estimate will come when the City pursues grant
funding. Final design will be determined through a public engagement process.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 96 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
## Bloomington Ave and Richfield Parkway
2a. Total project cost:
$1,800,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$1,800,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$1,800,000
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
$1,800,000 $1,800,000
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## Preserve ManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - Bloomington Ave and Richfield Parkway
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$1,800,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$1,800,000 $1,800,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Bloomington Ave and Richfield Pkwy is identified as a local intersection with a high injury crash rate. Multiple intersections nearby can have
difficult sightlines in addition to bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Metro Transit Route 14 also runs through the intersection area. Permanent
intervention requires realignment of two intersections (Bloomington Ave/63rd St, Bloomington Ave/Richfield Pkwy). A more detailed cost
estimate will come when the City pursues grant funding. Final design will be determined through a public engagement process.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 97 of 220
% of Total
100%
1. Project:
## Humboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction
2a. Total project cost:
$11,000,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$11,000,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$11,000,000
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$7,000,000 $7,000,000 64%Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$4,000,000 $4,000,000 36%Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve ManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - Humboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$11,000,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$11,000,000 $11,000,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Reconstruction of Humboldt Avenue and Lake Shore Drive between 69th Street and 75th Street. A public engagement process will take place to
identify the future road section and continuity. The reconstruction will include replacement of City utilities. Portions of this project may be
included in the 73rd St Pedestrian Bridge project; if that occurs, this project scope and funding would be adjusted accordingly.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 98 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
## North Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction
2a. Total project cost:
$4,900,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$4,900,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$4,900,000
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
$4,900,000 $4,900,000
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve ManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - North Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$4,900,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$4,900,000 $4,900,000
8. Brief summary of project:
This project includes reconstruction of Lyndale Ave between 65th St and Hwy 62. The project would “right-size” the roadway and modernize
the corridor to match the Lyndale Ave corridor south of 66th St. The project would include a full public engagement process to determine the
final design. The Lyndale Ave Reconstruction project is not planned to occur until the existing pavement and surface infrastructure reach end-of-
life.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 99 of 220
% of Total
5%
5%
90%
100%
## Right of Way Improvements
## Project Summary Form - TH 62 Noise Barrier East
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$11,000,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$11,000,000 $11,000,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Richfield is interested in installing a noise wall on the south side of TH 62 from 11th Ave to Bloomington Ave. This installation requires
collaboration with MnDOT and City of Minneapolis. Installation will only be pursued if the City is successful in obtaining funding from
MnDOT’s Standalone Noise Barrier Program. Currently, this project does not have identified funding from City of Minneapolis, but does have
Minneapolis’ continued interest.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve ManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)$9,900,000 $9,900,000
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
Other Funding (O)$550,000 $550,000
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
$550,000 $550,000
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$11,000,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## TH 62 Noise Barrier East
2a. Total project cost:
$11,000,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$11,000,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 100 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - SCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$200,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$200,000 $200,000
8. Brief summary of project: The Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system cybersecurity upgrade will modernize all
hardware within the SCADA network that controls the water treatment plant and other utility systems in Richfield. Much of the existing
equipment is outdated (some components are nearly 20 years old) which increases the risk of failure and makes the system more vulnerable to
cybersecurity threats. Upgrading to new hardware will significantly improve system reliability and performance, enabling faster response times
to operational changes. In addition, the new equipment will incorporate enhanced security features designed to better protect critical
infrastructure from unauthorized access and cyberattacks.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$200,000 $200,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP
$50,000
## 2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$50,000
## 2029 CIP
$50,000
Beyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$50,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## SCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade
2a. Total project cost:
$200,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$200,000
3. Years to complete:
5
Page 101 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Water Plant Elevator Replacement
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$200,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$200,000 $200,000
8. Brief summary of project: The elevator at the water treatment plant has reached the end of its useful life cycle. Public Works staff have
been advised by the elevator service company that parts are no longer available for this elevator and control system, and it has become difficult
to service or repair when the need arises. The elevator is used daily to transport equipment, chemicals, visitors, and staff from lower to upper
levels of the plant. It also satisfies ADA requirements for the building. This project includes a full replacement of the elevator and controls
with modern technology.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$200,000 $200,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$175,000
## 2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$150,000
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$50,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Water Plant Elevator Replacement
2a. Total project cost:
$200,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$200,000
3. Years to complete:
2
Page 102 of 220
% of Total
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Water Plant Generator
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$2,500,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$2,500,000 $2,500,000
8. Brief summary of project: The generator at the water treatment plant has reached the point where maintenance and problem solving are
too frequent. In addition, the integrated fuel tank and housing are badly corroded. Repairing the current unit is not advantageous due to the
age, the cost to implement the needed repairs, and the minimal return on such an investment. There has also been a shift in the industry and
technology for more efficient ways of providing a generator backup system for a building of this type and power demand. This project will
fund the design, supply of the generator, placement and commissioning, and oversight of these activities. A study was commissioned in 2024
to ascertain the design needs and future costs.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$2,500,000 $2,500,000 100%Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$100,000
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$2,400,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Water Plant Generator
2a. Total project cost:
$2,500,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$2,500,000
3. Years to complete:
2
Page 103 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Water Plant Sludge Pump #2 Replacement
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$50,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$50,000 $50,000
8. Brief summary of project: This project will include the procurement and installation of one new sludge pump at the water treatment plant
(the last of three sludge pumps to be replaced). The frequent efforts required for maintenance and repair has become untenable for plant
operations
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$50,000 $50,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$50,000
## 2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$50,000
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Water Plant Sludge Pump #2 Replacement
2a. Total project cost:
$50,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$50,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 104 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Sanitary Lift Station 6 Rehabilitation
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$300,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$300,000 $300,000
8. Brief summary of project: Rehabilitation of lift station 6, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control equipment,
and updated mechanical equipment to include pumps and valves. Project also will improve concrete slab around wet well to solve drainage
issues
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$300,000 $300,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$300,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Sanitary Lift Station 6 Rehabilitation
2a. Total project cost:
$300,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$300,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 105 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Utilities
Project Summary Form - Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Storm Sewer Collection System
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$1,400,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$2,000,000 $2,000,000
8. Brief summary of project: The storm sewer collection system was installed in the mid 1950’s and is comprised of mostly reinforced
concrete pipe. A cleaning and inspection program is conducted annually to determine the condition of the sewer mains and structures. Sewer
mains and structures that are identified as being in poor condition will be replaced or rehabilitated with the means and methods that are in-line
with industry standards. The rehabilitation will extend the life of the mains by up to 75 years.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$2,000,000 $2,000,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$200,000
## 2028 CIP
$200,000
## 2031 CIP
$200,000
## 2026 CIB Revised
$200,000
## 2029 CIP
$200,000
Beyond 2031 *
$200,000
* Annually beyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2019
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
Spent to Date – Through 2025
## NA
## 2027 CIP
$200,000
## 2030 CIP
$200,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Storm Sewer Collection System
2a. Total project cost:
$200,000 annually
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$200,000 annually
3. Years to complete:
## Ongoing
Page 106 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$5,400,000
* Annually Beyond 2031, through 2050 (estimated)
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$5,400,000 $5,400,000
8. Brief summary of project: The wastewater collection system was installed in the late 1950’s and mainly consists of Vitrified Clay Pipe
(VCP). As these VCP pipes age, tree root intrusion and cracking become more common. In order to preserve an appropriate level of service
to our users and protect the mill and overlay investment, portions of the wastewater collection system undergo cured-in-place pipe (CIPP)
lining. Lining consists of placement of a liner in the existing clay pipe, which is adhered to the pipe wall and cured through the use of steam,
hot water, or ultraviolet light. Once it cools, the liner hardens to a consistency of schedule 40 PVC, effectively restoring structural integrity.
This rehabilitation technique is widely used in the industry and is done at a fraction of the cost of open cutting a street to replace the line. It is
anticipated that this program will be ongoing until the entire wastewater collection system is rehabilitated, based upon funding availability.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$5,400,000 $5,400,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$900,000
## 2028 CIP
$900,000
## 2031 CIP
$900,000
## 2026 CIB Revised
$900,000
2029 CIPBeyond 2031 *
$900,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2017
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
Spent to Date – Through 2025
## NA
## 2027 CIP
$900,000
## 2030 CIP
$900,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining
2a. Total project cost:
$900,000 annually
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$900,000 annually
3. Years to complete:
## Ongoing
Page 107 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Restroom Renovations - WTP Second Floor
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$200,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$200,000 $200,000
8. Brief summary of project: The restrooms at the water plant date back to the 1960s and remain largely unchanged. The second-level
restrooms, in particular, are in urgent need of renovation to address outdated conditions and to meet current ADA accessibility standards. This
project will renovate existing water plant restrooms for ADA compliance and modernization.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManage Replace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$200,000 $200,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$200,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Restroom Renovations - WTP Second Floor
2a. Total project cost:
$200,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$200,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 108 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
## Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements
2a. Total project cost:
$225,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$225,000
3. Years to complete:
2
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2025
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$100,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$100,000
## 2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$125,000
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$225,000 $225,000
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$225,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$225,000 $225,000
8. Brief summary of project: The floor of the chlorine storage area in the water treatment plant has experienced severe spalling and exposure
of rebar due to a previous chlorine leak. Impairment has very likely spread further beyond the spalling that is observable. In order to
implement the proper repairs and restore the structural integrity of the floor, the chlorine storage tanks and day tank system will need to be
relocated and the full extent of the chlorine room floor inspected and repaired. This project will include the relocation effort along with the
requisite concrete and reinforcing bar repair to the floor.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 109 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
## Water Plant Personnel Safety Systems Improvements
2a. Total project cost:
$125,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$125,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$125,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$125,000 $125,000
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Water Plant Personnel Safety Systems Improvements
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$125,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$125,000 $125,000
8. Brief summary of project: The results of the Water Treatment Plant Condition Assessment conducted in 2022 revealed certain health and
safety issues. One of the issues identified was a deficiency with the design and setup of the eye wash and shower stations. Although the water
plant has the proper stations for our building type, it was discovered that the set up itself is not OSHA compliant. Public works staff retained a
consultant to formulate a design that mitigates these issues of non-compliance. This project will include the construction of a recirculation
system that satisfies both State and OSHA standards.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 110 of 220
% of Total
100%
1. Project:
## Water System Interconnect
2a. Total project cost:
$5,000,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$5,000,000
3. Years to complete:
2
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2025
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$4,900,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$100,000
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$3,909,000 $3,909,000 78%Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
Federal Grant (F)$1,091,000 $1,091,000 22%Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/ImproveExpand X
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form -
## Water System Interconnect
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$5,000,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$5,000,000 $5,000,000
8. Brief summary of project: The water treatment plant was built in 1963 and to date has been a standalone system. If it were to have
a catastrophic failure and unable to produce water, the city is not equipped with a long-term emergency backup water source.
Connecting to another city’s water system would create the needed level of service redundancy. As part of the DNR’s water supply
plan, they encourage all cities to have an emergency backup water source.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 111 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Well #3 Water Service
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$50,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$50,000 $50,000
8. Brief summary of project: A ¾ inch water service extends out to the Well #3 building at the water plant. The water service was
constructed in a manner that exposes a length of copper to the outside elements as it traverses from within the plant to the well house. This
length of pipe has burst on several occasions due to the cold weather rendering the well useless. This project will include the design,
construction, and oversight of construction of a water service extension that is frost protected.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$50,000 $50,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$50,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Well #3 Water Service
2a. Total project cost:
$50,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$50,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 112 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form -
## Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$500,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$500,000 $500,000
8. Brief summary of project: The Wilson Pond subwatershed is located in the southeast quadrant of the City. This subwatershed is subject
to flooding during heavy rain events. The low-lying nature of the subwatershed makes it challenging to manage stormwater within the regional
pond (Wilson Pond) system. Public Works staff have updated the stormwater model to reflect current flood risk conditions based on available
data. The results of the model will be used to explore engineering alternatives to reduce the flood risk to the immediate neighborhoods. A
design will be selected from the alternatives analysis that yields the most benefit.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/ImproveExpand X
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$500,000 $500,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP
$400,000
## 2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$100,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation
2a. Total project cost:
$500,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$500,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 113 of 220
% of Total
45%
45%
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form -
## HUB Redevelopment Participation
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$1,560,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$1,560,000 $1,560,000
8. Brief summary of project:
In conjunction with redevelopment of the HUB shopping center property, the City will work with the developer to construct stormwater
infrastructure that will address regional flooding of public right-of-way near the HUB property. The infrastructure will be designed to handle
runoff from public right-of-way, as well as anticipated developed conditions on the HUB property. The costs for this infrastructure will be
shared between the City and the developer. The City will also likely share cost to complete sidewalk installation along 65th St that was not
constructed with the 65th St Reconstruction Project.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManage Replace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)$160,000 $160,000 10%User Fee (U)$700,000 $700,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
Other Funding (O)$700,000 $700,000
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP
$1,560,000
## 2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## HUB Redevelopment Participation
2a. Total project cost:
$1,560,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$1,560,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 114 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
## Water Plant Filter Media Replacement and Rehabilitation
2a. Total project cost:
$500,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$500,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP
$500,000
## 2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$500,000 $500,000
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Utilities
Project Summary Form - Water Plant Filter Meda Replacement and Rehabilitation
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$500,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$500,000 $500,000
8. Brief summary of project: The filter media at the water treatment plant has reached the end of its useful life cycle. Industry standards
state that filter media of this type has a lifespan of roughly 20-years. The current media was replaced in 2006. This project will include a full
exchange of the current sand media, or an engineered media, in the event of the water chemistry changing and driving this need. This effort
will also include a coatings improvement effort to the walls of the filter bays and new actuating valves.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 115 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form -
## Sanitary Lift Station 4 Rehabilitation
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$350,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$350,000 $350,000
8. Brief summary of project: Rehabilitation of sanitary lift station 4, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control
equipment, and updated mechanical equipment including pumps and valves. Dry well pit to be updated to current safety standards
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$350,000 $350,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIP
$350,000
Beyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Sanitary Lift Station 4 Rehabilitation
2a. Total project cost:
$350,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$350,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 116 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
## Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains
2a. Total project cost:
$137,000,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$137,000,000
3. Years to complete:
50-75
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
$3,000,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
$3,000,000
2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031 *
$131,000,000
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)
$137,000,000
## Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$137,000,000
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$137,000,000
* $3,000,000 Annually Beyond 2031, through 2075 (estimated)
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$137,000,000 $137,000,000
8. Brief summary of project: The water distribution system is nearing the end of its functional life. Industry standards for cast iron pipe –
which is the primary pipe material within the distribution system – is 75 years. This watermain rehabilitation program has been structured to
either replace or rehabilitate (in-situ) the distribution system within the next 50-75 years. A recent study revealed that the present worth for
replacement/rehabilitation is whole is $137 Million. As years pass we expect this cost to increase, which is why this is programmed for years
beyond 50-years. This will be ongoing replacement and may be accelerated using bonding as needed and/or to avoid inflation.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 117 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
## Sanitary Lift Station #1 Rehabilitation
2a. Total project cost:
$350,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$350,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
$350,000
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$350,000 $350,000
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Sanitary Lift Station #1 Rehabilitation
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$350,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$350,000 $350,000
8. Brief summary of project: Rehabilitation of lift station #1, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control equipment,
and updated mechanical equipment to include pumps and valves. Update building with new HVAC and new roof.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 118 of 220
% of Total
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Logan Water Tower Coating
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$2,000,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$2,000,000 $2,000,000
8. Brief summary of project: The 1 million gallon Logan Ave water tower was originally constructed in 1962. The tower provides water
pressure and storage to the residents of Richfield. The interior and exterior were last reconditioned in 2011. This tower still has the old city logo.
The typical life span of these types of coatings is 15-20 years. This project is programmed for 2035.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$2,000,000 $2,000,000 100%Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$2,000,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Logan Water Tower Coating
2a. Total project cost:
$2,000,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$2,000,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 119 of 220
% of Total
100%
1. Project:
## Penn Tower Coating
2a. Total project cost:
$2,000,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$2,000,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$2,000,000
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)$2,000,000 $2,000,000 100%Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Penn Tower Coating
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$2,000,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$2,000,000 $2,000,000
8. Brief summary of project: The 1.5 million gallon Penn Ave water tower was originally constructed in 1963. A reapplication of the interior
and exterior protective coatings will be required at Penn Tower. The interior was last reconditioned in 2007, and the exterior of the tank was
repainted in 2017. Recent inspections revealed that the integrity of the coating is intact and the need is very low for corrective actions. This
project is scheduled for 2037.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 120 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Water Plant Lobby Restroom Renovations
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$185,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$185,000 $185,000
8. Brief summary of project: This project would renovate the lobby restrooms, bring them up to date with the current ADA standards.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$185,000 $185,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$185,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Water Plant Lobby Restroom Renovation
2a. Total project cost:
$185,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$185,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 121 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Sanitary Lift Station #2 Rehabilitation
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$350,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$350,000 $350,000
8. Brief summary of project: Rehabilitation of sanitary lift station #2, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control
equipment, and updated mechanical equipment to include pumps and valves. Update building with new HVAC and new roof.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$350,000 $350,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$350,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Sanitary Lift Station #2 Rehabilitation
2a. Total project cost:
$350,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$350,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 122 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Sanitary Lift Station #3 Rehabilitation
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$350,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$350,000 $350,000
8. Brief summary of project: Rehabilitation of sanitary lift station #3, to include updated safety equipment, updated electrical and control
equipment, and updated mechanical equipment to include pumps and valves.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$350,000 $350,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$350,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Sanitary Lift Station #3 Rehabilitation
2a. Total project cost:
$350,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$350,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 123 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Water Plant Handrail and Guardrail Replacement
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$100,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$100,000 $100,000
8. Brief summary of project: This project would bring all of the handrails and guardrails in the water plant up to current ADA standards.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$100,000 $100,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$100,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Water Plant Handrail and Guardrail Replacement
2a. Total project cost:
$100,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$100,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 124 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Water Plant Painting
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$40,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$40,000 $40,000
8. Brief summary of project: Painting the wall and floors through out the interior of the water plant along with the exterior concrete pilings.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$40,000 $40,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$40,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Water Plant Painting
2a. Total project cost:
$40,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$40,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 125 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
## Water Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings
2a. Total project cost:
$500,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$500,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$500,000
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$500,000 $500,000
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Water Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$500,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$500,000 $500,000
8. Brief summary of project: An evaluation was completed in 2023 to review the integrity of the coatings on the pipes within the water
treatment plant pipe gallery. The evaluation revealed a loss of the protective coatings on the pipes along with observations of corrosion of the
pipe, pipe-joints and hardware, and supporting beams in certain locations. The coatings effort will need to be completed within the next ten-
year cycle. This project will fund the work and oversight of this effort.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 126 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
## Well #2 Generator
2a. Total project cost:
$1,000,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$1,000,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$1,000,000
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$1,000,000 $1,000,000
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
## X
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Well #2 Generator
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$1,000,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## X
## TOTAL
$1,000,000 $1,000,000
8. Brief summary of project: The generator at Well 2 is nearing its life-cycle and will require replacement. This project will fund the
design, supply of the generator, placement and commissioning, and oversight of these activities.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 127 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1. Project:
## Well #5 Generator
2a. Total project cost:
$1,000,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$1,000,000
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Recreation Services
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
$1,000,000
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)$1,000,000 $1,000,000
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Utilities
## Project Summary Form - Well #5 Generator
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$1,000,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$1,000,000 $1,000,000
8. Brief summary of project: The generator at Well #5 is nearing the end of its useful life-cycle and will require replacement. This project
will fund the design, supply of the generator, placement and commissioning, and oversight of these activities.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 128 of 220
% of Total
100%
## Buildings IT & Fleet
Project Summary Form - Carpet Replacement - Fire Station #1 and Police
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$120,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$120,000 $120,000
8. Brief summary of project: The carpet in the police and fire department is worn and past it's life expectancy.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
$120,000 $120,000 100%Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$120,000
## 2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$120,000
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Government Buildings
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Carpet Replacement - Police and Fire
2a. Total project cost:
$120,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$120,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 129 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)
## Buildings IT & Fleet
## Project Summary Form - Richfield Liquor Cedar Point
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$774,502
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
## TOTAL
$774,502 $774,502
2026 - $7,500.00 - Replace 1 of 2 cooler compressors
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
2027 - $260,560. - Excavate & replace perimeter waterproofing below garage to eliminate water intrusion(199,699.50), Replace
damaged concreate sidewalks and calking (56,785.30), add blower fans to prevent moisture accumulation on cooler doors (4,075.50)
2029 - $11,126.37 - Replace weatherstripping seal on cooler doors (2,373.63), replace asphalt paving at south of building and calking
joint to building (8,752.74)
2030 - (17,053.02) - Replace electric water heater, near end of life (5,452.96), replace cracked concrete receiving dock slab and site
drainage system.
2031 - (38,556.87) - Replace fire alarm system, near end of life.
2031< - (439,705.83) - Parking lot repair/replacement & geotechnical survey (39,411.24), Roof replacement (266,219.08), repaint trim in
office suite (1,615.09), replace worn carpet in office suite (3,633.95), repaint gypsum walls in office suite (10,901.85), replace worn
countertops and casework (33,035.89), prep and paint walls in stairwell (4,463.38), replace damaged bollards by loading dock
(1,545.54), replace damage dock bumper (5,409.39), replace damaged block by loading dock wall (21,444.35), clean water stains from
exterior leaks on concrete blocks in basement (12,364.31), Landscaping allowance for site improvements (40,377.20).
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
PreserveManageReplace/Improve (X)Expand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
Other Funding (O)$774,502 $774,502
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$0
## 2028 CIP
$0
## 2031 CIP
$38,557
## 2026 CIB Revised
$7,500
## 2029 CIP
$11,126
Beyond 2031
$439,706
1. Project:
## Richfield Liquor Cedar Point (Wold Assessment)
2a. Total project cost:
$774,502
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$774,502
3. Years to complete:
10
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
## 5. Responsible department: Liquor Operations
## Government Buildings
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$0
## 2027 CIP
$260,560
## 2030 CIP
$17,053
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
Page 130 of 220
% of Total
100%
## Buildings IT & Fleet
## Project Summary Form - Fleet Vehicle Purchases
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$14,122,906
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$14,122,906 $14,122,906
8. Brief summary of project: The Public Works Garage Division purchases all vehicles used by City Departments to provide City Services.
This project is ongoing in which the Division makes vehicle purchases every year.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
$14,122,906 $14,122,906 100%Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$1,664,726
## 2028 CIP
$1,874,250
## 2031 CIP
$2,295,400
## 2026 CIB Revised
$1,664,726
## 2029 CIP
$1,967,960
Beyond 2031
$2,410,170
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
## N/A
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$1,785,000
## 2030 CIP
$2,125,400
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Fleet Vehicle Purchases
2a. Total project cost:
$14,122,906
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$14,122,906
3. Years to complete:
## Ongoing
Page 131 of 220
% of Total
100%
## Buildings IT & Fleet
## Project Summary Form - Public Works Facility Building Improvements
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$2,427,700
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$2,427,700 $2,427,700
8. Brief summary of project: A number of building maintenance items that need to be addressed were found in a recent Facility Study. The
building items vary from HVAC component replacement to repairing water intrusion into the building. This is an ongoing project and
maintenance items have been prioritized by City Staff.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
$37,700 $37,700 2%Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve Manage Replace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$2,390,000 $2,390,000 98%Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP
$235,000
## 2031 CIP
$415,000
## 2026 CIB Revised
$37,700
## 2029 CIP
$235,000
Beyond 2031
$695,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$460,000
## 2030 CIP
$350,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Public Works Facility Building Improvements
2a. Total project cost:
$2,427,700
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$2,427,700
3. Years to complete:
## Ongoing
Page 132 of 220
% of Total
15%
100%
## Buildings IT & Fleet
## Project Summary Form - Public Works Facility Office Area Upgrades
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$340,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$340,000 $340,000
8. Brief Summary of Project: The Public Works Department is running out of office space and room for additional staff. Currently there is
not an identified work area for a GIS Analyst that has not been hired and an identified hire date of June 1, 2026. This project includes adding 2
offices and some HVAC components. This project will fulfil an immediate space need but does not eliminate the need for other area upgrades
that are needed in the future including new carpet, new office cube equipment, and HVAC repairs.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve Manage Replace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
$290,000 $290,000 85%Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
Other Funding (O)$50,000 $50,000
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$50,000
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$290,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Public Works Facility Office Area Upgrades
2a. Total project cost:
$340,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$340,000
3. Years to complete:
2
Page 133 of 220
% of Total
44%
34%
100%
## Buildings IT & Fleet
## Project Summary Form - Public Works Storage Facility
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$1,475,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$1,475,000 $1,475,000
8. Brief summary of project: The City built its current maintenance facility with an understanding that ongoing storage needs could be
accommodated off-site. Historically, the City had relied on the MnDOT Cedar Ave Station to provide the salt needed for the winter season via
an ongoing agreement and did not need to store salt on site. This agreement was modified in 2021 and MnDOT has chosen to no longer
provide salt to the city. In addition, the site the City is currently using for temporary storage for tree debris, sweepings, water main break
debris etc., is a short-term solution, requiring the City to identify a new location to be used for its storage needs. In 2025 MnDOT conveyed a
parcel of land along the west side of TH 77 and north of Diagonal Blvd to the City which will become the future storage site. Construction is
anticipated in 2026.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
## X
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve Manage Replace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Franchise Fee (FF)$325,000 $325,000 22%User Fee (U)$500,000 $500,000
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
Other Funding (O)$650,000 $650,000
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$1,475,000
## 2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised
$1,475,000
2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Public Works Storage Facility
2a. Total project cost:
$1,475,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$1,475,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 134 of 220
% of Total
100%
1. Project:
## Computer Workstation Replacements
2a. Total project cost:
$458,511
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$458,511
3. Years to complete:
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Information Technologies
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$70,000
## 2030 CIP
$77,610
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP
$72,450
## 2031 CIP
$80,327
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIP
$74,986
Beyond 2031
$83,138
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
$458,511 $458,511 100%
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Buildings IT & Fleet
## Project Summary Form - Computer Workstation Replacements
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$458,511
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$458,511 $458,511
8. Brief summary of project:
Annual replacement of City desktop and laptop computer workstations based on the established four-year lifecycle replacement
schedule to maintain reliable, secure, and supported technology for City operations. This project also includes funding for additional
computer workstations needed to support departmental growth, operational needs, and changing staffing requirements across the
organization.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 135 of 220
% of Total
10%
100%
## Buildings IT & Fleet
Project Summary Form - Fire Station 1 Vehicle Exhaust Removal System
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$85,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$85,000 $85,000
8. Brief summary of project:
Fire Station 1 was built with a commercial exhaust detection system that uses the apparatus bays normal HVAC system to evacuate.
The industry standard for fire station apparatus bays is to have a dedicated ventilation system that activates when trucks are started
to capture all exhaust fumes and diesel particulate. Fire Station 2 was upgraded with a dedicated exhaust system in 2026 with
funding from a federal FEMA Assistance to Firefighter Grant (AFG). An AFG will be applied for in 2027 to fund the placement of
the same dedicated exhaust system in Fire Station 1. This type of grant requires a 10% match that the city is expected to fund and
will be accounted for in the 2027 proposed budget.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
Federal Grant (F)$76,500 $76,500 90%Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
Other Funding (O)$8,500 $8,500
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Fire
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$85,000
## 2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Fire Station 1 Vehicle Exhaust Removal System
2a. Total project cost:
$85,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$85,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 136 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
1.Project:
## Fire Station 2 Capital Needs
2a. Total project cost:
$2,348,286 (2027 dollars)
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$2,348,286
3.Years to complete:
6
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5.Responsible department:
## Government Buildings
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP
$306,406
## 2030 CIP
$324,007
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7.Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP
$599,601
## 2031 CIP
$379,403
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIP
$352,173
Beyond 2031
$386,696
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)$2,348,286
$2,348,286
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManage XReplace/ImproveExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Buildings IT & Fleet
## Project Summary Form - Fire Station 2 Repairs
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$2,348,286
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$2,348,286 $2,348,286
8.Brief summary of project:
Fire Station 2 was originally built in 1964 and remodeled in 2013. The city just completed a facilities study that looked at multiple city
buildings, one being Fire Station 2. This study identified many structural, safety, cosmetic and programmatic changes required to protect the
structural asset as well as the employees working and living within it. The study assigned priorities and costs to each identified need, and this
list was reviewed and refined by Interim Fire Chief Coppa. The estimated repair and replacement costs needed to satisfy the items identified in
the facilities study total $2.454M (2027 costs) over six years. While this addresses the currently identified needs, it fails to address the lack of
essential modern safety features and needed programmatic spaces that will need to be addressed in the near future. The current station would
need to be replaced with a building costing approximately $7,150,000 in 2027 dollars with a projected cost increase of 5-6% per year after. A
policy discussion needs to determine where the financial priorities lie and whether it makes more sense to pay for repairs and maintenance to
the existing building or consider a new building
.
9.Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 137 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
2a. Total project cost:
$2,120,114
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$2,120,114
3. Years to complete:
10
## Buildings IT & Fleet
## Project Summary Form - Richfield Liquor Downtown
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
1. Project:
## Richfield Liquor Downtown (Wold Assessment)
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$0
## 2027 CIP
$399,535
## 2030 CIP
$0
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
## 5. Responsible department: Liquor Operations
## Government Buildings
## 2026 CIB Revised
$0
## 2029 CIP
$0
Beyond 2031
$37,349
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$0
## 2028 CIP
$21,720
## 2031 CIP
$1,661,509
## TOTAL
$2,120,114
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
$2,120,114
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)$2,120,114
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
PreserveManageReplace/Improve (X)Expand
$2,120,114
2027 - (399,534.85) Excavate & replace perimeter waterproofing below grade to eliminate water infiltration (321,964.50), Replace
damaged sidewalk (31,788.90), replace damaged caulk joint around entire building perimeter (6,384.95), replace water heater, near
end of life (5,434.00), replace corroded stainless steel flue for boilers (33,962.50)
2028 - (21,720.38) replace crumbling concrete steps and galvanized hand rail by receiving dock (15,332.03), add glycol and chemical
treatment to hydronic loop to prevent freezing coils in the future (6,388.35).
2031 - (1,661,509.45) replace damaged block by exterior stairs (648.01), patch cracks along fault line in block foundation wall
(2,916.07), replace damaged cooler double door weatherstrip (810.02), replace toilet, lave and utility sink plumbing fixtures (qty 5)
($29,970.68), replace exhaust fan, duct and grills in restrooms (14,580.33), replace baseboard head on sales floor and restrooms
(12,150.27), replace existing heaters (2) near end of life (11,340.26), replace parking lot and conduct a geotechnical survey (568,146.81),
replace rusting HM doors and frames on the exterior of the building (27,054.61), replace warn entry aluminum door and frame
(11,340.26), replace leaking coping segment around parapet (1,782.04), replace boiler (243,005.48), replace main supply/return
ductwork and insulation in loading dock (40,500.91), add supply air duct to restrooms (7,290.16), service replacement 400A panel and
other panels (112,592.54), fire alarm system is near end of life (46,657.05), replace damaged tuck point brinks (14,580.33), clean water
stained block (162), renovate single bathroom to include ada code (154,713.49), paint HM frames in receiving area (972.02), replace
warn vct flooring and vinal base in office (1,620.04), replace countertops and case work on the sales floor (23,490.53), Replace roof
(316,555.14), Seal polished concrete floor $14,418.33), removed abandoned McQuay heat reclaim blower in basement (1,944.04), install
roof hatch and ships ladder (22,207.46), Landscaping allowance (15,141.45).
## TOTAL
$2,120,114
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
B. Indicate points for the following:
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
Page 138 of 220
% of Total
100%
## Buildings IT & Fleet
## Project Summary Form - Network Infrastructure Replacement
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$600,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$600,000 $600,000
8. Brief summary of project:
This project provides for the phased replacement of network switches that have reached or are approaching Cisco end of support
status over a three-year cycle. Much of the City’s network infrastructure replacement schedule had previously been deferred,
resulting in aging equipment with increased risk of failure and cybersecurity concerns. Cisco end of support means the
manufacturer no longer provides security updates, software patches, or technical support for the equipment. Switches will be
replaced in priority order based on their end of support dates to maintain reliable and secure network infrastructure for City
operations and services.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## Health/safety:
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
$600,000 $600,000 100%
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$0
## 2028 CIP
$50,186
## 2031 CIP
$100,000
## 2026 CIB Revised
$0
## 2029 CIP
$172,488
Beyond 2031
$100,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2025
5. Responsible department:
## Information Technologies
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$0
## 2027 CIP
$77,326
## 2030 CIP
$100,000
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Network Infrastructure Replacement
2a. Total project cost:
$600,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$600,000
3. Years to complete:
Page 139 of 220
% of Total
100%
1. Project:
## Carpet Replacement-City Hall
2a. Total project cost:
$190,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
3. Years to complete:
1
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Government Buildings
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP
$190,000
## 2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIPBeyond 2031
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
$190,000 $190,000 100%Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Buildings IT & Fleet
## Project Summary Form - Carpet Replacement - City Hall
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$190,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$190,000 $190,000
8. Brief summary of project: The carpet in the main area's of City Hall are worn and need of replacement. We have past the life
expectancy.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Page 140 of 220
% of Total
100%
## Buildings IT & Fleet
## Project Summary Form - City Hall Wold Assessment
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$6,180,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$6,180,000 $6,180,000
8. Brief summary of project: As a result of the facilities study by Wold. Capital cost is expected in 2029 and continue for the next ten
years. In 2029, they include, but not limited to replacing chiller, boilers, and pumps. In 2031, the fire alarm and BAS control is at the
end of life. Beyond 2031, replacement of parking lot and painting all of City Hall. Funding sources will include $1.8 million that was
transferred from Elections Fund to Capital Fund in 2026 and Building Fund.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## PreserveManageReplace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
$2,630,000 $2,630,000 43%Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$3,550,000 $3,550,000 57%Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
$2,700,000
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIP
$1,630,000
Beyond 2031
$1,850,000
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## Yes
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
2029
5. Responsible department:
## Government Buildings
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Municipal Building - City Hall
2a. Total project cost:
$6,180,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$6,180,000
3. Years to complete:
10
Page 141 of 220
% of Total
100%
100%
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
B. Indicate points for the following:
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? No
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
PreserveManageReplace/Improve (X)Expand
$885,711
2029 - (219,857.07) Excavate & replace perimeter waterproofing eliminate water infiltration (204,725.20), replace sidewalk &
building caulk joint to eliminate water infiltration (14,835.16), replace precast plank joint sealant in basement (296.70)
2031 - (33,858.76) Replace water heater, near end of life (5,670.13), Replace fire alarm system, near end of life (28,188.64)
2031< - (631,955.65) Parking lot repair/replacement & geotechnical engineering survey (325,552.01), replace damaged receiving dock
bumper guards (5,652.81), replace damaged exterior brick NE corner of building (3,633.95), replace ceramic tile wall near base of
cooler (807.54), paint gypsum walls on sales floor (10,296.19), replace warping gypsum wall board in office (2,018.86), paint office
walls (1,816.97), clean water stains from exterior leaks on concrete blocks in basement storage (1,816.97), landscaping allowance for
site improvements (15,141.45), roof replacement (265,218.90)
## TOTAL
$885,711
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
## Municipal State
Aid (M)
$885,711
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)$885,711
## TOTAL
$885,711
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## 2026 CIB Revised
$0
## 2029 CIP
$219,857
Beyond 2031
$631,996
## 2026 CIB Adopted
$0
## 2028 CIP
$0
## 2031 CIP
$33,859
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
Spent to Date – Through 2025
$0
## 2027 CIP
$0
## 2030 CIP
$0
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
## 5. Responsible department: Liquor Operations
## Government Buildings
2a. Total project cost:
$885,711
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$885,711
3. Years to complete:
12
## Buildings IT & Fleet
## Project Summary Form - Richfield Liquor Penn Central
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
1. Project:
## Richfield Liquor Penn Central (Wold Assessment)
Page 142 of 220
% of Total
100%
## Buildings IT & Fleet
## Project Summary Form - Public Works Facility Roof Replacement
2027 Capital Budget (CIB)
## 2028-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
## TOTAL
$2,000,000
## Meets objectives in Comprehensive Plan:
## TOTAL
$2,000,000 $2,000,000
8. Brief summary of project: The roof at the Public Works Facility is past it's useful life and is in need of replacement. A number of smaller
maintenance items have been completed to extend the life which includes sealing the overhead skylight windows and making minor repairs
where leaks have occurred. The Public Works Facility was constructed in 2008 and the average life span of a roof is 20 years.
9. Does the project conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan? Yes No X
10. Priority ranking system
A. Check one of the following:
## Fleet Special Revenue
## (FSR)
## Xcel Energy (X)
Land use compatibility:
Community support:
Cost effectiveness:
## X
## Preserve Manage Replace/Improve XExpand
Protect existing resources:
## X
## Health/safety:
## X
B. Indicate points for the following:
## Internal Special Revenue
## (ISR)
## Federal Grant (F)Tax Levy (TL)
## Franchise Fee (FF)User Fee (U)
## Buildings Special
Revenue (BSR)
## Special Revenue
## (SR)
Hennepin County (C)State (S)
## G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax
## (BST)
## Other Funding (O)
## G.O. Bonds-Utility (BU)Other Recreation
Funding (OR)
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
% of
## Total
## Funding SourceProject Total
Amount ($$)
## CIB-CIP
## Amount Total
($$)
## G.O. Bonds- Property
Tax (B)
$2,000,000 $2,000,000 100%Municipal State
Aid (M)
7. Please indicate the sources of funding:
## 2026 CIB Adopted2028 CIP2031 CIP
## 2026 CIB Revised2029 CIP
$2,000,000
Beyond 2031
4. Is this a continuation of a current project?
## No
If "Yes", what is first year project appears in CIP?
5. Responsible department:
## Public Works
## Spent to Date – Through 20252027 CIP2030 CIP
6. Please list below the annual cost for each of the following years for this project:
1. Project:
## Public Works Facility Building Improvements
2a. Total project cost:
$2,000,000
2b. CIB/CIP cost:
$2,000,000
3. Years to complete:
1
Page 143 of 220
## RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
## -$ B3,273$ B
-
## BST14,727 BST
## 20,000 SR20,000 SR
## - O207,941O
## 275,000 SR275,000 SR
## - O18,000 O
## 180,000 SR90,000 SR
5,
## 000,000 BST5,339,645 BST
-
## SR90,000 SR
-
## S250,000 S
1,
## 000,000 BST2,175,481 BST
## Community Center Building
## Community Center Building
## Community Center Building Repair
## Ice Arena Improvements
## Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance
## Outdoor Pool Improvements
## Parks Master Plan
## Veterans Park Improvements
## Veterans Park Improvements
## Veterans Park Improvements
## Wood Lake Nature Center Building
## Wood Lake Nature Center Building
## - S12,000,000 S
Wood Lake Trail Updates50,000 O- O
Wood Lake Trail Updates200,000 S- S
## TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE6,725,000$ 20,484,067$
## RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT
64th Street Sidewalk165,000$ M376,000$ M
## 64th Street Sidewalk- S854,000 S
## 69th Street Reconstruction- BU277,000 BU
73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)200,000 M435,000 M
## 73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)- S901,200 S
## 76th & Knox Improvements- F50,000 F
## 77th Street Pavement Maintenance- M100,000 M
Multi-Year ADA Improvements200,000 FF200,000 FF
## Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements40,000 FF40,000 FF
Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan737,000 FF345,000 FF
## Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements40,000 FF40,000 FF
Multi-Year Street Name Sign Replacement50,000 FF- FF
## Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacements- M120,000 M
Nicollet Ave Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)4,000,000 B1,325,000 B
Nicollet Ave Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)3,500,000 BU795,000 BU
Penn Avenue Reconstruction 300,000 M300,000 M
Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk150,000 M147,000 M
Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk544,500 S401,000 S
## TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT9,926,500$ 6,706,200$
## UTILITIES
Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains200,000$ U200,000$ U
Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining900,000 U900,000 U
## SCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade
## - U50,000 U
Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements100,000 U125,000 U
Water Plant Elevator Replacement175,000 U150,000 U
## Water Plant Generator
## - BU100,000 BU
Water Plant Program Space Renovation100,000 U- U
## Water Plant Sludge Pump Replacement50,000 U50,000 U
## Water System Interconnect- U100,000 BU
## TOTAL UTILITIES1,525,000$ 1,675,000$
## BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY
## Carpet Replacement - Fire-$ BSR50,000$ BSR
Carpet Replacement - Police120,000 BSR70,000 BSR
Fiber Infrastructure Projects - Information Technologies45,000 O45,000 O
Fire SCBA Purchase450,000 O- O
Laptop Purchases - Information Technologies34,260 ISR34,260 ISR
## Liquor Operations (Cedar Point) - Wold Assessment- O7,500 O
Multi-Year Fleet Purchases1,664,726 FSR1,664,726 FSR
Network Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies10,650 ISR10,650 ISR
## Public Works Facility Building Improvements- FSR37,700 FSR
## Public Works Facility Office Area UpgradesO50,000 O
Public Works Storage Facility325,000 FF325,000 FF
Public Works Storage Facility650,000 O650,000 O
Public Works Storage Facility500,000 U500,000 U
## TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY3,799,636$ 3,444,836$
## TOTAL USES OF FUNDS21,976,136$ 32,310,103$
## ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE
(B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax4,000,000$ 1,328,273$
(BSR) Buildings Special Revenue120,000 120,000
(BST) Bonds- Sales Tax6,000,000 7,529,853
(BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 3,500,000 1,272,000
(C) Hennepin County- -
(F) Federal Grant- 50,000
(FF) Franchise Fees1,392,000 950,000
(FSR) Fleet Special Revenue1,664,726 1,702,426
## (ISR) Internal Special Revenue44,910 44,910
## (LTCR) Long Term Capital Reserve- -
(M) Municipal State Aid815,000 1,478,000
(O) Other Funding1,195,000 978,441
## (OR) Other Recreation Funding- -
(S) State744,500 14,406,200
(SR) Special Revenue475,000 475,000
(TL) Tax Levy- -
(U) User Fees2,025,000 1,975,000
(X) Xcel Energy - -
## TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE21,976,136$ 32,310,103$
## 2026 Capital Improvement Budget
## 2026 Budget2026 Revised
Page 144 of 220
## RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
## 150,000$ SR
## 27,273 B
## 122,727 BST
## 20,000 SR
## 30,000 O
## 55,000 SR
## 100,000 O
## 220,000 C
## 90,000 SR
## 2,010,768BST
## 160,000 SR
## Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement
## Community Center Building
## Community Center Building
## Community Center Building Repair
## Ice Arena Improvements
## Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance
## Outdoor Pool Improvements
## Parks Building Improvements
## Parks Master Plan
## Veterans Park Improvements
## Veterans Park Improvements
## Veterans Park Improvements
## 250,000 S
## TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE3,235,768$
## RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT
69th Street Reconstruction413,000$ BU
76th & Knox Improvements350,000 F
77th Street Pavement Maintenance1,100,000 M
78th Street Lighting200,000 FF
Multi-Year ADA Improvements200,000 FF
## Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements40,000 FF
Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan755,000 FF
## Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements40,000 FF
Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacements900,000 M
Nicollet Ave Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)3,535,000 B
Nicollet Ave Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)205,000 BU
Nicollet Ave Reconstruction (project to be built in 2026-27)2,000,000 S
Penn Avenue Reconstruction 300,000 M
## TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT10,038,000$
## UTILITIES
Lift Station 6 Rehabilitation300,000$ U
Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains200,000 U
Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining900,000 U
Restroom Renovations-WTP Second Floor200,000 U
SCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade50,000 U
Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements100,000 U
Water Plant Elevator Replacement50,000 U
Water Plant Generator2,400,000 BU
Water Plant Personnel Safety Systems Improvements125,000 U
Water System Interconnect3,809,000 BU
Water System Interconnect1,091,000 F
Well #3 Water Service50,000 U
Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation100,000 U
## TOTAL UTILITIES9,375,000$
## BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY
Computer Workstation Replacement70,000$ ISR
Fire Station 1 Vehicle Exhaust Removal System76,500 F
## Fire Station 1 Vehicle Exhaust Removal System8,500 O
Fire Station 2 Repairs306,406 B
Liquor Operations (Cedar Point) - Wold Assessment260,560 O
Liquor Operations (Downtown) - Wold Assessment399,535 O
Multi-Year Fleet Purchases1,785,000 FSR
Network Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies77,326 ISR
Public Works Facility Building Improvements460,000 B
Public Works Facility Office Area Upgrades290,000 BSR
## TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY3,733,827$
## TOTAL USES OF FUNDS26,382,595$
## ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE
## (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax4,328,679$
## (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue290,000
## (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax2,133,495
(BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 6,827,000
## (C) Hennepin County220,000
## (F) Federal Grant1,517,500
## (FF) Franchise Fees1,235,000
## (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue1,785,000
## (ISR) Internal Special Revenue147,326
## (M) Municipal State Aid2,300,000
## (O) Other Funding798,595
## (OR) Other Recreation Funding-
(S) State 2,250,000
## (SR) Special Revenue475,000
## (TL) Tax Levy-
## (U) User Fees2,075,000
(X) Xcel Energy -
## TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE26,382,595$
## 2027 Capital Improvement Budget
## PROJECT EXPENDITURE
Page 145 of 220
## RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
## 754,545$ B
## 3,395,455 BST
## 30,000 O
## 105,000 SR
## 120,000 SR
## Community Center Building
## Community Center Building
## Ice Arena Improvements
## Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance
## Playground Replacement
## Veterans Park Improvements
## 250,000 SR
## TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE4,655,000$
## RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT
## 69th Street Reconstruction
## 3,240,000$ B
69th Street Reconstruction3,760,000 BU
76th & Knox Improvements150,000 F
76th Street & I35W Intersections150,000 M
76th Street & I35W Intersections600,000 S
## 78th Street Lighting
## 100,000 FF
Multi-Year ADA Improvements200,000 FF
Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements40,000 FF
Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan795,000 FF
Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements40,000 FF
Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacements805,000 M
Penn Avenue Reconstruction 3,500,000 B
Penn Avenue Reconstruction 2,500,000 BU
## TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT15,880,000$
## UTILITIES
## HUB Redevelopment Participation
## 160,000$ FF
## HUB Redevelopment Participation
## 700,000 O
## HUB Redevelopment Participation
## 700,000 U
## Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains
## 200,000 U
## Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining
## 900,000 U
## SCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade
## 50,000 U
Water Plant Filter Bay Media Replacement and Rehabilitation500,000 U
Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation400,000 U
## TOTAL UTILITIES3,610,000$
## BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY
Carpet Replacement - City Hall190,000$ BSR
Computer Workstation Replacement72,450 ISR
Fire Station599,601 B
Liquor Operations (Downtown) - Wold Assessment21,720 O
Multi-Year Fleet Purchases1,874,250 FSR
Network Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies50,186 ISR
Public Works Facility Building Improvements235,000 B
## TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY3,043,207$
## TOTAL USES OF FUNDS27,188,207$
## ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE
## (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax8,329,146$
## (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue190,000
## (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax3,395,455
(BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 6,260,000
## (C) Hennepin County-
(F)Federal Grant150,000
## (FF) Franchise Fees1,335,000
## (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue1,874,250
## (ISR) Internal Special Revenue122,636
## (M)Municipal State Aid955,000
## (O) Other Funding751,720
## (OR) Other Recreation Funding-
(S)State600,000
## (SR) Special Revenue475,000
## (TL) Tax Levy-
(U)User Fees2,750,000
## (X)
## Xc
el Energy -
## TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE27,188,207$
## 2028 Capital Improvement Plan
## PROJECT EXPENDITURE
Page 146 of 220
## RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
Community Center Building 1,090,909$ B
Community Center Building 4,909,091 BST
## Ice Arena Improvements
## 1,200,000 B
## Ice Arena Improvements
## 272,000 O
Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance355,000 SR
Playground Replacement120,000 SR
## TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE7,947,000$
## RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT
68th Street Sidewalk (Lyndale to Portland)175,000$ S
73rd Street Trail (35W to Lyndale)113,500 S
76th & Knox Improvements1,662,960 B
76th & Knox Improvements2,137,040 F
## 76th Street West Reconstruction700,000
## X
78th Street Lighting200,000 FF
Multi-Year ADA Improvements200,000 FF
Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements40,000 FF
Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan720,000 FF
Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements40,000 FF
## Multi-Year Traffic Signal Replacements840,000
## M
## Penn Avenue Reconstruction 3,500,000
## B
Penn Avenue Reconstruction 2,500,000 BU
## TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT12,828,500$
## UTILITIES
## Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains
200,000$
## U
Sanitary Lift Station 4350,000 U
## SCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade50,000
## U
## TOTAL UTILITIES600,000$
## BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY
City Hall Wold Assessment1,630,000$ BSR
## Computer Workstation Replacement74,986
## ISR
Fire Station352,173 B
Liquor Operations (Cedar Point) - Wold Assessment11,126 O
## Liquor Operations (Penn Central) - Wold Assessment219,857
## O
Multi-Year Fleet Purchases1,967,960 FSR
## Network Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies172,488
## ISR
## Public Works Facility Building Improvements235,000B
Public Works Facility Roof Replacement2,000,000 B
## TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY6,663,590$
## TOTAL USES OF FUNDS28,039,090$
## ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE
## (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax10,041,042$
## (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue1,630,000
## (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax4,909,091
(BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 2,500,000
## (C) Hennepin County-
## (F) Federal Grant2,137,040
## (FF) Franchise Fees1,200,000
## (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue1,967,960
## (ISR) Internal Special Revenue247,474
## (M) Municipal State Aid840,000
## (O) Other Funding502,983
## (OR) Other Recreation Funding-
(S) State 288,500
## (SR) Special Revenue475,000
## (TL) Tax Levy-
## (U) User Fees600,000
(X) Xcel Energy 700,000
## TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE28,039,090$
## 2029 Capital Improvement Plan
## PROJECT EXPENDITURE
Page 147 of 220
## RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
Community Center Building 8,124,000$ B
## Community Center Building 36,558,000
## BST
## Ice Arena Improvements
## 30,000 O
Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance355,000 SR
Playground Replacement120,000 SR
## TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE45,187,000$
## RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT
68th Street Sidewalk (Lyndale to Portland)1,625,000$ S
73rd Street Pedestrian Bridge2,500,000 B
73rd Street Pedestrian Bridge5,000,000 S
73rd Street Trail (35W to Lyndale)1,000,000 S
76th Street West Reconstruction4,100,000 B
76th Street West Reconstruction600,000 BU
## 76th Street West Reconstruction
300,000
## X
Multi-Year ADA Improvements200,000 FF
Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements40,000 FF
Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan845,000 FF
## Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements40,000
## FF
## TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT16,250,000$
## UTILITIES
## Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains
200,000$
## U
## Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining
## 900,000 U
Multi-Year Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains3,000,000 U
## TOTAL UTILITIES4,100,000$
## BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY
Computer Workstation Replacement77,610$ ISR
## Fire Station324,007
## B
## Liquor Operations (Cedar Point) - Wold Assessment17,053
## O
Multi-Year Fleet Purchases2,125,400 FSR
## Network Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies100,000
## ISR
Public Works Facility Building Improvements350,000 B
## TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY2,994,070$
## TOTAL USES OF FUNDS68,531,070$
## ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE
## (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax15,398,007$
## (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue-
## (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax36,558,000
(BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 600,000
## (C) Hennepin County-
## (F) Federal Grant-
## (FF) Franchise Fees1,125,000
## (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue2,125,400
## (ISR) Internal Special Revenue177,610
## (M) Municipal State Aid-
## (O) Other Funding47,053
## (OR) Other Recreation Funding-
(S) State 7,625,000
## (SR) Special Revenue475,000
## (TL) Tax Levy-
## (U) User Fees4,100,000
(X) Xcel Energy 300,000
## TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE
68,531,070$
## 2030 Capital Improvement Plan
## PROJECT EXPENDITURE
Page 148 of 220
## RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
Ice Arena Improvements30,000$ O
Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance355,000 SR
## Outdoor Pool Improvements
## 21,270 O
Playground Replacement120,000 SR
## TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE526,270$
## RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT
Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements40,000$ FF
Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan770,000 FF
Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements40,000 FF
## TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT850,000$
## UTILITIES
## Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains
## 200,000$ U
## Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining
## 900,000 U
## Multi-Year Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains
## 3,000,000 U
## Sanitary Lift Station 1
350,000
## U
## TOTAL UTILITIES4,450,000$
## BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY
City Hall Wold Assessment1,700,000$ B
City Hall Wold Assessment1,000,000 BSR
## Computer Workstation Replacement80,327
## ISR
Fire Station379,403 B
Liquor Operations (Cedar Point) - Wold Assessment38,557 O
Liquor Operations (Downtown) - Wold Assessment1,661,509 O
Liquor Operations (Penn Central) - Wold Assessment33,859 O
Multi-Year Fleet Purchases2,295,400 FSR
## Network Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies100,000
## ISR
Public Works Facility Building Improvements415,000 B
## TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY7,704,055$
## TOTAL USES OF FUNDS13,530,325$
## ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE
## (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax2,494,403$
## (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue1,000,000
## (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax-
(BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility -
## (C) Hennepin County-
## (F) Federal Grant-
## (FF) Franchise Fees850,000
## (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue2,295,400
## (ISR) Internal Special Revenue180,327
## (M) Municipal State Aid-
## (O) Other Funding1,785,195
## (OR) Other Recreation Funding-
(S) State -
## (SR) Special Revenue475,000
## (TL) Tax Levy-
## (U) User Fees4,450,000
(X) Xcel Energy -
## TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE13,530,325$
## 2031 Capital Improvement Plan
## PROJECT EXPENDITURE
Page 149 of 220
## RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
Ice Arena Improvements1,000,000$ O
Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance355,000 SR
## Outdoor Pool Improvements
## 158,420 O
Playground Replacement120,000 SR
## TOTAL REC. & OPEN SPACE1,633,420$
## RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT
63rd Street Greenway2,600,000$ F
63rd Street Greenway1,100,000 M
70th Street Reconstruction3,150,000 BU
70th Street Reconstruction1,300,000 M
76th/77th Street Intersection Control3,600,000 B
77th Street Reconstruction Lyndale to Portland25,000,000 B
77th Street Reconstruction Penn to Lyndale25,000,000 B
77th Street Reconstruction Portland to Richfield Parkway9,500,000 B
77th Street Reconstruction Portland to Richfield Parkway1,000,000 BU
Bloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd1,800,000 M
Bloomington Ave and Richfield Pkwy1,800,000 M
Humboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction7,000,000 B
Humboldt Avenue/Lake Shore Drive Reconstruction4,000,000 BU
Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements40,000 FF
Multi-Year Pavement Management Plan800,000 FF
Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements40,000 FF
North Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction4,900,000 M
TH62 Noise Barrier East550,000 M
TH62 Noise Barrier East550,000 O
TH62 Noise Barrier East9,900,000 S
## TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT103,630,000$
## Utilities
## Logan Tower Coating
## 2,000,000$ BU
## Multi-Year Rehabilitation of Stormwater Collection System Mains
## 200,000 U
## Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining
## 900,000 U
Multi-Year Watermain Rehabilitation - Transmission Mains3,000,000 U
Penn Tower Coating2,000,000 BU
## Sanitary Lift Station 2
## 350,000 U
## Sanitary Lift Station 3
## 350,000 U
Water Plant Handrail and Guardrail Replacement100,000 U
## Water Plant Lobby Restroom Renovations
## 185,000 U
Water Plant Painting40,000 U
Water Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings500,000 U
Well 2 Generator1,000,000 U
Well 5 Generator1,000,000 U
## TOTAL UTILITIES11,625,000$
## BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGY
City Hall World Assessment1,850,000$ B
Computer Workstation Replacement83,138 ISR
Fire Station386,696 B
Liquor Operations (Cedar Point) - Wold Assessment439,706 O
Liquor Operations (Downtown) - Wold Assessment37,349 O
Liquor Operations (Penn Central) - Wold Assessment631,996 O
Multi-Year Fleet Purchases2,410,170 FSR
Network Infrastructure Replacement - Information Technologies100,000 ISR
Public Works Facility Building Improvements695,000 B
## TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET & TECHNOLOGY6,634,054$
## TOTAL USES OF FUNDS123,522,474$
## ESTIMATED REVENUE BY SOURCE
## (B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax73,031,696$
## (BSR) Buildings Special Revenue-
## (BST) Bonds- Sales Tax-
(BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility 12,150,000
## (C) Hennepin County-
## (F) Federal Grant2,600,000
## (FF) Franchise Fees880,000
## (FSR) Fleet Special Revenue2,410,170
## (ISR) Internal Special Revenue183,138
## (M) Municipal State Aid11,450,000
## (O) Other Funding2,817,470
## (OR) Other Recreation Funding-
(S) State 9,900,000
## (SR) Special Revenue475,000
## (TL) Tax Levy-
## (U) User Fees7,625,000
(X) Xcel Energy -
## TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE123,522,474$
## Capital Improvement Plan - Beyond 2031
## PROJECT EXPENDITURE
Page 150 of 220
## Spent to DateCIB AdoptedCIB RevisedCIBCIPCIPCIPCIPTOTAL*CIPTotal**
## Through 20252026202620272028202920302031CIP CostBeyond 2031Project Costs
## RECREATION
## OPEN SPACE DEVELOPMENT
## 26-Community Center Building Repair20,000 SR20,000 SR20,000 SR- 40,000
26-Community Center Building - Replacement3,273 B27,273 B754,545 B1,090,909 B8,124,000 B9,969,455 10,000,000
26-Community Center Building - Replacement14,727 BST122,727 BST3,395,455 BST4,909,091 BST36,558,000 BST44,862,545 45,000,000
26-Ice Arena Improvements1,200,000 B1,200,000 1,200,000
26-Ice Arena Improvements207,941 O30,000 O30,000
## O
## 272,000 O30,000 O30,000 O362,000 1,000,000 O1,599,941
26-Multi-Year Parks Major Maintenance275,000 SR275,000 SR55,000 SR105,000 SR355,000 SR355,000 SR355,000 SR1,170,000 355,000 SR1,855,000
## 26-Outdoor Pool Improvements
## 18,000 O100,000
## O
## 21,270 O21,
## 270 158,420 O297,
690
26-Parks Master Plan180,000 SR90,000 SR90,000 SR- 180,000
26-Veterans Park Improvements1,649,587BST5,000,000 BST5,339,645 BST2,010,768 BST- 9,000,000
26-Veterans Park Improvements90,000 SR160,000 SR250,000 SR250,000 500,000
26-Veterans Park Improvements250,000 S250,000 S- 500,000
26-Wood Lake Nature Center Building8,824,519 BST1,000,000 BST2,175,481 BST- 11,000,000
26-Wood Lake Nature Center Building225,000 SR- 225,000
## 26-Wood Lake Nature Center Building-
## S12,000,000 S- 12,000,000
26-Wood Lake Nature Center Building3,000,000 F- 3,000,000
## 26-Wood Lake Trail Updates50,000 O- -
26-Wood Lake Trail Updates200,000 S- -
27-Adams Hill Park Play Equipment Replacement150,000 SR- 150,000
27-Parks Building Improvements220,000 C- 220,000
28-Playground Replacement120,000 SR120,000 SR120,000 SR120,000 SR480,000 120,000 SR600,000
TOTAL RECREATION & OPEN SPACE13,699,106 6,725,000 20,484,067 3,235,768 4,655,000 7,947,000 45,187,000 526,270 58,315,270 1,633,420 97,367,631
(B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax- - 3,273 27,273 754,545 2,290,909 8,124,000 - 11,169,455 - 11,200,000
(BST) Bonds- Sales Tax10,474,106 6,000,000 7,529,853 2,133,495 3,395,455 4,909,091 36,558,000 - 44,862,545 - 65,000,000
(C) Hennepin County- - - 220,000 - - - - - - 220,000
(F) Federal Grant3,000,000 - - - - - - - - - 3,000,000
(O) Other Funding- 50,000 225,941 130,000 30,000 272,000 30,000 51,270 383,270 1,158,420 1,897,631
(S) State- 200,000 12,250,000 250,000 - - - - - - 12,500,000
(SR) Special Revenue225,000 475,000 475,
000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 1,900,000 475,000 3,550,000
TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE13,699,106 6,725,000 20,484,067 3,235,768 4,655,000 7,947,000 45,187,000 526,270 58,315,270 1,633,420 97,367,631
## PROJECTS
## Spent to DateCIB AdoptedCIB RevisedTOTAL*TOTAL**
RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTSThrough 20252026202620272028202920302031CIP costBeyond 2031Project costs
26-64th Street Sidewalk80,000 M165,000 M376,000 M- 456,000
## 26-64th Street Sidewalk
## - S854,000
## S- 854,000
26-73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)65,000 M200,000 M435,000 M- 500,000
26-73rd Street Sidewalk Gap (Diagonal)901,200 S- 901,200
## 26-Multi-Year Street Name Sign Replacement50,000 FF- FF- -
26-Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk32,000 M150,000 M147,000 M- 179,000
26-Sheridan Hills SRTS Sidewalk544,500 S401,000 S- 401,000
27-77th Street Pavement Maintenance100,000 M1,100,000 M- 1,200,000
27-78th Street Lighting200,000 FF100,000 FF200,000 FF300,000 500,000
27-Multi-Year ADA Improvements100,000 FF200,000 FF200,000 FF200,000 FF200,000 FF200,000 FF200,000 FF600,000
1,100,000
2
7-Multi-Year Bicycle Improvements- FF40,000 FF40,000 FF40,000 FF40,000 FF40,000 FF40,000 FF40,000 FF160,000 40,000 FF280,000
27-Multi-Year Pedestrian Improvements- FF40,000 FF40,000 FF40,000 FF40,000 FF40,000 FF40,000 FF40,000 FF160,000 40,000 FF280,000
27-Nicollet Ave Reconstruction140,000 B4,000,000 B1,325,000 B3,535,000 B- 5,000,000
27-Nicollet Ave Reconstruction3,500,000 BU795,000 BU205,000 BU- 1,000,000
27-Nicollet Ave Reconstruction2,000,000 S- 2,000,000
27-Pavement Management Program- FF737,000 FF345,000 FF755,000 FF795,000 FF720,000 FF845,000 FF770,000 FF3,130,000 800,000 FF5,030,000
27-Traffic Signal Replacements120,000 M900,000 M805,000 M840,000 M1,645,000 2,665,000
28-
69th Street Reconstruction3,240,000 B3,240,000 3,240,000
28-69th Street Reconstruction277,000 BU413,000 BU3,760,000 BU3,760,000 4,450,000
## 28-76th Street & I35W Intersections150,000
## M
150,000 150,000
## 28-76th Street & I35W Intersections600,000
## S
600,000 600,000
28- Penn Avenue Reconstruction3,500,000 B3,500,000
## B
7,000,000 7,000,000
28- Penn Avenue Reconstruction2,500,000 BU2,500,000 BU5,000,000 5,000,000
28- Penn Avenue Reconstruction200,000 M300,000 M300,000 M300,000 M- 800,000
29-76th & Knox Improvements1,662,960 B1,662,960 1,662,960
## 29-76th & Knox Improvements50,000 F350,000
## F
150,000
## F
## 2,137,040 F2,287,040 2,687,040
30-68th Street Sidewalk (Lyndale to Portland)
175,000
## S1,625,000 S1,800,000 1,800,000
30-73rd Street Pedestrian Bridge2,500,000 B2,500,000 2,500,000
30-73rd Street Pedestrian Bridge5,000,000 S5,000,000 5,000,000
30-73rd Street Trail (35W to Lyndale)113,500 S1,000,000 S1,113,500 1,113,500
30-76th Street West Reconstruction4,100,000 B4,100,000 4,100,000
## 30-76th Street West Reconstruction600,000
## BU600,000
600,000
30-76th Street West Reconstruction700,000 X300,000 X1,000,000 1,000,000
31-63rd Street Greenway- 2,600,000 F2,600,000
31-63rd Street Greenway- 1,100,000 M1,100,000
31-70th Street Reconstruction- 3,150,000 BU3,150,000
31-70th Street Reconstruction- 1,300,000 M1,300,000
31-76th/77th Street Intersection Control- 3,600,000 B3,600,000
31-77th Street Reconstruction Lyndale to Portland- 25,000,000 B25,000,000
31-77th Street Reconstruction Penn to Lyndale- 25,000,000 B25,000,000
31-77th St Reconstruction Portland to Richfield Pkwy- 9,500,000 B9,500,000
31-77th St Reconstruction Portland to Richfield Pkwy- 1,000,000 BU1,000,000
31-Bloomington Ave and Diagonal Blvd- 1,800,000 M1,800,000
31-Bloomington Ave and Richfield Parkway- 1,800,000 M1,800,000
31-Humboldt Ave/Lake Shore Dr Reconstruction- 7,000,000 B7,000,000
31-Humboldt Ave/Lake Shore Dr Reconstruction- 4,000,000 BU4,000,000
31-North Lyndale Reconstruction- 4,900,000 M4,900,000
31-TH62 Noise Barrier East- 550,000 M550,000
31-TH62 Noise Barrier East- 550,000 O550,000
31-TH62 Noise Barrier East- 9,900,000 S9,900,000
TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS617,000 9,926,500 6,706,200 10,038,000 15,880,000 12,828,500 16,250,000 850,000 45,808,500 103,630,000 166,799,700
(B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax140,000 4,000,000 1,325,000 3,535,000 6,740,000 5,162,960 6,600,000 - 18,502,960 70,100,000 93,602,960
(BU) Govt Bond Utility- 3,500,000 1,072,000 618,000 6,260,000 2,500,000 600,000 - 9,360,000 8,150,000 19,200,000
(F) Federal Grant- - 50,000 350,000 150,000 2,137,040 - - 2,287,040 2,600,000 5,287,040
(FF) Franchise Fee100,000 1,067,000 625,000 1,235,000 1,175,000 1,200,000 1,125,000 850,000 4,350,000 880,000 7,190,000
(S) State- 544,500 2,156,200 2,000,000 600,000 288,500 7,625,000 - 8,513,500 9,900,000 22,569,700
(M) Municipal State Aid377,000 815,000 1,478,000 2,300,000 955,000 840,000 - - 1,795,000 11,450,000 17,400,000
(X) Xcel Energy- -
- - - 700,000 300,000 - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000
TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE617,000 9,926,500 6,706,200 10,038,000 15,880,000 12,828,500 16,250,000 850,000 45,808,500 103,630,000 166,799,700
2026 ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET, 2026 REVISED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET, 2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET & 2028 - 2031 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Page 151 of 220
2026 ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET, 2026 REVISED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET, 2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET & 2028 - 2031 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
## PROJECTSSpent to DateCIB AdoptedCIB RevisedTOTAL*TOTAL**
UTILITIESThrough 20252026202620272028202920302031CIP costBeyond 2031Project costs
26-SCADA Cybersecurity Upgrade- 50,000 U50,000 U50,000 U50,000 U100,000 200,000
26-Water Plant Elevator Replacement175,000 U150,000 U50,000
## U
- 200,000
26-Water Plant Generator- BU100,000 BU2,400,000 BU- 2,500,000
26-Water Plant Program Space Renovation100,000 U- U- -
26-Water Plant Sludge Pump Replacement50,000 U50,000 U- 50,000
27-Lift Station 6 Rehabilitation300,000 U- 300,000
27-Multi-Year Rehab of Stormwater Collect. Mains200,000 U200,000 U200,000 U200,000 U200,000 U200,000 U200,000 U800,000 200,000 U1,400,000
27-Multi-Year Sanitary Sewer Main Lining900,000 U900,000 U900,000 U900,000 U900,000 U900,000 U2,700,000 900,000 U5,400,000
## 27-Restroom Renovations - WTP Second Floor200,
## 000 U- 200,000
27-Water Plant Chlorine Storage Area Improvements100,000 U125,000 U100,000 U- 225,000
27-Water Plant Personnel Safety Systems Impr125,000 U- 125,000
27-Water System Interconnect100,000 BU3,809,000 BU- 3,909,000
27-Water System Interconnect1,091,000 F- 1,091,000
27-Well #3 Water Service50,000 U- 50,000
27-Wilson Pond Flood Mitigation100,000 U400,000 U400,000 500,000
28-HUB Redevelopment Participation160,000 FF160,000 160,000
28-HUB Redevelopment Participation700,000 O700,000 700,000
28-HUB Redevelopment Participation700,000 U700,000 700,000
28-Water Plant Filter Bay Media Replace & Rehab500,000 U500,000 500,000
29-Sanitary Lift Station 4350,000 U350,000 350,000
30-Multi-Year Watermain Rehab3,000,000 U3,000,000 U6,000,000 3,000,000 U9,000,000
31-Sanitary Lift Station 1350,000 U350,000 350,000
>31-Logan Tower Coating- 2,000,000 BU2,000,000
>31-Penn Tower Coating- 2,000,000 BU2,000,000
>31-Restroom Renovations- 185,000 U185,000
>31-Sanitary Lift Station 2- 350,000 U350,000
>31-Sanitary Lift Station 3- 350,000 U350,000
>31-Water Plant Handrail and Guardrail Replacement- 100,000 U100,000
>31-Water Plant Painting- 40,000 U40,000
>31-Water Plant Pipe Gallery Coatings- 500,000 U500,000
>31-Well 2 Generator- 1,000,000 U1,000,000
31-Well 5 Generator- 1,000,000 U1,000,000
TOTAL UTILITIES- 1,525,000 1,675,000 9,375,000 3,610,000 600,000 4,100,000 4,450,000 12,760,000 11,625,000 35,435,000
(BU) Govt Bond Utility- - 200,000 6,209,000 - - - - - 4,000,000 10,409,000
(F) Federal Grant- - - 1,091,000 - - - - - - 1,091,000
(FF) Franchise Fee- - - - 160,000 - - - 160,000 - 160,000
(O) Other Funding- - - -
700,000 - - - 700,000 - 700,000
(U) User Fee- 1,525,000 1,475,000 2,075,000 2,750,000 600,000 4,100,000 4,450,000 11,900,000 7,625,000 23,075,000
TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE- 1,525,000 1,675,000 9,375,000 3,610,000 600,000 4,100,000 4,450,000 12,760,000 11,625,000 35,435,000
## PROJECTSSpent to DateCIB AdoptedCIB RevisedTOTAL*TOTAL**
BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECHNOLOGYThrough 20252026202620272028202920302031CIP costBeyond 2031Project costs
26-Carpet Replacement - Fire50,000 BSR- 50,000
26-Carpet Replacement - Police120,000 BSR70,000 BSR- 70,000
26-Fiber Infrastructure Projects - IT45,000 O45,000 O- 45,000
26-Fire SCBA Purchase308,005 O450,000 O- O- 308,005
26-Laptop Purchases - Information Technologies34,260 ISR34,260 ISR- 34,260
26-Liquor Operations (Cedar Point) Wold Assessment7,500 O260,560 O11,126 O17,053 O38,557 O66,736 439,706 O774,502
26-Liquor Operations (Shops at Lyndale) Wold Assessment- -
26-Multi-Year Fleet Purchases1,664,726 FSR1,664,726 FSR1,785,000 FSR1,874,250 FSR1,967,960 FSR2,125,400 FSR2,295,400 FSR8,263,010 2,410,170 FSR14,122,906
26-Network Infrastructure Replacement - IT10,650 ISR10,650 ISR- 10,650
26-Public Works Facility Building Improvements460,000 B235,000 B235,000 B350,
## 000 B415,000 B1,235,000 695,000 B2,390,000
26-Public Works Facility Building Improvements37,700 FSR- 37,700
26-Public Works Facility Office Area Upgrades290,000 BSR- 290,000
26-Public Works Facility Office Area Upgrades50,000 O- 50,000
26-Public Works Storage Facility325,000 FF325,000 FF- 325,000
## 26-Public Works Storage Facility
## 650,000 O650,000 O- 650,000
26-Public Works Storage Facility500,000 U500,000 U- 500,000
27-Computer Workstation Replacement70,000 ISR72,450 ISR74,986 ISR77,610 ISR80,327 ISR305,373 83,138 ISR458,511
27-Fire Station 1 Vehicle Exhaust Removal System76,500 F- 76,500
27-Fire Station 1 Vehicle Exhaust Removal System8,500 O- 8,500
27-Fire Station 2 Repairs306,406 B599,601 B352,173 B324,007 B379,403 B1,655,184 386,696 B2,348,286
27-Liquor Operations (Downtown) Wold Assessment399,535 O21,720 O1,661,509 O1,683,230 37,349 O2,120,114
## 27-Network Infrastructure Replacement - IT77,326
## ISR50,
186 ISR172,488 ISR100,000 ISR100,000 ISR422,674 100,000 ISR600,000
28-Carpet Replacement - City Hall190,000 BSR190,000 190,000
29-City Hall Wold Assessment1,700,000 B1,700,000 1,850,000 B3,550,000
29-City Hall Wold Assessment1,630,000 BSR1,000,000 BSR2,630,000 2,630,000
29-Liquor Operations (Penn Central) Wold Assessment219,857 O33,859 O253,716 631,996 O885,711
29-PW Facility Roof Replacement2,000,000 B2,000,000 2,000,000
TOTAL BUILDINGS, FLEET AND TECH308,005 3,799,636 3,444,836 3,733,827 3,043,207 6,663,590 2,994,070 7,704,055 20,404,923 6,634,054 34,525,645
(B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax- - 766,406 834,601 2,587,173 674,007 2,494,403 6,590,184 2,931,696 10,288,286
(BSR) Buildings Special Revenue- 120,000 120,000 290,000 190,000 1,630,000 - 1,000,000 2,820,000 - 3,230,000
(F) Federal Grant- - - 76,500 - - - - -
- 76,500
(FF) Franchise Fee- 325,000 325,000 - - - - - - - 325,000
(FSR) Fleet Special Revenue- 1,664,726 1,702,426 1,785,000 1,874,250 1,967,960 2,125,400 2,295,400 8,263,010 2,410,170 14,160,606
(ISR) Internal Special Revenue- 44,910 44,910 147,326 122,636 247,474 177,610 180,327 728,047 183,138 1,103,421
(O) Other Funding308,005 1,145,000 752,500 668,595 21,720 230,983 17,053 1,733,925 2,003,682 1,109,050 4,841,832
(U) User Fee- 500,000 500,000 - - - - - - - 500,000
TOTAL FUNDING BY SOURCE308,005 3,799,636 3,444,836 3,733,827 3,043,207 6,663,590 2,994,070 7,704,055 20,404,923 6,634,054 34,525,645
## SUMMARY PROJECTS
Recreation/Open Space Development13,699,106 6,725,000 20,484,067 3,235,768 4,655,000 7,947,000 45,187,000 526,270 58,315,270 1,633,420 97,367,631
Right of Way Improvements617,000 9,926,500 6,706,200 10,038,000 15,880,000 12,828,500 16,250,000 850,000 45,808,500 103,630,000 166,799,700
Utilities- 1,525,000 1,675,000 9,375,000 3,610,000 600,000 4,100,000 4,450,000 12,760,000 11,625,000 35,435,000
Buildings, Fleet and Technology308,005 3,799,636 3,444,836 3,733,827 3,043,207 6,663,590 2,994,070 7,704,055 20,404,923 6,634,054 34,525,645
TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS14,624,111 21,976,136 32,310,103 26,382,595 27,188,207 28,039,090 68,531,070 13,530,325 137,288,693 123,522,474 334,127,976
(B) G.O. Bonds- Property Tax140,000 4,000,000 1,328,273 4,328,679 8,329,146 10,041,042 15,398,007 2,494,403 36,262,599 73,031,696 115,091,246
(BSR) Buildings Special Revenue- 120,000 120,000 290,000 190,000 1,630,000 - 1,000,000 2,820,000 - 3,230,000
(BST) G.O. Bonds-Sales Tax10,474,106 6,000,000 7,529,853 2,133,495 3,395,455 4,909,091 36,558,000 - 44,862,545 - 65,000,000
(BU) G.O. Bonds-Utility - 3,500,000 1,272,000 6,827,000 6,260,000 2,500,000 600,000 - 9,360,000 12,150,000 29,609,000
(C) Hennepin County- - - 220,000 - - - - - - 220,000
(F) Federal Grant3,000,000 - 50,000 1,517,500 150,000 2,137,040 - - 2,287,040 2,600,000 9,454,540
## (FF) Franchise Fees100,000
1,392,000 950,000 1,235,000 1,335,000 1,200,000 1,125,000 850,000 4,510,000 880,000 7,675,000
(FSR) Fleet Special Revenue- 1,664,726 1,702,426 1,785,000 1,874,250 1,967,960 2,125,400 2,295,400 8,263,010 2,410,170 14,160,606
(ISR) Internal Special Revenue- 44,910 44,910 147,326 122,636 247,474 177,610 180,327 728,047
183,138
1,103,421
(M) Municipal State Aid377,000 815,000 1,478,000 2,300,000 955,000 840,000 - - 1,795,000 11,450,000 17,400,000
(O) Other Funding308,005 1,195,000 978,441 798,595 751,720 502,983 47,053 1,785,195 3,086,952 2,817,470 7,989,463
(OR) Other Recreation Funding- - - - - - - - - - -
(S) State - 744,500 14,406,200 2,250,000 600,000 288,500 7,625,000 - 8,513,500 9,900,000 35,069,700
(SR) Special Revenue225,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 1,900,000 475,000 3,550,000
(U) User Fees- 2,025,000 1,975,000 2,075,000 2,750,000 600,000 4,100,000 4,450,000 11,900,000 7,625,000 23,575,000
(X) Xcel Energy - - - - - 700,000 300,000 -
1,000,000
- 1,000,000
TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES14,624,111 21,976,136 32,310,103 26,382,595 27,188,207 28,039,090 68,531,070 13,530,325 137,288,693 123,522,474 334,127,976
* Total CIP costs only include project costs between 2028 and 2031.
** Total Project costs include all spent to date through 2025, CIB Revised 2026, CIB 2027, CIP 2028 - 2031, and CIP Beyond 2031 costs.
Page 152 of 220
## City of Richfield
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## September XX, 20XX
## BILL NO. 2026-XX
## TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX
1 of 108
## Motion By:
## Seconded By:
## AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX D TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE;
## ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR CERTAIN PERMITS AND APPLICATIONS
## THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
## Section 1. Background
1.01 Appendix D to the Richfield City Code consists of the schedule of fees
adopted by the City Council, including those adopted by resolution and those
adopted by Ordinance.
1.02 Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.353 requires that certain fees be adopted
by Ordinance. The City Council has previously established certain fees by
Transitory Ordinance No. 19.41. The City Council has established other fees
by resolution, which resolution is also part of Appendix D.
1.03 The City Council has determined the need to update the schedule of fees
under Transitory Ordinance No. 19.41.
## Section 2. Fee Schedule Adopted
2.01 The fees set forth in the attached Exhibit A are hereby adopted by
Ordinance.
2.02 The fees adopted at Section 2.01 of this Ordinance shall be amended only
by Ordinance. Any fees established by resolution, other than those adopted at
Section 2.01 of this Ordinance, may be amended from time to time by
resolution of the City Council.
Section 3. Effective date; codification.
3.01 This Ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the City
Charter.
3.02 This Ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2027.
3.03 A copy of this Ordinance shall be included in Appendix D to the Richfield
City Code, immediately prior to the resolution establishing fees.
3.04 This Ordinance supersedes Transitory Ordinance No. 19.41.
Page 153 of 220
## City of Richfield
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## September XX, 20XX
## BILL NO. 2026-XX
## TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX
2 of 108
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this XX
rd
day of September,
2026.
## VOTING AYE VOTING NAY
Supple, Mary Supple, Mary
## Burk, Walter Burk, Walter
Christensen, Sharon Christensen, Sharon
Hayford Oleary, Sean Hayford Oleary, Sean
## Coleman-Woods, Rori Coleman-Woods, Rori
## Mary B. Supple, Mayor
## ATTEST:
## Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
Page 154 of 220
## City of Richfield
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## September XX, 20XX
## BILL NO. 2026-XX
## TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX
3 of 108
## EXHIBIT A.
## CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED PERMIT FEES AND CHARGES
## A. Investigation Fees: Work without a Permit:
Investigation. Whenever any work for which a permit is required by this code has been commenced
without first obtaining said permit, a special investigation shall be made before a permit may be
issued for such work.
Fee. An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a permit is
then or subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of the permit fee
required by this code. The minimum investigation fee shall be the same as the minimum fee set
forth in Section 2. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt any person from
compliance with all other provisions of this code nor from any penalty prescribed by law.
B. Permit fee refunds:
The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid
when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with this code.
The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid
when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or canceled
before any plan reviewing is done.
The building official shall not authorize refunding of any fee paid except on written application filed
by the original permitted not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment.
Type of
Permit or
## License
## Section
## Requiring
## Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE
(1) Building
## Permits
400.03 —
400.09
## Fee Schedule to follow MN Statute
326B.153 + State Surcharge
## 326B.148.
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/st
atutes/cite/326B.153
Except values of $1-$2,000,
the fee is $6583.50
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/st
atutes/cite/326B.148
$83.50
(2)
## Driveway,
## Parking Area
## Permits
515.05 (No permit fee for sidewalks). $100
(3)
## Swimming
420.00
Permanent or portable pools are
based on building permit fees with a
minimum of:
$65 $83.50
Page 155 of 220
## City of Richfield
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## September XX, 20XX
## BILL NO. 2026-XX
## TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX
4 of 108
(a) Existing single-family dwelling
minor nonstructural
alterations.
(b) Single- and two- family
dwelling repair and
maintenance work.
(c) Commercial and industrial
repair and maintenance work
not exceeding $1,000.00 or
where plans are not required.
(d) Reroof (all building types)
## Plan Review
fee for similar
buildings
Maximum 25% of permit fee based
## on Minnesota State Building Code
1300.0160.
(5)
## Contractor
## License
## Verification Fee
Contractor applies for permit(s).
$5
(6) Moving-
## Buildings
845 Moving Permit Fee $65 $200 within City limits;
$200 OR hourly rate of
$83.50 outside of City limits;
whichever is greater, plus
mileage
(7) Structure
## Demolition
400.00 —
400.09
(a) Commercial Demolition cost as
## per Building Permit Schedule
with a minimum of:
$65 $83.50
## (b) Residential Demolition
$65 $83.50
(4) Plan
## Review Fee
400.03 —
400.09
25% for decks/porches, gazebos,
bathroom remodels, etc. 35% of
building permit fee for one- and
two- family dwelling
basement remodels.
Plan review
fee for
similar
buildings
65% of building permit fee for all
other building permits, except no
fee for the following:
Page 156 of 220
## City of Richfield
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## September XX, 20XX
## BILL NO. 2026-XX
## TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX
5 of 108
(8) Plumbing
## Permit
400.03 —
400.09
## Residential Minimum Fee 2% of
Total Job cost with a minimum of
(includes one inspection).
$65 $83.50
Each additional inspection. $65 $83.50
(9) Plumbing
## Permit
400.03 —
400.09
Commercial/Industrial/Multi- family
based on total job cost
2% of estimated job cost with a
minimum of (includes one
inspection).
$65 $83.50
Each additional inspection $65 $83.50
(13) Solar
## Photovoltaic
## System Rating*
Based on 2% of cost of electrical
job to customer with a minimum of
(separate electrical permit required
for signs).
## 2027 FEE CHANGE
400.03 —
400.09
0—5,000 watts $65 $83.50
5,001—10,000 watts $150
10,001—20,000 watts $200
20,001—30,000 watts $250
30,001—40,000 watts $300
(14)
## Residential
## Heating,
## Ventilating, Air
Conditioning and
## Refrigeration
## Commercial
## Heating,
## Ventilating, Air
Conditioning and
## Refrigeration
400.03 —
400.09
## Central Systems and Additions,
Alterations and Repairs 1½%
estimated cost with a minimum
of (Includes one inspection)
$65 $83.50
Each additional inspection. $65 $83.50
## Central Systems and Additions,
Alterations and Repairs 1½%
estimated cost with a minimum of:
$65 $83.50
(15) Sign
## Installation
549.07-
549.11
(a) Temporary sign permit
(b) Permanent sign (any size)
Building permit is required for
sign support structures fees
based on building permit fee
schedule.
$65
$125
$83.50
Page 157 of 220
## City of Richfield
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## September XX, 20XX
## BILL NO. 2026-XX
## TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX
6 of 108
(16)
## Temporary
Certificate of
## Occupancy
400 A temporary Certificate of
Occupancy may be issued before
completion of the entire work
covered by the permit, provided
## the Chief Building Official deems
that the building is safe to occupy.
$200
Plus a letter of credit or
cash escrow equal to 125%
of the remaining City Code
requirements
Page 158 of 220
## City of Richfield
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## September XX, 20XX
## BILL NO. 2026-XX
## TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX
7 of 108
## ZONING, LAND USE AND RELATED CHARGES
## Type of Permit or License Section
## Requiring
## Description Fee 2027 FEE
## CHANGE
## (1) Planned Unit Development
542
(a) $1,000 plus $5/$1,000 of project value
(construction cost) up to a maximum fee
of:
$5,000
## (b) Major PUD Plan Amendment—$1,000
plus $5/$1,000 of project value
(construction cost) up to a maximum fee
of:
$5,000
## (c) Minor PUD Plan Amendment $400
## (2) Site Plan Review 547 (a) Standard Review:
$500 plus $5/$1,000 of project value
(construction cost) to a maximum fee of:
$3,500
(b) Administrative Review $500
(c) Major amendment—$500 plus
$5/$1,000 of project value (construction
cost) to a maximum fee of:
$3,500
(d) Minor amendment $350
(3) Variance 547 Residential $350
Non-Residential $500
## Variance Appeal
Residential and Non-Residential $350
(4) Conditional Use Permit 547 (a) $500 + $5/$1,000 of project value
(construction cost) up to a maximum fee
of:
$3,500
(b) Major amendment—$500 + $5/$1,000 of
project value (construction cost) up to a
maximum fee of:
$3,500
(c) Minor amendment $350
(5) Interim Use Permit 547 $1,000 plus $100/year monitoring fee up to a
maximum fee of:
$1,500
(6)
*
## Zoning District or Code
## Text Change
547
$2,000
(7)
*
## Subdivision Approval 500.13
$500
## Subdivision Waiver
500.25
$350
(8) Street/Easement
## Vacation
820/State
## Statute
$1,000
(9) Appeal to Board of Adj.
& Appeals
547
$350
Page 159 of 220
## City of Richfield
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## September XX, 20XX
## BILL NO. 2026-XX
## TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX
8 of 108
## (10) Special Request to City
## Council
$350
## (11) Zoning Compliance
## Letter
$75
## (12) Comprehensive Plan
Amend.
$1,000
(13) Plats
*
500 Preliminary/Final Plat $500 / $275
## (14) Sketch Plan Review
$500
(15) Extension
## Extension of a Land Use Approval (rezoning,
site plan approval, conditional use permit,
variance, etc.) beyond its original approval
period.
$250
## (16) Escrow Administration Fee
$125 +
$250/year
after
stipulated
completion
date if not
complete. (To
be
accrued/char
ged on the
day following
expiration and
annually on
this
anniversary
date until
complete).
## (17) Special Exception Review
for Fences or Walls
509.15
## Subd.13
A special fence exception may be issued per
the restrictions of Section 509.15 for corner
lots or through lots.
$250
## (18) Public Tree Planting Fund
544.03
## Subd.8
For the planting of trees in public parks or
public boulevards.
$160 per
caliper inch.
*Any additional expenses incurred by the City in the course of processing a request will be charged to the
applicant.
Page 160 of 220
## City of Richfield
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## September XX, 20XX
## BILL NO. 2026-XX
## TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX
9 of 108
## FIRE SERVICES FEES
## Type of Permit or License Section
## Requiring
## Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE
## (6) Fire Extinguishing
## System Permit
## Based on Building Permit fee
schedule with a minimum of:
Plan review fee: 65% of building
permit fee, except no fee for the
following:
(a) No plan review fee for
valuations of $1,000 or less;
minimum fee applies as listed.
(b) Plan submittal is required
for all fire sprinkler systems
with 10 or more sprinkler
heads.
$50
## (7) Fire Alarm Systems
## Based on Building Permit fee
schedule
with a minimum of: Plan review
fee: 65% of building fee, except no
fee for the following:
(a) No plan review fee for
valuations of $1,000 or
less; minimum fee applies
as listed.
(b) Plan submittal is required for
all fire alarm system
installations or modifications.
$50
(8) Flammable or Combustible
## Liquid or Gas
## Storage Tanks and Piping
(a) Tanks (installation or
modification).
$150
Installation or alteration of piping
## Each
unit or dispenser.
$50
Underground Tank Removal.
$100/Tank
## MISCELLANEOUS FEES
## Type of Permit or License
## Section
## Requiring
## Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE
## (3) Antenna Commercial
## Wireless Telecommunication
## Service
## (CWTS)
425 & 544 (a) CWTS antenna permit
application fee.
$100
(b) Antenna permit fee for
additional antennas added to
an existing antenna location
or replacement of existing
antennas at a location.
$35
Page 161 of 220
## City of Richfield
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## September XX, 20XX
## BILL NO. 2026-XX
## TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 19-XX
10 of 108
(Bill No. 2020-12, §§ 1—3; Bill No. 2022-12, § 3; Bill No. 2023-1; Bill No. 2023-9; Bill No. 2024-09; Bill No. 2025-15; Bill No.
## 2026-XX).
Page 162 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
Motion by:
Seconded by:
## RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2027 LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES PURSUANT TO THE
## PROVISIONS OF APPENDIX D OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD RESCINDING
## RESOLUTION NO 12346
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
## Section 1. Establishing Fees
A. License, permit and miscellaneous fees required under the ordinances of the City of Richfield shall be as
stated in the sections of this resolution.
B. A period of no less than 30 days will be allowed for the remittance of City Business license renewal fees
contained in Sections 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of this resolution.
C. A 10% administrative surcharge will be assessed upon all renewals contained in Section 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9
of the resolution if not received by the City on or before December 31st of each year. The 10%
surcharge will be based upon the cost of the license.
D. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to require the City to issue or renew any license for which the fee
has not been paid in a timely manner.
## Section 2. Construction and Related License Fees
Type of Permit or License Section Requiring Description Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE
(1) Heating and Ventilating Installer 400.07 1 Year $80
(2) Sign Installer 416.01—416.13 1 Year $80
## (3) Electrical Installer 400.03—400.09 State License Required
## (4) Plumber 400.03—400.09 State License Required
## (5) Well Driller 620 State License Required
## Section 3. Public Works Fees
Type of Permit or
## License
## Section
## Requiring
## Description Fee
## 2027 FEE CHANGE
(1) Benches
805.01—
805.27
## First Year $80
Renewal $30
(2) Boulevard
feature permit
811.07
a) Application to place a privately owned feature
in the boulevard
$30
b) If applied for after installation of feature has
begun
$60
(3) Excavation in
## Public Right-of-way
800.01—
800.15
a) For each transverse excavation and each
500 feet or portion thereof longitudinal
excavation and for each 500 feet of curb and
gutter or portion thereof installed or driveway
apron installed, except when survey and grade
stakes are set by City
$200
$0 .20
per foot
> 500'
b) If applied for after excavation has begun $400
c) For each pothole $20
Commented [KA1]: missing decimal point $0.20
Page 163 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
Page 164 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
## Section 3. Public Works Fees Continued
(4) Pole
## Attachment
/Small Cell
## Facilities Permit
802
a) Application to attach or collocate pole
attachment on City facilities in the City Right-
of-way
$500
/≤ 5 units
$100/unit
thereafter
b) Application to construct/install new small cell
pole w/ attachment in the City Right- of-
way
$1,000/unit
c) Annual rental fee per attachment to collocate
on the city structure, per agreement
Up to
$150/unit
d) Annual maintenance fee
associated with the collocation, per
agreement
Up to
$25/unit
## Monthly Electrical Fees
a) Radio node less than or equal to 100
maximum watts
b) Radio node over 100 maximum watts
c) The actual cost of electricity
$73/node
$182/node
(5) Forestry Permit 810 Applies only to trees on City property and public
## ROW
$100
## (6) Seasonal Load
## Limit
## Exemption
a) Per load $25
b) If applied for after delivery $50
(7) Obstruction
## Permit
802.17
(a) Short term, temporary single lane closure of
less than four hours
No fee
(b) Lane closures longer than four hours'
duration (or if between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00
a.m. or between 3:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.)
## Arterial
Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion
thereof)
$60
## Collector
Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion
thereof)
$30
## Local/Residential
Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion
thereof)
$15
## Sidewalk/Bike Lane
Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion
thereof)
$30
## Parking Lane
Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion
$7.50
Page 165 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
thereof)
(c) If applied for after obstruction closure has
begun, regardless of duration of closure
## Arterial
Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion
thereof)
$120
## Collector
Per Day for Each Lan (per block or portion
thereof)
$60
## Section 3. Public Works Fees Continued
## Local/Residential
Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion
thereof)
$30
## Sidewalk/Bike Lane
Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion
thereof)
$60
## Parking Lane
Per Day for Each Lane (per block or portion
thereof)
$15
If the closures are not removed by the permitted
completion date, then additional
Days will be charged at double the rate
(8) Noise
## Ordinance
## Exemption
930.35 (a) With conditions added as required $50
(b) If applied for after violation $100
(9) Certification
## Charge
705.03—
705.21
All delinquent accounts $50
## (10) NSF
## Check
## Charge
$30
## (11) Utility Services
Sanitary Sewer 700.05 All land uses
## New Service
$125
## Repair
$125
## Disconnect
$125
## Replacement
$125
## Sewer Service Line
## Televising
$100
Page 166 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
## Appointment
## Fee, No-Call,
## No-Show
For failure to appear/be available at scheduled
appointment time without reasonable advance
notice to the City Reasonable advance notice to
the City is considered at least 1 hour before the
scheduled
appointment time
$75
Water Service 715.01 All land uses $125
## New Service
$125
## Repair
$125
## Disconnect
$125
## Replacement
Turn on/off
After hours
$75
$150
## Meter Installation
$75
## Private Hydrant
$75
## Hydrant Meter Fee
$75
## Section 3. Public Works Fees Continued
## Appointment Fee,
## No-Call, No-Show
For failure to appear/be available at scheduled
appointment time without reasonable notice to
the City
$75
## Backflow Device
## Registration Fee
710.23 All properties, excluding SFH and Duplex
residential properties
$50
SFH and Duplex residential properties
No fee
## Storm Sewer
## 720 All Land Uses
## New Service
$125
## Repair
$125
## Disconnect
$125
## Replacement
$125
## Erosion Control
428.03
For review, approval, and inspection of erosion
control plans related to approved building
permits.
less than 0.25 acres = $40;
between 0.25 and 1 acres = $250;
greater than 1 acre = $750 + $1 per each 100
square feet above an acre
$40
$250
$750
## +$1/100 SF
above an
acre
## (12) Street Light
## Banners
855.05 First time applicant to hang street light banners
within a district of for an event
$50
Per street light banner installation (no existing
hardware)
$20
Per street light banner installation if supporting
hardware exists on the light pole
$10
Per street light banner removal
$10
Page 167 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
## Permit Renewal:
Annually for both decorative and event
banners, unless banner design has changed,
then full application fee is charged
If annual renewal is not completed, the
permittee risks removal of all banners at the
permittee's expense
$10
## (13) Utilities Special
## Charges
715.03
Transaction fee for utility accounts paying by
credit card (excludes ACH withdrawals, checks,
or debit card payments)
2.95% of
utility bill
or $1.95,
whichever
is greater
## Section 4. Fire Services Fees
## Type of Permit or License Section
## Requiring
## Description Fee
## 2027 FEE
## CHANGE
## (1) Fire Prevention
## Code (Fire Safety)
400.21—
400.29
For initial fee required
under code Per Year
Covers activities or materials
requiring fire department approval
per fire code, including tents,
hazardous materials, open flames,
and other regulated uses
$100
## Section 4. Fire Services Fees Continued
For each additional fee required under
code: Applies to each additional
regulated item under
the same permit (e g , multiple tents
at one location)
$20
Penalty if not renewed within 2 months of
notification
Applies to permits not renewed within
2 months of official notice (e g , fire
safety permit for hazardous materials)
$75
(2) Daycare/Adult
## Foster Care Facility
## Inspection
$100
(3) Reimbursement
## Fee for Fire/Rescue
## Unit
## Per Hour
$400
Page 168 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
(4) Sale of Consumer
## Fireworks
1131
(a) License per location selling only
consumer fireworks
## Per
## Year
Fireworks sales under temporary
membrane structures (e g , tents)
require a fire safety permit
$350
(b) License per location of each other
retail seller (Each physical store)
## Per Year
$100
(5) Display of
## Commercial Fireworks
5608
Licensed per display by qualified
vendor
$350
## Section 5. Amusement and Recreation Licenses and Permits
## Type of Permit or License Section
## Requiring
## Description Fee 2027 FEE
## CHANGE
(1) Arcade 1105 1 Year
$708 729.00
(2) Amusement Device 1100.01
(a) Mechanical
## Amusement
Device (Pinball) 1
## Year
$17 18.00
## (b) Mechanical Music Box 1
## Year
$17 18.00
## (c) Video Games 1 Year
$17 18.00
## Section 5. Amusement and Recreation Licenses and Permits Continued
(3) Lawful Gambling 1100.13
## Bingo,
## Tipboard,
## Paddle Wheel,
## Raffle, Pull
## Tabs
## State Fee
## 2027 FEE
## CHANGE
## Investigation Fee $250
## (4) Itinerant Place of Amusement
1100.05—
1100.11
1 Day
$381 392.00
(5) Public Dance 1110.03 For each day dances are
held: 1 month:
$6
$56
7.00
58.00
No fee for
locations holding
tavern licenses
Page 169 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
(6) General Amusement 1100.03
(a) Billiard, Pool or
Pigeonhole table (each) 1
## Year
$17 18.00
1 Coin operated 1 Year
$17 18.00
(b) Bowling Alley (per lane)
1 Year
$56 58.00
(c) Circus 1 Year
$214 220.00
## (d) Dance Hall 1 Day
$214 220.00
(e) Golf
1 Miniature 1 Year
$49 50.00
## 2 Driving Tee 1 Year
$49 50.00
(f) Mountback 1 Day
$205 211.00
(g) Rides,
mechanical/animal of any
kind (ea)
1 Year
$17 18.00
(h) Shows, any kind 1 Day
$205 211.00
(i) Shuffleboard (each lane)
1 Year
$18 19.00
(j) Other games 1 Day
$17 18.00
(7) Musical Concert 1110.01 Per event
$62 64.00
(8) Theatre Cinema 1120 1 Year
$297 306.00
## Section 5 Amusement and Recreation Licenses and Permits Continued
Plus a notice publication
fee
$9 10.00
(9) Roller Rink 1115 1 Year or portion thereof
$297 306.00
## (10) Commercial Adult-
## Oriented Enterprises
605 1 Year
$3,537 3643.00
Investigation fee 1 Year $3,537 3643.00
(11) Masseur/Masseuse 605 Certificate fee 1 Year
$115 118.00
Page 170 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
Investigation fee 1 Year
$288 297.00
(12) Public Baths 610 1 Year
$4096 4219.00
Investigation fee (actual
cost minimum)
$4096 4219.00
(13) Fortune Teller and related
trade
1130.05—
1130.07
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
1 Year
$237
$705
$1,410
$2,360
244.00
726.00
1452.00
2431.00
(14) Adult Establishments 1196 Annual license 1 Year
$3,537 3643.00
Investigation fee (new
license)
$3,537 3643.00
## Section 6 Animal Licenses and Permits
Type of
Permit or
## License
## Section
## Requiring
## Description Fee
## 2027 FEE
## CHANGE
(1) Animals
905.01—
905.29
(a) Animals (Spayed or Neutered) with option to
purchase a multi- year license
1 Year
$15
(b) Animals (Not Spayed or Neutered) 1 Year $25
## Section 6 Animal Licenses and Permits Continued
## (c) Duplicate Animal License $7
(d) Late Penalty $10
905.31—
905.33
## (e) Commercial Kennel 1 Year
$256 264.00
## (f) Residential Kennel 1 Year
$122 126.00
(g) Veterinary
$256 264.00
Page 171 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
905.37—
905.39
(h) Pigeons 1 Year
$45 46.00
905.41 (i) Non-domestic Animals (Temporary Permit)
$32 33.00
905.01—
905.29
(j) Impounding (each animal) 1st time
$79 81.00
2nd Time
$142 146.00
3rd time (each impound after)
$213 219.00
(k) Dangerous dog registration fee State Statute
347 51)
$500
906.13
905.37
(I) Beekeeping Registration +
## Inspection fee Fowl
## Registration +Inspection Fee
$50
$50
52.00
52.00
## Section 7 Vehicle and Transportation License and Permit Fees
## Type of Permit or License
## Section
## Requiring
## Description Fee
## 2027 FEE
## CHANGE
(1) Aircraft 1340 1 Day
$62 64.00
(2) Garbage and Refuse
## Collection
601.01—
601.33
## Commercial and Residential
First vehicle 1 Year
$353 364.00
Each additional vehicle 1 Year
$75 77.00
## Section 7. Vehicle and Transportation License and Permit Fees
(3) Motor Vehicle Dealer 1155 Per place of business 1 Year
$528 544.00
Each additional place of business 1
## Year
$200 206.00
(4) Motor Bicycle Business 1160 Per place of business 1 Year
$307 316.00
Page 172 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
Per place of business to
sell, rent or lease 1 Year
$141 145.00
(5) Sound Truck 1165 Per vehicle 1 Year $307 316.00
Per vehicle 1 Day
$45 46.00
(6) Taxicab 1170 First vehicle or auto livery 1 Year
$765 788.00
Each additional vehicle or auto livery
operated at any time within license
period 1 Year
$94 97.00
(7) Taxicab Driver 1175 1 Year
$72 74.00
## (8) Rental or Utility Trailers
and Trucks
1185 Each place of business 1 Year
$141 145.00
## Section 8 Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits
Type of Permit or
## License
## Section
## Requiring
## Description Fee
## 2027 FEE
## CHANGE
## (1) Firearms Dealer
920.01—
920.05
1 Year
$2,360 2431.00
(2) Food
## Establishments
617
(A) Type I Establishment, a large 1 year
high-risk food establishment serving on
average 500 or more meals
per day; having 175 or more seats;
or having 500 or more customers per
day
(1) Food service establishment
$1,059 1091.00
(2) School, kindergarten through grade
12
$778 801.00
## (3) Daycare Center or Preschool
$778 801.00
## Section 8. Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits Continued
Page 173 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
(B) Type II Establishment, a small
high-risk food establishment serving
on average fewer than 500 meals per
day; having
fewer than 175 seats; or having fewer
than 500 customers per day
(1) Food service establishment
$909 936.00
(2) School, kindergarten through grade
12
$606 624.00
## (3) Daycare Center or Preschool
$606 624.00
(C) Type III Establishment, a medium risk
food
establishment serving mainly non-
time/temperature control for safety (TCS)
foods and TCS foods prepared elsewhere
and only heated or held cold onsite; or
serving or retailing foods such as pizza
carryout or delivery, requiring handling
followed by heat treatment
(1) Food service establishment
$778 801.00
(2) School, kindergarten through grade
12
$386 398.00
## (3) Daycare Center or Preschool
$386 398.00
(D) Type IV Establishment, a food
establishment with minimal food handling
such as preparing coffee, hot dogs,
blended or mixed drinks, packaged foods
customers heat on-site, continental
breakfasts, unpackaged baked goods
made elsewhere
(1) Food service establishment
$507 522.00
(2) School, kindergarten through grade
12
$235 242.00
## (3) Daycare Center or Preschool
$235 242.00
(E) Type V Establishment, a food
establishment with non-TCS food or
food
products sold in the original packaging
Page 174 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
(1) Food service establishment
$312 321.00
## Section 8. Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits Continued
(2) School, kindergarten through grade
12
$194 200.00
## (3) Daycare Center or Preschool
$194 200.00
## (F) Supplemental Facility
## (1) High Supplemental Facility (like
## Type I or II)
$194 200.00
## (2) Medium Supplemental Facility (like
## Type III)
$155 160.00
## (3) Catering Supplemental Facility (for
## Food Catering Vehicles and equipment
Vehicle(s) and equipment)
$235 242.00
## (4) Low Supplemental Facility (like
## Type IV or V)
$115 118.00
## (G) Temporary Food Establishment
(1) Complex Temporary 1 to 3 days
## (like Type I or II)
$194 200.00
(2) Complex Temporary 4 to 21 days
## (like Type I or II)
$351 362.00
(3) Simple Temporary 1 to 3 days (like
## Type III, IV or V)
$80 82.00
(4) Simple Temporary 4 to
21 days (like Type III, IV
or V)
$187 193.00
## (5) Temporary Food Multi-Vendor
$984 1014.00
(H) Farmer's Market Stand (stands not
exempted from licensing in Minnesota
## Statue Chapter
## 28A)
$235 242.00
## (3) Automobile Washing
## Establishment
1125 Per calendar Year or fraction thereof
$235 242.00
(4) Cesspools 925.03
Permit fee for opening cesspool or
dumping contents of each cesspool into
City sewer
$36 37.00
(5) Incinerator
601.29—
601.31
1 Year
$70 72.00
Page 175 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
(6) Tobacco
No licenses being
issued
## 1146 01(M S
461.12)
## Retail Sale and Distribution - License
Issued renewed on calendar Year
(cigarette vending machines
prohibited) (Bill No 1998-19)
$591
$609.00
## (7) Transient Merchant
1181.01—
1181.09
1 Day
$150 155.00
## Section 8. Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits Continued
(8) Wagon Peddler 1181 1 Year
$354 365.00
(9) State hawker or
Peddler license
1181 6 month/per person covered
$87 90.00
(10) Canvasser or
## Solicitor
1181 6 month/per person covered
$87 90.00
## (11) Christmas Tree
## Sale
1130.03 1 Year
$192 198.00
(12) Lodging
## Establishments
618 (A) Hotel/Motel
$327 337.00
## (1) Each Guestroom
$27 28.00
(13) Outdoor
## Merchandising
1135 Permit
$149 154.00
## (14) Storage Enclosure 1135 Per Enclosure
$128 132.00
(15) Pawnbroker 1187 (a) Pawnbroker 1 Year
$6,148 6332.00
(b) Owner investigation fee 1 Year
(nonrefundable)
$3,534 3640.00
(c) Manager investigation fee 1 Year
(nonrefundable)
$1,278 1316.00
(d) Employee investigation fee 1 Year
(nonrefundable)
$122 126.00
(e) Transaction fee - per transaction
$2
(16) Secondhand
## Goods Dealer
## 1186 (a) Secondhand Goods Dealer 1 Year
$674 694.00
(b) Initial investigation fee
(nonrefundable)
actual costs in excess of above with total
not exceeding
$2,586 2664.00
Page 176 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
Applicant shall deposit $1,200 with
Licensing Clerk along with application
Amount in excess of actual application
costs shall be refunded
## (17) Auto Detailing
## Establishment
1195.01 1 Year
$525 541.00
## (18) Tattoo, Body
## Piercing, Body
## Painting or Body
## Branding
630
(a) Tattoo, body piercing, body
painting or body branding
1 Year
$1,176 1211.00
## Section 8. Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits Continued
(b) Initial investigation fee
(nonrefundable)
$1,109 1142.00
1 Year
## (19) Temporary Tattoo,
## Body Piercing, Body
## Branding and Body
painting events
630 Per booth
$70 72.00
## (20) Massage Therapy
## Enterprise License
(Business license)
1188 Annual license 1 Year
$1,142 1176.00
Investigation fee (new license)
$1,142 1176.00
## Massage Therapist
(Individual License)
Annual license 1 Year
$112 115.00
Investigation fee (new license)
$115 119.00
## Temporary Massage
## Therapist License
Per temporary location
$236 248.00
## (21) Public Swimming
## Pools
619 (A) Indoor
(1) First pool
$312 321.00
(2) Each additional pool
$155 160.00
(B) Outdoor
(1) First pool
$312 321.00
(2) Each additional pool
$155 160.00
(C) School, K through grade 12, pools
Page 177 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
(1) First pool
$202 208.00
(2) Each additional pool
$112 115.00
(D) Pool opening reinspection fee,
operator
makes an appointment for an inspection,
but the pool is not ready to open
$106 109.00
## Section 8. Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits Continued
(22) Motion pictures
and commercial
photography permit
1197
## Per event Photography
Motion picture (based on application)
$54
$212
56.00
218.00
(23) Adult-Use
## Cannabis
1198
## Cannabis Retailer Cannabis Renewal
(The initial registration fee shall include
the fee for initial registration and the first
annual renewal. Any renewal fee
imposed by the local unit of government
shall be charged at the time of the
second renewal and each subsequent
annual renewal thereafter)
$500
$1,000
## Low-Potency Hemp
## Edible
## 1198 Lower Potency Hemp Retailer
## Registration Annual Renewal
$125
$125
## Short Term Rental
## License
1199 Initial application license fee for short-
term rental
$700.00
## Short Term Rental
## License Renewal
1199 Annual renewal fee for short-term rental
license
$500.00
Page 178 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
## PLAN REVIEW FEE FOR FOOD, THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE AND LODGING
## PERCENTAGE OF FACILITY INVOLVED WILL BE DETERMINED BY STAFF
## Descriptions
Type I Establishment, a large high-risk food establishment serving on average 500 or more meals per
day; having 175 or more seats; or having 500 or more customers per day
Type II Establishment, a small high-risk food establishment serving on average fewer than 500 meals per
day; having fewer than 175 seats; or having fewer than 500 customers per day
Type III Establishment, a medium risk food establishment serving mainly non- time/temperature control
for safety (TCS) foods and TCS foods prepared elsewhere and only heated or held cold onsite; or
serving or retailing foods such as pizza carryout or delivery, requiring handling followed by heat
treatment
Type IV Establishment, a food establishment with minimal food handling such as preparing coffee, hot
dogs, blended mixed drinks, packaged foods customers heat onsite, continental breakfasts, unpackaged
baked goods made elsewhere
Type V Establishment, a food establishment with non-TCS food or food products sold in the original packaging
Environmental plan review—includes the physical remodeling, updating, equipment replacement,
equipment additions and the general overall review of all plans/work This also includes all new
development projects
## New Construction
## and/or Major Remodel
(over 50% of facility
involved)
## Extensive
## Remodel
(25—
50%
of facility)
## Minor Remodel 0—
24% of facility)
## Non-remodel
approval
consultation
($5,000 or less
in costs)
Type I $3,757 3870.00
$1,959
2017.00
$1,058 1090.00
$180 185.00
Type II $2,588 2666.00
$1,418
1461.00
$780 803.00
$180 185.00
Type III $1,419 1462.00
$789 813.00
$471 485.00
$180 185.00
Type IV $695 716.00
$271 279.00
$137 141.00 No fee
## Type V
New project or change of
owner - $180 185.00
Minor remodel -
permit but no plan
check fee
## Therapeutic
## Massage
$180 185.00
$180 185.00 $180 185.00 $180 185.00
Page 179 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
## Section 9. Liquor and Related License and Permit Fees
Type of Permit or
## License
## Section
## Requiring
## Description Fee
## 2027 FEE CHANGE
(1) 3 2 Malt Liquor 1202.05 (a) On-Sale 1 Year $912
(b) Tavern (dance) 1 Year $745
(c) Wholesale 1 Year $44
## (d) Growler (Micro Brewery Off-
## Sale Malt Liquor) 1 Year
$175
(e) Off-Sale 1 Year $264
(f) Club (Bottle Club) 1 Year $603
(g) Temporary per event $191 197.00
(2) Liquor 1202.05 (a) On-Sale 1 Year $12,029
(b) Sunday (Fee set by state law)
1 Year
$200
(c) Wine 1 Year $1,325
## (d) Taproom (Micro Brew On-Sale
## Malt Liquor) 1 Year
$700
(e) Cocktail Room (Micro
## Distillery On Sale)
1 Year
$800
## (f) Micro Distillery Off Sale 1 Year $600
(g) Veterans' Organization (Ex-
## Sunday) 1 Year
$863
(h) Temporary per event $191 $197.00
## (3) Employee License
## On-Sale Liquor
## Establishments
1208.01
Effective 10/1/95 all licenses
issued
shall be valid for a period of two
years from the
date of initial application
$37
## (4) Investigation Fee
1202.01—
1202.21
(a) On-Sale liquor
including Veterans'
## Organization
$824
and
Each person shown on
application
$247
Each additional investigation for
each person not listed on original
or renewal
application (excluding Veteran's
## Organizations)
$247
1202.11
## (b) Wine, Taproom,
## Brewpub, Distillery,
and
$824
Each person shown on
application
$247
Page 180 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
Each additional investigation for
each
person not listed on original or
renewal application
$247
1202.11 Investigation of substitute
manager
$103
Page 181 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
## Section 10. Housing Inspection and Rental License Fees
Type of Permit or
## License
## Section
## Requiring
## Description Fee
## 2027 FEE CHANGE
(1) License for
## Apartment Houses
## and Rental Homes
(includes up to
two inspections)
407 (a) Apartment House, 1 Year $190
Each unit $15
(b) Rental Home - single family
dwelling, 1 Year
$190
(c) Duplexes/double
bungalows/townhouses
First unit, 1 Year $190
Each additional rental unit, 1 Year $125
(d) Late Fee—Charged each month
the license is late
$100 or 25% of the
annual license fee,
whichever is
greater, up to a
maximum monthly
fee of $500
## (e) License Transfer Fee $50
(f) Reinstatement of suspended
license
100% of license fee
(minimum $80)
(g) Reinstatement of Revoked
license
200% of license fee
(h) Re-Inspection Fee (for
inspections over the first two)
1 Multi-family
3
rd
inspection: $100
4
th
inspection: $200
5
th
inspection: $400
6
th
inspection and
more:
$800
Up to $3,000
maximum
2 Single-family and duplex
3
rd
inspection: $50
4
th
inspection: $100
5
th
inspection: $200
6
th
inspection and
more:
$400
Up to $1,500
maximum
Page 182 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
Re-inspection fees shall be
payable at the time of license
renewal and no renewal license
shall be issued unless all
inspection fees are paid
(i) Provisional license for
apartment house Includes first unit
$380
## Section 10. Housing Inspection and Rental License Fees Continued
Each additional unit $30
Provisional license for Rental
Home— single-family dwelling
1 Year
$380
Provisional license for duplex First
unit
$380
Each additional unit $250
(j) Investigation fee for operating a
rental
property without a license
$500
(2) Certificate of
## Housing
## Maintenance
## Compliance
(Includes up to
two inspections)
408 Single-family home $190
2-family home $270
Condominium $140
## Re-inspection Fee
3
rd
inspection $50
4
th
inspection $100
5
th
inspection $200
6
th
inspection and
more
$400
Up to $1,500
maximum
Fee to process cash
escrow agreement
$125
Fee to process Agreement to
## Comply
$125
(3) Richfield
## Apartment
## Managers'
## Association Fee
407 Fee to support RAMA services $1.50/unit
Page 183 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
## (4) Permit Fee
## for Rooming House
406 1 Year $210
## Section 11 Miscellaneous Fees
Type of Permit or
## License
## Section
## Requiring
## Description Fee
## 2027 FEE CHANGE
(1) Permit to reside 1190 In motel for more than six Months $17
(2) Permit to Carry
a Gun
## Permit Issued By County
(3) False
Alarms (billable)
(a) in excess of 2 for calendar Year $100
## Section 11 Miscellaneous Fees Continued
(b) in excess of 10 for calendar Year $200
(c) in excess of 20 for calendar Year $300
(4)
## Nuisance
## Conduct
## Fee
925
Third call to a property for nuisance
conduct within a 365-day period
$400
(5) Copying
## Services
## Provided
Flat rate (per page) $.25
Special rate
(a) Black & White Photocopy rate
8.5 x 11 (per side) $.25
8.5 x 14 (per side) $.25
MN Statute 13 03C
11 x 17 (each) $.50
24 x 36 (each) $2.50
X-Large $2.50
## Color Photocopy rate
8.5 x 11 (per side) $1
8.5 x 14 (per side) $2
11 x 17 (each) $4
24 x 36 (each) $18
X-Large $3/sq ft
(b) Labor
hourly wage and
33%
## (c) Postage Prevailing Rate
(d) Fax per page $.50
(e) CD of meeting (per CD) $5
Page 184 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
(f) DVD of meeting (per DVD) $15
(g) Electronic copies (CD or disk) $5
(h) As builts (per image) $.50
## (6) Notary Fee
## Fee Set By State
(7) Candidate
## Filing Fee
## City Charter
4.04
$25
## (8) Photo Fee
Includes 2 photos
$16
including tax
(9) Assessment
## Search Fees
## Special Special Assessment Search Fees
- Per PID $25
## Creation of New or Special Report
## Section 11 Miscellaneous Fees Continued
- Fees to be based on time and
materials to create report
- Minimum Fee $25
## Review of Comparable Property
## Records
## Residential Field Card Report $.25
- for up to five comparable properties
(per copy)
## Commercial/Industrial/Apartment
## Field
(10) Domestic
## Partnership
120 Registration $30
(11) Certified copy
of various
documents
To certify documents i.e.,
resolutions, ordinances, minutes,
registration forms, etc., on file (per
copy)
$5
(12) Vacant
## Building
## Registration Fee
## 925 Single-Family Home or Duplex—
Vacant one to two years
$600
## Single-Family Home or Duplex—
Vacant three to four years
$800
## Single-Family Home or
Duplex—Vacant five or
more years
$1,000
Any other type of property of less
than 20,000
square feet in building size AND less
than 1 acres of lot size -
Vacant less than one Year
$618
Page 185 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
Any other type of property of less
than 20,000 square feet in building
size AND less than 1
acres of lot size - Vacant one Year
or longer
$1,133
Any other type of property larger
than 20,000
square feet in building size OR more
than 1 acres of lot size -
Vacant less than one Year
$1,390
Any other type of property larger
than 20,000 square feet in building
size OR more than 1
acres of lot size - Vacant one year or
longer
$2,678
(13) Violation of
## Conversion
## Therapy Ban
635 Providing conversion therapy to a
minor or vulnerable adult
$1,000 per instance
## 14) Passport No
## Show Fee
Failure to appear for scheduled
passport appointment
$20 per instance
Page 186 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
## Section 12 Room and Park Shelter Rental Fees
## Location or Type Description Fee Classification Fee 2027 FEE CHANGE
## Richfield Municipal
## Center
## Bartholomew Room
Civic and non-profit
groups and
governmental agencies
## $75/HR
(2-hour minimum)
Resident groups
## $100/HR
(2-hour minimum)
Non-Resident and other
groups
$500/4-hour block
## Heredia Room
Civic and non-profit
groups and
governmental
agencies
## $69/HR
(2-hour minimum)
Resident groups
## $82/HR
(2-hour minimum)
Non-Resident and other
groups
$400/4-hour block
## Fred Babcock
## Room
Civic and non-profit groups
and governmental
agencies
## $69/HR
(2-hour minimum)
Resident groups
## $82/HR
(2-hour minimum)
## Richfield
## Community
## Center
## Augsburg, Fireside,
## Nicollet, or Ruth
## Johnson Rooms
## Non-Profit
## Private
## $42/HR
## $60/HR
## Combined
## Nicollet/Augsbur
g or Richfield
## Rooms
## Non-Profit
## Private
## $69/HR
## $95/HR
## Kitchen All Renters
$80/4-hour block,
$15/additional hour
Free with combined
## Nicollet/Augsb
urg room
rental
## Wood Lake Nature
## Center
## Wood Lake
## Amphitheater
$75/4-hour block
## Cottonwood Room
$85/hour 2 hour
min; $75/hour
Page 187 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
non-profit
## Coneflower Room
$85/hour 2 hour
min; $75/hour
non-profit
## Cattail Room
$85/hour 2 hour
min; $75/hour
non-profit
All 3 rooms
$2200 (10a-
11pm); $1900
non-profit
Deck (w/3 room
rental)
$120; $100
non-profit
Exhibit (w/3 room
rental)
$75; $60 non-
profit
## Woodland
## Amphitheater
$85/4 hour
block Mon-Thur
$95/4 hour block
## Fri-Sun
## Glaus
## Amphitheater
$85/4 hour
block Mon-Thur
$95/4 hour
block Fri-Sun
## Conference Room
$75/hour 4 hr
min; $60/hour 4
hour min non-
profit
Fire pit
$40/hour 4 hour
min; $25/hour
non-profit
(wood included)
## Catering
## Commission
10%
## Park Shelters
## Wood Lake Nature
## Center - Emily Day
## Pavilion
## Monday - Thursday
$85/4-hour
block Friday-
## Sunday
$95/4-hour block
$50 Damage/
## Compliance
## Deposit
## Section 12 Room and Park Shelter Rental Fees Continued
Page 188 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
## Fairwood, Monroe,
## Augsburg Park
## Shelters
## Monday-Thursday
$46/4-hour block
## Friday-Sunday
$56/4-hour block
$50 Damage/
## Compliance
## Deposit
## Sheridan Park Shelter
## Monday-Thursday
$65/4-hour block
## Friday-Sunday
$75/4-hour block
$50 Damage/
## Compliance Deposit
## Veterans Park Shelter
## Monday-Thursday
$120 per
section/3-hr
block
## Friday- Sunday
$141 per
section/3-hr
block
$75/section
## Damage/
## Compliance Deposit
## Enclosed
## Park
## Buildings
## Jefferson Park,
## Washington Park,
## Madison Park
## Monday-Thursday
$65/4-hour block
## Friday-Sunday
$75/4-hour block
$100 Damage/
## Compliance Deposit
## Monday-
Thursday $70/4-
hour block
## Friday-Sunday
$80/4-hour
block
$100
## Damage/Compli
ance Deposit
## Athletic Fields
## Premier Baseball Fields
(Donaldson)
## Resident
## Non-Resident
## $57/HR
$284/day (first 8
hrs)
## $69/HR
$357/day (first 8
hours)
## Premier Youth
## Baseball/Softball Fields
(Roosevelt & Lincoln)
## Resident
## Non-Resident
## $464/HR
$273/day (first 8
hrs)
## $59/HR
$336/day (first 8
hrs)
Page 189 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
## Premium Softball Fields
(Taft)
## Resident
## Non-Resident
## $33/HR
$126/day (first 8
hrs)
## $44/HR
$183/day (first 8
hrs)
## General Baseball/Softball
## Fields
## Resident
## Non-Resident
## $26/HR
$115/day (first 8
hrs) $37/HR
$209/day (first 8
hrs)
## Section 12 Room and Park Shelter Rental Fees Continued
## Premier Soccer/
## Football Fields
(Taft & Washington)
## Resident
## Non-Resident
## $70/HR
## $100/HR
## General Soccer/Football
## Fields
(Christian & Donaldson)
## Resident
## Non-Resident
## $55/HR
## $81/HR
## Neighborhood Soccer
## Field
(Monroe)
## Resident
## Non-Resident
## $42/HR
## $63/HR
## Broomball/Hockey
## Rink
All outdoor rinks
## Resident
## Non-Resident
## $30/HR
## $41/HR
## Tennis Courts All parks Resident
## Non-Resident
$16/court/HR
$26/court/HR
## Volleyball Courts All parks Resident
## Non-Resident
## $19/HR
## $27/HR
## Basketball Courts All parks
## Resident
## Non-Resident
## $19/HR
## $27/HR
## Open Space All parks Resident
## Non-Resident
## $19/HR
## $27/HR
## Athletic Facility Light
## Use
## Softball, Baseball, Soccer,
## Football, Hockey, Tennis
All renters $31/HR
Page 190 of 220
## City of Richfield September XX, 202X
## County of Hennepin
## State of Minnesota
## RESOLUTION NO: XXXXX
## Additional Field
## Usage Fees
All parks All renters
## $75/HR
maintenance fee
$30 administrative
fee (Permit
changes/
cancellation)
$500 Damage/
Compliance deposit
## Richfield Band Shell Stage and Equipment All renters
## Stage
## $165/HR
## Equipment
$75/booking
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this XXrd day of September, 20XX.
## VOTING AYE VOTING NAY
## Supple, Mary Supple, Mary
## Burk, Walter Burk, Walter
## Christensen, Sharon Christensen, Sharon
## Coleman-Woods, Rori Coleman-Woods, Rori
## Hayford Oleary, Sean Hayford Oleary, Sean
## Mary Supple, Mayor
## ATTEST:
## Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
Page 191 of 220
## City of Richfield, Minnesota
## Financial Management Plan
August 12, 2026
Page 192 of 220
•To review the Financial Management Plan (FMP) and receive guidance from the
## City Council on:
## Property Tax Levy Changes
## Debt Issuance Assumptions
•Preview of the 2027 Budget
## Goals for the Work Session
Ke y Ta ke a way
The FMP works with the budget development process and there will be
ample opportunity to discuss changes
Page 193 of 220
•A multi-year fiscal plan for all tax-supported
funds
•Integrates:
Existing debt
## Capital Improvement Plans
Future debt
Tax base growth
Future operating costs
•Assures all capital, maintenance, staffing needs
are met and there are sustainable funding
sources
What is a Financial Management Plan?
Page 194 of 220
4
•City General
•EDA General
•HRA General
•Sales Tax
•Communications
## •Utility Franchise Fee
•Ice Arena
## Ta x-Supported Funds Included
•Pool
•Capital Improvements
•Parks Capital
## •Central Garage Fund
•Information Technology
•Insurance
•Building Services
## •All Debt Service
Page 195 of 220
5
•General Fund within fund balance policy of 40% of expenditures
Plan assumes maintaining 40% throughout the planning window
•All capital projects are funded per the respective Capital Improvement Plans and
most recent project estimates.
•2% increase in existing tax base, no new growth included
Includes decertification of Lyndale Gateway West & City Bella TIF Districts in 2029 &
2030
•2.0% increase in revenues, 4.0% increase in expenditures
## Assumptions and Other Factors
Page 196 of 220
6
## Impact on Median-Valued Home
## Next 10 Years
•Assumes 2% annual increase in existing
property values for 2028 & beyond
•2027: $130/year ($11/$.36) = 7.5%
Based on early valuation data from Hennepin
## County
$72/year due to changes in tax base and tax levy
•2031: $153/year ($13/$.43) = 7.0%
•2032: $152/year ($13/$.42) = 6.5%
•2033: $145/year ($12/$.40) = 5.8%
•2034: $143/year ($12/$.40) = 5.4%
•Other Years: $103/year average = 4.8%
Page 197 of 220
7
## Tax Levy Trends
Key Ta ke aways
•Projected Debt
Levies include
bonding for street
projects and
## Community Center
## •General Fund Levy
averages 4.8%
increase / year
5.4%
6.2%
4.5%
5.0%
5.0%
6.0%
6.3%
6.0%
5.4%
5.0%
3.8%
3.3%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
$-
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
$30,000,000
$40,000,000
$50,000,000
$60,000,000
202520262027202820292030203120322033203420352036
## Tax Levy Trends
## with Projected New Debt Levies
## General Fund LevyExisting Debt LeviesSpecial LeviesProjected Debt Levies
Page 198 of 220
8
## General Fund
## Key Takeaways
## •General Fund Balance
remains at 40% of
## Expenditures
•$1.5M from Public Safety
Aid in 2028-2031
•Includes support for:
## Swimming Pool Fund
## Ice Arena Fund
Communications Fund
Page 199 of 220
9
202520262027
202820292030203120322033203420352036
## GENERAL FUND SUM M ARY
Actua l
## Revised
## Budget
## Prelim BudgetPROJECTEDPROJECTEDPROJECTEDPROJECTEDPROJECTEDPROJECTEDPROJECTEDPROJECTED
## PROJECTED
## Revenues
## Property Taxes23,306,044$ 25,223,647
$ 26,308,418$ 27,223,756$ 28,512,524$ 29,893,501$
31,368,446$
33,281,230$
34,879,484$ 36,545,787$ 38,282,981$
40,094,021$
Contingency to Maintain Fund Balance- - - 317,721
598,342 622,674
647,997
674,354 701,787
730,339 760,058
790,990
Intergovernmental5,674,793 5,899,230
5,733,988
5,804,050 5,875,513
5,948,405 6,022,755 6,098,592 6,175,946 6,254,847
6,335,326
6,417,415
Other Revenues4,120,302 3,401,110
3,459,605
3,550,995
3,647,445 3,750,367 3,841,321
3,918,553
3,997,531
4,078,297 4,160,896
4,245,374
## Total Revenues
33,101,139$ 34,523,987$ 35,502,011$ 36,896,522$
38,633,824$ 40,214,947$
41,880,519$ 43,972,729$
45,754,748$ 47,609,270$
49,539,261
$ 51,547,800$
## Expenses
## Current Expenses31,519,762$
33,795,978$
35,449,167$ 36,886,581$
38,382,436$ 39,939,120$ 41,559,112
$ 43,244,996
$ 44,999,464
$ 46,825,311$ 48,725,457$
50,702,933$
Capital Expenses- - - - - - - - - - - -
## Total Expenses31,519,762$ 33,795,978$
35,449,167$ 36,886,581$ 38,382,436$ 39,939,120$ 41,559,112$ 43,244,996$ 44,999,464
$ 46,825,311$ 48,725,457$ 50,702,933
$
## Revenues Over / (Under) Expenses
1,581,377$
728,009$ 52,844$ 9,941$
251,389$
275,828$ 321,408$ 727,733$ 755,284$ 783,959$ 813,804$ 844,867$
O th e r S o u r ce s / (Use s)
Transfers In508,490$ 387,600$
335,860$ 708,339$ 759,782$ 772,374$ 765,261$
398,896$ 412,857$ 427,307$ 442,263$ 457,742
$
Transfers (Out)(352,250)$ (372,250)
$ (388,704)$ (400,559)$
(412,829)$ (425,528)$ (438,672)
$ (452,275)$ (466,354)$ (480,927)
$
(496,009)$ (511,619)
$
Total Other Sources / (Uses)156,240$ 15,350$ (52,844)$ 307,780$ 346,953
$ 346,846$ 326,589$ (53,379)$ (53,497)$ (53,620)$ (53,746)$ (53,877)
$
## Ending General Fund Balance13,766,419$
14,509,778$ 14,509,778$ 14,827,499$ 15,425,841$ 16,048,515$
16,696,512$ 17,370,866$ 18,072,652$ 18,802,991$ 19,563,050$ 20,354,040$
Ending Unassigned Fund Balance13,693,552$ 14,436,911$ 14,436,911$ 14,754,632$ 15,352,974$ 15,975,648$ 16,623,645$ 17,297,999$ 17,999,785$ 18,730,124$ 19,490,183$ 20,281,173$
% of Total Expenses43%43%41%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%
## General Fund
Page 200 of 220
10
•$180.8M in capital projects over next ten years (2027–2036)
Excludes utility funds and funds not included in the FMP
## Overall Capital Project Needs
•Capital Imp: $86.9M
•Parks: $63.6M
•Central Garage: $23.4M
•Building Services: $3.1M
•Information Tech: $1.9M
•All Others: $1.9M
Page 201 of 220
11
## Potential Bonding
## Projected Bonding by Fund
2027 Prelim
## Budget
2028
## PROJECTED
2029
## PROJECTED
2030
## PROJECTED
2031
## PROJECTED
2032
## PROJECTED
2033
## PROJECTED
Capital Improvements Fund5,625,000$ 10,075,000$ 11,250,000$ 7,275,000$ 2,495,000$ 6,530,000$ 7,000,000$
Parks Capital Project Fund - Sales Tax- 10,000,000 - 35,000,000 - - -
## Parks Capital Project Fund - General Obligation
- - 10,000,000 - - - -
Total Projected Bonding by Fund5,625,000$ 20,075,000$ 21,250,000$ 42,275,000$ 2,495,000$ 6,530,000$ 7,000,000$
Page 202 of 220
12
## 2027–2036 Street Projects Amount
## Penn Ave Reconstruction$12,300,000
## TH62 Noise Barrier East11,000,000
## Multi-Ye a r P M P7,885,000
73
rd
## Street Pedestrian Bridge7,500,000
## Humbolt Ave/Lake Shore Dr7,000,000
76
th
## St W Reconstruction5,100,000
## Nicollet Reconstruction3,535,000
76
th
## & Knox Improvements4,300,000
76
th
/77
th
## St. Intersection Control3,600,000
## All Others24,691,986
## TOTA L S$86,911,986
## Capital Improvements Fund
Page 203 of 220
13
## Capital Improvements Fund
## Next 10 Years
•$50.25M Recommended
## Bonding
2027: $5,625,000
2028: $10,075,000
2029: $11,250,000
2030: $7,275,000
2031: $2,495,000
2032: $6,530,000
2033: $7,000,000
## Key Takeaway
Fund balance reserves are healthy over time
## Includes Capital Improvement Reserve
Page 204 of 220
14
## Parks Capital Project Fund
2027 - 2036 ProjectsAmount
## Community Center Building$54,982,000
## Veterans Park2,670,768
## Multi-Year Parks Major Maint.3,070,000
## Outdoor Pool Improvements1,307,307
## Play Equipment Replacement1,080,000
## All Others480,000
## TOTA L S$63,590,075
Page 205 of 220
15
## Next 10 Years
## •Sales Tax Bonding:
$10M Community Center in 2028
$35M Community Center in 2030
## •General Obligation Bonding:
$10M Community Center in 2029
## •Other Revenue Sources:
## $475k Annual Transfer In from Liquor Store
## Fund
•Fund Balance declines over time
## Parks Capital Project Fund
Page 206 of 220
16
•City currently collects $0.005 sales tax until 2045
or up to $65M
$45M – Community Center
## $11M – Wood Lake Nature Center
## $9M – Veteran’s Memorial Park
•All projects are/will be bonded for
•Projected sales tax needed to pay debt:
$65M – Principal
$23.7M – Interest
•Current projections estimate sufficient revenues
collected by 2044
## Sales Tax Fund
Page 207 of 220
17
## Ice Arena Fund
## Next 10 Years
•$1.8M in capital projects
•No bonding recommended
•Assumes 3.97% annual increase
in charges for services
•Negative fund balance resolves
by 2028
Ke y Ta ke a way
Sufficient fund balance projected beginning in 2028
Page 208 of 220
18
## Swimming Pool Fund
## Next 10 Years
•$280k in capital projects
•No bonding recommended
•Assumes 4.02% annual increase
in charges for services
•Projected to receive some
General Fund support in later
years
Ke y Ta ke a way
Fund is projected to remain stable going forward
Page 209 of 220
19
## Next 10 Years
•Operating revenues currently cover
operating costs, excluding depreciation
•Recommend increasing charges
5%/year to maintain
•$23.4M in Capital Projects
Supported with Equipment Levy
## Central Garage Fund
Ke y Ta ke a ways
Fund may need additional support in later years as fund balance declines
after 2030
Page 210 of 220
20
## Next 10 Years
•Operating revenues do not cover
operating costs, excluding
deprecation
Supported with Equipment Levy
•Recommend increasing charges
4.5%/year
•$1.9M in capital projects
•Fund expected to be negative by
2033
## Information Technology Fund
Ke y Ta ke a way
Fund balance may need additional support from other funds or
higher annual charges for services
Page 211 of 220
21
## Next 10 Years
•Current operating revenues do not cover
operating costs, excluding depreciation
•Recommend increasing charges 4%/year
•$3.1M in Capital Projects
$1.8M from Capital Improvements
## Reserves
Supported with Equipment Levy
Supported with interest earnings from
## Capital Improvements Reserve Fund
## Building Services Fund
Ke y Ta ke a way
Strong fund balance and sufficient reserves
Page 212 of 220
22
## Impact on Median-Valued Home
## Next 10 Years
•Assumes 2% annual increase in existing
property values for 2028 & beyond
•2027: $130/year ($11/$.36) = 7.5%
Based on early valuation data from Hennepin
## County
$72/year due to changes in tax base and tax levy
•2031: $153/year ($13/$.43) = 7.0%
•2032: $152/year ($13/$.42) = 6.5%
•2033: $145/year ($12/$.40) = 5.8%
•2034: $143/year ($12/$.40) = 5.4%
•Other Years: $103/year average = 4.8%
Page 213 of 220
23
•The FMP responds to the strategic direction of the City Council as well as the
needs of the Richfield community
Some of the issues may take a few year to address
Need to balance financial needs with Strategic Priorities
Monitor the balances of various funds
Property tax impacts depend on the timing of additional expenditures
Borrowing limited as much as possible to meet capital needs and lessen property tax
impact
## Conclusion
Page 214 of 220
24
## A
## Q
&
Page 215 of 220
25
Ehlers is the joint marketing name of the following affiliated businesses (collectively, the “Affiliates”): Ehlers & Associates, Inc. (“EA”), a municipal advisor
registered with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”); Ehlers Investment Partners, LLC
(“EIP”), an SEC registered investment adviser; and Bond Trust Services Corporation (“BTS”), a holder of a limited banking charter issued by the State of
Minnesota.
Where an activity requires registration as a municipal advisor pursuant to Section 15B of the Exchange Act of 1934 (Financial Management Planning and
Debt Issuance & Management), such activity is or will be performed by EA; where an activity requires registration as an investment adviser pursuant to the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Investments and Treasury Management), such activity is or will be performed by EIP; and where an activity requires
licensing as a bank pursuant to applicable state law (paying agent services shown under Debt Issuance & Management), such activi ty is or will be performed
by BTS. Activities not requiring registration may be performed by any Affiliate.
This communication does not constitute an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any investment (including without li mitation, any municipal
financial product, municipal security, or other security) or agreement with respect to any investment strategy or program. This communication is offered
without charge to clients, friends, and prospective clients of the Affiliates as a source of general information about the services Ehlers provides. This
communication is neither advice nor a recommendation by any Affiliate to any person with respect to any municipal financial product, municipal security, or
other security, as such terms are defined pursuant to Section 15B of the Exchange Act of 1934 and rules of the MSRB. This communication does not
constitute investment advice by any Affiliate that purports to meet the objectives or needs of any person pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
or applicable state law.
## Important Disclosures
Page 216 of 220
## City of Richfield, Minnesota
40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%
## FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (FMP)
## LONG RANGE BUDGET PROJECTIONS
## Inflation Assumptions
1Revenue (Non-property tax)2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%
2Expenses4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%
3Interest Earnings5.64%1.74%1.90%0.73%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%
20232024202520262027202820292030203120322033203420352036
## GENERAL FUNDRevised BudgetPrelim Budget
## Revenue
4General Property Taxes21,040,066 22,211,293 23,306,044 25,223,647 26,308,418
27,223,756 28,512,524 29,893,501 31,368,446 33,281,230 34,879,484
36,545,787 38,282,981 40,094,021
5Contingency to Maintain Fund Balance40%- 317,721 598,342 622,674 647,997 674,354
701,787 730,339 760,058 790,990
6Licenses & Permits981,777 1,133,987 1,293,755 1,123,340
1,157,740
1,180,895 1,204,513 1,228,603 1,253,175 1,278,239
1,303,803
1,329,879 1,356,477 1,383,606
## 7LGA2,038,711 3,392,552 3,410,633 3,448,397
3,503,091
3,573,153 3,644,616 3,717,508 3,791,858 3,867,695
3,945,049
4,023,950 4,104,429 4,186,518
8Intergovernmental1,612,150
1,780,525 2,264,160 2,450,833
2,230,897
2,230,897 2,230,897 2,230,897 2,230,897
2,230,897
2,230,897
2,230,897 2,230,897 2,230,897
9
Charges for Services1,919,962 2,011,939 2,353,340
1,939,370
1,891,465
1,929,294 1,967,880 2,007,238 2,047,383
2,088,330
2,130,097
2,172,699 2,216,153 2,260,476
10Fines & Forfeits180,391
221,719 221,454 225,000 225,000 225,000
225,000
225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000
225,000
225,000
225,000
11Special Assessments4,308 19,141
6,889 - -
-
-
- - - -
-
- -
12Interest Earnings659,981 198,320 222,216 100,000 116,078 145,098
177,930
215,962 240,728 250,448 260,563
271,090
282,045 293,446
13Miscellaneous49,918 27,950 22,648 13,400 69,322 70,708
72,122 73,565 75,036 76,537 78,068
79,629
81,222 82,846
14Total Revenue28,487,264 30,997,426 33,101,139 34,523,987 35,502,011 36,896,522
38,633,824 40,214,947 41,880,519 43,972,729 45,754,748 47,609,270 49,539,261 51,547,800
## Expenses
15Current
16Legislative / ExecutiveALL1,034,837 1,162,137 1,266,192 1,308,196
1,284,676
1,336,243
1,389,881 1,445,673 1,503,705 1,564,067
1,626,855
1,692,162
1,760,094 1,830,752
17Administrative ServicesALL959,262
1,250,239 1,212,918
1,449,485 1,141,770 1,188,119
1,236,352 1,286,546 1,338,781
1,393,140 1,449,710 1,508,581 1,569,847
1,633,605
18Human ResourcesALL- - - -
562,852 585,366 608,781
633,132 658,457 684,796
712,187 740,675 770,302
801,114
19FinanceALL1,046,114 1,359,854
547,896 812,080 705,066 733,525 763,136
793,943 825,995 859,343
894,038 930,135 967,690 1,006,765
20Public SafetyALL11,133,159 11,907,830 12,680,034 13,332,315
14,312,605 14,891,509 15,493,877 16,120,668 16,772,870 17,451,516
18,157,684 18,892,492 19,657,106 20,452,735
21FireALL5,618,697 5,902,146 6,239,563 6,426,700 6,846,680 7,122,479 7,409,404 7,707,905 8,018,451 8,341,527 8,677,642 9,027,321 9,391,115 9,769,594
22Community DevelopmentALL1,652,012 1,736,430 1,688,853 1,884,350
1,972,361 2,051,765 2,134,369 2,220,301 2,309,698 2,402,699 2,499,448 2,600,098
2,704,804 2,813,732
23Public WorksALL5,064,179
5,104,976 5,377,729 6,021,652
5,751,837 5,990,652 6,239,454 6,498,662 6,768,718
7,050,078 7,343,221 7,648,642
7,966,862 8,298,421
24Recreation ServicesALL2,209,931
2,324,290 2,506,577
2,561,200 2,871,320 2,986,923 3,107,183
3,232,289
3,362,437 3,497,830
3,638,679 3,785,205 3,937,638
4,096,215
25Total Expenses28,718,191 30,747,902
31,519,762 33,795,978
35,449,167 36,886,581 38,382,436
39,939,120 41,559,112 43,244,996
44,999,464 46,825,311 48,725,457
50,702,933
26Revenue Over / (Under) Expenses(230,927) 249,524 1,581,377 728,009 52,844 9,941 251,389 275,828 321,408 727,733 755,284 783,959 813,804 844,867
## Other Financing Sources/(Uses)
27Transfers InCapital Improvements Fund639,598 - - - - - - - -
- - - - -
28Transfers InLiquor Fund3.5%347,927 622,290 508,490 387,600 335,860 347,615
359,782 372,374 385,407
398,896 412,857 427,307
442,263 457,742
## 29Transfers InPublic Safety Aid - Fire-
- - -
- 60,724 100,000 100,000 21,598
- -
-
- -
## 30Transfers InPublic Safety Aid - Police-
- -
- - 300,000
300,000 300,000 358,256 -
- - -
-
31Transfers (Out)Utility Franchise Fee Fund- - - -
- - -
- - -
- - - -
32Transfers (Out)Ice Arena Fund3.5%(140,000) (180,000) (220,000) (255,000)
(244,625) (294,587) (304,898)
(315,569) (326,614) (338,045) (300,000) (300,000) (300,000)
(100,000)
33Transfers (Out)Swimming Pool Fund(120,000) (50,000) (80,000) (40,000) (40,000) - - - - - (49,876) (62,122) (74,796) (287,914)
34Transfers (Out)Communications Fund- - - (25,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000)
(50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000)
35Transfers (Out)Other Funds3.5%- (100,000) (52,250) (52,250)
(54,079) (55,972) (57,931) (59,959) (62,058)
(64,230) (66,478) (68,805)
(71,213) (73,705)
36Sale of Fixed Assets- - -
- - -
- - - - - -
- -
37Bond Proceeds- - -
- - -
- -
-
- - -
- -
38Total Other Sources / (Uses)727,525 292,290 156,240 15,350 (52,844)
307,780 346,953
346,846 326,589 (53,379)
(53,497) (53,620) (53,746)
(53,877)
39Net Change in Fund Balance496,598 541,814
1,737,617 743,359 - 317,721 598,342 622,674
647,997 674,354 701,787 730,339 760,058 790,990
## 39Prior Period Adjustments
40Ending General Fund Balance 11,486,988 12,028,802 13,766,419 14,509,778
14,509,778 14,827,499 15,425,841 16,048,515
16,696,512 17,370,866 18,072,652 18,802,991
19,563,050 20,354,040
41Nonspendable - Prepaid Items61,640 317,975 72,867
72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867 72,867
72,867
42Unassigned General Fund Balance11,425,348 11,710,827 13,693,552 14,436,911 14,436,911 14,754,632 15,352,974 15,975,648 16,623,645 17,297,999
17,999,785 18,730,124 19,490,183 20,281,173
43% of FB to Current Year Exp (basis for City Policy of 40%)40%40%38%43%43%41%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%
44% of FB to Current Year Revenues (calcs used by Moody's)40%38%41%42%41%40%40%40%40%39%39%39%39%39%
## PROJECTED
## GENERAL FUND BUDGET
## ACTUAL
8/11/2026
Page 1 - Summary
Page 217 of 220
## City of Richfield, Minnesota
40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%
## FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (FMP)
## LONG RANGE BUDGET PROJECTIONS
## Inflation Assumptions
1Revenue (Non-property tax)2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%
2Expenses4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%
3Interest Earnings5.64%1.74%1.90%0.73%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%
20232024202520262027202820292030203120322033203420352036
## GENERAL FUNDRevised BudgetPrelim BudgetPROJECTED
## ACTUAL
45General Fund Operating Tax Levy21,236,477 22,442,251 23,654,051 25,475,883 26,308,418 27,541,477
29,110,866
30,516,175 32,016,443 33,955,584 35,581,271 37,276,126
39,043,039
40,885,011
46Annual Increase5.7%5.4%7.7%3.3%4.7%5.7%4.8%4.9%6.1%4.8%4.8%4.7%4.7%
## Debt Service Funds
47General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2013A2034161,138 158,723 161,438 149,730 161,018 162,330 158,235 109,390 110,387 135,978 136,818 - - -
48General Obligation Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 20152036280,868 284,570 279,451 279,582 284,832
279,320 283,756 212,653 205,861 249,274 252,371 254,904 256,873 -
49General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016B2028523,289 523,919 518,827 530,750 298,657
- - - - -
- - - -
50General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016C2029731,719 736,969 736,443 697,313 744,581
462,613 - - - -
- - - -
51General Obligation Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 20172038624,068 621,810 624,488 588,500
622,650
621,338 619,763 498,175 470,944 473,700
550,813
552,913 619,369 620,813
52General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Refunding Bon 2029355,005 359,520 360,728 339,675
362,198
367,710 - - -
-
-
- - -
53General Obligation Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 20182039284,339 284,393 284,288
284,025
309,544
313,829 312,866 211,731 205,174
258,776
271,384 268,765 271,209 273,296
54
General Obligation Bonds, Series 2019A2040386,190 382,410 378,420 356,700 374,850 380,520
367,238
380,363
332,358 348,538 355,468
356,675
347,068
358,460
55General Obligation Bonds, Series 2020A2041195,137 196,607
197,920 187,570 194,822 195,820
196,660
197,342 169,442 181,187 183,182
185,072
181,607 183,392
56General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2020B2033130,867 133,912 131,602 126,985
132,127
134,962
132,442 71,056 44,794 43,088 -
-
- -
57General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022A2043427,980 430,710 427,770 405,200
431,550
432,810
428,400 429,030 279,240 399,030
398,400 402,600
400,920 398,820
58Total Debt Service Funds4,100,600 4,113,543 4,101,375 3,946,030 3,916,828 3,351,251 2,499,359
2,109,740
1,818,199
2,089,571 2,148,435 2,020,929 2,077,046
1,834,781
## Special Levies
59Economic Development Authority Fund579,096 599,364 623,343
645,160 667,740 691,111
715,300 740,336 766,248
793,067 820,824 849,553
879,287 910,062
## 60Capital ImprovementsCentral Garage (Fleet) Levy700,000
850,000 1,135,000 1,174,725
1,775,457 2,187,075 2,172,791 2,172,791 1,737,614
1,737,614 1,737,614 1,737,614
1,737,614 1,737,614
## 61Capital ImprovementsTechnology Levy168,400
358,000 393,800 407,583
421,848 436,613 451,894
451,894 451,894 451,894
451,894 451,894 451,894
451,894
62Capital ImprovementsBuilding Services Levy- - - 100,000
103,500 107,123 110,872
110,872 110,872 110,872
110,872 110,872 110,872 110,872
63Total Special Levies1,447,496 1,807,364 2,152,143 2,327,468
2,968,545 3,421,922 3,450,857 3,475,893 3,066,628 3,093,447 3,121,204 3,149,933 3,179,667 3,210,442
64Total Tax Levy26,784,573 28,363,158 29,907,569 31,749,381 33,193,791 34,314,650 35,061,082 36,101,808 36,901,270
39,138,602 40,850,910 42,446,988
44,299,752 45,930,234
65Potential Debt Levy (See Page 5 for details)- - 529,359
1,517,776 2,657,789 4,291,868
4,536,642 5,177,274 5,864,015
5,864,015 5,864,015
## 66Total Tax Levy and Potential Debt Levy26,784,573
28,363,158 29,907,569
31,749,381 33,193,791 34,844,009
36,578,858 38,759,597 41,193,138 43,675,244
46,028,184 48,311,003 50,163,767
51,794,249
67Percent Change5.9%5.4%6.2%4.5%5.0%5.0%6.0%6.3%6.0%5.4%5.0%3.8%3.3%
68Less: Fiscal Disparities(3,688,262) (3,724,374) (4,699,663) (4,834,171)
(4,895,336) (5,060,433) (5,221,581)
(5,357,824) (5,532,399) (5,790,746)
(6,031,218) (6,242,677) (6,437,225) (6,559,769)
69Net Levy to Taxpayers23,096,311 24,638,784 25,207,906 26,915,210
28,298,455 29,783,576 31,357,277 33,401,773 35,660,739 37,884,497 39,996,966 42,068,326 43,726,542 45,234,480
70
71Existing Urban Tax Base45,429,412 47,158,126 46,055,876 48,250,755
49,684,525 50,056,016 51,057,136 52,387,983 54,042,753 55,123,608 56,226,080 57,350,602
58,497,614 59,667,566
72New Tax Capacity (See Page 3 for details)(610,000)
-
303,632 595,108 - - -
-
- -
## 73Total Tax Capacity45,429,412
47,158,126 46,055,876 48,250,755
49,074,525
50,056,016 51,360,768
52,983,091 54,042,753 55,123,608
56,226,080 57,350,602 58,497,614
59,667,566
74Urban Tax Rate on Net Tax Capacity50.841%52.248%54.734%55.783%57.664%59.501%61.053%63.042%65.986%68.726%71.136%73.353%74.749%75.811%
75Tax Rate % Change2.77%4.76%1.92%3.37%3.18%2.61%3.26%4.67%4.15%3.51%3.12%1.90%1.42%
76City Taxes $326,900 (prior to homestead credit) as of 20261,5181,6121,6501,7281,8581,9612,0582,1742,3272,4782,6232,7652,8822,988
77% tax increase/decrease avg home $326,900 value6.21%2.38%4.72%7.51%5.55%4.94%5.62%7.04%6.52%5.83%5.44%4.20%3.68%
78Existing Tax Base Inflation / (Deflation)3.8%-2.3%4.8%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%
## PROPERTY TAX LEVY AND TAX IMPACT
## Final
## Year
8/11/2026
Page 2 - Summary
Page 218 of 220
## City of Richfield, Minnesota
## Financial Management Plan
## HRA General Fund
## Inflation Assumptions
1Revenue (Non-property tax)3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%
## 2Property Tax Revenue0.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%
3Interest Earnings1.50%1.75%2.00%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%
4Expenses3.50%3.50%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%
## Revised BudgetPrelim Budget
## HRA General Fund
20232024202520262027202820292030203120322033203420352036
Maximum Tax Levy Calculation:Estimated Market Value4,868,218,300 5,061,837,200 5,039,434,100 5,050,617,100 5,202,135,613
5,238,550,562 5,343,321,573 5,482,247,934 5,657,679,868 5,770,833,465 5,886,250,134
6,003,975,137 6,124,054,640 6,246,535,733
(Per M.S. 469.033 Subd. 6) x 0.0185%900,620$
936,440$ 932,295$ 934,364$ 962,395$ 969,132$
988,514$
1,014,216$ 1,046,671$ 1,067,604$ 1,088,956$ 1,110,735$
1,132,950$
1,155,609$
## REVENUE
5General Property Tax666,533 688,925 705,344 742,230
742,230
764,497 787,432 811,055 835,387 860,449
886,262
912,850 940,236 968,443
6Intergovernmental100,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7Miscellaneous 165,897 20,494 42,752 12,260 13,000 13,390 13,792 14,206 14,632 15,071 15,523 15,989 16,469 16,963
8Interest Earnings90,253 119,540 110,876 80,000 80,000 81,262 110,843 120,946 131,398 142,206 153,375 164,912 176,823 189,113
9Total Revenue1,022,683 828,959 858,972 834,490 835,230 859,149 912,067 946,207 981,417 1,017,726 1,055,160 1,093,751 1,133,528 1,174,519
## EXPENSES
10Current
11Personnel services291,350 311,878 343,031 351,990 357,810 372,122 387,007 402,487 418,586 435,329 452,742 470,852 489,686 509,273
12Other serices and charges238,578 114,356 106,555 26,750 45,320 47,133 49,018 50,979 53,018 55,139 57,345 59,639 62,025 64,506
13I.T. Fund73,190 30,830 32,217 33,667 35,182 36,765 38,419 40,148 41,955 43,843 45,816
14Building Services Fund11,860 28,331 29,464 30,643 31,869 33,144 34,470 35,849 37,283 38,774 40,325
15Capital Outlay
16Community Development9,250 - 36,696 - - - - - - - - - - -
17Total Expenses539,178
426,234 486,282 463,790
462,291 480,936 500,335 520,517 541,513
563,357 586,084 609,729
634,328
659,920
18Revenues Over / (Under) Expenses483,505 402,725 372,690 370,700 372,939 378,213 411,732 425,690 439,904 454,369 469,076 484,022 499,200 514,599
## OTHER FINANCING SOURCES / (USES)
19Transfers In-
- - - -
- - -
- - -
-
20Sale of Fixed Assets- - - - - - - - - - - - -
21Bond Proceeds- - - - - - - - - - - - -
22Transfers Out(8,009) (7,600) (7,600) (38,620) (90,890) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600)
23Total Other Sources / (Uses)(8,009) (7,600) (7,600) (38,620)
(90,890) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600)
## 24Prior Period Adjustments
25Ending General Fund Balance (FB)2,688,756 3,083,881 3,448,971 3,781,051 4,063,100 4,433,713 4,837,845 5,255,935 5,688,239 6,135,008 6,596,484 7,072,906 7,564,506 8,071,505
26% of FB to Current Year Exp (basis for City Policy of 35% - 50%)0%724%709%815%879%922%967%1010%1050%1089%1126%1160%1193%1223%
27% of FB to Current Year Revenues (calcs used by Moody's)0%372%402%453%486%516%530%555%580%603%625%647%667%687%
28HRA Fund Operating Tax Levy675,960 699,617 720,610 742,230 742,230 764,497 787,432 811,055 835,387 860,449
886,262 912,850 940,236 968,443
29Annual Increase3.5%3.0%3.0%0.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%
30Total Tax Levy675,960699,617720,610742,230742,230764,497787,432811,055835,387860,449886,262912,850940,236968,443
31Less: Fiscal Disparities(95,159)(93,657)(115,584)(116,053)(113,908)(112,329)(114,347)(115,049)(115,313)(116,892)(118,384)(119,876)(121,368)(122,860)
32Net Levy to Taxpayers580,801605,960605,026626,177628,322652,168673,085696,006720,074743,557767,878792,974818,868845,583
33
34Existing Tax Base45,429,41247,158,12646,055,87648,250,75549,684,52550,056,01651,057,13652,387,98354,042,75355,123,60856,226,08057,350,60258,497,61459,667,566
35New Net Tax Capacity (See Page 7 for details)0000(610,000)0303,632595,108000000
36Total Net Tax Capacity1E+0745,429,41247,158,12646,055,87648,250,75549,074,52550,056,01651,360,76852,983,09154,042,75355,123,60856,226,08057,350,60258,497,61459,667,566
37
Tax Rate on Tax Capacity (Line 32/Line 36)1.279%1.285%1.314%1.298%1.280%1.303%1.311%1.314%1.332%1.349%1.366%1.383%1.400%1.417%
38Tax Rate % Change0.00%2.26%-1.22%-1.39%1.80%0.61%0.23%1.37%1.28%1.26%1.24%1.23%1.21%
39City Taxes on $160,000 Residential Homestead1818181920202122232424252627
40% Tax Increase / (Decrease)0.00%0.00%-0.66%4.79%2.27%2.66%3.15%3.45%5.33%3.71%3.76%3.74%3.61%3.64%
41Existing Tax Base Inflation / (Deflation)3.8%-2.3%4.8%3.0%0.7%2.0%2.6%3.2%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%
## HRA GENERAL FUND BUDGET
## Actual
## PROPERTY TAX LEVY AND TAX IMPACT
## Projected
8/11/2026Page 3 - HRA General Fund
Page 219 of 220
## City of Richfield, Minnesota
## Financial Management Plan
## Economic Development Authority Fund
## Inflation Assumptions
1Revenue (Non-property tax)3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%
## 2Property Tax Revenue3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%
3Interest Earnings1.50%1.75%2.00%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%2.50%
4Expenses3.50%3.50%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%
## Revised BudgetPrelim Budget
## EDA Fund20232024202520262027202820292030203120322033203420352036
## REVENUE
5General Property Tax579,486 599,364 623,343 645,160
667,740 691,111 715,300 740,336 766,248
793,067
820,824
849,553 879,287 910,062
6Intergovernmental- 38,875 12,500 12,500 - - - - - - - - -
7Miscellaneous2,400 2,515 203,871 7,850 2,650 2,730 2,812 2,896 2,983 3,072 3,164 3,259 3,357 3,458
8Interest Earnings36,230 57,775 46,213 35,000 35,000 21,962 20,449 13,016 4,988 (3,669) (12,994) (23,022) (33,795) (45,354)
9Total Revenue618,116 659,654 912,302 700,510 717,890
715,803
738,561
756,248 774,219 792,470 810,994
829,790
848,849
868,166
## EXPENSES
10Current
11Personnel services107,924 141,951 161,049 163,810 189,790 197,382 205,277 213,488 222,028 230,909 240,145 249,751 259,741 270,131
12Other services and charges320,791 414,559 581,947 710,010 754,580 784,763 816,154 848,800 882,752 918,062 954,784 992,975 1,032,694 1,074,002
13IT Fund- - - - 13,210 13,804 14,425 15,074 15,752 16,461 17,202 17,976 18,785 19,630
14Capital Outlay
15Community Development- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
16Total Expenses428,715 556,510 742,996 873,820
957,580
995,949 1,035,856 1,077,362 1,120,532 1,165,432
1,212,131
1,260,702 1,311,220 1,363,763
17Revenues Over / (Under) Expenses189,401 103,144
169,306
(173,310) (239,690) (280,146) (297,295)
(321,114)
(346,313)
(372,962) (401,137) (430,912) (462,371)
(495,597)
## OTHER FINANCING SOURCES / (USES)
18Transfers In- -
- 55,000 - - - -
- - - - -
19Sale of Fixed Assets- - - - - - - - - - - - -
20Bond Proceeds- - - - - - - - - - - - -
21Transfers Out- - - - - - - - - - - - -
22Total Other Sources / (Uses)-
- -
- 55,000 - -
-
- -
- - -
-
## 23Prior Period Adjustments
24Ending General Fund Balance (FB)1,183,639 1,286,783 1,456,089 1,282,779 1,098,089 817,943 520,647 199,534 (146,779) (519,742) (920,878) (1,351,790) (1,814,161) (2,309,758)
25% of FB to Current Year Exp (basis for City Policy of 35% - 50%)0%231%196%147%115%82%50%19%-13%-45%-76%-107%-138%-169%
26% of FB to Current Year Revenues (calcs used by Moody's)0%195%160%183%153%114%70%26%-19%-66%-114%-163%-214%-266%
27EDA Fund Operating Tax Levy- 599,364 - 645,160 667,740 691,111 715,300
740,336 766,248 793,067 820,824 849,553 879,287 910,062
28Annual Increase0.0%0.0%-100.0%3.5%3.5%3.5%3.5%3.5%3.5%3.5%3.5%3.5%3.5%
29Total Tax Levy0599,3640645,160667,740691,111715,300740,336766,248793,067820,824849,553879,287910,062
## 30Less: Fiscal Disparities00000000000000
31Net Levy to Taxpayers0599,3640645,160667,740691,111715,300740,336766,248793,067820,824849,553879,287910,062
32
33Existing Tax Base45,429,41247,158,12646,055,87648,250,75549,684,52550,056,01651,057,13652,387,98354,042,75355,123,60856,226,08057,350,60258,497,61459,667,566
34New Net Tax Capacity (See Page 7 for details)00000000001,431,180000
35Total Net Tax Capacity1E+0745,429,41247,158,12646,055,87648,250,75549,684,52550,056,01651,057,13652,387,98354,042,75355,123,60857,657,26057,350,60258,497,61459,667,566
36Tax Rate on Tax Capacity (Line 31/Line 35)0.000%1.271%0.001%1.337%1.345%1.381%1.401%1.413%1.418%1.439%1.424%1.481%1.503%1.525%
37Tax Rate % Change0.00%0.00%-99.92%133600.00%0.60%2.68%1.45%0.86%0.35%1.48%-1.04%4.00%1.49%1.46%
38City Taxes on $160,000 Residential Homestead01701920212222232424262728
39% Tax Increase / (Decrease)0.00%0.00%-99.92%137023.33%3.11%5.25%4.06%3.32%2.81%3.97%1.44%6.49%3.97%3.89%
40Existing Tax Base Inflation / (Deflation)0.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%
## EDA FUND BUDGET
## Actual
## PROPERTY TAX LEVY AND TAX IMPACT
## Projected
8/11/2026Page 4 - EDA Fund
Page 220 of 220